Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
January 2010
1 / 46
Overview of Composites
Ply Mechanics
Summary
1 2 3 4
Overview of Composites Ply mechanics Classical Laminates Theory Laminates optimization: laminated Parameters
January 2010
2 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Denition
Composite materials (Latin: componere) A macroscopic combination of two or more distinct materials into one with the intent of surpressing undesirable properties of the constituent materials in favour of desirable properties
January 2010
3 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
At Macro Level
Isotropic The same properties in all directions (Metals, plastics, concrete, etc) Anisotropic Dierent properties in dierent directions (Wood, reinforced concrete, bre composites, bone, and almost all natural building materials) An example would be the dependence of Youngs modulus on the direction of load
January 2010
4 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Laminates composites
Combination of two or more constituent materials on a macroscopic examination to produce a new material with enhanced properties: Fibers (carbon, glass, Kevlar) and matrix (Epoxy resin)
Strength and stiness are proportional to the amount of bers in the matrix (Fiber volume fraction) The reinforcing bers provide the useful engineering properties e.g., strength and stiness); whereas the matrix serves to protect and stabilize the bers while transferring loads among the bers predominantly through shear.
Joseph Morlier / Dimitri Bettebghor () Workshop 2.3 MAAXIMUS January 2010 5 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Stacking Sequence
January 2010
6 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Mirror symetry?
January 2010
7 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Coupling terms
When the local coordinate changes : some terms of Compliance matrix are dierent of Zero (Distortion of right angle)
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
9 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
Equivalent material
January 2010
10 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
11 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
12 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
13 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
14 / 46
Overview of Composites 1
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
15 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
16 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
17 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Shear Loading
Under pure shearing force 12 ,no 1 and 2 appears. G12 (shear modulus) is dened by : 12 = 2G12 12
January 2010
18 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
19 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
20 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Coordinate Transformations
January 2010
21 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Coordinate Transformations
January 2010
22 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Stress Transformation
January 2010
23 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Strain Transformation
January 2010
24 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
25 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
26 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
27 / 46
Overview of Composites 2
Ply Mechanics
Exemple 1
January 2010
28 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
Macromechanics
Nx = normal force resultant in the x direction (per unit length) Nxy = shear force resultant (per unit length) Mx = bending moment resultant in the yz plane (per unit length) Mxy = twisting moment resultant (per unit length)
Joseph Morlier / Dimitri Bettebghor () Workshop 2.3 MAAXIMUS January 2010 29 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
Displacement eld
January 2010
30 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
31 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
32 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
33 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
34 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
35 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
ABD?
18 terms are governing: A = [in-plane stiness matrix] D = [bending stiness matrix] B = [bending-extension coupling matrix] B=0 if symetrical vs middle plan
January 2010
36 / 46
Overview of Composites 3
Ply Mechanics
where zk are ply coordinate (sup and inf) (i,j=1,2,6) IS THERE ANY COMPACT FORM OF THIS COMPLEX PROBLEM EXISTING ???????
Joseph Morlier / Dimitri Bettebghor () Workshop 2.3 MAAXIMUS January 2010 37 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
38 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Lamination parameters
Lamination parameters are a compact representation of the stacking sequence. Miki, Tsa and Pagano carried out this representation of the mechanical behaviour of a laminate by decomposing the material-dependent part and the stacking-sequence dependent part, ending up with : 5 so-called material invariants or Tsa -Pagano parameters {Ui }i=1...5 that only depend on the material properties (E11 , E22 , G12 and 12 the longitudinal, transerve and shear moduli and the Poissons ratio)
A B D 12 so-called lamination parameters {1,2,3,4} , {1,2,3,4} , {1,2,3,4} that only depend on the stacking sequence (ber orientations and number of plies).
January 2010
39 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Lamination parameters
The knowledge of both U and is enough to derive the constitutive law of the material. More precisely, they allow ud to compute the ABD stiness tensor where : A is the in-plane stiness tensor that describe the tensile compressive behaviour of the material D is the out-of-plane stiness tensor that describe the exural behaviour B is the coupling stiness tensor
January 2010
40 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Lamination parameters
Their denition is :
A {1,2,3,4} =
1 h 1 h 1 h
h/2
B {1,2,3,4} =
(2)
h/2 D {1,2,3,4} =
(3) where h denotes the thickness of the laminate and the orientation of ber at height z [h/2, h/2]. It is a general denition of . For laminate composite it turns down to a simple nite sum of Nplies terms
Joseph Morlier / Dimitri Bettebghor () Workshop 2.3 MAAXIMUS January 2010 41 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Lamination parameters
Knowing these lamination parameters stiness tensors can be obtained by I 1 1 I11 I I22 1 1 I12 0 0 = I66 0 0 I16 0 I /2 3 I I26 0 3 /2 where I stands for A, B and D.
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 U 0 1 U2 0 U 1 3 U4 0 U5 0
(4)
January 2010
42 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
The lamination parameters oers another representation of the stacking sequence They represent the stacking sequence description through 12 variables, no matter how many plies there are. A lot of work has been done on describing the feasible design space for lamination parameters : Miki, Diaconu, Weaver... and the boundaries may be described with a closed form expression. Recently Weaver and al. carried out an implicit relationship to describe to feasible space for any set of arbitrary orientations. They can be used to build up surrogate model.
January 2010
43 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Lamination parameters
Figure: Exemple of feasible design space into the lamination parameter representation
Joseph Morlier / Dimitri Bettebghor () Workshop 2.3 MAAXIMUS January 2010 44 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
January 2010
45 / 46
Overview of Composites 4
Ply Mechanics
Others representations
Note that this representation is not the only one to be used for lay-up optimization We can use directly the reduced stiness tensors A and D and use continous techniques (gradient descente techniques) (Adams, Herencia,...). Note that we still have the post-identication problem. There also exists an equivalent representation used by Vanucci : the polar form
January 2010
46 / 46