Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Number 106
December 2006
ISSN: 183 3-
3-829 1
IN THIS ISSUE
President’s Sparge 1
Tr eseasurer ’s Repor t 2
2006 M alt Coop RAG Repor t 2
Social Secs’ Dr ibble 3
Club Competition Krausen 3
Brew er o f the YEAR! 4
President’s Sparge The Rise and Rise and Rise o f RIS! 6
The Ro ad to Recognition 8
Well, it seems to be that time of year again. T his Two Brew s So uth o f the Border 10
coming meeting is our AGM so a new committee will
No -Sparge=No -Idea 12
be elec ted. I will not be standing for election this time
as I have too many other demands on my time and Summer Cro sswort – The Mash 14
feel this would prevent me from serving the club Summer Cro sswort – The Bo il 16
properly. I believe there are other c ommittee
members who are in a similar position and will thus This meeting:
look toward others to s tep up and take on their c urrent 7.45 pm, Thursday, 7
res ponsibilities . I am confident however that we have
plenty of members who are up to the ask and able to December 2006
perhaps bring a fresh approach and new ideas so the Venue: The Harmonie German
club can continue to prosper and grow, not just in Club, Narrabundah
numbers but brewing knowledge and expertis e as well.
Next meeting: Thursday
(Continued next page) 1 February 2007
President’s Sparge conti nued Treasurer’s Report
I n parting, I wis h to thank the c urrent
It's been a busy but relatively pain- free
committee for all their efforts and congratulate
year for the T reasurer. We've had a lot of
them on a job well done. We have left the club
transactions , with unprec edented interes t
in a strong position, financially and otherwis e. I
in c omps and social events , but the
also thank the Canberra Brewers members for
Committee and members have made my
entrus ting us with the running of the club this
job pretty easy by using electronic
year and your ongoing s upport and involvment.
transactions when they can and by
doc umenting all their purchases clearly.
All the best for the fes tive seas on, safe travels I'm just in the proc ess of turning the
for thos e who brave the roads and may the next general ledger (whic h details every single
year bring some great new brews . transaction) into s omething a little more
readable for members , with a s ummary of
Cheers inc ome and exenditure for major items
like memberships , c omps , soc ial events
Chris toph
and raffles . O nc e some last minute
transactions have been sorted out (like
renewing our domain name and web
hos ting for another year), I'll pop a report
on the website.
Cheers
Bro Google
Cheerio
G orilla and the G oose (HO NKing out) (which is
which? – Ed)
The kettle Craig’s latest project - the brew stand Ex-grain bin (s/s of course) now HLT
The mash tun is a 38 litre Coleman esky with a c opper manifold - Craig made up the bulkhead for the tap.
He also made the 100 litre kettle from scratc h, all s /s with a copper bottom s oldered in place. I t has a dam
for filtering hops and break and works well as a whirlpool. Fired by gas .
All this kit s its on C raig’s newly made up brew stand - naturally it’s on wheels s o he can brew outside in
s ummer.
O nce the wort is chilled via a Therminator it’s into a 50l s /s fermenter - open fermenting, no airloc ks . The
fermenting fridge is c ontrolled by a neat thermostat that takes care of heating AND cooling, made for him
by a mate.
Craig kegs almost exc lus ively, as can be seen by his lagering fridge - those are 18 litre kegs , s horter and
fatter than us ual, so he c an get 2 layers in the fridge - handy.
The only bottling he does is for c omps , s urpris e surprise, and he us es G rolsc h bottles via a c ounter-
pressure filler he and Ross designed. This obviously works reas onably well.
Mariss O tter 9 kg
Crystal 1 kg
Chocolate 1 kg
Melanoidan 1 kg
Cane Sugar 1 kg (add to boil)
Treat mash with a c ouple of teaspoons of gyps um
BJCP RIC Guidelines con’d
Mas h at the lower end say around 64C
At boil plus 10 minutes Target 150gm
Malt backbone can be balanced and supportive to
At boil plus 60 minutes Target 50 gms rich and barleywine-like, and may optionally show
At boil plus 70 minutes flame out some supporting caramel, bready or toasty flavors.
Alcohol st rength should be evident, but not hot,
Or sharp, or solventy. No diacetyl. The palate and
At boil plus 10 minutes Fuggles 250 gms finish can vary from relatively dry to moderately
sweet, usually with some lingering roastiness, hop
At boil plus 60 minutes Fuggles 100 gms bitterness and warming character. The balance and
At boil plus 70 minutes flame out intensity of flavors can be affected by aging, with
some flavors becoming more subdued over time
Any good ale yeas t but lots and lots of it, and some aged, vinous or port-like qualities
oddly thes e beers do well with dried yeas ts so I developing.
s uggest 40 gms minimum of re- hydrated in 45C Mouthfeel: Full to very full-bodied and chewy,
water or 20 minutes say Nottingham. with a velvety, luscious texture (although the body
may decline with long conditioning). Gentle smooth
Use a big fermentor..or even two. warmth from alcohol should be present and
Fermentation may take more than a week. noticeable. Should not be syrupy and under-
attenuated. Carbonation may be low to moderate,
E njoy in 12 months . depending on age and conditioning.
Overall Impression: An in tensely flavored, big,
Kurt z dark ale. Roasty, fruity, and bittersweet, with a
noticeable alcohol presence. Dark fruit flavors meld
with roasty, burnt, or almost tar-like sensations.
Like a black barleywine with every dimension of
flavor coming into play.
History: Brewed to high gravity and hopping level
in England for export to the Baltic States and
Russia. Said to be popular with the Russian
Imperial Court. Today is even more popular with
American craft brewers, who have extended the
style with unique American characteris tics.
Comments: Variations exist, with English and
American interp retations (predictably, the American
versions have more bitterness, roasted character,
and finishing hops, while the English varieties
reflect a more complex specialty malt character and
a more forward ester profile). The wide range of
allowable characteristics allow for maximum brewer
creativity.
Ingredients: Well-modified pale malt, with
generous quantities of roasted malts and/or grain.
May have a complex grain bill using virt ually any
variety of malt. Any type of hops may be used.
Alkaline water balances the abundance of acidic
roasted grain in the grist. American or Englis h ale
yeast.
Vital Statistics:
OG 1.075 - 1.095+
FG 1.018 - 1.030+
IBUs 50 - 90+
SRM 30 - 40+
ABV 8 - 12+%
Commercial Examples: Samuel Smith Imperial
Stout, Courage Imperial Stout, Brooklyn Black
Chocolate Stout, Rogue Imperial Stout, North Coast
Old Rasputin Imperial Stou t, Victo ry Storm King,
Bell's Expedition Stout, Dogfish Head World Wide
Stout, Thirsty Dog Siberian Night, Stone Imperial
Stout, Avery The Czar, Founders Imperial Stout,
Newport Beach John Wayne Imperial Stout, Great
Lakes Blackout Stout
The Road to Recognition
or: t he road more (or less) t ravelled
A wrap up of t he 2006 BJCP journey
by Sist er Hot st uff
Februray 2006
It didn’t take any arm twisting, just a bit of elbow
bending, to entice Dan Rayner, C harles Newton,
Bec L etc her, Paul Kelly, G raham Hayward and
myself to embark upon the gruelling road that
leads to BJCP recognition. There were mumblings
from D r Kurtz and Brother Solstic e about c oming
along to tastings and resitting the exam...but
more on that later. T hus the Canberra 6 , for
2006, were formed.
Bright eyed and enthus iastic about the s tudy c ourse ahead, (apart from me who knew what to
expect and hoped the fear wouldn’t s how in my eyes ), we s et out to work our way through the
numerous beer styles over the c oming months . We met regularly, about every two weeks , to taste
the styles for that session and to discuss various brewing practices and how to formulate recipes .
The study sessions lasted a couple of hours depending on the beer styles involved – we tried to get
commercial examples of eac h style but that proved difficult for some. Many of the club’s brewers
generous ly donated their beer for us to try and we s imulated a judging session on these beers and
returned the evaluation s heets to them.
O ver the months thes e tasting sessions become, how s hall I s ay it, less formal than the earnest
and studious approach we took in the early days . I think the turning point was the Pale Ale session
whic h c ons isted of E nglish Pale Ales , American Ales and India Pale Ales . Now the astute reader will
already have put two and two together and realised that there are a lot of beers in this category
and many (many!) examples available…need I go on?
J uly 2006
Study over, the next step was to prepare for
the exam. We had the c hoice to sit in August
in Sydney but we opted to sit with some of the
NSW candidate’s up in the Hunter Valley at
Potter’s Brewery in late O ctober. Reas ons for
that dec ision was a long lead time to the exam
– more time to c ram, it coincided with the NSW
State comp judging, and we got to go on a
road trip. T he month’s ticked by…
There were about 12 of us sitting the exam and we were all relieved when it was over and, had it
not been for too many beers over the prior c ouple of days , we would have gone s traight to the
pub.
It was a great journey once again, even if not everyone s at the exam it was still great to spend
time with them all doing what we love...talking about, and drinking, beer. The journey will
eventually end in a beer but not until we get our res ults and that wont be till about March next
year, ok, there’ll be many a beer between now and then.
Beechworth is a lovely s pot for a brewery, a green, leafy town over a river and ravine, an eclectic
population, fantastic little restaurants everywhere and a good range of accommodation (we s tayed at
the main s treet pub, Tans well’s Commercial H otel, not too flash but c lean and very c heap). T he
Bridge Road Brewers is right outside the back door of the pub and is loc ated in an old brick cellar
looking building. I nside, the brewery equipment s its oppos ite an open and airy bar (s ervic ed by the
brewer’s Austrian wife Maria – how very authentic ), s ituated in front of a large glassed- in cool- room.
Patrons can purchas e off-licenc e six- pac ks and cas es or sit at several tables inside or out and order
glasses or samplers of the five draught beers or c hampagne bottles of the brewery’s s pecialty
“C hevalier” range. P rices range from around $3-4 per glass to $7 for five 125mL samples . The
Chevalier range is c urrently advertised as being a Hefe- weizen and a Bier de Guarde, both of which
had run out recently but after c hatting with Maria about how muc h we wanted to try the new s eason
brew, the brewer Ben Kraus was called and he delivered to us two freshly bottled Saisons one to try
on the s pot and a take home bottle (both on the house! ).
The beers were, unsurprisingly, excellent. We tried all five draught beers , the Wheat Ale, c loudy with a
s weet banana aroma, a big s pic y banana flavour and a mild bitter finish. Followed it up with an
Australian Ale, which, although well balanced and an easy session beer, is c learly made for rec ent
converts to mic robrews . The Pale Ale was a real standout- clean, c ris p, APA-style beer using American
Crystal hops and two others that were kept sec ret, certainly not as in-your- face as brews made with
Cascade but fruity none- the- less . Next up we tried the Celtic Red Ale (Irish red), whic h was relatively
light but with a nice roasty, toffee, malt complexity and we finished on the D ark Ale (porter) very
pleasant with a medium c reamy body, mild toasty, coffee notes and warming bitters weet finis h.
While trying the beers we had the opportunity to as k the brewer about how he got into the business.
After traveling across E urope working, unpaid, in various breweries (where he met M aria) to learn the
c raft Ben came home to establish the Bridge Road Brewers which has only been operating for the las t
18 months or s o. O riginally from Beechworth, he had been working for a few years at wineries in
Wes tern Australia before deciding to take up brewing, and seems to be well aware of what is needed,
in terms of marketing and sales , to open a success ful brewery. When I c ommented upon how like his
brewery was to many American mic robreweries , with their walk-through brewery tours and open
counters to both try and buy brews , Ben merely remarked that he based his brewery design on the
cellar-door approach that most s uccessful Aus tralian wineries have always employed. Beec hworth and
the Bridge Road Brewers are the bes t exc uses to break up a trip to M elbourne, well worth a stop.
I have never sparged in my life. When I s ay this in front of normally mild mannered brewing friends ,
some get visibly unc omfortable. Some less res trained brewers can even bark out a “jus t sparge like
normal people”, or something s imilar. I have to confess that I really enjoy thes e reac tions – it’s an
unexpec ted benefit of the “abnormal” practice of no-sparge. Still, after no-sparging for over a year now,
it’s probably time to grow up, and try to provide s ome constructive points of discussion on this topic . So,
the following article c ontains a mix of dry research, personal experience, and pure biased opinion in no
particular order.
PROS:
Richer sweet er wort / Less risk of ext ract ing
t annins (arguably).
For the reasons discussed above. I n theory, you
are draining off the very best frac tion of the mas h
at the expense of economy.
Quicker brew day.
There are fewer steps , and you don’t have to
worry as much about s etting up a modest
sparging rate.
More preci se ma sh t emps.
The mash is so thin that it’s much eas ier to get an
exact mash temp (as opposed to getting different
temps from different locations in a thicker mas h)
Lower cost of equipment (arguably).
There’s no need for a HLT, s parge arm or mas h
tun. I use a big (massive, really) aluminium pot
to mas h in. I don’t even insulate it, as the mass Check out my kettle! Being a guy, and owning a kettle
this big, it’s diffic ult to resist t he urge to draw parallels
of grains + water is s o signific ant, that the temp between the size of one’s kettle, and the size of one’s
stays pretty c ons tant. genitals. Fortunately, I have been mature enough to
(Continued next page) resist this u rge so far.
No-sparge = no-idea? con’d
CONS:
Highe r cost of ingredient s.
For no-sparge, the quoted increase in grain bill size c an vary depending on who you listen to. John
Palmer s ays a scale- up factor of about 1 .1 to 1 .25 (4). J effrey D onovan says about 1 .3 to 1 .5 (3). I bank
on a scale up factor of about 1 .35 for an ale on the strongish s ide (about 1 .055-1.060). Light beers c an
be as low as about 1 .15 , and very strong Belgian ale (O G = 1 .090 +) is almost a factor of 2 .
So, to work out how much more expens ive it is to no-s parge, take your current cost of grain and
multiply it by about 1 .35 for a s tandard beer. I f your current grain bill for a s ingle batch is 6kg, then it’s
very roughly about an extra $4 to go no-sparge (us ing our c lub’s prices ).
A free no-sparge grain bill calc ulator is available at http://home.elp.rr.c om/brewbeer/files /nbsparge.xls
(unfortunately, it uses American units )
Less experience of t his t echnique a mong t he brewi ng communit y.
I don’t know of another no-s parger among the local brewing community. T his c an be diffic ult when
seeking people’s opinion, as sparging people don’t know if a thin beer (for example) is attributed to
fac tors they are familiar with, or something to do with the no-s parge process . This leads to an
interes ting irony – although no-sparging is by far the easies t way to brew from a process perspective,
perhaps it’s best for beginners to start with sparging just to be able to have access to good feedback.
A recent example is where my beer has been a touch on the thin s ide recently. T he cause of this is
possibly that no-s parge leads to “more fermentables in the wort” (5), and needs to be combated with a
slightly higher mash temp than what is recommended in sparging recipes . The point is that this took me
a little while to find out (and a few brews ), where if I was s parging, there’s plenty of expertise to sort
something like this out pretty quickly.
*NOTE: “batch spargi ng” is a middle ground between spargi ng and no-spargi ng, a nd seems to be a really attractive option for brewers.
It’s more efficient than no-sparge, has some of the equi pment cost savings, has a low risk for ta nnin extraction, a nd only marginally
adds to the le ngth o f the brew day. I ha ve no e xperience with this techni que though, a nd have decide d not to include it in the scope o f
this article.
What are f amous people saying about no-spa rge?
It’s c onsidered that George Fix introduced the no-sparge technique to the home brewing public in
September 1992 (1). Some of the things he s aid in his brief description of this “experimental” technique
are, “some of the world's great ales and lagers have been brewed this way, and I have found it works in
homebrewing as well for s pecial beers .” But he also says “Clearly this is not the way to brew our
standard beers .”(2)
George didn’t elaborate on why he did not think that no-sparge was appropriate for “standard beers ”,
but he talks about the extra expense earlier on in the article, s o it could be assumed that this is the
reason.
I n any cas e, George’s thread was revived by the slightly less famous (but s till reasonably active brewing
artic le writer) Louis K. Bonham in H BD in Sept 1996, and discussion continued on and off until at least
Feb 1997 (1). People’s individual res ults in using this technique are disc ussed in these postings , with an
emphasis on debating the presenc e of “enhanced maltiness ”. There is still debate today about this
possible “enhanced maltiness”.
Jeff rey Donovan (P romash author) has conducted “many no-sparge mashes [as the] benefits (while
still being debated) include a richer, maltier beer”. He claims this richer wort would “seem” to be due to
“fewer tannins leac hed from the mas h due to the lack of s parging”. But, he also says that “...while no-
sparging may produce a better beer, it is als o less economic al, requiring from 1 /3 to 1 /2 additional grain
in the mas h grist.”(3)
John Palme r (H ow to Brew) “finally got on the bandwagon with a couple of methods that several of
[his ] friends have been
using for years : batch s parge and no-s parge brewing” between the first and s econd editions of his book.
He c laims that “these
methods c an produce a richer, s moother tasting wort with the same gravity as a s tandard recipe, but
use a s impler lautering proc ess that is more robust and pH stable.” H e then, however, points out that
“continuous sparging methods are more economical”, and that “everyone learns about continuous
sparging first and mos t all- grain recipes you will s ee (s uch as thos e in brewing magazines ) are based on
the efficiency of this method.”(4)
Paris Hi lt on dec lined to comment on the no-sparge technique, but did want to point out that she was
not wearing underpants .
(1) Ken Schwartz, A Formulation Procedure for No-Sparge and Batch-Sparge Recipes, 1998 (updated Oct 2005)
(2) George Fix, “Yummy Malt Flavour”, Home Brew Digest #977, Sept 1992.
(http://hbd.org/hbd/archive/977.html#977-3)
(3) Jeffrey Donovan, Mechanics Of No Sparge Brewing, from
http://www.promash.com/TipsNTricks/CommonTasks/MechOfNoSparge_Article.html
(4) John J Palmer, “How To Brew, 2nd Ed.”, 2002, Defenestrative Publishing Co.
(5) John J Palmer, “Skip the Sparge”, 2002, BYO Magazine, May-June.
Summer
crosswort
the mash
1 2
4 5 6 7
8 9 10
11 12 13
14 15
16 17 18 19 20
21
22 23 24 25 26
27 28
29 30 31
32 33 34
35 36 37
38 39 40 41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54
55
56 57 58 59
60
61 62 63 64 65
66
67 68
69
70 71
72 73
74
75
76
www.CrosswordWeaver.com
Summer crosswort – the mash
ACROSS DOWN
4 5 6 7
9 10 11 12 13
14
15 16 17
18 19
20 21 22
23 24 25 26
27 28
29 30 31
32 33 34
35 36
37
38 39 40
41
42 43 44 45
46 47 48
49
50 51
52 53 54 55
56 57
58 59 60 61
62 63 64
65 66 67
68 69
70
71
www.CrosswordWeaver.com
Summer crosswort – the lauter
ACROSS DOWN