Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ExampIes
%5 /03
Non CDFA
ILS ,43
CAT II /43
MAPt RBA
RBA
Non CDFA
TCH 51 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 nm
2100
1360
LDA 2130x40
6988x131ft
P 3.25 (55)
CircIing
(399)
1100m
560
(502)
1.6km
690
(722)
2.4km
910
(792)
3.6km
980
C
D
B
ACFT NDB
%
5
/
0
3
042
2m
in
194
CircIing
450m
115 (200)
450m
230 (200)
550m
230 (359)
900m
380
(667)
1.6km
750
(767)
2.4km
850
(767)
3.6km
850
C
D
B
ACFT CAT II /43 ILS ,43 ILS LLZ+DME
%
5
/
0
3
LDA 2400x45
7874x148ft
P 3 (50)
F
A
L
S
ABC ALT
11.2
9
7
5
4
3
2
3500
2790
2150
1510
1190
870
550
1.5 380
DME 3
a
Terms used in EU OPS Subpart E
CircIing. The visual phase of an instrument approach to bring an aircraft into position for landing on a runway which is not
suitably located for a straight-in approach.
Low VisibiIity Procedures (LVP). Procedures applied at an aerodrome for the purpose of ensuring safe operations during
Lower than Standard Category , Other than Standard Category , Category and approaches and Low Visibility Take-
Offs.
Low VisibiIity Take-Off (LVTO). A take-off where the Runway Visual Range (RVR) is less than 400m.
FIight controI system. A system which includes an automatic landing system and/or a hybrid landing system.
FaiI-Passive ight controI system. A fight control system is fail-passive if, in the event of a failure, there is no signifcant
out-of-trim condition or deviation of fight path or attitude but the landing is not completed automatically. For a fail-passive
automatic fight control system the pilot assumes control of the aeroplane after a failure.
FaiI-OperationaI ight controI system. A fight control system is fail-operational if, in the event of a failure below alert
height, the approach, fare and landing, can be completed automatically. n the event of a failure, the automatic landing
system will operate as a fail-passive system.
FaiI-operationaI hybrid Ianding system. A system which consists of a primary fail-passive automatic landing system and
a secondary independent guidance system enabling the pilot to complete a landing manually after failure of the primary
system.
VisuaI approach. An approach when either part or all of an instrument approach procedure is not completed and the ap-
proach is executed with visual reference to the terrain.
Continuous Descent FinaI Approach (CDFA). A specifc technique for fying the fnal-approach segment of a non-preci-
sion instrument approach procedure as a continuous descent, without level-off, from an altitude/height at or above the Final
Approach Fix altitude/height to a point approximately 15m (50ft) above the landing runway threshold or the point where the
fare manoeuvre should begin for the type of aeroplane fown.
StabiIised Approach (SAp). An approach which is fown in a controlled and appropriate manner in terms of confguration,
energy and control of the fight path from a pre-determined point or altitude/height down to a point 50 feet above the thresh-
old or the point where the fare manoeuvre is initiated if higher.
Head-Up DispIay (HUD). A display system which presents fight information into the pilot`s forward external feld of view
and which does not signifcantly restrict the external view.
Head-Up Guidance Landing System (HUDLS). The total airborne system which provides head-up guidance to the pilot
during the approach and landing and/or go-around. t includes all sensors, computers, power supplies, indications and
controls. A HUDLS is typically used for primary approach guidance to decision heights of 50ft.
Hybrid Head-Up DispIay Landing System (Hybrid HUDLS). A system which consists of a primary fail-passive automatic
landing system and a secondary independent HUD/HUDLS enabling the pilot to complete a landing manually after failure of
the primary system.
Note:Typically, the secondary independent HUD/HUDLS provides guidance which normally takes
the form of command information, but it may alternatively be situation (or deviation) information.
Enhanced Vision System (EVS). An electronic means of displaying a real-time image of the external scene through the
use of imaging sensors.
Converted MeteoroIogicaI VisibiIity (CMV). A value (equivalent to an RVR) which is derived from the reported meteoro-
logical visibility, as converted in accordance with the requirements in this subpart.
Lower than Standard Category I Operation. A Category nstrument Approach and Landing Operation using Category
DH, with an RVR lower than would normally be associated with the applicable DH.
Other than Standard Category II Operation. A Category nstrument Approach and Landing Operation to a runway
where some or all of the elements of the CAO Annex 14 Precision Approach Category lighting system are not available.
GNSS Landing System (GLS). An approach operation using augmented GNSS information to provide guidance to the
aircraft based on its lateral and vertical GNSS position (it uses geometric altitude reference for its fnal approach slope).
Approach Iight abbreviations.
FALS (Full Approach Light System) CAO: Precision pproach CAT Lighting System ( HALS 720m or more).
Distance coded centerline, Barrette centerline.
IALS (ntermediate Approach Light System) CAO: Simplifed Approach Lighting System (HALS 420-719m).
Single Source, Barrette.
BALS (Basic Approach Light System) Any other Approach Lighting System (HALS, MALS or ALS 210-419m).
NALS (No Approach Light System) Any other Approach Lighting System (HALS, MALS or ALS less than 210m)
or No Approach Lights.