CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Kent Elementary
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Debbie Williams, Principal

Vision Statement: Kent Elementary, in partnership with our families and community, will develop students
who meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfully transition to middle school and to take advantage the highest educational opportunities available.

October 1, 2010

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Position Years Served Signature

Donna Cotter Susan Ellis Yvonne Falcon Staci McAllister Susan Romaine Christie Self Julie Nors

Support Staff Classroom Teacher Special Education Classroom Teacher Classroom Teacher Support Staff Parent

1 2 1 1 1 2 1

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment
The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus, business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educational plans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides this work. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievement indicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance, graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered. The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253): 1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system. 2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations, including students in special education. 3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Timelines for reaching goals. 7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives. 8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus. 9. Program for encouraging parental involvement. 10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data, student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged that ensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1 funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards TA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning TA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs TA 5. Highly qualified teachers TA 6. Professional Development TA 7. Increase Parental Involvement TA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores) H. SAT I. PSAT/NMSQT J. Advanced Placement K. Graduation Data Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

RESULTS GOAL
Should identify what is desired in terms of performance after, or as a result of, putting new processes in place or improving existing processes.

SMART GOAL
Goal should be Strategic and specific, Measurable, Attainable, Resultsbased, and Time-bound.

MEASURES INDICATOR
Standards and objectives (weak areas for students) Tools well use to determine where students are now and whether they are improving.

TARGETS
The attainable performance level we would like to see.

F&P Open Ended Response 50% of all subpopulations will be commended on TAKS writing Development of ideas Conventions Student writing rubric analysis Student writing portfolio

Commended

TAKS 2009 79 50 91 88 56

Writing 2010 56 40 63 57 55 47 13 GOAL 2011 60 50 65 60 57 50 50

Improve student commended performance on 2011 TAKS written composition.

All Students African Amer. Hispanic White Spec. Ed. Eco. Disadv. LEP

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of

commitment. - Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

SMART GOALS (Example) 90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading Obj. 1 Basic Understanding 85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math Obj. 1 Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning Obj. 6 Mathematical Processes and Tools 6

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary
Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Data Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests Graduation 2009 Graduation 2010 Goal Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance 100 100 97.4 100 100 98 99 100 100 98 99 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100

African American 2010 Data 90 100 100 100 98 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100

Hispanic 2010 Data 100 100 100 100 100 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100 2010 Data 100 100 100 100 100

White 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 2010 Data 95 100 100 * 98 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 Data 97 100 100 93 98 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100 2010 Data 96 100 100 * 98

LEP 2011 Goal 100 100 100 100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 68 68 56 79 State 35 37 30 44
Diff. from state

African American 2011 Goal 70 70 60 80 Campus 53 42 40 63 State 25 23 21 28

Diff. from state

Hispanic 2011 Goal 55 45 50 65 Campus 55 56 64 70 State 28 31 25 36

Diff. from state

White 2011 Goal 57 60 65 72 Campus 77 77 57 85 State 48 47 38 59

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 80 80 60 87

+33 +31 +26 +35

+28 +19 +19 +35

+27 +25 +39 +34

+29 +30 +19 +26

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 45 43 55 * State 17 17 11 24
Diff. from state

Economically Disadvantaged 2011 Goal 47 45 57 Campus 53 53 47 64 State 26 28 22 33

Diff. from state

LEP Campus 46 46 13 * State 23 25 20 20

Diff. from state

2011 Goal 55 55 50 66

2011 Goal 48 48 50 25

+28 +26 +44 *

+27 +25 +25 +31

+23 +21 -7 *

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1
Use the IIP process to strengthen instruction

Criteria for Success

The percentage of students passing unit test will increase 10%. The percentage of students passing MOY and EOY tests will increase 10%. The percentage of students reading on grade level (F&P, MAP) will increase 10%.

Performance Measure
B,D B,D B,D

Campus Focus #2
Increase Objective 6 (mathematical process and tools) in Math

Criteria for Success

AWARE data for objective 6 will increase 10%.

Performance Measure
B,D,F

Campus Focus #3
Increase the number of students commended on TAKS writing.

Criteria for Success

LEP scores for TAKS commended in writing will increase to 50%. African American scores for TAKS commended writing will increase to 50%.

Performance Measure
B,D,E,F B,D,E,F

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus #4
Reduce the number of students who are tardy each day.

Criteria for Success

Reduce tardies by 10%.

Performance Measure
C

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

10

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Campus Focus #5
Decrease kilowatt usage at Kent.

Criteria for Success

2 point increase in energy usage score

Performance Measure
D

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

11

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Kent Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #6
Increase the efficiency of providing information to parents.

Criteria for Success

Update website to include information per parent survey by 15%

Performance Measure
B

Campus Focus #7

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure
A

Increase community Increase submissions to C-FB news by 10% awareness of campus activities

Campus Focus

Criteria for Success

Performance Measure

12

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011

Campus Focus
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Title Target Area

ACTION STRATEGY
Teachers will be trained to use LLI kits. Teachers will use LLI kits for RTI and identified students. Teachers will use talk moves during math instruction Teachers will use writing rubrics to grade compositions Analyze data from writing rubrics Use QAR strategies to increase reading comprehension Develop schedule to review data Review common language to be used when teaching writing Provide staff development on teaching writing to staff Follow IIP Process Increase awareness of Watt watching Parents will be contacted via letter and phone call after 5 tardies Review campus expectations for students Submissions of campus activities for district distributions Update school website
Teachers will incorporate portions of the CATCH fitness program into recess All PE classes will incorporate fitness program into warm up activities. Health classes will correlate the importance of fitness to students health, nutrition, and improved standardized test scores. Implement test protocols and

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Attendance certificate or sign in sheet Running records and RTI documentation Observation Feedback on rubrics sheet Tracked data Noted in lesson plans Meeting dates set Staff meeting District training Meet by unit of study for reading and math Morning Announcements TEAMS information Staff Meeting On-line form Feedback on district parent survey
Lesson Plans/Catch Documentation Teacher Lesson Plans Teacher Lesson Plans

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
June 2010 September 2010 September - June September June Every 3 weeks Every 3 weeks September - June October - June October November October June October June October - June October 2010 Monthly June 2010
On-going On-going On-going

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
CFB Staff Christi Self Reading Teachers Debbie Williams LA Teachers Debbie Williams Classroom teachers Debbie Williams Leadership Team Christi Self Debbie Williams Grade Level Teams Debbie Williams All staff Debbie Williams Ann Beltran Debbie Williams Donna Cook Ann Beltran Debbie Williams
Homeroom Teachers PE Teacher Chad Marsh PE Teacher Chad Marsh

COST/RESOURCES

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Additional kits will be purchased if money is available in June Pam Smith campus visits

Catch Activity Boxes Fitness Program Guidelines Health Textbooks

Fitnessgram Test

Fall 2010

PE Teacher Chad

Fitnessgram Assesment

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

procedures per state mandate

Marsh

14