PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.

com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@ earthlink.net, c=US Date: 2011.06.20 08:25:49 +03'00'

11-06-20 Request for investigation/impeachment, in re: Conduct of Alleged Simulated Litigation in Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048), in the US District Court, Central District of California
Executive Summary Los Angeles, June 20 Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the US Congress and with the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against US Judge JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE, Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI, and others in ht US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption through the conduct of simulated litigation in Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048). Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in analyzing fraud in state and US court records in recent years. His opinions were repeatedly supported by highly reputed experts. Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al originated in Fines complaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law (42 US 1983), alleging the circumstances, where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials, Los Angeles County government officials, and lawyers for the developers, who opposed him in the courtroom. However, the affair as a whole should be deemed part of the intimidation, harassment, and retaliation against the former US prosecutor Richard Fine. Following his protest of the corruption of California judges, he was held in solitary confinement for 18 months, starting March 2009, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case. A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv00048): Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify any of the PACER dockets of the court; No valid summonses are found in the docket, in alleged violation of Duties of the Clerk pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; No Civil Cover Sheet is found in the docket, which is required for the opening of a civil docket; No valid Assignment Order for Judge JOHN WALTER is found in the docket; No valid Referral Order for Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE is found in the docket; Numerous entries in the docket are by Ms DONNA THOMAS, who upon information and belief is not a Deputy Clerk, and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI has denied numerous requests to confirm or deny DONNA THOMASs authority as a Deputy Clerk; The Clerk of the Court routinely denies access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing), and in similar cases, where the same persons were accused, all NEFs were eventually discovered to be invalid; Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK, who appears in this case on behalf of the Defendants, falsely appeared on behalf of related defendants in a related case, with no authority at all, and No declaration or any other record signed by any of the Defendants is found in the pleading filed on their behalf, consistent with conduct of simulated litigation, and appearance by an unauthorized attorney. The case should be deemed of the highest public policy significance, since it holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in California, in general. Of note, the 2010 official Staff Report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations referred to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". The case also reflects the fraud inherent in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF, the public access and case management systems of the US courts. The complaint was copied to the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.

____ June 20, 2011

The Honorable Lamar Smith, Chair US House Committee on the Judiciary 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Fax: 202-225-8628 The Honorable Patrick Leahy, Chair US Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Page 2/2 433 Russell Office Building Washington DC 20510 Fax: 202-224-3479 The Honorable Spencer Bachus, Chair US House Committee on Financial Services 2129 Rayburn House Office Building Fax: 202-225-2082 The Honorable David Dreier, Chair U.S. House of Representatives H-312 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515 FAX: (202) 225-6763 EMAIL: Rules.Rs@mail.house.gov By fax and by email Andre Birotte Jr., US Attorney, Central District of California. 221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012 By fax: 213-894-6269 FBI Los Angeles and other offices By email

June 20, 2011

Dear Congressmen Bachus, Dreier, Leahy, and Smith, and US Attorney Birotte: Please accept instant notice and the records, outlined and linked below, pertaining to the conduct of alleged simulated litigation [i] in Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048), in the US District Court, Central District of California. [ii] The case pertains to the rights of an individual, but it bears on the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of all who reside in Los Angeles County, in particular, and California, in general. Please also notice below the request for Due Process in acknowledgment, review, and notice of outcome of complaints filed with your offices. COMPLAINT A. Complainants Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) Mailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750 Tel: 323-515-4583 Fax: 323-488-9697 Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net 1. Dr Zernik gained substantial experience over the past decade in analyzing fraud in large government and corporate case management systems. Dr Joseph Zernik gained substantial experience in records examination, particularly in examination of computerized court records: [iii] Dr Zernik published a report pertaining to PACER and CM/ECF, which was published in a peerreview computer science journal (see below), and reviewed hundreds of PACER dockets and related court records from US district courts and US courts of appeals across the United States. Dr Zernik filed a report on Human Rights in Los Angeles County, California, as part of the first ever 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States. The report was incorporated into the staff report of the Human rights Council of the United Nations with a reference

Page 3/3

June 20, 2011

to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". Dr Zernik published a report in a peer-reviewed computer science journal, with editorial board including scholars from six European nations and Canada, opining fraud in the case management systems and online public access systems of the Los Angeles County jails (Inmate Information Center) - enabling large-scale false imprisonments under the pretense of lawfulness. April 2009 Dr Zernik authored reports regarding Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Upon review of the reports, a leading computer science scholar, Prof Eliyahu Shamir, provided a qualified opinion, supporting Dr Zerniks claims of fraud in the design and operation of the system, and calling on US computer science scholars to examine the integrity of the system. January 2009 Dr Zerniks opinion of fraud in specific litigation records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was reaffirmed by the opinion of Fraud Expert James Wedick, an FBI veteran, who had been decorated by the US Congress, US Attorney General, and FBI Director for his accomplishments in crime prevention. [v] Dr Zerniks opinion of fraud in the underwriting and loan records of Countrywide Financial Corporation and related persons, was supported by the opinion of Fraud Expert Robert Meister, a Fraud Expert, who appears in courts across the United States. Dr Zerniks opinion of fraud in the online public access of the California Commission on Teachers Credentialing relative to teachers credentials in the Beverly Hills School District was confirmed after two lengthy investigations by the California Department of Education, which determined The School District is out of compliance and in violation of the law. 2. Complainants are not attorneys, neither are they represented by counsel in matters, which are subject of instant complaint.

Therefore, in most case, no sections of the code were cited. Instead, the US Congress and US Attorney are requested to apply the correct sections of the code. In case errors were made, where sections of the code were cited, it is requested that such errors be ignored, and instead, the facts alone be reviewed, and the correct sections of the code be applied by your offices. B. The Accused Instant request is for investigation, and impeachment proceedings, pursuant to Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution, against: 1. US Judge John Walter, 2. US Magistrate Carla Woehrle 3. Clerk of the Court Terry Nafisi With it, this notice is also a request for US Attorney and FBI investigation and prosecution, of the following individuals for conduct amounting to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law and Racketeering in the Courts: 4. Donna Thomas, Courtroom Assistant 5. Attorneys Kevin and Tracey McCormick 6. Others, who colluded in the conduct detailed below. C. Public Policy Significance 1. The ongoing case of former US Attorney Richard Fine holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in the State of California, in general. The case at hand, Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048), originated in Fines complaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, 42 US 1983, alleging the

Page 4/4

June 20, 2011

circumstances, where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials, Los Angeles County government officials and lawyers for the developers, who opposed him in the courtroom. However, the case as a whole, must be deemed part of the intimidation, harassment, and retaliation against the former US prosecutor Richard Fine. Following his protest of the corruption of California judges, he was held in solitary confinement for 18 months with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case. Eventually, he was released with no valid court order, either. [iv] The case provided unique documentation of arbitrary and capricious imprisonment in Los Angeles County, California. Upon review, it may be deemed torture pursuant to ratified international law. 2. Continued tolerance of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) undermines the rights of all 10 millions, who reside in Los Angeles County, in particular, and all residents of California, in general. The case documents how deeply entrenched the LA-JR is at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and the State of California courts. Conduct of the Los Angeles courts was the core evidence that led to the 2010 United Nations Human Rights Council report, which noted, corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California: [v,vi] a) In the Civil Division, such conduct is most noticeable in real estate and other types of financial institutions fraud under the guise of litigation [vii,viii,ix] b) In the Criminal Division, such conduct is most noticeable in the large-scale false imprisonments, best documented in the case of the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) thousands of victims of the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000), who remain imprisoned. [x,xi] c) High-level financial management fraud is inherent to the operations of the LA-JR, and has been repeatedly documented for over a decade as well. [xii] d) Particularly noted in this regard are the secret payments by Los Angeles County to the judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and the related false imprisonment of former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who exposed and rebuked the practice. Richard Fine was held for 18 months in solitary confinement, under false arrest and booking records, claiming that he was arrested and imprisoned on location and by authority of the non-existent Municipal Court of San Pedro. [xiii] 3. The LA-JR is patronized by certain US judges. The case at hand provides additional evidence of patronizing of the LA-JR by certain US judges. The case as a whole is alleged simulated litigation, [xiv] where none of the records is deemed valid and effectual by the US Court itself. However, through alleged fraud in the PACER docket, it is represented as a valid court case to Plaintiff Richard Fine and the People-at-large. Concomitantly, public access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing) is denied. However, in related cases in the US District Court, Central District of California, involving the individuals, named accused in instant complaint, some access was gained, and all NEFs were discovered to be invalid. [xv] Complaints and/or requests for impeachments were previously filed with the US Congress, FBI, and/or the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against Judge John Walter, Judge Virginia Philips, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk of the Court Terry Nafisi, and Court Room Assistant Donna Thomas, all from the US District Court, Central District of California, and against Attorney Kevin McCormick. The previous complaints pertained to the same conduct in litigation of Fine v Sheriff (09-cv-01914), the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine, and/or Zernik v Connor et al, complaint alleging conduct amounting to racketeering by a group of judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [xvi,xvii] D. General Claims

Page 5/5

June 20, 2011

Conduct of the accused at the Civil Division of the Court in the caption, referenced above, is alleged as including, but not limited to: 1. Falsification of Court Records; 2. Fraud; 3. Mail Fraud; 4. Honest Services Fraud; 5. Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; 6. Conspiracy; 7. Public Corruption, and 8. Racketeering. E. General Evidence For the sake of brevity, only a small part of the evidence was described and linked below. Please do not hesitate to contact Dr Zernik for additional evidence in this matter. Please also consider, as part of instant complaint: 1. All PACER and CM/ECF records in the case including, but not limited to, those posted online by the Complainants for ease of public access; [xviii] 2. Related complaints, previously filed with your offices against the same persons for similar conduct in other case in the US District Court, Central District of California, [xix] and 3. DRAFT Request for US Attorney General Eric Holder's investigation of integrity, or lack thereof, of electronic record systems of the US courts, PACER and CM/ECF. [xx] F. Specific Evidence No access has been gained to the NEFs in instant case, sufficient evidence is available to allege that the case is simulated litigation. Upon discovery of the NEFs, conclusive evidence should be found. 1. Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify any of the PACER dockets of the US District Court, Central District of California; 2. No valid summonses were entered in the docket, in alleged violation of Duties of the Clerk pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3. No Civil Cover Sheet is found in the docket, which is required for the opening of a civil docket; 4. No valid Assignment Order for Judge JOHN WALTER is found in the docket; 5. No valid Referral Order for Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE is found in the docket; 6. Numerous entries in the docket are by Ms DONNA THOMAS, who upon information and belief is not a Deputy Clerk, and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI has denied numerous requests to clarify the nature of Ms DONNA THOMASs authority; 7. The Clerk of the Court routinely denies access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing), and in related cases, where the most of the individuals named accused in instant complaint were also involved, all NEFs were eventually discovered to be invalid; 8. Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK, who appears in instant case on behalf of the Defendants, falsely appeared on behalf of related defendants in a related case, with no authority at all, and 9. No declaration or any other record signed by any of the Defendants is found in the pleading filed on their behalf, consistent with conduct of simulated litigation. G. Alleged widespread corruption and racketeering in the justice system in Los Angeles is drawing both national and international awareness. As part of the first ever review by the United Nations (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, report was filed by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Dr Joseph Zernik, [xxi] alleging widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California. The report further documented the refusal of senior officers of the US government to abide by its duties and responsibilities pursuant to ratified international law in failure to

Page 6/6

June 20, 2011

accord equal protection to the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County. The UPR Staff Report, which was issued by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, consequently noted corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California. [xxii] Internet sites created by the Complainants have drawn over the past 18 months over one million readers from close to 120 nations.[xxiii,xxiv] H. Remedies are requested by the US government, including, but not limited to equal protection of all 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County, and all residents of the State of California. The US Congress and the US Attorney, Central District of California, are herein requested to provide the following remedies: 1. Equal protection of the Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights of all 10 millions, who reside in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in California, in general, under US and ratified international law, by putting an end to simulated litigation in the US District Court, Central District of California, in particular, and all US Courts, in general. 2. Enforcement of First Amendment rights and US Supreme Court decision in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) in Los Angeles County, California, by compelling the Los Angeles Superior Court to permit public access to inspect and to copy court records - including, but not limited to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) of all cases of the US District Court, Central District of California. I. Request for due process in acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints at the US Attorney Office, Central District of California. It is requested that the US Congress and the US Attorney Office, Central District of California, accord due process to instant complaint: 1. That the complaint be accepted as such; 2. That the US Attorney Office acknowledge receipt of the complaint and issue a reference number for the complaint; 3. That the complaint be duly reviewed, and 4. That following review, a response be provided, verified by an authorized person. Your attention to these matters is kindly requested. Respectfully, Dated: June 20, 2011 By: ______________ Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (NGO) PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Phone: 323.515.4583 Fax: 323.488.9697 Email jz12345@earthlink.net

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/

Page 7/7
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345

June 20, 2011

_____________________________

CC:
1) 2) 3) 4) 5) The Hon Carl Levin, Chair US Senate Investigations Committee The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Senator from California Basel Accords Committee Various National Central Banks United Nations Human Rights Council Working Group on the 2010 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States.

LINKS
Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels. ii 11-06-20 Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048) in the US District Court, Central District of California PACER records s http://www.scribd.com/doc/58263807/
iii i

11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/ v 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/ vi For review of the LA-JR see United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) submission of Human Rights Alert (NGO) as part of the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States: 1) Press Release: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/ 2) Submission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/ 3) Appendix: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/ 4) 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession". http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ vii Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Marina v Los Angeles County: 10-07-08 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca for Public Corruption and Deprivation http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/ viii 10-08-13 RE: Karimi v Mithawaila (BD518503) - Complaint against Attorney David Pasternak and the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and racketeering in pretense receiverships at the Court. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/ ix Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Sturgeon v Los Angeles County: 10-07-15 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office Central District of California against Justice James A Richman Presiding Judge Charles McCoy Clerk John Clarke: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/ x 09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/ xi 10-06-28 Human Rights Alert Complaint filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Re Large Scale False Imprisonments in Los Angeles County s http://www.scribd.com/doc/33647477/ xii High-level financial management fraud: See [iii], above. xiii 10-07-08 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/ xiv Simulated Litigation, see [I], above. xv 11-06-02 DRAFT Request for US Attorney General Eric Holder's investigation of Integrity, or lack thereof, of electronic record systems of the US courts http://www.scribd.com/doc/56893149/ xvi Complaints/requests for impeachment:

iv

11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/

Page 8/8

June 20, 2011

10-07-04 Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County (2:09-cv-01914) Complaint against Attorney Kevin McCormick and the California Judicial Council, Chaired by California Chief Justice Ronald George for public corruption, deprivation of civil rights under the color of law Pertaining to Habeas Corpus Petition of 70 Year Old Former US Prosecutor Richard Fine. http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/ 10-07-12 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) Complaint against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/ 10-12-07 Request for Investigation and if Appropriate - Impeachment Proceedings - against TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California s http://www.scribd.com/doc/44818903/ 10-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for Investigation, Impeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate s http://www.scribd.com/doc/44669382/ xvii See also review of alleged fraud and racketeering by Woehrle, Nafisi, Thomas, and others in conduct of simulated litigation of Zernik v Connor et al (08-cv-01550), where a group of judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court were alleged of conduct amounting to racketeering: 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/ xviii Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048) in the US District Court, Central District of California: See [ii], above. xix Complaints/requests for impeachment: See [xiv], above. xix See also review of alleged fraud and racketeering by Woehrle, Nafisi, Thomas, and others in conduct of simulated litigation of Zernik v Connor et al (08-cv-01550), where a group of judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court were alleged of conduct amounting to racketeering: 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/ xx 11-06-02 DRAFT Request for US Attorney General Eric Holder's investigation of Integrity, or lack thereof, of electronic record systems of the US courts PACER and CM/ECF http://www.scribd.com/doc/56893149/ xxi 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States: See [iv], above. xxii 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States: See [iv], above. xxiii Scribd site of Human Rights Alert (NGO) http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert xxiv News sites where Human Rights Alert posts routine releases: http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/