Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
multi-body robot seen as a whole constraint (internal) reaction forces are automatically eliminated (they do not perform work) closed-form (symbolic) equations are directly obtained best suited for study of dynamic properties and analysis of control schemes
dynamic equations written separately for each link/body inverse dynamics in real time
equations are evaluated in a numeric and recursive way best for synthesis (=implementation) of modelbased control schemes
by elimination of reaction forces and back-substitution of expressions, we still get closed-form dynamic equations (identical to those of Euler-Lagrange!)
2
Robotics 2
Ri = S 0 i 0 Ri
( )
Robotics 2
fi =
d (mv c ) = m v c dt
Robotics 2
Newton-Euler equations
link i
center of mass
-1
FORCES
vci
zi
zi-1
ci
fi force applied from link (i-1) on link i fi+1 force applied from link i on link (i+1) mig gravity force all vectors expressed in the same RF (better RFi) N
fi
Oi-1 axis qi
.
mig
Newton equation
fi fi+1 + mi g = mi aci
linear absolute acceleration of ci
Robotics 2
Newton-Euler equations
link i TORQUES i torque applied from link (i-1) on link i i+1 torque applied from link i on link (i+1) fi x ri-1,c torque due to fi w.r.t. ci - fi+1 x ri,c torque due to - fi+1 w.r.t. ci Euler equation
zi-1
-2
i
zi
i fi
ri-1,ci
ri,ci
i+1
Oi-1 axis qi
Robotics 2
Forward recursion
Computing velocities and accelerations
moving frames algorithm (as for velocities in Lagrange) wherever there is no leading superscript, it is the same as the subscript for simplicity, only revolute joints
(see textbook for the more general treatment) initializations
AR
the gravity force term can be skipped in Newton equation, if added here
Robotics 2 7
Backward recursion
Computing forces and torques
from Ni F/TR to Ni-1
eliminated, if inserted in forward recursion (i=0)
initializations
from Ei
to Ei-1
at each step of this recursion, we have two vector equations (Ni + Ei) at the joint providing and : these contain ALSO the reaction forces/torques at the joint axis they should be next projected along/around this axis FP
generalized forces (in rhs of Euler-Lagrange eqs)
Robotics 2
N scalar equations
at the end
the previous forward/backward recursive formulas can be evaluated in symbolic or numeric form
symbolic substituting expressions in a recursive way at the end, a closed form dynamic model is obtained, which is identical to the one obtained using Euler-Lagrange (or any other) method this has no special convenience numeric substituting numeric values (numbers!) at each step computational complexity of each step remains constant grows in a linear fashion with the number N of joints strongly recommended for real-time use, especially when the number N of joints is large
Robotics 2
Newton-Euler algorithm
AR F/TR
FP
Robotics 2
10
number N and types ={0,1}N of joints (revolute/prismatic) table of DH kinematic parameters list of dynamic parameters of the links (and of the motors) vector parameter = {0g,0} (presence or absence of gravity) three ordered vector arguments typically, samples of joint position, velocity, acceleration taken from a desired trajectory generalized force u for the complete inverse dynamics or single terms of the dynamic model
11
input
output
Robotics 2
Examples of output
. ..
..
generalized momentum
.
Robotics 2
12
200 0 !200
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
velocity (deg/s)
!100 !200
velocity (deg/s)
1000 500 0
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
acceleration (deg/s2 )
1000 0 !1000
acceleration (deg/s2 )
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
2000 0 !2000
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
0 .1
2
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5 tim e (s)
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
1 .5
desired (smooth) joint motion: quintic polynomials for q1, q2 with zero vel/acc boundary conditions from (90,-180) to (0,90) in T=1 s
Robotics 2
0 .5
! 0 .5
!1 !1
! 0 .5
0 .5 m
1 .5
13
0 ! 100 ! 200
Nm
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
100
50
final torques u10, u2=0 balance link weights in final (0,90) configuration
! 50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
motion in vertical plane (under gravity) both links are thin rods of uniform mass m1=10 kg, m2=5 kg
Robotics 2 14
100
60
50
40
0
Nm
Nm
20
! 50
0
! 100
! 20
! 150
! 200
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
! 40
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
torque contributions at the two joints for the desired motion = total, = inertial = Coriolis/centrifugal, = gravitational
Robotics 2 15