ANNEX 3

DESCRIPTION AND MAPPING OF THE

BIOLOGICALLY TREATABLE WASTE STREAM
IN 4 DISTRICTS: AN NHON-TAY SON-HOAI NHON-PHU
MY IN BINH DINH PROVINCE
1. Brief description of the whole solid waste stream in the 4 districts.

Picture 1. Location map of 4 districts in Binh Dinh province.

The Project of Water Supply and Sanitation Program in Binh Dinh province (WSSP) organises a
feasibility study: "Valorization of organic waste in Binh Dinh province" to identify and analyze
viable options for recycling and re-valuating for organic waste in four target districts such as An
Nhon, Tay Son, Hoai Nhon, Phu My. The ultimate goal is maximize the amounts of waste that
re-used, and hence to reduce the waste to be dumped, incarnated or buried. Moreover, in overall
terms to contribute to the protection of environment and create positive social and economic
impact.
To determine the amount of organic waste which will be generated from four districts during 10
years from 2011 to 2020, we need to determine the volume of waste generated from households,
markets, schools, offices, factories, farms, etc. We have carried out the surveys and interviews in
order to calculate the volume of organic waste in four districts.
To calculate the daily amount of waste in four districts, this should be based on the number of
people living and working in there. There are many methods to calculate population by 2020.
The group has analyzed the rate of population growth based on the rate of natural increase of
population, including of social - economic situation, birth rates, death rates on population growth.
According to statistics from the master plan for solid waste management in Binh Dinh province
by 2020, the rate of natural population increases of 1%. However, following the survey data,
researching materials and statistics for 2009 without receiving an estimate for the coming years;
the birth rate in 2009 of Binh Dinh province was 1.67% and the death rate was 0.51%, the rate of
natural population growth was 1.16%. Therefore, we take the rate of natural population growth
for 2009 which is 1.16% and calculate for 2010 to 2020.
How to get data collection, we collect solid waste information through field surveys (Sub-Annex
No.1) and work with the WSSP, the other partners of the project; PCs district, the official
departments under PCs districts such as General Economic Division, Departments of Urban,
Department of Environment, Department of Industry, Agricultural Extension Station, the
Management Board of Industrial Zones; Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
under Binh Dinh province; the Urban Environmental Company in Qui Nhon City; the Urban
Environmental Company and Waste Management Cooperatives in four districts of Binh Dinh
province; Market Management Boards, etc. We can gather their awareness about solid waste,
waste volumes, the executors of waste management and treatment, sorting at source, public or
private sector, their role, the development of community, awareness activities, garbage collection
methods, how to transport and treat garbage, how to socialize, the expectation of feasible location
for installing equipment and waste treatment works to make plans for producing fertilizer
suitable for 4 districts, etc. (Sub-Annex No.2). We have identified that organic component is the
most important part in order to offer a plan for making suitable fertilizer plant for 4 districts by
analyzing biologically treatable waste stream from households and markets.
Through the survey of solid waste in four districts in October, 2010; we analyzed that the
garbage volume collected, transported and buried from households, markets, streets, industrial
parks, etc. is 101 tons/day, which accounted for 27%, the rest of 73% garbage are treated or
threw out public places by residents themselves. In the four districts, 101 tons of collected
garbage in which has 59 tons of organic waste with organic component is around 58.42% (it is
the highest component compared with other components such as plastic, paper, metal, etc.) and
has ability for producing fertilizer for industrial crops.
In general, through surveying in four districts, Phu My, Tay Son, An Nhon, Hoai Nhon in Binh
Dinh province, we identified that the solid waste stream has high organic component; most of
them are from household and market wastes. Source of organic waste from industrial zones is
negligible and source of organic waste from farms often used for farmers purposes, so it is not
be discharged into a solid waste stream to be collected and treated by district companies.

1.1. Phu My district

a. Geographical location
Phu My district belongs to Binh Dinh province, with an area of 550.46 km2 and borders on:
- The Northern borders on Hoai Nhon district.
- The Southern and Southwestern borders on Phu Cat district.
- The Northwestern borders on Hoai An district.
- The Western borders on the East Sea.

Picture 1.1 (a): The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Phu My district.

b. Social - economic situation:

Percentage of social - economic structure of Phu My district is mainly agriculture and
agricultural products accounted for 50.77%; business services 16.30%; and manufacturing
industries 32.93%.
According to statistics in 2009, the total population in Phu My district is 169,645 people,
population density are 308 persons/km2; including 17 communes and 2 towns as follows:
Table 1.1 (b) Average population in Phu My District in 2009

01

Binh Dng Town

Average
population
(People)
5,447

02

Phu My Town

10.55

11,325

1,073

03
04

My Duc Commune
My Chau Commune

6
8

32.65
31.61

7,157
8,330

219
264

05

My Thang Commune

27.88

10,566

379

06
07

My Loc Commune
My Loi Commune

9
8

36.87
25.88

7,229
7,285

196
281

08

My An Commune

21.50

8,343

388

09
10

My Phong Commune
My Trinh Commune

11
8

35.46
51.44

8,612
6,275

243
122

11

My Tho Commune

12

34.76

14,689

423

12
13

My Hoa Commune
My Thanh Commune

7
9

42.98
35.12

8,809
10,407

205
296

14

My Chanh Commune

16

22.52

13,740

610

15
16

My Chanh Tay Commune

My Quang Commune

6
7

23.85
23.33

4,371
6,705

183
330

17

My Hiep Commune

17

55.65

13,493

242

18
19

My Tai Commune
My Cat Commune

12
4

28.69
8.72

10,302
6,560

359
752

166

550.46

169,645

308

No.

Places

Villages

Area
(km2)

Total

Population density
(Person/km2)
1,362

Source: Statistical Yearbook of Phu My district in 2009.

c. Population prediction until 2020:

Population estimation for the Phu My district until 2020 is 192,592 people (Sub-Annex No.3),
and estimated for each year shown in Table and Chart 1.1 (c):
Table 1.1(c): Population in Phu My district in each year.

Year

2009

2010

2015

2020

169,645

171,613

181,800

192,592

Population
(People)

170,000
165,000

192,592

190,383

188,200

186,042

181,800

179,715

177,655

175,617

175,000

171,613

180,000

173,604

185,000

169,645

Population (People)

190,000

183,909

195,000

160,000
155,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Year

Chart 1.1 (c): The increasing population of Phu My district from 2009 to 2020.

d. Generating solid waste in Phu My district.

Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate until 2020,
the survey team collected data, information based on available forms and these following people:
-

Department of Agriculture Rural Development showed the social- economic situation as

well as agricultural production situation, the amount of generating waste from agriculture
or the amount of fertilizer needed for crops;

Phu My Districts Division of Industry and Commerce provided all the remaining
information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment companies;

The Transportation of Public Works Enterprises under Phu My districts People

Committee, solid waste management and treatment agency, is the States company.

Through the survey, the total of solid waste is collected in the district is 13 tons/day, while the
amount of generating waste which calculated per person is 91 tons/day. Including: waste from
markets (3 tons/day) and waste from households, streets and two industrial parks (10 tons/day).
The company focused on collecting in Binh Duong town (collected rate of 60%), Phu My town
(60%), center of My Hiep commune (20%), My Thang, My An, My Chanh Communes (collected
rate of 20%), My Quang and My Phong communes (collected rate of 5%). It is estimated that the
total generating waste until 2020 shown in table 1.1 (d), (Sub-Annex No.4-a, b, c):
Table 1.1 (d): The total generating waste in the Phu My District until 2020

Year

2010

2015

2020

Generating waste
(Ton/day)

91

107

113

Phu My district is the only unit in 4 districts in which has one states company collection,
transportation and treatment of solid waste.
Transportation of Public Works Enterprise has only one 5.3 m3 compact truck, with three trips
per day, which collects garbage from 60 public waste containers (type of 240 liters) in 30- 35
different places. It also collects garbage from households, Phu My, Binh Duong and Tam Xuan

market. Waste collection time is divided reasonably between Phu My district (from 5:30 AM to
12:00 AM) and Binh Duong town (from 12:00 AM to 5:00PM). They collect garbage in two Phu
My and Binh Duong markets everyday from 3:00 to 5:00PM.
Waste market which is stored in a simple storage point of 50 m2 uncovered from 9:00 AM in the
previous day to 9:00 AM in the following day, then is collected and transported to landfill. Tan
Xuan market waste is not collected every day because there is one fair/5 days. Besides, the
company also collects garbage in My Hiep town 2 times a week. According to statistics, waste
generated is about 30 tons/day in the annual holidays. Beside, garbage in My Thang, My An, My
Phong, My Chanh, My Quang is collected by spontaneous private teams by handle self vehicle.
Waste collection rate average for the whole Phu My district is 14.5%. There is one temporary
landfill at Chanh Thuan village in My Hinh commune, used for burying garbage in Phu My
district, My Hiep commune and near communes, has been used since 2005 with 5,800 m2 and
was widen with 4.000 m2 in 2008. It is used 60% and its height is 3 meters. There is also a 550
m2 temporary landfill, whose height is 3.5m, used 70% to bury garbage in Binh Duong town. The
company is proposing to expand the 500 m2 landfill to the southeastern. There are 3,600 tons of
average waste amount treated annually.

1.2. Tay Son District

a. Geographical location
Tay Son district belongs to Binh Dinh province, there is Phu Phong town with an area of 693
km2 and borders on:
- The Northwestern borders on Vinh Thanh district.
- The Northeastern borders on Phu Cat district.
- The Southeastern borders on An Nhon district.
- The Southern borders on Van Canh district.
- The western borders on Gia Lai province.

Picture 1.2 (a) The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Tay Son district.

b. Social - Economic situation:

Percentage of social - economic structure of Tay Son district is mainly agriculture and

agricultural products accounted for 24.8%; business services 42.7%; and manufacturing
industries 32.5%.
According to statistics in 2009, the total population in Tay Son district is 123,339 people,
population density is 178 persons/km2; including 14 communes and 1 town. They are shown in
table 1.2(b):
Table 1.2. (b) Average population in Tay Son District in 2009
No.

Places

Villages

Area
(km2)

Average
population
(People)

Population
density
(Person/km2)

01

Phu Phong Town

10

11.54

20,017

1,735

02

Binh Tan Commune

110.65

6,146

56

03

Tay Thuan Commune

77.66

7,060

91

04

Binh Thuan Commune

40.84

7,212

177

05

Tay Giang Commune

74.29

11,296

151

06

Binh Thanh Commune

53.10

9,225

174

07

Tay An Commune

10.51

4,883

465

08

Binh Hoa Commune

13.66

8,208

601

09

Tay Binh Commune

7.11

5,393

759

10

Binh Tuong Commune

35.22

9,028

256

11

Tay Vinh Commune

7.08

6,471

914

12

Vinh An Commune

104.97

1,158

11

13

Tay Xuan Commune

36.65

5,545

151

14

Binh Nghi Commune

49.50

13,447

272

15

Tay Phu Commune

60.18

8,350

139

76

692.96

123,339

178

Total

Source: Statistical Yearbook of Tay Son district in 2009

c. Population prediction until 2020:

Calculated population growth rate is 1.16%. So, the population estimated until 2020 (Sub-Annex
No.5) is:
Table 1.2 (c) Population in Tay Son district in each year

Year

2009

2015

2020

Population

123,339

132,176

140,022

(People)

d. Generating solid waste in Tay Son district.

Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation

of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate until 2020,
the survey team collected data, information based on available forms and on following people:
-

Tay Son district Department of Statistics has provided sufficient information in the
district: industry, markets, farms, agricultural situation, the amount of generating waste
from agriculture or organic fertilizer that is necessary for the plant;

Phu Phong Co-operative Agricultural & General Services is the only private unit for
waste management and treatment company in Tay Son district.

Beside, garbage is collected by spontaneous private teams by handle self vehicle in their
commune.

Through the survey, the total of solid waste is collected in the district is 22 tons/day, in which
waste from markets is 1 ton/ day and waste from households is 21 tons per day, and only
collected in Phu Phong town (collected rate of 80%), Tay Giang commune (50%) and Binh Hoa
commune (20%), Tay Binh commune (40%), Tay Xuan (20%), Binh Nghi commune (20%) and
Tay Phu (20%). If Tay son district organized the collection well, it would be collected all
generating waste, which is 72 tons/day for 2010. The result of generating waste shown in the
table 1.2 (d), (Sub-Annex No.6-a, b, c):
Table 1.2 (d): The total of generating waste in the Tay Son District until 2020
Year

2010

2015

2020

Generating Waste
(Ton/day)

72

81

86

Phu Phong Agricultural & General Services Cooperative manages and treats solid waste in Tay
Son district. Household wastes in Phu Phong town are collected by trolleys with 200kg
bucket/trolley every day and moved to number 27 Nguyen Lu Street at 8:00 AM & 11 AM and it
is collected and transported to landfill by 8 m3 truck then. They collect household waste from
6:30 AM to 5:00 PM in Phu Phong town, Binh Thanh and Binh Hoa commune. Markets waste in
Phu Phong Town is collected from stalls and moved to a collected garbage point in the market by
trolleys. They collect garbage at 3:30 PM and store them in 40 kg bamboo baskets and they have
been collected and transported to the landfill directly by 8 m3 truck. Besides, there are
spontaneous private team collect garbage in their areas and also dump garbage in Phu Phong
town landfill in Tay Binh, Tay Xuan, Binh Nghi communes. The collected average rate in Phu
Phong town is 80%, Tay Giang commune (collected rate 50%), Binh Hoa commune (20%), Tay
Binh commune (40%), Tay Xuan (20%), Binh Nghi commune (20%) and Tay Phu commune
(20%).
.
Tay Son district has a temporary landfill used for burying garbage in Phu Phong town, Binh
Thanh and Binh Hoa commune with an area of 0.5 ha and it has been used since 2005. There are
6,205 tons of average waste amount treated annually.

1.3. An Nhon District

a. Geographical location
An Nhon district belongs to Binh Dinh province with an area of 242, 64 km, borders by:
- The Northern borders on Phu Cat District.
- The Eastern and Southeastern borders on Tuy Phuoc district.
- The Southwestern borders on Van Canh district.
- The Western borders on Tay Son district.

Picture 1.3 (a) The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in An Nhon district.

b. Social - Economic situation:

Percentage of social - economic structure of An Nhon district is mainly agriculture and
agricultural products accounted for 46.1%, business services accounted for 18.2%;
manufacturing industries accounted for 35.7%.
According to statistics in 2009, the total population in An Nhon district is 178,724 people,
population density is 737 persons/km2 including 13 communes and 2 towns. They are shown in
Table 1.3(b):
Table 1.3 (b) Average population in An Nhon District in 2009

6.12

Average
population
(People)
17,332

Population
density
(Person/km2)
2,832

5.07

17,110

3,375

Nhon My Commune

17.18

11,280

657

04

Nhon Thanh Commune

12.69

15,574

1,227

05

Nhon Hanh Commune

12

10.88

10,729

986

06

Nhon Hau Commune

12.27

13,318

1,085

07

Nhon Phong Commune

8.25

8,485

1,028

08

Nhon An Commune

8.76

10,020

1,144

09

Nhon Phuc Commune

10.69

10,570

989

10

Nhon Hung Commune

8.33

12,357

1,483

11

Nhon Khanh Commune

8.59

8,515

991

12

Nhon Loc Commune

12.29

8,878

722

13

Nhon Hoa Commune

27.93

17,999

644

14

Nhon Tan Commune

61.51

7,751

126

15

Nhon Tho Commune

32.08

8,806

275

108

242.64

178,724

737

Villages

Area
(km2)

Binh inh Town

02

ap a Town

03

No.

Places

01

Total

Source: Statistical Yearbook of An Nhon district in 2009

c. Population prediction until 2020:

Population growth rate in 2009 was 1.16% and calculated from 2010 to 2020, (Sub-Annex No.
7):
Table 1.2(c) Population in An Nhon district in each year

Year

2009

2015

2020

Population

178,724

191,530

202,899

(People)
d. Generating solid waste in An Nhon district.
Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate to 2020, the
survey team collected data, information based on available forms and following people:

+ An Nhon Station Extension, the Market Management Board, the garbage collection
companies showed the social-economic situation as well as agricultural production situation,
the amount of generating waste from agriculture or necessary organic fertilizer for the plant;
+ An Nhon district Department of Economics and Urban Management provided all the
remaining information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment companies
in the area;
+ Surveying two private solid waste collection, transportation and treatment companies.
Through the survey, we know the total of solid waste collected in the district is 28 tons/day,
including waste from markets is 5 tons/day and waste from households is 23 tons/day, which
collected in Binh Dinh town (collected rate of 75%), Dap Da town (70%), Nhon Thanh commune
(20%), Nhon Phuc commune (20%), Nhon Hung commune (30%), Nhon Loc commune (20%),
Nhon Hoa commune (20%), Nhon Tho commune (20%). Volume of generating waste shown in
Table 1.3 (d), (Sub-Annex 8 -a, b, c)
Table 1.3 (d) The total of generating waste in the An Nhon District until 2020

Year

2010

2015

2020

Generating Waste
(Ton/day)

101

107

124

There are two private companies in An Nhon district, An Nhon Urban Environment Service Co.,
Ltd and Nhon Tho Development and Investment Joint Stock Company, which collect, transport
garbage and manage landfill. An Nhon Urban Environment Service Co., Ltd collects garbage in
Binh Dinh, Dap Da, Nhon Hung Town, waste market from the town's and communes market,
and industrial waste. Company has three 6-10 m3 compact trucks and one 6 m3 spared truck.
Small compact trucks collect garbage from alleys, big compact trucks collect garbage form
streets/roads, households and waste trolleys. They collect waste household and street from 4:00
AM to 2:00PM, waste market from 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM. On the other hand, Nhon Tho
Development and Investment Joint Stock Company collect garbage mainly in rural areas such as
Nhon Thanh, Nhon Tho, Nhon Phuc, Nhon Hoa commune, and commune markets. Because there
is hardly garbage in rural area, company collects garbage 2 times a week from 7:30 AM to 11:30
AM in the morning and from 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM in the afternoon by one commune/day.
Two companies collect garbage from towns and communes, and then they buried them in two
landfills. Phu Son landfill closed in 2009. Truc Son landfill, which has 4 buried holes with area
of 10,000 m2, has been opened since 2009 and buries 28 tons garbage per day. Market waste in
town is collected in the evening from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM every day. Market waste in communes
is collected with household waste because rural markets normally start early in day. There are
20,220 tons of average waste amount treated annually.

1.4.

Hoai Nhon District

a. Geographical location:
Hoai Nhon district belongs to Binh Dinh province, with an area of 550.46 km2, borders by:
- The Northern borders on Quang Ngai province.
- The Northwestern borders on An Lao District.
- The Southwestern borders on Hoai An district.
- The Southern borders on Phu My district.
- The Eastern borders on the East Sea.

Picture 1.4 (a): The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Hoai Nhon district.

b. Social - Economic situation:

Percentage of social - economic structure of Hoai Nhon district is mainly agriculture and
agricultural products accounted for 48.2%, business services and manufacturing industries
accounted for 51.8%.
According to statistics in 2009, the total population in Hoai Nhon district is 206,691 people,
population density is 470 persons/km2 including 15 communes and 2 towns as follows:
Table 1.4 (b): Average population in Hoai Nhon district in

7.43

Average
population
(People)
11,092

Population
density
(Person/km2)
1,511

11

22.00

17,652

802

Hoai Son Commune

12

62.00

9,501

153

04

Hoai Chau Bac Commune

10

21.25

9,492

447

05

Hoai Chau Commune

23.00

8,740

380

06

Hoai Phu Commune

42.66

8,841

207

07

10

7.26

17,281

2,380

9.24

11,718

1,268

37.93

12,585

332

10

14.20

10,912

768

11

Tam Quan Bac Commune

Tam Quan Nam
Commune
Hoai Hao Commune
Hoai Thanh Tay
Commune
Hoai Thanh Commune

10

15.58

12,196

783

12

Hoai Huong Commune

10.66

16,196

1,519

13

Hoai Tan Commune

29.00

17,798

614

14

Hoai Hai Commune

4.99

7,087

1,420

15

Hoai Xuan Commune

9.77

8,228

842

16

Hoai My Commune

11

50.00

13,281

266

17

Hoai uc Commune

10

73.00

14,091

193

153

439.97

206,691

470

Villages

Area
(km2)

Tam Quan Town

02

Bong Son Town

03

No.

Places

01

08
09
10

Total

Source: Statistical Yearbook of Hoai Nhon district in 2009

c. Population prediction until 2020:

Calculated population growth rate is 1.16%, so we estimate the growth of population until 2020,
(Sub-Annex No.9):
Table 1.2 (c): Population in Hoai Nhon district in each year

Year

2009

2015

2020

Population

206,691

221,500

234,649

(People)
d. Generating solid waste in Hoai Nhon district.
Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate until 2020,

the survey team collected data, information according to available forms and the following
people:
+ Hoai Nhon Station Extension provided us information about the social- economic situation
as well as agricultural production situation, the amount of generating waste from agriculture
or organic fertilizer which is necessary for the plant;
+ Hoai Nhon district Department of Economics and Urban Management provided all the
remaining information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment
companies;
+ Two waste collection, transportation and treatment companies provided us information
about the garbage management and treatment in district and identified the places where
households and markets waste are analyzed.
Through the survey, we know the total of solid waste collected in the district is 38 tons/day,
including waste from markets is 5 tons/day and waste from households is 33 tons/day, which
collected in Tam Quan town (80% collected rate), Bong Son town (96%), Hoai Chau Bac
commune (50%), Tam Quan Bac commune (50%), Hoai Thanh Tay commune (50%), Hoai Tay
commune (50%), Hoai Duc commune (50%).
Through the garbage analysis for each district, it is known that Hoai Nhon district has the largest
total of collected solid waste compared with four surveyed districts. Waste collection in town
collected by both private sectors which have many compact trucks, trolleys; so the percentage of
garbage collection is highest as table 1.3 (d), (Sub-Annex No.10 -a, b, c).
Table 1.4 (d): The total of generating waste in the Hoai Nhon District until 2020

Year

2010

2015

2020

Generating Waste
(Ton/day)

113

122

129

Hoai Nhon Department Urban Management manages and treats solid waste in Hoai Nhon
district. However, Bong Son Agriculture Cooperative and Nguyen Tin Company have
responsibility to collect garbage in district. They collect garbage from households, schools,
agencies and few industrial parks and waste markets in district with the corresponding collection
rate: Tam Quan Town (collected rate 85%), Bong Son town (90%), Hoai Chau Bac commune
(50%), Tam Quan Bac commune (50%), Hoai Thanh Tay commune (50%), Hoai Tan commune
(50%), Hoai Duc (50%). Garbage collectors collect and transport waste household to gathered
palaces from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM by trolley every day. Then 10 m3 compact truck collects
garbage from there and transports them to landfill. Bong Son town waste market is collected in
40 kg bamboo baskets from the stalls, then transported to waste warehouse in the market area.
They collect garbage from 12:00 AM and 10 m3 compact truck will collect garbage at 6:00 PM,
and then transport them to landfill directly.
There are two temporary landfills in Hoai Nhon district: Bong Son towns landfill with area of
5,000 m2 has been opened since 2002 to collect garbage from Bong Son town, Hoai Duc
commune, Hoai Tan commune. Tam Quan Bac commune landfill with area of 1,500 m2 has been
opened since 2002 to collect garbage from Tam Quan town, Tam Quan Bac commune, Hoai
Thanh Tay commune, Hoai Hao commune. The average amount of waste treated annually is
13,870 tones.

2. Description of the biologically treatable Waste Stream in the 4 districts.

2.1. Classification of different kind of biologically treatable waste.
Solid waste is discharged from the various sources of life and human activities. It related to solid
waste stream generated from households, markets, schools, offices, hospitals, industrial parks,
farms, cattle, poultry and industrial plants. From these sources, we can easily recognize that
organic components can be collected from the leftovers (in restaurants, households, schools, etc);
Vegetables, fruits waste from the market; The residues from processing industrial food factories;
waste from farms or farming (feces, food residue from poultry, livestock, surplus from
cultivation, nurseries, etc.); Waste from gardens (leaves, bushes, grasses, etc.); Waste from fish;
wood waste; paper waste and other organic waste, etc. However, through the real survey, we
know that source of high valuably organic waste made compost is waste from households,
restaurants, schools, offices and markets. Most of them are collected, transported and buried in
the landfill of each district. There is hardly organic waste from industrial parks, processing
factories; small amount of household waste is collected daily with solid waste steam. Organic
waste from livestock which is not discharged into the waste stream is treated by the owners on
their farms.
To know the amount of organic waste can be treated biologically, we have done quantitative
analysis of solid waste composition from market waste, household waste which will be presented
in Section 2.2. And from sources of different organic waste, the feasibility study project will give
out some plans for fertilizer production in next chapters.
2.2. Description and quantification of biologically treatable waste from specific sources:
Identifying the survey location is studied on the map of four districts, through contacting with
local people and studying the previous project survey results of solid waste that our personnel
took part in. The survey forms, interviews, and analysis of solid waste components are presented
in Sub-Annex No.1.
Focusing on studying which waste source has high organic components, we held a survey on
four major sources of organic waste (households, markets, industrial parks, farms) to qualitative
and quantitative analyses of organic waste.
Analyzing solid waste components based on quantitative methodology shown in solid waste
amount/time (kg/day, ton/day, and ton/year) or the solid waste volume/time (m3/day, m3/year).
However; solid waste volume depends on storage (compressed or not compressed). Thus, the
group chose to analyze the amount of generating solid waste or collected waste in the form of
"solid waste amount/time". An amount is the accurate parameter shown the quality of solid waste
because we can measure directly without compressing.
Analyzing solid waste components based on qualitative methodology, the survey team carried
out a number of interviews to Sanitation Company, the Urban Environment Company, Market
Management Board, Hygienic Staff, Collectors to get more information about the waste
collection, treatment, garbage volume, collection routes, the number of households or the stalls
were collected at the local, etc. and to estimate the solid waste components.
Comparing the arising level of solid waste during 10 years between communes in district, we
paid attention on population, area, rural or urban residents, transport situation, and location site
of communes compared with central areas (towns).
We implemented the survey ways as follows:
+ Qualitative analysis: with this method, the survey team identified and interviewed all relevant
information based on prepared interview forms and other information to be able to give the
volume of waste. For example, when the interviewees do not know how much the volume of
market waste generated/day, interview group will be based on the type of waste containers, the

number of collected rubbish and the times of garbage collection, the storage points, the collected
time and waste collectors. Basing on this information, analyzed group will give specific numbers
about the volume of waste generated. To be clear for comparing the percentage of organic waste
in markets, we will ask for more detailed information during interview process (the number of
stalls in the market, sale- type of each stall, the area of each stall). From that, we will know the
percentage of organic waste and inorganic waste in each market by preliminary estimates. Then,
the group will analyze waste components (organic, inorganic) based on quantitative method.
+ Quantitative analysis: following the surveyed team guidance, the analyzing group who is waste
collection staff at the market or workers of waste transportation company rent to analyze garbage
components. The quantitative analysis will help the surveyed group know the composition of
each type of waste in general and organic components in particular.
From beginning, we intended to analyze a big volumes of garbage 200-500kg/sample, but we
identified that the garbage components are nearly the same in a number of waste sample with
having different weight, so we mixed the large amount of garbage (about 500kg) by working
tools of workers as rakes, shovels and got 100-200 kg/sample to analyze for saving the time. In
the other hand, we selected the waste plastic packages of households and ripped out of the bag as
the analyzing samples. Besides, the garbage samples are specialized, for example there is a bag
of textiles from the factory, next to the market, in the sample, the analyzed group immediately
removed it out of analyzing samples (because it might be accumulated from several days); so it
will not specialize like market waste component if we mix it into market waste sample.
Four waste market samples analyzed at the central market of the districts should reflect the
typical characteristic. After being analyzed, organic waste component at the town market in the
district varied in about 69% - 90% and an average of 76.41% calculated based on the weighted
average method the volume of waste samples for analysis and components of waste markets are
analyzed in 4 districts. Organic waste components have identical characteristic due to depend on
the type of central markets in which fresh food, cooked food, textiles, clothing, household items,
electrical and electronic goods, etc. are sold without being divided into specialized markets like
HCM City. Compared with the same type markets (all goods are sold in the market) such as An
Khanh Market (District 2, Ho Chi Minh City) accounted for 76% (under the analysis) and An
Dong Market (District 5, Ho Chi Minh City) accounted for 82%, we know that the analyzing
data of market waste components surveyed is reliable for 4 districts. In Ho Chi Minh City the
volume of market wastes organic components has a very large fluctuation from 20.2% (ecommerce market) to 100% (wholesale selling vegetables market). (The analysis of Centema,
2000, 2001, 2003).
Five household waste samples were most analyzed at the waste rendezvous where they
concentrated solid waste collected from the centers of the four districts and four sample results at
main road and alley road of Tay Son district supplied by PPMU. Due to the cultural and political
center of the district, residents are more crowded in town and the amount of garbage also
discharged into environment more than communes in suburban area. After analyzing household
garbage, we determined the organic waste component is around 52% - 60% and 58% average
calculated based on the weighted average the volume of household waste samples and analyzed
garbage components in 4 district centers.
For Industrial Zons waste, we applied the qualitative analysis method for searching volume of
organic waste by interviewing the Industrial Zones Management Board and Manufacturing
companies where they have an organic waste to get more information about the waste collection,
treatment, and waste volumes etc. According to information from Industrial Zones Management
Board, solid wastes generated very few from companies, factories and it is not a major problem
but they are worry about waste water from plan operating not treated or not treated well in its
treatment system.

We have done the survey in 6 chosen factories having the amount of organic waste as the
cognizance of the Industrial Zones Management Board. However, through the survey results, we
determined that the amount of waste from these factories is too low. Most of the organic raw
materials are used to make products, or frozen for exporting or feeding their cattle. Thus, the
amount of waste is low because the companies of processing agricultural product only do operate
in specific season.
Mentioning the solid waste amount at the factories in Industrial Zones discharged by staff and
workers, the amount of waste which is very few is about 5-15kg/day, through the survey.
Because these companies do not need many workers for working (10-20 workers/company), and
most of them are local people so plants dont cook for them.
For the farm waste is analyzed by qualitative methodology as the statistics from the survey
information of Department of Agriculture & Rural Development and Agricultural Extension
Station. Through collected information, farm waste is mainly in two forms, wastes from leaves
and animal dung; leaves waste from farms almost treated by burning (for dry leaves) or made
compost and animal feed (for fresh leaves), so it is not collected with household waste collection.
For the animal dung, its quality and quantity depends on the way how to raise, the amount of
food as well as kind of food. In addition, it is calculated that the total amount of animal dung
generated from farms based on the total number of livestock which were from 2,972 tones/day to
4,889 tones/ day in four districts and An Nhons animal dung is the lowest district.
Method of quantitative (Sub-Annex 20)

Picture 2.2 (1) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of household waste and market waste, and
garbage collection method to rendezvous and transportation to the landfill

Table 2.2 The results of data collection and waste analysis in each district as follows:

Number

District

Waste
volume in
Master Plan
(tons/day)

Waste volume in real survey

(tons/day)
Disposal waste

Waste market

An Nhn

12

28

Hoai Nhon

30

38

Tay Son

22

Phu My

13

50

101

14

Total (tons/day)

The survey results in October, 2010 the units of solid waste collection, transportation and
treatment in four districts following the qualitative analysis method has determined the amount of
garbage collected was 101 tons/day, accounted for 27% of waste generated (different from
master plan in which the amount of garbage is 50 tons/day) and in which waste market is 14
tons/day. Thus, it is possible to accept the amount of solid waste collected in four districts in
2010.
The calculations volume of waste which
will be generated during 10 years from
2011 to 2020 based on the real waste
amount generated per person in the town
(0.8 Kg/person/day) and in the commune
(0.5 kg/person/day), for subtowns
planned to towns, generated garbage rate
is 0.9 kg/person. day, and 0.7 kg/person.
day for communes planned to sub town
and township. And according to the
Ministry of Constructions Master Plan
required to collect from 80% -100%
amount of waste. But, when we surveyed
we only calculated collected garbage rate
is 80%-100% for current collected
communes, for current un-collected
communes is 30%-60%. In addition, we
have considered the data of generated
Picture 5.2.2. (2) Training of solid waste management
waste per person, following report of 4 for 4 districts in October 22th, 2010
districts in the training of solid waste
management in October 22nd, 2010. If
comparing with the big cities in Viet Nam, the waste volume/person in district is lower due to 4
districts are in rural area where they discharge not much waste because of not requiring the high
needs for their lives. Moreover, most of them use organic waste for their garden and the
households in town also use organic waste like this way.
According to Master Plan was issued by the Ministry of Construction for 4 districts until 2015,
towns must collect 80% of waste volume, 70% for communes and towns must collect 100% of
waste volume, 80% for communes in 2020. It is estimated that the amount of garbage must be
collected and treated in 2015 is 234 tons/ day and in 2020 is 347 tons/day. From 2011 to 2020 the
amount of garbage collection will be reached 902,185 tons/10 years (Sub-Annex 11). If the
volume of waste generated is collected 100%, it would be 1,664,473 tons/10 years (Sub-Annex
12).
a. Phu My district
Phu Mys sanitation work has represented by Transportation of Public Works Co, so they
organize to sweep waste on the streets well. They put 240 liters dustbins at collecting waste
places to collect household waste and street waste. We analyzed household waste in two different
places, where they collect 240 liters dustbins and other place they collect household waste. After
analyzing, we determined that the percentage of organic component of dustbins sample is not
very high (44%), due to there are a lot of inorganic waste street, soil and sand while household
waste sample has high organic rate, 67% and the weighted average is 62.49% for both. This
figure compares with the Master Plan is similar.
The organic rate of market waste is 70%. The weighted average from one market waste sample
and four household waste samples in Phu My district are 64.26%. And total amount of organic

waste from markets and households in Phu My district in 2010 is 8.5 tons/day of 13 tons/day
solid waste collected.
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Binh Duong and Phu My town achieved 80 %, there is 1
village planned to township or subtown so collected rate is 60% in My Hiep, My Chanh, My Tho
communes, 30% for others communes. We also estimate that collection rate will be increased by
following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to meet the requirement of solid waste
management planning in Phu My (Sub-Annex 13).
Table 2.2 (a): Waste volume in Phu My district in each year.

14.5

In 2015
(Estimation)
50.2

In 2020
(Estimation)
75

Ton/day

13

54

85

Ton/day

8.5

35

55

No.

Content

Unit

In 2010

Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume

2
3

10/26/2010

Picture 5.2.2 (a1) 240-liter-container contain

household waste and sweep waste.

Picture 5.2.2 (a2) Analizing Phu My market

waste

b. Tay Son district.

The sanitation work of Tay Son district has done by Phu Phong Agriculture and General Services
Cooperation, so that sweeping is well organized on the streets and collected garbage from
households by handcarts with 200 kg dustbin/handcart as well. We analyzed the component of
household waste at a rendezvous point and two roads in Phu Phong town and determined that the
organic rate is (59.85%).
Organic rate of market waste is 68.91 %. The weighted average from one market waste sample
and one household waste sample in Phu Phong town is 60.26 %. And total amount of organic
waste from markets and households in Tay Son district in 2010 is 13.3 tons/day comparing with
total garbage collection (22 tons/day).
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Phu Phong subtown planned to Phu Phong town in 2015
achieved 90 %, in Tay Binh and Tay Giang commune, there are villages planned township or
subtown, so collected rate is 70%-80%, 30% for others un-collected communes. We also estimate
that collection rate will be increased by following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order

to meet the requirement of solid waste management planning in Tay son (Sub-Annex 14).
Table 2.2 (b): Waste volume in Tay Son district in each year.

30.7

In 2015
(Estimation)
57.6

In 2020
(Estimation)
77

Ton/day

22

47

66

Ton/day

13.3

28.2

40

No.

Content

Unit

In 2010

Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume

2
3

10/23/2010
Picture 2.2 (b1) Analyzing household waste in Phu
Phong town.

10/23/2010
Picture 2.2 (b2) Analyzing Phu Phong market
waste

c. An Nhon district
An Nhons sanitation work has carried out by An Nhon Service and Urban Environment Co.,
Ltd., and Nhon Tho Development and Investment Joint Stock Company, so they organize to
sweep on the streets well. We analyzed household waste of Binh Dinh town at Nhon Hoa
communes landfill and determined that the organic rate is not high (52.17 %), because of having
inorganic sweeping waste, soil and sand.
Organic component rate of market waste is 74.8 %. Its weighted average from one market waste
sample and one household waste sample in An Nhon district which is 56.21 %. We conducted the
survey in An Thai rural market in An Nhon district to determine the amount of organic by
qualitative analysis method. An Thai rural market is different from other town markets because it
only is opened from 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM and its garbage is collected 2 times a week (on
Tuesday and Friday). In addition, garbage is contained in 240 liters containers equipped by Dai
Tin Company in An Thai rural market. Most of garbage in An Nhon market is leaves, plastic and
packaging, so they only content about 50% the amount of organic. Total amount of organic waste
from markets and households in An Nhon district in 2010 is 16 tons/day of total garbage
collection (28 tons/day).
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Binh Dinh subtown planned to town so collected rate is
85% and 80% for Dap Da subtown, 60% for Nhon Hung, 50% for Nhon Thanh, Nhon Phuc,
Nhon Hoa, Nhon Tho communes, 35% for others communes (depending on the distance from the
town/central and collection network) and 30% for remote areas in 2015. We also estimate that

collection rate will be increased by following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to
meet the requirement of solid waste management planning in An Nhon (Sub-Annex 15).
Table 2.2 (c): Waste volume in An Nhon district in each year.

28.1

In 2015
(Estimation)
55.4

In 2020
(Estimation)
80.8

Ton/day

28

66

100

Ton/day

16

36

56

No.

Content

Unit

In 2010

Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume

2
3

Picture 2.2 (c1) Analyzing An Thai rural market

waste

Picture 2.2 (c2) Analyzing market waste in Binh

Dinh town

Picture 2.2 (c3) Analyzing household waste in Picture 2.2 (c4) compact truck transport
Binh Dinh town
household waste and market waste to landfill

d. Hoai Nhon district

Like An Nhon district, the sanitation work of Hoai Nhon district has done in Tam Quan and
Bong Son town by Bong Tay Son Agriculture Cooperative and Nguyen Tin Construction Co.,
Ltd., They organize to collect all wastes and sweep well on the streets because there is a
competition between two units, so the waste volume collected is highest compared with 4
districts. We analyzed household waste in Tam Quan town and determined that the organic

component rate is not high (52.03 %) because of the amount of inorganic sweeping waste, soil
and sand.
Organic component rate of market waste is 89.67 %, higher than other town markets because it is
fruits and vegetables market. The weighted average from one waste market sample and one waste
household sample in Hoai Nhon district is 57 % and determined that the total amount of organic
waste from markets and households in Hoai Nhon district in 2010 is 22 tons/day in total garbage
collection (38 tons/day).
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Bong Son subtown planned to Bong Son town in 2015
achieved 95 %. 90% collected rate for Tam Quan subtown because the collection rate in two
towns is 85%-90% at the present; 70% for Hoai Chau Bac, Tam Quan Bac, Hoai Thanh Tay,
Hoai Tan, Hoai Duc commune; 35% for others communes (depending on the distance from the
town/central and collection network) and 50% for remote areas. We also estimate that collection
rate will be increased by following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to meet the
requirement of solid waste management planning in Hoai Nhon (Sub-Annex 16).
Table 2.2 (d): Waste volume in Hoai Nhon district in each year.

33.6

In 2015
(Estimation)
56.8

In 2020
(Estimation)
74.4

Ton/day

38

69

96

Ton/day

22

39

55

No.

Content

Unit

In 2010

Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume

2
3

10/25/2010
Picture 2.2 (d1) Analyzing household waste in
Tam Quan town

10/25/2010
Picture 2.2 (d2) Analyzing Bong Son market waste

After synthesizing 4 market waste samples in the towns, we determined that average organic rate
is rather high 76.47 % (by weighted average the weight of each garbage sample and organic rate
of each garbage sample) in which Binh Dinh and Bong Son market have higher rates. Binh Dinh
town markets in An Nhon district is the largest fish market in Binh province and Bong Son town
market is fruits market where they sell pineapples, so they discharged so much pineapples peel.

Table 2.2 (2): Waste components in Tay Son, Phu My, An Nhon, Hoai Nhon district.

No

1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

COMPONE
NT

SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Phu
Phong
market in
Tay Son
Kg
%

Organic
(yard waste,
96.2 68.91
food)
Bone
Paper,
1.1
0.79
cardboard
Nylon
16.8 12.03
Textiles
0.2
0.14
Plastic
Rubber
Leather
Glass bottles
Can
Heavy metals
Ceramic
Demolition
waste
Styrofoam
Battery
Others
25.3 18.12
Total
139.6
1

SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Phu My
market in
Phu My

SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Binh
Dinh
market in
An Nhon
Kg
%

SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Bong Son
market in
Hoai Nhon
Kg

TOTAL

Kg

Kg

141.6

69.96

89

74.79

171.9

0.4

0.20

8.6

4.25

4.20

1.8

0.94 16.50 2.53

24.8
1.6
4
3
0.4

12.25
0.79
1.98
1.48
0.20

25
-

21.01
-

17.4
0.6
-

9.08 59.00 9.04

1.80 0.28
0.31 25.60 3.92
4.00 0.61
3.00 0.46
0.40 0.06

18
202.4

8.89
1

119

191.7

89.67 498.7 76.41

-

0.40

0.06

43.30 6.63
652.7 100

Synthesizing 9 household waste samples of 4 subtowns, we determined that the percentage of

organic waste is 60.38% (by calculating the weighted average of each sample weight and the rate
of each samples organic waste component).

Table 2.2. (3) : Domestic waste components in 4 districts: Phu My, An Nhon, Tay Son, Hoai Nhon:

No

COMPONEN
T

SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Phu Phong townlet in Tay Son district

SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Old market park in Phu My townlet

SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Binh Dinh town
in An Nhon
district

SAMPLE 2
(kg)
of Tam Quan
townlet in Hoai
Nhon district

AVERAGE

Kg

Kg

Kg

Total

Kg

Kg

Kg

Kg

Total

Kg

Kg

Kg

63.6

267.2

200.8

531.6

45.28%

32

58.5

32

36

158.50

10.94%

38.4

29.81%

67

40.07%

795.5

27.25%

58.8

24.9

87.3

171

14.57%

28

48

319

352

747.00

51.55%

28.8

22.36%

20

11.96%

966.8

33.12%

0.00%

0.00%

6.6

5.4

1.6

13.6

1.16%

7.6

23.60

1.63%

6.4

4.97%

4.8

2.87%

48.4

1.66%

29.4

40.6

58

128

10.90%

20

16

97

125

258.00

17.81%

18.4

14.29%

19.5

11.66%

423.9

14.52%

Organic
(food)
Organic (yard
waste)
Bone
Paper,
cardboard
Nylon

Textiles

2.1

16.6

16.2

34.9

2.97%

17.8

29.8

54.60

3.77%

2.4

1.86%

12

7.18%

103.9

3.56%

Plastic

4.2

23.5

7.9

35.6

3.03%

19

28.00

1.93%

1.6

1.24%

1.6

0.96%

66.8

2.29%

Rubber

6.6

14

11

31.6

2.69%

7.30

5.30

12.60

0.01

0.6

0.47%

44.8

1.53%

Leather

0.00%

0.00%

Glass bottles

0.6

3.8

7.4

11.8

1.01%

0.8

20.6

5.8

32.20

2.22%

1.6

1.24%

45.6

1.56%

Can

0.00%

0.50

0.50

0.03%

0.8

0.62%

1.3

0.04%

10

Heavy metals

1.5

0.7

4.2

0.36%

1.2

1.4

4.60

0.32%

8.8

0.30%

11

0.00%

1.5

0.90%

1.5

0.05%

72.80

8.80

81.6

6.95%

6.80

4.80

11.60

0.01

93.2

3.19%

13

Ceramic
Demolition
waste
Styroform

0.00%

0.00%

14

Battery

0.70

0.20

0.9

0.08%

2.30

1.40

3.70

0.00

4.6

0.16%

15

Others

28.90

100.20

129.1

11.00%

38.8

31.1

35.2

114.10

7.87%

29.8

23.14%

40.8

24.40%

313.8

10.75%

Total

173.4

500.4

500.1

1173.9

562.3 605.3

1449.0

128.8

167.2

1
1
1
2

12

136.4 145.0

2918.9 100.00%

To accurately determine the percentage of organic waste component for four districts, we
calculated two methods (1) The weighted average of organic components of market and
household waste, and (2) The weighted average of organic waste (%) calculated for each district.
Results calculated in two methods shown that the component rate of organic waste is 58.42%
(according to the weighted average of the real amount of garbage collected in the markets,
households and the organic component rate of 13 waste samples). Although the organic
component in each district is different because of not many samples, but they reflect the typical
situation of waste generated that mainly gathered in district centers. Although the rate of organic
waste in 4 the districts is different (according to the survey results table), all 4 districts belong to
rural area, so the data nearly 60% organic waste reflects as Master Plan for the four districts
issued by the Ministry of Construction.
Through the survey in rural markets and direct exchange with people who manage or conduct the
waste collection, transportation, treatment; we determined that the achievable rate of organic
waste only under 50%, perhaps 30% or 40%. Because of the real life of residents living in rural
or towns, they took the organic waste from waste to compost plants in the garden or their
vegetable field. The rest are mostly inorganic are brought out to collected waste points for
compact trucks collecting and burying. In addition, rural markets are poorer than town ones,
because of the low needs for their lives, so organic components are rather low. The 58.42% of
the average of organic waste for four districts is reliable calculation, despite the organic waste
component in Binh Dinh province is lower than other cities such as Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City,
Hai Phong, Da Nang, etc. Even in Qui Nhon city, where there are many closed apartments and
not have little gardens behind the house to take advantage of organic component in the waste.
Here are two statistics in Table 2.2 (4) and Table 2.2 (5) showing the results of the organic
waste rate is nearly 58.42%.
On the other hand, basing on the data in table 2.2 (4), we know that the real percentage of
organic waste components have changed comparing with the different volume of garbage
samples and collected waste.
Content

The organic waste sample

with the volume of
analyzed waste.
The organic waste sample
with the volume of real
collected waste.

The organic
market waste
component (%)
76.47

The organic
household waste
component (%)
60.38

The organic waste

component in 4
districts (%)
68.42

78.69

55.16

58.42

Notes:
- Market waste: The highest ppercentage of organic component at Hoai Nhon market has the
highest volume of collection, so when we weighted average we know that the real rate of
organic market waste in four districts is higher than 4 waste samples.
- Household waste: the ppercentage of organic component is lowest in Hoai Nhon district;
however the volume of collection is highest, so when we weighted average we know that
the real rate of organic household waste in 4 districts is lower than 9 waste samples.
-

Weighting average 13 waste samples shows that the rate of organic component of urban
waste in 4 districts is 68.42% did not accurately reflect the real organic component which
is 58.42% with the real collected waste volume in 4 districts.

Table 2.2. (4): The waste market and households average of organic components (The first method) (Sub-Annex 17)

Component

Market
waste in
Tay Son

Market
waste in
Phu My

Market
waste
in An
Nhon

Market
waste
in Hoai
Nhon

Total

%
Total garbage
(ton/day)

Organic (yard
waste, food)
(%)

68.91%

70.16%

Ton/day

domest
domestic
ic
waste in waste
Tay Son in Phu
My

14

21

74.79% 89.67% 78.69%

11.02

59.85%

Total

100

10

domestic
domestic
waste in
waste in
Hoai
An Nhon
Nhon

Total

%
23

62.49% 52.17%

33

52.03%

14

TOTAL

Ton/day Ton/day

87

101

55.16
%

47.99

59.01

58.42
%

100

87

101

100

Table 2.2 (5): The average of organic waste (%) calculated for each district (the second method) (Sub-Annex 18)
Tay Son district
Component

Phu My District

Market
waste

domestic
waste

Average

Total
garbage
(ton/day)

21

22

Organic
(yard waste,
food) (%)

68.91%

59.85%

Total

An Nhon district

Market domestic
Average
waste
waste

10

60.26% 70.16% 62.49%

13

64.26%

Hoai Nhon district

Market domestic
Market domestic
Average
Average
waste
waste
waste
waste

23

28

33

38

74.79% 52.17% 56.21% 89.67% 52.03% 56.99%

TOTAL

Ton/day

101

100

59.01

58.42%

101

100

From the samples of the household and market waste, we synthesized four key household waste components such as organic waste, recycled inorganic
waste, irrecycled inorganic waste and hazardous waste as follows:
Table 2.2 (6) Synthesizing 4 key components of household waste.

Tay Son district

Market
waste
Total garbage
(ton/day)
Organic (yard
waste, food,
bone)
Recycled
Non recycled
Hazardous
Total (%)

Phu My Distict

domestic
Average
waste

Market
waste

An Nhon district

domestic
Average
waste

Market
waste

Hoai Nhon district

domestic
Average
waste

Market
waste

TOTAL

domestic
Average Ton/day
waste

21

22

10

13

23

28

33

38

101

100

68.91%

59.85%

60.26%

70.16%

62.49%

64.26%

74.79%

52.17%

56.21%

89.67%

52.03%

56.99%

59.01

58.42%

0.79%
30.30%
100

5.55%
34.52%
0.00
100

5.34%
34.33%
0.07%
100

5.73%
24.11%
100

6.14%
31.12%
0.00
100

6.04%
29.50%
0.20%
100

25.21%
0.00%
100

8.07%
39.75%
100

11.13%
32.65%
0.00%
100

1.25%
9.08%
100

3.83%
44.14%
100

3.49%
39.53%
0.00%
100

6.40
35.55
0.04

6.34%
35.20%
0.04%
100

Note:
-

Organic: Food waste, garden waste, bone.

Rrecycled inorganic waste: Recycled plastic, recycled paper, glass (bottle and other), metal (can)
Irrecycled inorganic waste: Leather, rubber, wood, textiles, non recycled plastic (Styrofoam), non recycled paper, demolition waste (rubble,
construction waste, ceramic), others
Hazardous: Hazardous waste (battery, light bulb), infectious waste

2.3. Rationale and criteria for choosing sites for biological waste treatment operations
Having criteria will be given out for choosing sites in which build the biological waste treatment
systems for business models of small, medium and large scales and which depends on
identification about sources of organic waste and the suitable technology for each area. Criteria
will be established and given points based on more or less importance of the criteria
establishment rationale. Some common rationales to establish criteria for choosing site of
biological waste treatment system the following:
1. The organic waste volume
This is the main rationale to establish important criteria for choosing site for biological waste
treatment system. The chosen site can concentrate on the volume of organic waste which will be
used for input material for plant. According to Viet Nam standards - BXD QCVN 07/2010, the
volume of solid waste treated by some of technologies of recycling, reusing, processing organic
fertilizer, processing burning fuel etc. must achieve 85% and the rate of remaining solid waste
must not exceed 15%.
2. Future planning
The location for constructing plant must be based on urban planning in the future to calculate the
volume of generated waste and the plant power.
The location for constructing fertilizer plant needs to be considered all aspects: It should be
situated near a landfill area because of utilizing easily the garbage volume and got also
advantage in transportation. Nevertheless, the plant will be suitable together with master plan of
landfill area such as the location must be far away from residential areas following the Ministry
of Constructions regulations to be sure not to influence environment air, groundwater, and
surface water source for surrounding residential area. Or the plant is situated not too far from
waste sources so that not leaded to increase transportation costs and also increase production
cost.
3. Market
Fertilizer products will be used in agriculture must be appraised by competent authorities and
issued license in the market according to regulation No. 36/2010-TT BNNPTNT dated on June
24th, 2010 by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development is about Regulations on
production and business and fertilizer use and direction of the Government Office No.
5367/VPCP-KTN dated on August 4th, 2010 about management solutions to enhance
production and quality fertilizers.
The chosen location for plant must be determined to meet near the market consuming fertilizers
(or compost), or convenient traffic will help the business easier. It has to survey carefully the site
in which has the need in consuming lots of products and how to distribute products to the agents
near the consuming place because most of residents often like buying products closed their
house.
4. Infrastructure
Traffic system: this is the first important criterion for choosing the plants location. Traffic must
be convenient for transportation of organic waste to the plant and products to the market in the
local area.
Water supply system and electricity network: the plant must be constructed in the place where
there are good infrastructure conditions (water supply, drainage and electricity) to construct
conveniently plant and operate easily as well.

30

Allocation with the systems of the different biological waste treatment in the present and in the
future: the chosen place must be in the area where there is no or a few biological waste treatment
systems to control the material and market in the local area.
Land using: chosen land will be planned or not. Considering all abilities of the plants activities
to avoid compensating clearance many times due to increasing urban area.
Ecological landscape: The chosen site must be far from tourist places or not located in tourist
destinations as well as the plan to develop ecological zones of Binh Dinh province, district or
urban neighborhoods.
5. Distance
The location of the treatment and processing solid organic waste into fertilizer must have the
smallest safe environmental distance between the solid organic waste treatment station and
others civil constructions 500m.
6. Local communities
It must be easy place to gather labor resource in chosen location.
7. Natural factors
- Area topography: it is convenient for constructing plant and transportation when plant operates
- Climate and hydrology: chosen plant must not be influenced by climate and hydrology for
example flood, storm, etc.
- Geological: it must ensure for plants activities and dont much cost for plant foundation
building.
- Natural and Mineral resources: It must ensure that it doesnt exploit mineral resources in the
present and the future.
8. Legal and political basis
Paying attention on sponsoring finance and taxes incentives from the state for environmental
projects as fertilizer plant.
Criteria for building fertilizer production plant is based on National technical regulations projects
of urban infrastructure in Vietnam No. 07/2010-BXD promulgated to attach Circular No.
02/2010/TT-BXD dated by the Ministry of Construction on February 5th, 2010 and combine with
real conditions at 4 districts in Binh Dinh province.
Table 2.3 (b): Rationale and criterion for choosing location for biological waste treatment systems
Rationale
No.
Scale

Volume:
- The volume of organic waste
(tons/ year).
- The rate of recycling compared
with the total amount of garbage.
- The rate of buried waste
compared with the total amount of
garbage
Distance:
- The distance from residential
area to plant (m)

Criteria
Small factories
(10- 30
tons/day)

Medium
factories
30- 50 tons/day)

Large factories
(50- 100 tons
/days)

3,500-10,000

10,000 20,000

> 20,000

25%

25%

15%

15%

>500

>1,000

31

25%
15%

>1,500

Rationale
No.
Scale

- The distance to urban projects

(m)
- The location compared with
landfill

Criteria
Small factories
(10- 30
tons/day)
>500

Medium
factories
30- 50 tons/day)
>1,000

Large factories
(50- 100 tons
/days)
> 1,500

<2,000

<1,500

< 1,000

Future planning:
The volume of garbage until 2020. <50,000
(tons/ year)

50,000 70,000

>70,000

Market: (tons/ year)

5.000

5.000 10.000

>10.000

Infrastructure:
- Traffic
- Electricity
- Water supply
- Drainage
- Land using
- Ecological landscape

Asphalted road >3m

National electricity network
Water supply system
Drainage systems
Not in residential future planning, without removing or
clearing away
Not in tourists areas in present and in the future.

The source of labor resource

workers,
engineers

workers,
engineers

workers,
engineers

- Local terrain

Flat, convenient

Flat, convenient

Flat, convenient

- Climate, Hydrology

No flood, storm

No flood, storm

No flood, storm

- Geology

Hard soil, no Hard

flood
flood

- Mineral Resources

None

None

None

Legal, political

taxes incentives

taxes incentives

taxes incentives

Nature:

soil,

no Hard soil, no
flood

Note: Score from 1-10 with 10 points for each item is the highest.

(*) If fertilizer production plant is near the landfill, there will be advantage to reduce the pressure
on environmental pollution to the residential area and organic content will be higher than the
upstream emission (source 2009 Ho Chi Minh Sub-Annex 21), but has the disadvantage of
transportation route from sources to the plant, which may be too far to increase the production
costs. The collection also valuable for reusing and recycling waste at source and waste collection
points will reduce a significant amount of inorganic waste and increase the amount of organic
waste during transportation to the plant. It is an advantage for manufacturing fertilizer by
reducing the time to separate garbage at the plant to reduce production costs. Thereby leading to
the location of the plant will not depend much on the near or distant landfills.

32

SUB-ANNEX 1

Summary samples to collect data about the type, quantity and quality of organic waste from
households, markets, industrial factories, farms:
+ Form 1:
-

Interviewee: The government agency managing of district, district authorities,

departments and other sectors.

The interview content: Economic Situation, Social, Education, Agriculture

Situation production, manufacturing industry, market, farm, solid waste
collection, transportation and treatment.

+ Form 1.1:
-

Interviewee: The solid waste management companies, the solid waste collection,
transportation and treatment companies.

The interview content: volume, the ways of solid waste collection, transportation
and treatment in the locality.

+ Form 2:
-

Interviewee: The industrial parks, industrial zones, the management boards of

industrial parks.

The interview content: Find the industrial production in district, type of

production, product production, situation arise organic waste, waste volume, the
way of solid waste collection, transportation and treatment in industrial parks.

+ Form 2.1:
-

Interviewee: companies, factories, enterprises.

The interview content: Situation arising out of organic waste unit, volume and
way of collection, transportation and treatment of waste production and waste in
companies, enterprises.

+ Form 3:
-

Interviewee: Market Management, Market waste collectors.

The interview content: The infrastructure of the market, the number of stalls,
meeting market situation; volume, form collection, transportation of solid waste
in a market; market waste management and arising; Status of waste management
around the market area.

+ Form 4:
-

Interviewee: households, streets garbage collectors.

The interview content: volume, ways of solid waste collection, transportation and
treatment in the locality.

+ Form 5 (will be implemented after the survey period):

-

Interviewee: the farms

The interview content: livestock waste volume, the ways of solid waste collection,
transportation and treatment on the farm. Number of animals and plants and the
ability to arise organic waste.
33

+ Form 6:
-

Interviewee: Binh Dinh Department of Agricultural and Extension Center in 4

districts.

The interview content: area, agricultural production in the locality. Fertilizers

used for agricultural production. Number of animals and plants. Ability to arise
organic waste.

+ Model analysis of waste composition with form 3 and 4:

-

Analyzed samples: household and market waste

Analyzed Objective: Determination of organic components and other components

of household, market waste at survey places. Collecting the opinions of residents
directly.

34

SUB-ANNEX 2
Date
st

Oct 21 ,2010
Oct 21st,2010
Oct 21st,2010

Oct 22nd,2010
Oct 22nd,2010

Interviewees

Location

Market town in Binh

Nguyen Le ai
Dinh province; An
Nhon district.
An Thai village, Nhon
Ta Tan Lap
Phuc commune, An
Nhon district
Market town in Binh
Vo Van Tin
Dinh province; An
Nhon district.
Phu Phong Agricultural
Nguyen Thanh and General services
Binh
Cooperative, Tay Son
district.
Vo Van Tin Binh Dinh town, An
Ho Quoc Minh
Nhon district

Telephone
numbers
0905.024.377

Form 3 Market
Management Board

0122.541.5184

Form 3 Market
Management Board

0983.557.145

Form 3 Analysis
of market waste.

056.388.0216

0983.557.145

Oct 22nd,2010

Ta Tan Lap

An Thai village, Nhon

Phuc commune, An 0122.541.5184
Nhon district

Oct 22nd,2010

Le Anh Kiet

Kiet Anh company

Oct 22nd,2010

Le Van Giao

Thuan Giao company

Oct 22nd,2010

Vo Thanh Truc

Thu Trung company

Oct 23 , 2010

Nguyen
Hong

An Nhon environment
services,
investment 0982.180.627
company.

Oct 23rd, 2010

Nguyen
Thanh Hai

rd

rd

Oct 23 , 2010

Oct 23rd, 2010

Oct 23rd, 2010
Oct 23rd, 2010

Thanh

0914.152.382

0987.397.827

Thi Nhon Tho investment

0935.077.357
and development JSC

Phu Phong agricultural

Nguyen Thi Tho
and general services
- Truong Thi
cooperative, Tay Son
Lan
district.
Phu
Phong
town
Nguyen
Van
market,
Tay
Son 0122.378.1744
Nghia
district
Phu
Phong
town
ang Ngoc Han market,
Tay
Son 0978.799.101
district
Ho Van Loi Phu
Phong
town
Vo Thi Thanh market,
Tay
Son
Tu
district

35

Survey form

Form 1.1 waste

collection,
transportation and
treatment.
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste
Form 1- General
information in
province, district,
commune.
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
transportation and
treatment
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
transportation and
treatment
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste
Form 3 Market
Management Board
Form 3 Market
Management Board
Form 3- Analysis of
market waste.

Date

Interviewees

Telephone
numbers

Location

Ngo inh Ba

Phu My Department of
Agriculture and Rural
Development

Oct 25 ,2010

Nguyen
Can

Phu My Industrial and

Commercial
Department

Oct 25th,2010

Phan
Hung

Oct 25th,2010

Le Thi Lan

Oct 25th,2010

Pham
Chung

Oct 25th,2010

Tran inh Tong

Economic Division of
Hoai Nhon district

Oct 25th,2010

Mrs. Duoc

Economic Division of
Hoai Nhon district

Oct 25th,2010

Ho Xuan Canh

Hoai Nhon
Management
Department

Oct 25th,2010

Mai Chi Trung

Oct 25th,2010

th

Oct 25th,2010
Oct 25th,2010

Oct 26th, 2010

th

Oct 26 , 2010

inh

Thanh Transportation
Public Works

&

Nguyen Tin company

Van Economic Division of

Hoai Nhon district

Urban

Tam Quan townlet,

Hoai Nhon district
Pham
Minh Bong Son market, Hoai
Ninh
Nhon district
Pham
Minh
Ninh, Nguyen Bong Son market, Hoai
Huu
Hao, Nhon district
Huynh Van Gia
Bong
Son
Agriculture
Cooperative

Tran Du

Hoang
Hung

Huu

Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
0986.958.089
communes
and
Form
6

Agriculture.
Form 1- general
information
of
0914.021.068
province, districts,
communes
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
056.350.5299
transportation and
treatment
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
0913.487.522
transportation and
treatment
Form 1- general
information
of
0905.632.379
province, districts,
communes.
Form 1- general
information
of
0905.089.157
province, districts,
communes
Form 1- general
information
of
0985.654.992
province, districts,
communes
Form 1- general
information
of
0983.479.077
province, districts,
communes
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste
0165.809.1155 - Form 3 Market
056.376.1525
Management Board
Form 3- Analysis of
market waste

Tay
0935.200.556

Binh Dinh Department

of Agriculture and 0905.790.625
Rural Development.
36

Survey form

Form 1.1 waste

collection,
transportation and
treatment
Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
communes

Date

Interviewees

Oct 26 , 2010

Pham
Thanh

Oct 26th, 2010

Ho inh Thanh

th

th

Oct 26 , 2010
Oct 26th, 2010

Oct 26th, 2010

Van

Huynh
Quoc
Truong,
Tran
Thi Xuyen
Nguyen
Truc
Nhan
Huynh
Quoc
Truong,
Tran
Thi Xuyen, Tran
Thi Kim Ha,
Nguyen
Thi
Hoan

Location

Phu My townlet, Phu

My district
Phu My townlet, Phu
My district

Form 4- Analysis of
market waste

Phu
My
townlet
0167.787.9364
market, Phu My district

Form 3 Market
Management Board

Phu
My
townlet
market, Phu My district

Form 3- Analysis of
market waste

Quy Nhon URENCO

Oct 27th,2010

Oct 27th,2010

Bach Nhn Tan

An Nhon
Division

Economic

Oct 27th,2010

Hoa

An Nhon
Station

Extension

Oct 27th,2010

ang
Quoc

Oct 28th,2010

Thanh An Nhon
Division

Economic

0905.072.972

0983.508.064

0122.448.4828

0905.528.788

Thanh Tay Son Department of

0935.235.115
Statistics

Truong
Thuy Uc
Phung
Hong

Survey form
Form 1.1- waste
collection,
transportation and
treatment
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste

Nguyen
Minh

Oct 28th,2010

Telephone
numbers

Thi Hoai Nhon Extension

0938.074.899
Station
Xuan Hoai
Nhon
IZs
0906.560.159
Management Board

Oct 28th,2010

Truong Ha

Oct 28th,2010

Tran Thi Nhu

Nhu Hoa company
Hoa

Hai Ha company

37

Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form 1 - general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form
6-
Agriculture
Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form
6-
Agriculture
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories

PHU MY DISTRICT
Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes
Population: 171,613
Population rate: 1.16%

38

SUB-ANNEX 3
POPULATION OF PHU MY DISTRICT UP TO 2020
No.

Local

Type

Population
2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Binh Duong

Subtown

5,447

5,510

5,574

5,639

5,704

5,770

5,837

5,905

5,973

6,043

6,113

6,184

Phu My

Subtown

11,325

11,456

11,589

11,724

11,860

11,997

12,136

12,277

12,420

12,564

12,709

12,857

My Duc

Commune

7,157

7,240

7,324

7,409

7,495

7,582

7,670

7,759

7,849

7,940

8,032

8,125

My Chau

Commune

8,330

8,427

8,524

8,623

8,723

8,824

8,927

9,030

9,135

9,241

9,348

9,457

My Thang

Commune

10,566

10,689

10,813

10,938

11,065

11,193

11,323

11,454

11,587

11,722

11,858

11,995

My Loc

Commune

7,229

7,313

7,398

7,483

7,570

7,658

7,747

7,837

7,928

8,020

8,113

8,207

My Loi

Commune

7,285

7,370

7,455

7,541

7,629

7,717

7,807

7,898

7,989

8,082

8,176

8,270

My An

Commune

8,343

8,440

8,538

8,637

8,737

8,838

8,941

9,044

9,149

9,256

9,363

9,472

My Phong

Commune

8,612

8,712

8,813

8,915

9,019

9,123

9,229

9,336

9,444

9,554

9,665

9,777

10

My Trinh

Commune

6,275

6,348

6,421

6,496

6,571

6,647

6,725

6,803

6,882

6,961

7,042

7,124

11

My Tho

Commune

14,689

14,859

15,032

15,206

15,383

15,561

15,741

15,924

16,109

16,296

16,485

16,676

12

My Hoa

Commune

8,809

8,911

9,015

9,119

9,225

9,332

9,440

9,550

9,660

9,773

9,886

10,001

13

My Thanh

Commune

10,407

10,528

10,650

10,773

10,898

11,025

11,153

11,282

11,413

11,545

11,679

11,815

14

My Chanh

Commune

13,740

13,899

14,061

14,224

14,389

14,556

14,724

14,895

15,068

15,243

15,420

15,599

15

My Quang

Commune

6,705

6,783

6,861

6,941

7,022

7,103

7,185

7,269

7,353

7,438

7,525

7,612

16

My Hiep

Commune

13,493

13,650

13,808

13,968

14,130

14,294

14,460

14,628

14,797

14,969

15,142

15,318

17

My Tai

Commune

10,302

10,422

10,542

10,665

10,788

10,914

11,040

11,168

11,298

11,429

11,561

11,695

18

My Cat
My Chanh
Tay

Commune

6,560

6,636

6,713

6,791

6,870

6,949

7,030

7,112

7,194

7,278

7,362

7,447

Commune

4,371

4,422

4,473

4,525

4,577

4,630

4,684

4,739

4,793

4,849

4,905

4,962

169,645

171,613

173,604

175,617

177,655

179,715

181,800

183,909

186,042

188,200

190,383

192,592

19

Note: Based on form 1

39

SUB-ANNEX 4 (a)

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR PHU MY DISTRICT IN 2010

Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes

Population: 171,613; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 14.5%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
My Quang
My Hiep
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh Tay

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
5,510
11,456
7,240
8,427
10,689
7,313
7,370
8,440
8,712
6,348
14,859
8,911
10,528
13,899
6,783
13,650
10,422
6,636
4,422
171,613

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)

Total
garbage
(kg/day)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)

Rate of
organic
(%)

0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

4,408
9,165
3,620
4,213
5,344
3,656
3,685
4,220
4,356
3,174
7,430
4,456
5,264
6,950
3,391
6,825
5,211
3,318
2,211
90,896

60%
60%
20%
20%
5%
20%
5%
20%
-

2,645
5,499
1,069
844
218
1,390
170
1,365
13,199

64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%

40

Organic
(kg/day)
1,714
3,563
693
547
141
901
110
884
8,552

SUB-ANNEX 4 (b)

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR PHU MY DISTRICT IN 2015

Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes

Population: 130,927; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection : 50.2%

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Local
Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho (*)
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
(**)
My Quang
My Hiep (*)
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh
Tay

Type

Population
(people)

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)

Total
garbage
(kg/day)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)

Rate of
organic
(%)

Organic
(kg/day)

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

5,837
12,136
7,670
8,927
11,323
7,747
7,807
8,941
9,229
6,725
15,741
9,440
11,153

0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5

4,670
9,709
3,835
4,463
5,662
3,873
3,903
4,470
4,615
3,362
11,019
4,720
5,576

80%
80%
30%
35%
50%
35%
35%
50%
50%
30%
60%
35%
30%

3,736
7,767
1,150
1,562
2,831
1,356
1,366
2,235
2,307
1,009
6,611
1,652
1,673

64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%

2,421
5,033
745
1,012
1,834
878
885
1,448
1,495
654
4,284
1,070
1,084

Commune

14,724

0.8

11,780

60%

7,068

64.79%

4,579

Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

7,185
14,460
11,040
7,030

0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5

3,593
10,122
5,520
3,515

50%
60%
30%
30%

1,796
6,073
1,656
1,055

64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%

1,164
3,935
1,073
683

Commune

4,684

0.5

2,342

30%

703

64.79%

455

130,927

106,750
41

53,606

34,732

SUB-ANNEX 4 (c) TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR PHU MY DISTRICT IN 2020
Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes
Population: 137,605
Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 75%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho (*)
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh (**)
My Quang
My Hiep (*)
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh Tay

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
6,184
12,857
8,125
9,457
11,995
8,207
8,270
9,472
9,777
7,124
16,676
10,001
11,815
15,599
7,612
15,318
11,695
7,447
4,962
137,605

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5

Total garbage
(kg/day)
4,947
10,285
4,063
4,728
5,998
4,103
4,135
4,736
4,888
3,562
11,673
5,000
5,907
12,479
3,806
10,723
5,848
3,724
2,481
113,087
42

Rate of
collection
(%)
95%
95%
60%
70%
70%
70%
70%
70%
80%
60%
80%
70%
60%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
4,700
9,771
2,438
3,310
4,198
2,872
2,895
3,315
3,911
2,137
9,339
3,500
3,544
9,983
3,045
8,578
3,509
2,234
1,489
84,767

Rate of
organic
(%)
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%

Organic
(kg/day)
3,045
6,331
1,579
2,145
2,720
1,861
1,875
2,148
2,534
1,385
6,051
2,268
2,296
6,468
1,973
5,558
2,273
1,448
965
54,922

TAY SON DISTRICT

Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes
Population: 180,797
Population rate: 1.16%

43

SUB-ANNEX 5

POPULATION OF TAY SON DISTRICT UP TO 2020

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Local
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
TOTAL

Type
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

2009
20,017
6,146
7,060
7,212
11,196
9,225
4,883
8,208
5,393
9,028
6,471
1,158
5,545
13,447
8,350
123,339

2010
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770

2011
2012
20,484 20,722
6,289
6,362
7,225
7,309
7,380
7,466
11,457 11,590
9,440
9,550
4,997
5,055
8,400
8,497
5,519
5,583
9,239
9,346
6,622
6,699
1,185
1,199
5,674
5,740
13,761 13,920
8,545
8,644
126,217 127,681

2013
20,962
6,436
7,393
7,553
11,725
9,661
5,114
8,596
5,648
9,454
6,777
1,213
5,807
14,082
8,744
129,162

44

Population
2014
2015
21,205 21,451
6,511
6,586
7,479
7,566
7,640
7,729
11,861 11,998
9,773
9,886
5,173
5,233
8,695
8,796
5,713
5,779
9,564
9,675
6,855
6,935
1,227
1,241
5,874
5,942
14,245 14,410
8,846
8,948
130,661 132,176

2016
21,700
6,663
7,654
7,818
12,137
10,001
5,294
8,898
5,846
9,787
7,015
1,255
6,011
14,578
9,052
133,709

2017
21,952
6,740
7,742
7,909
12,278
10,117
5,355
9,001
5,914
9,901
7,096
1,270
6,081
14,747
9,157
135,260

2018
22,206
6,818
7,832
8,001
12,421
10,234
5,417
9,106
5,983
10,015
7,179
1,285
6,151
14,918
9,263
136,830

2019
2020
22,464 22,725
6,897
6,977
7,923
8,015
8,094
8,188
12,565 12,710
10,353 10,473
5,480
5,543
9,211
9,318
6,052
6,122
10,132 10,249
7,262
7,346
1,300
1,315
6,223
6,295
15,091 15,266
9,371
9,479
138,417 140,022

SUB-ANNEX 6 (a)

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT IN 2010

Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes
Population: 124,770; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 25.2%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
Total

Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

Total
garbage
(kg/day)
16,199
3,109
3,571
3,648
7,928
4,666
2,470
4,152
3,819
4,566
3,273
586
2,805
6,801
4,223
71,816

45

Rate of
collection
(%)
80%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
20%
40%
0%
0%
0%
20%
20%
20%

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
12,959
3,964
830
1,528
561
1,360
845
22,047

Rate of
organic
(%)
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%

Organic
(kg/day)
7,826
2,394
501
922
339
821
510
13,313

SUB-ANNEX 6 (b)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT IN 2015
Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes
Population: 132,176; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 57.6%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu

Town
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
21,451
6,586
7,566
7,729
11,998
9,886
5,233
8,796
5,779
9,675
6,935
1,241
5,942
14,410
8,948
132,176

Garbage per
person
(kg/person)

Total
garbage
(kg)

0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

19,306
3,293
3,783
3,864
9,599
4,943
3,663
4,398
4,624
4,837
3,467
620
2,971
7,205
4,474
81,048

46

Rate of
collection
(%)
90%
30%
30%
30%
80%
30%
40%
50%
70%
30%
30%
30%
50%
50%
50%

Garbage from
collection
(kg)
17,375
988
1,135
1,159
7,679
1,483
1,465
2,199
3,236
1,451
1,040
186
1,486
3,603
2,237
46,723

Rate of
organic
(%)
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%

Organic
(kg)
10,492
597
685
700
4,637
895
885
1,328
1,954
876
628
112
897
2,175
1,351
28,213

SUB-ANNEX 6 (c)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT IN 2020
Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes;
Population:
140,022 ; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection : 84.7%

No.

Local

Type

Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang (**)
Binh Thanh
Tay An (*)
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh (**)
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu

Town
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)

22,725
6,977
8,015
8,188
12,710
10,473
5,543
9,318
6,122
10,249
7,346
1,315
6,295
15,266
9,479
140,022
(*): There are 1 village will be township
(**): There are 1 village will be subtown
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Garbage per
person
(kg/person)

Total
garbage
(kg)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg)

Rate of
organic
(%)

0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

20,452
3,489
4,007
4,094
10,168
5,236
3,880
4,659
4,898
5,125
3,673
657
3,148
7,633
4,740
85,860

100%
60%
60%
60%
90%
60%
70%
70%
80%
60%
60%
60%
70%
70%
70%

20,452
2,093
2,404
2,456
9,152
3,142
2,716
3,261
3,918
3,075
2,204
394
2,203
5,343
3,318
66,133

60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%

47

Organic
(kg)
12,350
1,264
1,452
1,483
5,526
1,897
1,640
1,969
2,366
1,857
1,331
238
1,330
3,226
2,003
39,934

AN NHON DISTRICT
An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes
Population: 180,797
Population rate: 1.16%

48

SUB-ANNEX 7

POPULATION OF AN NHON DISTRICT UP TO 2020

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
Total

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

2009
17,332
17,110
11,280
15,574
10,729
13,318
8,485
10,020
10,570
12,357
8,515
8,878
17,999
7,751
8,806
178,724

2010
17,533
17,308
11,411
15,755
10,853
13,472
8,583
10,136
10,693
12,500
8,614
8,981
18,208
7,841
8,908
180,797

2011
17,736
17,509
11,543
15,937
10,979
13,629
8,683
10,254
10,817
12,645
8,714
9,085
18,419
7,932
9,011
182,894

2012
17,942
17,712
11,677
16,122
11,107
13,787
8,784
10,373
10,942
12,792
8,815
9,191
18,633
8,024
9,116
185,016

2013
18,150
17,918
11,813
16,309
11,236
13,947
8,886
10,493
11,069
12,940
8,917
9,297
18,849
8,117
9,222
187,162

Note: Based on form 1

49

Population
2014
2015
18,361 18,574
18,126 18,336
11,950 12,088
16,498 16,690
11,366 11,498
14,109 14,272
8,989
9,093
10,615 10,738
11,197 11,327
13,091 13,242
9,020
9,125
9,405
9,514
19,067 19,289
8,211
8,306
9,329
9,437
189,333 191,530

2016
18,789
18,549
12,228
16,883
11,631
14,438
9,198
10,862
11,459
13,396
9,231
9,624
19,512
8,403
9,546
193,751

2017
19,007
18,764
12,370
17,079
11,766
14,605
9,305
10,988
11,592
13,551
9,338
9,736
19,739
8,500
9,657
195,999

2018
19,228
18,981
12,514
17,277
11,903
14,775
9,413
11,116
11,726
13,709
9,446
9,849
19,968
8,599
9,769
198,272

2019
19,451
19,202
12,659
17,478
12,041
14,946
9,522
11,245
11,862
13,868
9,556
9,963
20,199
8,699
9,883
200,572

2020
19,676
19,424
12,806
17,681
12,180
15,119
9,633
11,375
12,000
14,028
9,667
10,079
20,434
8,799
9,997
202,899

SUB-ANNEX 8(a)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR AN NHON DISTRICT IN 2010
An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes
Population: 180,797; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 28.1%

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Local

Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
TOTAL
Note: Based on form 1

Type
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
17,533
17,308
11,411
15,755
10,853
13,472
8,583
10,136
10,693
12,500
8,614
8,981
18,208
7,841
8,908
180,797

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)

Total
garbage
(kg/day)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)

Rate of
organic
(%)

0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

14,026
13,847
5,705
7,877
5,427
6,736
4,292
5,068
5,346
6,250
4,307
4,490
9,104
3,920
4,454
100,851

75%
70%
20%
20%
30%
20%
20%
20%

10,520
9,693
1,575
1,069
1,875
898
1,821
891
28,342

56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%

50

Organic
(kg/day)
5,913
5,449
886
601
1,054
505
1,024
501
15,932

SUB-ANNEX 8(b)

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR AN NHON DISTRICT IN 2015

An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes
Population: 191,530; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 55.4%

1
2
3
4
5
6

Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My (**)
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

18,574
18,336
12,088
16,690
11,498
14,272

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5

Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh (*)
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan (**)
Nhon Tho
TOTAL

Commune

9,093

0.5

4,546

30%

1,364

56.21%

767

Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

10,738
11,327
13,242
9,125
9,514
19,289
8,306
9,437
191,530

0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5

5,369
5,664
6,621
6,388
4,757
9,644
6,645
4,718
116,638

35%
50%
60%
40%
50%
50%
50%
50%

1,879
2,832
3,973
2,555
2,379
4,822
3,323
2,359
64,659

56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%

1,056
1,592
2,233
1,436
1,337
2,711
1,868
1,326
36,347

No.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Local

Type

Population
(people)

Note: Based on form 1

(*): There are 1 village will be township
(**): There are 1 village will be subtown
51

Total
garbage
(kg/day)
16,716
14,669
9,671
8,345
5,749
7,136

Rate of
collection
(%)
85%
80%
50%
50%
30%
35%

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
14,209
11,735
4,835
4,172
1,725
2,498

Rate of
organic
(%)
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%

Organic
(kg/day)
7,987
6,597
2,718
2,345
969
1,404

SUB-ANNEX 8(b)

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR AN NHON DISTRICT IN 2020

An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes

Population: 202,899; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 80.8%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
TOTAL

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
19,676
19,424
12,806
17,681
12,180
15,119
9,633
11,375
12,000
14,028
9,667
10,079
20,434
8,799
9,997
202,899

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)

Total
garbage
(kg/day)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)

Rate of
organic
(%)

0.9
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5

17,709
15,539
10,245
8,840
6,090
7,560
4,816
5,688
6,000
7,014
6,767
5,039
10,217
7,040
4,999
123,562

100%
95%
80%
80%
60%
65%
60%
65%
80%
80%
70%
80%
80%
80%
80%

17,709
14,763
8,196
7,072
3,654
4,914
2,890
3,697
4,800
5,611
4,737
4,032
8,173
5,632
3,999
99,877

56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%

Note: Based on form 6

52

Organic
(kg/day)
9,955
8,298
4,607
3,975
2,054
2,762
1,624
2,078
2,698
3,154
2,663
2,266
4,594
3,166
2,248
56,144

HOAI NHON DISTRICT

An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 209,089
Population rate: 1.16%

53

SUB-ANNEX 9

POPULATION OF HOAI NHON DISTRICT UP TO 2020

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
11,092 11,221 11,351 11,482 11,616 11,750 11,887 12,025 12,164 12,305
17,652 17,857 18,064 18,273 18,485 18,700 18,917 19,136 19,358 19,583
9,501
9,611
9,723
9,835
9,950
10,065 10,182 10,300 10,419 10,540
9,492
9,602
9,713
9,826
9,940
10,055 10,172 10,290 10,409 10,530
8,740
8,841
8,944
9,048
9,153
9,259
9,366
9,475
9,585
9,696
8,841
8,944
9,047
9,152
9,258
9,366
9,474
9,584
9,696
9,808
17,281 17,481 17,684 17,889 18,097 18,307 18,519 18,734 18,951 19,171
11,718 11,854 11,991 12,131 12,271 12,414 12,558 12,703 12,851 13,000
12,585 12,731 12,879 13,028 13,179 13,332 13,487 13,643 13,801 13,962
10,912 11,039 11,167 11,296 11,427 11,560 11,694 11,829 11,967 12,106
12,196 12,337 12,481 12,625 12,772 12,920 13,070 13,221 13,375 13,530
16,196 16,384 16,574 16,766 16,961 17,157 17,356 17,558 17,761 17,967
17,798 18,004 18,213 18,425 18,638 18,855 19,073 19,294 19,518 19,745
7,087
7,169
7,252
7,336
7,422
7,508
7,595
7,683
7,772
7,862
8,228
8,323
8,420
8,518
8,616
8,716
8,818
8,920
9,023
9,128
13,281 13,435 13,591 13,749 13,908 14,069 14,233 14,398 14,565 14,734
14,091 14,254 14,420 14,587 14,756 14,927 15,101 15,276 15,453 15,632
206,691 209,089 211,514 213,968 216,450 218,960 221,500 224,070 226,669 229,298

54

2019
12,448
19,810
10,662
10,652
9,808
9,922
19,394
13,150
14,123
12,246
13,687
18,176
19,974
7,953
9,234
14,905
15,814
231,958

2020
12,592
20,040
10,786
10,776
9,922
10,037
19,619
13,303
14,287
12,388
13,846
18,387
20,205
8,046
9,341
15,077
15,997
234,649

SUB-ANNEX 10 (a)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2010
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 209,089; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 33.6%

No.

Local

Type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
Total

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

Population
(people)
11,221
17,857
9,611
9,602
8,841
8,944
17,481
11,854
12,731
11,039
12,337
16,384
18,004
7,169
8,323
13,435
14,254
209,089

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)

Total
garbage
(kg/day)

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)

Rate of
organic
(%)

0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

8,977
14,285
4,806
4,801
4,421
4,472
8,741
5,927
6,365
5,519
6,169
8,192
9,002
3,585
4,162
6,718
7,127
113,268

85%
90%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%

7,630
12,857
2,401
4,370
2,760
4,501
3,564
38,082

56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%

Note: Based on form 6

55

Organic
(kg/day)
4,348
7,327
1,368
2,490
1,573
2,565
2,031
21,701

SUB-ANNEX 10 (b)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2015
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 221,500; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 56.8%

11,887
18,917
10,182
10,172
9,366
9,474
18,519
12,558
13,487

Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

Total
garbage
(kg/day)
9,509
17,025
5,091
5,086
4,683
4,737
9,260
6,279
6,743

Rate of
collection
(%)
90%
95%
30%
70%
35%
35%
70%
35%
30%

Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
8,558
16,174
1,527
3,560
1,639
1,658
6,482
2,198
2,023

Rate of
organic
(%)
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%

Commune

11,694

0.5

5,847

70%

4,093

56.99%

2,332

Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

13,070
17,356
19,073
7,595
8,818
14,233
15,101
221,500

0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

6,535
8,678
9,537
3,797
4,409
7,116
7,550
121,883

30%
30%
70%
30%
35%
30%
70%

1,960
2,603
6,676
1,139
1,543
2,135
5,285
69,254

56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%

1,117
1,484
3,804
649
879
1,217
3,012
39,465

No.

Local

Type

Population
(people)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh
Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
TOTAL

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

56

Organic
(kg/day)
4,877
9,217
870
2,029
934
945
3,694
1,252
1,153

SUB-ANNEX 10 (c)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2020
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 234,649; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 74.4%

No.

Local

Type

Populatio
n
(people)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh
Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
TOTAL

Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

12,592
20,040
10,786
10,776
9,922
10,037
19,619
13,303
14,287

0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

10,074
18,036
5,393
5,388
4,961
5,018
9,809
6,652
7,144

95%
100%
60%
80%
60%
60%
80%
60%
60%

9,570
18,036
3,236
4,310
2,977
3,011
7,847
3,991
4,286

56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%

5,454
10,278
1,844
2,456
1,696
1,716
4,472
2,274
2,443

Commune

12,388

0.5

6,194

80%

4,955

56.99%

2,824

Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune

13,846
18,387
20,205
8,046
9,341
15,077
15,997
234,649

0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

6,923
9,193
10,103
4,023
4,670
7,539
7,999
129,118

60%
60%
80%
60%
60%
60%
80%

4,154
5,516
8,082
2,414
2,802
4,523
6,399
96,109

56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%

2,367
3,143
4,606
1,375
1,597
2,578
3,646
54,769

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Garbage per
person
(kg/person)

Total
garbage
(kg)

57

Rate of
collection
(%)

Garbage from
collection
(kg)

Rate of
organic
(%)

Organic
(kg)

TOTAL GARBAGE COLLECTION IN 4 DISTRICTS

Estimate to 2020

SUB-ANNEX 11

No

DISTRICT

Kg/day
1
2
3
4

No
1
2
3
4

An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

Up to 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year

2010

28,342

10,345

34,260

12,505

40,312

14,714

46,499

16,972

52,825

19,281

64,659

23,601

22,047

8,047

26,057

9,511

30,156

11,007

34,347

12,536

38,630

14,100

46,723

17,054

13,199

4,818

19,721

7,198

26,393

9,633

33,217

12,124

40,196

14,671

53,606

19,566

38,082

13,900

43,702

15,951

49,448

18,048

55,320

20,192

61,323

22,383

69,254

25,278

101,671

37,110 123,740

45,165 146,308

53,403 169,383

61,825 192,974

70,436 234,242

85,498

2016
2017
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year

Up to 2020
2018
2019
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year

2020
Kg/day Ton/year

Total
2010-2020
Tons

71,402

26,062

78,293

28,577

85,334

31,147

92,528

33,773

99,877

36,455

253,431.5

50,442

18,411

54,241

19,798

58,122

21,215

62,085

22,661

66,133

24,138

178,478.7

59,572

21,744

65,668

23,969

71,898

26,243

78,264

28,566

84,767

30,940

199,472.9

74,401

27,156

78,745

28,742

85,028

31,035

90,511

33,036

96,109

35,080

270,801.9

255,817

93,373

276,948

101,086

300,382

109,639

323,388

118,036

346,887

126,614

902,185.1

58

TOTAL GARBAGE GENERATION IN 4 DISTRICTS

Estimate to 2020

SUB-ANNEX 12

No
1
2
3
4

No
1
2
3
4

DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

Up to 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
2010

100,851

36,811

102,021

37,238

103,204

37,670

104,402

38,107

105,613

38,549

116,638

42,573

71,816

26,213

72,649

26,517

73,492

26,824

74,344

27,136

75,207

27,450

81,048

29,583

90,896

33,177

91,951

33,562

93,017

33,951

94,096

34,345

95,188

34,744

106,750

38,964

113,268

41,343

114,581

41,822

115,911

42,307

117,255

42,798

118,615

43,295

121,883

44,487

376,831 137,543 381,202 139,139 385,624 140,753 390,097

142,386

394,622 144,037 426,320

155,607

Up to 2020
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year

Total
2010-2020
Tons

117,991

43,067

119,360

43,566

120,745

44,072

122,145

44,583

123,562

45,100

451,334.6

81,989

29,926

82,940

30,273

83,902

30,624

84,875

30,979

85,860

31,339

316,864.0

107,988

39,416

109,241

39,873

110,508

40,335

111,790

40,803

113,087

41,277

410,446.7

123,297

45,003

123,297

45,003

126,174

46,053

127,637

46,588

129,118

47,128

485,828.1

431,265

157,412

434,837

158,716

441,328

161,085

446,448

162,953

451,626

164,844

1,664,473.4

59

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR PHU MY DISTRICT

2010-2020

SUB-ANNEX 13

Year

No.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Local

Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
My Quang
My Hiep
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh
Tay
TOTAL

2010

2011

2012

Garbag
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
Rate of e from
Rate of Garbage
per
Populati Total
Organic Populati Total
Populatio Total
collecti from
collecti collecti Organic
collectio from
Organic
person
on garbage
(kg/day
on
garbage
n
garbage
on collection
on
on
(kg/day)
n
collection (kg/day)
(kg/perso (people) (kg/day)
)
(people) (kg/day)
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
(%)
(kg/day
(%)
(kg/day)
n.day)
)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

(1)

(2)

(3)

5,510
11,456
7,240
8,427
10,689
7,313
7,370
8,440
8,712
6,348
14,859
8,911
10,528
13,899
6,783
13,650
10,422
6,636

4,408
9,165
3,620
4,213
5,344
3,656
3,685
4,220
4,356
3,174
7,430
4,456
5,264
6,950
3,391
6,825
5,211
3,318

60%
60%
20%
20%
5%
20%
5%
20%
-

4,422 2,211
171,61
90,896
3

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

2,645 1,714 5,574 4,459

5,499 3,563 11,589 9,271
7,324 3,662
8,524 4,262
1,069 693 10,813 5,406
7,398 3,699
7,455 3,727
844
547 8,538 4,269
218
141 8,813 4,406
6,421 3,211
15,032 7,516
9,015 4,507
10,650 5,325
1,390 901 14,061 7,030
170
110 6,861 3,431
1,365 884 13,808 6,904
10,542 5,271
6,713 3,357
-

4,473

13,199 8,552

2,236
91,951

60

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

64%
64%
6%
7%
26%
7%
7%
26%
14%
6%
12%
7%
6%
28%
14%
28%
6%
6%

2,854
5,934
220
298
1,406
259
261
1,110
617
193
902
316
319
1,968
480
1,933
316
201

1,849
3,845
142
193
911
168
169
719
400
125
584
204
207
1,275
311
1,252
205
130

5,639
11,724
7,409
8,623
10,938
7,483
7,541
8,637
8,915
6,496
15,206
9,119
10,773
14,224
6,941
13,968
10,665
6,791

4,511
9,379
3,704
4,312
5,469
3,742
3,771
4,318
4,458
3,248
7,603
4,560
5,387
7,112
3,471
6,984
5,332
3,395

68%
68%
12%
14%
32%
14%
14%
32%
23%
12%
24%
14%
12%
36%
23%
36%
12%
12%

3,067
6,378
445
604
1,750
524
528
1,382
1,025
390
1,825
638
646
2,560
798
2,514
640
407

1,987
4,132
288
391
1,134
339
342
895
664
253
1,182
414
419
1,659
517
1,629
415
264

6%

134

87

4,525

2,262

12%

271

176

19,721 12,778

93,017

26,393 17,100

2013

2014

2015

2016

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

5,704

4,563

72%

3,286

2,129

5,770

4,616

76%

3,508

2,273

5,837

4,670

80%

3,736

2,421

5,905

4,724 83% 3,921

2,540

11,860

9,488

72%

6,831

4,426 11,997 9,598

76%

7,294

4,726 12,136 9,709

80%

7,767

5,033 12,277 9,822 83% 8,152

5,282

7,495

3,747

18%

675

437

7,582

3,791

24%

910

589

7,670

3,835

30%

1,150

745

7,759

3,879 36% 1,397

905

8,723

4,362

21%

916

593

8,824

4,412

28%

1,235

800

8,927

4,463

35%

1,562

1,012

9,030

4,515 42% 1,896

1,229

11,065

5,532

38%

2,102

1,362 11,193 5,597

44%

2,463

1,595 11,323 5,662

50%

2,831

1,834 11,454 5,727 54% 3,093

2,004

7,570

3,785

21%

795

515

7,658

3,829

28%

1,072

695

7,747

3,873

35%

1,356

878

7,837

3,918 42% 1,646

1,066

7,629

3,814

21%

801

519

7,717

3,859

28%

1,080

700

7,807

3,903

35%

1,366

885

7,898

3,949 42% 1,658

1,075

8,737

4,368

38%

1,660

1,076

8,838

4,419

44%

1,944

1,260

8,941

4,470

50%

2,235

1,448

9,044

4,522 54% 2,442

1,582

9,019

4,509

32%

1,443

935

9,123

4,562

41%

1,870

1,212

9,229

4,615

50%

2,307

1,495

9,336

4,668 56% 2,614

1,694

10

6,571

3,286

18%

591

383

6,647

3,324

24%

798

517

6,725

3,362

30%

1,009

654

6,803

3,401 36% 1,224

793

11

15,383

7,691

36%

2,769

1,794 15,561 7,780

48%

3,735

2,420 15,741 11,019 60%

6,611

4,284 15,924 11,147 64% 7,134

4,622

12

9,225

4,612

21%

969

628

9,332

4,666

28%

1,306

846

9,440

4,720

35%

1,652

1,070

4,775 42% 2,005

1,299

13

10,898

5,449

18%

981

636

11,025 5,512

24%

1,323

857

11,153 5,576

30%

1,673

1,084 11,282 5,641 36% 2,031

1,316

14

14,389

7,194

44%

3,166

2,051 14,556 7,278

52%

3,784

2,452 14,724 11,780 60%

7,068

4,579 14,895 11,916 64% 7,626

4,941

15

7,022

3,511

32%

1,123

3,552

41%

1,456

50%

1,796

1,164

3,634 56% 2,035

1,319

16

14,130

7,065

44%

3,109

2,014 14,294 7,147

52%

3,716

2,408 14,460 10,122 60%

6,073

3,935 14,628 10,239 64% 6,553

4,246

17

10,788

5,394

18%

971

629

10,914 5,457

24%

1,310

849

11,040 5,520

30%

1,656

1,073 11,168 5,584 36% 2,010

1,302

18

6,870

3,435

18%

618

401

6,949

3,475

24%

834

540

7,030

3,515

30%

1,055

683

7,112

3,556 36% 1,280

829

19

4,577

2,289

18%

412

267

4,630

2,315

24%

556

360

4,684

2,342

30%

703

455

4,739

2,369 36%

553

Total

94,096

728

33,217 21,522

7,103

95,188

943

40,196 26,043

61

7,185

3,593

106,750

53,606 34,732

9,550

7,269

107,988

(3)

(4)

853

(5)

59,572 38,597

2017
No.

(1)

2018

2019

2020

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

5,973

4,779

86%

4,110

2,663

6,043

4,834

89%

4,302

2,788

6,113

4,890

92%

4,499

2,915

6,184 4,947 95% 4,700

3,045

12,420

9,936

86%

8,545

5,536 12,564 10,051 89%

8,945

5,796 12,709 10,168 92%

9,354

6,061 12,857 10,285 95% 9,771

6,331

7,849

3,924

42%

1,648

1,068

7,940

3,970

48%

1,906

1,235

8,032

4,016

54%

2,169

1,405

8,125 4,063 60% 2,438

1,579

9,135

4,568

49%

2,238

1,450

9,241

4,621

56%

2,588

1,676

9,348

4,674

63%

2,945

1,908

9,457 4,728 70% 3,310

2,145

11,587

5,794

58%

3,360

2,177 11,722 5,861

62%

3,634

2,354 11,858 5,929

66%

3,913

2,535 11,995 5,998 70% 4,198

2,720

7,928

3,964

49%

1,942

1,258

8,020

4,010

56%

2,246

1,455

8,113

4,056

63%

2,556

1,656

8,207 4,103 70% 2,872

1,861

7,989

3,995

49%

1,957

1,268

8,082

4,041

56%

2,263

1,466

8,176

4,088

63%

2,575

1,669

8,270 4,135 70% 2,895

1,875

9,149

4,575

58%

2,653

1,719

9,256

4,628

62%

2,869

1,859

9,363

4,681

66%

3,090

2,002

9,472 4,736 70% 3,315

2,148

9,444

4,722

62%

2,928

1,897

9,554

4,777

68%

3,248

2,105

9,665

4,832

74%

3,576

2,317

9,777 4,888 80% 3,911

2,534

10

6,882

3,441

42%

1,445

936

6,961

3,481

48%

1,671

1,082

7,042

3,521

54%

1,901

1,232

7,124 3,562 60% 2,137

1,385

11

16,109 11,276

68%

7,668

4,968 16,296 11,407 72%

8,213

5,321 16,485 11,539 76%

8,770

5,682 16,676 11,673 80% 9,339

6,051

12

9,660

4,830

49%

2,367

1,533

4,886

56%

2,736

1,773

4,943

63%

3,114

2,018 10,001 5,000 70% 3,500

2,268

13

11,413

5,706

42%

2,397

1,553 11,545 5,773

48%

2,771

1,795 11,679 5,840

54%

3,153

2,043 11,815 5,907 60% 3,544

2,296

14

15,068 12,054

68%

8,197

5,311 15,243 12,194 72%

8,780

5,689 15,420 12,336 76%

9,375

6,074 15,599 12,479 80% 9,983

6,468

15

7,353

3,677

62%

2,279

1,477

68%

2,529

1,639

74%

2,784

1,804

7,612 3,806 80% 3,045

1,973

16

14,797 10,358

68%

7,043

4,564 14,969 10,478 72%

7,544

4,888 15,142 10,600 76%

8,056

5,219 15,318 10,723 80% 8,578

5,558

17

11,298

5,649

42%

2,373

1,537 11,429 5,714

48%

2,743

1,777 11,561 5,781

54%

3,122

2,023 11,695 5,848 60% 3,509

2,273

18

7,194

3,597

42%

1,511

979

7,278

3,639

48%

1,747

1,132

7,362

3,681

54%

1,988

1,288

7,447 3,724 60% 2,234

1,448

19

4,793

2,397

42%

1,007

652

4,849

2,425

48%

1,164

754

4,905

2,453

54%

1,324

858

4,962 2,481 60% 1,489

965

Total

109,241

65,668 42,547

9,773

7,438

3,719

110,508

71,898 46,584

62

9,886

7,525

3,762

111,790

78,264 50,708

(1)

(2)

113,087

(3)

(4)

(5)

84,767 54,922

SUB-ANNEX 14

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT

2010-2020

Year

No.

Local

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
TOTAL

2010

2011

2012

Garb
age
Rate Garbag
Rate
Rate
per
Total
Garbage
Garbage
Populati
of
e from
Populati Total
of
Populati Total
of
perso
garbag
Organic
from Organic
from Organic
on
collect collectio
on
garbage collect
on garbage collec
n
e
(kg/day)
collection (kg/day)
collection (kg/day)
(people)
ion
n
(people) (kg/day) ion
(people) (kg/day) tion
(kg/pe
(kg/d)
(kg/day)
(kg/day)
(%)
(kg/d)
(%)
(%)
rson.d
ay)
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

(1)
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770

(2)
16,199
3,109
3,571
3,648
7,928
4,666
2,470
4,152
3,819
4,566
3,273
586
2,805
6,801
4,223
71,816

(3)
80%
50%
0%
20%
40%
20%
20%
20%

(4)
(5)
12,959
7,826
3,964.06 2,394
830
501
1,527.56
922
560.93
339
1,360.30
821
844.69
510
22,047 13,313

(1)
20,484
6,289
7,225
7,380
11,457
9,440
4,997
8,400
5,519
9,239
6,622
1,185
5,674
13,761
8,545

63

(2)
16,387
3,145
3,612
3,690
8,020
4,720
2,498
4,200
3,863
4,619
3,311
593
2,837
6,880
4,272
72,649

(3)
82%
6%
6%
6%
56%
6%
8%
26%
46%
6%
6%
6%
26%
26%
26%

(4)
13,438
189
217
221
4,491
283
200
1,092
1,777
277
199
36
738
1,789
1,111
26,057

(5)
8,114
114
131
134
2,712
171
121
659
1,073
167
120
21
445
1,080
671
15,734

(1)
(2)
20,722 16,577
6,362 3,181
7,309 3,654
7,466 3,733
11,590 8,113
9,550 4,775
5,055 2,527
8,497 4,248
5,583 3,908
9,346 4,673
6,699 3,349
1,199
599
5,740 2,870
13,920 6,960
8,644 4,322
73,492

(3)
84%
12%
12%
12%
62%
12%
16%
32%
52%
12%
12%
12%
32%
32%
32%

(4)
13,925
382
439
448
5,030
573
404
1,360
2,032
561
402
72
918
2,227
1,383
30,156

(5)
8,409
231
265
270
3,037
346
244
821
1,227
339
243
43
555
1,345
835
18,209

2013
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2014
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2015
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2016
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

20,962 16,770 86% 14,422 8,709 21,205 16,964 88% 14,928 9,015 21,451 19,306 90%

6,436

3,218 18%

579

350

6,511

3,255 24%

781

472

6,586

3,293

30%

988

597

6,663

3,331

36% 1,199

724

7,393

3,697 18%

665

402

7,479

3,740 24%

897

542

7,566

3,783

30%

1,135

685

7,654

3,827

36% 1,378

832

7,553

3,776 18%

680

410

7,640

3,820 24%

917

554

7,729

3,864

30%

1,159

700

7,818

3,909

36% 1,407

850

11,725 8,207 68% 5,581

3,370 11,861 8,302 74% 6,144 3,710 11,998 9,599

80%

7,679

4,637 12,137

9,710

82% 7,962 4,808

9,661

4,830 18%

869

525

9,773

4,886 24% 1,173

708

9,886

4,943

30%

1,483

895 10,001

5,000

36% 1,800 1,087

5,114

2,557 24%

614

371

5,173

2,586 32%

500

5,233

3,663

40%

1,465

885

5,294

3,705

46% 1,705 1,029

8,596

4,298 38% 1,633

986

8,695

4,348 44% 1,913 1,155

8,796

4,398

50%

2,199

1,328 8,898

4,449

54% 2,402 1,451

5,648

3,953 58% 2,293

1,385

5,713

3,999 64% 2,559 1,546

5,779

4,624

70%

3,236

1,954 5,846

4,677

72% 3,368 2,033

10

9,454

4,727 18%

851

514

9,564

4,782 24% 1,148

693

9,675

4,837

30%

1,451

876

9,787

4,894

36% 1,762 1,064

11

6,777

3,388 18%

610

368

6,855

3,428 24%

823

497

6,935

3,467

30%

1,040

628

7,015

3,508

36% 1,263

762

12

1,213

109

66

1,227

147

89

1,241

620

30%

186

112

1,255

628

36%

136

13

5,807

666

5,874

780

5,942

2,971

50%

1,486

897

6,011

3,006

54% 1,623

14

14,082 7,041 38% 2,676

1,616 14,245 7,123 44% 3,134 1,892 14,410 7,205

50%

3,603

2,175 14,578

7,289

54% 3,936 2,377

15

8,744

1,003

50%

2,237

1,351 9,052

4,526

54% 2,444 1,476

81,989

50,442 30,459

Tot
al

606

18%

2,903 38% 1,103

4,372 38% 1,661

74,344

34,347 20,740

8,846

613

24%

828

2,937 44% 1,292

4,423 44% 1,946 1,175

75,207

8,948

38,630 23,327

64

4,474
81,048

17,375 10,492 21,700 19,530

(3)

46,723 28,213

92% 17,968 10,850

226

980

2017
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2018
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2019
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2020
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

21,952 19,757 94% 18,571 11,214 22,206 19,986 96% 19,186 11,586 22,464 20,218 98% 19,813 11,964 22,725 20,452 100% 20,452 12,350

6,740 3,370 42% 1,415

855

6,818

3,409 48% 1,636

988

6,897

3,449

54%

1,862

1,125

6,977

3,489

60%

2,093

1,264

7,742 3,871 42% 1,626

982

7,832

3,916 48% 1,880

1,135

7,923

3,962

54%

2,139

1,292

8,015

4,007

60%

2,404

1,452

7,909 3,955 42% 1,661

1,003

8,001

4,000 48% 1,920

1,160

8,094

4,047

54%

2,185

1,320

8,188

4,094

60%

2,456

1,483

12,278 9,823 84% 8,251

4,982 12,421 9,936 86% 8,545

5,160

12,565 10,052 88%

8,846

5,341

12,710 10,168 90%

9,152

5,526

10,117 5,058 42% 2,124

1,283 10,234 5,117 48% 2,456

1,483

10,353

5,176

54%

2,795

1,688

10,473

5,236

60%

3,142

1,897

5,355 3,748 52% 1,949

1,177

5,417

3,792 58% 2,199

1,328

5,480

3,836

64%

2,455

1,482

5,543

3,880

70%

2,716

1,640

9,001 4,501 58% 2,610

1,576

9,106

4,553 62% 2,823

1,705

9,211

4,606

66%

3,040

1,836

9,318

4,659

70%

3,261

1,969

5,914 4,731 74% 3,501

2,114

5,983

4,786 76% 3,638

2,197

6,052

4,842

78%

3,777

2,280

6,122

4,898

80%

3,918

2,366

10

9,901 4,950 42% 2,079

1,255 10,015 5,008 48% 2,404

1,451

10,132

5,066

54%

2,736

1,652

10,249

5,125

60%

3,075

1,857

11

7,096 3,548 42% 1,490

900

7,179

1,040

7,262

3,631

54%

1,961

1,184

7,346

3,673

60%

2,204

1,331

12

1,270

161

1,285

186

1,300

650

54%

351

212

1,315

657

60%

394

238

13

6,081 3,040 58% 1,763

1,065

6,151

3,076 62% 1,907

1,152

6,223

3,111

66%

2,054

1,240

6,295

3,148

70%

2,203

1,330

14 14,747 7,373 58% 4,277

2,582 14,918 7,459 62% 4,625

2,793

15,091

7,545

66%

4,980

3,007

15,266

7,633

70%

5,343

3,226

15

1,604

1,734

9,371

4,685

66%

3,092

1,867

9,479

4,740

70%

3,318

2,003

635

42%

267

9,157 4,579 58% 2,656

82,940

54,241 32,753

9,263

3,589 48% 1,723

642

48%

308

4,632 62% 2,872

83,902

58,122 35,097

65

84,875

62,085 37,490

85,860

66,133 39,934

SUB-ANNEX 15

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR AN NHON DISTRICT

2010-2020

Year

No.

Local

2010

2011

2012

Garbag
Garbag
Rate of
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
e per Populatio Total
e from
Populati Total Rate of
Organi Populatio Total
collecti
Organic
from
collecti
from
Organic
person
n
garbage
collecti
on garbage collection
c
n
garbage
on
(kg/d)
collection
on
collection (kg/day)
(kg/per (people) (kg/d)
on
(people) (kg/day) (%)
(kg/d) (people) (kg/day)
(%)
(kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
son.d)
(kg/d)
(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Binh Dinh

0.8

17,533 14,026 75%

10,520

5,913

17,736 14,189

77%

10,926

6,142

17,942

14,354

79%

11,339

6,374

Dap Da

0.8

17,308 13,847 70%

9,693

5,449

17,509 14,007

72%

10,085

5,669

17,712

14,170

74%

10,486

5,894

Nhon My

0.5

11,411

5,705

11,543

5,772

10%

577

324

11,677

5,839

20%

1,168

656

Nhon Thanh

0.5

15,755

7,877

20%

1,575

886

15,937

7,969

26%

2,072

1,165

16,122

8,061

32%

2,580

1,450

Nhon Hanh

0.5

10,853

5,427

10,979

5,490

6%

329

185

11,107

5,553

12%

666

375

Nhon Hau

0.5

13,472

6,736

13,629

6,814

7%

477

268

13,787

6,893

14%

965

542

Nhon Phong

0.5

8,583

4,292

8,683

4,341

6%

260

146

8,784

4,392

12%

527

296

Nhon An

0.5

10,136

5,068

0%

10,254

5,127

7%

359

202

10,373

5,186

14%

726

408

Nhon Phuc

0.5

10,693

5,346

20%

1,069

601

10,817

5,408

26%

1,406

790

10,942

5,471

32%

1,751

984

10

Nhon Hung

0.5

12,500

6,250

30%

1,875

1,054

12,645

6,323

36%

2,276

1,279

12,792

6,396

42%

2,686

1,510

11 Nhon Khanh

0.5

8,614

4,307

8,714

4,357

8%

349

196

8,815

4,407

16%

705

396

12

Nhon Loc

0.5

8,981

4,490

0.20

898

505

9,085

4,543

26%

1,181

664

9,191

4,595

32%

1,470

827

13

Nhon Hoa

0.5

18,208

9,104

20%

1,821

1,024

18,419

9,209

26%

2,394

1,346

18,633

9,316

32%

2,981

1,676

14

Nhon Tan

0.5

7,841

3,920

7,932

3,966

10%

397

223

8,024

4,012

20%

802

451

15

Nhon Tho

0.5

8,908

20%

891

501

9,011

26%

1,171

659

9,116

4,558

32%

1,459

820

28,342

15,932

4,506
102,02
1

34,260

19,259

TOTAL

4,454
100,85
180,797
1

66

103,204

40,312 22,660

2013
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2014
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2015
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2016
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

18,150 14,520 81% 11,761 6,611 18,361 14,689 83% 12,192 6,853 18,574 16,716

85% 14,209 7,987

18,789 16,910 88% 14,881 8,365

17,918 14,334 76% 10,894 6,124 18,126 14,501 78% 11,310 6,358 18,336 14,669

80% 11,735 6,597

18,549 14,839 83% 12,316 6,923

11,813 5,906 30% 1,772

16,309 8,155 38% 3,099

11,236 5,618 18% 1,011

568

11,366 5,683 24% 1,364

13,947 6,973 21% 1,464

823

14,109 7,054 28% 1,975

8,886 4,443 18%

450

8,989

4,494 24% 1,079

606

10,493 5,247 21% 1,102

619

10,615 5,307 28% 1,486

835

11,069 5,535 38% 2,103

10

12,940 6,470 48% 3,106

11

8,917 4,459 24% 1,070

601

9,020

4,510 32% 1,443

811

12

9,297 4,649 38% 1,766

993

9,405

4,703 44% 2,069

1,163

13

18,849 9,424 38% 3,581

14

8,117 4,058 30% 1,218

684

8,211

4,106 40% 1,642

923

15

9,222 4,611 38% 1,752

985

9,329

4,664 44% 2,052

1,154

104,402

800

996

11,950 5,975 40% 2,390

1,343 12,088

9,671

50%

4,835

2,718

12,228

9,783 56% 5,478

3,080

1,742 16,498 8,249 44% 3,630

2,040 16,690

8,345

50%

4,172

2,345

16,883

8,442 56% 4,727

2,657

11,498

5,749

30%

1,725

969

11,631

5,816 36% 2,094

1,177

1,110 14,272

7,136

35%

2,498

1,404

14,438

7,219 41% 2,960

1,664

9,093

4,546

30%

1,364

767

9,198

4,599 36% 1,656

931

10,738

5,369

35%

1,879

1,056

10,862

5,431 41% 2,227

1,252

1,182 11,197 5,599 44% 2,463

1,385 11,327

5,664

50%

2,832

1,592

11,459

5,729 56% 3,208

1,804

1,746 13,091 6,545 54% 3,534

1,987 13,242

6,621

60%

3,973

2,233

13,396

6,698 64% 4,287

2,410

9,125

6,388

40%

2,555

1,436

9,231

6,462 46% 2,972

1,671

9,514

4,757

50%

2,379

1,337

9,624

4,812 56% 2,695

1,515

2,358 19,289

9,644

50%

4,822

2,711

19,512

9,756 56% 5,463

3,071

8,306

6,645

50%

3,323

1,868

8,403

6,722 56% 3,764

2,116

9,437

4,718

50%

2,359

1,326

9,546

4,773 56% 2,673

1,503

2,013 19,067 9,534 44% 4,195

46,499 26,138

105,613

767

52,825 29,694

67

116,638

64,659 36,347 193,751 117,991

71,402 40,137

2017
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2018
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2019
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2020
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

19,007 17,107 91% 15,567 8,751 19,228 17,305 94% 16,267 9,144 19,451 17,506

97% 16,981 9,545

19,676 17,709 100% 17,709 9,955

18,764 15,011 86% 12,909 7,257 18,981 15,185 89% 13,515 7,597 19,202 15,361

92% 14,132 7,944

19,424 15,539 95% 14,763 8,298

12,370 9,896 62% 6,136

3,449 12,514 10,011 68% 6,807

3,827 12,659 10,127

74%

7,494

4,213

12,806 10,245 80% 8,196

4,607

17,079 8,540 62% 5,295

2,976 17,277 8,639 68% 5,874

3,302 17,478

8,739

74%

6,467

3,635

17,681

8,840 80% 7,072

3,975

11,766 5,883 42% 2,471

1,389 11,903 5,951 48% 2,857

1,606 12,041

6,020

54%

3,251

1,827

12,180

6,090 60% 3,654

2,054

14,605 7,303 47% 3,432

1,929 14,775 7,387 53% 3,915

2,201 14,946

7,473

59%

4,409

2,478

15,119

7,560 65% 4,914

2,762

9,305 4,653 42% 1,954

1,098

1,270

9,522

4,761

54%

2,571

1,445

9,633

4,816 60% 2,890

1,624

10,988 5,494 47% 2,582

1,452 11,116 5,558 53% 2,946

1,656 11,245

5,622

59%

3,317

1,865

11,375

5,688 65% 3,697

2,078

11,592 5,796 62% 3,593

2,020 11,726 5,863 68% 3,987

2,241 11,862

5,931

74%

4,389

2,467

12,000

6,000 80% 4,800

2,698

10

13,551 6,776 68% 4,607

2,590 13,709 6,854 72% 4,935

2,774 13,868

6,934

76%

5,270

2,962

14,028

7,014 80% 5,611

3,154

11

9,338 6,537 52% 3,399

1,911

9,446

6,612 58% 3,835

2,156

9,556

6,689

64%

4,281

2,406

9,667

6,767 70% 4,737

2,663

12

9,736 4,868 62% 3,018

1,697

9,849

4,925 68% 3,349

1,882

9,963

4,982

74%

3,686

2,072

10,079

5,039 80% 4,032

2,266

13

19,739 9,869 62% 6,119

3,440 19,968 9,984 68% 6,789

3,816 20,199 10,100

74%

7,474

4,201

20,434 10,217 80% 8,173

4,594

14

8,500 6,800 62% 4,216

2,370

8,599

6,879 68% 4,678

2,629

8,699

6,959

74%

5,150

2,895

8,799

7,040 80% 5,632

3,166

15

9,657 4,829 62% 2,994

1,683

9,769

4,885 68% 3,322

1,867

9,883

4,941

74%

3,657

2,055

9,997

4,999 80% 3,999

2,248

119,360

9,413

4,707 48% 2,259

78,293 44,010 198,272120,745

85,334 47,968

68

122,145

92,528 52,012

123,562

99,877 56,144

SUB-ANNEX 16

TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT

2010-2020

Year

No.

Local

2010

2011

Garbag
Garbag
Total
Rate of e from
Rate of
e per Populat garba
Organic Populati Total
collecti collecti
collecti
person
ion
ge
(kg/day
on garbage
on
on
on
(kg/per (people) (kg/d
)
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day
(%)
son.d)
)
)
(1)

(2)

2012
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
from
Populati Total
Organic
collecti from Organic
collectio
on
garbage
(kg/d)
on collection (kg/d)
n
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
(kg/day)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

4,554

Tam Quan

0.8

11,221 8,977

85%

7,630

4,348

11,351

9,081

86%

7,809

4,450

11,482

9,186

87%

7,992

Bong Son

0.8

17,857 14,285 90%

12,857

7,327

18,064 14,451

91%

13,151

7,494

18,273 14,619

92%

13,449 7,664

Hoai Son

0.5

9,611

4,806

9,723

4,861

6%

292

166

9,835

4,918

12%

590

336

Hoai Chau Bac

0.5

9,602

4,801

50%

2,401

1,368

9,713

4,857

54%

2,623

1,495

9,826

4,913

58%

2,850

1,624

Hoai Chau

0.5

8,841

4,421

8,944

4,472

7%

313

178

9,048

4,524

14%

633

361

Hoai Phu

0.5

8,944

4,472

9,047

4,524

7%

317

180

9,152

4,576

14%

641

365

Tam Quan Bac

0.5

17,481 8,741

50%

4,370

2,490

17,684

8,842

54%

4,775

2,721

17,889

8,945

58%

5,188

2,956

Tam Quan Nam

0.5

11,854 5,927

11,991

5,996

7%

420

239

12,131

6,065

14%

849

484

Hoai Hao

0.5

12,731 6,365

12,879

6,439

6%

386

220

13,028

6,514

12%

782

445

10

Hoai Thanh Tay

0.5

11,039 5,519

50%

2,760

1,573

11,167

5,583

54%

3,015

1,718

11,296

5,648

58%

3,276

1,867

11

Hoai Thanh

0.5

12,337 6,169

12,481

6,240

6%

374

213

12,625

6,313

12%

758

432

12

Hoai Huong

0.5

16,384 8,192

16,574

8,287

6%

497

283

16,766

8,383

12%

1,006

573

13

Hoai Tan

0.5

18,004 9,002

50%

4,501

2,565

18,213

9,107

54%

4,918

2,802

18,425

9,212

58%

5,343

3,045

14

Hoai Hai

0.5

7,169

3,585

7,252

3,626

6%

218

124

7,336

3,668

12%

440

251

15

Hoai Xuan

0.5

8,323

4,162

8,420

4,210

7%

295

168

8,518

4,259

14%

596

340

16

Hoai My

0.5

13,435 6,718

13,591

6,795

6%

408

232

13,749

6,874

12%

825

470

17

Hoai Duc

0.5

14,254 7,127

50%

3,564

2,031

14,420

7,210

54%

3,893

2,219

14,587

7,294

58%

4,230

2,411

TOTAL

209,089113,268

38,082 21,701

114,581

69

43,702 24,904

115,911

49,448 28,178

2013
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2014
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2015
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

2016

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

11,616 9,293 88% 8,177 4,660 11,750 9,400 89% 8,366

4,768 11,887 9,509

90%

8,558

4,877

12,025

9,620

18,485 14,788 93% 13,753 7,837 18,700 14,960 94% 14,062 8,014 18,917 17,025

95%

16,174

9,217

19,136

17,223 96% 16,534 9,422

9,950 4,975 18%

10,182 5,091

30%

1,527

870

10,300

5,150

36% 1,854

1,057

9,940 4,970 62% 3,081 1,756 10,055 5,028 66% 3,318

1,891 10,172 5,086

70%

3,560

2,029

10,290

5,145

72% 3,704

2,111

9,153 4,576 21%

961

548

9,259

4,629 28% 1,296

739

9,366

4,683

35%

1,639

934

9,475

4,737

40% 1,895

1,080

9,258 4,629 21%

972

554

9,366

4,683 28% 1,311

747

9,474

4,737

35%

1,658

945

9,584

4,792

40% 1,917

1,092

18,097 9,048 62% 5,610 3,197 18,307 9,153 66% 6,041

3,443 18,519 9,260

70%

6,482

3,694

18,734

9,367

72% 6,744

3,843

12,271 6,136 21% 1,288

734

12,414 6,207 28% 1,738

990

12,558 6,279

35%

2,198

1,252

12,703

6,352

40% 2,541

1,448

13,179 6,590 18% 1,186

676

13,332 6,666 24% 1,600

912

13,487 6,743

30%

2,023

1,153

13,643

6,822

36% 2,456

1,399

2,174 11,694 5,847

70%

4,093

2,332

11,829

5,915

72% 4,259

2,427

13,070 6,535

30%

1,960

1,117

13,221

6,611

36% 2,380

1,356

895

510

10,065 5,032 24% 1,208

10 11,427 5,714 62% 3,542 2,019 11,560 5,780 66% 3,815

688

4,988

11 12,772 6,386 18% 1,149

655

12,920 6,460 24% 1,550

12 16,961 8,480 18% 1,526

870

17,157 8,579 24% 2,059

1,173 17,356 8,678

30%

2,603

1,484

17,558

8,779

36% 3,160

1,801

13 18,638 9,319 62% 5,778 3,293 18,855 9,427 66% 6,222

3,546 19,073 9,537

70%

6,676

3,804

19,294

9,647

72% 6,946

3,958

14

7,422 3,711 18%

668

381

7,508

3,754 24%

15

8,616 4,308 21%

905

516

8,716

713

16 13,908 6,954 18% 1,252

901

513

7,595

3,797

30%

1,139

649

7,683

3,841

36% 1,383

788

4,358 28% 1,220

695

8,818

4,409

35%

1,543

879

8,920

4,460

40% 1,784

1,017

14,069 7,035 24% 1,688

962

14,233 7,116

30%

2,135

1,217

14,398

7,199

36% 2,592

1,477

2,807 15,101 7,550

70%

5,285

3,012

15,276

7,638

72% 5,499

3,134

17 14,756 7,378 62% 4,574 2,607 14,927 7,464 66% 4,926

117,255

55,320 31,525

884

91% 8,754

(5)

118,615

61,323 34,945

70

121,883

69,254 39,465

123,297

74,401 42,398

2017
No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

2018
(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

2019
(4)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

12,025 9,620 92% 8,850

5,217 12,448 9,958

94%

9,361

5,334

12,592

10,074 95% 9,570

19,136 17,223 97% 16,706 9,520 19,583 17,624 98% 17,272 9,843 19,810 17,829

99%

17,651 10,058

20,040

18,036 100% 18,036 10,278

10,300 5,150 42% 2,163

1,233 10,540 5,270 48% 2,530

1,442 10,662 5,331

54%

2,879

1,641

10,786

5,393

60% 3,236

1,844

10,290 5,145 74% 3,807

2,170 10,530 5,265 76% 4,001

2,280 10,652 5,326

78%

4,154

2,367

10,776

5,388

80% 4,310

2,456

9,475 4,737 45% 2,132

1,215

9,696

4,848 50% 2,424

1,381

9,808 4,904

55%

2,697

1,537

9,922

4,961

60% 2,977

1,696

9,584 4,792 45% 2,156

1,229

9,808

4,904 50% 2,452

1,397

9,922 4,961

55%

2,728

1,555

10,037

5,018

60% 3,011

1,716

18,734 9,367 74% 6,932

3,950 19,171 9,586 76% 7,285

4,151 19,394 9,697

78%

7,563

4,310

19,619

9,809

80% 7,847

4,472

12,703 6,352 45% 2,858

1,629 13,000 6,500 50% 3,250

1,852 13,150 6,575

55%

3,616

2,061

13,303

6,652

60% 3,991

2,274

13,643 6,822 42% 2,865

1,633 13,962 6,981 48% 3,351

1,909 14,123 7,062

54%

3,813

2,173

14,287

7,144

60% 4,286

2,443

10

11,829 5,915 74% 4,377

2,494 12,106 6,053 76% 4,600

2,621 12,246 6,123

78%

4,776

2,722

12,388

6,194

80% 4,955

2,824

11

13,221 6,611 42% 2,777

1,582 13,530 6,765 48% 3,247

1,850 13,687 6,843

54%

3,695

2,106

13,846

6,923

60% 4,154

2,367

12

17,558 8,779 42% 3,687

2,101 17,967 8,984 48% 4,312

2,457 18,176 9,088

54%

4,907

2,797

18,387

9,193

60% 5,516

3,143

13

19,294 9,647 74% 7,139

4,068 19,745 9,872 76% 7,503

4,276 19,974 9,987

78%

7,790

4,439

20,205

10,103 80% 8,082

4,606

14

7,683 3,841 42% 1,613

919

7,862

3,931 48% 1,887

1,075

7,953 3,977

54%

2,147

1,224

8,046

4,023

60% 2,414

1,375

15

8,920 4,460 45% 2,007

1,144

9,128

4,564 50% 2,282

1,300

9,234 4,617

55%

2,539

1,447

9,341

4,670

60% 2,802

1,597

16

14,398 7,199 42% 3,024

1,723 14,734 7,367 48% 3,536

2,015 14,905 7,452

54%

4,024

2,293

15,077

7,539

60% 4,523

2,578

17

15,276 7,638 74% 5,652

3,221 15,632 7,816 76% 5,940

3,385 15,814 7,907

78%

6,167

3,514

15,997

7,999

80% 6,399

3,646

123,297

5,043 12,305 9,844 93% 9,155

(5)

2020

78,745 44,873

126,174

85,028 48,454

71

127,637

90,511 51,578

129,118

5,454

96,109 54,769

SUB-ANNEX 17

No.

Component

PERCENTTAGE OF COMPONENT WASTE

Year 2010
Market Market Market Market TOTAL
waste in waste in waste in waste in
Tay Son Phu My
An
Hoai
Nhon
Nhon
%

Total garbage
3
5
5
1
(ton/day)
1 Organic (yard
waste, food,
68.91% 70.16% 74.79% 89.67%
bone)
2 Paper, cardboard
0.79% 4.25% 4.20% 0.94%
3 Nylon
12.03% 12.25%
9.08%
4 Textiles
0.14% 0.79%
5 Plastic
21.01% 0.31%
6 Rubber
7 Leather
1.98%
8 Glass bottles
1.48%
9 Can
10 Heavy metals
11 Ceramic
0.20%
12 Demolition waste
13 Styroform
14 Battery
15 Others
18.12% 8.89%
Total
100%
100% 100%
100%
Note: Based on form 1, form 1.1, form 3.1 and form 4.1

domestic domestic domestic domestic TOTAL

waste in waste in waste in waste in
Tay Son Phu My
An
Hoai
Nhon
Nhon
Ton/d
ay
14

%
21

10

23

33

TOTAL

Ton/d Ton/day
ay
87

101

78.69% 11.02 59.85% 62.49% 52.17% 52.03% 55.16% 47.99

59.01

58.42%

2.80%
6.73%
0.18%
7.61%
0.42%
0.32%
0.04%
3.20%
100%

2.89
12.15
3.82
2.50
0.76
0.06
0.76
0.15
0.11
0.30
1.54
0.04
16.92
101

2.86%
12.03%
3.79%
2.47%
0.75%
0.06%
0.76%
0.14%
0.11%
0.30%
1.52%
0.04%
16.75%
100%

0.39
0.94
0.03
1.07
0.06
0.04
0.01
0.45
14

72

1.16%
10.90%
2.97%
3.03%
2.69%
1.01%
0.36%
0.07
0.00
11.00%
100%

1.63% 4.97% 2.87% 2.87% 2.50

17.81% 14.29% 11.66% 12.88% 11.20
3.77% 1.86% 7.18% 4.37% 3.80
1.93% 1.24% 0.96% 1.65% 1.43
0.01
0.47%
0.87% 0.76
2.22% 1.24%
0.83% 0.72
0.00
0.62%
0.17% 0.15
0.32%
0.12% 0.11
0.90% 0.34% 0.30
0.01
1.77% 1.54
0.00%
0.00
0.05% 0.04
7.87% 23.14% 24.40% 18.93% 16.47
100%
100%
100%
100%
87

SUB-ANNEX 18

PERCENTTAGE OF COMPONENT WASTE IN EACH DISTRICT

Year 2010
Tay Son district

No.

Component

Market
waste

Phu My District

An Nhon district

Hoai Nhon district

TOTAL

Averag
Averag
Average
Average
domestic
Market domestic
e
Market domestic
Market domestic
e
percent
percent
Ton/day
waste
waste
waste percent waste
waste
waste
waste percent
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)

Total garbage
1
21
22
3
10
13
5
23
28
5
33
38
101
(ton/day)
Organic (yard
1
waste, food,
68.91% 59.85% 60.26% 70.16% 62.49% 64.26% 74.79% 52.17% 56.21% 89.67% 52.03% 56.99% 59.01
bone)
Paper,
2
0.79% 1.16% 1.14% 4.25% 1.63% 2.23% 4.20% 4.97% 4.83% 0.94% 2.87% 2.62%
2.89
cardboard
3
Nylon
12.03% 10.90% 10.96% 12.25% 17.81% 16.52%
14.29% 11.73% 9.08% 11.66% 11.32% 12.15
4
Textiles
0.14% 2.97% 2.84% 0.79% 3.77% 3.08%
1.86% 1.53% 0.00% 7.18% 6.23%
3.82
5
Plastic
3.03% 2.89%
1.93% 1.49% 21.01% 1.24% 4.77% 0.31% 0.96% 0.87%
2.50
6
Rubber
2.69% 2.57%
0.01
0.01
0.47% 0.38%
0.76
7
Leather
1.98%
0.46%
0.06
8
Glass bottles
1.01% 0.96% 1.48% 2.22% 2.05%
1.24% 1.02%
0.76
9
Can
0.03%
0.00
0.62% 0.51%
0.15
10 Heavy metals
0.36% 0.34%
0.32% 0.24%
0.11
11 Ceramic
0.20%
0.05%
0.90% 0.78%
0.30
Demolition
12
6.95% 6.64%
0.01
0.01
1.54
waste
13 Styroform
0.00%
14 Battery
0.08% 0.07%
0.00
0.00
0.04
15 Others
18.12%
0.11 11.32% 8.89% 7.87% 8.11%
23.14% 19.01% 0.00% 24.40% 21.19% 16.92
Total
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100% 100%
100%
100%
100%
100% 100%
101
Note: Based on form 1, form 1.1, form 3.1 and form 4.1

73

100
58.42%
2.86%
12.03%
3.79%
2.47%
0.75%
0.06%
0.76%
0.14%
0.11%
0.30%
1.52%
0.00%
0.04%
16.75%
100%

AMOUNT OF ORGANIC WASTE IN 4 DISTRICTS

Estimate to 2020

SUB-ANNEX 19

No
1
2
3
4

No
1
2
3
4

DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total

2011
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year

2012
Kg/day Ton/year

Up to 2015
2013
Kg/day Ton/year

15,932

5,815

19,259

7,029

22,660

8,271

26,138

9,541

29,694

10,838

36,347

13,266

13,313

4,859

15,734

5,743

18,209

6,646

20,740

7,570

23,327

8,514

28,213

10,298

8,552

3,121

12,778

4,664

17,100

6,242

21,522

7,855

26,043

9,506

34,732

12,677

21,701

7,921

24,904

9,090

28,178

10,285

31,525

11,507

34,945

12,755

39,465

14,405

59,498

21,717

72,674

26,526

86,148

31,444

99,925

36,473

114,010

41,614

138,757

50,646

2010

2016
Kg/day
Ton/year

2017
Kg/day
Ton/year

Up to 2020
2018
Kg/day Ton/year

2014
Kg/day Ton/year

2015
Kg/day Ton/year

Total
2019
Kg/day
Ton/year

2020
Kg/day
Ton/year

2010-2020
Tons

40,137

14,650

44,010

16,064

47,968

17,508

52,012

18,985

56,144

20,492

142,460.2

30,459

11,118

32,753

11,955

35,097

12,810

37,490

13,684

39,934

14,576

107,773.8

38,597

14,088

42,547

15,530

46,584

17,003

50,708

18,508

54,922

20,046

129,241.3

42,398

15,475

44,873

16,379

48,454

17,686

51,578

18,826

54,769

19,991

154,318.8

151,592

55,331

164,185

59,927

178,103

65,007

191,789

70,003

205,768

75,105

533,794

74

SUB-ANNEX
20

NUMBER OF WASTE FROM ANIMAL IN 4 DISTRICT

Animal

Coefficient of
waste
Kg/day
Min

Max

An Nhon

Hoai Nhon

Phu My

TOTAL
Head

Number of
manure per day
Kg/day
Min

Buffalo

18

25

1,065

19,170

Cattle

15

20

30,050

450,750

Pig

1.2

73,632

88,358

Poultry

0.02

0.05

751,898

15,037

TOTAL

Tay Son

Head

Max
26,625

920

Number of
manure per
day
Kg/day
Min
Max

Head

Min

16,560 23,000

2,840

601,000 45,923 688,845 918,460

25,229

294,528 49,475 59,370 197,900 164,549

37,594 422,213 8,444

573,316 959,747

21,110

Number of manure
per day
Kg/day

533,233

1,160,47
773,219 0

Max

51,120

71,000

378,435

504,580

197,458

658,196

10,664

26,661

637,678

Head

1,260,437

Number of
manure per day
Kg/day
Min

4,647

83,646

Head

Min

Max
116,175 9,472

53,630 804,450 1,072,600 154,832

70,907 85,088
718,749 14,374

283,62

Kg/day

358,563

170,496

430,275

1,434,252
121,304

2,971,773 4,888,996

Note: Applying livestock waste coefficient by manual use of biogas program for the livestock sector in Vietnam 2007-2011, Department of
Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Dutch development organization

75

236,800

2,322,480 3,096,640

35,937 2,426,093 48,521

987,559 1,508,340

Max

SUBANNEX 21

SOLID WASTE COMPONENTS AT SOURCES IN HO CHI MINH CITY in

2009
Table 1: Solid waste component at sources
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Composition
Paper
Plastic
Organic waste
Iron
Other metal
Glass
Fibber
Rubber
Wood
Harardous waste
Brick

Ofice
waste
46.4
14.5
32.9
0.9
0.7
2.7
0.9
1.2
0.0
0.6
0.0

Household waste
9.0
8.9
69.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
3.6
0.2
0.0
3.6
5.4

Table 2. Solid waste component at landfill and transfer station

No. Composition
Transfer station
Landfill
1 Paper
2.7
2
2 Plastic
3.2
1.9
3 Organic
88.2
91.8
4 Iron
0.7
0.1
5 Other metal
0.8
0.6
6 Glass
0.4
1
7 Fibber
0.9
1.1
8 Rubber
0.8
0.2
9 Wood
1.2
0.5
10 Harardous waste
0.1
0.1
11 Brick
1.1
1.1
Source: Ho Chi Minh Waste Recycling Fund,
2009

76

Trade center
waste
28.5
20.7
27.8
0.0
1.8
1.7
1.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
16.7

Market
waste
2.8
4.0
86.6
0.0
0.4
0.6
2.3
2.1
0.6
0.0
0.8