Sie sind auf Seite 1von 24

PWR

Anaerobic Digestion &

Municipal Waste Water Treatment

A Project Road-Map For Bulgaria

PWR
Presentation Structure

1. Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water Treatment What are we talking about ? What are the first questions municipalities need to answer? 2. Feedstocks just sewage sludge? or can other feedstocks be used? What is the gas yield from sewage sludge and other feedstocks? 3. What does AD cost? Does it make any money? Costs & Possible Revenues An Outline Action Plan

PWR
Why AD?

AD Advantages less sludge to dispose of after AD (reduces cost$ for the WWTP) sludge can be spread on agricultural land or $old AD plants can be compact Sewage sludge is stabilised by AD bioga$ production

AD Disadvantages no nitrogen elimination, process control & know-how needed, not able to easily adapt to large changes in flow volumes

And of course it is possible to make $$$$$$$ from AD

What are we talking about? Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water Treatment

PWR

Henriskdal WWTP - Sweden

PWR
Question 1a & 1b for Municipalities

1a: What volume of waste water occur 1b. What is the Dry Matter Content of Your Waste Water? Methods 1. Measure off-line through drying and weighing (but only measures samples not flows) 2. Microwave measurement on-line - can measure a flow with sampling rate of seconds (but only handles DMs of 3 to 15%).
3. Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) on-line technique can be used at various points in the AD process

PWR
Question 2 for Municipalities
What is the Energy Content ($$$) of Your Waste Water?

Traditional Methods 1. COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand, indirect measurement of organic compounds (but no correlation to energy content) 2. Calorimetry: dry the sample and then burn it & measure energy
Problem!!: tends to underestimate energy content of waste water by up to 20%* because drying causes loss of volatile matter

*Source: Elizabeth Heidrich, PhD student, Newcastle University UK.

Decision Point 1

PWR

Budget Issue

Build MWW System Only

Build MWW System & Plan for AD (later)

Build MWW System & AD

Decision Point 2 Availability of other material for AD AD & Co-digestion Suitability of other material for AD

AD using only MWW sludge

Gas Yields & Why Co-Digestion is (very) desirable

PWR

More Data on Gas Yields

PWR

PWR
Question 3

a. b. c. d.

How much material for co-digestion is available? Is it available on a regular basis? (seasonal basis?) Could the supplier be charged for disposing of it (= revenue stream) How far away is it (transport costs an issue?)

Is the material viable (both from an AD and financial point of view for inclusion in the AD project)

Is Co-Digestion Worth it? 1. 2. 3. 4. Biogas to produce electricity Biogas to fuel vehicles Pelletised sluge to use in, e.g. cement production* Acceptance fees for industrial/commercial waste

PWR

* Biogasmax Report: WWTP Bern

PWR
AD for Municipal Waste Water Treatment

Budget, flexibility of the process, space

1. High rate system (short hydraulic retention times) (usually solids retention time = hydraulic retention time) 2. Single stage system (i.e. one AD tank) 3. But several different processes to choose from: WABIO one step system BTA single stage Linde KCA process

4. Most common process: activated sludge process (as used in Swedish AD system)

AD System Size

PWR

An example from XXXXXXX for one house

AD & Energy Self-Sufficiency

PWR

Location: System: Politics: End Result:

Juhned, Germany, 800 population AD plant using local biomass (animal manure) plus CHP/district heating System is communally financed & owned Export 50% of power produced, 99% self-sufficient in energy for heating

PWR
Capital Costs A Swiss Example

WWTP Luzern 2000 to 2006 wastewater treatment plant was redeveloped (to include AD) Total AD module costs 750 /m digester volume (WETT 2009) 10 % costs for machine technology 90 % for physical facilities (KOBEL and BGUE 2008). Overhead expenses - approval and planning 10 % total investment costs (KTBL 2007).

Tanks, bases etc (make locally?)

Pumps & controls (import?)

Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

PWR
Capital Costs II

Capex Costs for Electricity Generation:


(Source: 2008 SLR study)

Euro 750/kW

Similar costs for biogas into gas grid or use with gas engine

Operating Costs vs Gas Market Prices I Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.09 (From Luzern Switzerland*)
Methane content = 62.5%

PWR

Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas) Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.013
Current Bulgarian (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0351/kWhr Current Bulgarian (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0215/kWhr

Biogas prices for vehicles: Euro 0.42/m3


Lesson: AD gas can be produced @ 60% less than the selling price of domestic gas, 35% less than the selling price of industrial gas and 66% less than the selling price for gas for vehicles.
*Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

France

PWR

Rubbish collection vehicles fuelled by.. rubbish

Combined waste treatment plant & bus depot with the buses power by..

Operating Costs vs Gas Market Prices II Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.19 (From Henriksdal Sweden*)
Methane content = 65%

PWR

Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas) Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.027
Current Swedish (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.10/kWhr Current Swedish (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.05/kWhr

Lesson: Even in a high cost location like Sweden AD & biogas is interesting as a method to turn waste into revenue

*Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

PWR
Commercial Considerations & Group Action

1. Do Bulgarian municipalities have similar types of waste water to treat? (probably)

2. Should Bulgarian municipalities group together depending on the flow rates of waste water (and thus the size and type of AD system they might need) and act as a single unit when purchasing AD systems? 3. Do you think that the price for a single AD system might be different from the price if 10 or 100 are purchased?

PWR
More Decisions

Decision Point 3

Decision Point 4

Collaborate with other municipalities

What to do with the gas?

Option 1 Generate Electricity (CHP?) Clean the gas

Option 2 Gas for Vehicles

Option 3 Sell to gas grid

PWR
Project Success Criteria

1. Detailed feasibility study (Answer Questions 1a, 1b & 2 &.) 2. Effective business plan 2a What size of plant is appropriate 2b What type of plant is appropriate) 2c What other feed-stock is available? 2d Citizens participation (partners?) of the bioenergy plant 2e Define revenue streams are these realistic

PWR
Key Documents

Web site: (EU project)


Reports

www.biogasmax.eu

Assessment Report on Operational Experience

Final Assessment Report on Residual Materials Decision Makers Guide: How to Implement a Biomethane Project (for vehicles) Arcadis: Final Report Assessment of the Options to Improve the management of Biowaste in Europe

PWR
AD & Improved Gas Yields

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Thermal Hydrolysis (e.g CAMBI method) Chemical Hydrolysis Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Ozone Treatment Ultrasound Electroporation Addition of Enzymes

Reference: Increased Gas Production @ the Henriksdal Waste Water Treatment Plant ( www.biogasmax.eu ).

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen