Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Refinery Challenges 2. Refinery Crude Upgrading and Consequences 3. Refinery Gasification Projects with SGP 4. Fujian Refinery Ethylene Project 5. LOTOS, Gdansk (Update) 6. Discussion
Shell Gasification Process & Refineries: Challenge (1) Oil to be main feedstock for a long time to come Possible introduction of bio-crudes Product slate will have to change Refinery hydrogen balance Cutting deeper into the barrel Achieving zero-sulphur products while maintaining throughput New routes to gasoline Responding to falling demand for heavy fuel oil Upgrading residue more efficiently
Shell Pulau Bukom Refinery Singapore GTC Oct 2005 San Francisco 3
Shell Gasification Process & Refineries: Challenge (2) Advances in combustion engine technology Pace of introduction of new technologies, like fuel cells The stance to be taken by governments Tax and fiscal measures Energy, transport and environmental legislation Public opinion Regional variations
Shell Gasification Process & Refineries Upgrading Ways for liquid Residue
Technology Blending
Minus No upgrading; No contribution to quality and to environmental Removes 10 % (VB) to 40 % (DTC) of sulphur Not selective for CCR
Comment Depending on location of the refinery Difficult to store and to blend Difficult to store and to blend
HV SR
Diluent Bunker
Bunker
! More viscous residue ! More heavy metals and sulphur in the residue ! Difficulties in blending ! Difficulties achieving fuel oil quality
GTC Oct 2005 San Francisco 6
VFCR Asphaltenes
Special aspects Gasifier fuel Gas turbine fuel Superheated steam ex Syngas Cooler Syngas substitutes natural gas Chemical site; Very high pressure steam (121 bara; 1755 psia) Import of cheap crude oil
Integration Full refinery integration Limited integration (low pressure BFW, cooling water etc.) Full integration to upgrader and SAGD Full integration between refinery, gasification and chemical complex Full refinery integration
Opti Canada
(GTC 2004: Phil Rettger)
Refinery expansion (80,000 -> 240,000 bpd) Sour Arabian Crude 800,000 t/a ethylene steam cracker Polyethylene and polypropylene units 700,000 t/a paraxylene Shell Gasification Unit
GTC Oct 2005 San Francisco 9
HP steam
Flue gas
ECO
Soot separator
BFW
CD
Component Carbon Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrogen Sulphur Ash Viscosity @ 270 C HHV Vanadium Nickel %wt, MAF %wt, MAF %wt, MAF %wt, MAF %wt, MAF %wt cSt MJ/kg ppmwt ppmwt
De-asphalt Rock 84.0 8.0 0.2 1.0 6.8 0.18 300-350 40.7 275 79
LR
HV SR
Diluent Bunker
SGP Bunker
Route to Power Acid Gas Removal (Rectisol) Route to Hydrogen Sour CO-Shift Acid Gas Removal (Rectisol) PSA
Design t/h (st/h) 100.0 (110.2) 92.2 (101.6) 221.6 (244.2) 241.7 (266.4) 0.19 (0.21)
12
Oxygen (Purity 99.5 mol%) Syngas Saturated Steam Metal ash (V, Ni)
GTC Oct 2005 San Francisco
SGP requirement: Syngas pressure always higher than steam pressure Differential pressure design of inlet section & coils Specification of set pressure for Pressure Safety Relief Valves
Fujian requirement: - 4 years operating cycle with no major capacity reduction - Maintenance while plant in operation - Chinese Codes and Standards (Hazardous area requirements) - Gasification & SARU @ different locations (based on Pernis experience)
15
VVVVVVVVVVVVvV
MJ/kg (Courtesy LOTOS, Gdansk Refinery)
Shell Gasification Process & Refineries Discussion Liquid routes to enhance refinery capacity: Deeper Conversion (DTC) Solvent De-asphalting Key strategic drivers for a strong business case: " Meet future product specifications " Increase crude flexibility (lower cost crudes) " Eliminate high-sulphur fuel oil export " Replace obsolete facilities, improve refinery environmental performance & enhance energy utilisation " Cost effective hydrogen production " Secure or expand employments and regional business opportunities
Joachim.wolff@shell.com