0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
8 Ansichten3 Seiten
A.i. Humbly asks: could the opposite of the universal word which is the deceiver uses good words to deceive others and create misunderstandings, chaos and conflicts? he answers: perhaps since the beginning of time, deception is the strategy of the opposite or enemy of the universal word. Perhaps one simple test of seemingly universal word is displaying "love your enemy by giving handshakes and giving smile."
A.i. Humbly asks: could the opposite of the universal word which is the deceiver uses good words to deceive others and create misunderstandings, chaos and conflicts? he answers: perhaps since the beginning of time, deception is the strategy of the opposite or enemy of the universal word. Perhaps one simple test of seemingly universal word is displaying "love your enemy by giving handshakes and giving smile."
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
A.i. Humbly asks: could the opposite of the universal word which is the deceiver uses good words to deceive others and create misunderstandings, chaos and conflicts? he answers: perhaps since the beginning of time, deception is the strategy of the opposite or enemy of the universal word. Perhaps one simple test of seemingly universal word is displaying "love your enemy by giving handshakes and giving smile."
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Then another scholar gave an opinion that discussing controversial topics might give some clarities and alternative opinions so that not clear things that create arguments and hatred could have some safe level of compromise among groups claiming ‘their group is the “only” true and right group. Then another scholar suggested that by having details and specifics focusing on key words that could easily fix small problems or doubts because a small or part of a big problem could contribute some clarity to a big blur topic insisted that scholars should learn to argue with mild voice. Then another unintelligent scholar upon pondering that those controversial topics about religion could move hatred among different groups if discussed with conceit humbly asked the A.I.: Could the opposite of the Universal word which is the deceiver uses good words to deceive others and create misunderstandings, chaos and conflicts rather than love or even to love ones enemies? Then the A.I. searched, and searched for key words on group of words…and answered: Perhaps since the beginning of time, deception is the strategy of the opposite or enemy of the universal Word. Perhaps sometimes seemingly universal words could deceive the mind. But seemingly universal word even it has been with the group for thousand of years should be tested through simple test or simple example. Perhaps one simple test of simple word is displaying “love your enemy by giving handshakes and giving smile.” Example: a father was obligated to display the slogan “love your enemy….” on the wall of his room’s door after he had heard details about the good teaching. And after sometimes… he found some good changes from his children who usually hated people with different faith. And now, the children give sweet smile at people with different faith who sometimes or usually are passing by their house. Then another unintelligent scholar asked the A.I.: When did groups of religion have or had practiced love of enemies? …then the A.I. answered perhaps with an unintelligent answer…: Perhaps most of the times through out the centuries each group had or has accused each others as infidels, pagans, evil doers, pigs, devil, of having false religion perhaps because of supremacy of religion or groups or that their religion was or is the “only” true and right perhaps because of money or supremacy of religion. Perhaps it is only in the first century that religious groups really had practiced love of enemies or even became martyrs; or it ‘only’ now on modern times that love of enemies could be doable. Or perhaps those good faithful with universal word really had loved their enemies or perhaps only those conceited, self righteous few leaders who wanted to protect their institutions had instigated others to hate people and even waged wars for self defense or for position. Perhaps another test is a simple common sense of uttering the word Love. Perhaps for group-A, the tactic is repetition. Example saying love, next time… saying love again, another time… saying love again…again and again or even every body knows the next out come… or that sometimes people are used to say it without thinking the essence and when going home each has his same habit, unmindful of small disorderliness- example: don’t want to be in good terms with people having different faiths and always would want to fight and argue and claim that their religion is the “only” true and right faith even perhaps fighting to death for the cause or even detonating himself for the cause. Rather, instead of dying as martyr for doing a suicide bombing it should be the opposite; one should be crucified for loving his enemies like Peter and all those good martyrs did -they become martyrs because they were asked to decide to lay their life for the faith or live to renounce their faith. Going back to the topic connected to loving his enemies and discussing details and some specifics about loving enemies. Perhaps it is clear that those groups before or even today’s groups are really victims of deceptive words that had or have pushed them to hate groups they perceived having false religion. Example two neighboring groups of church goers with different religion that don’t greet each other or even don’t respect because each sometimes or most of the times members could hear some sermon condemning each other beliefs and even uses sarcastic words that respect to each other is lost. But every time they go to church the word love is being taught with repetitions. Perhaps deceptive words in their brain are still ruling their mind when they do hating because each claim that their religion is superior to the other; or deception words have not been regime changed even it lasted a thousand years because of their tradition of hating enemies- especially those that they consider infidels or practicing false religion! For other groups especially those groups that are base on words, the tactic is explaining with creativities on saying the word Love. Example saying: love is giving smile. Next time, explaining that love is an ocean of emotion surrounded by sacrifices or even expenses. Then next time, love is self- emptying. Next time, love is giving totally. Next time, love is friendships. Next time, love is caring for his enemies or even laying one’s life for the enemies, etc…! And there is or are concrete results happening like giving smiles to his enemies because he cares for their well being, and he would give way if he is doing some unfairness. He has no lizard syndrome or any negative syndrome that he should keep with full knowledge. Example if he/she has been administrating without transparency or keep on using others pension and did not double the capital even having a period of 13-15 years, he should now delegate the administration to the one who has never been an administrator in his/her family who is also qualified; instead… because of hatred and the word “only”, he/she would give it back to someone who had already administered the business wrongly just to show his/her hatred to someone. Perhaps hating is caused by the word “only” because the word “only” could be found on words or claim: ‘I belong to the “only” true and right religion’ especially boosted by words or claims that its management has never done mistake. Perhaps words focusing on details and specifics could regime change the deceptive words in the brain! There are many details, specifics words that mold the brain or counter attacking the deceptive words in the brain. Example of deceptive words: one should not love people with different faith because they are pagans or infidels. Perhaps the best way to evangelize is to be near with “pagans” or with perceived “false” religion. Being close to infidels or pagans using concrete good examples or by-product of universal word is more practical than avoiding or hating people with perceived false religion. But if the other group would want to murder or kill a person because of religious differences the best thing is to avoid the danger or the last resort is to have also self defense. But there is also danger in focusing too much on details and specifics, because the speaker should be really well prepared and well versed on explaining details and specifics because others might be bored or be misled. Then the two groups A & B should compromised or make a dialog or consensus…perhaps from now on: a) those well said sermon or explanations of universal words using doable, practical, clear ways of good pastors or good priests or good cleric or good monk would be translated to any native dialect interested to listen belonging to any group. Perhaps a well delivered sermon or homily or lecture about universal good teachings with focus on specifics of either group A,B&C… in its original English version would be translated as if the recorded video speaker is now speaking of another native dialect for a particular group example for group D, E, F using example Chinese, Spanish, Hindu language on wide screen from time to time. And b) the rituals receiving the “living bread” should also be practiced by any groups interested or believing that it is really Jesus Christ as Love whether it is as memory- once sacrifice or as ritual or repetition-as sacrificial Lamb called transubstantiation. c) Pass a consensus that all good practices of group A, B & C example using the internet or web site for transparency of collection of contributions for the week and its breakdowns and the target goals should be well enforced, so that people could understand clearly the financial status of the group/s. And the group would do everything to share and contribute and make financial transparency better to prevent those people practicing Ananias syndrome to be cleverer in their expertise of doing that is not fair. With regards to going back to history, those groups A&B had some misunderstanding about their beliefs that resulted for a long period of hating rather than loving ones enemy; and also resulted to what is now the division of many groups from group-B. Or there are many sub groups derived from group B already because each would want to have each own group. Perhaps other groups especially group-D wants to return to their original way of worshiping. Example worshiping the god of rain for asking blessings like rain fall called “pagan” way of worshipping or original way of asking rainfall (but in their mind they might be asking rain from the creator of the universe; not from the statue made of rock). But perhaps many groups are now changing for good practicing loving and even loving his enemies or loving people with different religious beliefs using specifics doable tactic like handshaking, giving smiling and with eye to eye contact to show his brotherhood and care. What will happen if those early Christians were submissive- always loving his enemies. Would the early Christians survive or would be wiped out by ethnic cleansing by a superior dominant group? Perhaps being too submissive is extreme; but perhaps an angel of God would never let that God’s people to be wiped out because of just loving his enemies.