You are on page 1of 8

Sag and tension calculations for mountainous terrain

J. Bradbury, Dip. Tech. (Eng.), G.F. Kuska, C. Eng., M.I.E.E., and D.J. Tarr
Indexing terms: Cables and overhead lines, Power transmission Abstract: While normal sag and tension calculations based on the 'equivalent-span' concept are satisfactory, when applied to transmission lines located in a reasonably undulating terrain, the answers obtained by this method are inaccurate for mountainous terrain. An alternative method of calculation, which is based on the analysis of the change of state equation for each span of a section in turn, is given. It is shown that when using this new approach the full effect of both the suspension and tension insulators can be included together with the influence of the running-out blocks on the sag of the conductor. The paper also shows how this concept can be adapted to the function of line design and gives several examples of critical areas where existing methods may give unacceptable results. When stringing conductors in mountainous terrain, it is not always practical to measure the conductor sag using conventional techniques and the paper gives three additional means which may be used, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each.
List of symbols

A = cross-sectional area of conductor, mm2 a,b,c,d = constants depending on sag>> C — catenary constant = H/W,m E = Young's modulus of complete conductor, kg/mm2 H = horizontal tension of conductor, kg H' = component of tension in line with AG (Fig. 2d), kg h = height difference between attachment points at adjacent towers, m ht = vertical distance from tower to instrument, m K = unstretched length of conductor in a span (i.e. length after removing the tension at 0° C), m L = chord length between adjacent towers (Fig. 1), m / = length of tension or suspension insulator set, m S = stretched length of conductor in a span, m T = total (tangential) tension in conductor, kg V = vertical load at attachment point due to conductor (uplift load denoted by negative value), kg W = conductor weight per unit length, kg/m Wh = conductor wind load per unit length (wind acting normal to conductor), kg/m Wr = resolved conductor weight per unit length in the plane (as shown in Fig. 2c), kg/m Wv = W + weight of ice per unit length, kg/m W' = resolved conductor weight per unit length in the plane (as shown in Fig. 2b), kg/m X = horizontal span length, m Xo = horizontal distance from attachment point to low point datum (Fig. 1), m Xp = horizontal distance from any point on the catenary to low point datum (Fig. 1), m x = horizontal distance from attachment point to any point on the catenary, m xt = horizontal distance from tower to instrument, m y = sag from chord line at point x on the catenary, m y0 = sag from attachment point at low point datum (Fig. yh yh ' Z = maximum value of y occurring at point X/2 (absence of tension insulators) (Fig. 1), m = maximum value of y not necessarily at point X/2 in presence of tension insulators (Fig. 4), m = transverse horizontal load at attachment point due to conductor, kg

= coefficient of thermal expansion of complete conductor, per deg C /3 = blow-out angle of conductor (Fig. 2b), degrees 7 = angle to the vertical of the suspension or tension insulator sets, degrees Ah = height difference between tower and conductor attachment points (Fig. 9), m Ax = horizontal difference corresponding to Ah, m 5 = angle between chord line and the horizontal in the unresolved plane, degrees 6 = conductor temperature, °C i// = angle between chord line and the horizontal in the resolved plane (Fig. 2d), degrees to = weight of tension or suspension insulator set, kg <t> = angle of the tangent at point F to the horizontal (Fig. 1), degrees Subscripts 1 and 2 denote different values for the same variables.
1 Introduction


Paper 20S4C (P8), first received 2nd November 1981 and in revised form 20th May 1982 The authors are with Balfour Beatty Power Construction Limited, Power Transmission Division, 7 Mayday Road, Thorton Heath, Surrey CR4 7XA, England IEEPROC, Vol. 129, Pt. C, No. 5, SEPTEMBER 1982

Since the advent of transmission lines, theories have been progressively developed to define the sag and tension behaviour of the conductor. Initially these were oriented towards manual calculations and, consequently, were based upon the parabolic theory (Boyse and Simpson [1]). With the introduction of computers most theories are now based upon the accurate catenary equations (Rieger [2]). In multi-span sections, it is usual to assume that the horizontal tensions will react to changes in load and temperature as a single span referred to by the well known term 'equivalent span'. The mathematical treatment to obtain the 'equivalent span' is based upon parabolic theory, and there is no similar concept using full catenary equations. While the methods give acceptable and practical results for the majority of lines constructed'in normal, reasonably undulating terrain, e.g. in the UK, in mountainous areas these theories produce significant errors. Overhead-line engineers are already aware of this problem, as illustrated by Winkelman [3], which develops the parabolic and catenary theories for application to inclined sections. Our recent experience, on applying this method to very mountainous terrain, highlighted the presence of further inaccuracies which will result in the towers and conductors experiencing loads in excess of their limiting design values. In an attempt to overcome these problems, a theory has been developed which is the subject of this paper. At the development stage it became evident that the above inaccuracies were valid for both the single- and multi-span sections. This paper was originally presented to the 2nd international conference on 'Progress in cables and overhead lines
0143-7046/82/050213 + 08 $01.50/0 213

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on July 1, 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

2a). With respect to the former. 5. The forces in the deflected plane. by reference to Fig.1 Theory Basic equations angle to the horizontal of the tangent at point F = tan" 1 ! s i n h l . To use eqns. it is first necessary to calculate the Vertical' force in the rotated IEEPROC.01 % in the estimation of the unstretched length. It is felt that this accuracy is sufficient for practical purposes. the value of K is equal to the chord length L. When the conductor is subjected to wind acting normal to it. and. V and Z at tower A (Fig. the latter applied parallel with the chord line. the change-of-state equation becomes: (4) sinh C2 (5) h sinh yi A (Y) EA (10) (6) (7) 1+ 2 Csinh X 2C~ (8) Xo Fig. an assumption was made that.2 Change-of-state equation (9) Before detailed considerations were given to the problem. The resultant force W' acting at an angle j3 to the vertical is obtained. Under this condition. it is assumed that the unstretched length K of the conductor at 0°C is constant. 2a) along the X X axis. It should be noted that this equation is only valid for stillair conditions. after it has been clamped in. it became evident that the elastic treatment requires lengthy computation without producing worthwhile improvements in the accuracy of the result. C. if further accuracy is required. 2 and explained below: Step 1: Fig. Referring to Fig. if point F is to the left of D. Consider the forces acting on the conductor element. it equals the length given by the catenary equation less the elastic and thermal changes. in calculating the elastic changes. It is therefore felt that the inelastic theory gives a tolerable accuracy. 2b shows a section through the element (Fig. The forces acting are Wh. No.e. are given below: LT catenary constant C = — = c/cosh^length of conductor between points A and D S = Csinh — C horizontal length Xo (D' A) Xo also Xo = Csinh" 1 — H vertical component of tension at point A V = //sinh^total tension at point A T = half-span sag yh = C |cosh—-1 ^ =— -Csinh"1 h X 2Csinh — (1) (2) (3) When considering a length of conductor suspended between two towers. when calculating the elastic and thermal changes. Regarding the tension. This line represents the 'horizontal' plane in which the catenary equations are valid. Having solved eqn. inelastic [2. The method for resolving these forces is given in Fig. and not the inline horizontal force at the tower. Xp becomes positive 214 where subscripts 1 and 2 denote two different conditions. To utilise the above statement in the development of the change-of-state equation.for 220 kV and above' [4] and has now been expanded to include practical examples using the methods of calculations described. 2 2. Considering the two theories. Force Wv must be resolved along two axes normal to and parallel with the chord line. i. but. the vertical and transverse forces present must be resolved in the deflected plane of the conductor before applying eqn. the mean total tension in the conductor length has been assumed to equal the horizontal tension. Step 3: Fig. 1 for the unknown H'2 it should be noted that this is the 'horizontal' tension in the rotated plane (Fig. it can be improved by adopting the second-term-approximation system given in step (d) of Section 3. 10). W' and Wv sin 5. such that the chord line makes an angle \p to the line AG. 2a shows an inclined span under the influence of a wind force. 1. 2d shows the inclined span rotated about point A. This assumption causes an error of less than 0. 1 Inclined span Sign convention: Xo positive and Xp negative for the case shown. Step 2: Fig.e. 1. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. thus satisfying the requirements to solve the change-of-state equation (eqn. These. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. it was recognised that there are two theories. 2c shows the inclined span rotated about axis AB through angle /3. Step 4: Fig. force Wr is the only force present and acts 'vertically'. Wv cos 5 and Wv sin 5.1. are combined to give the resultant force Wr acting at an angle i// to the normal to the chord line. the wind force Wh acting normal to the conductor and the vertical force Wv due to the conductor and ice weight. Restrictions apply. i.3] and elastic (Hattingh [5]). respectively. Pt. i. the inelastic catenary equations are used.e. 1—10 the parameters H and W should be replaced by H' and Wr. 129. for this reason. applicable to the solution of a catenary.^ |} 2. Downloaded on July 1. Vol. 10. To obtain the tension components H. two simplifications have been made related to the unstretched length of the conductor and its tension. . 2d~).

. 5. SEPTEMBER 1982 215 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Restrictions apply. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on July 1. 2 Resolution of forces under wind conditions a Span subjected to a wind force normal to the conductor 6 Deflection of element through section X X c Span through section Y Y d Span in resolved plane suspension insulator suspension insulator Fig. 3 Forces on suspension insulators a Conductor on running-out blocks b Conductor clamped in IEEPROC. 129.Q=Wh c = W v sin8 d = Wwcos6 Fig. No. Vol. Pt. C.

3.1 Conductor on running-out blocks: Consider Fig. span-byspan analysis. Downloaded on July 1. the left-hand side of eqn. (c) The left-hand side of eqn. JC = —b/2a (iv) Substitute x from (iii) into eqn. 10 the procedure is as follows: (a) The vertical and transverse loads are estimated at each tower position. . the maximum sag y^ (which does not necessarily occur at X/2) must be calculated. 12 can be derived. (d) Should further accuracy in the unstretched length be required (see Section 2. 2. For calculating the left-hand side of eqn. Restrictions apply.e. with the result that the horizontal tensions in adjacent spans may not be equal. 10 and are ignored. Under conditions of excessive gradients the suspension insulator will swing longitudinally. Considering this condition. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. (e) Steps (c) and (d) are repeated for all spans in the section IEEPROC. Pt. Assuming the block to be frictionless.l H2 — (12) Furthermore. 6) and then reverse the above step-bystep procedure. 10 can be recalculated using the value for the unstretched length found under step (c) above. 15 thus obtaining ^ 3 Application of theory by computer programming For the purpose of tower design. SEPTEMBER 1982 Fig. the following equations apply: tan 3 also / = VA/J2 + Ax2 7 H V + co/2 Ax Ah (13) (14) T = \IH\ + v\ = \ltii + v\ (11) Taking moments about point Q. the unstretched length in individual spans remains constant. 129. reflect the geometry of the line. These must. the 'equivalent span' concept is not valid. an overhead line contractor requires data resulting from a large number of sag and tension calculations. C. i. Normally the suspension insulators are assumed to be vertical at the expected stringing temperature. While the programming of the sag equations was straightforward. 2.3 Effect of suspension insulators Two conditions must be considered. Vol. when the conductor is on running out blocks. As far as the error in sag is concerned. particularly in mountainous terrain. profiling and stringing. as the block is free to rotate thus permitting conductor movement between spans. Again by taking moments about Q. eqn. it is evident that although previous theories assumed the suspension set to be always vertical this assumption is incorrect. (b) The total tension is estimated at the first tower. The vertical force V is dependent on Xo and hence on Ah. For multi-span sections these were overcome by the method outlined below: 3. For this reason Fig.plane at point A (eqn. using the value of the chord length for the unstretched length. as required by the specification. 5. the reduction in span length X and the slight variation in height difference h have only a marginal influence The horizontal tension H is known from the change-of-state equation and the insulator weight co given. the angle 7 of all suspension insulators and a limit tension. with regard to tension.2 Conductor clamped in: Once the conductor is clamped in. particularly in EHV downleads. the following equation is derived: 7 = tan . and a practical approach is given below: (i) Calculate y for three different values of* (ii) Solve y = ax2 + bx + c (15) (iii) Calculate JC for maximum sag.2). it follows that: on the solution of eqn. 2. To provide the necessary sagging information during stringing. The solution for Ah and Kcan be achieved by iterative technique. However.3. The solution to the problem lies in the evaluation of the elastic and thermal effects in the conductor in each individual span. The assumed tension values relate to a limit in the horizontal or total component.0001 %). 3b shows the suspension insulator at an angle 7 to the vertical. 3a which shows the conductor mounted immediately below the suspension insulator. Consequently. the effect can be significant.e. In this respect. Without the aid of a computer program it is not practical to undertake these calculations. namely. (This improves the accuracy in calculating the unstretched length to better than 0. 4. 2. Obviously. the tension equations presented some difficulties. i. 10 is evaluated for the first span in the section. It follows that the horizontal tensionsHx and H2 in the adjacent spans are different unless 7 equals zero. and when it is clamped in. because the verticality depends upon the geometry of the section and the temperature. because no conductor movement occurs at the clamp. the total unstretched length in a section is constant.4 Effect of tension insulator The length and weight of a tension insulator cause errors in sag and tension.1 Starting conditions To carry out the calculations two parameters of the line must be known at a given point in time. By reference to Fig. it should be noted that eqn. the unstretched length in individual spans is not constant. No. 4 216 Span with tension insulator Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. 8 no longer applies.

5 Practical application to line design Conventional sag and tension methods are satisfactory for the majority of situations. when the conventional method is selected. No.18mm ACSR) strung to typical UK loading conditions. it is not ideal to IEEPROC. (c) The right-hand side of eqn. C. number 1355. As conditions on the line change from a level span. Hence.5 m (c) for all sections containing spans in excess of 1 km. 4 Application of theory to practical line situations adopt more than one sag and tension method for its construction. the following empirical conditions have been developed. Under extreme circumstances. Restrictions apply. Thus. This.12 for calculation of the horizontal tension in succeeding spans. Fig. can lead to critical ground-clearance problems (e) the production of sags and tension data for field use.0. when considering a complete line. vertical and transverse tensions are estimated at each tower. e. It is therefore necessary to have available a method of assessing these critical situations. hence. The procedure adopted is as follows: (a) Using the equivalent-span technique the horizontal. if any. the difference between conventional methods and the one proposed gradually increases. cannot be normally justified in view of the additional data required.1 Variation of tensions with span gradients In most specifications. 5. if conventional suspension insulators are used. there is a small difference of approximately 0. With some line constructions. This occurs at the highest point of attachment of the conductor to the tower. of the suspension insulator. Naturally. but ignored in conventional techniques. the maximum working tension (MWT) in the conductors refers to the maximum tension anywhere in the conductor's length. even though. it has been found increasingly useful in connection with studies and calculations relevant to the following design activities: (a) the determination. The conventional UK practice for sag and tension calculations for this conductor is to employ a maximum horizontal tension of 5505 kg. causing an increase in the chord length between the fixing points.2 with the exception of step (c). 11. 129. and use of the method described above. These examples relate to a 'Zebra' conductor (54/7/3. river crossings (d) if aircraft warning spheres are fitted (e) if for some reason one or more suspension sets are not designed to be vertical at the time of clamping. 10 should be reduced as the span gradient is increased. for safely overcoming the inadequacies of conventional sag and tension calculations. where even with level span sections. it is apparent that in critical situations there is a need for more accurate sag and tension techniques. mentioned in this paper. see below. to determine the sections in which the more rigorous treatment given in this paper should be considered: (a) if the span gradient for any span within the section exceeds 0. to ensure that the MWT is not exceeded. to ensure that the tension on a 366 m span does not exceed 2651 kg under still-air conditions anywhere in the span 217 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO.taking into account the angle 7. Downloaded on July 1. 10. Tension calculations (eqn. This is due to the fact that under wind conditions. 3. in cases of excessive gradients. This may be required when dealing with very long sections (g) use as a general-purpose design aid for the evaluation of sags and tensions leading to rapid solution of field problems In order that a better understanding of this theory can be obtained. SEPTEMBER 1982 Following the development of the program. 10 is evaluated for each span and angle 7 of the suspension insulator. the tension used in eqn. Vol. of all loads imposed by the conductors and earthwires (b) the design and selection of profile-plotting templates which reflect the effect of gradients (c) the investigation of tower loads in cases where a combination of long and short spans may result in unacceptable out-of-balance longitudinal and vertical loads (d) an accurate determination of sags and tensions in circumstances where the route topography imposes a severe limitation on tower locations. isolated sections may be found which slightly exceed the limits given above. the horizontal tension is changed according to eqn. one method is selected and used throughout the line. convergence on the position of the conductor attachment point at the last tower is obtained. As guidelines. In the UK external loads and factors of safety related to transmission lines are governed by the Statutory Instruments 1970. 5. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. unlike multi-spans.3 % between the theories. isolated mountainous sections may be present where the method from this paper must be considered.e. When considering successive spans. however.2 Condition when conductor is clamped in This refers to the evaluation of the right-hand side of eqn. 3.2 defines the minimum factor of safety for total (tangential) tensions of the conductors as 2. Computer runs have shown that for normal level singlespan sections there is no difference between conventional methods and the one now proposed.15 (b) if the conventional sag and tension using the modifications given by Winkelman [3] give an offset in excess of 0. a number of examples are given below.2 or if the average span gradient within the section exceeds 0. using eqn. the bottom of the suspension insulator will move in the transverse direction. for a condition other than the starting condition. This Section. This effect is included in the present theory. 10) are ruled by the horizontal tensions. The difference between these two figures is more than sufficient to account for any increases in tension due to the nature of the terrain in the UK. 5 illustrates this reduction in horizontal tension against span gradient. where conventional techniques may be ideal. changed to accommodate any variation in the chord length. (b) The total tension is estimated at the first tower. 10 is made. For the 'Zebra' conductor this corresponds to a tension of 6722 kg. at an early stage. In mountainous terrain the output refers to two stringing conditions: (i) when the conductor in a section is located on running-out blocks (ii) when the conductor in a section is clamped in (f) the evaluation of suspension-insulator longitudinalswing and out-of-balance tensions.g. Before considering the next span the horizontal tension is altered according to eqn 12. .3 Condition when conductor is on running-out blocks This refers to the conductor being free to move and the procedure adopted is the same as under Section 3. Pt. does not constitute a criticism of UK practice which employs a special technique. for tower-design purpose. Clause 9. (d) By reiteration of steps (b) and (c). which is as follows: (c) A summation of the values for the right-hand side of eqn. i. limited investigations have shown that conventional theories will underestimate the maximum tension and sag by up to about 20%.

£ 1. the suspension insulator is not normally 218 Fig.mSketch of template selection graph 30- 3400 Fig. . >v \ specified maximum tension \ n200 150g E c vertical and. This results in the tension of the earthwire being increased. It was further assumed the set is vertical when under wind conditions.2 : 0. 7 sets. to be used during plotting. causing a discontinuity in eqn. 5. 2 at the point of their application. The magnitude of this force is influenced by the length of the insulator string or earthwire set. 6. These form effective masses at discrete points of the line. Fig. This Figure was constructed assuming a level two-span section having 150 and 500 m span lengths. this graph is used in the following manner: (a) The worst span in a section is visually selected.7%. Fig. 5. 10 should be reduced to 2454 kg. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. 6. it is necessary to install aircraft warning spheres on the earthwires. Fig. so that the sag remains the same as a conductor without such a mass. this figure shows the specified tension should be reduced by 0. 7 shows that if this set is made too short. From this data. hence. It follows. 6 equivalent span. placed on a 366 m level span. 5 Horizontal tension on a 366 m span to ensure conductor's tension should not exceed 2651 kg 5. Vol. In the case of insulator sets. owing to their length.4%.4 0.8 I 0. the transmitted force is normally very small. However. therefore. longitudinal loads of a magnitude H2 — Hi are transmitted to the suspension towers. a reduction of 7. Even on level spans. located in the vicinity of aircraft flight paths. and tensions for each template. Fig.1 cause further complications during the profile plotting stage. The program is run to predict the horizontal tension.0 0. Restrictions apply. 129. and the longitudinal out-of-balance forces shown are calculated at 75° C in still air. 8 shows a simplified example of this. a second and far more important effect can arise with some designs. and the correct template selected for use in final plotting 5. in which the increase in tension has been calculated to accomodate a single-centre span mass. The straight line given in the Figure represents the level single-span condition. there has been a tendency to reduce the length of the earthwire set which connects the earthwire to the tower.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 horizontal tension applied to earthwire peak at suspension tower. C. Downloaded on July 1. at maximum operating temperature.4 j | Loads applied to the suspension tower Effect of masses on conductors On some lines. from which template selection is made . considering a span having a difference in height between the conductor attachment points of 100 m that the tension in eqn. In practice.0.length. 6 can be drawn by plotting the lines corresponding to the horizontal tension chosen for the templates.3 o in 0.3 Transverse loads on suspension earth wire peaks 3200 3000 10 2800 0 20 40 60 80 weight of central mass. This shows. This problem has been solved by introducing a graph. a fact often ignored when conventional sag and tension equations are used. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore.4 >. kg 100 As eqn.1 100? c \ \ •- c si a. from the specified limiting conditions for a number of spans and span gradients.5 . "U 0 2000 o <D "o Fig.2 Profile plotting The problems mentioned in Section 5. usually having the highest span gradient (b) Any template is offered to this span and the weight span at the highest tower read off the template (c) The weight span is checked against Fig. No. this may give rise to high longitudinal loads at the tower. kg 2600 thwi ength & 0. Fig. a o "50 £ ^ \ 2200 2400 horizontal tension. While the effect of this is mainly on the sag calculations. Pt. 6 is obtained by determining the number of templates. When considering additional masses under MWT conditions. Fig. below which the graph is indeterminate. that template selection is a function of equivalent span length and span gradient. 0.6 0.6 0. because the templates are based on horizontal tensions. in recent years. because the sag of the earthwire should be equal or less than the sag of the conductor from electrical considerations. 12 shows. 8 Increase in tension to accommodate a centre span mass without increasing sag IEEPROC.

6 Stringing tables It is not possible to provide site staff with sufficient information in conventional sag-chart form to string conductors using sighting board Fig. No. For reason of accuracy and site calculation this method is to be avoided if possible. Obviously. In application. 6 Sag measuring techniques 6. To accommodate this additional tension caused by fitting spheres. it is seen that this method applies to conditions when the gun sight and the sighting board cannot be located on the tower. Each has its limitations. theodolite or dumpy level. To provide field staff with alternatives. together with their weight. Failure to achieve this can result in a situation in which the sag of the earthwire dictates the main conductor sags.2 Modified conventional method The difficulty in using this method lies in the reiterative calculation for 0 and the accuracy with which it has to be measured. 9a. e.5 Tension method By reference to Fig. Restrictions apply. 9 Method of sag measurement a Conventional b Modified conventional c Low-point datum d Tangent IEEPROC. The field application is straightforward. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. 9c). having fixed its location.1. Vol. 6.g.3 Low-point method With this method (Fig. 129. SEPTEMBER 1982 219 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. C. the stringing engineer. 6. which can prove to be an uneconomical solution. and is made by the stringing engineer. while still maintaining the required factors of safety. . It requires care in accurate location of the theodolite. 6. Pt. where the gun sight and the sighting board are fixed to the towers at a distance yh> below the conductor attachment points. 6.the effect of the weight of ice load and extra wind load on the added masses. is required to make use of the following equations: (16) where d = C In (tan 0 + sec 0) (17) This is illustrated in Fig. but the selection of the appropriate method will be dictated by site circumstances. Downloaded on July 1. the instrument. the selected earthwire must be sufficiently strong. This technique lends itself to situations where compression deadends are made aloft.1 Conventional method Fig. 5. 9b. must also be included in the tension calculations. and the accuracy achieved is dependent upon the variation of y0 with changes in temperature. an accurate sagging method can be achieved by the use of a load cell prior to conductor marking and the installation of tension insulator. If the variation is small the method may be unsuitable. is located at a distance y0 below the conductor attachment point. Its accuracy will decease with small spans.4 Tangent method When stringing conductors in mountainous terrain it is not always possible or desirable to use the conventional sagging technique. When considering short span sections. but limited to cases when yh' is less than the tower heights. four further methods have been developed. its application is limited to cases having a low-point datum. 6. 9d illustrates the case where the location of the theodolite is defined by limited access. and has the same limitations as in Section 6.

Pt. 219-238 2 RIEGER.50 16. KUSKA.30 all five methods given above. Pt.42 0. Ill B pp.36 16.T.J. IEE Conf. where the conventional method of sagging is either impossible or impracticable. pp.: 'The problem of conductor sagging on overhead transmission lines'.32 3. where existing techniques may result in noticeable errors. II.: 'Sag-tension computations and field measurements of Bonneville Power Administration'.. illustrated in Table 1.28 tower number Y m °C 0. The authors acknowledge the help of their colleagues in the preparation of this work.Table 1 : Typical stringing table obtained from computer Temperature Horizontal load kg 2400 2290 2189 2096 2011 1933 1862 1796 Total tension high tower low tower number number kg kg 2400 2290 2189 2097 2012 1934 1862 1796 2422 2312 2211 2118 2033 1955 1883 1817 Half span sag m low tower number Y X m m high X m 233..00 10. C. as detailed under Section 6. No.29 16. 91. 8 Acknowledgments To satisfy the statutory ground clearance requirements. The program provides computerprintout tables. consideration need not be given to the out-of-balance loads due to the longitudinal swing of the suspension insulator. which has an added advantage over conventional sag-chart owing to ease of reading rather than interpolation of graphs. 1532-1547 4 BRADBURY.14 1. J..39 0. it was necessary to apply the full range of methods.95 -25.22 207. 5. 1-5 5 HATTINGH.11 -2. proved extremely effective. Amer.74 227.00 15. the use of the tension method. in reasonable terrain. 176.05 216. Publ. However. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore.: 'Sag and tension calculations in mountainous terrain'. and wish to thank the General Manager of the Power Transmission Division.00 30.52 0. 9 References 1 BOYSE.42 16. Vol. N.30 16.65 222.86 -20. Engrs. 1936) 220 IEEPROC.46 0.51 0. and the Directors of Balfour Beatty Limited for permission to publish this paper.12 4. 1979.29 16.26 -15.40 16.13 -10. 1944.96 4. Downloaded on July 1. CO.64 3. G. where the tangential tension is measured by a load cell. 129. 78. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO.80 3.93 200. J. Trans. H. .. This is of particular importance in mountainous terrain. In mountainous terrain. D.32 16. alternative methods must be available to the site organisation. Balfour Beatty Power Construction Limited. 7 Conclusions In many instances. Restrictions apply.00 20.48 3.: 'Der Freileitungsbau' (Springer Verlag.00 5.44 -31.: 'A universal stress-sag chart (for line computations)' (Blackie & Sons.00 3. and to ensure that the specified factors of safety of the line are maintained.G.00 35. P. IEE. J. in long multi-span sections with excessive gradients this effect can be significant and should be examined. Pt.43 -6. During the construction of the 400 kV line through the formidable Zagros mountains in Central Iran. where conditions were so severe that the use of helicopters became the only means of access.F.F..39 0. pp. and SIMPSON. and TARR.00 25. then. Elect. 1959.92 212. Normally.90 203. each being determined by the relative conditions of each section encountered.60 0.20 4. 1960) 3 WINKELMAN. Inst. an accurate method of span-to-span analysis has been developed.40 0.