Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
once did a field experience for nine weeks in a second grade classroom. I was appalled at the rigidity of the curriculum. Not only did the students seem bored and uninterested in pursuing more than the bare minimum, but the teacher seemed frustrated with her role. She felt more like a facilitator of someone elses
teaching style than an actual teacher. She felt hopeless, and could not figure out how to reach her students while still maintaining high test scores. Her class, though uninterested in learning, had learned the importance of high scores and did well enough on the tests to make them seem like good learners, but as an educator, she knew that they had still not learned to thirst for knowledge. Because the United States of America has placed such rigid expectations on educators, and thus, students, many teachers are at a loss for how to make learning fun for their students. These creative teachers, who are some of the teachers students used to remember the most fondly, have to find new ways to incorporate their creative ideas for student learning around rigid rules, time restraints, and standards. Teachers go into education for various reasons, but most do so at least partially because they love children, their subjects, and learning. Rather than giving up on their passions, creative teachers must find ways to expand and invigorate standardized curriculums with creativity and energy. While a standardized curriculum is admittedly not the most conducive environment for creative teachers, these teachers can thrive and incorporate their ideas into the context of standardized curriculum in a way that will be beneficial for all students.
Because the United States of America has placed such rigid expectations on educators, and thus, students, many teachers are at a loss for how to make learning fun for their students.
about what and how teachers are supposed to teach. Some districts encourage teachers to follow pacing guides that outline the material to be covered by different points in the school year. (Rentner et al. 2006) Curriculums are increasingly standardized, and many teachers have lost the freedom to choose how and what to teach their students. This standardization is an effort to ensure that all students receive the same education regardless of race, socioeconomic status, and other indicators. By standardizing curriculum, states, districts, and schools are able to more easily monitor the things students learn in preparation for the high stakes testing that determines the allotment of federal Title I funds. In addition to standardized curriculums, each class is to be led by a Highly Qualified Teacher, defined by NCLB as a teacher who has: a bachelor's degree, full state certification, as defined by the state, and demonstrated competency, as defined by the state, in each core academic subject taught by the teacher. The core academic subjects defined by NCLB are English, reading or language arts, math, science, history, civics and government, geography, economics, the arts and foreign language. (Reese) These efforts were instated to grant quality education to all American students. Whether or not NCLB is helping or hindering students is a hot topic even outside of education circles, but it is a raging debate within schools, districts, and states. Some educators believe NCLB has brought about a dawn of increased learning while others argue that it has forced them to teach strictly to the test. The author of Diary of a Public School Teacher, a well-read blog stated, sometimes, I feel like a robot, I am micro managed every second, minute, hour, day, week, month, of the school year. I feel like a body in the room, programmed to teach not only what they want me to teach, but also how to teach it, and when to teach it. Regardless of teachers stances, they must teach to federal, state, district, and school guidelines or risk losing their jobs.
THERE IS HOPE.
Unless we want to raise a generation of learners with no interest in knowledge for knowledges sake, we must go above and beyond the standardized curriculum.
Unless we want to raise a generation of learners with no interest in knowledge for knowledges sake, we must go above and beyond the standardized curriculum. Standardized curriculums are good in many ways. They certainly narrow the gap between good teachers and bad teachers, but unfortunately the gap is partially narrowed by excellent teachers slipping closer to mediocre. Many veteran teachers have been forced to change the curriculums they tirelessly developed over the years for unfamiliar, and sometimes boring, standardized curriculums. These curriculum changes may have caused creative teachers to lose faith in themselves and their teaching methods. Many teachers ask themselves if there is any value in their curriculum ideas. How can teachers best teach students what they need to know (as defined by state standards and standardized curriculums) while instilling in them a thirst for knowledge? The good
news is that there is always hope. Teachers should not feel like they have to lose their passion in order to teach from a standardized curriculum. The first step is to recognize that there is hope, and that every teacher can make a difference. Students respond to teachers who care. Even just seeing continued efforts to make learning fun will help students enjoy learning more and gain a greater respect for knowledge and learning.
Understanding motivation will enable teachers to focus the small amounts of discretionary time they
have during standardized curriculum on fulfilling enrichments that will help them feel at home in the classroom and to truly shine as educators.
Good professional relationships can help each teacher improve his or her teaching without going through as many trials and errors to get to positive results.
Teachers should not be afraid to network with each other and learn from one another. Good professional relationships can help each teacher improve his or her teaching without going through as many trials and errors to get to positive results.
INVOLVE LEADERSHIP.
Most principals and administrators show gratitude for their teachers in a number of ways. Teachers should take advantage of opportunities to communicate with the leadership in their schools and districts. Because teachers are on the frontlines of education, most principals and administrators are interested in hearing their ideas and successes. In Nurturing Teachers in the Famine of NCLB, June Million discusses some of the ways that principals have chosen to help teachers succeed. From using their own money to buy supplies and covering classrooms for half hour periods to using humor and praise to raise teachers spirits, these ideas all had a single purpose to make teachers more effective by raising their morale. (NAME) Because principals and administrators are integral in the decisions regarding school governing, it is important for teachers to maintain relationships with them. Obviously, ongoing problems in the classroom should be discussed with the principal, but so should successes. Principals should hear about the positive things going on in classrooms so that they can have access to information that only teachers can receive through their close contact with students. If something works, share it with the administration so that they can help other teachers learn from successes.
Teachers are not the only ones responsible for their teaching style. Principals and other administrators can do many things to help creative teachers succeed within the context of a standardized curriculum. By ensuring that teachers have enough time, space, and funding for creative curriculum ideas, principals and administrators can give their students the guarantees provided by a standardized curriculum without sacrificing the excitement that naturally occurs in the classroom of a fulfilled, creative teacher.
By working with the standardized curriculum rather than fighting against it, teachers can instill a passion for knowledge in their students without fear of losing their jobs.
WORKS CITED
Aspen Inst., Washington, DC. "Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the Promise to Our Nation's Children." Aspen Institute, The (2007): ERIC. EBSCO. Web. 11 May 2011. Bunting, Carolyn. "Teachers Get Personal about Teaching to Survive NCLB." Education Digest 72.5 (2007): 12. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCO. Web. 11 May 2011. Hill, Deborah M., and Marlene Barth. "NCLB and Teacher Retention: Who Will Turn out the Lights?."Education and the Law 16.2-3 (2004): 173-181. ERIC. EBSCO. Web. 11 May 2011. Million, June. "Nurturing Teachers in the Famine of NCLB." Education Digest 70.9 (2005): 16. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCO. Web. 11 May 2011. Reese, Susan. "The Highly Qualified Teacher Under NCLB." Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers 79.8- (2004): 33-35. ERIC. EBSCO. Web. 11 May 2011. I Am Mrs. Smith (Spoken Robotically). Diary of a Public School Teacher. Blog. 22 May 2011.