Difference between OTC and Exchange Traded market

Counter Party Risk : is more in OTC markets. In an exchange traded market the exchange or the regulatory becomes the counter part to every transaction and delivery of securities/funds is guaranteed in OTC market this is not the case and counter party risk exists. Best Price Discovery: in Exchange traded markets as there are number of traders who trade on a single and centralized system. So there will be less chances of manipulation by operators whereas in OTC markets it depends on the number of dealers (markets makers) who trade in a particular security. Less Liquidity : in OTC market as there are less number of clients and participants. In Exchange traded market there will be buyers and sellers in almost all counters. Absence of proper regulatory body: in OTC markets. All firms that offer exchange traded products must be members and register with exchange, there is greater regulatory oversight which can make exchange traded markets a much safer place for individuals to trade.

What is an interest rate swap? (i) An interest rate swap is a contractual agreement entered into between two
counterparties under which each agrees to make periodic payment to the other for an agreed period of time based upon a notional amount of principal. The principal amount is notional because there is no need to exchange actual amounts of principal in a single currency transaction: there is no foreign exchange component to be taken account of. Equally, however, a notional amount of principal is required in order to compute the actual cash amounts that will be periodically exchanged. Under the commonest form of interest rate swap, a series of payments calculated by applying a fixed rate of interest to a notional principal amount is exchanged for a stream of payments similarly calculated but using a floating rate of interest. This is a fixed-forfloating interest rate swap. Alternatively, both series of cashflows to be exchanged could be calculated using floating rates of interest but floating rates that are based upon different underlying indices. Examples might be Libor and commercial paper or Treasury bills and Libor and this form of interest rate swap is known as a basis or money market swap. (ii) Pricing Interest Rate Swaps If we consider the generic fixed-to-floating interest rate swap, the most obvious difficulty to be overcome in pricing such a swap would seem to be the fact that the future stream of floating rate payments to be made by one counterparty is unknown at the time the swap is

being priced. This must be literally true: no one can know with absolute certainty what the 6 month US dollar Libor rate will be in 12 months time or 18 months time. However, if the capital markets do not possess an infallible crystal ball in which the precise trend of future interest rates can be observed, the markets do possess a considerable body of information about the relationship between interest rates and future periods of time. In many countries, for example, there is a deep and liquid market in interest bearing securities issued by the government. These securities pay interest on a periodic basis, they are issued with a wide range of maturities, principal is repaid only at maturity and at any given point in time the market values these securities to yield whatever rate of interest is necessary to make the securities trade at their par value. It is possible, therefore, to plot a graph of the yields of such securities having regard to their varying maturities. This graph is known generally as a yield curve -- i.e.: the relationship between future interest rates and time -- and a graph showing the yield of securities displaying the same characteristics as government securities is known as the par coupon yield curve. The classic example of a par coupon yield curve is the US Treasury yield curve. A different kind of security to a government security or similar interest bearing note is the zero-coupon bond. The zero-coupon bond does not pay interest at periodic intervals. Instead it is issued at a discount from its par or face value but is redeemed at par, the accumulated discount which is then repaid representing compounded or "rolled-up" interest. A graph of the internal rate of return (IRR) of zero-coupon bonds over a range of maturities is known as the zero-coupon yield curve. Finally, at any time the market is prepared to quote an investor forward interest rates. If, for example, an investor wishes to place a sum of money on deposit for six months and then reinvest that deposit once it has matured for a further six months, then the market will quote today a rate at which the investor can re-invest his deposit in six months time. This is not an exercise in "crystal ball gazing" by the market. On the contrary, the six month forward deposit rate is a mathematically derived rate which reflects an arbitrage relationship between current (or spot) interest rates and forward interest rates. In other words, the six month forward interest rate will always be the precise rate of interest which eliminates any arbitrage profit. The forward interest rate will leave the investor indifferent as to whether he invests for six months and then re-invests for a further six months at the six month forward interest rate or whether he invests for a twelve month period at today's twelve month deposit rate. The graphical relationship of forward interest rates is known as the forward yield curve. One must conclude, therefore, that even if -- literally -- future interest rates cannot be known in advance, the market does possess a great deal of information concerning the yield generated by existing instruments over future periods of time and it does have the ability to calculate forward interest rates which will always be at such a level as to eliminate any arbitrage profit with spot interest rates. Future floating rates of interest can be calculated, therefore, using the forward yield curve but this in itself is not sufficient to let us calculate the fixed rate payments due under the swap. A further piece of the puzzle is missing and this relates to the fact that the net present value of the aggregate set of cashflows due under

any swap is -- at inception -- zero. The truth of this statement will become clear if we reflect on the fact that the net present value of any fixed rate or floating rate loan must be zero when that loan is granted, provided, of course, that the loan has been priced according to prevailing market terms. This must be true, since otherwise it would be possible to make money simply by borrowing money, a nonsensical result However, we have already seen that a fixed to floating interest rate swap is no more than the combination of a fixed rate loan and a floating rate loan without the initial borrowing and subsequent repayment of a principal amount. The net present value of both the fixed rate stream of payments and the floating rate stream of payments in a fixed to floating interest rate swap is zero, therefore, and the net present value of the complete swap must be zero, since it involves the exchange of one zero net present value stream of payments for a second net present value stream of payments. The pricing picture is now complete. Since the floating rate payments due under the swap can be calculated as explained above, the fixed rate payments will be of such an amount that when they are deducted from the floating rate payments and the net cash flow for each period is discounted at the appropriate rate given by the zero coupon yield curve, the net present value of the swap will be zero. It might also be noted that the actual fixed rate produced by the above calculation represents the par coupon rate payable for that maturity if the stream of fixed rate payments due under the swap are viewed as being a hypothetical fixed rate security. This could be proved by using standard fixed rate bond valuation techniques. (iii) Financial Benefits Created By Swap Transactions Consider the following statements: (a) A company with the highest credit rating, AAA, will pay less to raise funds under identical terms and conditions than a less creditworthy company with a lower rating, say BBB. The incremental borrowing premium paid by a BBB company, which it will be convenient to refer to as a "credit quality spread", is greater in relation to fixed interest rate borrowings than it is for floating rate borrowings and this spread increases with maturity. (b) The counterparty making fixed rate payments in a swap is predominantly the less creditworthy participant. (c) Companies have been able to lower their nominal funding costs by using swaps in conjunction with credit quality spreads. These statements are, I submit, fully consistent with the objective data provided by swap transactions and they help to explain the "too good to be true" feeling that is sometimes expressed regarding swaps. Can it really be true, outside of "Alice in Wonderland", that everyone can be a winner and that no one is a loser? If so, why does this happy state of affairs exist?

(a) The Theory of Comparative Advantage When we begin to seek an answer to the questions raised above, the response we are most likely to meet from both market participants and commentators alike is that each of the counterparties in a swap has a "comparative advantage" in a particular and different credit market and that an advantage in one market is used to obtain an equivalent advantage in a different market to which access was otherwise denied. The AAA company therefore raises funds in the floating rate market where it has an advantage, an advantage which is also possessed by company BBB in the fixed rate market. The mechanism of an interest rate swap allows each company to exploit their privileged access to one market in order to produce interest rate savings in a different market. This argument is an attractive one because of its relative simplicity and because it is fully consistent with data provided by the swap market itself. However, as Clifford Smith, Charles Smithson and Sykes Wilford point out in their book MANAGING FINANCIAL RISK, it ignores the fact that the concept of comparative advantage is used in international trade theory, the discipline from which it is derived, to explain why a natural or other immobile benefit is a stimulus to international trade flows. As the authors point out: The United States has a comparative advantage in wheat because the United States has wheat producing acreage not available in Japan. If land could be moved -- if land in Kansas could be relocated outside Tokyo -- the comparative advantage would disappear. The international capital markets are, however, fully mobile. In the absence of barriers to capital flows, arbitrage will eliminate any comparative advantage that exists within such markets and this rationale for the creation of the swap transactions would be eliminated over time leading to the disappearance of the swap as a financial instrument. This conclusion clearly conflicts with the continued and expanding existence of the swap market. It would seem, therefore, that even if the theory of comparative advantage does retain some force -- not withstanding the effect of arbitrage -- which it almost certainly does, it cannot constitute the sole explanation for the value created by swap transactions. The source of that value may lie in part in at least two other areas. (b) Information Asymmetries The much- vaunted economic efficiency of the capital markets may nevertheless co- exist with certain information asymmetries. Four authors from a major US money centre bank have argued that a company will -- and should -- choose to issue short term floating rate debt and swap this debt into fixed rate funding as compared with its other financing options if: (1) It had information -- not available to the market generally -- which would suggest that its own credit quality spread (the difference, you will recall, between the cost of fixed and floating rate debt) would be lower in the future than the market expectation. (2) It anticipates higher risk- free interest rates in the future than does the market and is more sensitive (i.e. averse) to such changes than the market generally.

In this situation a company is able to exploit its information asymmetry by issuing short term floating rate debt and to protect itself against future interest rate risk by swapping such floating rate debt into fixed rate debt. (c) Fixed Rate Debt and Embedded Options Fixed rate debt typically includes either a prepayment option or, in the case of publicly traded debt, a call provision. In substance this right is no more and no less than a put option on interest rates and a right which becomes more valuable the further interest rates fall. By way of contrast, swap agreements do not contain a prepayment option. The early termination of a swap contract will involve the payment, in some form or other, of the value of the remaining contract period to maturity. Returning, therefore, to our initial question as to why an interest rate swap can produce apparent financial benefits for both counterparties the true explanation is, I would suggest, a more complicated one than can be provided by the concept of comparative advantage alone. Information asymmetries may well be a factor, together with the fact that the fixed rate payer in an interest rate swap -- reflecting the fact that he has no early termination right -- is not paying a premium for the implicit interest rate option embedded within a fixed rate loan that does contain a pre-payment rights. This saving is divided between both counterparties to the swap. (iv) Reversing or Terminating Interest Rate Swaps The point has been made above that at inception the net present value of the aggregate cashflows that comprise an interest rate swap will be zero. As time passes, however, this will cease to be the case, the reason for this being that the shape of the yield curves used to price the swap initially will change over time. Assume, for example, that shortly after an interest rate swap has been completed there is an increase in forward interest rates: the forward yield curve steepens. Since the fixed rate payments due under the swap are, by definition, fixed, this change in the prevailing interest rate environment will affect future floating rate payments only: current market expectations are that the future floating rate payments due under the swap will be higher than those originally expected when the swap was priced. This benefit will accrue to the fixed rate payer under the swap and will represent a cost to the floating rate payer. If the new net cashflows due under the swap are computed and if these are discounted at the appropriate new zero coupon rate for each future period (i.e. reflecting the current zero coupon yield curve and not the original zero coupon yield curve), the positive net present value result reflects how the value of the swap to the fixed rate payer has risen from zero at inception. Correspondingly, it demonstrates how the value of the swap to the floating rate payer has declined from zero to a negative amount. What we have done in the above example is mark the interest rate swap to market. If, having done this, the floating rate payer wishes to terminate the swap with the fixed rate payer's agreement, then the positive net present value figure we have calculated represents the termination payment that will have to be paid to the fixed rate payer. Alternatively, if

the floating rate payer wishes to cancel the swap by entering into a reverse swap with a new counterparty for the remaining term of the original swap, the net present value figure represents the payment that the floating rate payer will have to make to the new counterparty in order for him to enter into a swap which precisely mirrors the terms and conditions of the original swap. (v) Credit Risk Implicit in Interest Rate Swaps To the extent that any interest rate swap involves mutual obligations to exchange cashflows, a degree of credit risk must be implicit in the swap. Note however, that because a swap is a notional principal contract, no credit risk arises in respect of an amount of principal advanced by a lender to a borrower which would be the case with a loan. Further, because the cashflows to be exchanged under an interest rate swap on each settlement date are typically "netted" (or offset) what is paid or received represents simply the difference between fixed and floating rates of interest. Contrast this again with a loan where what is due is an absolute amount of interest representing either a fixed or a floating rate of interest applied to the outstanding principal balance. The periodic cashflows under a swap will, by definition, be smaller therefore than the periodic cashflows due under a comparable loan. An interest rate swap is in essence a series of forward contracts on interest rates.. In distinction to a forward contract, the periodic exchange of payment flows provided for under an interest rate swap does provide for a partial periodic settlement of the contract but it is important to appreciate that the net present value of the swap does not reduce to zero once a periodic exchange has taken place. This will not be the case because -- as discussed in the context of reversing or terminating interest rate swaps -- the shape of the yield curve used to price the swap initially will change over time giving the swap a positive net present value for either the fixed rate payer or the floating rate payer notwithstanding that a periodic exchange of payments is being made. (vi) Users and Uses of Interest Rate Swaps Interest rate swaps are used by a wide range of commercial banks, investment banks, nonfinancial operating companies, insurance companies, mortgage companies, investment vehicles and trusts, government agencies and sovereign states for one or more of the following reasons: 1. To obtain lower cost funding 2. To hedge interest rate exposure 3. To obtain higher yielding investment assets 4. To create types of investment asset not otherwise obtainable 5. To implement overall asset or liability management strategies

6. To take speculative positions in relation to future movements in interest rates. The advantages of interest rate swaps include the following: 1. A floating-to-fixed swap increases the certainty of an issuer's future obligations. 2. Swapping from fixed-to-floating rate may save the issuer money if interest rates decline. 3. Swapping allows issuers to revise their debt profile to take advantage of current or expected future market conditions. 4. Interest rate swaps are a financial tool that potentially can help issuers lower the amount of debt service. Typical transactions would certainly include the following, although the range of possible permutations is almost endless. (a) Reduce Funding Costs. A US industrial corporation with a single A credit rating wants to raise US$100 million of seven year fixed rate debt that would be callable at par after three years. In order to reduce its funding cost it actually issues six month commercial paper and simultaneously enters into a seven year, nonamortising swap under which it receives a six month floating rate of interest (Libor Flat) and pays a series of fixed semiannual swap payments. The cost saving is 110 basis points. (b) Liability Management. A company actually issues seven year fixed rate debt which is callable after three years and which carries a coupon of 7%. It enters into a fixed- tofloating interest rate swap for three years only under the terms of which it pays a floating rate of Libor + 185 bps and receives a fixed rate of 7%. At the end of three years the company has the flexibility of calling its fixed rate loan -- in which case it will have actually borrowed on a synthetic floating rate basis for three years -- or it can keep its loan obligation outstanding and pay a 7% fixed rate for a further four years. As a further variation, the company's fixed- to- floating interest rate swap could be an "arrears reset swap" in which -- unlike a conventional swap -- the swap rate is set at the end and not at the beginning of each period. This effectively extends the company's exposure to Libor by one additional interest period which will improve the economics of the transaction. (c) Speculative Position. The same company described in (b) above may be willing to take a position on short term interest rates and lower its cost of borrowing even further (provided that its judgment as to the level of future interest rates is correct). The company enters into a three year "yield curve arbitrage swap" in which the floating rate payments it makes under the swap are calculated by reference to a formula. For each basis point that Libor rises, the company's floating rate swap payments rise by two basis points. The company's spread over Libor, however, falls from 185 bps to 144 bps. In exchange, therefore, for significantly increasing its exposure to short term rates, the company can generate powerful savings.

(d) Hedging Interest Rate Exposure. A financial institution providing fixed rate mortgages is exposed in a period of falling interest rates if homeowners choose to pre- pay their mortgages and re- finance at a lower rate. It protects against this risk by entering into an "index-amortising rate swap" with, for example, a US regional bank. Under the terms of this swap the US regional bank will receive fixed rate payments of 100 bps to as much as 150 bps above the fixed rate payable under a straightforward interest rate swap. In exchange, the bank accepts that the notional principal amount of the swap will amortize as rates fall and that the faster rates fall, the faster the notional principal will be amortized. A less aggressive version of the same structure is the "indexed principal swap". Here the notional principal amount continually amortizes in line with a mortgage pre- payment index such as PSA but the amortization rate increases when interest rates fall and the rate decreases when interest rates rise. (e) Creation of New Investment Assets. A UK corporate treasurer whose company has substantial business in Spain feels that the current short term yield curves for sterling and the peseta which show absolute interest rates converging in the two countries is exaggerated. Consequently he takes cash currently invested in the short term sterling money markets and invests this cash in a "differential swap". A differential swap is a swap under which the UK company will pay a floating rate of interest in sterling (6 mth. Libor) and receive, also in sterling, a stream of floating rate payments reflecting Spanish interest rates plus or minus a spread. The flows might be: UK corporation pays six month sterling Libor flat and receives six month Peseta Mibor less 210 bps paid in sterling. Assuming a two year transaction and assuming sterling interest rates remained at their initial level of 5.25%, peseta Mibor would have to fall by 80 bps every six months in order for the treasurer to earn a lower return on his investment than would have been received from a conventional sterling money market deposit. (f) Asset Management. A German based fund manager has a view that the sterling yield curve will steepen (i.e. rates will increase) in the range two to five years during the next three years he enters into a "yield curve swap "with a German bank whereby the fund manager pays semi- annual fixed rate payments in DM based on the two year sterling swap rate plus 50 bps. Every six months the rate is re- set to reflect the new two year sterling swap rate. He receives six monthly fixed rate payments calculated by reference to the five year sterling swap rate and re- priced every six months. The fund manager will profit if the yield curve steepens more than 50 bps between two and five years. To repeat: the possibilities are almost endless but the above examples do give some general indication of how interest rate swaps can be and are being used.

What is LIBOR
nterbank market is a wholesale money market in London where banks exchange currencies either directly or through electronic trading platforms. The acronym LIBID stands for London Interbank Bid Rate. It is the bid rate that banks are willing to pay for eurocurrency deposits in the London interbank market. Eurocurrency deposits refer to money in the form of bank deposits of a currency outside the country that issued the currency. However, eurocurrency deposits may be of any currency in any country. The most common currency deposited as eurocurrency is the US dollar. For example, if US dollars are deposited in a European bank or any bank outside the U.S, then the deposit is referred to as a eurocurrency. LIBOR stands for London InterBank Offered Rate. LIBOR is the interest rate at which banks borrow money from other banks in the London interbank market. The LIBOR is set on a daily basis by the British Bankers' Association. The LIBOR is derived from a filtered average of the world's most creditworthy banks' interbank deposit rates for larger loans with maturities between overnight and one full year. LIBOR is the most widely used point of reference for short-term investment interest rates.

Definition
London Inter-Bank Offer Rate. The interest rate that the banks charge each other for loans (usually in Eurodollars). This rate is applicable to the shortterm international interbank market, and applies to very large loans borrowed for anywhere from one day to five years. This marketallows banks with liquidity requirements to borrow quickly from other banks with surpluses, enabling banks to avoid holding excessively large amounts of their asset base as liquid assets. The LIBOR is officially fixed once a day by a small group of large London banks, but the ratechanges throughout the day.

OTC and exchange-traded

In broad terms, there are two groups of derivative contracts, which are distinguished by the way they are traded in the market: Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are contracts that are traded (and privately negotiated) directly between two parties, without going through an exchange or other intermediary. Products such as swaps, forward rate agreements, and exotic options are almost always traded in this way. The OTC derivative market is the largest market for derivatives, and is largely unregulated with respect to disclosure of information between the parties, since the OTC market is made up of banks and other highly sophisticated parties, such as hedge funds. Reporting of OTC amounts are difficult because

trades can occur in private, without activity being visible on any exchange. According to the Bank for International Settlements, the total outstanding notional amount is US$684 trillion (as of June 2008).
[6]

Of this total notional amount, 67% are interest rate contracts, 8% are credit default swaps

(CDS), 9% are foreign exchange contracts, 2% are commodity contracts, 1% are equity contracts, and 12% are other. Because OTC derivatives are not traded on an exchange, there is no central counter-party. Therefore, they are subject to counter-party risk, like an ordinary contract, since each counter-party relies on the other to perform. Exchange-traded derivative contracts (ETD) are those derivatives instruments that are traded via specialized derivatives exchanges or other exchanges. A derivatives exchange is a market where individuals trade standardized contracts that have been defined by the exchange.
[8] [7]

A derivatives

exchange acts as an intermediary to all related transactions, and takes Initial margin from both sides of the trade to act as a guarantee. The world's largest derivatives exchanges (by number of

transactions) are the Korea Exchange (which listsKOSPI Index Futures & Options), Eurex (which lists a wide range of European products such as interest rate & index products), and CME Group (made up of the 2007 merger of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade and the 2008 acquisition of theNew York Mercantile Exchange). According to BIS, the combined turnover in the world's derivatives exchanges totaled USD 344 trillion during Q4 2005. Some types of derivative instruments also may trade on traditional exchanges. For instance, hybrid instruments such as convertible bonds and/or convertible preferred may be listed on stock or bond exchanges. Also, warrants (or "rights") may be listed on equity exchanges. Performance Rights, Cash xPRTs and various other instruments that essentially consist of a complex set of options bundled into a simple package are routinely listed on equity exchanges. Like other derivatives, these publicly traded derivatives provide investors access to risk/reward and volatility characteristics that, while related to an underlying commodity, nonetheless are distinctive.

CONTRACT TYPES UNDERLYING Exchange-traded futures Exchange-traded options OTC swap OTC forward OTC option

Equity

Option DJIA Index future on DJIA Index future Equity swap Single-stock future Single-share option

Back-to-back Repurchase agreement

Stock option Warrant Turbo warrant

Interest rate

Eurodollar future Euribor future

Option on Eurodollar future Interest rate Option on Euribor swap future

Forward rate agreement

Interest rate cap and floor Swaption Basis swap Bond option

Credit

Bond future

Option on Bond future

Credit default swap Total return swap

Repurchase agreement

Credit default option

Foreign exchange

Currency future

Option on currency future

Currency swap Currency forward Currency option

Commodity

WTI crude oil futures

Weather derivatives

Commodity swap

Iron ore forward contract

Gold option

Types of swaps
The five generic types of swaps, in order of their quantitative importance, are: interest rate swaps, currency swaps, credit swaps, commodity swaps and equity swaps. There are also many other types. [edit]Interest

rate swaps

Main article: Interest rate swap

A is currently paying floating, but wants to pay fixed. B is currently paying fixed but wants to pay floating. By entering into an interest rate swap, the net result is that each party can 'swap' their existing obligation for their desired obligation. Normally the parties do not swap payments directly, but rather, each sets up a separate swap with a financial intermediary such as a bank. In return for matching the two parties together, the bank takes a spread from the swap payments.

The most common type of swap is a plain Vanilla interest rate swap. It is the exchange of a fixed rate loan to a floating rate loan. The life of the swap can range from 2 years to over 15 years. The reason for this exchange is to take benefit from comparative advantage. Some companies may have comparative advantage in fixed rate markets while other companies have a comparative advantage in floating rate markets. When companies want to borrow they look for cheap borrowing i.e. from the market where they have comparative advantage. However this may lead to a company borrowing fixed when it wants floating or borrowing floating when it wants fixed. This is where a swap comes in. A swap has the effect of transforming a fixed rate loan into a floating rate loan or vice versa. For example, party B makes periodic interest payments to party A based on a variable interest rate ofLIBOR +70 basis points. Party A in return makes periodic interest payments based on a fixed rate of 8.65%. The payments are calculated over the notional amount. The first rate is calledvariable, because it is reset at the beginning of each interest calculation period to the then current reference rate, such as LIBOR. In reality, the actual rate received by A and B is slightly lower due to a bank taking a spread. [edit]Currency

swaps

Main article: Currency swap A currency swap involves exchanging principal and fixed rate interest payments on a loan in one currency for principal and fixed rate interest payments on an equal loan in another currency. Just like interest rate swaps, the currency swaps also are motivated by comparative advantage. Currency swaps entail swapping both principal and interest between the parties, with the cashflows in one direction being in a different currency than those in the opposite direction.

[edit]Commodity

swaps

Main article: Commodity swap A commodity swap is an agreement whereby a floating (or market or spot) price is exchanged for a fixed price over a specified period. The vast majority of commodity swaps involve crude oil. [edit]Equity

Swap

Main article: Equity swap An equity swap is a special type of total return swap, where the underlying asset is a stock, a basket of stocks, or a stock index. Compared to actually owning the stock, in this case you do not have to pay anything up front, but you do not have any voting or other rights that stock holders do. [edit]Credit

default swaps

Main article: Credit default swap A credit default swap (CDS) is a swap contract in which the buyer of the CDS makes a series of payments to the seller and, in exchange, receives a payoff if a credit instrument - typically a bond or loan - goes into default (fails to pay). Less commonly, the credit event that triggers the payoff can be a company undergoing restructuring, bankruptcy or even just having its credit rating downgraded. CDS contracts have been compared with insurance, because the buyer pays a premium and, in return, receives a sum of money if one of the events specified in the contract occur. Unlike an actual insurance contract the buyer is allowed to profit from the contract and may also cover an asset to which the buyer has no direct exposure. [edit]Other

variations

There are myriad different variations on the vanilla swap structure, which are limited only by the imagination of financial engineers and the desire of corporate treasurers and fund managers for exotic structures.
[1]

A total return swap is a swap in which party A pays the total return of an asset, and party B makes periodic interest payments. The total return is the capital gain or loss, plus any interest or dividend payments. Note that if the total return is negative, then party A receives this amount from party B. The parties have exposure to the return of the underlying stock or index, without having to hold the underlyingassets. The profit or loss of party B is the same for him as actually owning the underlying asset.

An option on a swap is called a swaption. These provide one party with the right but not the obligation at a future time to enter into a swap.

A variance swap is an over-the-counter instrument that allows one to speculate on or hedge risks associated with the magnitude of movement, a CMS, is a swap that allows the purchaser to fix the duration of received flows on a swap.

An Amortising swap is usually an interest rate swap in which the notional principal for the interest payments declines during the life of the swap, perhaps at a rate tied to the prepayment of a mortgage or to an interest rate benchmark such as the LIBOR. It is suitable to those customers of banks who want to manage the interest rate risk involved in predicted funding requirement, or investment programs.

A Zero coupon swap is of use to those entities which have their liabilities denominated in floating rates but at the same time would like to conserve cash for operational purposes.

A Deferred rate swap is particularly attractive to those users of funds that need funds immediately but do not consider the current rates of interest very attractive and feel that the rates may fall in future.

An Accreting swap is used by banks which have agreed to lend increasing sums over time to its customers so that they may fund projects.

A Forward swap is an agreement created through the synthesis of two swaps differing in duration for the purpose of fulfilling the specific time-frame needs of an investor. Also referred to as a forward start swap, delayed start swap, and a deferred start swap.

[edit]Valuation Further information: Rational pricing#Swaps and Arbitrage The value of a swap is the net present value (NPV) of all estimated future cash flows. A swap is worth zero when it is first initiated, however after this time its value may become positive or negative. are two ways to value swaps: in terms of bond prices, or as a portfolio offorward contracts. [edit]Using
[1] [1]

There

bond prices

While principal payments are not exchanged in an interest rate swap, assuming that these are received and paid at the end of the swap does not change its value. Thus, from the point of view of the floating-rate payer, a swap is equivalent to a long position in a fixed-rate bond (i.e.receiving fixed interest payments), and a short position in a floating rate note (i.e. making floating interest payments):

From the point of view of the fixed-rate payer, the swap can be viewed as having the opposite positions. That is,

Similarly, currency swaps can be regarded as having positions in bonds whose cash flows correspond to those in the swap. Thus, the home currency value is:

Vswap = Bdomestic S0Bforeign, where Bdomestic is the domestic cash flows of the swap, Bforeign is the
foreign cash flows of the LIBOR is the rate of interest offered by banks on deposit from other banks in the eurocurrency market. One-month LIBOR is the rate offered for 1-month deposits, 3month LIBOR for three months deposits, etc. LIBOR rates are determined by trading between banks and change continuously as economic conditions change. Just like the prime rate of interest quoted in the domestic market, LIBOR is a reference rate of interest in the international market.