Final Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay
Declaration
I hereby certify that this work is my own, except where otherwise acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted previously for a degree at this, or any other university.
Name:
Dateme Ibifubara Abam
Signature:
August 2011
Msc. Project Dissertation
Page i of 54
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Almighty God for life, and for the privilege he has given me to complete this program successfully. I also express my profound appreciation to my supervisor Dr. Mohammed Rouainia for his time, guidance, experience and knowledge throughout this work. Im also thankful to Stylianos Panayides for his time, patience, encouragement, and continual support from the start right up to the very end of this project.
My deepest appreciation is directed to my employer, Engr Mayne David-West and his associate partner Nathaniel Frank Iboroma for funding my studies and their sacrifice towards my progress as an Engineer. I also thank my uncle Dr T.K.S Abam, and my tutors Colin Davie, Jean Hall, and Gaetano Elia for helping me as well in my progress as a geotechnical engineer. Finally, I will always be indebted to my parents Sir Prof & Dame Dr (Mrs) D.P.S Abam, for their sacrifices throughout my life. I am where I am today because of you all. Thank you so much.
August 2011
Page ii of 54
Abstract
Structures built on soft clay materials over the years have been a major challenge in the construction industry. Natural soft clays tend to have significant anisotropy of fabric generated by plastic straining during laboratory tests. Anisotropy can influence plastic behaviour for soft clays. A Kinematic Hardening Soil Model which accounts for structure anisotropy and destructuration effects is implemented in the 3D commercial finite element package PLAXIS to study the behaviour of an embankment founded on soft structured clay.
The Teven Road trial embankment constructed in Eastern Australia which was founded on a soft soil deposit has been used as a case study in this project. Coupled analysis of excess pore pressure dissipation and displacements have been done to study the embankment behaviour. Long term settlement and excess pore pressure predicted from the finite element analysis have been compared with measured data from the site. Parametric studies have also been performed on the initial degree of structure, permeability anisotropy, interpolation exponent, destructuration parameter to understand how they affect the model prediction using coupled analysis.
Keywords: settlement
Anisotropy, constitutive model, embankment, initial structure, pore pressure,
August 2011
Page iii of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay NOTATION parameter controlling relative proportions of distortional and volumetric destructuration stiffness interpolation parameter Youngs Modulus parameter controlling rate of loss of structure with damage strain critical state stress ratio mean effective stress ratio of sizes of bubble and reference surface parameter describing ratio of sizes of structure and reference surfaces initial value of r slope of swelling line in ln : ln p compression line slope of normal compression line in ln : ln p compression plane poissons ratio stiffness interpolation exponent
August 2011
Page iv of 54
Table of Contents
Declaration .................................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................ii Abstract .................................................................................................................................. iii NOTATION ............................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. x 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2. 3. Background .................................................................................................................. 1 Project Aim .................................................................................................................. 3 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................... 3 Project Layout .............................................................................................................. 3
Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Teven Road Trial Embankment................................................................................... 11 Material parameters .................................................................................................... 12 3D Model ................................................................................................................... 14 Boundary Conditions and Model Assumptions ............................................................ 16 Calculations ................................................................................................................ 17
4.
Parametric Study................................................................................................................ 18 4.1 4.2 Analysis of Embankment Behaviour on Soft Structured Clay ...................................... 18 Effect of Initial structure on the Finite Element Analysis prediction of Embankment
Behaviour .............................................................................................................................. 26
August 2011
Page v of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 4.3 Effect of Permeability Anisotropy on the Finite Element Analysis prediction of
Embankment Behaviour ........................................................................................................ 29 4.4 Effect of the Stiffness Interpolation Exponent on the Finite Element Analysis
Prediction of Embankment Behaviour ................................................................................... 31 4.5 Effect of the Destructuration Parameter (k) on the Finite Element Analysis Prediction of
Embankment Behaviour ........................................................................................................ 34 5. Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 37
References ................................................................................................................................ 39
Appendix Table A 1 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-1.................... 42 Table A 2 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-2..................... 42 Table A 3 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC3-3..................... 42 Table A 4 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-4..................... 42 Table A 5 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point A ................. 42 Table A 6 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point B ................. 43 Table A 7 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point C ................. 43 Table A 8 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point D ................. 43
August 2011
Page vi of 54
List of Figures
Figure 1.1. Model for destructuration of clays: (a) Cam-clay model: (b) bubble (yield surface) and outer surface in bubble model; (c) reference surface, structure surface and bubble (yield surface) for destructuration model; (d) deviatoric section through bubble and structure surface for destructuration model. This diagram has been reproduced from Fig 1. (D. Muir Wood 2000)..... 2
Figure 1.2. Project outline ........................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2.1. Finite element mesh and soil profile for the trial embankment (M.Rouainia 2005)..... 6
Figure 2.2 Longitudinal and cross sections of the Haarajoki test embankment. Cross section 35840, where no vertical drains were applied, is analysed. (Marcin Cudny 2003)....................... 7
Figure 2.3. Finite element discretisation of the boundary problem. (Marcin Cudny 2003) ........... 7
Figure 2.4. Plan View of Trial Embankment Design. (N.Sivakugan 2005) .................................. 8
Figure 2.5. Construction History of Trial Embankment.(N.Sivakugan 2005) ............................... 9
Figure 2.6. Location of instrumentation below trial embankment (N.Sivakugan 2005) ................ 9
Figure 3.1. Soil strata beneath a section across Teven Road trial embankment .......................... 11
Figure 3.2. Construction sequence of the Teven Road embankment .......................................... 12
Figure 3.3. Plan view of the Teven road embankment on soft soil deposit. ................................ 15
Figure 3.4. 2D plan view mesh of Teven road trial embankment on the soft soil deposit ........... 15
Figure 3.5. 3D mesh of Teven road trial embankment on the soft soil deposit ........................... 16
August 2011
Page vii of 54
Figure 4.1. 3D representation of the deformed mesh of the trial embankment at the end of consolidation period .................................................................................................................. 20
Figure 4.2. Excess pore pressure in the soil depost at end of each phase ................................... 21
Figure 4.3 Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressures at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data........................................................................... 22
Figure 4.4 Vertical displacements of the ground surface beneath the embankment at end of each phase ........................................................................................................................................ 23
Figure 4.5. Horizontal displacements of the ground surface beneath the embankment at the end of each face ............................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 4.6. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlements at points A, B, C and D with measured data ......................................................................................................... 25
Figure 4.7. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different degrees of initial structure ................................................................................................................................................. 27
Figure 4.8. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlements at Points A, B, C and D with measured data for different degrees of initial structure ............................................ 28
Figure 4.9. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different degrees of permeability anisotropy. ................................................................................................................................ 29
August 2011
Page viii of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay Figure 4.10. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different degrees of permeability anisotropy ............................... 30
Figure 4.11. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different values of . . 32
Figure 4.12. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of .................................................................. 33
Figure 4.13 Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of destructuration parameter k ........................... 35
Figure 4.14. Comparison of FE prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of destructuration parameter k ............................................................. 36
August 2011
Page ix of 54
List of Tables
Table 3.1 Estimated Values used in the numerical analysis ....................................................... 13 Table 3.2 Coordinates for the boreholes shown in plan view of Teven road embankment .......... 14 Table 3.3 Summary of phase calculations .................................................................................. 17
August 2011
Page x of 54
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Numerical simulations by means of the Finite Element Method have become a valuable tool in geotechnical engineering to predict and to understand the behaviour of complex structures and extensive research has been recently carried out in this area (Yildiz 2009). Embankments and other construction works built on soft soil deposits have posed difficulties in geotechnical design over the years. The behaviour of stressstrain for soft soils is very complex as the soil response to loading the foundation is influenced by different basic characteristics of natural soil behaviour which include creep, anisotropy and
destructuration (M. Karstunen 2006). Low strength of the soft soil deposits limits the embankment height that may be constructed on it with adequate safety for short term stability, and low permeability determines large settlements that develop slowly as excess pore pressure dissipates in the soft deposit. Thus, stability and time required for consolidation of the soft soil deposit are major considerations in the design and construction of embankments over soft cohesive foundations (Yildiz 2009). This project presents a numerical analysis of the Teven Road trial embankment, which will be used as a case study in studying the behaviour of an embankment on soft clay deposit, by comparing the excess pore pressures and settlements predicted from finite element analysis based on laboratory results with field monitoring data from the instrumented embankment. The Kinematic Hardening Structure Model (KHSM) developed by (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000) and implemented in the 3D commercial finite element package PLAXIS has been used to model all the layers in the soil deposit. The KHSM is an extension of the well established Modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model. Natural soft clays tend to have significant anisotropy of fabric, developed during deposition and one-dimensional consolidation. During plastic straining, as a result of the re-orientation of particles, the fabric anisotropy can change and this inuences both elastic and plastic behaviour of the material. The KHSM thus adds some initial structure to the soft material which is lost progressively during plastic straining. The
August 2011
Page 1 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay KHSM introduces three surfaces which are the bubble surface, the structure surface and the reference surface into the MCC model. The bubble surface moves with the current stress and separates regions of elastic and plastic response. The structure surface stores the data about the current anisotropy and magnitude of structure and acts as a bounding surface. This then reduces to the reference surface as plastic straining occurs. The reference surface represents the behaviour of the reconstituted material. All three surfaces change in size as plastic straining occurs (D. Muir Wood 2000). Figure 1.1 shows the KHSM model for destructuration of clays.
Figure 1.1. Model for destructuration of clays: (a) Cam-clay model: (b) bubble (yield surface) and outer surface in bubble model; (c) reference surface, structure surface and bubble (yield surface) for destructuration model; (d) deviatoric section through bubble and structure surface for destructuration model. This diagram has been reproduced from Fig 1. (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000).
August 2011
Page 2 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 1.2 Project Aim
The aim of this project is to simulate the performance of a fully instrumented trial highway embankment on thick soft clay deposit.
1.3 Project Objectives In other to achieve the aim, the following objectives have been outlined for the project. (i) (ii) (iii) Obtain material parameters to be used in the numerical analysis Create a 3D finite element model of the embankment Simulate the embankment construction on the soft soil deposit using the KHSM constitutive model which accounts for anisotropy and destructuration effects in finite element (FE) analysis. (iv) Compare the settlements and excess pore pressures predicted from the FE analysis and compare it with measured data obtained from the site.
1.4 Project Layout
This project consists of four chapters described in very brief terms below. A diagram of the relationship between the chapters is shown in Figure 1.2. Project outline Chapter 1 gives a background of the basic concepts, aim and objective of this project. Chapter 2 discusses related work on this study. In Chapter 3, the geometry of the embankment and underlying soft soil deposit is described. Following this is the soil parameters used in the numerical analysis for each material in the soil strata of the deposit. Sequel to it is the layout and 3D model of the embankment on the soil deposit. The boundary conditions used in the numerical analysis will then be described, and finally the phase calculations following the construction sequence of the embankment on site will be outlined. In Chapter 4, the embankment behaviour is analysed using a coupled analysis of deformation and pore pressure dissipation. Parametric studies will be conducted on the model to study the effect of effect of structure anisotropy, permeability
August 2011
Page 3 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay anisotropy, interpolation stiffness exponent, and destructuration parameter on the model prediction of the embankment behaviour. In Chapter 5 the conclusions drawn from the embankment behaviour, and parametric study will be made.
Figure 1.2. Project outline
August 2011
Page 4 of 54
2. Literature Review
In an earlier study, (M.Rouainia 2005) investigated the influence of structure degradation on the behaviour of embankments on soft soil. Using the fully instrumented trial embankments which had been constructed on estuarine clay deposits on the Pacific Highway along the east coast of Australia, the Kinematic Hardening Structure Model (KHSM) proposed by (D. Muir Wood 2000) which is proficient in addressing the initial structure and destructuration process in soft clays was implored to validate the settlement of the embankment by the finite element method. The parameters which were used in the KHSM were calculated from a set of field and laboratory data from soft soils in that region and in other to predict the consolidation behaviour of the soft deposit, coupled analysis of excess pore pressure and displacements was used in the finite element implementation. The left and right boundaries of the finite element mesh that was used to describe the soils below the embankment shown in Figure 2.1 were restrained in the horizontal directions, the bottom boundary was set to be undrained and the top boundary was set to be free drained to zero pore pressure. As the embankment is symmetric, just half of the embankment was simulated in the model and allowed to consolidate for 100,000 days. The settlements at the ground surface as well as the excess pore pressures beneath the embankment along some reference points were compared with the field measured data to access the level of accuracy of the finite element model.
From the results, the displacements predicted by the finite element analysis using the KHSM were very good in the overall. However, the excess pore pressures were under predicted as a result of variable boundary in-situ conditions. It was concluded that since in soft clay materials, the excess pore pressures and settlements are connected, using models that account for destructuration processes were necessary to correctly study geotechnical problems with related materials (M.Rouainia 2005).
August 2011
Page 5 of 54
Figure 2.1. Finite element mesh and soil profile for the trial embankment (M.Rouainia 2005)
(Marcin Cudny 2003) investigated the possibilities of a multi-laminate constitutive model which accounts for structural anisotropy and destructuration effects with the 2D finite element code Plaxis to simulate the behaviour of a test road embankment constructed on soft soil deposits at Haarajoki, Finland. A spatially distributed anisotropic overconsolidation was introduced in the multi-laminate model which combines the strength anisotropy with the characteristic mechanical process of destructuration. The longitudinal and cross sections of the Haarajoki test embankment are shown in Figure 2.2. The construction of the embankment was completed within 3 weeks and was done in multi-stages of 0.5 m using a gravel fill. Excess pore pressures of about 3 to 10 kPa were measured in the deposit before the construction began. The part of the embankment without ground improvement (cross section 35840) was analysed in the study.
August 2011
Page 6 of 54
Figure 2.2 Longitudinal and cross sections of the Haarajoki test embankment. Cross section 35840, where no vertical drains were applied, is analysed. (Marcin Cudny 2003)
Material parameters for the main soft soil were estimated from available laboratory test results and previous parameter sets with only the initial values of state variables which represent bonding and overconsolidation varying with depth. Phase calculations which followed the construction sequence of 0.5m high multi stages for the embankment were set to consolidate for a total period of 1920 days were computed as fully coupled static/consolidation analysis. The finite element discretisation of the boundary problem is shown in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3. Finite element discretisation of the boundary problem. (Marcin Cudny 2003)
August 2011
Page 7 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay Measured and calculated vertical displacements were compared at the centre line and at the points located 4 and 9 m from the centre line. Horizontal displacements were compared along the vertical profile located 9 m from the centre line. From the results, the horizontal settlements were overestimated but the vertical displacements were good. Considering an assumed simplicity of the initial field conditions and use of average material parameters for the deep soft soil deposit, the final accuracy of the simulations was deemed acceptable.
(N.Sivakugan 2005) presented a case history of a trial embankment that was built on soft, organic clay in the Sunshine Coast Motorway in South East Queensland, Australia. An assessment of the efficiency of vertical drains to reduce the time of consolidation of the clay deposit was done by studying the settlements and pore pressure below the trial embankment on the soft deposit with the installed vertical drains. The trial embankment constructed had approximately 40m width and 90m length and was studied in three parts A, B and C (see Figure 2.4). Part B had no prefabricated vertical drains, while part A had prefabricated vertical drains with triangular grid patterns spaced at 1m, and part C at 2m.
Figure 2.4. Plan View of Trial Embankment Design. (N.Sivakugan 2005)
The embankment fill was a granular material which was placed in stages with the construction sequence shown in Figure 2.5. The left side of the embankment was instrumented with the locations shown in Figure 2.6 to obtain relevant data.
August 2011
Page 8 of 54
Figure 2.5. Construction History of Trial Embankment.(N.Sivakugan 2005)
Figure 2.6. Location of instrumentation below trial embankment (N.Sivakugan 2005)
The numerical analysis was performed using the finite difference program, FLAC, and settlements predicted on the basis of a fully coupled Biot consolidation model. The bottom boundary was considered to be rigid as the sand layer below the clay deposit was dense so that any settlements connected with it could be ignored, while the lateral boundaries of the finite difference mesh were positioned at 150 m from the centre of the embankment, and fixed in the horizontal direction to minimize the effect. Both the top and bottom surfaces of the clay were assumed as free draining, and the water table at the ground surface.
August 2011
Page 9 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay From the results obtained in the numerical analysis, the settlements and pore pressures compared well with the field measured data. Furthermore, it was observed that the horizontal and vertical permeability values on each of the models from field measurements were smaller than those obtained from the laboratory testing.
August 2011
Page 10 of 54
3. Methodology
3.1 Teven Road Trial Embankment
The Teven Road trial embankment on the soft soil deposit which will be used as a case study in this project is shown in Figure 3.1 The base of the trial embankment has a 54m width and 84m length with a total height of 1.6m reached over a period of 69 days following a construction sequence shown in Figure 3.2. The soil strata consist of four layers. The first is a 2m thick crust clay slightly sandy layer which is unsaturated and overconsolidated. Following this layer is a soft estuarine clay layer about 8m thick. The third layer which is 2m thick is a dense sand layer which is fine to medium grained and the last layer is a firm to stiff clay layer which is 19m thick. The water level was measured as 1m below ground level. Locations of settlement plates and piezometers are also shown in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1. Soil strata beneath a section across Teven Road trial embankment
August 2011
Page 11 of 54
Figure 3.2. Construction sequence of the Teven Road embankment
3.2 Material parameters
The model parameters for the finite element analysis have been obtained from a previous study (Allman) which was determined from a set of field and laboratory data from soft soils in a nearby site and listed in Table 3.1. In this study, only the soft estuarine clay layer has been modelled using the structure model in the KHSM. All other layers in the soil deposit have been modelled with the bubble model, while the embankment is modelled with the Mohr-coulomb model.
August 2011
Page 12 of 54

Table 3.1 Estimated Values used in the numerical analysis
Table 3.1 cont. Estimated Values used in the numerical analysis
August 2011
Page 13 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 3.3 3D Model The 3D model of the trial embankment on the soft soil deposit was built in such a way that simulating the staged construction sequence of the trial embankment on site shown in Figure 1.1 could be achieved. This was done by creating a plan view of the embankment constructed in stages, and inserting boreholes at the vertices to describe the soil profile and depths as shown in Table 3.1. Figure 1.1 shows the plan view of the embankment on the deposit. The coordinates for the outer boundaries and embankment are shown in Table 3.2
Table 3.2 Coordinates for the boreholes shown in plan view of Teven road embankment
August 2011
Page 14 of 54
Figure 3.3. Plan view of the Teven road embankment on soft soil deposit.
Figure 3.4. 2D plan view mesh of Teven road trial embankment on the soft soil deposit
August 2011
Page 15 of 54
Figure 3.5. 3D mesh of Teven road trial embankment on the soft soil deposit
3.4 Boundary Conditions and Model Assumptions The boundary conditions for the problem were such that pore water was allowed to move across the left and right boundaries in other not to affect horizontal flow conditions, and the displacements were fixed. The bottom boundary is set to undrained with zero displacement. At the ground surface, displacements were not restricted and free drainage conditions applied. Boundary effects were controlled by choosing an area such that significant influence on the results will be avoided. The global coarseness of the mesh size for the model was set to medium for the horizontal element distribution, and fine in the vertical element distribution in other to ensure reasonably accurate results as computing problems hindered the use of a fine mesh entirely. Total number of elements was 10,160. Figure 3.4 and Figure 3.5 show the 2D and 3D mesh of the Teven road embankment on the soft soil deposit.
August 2011 Msc. Project Dissertation Page 16 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 3.5 Calculations The calculations consisted of seven phases which was done in accordance with the construction sequence on site earlier discussed. The entire height of 1.6m of embankment was raised in stages, and allowed to consolidate in between stages. Table 3.3 shows a summary of the phase calculations, procedure, and phase time completion. The total consolidation time was 100,000days.
Table 3.3 Summary of phase calculations
August 2011
Page 17 of 54
4. Parametric Study
Coupled analysis of the dissipation of pore pressure and the displacement of the ground surface beneath the embankment has been adopted in the finite element (FE) analysis to predict the consolidation behaviour. Excess pore pressure time plots obtained from the FE analysis were done at points PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 to analyse the dissipation of the excess pore pressures in the soil deposit and compared with measured data. PC2-1, PC2-2 and PC2-4 are located at 3m, 5m, and 10m deep respectively from the centre of the embankment on the ground surface, while PC3-3 is 7m deep, 15m away from the centre of the embankment as can be seen in Chapter 3, Figure 3.1. Similarly, settlement-time plots obtained from the FE analysis were done at points A (centre of the embankment), B (15m from the centre of the embankment), C (toe of the embankment) and D (7m from the toe of the embankment) to study embankment behaviour and compare the displacements of the ground level under the embankment with measured data. These can be seen in Chapter 3, Figure 3.1. Parametric studies have been carried out on the KHSM to understand the model prediction of the embankment behaviour using the coupled analysis. The effect of initial degree of structure , permeability anisotropy , destructuration parameter , and stiffness
interpolation exponent
on the FE analysis prediction have been investigated and also
compared with measured data from the field.
4.1 Analysis of Embankment Behaviour on Soft Structured Clay The 3D deformed mesh from the model prediction at the end of the phase calculations following the construction sequence is shown in Figure 4.1 The dissipation of excess pore pressures in the soil deposit is shown at the end of each phase in Figure 4.2 while the excess pore pressure predicted from FE analysis are shown in appendix, Table A 1 Table A 4. The excess pore pressure time plots from the FE analysis are compared with measured data and shown in Figure 4.3. The measured data which was compared with the FE analysis prediction have been
August 2011
Page 18 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay obtained from a previous study by (Sheng 2006, et al ) using win-dig software and are shown in appendix Table A 9 As can be seen from Figure 4.2, the dissipation of the excess pore pressure begins and continues at the end of each phase as the embankment is constructed. The pore pressure dissipation increases at end of each loading stage and hits its peak value at the end of construction (phase 5). At the end of the consolidation period (phase 6), the pore pressure in the soil deposit is completely dissipated. As can be seen from Figure 4.3, the FE analysis generally over predicts the pore pressure dissipation apart from the FE analysis prediction at PC2-2, although the general behaviour of the pore pressure is some-what same as that of the measured data. This could be as a result of highly variable boundary conditions in situ. Again we notice that a sharp peak value occurs in PC2-1, but smooth peak values in PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4. This can partly be attributed to the value of initial degree of structure , used in the modelling
the soft clay layer. The destructuration parameter could also be another factor as low values of slows down the rate at which structure is lost with continuing strain and hence smoothens the peak value (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000). The vertical and lateral displacements of the ground surface predicted from FE analysis are shown at the end of each phase in Figure 4.4 and Figure 4.5. The vertical displacements predicted from FE analysis are shown in appendix, Table A 5 Table A 8 while the settlement time curves from the FE analysis are compared with measured data and shown in Figure 4.6. As can be seen from Figure 4.5, the FE analysis predicts maximum horizontal displacements of about 91mm either side of the embankment at the end of the consolidation period. Also notice the potential failure surfaces developed on either side of the embankment in Figure 4.5(f). As can be seen from Figure 4.6 the FE analysis predicts about 445mm maximum vertical displacement of the ground surface beneath the embankment occurring at the centre of the embankment (point A) which reduces as the distance moves away from the centre. The FE analysis also predicts heaving of the ground surface of about 12.7mm at point D. In general, the displacements predicted from the FE analysis compares very well with the measured data although the model accuracy reduces as we move away from the embankment.
August 2011
Page 19 of 54
Figure 4.1. 3D representation of the deformed mesh of the trial embankment at the end of consolidation period
August 2011
Page 20 of 54
Figure 4.2. Excess pore pressure in the soil depost at end of each phase
(a) end of phase 1, height of embankment = 0.5m, (b) end of phase 2, height of embankment = 0.5m, (c) end of phase 3, height of embankment = 1.0m, (d) end of phase 4, height of embankment = 0.5m, (e) end of phase 5, height of embankment = 1.6m, (f) end of phase 6, height of embankment = 1.6m,
, , , , ,
August 2011
Page 21 of 54
Figure 4.3 Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressures at PC2-1, PC22, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data
August 2011
Page 22 of 54
Figure 4.4 Vertical displacements of the ground surface beneath the embankment at end of each phase
(a) end of phase 1, height of embankment = 0.5m, (b) end of phase 2, height of embankment = 0.5m, (c) end of phase 3, height of embankment = 1.0m, (d) end of phase 4, height of embankment = 0.5m, (e) end of phase 5, height of embankment = 1.6m, (f) end of phase 6, height of embankment = 1.6m,
, , , , ,
August 2011
Page 23 of 54
Figure 4.5. Horizontal displacements of the ground surface beneath the embankment at the end of each face (a) end of phase 1, height of embankment = 0.5m, (b) end of phase 2, height of embankment = 0.5m, (c) end of phase 3, height of embankment = 1.0m, (d) end of phase 4, height of embankment = 0.5m, (e) end of phase 5, height of embankment = 1.6m, (f) end of phase 6, height of embankment = 1.6m, , , , , ,
August 2011
Page 24 of 54
Figure 4.6. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlements at points A, B, C and D with measured data
August 2011
Page 25 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 4.2 Effect of Initial structure on the Finite Element Analysis prediction of Embankment Behaviour
The effect on the prediction of the soil behaviour using FE analysis due to the amount of structure in the KHSM was investigated. The initial structure in the soft estuarine clay layer (layer 2) which is modelled with the structure model in the KHSM is initially removed .
Subsequently, the amount of structure in the layer is gradually increased for values of
The FE prediction of the dissipation of excess pore pressure and deformation in the as well as measured data.
soil deposit is analysed and compared for all assumed values of
These are shown in Figure 4.7and Figure 4.8 (Data obtained from FE analysis have been put in a CD attached to this project.) As can be seen from Figure 4.7 and Figure 4.8 we observe that when the initial structure is non-existent , the FE analysis greatly over predicts the excess pore pressure and
displacements beneath the embankment. However as the initial degree of structure increases, the FE analysis prediction of the displacements and dissipation of excess pore pressure improve, and then converge at . Further increase in the initial degree of structure gives virtually the
same FE analysis prediction at this stage. We can thus conclude that the structure surface in the KHSM is quite large at , and thus cannot degrade significantly. Hence further increase in
the initial degree of structure will not produce different results. Furthermore, the FE analysis prediction of vertical displacements compares well with the measured data for an initial degree of structure,
August 2011
Page 26 of 54
Figure 4.7. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different degrees of initial structure
August 2011
Page 27 of 54
Figure 4.8. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlements at Points A, B, C and D with measured data for different degrees of initial structure
August 2011
Page 28 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 4.3 Effect of Permeability Anisotropy on the Finite Element Analysis prediction of Embankment Behaviour
The effect of the permeability anisotropy on the FE analysis prediction of soft soil behaviour under the trial embankment was investigated as its importance in the pore pressure estimation and rate of post settlements cannot be over-emphasized. The permeability anisotropy ratios in all the layers were varied using values of respectively. The
results shown in Figure 4.9 and Figure 4.10 display how the measured data from the field compare with the predictions from FE analysis of the excess pore pressures and displacements of the ground surface. (Data obtained from FE analysis have been put in a CD attached to this project).
Figure 4.9. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different degrees of permeability anisotropy.
August 2011
Page 29 of 54
Figure 4.10. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different degrees of permeability anisotropy
As can be seen from Figure 4.9 at PC2-2, we observe that as
increases, the peak
values of pore pressure predicted from the FE analysis do not change much although complete dissipation in the soil deposit is achieved at different times. This can be easily understood as a more permeable material will consolidate faster than the less permeable ones. At points PC3-3, and PC 2-4, the peak values predicted from FE analysis increase as reduces. Furthermore,
the FE analysis over predicts the pore pressure at PC2-1, PC3-3, and PC2-4.
August 2011
Page 30 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay In Figure 4.10 at points A and B, the plot shows that the settlements predicted from the FE analysis compares well with the measured data on site for permeability anisotropy ratio of .
4.4 Effect of the Stiffness Interpolation Exponent Prediction of Embankment Behaviour
on the Finite Element Analysis
The effect of the stiffness interpolation exponent parameter on the FE analysis prediction of the soft soil behaviour beneath the trial embankment was investigated. Assumed values of parameter were used in all the layers while the values of the destructuration strain remained fixed. The results of the were compared with measured data and
and stiffness interpolation parameter
prediction from FE analysis for all assumed values of
are shown in Figure 4.11 and Figure 4.12. (Data obtained from FE analysis have been put in a CD attached to this project). In Figure 4.11, the differences in predicted peak values for all assumed values of the interpolation exponent are small. It is also observed that while the FE analysis predicts a than for a high one, the higher , FE analysis predicted a peak after consolidating for 1000days, after 133.5days, and
smaller peak value of excess pore pressure for a low value of values of value of while for consolidate faster than the lower ones. For at point PC3-3 after 133.5days, and , the predicted peak value from FE was
after 1000days. Again, the peak values of the excess pore pressure at PC3-3, and PC2-4 appears smoother than those at PC2-1, and PC2-2 In Figure 4.12 the settlements predicted from FE analysis are almost same for all values of after construction, but begin to change slightly as the clay consolidates after 800 years at reduces the settlement increases. This can be can attributed to the
Point A. After this period, as fact that as
controls the way in which plastic stiffness falls as the bubble yield surface
approaches the structure surface and hence the rate at which plastic strains develop, reducing the value of increases the plastic hardening modulus and hence reduces the plastic strains and
slows the destructuration process (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000).

August 2011 Msc. Project Dissertation Page 31 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay The FE analysis still over predicts the dissipation of excess pore pressure at all the points except at PC2-2. As can be seen from Figure 4.12, the FE analysis compares well with measured data at points A, and B for . Further increase in gives very little difference in the
settlements predicted from FE analysis.
Figure 4.11. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for excess pore pressure dissipation at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC3-3, and PC2-4 with measured data for different values of .
August 2011
Page 32 of 54
Figure 4.12. Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of
August 2011
Page 33 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 4.5 Effect of the Destructuration Parameter (k) on the Finite Element Analysis Prediction of Embankment Behaviour
The effect of the destructuration parameter on the FE analysis prediction of the soft soil behaviour beneath the embankment was investigated. The parameters maintained in all the layers while assumed values of and were
were used in soft
estuarine clay layer which is modelled with the structure model of the KHSM. The results of the prediction from FE analysis for all assumed values of were compared with measured data and
are shown in Figure 4.13 and Figure 4.14. (Data obtained from FE analysis have been put in a CD attached to this project). As can be seen from both plots, we observe that as increases, the prediction from FE
analysis doesnt change. This can be attributed to the fact that since the calculation type used which was earlier mentioned in Chapter 3 is consolidation rather than plastic, it is possible that due to long periods of consolidation, plasticity is not achieved hence there is no loss of structure in the material. However, in the event that the value of the parameters and which control the rate at
which plastic strains develop were able to cause enough plastic strains in the structured layer for destructuration to occur, it is expected that increase in will lead to rapid loss of structure in the
material (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000). Thus the predicted peak values for pore pressure dissipation from FE analysis may have increased with increasing values of
August 2011
Page 34 of 54
Figure 4.13 Comparison of Finite Element analysis prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of destructuration parameter k
August 2011
Page 35 of 54
Figure 4.14. Comparison of FE prediction for settlement at points A, B, C and D with measured data for different values of destructuration parameter k
August 2011
Page 36 of 54
5. Conclusion
The construction of embankments on soft soil deposit is a major problem in geotechnical engineering. Low permeability, low strength and high deformations are among the characteristics displayed by natural soft soils which make construction on this material very difficult.
The Kinematic Hardening Soil Model (KHSM) developed by (Rouainia and D. Muir Wood 2000) has been implemented in finite element analysis and used to study the behaviour on a trial embankment on soft structured clay. Parametric studies were also conducted on the initial degree of structure, permeability anisotropy ratio, interpolation exponent and destructuration parameter in the KHSM model to understand how they affect the prediction from FE analysis of the embankment behaviour. The results from the coupled analysis of excess pore pressure and displacements of the ground surface gave the following conclusions
(1) The settlements predicted from FE analysis is generally in good agreement with the measured data obtained from the field. However, the excess pore pressures are generally overestimated. This has been attributed to variable in-situ conditions.
(2) The effect of the initial degree of structure is evident on the prediction from FE analysis of the settlements of the ground surface as an increase in the degree of structure results in a better prediction of the settlements from FE analysis which continues until the structure surface becomes large enough and cannot degrade further. At this point, the settlements predicted from FE analysis is in good agreement with measured data from the field.
(3) Permeability anisotropy ratio has an effect on the maximum values of pore pressure dissipation predicted from FE analysis. An increase in the permeability anisotropy ratio results in lower peak values of pore pressure dissipation predicted from FE analysis. In this study, the settlements predicted from FE analysis compares well with measured data from the field for a permeability anisotropy ratio of 2.
August 2011
Page 37 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay (4) After long periods of consolidation, the stiffness interpolation exponent predicted settlements from FE analysis as an increase in affects the
results in a reduction of the
predicted settlement at ground surface beneath the centre of the embankment. This takes place mainly at the centre of the embankment (point A).
(5) The destructuration parameter does not affect the prediction from FE analysis as the calculation type used in this study is consolidation as against plastic strain. Hence due to long periods of consolidation, plasticity is not reached so there is no loss of structure in the material.
In the overall, we can conclude from this study that using constitutive models that account for effects of initial structure and destructuration to analyse construction on natural soft clays is important as they improve the prediction of the behaviour of the structure on the soft soil deposit.
August 2011
Page 38 of 54
References
Allman, D. S. a. M. A. "Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay."
Borges, J. L. (2004). "Three-dimensional analysis of embankments on soft soils incorporating vertical drains by finite element method." Computers and Geotechnics 31(8): 665-676.
Cudny, M. and P. A. Vermeer (2004). "On the modelling of anisotropy and destructuration of soft clays within the multi-laminate framework." Computers and Geotechnics 31(1): 1-22.
D. Muir Wood, M. R. (2000). "A kinematic hardening constitutive model for natural clays with loss of structure." Geotechnique 50(2): 153-164. Jin-Chun Chai, N. M., and Shui-Long Shen (2002). "Performance of embankments with and without reinforcement on soft subsoil." Can. Geotech. J. 39: 838-848. M. Karstunen, C. W., H. Krenn, F. Scharinger, H. F. Schweiger (2006). "Modelling the behaviour of an embankment on soft clay with different constitutive models." International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 30(10): 953-982. M.Rouainia, D. S. J. Z. (2005). "Influence of sturcture degradation on the behaviour of embankments on soft soil." 13th ACME Conference: University of Sheffield. Marcin Cudny, H. P. N. (2003). "Numerical analysis of a test embankment on soft ground using an anisotropic model with destructuration." Int. Workshop on Geotechnics of Soft Soils - Theory and practice, Schweiger, Karstunen & Cudny (eds.). N.Sivakugan, B. R. (2005). "Observed and predicted behaviour of clay foundation response under the Sunshine Motorway trial embankment." International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Shen, S.-L., J.-C. Chai, et al. (2005). "Analysis of field performance of embankments on soft clay deposit with and without PVD-improvement." Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23(6): 463485.
August 2011
Page 39 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay Sheng, W. H. S. F. D. B. D. S. a. D. (2006). "Finite-Element Parametric Study of the Consolidation Behaviour of a Trial Embankment on Soft clay " International Journal of Geomechanics 6(5): 328-341.
Yildiz, A. (2009). "Numerical analyses of embankments on PVD improved soft clays." Advances in Engineering Software 40(10): 1047-1055.
August 2011
Page 40 of 54
APPENDIX
August 2011
Page 41 of 54

Table A 1 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-1
Table A 1 cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-1
Table A 4 Cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Excess Pore Pressures at PC2-4
Table A 5 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point A
Table A 5 cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point A
August 2011
Page 42 of 54
Table A 6 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point B
Table A 6 cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point B
Table A 7 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point C
Table A 7 cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point C
Table A 8 Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point D
Table A 8 cont. Predicted Values from FE Analysis of Vertical Displacements at Point D
Table A 9 Measured data from instrumentation on site of Excess pore pressure at PC2-1, PC2-2, PC33, and PC2-4
Table A 10 Measured data from instrumentation on site of vertical displacements at Points A, B, C and D
August 2011
Page 43 of 54
Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay Table A 10 cont. Measured data from instrumentation on site of vertical displacements at Points A, B, C and D
August 2011
Page 44 of 54

Final Project Dissertation

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Final Project Dissertation

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Dateme Ibifubara Abam

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Anisotropy, constitutive model, embankment, initial structure, pore pressure,

Msc. Project Dissertation

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Embankment Behaviour ........................................................................................................ 34 5. Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 37

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Figure 1.2. Project outline ........................................................................................................... 4

Figure 2.5. Construction History of Trial Embankment.(N.Sivakugan 2005) ............................... 9

Figure 3.2. Construction sequence of the Teven Road embankment .......................................... 12

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay 1.2 Project Aim

1.4 Project Layout

Msc. Project Dissertation

Figure 1.2. Project outline

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Figure 2.4. Plan View of Trial Embankment Design. (N.Sivakugan 2005)

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Figure 2.5. Construction History of Trial Embankment.(N.Sivakugan 2005)

Figure 2.6. Location of instrumentation below trial embankment (N.Sivakugan 2005)

Msc. Project Dissertation

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Figure 3.2. Construction sequence of the Teven Road embankment

3.2 Material parameters

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Table 3.1 cont. Estimated Values used in the numerical analysis

Msc. Project Dissertation

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

Table 3.3 Summary of phase calculations

Msc. Project Dissertation

Numerical Analysis of a Trial Embankment on Soft Clay

on the FE analysis prediction have been investigated and also

compared with measured data from the field.