## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

**J. Bradbury, Dip. Tech. (Eng.), G.F. Kuska, C. Eng., M.I.E.E., and D.J. Tarr
**

Indexing terms: Cables and overhead lines, Power transmission Abstract: While normal sag and tension calculations based on the 'equivalent-span' concept are satisfactory, when applied to transmission lines located in a reasonably undulating terrain, the answers obtained by this method are inaccurate for mountainous terrain. An alternative method of calculation, which is based on the analysis of the change of state equation for each span of a section in turn, is given. It is shown that when using this new approach the full effect of both the suspension and tension insulators can be included together with the influence of the running-out blocks on the sag of the conductor. The paper also shows how this concept can be adapted to the function of line design and gives several examples of critical areas where existing methods may give unacceptable results. When stringing conductors in mountainous terrain, it is not always practical to measure the conductor sag using conventional techniques and the paper gives three additional means which may be used, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each.

List of symbols

A = cross-sectional area of conductor, mm2 a,b,c,d = constants depending on sag>> C — catenary constant = H/W,m E = Young's modulus of complete conductor, kg/mm2 H = horizontal tension of conductor, kg H' = component of tension in line with AG (Fig. 2d), kg h = height difference between attachment points at adjacent towers, m ht = vertical distance from tower to instrument, m K = unstretched length of conductor in a span (i.e. length after removing the tension at 0° C), m L = chord length between adjacent towers (Fig. 1), m / = length of tension or suspension insulator set, m S = stretched length of conductor in a span, m T = total (tangential) tension in conductor, kg V = vertical load at attachment point due to conductor (uplift load denoted by negative value), kg W = conductor weight per unit length, kg/m Wh = conductor wind load per unit length (wind acting normal to conductor), kg/m Wr = resolved conductor weight per unit length in the plane (as shown in Fig. 2c), kg/m Wv = W + weight of ice per unit length, kg/m W' = resolved conductor weight per unit length in the plane (as shown in Fig. 2b), kg/m X = horizontal span length, m Xo = horizontal distance from attachment point to low point datum (Fig. 1), m Xp = horizontal distance from any point on the catenary to low point datum (Fig. 1), m x = horizontal distance from attachment point to any point on the catenary, m xt = horizontal distance from tower to instrument, m y = sag from chord line at point x on the catenary, m y0 = sag from attachment point at low point datum (Fig. yh yh ' Z = maximum value of y occurring at point X/2 (absence of tension insulators) (Fig. 1), m = maximum value of y not necessarily at point X/2 in presence of tension insulators (Fig. 4), m = transverse horizontal load at attachment point due to conductor, kg

= coefficient of thermal expansion of complete conductor, per deg C /3 = blow-out angle of conductor (Fig. 2b), degrees 7 = angle to the vertical of the suspension or tension insulator sets, degrees Ah = height difference between tower and conductor attachment points (Fig. 9), m Ax = horizontal difference corresponding to Ah, m 5 = angle between chord line and the horizontal in the unresolved plane, degrees 6 = conductor temperature, °C i// = angle between chord line and the horizontal in the resolved plane (Fig. 2d), degrees to = weight of tension or suspension insulator set, kg <t> = angle of the tangent at point F to the horizontal (Fig. 1), degrees Subscripts 1 and 2 denote different values for the same variables.

1 Introduction

a

Paper 20S4C (P8), first received 2nd November 1981 and in revised form 20th May 1982 The authors are with Balfour Beatty Power Construction Limited, Power Transmission Division, 7 Mayday Road, Thorton Heath, Surrey CR4 7XA, England IEEPROC, Vol. 129, Pt. C, No. 5, SEPTEMBER 1982

Since the advent of transmission lines, theories have been progressively developed to define the sag and tension behaviour of the conductor. Initially these were oriented towards manual calculations and, consequently, were based upon the parabolic theory (Boyse and Simpson [1]). With the introduction of computers most theories are now based upon the accurate catenary equations (Rieger [2]). In multi-span sections, it is usual to assume that the horizontal tensions will react to changes in load and temperature as a single span referred to by the well known term 'equivalent span'. The mathematical treatment to obtain the 'equivalent span' is based upon parabolic theory, and there is no similar concept using full catenary equations. While the methods give acceptable and practical results for the majority of lines constructed'in normal, reasonably undulating terrain, e.g. in the UK, in mountainous areas these theories produce significant errors. Overhead-line engineers are already aware of this problem, as illustrated by Winkelman [3], which develops the parabolic and catenary theories for application to inclined sections. Our recent experience, on applying this method to very mountainous terrain, highlighted the presence of further inaccuracies which will result in the towers and conductors experiencing loads in excess of their limiting design values. In an attempt to overcome these problems, a theory has been developed which is the subject of this paper. At the development stage it became evident that the above inaccuracies were valid for both the single- and multi-span sections. This paper was originally presented to the 2nd international conference on 'Progress in cables and overhead lines

0143-7046/82/050213 + 08 $01.50/0 213

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Downloaded on July 1, 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

1—10 the parameters H and W should be replaced by H' and Wr. it equals the length given by the catenary equation less the elastic and thermal changes. such that the chord line makes an angle \p to the line AG. if further accuracy is required. Step 3: Fig. Pt. it became evident that the elastic treatment requires lengthy computation without producing worthwhile improvements in the accuracy of the result. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. i. Downloaded on July 1. and not the inline horizontal force at the tower. This assumption causes an error of less than 0. 2 2. i.e. With respect to the former. 1 Inclined span Sign convention: Xo positive and Xp negative for the case shown. and. W' and Wv sin 5. the change-of-state equation becomes: (4) sinh C2 (5) h sinh yi A (Y) EA (10) (6) (7) 1+ 2 Csinh X 2C~ (8) Xo Fig.1 Theory Basic equations angle to the horizontal of the tangent at point F = tan" 1 ! s i n h l . 2d shows the inclined span rotated about point A. Wv cos 5 and Wv sin 5. C. 2d~). This line represents the 'horizontal' plane in which the catenary equations are valid. the inelastic catenary equations are used. i. It is therefore felt that the inelastic theory gives a tolerable accuracy.1. The method for resolving these forces is given in Fig. Xp becomes positive 214 where subscripts 1 and 2 denote two different conditions. after it has been clamped in.3] and elastic (Hattingh [5]). 2a) along the X X axis. V and Z at tower A (Fig. when calculating the elastic and thermal changes. it is assumed that the unstretched length K of the conductor at 0°C is constant. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore.e. the wind force Wh acting normal to the conductor and the vertical force Wv due to the conductor and ice weight. The forces acting are Wh.for 220 kV and above' [4] and has now been expanded to include practical examples using the methods of calculations described. 2a shows an inclined span under the influence of a wind force. The resultant force W' acting at an angle j3 to the vertical is obtained. if point F is to the left of D. thus satisfying the requirements to solve the change-of-state equation (eqn. 1 for the unknown H'2 it should be noted that this is the 'horizontal' tension in the rotated plane (Fig. inelastic [2. applicable to the solution of a catenary.01 % in the estimation of the unstretched length. two simplifications have been made related to the unstretched length of the conductor and its tension. Force Wv must be resolved along two axes normal to and parallel with the chord line. the value of K is equal to the chord length L. but. Vol. Under this condition. When the conductor is subjected to wind acting normal to it. 2c shows the inclined span rotated about axis AB through angle /3. it is first necessary to calculate the Vertical' force in the rotated IEEPROC. Consider the forces acting on the conductor element. 2 and explained below: Step 1: Fig. Considering the two theories. 2a).e. force Wr is the only force present and acts 'vertically'. The forces in the deflected plane. No. Regarding the tension.^ |} 2. 1. To utilise the above statement in the development of the change-of-state equation. 10. 2b shows a section through the element (Fig. 129. respectively. To use eqns. It is felt that this accuracy is sufficient for practical purposes. an assumption was made that. Having solved eqn. it was recognised that there are two theories. it can be improved by adopting the second-term-approximation system given in step (d) of Section 3. 1. 5. for this reason. the vertical and transverse forces present must be resolved in the deflected plane of the conductor before applying eqn. Step 4: Fig. are combined to give the resultant force Wr acting at an angle i// to the normal to the chord line. by reference to Fig. the mean total tension in the conductor length has been assumed to equal the horizontal tension.2 Change-of-state equation (9) Before detailed considerations were given to the problem. It should be noted that this equation is only valid for stillair conditions. the latter applied parallel with the chord line. To obtain the tension components H. These. are given below: LT catenary constant C = — = c/cosh^length of conductor between points A and D S = Csinh — C horizontal length Xo (D' A) Xo also Xo = Csinh" 1 — H vertical component of tension at point A V = //sinh^total tension at point A T = half-span sag yh = C |cosh—-1 ^ =— -Csinh"1 h X 2Csinh — (1) (2) (3) When considering a length of conductor suspended between two towers. Restrictions apply. Referring to Fig. . in calculating the elastic changes. 10). Step 2: Fig.

Downloaded on July 1. 5.Q=Wh c = W v sin8 d = Wwcos6 Fig. C. SEPTEMBER 1982 215 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. Vol. 129. Restrictions apply. No. 2 Resolution of forces under wind conditions a Span subjected to a wind force normal to the conductor 6 Deflection of element through section X X c Span through section Y Y d Span in resolved plane suspension insulator suspension insulator Fig. 3 Forces on suspension insulators a Conductor on running-out blocks b Conductor clamped in IEEPROC. Pt. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. .

It follows that the horizontal tensionsHx and H2 in the adjacent spans are different unless 7 equals zero. 6) and then reverse the above step-bystep procedure. Again by taking moments about Q. the angle 7 of all suspension insulators and a limit tension. No. The vertical force V is dependent on Xo and hence on Ah.e. (d) Should further accuracy in the unstretched length be required (see Section 2.0001 %). with the result that the horizontal tensions in adjacent spans may not be equal. eqn. as required by the specification. JC = —b/2a (iv) Substitute x from (iii) into eqn. the effect can be significant. 10 the procedure is as follows: (a) The vertical and transverse loads are estimated at each tower position. Vol. the maximum sag y^ (which does not necessarily occur at X/2) must be calculated.1 Starting conditions To carry out the calculations two parameters of the line must be known at a given point in time. and when it is clamped in. .4 Effect of tension insulator The length and weight of a tension insulator cause errors in sag and tension. 129. 4 216 Span with tension insulator Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. For multi-span sections these were overcome by the method outlined below: 3. However. it should be noted that eqn. Under conditions of excessive gradients the suspension insulator will swing longitudinally. it is evident that although previous theories assumed the suspension set to be always vertical this assumption is incorrect. (b) The total tension is estimated at the first tower. SEPTEMBER 1982 Fig.3 Effect of suspension insulators Two conditions must be considered.e. The solution for Ah and Kcan be achieved by iterative technique. it follows that: on the solution of eqn. the following equation is derived: 7 = tan . the total unstretched length in a section is constant. For this reason Fig. 10 and are ignored. the following equations apply: tan 3 also / = VA/J2 + Ax2 7 H V + co/2 Ax Ah (13) (14) T = \IH\ + v\ = \ltii + v\ (11) Taking moments about point Q. because no conductor movement occurs at the clamp. the tension equations presented some difficulties. i. 2. i. particularly in EHV downleads. particularly in mountainous terrain. As far as the error in sag is concerned. the left-hand side of eqn. These must. In this respect. Consequently. 15 thus obtaining ^ 3 Application of theory by computer programming For the purpose of tower design. 2. 3a which shows the conductor mounted immediately below the suspension insulator. namely. Obviously. 3b shows the suspension insulator at an angle 7 to the vertical. Pt. 4. Considering this condition. Downloaded on July 1. Assuming the block to be frictionless. Restrictions apply. reflect the geometry of the line. when the conductor is on running out blocks. an overhead line contractor requires data resulting from a large number of sag and tension calculations. using the value of the chord length for the unstretched length. the 'equivalent span' concept is not valid. For calculating the left-hand side of eqn.3. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. 8 no longer applies.1 Conductor on running-out blocks: Consider Fig. 10 can be recalculated using the value for the unstretched length found under step (c) above. 5. because the verticality depends upon the geometry of the section and the temperature. 12 can be derived. To provide the necessary sagging information during stringing. 2.3. While the programming of the sag equations was straightforward. (c) The left-hand side of eqn. as the block is free to rotate thus permitting conductor movement between spans.l H2 — (12) Furthermore. The solution to the problem lies in the evaluation of the elastic and thermal effects in the conductor in each individual span. with regard to tension. Without the aid of a computer program it is not practical to undertake these calculations. The assumed tension values relate to a limit in the horizontal or total component. C. the unstretched length in individual spans is not constant.2). Normally the suspension insulators are assumed to be vertical at the expected stringing temperature. (This improves the accuracy in calculating the unstretched length to better than 0. By reference to Fig. 10 is evaluated for the first span in the section. and a practical approach is given below: (i) Calculate y for three different values of* (ii) Solve y = ax2 + bx + c (15) (iii) Calculate JC for maximum sag. (e) Steps (c) and (d) are repeated for all spans in the section IEEPROC. span-byspan analysis. the unstretched length in individual spans remains constant.2 Conductor clamped in: Once the conductor is clamped in.plane at point A (eqn. 2. profiling and stringing. the reduction in span length X and the slight variation in height difference h have only a marginal influence The horizontal tension H is known from the change-of-state equation and the insulator weight co given.

convergence on the position of the conductor attachment point at the last tower is obtained. 4 Application of theory to practical line situations adopt more than one sag and tension method for its construction. Hence. to ensure that the MWT is not exceeded. 129. if conventional suspension insulators are used. 5. Downloaded on July 1. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. mentioned in this paper. unlike multi-spans. of the suspension insulator.e. even though. for safely overcoming the inadequacies of conventional sag and tension calculations. the following empirical conditions have been developed. 3. With some line constructions. Fig. 5. where even with level span sections. The conventional UK practice for sag and tension calculations for this conductor is to employ a maximum horizontal tension of 5505 kg. changed to accommodate any variation in the chord length. if any. This occurs at the highest point of attachment of the conductor to the tower. The procedure adopted is as follows: (a) Using the equivalent-span technique the horizontal. the horizontal tension is changed according to eqn. the difference between conventional methods and the one proposed gradually increases.18mm ACSR) strung to typical UK loading conditions. to ensure that the tension on a 366 m span does not exceed 2651 kg under still-air conditions anywhere in the span 217 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. number 1355. It is therefore necessary to have available a method of assessing these critical situations. isolated mountainous sections may be present where the method from this paper must be considered. .5 m (c) for all sections containing spans in excess of 1 km. 5 illustrates this reduction in horizontal tension against span gradient.3 % between the theories. there is a small difference of approximately 0. one method is selected and used throughout the line. (d) By reiteration of steps (b) and (c). limited investigations have shown that conventional theories will underestimate the maximum tension and sag by up to about 20%. Thus. for a condition other than the starting condition.1 Variation of tensions with span gradients In most specifications.15 (b) if the conventional sag and tension using the modifications given by Winkelman [3] give an offset in excess of 0. in cases of excessive gradients. 3. it is apparent that in critical situations there is a need for more accurate sag and tension techniques. 10) are ruled by the horizontal tensions. Under extreme circumstances. e.g. which is as follows: (c) A summation of the values for the right-hand side of eqn. to determine the sections in which the more rigorous treatment given in this paper should be considered: (a) if the span gradient for any span within the section exceeds 0. Restrictions apply.2 defines the minimum factor of safety for total (tangential) tensions of the conductors as 2. at an early stage. (c) The right-hand side of eqn. Pt. These examples relate to a 'Zebra' conductor (54/7/3. This effect is included in the present theory. a number of examples are given below. when the conventional method is selected. where conventional techniques may be ideal.12 for calculation of the horizontal tension in succeeding spans. This is due to the fact that under wind conditions. cannot be normally justified in view of the additional data required. When considering successive spans. causing an increase in the chord length between the fixing points.2 or if the average span gradient within the section exceeds 0. the bottom of the suspension insulator will move in the transverse direction. when considering a complete line. the tension used in eqn. 10 should be reduced as the span gradient is increased. (b) The total tension is estimated at the first tower. it is not ideal to IEEPROC. i. hence. for tower-design purpose. This may be required when dealing with very long sections (g) use as a general-purpose design aid for the evaluation of sags and tensions leading to rapid solution of field problems In order that a better understanding of this theory can be obtained. This.2 with the exception of step (c). using eqn. 10 is made. Vol. of all loads imposed by the conductors and earthwires (b) the design and selection of profile-plotting templates which reflect the effect of gradients (c) the investigation of tower loads in cases where a combination of long and short spans may result in unacceptable out-of-balance longitudinal and vertical loads (d) an accurate determination of sags and tensions in circumstances where the route topography imposes a severe limitation on tower locations. SEPTEMBER 1982 Following the development of the program. can lead to critical ground-clearance problems (e) the production of sags and tension data for field use. however. and use of the method described above. Computer runs have shown that for normal level singlespan sections there is no difference between conventional methods and the one now proposed. C. In the UK external loads and factors of safety related to transmission lines are governed by the Statutory Instruments 1970. In mountainous terrain the output refers to two stringing conditions: (i) when the conductor in a section is located on running-out blocks (ii) when the conductor in a section is clamped in (f) the evaluation of suspension-insulator longitudinalswing and out-of-balance tensions. No. 10 is evaluated for each span and angle 7 of the suspension insulator. 11. The difference between these two figures is more than sufficient to account for any increases in tension due to the nature of the terrain in the UK. it has been found increasingly useful in connection with studies and calculations relevant to the following design activities: (a) the determination. Naturally. Tension calculations (eqn. 5 Practical application to line design Conventional sag and tension methods are satisfactory for the majority of situations. isolated sections may be found which slightly exceed the limits given above. river crossings (d) if aircraft warning spheres are fitted (e) if for some reason one or more suspension sets are not designed to be vertical at the time of clamping. For the 'Zebra' conductor this corresponds to a tension of 6722 kg. As conditions on the line change from a level span.0. see below. but ignored in conventional techniques. does not constitute a criticism of UK practice which employs a special technique.3 Condition when conductor is on running-out blocks This refers to the conductor being free to move and the procedure adopted is the same as under Section 3. This Section. vertical and transverse tensions are estimated at each tower. 10. Before considering the next span the horizontal tension is altered according to eqn 12. As guidelines. the maximum working tension (MWT) in the conductors refers to the maximum tension anywhere in the conductor's length. Clause 9.taking into account the angle 7.2 Condition when conductor is clamped in This refers to the evaluation of the right-hand side of eqn.

usually having the highest span gradient (b) Any template is offered to this span and the weight span at the highest tower read off the template (c) The weight span is checked against Fig.1 100? c \ \ •- c si a. These form effective masses at discrete points of the line. 6. Fig. 129.0 0. Downloaded on July 1. at maximum operating temperature. and the longitudinal out-of-balance forces shown are calculated at 75° C in still air. because the sag of the earthwire should be equal or less than the sag of the conductor from electrical considerations. The straight line given in the Figure represents the level single-span condition. 6 equivalent span. 7 shows that if this set is made too short. Restrictions apply. longitudinal loads of a magnitude H2 — Hi are transmitted to the suspension towers.4 0. 7 sets. However. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. the transmitted force is normally very small. from which template selection is made . 6. C. that template selection is a function of equivalent span length and span gradient. because the templates are based on horizontal tensions. 6 is obtained by determining the number of templates. therefore. this graph is used in the following manner: (a) The worst span in a section is visually selected. 12 shows. a second and far more important effect can arise with some designs.8 I 0. causing a discontinuity in eqn.mSketch of template selection graph 30- 3400 Fig. so that the sag remains the same as a conductor without such a mass.1 cause further complications during the profile plotting stage. This results in the tension of the earthwire being increased.2 : 0. 2 at the point of their application. located in the vicinity of aircraft flight paths. "U 0 2000 o <D "o Fig. The magnitude of this force is influenced by the length of the insulator string or earthwire set. When considering additional masses under MWT conditions. In practice.6 0. 6 can be drawn by plotting the lines corresponding to the horizontal tension chosen for the templates.4 >. to be used during plotting. 10 should be reduced to 2454 kg.6 0. in which the increase in tension has been calculated to accomodate a single-centre span mass.4%. Pt.0. This problem has been solved by introducing a graph.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 horizontal tension applied to earthwire peak at suspension tower. Fig.3 Transverse loads on suspension earth wire peaks 3200 3000 10 2800 0 20 40 60 80 weight of central mass. Fig. 5 Horizontal tension on a 366 m span to ensure conductor's tension should not exceed 2651 kg 5. In the case of insulator sets. this may give rise to high longitudinal loads at the tower. it is necessary to install aircraft warning spheres on the earthwires. kg 100 As eqn. placed on a 366 m level span. from the specified limiting conditions for a number of spans and span gradients. kg 2600 thwi ength & 0. . a fact often ignored when conventional sag and tension equations are used. This shows.2 Profile plotting The problems mentioned in Section 5. 8 shows a simplified example of this. owing to their length. This Figure was constructed assuming a level two-span section having 150 and 500 m span lengths. this figure shows the specified tension should be reduced by 0. a reduction of 7.5 . It follows. Even on level spans. From this data. and tensions for each template. 8 Increase in tension to accommodate a centre span mass without increasing sag IEEPROC. hence. below which the graph is indeterminate. the suspension insulator is not normally 218 Fig.7%. there has been a tendency to reduce the length of the earthwire set which connects the earthwire to the tower. No. 5. £ 1. 5. Fig.4 j | Loads applied to the suspension tower Effect of masses on conductors On some lines. While the effect of this is mainly on the sag calculations. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore. 0. and the correct template selected for use in final plotting 5. Fig. considering a span having a difference in height between the conductor attachment points of 100 m that the tension in eqn. Vol. a o "50 £ ^ \ 2200 2400 horizontal tension.length. Fig. The program is run to predict the horizontal tension. >v \ specified maximum tension \ n200 150g E c vertical and. It was further assumed the set is vertical when under wind conditions. in recent years.3 o in 0.

having fixed its location. 6 Sag measuring techniques 6. the selected earthwire must be sufficiently strong. 9a. its application is limited to cases having a low-point datum. It requires care in accurate location of the theodolite. 6. but limited to cases when yh' is less than the tower heights. 9b.g. 6. 6. 129. Each has its limitations.1 Conventional method Fig. For reason of accuracy and site calculation this method is to be avoided if possible. The field application is straightforward. . 9 Method of sag measurement a Conventional b Modified conventional c Low-point datum d Tangent IEEPROC. If the variation is small the method may be unsuitable. 9d illustrates the case where the location of the theodolite is defined by limited access. theodolite or dumpy level.3 Low-point method With this method (Fig. In application. To provide field staff with alternatives. 6.1. To accommodate this additional tension caused by fitting spheres. an accurate sagging method can be achieved by the use of a load cell prior to conductor marking and the installation of tension insulator. but the selection of the appropriate method will be dictated by site circumstances. 5. and is made by the stringing engineer. Restrictions apply. e.5 Tension method By reference to Fig. 6.4 Tangent method When stringing conductors in mountainous terrain it is not always possible or desirable to use the conventional sagging technique. Pt. it is seen that this method applies to conditions when the gun sight and the sighting board cannot be located on the tower. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore.the effect of the weight of ice load and extra wind load on the added masses. the stringing engineer. four further methods have been developed. Its accuracy will decease with small spans. while still maintaining the required factors of safety. and the accuracy achieved is dependent upon the variation of y0 with changes in temperature.2 Modified conventional method The difficulty in using this method lies in the reiterative calculation for 0 and the accuracy with which it has to be measured. This technique lends itself to situations where compression deadends are made aloft. together with their weight. 9c). Downloaded on July 1. Vol. the instrument. When considering short span sections. is located at a distance y0 below the conductor attachment point. Obviously. No. and has the same limitations as in Section 6. C. SEPTEMBER 1982 219 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. which can prove to be an uneconomical solution. Failure to achieve this can result in a situation in which the sag of the earthwire dictates the main conductor sags. is required to make use of the following equations: (16) where d = C In (tan 0 + sec 0) (17) This is illustrated in Fig.6 Stringing tables It is not possible to provide site staff with sufficient information in conventional sag-chart form to string conductors using sighting board Fig. must also be included in the tension calculations. where the gun sight and the sighting board are fixed to the towers at a distance yh> below the conductor attachment points.

Publ.00 3.30 all five methods given above. where the tangential tension is measured by a load cell.43 -6. and the Directors of Balfour Beatty Limited for permission to publish this paper. proved extremely effective.G.J.20 4. Amer. the use of the tension method. Downloaded on July 1.51 0. The authors acknowledge the help of their colleagues in the preparation of this work.00 25.: 'Sag and tension calculations in mountainous terrain'. KUSKA.12 4. Restrictions apply..36 16. where conditions were so severe that the use of helicopters became the only means of access. The program provides computerprintout tables. consideration need not be given to the out-of-balance loads due to the longitudinal swing of the suspension insulator.F. where the conventional method of sagging is either impossible or impracticable. and SIMPSON. Normally.00 15.. and wish to thank the General Manager of the Power Transmission Division.64 3. as detailed under Section 6. J.46 0.F. However.90 203.52 0.00 35. II.14 1. H. 8 Acknowledgments To satisfy the statutory ground clearance requirements.T.: 'Der Freileitungsbau' (Springer Verlag.00 20. Vol. Ill B pp. Pt. then. illustrated in Table 1. 1936) 220 IEEPROC.40 0. Inst.93 200.42 16. J. where existing techniques may result in noticeable errors. 1-5 5 HATTINGH. 219-238 2 RIEGER..00 30.. 1960) 3 WINKELMAN. 2009 at 09:11 from IEEE Xplore.: 'Sag-tension computations and field measurements of Bonneville Power Administration'. Pt.42 0.00 10. G.13 -10. During the construction of the 400 kV line through the formidable Zagros mountains in Central Iran.05 216. IEE Conf. and to ensure that the specified factors of safety of the line are maintained. 176. Elect.39 0. Pt.96 4. in long multi-span sections with excessive gradients this effect can be significant and should be examined.40 16. it was necessary to apply the full range of methods.32 16. N.11 -2.32 3.86 -20. . 1979. 5. 91. pp.29 16. which has an added advantage over conventional sag-chart owing to ease of reading rather than interpolation of graphs. and TARR.92 212.30 16.26 -15.22 207. D. 1959. IEE. 9 References 1 BOYSE. 1944. 1532-1547 4 BRADBURY. pp.39 0.: 'A universal stress-sag chart (for line computations)' (Blackie & Sons.48 3. 7 Conclusions In many instances. alternative methods must be available to the site organisation.74 227. 129. No. CO. P.: 'The problem of conductor sagging on overhead transmission lines'. Trans.Table 1 : Typical stringing table obtained from computer Temperature Horizontal load kg 2400 2290 2189 2096 2011 1933 1862 1796 Total tension high tower low tower number number kg kg 2400 2290 2189 2097 2012 1934 1862 1796 2422 2312 2211 2118 2033 1955 1883 1817 Half span sag m low tower number Y X m m high X m 233. 78.60 0. This is of particular importance in mountainous terrain. Engrs. an accurate method of span-to-span analysis has been developed. C.44 -31.28 tower number Y m °C 0.95 -25.00 5. SEPTEMBER 1982 Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO. In mountainous terrain. Balfour Beatty Power Construction Limited.29 16.65 222. in reasonable terrain.80 3.50 16. each being determined by the relative conditions of each section encountered. J..

- Conductor Sag & Tension
- Sag & Tension Calculation
- 800 kV TL Design
- Sag.and.Tension.calculations.refinements.and.Enhancements.made.by.trimble
- Distribution Conductor Stringing
- How to Calculate Catenary
- Calculation of Sag
- Handbook on Overhead Line Construction
- 400KV 34.5MTRS Sag Tension Calculation
- SAG10 Manual
- Sag & Tension
- A Method for the Sag-tension Calculation in Electrical Overhead Lines
- Sag Calculation
- IEEETPCTutorial Sag TensionCalcs
- 2.SAG Conductor
- 400KV TL History
- MECHANICAL DESIGN of TRANSMISSION LINE
- Sag & Tension
- Transmission line design & construction
- 16 II.6 Stringing
- DR09051-DR09051
- Chipman TransmissionLines Text
- MANUAL ON TRANSMISSION LINE TOWERS
- Transmission line specs 115-230 kV
- How to Determine the Sag in Transmission Lines
- Sag-Tension Calculation IEEE Std 605 2008
- Aluminium Conductor Sag & Tension Calculator
- Transmission Line Loading Design Criteria
- Construction Manual for Transmission Lines

- Material Description
- Water Power News-01.10.15
- 7161Mech-7
- Radial Gate Design Procedure
- New Microsoft Excel Worksheet
- Measurement of Luminous Intensity.doc
- Qwerty
- Intake stoplog
- ८०-प्रतिशत-ऋण-सापटी-लिने-फारम
- Eco Sport
- Design Code Lists
- Ultrasonic-test-inspection-Free-NDT-sample-procedure.pdf
- External Loads
- Mobile Secret Keys
- Welding Details
- S-10016.G
- 16 - Moment Distribution
- 3- Section of v-Francis
- Critical Bucking Eqn.pdf
- Chapter 2 _ Pelton Turbine _ Fluid Machinery
- Terratec RBM Brochure
- Hy Andritz Hydro Image En
- JFE Brochure
- HVOF Coatings for Turbine
- Trashrack Manuals
- The_ant_story (Management Analysis )
- Beam Design Formulas With Shear & Bending Diagrams
- LT0189
- Moment calculations for frames Used in Radial Gates
- 61965879-54815763-Shaft-Alignment-Manual

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading