National Award for Excellence in Water Management

CII Soharabji Godrej Green Buisness Centre, Hyderabad

Our Approach The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas of water management and conservation, but in escaping the old ones

ENDURING VALUE THROUGH VALUES

Hindustan Zinc Limited Chanderiya Lead Zic Smelter 2008

Vision & Mission VISION

Be a world-class company, creating value, leveraging mineral resources and related core competencies

MISSION
Be a globally lowest cost zinc producer on a global scale , maintaining market leadership One million tonne Zinc-Lead metal capacity by 2010 Be innovative, customer oriented, and eco-friendly maximizing stake-holder value

Corporate Purpose
Harnessing natural resources in harmony with nature to enhance economic well being and quality of life

Core Values
Trustworthy, Entrepreneurial & Innovation, Concern for Environment, Respect and care for people, Passion to excel.

To be counted among Best Zinc People in the World

Hydro Smelting Complex

Hydromet Route of Zinc Production

Effluent

Effluent Treatment

Disposal to Secure Land Fill Jarofix Pond Tank House

Sustainable Development at CLZS

Sustainable Development at CLZS

Key factors for achieving Sustainable development 100% EOHS Compliance Aspire 10% reduction in water and Energy consumption every year Encourage to discover and innovate ideas for CDM Credits Find beneficial use of solid waste like Jarosite and Slag Accelerate social development initiatives around CLZS Operational excellence

Bottom-up Improvement Methodology

At least two improvement projects for all Green belt training for all (Six sigma) 5S at CLZS location Online Tracking System Management employee engagement and facilitation framework

Our Approach to Sustainable Development in Smelter

Adoption of 5 R waste management principles Adoption of sustainability framework by International Council of Mines & metals Benchmarking with Worlds best in all operating parameters Focused environmental initiatives for effective water management, waste minimization and recycling, reducing air emissions, energy conservation and sustainable development drivers. Comprehensive GRI G3 guidline based online data management system to capture all Triple Bottom Lime dimensions Implementation of British Safety Council s safety management system

Our Implementation Methodology

An integrated and structured approach -- comprising of Involvement of executives and contract labors like Water Stewards nominated for each Plant, further report to Water Managers and Unit Head for Water Conservation activities Discussion of underlying factors behind the trends of HSE key performance indicators by top management during the monthly HSE review meetings. Training - an efficient tool to improve the KPIs by motivating employees. Frequent training programs for external environment, safety and health, supervised by the HR head. The CEO usually takes feedback from Environment head and external faculty members who conduct the training program.

HSE at CLZS
Integrated Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) System in place HSE is driven by its Policy and overseen by HSE Committee. HSE policy at Company level as well as unit level HSE Committee at Company level HSE System is in place Qualified / specialized HSE Team Integrated Management System (ISO 9001, ISO 14001 & OHSAS 18001) HSE Business Plan Management information system (MIS) Training on HSE, pollution prevention and control HSE audits, HAZOP Studies, Work permit, periodic mock drill, steward Regular reviews with Management for a strong focus Elaborate MIS based on GRI Guidelines on key performance indicators is in place.

Management Systems Excellence in Quality, Environment, Occupational Health & Safety

CERTIFICATE
ISO 14001: 2004

Significant Environmental Initiatives

Legally Compliant Organization CDM Project First in Zinc Industry in the world (CER: 516,090) 9.4 MW and 4.3 MW Waste Heat Recovery Boiler DCDA Tech. with cesium based V2O5 catalyst at Acid Plants Tail Gas Treatment (TGT) Plant based on Japanese Techn (Mescon) Cansolv Technology to concentrate lean & varying SO2 gas. Integrated ETP with Storm Water Ponds having auto sampler, online pH and water level indicators & GSM network. Reverse Osmosis Plant First & Biggest in Rajasthan Secured Landfill First & Biggest in Rajasthan Jarofix Technology First in Asia & 3rd in World Jarofix Disposal Area - First in Asia & 3rd in World Concrete road network, truck mounted industrial vacuum cleaner, road sweeper & pressure jet road washing Dry Fog Dust Suppression System De-dusting and Ventilation Systems in each plant. Rain Water Harvesting System

Significant Environmental Initiatives (Contd..)

O&M towards EMS : Rs 17.38 Crores (previous year Rs 10.75 Cr) 25,000 Jatropha plants during FY 07-08 Full fledged Env. Mngt Cell & sophisticated laboratory. Online AAQM Stations, Multi Parameter Analyser, Stack Analysers MoEF approved Agency for env. monitoring & analysis. O&M of SLF & Jarofix Sites by CPCB recognized agency. Quarterly Magazine on HSE Saath Saath. Intranet based website on HSE. Computerized Haz. Manifest and Water System. 19 Lead Auditors and 80 Internal Auditors

Activities for awareness on water conservation in Plant

We celebrate World Environment Day on June 5 every year CHANGE: Challenge for How to Acknowledge the Green Education was organized in May, 08 as One day awareness workshop on Water Conservation. One week was fully dedicated and Declared as WATER WEEK from 5TH June to 11th June, 08 in Colony as water conservation and capacity building initiative. Green Employee of the Month Scheme is in practice to recognize the efforts of plant personal towards Water Conservation Activities. We also publish quarterly magazine on HSE titled Saath Saath Posters on water conservation are displayed at various locations of the plant In-house intra net based web-site titled Apna HSE Web Portal Promotion of use of treated sewage water for lawns & plantation in respective households Rain water harvesting thereby recharging old bore wells at Township adopted

Internal Training & Awareness

Classroom Training to Contractors, Supervisors & Workers

Training / Display to Govt Officials, school children, sarpanchs

WATER CONSERVATION HYDRO I

CONSUMPTION CONTROL

Mapping the consumption points-

WASTE CONTROL
Assessing quantity of effluent Exploring the possibility of reuse/recycle Within system without any treatment After ETP & RO treatment

Identifying key Measurement pointsInstallation of meters- Consumption SBU wise recorded

MONITORING MECHANISM
Recording shift wise consumption Reporting in daily morning report Immediate action on excess consumption & why-why analysis for same Monthly review with SBU on consumption pattern & reduction possibility

WATER CONSERVATION

Monitoring and Review Systems

Top Management (e.g RKB, DK Ghosh , etc) (Review)

Middle Management ( SBUs etc) (Reporting)

Lower Management ( Shift in charge/ PAs) (Supervision)

Contractor (Supervisors, labors etc) (Implementation)

Morning meetings and daily plant SAP generated MIS will show the variance analysis of Water consumption in the plant. Each Water Stewards will tell in the morning meeting regarding the root causes and carry out the structured analysis to find out the reasons. HSE Online software is in place to track the daily Environment operations and update Water consumption and other initiatives and drives status can be assessed through HSE Online.\ Daily plant MIS is generated EXCEL and in SAP and is included in Daily Production Report. Enclosed: Format of daily MIS and Daily Report also.

Water Circuit Hydro I

Raw water clarifier 3500-3000 m3 Water treatment 5500 m3

RO treated water 2000-2500 m3

Roaster & Acid 400 m3

DM plant 1500 m3 Regeneration ACF & PSF back wash

Cooling Tower 2500 m3 Blow down

L& P 600 m3 Mg Bleeding

Cell house & Melting 500 m3 Anode & Cathod washing Pump seal cooling

GCP area

250 m3 300 m3 300 m3

320 m3 ETP

400 m3

Specific Water Consumption Figures

Year (Apr-Mar)

Annual Water consumption Quantity (m3) Domestic (Lit/capita/ day) 19.02 19.22

Specific Water Consumption m3 / MT

Industrial

Source Captive dam Captive dam Captive dam

2005 06 2006 07

1407000 1755000

21.87 12.99

2007 08

1867670

17.2

11.72

10

Maintaining Zero Discharge Pragmatically

Year (Apr - Mar)

Quantity generated (m3)

Quantity recycled (m3)

Quantity discharged (m3)

2005 06 2006 07

74325

74325

62358

62358

2007 08

52928

52928

Revolutionary improvement.
Specific Water Consumption 25 20 m3/MT 15 10 5 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 12.99 11.72

21.87

54.09% decrease

10.04

11

Beyond Benchmarks/ Global Norms

Specific Water consumption (m3/MT) 15 10 m3/MT 5 0

14 10.26 8.18

Clarks ville, Newyork

Hobart, Australia

Hydro-1, CLZS

Hobart, Australia :10.26

Beyond the Benchmark

12

Water Saving project implemented

Sl No 1 2.

Title of Water Saving project implemented ETP treated water to RO-I plant (88 m3/hr) Process optimization of DM plant operation to reduce regeneration by increasing the OBR Reduction in evaporation by optimization of CT fan operation according to the heat load

Year of Implementation 05 - 06 06 - 07

Annual Water Savings M3 339190 29200 Rs. Lakhs 25.43 2.19

Invest. Made Rs. Lakhs 215 Nil

Payback Period (Months) 55 Nil

3.

06 - 07

27375

2.05

Nil

Nil

Contd..
Sl No 4. Title of Water Saving project implemented Year of Implementation Annual Water Savings M3 36500 Rs. Lakhs 2.73 Invest. Made Rs. Lakhs 4.63 Payback Period (Months) 21

Recirculation of vacuum 07 - 08 pumps seal cooling water To CT as Make up water Recirculation of steam Condensate from Leaching & purification to CT as make up water RO treated water directly taken to Filter water storage tank, reduced PSF backwash frequency Recirculation of Boiler blow down water to CT as Make up water 07 - 08

5.

73000

5.47

3.46

6.

07 - 08

27375

2.05

0.20

7.

07 - 08

87600

6.57

0.72

1.5

13

Sl No

Title of Water Saving Year of project implemented Implementation

Optimization of CT 07 - 08 water circulation rate by switching on/off pump as & when require under six sigma project Optimization of COC at 07 - 08 CT by chemical treatment & continuous monitoring under six sigma project Providing Level probe 07 08 in all CT to avoid overflow under six sigma project ETP treated water to RO-II plant (50 m3/hr) 07 - 08

Annual Water Savings

Invest. Made

Payback Period (Months Nil

8.

154395

11.58

Nil

10.

11 Total

192720 901655

14.45 72.52

135 359.01

61

Innovative CASE STUDIES

14

D M A I C
Reduction of Specific Water Consumption in Hydro -I

D
0 1

Project & Business Synergy Who is the customer in your project? Hydro -I Conservation of Natural Resources What is the Customer CTQ?

Establish CTQ Characteristics

M
2 3

A
4 5 6

What is the Project CTQ? Reduction of Specific Water Consumption in Hydro-I

I
7 8 9

C
10 11 12

15

D
0 1

SIPOC SIPOC REDUCTION OF Water IN CELL HOUSE Conservation of MnO2

RO product

Define a Project

M
2 3

Raw water pond

Water

DM Plant Filter Water

A
4 5 6

Raw water from Pyro

DM Water

Soft Water

Roaster CPP L&P Cell House & M&C ETP

I
7 8 9

C
10 11 12

Macro Level Process Map

D
0 1

Project Scoping Longitudinal Scope

It start from Raw Water Pond at DM Plant at Hydro-I and ends at ETP

Define a Project

M
2 3

Outside Scope
Period when there is continuous heavy rains When any of SBU is not in operation on a particular day for more than 8 hrs.

A
4 5 6

Lateral Scope I
7 8 9

Water saving at each SBUs at Hydro I

C
10 11 12

16

D
0 1

Loss - Gain Matrix Gains Loss

M
2 3 Reduced water Consumption.

A
4 5 6

Short Term

ETP treatment cost will be high Water cess will be high

Maintenance of zero discharge Lower effluent generation Sustainable growth

Violation of zero discharge conditions During draught years continuity of operations may suffer

I
7 8 9

Long Term

Cost reduction

Leaning & satisfaction of team members Better image within stakeholders

C
10 11 12

Water balance of Zinc Smelter

RO Product Treated Eff 100 1500
Water treatment Plant

Filtered water = 4500

Concentrate Handling

100 Evap 1400 Condensate = Roaster 200 150 Leaching & Cell Gas cleaning 1800 750 house. Acid plant 800
Soft water plant.

Moist with cake 450 200 Effluent

550

1300

DM Plant

Effluent= 150

400 Evap. & drift 2450

Cooling tower

2 3 0 0 Blow dow n= 250

1 1 0 0 Roaster Boiler

Loses = 250

Eff 100

ETP To RO 1700

17

As-is Micro-Level Process Map

ROASTER PLANT FLOW CHART
Concentrate from RMH
TABLE FEEDER
Direct water injection Max 3000 Lit/hr

DAY BIN

EX. BELT

SLINGER
Feed machine GAS

FURNACE

DM water

U/F

GCP

GAS

HGP

GAS

CYCLONES

GAS

WHRB
Pressure 42 bar

Cooling water from CT5

DRUM COOLER
Again Return to CT5 CALCINE

CALCINE

CALCINE CALCINE

ROTARY VALVE

ROTARY VALVE

220 CONV BCC

HRZ. CONV. 60 CONV

BALL MILL

CALCINE

D
0 1

Operational Definition

M
2 3

A
4 5 6

What To Measure: water consumption in M3/MT of Cathode Produced on daily basis How to Measure: Water consumption will be measured by referring flow meter in the line of raw water coming from raw water tank at Pyro and at line bringing recycled water from RO plant. Cathode production for the day will be taken from daily production report.

I
7 8 9

C
10 11 12

18

OFE

Charge preparation Operation. Cooling Towers Operation. Evaporation Losses. Drift Losses Maintenance of COC. Overflow of Cooling Towers. Leaching Operation. Wastage of Steam Condensate. Use of Filter Water for washing Horizontal Belt Filters. Cell House Operation.

Root Cause Analysis:

Cooling Tower Operation Scaling & Chocking in HEX. Increased CT Inlet Temp. Increased Circulation Increased Evaporation Losses

Disposal of Low Density Jarofix

Water Leakages

condensate draining from L&P pump seal water to drain mal operation of HBF failure of valve & NRV flange leakages High speed of HBF drift losses from CT Higher flow of jarofix plant CT Overflow

High Water Consumption Water addition in system to maintain reqd parameter Bus bar cooling at CH Less recycling of treated effluent B/D & PMI T.G is Not Running

Increase in turbidity Increase in silica

Increased frequency in backwash/regeneration Bad quality raw water from dam Excess Use Of Water Steam Venting

Root Cause Analysis for Increased Water Consumption

19

D
0 1

Generation of Xs

M
2 3

A
4 5 6

I
7 8 9

Sl.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Causes of High Water Consumption Over Flow of Cooling Towers Excessive Drift Losses Excessive Evaporation Losses Operation of Cooling Towers at reduced COC Excessive use of Raw Water Use of Raw Water for Lime Preparation for Magnesium removal Use of Filter Water for HBF Cloth washing Use of Filter water for clarifier Make up Excessive use of Water for HBF Cake Washing Wastage of condensate in L& P

C
10 11 12

Water Consumption and Stoppage of Use of Filter water for HBF Cloth Cleaning:
Boxplot of April Water Cons., May Water Cons.
26 24 22 20 Data 18 16 14 12 10 April Water Cons. May Water Cons. comparison of water consumption april & may 07after modification at HBF washing lines.BF cloth washing stopped by using Filter Water.

One-way ANOVA: April Water Cons., May Water Cons. Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 79.83 79.83 10.38 0.005 Error 18 138.46 7.69 Total 19 218.28 S = 2.773 R-Sq = 36.57% R-Sq(adj) = 33.05% Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev Level N Mean StDev --+---------+---------+---------+------April Water Cons 9 19.437 3.317 (---------*---------) May Water Cons. 11 15.421 2.245 (--------*--------) --+---------+---------+---------+------14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0

20

Effect of Introduction of Level Probes in Cooling Towers on Water Consumption.

Boxplot of Water Before Level Prob, Water after Level Prob

22
One-way ANOVA: Water Before Level Prob, Water after Level Prob Source DF SS MS F P

Factor 1 26.47 26.47 6.19 0.020 Error 25 106.98 4.28

20 18 Data 16 14

Total 26 133.46 S = 2.069 R-Sq = 19.84% R-Sq(adj) = 16.63% Level N Mean StDev Water Before Lev 17 15.416 2.186 Water after Leve 10 13.365 1.842 Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev +---------+---------+---------+--------(-------*--------) (----------*-----------)

Level

Water Before Lev Water after Leve

+---------+---------+---------+--------12.0 13.2 14.4 15.6

12

10 Water Before Level Prob Water after Level Prob

.Base Line vs Improved Performance:

Boxplot of water cons. m3/MT Cathode BL, Water . Cons. M3/MT Improved
18 17 16 15 Data 14 13 12 11 10 9 water cons. m3/MT Cathode BL Water . Cons. M3/MT Improved
One-way ANO VA: wate r cons. m3/MT Ca thode BL, W ate r . Cons. M3/MT Improved Source DF SS MS F P Factor 1 38.49 38. 49 19.89 0.000 Error 71 137. 42 1. 94 Tot al 72 175. 91 S = 1. 391 R-Sq = 21.88% R-Sq(adj) = 20.78%

Individua l 95% CIs For Me an Ba sed on Poole d StDe v Level N Me an St Dev --------+ ---------+---------+---------+ wa ter cons. m3/M 46 14.786 1.343 (-----*-----) Wa ter . Cons. M3 27 13.282 1.471 (-------*------) --------+---------+---------+ ---------+ 13.30 14.00 14.70 15.40

21

FMEA:
FMEA Table
Process / Product Potential Failure Characteristic Mode(s) s Charge Prepration Potential Effect(s) of Failure Sev (S) Potential Cause(s) of Failure Occ (O) Current Design Controls Increase in Moisture % of Concentrate Det (D) RPN Recommended Action(s) Responsibili ty & Target Completion Date Actions Taken New Sev (SN) New Occ (ON)

FMEA water conservation

New Det (DN)

New RPN (RPNN)

Excessive Use of Increased Water Water Consumption

Use of Fresh Water

126

Switch over to Recycle Roaster water SBU Head

Stopped Using Raw Water and replaced it with Recycled water

42

Operation of Increased Water Cooling Tower Consumption at Low COC

Increased Make Up

Periodical Analysis

192

1.Ensured Cooling Tower Operation at >7 Operation of Cooling Deepak Jain COC Tower at High COC 2. Increased Frequency of Analysis As an when possible Judicious operation of Deepak Jain reduced No. of pumps Pumps. in operation. Cooling Towers Top 1.Increase frequency of Nozzles were cleaned at Nozzle Cleaning. regular frequency and Deepak Jain 2. Replacement of agency was engaged to Damaged Loovers. attend the cooling towers loovers etc. To have Level Probs in Deepak Jain Optimization of Level Hitesh Probs in Cooling Cooling Tower Hot/Cold Well Arora Towers Collection of Condensate Repositioning of Cleaning Nozzles & Removal of certain Nozzles minimal spary of water for cooling of bus bars Steam Condensate was transferred to Cooling tower # 2 Stopped use of Filter Water for HBF Cloth Cleaning

48

Increased Increased Water Circulation Rate Consumption Cooling Tower Operation Increased Drift Increased Water Losses Consumption

Increased evopration losses

Accounting of No. of Circulation Pumps

252

140

Spillage of water

Visual Inspection

168

84

Water Wastage

Increased Water Consumption

Spillage of water Draining of Steam Condensate in to Drain Increased Consumption of Filter Water Increased Consumption of Filter Water

Visual Inspection

224

64

Excessive Increased Water consumption of Consumption Steam Leaching Operation Excessive Consumption of Increased Water Consumption water for HBF Cloth Cleaning. use of filter Increased Water water for cooling Consumption of bus bars

Visual Inspection

126

Amit Wali

42

Valve Control

126

A.K.Singh Sheeba

36

Cell House Operation

Visual Inspection

108

DK Ahir

Minimal spray

36

D
0 1

List of Xs Chosen for Screening

Identify Variation Sources

M
2 3

Sl. No.

Name of X

Description of X
Cycle of concentration i.e TDS in circulation water to TDS in Make Up water is to be maintained >7

A
4 5 6

X1

COC

X2

Water Level Probe

Probes at all the CTs were optimized

I
7 8 9 X3 Stoppage of Use of Filter Water for HBF washing Filter water use at HBF cake washing as well as at cloth washing reduced and replaced with recycled water.

C
10 11 12

22

D
0 1

List of Xs Chosen for Screening

Identify Variation Sources

M
2 3

Sl. No.

Name of X
Transfer of Condensate to Cooling Tower

Description of X
Condensate tanks line earlier connected with CT3, Now shifted to CT1 & 2 for reduction in makeup water. Schedule has been made and being followed for cleaning of nozzles at all CTs

A
4 5 6

X4

X5

Frequent Cleaning of Cooling Tower Nozzles

I
7 8 9 X6 Optimization of Cooling Tower Circulation Circulation rate of CT pumps are optimized based on requirement at end use.

C
10 11 12

Water Saving & Financial Impact in terms of Monthly Saving:-

Water Consumption M3/MT of Cathode

Water Conservation
Water Consumpt Month ion M3/MT of Cathode Base Line 14.79 SST 14.25 PT 13.75 June,07 13.05 July,07 11.83 August,07 12.57 Sept,07 11.82 Oct,07 11.65 Financial Savings (Rs)

Financial Savings (Rs) Linear (Water Consumption M3/MT of Cathode)

16 Water M3/MT of Cathode 15 14 13 12 11 10 June,07 July ,07 SST PT Base Line August,07 Sept,07 Oct,07

800000 700000 Financial Saving 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0

141762 273023 432400 748007 570289 715241 752124

Month

23

D
0 1

Process Improvement:

Define Performance Goals

M
2 3

< 14.79> < 14.2 > < 13.75 > < 12.0 >

A
4 5 6

I
7 8 9

Mean

Baseline

SST

Target

Achieved

C
10 11 12

Waste Heat Recovery Boiler- Case study-2

STEAM FROM WHRB

The waste heat, recovered from Roaster in the boiler, in the form of steam is transferred to STG where steam of qty 51.5 tns/hr and 40 bar pressure is used to generate 9.4 MW power. The extracted steam is used in leaching and the condensate is used back in the boiler.

TO CONDENSER

TURBI NE

GENERATOR

IF LOAD > 5.4 MW NO

YES

EXTN.STEAM TO LEACHING (20 TO 30 TONNS)

DEAERATOR

24

Waste Heat

1. Waste Flue Gas from Zinc Roaster has been used for generating high pressure steam in a waste heat recovery boiler (WHRB). 2. High pressure steam from WHRB has been used for generating electricity in a 9.4 MW back pressure turbine. Waste heat recovery boiler Type : Back Pressure & Forced Circulation type Steam output : 55 tonnes per hour Steam pressure : 45 kg/cm2 Steam temperature : 400 0C

Steam turbine Capacity : 9.4 MW The technology for the boilers and turbines is well established and available in India.

Estimated CO2e
Years 2006 07 2007 08 2008 09 2009 10 2010 11 2011 12 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 Total estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) Total number of crediting years Annual average over the crediting period of estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) Annual estimation of emission reductions in tonnes of CO2e 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 51,609 5,16,090 10 51,609

25

Certified Emission Reductions

The project activity would be generating around 702 million units of electricity over a period of 10 years (@ 70.2 million units per annum) and hence would result in CO2 emission reduction of 5,16,090 tonnes of CO2.

Case Study 3 Reuse of Pump Seal Water

CT

DCS Reading

Seal Water Sump

Seal Water Sump

Seal Water Sump

26

Way Forward..
Separation of Hydro-1 and Pyro effluent at ETP-2 for easy treatment and improved treated water quality Achieving 100% recycling of effluent by treating RO Rejects Control at Source for metal coming in to the effluent Recovery of Acid and Zinc from Hydro Effluent going to ETP Recovery of non-metal bearing effluent, which do not require total treatment and may join other effluent in 2nd Stage of treatment i.e directly to RO. RO Reject Treatment Plant 3 D TRASAR technology for CT operation Improve the run off collection in Gosunda - catchments area

CLZS-PARTNER IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CLZSDEVELOPMENT

27

We grow together- Support of Key Communities

HUMBLE SMART HUNGRY At HZL/CLZS, we believe in sustainable development and are committed to raise the quality of life and social well-being of the communities where we operate. Towards this, we will be guided by following: Our community development initiatives will be prioritized based on local needs. Broad areas of focus will be Social Investment Health, Education, Livelihood, Social Mobilization & Infrastructural Development Bio Investment Water harvesting, agriculture and animal husbandry. Environment conservation- Social forestry All operating locations will incorporate CSR activities as an integral part of their business plan and have an appropriate organization to implement the same. We will be open to working with like minded associates, Government bodies and other volunteer organization in pursuit of our mission. We will measure and report progress as per social accounting systems and encourage third party reviews for effective delivery and measurable impact. We regularly communicate with all our stakeholders on the progress and performance on social management.

OUR REACH
RAJASTHAN
A jmer Tonk Pali Raj Samund Bhilw ara Sirohi
RDM RDM RDM RDM RDM ZSD ZSD ZSD ZSD ZSD ZSD CLZS CLZS CLZS CLZS CLZS RAM RAM RAM RAM RAM RAM

Jaipur

Impacting the lives of more than half million people (inclusive of High Impact Projects)

Bundi Kota

61.79 % Families belong to Below Poverty Line

Udaipur
ZM ZM ZM ZM ZM ZM

Chittorgarh
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh

Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat

Covering 152 Villages including 59 Model Villages

Dungarpur Bansw ara

V ZS V ZS V ZS V ZS V ZS V ZS

AP

45 Member strong CSR team including Professionals and Subject matter specialists

28

HI-TECH KITCHEN (MID-DAY MEAL)

Objective To improve the enrolment, attendance, retention and nutrition status in primary school going children Status Eight high tech central kitchens. Project will cover More than 100,000 children, over 2000 schools in Chittorgarh, Udaipur & Bhilwara districts. Chittorgarh probably is the only district comprehensively covered under centralised kitchen Mid-day meal scheme. Overall school attendance has improved 90% and girls attendance by 70%

KEY PROJECTS
COMPUTER EDUCATION PROGRAMME MOU signed with GOR 1000 Computers in 200 Govt. Schools - four Districts of Rajasthan Targeted 40,000 students. Public Private Partnership Project with State Government, HZL & Sterlite Foundation MODEL VILLAGE 59 Villages will be covered in Three phases (2003-2011) Phase II 20 Villages (2005-08) Phase III 27 Villages (2008-11) LIVELIHOOD PROJECT 2500 Un-Employed Rural Youth to be imparted skill based training Project will be implemented in joint collaboration with Rajasthan Mission on Livelihood and District Administration LEAD PROJECT ( Literacy for Empowerment And Development) 5 villages will be covered in Chittorgarh District under Public Private Partnership All the villages will be declared 100% literate in one year

29

External Accolades and Audits

Independent Social Audit Our Model Village Development Project was externally assessed by Operations Research Group, New Delhi (ORG) in 2008 which independently evaluated the project around our operations. We have taken up 16 Model Villages in phased manner and under Phase 1 & 2, 8 villages were audited. It concluded that 70% population have been brought above poverty line along access to basic amenities including sustainable livelihood options and education. They recommended us to graduate from these villages in one year time frame. External Accolades Village Literacy and Computer Education Project awarded with Satyen Maitri National Literacy Award 2007 from National Literacy Mission, Govt of India FICCI SEDF CSR Award 2007 TERI CSR Award 2007 FIMI Social Awareness Award 2008 Readers Digest Pegasus CS Award 2008 State Bhamashah Award for Education from Govt of Rajasthan for 2006,2007,2008 State Population Stabilization (Family Planning) award from Govt of Rajasthan 2008 Certificate of excellence for CSR from District Administration Chittorgarh 2008.

Awards and Recognitions

# 1

Name of Award or Rating or Certification

American Express Corporate Award Best Nonferrous Industry in India 9th Annual European Process Excellence Award Golden Peacock Award for Excellence in Corporate Governance ICWA for Excellence in Cost Management

Name of Awarding / Rating / Certifying Organisation

Dun & Bradstreet

Year
2007

Relates to Dimension(s)*
Economic

International Quality & Productivity Centre, London Golden Peacock

2008

Economic

2007

Economic

Institute of Cost & Works Accountant

2007

Operational Excellence

Asian Power Plant of the Year Award

Asian Power, Charlton Media Group, Singapore Golden Peacock

2007

Eco, & Env.

Golden Peacock Award for Health & Safety CII-GBC National Award in Water Management Safety Gold Award

2007

Environment

CII-GBC, Hyderabad

2007

Environment

Royal Society for Prevention of Accidents, UK

2007

Environment

9 10 11 12

International Safety Award ISTD Training Award TERI CSR Award FIMI Social Awareness Award

British Safety Council, UK ISTD The Energy and Resources Institute Federation of Indian Mineral Industry

2006 2007 2007 2006-07

Environment Human Resource Social Social

30

THANK YOU
At the end of the day, the essence of CLZS is not what we do - it is what we know

31