Sie sind auf Seite 1von 25

Cell Phones And Wireless Dangers - The

Fundamentals
By Arthur Firstenberg
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/wirelessandcellphonedangers05oct07.shtml
October 5, 2007

Cell Phones And Wireless Dangers - The Fundamentals (Oct 7, 2007)

Original title:
The Largest Biological Experiment Ever
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/04/20/mobile_and_wireless_largest_biological_ex
periment.htm

Introductory Remarks by Sepp Hasslberger

It is getting quite difficult to imagine a world without mobile communications. Wireless internet
access is set to blanket the planet, just like cell phone networks already do. There has been an
explosive development - practically all during the last three decades - that brought mobile to the
farthest corners of the earth. But the technology is not without danger. The microwaves that
carry bits and packets of data also carry a germ of destruction. Some people - as many as
120,000 Californians - and by implication 1 million Americans - are actually unable to work as
they suffer from the incapacitating influence that this cacophony in the ether has on them.

We might say they are the unlucky ones who have to suffer for progress to continue - but have
you ever heard of canaries in the mines? They were the first ones to die when a potentially
deadly but otherwise undetectable accumulation of "mine gas" threatened the lives of the miners
working underground. What if those 120.000 Californians and the one million Americans and by
extension tens of millions of people world wide are in a very real sense our equivalent of deep-
mine canaries? Are we not ignoring their plight at our own very imminent peril?

Arthur Firstenberg, himself a sufferer of what the Russians call "microwave sickness" has put
together the salient facts about the largest biological experiment ever, in a very readable article
published in the Eldorado Sun.

We cannot call ourselves informed in the wireless debate unless we start looking at its dark side
as well as all the positive aspects. Firstenberg's article is as good as any to get us going in this
direction ...

Original title:
The Largest Biological Experiment Ever
By Arthur Firstenberg
(original in Eldorado Sun- http://www.eldoradosun.com/Archives/01-06_issue/Firstenberg.htm)

In 2002, Gro Harlem Brundtland, then head of the World Health Organization, told a
Norwegian journalist that cell phones were banned from her office in Geneva because she
personally becomes ill if a cell phone is brought within about four meters (13 feet) of her. Mrs.
Brundtland is a medical doctor and former Prime Minister of Norway. This sensational news,
published March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was ignored by every other newspaper in the world. The
following week Michael Repacholi, her subordinate in charge of the International EMF
(electromagnetic field) Project, responded with a public statement belittling his boss’s
concerns. Five months later, for reasons that many suspect were related to these circumstances,
Mrs. Brundtland announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO after just
one term.

Nothing could better illustrate our collective schizophrenia when it comes to thinking about
electromagnetic radiation. We respond to those who are worried about its dangers — hence the
International EMF Project — but we ignore and marginalize those, like Mrs. Brundtland, who
have already succumbed to its effects.

As a consultant on the health effects of wireless technology, I receive calls that can be broadly
divided into two main groups: those from people who are merely worried, whom I will call A,
and those from people who are already sick, whom I will call B. I sometimes wish I could
arrange a large conference call and have the two groups talk to each other — there needs to be
more mutual understanding so that we are all trying to solve the same problems. Caller A,
worried, commonly asks what kind of shield to buy for his cell phone or what kind of headset to
wear with it. Sometimes he wants to know what is a safe distance to live from a cell tower.
Caller B, sick, wants to know what kind of shielding to put on her house, what kind of medical
treatment to get, or, increasingly often, what part of the country she could move to to escape the
radiation to save her life.

The following is designed as a sort of a primer: first, to help everybody get more or less on the
same page, and second, to clear up some of the confusions so that we can make rational
decisions toward a healthier world.

Fundamentals

The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they emit microwave radiation; so
do Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas, wireless computers, cordless (portable) phones and their
base units, and all other wireless devices. If it's a communication device and it's not attached to
the wall by a wire, it's emitting radiation. Most Wi-Fi systems and some cordless phones operate
at the exact same frequency as a microwave oven, while other devices use a different frequency.
Wi-Fi is always on and always radiating. The base units of most cordless phones are always
radiating, even when no one is using the phone. A cell phone that is on but not in use is also
radiating. And, needless to say, cell towers are always radiating.

Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the electromagnetic spectrum
into "ionizing" and "non-ionizing." Ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic
radiation, causes cancer. Non-ionizing radiation, which includes microwave radiation, is
supposed to be safe. This distinction always reminded me of the propaganda in George Orwell's
Animal Farm: "Four legs good, two legs bad." "Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad" is as little to be
trusted.

An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969,
it would have appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation in the
universe, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way. He was right. Life evolved with negligible
levels of microwave radiation. ** An increasing number of scientists speculate that our body's
own cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to communicate with one another, like children
whispering in the dark, and that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their signaling. **
In any case, it is a fact that we are all being bombarded, day in and day out, whether we use
a cell phone or not, by an amount of microwave radiation that is some ten million times as
strong as the average natural background. And it is also a fact that most of this radiation is
due to technology that has been developed since the 1970s.

As far as cell phones themselves are concerned, if you put one up to your head you are damaging
your brain in a number of different ways. First, think of a microwave oven. A cell phone, like a
microwave oven and unlike a hot shower, heats you from the inside out, not from the outside in.
And there are no sensory nerve endings in the brain to warn you of a rise in temperature because
we did not evolve with microwave radiation, and this never happens in nature. Worse, the
structure of the head and brain is so complex and non-uniform that "hot spots" are produced,
where heating can be tens or hundreds of times what it is nearby. Hot spots can occur both close
to the surface of the skull and deep within the brain, and also on a molecular level.

Cell phones are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, and you can find, in the
packaging of most new phones, a number called the Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR, which
is supposed to indicate the rate at which energy is absorbed by the brain from that particular
model. One problem, however, is the arbitrary assumption, upon which the FCC's regulations are
based, that the brain can safely dissipate added heat at a rate of up to 1 degree C per hour.
Compounding this is the scandalous procedure used to demonstrate compliance with these limits
and give each cell phone its SAR rating. The standard way to measure SAR is on a "phantom"
consisting, incredibly, of a homogenous fluid encased in Plexiglas in the shape of a head. Presto,
no hot spots! But in reality, people who use cell phones for hours per day are chronically heating
places in their brain. The FCC's safety standard, by the way, was developed by electrical
engineers, not doctors.

The Blood-Brain Barrier

The second effect that I want to focus on, which has been proven in the laboratory, should by
itself have been enough to shut down this industry and should be enough to scare away anyone
from ever using a cell phone again. I call it the “smoking gun” of cell phone experiments. Like
most biological effects of microwave radiation, this has nothing to do with heating.

The brain is protected by tight junctions between adjacent cells of capillary walls, the so-called
blood-brain barrier, which, like a border patrol, lets nutrients pass through from the blood to the
brain, but keeps toxic substances out. Since 1988, researchers in the laboratory of a Swedish
neurosurgeon, Leif Salford, have been running variations on this simple experiment: they
expose young laboratory rats to either a cell phone or other source of microwave radiation, and
later they sacrifice the animals and look for albumin in their brain tissue. Albumin is a protein
that is a normal component of blood but that does not normally cross the blood-brain barrier.
The presence of albumin in brain tissue is always a sign that blood vessels have been damaged
and that the brain has lost some of its protection.

Here is what these researchers have found, consistently for 18 years: Microwave radiation, at
doses equal to a cell phone’s emissions, causes albumin to be found in brain tissue. A one-time
exposure to an ordinary cell phone for just two minutes causes albumin to leak into the brain. In
one set of experiments, reducing the exposure level by a factor of 1,000 actually increased the
damage to the blood-brain barrier, showing that this is not a dose-response effect and that
reducing the power will not make wireless technology safer. And finally, in research published in
June 2003, a single two-hour exposure to a cell phone, just once during its lifetime, permanently
damaged the blood-brain barrier and, on autopsy 50 days later, was found to have damaged or
destroyed up to 2 percent of an animal’s brain cells, including cells in areas of the brain
concerned with learning, memory and movement.1 Reducing the exposure level by a factor of 10
or 100, thereby duplicating the effect of wearing a headset, moving a cell phone further from
your body, or standing next to somebody else’s phone, did not appreciably change the results!
Even at the lowest exposure, half the animals had a moderate to high number of damaged
neurons.

The implications for us? Two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier, two
hours on a cell phone causes permanent brain damage, and secondhand radiation may be almost
as bad. The blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.

These results caused enough of a commotion in Europe that in November 2003 a conference was
held, sponsored by the European Union, titled “The Blood-Brain Barrier — Can It Be Influenced
by RF [radio frequency]-Field Interactions?” as if to reassure the public: “See, we are doing
something about this.” But, predictably, nothing was done about it, as nothing has been done
about it for 30 years.

America’s Allan Frey, during the 1970s, was the first of many to demonstrate that low-level
microwave radiation damages the blood-brain barrier.2 Similar mechanisms protect the eye (the
blood-vitreous barrier) and the fetus (the placental barrier), and the work of Frey and others
indicates that microwave radiation damages those barriers also.3 The implication: No pregnant
woman should ever be using a cell phone.

Dr. Salford is quite outspoken about his work. He has called the use of handheld cell phones
“the largest human biological experiment ever.” And he has publicly warned that a whole
generation of cell-phone-using teenagers may suffer from mental deficits or Alzheimer’s
disease by the time they reach middle age.

Radio-Wave Sickness
Unfortunately, cell phone users are not the only ones being injured, nor should we be worried
only about the brain. The following brief summary is distilled from a vast scientific literature on
the effects of radio waves (a larger spectrum which includes microwaves), together with the
experiences of scientists and doctors all over the world with whom I am in contact.

Organs that have been shown to be especially susceptible to radio waves include the lungs,
nervous system, heart, eyes, testes and thyroid gland. Diseases that have increased remarkably in
the last couple of decades, and that there is good reason to connect with the massive increase in
radiation in our environment, include asthma, sleep disorders, anxiety disorders, attention deficit
disorder, autism, multiple sclerosis, ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, fibromyalgia, chronic
fatigue syndrome, cataracts, hypothyroidism, diabetes, malignant melanoma, testicular cancer,
and heart attacks and strokes in young people.

Radiation from microwave towers has also been associated with forest die-off, reproductive
failure and population decline in many species of birds, and ill health and birth deformities in
farm animals. The literature showing biological effects of microwave radiation is truly
enormous, running to tens of thousands of documents, and I am amazed that industry
spokespersons are getting away with saying that wireless technology has been proved safe or —
just as ridiculous — that there is no evidence of harm.

I have omitted one disease from the above list: the illness that Caller B has, and that I have. A
short history is in order here.

In the 1950s and 1960s workers who built, tested and repaired radar equipment came down with
this disease in large numbers. So did operators of industrial microwave heaters and sealers. The
Soviets named it, appropriately, radio wave sickness, and studied it extensively. In the West its
existence was denied totally, but workers came down with it anyway. Witness congressional
hearings held in 1981, chaired by then Representative Al Gore, on the health effects of radio-
frequency heaters and sealers, another episode in “See, we are doing something about this,”
while nothing is done.

Today, with the mass proliferation of radio towers and personal transmitters, the disease has
spread like a plague into the general population. Estimates of its prevalence range up to one-third
of the population, but it is rarely recognized for what it is until it has so disabled a person that he
or she can no longer participate in society. You may recognize some of its common symptoms:
insomnia, dizziness, nausea, headaches, fatigue, memory loss, inability to concentrate,
depression, chest discomfort, ringing in the ears. Patients may also develop medical problems
such as chronic respiratory infections, heart arrhythmias, sudden fluctuations in blood
pressure, uncontrolled blood sugar, dehydration, and even seizures and internal bleeding.

What makes this disease so difficult to accept, and even more difficult to cope with, is that no
treatment is likely to succeed unless one can also avoid exposure to its cause — and its cause
is now everywhere. A 1998 survey by the California Department of Health Services indicated
that at that time 120,000 Californians — and by implication 1 million Americans — were unable
to work due to electromagnetic pollution.(4) The ranks of these so-called electrically sensitive
are swelling in almost every country in the world, marginalized, stigmatized and ignored. With
the level of radiation everywhere today, they almost never recover and sometimes take their own
lives.

“They are acting as a warning for all of us,” says Dr. Olle Johansson of people with this illness.
“It could be a major mistake to subject the entire world’s population to whole-body irradiation,
24 hours a day.” A neuroscientist at the famous Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Dr.
Johansson heads a research team that is documenting a significant and permanent worsening of
the public health that began precisely when the second-generation, 1800 MHz cell phones were
introduced into Sweden in late l997.(5,6) After a decade-long decline, the number of Swedish
workers on sick leave began to rise in late 1997 and more than doubled during the next five
years. During the same period of time, sales of antidepressant drugs also doubled. The number of
traffic accidents, after declining for years, began to climb again in 1997. The number of deaths
from Alzheimer’s disease, after declining for several years, rose sharply in 1999 and had nearly
doubled by 2001. This two-year delay is understandable when one considers that Alzheimer’s
disease requires some time to develop.

Uncontrolled Proliferation

If cell phones and cell towers are really deadly, have the radio and TV towers that we have been
living with for a century been safe? In 2002 Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson coauthored a
paper titled “Cancer Trends During the 20th Century,” which examined one aspect of that
question.7 They found, in the United States, Sweden and dozens of other countries, that mortality
rates for skin melanoma and for bladder, prostate, colon, breast and lung cancers closely
paralleled the degree of public exposure to radio waves during the past hundred years. When
radio broadcasting increased in a given location, so did those forms of cancer; when it decreased,
so did those forms of cancer. And, a sensational finding: country by country — and county by
county in Sweden — they found, statistically, that exposure to radio waves appears to be as big a
factor in causing lung cancer as cigarette smoking!

Which brings me to address a widespread misconception. The biggest difference between the cell
towers of today and the radio towers of the past is not their safety, but their numbers. The
number of ordinary radio stations in the United States today is still less than 14,000. But cell
towers and Wi-Fi towers number in the hundreds of thousands, and cell phones, wireless
computers, cordless telephones and two-way radios number in the hundreds of millions. Radar
facilities and emergency communication networks are also proliferating out of control. Since
1978, when the Environmental Protection Agency last surveyed the radio frequency environment
in the United States, the average urban dweller’s exposure to radio waves has increased 1,000-
fold, most of this increase occurring in just the last nine years.8 In the same period of time, radio
pollution has spread from the cities to rest like a ubiquitous fog over the entire planet.

The vast human consequences of all this are being ignored. Since the late 1990s a whole new
class of environmental refugees has been created right here in the United States. We have more
and more people, sick, dying, seeking relief from our suffering, leaving our homes and our
livelihoods, living in cars, trailers and tents in remote places. Unlike victims of hurricanes and
earthquakes, we are not the subject of any relief efforts. No one is donating money to help us, to
buy us a protected refuge; no one is volunteering to forego their cell phones, their wireless
computers and their cordless phones so that we can once more be their neighbors and live among
them.

The worried and the sick have not yet opened their hearts to each other, but they are asking
questions. To answer caller A: No shield or headset will protect you from your cell or portable
phone. There is no safe distance from a cell tower. If your cell phone or your wireless computer
works where you live, you are being irradiated 24 hours a day.

To caller B: To effectively shield a house is difficult and rarely successful. There are only a few
doctors in the United States attempting to treat radio wave sickness, and their success rate is poor
— because there are few places left on Earth where one can go to escape this radiation and
recover.

Yes, radiation comes down from satellites, too; they are part of the problem, not the solution.
There is simply no way to make wireless technology safe.

Our society has become both socially and economically dependent, in just one short decade,
upon a technology that is doing tremendous damage to the fabric of our world. The more
entrenched we let ourselves become in it, the more difficult it will become to change our course.
The time to extricate ourselves, both individually and collectively — difficult though it is already
is — is now.

NOTES

1. Leif G. Salford et al., “Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain After Exposure to
Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones,” Environmental Health Perspectives 111, no. 7 (2003):
881–883.

2. Allan H. Frey, Sondra R. Feld and Barbara Frey, “Neural Function and Behavior,” Annals of
the New York Academy of Sciences 247 (1975): 433–439.

3. Allan H. Frey, “Evolution and Results


of Biological Research with Low-Intensity Nonionizing Radiation,” in Modern Bioelectricity,
ed. Andrew A. Marino (New York: Dekker, 1988), 785–837, at 809–810.

4. California EMF Program, The Risk Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Possible Risks From
Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) From Power Lines, Internal Wiring, Electrical Occupations
and Appliances (2002), app. 3.

5. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “1997 — A Curious Year in Sweden,” European Journal
of Cancer Prevention 13, no. 6 (2004): 535–538.

6. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Does GSM 1800 MHz Affect the Public Health in
Sweden?” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop “Biological Effects of EMFs,” Kos,
Greece, October 4-8, 2004, 361–364.
7. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Cancer Trends During the 20th Century,”
Journal of Australian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine 21, no. 1 (2002): 3–8.

8. David E. Janes Jr., “Radiofrequency Environments in the United States,” in 15th IEEE
Conference on Communication, Boston, MA, June 10–14, 1979, vol. 2, 31.4.1–31.4.5.

1993 FDA Memo

Data “Strongly Suggest” Microwaves Can Promote Cancer


(FDA knew more than a decade ago.. )
http://www.microwavenews.com/j-f03fdamemo.html

In the spring of 1993 at the height of public concern over cell phone-brain tumor risks, Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) biologists concluded that the available data "strongly suggest" that
microwaves can "accelerate the development of cancer." This assessment is in an internal agency
memo recently obtained by Microwave News under the Freedom of Information Act.

"Of approximately eight chronic animal experiments known to us, five resulted in increased
numbers of malignancies, accelerated progression of tumors, or both," wrote Drs. Mays
Swicord and Larry Cress of FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) in
Rockville, MD. They also pointed to other evidence from laboratory (in vitro) studies that
supported a cancer risk.

Yet, in its public statements at that time, the agency played down these findings. For instance, in
a Talk Paper issued in early February, the FDA stated that there was "limited evidence that
suggests that lower levels [of microwaves] might cause adverse health effects."

"A few studies suggest that [microwave] levels [from cellular phones] can accelerate the
development of cancer in laboratory animals," the FDA added, "but there is much uncertainty
among scientists about whether these results apply to the use of cellular phones."

.... the story continues: (http://www.goaegis.com/fda0203.html)

But in a letter submitted to the U.S. House of Representatives four years later during May 1997,
the FDA stated "Little is known about the possible health effects of repeated or long-term
exposure to low levels of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) of the types emitted by wireless
communications devices."

And again in February, 2000, the FDA issued a Nomination reiterating their position, stating
"There is currently insufficient scientific basis for concluding either that wireless communication
technologies are safe or that they pose a risk to millions of users. A significant research effort,
involving large well-planned animal experiments is needed to provide the basis to assess the risk
to human health of wireless communications devices."
Dr. Swicord joined Motorola after leaving the FDA and is also the Chief Editor on the editorial
staff of BEMS (BioElectro-Magnetics Society).

See related:

Swimming In A Deadly Sea: Awash In Radiation (http://www.cancer-


coverup.com/newsletter/2006-03/)
Part One

Although most of us are unaware of it, we are literally swimming in sea of radiation. Some of it
is natural, like the cosmic rays that bombard our planet from space, trace amounts from elements
that occur naturally in the ground, and even microwave radiation from sunspots and solar flares.
But increasingly, the radiation we are subjected to comes from man-made sources, ranging from
medical X-rays to leakage from appliances to cell phones. While much has been written about
man-made radiation, most of us have little understanding of what it is and how it might affect us.

Swimming In A Deadly Sea: Awash In Radiation (http://www.cancer-


coverup.com/newsletter/print-version/radiation-exposure-02-01.asp)
Part Two

Over 1 in 10 Complain About Cell Sickness


(http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/tech/200605/kt2006050317221511780.htm)
By Kim Tae-gyu
The Korea Times

Mobile operators and governments have claimed cell phones don’t emit enough microwaves
harm people, but sensitive Koreans are feeling their negative effects. According to a survey by
Rep. Suh Hae-suk at the governing Uri Party, 10.9 percent of 1,034 respondents said that they
felt physical disorders due to cell phone usage.

---

Here are some links from the latest weekly newsletter of Buergerwelle Germany' Citizens
Initiative Omega, compiled by Klaus Rudolph. This newsletter deals exclusively with issues of
microwave and other emf-wave damage and is a good source for continuous updates.

To subscribe, you can send a blank email to


emf-omega-news-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

---
Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1834449/

Immunotropic influence of 900 MHz microwave GSM signal on human blood immune cells
activated in vitro
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1834468/

Effects of intensive and moderate cellular phone use on hearing function


http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1834490/

Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near
mobile phone base stations
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1840014/

--------

Other links:

Do you have Microwave Sickness?


http://www.laleva.org/eng/Do%20You%20Have%20Microwave%20Sickness.

Dr. George Carlo, who used to run a multi-million dollar research program for the cell phone
industry and went public regarding the dangers posed by cell phones, uses the analogy of putting
a frog in water. If you put a frog in boiling water, it will jump out. However, if you put a frog in
cold water and gradually heat the water, you can cook the frog because the frog's body will
adjust to the slight changes in temperature and it will not notice it is being cooked. Well, the
same thing might be happening to an unsuspecting public - a public that has not been informed
about the real dangers of microwave radiation from cell phones, WiFi and other high-frequency-
radiation emitting devices and antennas. The truth of the matter, your cell phone and your WiFi
might very well indeed be making you and those around you sick!

Drowning in a Sea of Microwaves


http://www.i-sis.org.uk/DSOM.php

The increasing popularity of wi-fi comes on the heels of the explosive growth in wireless mobile
telephones, and amid heightened concerns over the health hazards of saturating levels of
electromagnetic radiation. Microwaves at current exposure levels are linked to brain damage,
DNA damage, brain tumours, cancers, microwave sickness, impairment of cognitive functions,
impairment of reproduction and fertility, affecting humans, rodents, birds, and bees.

Microwave News
http://www.microwavenews.com/

Radiation Research
http://www.radiationresearch.org/
Safe Wireless Initiative
http://www.safewireless.org/

Science and Public Policy Institute


http://www.sppionline.org/

Cell phones Invisible hazards of the wireless age


http://commonground.ca/iss/0612185/cg185_cellphone.shtml

Few people would be surprised to hear that cell phones are unhealthy. But how many of us
actually know the degree of damage they cause, the extent of the cover-up by the industry, or
that there is a viable solution? Dr. George Carlo, a mobile phone industry whistleblower,
recently presented a talk in Vancouver about how electropollution from wireless technology can
cause brain damage, cancer and an array of mental illnesses. I checked his facts against recent,
peer-reviewed scientific papers and the results were startling. Dr. Carlo explained why the
industry’s user manuals don’t warn of these health hazards: currently, there are pending class
action lawsuits against them, which threaten to expose the entire industry, similar to the cases
brought against “Big Tobacco”, and the asbestos and silicone breast implant industries...

Australian Research Shows Mobile Phones Affect Brain Function


http://www.healthliesexposed.com/articles/article_2006_04_28_0713.shtml

The Health Implications Of Playing With Big Brother's Most Cool Tool - Pt 2
http://www.rense.com/general71/repe.htm
By Amy Worthington
The Idaho Observer 6-9-6

Mobile phone emissions and human brain excitability


http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-
bin/abstract/112660876/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

Italian study on brain excitability by GSM mobile phone radiation. The double blind study shows
that the brains of volunteers were definitely affected by exposure to the cell phone radiation.

Cell Phones - More Damning Evidence


http://www.rense.com/general76/celkll.htm

The effects of the radiation can produce a wide range of physical symptoms. Some symptoms
may take years to show up. Some of the effects can be short-term while other effects can be
long-term or permanent. Opening the blood-brain barrier allows toxins into the brain that cause a
wide range of ailments - many of which are currently unknown or poorly understood.

Do Microwave Technologies Cause Chronic Fatigue?


http://www.laleva.org/eng/2006/12/do_microwave_technologies_cause_chronic_fatigue.html
Scientists develop new terahertz material
Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory have created a device for manipulating terahertz
(THz) radiation. The device could be the basis for novel electronics and photonics applications
ranging from new imaging methods to advanced communication technologies. The THz range of
the electromagnetic spectrum lies between the infrared and microwave wavelengths.

New wireless technology to be developed


"The project's goal is basically to create a small, low-power handheld device that combines a
spectrum analyzer and a truly powerful communication device," said Ayazi, a Georgia Tech
associate professor of electrical and computer engineering. "We are basically looking for orders-
of-magnitude improvement in performance, size and cost. The ultimate goal," he added, "is to
integrate Analog Spectral Processors with high-speed electronics on a single chip and bring
unprecedented capabilities to the wireless world."

Health concerns over mobile phone masts prompt review


Originally promised three years ago, and then shelved, the review follows articles in The
Independent on Sunday about possible effects of the radiation on children and bees. The
Government will take account of new scientific and medical evidence, and consult experts and
campaigners, as part of a wider review of planning guidelines which ministers send to local
authorities. More than 47,000 "base stations", like masts, have already been erected in Britain to
service its 50 million mobile phones, often in defiance of intense local public opposition.
Successive governments have made extraordinary concessions to the companies to ensure that
coverage was rolled out across the country as quickly as possible.

World's safest mobile phone on way


The Wi-Guard technology works by randomising the field so it becomes more similar to
naturally occurring electromagnetic fields that the body can deal with. Lawler said the amount of
radiation emitted by man-made electromagnetic fields was one billion times higher than in 1950,
due predominantly to the massive rise in the number of mobile phones and wireless laptops
being used over the past decade.

This is an interesting technology, as randomizing the extra low frequency pattern could indeed
make the radiation from cell phones and wireless devices less harmful for biological organisms.
Of course it would be more efficient to implement this concept not as a remediation effort but as
a basic feature of wireless standards...

Wireless broadband Internet access is all the rage.


The noise is drowning out concerns for this technology's risks. In 2004, the International
Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) decided that they would not permit cell phone antennas on
firehouses. The decision was made by resolution at the IAFF's annual delegate assembly. The
resolution directed the IAFF to review the potential health risks from cell antennas. If the science
demonstrated a risk, then the union would oppose the use of fire stations as sites for cell antennas
until further science demonstrated that cell antennas are safe. The resolution was passed in
August 2004. In April 2005, the union's Health and Safety Department completed the review of
the science. They found more than ample evidence to conclude that the union should oppose cell
antennas on fire stations. The position paper included 49 references and a bibliography of 40
citations.

New doubts raised over mobile phone safety


Prof Seger said: "The real significance of our findings is that cells are not inert to non-thermal
mobile phone radiation. "We used radiation power levels that were around 1/10th of those
produced by a normal mobile. The changes we observed were clearly not caused by heating."

EU watchdog calls for urgent action on Wi-Fi, mobile phone radiation


Europe's top environmental watchdog is calling for immediate action to reduce exposure to
radiation from Wi-Fi, mobile phones and their masts. It suggests that delay could lead to a health
crisis similar to those caused by asbestos, smoking and lead in petrol. The warning, from the
EU's European Environment Agency (EEA) follows an international scientific review which
concluded that safety limits set for the radiation are "thousands of times too lenient", and an
official British report last week which concluded that it could not rule out the development of
cancers from using mobile phones.

The hidden menace of mobile phones


Using a mobile phone for more than 10 years increases the risk of getting brain cancer, according
to the most comprehensive study of the risks yet published. The study – which contradicts
official pronouncements that there is no danger of getting the disease – found that people who
have had the phones for a decade or more are twice as likely to get a malignant tumour on the
side of the brain where they hold the handset. The scientists who conducted the research say
using a mobile for just an hour every working day during that period is enough to increase the
risk – and that the international standard used to protect users from the radiation emitted is "not
safe" and "needs to be revised".

posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Thursday April 20 2006


updated on Sunday October 7 2007

URL of this article:


http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/04/20/mobile_and_wireless_largest_biological_ex
periment.htm

Related

Microwaves: The Radiation Poisoning of America (Oct. 8, 2007)


http://educate-yourself.org/cn/mircrowaveradiationpoisoningamerica08oct07.shtml

GRAVE Cell Phone Dangers Revealed...


..."public health scientist George Carlo found that rare tumors on the outside of the brain are
more than doubled among cell phone callers particularly on the right side of the head where
`phones are usually held... Here is more support for the earlier post: "Em Fields On Brain Tumor
Incidence - Chemicals And Cell Phones" the evidence is so compelling and the regulatory bodies
will continually get usurped by... [read more]
February 15, 2005 - Chris Gupta

The Cell Phone Experiment: Is Mobile Communication Worth The Risk?


Undoubtedly mobile phones and wireless broadband are immensely useful, but there is a
persistent question: what are the risks of using these technologies? Many of us asking the "risk"
question are - alas - not necessarily informed or even willing to consider the benefits of
networking, and those planning the digital and mobile revolution have hardly heard about the
risks. Providers are reluctant to discuss the health implications of the... [read more]
December 14, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger

Mobile Phones Increase Tumor Risk, Study Says


Further to the post: Em Fields On Brain Tumor Incidence - Chemicals And Cell Phones Chris
Gupta ---------------------- Mobile Phones Increase Tumor Risk, Study Says Thu Oct 14, 1:38 AM
ET STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Ten or more years of mobile phone use increases the risk of
developing acoustic neuroma, a benign tumor on the auditory nerve, according to a study
released on Wednesday by Sweden's Karolinska Institute. The risk was... [read more]
November 03, 2004 - Chris Gupta

Children, cell phones and psychiatry


Now what does a psychiatrist have to do with cell phones, you may ask. Psychiatrists are the
"experts" in mental health - our mental health. So they recognize when you're delusional if you
should start to complain about symptoms from radiation overdosing, for example from your cell
phone. Here is an exchange of messages forwarded by Jennie Gorman, about this matter. It
illustrates the connection and leads us right back... [read more]
September 02, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

Bad News For Cell Phone Users


According to a study published in the June issue of "Environmental Health Perspectives",
researchers have documented damage to nerve cells in the brains of rats they exposed to the type
of radiation cell phone users get when calling their friends or family. The damaging mechanism
seems to be a weakening of the blood-brain barrier, a kind of filter which protects the brain from
toxic or otherwise unwanted chemicals circulated with... [read more]
October 01, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

Cell phones are not innocuous


There is considerable resistance by groups in affected neighbourhoods to the construction of cell-
phone relay towers. Their operation close to Schools and other places where children are
normally present, is prohibited in several countries. But the phones themselves? They are not as
innocuous as the telecoms and the manufacturers would have you believe. Amy Worthington
informs us that recent studies confirm that cell and cordless phone microwave can: *Damage
nerves... [read more]
June 07, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger
Readers' Comments

A comment received in a recent email:

There's no better example of society's "bass-ackwardness" than the fact that so many things we
embrace (like technology) are self-destructive to an equal or greater extent than politically
correct and hyped concerns (like street drugs). And there is no better example of that
contradiction than the wireless revolution. This is a stunning article. The industry IS aware...

A recent upshot of the corporate malfeasance and public unawareness (due to lapdog media) was
an article (seen in my local paper) about Disney's new promotion of a line of cell phones
designed to help parents and kids "keep in touch." Not even a hint in that piece about this
extreme threat. And my paper has never presented one thing on microwave danger, is forever
grandstanding about drugs, and loves to show 'cute' pictures of kids eating junkfood.

"A" for hypocrisy and junk journalism! :-)

The title should read "...Uncontrolled Biological Experiment..."

PeterT

Posted by: Sepp on April 25, 2006 10:39 PM

***

I've been thinking I must be crazy or something. I've been telling people for awhile now that I
can't sit in front of certain computers ( compacs) without all my muscles in my hands and arms
stiffening up painfully. I've been joking about getting off the planet to get away from all this
technology for quite some time now as well. I've been suffering horrible affects from technology.
I've been really scared. I feel " surges" of radiation here and there. When it happens, I literally
feel like I am being bombarded by radiation. Sometimes my body feels like it's going to fall right
apart and other times I get pain inside my head and feel like I could die from it.While the
radiation is going on my whole body stiffens up and it feels like something has me by the back of
my neck in a kind of paralysing grip.I've been trying to find out if other people have been going
through this, for awhile now. This is the first I've read of other people suffering from this.

Posted by: j. keillor on June 7, 2006 10:53 PM

***

This information was forwarded by Paul Doyon, who researches the effects of electrosmog,
mobile and wireless technologies

Dear Ms. Levitt,


My son has been having serious ailments over the last 6 months including: Severe and constant
headaches, leg pains, poor sleep, and even heart palpitations. Various specialists were at a loss as
to why he had these conditions! The only thing that showed up in extensive bloodwork was a
low IgA level. I did some research and figured out that it may be the WiFi Wireless Internet I
installed in our home exactly 6 months prior.

So I quietly unhooked the system, and monitored my son so not to tell him of my changes. Sure
enough, within hours his headache that he had without pause for 6 months went away. We're
about 2 weeks from when I first disabled the WiFi system and my sons ENTIRE medical
symptom list has complete cleared up! No longer does he complain of sore legs or headaches,
which is a big relief to us.

Most importantly, his blood panel showed that his IgA levels returned to normal. Upon
investigation I found that EMF/EMR from Wireless Networks can lower Melatonin, which
indirectly lowers IgA - there are studies that confirm this. IgA itself is responsible for fighting a
VARIETY of illness. So we can say indirectly that EMF/EMR may be responsible for an
extremely wide range of human ailments.

I have found some schools and some countries are already removing WiFi systems because of
extremely high levels of complaints from teachers and students about ill effects after their
installation.. I believe this issue is vastly more dangerous than Cellular towers because of the
highly concentrated continuous signal nature of wireless internet.

I believe there needs to be some detailed and up to date works to reflect the rapid increase of
high powered wireless internet networks being installed in schools, homes, and cities nationwide.

Any opinions on this? Kind Regards,

Robert McNaughton

---

Dear Robert,

Thanks for this email. I will pass it along to appropriate people in federal regulatory agencies
who need to hear this exact kind of information. Just so you know, this is about the 10th such
communication within the last year that I have gotten describing pretty much the same
symptoms. WiFi is certainly a problem. When I lecture on cell towers, I now say that it never
ceases to amaze me that people will fight a cell tower in their neighborhood, then throw in a
WiFi system at home which is just like inviting a cell tower indoors. The problem with
towers/infrastructure now is that they are using significantly higher frequencies due to the FCC
licensing of broadband, i.e. telecom companies can now offer Internet access, TV, text
messaging, music downloads, etc. etc. Yesterday's old analog cell tower that could cover a 10-15
mile radius morphed into digital PCS that could cover about a 3-mile radius, and now the "next
generation" infrastructure requires antennas/towers every 1-2 miles. These are likely all unsafe
technologies, it's just a question of degree and exposure parameters. But personal WiFi domestic
systems are by far the worst right now due to it's very close proximity to people and the higher
frequencies at which they operate. And of course whole cities are going WiFi. Unfortunately the
learning curve on this is steep, there are literally NO research funds available in America, and the
FCC, which controls for exposure standards, is a non-health agency. So everyone is learning
about this one individual anatomy at a time, literally. Eventually the adage that the "plural of
anecdote is data" will come to pass. But someone needs to collect the information and we don't
even have that going on. No one wants to monitor this. Everyone just wants it to be fine. People
who get into difficulties have no one to tell but a journalist like me. And most MDs are clueless.

I am glad that you figured out your son's problems so quickly. That's unfortunately rare. Please
let me know how he progresses.

Best Regards,
Blake Levitt

P.S. I wrote about melatonin in my first book on this subject and there is another book called The
Melatonin Hypothesis, edited by Stevens, Wilson &Anderson. That latter is mostly about
powerline frequencies but it is full of good information.

---

Paul Raymond Doyon


MAT (TESOL), MA Advanced Japanese Studies, BA Psychology
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

Posted by: Sepp for Paul D. on March 27, 2007 10:57 AM

***

I want to get an emergency help. Data about the safety regulations about mounting up a cell
phone tower on top of a public humanly inhibited building. Many thanks for any advise or help.
Dr Daniel Gad

Posted by: Daniel Gad on May 16, 2007 12:38 AM

***

As with all website such as this nothing is documented or cited. Random names are just thrown
around and "Dr." inserted before them. Oh yeah, and insert a few Internet newspaper articles and
grossly paraphrase them and hold their findings as dispositive. In the most basic high school
research paper a student is required to submit a detailed works cited page. That is, every sentence
must be cited to the specific source and page from where the information is derived. Oh yeah, I
forgot...the established media and print sources are involved in a conspiracy - they don't want us
to know about anything. I always forget that. Robin Good, however, he is looking out for us and
he knows what he's talking about. First, people should worry about the destructive things they
voluntarily do to their bodies each day before they become preoccupied with cell towers and Wi-
Fi connections.

Posted by: Jim Cornwell on October 5, 2007 08:50 PM

***

I won't argue with you on the cellphones and cordless phones. What about the wireless keyboard
and mouse. Are they harmful too ?

Posted by: H.T. Oliver on October 5, 2007 11:27 PM

***

My cell phone contract finally ended and I will never use one again. I would start with a scratchy
throat then my whole neck area felt like it was swelling up, my ears would ring and if I talked
awhile I would lose my voice. They are great for emergencies but hey, everyone seems to have
one so I should be able to get help in an emergency.

Posted by: Cindy on October 6, 2007 09:34 AM

***

Dear Ms. Levitt, Is there any significant difference between the radiation emitted by a CRT
display and that emitted by an LCD display? Thanks Tim

Posted by: Tim Barringer on October 6, 2007 09:58 AM

Free Newsletter

Email Address:
Subscribe

Bottom of Form

Join the Educate-Yourself Discussion Forum


All information posted on this web site is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational
purposes only. It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor can legally
offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer of your choice for medical care and
advice.

Current News | Introduction | Colloidal Silver | Chemtrails | Sylphs | Emerging Diseases |


Forbidden Cures |Ozone | Immunity Boosting | Nutrition | The CIA
Mind-Body Connection | Ozone | Bioelectrification | Story on Drugs | Vaccine Dangers |
Cancer | Newsletter | New World Order | NWO News | Pam Schuffert
Phil Schneider | Al Bielek | Trevor James Constable | Mind Control | Brice Taylor | Ted
Gunderson | The Relfes | Free Energy | Kanya V. McGhee | Montalk
Dr. Robert Bitzer | T. Lobsang Rampa | Ruth Drown | ZS Livingstone | David Brandt | Red
Elk | Phil Ledoux | Gary Wade | BBB | The Draft | Veterans Awaken
Tone Gen | Depleted Uranium | Discussion | Dowsing | Police & Tasers | Rev. Sun Myung
Moon | British Israel | The End Times | Amy Goodman Gatekeeper
'Peak Oil' | Amitakh Stanford | Military Draft | Rosie's Predictions | Project Blue Beam |
Otto Skorzeny | Insights on Aliens | Cell Towers | Cell Phone Dangers
CPS/DCF Tyranny | Adrenal Burnout | The Women Warriors | Orgone Adventures | Dr.
John Coleman | Railroading Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald | Henry Makow
Bush Family & Nazis | Holistic Dentists | Metal Free Dentistry | Water Supply Sabotage |
Dr. Hulda Clark Books | Planet X Sequel | 'Undocumented Immigrants'
Tavistock Institute | U.S. Concentration Camps | FEMA | Aliens Are Coming! | Guiding
Principles | Global Warming | Gang Stalking | Monoatomic Gold
Common Law | Hope | Healing Thought Forms | Vanquish Fear |Search Yahoo Track Free |
Rethinking Noam Chomsky | Rockefeller File | War is a Racket
Letters | Zeitgeist | Radio Interviews | Daily Blog | Chiropractic Handbook | Global
Warming | Allies Contact Sheet | Hydrogen Peroxide | Byline Philippines
Daily Blog | James Casbolt | Products | Orgone Generators | The Succor Punch | The Mini
Silver Terminator | Home | Links | Contact Us/ E-mail
The BioElectric Shield Company has been dedicated to helping create a more balanced and peaceful
world one person at a time since 1990.

In the 1980’s, when Dr. Charles Brown, DABCN, (Diplomate American College of Chiropractic
Neurologists), the inventor of the Shield, became aware that a certain group of his patients exhibited
consistent symptoms of stress and a slower rate of healing that the rest of his patient population. This
group of patients all worked long hours in front of CRT computer screens for many hours a day, and
usually 6 days a week. He began researching the effects of electromagnetic radiation in the literature, and
found there were many associated health effects. He wanted to help these patients, and hoped that he
could come up with a low-tech, high effect product.

In 1989, he had a series of waking dream that


showed him a specific pattern of crystals. Each
of 3 dreams clarified the placement of the
crystals. He showed the patterns to an individual
who can see energy and she confirmed that the
pattern produced several positive effects. She
explained that the Shield interacts with a
person’s energy field (aura) to strengthen and
balance it. Effectively it created a cocoon of
energy that deflects away energies that are
not compatible. In addition, the Shield acts to
balance the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual bodies of the aura.

A series of studies was conducted to investigate the possible protection from EMF's wearing this kind of
device. Happily the studies were consistent in showing that people remained strong when exposed to
these frequencies. Without the shield, most people showed measurable weakening in the presence of both
EMF’s and stress. Of interest to us was that these same effects were noted when people IMAGINED
stress in their lives. It seems obvious that how we think and what we are exposed to physically both have
an energy impact on us. The Shield addresses energy issues-stabilizing a person's energy in adverse
conditions. See “How the Shield Works” for more information.

Since that time, we have sold tens of thousands of Shields and had feedback from more people than we
could possibly list. Here are just a few of the testimonials we have gotten back from Shield wearers.

Dr. David Getoff was one of the earliest practitioners to begin wearing a Shield and doing his own testing
with patients with very good results (video).

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact


OUR MISSION

Our mission is to make the BioElectric Shield available worldwide. In doing so, we feel we are part of the
solution to the health crisis that is, in part, caused by exposure to electromagnetic radiation and well as
exposure to massive amounts of stress, from situations and other people’s energy.

We also want to bring more peace, balance and joy to the world - and the Shield offers a vibration of
peace, love, and balance in a world filled with fear and uncertainty. Selling a Shield may seem like a
small thing in the scheme of things, but each Shield helps one more person find a greater sense of ease,
balance and protection, allowing them to focus on living their dreams

To enhance your sense of well-being, (In addition to the Shield, ) we offer other products that provide
health and wellness benefits on many levels.

By working together we can, and are, accomplishing miracles.

Charles W. Brown, D.C., D.A.B.C.N.

Dr. Brown graduated in 1979 w ith honors from Palmer College of Chiropractic. He
is a Di plomate of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners and a Di plomate of
the A merican B oard o f Chiropractic Neu rologists. He al so i s cer tified i n Ap plied
Kinesiology. Dr. Brown has had his own radio show "Health Tips". Additionally, he
has t aught an atomy at B oston Un iversity an d t he New E ngland I nstitute o f M assage
Therapy.

He invented the BioElectric Shield, Conditioning Yourself for Peak Performance (a DVD of series of
Peak Performance Postures with Declarations) and Dr. Brown’s Dust and Allergy Air Filters, as well as
Dr. Brown’s Dust and Allergy Anti-Microbial, Anti-Viral Spray. He is presently working on other
inventions.

Dr. Brown’s experience of the Shield is that it has helped him move deeper into spiritual realms, quantum
energy, and creative meditative spaces. It has always been his desire to help others, and he is grateful that
the Shield is helping so many people worldwide.

Virginia Bonta Brown, M.S., O.T.R.

As child, I always wanted others feel better. As a teenager, I volunteered as a


Candy Striper at the local hospital, wheeling around a cart of gifts to patients’
rooms. The hospital setting didn’t really draw me, so summers were spend
teaching tennis to kids at a wonderful camp in Vermont. With the idea of
becoming a psychologist, I received a B.S. degree from Hollins College in

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact


psychology and worked with drug addicts for a year. Called by the practicality of Occupational Therapy, I
received an M.S. degree in Occupational Therapy from Boston University in 1974

For the next 16 years, working with ADD, ADHD, autistic and other special needs children was my
passion. Because of my specialty in Sensory Integration Dysfunction (a technique based on neurology), I
met Anne Shumway Cook, RPT, PhD, a brilliant PT, with a PhD in neurophysiology. We created special
therapy techniques for children with vestibular (balance and position in space) dysfunction while she
worked with the Vestibular Treatment Center at Good Samaritan, and while I managed the therapy
services of the Children's Program at this same hospital in Portland, Oregon. A fun project at that time
also included collaborating with a team of other therapists to create a therapy in the public schools manual
for OT, PT and Adapted PT procedures. It included goals and treatment plans which has served as a
model for nearly every school district in the United States. There was nothing quite so satisfying as
seeing a child move from frustration to joy as they began to master their coordination and perceptual
skills.

For the next seven years, I shifted my focus. Married to Dr. Charles Brown, we decided that I’d begin to
work with him in his Pain and Allergy Clinic, first in Boston and then in Billings, Montana. During this
time I began to hear people talk about how thoroughly stressed out they were by their job environment.
Their neck and shoulders hurt from sitting in front of computer screens. They were fatigued and
overloaded dealing with deadlines and other stressed out people! They wanted to be sheltered from the
“storm” of life. Though conversation, myofascial deep tissue and cranio-sacral therapy helped them, the
stress never disappeared. It was our patients who really let us know that something that managed their
environment and their energy would be a wonderful miracle in their lives.

What could we do to help them? I became an OT so I could help children and adults accomplish whatever
it was that they wanted to do. When my husband, Dr. Brown, invented the Shield, initially I felt I was
abandoning my patients. Running the company meant I didn’t spend as much time in the clinic. But then
I saw what the Shield was accomplishing with people. They got Shields and their lives began to improve.
People told me they felt less overwhelmed, didn’t get the headaches in front of the computer, were less
affected by other people’s energy and enjoyed life more. I began noticing the same thing!

In 2000, we received a request for a customized shield for a child with ADD/ADHD. After it was
designed, our consultant told us that she could create a special shield that would help any person with
these symptoms. Read more about the ADD/ADHD Shield.

When we started the company in 1990, I was still seeing patients nearly full time. I was wearing the
Shield and began to notice something different about my own life. At the clinic, I noticed my energy was
very steady all day. Instead of being exhausted at the end of the day, particularly when I had treated
particularly needy patients, I was pleasantly tired and content. I noticed I was more detached from the
patient’s problem. In other words, I didn’t allow it to tire me. Instead I became more compassionate and
intuitive about what they needed to help them. I was able to hear my Guides more clearly as they helped
me help them. As I wore it during meditation, I felt myself go deeper into a space of Unity of all things,
from people to mountains to stars.

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact


Over the years, I’ve spoken with many, many people, from all walks of life. Because they consistently
tell me how much it’s helped them, I become more committed each year to offer this to as many people
as possible. It is my belief that the Shield is a gift from the Divine, and that those who wear it will be
helped on earth to accomplish their own mission, with greater health and greater compassion. For this
reason, it is my desire to provide the blessing of the BioElectric Shield to as many people as possible.

Carolyn (Workinger) Nau:

I joined the BioElectric Shield Company in January 1994 when the shipping and order
department consisted of one computer and a card table. With my help, the company
grew to what it is today. From 1994 to 2000 I traveled and did approximately 100 trade
shows, talking to people, muscle testing and really finding out how much difference the
Shield makes in people’s lives.

An empath and natural intuitive, I have personally found the Shield to be one of my most important and
valued possessions, as it assists me in not taking on everyone else’s stuff. That ability has also been
invaluable when I talk to and connect with clients in person, over the phone or even via email. I am
frequently able to “tune in” and help advise on the best Shield choice for an individual.

I felt a strong pull to move to California and reluctantly left the company in 2000. While in California I
met the love of my life, David Nau. After being married on the pier in Capitola, we relocated to
Milwaukee, Wisconsin where he’d accepted a job as design director of an award winning exhibit firm.
David is an artist and designer, and has taken all the newest photos of the Shields. They are the most
beautiful and accurate images we have ever had!
Through the magic of the internet I was able to return to working with the company in January 2008. I
love how things have changed to allow me to live where I want and work from home. I am fully involved
and even more excited about the Shield’s benefits and the need for people to be strengthened and
protected. I am thrilled to be back and loving connecting with old and new customers. It’s great to pick up
the phone and have someone say, “Wow, I remember you. You sold me a Shield in Vegas in 1999”

How did I get started making Energy Necklaces? It's not every day that going to a trade show can totally
change your life. It did mine. I must have been ready for a drastic change. I just didn't know it. I guess
I’ve just always been a natural Quester.

Quite by chance, I went to the Bead and Button Show in Milwaukee. The show is an entire convention
center filled with beads, baubles and semi-precious stones. I looked over my purchases at the end of the
first day and realized I didn't have enough of some for earrings. So I went back with a friend who
normally is the voice of reason. I thought if I got carried away she’d help me stop. Joke was on me.

I was unable to resist all those incredible goodies. My friend turned out to be a very bad influence, she’d
find fabulous things and hold semi-precious and even precious stones in front of me saying "Have you
seen this?". How can a woman resist all that beauty? I can’t! I couldn't. I walked out with a suitcase full
of beads and stones. The only problem was, I didn’t even know how to make jewelry.

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact


I spent the summer taking classes, reading books, practicing jewelry making. Immediately people were
stopping me in the street asking about the jewelry I was wearing. It finally dawned on me that just maybe
I was meant to design and share my creations. Thus Bold Bodacious Jewelry was born.

I still laugh about this whole process. Obviously the Universe or someone was guiding me. Looking back
it should have been obvious that I was buying enough to start a business. But at the time, it just felt like
the right thing to do. Not a conscious plan. Sometimes following your gut can change your life.

In the fall of 2008, I felt a pull to examine how various gemstones could enhance the protective and
healing effects of the BioElectric Shield. I also wanted to wear great jewelry and my gold and diamond
Shied at the same time, so I created something new so I could do that. After making a few “Shield energy
necklaces”, I was convinced that not only was my jewelry beautiful and fun to wear, it had additional
healing qualities as well. Since then I’ve been immersed in studying stones and their properties, paying
particular attention to the magical transformation that happens when stones are combined. Much like the
Shield, the combined properties of the stones in my jewelry are more powerful than the same combination
of stones loose in your hand. To view gem properties and styles to complement your shield, please visit
Shield Energy necklaces .

David Nau:

We’re pleased to have added David to our team. David is an award winning creative
designer who readily calls on the wide variety of experience he has gained in a
design career spanning over thirty years. His familiarity with the business allows
him to create a stunning design, but also one that works for the needs of the client.
The design has impact, and functions as needed for a successful event. Having
owned his own business, David maintains awareness of cost as he designs, assuring the most value
achieved within a budget.

A Graduate of Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY, David’s career has included positions as Senior Exhibit
Designer, Owner of an exhibit design company, Design Director, and Salesman. This variety of positions
has provided experience in all phases of the exhibit business; designing, quoting, selling, directly working
with clients, interfacing with builders and manufacturers, staging and supervising set-up.

David has worked closely with many key clients in the branding of their products and themselves in all
phases of marketing, both within and outside the tradeshow realm. He has designed tradeshow exhibits,
museum environments and showrooms for many large accounts including Kodak, Commerce One,
Candela Laser, The Holmes Group, Kendell Hospital Products, Enterasys, Stratus, Pfizer, Ligand
Medical, Polaroid, Welch Allyn, and Nortel. He has also designed museum and visitor centers for
Charlottesville, NASA Goddard, Hartford and Boston children’s museums.

David’s artistic eye has added to other aspects of our BioElectric Shield site and we appreciate his
ongoing contributions. David is currently unemployed and so has started going to trade shows with
Carolyn. For someone who has been designing trade shows for 35 years actually being in the booth he
designed is a whole new experience for him.

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact


Sam Sokol

Sam is our Internet consultant, bringing expertise and wisdom to this area of
communication for our company. Sam works with a wide variety of companies
in many industries to build, market and maintain their online presence. He has
helped both small and big companies to increase their online sales and build their
businesses. He has helped us to grow BioElectric Shield by giving us direct
access to great tools to make changes to our web site.

Dedicated to helping create a more balanced and peaceful world one person at a time Let's change our
lives and our worlds one thought, one action at a time.

BioElectricShield.com | About the Shield | Shield Products | In the Media | Contact

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen