Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AN INTEGER
SAMUEL A. HAMBLETON
is proved.
1.
Introdu tion
Many results exist on identities relating to binomial
oe
ients m
r modulo n
where
n is anq odd positive integer [2. Granville [3 has given new results
on
erning
m
(mod p ) where p is prime, with a ni
e a
ount of known results. Perhaps the
r
most well known identity on fa
torials modulo n is Wilson's theorem, whi
h states
that a positive integer n is prime if and only if (n 1)! 1 (mod n). Granville
[3 writes that Fle
k [2 has generalized Wilson's theorem to the statement that for
all positive integers r less that the least prime divisor of n, n is prime if and only if
r1
n1r
Y r + j
r+1 Y
r
(mod n).
(1)( 2 )
j
r
j=1
j=0
Similarly, we will
onsider the residue modulo an odd positive integer n of a symbol
(n, r) dened in terms of binomial
oe
ients where, likewise, r is less than or
equal to the least prime divisor p of n. We will briey dis
uss the
ase r > p. Let
a and a respe
tively denote the greatest integer A a, and the least integer
A a.
(1)
(2)r .
r
2
if r < p
0 (mod n)
Then (n, r) satises (n, r) =
.
n/p (mod n) if r = p
Theorem 1.1.
Eqn. (1) o
urs as the leading
oe
ient of the dieren
e modulo n of two
polynomials whi
h are important in the study of the ane genus zero
urves known
as Pell
oni
s examined in detail by Lemmermeyer [7, 8 and other authors [4, 5
in relation to the analogy between these
urves and ellipti
urves. Let be the
Date : July 28, 2011.
Mathemati
s Subje
t Classi
ation. Primary 11A51, 11B65; Se
ondary 11B39, 11G20.
Key words and phrases. Binomial symbols, fa
torization, Pell Coni
s, Di
kson polynomials.
2010
S. HAMBLETON
p1
2
(mod p).
n (H) =
2
X
r=0
(1) 2
r
n1
2
n1
2r
H 2 r .
r
2
This
ompletes the dis
ussion of the
ontext of the identity for (n, r).
2.
We require the following equality whi
h holds for all positive integers a.
(3)
a
Y
j=1
(a + j) = 2a
a1
Y
(2j + 1).
j=0
Eqn. (3) Q
may be proved by reordering the produ
ts in the numerator and denoma
a+j
, showing that this is equal to 1. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is
inator of j=1 4j2
as follows.
Proof. First assume that r < p. Let s = r/2 and t = r/2. Then
(n, r)
=
=
(n, p)
(1)
n1
2
n1
2
Qt1
(2)r ,
Y n1
j t1
sj ,
s!
r!
2
j=1
Q
Q
t
t1
s
r
n1
(1)
Y n1
j t1
j=1 (s + j) (2)
j=0
2
sj ,
r!
2
j=1
t1
Q
Q
t
t1
s
r+t
s
(1)
Y
2
j=1 (s + j) (1)
j=0 1 + 2j n
1 + 2s + 2j n ,
t1
r!(2)
j=1
Q
Q
t
t1
s
t1
Y
(s
+
j)
2
1
+
2j
n
j=1
j=0
2t+1 (1)r1
1 + 2s + 2j n ,
r!
j=1
Q
t
t1
s Qt1
Y
j=1 (s + j) 2
j=0 1 + 2j
2t+1 (1)r1
1 + 2s + 2j
(mod n).
r!
j=1
(1)s
(2)r
j=0
n1
2
Sin
e r is stri
tly less than p, the integers r! and n are relatively prime. By Eqn.
(3), (n, r) = 0. Now let r = p = 2s + 1. Then
(n, p)
=
=
(n, p)
!
!
n1
s1
2
(1)
2p ,
+
p
s
s
Q
(1)s
2s sj=0 n 1 2j Y
n1
+
sj ,
s!
p!
2
j=1
s
Qs1
s n
(1)s
2 ( p 1) j=0 n 1 2j Y
n1
+
sj ,
s!
(p 1)!
2
j=1
Q
Qs1
s1
s n
s
1
j=0 (s + j + 1) + 2
j=0 n + 1 + 2j Y
p
n + p + 2j ,
s
(p 1)!2
j=1
s
s1
Y
j=0
n1
2
(s + j + 1) +
n
p
s
s
Y
Y
1
s + j (p 1)!1 2s
p + 2j
j=1
s
Y
n
(p 1)!1 2s
s + j p + 2j
p
j=1
p1
Y
n
(p 1)!1 2p+1
p+j
p
j=1
p1
nY
(2j)1 p + j
p j=1
(mod n),
j=1
(mod n),
(mod n),
(mod n).
Qp1
1
j=1 (2j)
p+j
We
on
lude by spe
ulating as to the value of (n, r) when r ex
eeds the least
prime divisor of n, within some bounds. The author has only tested the following
onje
ture for n < 106 .
S. HAMBLETON
Conje ture 2.1. Let p be the least prime divisor of an odd integer n and assume
that 2 n < 3p. If r is an integer bounded by p < r < n then (n, r) > 0.
If Conje
ture 2.1 holds and the least prime divisor p of n satises 2 n < 3p then
the follow exponential algorithm will terminate.
Let
j A =k(a1 , a2 ) and assume
j we wish
fa
tor n. Set A =
k to
a1 +a2
a1 +a2
(2, n). If n,
= 0, Set A =
, a2 , otherwise set A =
2
2
j
k
a1 +a2
a1 ,
, and print A. Repeat until a2 a1 2.
2
Algorithm 2.2.
A knowledgments
The author would like to thank Vi
tor S
haras
hkin for do
toral supervision of
whi
h this proje
t has been a very small part of, and supported by the University
of Queensland.
Referen
es
1. P. Ba
hmann, Die Lehre von der Kreistheilung, Leipzig, pp. 9, 10 (1872).
2. L. Di
kson, History of the theory of numbers, I, AMS Chelsea publishing, (1992)
3. A. Granville, Binomial Coe
ients (mod pq ), available at:
http://www.
e
m.sfu.
a/organi
s/papers/granville/
4. S. Hambleton, Generalized Lu
asLehmer tests using Pell
oni
s, Pro
. AMS,
to appear.
5. S. Hambleton, V. S
haras
hkin, Pell
oni
s and quadrati
re
ipro
ity, RMJM,
to appear.
6. D. H., Lehmer, An extended theory of Lu
as' fun
tions, The Ann. Math., 31,
(3), 419448, (1930).
7. F.
Lemmermeyer,
Coni
s A poor man's ellipti
urves,
arXiv:math/0311306v1, preprint available at:
http://www.fen.bilkent.edu.tr/franz/publ/
oni
s.pdf
8. F. Lemmermeyer,
Modular Pell
oni
s,
preprint available at:
http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/hb3/publ-new.html
9. R. Lidl, G. Mullen, G. Turnwald, Di
kson Polynomials, Longman S
ienti
and
Te
hni
al (1993).
10. H. Williams, Ee
tive primality tests for some integers of the form A5n 1 and
A7n 1, Math. Comp. 48, 177, 385403 (1987).
S
hool of Mathemati
s and Physi
s, University of Queensland, St. Lu
ia, Queensland, Australia 4072