Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1|Page
COMPANY PROFILE
Corporate Office Address:
Pakistan Engineering Company limited 6/7 Ganga Ram Trust Building Shahrah-e-Quaid-e-Azam, Lahore Pakistan
Location of Plant:
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMAPNY Kot Lakhpat Works, Lahore Pakistan
Regional Offices:
Karachi Islamabad
Type of Firm:
Public Limited company under the control of Ministry of Industries & Production, Government of Pakistan
Website:
www.peco.com.pk
E-mail Address:
peco@gmail.com
2|Page
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Board of Directors:
Mr. Ghulam Rasool Aphan (Chairman) Mr. Khawaja Shoukat Ali (Chief Executive) Mr. Khizar Hayat Khan Mr. Muhammad Arif Habib Mr. Liaqat Muhammad Mr. Rashid Ali Khan Mr. Mirza Mehmood Ahmed Mr. Muhammad Shabbir Malik Mr. Muhammad Iqbal
External Auditors:
M / s Fazal Mehmood & Co. Chartered Accountants
Share Registrar:
M / s Scarlet IT System (Pvt) Ltd.
Bankers:
National Bank of Pakistan United Bank Limites Summit Bank Limited
4|Page
5|Page
Vision Statement
A sustainable growth oriented company and market leader in steel towers for Electricity Towers for Electricity Transmission and Telecommunication.
Mission Statement
To replace old machines and equipment with most modern, efficient machines leading towards automation. To produce quality products at higher efficiency and consistent quality with lower cost. To bring the company on sound financial footings. Market leader with technological edge, services and customer satisfaction.
Objectives
The Company has started Pump manufacturing, along with Electric Motors & Foundry. Presently we shall confine to concentrate on the old range of our products i.e. Centrifugal Pumps, Submersible Pumps, Non Clogging Pumps, Deep well Turbine Pumps, Tube well accessories etc. Foundry which is mother shop is planned to be up graded not only to produce quality casting for self requirement, but also to meet requirement of tractor parts, and other automotive parts. There is a bright prospect of foundry products locally as well as export, because developed countries are shedding this industry due to pollution concerns and its dirty nature. Proper study is under progress for gradual up-gradation of Foundry equipments, to produce good quality and economical castings. Machining center for customized machining of the casted parts is also under study, and most of the machines are available with us. In order to utilize idle facilities of closed bicycle plant, efforts are in progress to utilize these for manufacturing of motor cycle parts for Chinese version motor cycle manufactures.
6|Page
Quality Policy
We are committed to maintain our customers satisfaction by delivering the qualitative products and services in accordance with their needs and requirements. Customer feedback is continuously reviewed for quality improvement to have a continued customers confidence & trust in our products.
Corporate Strategy
To accomplish excellent results through increased earnings in the best interest of all stake holders To be a responsible employer to take care of the employees in their career planning and reward Being a good corporate citizen, contributing to the development of society through harmony in all respects
7|Page
8|Page
9|Page
Production Facilities
Rolling Mills:
Four semi-automatic and manual Re-Rolling mills are installed which produce 30,000 ton of rolled products of grade 40 & 60 per annum. All grades of re-rolled steel conform to International standards i.e. B.S., A.S.T.M., S.A.E. and D.I.N. standards under the strict supervision of qualified and experienced Engineers.
Fabrication:
Fabrication Division has modern computerized Numerically Controlled Machines (CNC) for Shearing, Punching and Marking Steel Angles and Steel Plates in addition to Mechanical & Hydraulic presses of different capacities for different types of Fabrication Work. The annual capacity of this Division is 30,000 M/Tons of Steel Structure on 8 hours single shift basis.
10 | P a g e
Galvanizing:
Three galvanizing Plant is available, where cleaning, pickling & Hot Dip Galvanizing is carried out to ensure smooth zinc deposit on structural members. Galvanized tower members are inspected individually and in batch for defect free Galvanizing layer of Uniform thickness prior to dispatch. Tower members are stored in a vast area in a wellplanned way to ensure smooth loading and unloading.
11 | P a g e
Bottlenecks (Problems)
Bottlenecks on production methods are:
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
1. Towers:
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMAPNY is manufacturing following types of towers: Transmission Line Towers Telecommunication Towers
14 | P a g e
220KV Towers:
EA(SUSPENSION TOWER) EB(RIVERCROSSING TOWER) ED(DEGREE TOWER(20-30 DEGREE) ED(DEGREE TOWER(30-60 DEGREE)
15 | P a g e
132KV Towers:
ZM-1 DEGREE (SUSPENSION TOWER) ZM-30 DEGREE(ANGLE TOWER(20-30 DEGREE) ZM-60 DEGREE(ANGLE TOWER(30-60 DEGREE)TBA1 DEGREE(SUSPENSION TOWER)
2. Electric Motors:
Following are the types of electric motors: Horizontal Foot-Mounted Drip Proof Motors Totally Enclosed Fan Cooled 3 Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Motors Flange Mounted 3 Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Motors Totally Enclosed Naturally Cooled Loom Motors Vertical Hollow Shaft Motor Drip Proof And Totally Enclosed Fan Cooled
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
18 | P a g e
SWOT Analysis
Introduction of SWOT:
SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool used to understand the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business. It involves specifying the objective of the business or project and identifying the internal and external factors that are supportive or unfavorable to achieving that objective.
SWOT is an abbreviation for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats SWOT analysis is an important tool for auditing the overall strategic position of a business and its environment. Once key strategic issues have been identified, they feed into business objectives, particularly marketing objectives. SWOT analysis can be used in conjunction with other tools for audit and analysis, such as PEST analysis and Porter's Five-Forces analysis. It is also a very popular tool with business and marketing students because it is quick and easy to learn. Stanford Universitys Albert Humphrey led a research project in the 1960s-1970s based upon the United States Fortune 500. Humphrey lead a research project which ultimately developed his Team Action Model (TAM) which is a management concept that enables groups of executives to manage change. SWOT was to have originated from his Stakeholders Concept and SWOT Analysis. However, if one proceeds to find out more about the author in academic libraries there is nothing accredited to him. It is unusual for such a prolifically cited piece of research not to have an original definitive publication as its centrepiece. The TAM approach is one of a number that are used by trainers around the World, although for us the crediting to Humphrey as the creator of SWOT cannot be supported.
19 | P a g e
Weaknesses:
Many divisions are now closed Low sales growth 20 | P a g e
No control over expenses resulting in low net income Low salaries HR activities are not effective causing dissatisfaction of employees Lack of technical & skilled people EPS is negative resulting no interest of creditors Low production than capacity Computer illiteracy Out dated machinery & lot of manual work Marketing strategies are not up to the mark No Research & Development (R& D) centers
Comments:
As internal factors represents strengths and weaknesses of the company. No company internally strong can compete externally. These strengths and weaknesses cover functional areas of business, including management, and management information system. Relationships among these areas in PECO are examined. PECO is struggling to utilize its strengths to overcome weakness. The example of this struggle is, it has turned its negative profits to positives one. Other steps are taken to improve its internal environment.
21 | P a g e
Threats: Intense local & international competition Technological advancement Only tender based business Replacement of towers by underground pipes Political instability & Poor economic conditions CHINAS bug share in engineering products in ASIA Only one regular customer i.e. WAPDA (MONOPSONY)
Comments:
External factors like opportunities and threats are very important for any company. Every company has some opportunities in the environment also this environment provides many threats. PECO has to face many threats in external environment. Its major competitors are international.
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
ACTIVITY RATIOS
Activity ratios are used to check the Activity or efficiency or turnover ratios concerned with measuring the efficiency in asset management. This category includes several ratios referred to asset utilization or turnover ratios. They often indicate of how well a firm utilizes various assets such as inventory and fixed assets. (Figures in Millions) 1) Receivable Turnover Ratio = = = 5.623 Times
= = = 65 Days
= = = 3.64 Times
24 | P a g e
= = = 100 days
= = = 9.43 Times
= = = 39 Days
= = = 0.27 Times
= = = 0.33 Times 25 | P a g e
= = = 2.29 Times
26 | P a g e
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Liquidity ratios are employed by analysts to determine the firms ability to pay its short-term liabilities.
1) Current Ratio
= = = 4.06:1 Times
2) Quick Ratio
= = = 1.60:1 Times
3) Cash Ratio
= = = 0.35:1 Times
4) Defensive Interval
= = =
SOLVENCY RATIOS
One of many ratios used to measure a company's ability to meet long-term obligations. The solvency ratio measures the size of a company's after-tax income, excluding noncash depreciation expenses, as compared to the firm's total debt obligations. It provides a measurement of how likely a company will be to continue meeting its debt obligations. 1) Debt to Equity = = = 2) Debt to Capital = = = 3) Debt to Asset = = = 4) Financial Levarage = = = 1.576 29.24% 31.15% 45.25%
28 | P a g e
5) Interest Coverage
= = = 8.42
= = = 8.41
29 | P a g e
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
A class of financial metrics that are used to assess a business's ability to generate earnings as compared to its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of time. For most of these ratios, having a higher value relative to a competitor's ratio or the same ratio from a previous period is indicative that the company is doing well. 1) Net Profit Margin = = = 2) Gross Profit Margin = = = 3) Operating Profit Margin = 18.26% 7.10%
=
= 4) Pretax Margin = = = 11.22% 13.04%
30 | P a g e
= = = 1.95%
=
= 7) Return on Equity = = = 8) Return on Common Equity = = = 9) DUPONT Analysis: = 3.08% 3.08% 3.85%
= =
= = 3.08% 31 | P a g e
2010
5.623 times 65 days 3.64 times 100 days 9.43 times 39 days 27.53 times 33.2 times 2.29 times
Liquidity ratios:
Current ratio: Quick ratio: Cash ratio: Defensive ratio: Cash conversion cycle:
2010
4.06 times 1.60 times 0.35 times 108 days 126 days
32 | P a g e
Solvency ratio:
Debt to equity ratio: Debt to capital ratio: Debt to asset ratio: Financial leverage ratio: Interest coverage ratio: Fixed charge coverage ratio: 45.25 % 31.15 % 29.24 % 1.576 8.42 8.41
2010
Profitability ratios:
Net profit margin ratio: Gross profit margin: Operating profit margin: Pretax margin ratio: Return on assets ratio: Return on total capital: Return on equity ratio: 7.10 % 18.26 % 13.04 % 11.22 % 1.95 % 3.85 % 3.08 %
2010
33 | P a g e
34 | P a g e
Comparison Of Financial Ratios Pakistan Engineering Company Limited With Ghani Automobiles Industries Limited
Activity ratios:
Receivables turnover: Receivables turnover in days: Inventory turnover ratio: Inventory turnover in days Payables turnover ratio: Payables turnover in days: Total asset turnover ratio: Fixed asset turnover ratio: Working capital ratio: 3.64
A high turnover ratio is generally a good thing since it means that customers are paying their bills on time. Calculated ratio shows that company receivables are converting into cash 5.6 times in a year. PECOs receivable turnover is greater than the other firm, thus it is efficient.
35 | P a g e
Receivables turnover in days: It indicates that in how many days firm is collecting their receivables. High RTD is too bad and Very low RTD may not necessarily be good. A high RTD mean that customers are too slow in paying their bills. Calculated ratio indicates the efficient RTD as compare to other firm. Inventory turnover ratio: Determine how effectively the firm is managing inventory. The IT tells us how many times inventory is turned over into receivables through sales during the year. Generally, the higher the IT, the more efficient the inventory management of the firm. Calculated ratio is showing that company inventory management is in-efficient as compare to the other company.
Inventory turnover in days: Lower the inventory turnover on hand the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has more days as compare to the other firm.thus, PECO is inefficient.
Payables turnover in days: Higher the payable turnover in days the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser days as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is inefficient.
36 | P a g e
Total asset turnover: Higher the Total asset turnover the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser turnovers as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is inefficient.
Fixed asset turnover: Higher the Fixed asset turnover the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser turnover as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is inefficient.
Working capital turnover: Higher the Working capital turnover the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser turnover as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is inefficient.
37 | P a g e
Liquidity ratios:
Current ratio: Quick ratio: Cash ratio: Defensive ratio: Cash conversion cycle: 4.06 1.06 0.35
PECO Ltd.
Quick ratio: The higher the quick ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has greater quick ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is efficient.
Cash ratio: The higher the cash ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has more cash ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is efficient.
38 | P a g e
Defensive interval: The higher the defensive interval the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser defensive interval as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is inefficient.
Cash conversion cycle: The lower the cash conversion cycle the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has more cash conversion cycle as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Inefficient.
39 | P a g e
Solvency ratio:
Debt to equity ratio: Debt to capital ratio: Debt to asset ratio: Financial leverage ratio: Interest coverage ratio: Fixed charge coverage:
Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. 86.34 % 46.34 % 22.25 % 3.89 0.043 0.041
Debt to capital ratio: The lower the Debt to equity ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Efficient.
Debt to asset ratio: The lower the Debt to equity ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Efficient.
40 | P a g e
Financial leverage ratio: The lower the financial leverage ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is less risky.
Interest coverage ratio: The lower the Debt to equity ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Efficient.
Fixed charge coverage: The lower the Debt to equity ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Efficient.
41 | P a g e
Profitability ratios:
Net profit margin ratio: Gross profit margin: Operating profit margin: Pretax margin ratio: Return on assets ratio: Return on total capital: Return on equity ratio:
Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. 6% 7.5 % 6.223 % 2.23 % 6.1 % 41.66 % 29.95 %
Gross profit margin: The higher the Gross profit margin the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has greater margin as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is efficient.
42 | P a g e
Operating profit margin: The higher the Operating profit margin the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has greater margin as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is efficient. Pretax margin ratio: The higher the Pretax margin ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has greater margin as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is efficient. Return on assets ratio: The higher the Return on assets ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Inefficient. Return on total capital: The higher the Return on total capital the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Inefficient. Return on equity ratio: The higher the Return on equity ratio the better it is. Calculated ratio shows that PECO has lesser ratio as compare to the other firm. Thus, PECO is Inefficient.
43 | P a g e
44 | P a g e
Horizontal Analysis of Balance Sheet Pakistan Engineering Company Balance Sheet As on June 30, 2010
Particulars Non Current Assets Property, Plant, And Equipment-Tangible Assets Subject to Finance Lease Capital Work in Progress Land Held For Sale Long Term Security Deposit Total Non-Current Assets Current Assets Stores, Spares, And Loose Tools Stock-in-Trade Assets Held For Sale Trade Debtors Loans And Advances to Employees Advance to Others Trade Deposits, Prepayments, & receivables Cash & Bank Balances Total Current Assets Current Liabilities Trade Creditors Accrued Liabilities Deposits & Advance Payments Other Liabilities Unclaimed Dividend Accrued Mark-Up Short Term Borrowings Current Portion of Long Term Liability Current Portion of Liabilities Against Assets Subject to Finance Lease Provision For Taxation Total Current Liabilities Net Current Assets Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 68,778 238,057 728,401 5,929,952 17,653 366,390 737,846 5,651,536 3.90 0.65 0.99 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,546 5,779 13,012 59,306 12,226 5,910 22,500 143,023 9,419 15,289 81,591 7,803 30,932 59,725 955 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.61 0.85 0.73 1.57 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 137,494 307,565 20,556 298,301 1,175 77,934 39,757 83676 966,458 142,403 445,460 25,654 347,364 1,022 67,717 46,366 28250 1,104,236 0.97 0.69 0.80 0.86 1.15 1.15 0.86 2.96 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4,879,205 5,684 314,724 1,938 5,201,551 4,592,772 710 2,559 314,724 2,925 4,913,690 1.06 2.22 1.00 0.66 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2010 Rs (,000) 2009 Rs (,000) 2010 2009 Rs (,000) Rs (,000)
45 | P a g e
Non-Current Liabilities Government of Pakistan Loans Long Term Loan Deffered Tax-Net Total Non-Current Liabilities Net Total Assets PRESENTED BY Share Capital Revenue Reserve - General Accumulated (Loss) Total Surplus on Revaluation of Fixed Assets Total Equity 56,902 10,000 (994,063) (927,161) 4,913,034 3,985,873 56,902 10,000 (1,056,203) (989,301) 4,736,958 3,747,657 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.04 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,790,848 12,887 140,344 1,944,079 3,985,873 1,790,848 76,317 36,714 1,903,879 3,747,657 1.00 0.17 3.82 1.02 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
46 | P a g e
Horizontal Analysis of Profit and Loss Statement Pakistan Engineering Company Profit & Loss Statement For The Year Ended 30, 2010
Particulars Sales Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling & Distribution Expenses Freight & Forwarding Expenses General & Administrative Expenses Total Operating Expenses Operating Profit Other Charges Finanacial Charges Total Other Charges Other Income Workers Profit Participation Fund Profit Before Taxation Taxation Profit After Taxation Earning Per Share - Basic 2010 Rs (,000) 1,677,379 (1,371,129) 306,250 (11,961) (25,587) (49,916) (87,464) 218,786 (757) (26,118) (26,875) 5,880 (9,596) 188,195 (69,091) 119,104 20.93 2009 Rs (,000) 1,361,633 (1,035,306) 326,327 (14,168) (22,182) (41,807) (78,157) 248,170 (501) (82,551) (83,052) 44,309 (8,256) 201,171 (67,223) 133,948 23.54 2010 1.23 1.32 0.94 0.84 1.15 1.19 1.12 0.88 1.51 0.32 0.32 0.13 1.16 0.94 1.03 0.89 0.89 2009 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rs (,000) Rs (,000)
47 | P a g e
Current Assets
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Cash Trade Debtors Stock In Trade Advances Deposits & Prepayments 2010 2009
Current Liabilities
4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Trade Creditors Deposits & Advance Payments Provision For Taxation Other Liabilities 2010 2009
48 | P a g e
Non-Current Assets
2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Property Plant & Equipment Capital Work In Progress Land Held For Sale Long Term Security Deposit 2010 2009
Non-Current Liabilities
4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Government of Pakstan Loans Long Term Loan Deffered Tax 2010 2009
49 | P a g e
0.2
0 Sales Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Operating Expenses Net Profit
50 | P a g e
51 | P a g e
Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet Pakistan Engineering Company Balance Sheet As on June 30, 2010
Particulars Non Current Assets Property, Plant, And Equipment-Tangible Assets Subject to Finance Lease Capital Work in Progress Land Held For Sale Long Term Security Deposit Total Non-Current Assets Current Assets Stores, Spares, And Loose Tools Stock-in-Trade Assets Held For Sale Trade Debtors Loans And Advances to Employees Advance to Others Trade Deposits, Prepayments, & receivables Cash & Bank Balances Total Current Assets Current Liabilities Trade Creditors Accrued Liabilities Deposits & Advance Payments Other Liabilities Unclaimed Dividend Accrued Mark-Up Short Term Borrowings Current Portion of Long Term Liability Current Portion of Liabilities Against Assets Subject to Finance Lease Provision For Taxation Total Current Liabilities Net Current Assets Total Assets Less Current Liabilities 68,778 238,057 728,401 5,929,952 17,653 366,390 737,846 5,651,536 1.1% 3.9% 11.8% 96.1% 0.29% 6.1% 12.3% 93.9% 50,546 5,779 13,012 59,306 12,226 5,910 22,500 143,023 9,419 15,289 81,591 7,803 30,932 59,725 955 0.4% 0.0% 0.99% 0.02% 0.8% 0.1% 0.2% 1.0% 0.2% 0.1% 2.38% 0.16% 0.25% 1.36% 0.13% 0.51% 137,494 307,565 20,556 298,301 1,175 77,934 39,757 83676 966,458 142,403 445,460 25,654 347,364 1,022 67,717 46,366 28250 1,104,236 2.2% 5.0% 0.3% 4.8% 0.0% 1.3% 0.6% 1.4% 15.7% 2.37% 7.40% 0.43% 5.77% 0.02% 1.13% 0.77% 0.47% 18.3% 4,879,205 5,684 314,724 1,938 5,201,551 4,592,772 710 2,559 314,724 2,925 4,913,690 79.1% 0.0% 0.1% 5.1% 0.0% 84.3% 76.3% 0.01% 0.04% 5.23% 0.05% 81.7% 2010 Rs (,000) 2009 Rs (,000) 2010 2009 Rs (,000) Rs (,000)
52 | P a g e
Non-Current Liabilities Government of Pakistan Loans Long Term Loan Deffered Tax-Net Total Non-Current Liabilities Net Total Assets PRESENTED BY Share Capital Revenue Reserve - General Accumulated (Loss) Total Surplus on Revaluation of Fixed Assets Total Equity 56,902 10,000 (994,063) (927,161) 4,913,034 3,985,873 56,902 10,000 (1,056,203) (989,301) 4,736,958 3,747,657 0.9% 0.2% -16.1% -15.0% 79.7% 65% 1% 0% -18% -16% 79% 62% 1,790,848 12,887 140,344 1,944,079 3,985,873 1,790,848 76,317 36,714 1,903,879 3,747,657 29% 0.2% 2.3% 31.5% 65% 30% 1% 1% 32% 62%
53 | P a g e
Vertical Analysis of Profit & Loss Statement Pakistan Engineering Company Profit & Loss Statement For The Year Ended 30, 2010
Particulars Sales Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling & Distribution Expenses Freight & Forwarding Expenses General & Administrative Expenses Total Operating Expenses Operating Profit Other Charges Finanacial Charges Total Other Charges Other Income Workers Profit Participation Fund Profit Before Taxation Taxation Profit After Taxation Earning Per Share - Basic 2010 Rs (,000) 1,677,379 (1,371,129) 306,250 (11,961) (25,587) (49,916) (87,464) 218,786 (757) (26,118) (26,875) 5,880 (9,596) 188,195 (69,091) 119,104 20.93 2009 Rs (,000) 1,361,633 (1,035,306) 326,327 (14,168) (22,182) (41,807) (78,157) 248,170 (501) (82,551) (83,052) 44,309 (8,256) 201,171 (67,223) 133,948 23.54 2010 100% -82% 18% -1% -2% -3% -5% 13% 0% -2% -2% 0% -1% 11% -4% 7% 0.89 2009 100% -76% 24% -1% -2% -3% -6% 18% 0% -6% -6% 3% -1% 15% -5% 10% 1.00 Rs (,000) Rs (,000)
54 | P a g e
Current Assets
8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00%
2010
2009
0.00%
Cash Trade Debtors Stock in Trade Advances Deposits & Prepaymens
Current Liabilities
2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 2010 2009
0.50%
0.00%
Trade Creditors
Other Liabilities
55 | P a g e
Non-Current Assets
90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 2010 2009
30.00%
20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Property Plant & Equipment Capital Work In Progress Land Held For Sale Long Term Security Deposit
Non-Current Liabilities
35.00% 30.00%
25.00%
20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Government of Pakstan Loans Long Term Loan Deffered Tax 2010 2009
56 | P a g e
2010 2009
57 | P a g e
58 | P a g e
Operating expenses are relatively decreased as compare to last year but companys net profit is affected and diminishes this year. Overall position tells that company has increased their expenses with higher ratio.
59 | P a g e
60 | P a g e
Findings:
By the analysis of PECO financial report we finds that company is gaining profit. The company is managing their assets debts etc efficiently. If company production is increasing our cost is also increasing with a proportionate increase in our sales thus our profit is also increasing. The company has been effected by the economic crises and increase in the international fuel prices. Overall performance of the company is better according to the size of the organizations because it has increasing trend in sales and profit so it would be better form Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. to proceed its future prospectus.
Conclusion:
We have compared the results of PECO & Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. and result out that the PECO is working better then Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. PECOs Liquidity is so much Better then Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. PECOs profitability and Debt management is also good.
Decision:
By the investment point of view we will suggest that we should invest not in Ghani Industries Automobiles Ltd. rather PECO is preferable. As PECO is less risky and have better solvency position thus, banks can approve loans to PECO.
61 | P a g e
References:
Books
1. Strategic management by Fred R. David. 2. Principles of Marketing by Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong. 3. Managerial Economics and Business Strategy by Micheal R. Baye. 4. An Experiential approach to Organization Development by Donald R. Brown, Don Harvey. 5. Financial management by Gittman. 6. Financial management by James C Van Horne. 7. Management. 8. Profiles, annual reports and other documents of Pakistan Engineering Company.
Websites:
1. www.peco.com.pk 2. www.answers.com 3. www.engineeringindustry.info 4. www.wikipedia.com 5. www.investopedia.com
62 | P a g e