Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 280-5 #:6819

Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI and PHILIP J. BERG, ) ESQUIRE and THE LAW OFFICES OF ) 12 PHILIP J. BERG and EVELYN ADAMS) a/k/a MOMMA E and LISA M. ) 13 OSTELLA and GO EXCEL GLOBAL, )
11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ, ) a/k/a LAW OFFICES OF ORLY TAITZ; ) a/k/a WWW.ORLYTAITZESQ.COM ) a/k/a WWW.REPUBX.COM a/k/a ) ORLY TAITZ, INC. and DEFEND OUR ) FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC. ) and YOSEF TAITZ and THE SANKEY ) FIRM and SANKEY INVESTIGA) TIONS, INC. and NEIL SANKEY and ) JAMES SUNQUIST and ROCK SALT ) PUBLISHING and LINDA SUE ) BELCHER a/k/a LINDA S. BELCHER ) a/k/a LINDA STARR; a/k/a ) NEWWOMENSPARTY a/k/a ) STITCHENWITCH a/k/a EVA BRAUN ) a/k/a WEB SERGEANT a/k/a KATY ) a/k/a WWW.OBAMACITIZENSHIP ) DEBATE.ORG and EDGAR HALE ) a/k/a JD SMITH; and CAREN HALE; ) and PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, a/k/a ) PLAINS RADIO NETWORK, INC. ) a/k/a PLAINS RADIO; and BAR H ) FARMS; and KPRN AM 1610; and ) DOES 1 through 200 Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) -1-

Case No. 8:11-CV-00485-AG (AJW) Hon. Andrew Guilford Courtroom 10D [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP, RULE 12(b)(6) Date Action Filed: Discovery Cut-Off: Final Pre-Trial Conf.: Trial Date: Hearing Date: Hearing Time: Courtroom: Location: May 4, 2009 March 5, 2012 May 21, 2012 June 5, 2012

August 15, 2010 10:00 AM 10D Santa Ana Courthouse 411 W. Fourth St. Santa Ana, CA 92701

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 280-5 #:6820

Filed 07/11/11 Page 2 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On August 15, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., ORLY TAITZs Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), as to Plaintiffs, LISA LIBERI, PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG and LISA M. OSTELLAs First Amended Complaint, came regularly before the Honorable Andrew Guilford of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Divison, in Courtroom 10D, at the Santa Ana Courthouse located at 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Appearing on behalf of DEFENDANT and moving party was Orly Taitz, Esq., and Peter Cook of Schumann, Rallo & Rosenberg, LLP; on behalf of PLAINTIFF, was PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ. After hearing oral argument from the involved parties, the Court ruled as follows: [ ] 1. The FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION for INVASION OF PRIVACY of

Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 2. The SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION for PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF

PRIVATE FACTS of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 3. The THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION for FALSE LIGHT of Plaintiffs

Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 4. The FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION for RIGHT OF PUBLICITY

AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF LIKENESS of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 5. The FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION for VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL CODE 1798.53 of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 6. The SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION for VIOLATION OF

CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 1798.85 of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 7. The SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION for CYBER-STALKING,

CYBER-HARASSMENT AND CYBER-BULLYING of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim.


-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 280-5 #:6821

Filed 07/11/11 Page 3 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[ ]

8.

The EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION for DEFAMATION PER SE,

SLANDER AND LIBER PER SE of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 9. The NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION for INTENTIONAL INFLICTION

OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 10. The TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION for MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 11. The ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION for ABUSE OF PROCESS of

Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 12. Plaintiff has no leave to file an amended Complaint as to the following

causes of action:________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ [ ] 13. Plaintiff has __ days leave to file an amended Complaint as to the

following causes of action:_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ If no amended Complaint has been filed after __ days, Defendant shall file an Answer within __ days after Plaintiffs amended Complaint filing due date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:_______________

__________________________________ Hon. Andrew Guildford

-3[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)