Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hun Nomad Horse Archer - Horse and Hun Rider taking a break. Note slung bow & straight sword
much like the Mongol Tribes and Clans 1000 years later. Amongst these Sarmatian tribes were also the Saccae (the former Greek name for the Scythians), Roxolani, Iazyges, Siraces, Aorsi and the Alani. These were all related peoples and were of similar culture and ethnicity. These tribes shared Central Europe with the ever-present Gothic Tribes (who would later divide into Visi-Goths in the West and Ostro-Goths in the East) and a plethora of Slavic and Celtic tribes that lingered in these central European lands loosely or occasionally held by the Roman Empire. Ultimately by the 4th Century AD they were about to be over-run by a fierce, nomadic warrior tribe who shared neither culture nor ethnicity - but had in all probability at one time shared their former homelands of the Central Steppes. These were the Huns. They were undoubtedly of East Asian origin - and thus a different cultural and ethnic make-up than the more Indo-Iranic nomadic tribes occupying Pannonia.
As they were later described, The Scourge of God would sweep out of the East in an unholy whirlwind of violence and destruction and completely overwhelm most of the nomadic peoples occupying Pannonia; ultimately either destroying or allying with these tribes to further their conquests - which reached everfurther Westwards and Southwards towards Rome and Byzantium. Although it would be the sacking of Rome by Gothic tribes that would bring about the final destruction of the Western Roman Empire, the Huns would provide critical deathblows between the infamous sackings (first by the Visigoths in 410AD and secondly by the Vandals 455AD). Despite conquering or allying a number of Sarmatian tribes, in the end, the Huns were repulsed by a mixture of diplomacy, trickery, famine, disease and a few key defeats in battle by the Romans - the most notable being the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains (or Battle of Chlons).
Sarmatian Heavily Armoured Cavalry - these universal horseman utilised both bow & lance
the Equites Sagittarii Clibanarii - evidently heavily armored horse archers based on the heavy cavalry of contemporary Sassanid armies and possibly made up of the Sarmatian knights. The Sarmatians remained dominant until the Gothic ascendancy in the Black Sea area and then disappeared from historical record following the Hunnish destruction of the Gothic empire and subsequent invasion of Central Europe. From bases in Hungary, the Huns ruled the entire former Sarmatian territory. Their various constituents enjoyed some autonomy under Hunnish rule, fought for the Huns against a combination of Roman and Germanic troops, and went their own ways after the Battle of Chlons (except those of the Alani settled near Orlans that fought with the Roman Alliance). Goths attacked Sarmatian tribes on the north of the Danube in what is today Romania. In their efforts to halt the Gothic expansion the Sarmatians armed their slaves. After a massive Roman victory against the Goths by Constantine II (son of Emperor Constatine the Great) the Goths were repulsed. However, the local enslaved population revolted against their Sarmatian masters, pushing them beyond the Roman border. Constantine I, on whom the Sarmatians had called for help, defeated the rebels and moved the Sarmatian population back under its auspices. However it came with a price and in the Roman provinces Sarmatian combatants were enlisted in the Roman army, whilst the rest of the population was distributed throughout Thracia, Macedonia and Italy.
Nearly 300,000 refugees resulted from this conflict and subsequently the Emperor Constantine was attributed the honorific Sarmaticus Maximus. (This was the historical episode that formed the basis for the 2004 King Arthur film directed by Antoine Fuqua) THE HUNS The Huns were a group of nomadic pastoral people who, appearing from beyond the Volga, migrated into Europe AD 370 and built up an enormous empire in Europe. The Huns may have stimulated the Great Migration, a contributing factor in the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. They formed a unified empire under Attila the Hun, who died in 453; however their empire broke up the next year. Jordanes, a Goth writing in Italy in 551AD describes the Huns: A savage race ... they cut the cheeks of the males with a sword, so that before they receive the nourishment of milk they must learn to endure wounds. They are short in stature, quick in bodily movement, alert horsemen, broad shouldered, ready in the use of bow and arrow The Huns kept herds of cattle, horses, goats, and sheep. Their other sources of food consisted of wild game and the roots of wild plants. For clothes they had round caps, trousers or leggings made from goat skin, and either linen or rabbit fur tunics. In warfare they utilized the bow and javelin whose arrowheads and javelin tips were originally made from bone, but were quickly replaced
Whilst the Sarmatian tribes mostly disappeared from the annals of history, one endured into the Middle Ages. The Alans who had remained settled in the Caucasus acted as mounted mercenaries to the Byzantines before coming under the dominion of the Tartar dynasty. The Alani repulsed the Mongol hordes, and fought on the side of the Tartars against Tamburlaine - following which a large proportion of their nation was massacred. However, some survived and became the modern-day Ossetians. Those Alani that migrated westwards during the Great M igration settled in the Loire & Brittany in Gaul, Lusitania in Iberia and even North Africa - where they allied with the Visigoths. Even though the Alani were eventually assimilated, their legacy was evident from hunting dogs to horsebreeds and horsemanship in nearly all these regions (and many town names & crests still bear references to the Alani to this day.)
Hun Invaders
Supplementing their wealth by plundering and raising tribute from Roman cities to the south, the Huns maintained the loyalties of a number of tributary tribes including elements of the Gepids, Scirii, Rugians, Sarmatians, and Ostrogoths. Initially they made peace with Romans, returned to Pannonia and sought to expand eastward into Sassanid territory however they were checked by Sassanian Shah Yazdegerd I in Armenia. Seeking easier, softer, prey they turned their attentions Westward once more. After several crushing defeats the Byzantines in the East Roman empire eventually sued for peace and paid tribute to the Hun kings. For a time this placated Attila and Bleda; that is until 445 AD when Bleda was killed in a bizarre hunting accident; which was probably arranged by Attila himself. As sole ruler Attila once again rode Southwards and reached the walls of Contantinople. However he couldnt quite topple the East Empire and the Hun armies were held back by the Byzantines; who once again sued for peace and made a treaty with Attila. This time Attila rode West to attack both the Visigoths and West Roman Empire in Gaul. After much success as he pillaged and fought across Gaul and the Gothic Empire of North West Europe, Attila was finally checked at Chlons by Flavius Aetius. (see overleaf.) Whilst this was not a crushing defeat, Attila was repulsed by the Roman-Visgoth alliance and Attila headed south into Italy to strike at the core of the Roman Empire in the West ... However he was destined never to take Rome, combinations of famine, disease, and an East Roman force invading the Hun homelands, stopped Attila
north of the Po. Furious with the East Roman Empire (who were under treaty) Atilla returned to his palace in Pannonia and plotted to invade their lands in retribution. But whilst celebrating his marriage to a beautiful young Gothic princess he suffered a nosebleed and died (this has been attributed variously to a drunken stupor, nuptial over-exertion or perhaps even murder by his new, possibly unwilling, wife!) Following the death of Attila, allied forces of the Germanic peoples under the leadership of Ardaric, king of the Gepids, defeated the Hunnic forces of Ellac, the son of Attila (who had struggled with his half-brothers Irnik and Dengizich for supremacy after Attilas death). Ardaric eventually killed Ellac in single combat and Hunnic dominance in Central and Eastern Europe was broken as a result. The handful of Hunnic forces left were expelled by Ardaric - fleeing Eastwards and back to the lands that they had originally left. After the disintegration of the Hun Empire, they never regained their lost glory. Once disorganized, the Huns were absorbed by more organized polities. One reason was that the Huns never fully established the mechanisms of state, such as bureaucracy and taxes, unlike the Bulgars, Magyars or Mongol Khanates. Like the Avars after them, once the Hun political unity failed there was no way to re-create it, especially because the Huns had become a multi-ethnic empire under Attila. Given that the Huns were a political creation, and not a consolidated people, or nation, their defeat in 454 marked the end of that political creation.
Arrow Storms
A symbol of status among the Huns was a gilded bow - which showed the importance they placed on their horse bows. Equally their foes learned to respect and fear the bows of the Huns. The tactic of circling horse-archers in an ever wheeling whirlwind, just beyond the reach of the enemies ranks, firing their bows as each horse-archer passed in front of the enemy, was a very succesful and demoralizing battle manoeuvre. The Romans (and others) called it an arrow storm as the Huns, by virtue of the ever-changing face engaged against the enemy, were able to keep up a phenomenal rate of fire - especially since it is likely the Huns became adept at taking the arrows from the hand rather than a quiver (similar to the modern Hungarian competition style.)
In many ways the story of Attila the Huns greatest defeat, at the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains, is best told by telling the story of the man who beat him. That man was Flavius Aetius, the leading Roman general of the age and a man who had known Attila for years. In 405AD, when Aetius was still in his teens, he was sent to live with King Rugilas of the Huns. While there he learned horsemanship and archery. It is not stated explicitly, but we may speculate that he learned to combine the two skills into Hunnish horseback archery. On his return to Rome he maintained a close relationship with the Huns. In 423, when he backed the wrong man in a struggle for the succession, he only survived the subsequent purge because an army of Huns was at his back. During this upheaval the Visigoths, under King Theodoric (whose father Alaric had sacked Rome in 410AD), had tried to seize Roman land. Aetius defeated them and their enmity was to last over a decade. For the next six years Aetius forged a brilliant career in war and in politics, becoming the chief general of Rome. When the Emperor moved against him in 432 he again fled to the Huns, still ruled by his friend Rugilas. With their help he returned and became commander-in-chief of the Western Empire and the power behind the throne. In 434 Rugilas died and was succeeded by his nephews Attila and Bleda, who ruled jointly until Bledas death, allegedly at Attilas hand. Attila thus became sole ruler. He raided the Eastern Roman Empire mercilessly, extorting vast tribute as payment for withdrawing. When this tribute stopped under a new Emperor Attila was spoiling for a fight, but he had already raided the East and bled it almost dry. His eye turned West instead. Relations with the West, and particularly with Aetius, had been positively cordial, with the Huns sending forces to support Aetius in his various campaigns. This relationship was upset, however, by one of the most scandalous incidents in Roman history. Having been caught in flagrante delicto, the Emperors sister had been married off and kept a virtual prisoner. She wrote to Attila, enclosing a ring and asking him to free her. He took this as a marriage proposal and wrote to the Emperor accepting and requiring half the Empire as a dowry. This was the first that Valentinian knew of his sisters letter and he refused, trying desperately not to provoke Attila. He failed and the Huns invaded the Western Empire. Realistically, of course, this episode was little more than a pretext for invasion and plunder. Aetius knew that his armies were not sufficient to withstand Attila. He needed allies and in particular he needed the Visigoths. He persuaded King Theodoric that the best defence for the Visigothic territory, threatened by Attila, was to meet the Huns in battle before they reached those lands. Their combined armies marched to attack the Huns, who were besieging Orleans. The Huns broke off the siege and withdrew to the Catalaunian Plains. In the resulting battle both armies consisted of multi-national alliances rather than individual nations. In particular the Romans were aided by the Visigoths and the Huns by the Gepids, whose king, Ardaric, was perhaps Attilas closest advisor. We know little about the battle itself, but the following seems likely. It seems that the Huns attacked and broke the Roman centre. The problem was that their allies were not able to match this victory so the Romans were able to attack the Huns flanks and rear. The Huns were overwhelmed and withdrew to their camp. The following day the Roman alliance set about besieging the Huns camp. Theodoric had been killed in the battle and his son, Thorismund, wanted to assault the Huns but Aetius, anxious lest the annihilation of the Huns leave the Visigoths too powerful, persuaded him to return home immediately lest one of his brothers claim the throne. So why did the Huns lose? It has been credibly suggested that they may not have been using their customary horseback archery tactics. Even if they had, Aetius knew those tactics as well as anyone. Nonetheless, the Huns were coming from a siege, which is not a natural place for horseback archers. They were low on rations and the area around Orleans is nothing like as well suited to the maintenance of thousands of horses as the Steppe or the Hungarian plain. The suggestion is backed up by the fact that they charged into the Romans rather than standing off as would be usual for horseback archers. This battle, therefore, may well show that Steppe archers do not succeed anything like as well when they abandon their traditional tactics. Gibbon notes that neither the spirit, nor the forces, nor the reputation of Attila were impaired by this defeat. The Roman alliance could never be reformed and the following year Attila ravaged Italy, withdrawing only because the Eastern Empire was invading his lands. Attila died the following year (453) on his wedding night. As usually happened when a steppe leader died, his sons fought and their neighbours took advantage. In particular Ardaric, Attilas close friend, led his Gepids to a crushing victory over the Huns, effectively ending the Hunnic empire. In 454, barely 18 months after the death of Attila and 3 years to the day after the Catalaunian Plains ended, Aetius was assassinated by the Emperor, who feared and resented the great general. 6 months later the Emperor himself was assassinated by Hunnic officers who had served under Aetius. The Catalaunian Plains marks Imperial Romes last victory. 25 years later the last Emperor, a boy named Romulus Augustus, was forced to abdicate. He had ruled only in name, the Empire being run by his father, Orestes, a former aide to and emissary of Attila the Hun.
Top & Middle Top: Kaya Traditional Korean Bow ( & Bamboo Arrows) Cost: 125 Length Strung: 42 Middle bottom : Kassai Panther Magyar Bow 200 (very similar to the much cheaper Greyhound 150 or Avar 140 ) Cost: 140 - 200 Length Strung: 50- 52 Bottom: Grozer Old Scythian Bow Cost: 150 Length Strung: 45
Advantages
The reasons are evident. The reason usually stated first is the fingerpinch, which occurs with the small bows used for horseback archery. But that doesnt explain why the Chinese (Manchu) for example use the thumbdraw and thumbring? Their bows are relatively big. And what about the Japanese thumbdraw and their Yumi assymetric bows? Simply put, a release with the thumbdraw technique and the thumbring is cleaner, smoother and faster than a 2 or 3 finger European release. When done properly, the release can be compared to a modern mechanical compound bow release. Sir Ralph Payne Gallwey describes the advantages of a thumbdraw and thumbring in a similar way in his treatise which he wrote more than 100 years ago. Thumbrings could be highly decorated - as can be seen in the pictures opposite - and they could be permanently worn to distinguish oneself in Ottoman society as an elite archer. Note the ring on the thumb of Fatih Sultan Mehmed II, the Conqueror of Istanbul. Tests show us that the same archer achieves more speed with the arrow if the archer uses a thumbring and thumb release compared to a 3 finger release. I see that a lot of European archers are very interested in this technique and the thumbring but they lack the knowledge to make one. You can buy some online but I have seen that these are more decoration than a functional thumbring. The best way to obtain a thumbring is to make one yourself. It has to fit perfectly, otherwise it will hurt you like a shoe that does not fit. So let me describe step by step how to make one. Be patient though, the first ones will be for the bin but will give you precious experience.
The best materials for thumbrings are ivory, jade, agate, bone, or walrus ivory. Horn is inferior as the material is softer and the thumbring can deform after a while. Metals such as bronze or silver were used as well and once you have a good original it is easy to copy it. I do not advise antler. Nowadays it is hard to obtain ivory. For bows with drawweights of less than 70 lbs plexiglass can be used as well. We have had positive experience with a material called kestamid, which is a kind of polyamide. I lost my kestamid thumbring once and drove over it accidentally with the car; nothing happened, just minor scratches. I can use it for heavy bows of 90+ lbs draw weights. For an Ottoman type thumbring get a block with at least 4,5 x 3 x 2 cm (1 x 1 x inch). This full block should be good quality (picture 1 overleaf)
ii
Making of a thumbring
iii
With a pen you can draw the simple outlines of the thumbring on the top and the sides. We will cut these parts to save time, rather than starting to file down the whole block. When you cut it, it should look similar to picture 2 overleaf. Now you can drill a hole in the middle using a rather big drill bit. You can use the sides of the bit to make the hole a bit bigger but for now you can leave it small like in picture 3 overleaf. Now use a tool like a Dremel (a kind of small light rotary craft-tool used by hobbyists). Use a rough bit that will let you give a more typical thumbring shape. You could use a normal file as well. Make the hole bigger now though be careful, leave it still much smaller than it would fit your thumb. The tricky part is now to make a fitting hole for your thumb. The hole is oval, it is not round. The ovalness is very slight though. In the end you should put it on, turn it 90 degrees and it should lock and fit comfortably. The thickness of the sides and back can be 2-5mm depending on the material and the style.
iv
i. Iranian Jade Thumbring 17th -18th C. ii. Ottoman Jade Thumbrings 17th C. iii. Sultan Mehmed II The Conqueror iv. Historic Bronze and Replica Silver Thumbrings
To save the thumb when using heavy drawweights, an additional piece of leather can be glued to the inside of the thumbring as seen below on a museum thumbring (Pic C). The leather is not used between the string and ring as wrongly stated in some literature. Instead it is placed between the string and thumb. The size of your thumb changes according to weather conditions. In winter your thumbring might be too loose, in summer too tight. I recommend having at least 2 thumbrings e.g. one for winter, one for summer. An alternative solution is using a trapezoid or triangular piece of leather. You can pull the thinner side through the thumbring on your thumb until the thumbring fits tightly, as a secondary benefit the leather will protect you from the string like the conventional leather piece as seen in Pic D. As I warned you the first ones will be for the bin so start with cheap material. Rather than making a few at a time, make one and shoot with it for at least a week to see how it fits and if there are any mistakes. Making a thumbring will take 2-10 hours depending on experience, material and tools. Feel free to contact me if you need help or advice at gokmenaltinkulp@gmail.com
D 6
SINGLE SHOT KOREAN 1st Neil Payne 7pts/2 targets 2nd Gkmen Altinkulp 4pts/2 targets 3rd Dan Sawyer 4pts/1 target DOUBLE SHOT KOREAN 1st Neil Payne 10pts/3 targets 2nd Rick Lippiett 3pts/ 2 targets (-2 time penalties) 3rd Claire Sawyer 2pts/1 target TRIPLE SHOT KOREAN 1st Claire Sawyer 11pts/ 4 targets 2nd Neil Payne 7pts/ 3 targets 3rd Damian Stenton 7pts/ 2 targets HUNTING SHOT 1st Damian Stenton 2nd Gkmen Altinkulp 3rd = Zana Greenwood 3rd = Franklin Henson OVERALL RANKING 1st Neil Payne 24pts 2nd Claire Sawyer 13pts 3rd Gkmen Altinkulp 10pts
Champion Neil Payne riding his Appaloosa Cross mare, Anabel in the Single Shot
Runner up Gkmen Altinkulp riding the turbocharged 11yr old Welsh Cob gelding, Sputnik
Zana Greenwood, riding her 8 year old Andulusian gelding Niagara in the Double Shot
TV Coverage
During the August BHAA Competition a Reuters cameraman shot footage that has been syndicated to TV networks in Turkey, the Ukraine, the USA and of course here in the UK. Some of this footage was used for the October 16th edition of the BBC Breakfast Special - presented by Mike Bushell (who also came to the Centre and shot some additional segments of him learning horseback archery). Further reports have also appeared across the UK on BBC South East local programming (featuring the Centre as the only establishment of its kind in the UK) and an additional feature on ITVs Meridian News centred around the BHAA competition.
The sport was featured in Octobers edition of the HORSE Magazine in the We Try section. Furthermore a feature appeared in an August edition of the Sussex Courier (where the reporter again tried a half-day course) and the Horse & Hound edition of the 23rd September featured an article on New Exciting Courses to Try. Finally the Horse and Rider December issue goes on the shelf during the first week of November and will feature a fantastic 3-page spread. I think everyone should agree this is fantastic for the profile of the sport in the UK and has brought Horseback Archery to a wider audience than ever before. There are of course further plans afoot and once these have been discussed at the BHAA AGM in November we hope to build upon such a successful year promoting mounted archery in the UK. BBC Video on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_kizv5n6JM
Top: Damian Stenton lines up the winning shot in the Hunting Competition Middle: Franklin Henson, aboard his Andalusian Bo, celebrates hitting the Hare in the Hunting Competition Bottom: All the BHAA 2010 Competitors at the awards ceremony. The Hare taking centre-stage! All BHAA Competition Photos Alan Sawyer
In early September Dan and I had the honour of representing GB and the BHAA at the European Open Championship of Horseback Archery (EOCHA). Competitors gathered at the venue outside Brussels on Friday with the afternoon put aside for trying out and being paired with horses. I was lucky enough to get a super Andalucian stallion called Mercenario and Dan got another French stunt horse called Cisco. Saturday was a beautiful day and a small crowd gathered to enjoy the sun, HBA action and crepes. 35 competitors from 10 nations paraded behind their national flags then those on horseback did a gallop past; this was even more exciting than I expected as my horse unexpectedly decided to jump the qabaq lines which had been painted on the track overnight. On both Saturday and Sunday (which unfortunately was a bit of a wash out) there was competition in all 4 disciplines. I competed in the Hungarian competition on Saturday. It was only my 2nd time trying this style and I struggled a little with the long range shots and there was
All EOCHA Photos Claire & Dan Sawyer
added difficulty with Mercenario still throwing in phantom jumps here and there. There were many students of this style at EOCHA wearing their matching kaftans. Dan competed in qabaq on Sunday morning and performed well in his 3 runs. It was interesting to see how some people leant backward to aim upwards and others leant over the horses shoulder and twisted round. It was the first time qabaq had been included in EOCHA and the difficulty was clear, of 11 competitors taking 3 shots each there were only 2 hits of the 30cm target on an 8m pole. We both competed in Sundays Korean competition with 2 runs at the single and double shot and then 2 goes at the 5-target run on a lengthened track. The rules of EOCHA are that you need to hit 3 of the 5 targets in order to score points on the multiple shot which put the pressure on. Maybe it was just this pressure but the 5 targets in 150m seemed to come faster than expected and many people seemed to having difficulty in hitting enough to score, though arguably those on the Sunday benefitted from the run turning into a quagmire in the rain causing the horses to slow considerably. The final competition was the Belgian event a cross between single shot Korean and its a knockout.
On the Saturday evening we were treated to a skill at arms and jousting show accompanied by the wit of Fred Piraux (EOCHA 2010 event manager). The competition was a great learning experience and Dan and I were happy to both come midway up the field in the Korean event. The overall winner was Christian Prestin (Ger) with Michal Sanzcenko (Pol), Roger Ittig (Swi) and Robin Descamps (Fra) taking the next placings. The highest placed Brit was Mike Ashington, an independent competitor who shot mostly with his longbow, who came joint 7th. The highlight for us was the experience as a whole; a chance to ride and compete under a little more pressure, meeting competitors from across Europe and from Korea, and the exchange of ideas and techniques. Many thanks to Zana who came over with us and was a huge help with the horses. We would encourage other members to enter international competitions, everyone there has had to cut their teeth at this level of competition at some point; we found the atmosphere welcoming and Christian Schrade very encouraging. Get in touch with BHAA committee members if you want any advice or help.
Pre-training Checks
Have a basic knowledge of horse psychology and how that affects their behaviour. Have a good knowledge of your horses temperament, what their attitude to life is and some idea of the reactions to expect. Be able to lead safely and control your horses position and pace from the ground, including standing. Be familiar with the desensitisation / approach and retreat method of introducing new stimuli. Ensure you have the use of another person to help at times.
Conclusion
The key to training is the quality of approach and retreat, it isnt always what you are doing that teaches, but when you stop doing it! If each of the above stages is given enough time and repetition, and you also consider spending the time required to establish sound control of pace and direction, you are on your way to forming the relationship necessary for successful shooting. Remember this is not a training manual, rather a brief outline. If you have any questions or would like any points explaining further or expanding you are welcome to contact me ossrider@horseback-archers.co.uk
From top: Damian training Senator, an 18yr old, warmblood gelding. 1. Shooting on the ground while held. 2. Shooting mounted whilst standing still. 3. Shooting mounted at walk. 4. Shooting mounted at trot, and finally 5. Shooting Mounted at canter. Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=8mhQQxBFK0
Top: British Cameraderie - Neil Payne congratulates Jehad Shamis on a succesful run Bottom: MA3 Competitors from all over the globe Photos Azusa Namimoto
A closing ceremony brought the event to an all too early end. Overall winners included Master Lee (Korea), Lukas Novotny (USA), Michal Sanchenko (Poland) and Dana Hotko (USA). So what did the competition achieve? It has without doubt raised the profile of horseback archery in the USA. The event attracted horsey people and all of them were extremely impressed with the sport and the competitors. A cowboy in conversation with Neil remarked Id love to see what you guys could do on your own horses! A lot, it is felt, will follow up and take up the sport. Secondly the competition, it would appear, has reinvigorated the members of MA3.
Although a steep learning curve, the organisers learnt a lot from hosting the event and their enthusiasm to do bigger and better event next time, was clearly visible. Lastly, from the purely personal perspective of both British competitors, the experience radically changed all perceptions of America and Americans. Without doubt the British media feeds a certain stereotype of the people. Nothing could be further from the truth. Both Neil and Jehad came back with glowing comments on how nice, genuine, warm, caring, concerned, open-minded, tolerant and wonderful all the people were. Genuine friendships were made in that week which will last a lifetime ...
2011 Competitions
This year will see an EOCHA in Poland in September and also a further BHAA Competition - likely again to be at the end of the Summer. The 7th annual World Horseback Archery Federation competition in Korea will take place in late July 2011, and there may be further events in the USA and Europe however the dates for these are yet to be agreed. If anyone wishes more information about representing the BHAA or competing abroad in general please email: info@bhaa.org.uk