Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY Saurabh Ashok Thadani 10FN-102 Srikanth Kumar Konduri 10FN-109 Tushar Gupta Nikhil Gupta 10FN-115 10FN-121
IMT
Table of Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 The Research Design ............................................................................................................................. 6 Step 1: Identification of the factors to be considered as a part of cost of construction ...................... 7 Step 2: Data Collection for the historical prices of each factor ............................................................ 9 4.1 Historical Cement Prices ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Historical Iron and Steel Prices ......................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Historical WPI for All Commodities ................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Historical Minimum Monthly Wage Rates ........................................................................................ 11 4.5 Historical Monthly Yields on 10 Year GOI Securities ........................................................................ 11 5. Step 3: Forecasting of the future prices of each factor and the volatility associated with them....... 12 5.1 Forecasted Cement Prices................................................................................................................. 13 5.2 Forecasted Iron and Steel Prices ....................................................................................................... 14 5.3 Forecasted WPI for All Commodities ................................................................................................ 15 5.4 Forecasted Minimum Monthly Wage Rates ..................................................................................... 16 5.5 Forecasted Monthly Yields on 10 Year GOI Securities ...................................................................... 17 6. Step 4: Creation of the financial model and Monte Carlo Simulation ................................................ 18 6.1 Control Sheet .................................................................................................................................... 18 6.2 Project Snapshot ............................................................................................................................... 18 6.3 Modeling Section .............................................................................................................................. 18 6.4 Cost Summary Section ...................................................................................................................... 19 6.5 Revenue Summary Section ............................................................................................................... 19 6.6 Term Loan ......................................................................................................................................... 19 6.7 Project Profit and Loss ...................................................................................................................... 19 6.8 Tax Summary..................................................................................................................................... 19 6.9 Cash Flow Statements ....................................................................................................................... 19 6.10 Simulation ....................................................................................................................................... 20 6.11 Defining Assumptions ..................................................................................................................... 20 6.12 Input and Output ............................................................................................................................ 21 7. Step 5: Results and interpretation ...................................................................................................... 24
Modeling of Risk in Cost of Construction in Real Estate in India 10. References ............................................................................................................................................ 28
1. Introduction
Large construction projects require detailed cost risk analysis to analyze the profitability of the project. A cost risk analysis is the quantitative process used to determine how the project cost may vary because of systemic and project specific risks, positive or negative. The analysis uses a model reflecting the estimated project cost and potential variations in that cost. Traditional corporate finance theory suggests that firms should use a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model to analyze capital allocation proposals. Given the uncertainty inherent in project forecasting and valuation, analysts will wish to assess the sensitivity of project Net Present Value (NPV)/ Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to the various inputs (i.e. assumptions) to the DCF model. In a typical sensitivity analysis the analyst will vary one key factor while holding all other inputs constant, ceteris paribus. The sensitivity of NPV/IRR to a change in that factor is then observed, and is calculated as a "slope": NPV / factor. For example, the analyst will determine NPV at various growth rates in annual revenue as specified (usually at set increments, e.g. -10%, -5%, 0%, 5 %....), and then determine the sensitivity using this formula. Often, several variables may be of interest, and their various combinations produce a "value-surface" (or even a "valuespace"), where NPV/IRR is then a function of several variables. Using scenario analysis, analysts also run scenario based forecasts of NPV/IRR. Here, a scenario comprises a particular outcome for economy-wide, "global" factors (demand for the product, exchange rates, and commodity prices, etc.) as well as for company-specific factors (unit costs, etc). As an example, the analyst may specify specific growth scenarios (e.g. 5% for "Worst Case", 10% for "Likely Case" and 25% for "Best Case"), where all key inputs are adjusted so as to be consistent with the growth assumptions, and calculate the NPV/IRR for each. For scenario analysis, the various combinations of inputs must be internally consistent, whereas for the sensitivity approach these need not be so. An application of this methodology is to determine as an "unbiased" NPV/IRR, where management determines a (subjective) probability for each scenario the NPV for the project is then the probability-weighted average of the various scenarios. In this project we will try to incorporate further advancement which is to construct stochastic or probabilistic financial models as opposed to the traditional static and deterministic models as above. For this purpose, we will use Monte Carlo simulation to analyze the projects NPV/IRR. This method was introduced to finance by David B. Hertz in 1964, although has only recently become very common: We will run simulations in spreadsheet based DCF models, using Monte Carlo Simulation technique. Using simulation, the cash flow components that are (heavily) impacted by uncertainty are simulated, mathematically reflecting their "random characteristics". Here, in contrast to the scenario approach above, the simulation will produce several thousand random but possible outcomes, or "trials"; the output will then be a histogram of project NPV/IRR, and the average NPV/IRR of the potential investment. This histogram provides information not visible from the static DCF: for example, it allows for an estimate of the probability that a project has a net present value greater than zero (or any other value).
4
In the following project we would try to build upon a financial model of a township project in Mullanpur, Chandigarh, which besides predicting the value of NPV/IRR, will also describe the risk associated with it. We will try to outline the process with the help of a sample project. The most basic financial model is Profit = Revenue Cost This simply means that the profit or returns will vary depending on the cost or the revenue. In the following project we will try to study how the change in the construction cost will affect the returns on the project and how an analysis of each of the costs and proper weight age for each of them will tell us the risk associated with the complete project. When designing, planning as well as constructing a commercial property the costs involved are of paramount importance. Unfortunately this is even truer today than it was 10 years ago for the simple fact prices of materials etc., are continually increasing. The project assumes that the revenue stream is constant and as predicted by the financial analyst and only the cost price of various commodities vary. This will vary the cost of construction associated with our project and in turn would affect the expected returns. While a probabilistic model is followed for the future costs, the same will result in a probabilistic output and will define the risk associated with any of the real estate projects.
The standard deviation of the prices of each factor has been used to quantify the risk associated with that factor which is then translated into risk in the final IRR value calculation for the project. To prepare a model to assess and analyze the risk the following steps were undertaken: Step 1: Identification of the factors to be considered as a part of cost of construction. As a part of the first step, research was carried out to identify the major factors to be considered as a part of the cost of construction in a real estate project and also to decide on the weight age to be allocated to each factor. After which meetings were held with project management teams to confirm the factors and their weight ages. Step 2: Data Collection for the historical prices of each factor. After identifying the major factors in the cost of construction, historical data for each factor was collected from various databases like CMIE and websites like www. labourbureau.nic.in. Step 3: Forecasting of the future prices of each factor and the volatility associated with them. The historical data was then analyzed using various tools and techniques as described later based on which the future prices for each factor and the volatility associated with them was forecasted. Step 4: Creation of the financial model and Monte Carlo Simulation. In this step the financial model was created which accepted the various parameters related to a real estate project as inputs and provided the profitability of the project in the form of the IRR value as the output. After which the factors associated with the cost of construction that were identified in the first step were varied as per the predictions and its effect was seen on the IRR value by using Monte Carlo Simulation. Step 5: Results and interpretation. In the final step the output obtained from the Monte Carlo Simulation was analyzed and recommendations were made corresponding to the output.
6
These identified factors were then analyzed for the amount of contribution each makes to the total cost of civil structure psf (per square foot). On analyzing the data of few projects, it was estimated that the percentage contribution of each of these factors to the total cost of construction is as given in the table: Factor Cement Iron and Steel Labour Miscellaneous Total Percentage Contribution 28% 39% 26% 7% 100%
Table 1: Percentage contribution of each factor to the total cost of construction Interest Costs: The interest costs are the interest payments that need to be paid on the amount of debt that is raised for the project. Hence the risk of changing interest rates during the tenure of the project becomes significant when the amount of debt raised is large. Since real estate projects are usually on a large scale, significant amount of the capital requirements are fulfilled by raising debt and hence the changing interest rates have adverse effects on the cost of the project.
Historical Average Retail Prices of Cement (CMIE): Delhi (Rs. per Kg)
6 5 Price per Kg (in Rs.) 4 3 2 1 0
Figure 1: Historical Average Retail Prices Of Cement (CMIE): Delhi (Rs. per Kg)
Figure 2: Historical Prices of HR Coils 2.00 mm: Delhi (Rs. per Kg)
10
11
5. Step 3: Forecasting of the future prices of each factor and the volatility associated with them
The historical data as obtained in the previous step is a time series data. A time series is a sequence of data points, measured typically at successive times spaced at uniform time intervals. Time series can be represented as a curve that evolves over time. Forecasting time series means that we extend the historical values into the future where measurements are not yet available. Several methods were considered to get the forecast of the data. Some of them were Regression Analysis and Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model. But since the main concern of the project is to analyze the risk and the effect on NPV and IRR where we would be using a probability distribution for the prices in future, it was decided to follow regression analysis to forecast the data. The forecasted data had the weekly price data for cement and iron and steel, monthly Wholesale Price Index data for all commodities, monthly yield data on 10 Year GOI securities and annual data on minimum monthly wages of the labours for the next six years which is the tenure of the project. The historical data for each factor was analyzed with various trend lines that is, linear, logarithmic and exponential. The trend line that explained the maximum percentage of variation in each factor was used for forecasting the future values of that factor. The calculated values are shown in the Appendix 2. The following charts show the forecasted values for the price data.
12
Table 2: Percentage of variation explained by each trend line for historical cement prices The linear trend line explained the maximum variation in the historical cement prices; hence it was used to forecast the cement prices for the next six years. The equation formed for forecasting the data was: Y=0.0029X+2.1103 Where Y is the Retail Price of Cement Per kg in Delhi (in Rs.) And X is the No. of the period (For Example, 1 is for week ending 1st April 1995 and 2 is for the week ending 8th April 1995 and so on)
Figure 6: Forecasted Average Retail Prices of Cement: Delhi (Rs. per Kg)
13
Table 3: Percentage of variation explained by each trend line for historical iron and steel prices The exponential trend line explained the maximum variation in the historical iron and steel prices; hence it was used to forecast the iron and steel prices for the next six years. The equation formed for forecasting the data was: Y=29.869e0.001X Where Y is the Retail Price of HR Coils 2.00 mm per Kg in Delhi (in Rs.) And X is the No. of the period (For Example, 1 is for week ending 10th April 2004 and 2 is for the week ending 17th April 2004 and so on)
14
Table 4: Percentage of variation explained by each trend line for historical WPI for all commodities The exponential trend line explained the maximum variation in the historical WPI for all commodities; hence it was used to forecast the WPI for all commodities for the next six years. The equation formed for forecasting the data was: Y=116.26e0.0043X Where Y is the WPI of all commodities (in Rs.) And X is the No. of the period (For Example, 1 is for month of April 1995 and 2 is for the month of May 1995 and so on)
15
Table 5: Percentage of variation explained by each trend line for historical Minimum Monthly Wage Rate The linear trend line explained the maximum variation in the historical minimum monthly wage rate; hence it was used to forecast the minimum monthly wage rate for the next six years. The equation formed for forecasting the data was: Y=173.89X+1167.9 Where Y is the Minimum Monthly wage of Labours (in Rs.) And X is the No. of the period (For Example, 1 is for year of 1993 and 2 is for the year of 1994 and so on)
16
Table 6: Percentage of variation explained by each trend line for historical Monthly Yields on 10 Year GOI Securities The logarithmic trend line explained the maximum variation in the historical monthly yields on 10 Year GOI Securities; hence it was used to forecast the monthly yield on 10 Year GOI Securities for the next six years. The equation formed for forecasting the data was: Y=0.7437ln(X)+4.8192 Where Y is the Yield on 10-Year GOI Securities in Secondary Market (in %) And X is the No. of the period (For Example, 1 is for month of October 2003 and 2 is for the month of November 2003 and so on)
Figure 10: Forecasted Average Yield on 10-Year GOI Security in secondary market (in %)
17
18
less. This section provides a snap shot of timelines of various expenses and when will they be incurred and how will the revenue flow be in the future.
6.10 Simulation
The simulation was done using Crystal Ball. It comes as an add-in in the Microsoft Excel. The most important part of running the simulation is setting the assumptions for the various inputs.
Table 7: Assumptions of the mean and standard deviation of the forecasted values for each factor The IRR and NPV values were defined as the forecast and analyzed. The analysis results for the IRR analysis are as given in the next section.
20
Assumption: Labour Lognormal distribution with parameters: Location Mean Std. Dev.
Assumption: Steel Lognormal distribution with parameters: Location 0.00 Mean 526.50 Std. Dev. 48.18
Assumption: Misc(Inflation) Lognormal distribution with parameters: Location 0.00 Mean 94.50 Std. Dev. 8.85
21
Assumption: Onshore debt Lognormal distribution with parameters: Location 0.00% Mean 15.00% Std. Dev. 0.27%
Figure 12: Distribution of IRR values as obtained from Monte Carlo Simulation
22
The forecasted values of IRR and the percentiles associated with them as obtained from the output of the Monte Carlo Simulation are as follows: Forecast: IRR Percentiles Forecast values 0% 17.91% 10% 21.12% 20% 21.54% 30% 21.84% 40% 22.09% 50% 22.31% 60% 22.54% 70% 22.77% 80% 23.04% 90% 23.40% 100% 25.61% Table 8: Forecasted values of IRR and the percentiles associated with them as obtained from the output of the Monte Carlo Simulation
23
Trials
Monte Carlo Simulation assumed 100,000 input points. The large sample size was used to decrease the difference between repeated simulations. The Base case of the IRR value is 22.30% which means that based on our assumptions given to financial model the return from the project will be 22.30%. The mean value of the IRR value is 22.38% which means that if investment is made on a number of similar projects the average return from all the projects will be 22.38%. The median value of the IRR value is 22.31% which means that 50% of the results from the simulation are less than 22.31% and the remaining 50% of the results from the simulation are greater than 22.31%. The Standard Deviation of 0.90% means that 68% of the IRR value will lie between 22.38% +/- 0.90%. A low value for the standard deviation means the possibility of having IRR value close to the mean is higher. The distribution has a negative skew with a long tail in the negative direction, which means that there is more chance of getting lower numbers than mean value and lesser chance of having IRR value greater than the mean value. A kurtosis value of 3.08 means that the distribution is almost a normal distribution. However being slightly greater than 3 means that there is comparatively more
24
Base Case
22.30%
Mean
22.38%
Median
22.31%
Standard Deviation
0.90%
Skewness
-0.2218
Kurtosis
3.08
data in the tail portion. Coeff. of Variability 0.0402 The Coefficient of Variability value of 0.0402 suggests that all the variability in the IRR value cannot be explained by just these 5 factors, which is true since revenue, time of revenue collection and other costs will be needed to explain the full variation. Under the most pessimistic condition the IRR value will be 17.91%. Under the most optimistic condition the IRR value will be 25.61%. The maximum variation in the IRR value is 7.71% but due to the small standard deviation most of the IRR values will lie within a smaller range.
Minimum
17.91%
Maximum
25.61%
Range Width
7.71%
Table 9: Output obtained from Monte Carlo Simulation with their interpretation
25
8. Conclusion
The use of the static DCF model to analyze the township project in Mullanpur, Chandigarh gives us an IRR value of 22.30%. However on further investigation by supplementing the DCF model with Monte Carlo simulation, we find that 22.30% is not the final IRR value. Based on the inputs of the standard deviation and mean of the forecasted prices of each factor of the cost of construction, we get an IRR value ranging from 17.91% in the most pessimistic case to 25.61% in the most optimistic case. We also get the associated probability of attaining all possible IRR values. For example, there is a 63% probability of attaining an IRR value greater than 22%. Hence we get a better understanding about the risk associated with each IRR value. The investor should undertake the investment only if he is willing to accept the risk associated with the required return and no safer investment options are available. The output statistics as described above also tell us important characteristics about the output obtained from Monte Carlo Simulation. Since the graph is negatively skewed, there is more probability of getting an IRR value less than the mean value of 22.30% than getting an IRR value above 22.30%. The low value of Coefficient of Variability suggests that all the variability in the IRR value cannot be explained by just these 5 factors, which is true since revenue, time of revenue collection and other costs will be needed to explain the full variation. A low value for the standard deviation means the possibility of having IRR value close to the mean is higher.
The above analysis depicts as to how by creating a probabilistic model instead of a deterministic model, that is, by supplementing DCF with Monte Carlo Simulation we can arrive at better conclusion of the risks and profitability of the project than by static DCF Analysis. This improves the chances of making a successful investment.
26
2.
3.
4.
5.
Identify the sources of finance and start securing commitments for funds. Dispose of the units suitably (sale/lease/license). Set up a system for maintenance of the property.
6.
7.
Table 10: Stages in the life cycle of a real estate project and the risk associated with each stage This project was undertaken to assess the risks involved in Step 4 only. Hence the other steps were assumed to be in line with the expectations of the financial model of the real estate investment project. All the risks involved can be taken into consideration for future work.
27
10. References
Paul Glasserman. Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering Koop G, Introduction to Econometrics Johnathan Mun, Real Option Analysis Andrew Mclean & Gary W. Eldred, Investing in Real Estate Christopher Chatfield, Time-Series Forecasting Industry Analysis Service, CMIE Database Business Beacon, CMIE Database http://www.labourbureau.nic.in http://www.investopedia.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/real-estate-sector-india.pdf http://propertyinmullanpur.com http://www.ibef.org http://www.riskamp.com/files/RiskAMP%20-%20Monte%20Carlo%20Simulation.pdf http://www.oracle.com
28