RUBRICS Rubrics for Managing Groups and Teams Fail F 0 Unsatisfactory E 1 Average D 2

Criteria

Case/Situational Analysis (5 marks)

*Application of the key concept *Creative in approach *Clear and precise *Presentation *Methodology

No understanding of the concepts taught in the class, presented the answers very vaguely with no application at all. Presentation is incomplete. No analysis.

The application of concepts is not satisfactory. Presentation is irrelevant to the issue under discussion.

Little application of key concepts and was not able to present the answer in clear and precise manner. Presentation is disorganized.

Continuous Assessment (Grpoup Project/ Presentation-5 marks)

* Frequency *Project Data *Project Analysis 2.5 marks

Project data and analysis lacks originality. The analysis is not relevant and the objective of the project is not met.

Barely manages to meet the objectives of the project. Report writing is inadequate, limited understanding of concepts is demonstrated.

Part of the data (Organisation profile) is copied from the organisation website and is not even paraphrased. The Analysis is superficial and does not make sense to the objectives of the project.

Continuous Assessment (Grpoup Project/ Presentation-5 m

*Participation of Members *Engaging Audience *Relevance 2.5 marks

Presentation incomplete irrelevant.

Dominates discussion, not allowing students to contribute or creates distractions by playing with items. Comments are not relevant or goes back to is previous and discussion. Language is so confused that it's difficult to understand where comments fits. Only 1 members participates and addresses the audience. May simply paraphrase or restate the question. There is no analysis and has incompetent, inappropriate responses. Contains many major or minor errors, disorganized and poorly written

Contributes very little or at times that break the flow of the discussion. Comment is irrelevant and language is general. 2 members participating and very little contact with the audience. Most group members speak only to part of the audience. Presentation is Disorganized.

*Understanding of the Question *Analysis *Supportive Information with examples *Grammar and Structure *Organization and writing Style

Written Exam (20 marks)

Fails to demonstrate any understanding of the concepts under concern. Lacks evidence of any knowledge related to the subject.

May deal with the question in a superficial way. Inappropriate analysis and supporting information given. May contain major errors and is very weakly organized and written.

RICS g Groups and Teams Good C 3 Very Good B 4 Excellent A 5 Concepts and ideas are relevant and clearly stated, demonstrate a high level of competence and knowledge of the key issues and solutions. Concepts and theories are well integrated in the solutions. Answers to queries are well framed. Presentation is visually organized and complete.

Able to apply some concepts but the key areas were missed or a lack of integration of ideas. Not able to answer all questions asked. Presentation is complete.

Application of concepts are competent, appropriate concepts and theories included but not fully integrated to the solution. Presentation is visually organized and complete.

Some of the objectives of the project are met and not all. The application of concepts to the issues is not clear. Analysis does not integrate relevant theories to he issue under concern.

All the objectives of the project are met with. The analysis includes theories and concepts discussed in class, however integration is missing. The relationship with the concepts is not clear.

Original work in respect of data collection and analysis. The analysis is done integrating all the concepts and theories dealt with in class. Report discusses real life examples and throws insight on interesting trends in industry.

Comments or contribute sometimes. Sometimes talks over others. Comments may repeat what has been already said and language is fairly general. Few members participating and answering questions asked by audience. Not able to answer all questions asked. Presentation is Complete.

Contributes regularly to discussions and allows others to share comments as well. Contributions is related to topic and support is provided. Clarification questions are asked and language is clear. All group members participate and addresses the queries. Most group members speak to the entire audience. Presentation is organized and complete.

Frequency of comments is optimal. Steps in when there are silences to move discussion along but keeps quiet or allows others to contribute. Sensitive to when to comment. Contributions enhance discussion and brings in relevant personal knowledge. Able to indicate gaps to topic. All group members equally participate and addresses all the question asked by the audience very well. All group members speak to the entire audience Presentation is visually organized and complete.

May deal with one part of the question in some depth and there is weak analysis done. Lacks supporting information. May contain few errors and is weakly organized and written.

May deal with all part of the question in a more general way. Limited analysis and supports the answer with some factual information. May contain minor errors that do not detract from overall essay. Clearly organized and written, but not exceptional.

Understand and deals with all part of question in depth. Provides effective analysis of question. Supports with substantial relevant information and application of more examples . May contain insignificant errors, well organized and also well written.