TRANSLATION PROBLEMS

Brie Laura Mihaela LMA, AN II, EN-FR

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction In my research for this paper, I used mostly the internet, but also the ideas written during the course and some of the books included in the bibliography for the course. In this paper, with the help of the theoretical aspects read during my research, I will try to give some examples for each of the translation problems explained by Nord. I will also try to offer, as much as possible, my own translations for the examples. When dealing with a translation, one of the processes included in the work is the analysis of the ST. This analysis, called TOSTA (Translation Oriented Source Text Analysis), helps us discover the function of the text, the target readers (with different levels of knowledge and different ages), as well as ST elements that need to be preserved or adapted in translation (Nord 1991: 21). In addition to these extratextual and intratextual elements that Christiane Nord speaks about, the analysis helps us identify possible translation problems and develop a translation strategy to be able to solve these problems. According to Christiane Nord, there are four problems in translation. These problems require specific transfer strategies; that is why they are considered the starting point in the translation process and, consequently, have to be identified before we start working. The four problems referred to in Nords Text Analysis in Translation are: pragmatic, linguistic, cultural and text-specific. Pragmatic problems As described by Nord, they refer to the fact that there may be differences between the situations in the source culture and the target culture. These differences include time, place, etc. The receivers lack of orientation may give birth to this kind of problems, as well as text function. These are always present in the translation task, no matter the direction of the translation process or the languages involved. In order to identify potential pragmatic problems, we need to check the extratextual factors, for each text (the profile and intention of the text producer, the target reader, the medium of communication, places and time of production and reception of the text). In the following example, the translation of the sentence depends on the communicative intention of the speaker:
(1) Can you change the settings for the AVG antivirus update manager?

When hearing this, we cannot know what sort of action is intended by the speaker. Is it a request for action? Or is it a request for information? This might make a difference to the translation. I find myself in a difficult situation. How do we translate it?
Poi s schimbi setrile de actualizare ale antivirusului AVG? (request for action)

Se pot schimba setrile de actualizare ale antivirusului AVG? (request for information) The next example is taken from a book, Pour la rforme de la fiscalit, written by Maurice Allais (1990: 19).
(2) Si la dcentralisation des decisions est considre, comme cest gnralement le

cas en Occident, et de plus en plus dans les pays communistes, comme une condition majeure defficacit, vouloir assurer par des messures fiscales lefficacit de lconomie revient en ralit mettre en application par une voie dtourne une planification centralise incompatible avec cette dcentralisation.1 (I underlined the problem)

At first sight, one might say that there is no problem here. But we have to take into account that the book was written in 1990, and in 2008 communist countries no longer exist. Therefore, we have to find a way to translate this phrase, so that the reader gets the correct information. This is what I suggest:
Dac, aa cum se ntmpla n Occident, i apoi tot mai mult n rile comuniste din acea perioad, descentralizarea deciziilor era considerat o condiie major a eficienei, dorina de a asigura eficiena economic prin msuri fiscale s-a redus de fapt la punerea n aplicare, pe o cale ocolit, a unei planificri centralizate, incompatibil cu aceast descentralizare.

In the following example, they speak about the meeting of the main political parties to discuss about means to adopt a reform that would lead to changing the voting system. The problem is that they dont mention what parties, or where they come from. They could be different parties from different countries.
(3) Cum doresc partidele s reformeze sistemul de vot? Care este miza referendumului

din 25 noiembrie i care vor fi efectele asupra scrutinului europarlamentar? Liderii principalelor partide sunt invitai s disece subiectul. (http://www.comunicatedepresa.ro/Uninominal_contra_uninominal~MzE3NDA)

If we take into account the decentralization of decisions, as it is the case in the West, and more and more in the communist countries as a fundamental condition for efficiency, assuring the economic efficiency by fiscal measures means, in fact, to apply a centralized plan in an indirect way, which is incompatible with this decentralization. (my translation)

When we have to translate this text for someone in Great Britain, for example, we should add some information.
How do political parties in Romania want to improve the voting system? What are the stakes of the referendum that took place on the 25th of November and which will be its effect on the European parliamentary scrutiny? The leaders of the main Romanian parties are invited to debate on the subject. (I underlined what I added)

What I added to the translated text does not change its message in any way, or its effect on the reader. It simply informs where the event will happen and who will take part in it. Linguistic problems They arise from differences of structure in the vocabulary and syntax of the SL and TL. Some of these problems may be caused by the so called false friends or by situations of one-tomany or one-to-zero equivalence, according to Christiane Nord. These problems can also be caused by lack of grammar knowledge in the SL or the TL. We must keep in mind that according to the domain to which the ST belongs, our translation may require different tenses, or has different grammar rules or syntax. Linguistic problems may appear also when we are translating texts from specific domains, especially technical. Obviously, it is almost sure that we do not have enough knowledge therefore, we will use a dictionary. The problem springs out when we see that one word in the SL may have more than one meaning in the TL and they all seem to be the same. Or, it might be even worse, if we do not have advanced dictionaries, as we might find only the most commonly used translation. This might be a problem for us. Lets take a look at the following example:
(4) CAUTION: make sure the Safety Bolt (S) is tight. A loose Safety bolt will result in an unstable installation which may result in property damage and/or personal injury. (this example is taken from an instruction manual to help users install a flat TV on their wall: http://www.sanus.com/pdf/manualEN/6901-100044.pdf, p. 5)

As I looked up the word bolt in a general dictionary, this is what I found out: bulon, urub. But, when I looked it up in a technical dictionary, I found these: pivot, piron, broasc, lact, dorn, ax, plint, urub, zvor, bol, bulon. For my sentence, I thought one of these was the one I was looking for: pivot, dorn, plint, urub, bol, bulon. Because all these seem quite the same to me, I had to look in a Romanian dictionary, to see the difference between them. After the research I reached the conclusion that:

pivot = fus n form cilindric/conic ce se rotete ntr-un lagr la care sarcina acioneaz n direcia axului

dorn = unealt de forma unei tije cilindrice sau conice, avnd rolul de a prinde, de a degaja, de a deplasa o pies

urub = tij cilindric de oel sau lemn, cu filet, care ajut la asamblarea a dou sau mai multor piese

bol = pies de legtur ntre un piston i o biel bulon = tij cilindric, cu sau fr cap, prevzut cu filet, care servete la asamblarea a dou piese

were not the words I needed. But plint (= cui de siguran) was the one.
ATENIE: asigurai-v c ai bine nfiletat cuiul de siguran (S). Dac nu este strns, instalaia va fi instabil i ar putea produce stricciuni i/sau provoca rni.

We may have linguistic problems due to the different structures of the SL, compared to the TL. For example:
(5) Le moment arriv je serais prte2. When the time comes, I shall be ready.

Another example would be:

(6) Young people like this music.

To translate this sentence into French, for example, we have to make some changes, in accordance with the French grammatical structure, if we want to use a verb equivalent to like:
Cette musique plat aux jeunes3.

If we use the same structure, we have to use another verb, aimer = to love, and it is not the same in meaning as to like. The next example is taken from Evenimentul Zilei, no. 5055 published on the 22nd of October 2007 (http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=327569 )
(7) Oricum era ceva inofensiv i chiar avea toate motivele s fie nervos. Era o chestiune de producie pe care, mpreun cu colegii, nu o tratasem aa cum trebuie. (I underlined)

2 3

Cnd va veni momentul, voi fi pregtit. Muzica aceasta place tinerilor.

In any case, it was something harmless, and he really did have reasons to be angry. It was a matter of production, which I and my colleagues hadnt dealt with in the best way.

Someone who doesnt know that the word nervos in this context must be translated by angry, will certainly use the word nervous, which has a completely different meaning. Cultural problems According to Nord, are the result of the differences in norms and conventions that guide verbal and non-verbal behavior in the two cultures involved, as every culture has its own habits and conventions. The first example is taken from a recipe book, Buctrie englezeasc& irlandez, galez, scoian.
(8) Se cur varza i se spal bine n ap cu sare, apoi se scurge. Se fierbe ntr-o oal

mare cu ap srat pn cnd este bine fiart.

When translating this phrase in English, we must remember (or search for!) rules / conventions in writing recipes:
Wash the cabbage in salted water, then drain it. Boil the cabbage in a big pot with salted water, until it is well done. (my translation)

I had a translation about traditional costumes in Romania. Fortunately, the SL was English and the TL was Romanian, and this helped me a lot, because I know a lot more about Romanian traditions and costumes than about English ones. The text was very easy to translate also because it had pictures for each costume, and I even had the Romanian name in brackets:
(9) Lambskin vest (Pieptar) warn over the shirt, consisting of two forms: closed in the

front (with a black background and red feathers), and open in the front (with buttons and flowers in the front, white background with large silken tassels).

If I had to translate in the other direction (Romanian as SL and English as TL) it would have been a bit more difficult. Text-specific problems They are the ones that can not be included in any of the other three categories. They refer to specific situations of communication that are unique and depend on a certain context. The first example is from Dicionar de proverbe Romn-Englez, by Virgil Lefter (1978: 79)
(10) Nici o boal nu-i mai rea, ca dorul i dragostea.

He translates it as follows:
No herb will cure love.

Obviously, he found himself in the situation to translate dor which has no equivalent in other languages. And there are many examples in Ion Creangs books.
(11) dac Iar stenii duc pe lene la locul cuvenit i-i fac felul. i iaca aa au scpat i leneul le d mna i-i ine cureaua. (Povestea
4

acela de steni, i stenii aceia de dnsul. Mai pofteasc de-acum i ali lenei n satul acela, unui om lene, http://www.neamt.ro/cmj/Creanga/Povestea_lenesului.html )

Creangs texts are indeed very difficult to translate, but not impossible. Here is my translation for the text above; I had to admit it was quite a challenge.
And the peasants take the lazy man to the place he deserves and do away with him. And this is how they got rid of the lazy man and how the lazy man got rid of them. Other lazy people are welcomed to that village, if they can put up with the situation.

Conclusion After these few pages of short research, I can really see now why theory is good in translation and why it is necessary to discover the problems in translations and how I can deal with them. Being still a student and that means I dont have much experience at the moment, I found it difficult to find examples for these problems. I am sure that after years of experience I will find it easier to think of texts and examples for all kinds of situations.

Text reprodus dup volumul Ion Creang, Poveti i povestiri, 1987, Bucureti, Editura Minerva

Bibliography: 1. Nord, C (1991) Text Analysis in Translation. Theory. Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation Oriented Text Analaysis: Amsterdamer Publikationen zur Sprache & Literatur, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Ga.: Rodopi 2. Allais, M. (1990) Pour la rforme de la fiscalit, ??? 3. Lefter, Virgil (1978) Dicionar de proverbe roman-englez, Bucureti, EDP
4. http://www.comunicatedepresa.ro/Uninominal_contra_uninominal~MzE3NDA 5. http://www.sanus.com/pdf/manualEN/6901-100044.pdf

6. http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=327569
7. http://www.neamt.ro/cmj/Creanga/Povestea_lenesului.html

8. http://www.dictionarenglezroman.ro/ 9. Cincu, C; Cisma, I; Croitoru, M. (2004) Dicionar tehnic englez-romn, Bucureti, editura Tehnic