REPORT AND PROCEEDING OF WORKSHOP

STATE LEVEL CONSULTATION WORKSHOP ON NATIONAL RURAL LIVELIHOOD MISSION (NRLM)

26-27 AUGUST 2011

ORGANISED BY

JHARKHAND STATE LIVELIHOOD PROMOTION SOCIETY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

TABLE OF CONTENT S.No. 1. 2. 3. Content Inaugural Session Group Work Presentation 3.1 Presentation on POTENTIAL CONVERGENCE OPPORTUNITY IN NRLM 3.2 Presentation on POTENTIAL ROLE OF NGOS, CIVIL SOCIETY IN NRLM 3.3 Presentation on POTENTIAL ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR IN NRLM 4. 5. 6. Deliberation by Mr. T. Vijay Kumar on inception of NRLM Question Answer Session Annexure: 6.1 List of Participant 6.2 Acronyms 20 21 4-7 8-10 11-13 14-17 17-19 Page No. 2 2-13

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

The Programme started with welcome note of Mr. S.N. Pandya, SPM, Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society. Later a bouquet was presented to Mr. Debasish Gupta, Development Commissioner, Mr. R.S. Poddar, Principal Secretary Rural Development Department and Mr. Vishnu Kumar, Secretary Labour and Welfare Department.

INAUGURAL SESSION Dignitaries like Mr. Debasis Gupta, Development commissioner, Principal Secretary, RDD, Mr. Vishnu Kumar, Secretary, Labour and welfare Govt of Jharkhand have contributed in the inaugural session. Their contribution in the workshop is given in brief as follows: Mr. Poddar brought to attention of the house the importance of conducting workshop in order to meet deadline of submitting SPIP (State project implementation plan) by Sept 30, 2011. He introduced the concept of National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM) and explained the rich background Jharkhand state, though Jharkhand is suffering from poverty the present times. He reiterated that JSLPS, a functional society under RDD will be the nodal agency to implement NRLM. Mr. Poddar explained how grass root level institutions will be involved in NRLM and what would be their role in preparation of SPIP. Describing about the journey of poverty alleviation programmes in India, Mr Poddar said that IRDP was launched and completed its 15 years of project period. Later, IRDP was replaced by SGSY under which a community institution (SHG) formed and it was linked with banks. Now, NRLM is going to be launched. The basic feature of NRLM is to enable community institution to carry on with livelihood activity on their own and govt role should be minimal. Mr. Bishnu Kumar said about the offers of 22 ITIs in Jharkhand to promote skill to the rural poor. He informed the house that National Council for Vocational Training has recognised 125 industrial centres. Mr. Debashis Kumar Gupta shared with the house his dismal past experiences, when poverty alleviation program confined to just asset distribution.

GROUP EXERCISE SESSION This session started with brief introduction about the workshop by Mr. Pandya. He threw light on the reasons of conducting the workshop. Describing the importance of workshop, he said that JSLPS, being a nodal agency for implementation of NRLM in the state has the responsibility to prepare quality SPIP and hence this workshop is a road in the making of SPIP. And for this purpose, two competent consultants have been working rigorously for the last two months for JSLPS.

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

Further about group exercise, he reiterated that this session is purely technical session. Groups will be formed for the discussion
1. Role of NGO, how we want to integrate, role for better implementation, 2. What would be the convergence, 3. Role of private sector, what exact role for skill training and skill development.

Subsequently Mr. Pandeya Invited Mr. Manish Dubey, consultant JSLPS for SPIP to acknowledge the house about group exercise Mr. Manish Dubey greeted house to join the workshop and explain as to why their role is important in making SPIP. He reiterated that shaping of programme is rolling process and similarly rural livelihood promotion is also taking its shape right from IRDP then SGSY to NRLM in terms of the perspective and view replaces in the issue on rural livelihood e.g how the role of implementers, how the programme has changed, What would be whole range of stakeholders (Civil society, Pvt. Sector, various Govt support institution like financial institution and line department) and their potential role, How the partnership should be happen, anticipate the challenges, how to address the entire programme. He throws a big question to the house that how we can together mobilize and strengthen the institution of the poor to make sure that the range the livelihood actually reach to the poor, who ensure poor better access to the services, to entitlement, to right & so on and to strengthen policy and governance in terms of livelihood concern, programme management of NRLM. What are the enable arrangement, structure, instrument and people will live for this to happen. How we will planning for partnership work. How it will actually be operationalize. Moreover, he briefed about the formation groups, for exercise and told that three groups will be formed to discuss on three different topics as follows:
1. Potential role of NGOs, Civil society in NRLM 2. Potential convergence opportunity in NRLM; 3. Potential role of private sector in NRLM;

Before starting group exercise, a brief presentation to the house on NRLM guidelines & implementation framework given by Mr. Manish Dubey. After this presentation, Mr. Dubey briefed the house about the topic on which groups will have to work out.

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

PRESENTATION ON POTENTIAL CONVERGENCE OPPORTUNITY IN NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

PRESENTATION ON POTENTIAL ROLE OF NGOS, CIVIL SOCIETY IN NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

10

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

11

PRESENTATION ON POTENTIAL ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTOR IN NRLM

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

12

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

13

Exercise of group 3 is presented by Mr. Deepak Upadhyay Addition/queries 1. If beneficiary gets skill training and is positioned in a far flung place, 50 km away from the village. Will it be worthwhile, when hostel in the same city can be provided at least during the probation period, so that they can save money which can be spent on the journey between village and town. 2. Participant from DBtech assured that L & T provides accommodation also. Mr. T Vijay Kumar answered that this is a valid point. The employers should provide the accommodation facilities. State Livelihood Mission with a dedicated setup can start facilitation centres, and the remuneration for this can be part of their own salary structure. He indicated at the kind of facilitation centres D Btech & L & FS and have provided, and that this should be responsibility of SLM and private sector.

Mr. Pandya was facilitating the programme and summed up the gist of all the three presentations. Mr. Pandya called the house for their queries, confusions, suggestions and comments regarding operational issues, implementation framework, and policy to be formed at state level. Mr. Pandya pointed at the commendable contribution of Mr. T.Vijay Kumar as a key planner of NRLM & extended his gratitude for his commitment towards the programme, as he could make his presence in the programme a very short notice. Mr. Pandeya invited P Secretary RDD Mr. R.S Poddar, J.S MORD Mr. T. Vijay Kumar and special secretary RDD Mr. Paritosh Upadhyay to be with members on the dais and called on the participants to clear their doubts and queries in the open session and expressed his confidence that this session would definitely give the whole house a very good insight of the programme.

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

14

DELIBERATION OF MR. T. VIJAY KUMAR ON INCEPTION OF NRLM

Mr T. Vijay Kumar described about how this programme came into inception and how it differed from the earlier programmes. He said that IRDPs focus was on asset and over the years, different initiatives, many of them from NGOs have been taken. Several interventions came from the report which was submitted to the SAARC summit in Dhaka in 1993. Where the first independence of South Asia commission of poverty eradication consisting of eminent experts from South Asian Countries took close to two years 91-92 to look at large scale poverty eradication initiatives in countries like India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan. They looked for those initiatives of poverty eradication which had worked and those which had failed. The challenge before the commission was that most of the world had eradicated poverty. Many countries which had become independent when India had come out of the colonial rule, experienced tremendous economic growth and also were able to abolished poverty. The world largest numbers of poor are in South Asia, and naturally in South Asia, India. So the attempt of this commission was to understand why poverty is endemic and why poverty has not been eradicated in these areas, compared to the similar countries which attained independence at same time, e.g. China, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Philippines. India was represented by Mr. Hashim & Mr. Venugopal was secretary to PM at that time. They said what we should have a model, unique to south Asia. South Asia also has its strengths, be it institution of the family, being community, the village community so looking into this they saw mostly failure. The interventions, in which poor had a very active role right from beginning, were successful. There didnt come at the end of all the planning method done for them. Thats why the paradigm shift from seeing poor as passive object, to basically subject people who are thinking, people who have capabilities. So, they said those programme which had taken this into account and there was active role for the poor members in all stages of the programme, those programme was successful. The second thing they said, poor suffers from multiple deprivations so, economic poverty eradication will not do so there are multiple deprivations. Poor face many obstacles even though they have tremendous capabilities. So, what is that secret, what is that mechanism, which has enabled the poor to come out from poverty in spite of so many obstacles. And that they said to when you, when institution of the poor. When people were organised and when they build their own institutions and here we must be clear the meaning institution of the poor as compared to institution for the poor, so institution for the poor will include NGOs Govt, Bank etc. They still external to the poor. The institutions of the poor will include SHGs, Farmer group, Labour association. These groups are formed by the poor themselves, and hence there is sense of ownership in decision making. So, the institution of the

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

15

poor are typical building blocks for any poverty eradication programme that was the very important lesson, very important finding and they found wherever poor were encouraged, poverty eradication was possible. They also said that these are not, they also look at to correct the institution of the poor so generic institutions which are based on affinity, based on bonding. These are the worth which is capable of being with sovereignty of deprivation. They also said that this has not happened automatically so there is need to induce this. And that is the role of institution for the poor. A sensitive support system for the poor that is provided by local govt, NGO, Govt. Now, based on the recommendation of commission, UNDP funded a pilot in each of the SACs. So the pilot in India was implemented in AP from 95 to 2000. Similarly there is pilot in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Incidentally it may come as surprise that in Independence south Asia commission recommendations were based on very successful programme that was run in Pakistan by a very eminent person who was from the Civil Service of Pakistan govt, who resigned and joined AGA Khan rural support programme Mr. Shoyeb Sultan Khan. So the Pilot in AP was most the successful one among pilots in South Asia. And then the idea of the SAARC secretariat at the time was that similar programme should be run in various states and some more that didnt happen. But within AP the lesson learnt for UNDP pilot from 95-2000, was scaled out. The state govt itself took a loan from World Bank and this was scaled up in two phases which ran from 2000 and it will be over in 2011. So for about 11 years of this programme based on success of the first UNDP pilot was scaled up in our state. I have privilege to be associated with the Andhra Pradesh govt for about 10 years right from the beginning when I came here at New Delhi. Meanwhile the planning commission & MORD looked at what was the large scale initiative throughout the country and therefore how to restructure SGSY programme and so as a result of this based on Kudubashree, SERP based on Tamilnadu experience, Pradan, various NGOs, and Myrada etc. Idea was how to do we scale up without losing of quality and that is how NRLM was formed based on assessing what happened within the country and plugging the missing areas in various programme. Therefore the programme has been conceived based on practical appreciation of situation on ground its not theatrical. There are some generic principles common to and across the country but exact shape which naturally which NRLM will take in any state naturally depend upon local circumstances, local geography and local history. There are some generic principle those are believe in the capabilities of poor, organising of the poor, building institution of the poor, nurturing them and so institution is poor has independent investment on its own and then having a sensitive support structure. So whenever you have all these three then its possible to work with the NRLM and each state should learn what are the best practices within the state is and Jharkhand itself has many best practices. So, my request to the SPIP team, state govt which is at planning phase is all to take stocks of which are the best practices within the state of
JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

16

Jharkhand. And I have very interest to the last presentation I saw the lots of corporate have expressed interest to do a bulls tick model and that is something which I have not heard in other states. When I saw the agenda of the govt body come out of the corporate partnership but we look surprise and I am very impressed the group recommended that we would we will to take up certain block, certain geography in bull stick model. So I think we should take stock of whatever work has Jharkhand but not quick results there have been in operation for reason time for us to learn lessons. So I think the first thing to recommend to SPIP team is to take stock of this so whether best practice of institution building, livelihood promotion, financial inclusion, around social issues. Poverty is not based on income power; go around health, around issues of trafficking. So this states of yours best practices and how the lesson to be learnt from that. We also do that failure, what is not work why it is not work. So we should be very honest we should do infrastructure. Its not the question of blaming but at least we should not repeat mistakes. So that gives us, then we should look at what are happened outside of state or can we learn from there. So we should have home grown model which is built on your strength. Which is based on your unique opportunities, so this is I thought is the framework for the SPIP planning for you to do a planning and one very serious problem I do see in Jharkhand is about Financial Inclusion. The performance is very poor, I really dont know even though Mr. Pandeya has been saying that I have all answers but this something which bits me. So, we really have to figure out what is the solution for financial inclusion but at affordable cost. So, I also need to worry when people say that we should have MFIs. So what is the affordability to the poor? For this we need private sector. MFI unfortunately have been looking at whatever affordable potentials. So, poor their own viability should be there. So this again we have to look at various alternatives. In fact one of the states realises that PACS is working well. So, I advice to the state why cant you do financial intermediaries through your PACS. States like Chhattisgarh where PACS are doing wonderful work around procurement for Paddy & etc. My request to GM NABARD, please you should constitute today team which looks at financial input it is matter which is you know being discussed at all level actually in Delhi we have so many meetings where the moment we talk about Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Orissa and then the issue of Financial Inclusion. If you see the history of Jharkhand, many tribal worlds suffer exploitation by the middleman. Where the poor there, Mahajan are there. Government will not be there, Mahajan is there. So, Financial Inclusion we need to have a unique solution. One of the solutions which Jharkhand should look at the Karnataka Govt experience with NABFINS that Mr. Al. Fernandez is also closely involved with work done in Jharkhand that something you should have seen. Third piloting with commercial banks in Bihar to basically address the problem faced by Branch Manager. Because at corporate level CMDs & all they says yes yes we look for the poor but finally BM is the person who decides he the chairman for me. Unless he signs cheque, credit will not be given to the beneficiary. There are some experiences in Jharkhand, where NGOs have worked with branch managers. For financial inclusion, I would request all of you apply your mind; this is very serious bottleneck so far as NRLM is concern. We know the fact that poverty can be defeated. It is shame that poverty is still there. One of the important learning from AP. Turning point in NRLM will be also in Jharkhand when you develop social capital among the poor. So the women come out of poverty, became

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

17

the trainer, we have this is concept of Community Resource person. These pools of resource persons really change the picture. We realise that when you build SHG & SHG federation, federations you know this worked out institution of the poor but when you transform them into Institution support the poor then your job is that. NRLM success depends upon how well you nurture the social capital of the poor and it is highly doable. It is highly doable, 8 years ago we started requesting women who had come out with poverty to go to neighbouring village, neighbouring district and to do the training them and they responded very well and result was outstanding. In Bihar, the programme started in 2005-06, 200 women came from AP these were SHG members who had came out from poverty, who had been members of SHG for more than 10 years that will be substantial diversified livelihoods and still they are willing to go to other state that to train people. 200 women come to Bihar and 40-50 villages covered village by them. They spent month in each village and they took 4 to 5 rounds in a year. They have to for about 2.5 years and turning point in Bihar Jeevika is when the first set of hosts in Bihar were able to produce their own CRP. So, CRP is not women whos very articulate or who speaks well but is a person whose life has changed whose life has been transformed. And so she speaks from her experience. So its experience is training and that is the solution for Jharkhand. So to cover the whole state we dont have to multiply their office, we do this own way initially in blocks and human resource from this block they once move this programme to neighbouring block, districts, and then human resource there takes into other places. Sometimes people thinking that you know we are training when we talk about poverty eradication, but it is possible that we have to change, change of our thinking and we have to differently and its also not costly but it is very cost effective model. So the CRP that means NRLM should be driven by the poor. Apply all element of strategies in every phase of implementation rather applying it into first stage of introduction and then phase of conclusion whatever strategy whatever implementation we want to do the lens that you should adopt the lens you will adopt judge whether strategy make sense or not is what is the role of institution of the poor, what is the role of CRPs what is the role of community professional. Each and every element of the strategy would be the might view of salt test. One you do this the result will automatically come. So, NRLM would require believing in the capability of poor and believing in each of operational strategy.

Question answer session It has become fashion to initiate a programme with the name of MISSION like NRHM, NHM etc but parent department never gives full autonomy of its operation. Still project mission unit is dependent to the parent organisation for decision making. Hence system of operation is not improved. So, under NRLM, state management unit will have autonomy to work independently? Mr. T. Vijay Kumar replied that we have said, state govt should develop annual action plan based on their condition. Action plan by interface by the ministry, by the state govt, by the mission. The Annual Action Plan is also in the context of 7 year poverty eradication plan, so therefore the flexibility is there. But, I know unless that spelt very carefully into the byelaws for the society and govt also keep say the flexibility of operation. So, I couldnt agree with you more. This is only programme where entire focus is building demand side. We are saying that

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

18

we do have any target for the development of like road, infrastructure etc. For the success of mission how many self reliant, self dependent institution of a poor have been created. We believe that once you have built strong institution of people, they will have known how to remove the poverty. They understand better how to remove the poverty. The objective here to build good institution of the poor, institution managed by people, financially self reliant. This is investment for demand side. The basic work under NRLM is to involve people. SHG movement is very poor. NABARD can participate to improve the scenario, only if principal secretary Mr. Poddar initiate in this issue. Mr. Poddar replied that the problem of FI is very much centre of agenda. UIDAI Adhar, 30 members have enrolled. Whosoever is registered job card in NAREGA will have bank a/c. We have allocated one block one bank in different areas to ensure ADHAR number to open bank a/c. PACS have presence in each and every village/panchayat. We have allowed regenerating PACS in every panchayat/village. This LAMPS and PACS can do banking operation. Cooperative deptt has a plan under ITDP to enable each of the LAMPS & PACS banking operation. Those institutions which are very mature very much in place and they have lot of potential what is missing link are there. We can probability can take care of these institution. Suggestion by Mr. T Vijay that if PRADAN or NGO can map of good SHG. We can work under NRLM treat this location as intensive area by capitalising federations from both end, work can be started at demand and supply both. Mr. Poddar added that under NRLM, SPIP should also envisage convergence with similar programmes implemented by different programme like agriculture department, welfare deptt. Our SPIP will take of this aspect. Everybody in isolation will not work. T Vijay reiterated that in second phase JTDP is scaling in 500 villages. Earlier they were working in 300 villages. Rather scale up to 500 villages, JTDP has to scale up the programme to 200 villages and take care of 300 villages for further support mean supply side, if capacity building aspect took place. Narendranath from PRADAN shared experience regarding bank linkage in Hazaribag & told NABARD will be an effective body in mobilising bankers and their support for financial linkage. Mr Deepak Upadhyay raised and issue on Financial Inclusion and said that just opening of bank a/c is should not be considered as financial inclusion. This is the very sector, where NGO has great opportunity. Unless and until income level of beneficiary increased and they go for re-banking, it should not be treated as FI. He again asked a condition of those areas which is not taken intensive block in first phase and SGSY will be terminated by 31 Dec 2011. Mr. T Vijay Kumar replied that for non-intensive, flow of fund will not stop. But budget given to the state government the fund for non intensive will cut down but it will not be zero. Discussing in this issue he reiterated that wherever good work has been done with SHG might have work like intensive block. But this will do in partnership with corporate. So, identify block, cluster etc and also treat them as intensive.

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

19

Mr. Paritosh Upadhyay, special secretary RDD said regarding the nodal agency in state for the preparation of SPIP that we have submitted proposal to nominate existing JSLPS as nodal society for SPIP preparation as initial work of NRLM. It is clear from Law department but from finance deptt, has reservation that how can society formed for one project can be applicable for multiple projects, if it is formed for the purpose to run one project. They again raised the issue of funding after NRLM. Replying on the issue of state nodal agency Mr. T. Vijay Kumar said if we looked at other state Tamilnadu women development corporation, In Bihar Jeevika (BRLP) was setup to implementing Jeevika has been nominated by government as nodal agency. Its not necessary to start new society. If state can start new society, please mend the bye-laws in such way that the programme can be implemented across state. Mr. Pandya concluded the session with a belief that this not end but this is starting of sharing innovative and workable views. Finally Mr. Kailashpati Jha gave vote of thanks to Debasish Gupta, Mr. Vishnu Kr Secretary labour deptt, Mr. Poddar, Principal secretary Mr Paritosh Upadhyay and delegates from various institution, NGOs and corporate.

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

20

Appendix
Sl Name of the Participant No Administration & Government 1 Mr. T. Vijay Kumar 2 Mr. Debasis Gupta 3 Mr. R S Poddar 4 Shri Vishnu Kumar 5 Mr. Paritosh Upadhaya 6 Mr. B. Nijalingappa 7 Mr. Jata Shankar Choudhury NNMU (NRLM) 8 Mr. Kamalesh Prasad Banking 9 Mr. Vinay Kumar Vutukuru 10 Mr. Jiji Mammen 11 Mr. B K Das 12 Mr. S K Singh 13 Mr. Sanjay Akhouri 14 Tarlochan Singh 15 Shalabh Kr. Shrivastava Academics & Research 15 Dr. Harishwar Dayal 16 Dr. Shivendra Kumar 17 Prof. A.K Jaiswal 18 Mr. Mintoo Job CSR & Industry 19 Dr. O P Jha 20 Mr.Biren Bhuta 21 Ms. Jaya Patel 22 Mr. Ravindra Singh Non Government Organization 23 Mr. Mahesh Venketesh 24 Siva Kumar 25 Mr. Sanjay Basu Mullick 26 Bipin Bihari Singh 27 Mr. S.A.Ahmed 28 Mr. Satish Girija 29 Mr. Arvind 30 Mr. Manish Kumar Narendra Nath Non-farm Skill Development 31 Dr. B.V. Somasekhar 32 Mr. Sebastian Fernandis 33 R.Anwer 34 Mr. Vikash Kumar 35 Col.N.B. Saxena(RETD.) Designation List of Participants NRLM Workshop Organization Phone E-mail Joint Secretary MORD Development Comissioner Secretary Principal Secretary Program Director CEO Director National Manager Consultant Genral Manager AGM Coordinator,SLBC Zonal Manager Zonal Manager Chief Manager Regional Coordinator Head Principle Scientist Professor Eecutive Director Chief (Corporate Sustainability Services) Head(CSR) Executive Director Government of India Government of Jharkhand Department of Rural Development,GoJ Department of Labour ,Employment and Training SRLM,GoJ SLNA,GoJ SAMETI National Project Management Unit World Bank NABARD NABARD Allahabad Bank State Bank of India Bank of India PNB Institute of Human Development HARP IINRG( formely ILRI) Birsa Agricultural University Zindal Steel & Power Tata Steel Tata Power Ltd Bokaro Steel Plant KGVK Agri & IT Businesses,ITC ICFG GVT KSRA NBJK Badlao Foundation Dynamics Tarang PRADAN 040-32995455/ 325520000, 9701299933 Cap Foundation BOSCO(DBTI) IL& FS Cluster Development Initative Ltd. Lersen & Tuubro Limited 9279448630 91 40 2780 0875 9431103041 0651-2230904 651-2351520 6546-263332 9334346801 0651-2547480 9868882025 0651-2491070 9431707250 0651-2490514 9431381831 9204857260 9431115706 9810899893 9934368224 9431708964 7250961670 9470140089 9431706703 9431115417 7209015729 9835540564 9955360454 9431593545 9431374196 0651 2242362 9234531276 sec-labour-jhr@nic.in paritosh1069@gmail.com sametijharkhand@rediffmail.com kamlesh_prasad@hotmail.com v_vinni@yahoo.com jijimammen@rediffmail.com bkdash@rediffmail.com sksinghagm@gmail.com s.akhouri@sbi.co.in Jharkhandhc.Ranchi@bankofindia.co.i n shrivastvask@pnb.co.in hdayal1@rediffmail.com sk_harp@yahoo.co.in ilri@mail.com/jaiswalak59@yahoo.com mintujob@rediffmail.com op.jha@jindalsteel.com biren.bhuta@tatasteel.com jaya.Patel@tatapower.com

Group Head Secretary Zonal Programme Manager President Secretary Secretary Executive Director

mahesh.v@umruralservices.com SivaKumar.S@itc.in sanjay_samar@hotmail.com gvtfullmonth@rediffmail.com mail2ksra@gmail.com nbjkco@gmail.com/ satishgirija@gmail.com badlaofoundation@redifmail.com manish.kumar@dynamictarang.co.in

Fashion Institute, OCFIT Regional Coordinator State Coordinator Regional Head Regional Training Manager

40-66772009 9337475699 9811122604 9801555990 9810646996

bvsomasekhar@yahoo.com sebastian_Fernandis@yahoo.in r.anwer@dbtech.in vikash.kumar@ilfsets.com saxenanb@yahoo.co.uk / saxenanb@lntecc.com

36 G. Singh Peoples' Enterprise & Producer Networks 36 Mr. Nilesh K. Singh 37 Ms. Bala Devi 38 Other 39 Mr. Vartika Jaini

Program Coordinator CEO Executive Director

RRA ( Watershed network) VB.Net( State wide Value Chain network) Collectives for Integrated Livelihood Initiative The Centre for Development and population activities NRLM NRLM UNDP/JSLPS UNDP/JSLPS UNDP/JSLPS UNDP/JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS JSLPS

6512401974 9431385251 9910866637

nksingh2@gmail.com baladevi@pradan.net vartika.j@cinicell.org

Mr.Abhijit Chanda

Programme Officer Consultant NRLM Consultant State Project Manager M & E expert Livelihood Specialist State Finance Associate District Coordinator, Palamu Block Coordinator, Satbarwa Block Coordinator, Bishrampur District Coordinator, Ranchi Block Coordinator, Anagara Block Coordinator, Namkom District Coordinator, HB Block Coordinator, Padma District Coordinator, Pakur Block Coordinator, Pakuria Block Coordinator Block Coordinator Block Coordinator EACO

0651 2243296 9471710631 9810511019 9431102803 9471171401 9431102656 9470161360 9471761237 8986715542 9304969406 9934161626 9431356408 9431750399 9431552327 9471142332

achanda@cedpaindia.org kallolsh@yahoo.com dubey.manish1@gmail.com

40 Mr.Kallol Saha 41 Mr.Manish Dubey JSLPS team 42 S.N. Pandya 43 Mr. K.P. Jha 44 Mr. Debasis Mohapatra 45 Mr. Navin Gupta 46 Mr. Arif M. Akhtar 47 Mr. Kamal Jaiswal 48 Mr. Debashis Chaki 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Ms. Shanti Mardi Mr. Khalid Hussain Mr. DD Singh Mr. Praveen Singh Mr. H. N. Mishra Mr. Ajit Singh Mr. Birbal Thakur Mr. Prakash Kumar Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mr. Xavier Ekka Ms. Ekta Kumari

8986641070

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM

21

Acronyms
RDD Rural Development Department NRLM National Rural Livelihood Mission CRP Community Resource Person SPIP State Project Implementation Programme, SHG Self Help Group AP- Andhra Pradesh BRLP Bihar Rural Livelihood Programme GM General Manager NABARD National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development PACS Primary Agriculture Credit Society SLM State Livelihood Mission NGO Nan Government Organisation, SERP Society for elimination of Rural Poverty, SGSY Swarn Jayanti Swarozgar Yojna, MORD Ministry of Rural Development, SAARC South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, IRDP Integrated Rural Development Programme, JTDP Jharkhand Tribal Development Programme, LAMPS Large Area Multipurpose Society, UAIDAI Unique Identification Authority of India, JSLPS Jharkhand State Livelihood Promotion Society, PM Prime Minister SPM State project Manager

JSLPS/Arif Document/Report/Workshop NRLM