0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
52 Ansichten10 Seiten
Starch in Rubber Influence of Starch Type and Concomitant Variables in reinforcing of styrene butadiene elastomer (SBR) masterbatch compositions for futlire optimization swdies. Further swdy of certain high-amylose starch compositions might lead to masterbatches gi'uing vulcanizates with both low adsorption and gooe! strength properties.
Starch in Rubber Influence of Starch Type and Concomitant Variables in reinforcing of styrene butadiene elastomer (SBR) masterbatch compositions for futlire optimization swdies. Further swdy of certain high-amylose starch compositions might lead to masterbatches gi'uing vulcanizates with both low adsorption and gooe! strength properties.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Starch in Rubber Influence of Starch Type and Concomitant Variables in reinforcing of styrene butadiene elastomer (SBR) masterbatch compositions for futlire optimization swdies. Further swdy of certain high-amylose starch compositions might lead to masterbatches gi'uing vulcanizates with both low adsorption and gooe! strength properties.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Sonderdruck aus der Zeitschrift "die starke - starch"
Internationale Zeitschrift fur die Erforschung, Verarbeitung und Verwendung von Kohlenhydraten und deren Derivaten International Journal for Research, Processing, and Use of Carbohydrates and their Derivatives 23. Jahrgang Heft 10 Seite 350-359 Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim/Bergstr. "Purchased by U.S. Department of Agriculture for Official Use." Starch in Rubber Influence of Starch Type and Concomitant Variables in Reinforcement of Styrene-Butadiene Rubbers By R. A. Buchanan, W. F. Kwolek, H. C. Katz, and C. R. Russell, Peoria, Illinois (USA) These swdies allowed selection of four starch derivative styrene butadiene elastomer (SBR) masterbatch compositions for futlire optimization swdies. The main factor remaining to be opti- mized is level of resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) incorporation; btlt fine adjllstment of such factors as stanh loading and plasticizer incorporation is needed also. Results in these experiments suggest that further swdy of certain high-amylose starch composi- tions might lead to masterbatches gi'uing vulcanizates with both low adsorption and gooe! strength properties. Fmther work is also needed on oil-extension of starch derivative-SBR masterbatches. Properties of selected starch-SBR masterbatches met requirements of the rubber indllstry for many end-lise applications. (ZusammenfaSSlmg siehe Seite 357; ReSt/me ala page 358) Introduction Certain crosslinked resinlike starch derivatives are effective reinforcing agents for rubber when incorporated by latex masterbatching procedures [1, 2]. Further studies have extended this technology [3, 4, 5Jand have delineated large areas of potential commercial interest. A number of compositional and operational variables have been treated in the work cited above. However, there are no published results showing the influence of starch molec- ular size and structure on resultant reinforced rubbers. Further, the only comparisons of reinforcing agents from cereal flour derivatives with those from starch derivatives are with a few powdered elastomer compositions [5J. This paper reports research results which relate starch characteristics to properties of corresponding starch-rein- forced rubbers. Because of the large number of variables and possible interactions involved in the complex master- batching process, statistical experimental designs were used. Also, these studies were limited to two styrene-butadiene (SBR) elastomers representative of the major synthetic rubber in domestic usage. Experimental Materials Types 1502 and 1713 SBR latices were the untreated emul- sion polymerization products of about 20 % total solids content supplied by manufacturers of the conventional elastomers [6J. Starch xanthates were prepared from pearl corn starch (unmodified corn starch), 37 fluidity acid-modified corn starch (intrinsic viscosity 0.98), 75 fluidity acid-modified corn starch (intrinsic viscosity 0.54), waxy maize starch, and high-amylose corn starch (71 % apparent amylose, intrinsic viscosity 1.07). Flour xanthates were prepared from edible yellow corn flour, soft wheat flour and hard wheat flour. These starches and flours were used as pur- chased from domestic processors. Starch and flour xanthates were made at 10 % concentra- tion, based on dry starting materials, by a procedure [7J which causes little reduction in starch intrinsic viscosity. The desired xanthate degree of substitution (D.s.) was achieved with 0.5 mole sodium hydroxide per mole starch or flour (taken as 162 unit molecular weight) and with variable amounts of carbon disulfide. Xanthates for each starch-elastomer masterbatch preparation were made indi- vidually and used after overnight storage in a refrigerator. Technical grades of resorcinol and paraformaldehyde were used. Vulcanizing agents, accelerator, antioxidants and other rubber compounding ingredients were common com- mercial materials. Fillers were a rubber-reinforcing grade of hydrated silica and a white kaolin clay designated a "hard clay" by rubber compounders. The extender oil incorporated into SBR 1713 was a stain- resistant naphthenic oil of about 31 % aromatic coment and about 1200 SUS at 100 OF (= 38 0q. Sulfuric acid, zinc sulfate, sodium nitrite and other reagents were analytical grade. Preparation of Starch-Elastomer jllasterbatches All preparations were nude by slight modification of pre- viously described procedures [3J as schematically diagram- med in Figure 1. Batch size was generally based on 400 g latex solids. Xanthate solution was mixed with latex to give either 30 or 45 parts starch per 100 parts (phr) latex solids. In those SBR 1713 preparations containing extender oil, the oil was emulsified in xanthate solution before mixing with latex. Also, in preparations containing fillers, the in- organic pigment was suspended in xanthate prior to mixing with latex. Styrenated-phenol antioxidant emulsion was added to a level of 1.25 phr. When resorcinol and form- aldehyde (RF) were coreacted with xanthate, the level of resorcinol addition was 0.03 mole per mole starch with a formaldehyde to resorcinol mole ratio of 3. All mixtures were stirred continuously for 30 min before and during coprecipi tation. Xanthate-latex mixtures were coprecipitated with zinc by slowly adding an amount of M sulfuric acid calculated to ~ ~ g -=====, ....--- _h_____ Filtration Drying \::\====, t ICurd Serum, t discarded \::====::::1 1 Partial C:::=:::=:::=:::l' Drying WetExtrusion ~ Processed Masterbatch, Product Curing characteristics were obtained with an oscillating disk rheometer operated at 10 cpm frequency, 3 arc ampli- tude and 150C by ASTM D2705-68T method [8]. Opti- mum cure time, to' (90), was taken as time for the torque to increase to 90 % of its total increase or increment. In wet-extrusion processing, the starch-elastomer coprecipi- tate was partially dried at 70C in a forced draft oven to moisture levels of 10, 20 or 300/0. Moist coprecipitate was stored in air-tight plastic bags for at least 24 hr and then processed to dryness by repeated extrusions from small laboratory extruders at temperatures above 100C. In these studies, the best process employed a Brabender Plasti- corder l ) equipped with a 25/1, length to diameter ratio, vacuum vented extrusion-head. This extruder had three independent temperature-controlled barrel zones and was operated at 100 rpm. to give a product temperature near 150C. An unheated "spaghetti" die with 24 holes of 1/32 in. diameter was employed. Up to four extrusion passes were required to completely dry the products. Compounding and Curing Usual test compound contained 1 phr stearic acid, 4 phr zinc as zinc oxide, 2 phr sulfur, 1.5 phr alkylated diphenyl- amine, 1.5 phr benzothiazyl disulfide and 0.1 phr tetra- methylthiuram disulfide. Note that zinc oxide, per se, was only added to xanthide preparations since zinc xanthate preparations were coprecipitated with the required 4.0 phr zinc as zinc oxide for cure activation. Compounds were mii! mixed by slight modification of the procedure described in ASTM D15-68a [8]. Extrusion Drying Vacuum Vent t Mixing t ~ Coprecipitation W Zinc Sulfate or Sodium Nitiite and Acid ~ MiIli"0 ~ OryMili Processed Masterbatch. 1550Y Product ResorcinolFormaldehyde, Extender Oil and Fillers Starch Xanthate Solution give final serum pH about 7.0, followed by M zinc sulfate solution equivalent to 4.0 phr zinc as zinc oxide in the coprecipitate. The crosslinked starch derivative in these products was zinc starch xanthate, and those products con- taining resorcinol and formaldehyde were designated zinc starch xanthate RF. In subsequent discussion, individual preparations (master- batches) are mainly characterized in terms of their vulcan- izate physical properties. Since all preparations were com- pounded alike and cured to the same degree, vulcanizate properties are considered derivative from masterbatch prop- erties. Xanthate-latex mixtures were also coprecipitated by adding 1.25 moles of sodium nitrite per mole of xanthate group, followed by slow addition of M sulfuric acid to reduce pH of the mixture to 4.5 and to maintain that pH for 10 min. The crosslinked starch derivative in these products was starch xanthide, and those products containing resorcinol and formaldehyde were designated starch xanthide RF. Coprecipitates were recovered on Buchner funnels with cloth filters. Xanthide products were washed by suspension in water, but zinc xanthate products were not washed be- cause they tend to become sticky upon washing. Volumes of serums and wash waters were measured and analyzed for starch content. Processing of wet coprecipitates was by one of the two methods outlined in Figure 1. Weights of dry masterbatch products indicated that there was generally no loss of elastomer. In dry-mill processing, the starch-elastomer copreClpltate was dried at 70C in a forced draft oven to less than 2 0 /0 moisture content. Then the dry crumb product was con- solidated, banded onto a laboratory differential roll mill and milled for a few minutes at roll temperatures below 65C. Vttlcanizate Testing Specimens for physical testing were made by press curing at 150C for the optimum cure time as determined by rheometer measurement. Physical properties of rubber spec- imens were measured by ASTM methods [8]. Measured properties were indentation hardness ASTM D2240-68, im- pact resilience ASTM D2632-67, tensile properties ASTM D412-68, tear resistance ASTM D624-54 die C, compres- sion set ASTM D395-67 method B, change in properties resulting from water immersion for 70 hr at 72 OF (=22C) ASTM D471-68 and abrasion resistance ASTM D394-59. Design of Experimental Program The total number of preparations required to examine all the factors and interactions was reduced from several thousand to 144 by dividing the problem into four stages [9] and utilizing fractional factorial experimental designs The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned. Die Starke 23. Jahrg. 1971 / Nr. 10 351 Table 1. Experimental Program for Selection of Starch Types and Preparative Conditions Giving Best Masterbatch Properties. Stage II III IV Processing method Dry-mill \'\/et-extrusion \\7et-extrusion \\7et-extrusion Number of preparations 60 28 40 16 Factor Starch type SBR type") Xanthate D.S.") Crosslinking reaction Starch loading Silica loading Clay loading Method of filler addition :Milling procedure Starch type Cereal flour Crosslinking reaction Starch loading Moisture content Starch type Loading-crossJinking reaction interaction Extruder variables Starch type Loading-crosslinking reaction interaction Resorcinol-formaldehyde coreaction Oil extension Xanthare D.S. Levels 6 Starches l ) SBR 1502, SBR 1713 3 ) 0.06,0.23 Zinc xanthare, xanthide 30 phr, 45 phr ophr, 20 phr ophr, 26.2 phr Coprecipitation, mill mixing Dry mill, hot-wet milP) 4 Starches 3 Flours Zinc xanthate, xanthide 30 phr, 45 phr 10%,30% Starch and corn flour { 30 phr zinc xanthate } 45 phr xanthide Many Starch and corn flour J 30 phr zinc xanthate t 45 phr xanthide 0,0.03 SBR 1502, SBR 1713 3 ) 0.06, 0.10 Selected for further study 4 Starches BOth 0.06,0.10,0.12 Both Both ophr ophr No filler addition \\7et-extrusion Unmodified corn starch Yellow corn flour 30 phr, zinc xanthate 45 phr, xanthide 20% Both Both Extrusion conditions') Both Both 0.03 SBR 1502 f 0.06 D.S. starch l 0.10 D.S. corn flour 1) Unmodified corn starch (pearl corn starch), 37 and 75 fluidity acid-modified corn starches, waxy maize starch, high-amylose corn starch and yellow corn flour; 2) SBR = styrene-butadiene; D.S. = degree of substitution; 3) SBR 1713 employed \vithout oil-extension in Stage I, with 50 phr napthenic oil in Stage IV. In Stage IV studies starch loadings were based on oil plus elastomer; 4) An unsuccessful attempt to duplicate wet-extrusion processing using steam-heated open rolls for mastication of moist starch-elastomer coprecipitate during drying; 5) Extrusion conditions were uncritical within the range of variables accessible to our laboratory equipment. [10]. From five to mne factors and their interactions were examined in each stage of the study. At the end of each stage, conditions for best starch-elastomer masterbatch prop- erties were selected for inclusion along with other variables needing further study in the design for the next stage [9, 10]' An outline of the experimental program, showing selections made at the end of each stage is given in Table 1. This table presents a detailed listing of factors included in the experimental design for each stage of the study. Details of statistical analysis are not given in this paper. For Stage I studies, an experimental design with six starch types and seven other factors at twO levels each was em- ployed (Table 1). This design allowed measurement of var- iations associated with starch type, main effects of the seven factors and interactions between starch type and each of the seven factors. Stage I studies also included a comparison between a hot-wet-mill processing procedure and dry-mill processing. Dry-mill processing was employed in Stage I studies because this process is related to the process for preparation of powdered starch-elastomers [5]. For Stage II studies, an experimental design with four starch types and three other factors at two levels each was selected (Table 1). Confounding [10] a difference between 352 pairs of starch types with an interaction provided a design requiring only 16 preparations and allowing estimation of several interactions. Twelve additional runs were then added to allow comparison of yellow corn flour with soft wheat and hard wheat flours. Previous work [4] had in- dicated that wet-extrusion processing, as employed in Stage II studies, gave better masterbatch properties than did dry-mill processing. However, data from Stages I and II did not provide a direct comparison between the two processing methods because of differences in xanthate D.S. In Stage III studies, extruder variables involved in wet- extrusion processing were examined using three extrusion heads and a variety of screws available as standard items for the Brabender Plasticorder with several nonstandard spaghetti extrusion dies. However, the full factorial experi- mental design was not completed when it became evident that extrusion conditions were noncritical within the range of variables being studied. Primary objective of Stage IV studies was to determine effects from coreaction of starch xanthate derivatives with RF and of oil extension. A fractional factorial experiment was employed to examine five main effects and their 10 two-way interactions (Table 1). Die St"rke 23. jahrg. 1971 I Hr. 10 Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations, by Measurement. Starch Mini- Opti- Hard- Re- lvlodu- recovery mum mum ness bound Ius at ( ~ 6 ) rheo- cure (Shore resi- 300% meter time at A) lience elon- torque 150 c C (%) gation (in.-Ib) (min) (psi) After 70 hr water immersion Elon- Tensile Tear Com- Abra- Volume Tensile Elon- gation strength resi- pression sion increase strength gation at break (psi) stance set, B rate (%) (psi) (%) (%) (lb/in.) (%) (cm 3 1 hr) Stage I J'vlean value 95.00 20.95 17.55 77.56 43.50 1050 485.6 1517 201.0 0.99 14.14 1123 523.6 Standard deviation l ) 3.86 3.79 4.27 3.20 2.50 215 77.5 278 24.0 0.32 4.99 265 69.3 Stage II Mean value 97.43 6.05 20.91 63.54 53.15 851.7 392.7 1069 152.8 1.01 6.77 878.5 430.1 Stage IV Mean value 97.96 8.21 22.66 64.81 46.79 346.9 1269 137.5 24.91 2.68 11.86 837.8 402.5 Standard deviation 2 ) 1.69 9.28 2.14 2.21 53.4 261 18.1 2.37 0.18 3 ) 1.63 163 46.4 1) Forty degrees of freedom; 2) Pooled Stage II and IV, 15 degrees of freedom; 3) Four degrees of freedom. Results and Discussion Selection of Starch Type for Best Masterbatch Properties Estimation of Variance A measure of random run-to-run variation was obtained at each stage in the study as illustrated by data in Table 2. Variation estimates included some interaction effects and preparative, analytical, testing and random run variations. Therefore standard deviations and standard errors required for evaluating the significance of effects tend to be larger than precision estimates for physical testing of rubber vul- canizates as an isolated step. A main purpose of this research was to relate starch charac- teristics to properties of resultant starch derivative-SBR masterbatches. Table 3 gives only those analytical and test values significantly influenced by starch characteristics. Comparison in Stage I studies of pearl (unmodified) starch with starches having fluidity of 37 and 75 showed that low starch molecular weight (high fluidity) had a deleterious effect on starch recovery, i.e., on completeness of coprecipi- tation of crosslinked starch with latex solids. Tensile Table 3. Relation of Starch Type to Masterbatch Properties. Starch type Starch Minimum Optimum Hardness Tensile recovery rheometer cure time (Shore A) strength (%) torque at 150 c C (psi) (in.-Ib) (min) Tear resistance (lb/in.) Abrasion rate (cm 3 /hr) After 70 hr water immersion Tensile Elongation strength at break (psi) (%) 501.8 485.3 608.1 523.5 493.8 529.1 69.1 1046 937 1250 1122 1039 1345 236 1.02 0.86 1.23 0.99 0.85 0.98 0.36 21.52 25.84 15.16 20.48 22.40 20.29 3.08 Stage I, means of eight dry-mill preparations 16.14 80.38' 1615 204.8 15.60 80.25 1814 217.8 23.40 72.37 1134 175.0 14.90 76.00 1378 191.9 16.88 77.62 1365 195.0 18.41 78.75 1796 221.9 4.05 3.09 286 34.1 Stage II, means of four wet-extrusion preparations 65.0 1498 179.8 0.98 1040 65.0 1375 176.0 0.98 905 61.2 709 133.2 1.21 745 65.5 1398 177.8 1.01 974 3.5 443 31.8 0.21 278 Stage II, means of two preparations showing interaction of starch type with crosslinking reaction 98.12 97.25 96.25 96.13 86.62 95.63 3.06 Pearl corn starch \\faxy maize starch 71 % Amylose starch YellO\v corn flour LSD Pearl corn starch \\faxy maize starch 71 %Amylose starch 37 Fluidity starch 75 Fluidity starch Yellow corn flour LSDl) \'7axy maize starch-zinc xanthate 61 1015 156.5 71 % Amylose starch-zinc xanthate 61 840 147.5 \\faxy maize starch- xanthide 69 1735 195.5 71 % Amylose starch- xanthide 61.5 577 119.0 LSD 4.9 626 44.9 1) Least significant difference between the respective means at the 95 % probability level. Die Stiirke 23. Jalng. 1971 I Nr. 10 353 strengths given in Table 3 suggest that high-fluidity starches give poorer vulcanizates than unmodified starch. The comparison of waxy maize starch, pearl corn starch and 71 0/0 amylose corn starch showed that starch molecular structure had a definite effect on properties of resultant starch derivative-SBR masterbatches. Vulcanizates rein- forced with high-amylose starch derivatives gave generally poorer physical properties than those given by either pearl corn starch or waxy maize starch, but exhibited less change in properties after water immersion. The interaction be- tween crosslinking reaction and starch type in Stage II studies may indicate that masterbatches containing 30 phr zinc high-amylose starch xanthate are worthy of further investigation because their vulcanizates have respectable physical properties and change very little during water ImmerSIon. Yellow corn flour gave results equivalent to those obtained with pearl corn starch in each stage of the study except that it imparted a darker color to the masterbatch. This darker color would be a serious consideration in some rubber applications. Effect of Filler Addition on Masterbatch Properties Incorporation of two representative nonblack fillers into starch-reinforced SBR masterbatches was considered in Stage I studies. These fillers, incorporated at equal volume loadings, were a low-cost, hard-clay extender and a higher cost rubber-reinforcing grade of hydrated silica. Filler was incorporated either by coprecipitation with starch and latex solids or by mixing on the mill during dry-mill processing. The effects of filler addition and the method of incorpora- tion are presented in Table 4, which lists only those master- batch properties significantly influenced by these variables. Data in Table 4 show that starch reinforced-SBR master- batches respond to filler addition by exhibiting increased vulcanizate strength as expected. The only effect associated with the method of incorporation was a small difference in ultimate elongation. Studies on the effect of filler addi- tion were discontinued after Stage 1. Relation of Xanthate D.S. to Masterbatch Properties Target xanthate D.S. levels 0.06 and 0.23 were employed in Stage I studies, D.5. 0.12 in Stage II and III studies and Table 4. Effect on Masterbatch Properties of Fillers and Their Method of Incorporation. 12.41 880 482 15.87 1366 565 1227 1019 2.32 136 40 Filler type and Minimum Optimum Hardness Rebound Modulus Elonga- Tensile Tear method of rheometer cure dme (Shore A) resilience at 300%, don at strength resistance incorporation torgue at 150 a C (%,) elongation break (psi) (lb/in.) (in.-lb) (min) (psi) (%,) Stage I, means of 24 dry-mill preparations Hydrated silica, ophr 18.32 15.48 44.84 961 454 1206 176 Hydrated silica, 20 phr 23.58 19.63 42.17 1137 517 1828 226 Hard clay, 0 phr 17.10 20.60 74.96 46.46 929 1431 Hard clay, 26.2 phr 24.80 14.51 80.16 40.54 1170 1603 LSD 1.79 2.34 1.78 1.48 145 32 165 20 Coprecipitation 462 Dry-milling 510 LSD 32 After 70 hr Water immersion Volume Tensile Elongation increase strength at break C%') (psi) (%,) Table 5. Relation of Xanthate D.S. to Masterbatch Properties. Xanthate D.S. or Starch Minimum Optimum Hardness Tensile Compression Abrasion After 70 hr interaction recovery rheometer cure time (Shore A) strength set rate water im- (%,) torgue at 150 a C (psi) (%,) (cm 3 /hr) mersion, (in.-Ib) (min) volume in- crease (%,) D.S.0.06 D.S.0.23 LSD D.S.0.06 D.S.0.l0 LSD D.S. 0.06-starch D.S. 0.06-eorn flour D.S. 0.10-starch D.S. 0.10-eorn flour LSD Stage I, means of 24 dry-mill preparations 93.21 22.15 19.43 1734 96.79 19.75 15.68 1300 1.77 1.79 2.34 165 Stage IV, means of eight wet-extrusion preparations 25.19 23.27 2.48 18.75 26.55 2.88 9.89 3.29 0.20 Stage IV, means of four preparations showing interaction of xanthate D.S. with starch type 66.25 1.86 62.50 3.10 62.25 3.48 68.25 2.28 3.22 0.28 12.71 9.65 1.74 354 Die Starke 23. ]ahrg. 1971 I Nr. 10 Table 6. Effect on Masterbatch Properties of Crosslinking Reaction, Starch Loading and Their Interactions. Crosslinking reaction and starch loading Starch recovery (%) Minimum Optimum rheometer cure time torque at 150'C (in.-lb) (min) Hardness Elongation Tensile (Shore A) at break strength (%) (psi) Abrasion rate (cm 3 jhr) After 70 hr water immersion Volume Tensile Elongation increase strength at break (%) (psi) (%) Stage I, means of 24 dry-mill preparations Zinc xanthate 17.81 16.35 76.29 587.7 1391 1.30 16.22 614.8 Xanthide 24.09 18.76 78.83 383.5 1642 0.68 12.06 432.4 30 phr Loading 97.04 17.68 20.16 73.58 541.9 1686 8.64 1416 573.7 45 phr Loading 92.96 24.22 14.95 81.54 429.4 1348 19.64 830 473.5 LSD 1.77 1.79 2.34 1.78 32.0 165 0.21 2.32 136 39.9 Stage II, means of eight wet-extrusion preparations Zinc xanthate 4.52 61.8 440.0 1054 1.33 Xanthide 6.63 66.6 339.4 1436 0.76 30 phr Loading 4.59 61.1 416.9 0.85 5.06 45 phr Loading 6.56 67.3 362.5 1.24 7.57 LSD 1.64 2.5 52.9 313 0.15 1.71 Stage II, means of seven preparations showing interaction of crosslinking reaction \vith starch loading Zinc xanthate, 30 phr 98.91 4.64 59.1 461.4 1208 0.74 6.40 931 482.1 Xanthide, 30 phr 94.87 6.00 61.4 384.3 1150 0.57 4.37 890 394.3 Zinc xanthate, 45 phr 97.10 6.00 63.6 413.6 705 1.55 8.91 689 492.9 Xanthide, 45 phr 96.84 7.64 68.3 325.7 1301 1.17 7.46 993 355.0 LSD 4.05 1.75 2.6 56.6 335 0.16 1.83 211 52.3 Srage IV, means of eight wet-extrusion preparations Zinc xanthate, 30 phr 99.66 5.68 29.69 55.12 418.7 3.40 6.05 476.2 Xanthide, 45 phr 96.26 10.75 14.25 74.50 272.5 1.96 16.31 328.7 LSD 3.79 1.80 9.89 2.28 56.9 0.20 1.74 49.4 D.S. 0.06 and 0.10 in Stage IV studies. In Stage I studies, the higher xanthate D.S. gave better starch recovery, less viscous masterbatches (indicated by lower rheometer torque), and faster curing compounds but gave lower strength vul- canizates as shown in Table 5. Stage IV studies indicated that higher xanthate D.S. also had a somewhat deleterious effect on compression set and abrasion resistance. However, as shown in Table 5, there is an interaction requiring that corn flour be used at higher D.S. than pearl starch for equivalent vulcanizate hardness and abrasion resistance. Stage II studies showed that low starch recoveries, as noted for D.S. 0.06 preparations in Stage I (Table 5), were asso- ciated with 30 phr starch xanthide coprecipitations (Table 6). Thus in Stage IV studies, which included only the 30 phr zinc xanthate and 45 phr xanthide preparations, the average starch recovery at D.S. 0.06 was 98.5 0 /0. For further examination of the influence of xanthate D.S. on masterbatch properties, data from wet-extrusion pro- cessed 30 phr zinc xanthate-SBR 1502 and 45 phr xanthide- SBR 1502 preparations in Stage II, III and IV studies were pooled. This gave a data pool with 28 individual prepara- tions and a xanthate D.S. range 0.05 to 0.18 for each com- position. Least-squares regression lines for various master- batch properties as a function of xanthate D.S. were cal- culated from this data. Even though a wide range of prepa- ration variables were included, the regression lines provided a significant fit of the data for several properties. Over the xanthate D.S. range 0.05 to 0.18, starch recoveries improved slightly with increasing D.S.; but vulcanizate properties in general were adversely affected by increasing xanthate D.S. Thus xanthate D.S. 0.06 appears to be about optimum. This result has been confirmed in other studies [11]. Die Starke 23. Jalng. 1971 I Nt. 10 Selection of Processing Procedure Previously published [4] and unpublished [11] results have disclosed that mastication of wet starch-elastomer copreci- pitates during extrusion drying gives large improvements in masterbatch properties. In Stage I studies, a partially suc- cessful attempt was made to achieve this advantage by drying wet coprecipitate while masticating on an open steam-heated differential roll mill. This hot-wet-milling procedure gave some improvement in masterbatch proper- ties, but the improvement was much less than expected for wet-extrusion processing. No direct comparison of Stage I preparations with wet-extrusion processed masterbatches in Stages II - IV was permitted by the choices made in xan- thate D.S. and crosslinking reaction. Stage II studies employed wet-extrusion processing with coprecipitate moisture levels of 10 and 30 0 /0. No significant effects were associated with these levels except an inter- action of 30 % moisture content and zinc xanthate cross- linking to give a slight reduction in optimum cure at the expense of slightly increased abrasion rate. Thus, 20 0 /0 coprecipitate moisture content was selected for remaining wet-processing studies. Stage III studies were devoted exclusively to extruder vari- ables in wet-extrusion processing of two selected SBR 1502 coprecipitate compositions. A vacuum vented extruder was compared with an unvented extruder. Three length-to- diameter ratio extruders were employed with various screw compression ratios, die configurations and temperature pro- files.. However, variations in xanthate D.S. accounted for most of the observed variation in experimental results as discussed above. The wet-extrusion processing procedure 355 described in the experimental section of this paper was used in Stage IV studies. This procedure employs best con- ditions accessible to the Brabender Plasticorder equipment. Optimum conditions for wet-extrusion processing of starch- SBR coprecipitate by other machines will have to be estab- lished by further experimentation. Selection of Crosslinking Reaction Type and Starch Loading Stage I studies indicated that both starch loading and cross- linking reaction type affected most masterbatch properties as shown in Table 6. However, the Stage I experimental design did not allow estimation of certain interactions. The interaction of starch loading and crosslinking reaction was investigated in Stage II studies. As shown in Table 6, 30 phr starch xanthide preparations resulted in low starch recoveries and 45 phr zinc starch xanthate preparations gave low tensile strengths, high abrasion rate and high water absorption. The remaining two compositions were selected for further study and did not give significantly different vulcanizate tensile strengths even in Stage IV studies where the factors of oil-extension and RF coreaction were included. Effect of Coreaction of Resorcinol-Formaldehyde with Xanthate Resorcinol and formaldehyde can be employed at relatively high levels as primary starch crosslinking agents in prepara- tion of starch-reinforced rubbers [2]. In Stage IV studies, RF was coreacted with starch xanthate at a level of 0.03 mole per mole starch and affected vulcanizate properties as shown in Table 7. In general, incorporation of RF gave increases in vulcanizate strength and abrasion resistance. The effect of RF was relatively greater in corn flour prepa- rations than in starch preparations. Also, the effect of RF was relatively greater at 30 phr starch loading than at 45 phr starch loading. This latter interaction suggests that the level of RF incorporation might have been better cal- culated on a phr basis than on a starch content basis. Effect of Oil-Extension on Masterbatch Propnties High-molecular-weight SBR type 1713 was used without oil extension in Stage I studies and gave vulcanizate strengths higher than were obtained with SBR type 1502 as expected. In Stage IV studies, SBR 1713 was used with its normal oil-extension (50 phr naphthenic oil), and starch loading for the oil-extended SBR 1713 compositions was calculated based on elastomer plus oil. Under these con- ditions, oil-extension had a severe deleterious effect on vul- canizate properties. For example, average tensile strength and abrasion rate for oil-extended SBR 1713 compositions were, respectively, 766 psi and 4.59 cm 3 /hr compared to 1771 psi and 0.77 cm 3 /hr for SBR 1502 vulcanizates in Stage IV studies. However, several interactions of oil- extension with other factors occurred. In a separate com- parison, the oil was incorporated into starch derivative- SBR 1713 masterbatches by mill mixing after wet-extrusion processing rather than before coprecipitation. This "late" oil incorporation gave masterbatches having different pro- perties than those obtained in Stage IV studies. Future studies will consider oil-extension in much greater detail. Properties of Select Masterbatches Selection of factors leading to best masterbatch properties gives four best compositions. These compositions are based on nonoil-extended SBR elastomers, contain derivatives of either pearl corn starch or corn flour and would be pro- cessed by the wet-extrusion method. The starting xanthate D.S. for corn flour preparations would be 0.10 and for starch preparations 0.06. Crosslinking of starch or flour would be by the zinc xanthate reaction at 30 phr loading and by the xanthide reaction at 45 phr loading. RF would be coreacted with xanthate in each preparation at an op- timum level which will have to be determined in future studies. Coreaction with RF imparts a darker color to the masterbatch, and this effect would also have to be taken into account in optimizing RF level for applications where bright colors are desired. Table 7. Effect on Masterbatch Properties of Resorcinol-Formaldehyde (RF) Coreaction ''lith Xanthate. RF level (moles/starch mole) Hardness (Shore A) Rebound resilience (%) Tensile strength (psi) Tension set Tear Abrasion at break resistance rate (%) (lb/in.) (cm 3 /hr) Compression After 70 hr set, B Water im- (%) mersion, volume in- crease (%) None 0.03 LSD None--eorn flour 0.03-Corn flour None-starch 0.03-Starch LSD None-30 phr 0.03-30 phr None-45 phr 0.03-45 phr LSD Stage IV, means of eight ,vet-extrusion preparations 60.70 48.60 1108 11.87 124.2 3.61 68.87 46.12 1430 26.00 150.7 1.76 2.28 2.35 278 19.3 0.20 Stage IV, means of four preparations sho"'ing interaction of RF level with starch type 59.3 49.5 71.5 44.3 62.2 47.8 66.2 48.0 4.2 3.3 Stage IV, means of four preparations showing interaction of RF level with starch loading 47.8 54.0 4.90 62.5 47.2 1.90 ll7 ~ 3 D1 75.2 45.0 1.62 3.2 3.3 0.28 23.00 26.38 26.22 24.05 4.65 8.50 12.40 12.50 11.32 2.45 356 Die Stiirke 23. ]ahrg. 1971 I Nr. 10 Table 8. Properties of Select Starch Derivative-SBR 1502 Master- batches. Starch derivative!) and loading 30 phr, 30 phr, 45 phr, 45 phr, Zinc corn Zinc starch Corn flour Starch flour xanthate xanthide xanthide Property xanthate RP) RpJ RF5) RP) Starch recovery, % " 99.75 99.43 96.8 99.2 Mooney viscosity, MLl + 4 (100 c C) 66.5 70.2 97 107 Minimum rheometer torque, in.-l b 6.0 7.2 13 13.5 Optimum cure, at 150 a C, min 25.75 24.8 14 20.5 Specific gravity 1.093 1.097 1.115 1.122 Hardness, Shore A 65 69 81 80 Rebound resilience, 0"" 49 50 46 45 /0 Modulus, at 300% elongation, psi 1470 1553 Elongation at break, psi 375 383 250 270 Tensile strength, psi 1800 2000 1860 2140 Energy for tensile break, relative 497 525 322 388 Tension set, at break, % 22.5 21.7 26 32 Tear resistance, lb/in. 149 136 191 183 Compression set, B, Of 17.8 19.2 25.6 19.9 /0 Abrasion rate, cm 3 /hr 0.87 0.44 0.67 0.56 Properties after 70 hr water immersion: Volume increase, 0/ 4.7 4.3 6.8 6.2 /0 Tensile strength, psi 1350 1213 1280 1390 Elongation at break, % 455 417 340 350 1) RF level in all preparations, 0.03 mole/mole starch; 2) Average from t\VO preparations, xanthate D.S. 0.06; 3) Average from three prepara- tions, xanthate D.S. 0.10; 4) Individual preparation, xanthate D.S. 0.10; 5) Individual preparation, xanthate D.S. 0.06. Table 8 gives properties for those Stage IV preparations most nearly approximating the above best compositions. From data in Table 8, the 30 phr zinc xanthate preparations probably had a better overall balance of properties than the 45 phr xanthide preparations. The 30 phr zinc starch xanthate masterbatches had lower viscosities and gave vul- canizates which were softer, more resilient, more elastic, and about as strong as vulcanizates containing 45 phr starch xanthide reinforcing agent. However, in practical applica- tion, the properties of vulcanizates from starch derivative- SBR masterbatches would be modified over a wide range by compounding with conventional reinforcing agents, fillers, plasticizers, etc. and by use of other curing systems. Starch derivative-SBR elastomers can be compounded to give vulcanizate properties adequate for the wide variety of end uses listed in Table 9. Table 9 compares hardness and tensile properties of test vulcanizates from the above selected starch-SBR masterbatches with properties of rep- Die Starke 23. Jahrg. 1971/ Nr. 10 resentative commercial SBR rubbers as given in the Vander- bilt Handbook [12J and industrial literature. Starch-rein- forced rubbers are of particular interest in applications for brightly colored rubbers. Acknowledgements idabel D. Swanson for analyses, "Wilbur C. Bury and Loyal D. Miller for physical testing. Summary Xanthate derivatives of pearl corn starch, acid-modified corn starches, waxy maize starch, high-amylose corn starch and corn and wheat flours were evaluated in reinforcement of styrene-butadiene (SBR) elastomers. Concomitant vari- ables included in the experimental design were starch load- ing, xanthate degree of substitution (D.5.), crosslinking reaction, coreaction with resorcinol and formaldehyde (RF), incorporation of fillers or extender oil, and processing con- ditions. Xanthate derivatives of high-molecular-weight starches were quantitatively retained in resultant starch-SBR master- batches, but analogous acid-modified starch products were poorly retained. Vulcanized rubbers containing high-amy- lose starch xanthate derivatives had lower water absorptions but generally poorer physical properties than those con- taining the same derivatives of pearl corn starch and waxy maize starch. Corn and wheat flour xanthate derivatives gave rubber reinforcement about equal to that obtained from corresponding derivatives of pearl corn starch, but produced vulcanizates of darker color. Optimum starch xanthate D.S. was about 0.06 mole xan- thate group per mole of anhydroglucose unit. There were interactions between starch loading and crosslinking reac- tion resulting in best rubber reinforcement at a loading of 30 parts zinc starch xanthate and 45 parts starch xanthide, respectively, per 100 parts (phr) SBR elastomer. Coreaction of RF with starch xanthate derivatives increased rubber reinforcement. Reinforcing grades of hydrated silica and hard clay were easily incorporated into masterbatches by coprecipitation with starch derivatives. Wet extrusion meth- ods for processing starch-elastomer coprecipitates gave bet- ter results than hot-wet-mill or dry-mill processing. Incor- poration of 50 phr naphthenic oil into high-molecular- weight SBR by coprecipitation with starch derivatives gave poor quality products. Best masterbatch types contained 30 phr zinc starch xan- thate RF and 45 phr starch xanthide RF, respectively, in SBR 1502 elastomer. These masterbatches had properties meeting requirements for many end-use applications. Zusammenfassung Starke in Gummi. EinfluB des Starketyps und der begleitenden Variablen bei der Verstarkung von StyroI-Butadiengummi. Xanthatderivate von Perlmaisstarke, sauremodifizierten Maisstar- ken, amylosereicher Maisstarke und Weizenmehlen wurden fiir 357 Table 9. Comparison of Starch Reinforced SBR with Commercial SBR Rubbers. Major reinforcing agent Product Type Loading Modulus, at Tensile Elongation Hardness (phr) 300 % elonga- strength at break (Shore A) tion (psi) (psi) (%) Zinc starch xanthate RF-SBR 1502 1 ) Starch 30 1553 2000 383 69 Starch xanthide-SBR 1502 1 ) Starch 45 2140 270 80 Truck tire sidewall, SBR 1500 GPF black 60 1120 1980 550 58 Passenger tire sidewall, SBR 1500 GPF black 65 1200 2000 560 56 Third line passenger tire tread, SBR 1825 HAFblack 90 970 2150 640 60 Competitive orbitread, SBR 1808 & reclaim HAF black 75 960 2190 580 55 Heat resistant conveyor belt, SBR 1500 FEF & FT black 45 300 1450 800 41 V belt, base stock, SBR 1500 HLF (N724) black 132 1140 2130 280 74 Washing machine hose, SBR 1018, 1503 Whiting & Clay 200 180 320 550 52 Low cost hose compound, SBR 8754 SRF black, clay, talc 310 550 900 580 67 Molded goods, SBR 1500 FT black 125 1240 1360 400 70 Molded goods, SBR 1500 FT & EPC blacks 100 1920 2180 390 69 \XThite molded goods, SBR 1006 Clay, calcium silicate 140 670 1400 600 70 White molded goods, SBR 1006 Clay, calcium silicate 115 870 1410 530 80 Neutral extruded goods, SBR 1006 Silica, clay, "vhiting 200 450 930 600 70 Transparent molded shoe sole, SBR 1507 Silica 40 700 2000 900 57 Translucent molded shoe sole, SBR 1551, 8107 Silica 60 300 1200 925 57 Molded shoe sole, SBR 1507, 1703 Clay 170 500 1400 500 60 RHW wire insulation, SBR 1018,1503 Resin, ZnO, hydrocarbon 80 1360 490 1) See Table 8 for detailed properties and product description. die Verstarkllng von Styrol-Blltadien-(SBR)-Elastomeren einge- setzt. In die experimentelle Anordmmg wllrden als begleitende Variablen die Starkeeinspeisung, der Xanthat-Sllbstitlltionsgrad (D. S.), die Vemetzlmgsreaktion, die Coreaktion mit Resorcin lind Formaldehyd (RF), der Einball von Fiillmitteln oder von Fiil!ol lind die Verf,thrensbedingllngen aufgenommen. Die Xanthatderivate von Starken mit hohem j\;Jolektdargewicht wllrden qllantitativ in den resliltierenden Starke-SBR-Hallptchar'- gen festgehalten, wogegen analoge saltremodifizierte Starkepro- dllkte kaum festgehalten wurden. Vu'kanisiertes Gllmmi, das Xanthatderivate ails amylosereicher Starke enthielt, zeigte gerin- gere IVasserabsorption, jedoch im allgemeinen schlechtere physi- kalische Eigenschaflen als diejenigen, die Xanthatderivate ails Perlmaisstarke und IVachsmaisstarke enthielten. Derivate aus Mais- und IVeizenmehl ergaben eine Verstarktmg des Gummis, die in etwa der der entsprechenden Derivate aus Perlmaisstarke ent- sprach. Allerdings fiihrten sie zu Vulkanisiemngsprodukten 'von dtmklerer Farbe. Der optimale Xanthat-Sllbstitutionsgrad der Starke lag bei 0,06 Xanthatgmppen je Anhydroglucoseeinheit. Es wllrden IVechsel- 'wirkungen zwischen der Starkeeinspeisung tmd der Vemetztmgs- reaktion festgestellt, die bei der Einspeisung von 30 Teilen Zink- Starkexanthat bzw. 45 Teilen Starkexanthid je 100 Teilen (phr) SBR-Elastomer zu hervorragender Gummiverstarktmg fiihrten. Die Coreaktion von RF mit Starkexanthatderivaten erhohte die Gummiverstarktmg. Die verstarkenden Qualitaten von Silicium- dioxid-Hydrat Imd Hartton wurden durch gemeinsame Ausfallllng mit Starkederivaten leicht in die HauptdJargen eingebaut. Nap- extmsionsmethoden zur Gewinmmg von Starke-Elastomer-Co- prazipitaten gaben bessere Ergebnisse als Heip-Napmahl- oder Trockenmahlverfahren. Die Einarbeittmg von 50 phr Naphthenol in hochmolekulares SBR durch gemeinsame Ausfalltmg mit Starke- derivaten fiihrte ZIt qualitativ minderwertigen Produkten. Die besten Hauptchargen enthielten 30 phr Zink-Starkexanthat- RF, bzw. 45 phr Starkexanthid-RF in SBR 1502-Elastomer. Diese Hauptchargen zeigten Eigenschaflen, die den Anfordemngen bei zahlreichen Endanwendungen entsprechen. 358 Resume L'amidon dans les gommes. Influence du type d'amidon et des phenomenes variables concomitants au cours du renforcement des gommes de styrene-butadiene. derives des amidons suivan,ts ont ,ete testes qt;ant a leurs proprzetes de renforcement des elastomeres de styrene- blltadiene (SBR): amidon de mai's pede, amidon de mai's l'iche en amylose, amidon modifif: par l'acide et farine de ble. Les pheno- menes variables concomitants inchts au COllrs des hudes experi- mentales haient: la dJar'ge en amidon, Ie degre de mbstitlltion (D. S.) dll xanthate, la daction de rhicttlation, la coreaction avec Ie resorcinol et Ie formaldehyde (RF), l'incorporation d'lmile ou de charge et conditions teclmologiques. Les derives xanthates des amidons de poids molewlaire eleve ont pu etre retemts quantitativement dans les charges principales ami- don-SBR reStlltantes, par contre les produits analogues des ami- dons modifies par l'acide n'ont he que faiblement retenlls. Les gommes vlllcanisees contenant des derives xanthates d'amidon riche en amylose montraient tme absorption d'eau pllls faible, mais des proprihes physiques inff:riellres acelles contenant les memes deri- ves de l'amidon de .maYs perle et l'amidon de mai's cireux. Les derives de farine de mai's et de ble provoquent tm renforcement de la gomme analogue a ce que l'on obtient avec les derives corre- spondants de l'amidon de maYs perle, mais if conduisent ades pro- dllits vulcanises d'tme coulellr plus sombre. Le degre optimal de mbstittttion du xanthate d' amidon est de l'ordre de 0,06 groupement xanthate par IInite anhydroglllcose. Il y avait des interactions entre la charge en amidon et la reaction de rhiwlation donnant 1m meilleur renforcement pour une charge de 30 parties de xanthate d'amidon au zinc et 45 parties de xan- thate d'amidon respectivement pour 100 parties (pIn) d'elastomeres SBR. La co-reaction de RF avec les derives xanthate d'amidon augmente Ie renforcement de la gomme. Les qualites renforr;antes de ['hydrate du dioxyde de silice et de l'argile dure ont pu etre incorporees facilement dans les charges principales par co-precipi- tation avec les derives d'amidon. Les methodes d'extmsion par Die Starke 23. 1971 I Nr. 10 voie Immide pOllr la production de co-precipites amidon-elasto- mhes ont donne de meillellrs resldtats qlle ceux obtenlls par les procedes de mOIlWre hllmide achalld 011 sr;che. L'incorporation de 50 pin d'imile naphthenique dans les SBR de poids molecldaire eleve par co-precipitation avec des derives d'amidon donne des prodllits de qllalite mediocre. Les meillelires charges principales contenaient 30 pin- de xanthate d'amidon all zinc-RF et 45 phr de xanthide d'amidon-RF respec- tivement dans l'elastomere SBR 1502. Les charges principales montrent des proprihes qlli correspondent allX exigences de nom- breuses applications finales. References [1] Buchanan, R. A., O. E. Weislogel, C. R. Rlissell, and C. E. Rist: Ind. Eng. Chern. Prod. Res. Develop. 7 (1968), 155. [2] Buchanan, R. A., C. R. Rlissell, and C. E. Rist: "Starch in Rubber. Reinforcement of Rubber by Starch-Resorcinol- Formaldehyde Resin", 93rd Meeting, Division of Rubber Chemistry, ACS, Cleveland, Ohio, April 23-26, 1968. Ab- str. in Rubber Chern. Techno!. 41 (1968), 1380. [3] Stephens, H. L., R. ]. kfurphy, and T. E. Reed: Rubber World 161 (1969), 77 [4] Stephens, H. L., R. W. Roberts, T. F. Reed, and R. j. kfurphy: Ind. Eng. Chern. Prod. Res. Develop. 10 (1971),84. [5] Buchanan, R. A., H. C. Katz, C. R. Russell, and C. E. Rist: "Starch in Rubber. Powdered Elastomers from Starch-En- cased Latex Particles", 98th Meeting, Division of Rubber Chemistry, ACS, Chicago, Illinois, October 20 - 23, 1970. Abstr. in Rubber World 162 (1970),70. [6] "Description of Synthetic Rubbers and Latices", January 1968 ed., International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Pro- ducers, Inc., 45 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N. Y. 10020. Reproduced in reference [8] pp. 1214 -1245. [7] Lancaster, E. B., L. T. Black, H. F. Conway, and E. L. Griffin, Jr.: Ind. Eng. Chern. Prod. Res. Develop. 5 (1966), 354. [8] 1969 Book of ASTM Standards, Part 28 (April 1969) Ameri- can Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race St., Phila- delphia, Pennsylvania 19103. [9] Hllnter, W. G., and M. E. Hoff: Ind. Eng. Chern. 59 (3) (1967), 43. [10] Cocln-an, W. c., and G. lv!. Cox: "Experimental Designs", 2nd ed. (1964), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y. [11] Stephens, H. L., Institute of Polymer Science, Akron, Ohio. Unpublished research progress report, April 1970. [12] lVinspear, G. G.: "The Vanderbilt Rubber Handbook" (1968), R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc., 230 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017. Address of authors: R. A. Bllchanan, H. C. Katz, and C. R. Rlissell, Cereal Products Laboratory, Northern Regional Research Labo- ratory"'), Peoria, Illinois 61604 (USA). W. F. Kwolek, Biometrical Services, Agricultural Research Service, U.s. Department of Agri- culture, stationed at Peoria. ". This is a laboratory of rhe Northern Marketing and Nutrition Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.s. Department of Agriculture. (Received: May 3, 1971)