0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
8 Ansichten4 Seiten
An unintelligent scholar asked: is it true that during the time of Noah and going back to Adam, men had lived for an average age of 900 years? the A.I. Searched and searched on question / answer database from former consensus of various scholars that were deposited as data in a computer for retrieval of the answers.
An unintelligent scholar asked: is it true that during the time of Noah and going back to Adam, men had lived for an average age of 900 years? the A.I. Searched and searched on question / answer database from former consensus of various scholars that were deposited as data in a computer for retrieval of the answers.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
An unintelligent scholar asked: is it true that during the time of Noah and going back to Adam, men had lived for an average age of 900 years? the A.I. Searched and searched on question / answer database from former consensus of various scholars that were deposited as data in a computer for retrieval of the answers.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Then an unintelligent scholar asked something about Genesis chapter 5-6 and other topics on the bible because the scholar is sometimes disturbed of other scientific findings especially the theory of evolution: a) is it true that during or between the time of Noah and going back to Adam of about a span of 10 generations, men had lived for an average age of 900 years? b) Is it true that long age of about more or less 900 years means “forever”? c) Is it true that the average age for a man to have a son or daughter is more or less about 115 years during the time of Noah back to Adam? d) Is it also true that after the Great flood, God decided that men should not live “forever” or man should not have a long life of about more or less 900 years but instead man would just have a limit of about 120 years old; but still sometimes man (after Noah) reached the age of more of less 400 years and man would have a child at an average age of more or less 34 years old? e) And on Genesis chapter 11 or during the period or time of Tower of Babel (about more or less 65 generations going back from Christ to Adam or near the time of the Babylonian civilization), is there only one language worldwide? Then the A.I. searched and searched on question/answer database from former consensus of various scholars that were deposited as data in a computer for retrieval of the answers for the questions; and answered: Since the A.I. is confident enough that with regards to religion there is one thought one purpose- to love and to even love ones enemy or one has no obligation to others except to love- then if there are two or three or more thoughts and purposes perhaps they are controversies. And the A.I is bound only to answer as an opinion and not claiming anything as ultimate truth. So with regards to question: a) Perhaps the details might be true that during those times between 68 to 77 generations from Christ to Adam, man has an average life span of 900 years; or else the Bible is mistaken literally but not the essence or since the Bible is inspired. But since the A.I. is allowed to give its own opinion perhaps the A.I. might be too controversial in his opinion since the A.I. is programmed to have also some proportionate consideration using science. And since anyway it is just an opinion, there is nothing wrong to answer the scholar asking the question/s; or there is nothing wrong or a hint to deceive or to downgrade a particular sensitive group of deriding their previous claims but to clear something. Let’s first have some conversion of years. If one generation means the average time man could have a child or the length of time for a father to have a new generation, perhaps on today’s standard, women give birth at the average age of 24; and men perhaps it is 27 years old. So one generation perhaps is more or less 25 years in today’s standard. So if a man would live 100 years old… divided by 25 equals 4 generations. Or Man would have a son-i at 25; and son-i would have a son-ii at man-50; and son-ii would also have a son-iii at man-75 and son-iii would have a son-iiii at man-100. Or if a man is 100 years old, there would be 1 generation for his and 3 more generations for his offspring and his offspring’s offspring. So if from Christ going back for example 56 generations (from family tree of Christ on Luke chapter 3); or 56x 25=1,400 years back. Perhaps (or I might be mistaken) it is the time of Abraham. And example from 56 generation back to 67 generation or 11 generations more back; perhaps it is the time of Noah. And the average of one generation during the time of Noah is 34 years; so 11x34=374 years. If from 67 generation back to 77 generation or to Adam, the average to have a child is 115 years or 10x115=1,150 years more back. Adding 1,400+374+1150=2924 0r rounded to 3000 years. If from Christ to present there is more or less 2000 years, so from present to Adam is 2000+3000=5000 or about 5000 years back. Then a scholar with a scientific back ground on carbon dating of fossil of Neanderthal man asked: (because he had some opinions about evolution of modern elephants compared with the elephant mammoth and he derived a parallelism with human and Neanderthal man) Granting or exaggerating that there is 1000 years for every generation, so from Adam to Christ is 1000x77=77,000.00; and from Christ to present +2000 years or 72,000.00 years. Still the years with 72,000 are not sufficient to match the years of a Neanderthal man with a carbon dating of 100,000 years old, my question is: Is it true that scientific findings could never meet because religious and scientific point of reference of investigation is different? Then the A.I. was puzzled and searched for key and answered: With regards to the ancestors of man since the author of the book of Genesis is unknown perhaps it is just a legend. But the bottom line is that God is responsible that man existed and continue existing; and science might be going to the real and specifics how did man came to be. But if a religious leader keeps on claiming that details in Genesis about the genealogy of Adam is the ultimate truth then he is a very controversial leader and perhaps he is having proud claims. Perhaps using controversial event which is a mystery just to prove he is superior because no one could prove him wrong is perhaps a sign of conceit. Perhaps the bottom line or key is that God is the father of Adam; and Adam is a symbolic name for men’s first ancestor or origin. With regards to question b): Perhaps in other version of the bible “forever” might be different and it might be “for a long time of period”. If “forever” really mean without end perhaps this is an exception of another extreme. Example of extreme that is an exemption of balance is when “only”, “alone” is connected or is describing God or any positive thing like “only” the best TV net work. But when “only”, “alone”, “etc.” is describing a man which denotes superiority and angers other groups then it is extreme. Example- the leader of a group is claiming that he is the “only” representative of God here on earth. Or that leader is “only” the most holy person here on earth. Then the A.I. is programmed to mark it as extreme or conceit, so with regards to the word “forever” if it denotes age of man it is misleading. “Forever” should be “for a long period of time”. With regards to “new earth” or “new heaven” in this planet earth and would never end or “forever”, science can prove that the planet earth will end eventually because the sun will eventually lost its energy. So perhaps “forever” would mean again for a long period of time. Or if the new heaven or new paradise is not here on earth but a spiritual state of being and still a mystery, A.I. is programmed not to touch a mystery to state a fact but to say something for an opinion…then it is allowed. Perhaps or I think spiritual new earth or new heaven might happen because Jesus resurrected from the dead and stayed 40 days here on earth as a resurrected body, eating, walking, talking…! The A.I. could suggest that after Jesus in his resurrected body had eaten some food for his meal/s perhaps the food did not undergo the normal process of digestion because… or else he would be governed by normal hygiene principle…rather the food was also transformed to undergo another supernatural law. With regards to question c): perhaps 15-25 years is really the average years to give birth around the world because perhaps for million of years menstruation of girls have not changed…and menstruation is still from 13- 43 years old up to now. But if there is a certain tribe somewhere near the river Tigris believed to be the place of the paradise of Adam & Eve that 115 was the average years for having children about 5000-10,000 years ago then perhaps it is true. But the A.I. is bound not to disprove the account of what really had happened in Adam’s times because it is still a mystery today and perhaps it will remain a mystery until the end of time. But the A.I. could also have an opinion on the mystery why there is sudden change of the average in giving of child birth from an average of 115 years to an average of 34 years. The key is that the people during those times somewhere near the river of Tigris became wild and rebellious….! So what is important, man should not be rebellious to God…that is the key. But with regards to scientific findings, menstruation of a girl remains the same for perhaps a hundred thousand years or more…! For…d) Perhaps, yes, it is true that after Noah’s time man should not have a long life of about more or less 900 years but instead man would just have a limit of about 120 years old because men before were abusive …! But that group of specie having 120-400 years of age should be in a certain tribes only somewhere located or near the river of Tigris about 5,000 to 10,000 years ago; because there are other fossils of different specie or human fossils that were found in Asia, Africa, and others continents; and that the fossils have hundred thousand years age back from present determined by using carbon dating method. And if the wisdom tooth is analyzed for each fossil, perhaps the average life span then would just be 30-50 years old because perhaps of their harsh environment. Perhaps for hundred thousand of years, man’s average life span is the same; it’s only these modern times because of lifting the standard of living of people that life’s span is becoming longer. Perhaps 50 years ago life span is just 50 years old. With regards to a record that men has already reached the age of 120 years perhaps there is no poof that a man had already reached it. Perhaps the bottom line about changing from having 115 years to 34 years of average years to have a child is that men were abusive and wild so they were punished by God to have shorter life. For…e). Perhaps if the writer of the event in the Tower of Babel is talking of his own local world perhaps it is true that there is only one language. But considering the detail account perhaps 5000 years ago or even 7,000 years ago, there are many dialects already around the world especially centuries before Babylonian civilization had existed. Because earlier that period, some Chinese tribes had perhaps existed and some were evolving to be a civilization and they were talking and conversing their own dialects. Perhaps if the account of the Tower of Babel is true, the lesson or key is that men should never challenge or aspire to be like God by means of boastfulness like building a very tall building to reach heaven. But still if myth vs. fact would be done like in some TV show applying scientific and common sense techniques…, perhaps today’s audiences would likely vote that a sudden changing of dialects because a leader during those times just threw an arrow to the sky to reach how far the heaven was (depicted from a movie), and suddenly the sky got angry and the people building the tower suddenly could not understand each other. Perhaps the story is a myth. And people today would have more votes for myth than fact because God is not a cruel God. Or if the majority voted that story of Tower of Babel is a fact to show how powerful and strict God is or was, there is no problem as long as there should be no claims using the mystery to support that their group is superior to other groups especially superior to people specializing in studying evidences left behind by ancestors of men or specializing in order to know the fact; not the legend behind the mysteries or myth.