Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
\I
~i
Filed O~/~/11
Page 2 of 5
ORIGINAL J
1
J .
r
Suzanne A. North 220 East Bronco St. Pahrump, Nevada 89048 , (775) 751-2722 Plaintiff Appearing Pro Se
This document
..~
'
1 __ .'
,~Q~~~--6~~~q
I. .' '
.,. .
'''.-
"
.", c. ") I
t\
IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NYE
)
)
CV31506 2
)
)
Plaintiff,
10 II 12
)
)
)
v.
IJ
14 15 16
BANK OF AMERICA, CORP., a Foreign Corporation; RECONTRUST COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, PRLAP, Inc., a Foreign Registered Corporation, BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP, a Foreign Registered L.P., CORPORATIONS ROE 1 -100, JOHN / JANE DOES, 1 - 100, Defedants. ------------------------------)
) ) ) ) )
)
)
)
17
18 19
ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PLAINTIFF Pro Se Suzanne A. North, pursuant to N.R.S. 33.010 and Rule 65 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, having moved this honorable court for an emergency temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and good cause appearing: THE COURT FINDS: 1. On January 10, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Petition for Judicial Review with this court. After filing the Petition, the Plaintiff discovered additional information and filed her Motion
20
21 22
23
24 25
--------
II
2 . 1 4
5
Document 1-6
Filed 011)5/11
Page 3 of 5
to Amend Complaint,
on January
Civil
Recontrust Company violated N.R.S. 76 et. seq., N.R.S . #35 among many other local ordinances from
2. Since filing the Petition and the Amended Complaint, additional information
7
necessitating consent
the tiling of the Second Amended Complaint. to the amendment have consented pursuant to NevRCivP,
written
therefore,
10 II 12
Complaint
Petitioner to tile the proposed Second Amended Complaint. 3. Unless enjoined foreclosure by this court, Defendant Recontrust Company may continue the
13
14
non-judicial Plaintiff. 4.
15
16 17
the Plaintiff
respectfully Defendant
certifies to the court that on January 14, 20 II an attempt was made to contact Recontrust Company and Recontrust Company refused to discuss this matter
18
because of the filing of the Petition for Judicial Review, which was served by this court upon
19
5. As of the tiling of this Motion, the Defendants have received the Plaintiff's to Amend and the Amended the Plaintiff's independent Supplemental Civil Complaint. It is unclear if the Defendants
Motion
23
24
Motion for Leave and Second Amended Complaint; to the court that the Supplemental
25
Document 1-6
Filed O~/j/11
Page 4 of 5
Amended Complaint
2
.1
was send via United States Mail, First Class Mail, Postage Pre-paid to
all named Defendants . 6. There is a substantial likelihood that Plaintiff will establish at trial that Recontrust privities with respect to the contractual relationship between
4 5
the Plaintiff and the other Defendants regarding the promissory note and deed of trust. 7. A Temporary Restraining Order / Preliminary Injunction is necessary to preserve the injury to the Plaintiff that would result from the Company
x
unlawful
<)
non-judicial
being carried
out by Defendant
Recontrust
against the Plaintiff, and to allow the court to render effective relief if the Plaintiff prevails at
10
trial.
II 12
8.
If the Temporary
Restraining
Order / Preliminary
Injunction
Il 14
15 16 17 18 19
remedy at law; and, this court's (or any other court's) impaired if Defendant foreclosure, that if
ability to fashion effective and equitable relief would be significantly Recontrust Company is allowed to continue
found after trial, to be unlawful. 9. Any harm to Defendant non-judicial Plaintiff. 10. Further, granting the requested preliminary relief will serve the public interest. foreclosure Recontrust Company by enjoining it from carrying out the by the actual and potential loss and damages of the
is outweighed
20
21
preliminary
Document 1-6
Filed 01/)5/11
Page 5 of 5
the statutory 2
requirement
licenses
to
conduct business in this state and to properly carry out the non-judicial 13. As a result, Defendant Recontrust
foreclosure process. or
by a requirement
Defendant
Recontrust cannot b considered to be burdened with any "costs" for its failure to comply with the Jaw.
7
x
9 10 II 12 IJ 14 15 16 17
14. Therefore, no security bond should be required. 15. The Emergency Authorities. Motion was properly supported by a Memorandum of Points and
Recontrust
Company,
from conducting
any non-judicial
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Plaintiff will not be required to post any
security deposit or bond.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Defendant Recontrust Company, N.A., will appear -:U-18 19
// .5/
20 21
am
e
)0
"} v
r= day of
12:o ,r.~
,2011,
at the
hour of
DATED this
z:
The Honorable Robert W. Lane District Court Judge Nye County District Court
25