Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • The Criminal Enterprise at The Us District Court of Massachusetts Continues

    Hochgeladen von

    tired_of_corruption
    265 Ansichten45 Seiten
    You have to read the links associated with this document to see the level of corruption in the Massachusetts Federal Court System. http://t.co/WEefP8i The docket is highlighted where clear and unquestionable usurpation by the clerks of this court and a Magistrate is evident (simply put they use power they have no legitimate authority to use). The red comments explain the reality of the docket entries. The case never saw a US District Judge. Keep in mind the Defendants in this action built their facility with HUD money--their income is Medicaid and Medicare--they took State money through the ECLI program to ensure competent staff and low turnerover; since this litigation they have caused many career changes as they replaced staff in an attempt to spoil evidence in case their ruse failed which would have put them before a judge. The corruption is extended to the Circuit Executive Office of the First Circuit; this office creates bogus documents regarding judicial misconduct void of fact and law to protect the corrupt court staff and "elite" meaning corrupt outside attorneys. The Massachusetss Federal Court System is one huge RICO scam where they deny indigent litigants access to the pro bono program if their action is against a former or current employer. The corrupt attorneys know this and the EEOC is in their pocket; a faux investigation ensues and a right to suit letter is issued. Blacklisting promotes your indigent status; the court and attorneys then run pretense litigation. The Defendants who never would have prevailed in a legitimate litigation continue to pay the attorneys. The attorneys in this action think nothing of breaking federal law. The staff that work in the federal court system block the case from a US District Judge and think nothing of violating your constitutional rights as they too commit multiple Title 18 violations; they are alleged to be a form of domestic terrorist who have infiltrated our judiciary and utilize the electronic filing system to promote their terror and without fear of consequence sign the name of a US District without his or her knowledge to their bogus documents and file these documents as though they are legitimate court records in the electronic filing system. In short, you the tax payer are forced to support these criminals because your taxes provide their pay checks and benefits.

    Originaltitel

    The Criminal Enterprise at the Us District Court of Massachusetts Continues

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    You have to read the links associated with this document to see the level of corruption in the Massachusetts Federal Court System. http://t.co/WEefP8i The docket is highlighted where clear and unquestionable usurpation by the clerks of this court and a Magistrate is evident (simply put they use power they have no legitimate authority to use). The red comments explain the reality of the docket entries. The case never saw a US District Judge. Keep in mind the Defendants in this action built their facility with HUD money--their income is Medicaid and Medicare--they took State money through the ECLI program to ensure competent staff and low turnerover; since this litigation they have caused many career changes as they replaced staff in an attempt to spoil evidence in case their ruse failed which would have put them before a judge. The corruption is extended to the Circuit Executive Office of the First Circuit; this office creates bogus documents regarding judicial misconduct void of fact and law to protect the corrupt court staff and "elite" meaning corrupt outside attorneys. The Massachusetss Federal Court System is one huge RICO scam where they deny indigent litigants access to the pro bono program if their action is against a former or current employer. The corrupt attorneys know this and the EEOC is in their pocket; a faux investigation ensues and a right to suit letter is issued. Blacklisting promotes your indigent status; the court and attorneys then run pretense litigation. The Defendants who never would have prevailed in a legitimate litigation continue to pay the attorneys. The attorneys in this action think nothing of breaking federal law. The staff that work in the federal court system block the case from a US District Judge and think nothing of violating your constitutional rights as they too commit multiple Title 18 violations; they are alleged to be a form of domestic terrorist who have infiltrated our judiciary and utilize the electronic filing system to promote their terror and without fear of consequence sign the name of a US District without his or her knowledge to their bogus documents and file these documents as though they are legitimate court records in the electronic filing system. In short, you the tax payer are forced to support these criminals because your taxes provide their pay checks and benefits.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    265 Ansichten45 Seiten

    The Criminal Enterprise at The Us District Court of Massachusetts Continues

    Hochgeladen von

    tired_of_corruption
    You have to read the links associated with this document to see the level of corruption in the Massachusetts Federal Court System. http://t.co/WEefP8i The docket is highlighted where clear and unquestionable usurpation by the clerks of this court and a Magistrate is evident (simply put they use power they have no legitimate authority to use). The red comments explain the reality of the docket entries. The case never saw a US District Judge. Keep in mind the Defendants in this action built their facility with HUD money--their income is Medicaid and Medicare--they took State money through the ECLI program to ensure competent staff and low turnerover; since this litigation they have caused many career changes as they replaced staff in an attempt to spoil evidence in case their ruse failed which would have put them before a judge. The corruption is extended to the Circuit Executive Office of the First Circuit; this office creates bogus documents regarding judicial misconduct void of fact and law to protect the corrupt court staff and "elite" meaning corrupt outside attorneys. The Massachusetss Federal Court System is one huge RICO scam where they deny indigent litigants access to the pro bono program if their action is against a former or current employer. The corrupt attorneys know this and the EEOC is in their pocket; a faux investigation ensues and a right to suit letter is issued. Blacklisting promotes your indigent status; the court and attorneys then run pretense litigation. The Defendants who never would have prevailed in a legitimate litigation continue to pay the attorneys. The attorneys in this action think nothing of breaking federal law. The staff that work in the federal court system block the case from a US District Judge and think nothing of violating your constitutional rights as they too commit multiple Title 18 violations; they are alleged to be a form of domestic terrorist who have infiltrated our judiciary and utilize the electronic filing system to promote their terror and without fear of consequence sign the name of a US District without his or her knowledge to their bogus documents and file these documents as though they are legitimate court records in the electronic filing system. In short, you the tax payer are forced to support these criminals because your taxes provide their pay checks and benefits.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 45

    Query Reports Utilities Logout

    Docket Activity Report


    United States District Court -- District of Massachusetts Report Filed Period: 8/2/2010 - 9/13/2011
    Case Number/Title 1:10-cv-11343GAO McGarry v. Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc. et al
    CASE CLOSED on 06/28/2011

    Dates Entered: 08/10/2010 09:15:17 Filed: 08/02/2010

    Category/ Event

    Docketed by

    Notes Cause: 42:1218(2) Americans with Disabilities Act NOS: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Employment Office: Boston Presider: George A. OToole, Jr Jury demand: Plaintiff

    Category: cmp C. Gawlik Event: Complaint Note it took 9 days to get this complaint Type: crt entered; I allege this was so it would go to Judge OTooles docket and his alleged corrupt clerks. (Google Chester and Margaret Chalupowski and you will see how Jude OTooles docket it preferred by attorneys who have no defenseI allege the corrupt staff of both the US District Court and the USCA1 have been rendering false documents where they type in the undersigned judges name for years) Document: 1

    Case Flags: CLOSED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gawlik, Cathy) Entered: 08/10/2010 09:17:31 Filed: 08/02/2010 Category: notice Event: Notice of Case Assignment C. Gawlik Type: crt

    ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Gawlik, Cathy) no notice of consent to the magistrates jurisdiction was sent to me in violation of courts general order 09-03 so the pro se staff attorney could control the case. No docket number assigned to the case assignment. Entered: 08/10/2010 09:19:09 Filed: 08/02/2010 Entered: 08/10/2010 09:21:08 Filed: 08/02/2010 Category: motion Event: Proceed In Forma Pauperis Document: 2 C. Gawlik Type: crt

    MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Laura J. McGarry.(Gawlik, Cathy) Category: motion This motion was C. Gawlik deniedit did not mention that the court has a general order Type: crt that excludes indigent Event: Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs from the pro bono program if they filed suit against a current or former employer Document: 3 TITLE 28 1915. Proceedings in forma pauperis (e)(1) The court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel. COURT GENERAL ORDER 09-4 This Plan does not apply to the appointment of counsel for pro se plaintiffs who assert employment-related claims against current or former employers. This order

    allows corrupt attorneys to promote retaliation so they do not have to go up against an attorney. MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Laura J. McGarry.(Gawlik, Cathy) Entered: 08/10/2010 09:22:39 Filed: 08/02/2010 Category: motion Event: Miscellaneous Relief Document: 4 C. Gawlik Type: crt

    MOTION Electronic Filing by Laura J. McGarry.(Gawlik, Cathy) Bogus Dkt. #101 took away my electronic filing privileges and they did this before I could file a notice of appeal Entered: 08/10/2010 09:24:37 Filed: 08/02/2010 Entered: 08/10/2010 09:25:15 Filed: 08/10/2010 Category: utility Event: Remark C. Gawlik Type: crt

    Exhibits to complaint NOT SCANNED (numerous) (Gawlik, Cathy) Category: notice C. Gawlik Event: Notice for Social Security and Immigration Cases Type: crt This was wrong entry was placed with purposethese cases do not have scheduling conferences. The docket clerk was notified by phone to correct this and he did not my category sheet is missing from the docket.

    Online access to documents in this case are limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Gawlik, Cathy) However the case comes up on PACER Entered: 08/12/2010 09:54:01 Filed: 08/11/2010 Entered: 08/12/2010 Category: notice Event: Notice of Change of Address or Firm Name Document: 5 C. Danieli Type: crt

    NOTICE of Change of Address by Laura J. McGarry (Danieli, Chris) Category: misc Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion C. Danieli Type: crt

    10:32:02 Filed: 08/11/2010

    Document: 6

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to 1 Complaint. New Last Page of Complaint with Corrected Address. (Danieli, Chris) Modified on 8/12/2010 to correct the filing date(Danieli, Chris). NOT A COMPLAINT ADMENDMENT Entered: 08/12/2010 10:35:14 Filed: 08/11/2010 Category: misc Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion A CORRECTED STATEMENT NOT A COMPLAINT AMENDMENT Document: 7 C. Danieli Type: crt

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to 1 Complaint. Complaint Amendment Paragraphs 180 and 181. (Attachments: # 1 New Attachment Paragraph 181)(Danieli, Chris) Entered: 08/12/2010 10:51:23 Filed: 08/12/2010 Entered: 08/19/2010 16:36:22 Filed: 08/18/2010 Category: notice Event: Notice - Other Document: 8 C. Danieli Type: crt

    NOTICE of Party Correction by Laura J. McGarry re 1 Complaint (Danieli, Chris) Category: order Event: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief I included that my only income was SSDI and my hospital discharge report from June 2010 with the initiating documents that stated stroke, hypothyroidism, depression and anxiety yet they have had no problem torturing me for over a year with this pretense litigation. Document: 9 4. PSSA Type: crt

    Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 4 Motion for electronic filing to the extent that McGarry can meet the requirements and gains approval from the Clerks Office for cm/ecf access. (PSSA, 4) They did not docket the summonses until after services and then they had no court stamps. They left the

    address off the corporations summons Entered: 08/19/2010 16:37:28 Filed: 08/19/2010 Category: service Event: Summons Issued They used the US Mail to carry a conspiracy to violate my rights!!! Hard copy exhibits were missing from the courtesy copy they mailed me including the last page of the fraudulent position statement with the attorneys signature they submitted to the EEOC. They mailed the bogus docket with only docket text. Morse also mailed a letter with the docket text but no consent to the Magistrate; instead of ensuring I received a copy of the exhibit I had requested in my email to Lyness she removed the exhibit along other hard copy exhibits. 4. PSSA Type: crt

    Summons Issued as to Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. Mailed to plaintiff with USM 285 forms, L.R. 4.1, notice for service by U.S. Marshal, and courtesy copy of the complaint.(PSSA, 4) They purposely neglected to include the corporations address on the summons and when I sent for a new one they stalled and attempted to interfere with service of process and placed a call to the US Marshal who then treated me quite differently than the kind cordial treatment I had been receiving telling me they didnt know when they would be able to get the summones and complaints servedthat they had court ordered summonses that took priority; mine were also court ordered. Entered: 09/02/2010 14:47:56 Filed: 09/02/2010 Category: misc Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion Clarification and correction submitted not a complaint amendment C. Danieli Type: crt

    Document: 10 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to Exhibits. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 09/02/2010 14:56:19 Filed: 09/02/2010 Category: misc C. Danieli Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion I refilled the Type: crt missing exhibits and added an exhibit listnot a complaint amendment Document: 11

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to Exhibits. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 09/02/2010 14:57:40 Filed: 09/02/2010 Category: misc C. Danieli Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion I corrected Type: crt misspoken statement in paragraph 153 of my Complaint that I discovered when I entered my old computer to search for the original of the exhibit that was now removed from the hard copy packet. Not a complaint amendment. Document: 12 Category: misc C. Danieli Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion I submitted a Type: crt request for a new summons with the annual business reports so they would see the addresses of the corporation. NOT A COMPLAINT AMENDMENT. The court received this request on 9/7/2010 by FRCP it should have been processed upon receipt- I called on the 10th and was told they would probably get to it the next week I insisted they comply with rule 4they refused to transfer the information on the single sheet USM-285 form I sent with the amended summons request to the triplet form required - I had to wait for new USM-285 to come by mail which took 4 more days I received the amended summons on the 10th via the ECF systemthe docket clerk not the deputy clerk signed the summons Document: 13

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to 1 Complaint. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 09/10/2010 10:15:49 Filed: 09/07/2010

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to Exhibits. (Attachments: # 1 Addendum to Attachment 13, # 2 Annual Business Reports)(Danieli, Chris) Entered: 09/10/2010 10:17:47 Filed: 09/10/2010 Category: service Event: Summons Reissued Document: 14 C. Danieli Type: crt

    Summons Reissued as to Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. Mailed to plaintiff with USM 285 forms and courtesy copy of complaint (Danieli, Chris) Modified on 9/10/2010 to indicate USM 285 and copy of complaint sent to plaintiff (Danieli, Chris). Entered: 09/13/2010 05:40:43 Filed: 09/13/2010 Category: notice Event: Notice - Other Document: 15 L. McGarry Type: pty

    NOTICE by Laura J. McGarry re 11 Amended Document, 1 Complaint McGarry vs. Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., et al (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Complaint, # 3 Exhibit Complaint, # 4 Exhibit Complaint, # 5 Exhibit Complaint, # 6 Exhibit Complaint, # 7 Exhibit Complaint, # 8 Exhibit Complaint, # 9 Exhibit Complaint, # 10 Exhibit Complaint, # 11 Exhibit Complaint, # 12 Exhibit Complaint, # 13 Exhibit Complaint, # 14 Exhibit Complaint, # 15 Exhibit Complaint, # 16 Exhibit Complaint, # 17 Exhibit Complaint, # 18 Exhibit Complaint, # 19 Exhibit Complaint, # 20 Exhibit Complaint, # 21 Exhibit Complaint, # 22 Exhibit Complaint, # 23 Exhibit Complaint, # 24 Exhibit Complaint, # 25 Exhibit Complaint, # 26 Exhibit Complaint, # 27 Exhibit Complaint, # 28 Exhibit Complaint, # 29 Exhibit Complaint, # 30 Exhibit Complaint, # 31 Exhibit Complaint, # 32 Exhibit Complaint, # 33 Exhibit Complaint, # 34 Exhibit Complaint, # 35 Exhibit Complaint, # 36 Exhibit Complaint, # 37 Exhibit Complaint, # 38 Exhibit Complaint, # 39 Exhibit Complaint, # 40 Exhibit Complaint, # 41 Exhibit Complaint, # 42 Exhibit Complaint, # 43 Exhibit Complaint, # 44 Exhibit Complaint, # 45 Exhibit Complaint, # 46 Exhibit Complaint, # 47 Exhibit Complaint, # 48 Supplement Guide for Exhibits)(McGarry, Laura) I entered all my exhibits because the collusion was becoming evident Entered: 09/16/2010 16:42:56 Filed: 09/16/2010 Category: service NO C. Danieli AMENDMENTS OF ANY KIND TO THE COMPLAINT Type: crt AFTER SERVICE OF PROCESS Event: Summons Returned Executed UNTIL Dkt. # 30 and the pro se staff attorney strikes Dkt. # 30 in collusion with the corrupt attorneys who continually state in their opposition that Rule 15 states 21 days after filed where the rule states amendments can be up to 21 days after served. The corrupt attorneys state that the corrections I made to the complaint were complaint amendments.

    Document: 16 They did not docket the summonses before service and the ones they docketed had no court stamp USM Process Receipt and Return and SUMMONS Returned Executed. Renee Mikita served on 9/13/2010, answer due 10/4/2010. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 09/20/2010 05:14:42 Filed: 09/20/2010 Category: motion Event: Intervene This is actually an injunctive motion but not once did the docket clerk inform me that any of my filings were filed incorrectly or corrected by him and he ignored documents that I filed with Judicial Notice in the caption. Document: 17 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Emergency MOTION to Intervene enjoin Defendants from initiating bankruptcy/ expedite service of summons by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit webster's actual residence, # 2 Exhibit business annual report, # 3 Exhibit cape condo_Webster, # 4 Exhibit Lien solutions, # 5 Exhibit Webster_cape condo, # 6 Exhibit homestead vacant)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 09/20/2010 05:46:00 Filed: 09/20/2010 Category: misc Event: Exhibit Document: 18 L. McGarry Type: pty

    EXHIBIT New guide to exhibits--the guide in document 15 should not be used by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Guide to exhibits of Document #1-the Complaint, # 2 Exhibit paragraph 128 of the complaint and document 11)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 09/24/2010 14:36:45 Filed: 09/24/2010 Category: misc L. Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion This is a McGarry Type: pty motion addendum not an amended documentagain the docket clerk does not correct or inform me to correct the filing category Document: 19

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to 17 Emergency MOTION to Intervene enjoin Defendants from initiating bankruptcy/ expedite service of summons motion addendum/information correction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit annual reports excerpts)(McGarry, Laura)

    Entered: Sunday09/26/2010 14:01:07 Filed: 09/24/2010

    Category: order 4. PSSA Event: Order on Motion to Intervene Type: crt Document: 20 Pro se staff attorney wrote the memorandum and order to an injunctive motion w/ zero US District Judge oversightshe ignored the evidence I submitted regarding the falsifying of an annual business report and that the business had begun restructuring with lien solution She manipulate the filing date. She ignored title 18 violations documented in the motion. She stated my complaint would not succeed although it clearly indicated that the law was brokenthey refused to interview a qualified disabled candidate and the position remained opened. She also ignores the fact that although these attorneys informed me that they were representing the defendants there was no notice of appearance so they could not be served. She did not even state the position I held with the employer correctly and she blocked my complaint that was solid on merit from a US Judge and Magistrate judge so she could make rulings and forge a judges name. NOT EVEN THE MAGISTRATE CAN WRITE ORDERS TO AN INJUNCTIVE MOTION. After the hassle of getting the corrected summons Morse writes in this document that a clerk of the court had called the US Marshalthe US Marshal after that call was rude to me and told me she did not know when they would get around to serving the summonses. Absolutely no reason existed for that call to the US MarshalI made all the effort in spite of their attempt to delay getting the corrected summons back to me and was in communication with the Marshal on the anticipated time they would have the corrected summons my emails prove this.

    Judge George A. OToole, Jr: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying without prejudice 17 Motion to Enjoin Defendants from Initiating Bankruptcy. (PSSA, 4)

    Entered: 10/04/2010 16:42:14 Filed: 10/04/2010

    Category: answer denials, false statements and not enough G. Tully information to a 41 page complaint with 47 exhibitsthey Type: aty even denied or stated not enough information with public records and official documents as the exhibits. They never once state on this document or any document that comes in the future that the submissions to the court are on behalf of the defendants by and through their attorneys. They never file a notice of appearance. The court rules state a corporation will not be recognized by the court without the notice of appearance by at least one attorney. The defendants made no pro se filings and there is absolutely no notice of appearance on behalf of the defendants in any way shape or formit is all a total bogus litigation where these alleged criminals in collusion with one another have been torturing me for over a year with multiple frauds upon the court!!! Event: Answer to Complaint Document: 21

    ANSWER to 1 Complaint by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman.(Tully, Guy) Entered: 10/04/2010 16:43:43 Filed: 10/04/2010 Entered: 10/05/2010 14:38:30 Filed: 10/05/2010 Category: misc Event: Corporate Disclosure Statement Document: 22 G. Tully Type: aty

    CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc.. (Tully, Guy) Category: service C. Danieli Event: Summons Returned Executed NO COURT STAMP Type: crt Document: 23 no court stamp on summons which they docket after service

    USM Process Receipt and Return and SUMMONS Returned Executed. Roxanne Webster served on 10/4/2010, answer due 10/25/2010. (Danieli, Chris)

    Entered: 10/05/2010 14:40:00 Filed: 10/05/2010

    Category: service Event: Summons Returned Executed Stamped but has docket clerk where deputy clerk or clerk of the court is suppose to sign Document: 24

    C. Danieli Type: crt

    USM Process Receipt and Return and SUMMONS Returned Executed. Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc. served on 10/4/2010, answer due 10/25/2010. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 10/05/2010 14:41:15 Filed: 10/05/2010 Category: service Event: Summons Returned Executed Document: 25 C. Danieli Type: crt

    USM Process Receipt and Return and SUMMONS Returned Executed. Joshua Zuckerman served on 10/4/2010, answer due 10/25/2010. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 10/06/2010 14:47:02 Filed: 10/06/2010 Category: notice L. Event: Notice Other This informed them that no McGarry complaint amendments occurred since service of process Type: pty and that any amendments were mailed to and entered by the court as minor corrections because my complaint was done after I had just been discharged from the hospital and medicated I had made a few mistakesall corrected before service of process and corrections served with service of process. Document: 26

    NOTICE by Laura J. McGarry re 16 Summons Returned Executed notice of asserted rule 15 compliance-notice of motion with exparte consideration document 17 & 19--notice of exhibit entry to ECFdocument 18 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Mikita's process receipt, # 2 Exhibit paragraph 12 complaint, # 3 Exhibit paragraph 22 complaint, # 4 Exhibit paragraph 24 complaint, # 5 Exhibit paragraph 42B complaint, # 6 Exhibit paragraph 105 complaint, # 7 Exhibit paragraph 153 complaint, # 8 Exhibit paragraph 177A complaint, # 9 Exhibit paragraph 181-182B complaint, # 10 Exhibit paragraph 186C complaint, # 11 Exhibit paragraph 186D complaint, # 12 Exhibit paragraph 190 complaint, # 13 Exhibit Document 18, # 14 Supplement Exhibit guide for Complaint exhibits, # 15 Exhibit paragraph 128 complaint, # 16 Exhibit page 5 position statement, # 17

    Exhibit Document 15, # 18 Exhibit Document 17 Motion, # 19 Exhibit vacant property-motion exhibit, # 20 Exhibit condo-motion exhibit, # 21 Exhibit restructure of business-motion exhibit, # 22 Exhibit residence-motion exhibit, # 23 Exhibit annual report --motion exhibit, # 24 Exhibit Document 19--addendum to motion, # 25 Exhibit report excerpts--exhibit to motion addendum)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 10/25/2010 17:30:08 Filed: 10/25/2010 Entered: 10/25/2010 17:35:50 Filed: 10/25/2010 Category: motion Event: Disqualify Counsel loaded with authority and rules of misconduct that had already been violated Document: 27 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) Category: motion They had no defenses backed by L. anythingtheir answer was denials, false statement or not McGarry enough information with 47 exhibits that backed my Type: pty allegations at their right handthey even denied documents of public record Event: Strike Document: 28 JUDICIAL REVIEW of the EEOCs failure to comply with regulation and policy requested in the caption Proposed MOTION to Strike 21 Answer to Complaint, 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis, 1 Complaint Defendant's affirmative defenses by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 10/25/2010 17:44:27 Filed: 10/25/2010 Category: answer This was duly required and stated with L. particularity after their fraudulent answer was filed. This McGarry was supported by FRCP 9 and USCA authority. My Type: pty opposition to their motion to strike was ignored; the pro se staff attorney strikes this document. The UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT decision in the following case quite adequately supports (Document 29) as argued in (Document 32), citing 562 F.3d 784; 2009 U.S. App. 58 LEXIS 6072; 186 L.R.R.M. 2019 [Nos. 06-3936, 07-1650, 07-3427. - BAUER MECHANICAL 59 INC v. JOINT]. [The Federal Rules

    themselves instruct us to construe and administer their provisions to do substantial justice and to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.] Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, 8(e). Rules 7(a) and (b) do not limit the methods by which a pleading may be filed. See, e.g., Hamm v. DeKalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir.1985) (affirming district court ruling recognizing an answer and response attached to a motion for leave to file defensive pleadings); In re World Access, Inc., 301 B.R. 217, 220 n. 1 (N.D.Ill.2003) (recognizing an amended complaint attached to a motion for leave to file an amended complaint instanter); Andersen v. Roszkowski, 681 F.Supp. 1284, 1287-88 (N.D.Ill.1988) (same). The defense state in a foot note of their motion to stike Dkt. #37 &38 This motion addendum is of no momentit offers no legal basis whatever to support the Response and should by no means affect the striking of Plaintiffs Response. After I sent them the authority to support the document via email they halted any further conference and filed their frivoulous motion to strike. Event: Answer to Complaint Document: 29 Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' 21 ANSWER to 1 Complaint with Jury Demand Answer to Answer by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit mikita license A, # 2 Exhibit mikita license B, # 3 Exhibit mikita license c, # 4 Exhibit health records notice to submit to eeoc)(McGarry, Laura) Modified on 12/3/2010 to create a link to the answer(Danieli, Chris). The modification was not needed and nothing was modified; this was planned fraud to randomly enter the case and switch scanned PDFs with word process PDFs; I had already linked the documents when I made this entry. I filed for sanctions on November 29th which exposed their scanned document ruse among other acts of planned fraud. (the docket clerk makes this text note again on 11/5/2010) Entered: Category: misc L.

    10/25/2010 17:47:36 Filed: 10/25/2010

    Event: Amended Document - NOT Motion THIS IS MY McGarry ONE AND ONLY COMPLAINT AMENDMENT WHICH Type: pty ADDED AN ADDITIONAL COUNT AGAINST DEFENDANT MIKITA; A WELL DESERVED AND SUPPORTED COUNT. Document: 30

    AMENDED DOCUMENT by Laura J. McGarry. Amendment to 29 Answer to Complaint, 1 Complaint Amendment Count 10 added against Defendant Mikita. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 10/31/2010 11:05:22 Filed: 10/31/2010 Category: respm Event: Addendum to Motion/Memorandum Document: 31 L. McGarry Type: pty

    ADDENDUM re 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis line 268 date correction filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/04/2010 03:00:11 Filed: 11/04/2010 Category: respm Event: Addendum to Motion/Memorandum Document: 32 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First ADDENDUM re 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis associate this motion with document # 29,Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' answer to Complaint,as an attachment and Complaint, document #1and document #28, Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative defenses and Defendants' Answer to Complaint document #21 filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/04/2010 03:07:31 Filed: 11/04/2010 Category: respm Event: Addendum to Motion/Memorandum Document: 33 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First ADDENDUM re 28 Proposed MOTION to Strike 21 Answer to Complaint, 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis, 1 Complaint Defendant's affirmative defenses associate this motion with document # 29,Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' answer to Complaint,as an attachment filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura)

    Entered: 11/05/2010 03:05:39 Filed: 11/05/2010

    Category: respoth Event: Amended Answer to Complaint Document: 34

    L. McGarry Type: pty

    Addendum to 29 Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Document # 21) 1 Complaint Correction to Paragraph 186 sub paragraph #2-line #4 by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Modified on 12/3/2010 making the filing event an Addendum to the Plaintiff's Response to the Defendants' Answer (Danieli, Chris). The modification was not needed and nothing was modified; this was planned fraud to randomly enter the case and switch scanned PDFs with word process PDFs; I had already linked the documents when I made this entry. I filed for sanctions on November 29th which exposed their scanned document ruse among other acts of planned fraud. (the docket clerk makes this text note again on 11/5/2010) Entered: 11/05/2010 14:58:21 Filed: 11/05/2010 Category: respm SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF G. Tully Event: Opposition to Motion Type: aty Document: 35 Submitted into the ECF system as a scanned PDF switched to word process PDF on Dec. 3rd four days after I motioned for sanctions they do not support their opposition. This is a frivolous filing; I had multiple exhibits that clearly showed misconduct and title 18 violations during a federal agency investigation and strong circumstantial evidence indicating the EEOC was paid off. Not only the former but the corrupt attorneys never filed a notice of appearance yet the corrupt PSSA strikes my motion when she goes into her fit of usurpation after I file a motion to enjoin her from the case.

    Opposition re 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 11/05/2010 15:05:44 Filed: 11/05/2010 Category: respm See foot note where they inserted an G. Tully adverse authority established in this court and claim it Type: aty supports their position. changed the spelling of the partys name and recorded the lexis number incorrectly. They write See Kaufman v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 2009 US Dist. LEXIS 68880, *2 (D. Mass. 2009) which is

    actually Kaufmann v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68800 at *2 (D. Mass. Aug. 6, 2009) (holding that the court is inclined to think that a defendant has the same Rule 8 obligations with respect to notice pleading as does a plaintiff). The defense states in their foot note Although Plaintiffs Motion Addendum is nothing more than yet another attempted volley that misses its mark, it does point up the dire need for a net in this match. The scanned document masked the fact that their purposeful incorrect transcription of the authority would raise no hyperlink. They scan and attached Dkt. #35(a word process file just moments earlier created on their computerscanned PDFs are prohibited and only allowed you need to show a hand signature or have no way of producing the document in word process PDF form) with the word copy stamped on it to help pull off their ruse. Event: Opposition to Motion MY MOTION IS STRICKEN BY THE CORRUPT PRO SE STAFF ATTORNEY AND THE FRAUD UPON THE COURT IS PROMOTED THROUGH COLLUSION WITH COURT STAFF Document: 36 SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF Opposition re 28 Proposed MOTION to Strike 21 Answer to Complaint, 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis, 1 Complaint Defendant's affirmative defenses filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Tully, Guy) Entered: 11/05/2010 15:09:46 Filed: 11/05/2010 Category: motion Event: Strike Document: 37 SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF G. Tully Type: aty

    MOTION to Strike 29 Answer to Complaint, Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Answer To Complaint by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman.(Tully, Guy) Entered: Category: respm See foot note regarding their response to G. Tully

    11/05/2010 15:11:10 Filed: 11/05/2010

    USCA authority that supported document # 29 Event: Memorandum in Support of Motion Document: 38 SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF

    Type: aty

    MEMORANDUM in Support re 37 MOTION to Strike 29 Answer to Complaint, Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Answer To Complaint filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 11/05/2010 15:15:08 Filed: 11/05/2010 Category: motion SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF Event: Strike Document: 39 G. Tully Type: aty

    MOTION to Strike 30 Amended Document Plaintiff's Complaint Amendment by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman.(Tully, Guy) Entered: 11/05/2010 15:32:23 Filed: 11/05/2010 Category: respm This where defense change the wording of G. Tully rule stating complaint amendments can be made once 21 Type: aty days after filed not 21 days after served as rule 15 actually states. The authority they used in #38 and this document support my position. Both documents have authority where Rule 15 was discussed before and after the 2009 amendments to the rule and clearly state that you can make an amendment up to 21 days after service. Event: Memorandum in Support of Motion THE CORRUPT PSSA STRIKES MY DOCUMENT #30 Document: SUBMITTED SCANNED PDF

    MEMORANDUM in Support re 39 MOTION to Strike 30 Amended Document Plaintiff's Complaint Amendment filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 11/09/2010 03:26:23 Filed: 11/09/2010 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion IGNORED Document: 41 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First Opposition re 37 MOTION to Strike 29 Answer to Complaint, Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Answer

    To Complaint filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/09/2010 03:28:41 Filed: 11/09/2010 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion IGNORED Document: 42 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First Opposition re 39 MOTION to Strike 30 Amended Document Plaintiff's Complaint Amendment filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/11/2010 04:51:24 Filed: 11/11/2010 Category: motion L. Event: Default Judgment This is also my second request to McGarry disqualify counsel for fraud upon the court related to their Type: pty scam of scanned files, erroneous authorities and change of party name and lexis numbers in their filed documents. It was ignored and then denied with the pro se staff attorneys fit of usurpation after I motioned to enjoin her from the case. IGNORED and emergency request left to linger as fraud upon the court continues. Document: 43

    Ex Parte MOTION for Default Judgment THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!!!!!!! Document as to Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc. Roxanne Webster Renee Mikita and Joshua Zuckerman by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/11/2010 21:38:40 Filed: 11/11/2010 Category: respm This is bizarre garbling as G. Tully they try to confuse the issue that they cited adverse Type: aty authority in a foot note as support for their position without mentioning the adverse component of the authority; they claim poor administrative skills and a type o regarding the misspelled authority and changed lexis number. Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 44

    Opposition re 43 Ex Parte MOTION for Default Judgment THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!!!!!!! Document as to Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc. Roxanne Webster Renee Mikita and Joshua Zuckerman filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy)

    Entered: 11/15/2010 03:29:59 Filed: 11/15/2010

    Category: respm L. Event: Memorandum in Support of Motion IGNORED McGarry Type: pty except the PSSA makes my comment regarding how I thought choosing the ex parte option should cancel service to anyone but the court as what I was complaining bout when I stated there was a compromise to the ECF System. THE COMPROMISE WAS SWITCHING FILES. Choosing the ex parte option does cancel service to anyone but the court but my ECF did not have the first part of the option that yo need to make this happenthe court has this when they enter see Dkt.#85 (Oh thats right you cant because the court filed it ex parte after it disappeared for three months (but clearly the option cancels notice to other parties) Document: 45

    First MEMORANDUM in Support re 27 Emergency MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis, 43 Ex Parte MOTION for Default Judgment THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!!!!!!! Document as to Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc. Roxanne Webster Renee Mikita and Joshua Zuckerman filed by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit conferences)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 11/29/2010 12:30:06 Filed: 11/29/2010 Entered: 12/13/2010 11:39:08 Filed: 12/13/2010 Category: motion Event: Sanctions Captioned Judicial notice Requested IGNORED DENIED Document: 46 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion BOGUS Document: 47 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) G. Tully Type: aty

    Opposition re 46 First MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Tully, Guy)

    Entered: 12/27/2010 12:25:25 Filed: 12/27/2010

    Category: motion Clerk staff ignored emails prior to this L. motion that questioned as to why a scheduling conference McGarry had not been scheduled DENIED MOST OF MOTION A Type: pty BOGUS SCHEDULING CONFERENCE THE MAGISTATE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO CONVENE WAS THEN SCHEDULED WITH DKT. #62 Event: Expedite Document: 48

    MOTION to Expedite notice of scheduling conference--scheduling order is due January 11, 2011 and the notice of this conference was not sent by the court--Plaintiff requesting that conference be by phone with Judge O'Toole and orders from the Judge regarding 16.1(a) (b) (c) &(d) PRIOR to the conference by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 email from defense counsel regarding rule 16.1)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 12/31/2010 11:42:57 Filed: 12/31/2010 Category: respm Event: Response to Motion Document: 49 G. Tully Type: aty

    RESPONSE to Motion re 48 MOTION to Expedite notice of scheduling conference--scheduling order is due January 11, 2011 and the notice of this conference was not sent by the court--Plaintiff requesting that conference be by phone with Judge O'Toole and orders from the J filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 01/03/2011 03:34:26 Filed: 01/03/2011 Category: misc Event: Redacted Document Document: 50 L. McGarry Type: pty

    REDACTION to 15 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), 11 Amended Document, 18 Exhibit, 1 Complaint please restrict document 11 and exhibit 27 of document 15-clarification on exhibits list attachment 1 of document 18 byLaura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EEOC discrimination charge Exhibit 1 to the complaint, # 2 Exhibit Employment application exhibit 27 to the complaint, # 3 Exhibit generic employment application located in document 11)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/19/2011 Category: motion DENIED Event: Injunctive Relief PSSA WHO WAS THE L. McGarry

    17:37:42 Filed: 01/19/2011

    SUBJECT OF RELIEF RULED SEE DKT.# 57 FRAUD Type: pty UPON THE COURT CONTINUES Document: 51

    Emergency MOTION for Injunctive Relief Enjoin PSSA from this Action--Chief Judge Wolf has been notified of this filing by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement quick look summary of action, # 2 Exhibit emails to clerk, # 3 Exhibit letter from PSSA, # 4 Exhibit hold service email, # 5 Exhibit express mail sent email, # 6 Exhibit excerpt from document 29, # 7 Exhibit excerpt from task force article)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/19/2011 17:45:31 Filed: 01/19/2011 Category: motion They SENT A CONFERENCE L. th McGarry EMAIL stating the orders of January 19 Dkt. #53 which were actually January 20th made the motion moot. Type: pty DENIED SEE Dkt. #57 request declared moot based on manipulated filing date of Dkt. # 53 (created and entered 1/20/2011) Event: Disqualify Counsel DENIED Document: 52

    Third MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis--Chief Judge Wolf has been notified of this filing by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit letter, # 2 Exhibit docket, # 3 Exhibit exhibit)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/20/2011 12:01:25 Filed: 01/19/2011 Category: order 4. PSSA Event: Order on Motion to Strike Order on Motion for Type: crt Default Judgment Order on Motion for Sanctions Order on Motion to Disqualify Counsel PSSA wiped out my case with bogus rulings and manipulated the filing date. (PDF created and entered 1/20/2011) ABUSE OF THIS PRO SE DISABLED LITIGANT BEGINS WITH THIS DOCUMENT FROM THE COURT-NO RELIEF WILL EVER COME REGARDING A FULL BLOWN CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!! Document: 53 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 37 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's

    Response to the Answer; granting 39 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's September and October Amendments to her Complaint; denying 43 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 46 First Motion for Sanctions; denying 27 Motion to Disqualify Counsel; denying 28 Plaintiff's Proposed Motion to Strike Answer. (PSSA, 4) PSSA read the motion to enjoin her on January 20th and then wrote this ruling. Nothing was in accord with rule, law, authorities or evidence. Properties of PDF name Morse as the Author. Entered: Category: misc L. 01/21/2011 Event: Letter/request - non-motion They blocked this letter McGarry 16:03:52 from the Judges Type: pty Filed: 01/21/2011 Document: 54 To the Honorable Chief Judge Wolf and the Honorable Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. Letter/request (nonmotion) from Laura J. McGarry FRAUD UPON THE COURT--Related Motions being blocked from judicial review. See motions (Documents 51 & 52). (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/21/2011 17:00:47 Filed: 01/21/2011 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 55 B. Childs Type: aty

    Opposition re 51 Emergency MOTION for Injunctive Relief Enjoin PSSA from this Action--Chief Judge Wolf has been notified of this filing filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-Mail Exchange)(Childs, Brian) I sent notification through general court email that my motion #51 was filed and pled with particularity based on fraud upon the court blocked or Chief Judge complicit Entered: 01/21/2011 17:04:19 Filed: 01/21/2011 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 56 B. Childs Type: aty

    Opposition re 52 Third MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Jackson Lewis--Chief Judge Wolf has been notified of this filing filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-Mail Exchange)(Childs, Brian) I sent notification through general court email that my motion #52 was filed and pled with particularity based on fraud upon the court blocked or Chief Judge complicit Entered: Category: order 4. PSSA

    01/28/2011 16:20:00 Filed: 01/28/2011

    Event: Order on Motion to Expedite Order on Motion for Type: crt Injuctive Relief Order on Motion to Disqualify Counsel Document: 57 PSSA switch computers (she used either the deputy clerk or the docket clerk computer)because she knew I was reading the properties and she tried to better mimic Judge OTooles Style; she references the case to the Magistrate ABSOLUTELY NO US DISTRICT JUDGE INVOLVEMENT AND SHE JUST RULED ON A MOTION THAT REQUESTED SHE BE REMOVED FROM THE CASE BECAUSE OF COLLUSION WITH THE DEFENSE WHICH I DOCUMENTED WITH PARTICULARITY SHOWING ALL THE IMPROPRIETIES THAT HAD OCCURRED IN THIS CASEprohibited me from making referencing to the docket Judge George A. OToole, Jr: Plaintiff's Motion 51 to Enjoin PSSA is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion 52 to disqualify defense counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff is prohibited from making personal comments or attacks upon defense counsel or court staff, intimidating, harassing, or warning defense counsel or court staff in any way as to make a direct or indirect threat, or making reference to docketing information. Plaintiff's Motion 48 for Rule 16(b) conference is granted in part by directing the clerk to refer this matter to Magistrate Judge Sorokin for all pretrial proceedings and the motion is denied in all other respects. The Clerk shall refer this case to Magistrate Judge Sorokin for all pretrial proceedings. (PSSA, 4) The order of reference must come from US District Judgethe pro se staff attorney answered motion of injunctive relief of which she was the subject of relief Entered: 01/30/2011 22:47:53 Filed: 01/30/2011 Category: motion I filed contempt because she wiped out L. my case with #53 and then answered my motion to take her McGarry off the case with dkt. # 57 still demonstrating active Type: pty collusion with the defense and ghost writing by the defense counsel is evident in these documents. Event: Contempt Shows a in forma pauperis disabled pro se litigant literally begging for her constitutional rights in a fed court and they forced the reference without consent to the Magistrate who then joined the conspiracy to violate my

    rights. The motion #58 stated the pro se wrote the bogus memorandum & order and undersigned Judge OTooles namethere would be no need to refer it to a magistrate he would have known if the document was under his approval. Court policy states only deputy clerks, if appropriate, can enter electronic orders if appropriate.The docet clerk on January 30th slides this motion in with an electronic order that references the case to the Magistrate. This motion for contempt received absolutely no due process and was blocked from a US District Judge. Document: 58 Emergency MOTION for Contempt against Barbara Morse PSSA and Defense counsel Guy Tully & Brian Childs--collusion with PSSA---oppression and intimidation of Plaintiff-deliberate deprivation of constitutional rights and blocking disabled in forma pauperis pro se litigant's access to the court--this case has had no legitimate court procedure beyond complaint filing and service of process for six months--all terminated filings by the Plaintiff need notice of terminated removed and Documents 20, 53, & 57 are illegitimate and need removed from the docket--requesting immediate relief and case management by Article III Judge--O'Toole by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit case summary, # 2 Exhibit B. Morse Documents, # 3 Exhibit doc.57_memorandum and order by Morse, # 4 Exhibit doc.53_memorandum and order by Morse, # 5 Exhibit doc.20_Memorandum and order by Morse, # 6 Exhibit used for general reference of PSSA position, # 7 Exhibit emails to clerks and general court email, # 8 Exhibit note via general email to Chief that doc.51 & 52 were being filed and blocking of action from judge, # 9 Exhibit Letter entered in the ECF to Chief and Judge O'Toole hoping for relief of deprivation of constitutional rights)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/31/2011 00:48:24 Filed: 01/31/2011 Category: misc L. Event: Letter/request - non-motion No response--McGarry subsequent emails to the clerk of the court reporting the Type: pty improprieties that had occurred in this case where I made a polite request that she set my case on a legitimate route were responded to by Sarah Allison Thornton directing the US Marshal to send me a certified letter VIA THE US MAIL informing me that if I emailed any clerk of the court again I would be charged with criminal federal and state

    harassment violations. Document: 59 Sarah Allison Thornton, Clerk of Court Letter/request (non-motion) from Laura J. McGarry regarding B. Morse. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B. Morse Documents)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 01/31/2011 10:43:19 Filed: 01/28/2011 Category: order Event: Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge The docket clerk slid my contempt motion which was filed on the 30th into this electronic order blocking it from the US District Judge and due process. C. Danieli Type: crt

    Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin Referred for: all Pretrial Proceedings. Motions referred: 58 Emergency MOTION for Contempt against Barbara Morse PSSA and Defense counsel Guy Tully & Brian Childs--collusion with PSSA---oppression and intimidation of Plaintiff-deliberate deprivation of constitutional rights and blocking disabled in forma paupe. (Danieli, Chris) Motions referred to Leo T. Sorokin. Entered: 01/31/2011 10:54:52 Filed: 01/31/2011 Category: notice Event: Notice Other I sent notice that a staff person for the Clerk of the Court had been notified by Skype of the letter in the ECF system. The staff person after reading my letter in the ECF System abruptly ended my call and transferred me back to the docket clerk. Document: 60 L. McGarry Type: pty

    NOTICE by Laura J. McGarry re 59 Letter/request (non-motion), 58 Emergency MOTION for Contempt against Barbara Morse PSSA and Defense counsel Guy Tully & Brian Childs--collusion with PSSA--oppression and intimidation of Plaintiff-deliberate deprivation of constitutional rights and blocking disabled in forma paupe clerk office notified of letter to clerk of the court in ECF-- (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 02/01/2011 13:05:06 Filed: 02/01/2011 Category: order M. Event: Order on Motion for Contempt The pro se staff Simeone attorney then ruled on the contempt motion of which she Type: crt was subject and signed the magistrates nameshe restricted my filing with the court in the order. A magistrate has no authority o write orders if he does not have a signed

    consent by all parties to his jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 636 Not only was this document beyond any legislative authority it had no notice of my right to appeal his decision which is mandatory. The Magistrate had no authority to convene a scheduling conference. This document excused defense from filing an opposition to the motion. The Magistate at the bogus scheduling conference told me I had to follow judge OTooles orders and not file with the court. When I confronted him with Oh, I thought you said you wrote the orders he stated thanks for reminding me. I asked directly if I could file to appeal his orders and request reconsideration on Dkt. #53 & #57. He stated NO. My son was a witness. My son was in the court room. I was in Washington and attended the bogus conference by phone. Document: 61 Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; The undersigned will hold a Rule 16(b) conference by telephone on February 14, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. The clerk shall make the necessary arrangements for this conference. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED Plaintiffs Motion (Docket Entry #58) for Contempt is Denied; Plaintiff is prohibited from filing any further pleadings or documents in this action until directed to do so by a judicial officer.SO ORDERED.re 58 Motion for Contempt (Simeone, Maria) Entered: 02/01/2011 13:11:20 Filed: 02/01/2011 Category: notice Event: Notice of Scheduling Conference Document: 62 M. Simeone Type: crt

    NOTICE of Scheduling Conference; The Scheduling Conference has been set for 2/14/2011 04:00 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. The Plaintiff is to contact the clerk with a phone number where the plaintiff can be reached; The court will contact the plaintiff at the time scheduled for the hearing.(Simeone, Maria) Entered: 02/07/2011 16:47:13 Category: misc Event: Recommendations for Scheduling Order Document: 63 G. Tully Type: aty

    Filed: 02/07/2011 Recommendations for Scheduling Order Defendants' Proposed Statement Pursuant To Local Rule 16.1(D). (Tully, Guy) Entered: 02/07/2011 17:52:53 Filed: 02/07/2011 Category: notice I informed of my intent to file L. Mandamus and also had Judge OToole served the language McGarry of the mandamushis assistant accepted it from the process Type: pty serverI received no response. I allege corrupt court staff blocked this document from Judge OToole. Event: Notice - Other Document: 64

    NOTICE by Laura J. McGarry Plaintiff's Intent to file writ of Mandamus with the U S Court of Appeals of the First Circuit regarding deprivation of Constitutional Rights (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit writ of mandamus, # 2 Exhibit plaintiff's recent filings asserting need for Article lll Judge, # 3 Exhibit unwaranted intimidation threatening sanctions, # 4 Exhibit email via court general email and mailed to Chief Judge, # 5 Exhibit sudden reference to magistrate, # 6 Exhibit with email and US mail to Chief Judge)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 02/07/2011 21:43:32 Filed: 02/07/2011 Category: misc Event: Recommendations for Scheduling Order Document: 65 G. Tully Type: aty

    Recommendations for Scheduling Order Defendants' Amended Proposed Statement Pursuant To Local Rule 16.1(D). (Tully, Guy) Entered: 02/14/2011 08:47:00 Filed: 02/14/2011 Entered: 02/15/2011 12:32:33 Filed: 02/14/2011 Category: discov Event: Certification pursuant to Rule 16.1 Document: 66 B. Childs Type: aty

    CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Childs, Brian) Category: minutes M. Event: Scheduling Conference ~Util - Set Scheduling Order Simeone Deadlines Type: crt There are no legitimate orders from the courtall are

    through usurpation and transparently invalid and in violation of constitutional rights and due process. The Magistrate with my son sitting in the court denied my right to file so I could appeal his orders and the bogus orders by the pro se staff attorney to the US District Judge-he then continued to block all my attempts at getting through to a U District Judge. ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: Scheduling Conference held on 2/14/2011; The Plaintiff appears by phone; Atty Tully; Court goes over the status of the case with the parties; Court addresses the importance of court procedures and compliance with court orders; Court goes over the discovery issues and schedule in the case; The court makes the following Orders; (1)The plaintiff is to comply with all orders of the court (2)The plaintiff will be allowed to file only one document, with a list naming all persons plaintiff wishes to depose, Where they live and or work; Plaintiff is allowed up to but no more than 4 sentences as to why their testimony/deposition is needed; Court orders this filed by 3/1/11; defense counsel will file their list on 3/4/11; (Court Reporter: Digital Recording.)(Attorneys present: Plaintiff McGarry; Atty Tully) (Simeone, Maria) Modified on 2/17/2011 (Simeone, Maria). Entered: 02/15/2011 15:09:46 Filed: 02/15/2011 Category: order l. LTS Event: Order Type: crt Document: 67 same document docketed twice and sent to me in the US Mail restricted my filing with no jurisdiction or legislative authority to continue conspiracy to violate my constitutional rights of due process and bringing my grievance before the court

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. It is ORDERED that: (1) The Plaintiff shall not make any filings with this Court without the prior approval of a District or Magistrate Judge; (2) By March 1, 2011, the Plaintiff shall file with the Court one document listing: (a) the name and, if known, the employer of each person she wishes to depose, along with up to four sentences per person explaining the reason she wishes to take the deposition; (b) the documents or categories of documents she seeks, if any, from the Defendants; and (c) the interrogatory questions, if any, she wishes to ask of the Defendants; and (3) By March 4, 2011, the Defendants shall file with the Court the equivalent document See attached Order. (Chernetsky, James). Entered: 02/15/2011 Category: order MAILED TO ME Event: Order M. Simeone

    15:46:38 Filed: 02/15/2011

    Document: 68 same document docketed twice and sent to Type: crt me in the US Mail restricted my filing with no jurisdiction or legislative authority to continue conspiracy to violate my constitutional rights of due process and bringing my grievance before the court

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The Plaintiff shall not make any filings with this Court without the prior approval of a District or Magistrate Judge; By March 1, 2011, the Plaintiff shall file with the Court one document listing: (a) the name and, if known, the employer of each person she wishes to depose, along with up to four sentences per person explaining the reason she wishes to take the deposition; (b) the documents or categories of documents she seeks, if any, from the Defendants; and (c) the interrogatory questions, if any, she wishes to ask of the Defendants. By March 4, 2011, the Defendants shall file with the Court the equivalent document.(Simeone, Maria) Entered: 02/23/2011 17:32:15 Filed: 02/23/2011 Category: motion A magistrate had no authority to rule on this motion and he terminated it from the docket after denying THE MOTION with docket text and blocked my request for reassignment from the US District Judge. Event: Disqualify Judge Document: 69 First MOTION to Disqualify Judge O'Toole and Sorokin sua sponte ---Plaintiff request that reassignment be by Judge Sorokin and his clerk by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit service of process receipt)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 02/23/2011 17:38:42 Filed: 02/23/2011 L. Category: motion Requested decision UPON REASSIGNMENT OF A NEW US DISTRICT JUDGE in captionA McGarry Type: pty magistrate had no authority to rule on this motion and he terminated it from the docket after denying with docket text. Event: Vacate Document: 70 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First MOTION to Vacate 69 First MOTION to Disqualify Judge O'Toole and Sorokin sua sponte ---Plaintiff

    request that reassignment be by Judge Sorokin and his clerk vacate void orders--Plaintiff request that this motion be addressed after reassignment to a new Article lll Judge by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit pdf recognition)(McGarry, Laura) Modified to remove the link to docket 69; linked in error by pltf; on 3/2/2011 (Simeone, Maria). Entered: 03/02/2011 16:14:28 Filed: 03/02/2011 Category: order Event: Order on Motion to Disqualify Judge terminated from docket with no legislative authority to make a judgment and blocked from US District Judge THIS MAGISTRATE HAS NO AUTHORITY BEYOND A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE US DISTRICT JUDGE M. Simeone Type: crt

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 69 Motion to Disqualify Judge; The Motion to Disqualify is DENIED. (Simeone, Maria) Entered: 03/03/2011 14:33:15 Filed: 03/03/2011 Category: order Event: Order on Motion to Vacate terminated from docket with no legislative authority to make a judgment and blocked from US District Judge THIS MAGISTRATE HAS NO AUTHORITY BEYOND A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE US DISTRICT JUDGE M. Simeone Type: crt

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 70 Motion to Vacate; This Motion is DENIED. The Court cautions Plaintiff that she has been ordered not to file any documents with the Court without prior permission of the Court. (Simeone, Maria) Entered: 03/03/2011 17:22:57 Filed: 03/03/2011 Category: order Event: Order M. Simeone Type: crt

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiff has asked by telephone of the Clerk's Office whether she may obtain more time to file her discovery proposal. If Plaintiff wishes to request more time she must do so in a written motion to the Court. Plaintiff has permission to file ONE such motion not to exceed five pages in length. (Simeone, Maria)

    Entered: 03/04/2011 14:49:49 Filed: 03/04/2011

    Category: motion Event: Contempt Defense files for contempt because I had made filings that asserted my constitutional rights asserted transparently invalid orders restricting my filing with the court, prohibiting me from referencing the docket and pointed out the only legal argument in any filing from this court had to do with sanctions and complaint dismissal as they ignored supreme court law and other authorities, and FRCP as well as local rules and administrative procedures of the court. Document: 71

    G. Tully Type: aty

    MOTION for Contempt by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman.(Tully, Guy) Entered: 03/04/2011 14:50:53 Filed: 03/04/2011 Category: respm Event: Memorandum in Support of Motion Document: 72 G. Tully Type: aty

    MEMORANDUM in Support re 71 MOTION for Contempt filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 03/04/2011 14:53:53 Filed: 03/04/2011 Category: respm Event: Affidavit in Support of Motion Document: 73 G. Tully Type: aty

    AFFIDAVIT of Brian M. Childs in Support re 71 MOTION for Contempt filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Tully, Guy) Entered: 03/04/2011 17:55:12 Filed: 03/04/2011 Category: motion L. Event: Stay This was DENIED even though I explained McGarry both over the Skype and in email that I was exhausted Type: pty because my son was extremely ill and hospitalized and that all my time had BEEN used up conferencing with medical professionals. I also requested that it be stayed pending

    judgement on 69 and 70 by the US District Judge.. Document: 74 First MOTION to Stay scheduling conference assignment by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 03/07/2011 16:28:35 Filed: 03/07/2011 Category: order Event: Order on Motion to Stay Document: 75 M. Simeone Type: crt

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY; The Motion to Stay (Docket # 74) is DENIED. There is no basis to stay litigation of this matter. The Plaintiff was ordered by the Court to file her discovery information by March 1, 2011. She has failed to do so. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall file the discovery information by no later than the close of business on Friday, March 11, 2011. A further failure to comply with this Order, or with any of the Courts other Orders (including its Order prohibiting the Plaintiff from making any filing without prior permission of a district or magistrate judge and its Order prohibiting the Plaintiff from making personal comments or attacks upon the staff of the Clerks office) will lead to the imposition of sanctions, including fines and/or dismissal of the Plaintiffs case. re 74 Motion to Stay (Simeone, Maria) Entered: 03/10/2011 11:45:38 Filed: 03/10/2011 Category: utility Event: Set Deadlines/Hearings C. Danieli Type: crt

    Set Deadlines: The Plaintiff shall file the discovery information by no later than the close of business on Friday, 3/11/2011. (Danieli, Chris) Entered: 03/11/2011 17:36:01 Filed: 03/11/2011 Category: misc Event: Recommendations for Scheduling Order I FILED AS ORDERED Document: 76 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Recommendations for Scheduling Order per court ordered submissions for document request from defendants, depositions and interrogatories. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Manning named as ADON)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 03/16/2011 Category: order Event: Order They then ordered stricken just about all l. LTS Type: crt

    09:21:43 Filed: 03/16/2011

    my request and denied my right to depose anyone. They had no intention of letting me prosecute the retaliation portions of my complaint. Document: 77

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Order on Plaintiff's Requested Discovery. It is ORDERED that all of the requests listed in the Plaintiff's proposed discovery requests (other than those listed in this Order) are STRICKEN. See attached Order. (Chernetsky, James) Entered: 03/18/2011 17:52:18 Filed: 03/18/2011 Entered: 03/21/2011 14:13:34 Filed: 03/21/2011 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Loaded with law and ignored Document: 78 Category: respoth Event: Response - not related to a motion You have to see this to believe it as they continue to charge their clients Document: 79 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First Opposition re 71 MOTION for Contempt filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) G. Tully Type: aty

    Response by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman to 77 Order, - Defendants' Initial Discovery Requests To Plaintiff. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed First Set Of Interrogatories To Plaintiff, # 2 Exhibit Proposed First Set Of Requests For Production Of Documents To Plaintiff)(Tully, Guy) Entered: 03/23/2011 15:46:43 Filed: 03/23/2011 Category: motion M. Event: Report and Recommendations Bogus document that Simeone replays previous memorandumstates no facts and I had Type: crt requested that the R & R not be done by Judge Sorokin because he was freely violating all my rights. Documented on Simones computer. Document: 80

    Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; I RECOMMEND that, prior to ruling on the pending motion for contempt, the district judge assigned to this case render his own ruling on that portion of the Plaintiffs Motion to Disqualify (Docket # 69) directed at him. In addition, for the foregoing reasons, I RECOMMEND that the district judge assigned to this case ALLOW the

    Motion for Contempt (Docket # 71) and DISMISS this action. Discovery and proceedings in this matter are STAYED pending the ruling by the district judge on this Report and Recommendation; re 71 MOTION for Contempt filed by Joshua Zuckerman, Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Roxanne Webster, Renee Mikita;(Simeone, Maria) Entered: 04/05/2011 17:49:22 Filed: 04/05/2011 Category: respoth Article III Judicial Notice Requested in caption of document; ignored!!! Event: Objection to Report and Recommendations Document: 81 L. McGarry Type: pty

    OBJECTION to 80 Report and Recommendations contempt--Judicial Notice Requested filed by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Rules, # 2 Exhibit email to Magistrate's clerk)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 04/12/2011 12:02:49 Filed: 04/12/2011 Category: respoth G. Tully Event: Reply to Objection to Report and Recommendations Type: aty BOGUS Document: 82

    REPLY TO OBJECTION to 80 Report and Recommendations filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 06/10/2011 13:52:43 Filed: 06/10/2011 Category: notice C. Danieli Event: Notice Other Clerk of Court, Judge OToole and Type: crt Chief Judge Wolf were served this document by certified mail; I allege the Clerk of the Court made sure they did not receive this document. All mail is intercepted by clerk staff; even certified. Document: 83

    NOTICE of Petition for an Emergent Extraordinary Writ to the United States District Court of MassachusettsBoston by Laura J. McGarry (Attachments: # 1 exhibit)(Danieli, Chris) Entered: 06/21/2011 12:41:05 Filed: 06/21/2011 Category: utility Event: Remark DENIED WITHOUT AN OPINION25 pages loaded with fact rule law and supporting documentsI allege it never saw a three judge panel and one of the named panel members was Chief Judge Lynch J. Ramos Type: crt

    who signed the bogus Judicial misconduct order on May 18thshe would have recused herself. I also allege that the bogus judicial misconduct order is a forgery. The writ had the bogus document #61 attached that showed no US District Judge oversight. The opinions docket was missing #9,20, 53 &57. The Defense made an appearance on the 15th and then the Docket was modified to show Judge OToole as the presiding Judge; it had shown only the Magistrateusurpation continued over at appeals and they stole my $450.00. UPDATE Brian M. Childs made an appearance on June 28theight days after the decision DENIED already occurred. I down loaded the docket. On September 22nd I noted Childs appearance and June 13th docket text was slid in saying a Judical panel had been chosen and assigned. PACER ACCESS TO THE WRIT WAS MANIPULATED SO THAT THE ONLY WAY YOU COULD BRING UP THE CASE WAS IF YOU HAD THE CASE NUMBER. (this is now fixed) THESE PEOPLE ARE ALLEGED CRIMINALS THEY STOLE A DISABLED PERSONS $450.00 AND BLOCKED HER FILING FROM A JUDGE. Document: 84 The Petition for an Emergent Extraordinary Writ to the United States District Court [for the District of] Massachusetts is DENIED. Petition filed in the USCA 6/20,2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) Entered: 06/28/2011 12:08:23 Filed: 06/28/2011 Category: order C. Danieli Event: Order on Report and Recommendations Type: crt Document: 86 SCANNED TO MASK THAT IT WAS NOT FROM JUDGE OTOOLE-states considered the factual record established by the docket- this is blatant perjury. Note Dkt. #85 is missing from the docket because I attempted to have another motion for contempt served directly to Chief Judge Wolf. The clerk

    staff held onto the motion and three months later it showed up on the docket (the day after my writ was denied)the document had written on this motion is hereby referred to Judge OToole and initialed by Chief Judge Wolf. I stated on the document that I would file it in the ECF terminating its ex parte status as soon as I had verification that it made it to the Chief Judge. The Docket clerk filed it ex parte so it disappears off the docket. It never received any due process and the defendants did not have to file an opposition because of the way it was filed. (SEE Below this docket for the docket entry of #85) I allege that after I called Chief Judge Wolfs Deputy Clerk to find out if he had received his certified mail that contained the extraordinary writ where I was told he knew nothing about it that through misunderstanding they thought they should present the motion they had been holding and simply presented in a fashion to the Chief Judge that would indicate it was mistakenly directed to him and belonged on Judge OTooles Docket. Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 85 Motion for Contempt filed by Laura J. McGarry, 71 Motion for Contempt filed by Joshua Zuckerman, Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Roxanne Webster, Renee Mikita, 80 Report and Recommendations,, Action on motions: The Plaintiff's recently filed motion for contempt, addressed to Chief Judge Wolf but by him referred to me (dkt. no. 85) is DENIED. The Defendants' Motion for Contempt (dkt. no.71) is GRANTED, and the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is SO ORDERED.(Danieli, Chris) There was no report and recommendation for document # 85ordered or otherwise THIS WAS A SCANNED DOCUMENT FORGED WITH JUDGE OTOOLES NAME AND PERJURY. See affidavit exhibit 1 of Dkt. 100 Entered: 06/28/2011 12:37:05 Filed: 06/28/2011 Category: order C. Danieli Event: Order Dismissing Case The docket clerk signs where Type: crt deputy clerk should be signingdeputy clerks are sworn to file only valid documents

    Document: 87 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Danieli, Chris) Entered: 06/28/2011 12:38:43 Filed: 06/28/2011 Entered: 07/08/2011 15:50:59 Filed: 07/08/2011 Category: utility Event: Terminate Civil Case C. Danieli Type: crt

    Civil Case Terminated. (Danieli, Chris) Category: motion Event: Reconsideration Document: 88 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First MOTION for Reconsideration re 86 Order on Report and Recommendations,, to dismiss this action with prejudice RULING REQUESTED ASAP AND WITHOUT OPPOSITIONTHERE ARE NO ATTORNEYS LEGALLY ON THE RECORD by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Exhibit list, # 2 Exhibit All Recent Opinions, # 3 Exhibit attorney email response to attorney of record request, # 4 Exhibit CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE # 110-cv-11343-GAO Docket 7_1_2011 By Docket number, # 5 Exhibit CIVIL DOCKET text orders with no docket number, # 6 Exhibit deadlines docket 7_4_11 Doc 1 and 85 missing never was any document marked as satisfied other than answer, # 7 Exhibit deadlines docket answer satisfied, # 8 Exhibit deadlines docket now missing doc. 1 and answer satisfied 7_4_2011, # 9 Exhibit Doc_ 85 Plaintiffs motion for contempt appears no where on closed docket, # 10 Exhibit docket activity report 06_30_2011 time 18_51_05 has Doc 85, # 11 Exhibit docket activity report 06_30_2011 time 22_38_10 Doc 85 gone again, # 12 Exhibit docket activity report 6_27 missing Dkt. # 85, # 13 Exhibit Docket Activity Report 6_29_2011 Missing Doc_85, # 14 Exhibit 14.Docket Activity Report 7_8_2011, # 15 Exhibit email communications with US Marshal Dumas, # 16 Exhibit Email The document has been removed, # 17 Exhibit emails to Sarah Allison Thornton Clerk of the Court US District MA, # 18 Exhibit extraordinary writ mandamus from pacer, # 19 Exhibit fraud shown to court with ecf filing switching back in December 2010, # 20 Exhibit initiating information for WRIT, # 21 Exhibit judicial misconduct decision, # 22 Exhibit Mikita summons without stamp, # 23 Exhibit recent opinions 5_23_11 to 7_6_11 case dismissal not listed, # 24 Exhibit recent orders 2011-0628 time 12_37_05 missing document 87 docket clerk signed in place of deputy clerk, # 25 Exhibit summons mikita, # 26 Exhibit reissued summons stamped & docket clerk signed geriatric facilities, # 27 Exhibit summons Webster, # 28 Exhibit summons Zuckerman, # 29 Exhibit USPS - Track & Confirm CHILDS, # 30

    Exhibit USPS - Track & Confirm TULLY, # 31 Exhibit Written Opinions Report filed report period 8_2_2010 to 7_5_2011 Missing doc 9,20, 53, 57)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/08/2011 15:56:30 Filed: 07/08/2011 Category: misc Event: Request for Judicial Notice IGNORED Document: 89 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Request for Judicial Notice regarding this Plaintiff's Motion Dkt. # 88 that request reconsideration on the order of Dkt. #86 that dismisses this action with prejudice by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/08/2011 16:04:23 Filed: 07/08/2011 Category: motion Event: Order Document: 90 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First MOTION for Order to Judge Order on the Clerk of the Court to file a Statement on the Record to explain the legal foundation for disappearance of the Motion for Contempt Dkt. #85. that was referred to Judge O'Toole by Chief Judge Wolf and filed June 21, 2011 after served by process server on March 24th 2011 by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit this is the attachment filed with #85)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/08/2011 16:53:41 Filed: 07/08/2011 Category: respm Event: Addendum to Motion/Memorandum Document: 91 L. McGarry Type: pty

    First ADDENDUM re 90 First MOTION for Order to Judge Order on the Clerk of the Court to file a Statement on the Record to explain the legal foundation for disappearance of the Motion for Contempt Dkt. #85. that was referred to Judge O'Toole by Chief Judge Wolf NEF to Document 85 added filed by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/09/2011 12:16:50 Filed: 07/09/2011 Category: respm Event: Addendum to Motion/Memorandum Document: 92 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Second ADDENDUM re 90 First MOTION for Order to Judge Order on the Clerk of the Court to file a Statement on the Record to explain the legal foundation for disappearance of the Motion for Contempt Dkt.

    #85. that was referred to Judge O'Toole by Chief Judge Wolf Document 85 exparte motion for contempt noted as received by Chief Judge Wolf and referred to Judge O'Toole ruled on as (DENIED) now filed per RULE 7.1(c) Dkt./Document 88s language in the last paragraph page 8 through beginning of page 9 now validated by most recent dockets-see exhibits to this addendum showing the disappearance, reappearance and, again, disappearance of document 85. filed by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Document 85 missing 07_09_2011 time 08_19_52 Docket Activity Report, # 2 Exhibit Document 85 present 07_08_2011 time 17_00_52 Docket Activity Report, # 3 Exhibit Document 85 missing 07_08_2011 time 05_40_23 Docket Activity Report)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/11/2011 11:08:13 Filed: 07/11/2011 Category: motion Event: Default Judgment Document: 93 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Emergency MOTION for Default Judgment second motion NO OPPOSITION WARRANTED NO ATTORNEY HAS FILED A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR THIS ACTION requesting RULING to this motion WITHIN 72 HOURS as to Mikita, Webster, Zuckerman & Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit usmail certified letter received)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/11/2011 11:11:35 Filed: 07/11/2011 Category: misc Event: Request for Judicial Notice IGNORED Document: 94 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Request for Judicial Notice NO ATTORNEY HAS FILED A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR THIS ACTION requesting RULING WITHIN 72 HOURS by Laura J. McGarry. (McGarry, Laura) Entered: 07/21/2011 09:21:09 Filed: 07/21/2011 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 95 G. Tully Type: aty

    Opposition re 88 First MOTION for Reconsideration re 86 Order on Report and Recommendations,, to dismiss this action with prejudice RULING REQUESTED ASAP AND WITHOUT OPPOSITIONTHERE ARE NO ATTORNEYS LEGALLY ON THE RECORD filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Modified on 7/21/2011 to delete duplicate docket text from the entry (Danieli, Chris). (Main Document 95 replaced on 7/21/2011) (Danieli, Chris).

    Entered: 07/21/2011 10:47:51 Filed: 07/21/2011

    Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 96

    G. Tully Type: aty

    Opposition re 90 First MOTION for Order to Judge Order on the Clerk of the Court to file a Statement on the Record to explain the legal foundation for disappearance of the Motion for Contempt Dkt. #85. that was referred to Judge O'Toole by Chief Judge Wolf, 93 Emergency MOTION for Default Judgment second motion NO OPPOSITION WARRANTED NO ATTORNEY HAS FILED A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR THIS ACTION requesting RULING to this motion WITHIN 72 HOURS as to Mikita, Webster, Zuckerman & Geriatric Facilities of C Consolidated Opposition filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 08/02/2011 09:59:56 Filed: 08/02/2011 Entered: 08/16/2011 12:02:47 Filed: 08/16/2011 Category: utility Event: Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge M. Simeone Type: crt

    Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria) Category: motion Event: Default Judgment Document: 97 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Third MOTION for Default Judgment Under Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and on the basis of FRAUD UPON THE COURT--this case has had no legitimate action for over one year prompt decision requested as to Roxanne Webster, Renee Mikita, Joshua Zuckerman and Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc. by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in support of default judgment, # 2 Exhibit case with notice of appearance by filed by childs, # 3 Exhibit Childs request for on the record attorney validation, # 4 Exhibit deficient summons geriatric facilities initially sent by the court, # 5 Exhibit legitimate LR 16.1(D)(#) certification compare Dkt. # 66 childs, # 6 Exhibit legitimate LR 16.1(D)(#) certification compare Dkt. # 66 Tully, # 7 Exhibit Mikita request for on the record attorney validation, # 8 Exhibit notice of appearance childs in another case, # 9 Exhibit notice of appearance childs, # 10 Exhibit Tully notice of appearance in legitimate action, # 11 Exhibit Tully request for on the record attorney validation, # 12 Exhibit Websters certified mail, # 13 Exhibit Webster request for on the record attorney validation, # 14 Exhibit Zuckerman request for on the

    record attorney validation (includes corporation), # 15 Exhibit Jackson Lewis signature block from legitimate action v. this pretense litigation, # 16 Affidavit defendants not infant, incompetent, military declaration)(McGarry, Laura) Entered: 08/16/2011 12:10:40 Filed: 08/16/2011 Category: motion L. Event: Order All my emergency motions requesting prompt McGarry decision stating I had a very sick son who was in the Type: pty hospital that I needed to take home with me were ignored. I explained I needed to take him back to Washington with me. I arrived in Massachusetts on May 7th at my fathers beckon call to get him out of a nursing home he was in as soon as possible. Confused and disoriented this nursing home had him surrender his life insurance policies under the ruse that as soon as he applied for MEDICAID they would move him to an assisted living facility so his friends could visit. They refused to activate his POA so he would have appropriate legal representation during this decision. They ignored Massachusetts law and did not send me the information regarding qualification rules for MEDICAID. It turns out he would have never qualified. They also, while he was confused and disoriented, decided to take away all his routine medications without activating his healthcare proxy and no one to advocate for him was present for this so called comfort care talk; they stopped treatment of an infection they caused. He died 42 days after he surrendered his policies. He died on May 12th. I put his ashes in the wall at the Veterans cemetery on May 17th. On May 18th I received the bogus judicial misconduct first order. On May 19th I received a bill for $1,200.00 from the nursing home. During the last three days of my Dads life he finally had his POA activated; this gentleman informs me that he has been informed that the bill is now approx. $27,000.00; the total of the surrenders and the value of my Dads car. The Massachusetts DOI refused to have the life

    insurance company vacate the surrender ignoring Massachusetts law regarding competency to sign legal papers, the fact that he would never qualify because of his five year financial history and the fact that only the owner of a policy can change the terms of the policy and significant evidence that the surrender had many fraudulent aspects to its initiation; this tax paid servant states I was the POA and signed papers surrendering the policy which is a blatant false statement. I am still waiting for an appropriate investigation by DPH (it is now October 7th). One of the defendants is on the Massachusetts Board of Nursing Home Administrators. THIS STATE STINKS OF WIDE SPREAD CORRUPTION. The court is trying to cover its corrupt footprints. A US Attorney who had his misconduct case sitting for nine months finally had a decision signed by three Judges and scanned on the computer that scanned my decision. This favorable decision is the only decision that has ever appeared on Judge OTooles Docket. I have reached for help beyond the corrupt Sate of Massachusetts. This visually beautiful State seems to be a little hopeless part of hell. God Bless and watch over the citizens of Massachusetts; they are under tyranny!! Document: 98 Emergency MOTION for Order to Direct Unauthorized Attorneys Guy Tully and Brian Childs be removed as registered participants in this action and prohibited from any further filing related to this action. per LR RULE 83.5.2 APPEARANCES and fraud upon the court by Laura J. McGarry.(McGarry, Laura) They are allowed to continue with multiple frauds upon the court in collusion with court staff Entered: 08/29/2011 14:23:09 Filed: 08/29/2011 Category: respm Event: Opposition to Motion Document: 99 G. Tully Type: aty

    Opposition re 98 Emergency MOTION for Order to Direct Unauthorized Attorneys Guy Tully and Brian Childs

    be removed as registered participants in this action and prohibited from any further filing related to this action. per LR RULE 83.5.2 APPEARANCES and fraud upon, 97 Third MOTION for Default Judgment Under Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and on the basis of FRAUD UPON THE COURT--this case has had no legitimate action for over one year prompt decision requested as to Roxanne Webster, Renee Miki filed by Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc., Renee Mikita, Roxanne Webster, Joshua Zuckerman. (Tully, Guy) Entered: 09/08/2011 10:08:27 Filed: 09/08/2011 Category: motion Event: Vacate Document: 100 L. McGarry Type: pty

    Emergency MOTION to Vacate 86 Order on Report and Recommendations,, 87 Order Dismissing Case VACATE THE VOID ORDER & JUDGMENT THAT DISMISSED THIS CASE WITHOUT DUE PROCESS-no opposition to this motion is allowed from unauthorized defense attorneys and vacating void orders by law is mandatory--please adjust the docket date to reflect the same-- requesting an immediate notice (by 1:00 PM today) hand signed by US District Judge that this action is now under his or her oversight by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in support of VACATE THE VOID ORDER & JUDGMENT)(McGarry, Laura) ECF Notice Document Number: 85

    Docket Text: MOTION for Contempt by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit)(Danieli, Chris) Docket Language below

    Entered: 06/21/2011 Category: motion C. Danieli Type: crt 16:13:41 Filed: Event: Contempt 06/21/2011 Document: 85 (Ex Parte) MOTION for Contempt by Laura J. McGarry. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Danieli, Chris) Entered: Category: order C. Danieli

    Docket 101 Plaintiff McGarry is enjoined from filing any further pleadings in this action and from filing any additional or new claims, cases, complaints, or other documents in this Court, except to effect an appeal by regular mail, without first obtaining leave of Court. The Court finds that Plaintiff is not entitled to relief. Although Plaintiff clearly questions whether the undersigned actually issued the order of dismissal, she has not demonstrated any fraud and the Order dismissing this case is not void. As noted by Defendants in their opposition, Plaintiffs request for reconsideration is nothing more than yet another rehashing of her various attacks on the integrity of the Court, Court personnel, and defense counsel. It then states to see Document 95 which is an opposition by the corrupt attorneys. The Court finds that Plaintiff's motions seeking the entry of default and removal of defense counsel to be in knowing violation of earlier orders warning Plaintiff that baseless attacks on court staff and defense counsel is abusive and vexatious. I certify that any appeal would not taken in good faith. See full memorandum and order at the end of th Dishonest Services Document below which was entered and filed by Paul Lyness, Deputy Clerk to Judge OToole--THIS CASE HAS NEVER SEEN A US DISTRICT JUDGE. PDF properties follow and check out that signature!!! I really hope these fools enjoy some serious prison time because I wont stop until they get there and void judgments can be raised ANY TIME. Created: 9/13/2011 12:36:32PM Author: PDF Producer: Acrobat Distiller 8.2.6 (Windows) PDF Version: 1.4 (Acrobat 5.x)

    SEE http://www.scribd.com/doc/64299428/Cover-Up-of-Corruption-and-Violation-of-Constitutional-Rights-in-the-US-District-Courtof-Massachusetts-With-Published-Opinion-Drafted-by-and-Submitte SEE Dishonest Service fraud w/obstruction of justice-US District Court of MA-law & Constitution mean nothing!! Names Named http://t.co/WEefP8i

    See mob activity by corrupt staff US District Court MA & corrupt Jackson Lewis attorneys carries 2 USCA1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/57692690

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen