Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Deficient
(1)
Lacks
minimal
background
information
Thesis
is
unclear
and
lacking
in
logic
Insufficient
support
and
evidence
Weak
analysis,
development
and
insight
Content
(as
expressed
in
your
writing)
Provides all essential Provides most essential background information background information Thesis is clear and insightful Thesis is clear and logical Support, explanation, and evidence are comprehensive Exceptional analysis, development, and insight Support, explanation, and evidence are fairly thorough Strong analysis, development, and insight
Exemplary
(4)
Introduction
creates
interest,
provides
direction,
and
shows
engagement
with
topic
Paragraphs
reflect
highly
unified
thinking,
strongly
promote
the
essay's
flow
and
effectively
present
details
Conclusion
thoughtfully
and
effectively
ends
paper
-
goes
beyond
mere
summary
Transitions
between
paragraphs
and
sentences
are
logical
and
enhance
meaning
Proficient
(3)
Introduction
creates
some
interest,
provides
fair
direction,
and
shows
some
engagement
with
topic
Developing (2)
Deficient
(1)
Introduction
lacks
interest,
direction,
and
engagement
with
topic
Paragraphs
lack
unified
thinking,
limit
the
essay's
flow,
and
lack
effective
details
Conclusion
is
either
missing
or
lacks
even
a
basic
summary
Lack
of
consistent
transition
between
sentences
and
paragraphs
significantly
limits
meaning
Organization
Introduction creates little interest, provides limited direction, shows little engagement with topic Paragraphs reflect unified Paragraphs reflect limited thinking, promote the thinking, somewhat essay's flow and present promote the essay's flow, details somewhat effectively and present some, but not enough details Conclusion effectively ends Conclusion ends the essay the the essay and includes with summary and some observation beyond repetition only mere summary Transitions between Transitions between paragraphs and sentences paragraphs and sentences are logical but do not are inconsistent or enhance meaning insufficient
Proficient
(3)
Variety
and
quality
of
sentences
are
evident
in
the
essay
Effective
vocabulary
and
language
use
Voice
and
tone
are
appropriate
for
the
purpose
of
the
essay
Developing
(2)
Some
sentence
variety
but
relies
too
heavily
on
a
few
simple
patterns
Simple
vocabulary
and
language
use
Voice
and
tone
must
better
match
the
purpose
of
the
essay
Deficient
(1)
Little
sentence
variety
relies
on
a
few
simple
patterns
Vocabulary
errors
and
misuse
of
language
limit
meaning
Voice
and
tone
are
inappropriate
for
the
purpose
of
the
essay
Style
Exemplary
(4)
Very
few
or
no
errors
Spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization
enhance
clarity
Usage
(tense,
agreement,
etc.)
enhances
clarity
Proficient
(3)
Few
errors
Spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization
are
mostly
correct
Usage
is
mostly
correct
Developing
(2)
Errors
but
meaning
is
clear
Some
errors
in
spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization
diminish
clarity
Some
errors
in
usage
diminish
clarity
Deficient
(1)
Errors
interfere
with
meaning
Errors
in
spelling,
punctuation,
capitalization
seriously
diminish
clarity
Usage
errors
seriously
diminish
clarity
Exemplary
(4)
All
citations
and
reference
materials
are
authoritative,
credible,
and
presented
in
the
correct
format.
Proficient
(3)
Most
citations
and
reference
materials
are
authoritative,
credible
and
presented
in
the
correct
format.
Most
reference
materials
have
been
used
and
formatted
correctly,
but
some
irregularities
and/or
inconsistencies
are
apparent.
Developing
(2)
A
varied
number
of
citations
appear
throughout
the
essay,
but
they
are
of
rather
dubious
origin
and
quality.
Padding
is
evident
and
there
are
some
inconsistencies
in
the
referencing
system
being
used.
Deficient
(1)
A
limited
number
of
citations
appear,
padding
is
evident
and
there
is
no
consistency
in
the
referencing
style
being
used.
Content (research)