MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS & COST MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF CASE ANALYSIS NAME:

CRITERIA Knowledge & understanding BELOW 40% Fails to demonstrate understanding of topic/area. Little or no analysis. Fails to identify key issues/theory.

PGP NO.
40-49% Shows a bare understanding of basic issues/theory. Overly descriptive identifies obvious issues. Misses more subtle issues 50-69% Shows grasp of basic issues/theory. 70-79% Well informed. Demonstrates sound understanding. Accurate & detailed coverage of obvious issues. More subtle issues recognised & reasonably dealt with. Presented in logically reasoned, coherent and evaluative manner. Provides most of the possible solutions the company could pursue

DATE:
80% + Demonstrates well co-ordinated, grounded and reasoned understanding. Provides concise analysis of all relevant issues

Analysis & identification of key issues

Some evidence of understanding. Coverage of obvious issues only.

Alternative solutions the company could pursue

No solution provided

Provides some of the possible solutions the company could pursue but not satisfactory.

Provides some of the possible solutions the company could pursue

Some of the relevant concepts applied. Conclusion attempted but some points missing. Reasonable application of knowledge to main issues/theory. Language mainly fluent. Grammar/spelling mainly accurate.

Apply relevant concepts Conclusion problem solving

Fails to apply relevant topic. No proper concluding section. Poor or no attempt at application of knowledge. Purpose & meaning unclear. Language, grammar & spelling poor. Structure unclear. Poorly presented. This case analysis has been penalised because it is significantly over length.

Some part of concepts applied Conclusion repetitive, thin in content. Weak but satisfactory application of issues/theory. Language mainly fluent, but frequent errors of grammar or spelling. Problems with structure and presentation.

Most of the relevant concepts applied. Cogent and intelligent conclusion. Good application of knowledge to all issues/theory. Thoughts & ideas clearly expressed. Grammar/spelling accurate and language fluent. Structure supports argument clearly. Presentation clear & appropriate.

Provides details of all the possible solutions the company could pursue All relevant concepts applied
Excellent concluding section drawing together the various points made and adding an original perspective. Articulate & persuasive use of language. Consistently accurate user of grammar/spelling. Structure guides reader through argument. Presentation excellent.

Written communication spelling & grammar

Structure & presentation

Structure coherent. Presentation satisfactory.

Length

Not all sections carry the same weighting and the final mark reflects the academic worth of the assignment as a whole.

General Comments:

Mark: