ANALYSIS OF THE DATA: The primary data collected has been analyzed and the results are presented

under the following three heads: Respondents Profile Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix Factors Identified

Respondents Profile: The profile of the respondents with respect to their Gender, Marital Status, Nature of Organization, Age, Years of Experience, Qualification, Designation, Salary, No. of Family dependents is presented in Table 1. Demographic Variable Gender Table 1: Respondents Profile Character Frequency Male 60 Female 58 Total 118 Married 114 Unmarried 4 Total 118 Government 106 Corporate 6 Own Practitioner 6 Total 118 < 25 years 2 25 to 35 years 18 35 to 45 years 30 45 to 60 years 68 Total 118 less than 5 Years 18 5 to 10 years 6 10 to 15 years 32 15 to 20 years 34 20 to 25 years 16 Above 25 Years 12 Total 118 MBBS 4 BDS 4 MD 4 MS 92 MDS 12 Cumulative Percent 50.8 100.0 96.6 100.0 89.8 94.9 100.0 1.7 16.9 42.4 100.0 15.2 20.3 47.4 76.2 89.8 100 3.4 6.8 10.2 88.1 98.3

Marital Status

Nature of Organization

Age

Years of Experience

Qualification

Percent 50.8 49.2 100.0 96.6 3.4 100.0 89.8 5.1 5.1 100.0 1.7 15.3 25.4 57.6 100.0 15.2 5.1 27.1 28.8 13.6 10.2 100 3.4 3.4 3.4 78.0 10.2

Designation

Salary

No. of Family dependents

Others Total Civil Assistant Surgeon Civil Surgeon(General) Tutor or Jr/Sr Resident Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor HoD Others Total < Rs 10000 Rs 10000 to Rs 20000 Rs 20000 to Rs 30000 Rs 30000 to Rs 50000 Rs 50000 to Rs 75000 > Rs 75000 Total <2 2 to 4 4 to 6 Above 6 Total

2 118 14 2 4 28 8 44 14 4 118 2 10 2 34 50 20 118 34 80 2 2 118

1.7 100.0 11.9 1.7 3.4 23.7 6.8 37.3 11.9 3.4 100.0 1.7 8.5 1.7 28.8 42.4 16.9 100.0 28.8 67.8 1.7 1.7 100.0

100.0 11.9 13.6 17 40.7 47.4 84.7 96.6 100.0 1.7 10.2 11.9 40.7 83.1 100.0 28.8 96.6 98.3 100.0

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix The descriptive statistics include the mode, mean and standard deviation of the raw score of each of the variable as given by the respondents. The mean values for the thirty four variables (on scale of 1 to 7: 1 =

extremely satisfied to 7= extremely dissatisfied and 4= neutral response) ranged from 2.54 to 4.86 and the standard deviation ranged from 1.015 to 1.749. The correlation matrix reveals the degree of pair-wise relationship of the variables. The correlation coefficients were both negative as well as positive.
Table 2: Descriptives of Response Sl. No. Aspect of Job Satisfaction Mode 1 Physical working conditions in hospital 3 2 Physical working conditions in my department 4 3 Relationship with top management 2 4 Relationship with fellow workers 3 5 Amount of work (responsibility) 3 6 Rate of Pay(Salary) 4 7 Freedom to use abilities 3 8 Opportunity of promotion 4 9 Attentions paid to suggestions 4 Mean 3.34 3.08 3.10 2.58 2.75 3.66 3.37 4.08 3.63 Std. Deviation 1.428 1.350 1.487 1.215 1.178 1.509 1.524 1.667 1.512

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Table 2: Descriptives of Response 3 Hours of work 3.15 1 Job Security 2.54 3 Variety in work 3.29 3 Relationship with subordinates 2.54 4 Relationship with patients 3.12 4 Company policies practiced 3.83 3 Job accomplishment 3.22 2 Individual's job satisfaction 2.68 3 Fair compensation package 3.83 4 The availability of infrastructure facilities 3.88 4 Career opportunities 3.97 4 Retirement benefits 3.64 4 Satisfaction of complete task 3.32 4 Satisfaction with closure 3.17 3 Administrative responsibilities 3.32 4 With your selection process 3.22 Proud to be an employee / private practitioner 3 2.58 1 Sense of pride in doing job 2.63 2 Communication process 2.64 Recreation facilities in combating mental strain 6 4.86 3 Work influence on physical health 3.81 4 With the HR policies and strategies 3.95 4 Recruitment Practices 4.34 4 Grievance mechanism 3.83 3 Disciplinary actions 3.61 Max 4.86 Min 2.54 Range 2.32

1.454 1.594 1.359 1.231 1.347 1.229 1.213 1.377 1.361 1.385 1.490 1.555 1.413 1.015 1.339 1.282 1.257 1.370 1.465 1.719 1.749 1.437 1.379 1.549 1.396 1.749 1.015 0.734

Factors Identified: The responses to various aspects related to Job Satisfaction are subjected to factor analysis by principal components using SPSS. The primary goal had been to obtain factors each of which would explain the Job Satisfaction among Doctors working in Government and Private Hospitals. The following statistics are generated and used for the purpose of this study: i. ii. iii. iv. Communalities Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy & Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Eigen Value and Scree plot; and Component Matrix and Rotated component matrix

Communalities

In factor analysis, there are set of factors which are referred to as common factors, each of which loads on variable/s and other factors which are extraneous to each of the variable. The proportion of variance of a variable explained by the common factor is called the Communality. The Communality of the variable range between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the common factors explains none of the variance and 1 indicates all the variance is explained by the common factors. The extracted communalities are estimates of the variance in each variable accounted for by the components. The Communalities are all above mediocre, ranging from 0.590 to 0.875.
Table 3: Communalities Initial Physical working conditions in hospital Physical working conditions in my department Relationship with top management Relationship with fellow workers Amount of work (responsibility) Rate of Pay(Salary) Freedom to use abilities Opportunity of promotion Attentions paid to suggestions Hours of work Job Security Variety in work Relationship with subordinates Relationship with patients Company policies practiced Job accomplishment Individual's job satisfaction Fair compensation package The availability of infrastructure facilities Career opportunities Retirement benefits Satisfaction of complete task Satisfaction with closure Administrative responsibilities With your selection process Proud to be an employee / private practitioner Sense of pride in doing job Communication process Recreation facilities in combating mental strain Work influence on physical health With the HR policies and strategies Recruitment Practices Grievance mechanism Disciplinary actions Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Extraction .834 .668 .728 .697 .875 .782 .838 .760 .767 .826 .727 .689 .867 .780 .682 .723 .773 .682 .629 .801 .691 .777 .628 .590 .624 .850 .858 .670 .766 .767 .804 .662 .840 .741

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy & Bartlett's Test of Sphericity: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) static varies between 0 and 1. A value of 0 indicates that the sum of partial correlations is large relative to the sum of correlations indicating diffusion in the pattern of correlations (hence, factor analysis is likely to be inappropriate). A value close to 1 indicates that the patterns of correlations are relatively compact and so factor analysis should yield distinct and reliable factors. Kaiser (1974) recommends accepting values greater than 0.5 as acceptable (values below this should lead to either collect more data or rethink which variables to include). Furthermore, values between 0.5 and 0.7 are mediocre; values between 0.7 and 0.9 are great and values above 0.9 are superb. For these data the values is 0.684, which falls in to the range of being higher mediocre; so we should be confident that factor analysis is appropriate for these data. Bartlett's measure tests the null hypothesis that the original correlation matrix is an identity matrix. For factor analysis to work we need some relationships between the variables and if the R-matrix were an identity matrix then all correlation coefficients would be zero. Therefore, we want this test to be significant (i.e. have a significance value less than 0.05). A significant test tells us that the R-matrix is an identity matrix; therefore, there are some relationships between the variables we hope to include in the analysis. For these data, Bartlett test is highly significant (p<0.001), and therefore factor analysis is appropriate.
Table 4: KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square df Sig. .684 3408.941 561 .000

Eigen Value and Scree plot Eigen values represent the amount of standardized variance that has been captured by each of the components. The first component accounts for the largest possible amount of variance. Table 5 represents the Initial Extraction using Principal Component Analysis method suppressing the components with values less than 0.3 and graph represents the corresponding Scree Plot.

Table 5: Total Variance Explained Compo nent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Initial Eigen values Total 10.249 4.594 3.178 2.120 1.566 1.481 1.147 1.061 .984 .847 .790 .668 .591 .557 .502 .460 .389 .354 .335 .323 .300 .229 .207 .187 .167 .153 .124 .093 .088 .078 .069 .043 .040 .027 % of Variance 30.144 13.512 9.348 6.236 4.605 4.356 3.374 3.121 2.894 2.490 2.323 1.966 1.737 1.638 1.476 1.353 1.144 1.042 .986 .950 .883 .672 .609 .550 .491 .450 .364 .273 .260 .228 .204 .126 .117 .079 Cumulative % 30.144 43.656 53.004 59.240 63.845 68.200 71.574 74.695 77.589 80.079 82.402 84.368 86.105 87.743 89.219 90.572 91.717 92.758 93.745 94.695 95.577 96.249 96.858 97.408 97.899 98.349 98.713 98.986 99.246 99.475 99.678 99.804 99.921 100.000 Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total 10.249 4.594 3.178 2.120 1.566 1.481 1.147 1.061 % of Variance 30.144 13.512 9.348 6.236 4.605 4.356 3.374 3.121 Cumulative % 30.144 43.656 53.004 59.240 63.845 68.200 71.574 74.695

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

The Scree plot helps in determining the optimal number of components. The Eigen value of each component in the initial solution is plotted. Generally the components on the steep slope are extracted. Based on Eigen values and Scree Plot Six Factors are extracted in this study. Component Matrix and Rotated Component Matrix The component matrix presents (Table 6) the initial factor loadings. The factor loadings associated with a variable is the correlation between the factor and the standard score of the variable.

Table 6 : Component Matrixa Component 1 Job accomplishment Freedom to use abilities Amount of work (responsibility) With the HR policies and strategies Hours of work Proud to be an employee / private practitioner with subordinates Relationship Physical working conditions in my department Job Security Relationship with top management Satisfaction of complete task Sense of pride in doing job Rate of Pay(Salary) Administrative responsibilities Relationship with fellow workers Individual's job satisfaction Work influence on physical health Satisfaction with closure Communication process The availability of infrastructure facilities selection process With your Company policies practiced Fair compensation package Relationship with patients Attentions paid to suggestions Grievance mechanism Recruitment Practices Career opportunities Opportunity of promotion Disciplinary actions Variety in work Physical working conditions in hospital Retirement benefits .421 .459 .445 .416 .351 .337 .353 .395 .363 .389 .565 .371 .480 .712 .711 .704 .702 .698 .681 .678 .650 .638 .624 .614 .608 .596 .587 .586 .556 .545 .534 .519 .518 .503 .461 .644 -.635 .596 .558 .554 .804 .619 -.530 .364 .520 -.499 -.329 .604 -.383 -.475 .334 .332 -.335 -.389 .316 .418 .318 -.430 -.509 -.322 .397 -.434 .414 -.310 .364 .372 .421 .519 .420 -.358 -.541 .498 -.335 .318 -.467 -.462 -.410 -.427 -.305 -.414 -.424 -.399 -.354 .312 .353 .302 -.357 -.375 -.338 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Recreation facilities in combating .388 mental strain Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a. 8 components extracted.

The component matrix is rotated by varimax for the purpose of establishing a high correlation between variables and factors and in determining what the factor represents.

Table 7 depicted below represents the rotated component matrix and the Table 8 presents Eigen values as well as the percentage of variance explained, it is noted that 68.2% of the variance is explained by the six components and
Table 7 : Rotated Component Matrixa Component 1 Recruitment Practices Opportunity of promotion Attentions paid to suggestions Freedom to use abilities Career opportunities Fair compensation package Work influence on physical health The availability of infrastructure facilities Relationship with patients Relationship with subordinates Relationship with fellow workers Satisfaction with closure With your selection process Individual's job satisfaction Satisfaction of complete task Communication process Amount of work (responsibility) Hours of work Job accomplishment With the HR policies and strategies Physical working conditions in hospital Physical working conditions in my department Company policies practiced Relationship with top management Disciplinary actions Variety in work Rate of Pay(Salary) Job Security Administrative responsibilities Recreation facilities in combating mentalto be an employee / private Proud strain practitioner Sense of pride in doing job Retirement benefits Grievance mechanism a. Rotation converged in 25 iterations. .481 .321 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. .333 .523 .592 .300 .537 .508 .438 .437 .305 .325 .424 .465 .761 .728 .709 .696 .663 .644 .638 .551 .849 .732 .719 .679 .676 .624 .565 .525 .694 .678 .666 .653 .637 .623 .620 .599 .378 .739 .705 .606 .583 .497 .731 .648 .642 .724 -.509 .323 -.447 .503 .431 .451 .582 .375 .468 -.397 .344 .336 .366 .438 2 3 4 5 6

Table 8 : Total Variance Explained Component 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings Total 5.156 5.113 4.867 3.649 2.471 1.931 % of Variance 15.165 15.039 14.316 10.732 7.267 5.680 Cumulative % 15.165 30.204 44.521 55.253 62.520 68.200

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

FACTORS EXTRACTED AND THEIR LOADINGS: The six factors extracted are described and the factor loadings are outlined. Factor 01: Human Resource Practices This factor accounts for 15.165% of the total common variance and is a major factor. The nine variables in this factor are all positive and have substantial loadings varying from 0.481 to 0.761. Factor 1: Human Resource Practices
Recruitment Practices Opportunity of promotion Attentions paid to suggestions Freedom to use abilities Career opportunities Fair compensation package Work influence on physical health The availability of infrastructure facilities Grievance mechanism .761 .728 .709 .696 .663 .644 .638 .551 .481

Factor 2: This factor accounts for 15.039% of the total common variance. The eight variables in this factor are all positive and have substantial loadings varying from 0.525 to 0.849.
Factor 2: Personal Contentedness Relationship with patients Relationship with subordinates Relationship with fellow workers Satisfaction with closure With your selection process Individual's job satisfaction Satisfaction of complete task Communication process .849 .732 .719 .679 .676 .624 .565 .525

Factor 3: This factor accounts for 14.316% of the total common variance. The eight variables in this factor are all positive and have substantial loadings varying from 0.599 to 0.694.
Factor 3: Work & Delegation Amount of work (responsibility) Hours of work Job accomplishment With the HR policies and strategies Physical working conditions in hospital Physical working conditions in my department Company policies practiced Relationship with top management .694 .678 .666 .653 .637 .623 .620 .599

Factor 4: This factor accounts for 10.732% of the total common variance. The five variables in this factor are all positive and have substantial loadings varying from 0.497 to 0.739.

Factor 5: This factor accounts for 7.267% of the total common variance. The three variables in this factor are all positive and have substantial loadings varying from 0.642 to 0.731.
Factor 5: Cognition Recreation facilities in combating mental strain Proud to be an employee / private practitioner Sense of pride in doing job .731 .648 .642

Factor 6: This factor accounts for 5.680% of the total common variance. The only variable in this factor are all positive and have substantial loading of 0.724.

Factor 6: Retirement Benefits Retirement benefits .724

CONCLUSION: The analysis leads to the conclusion that ____________, ______________ and _______________ are