Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SPECTROSCOPY FOR
STUDYING
POLYMERIZATION AND
POLYMER DEGRADATION
REACTIONS
T. G. CARSWELL, R. W. GARRETT, D. J. T. HILL,
J. H. O'DONNELL, P. J. POMERY and C. L. WINZOR
Polymer Materials and Radiation Group, Department of Chemistry, University
Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Electron spin resonance spectroscopy offers a unique technique to study the role
of radical species as intermediates in both polymerization and polymer degrada-
tion processes. The technique has been developed significantly since its introduc-
tion to chemical applications in the 1950s [1], with major advances in the
stability of the magnetic field, in the sensitivity to low radical concentrations—
and hence the limit of detection and measurement—and in data collection and
manipulation. ESR spectrometry enables both the identification of radicals
and the measurement of their concentration. It is a non-destructive technique and
spectra can be recorded both during polymerization, and, in suitable circumstan-
ces, during degradation of polymers [2].
New quantitative studies of free radical polymerization kinetics are currently
being undertaken by a number of researchers using pulse laser techniques [3,4].
However, the pulsed laser methods cannot be used for crosslinking systems.
There has also been development of a number of new theoretical models for
polymerization [5-7]. The experimental information available comprises mono-
mer concentration and polymer molecular weight. ESR spectroscopy offers the
possibility of an additional piece of information—the radical concentration
during polymerization. There is increasing interest in polymerization to high
conversion, which is of great practical importance, and ESR spectra can be
Polymer Spectroscopy. Edited by Allan H. Fawcett
© 1996 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
obtained readily under these conditions when other methods can be difficult to
apply [8].
Degradation of polymers is often understood from a practical viewpoint as
a deterioration in the properties of polymer materials leading to failure in service.
Changes in the molecular structure, and particularly the molecular weight, of the
polymer is the fundamental degradation process. High-energy radiation, e.g.
gamma-rays and electron beams, is an important cause of controlled polymer
degradation [9]. The degradation reactions usually involve free radical inter-
mediates, and therefore ESR spectroscopy is a valuable technique for investigat-
ing the chemical mechanism of degradation.
We have studied the degradation by high-energy radiation of a number of
families of polymers by using a variety of techniques, including ESR spectroscopy
[10, H]. In this paper we show the similarities and differences in the role of free
radicals in the radiolysis of poly(methyl methacrylate), polystyrene, and random
copolymers of methyl methacrylate and styrene.
10.2 EXPERIMENTAL
The ESR spectra were recorded using a Bruker ER200D spectrometer fitted with
a liquid nitrogen dewar for measurements at 77 K, and with a variable tempera-
ture cavity having a heated supply of cold nitrogen for temperature control from
100 to 400K.
Methyl methacrylate (MMA) was distilled under a reduced pressure of nitro-
gen; ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) was purified by passage through
an alumina column. Polymerization mixtures containing azobisiso- butyronitrile
(AIBN) as initiator were sealed in 3 mm i.d. quartz tubes under vacuum. Some
measurements were also made in 1 mm i.e. tubes in order to minimize increases in
the temperature of the polymerization which could result from the exothermic
heat of polymerization during the Norrish-Trommsdorff region. The conversion
of monomer ( C = C concentration) was measured by near-infrared Fourier
transform spectroscopy using the C = C H vibration at 6152cm" l .
Linewidth
Intensity
Lines
Figure 10.1 ESR spectrum of the methyl radical (CH3') showing the characteristic
features of g value, number of lines, relative intensities of the lines, hyperfine splitting (hfs),
line width, and line shape
(3) the relative intensities of the component lines of the spectrum of the
radical—frequently described by a binomial distribution of intensities;
(4) the hyperfine splitting, hfs, between the lines—this separation of the lines
depends on the electron spin on the radical site, the magnitude of interacting
nuclear spins and the conformation of the radical;
(5) the line widths—usually measured between the positive and negative peaks
of the derivative spectrum, or the width at half height of the absorption spectrum.
(6) the line shape—usually represented by a Gaussian or Lorentzian express-
ion, or a combination, depending on the curvature of the wings of the absorption
spectrum, reflecting the environment of the radical.
1/2
(Microwave power)
Figure 10.2 Microwave power saturation plot of the area of the ESR spectrum versus the
square root of the microwave power: (•) (experimental values; ( ) linear relationship
assuming no saturation, S is the maximum power level that can be used without saturation
occurring
Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy, using the C = C H band at
6152 cm" 1 for methacrylates, enabled the conversion to be followed in a single
sample throughout the polymerization to high conversion. Parallel experiments
were performed for near-infrared spectroscopic determination of monomer con-
centrations and for ESR measurements of radical concentrations. A further advan-
tage of the near-IR method is its applicability to insoluble crosslinked systems.
A typical conversion curve for the polymerization of methyl methacrylate is
shown in Figure 10.3. The three regions in the conversion curve correspond to (1)
the pre-gel region, (2) the Norrish-Trommsdorff region between the gel point and
the glass point, and (3) the glass region. The steep rise in the polymerization rate
above the gel point is attributed to a marked decrease in the termination rate
parameter, kv and the decrease in polymerization rate to near zero above the
glass point is attributed to a decrease of several orders of magnitude in the
apparent propagation rate parameter, kp.
gel point
Time / min
Figure 103 Typical conversion curve for polymerization of methyl methacrylate show-
ing the gel and glass points and the (1) pre-gel, (2) Norrish-Trommsdorff, and (3) glass
regions. Polymerization temperature 45 0C; [AIBN] = 0.1 M
Time/ min
Figure 10.4 The variation of the radical concentration [R#] with time during the
polymerization of methyl methacrylate at 45 0C for different concentrations of AIBN
initiator: (A) 0.2 M; (o) 0.1 Af; (•) 0.05 Af, spectra obtained in situ during polymerization in
the ESR spectrometer. (•) 0.05 M AIBN, spectra obtained by quenching to 77 K, enabling
accumulation of scans
Figure 10.5 Simultaneous measurement of the ESR spectra of Mn2+ and methacrylate
propagating radicals during the polymerization of methyl methacrylate: Mn area, sensitiv-
ity of the spectrometer; Mn field, conversion: [R*], corrected concentration of MMA
radicals
exposing the tube to the flame from burning magnesium metal. The variation in
sensitivity is shown in Figure 10.5 as the area of one peak in the spectrum of
Mn2 + . The increase in sensitivity occurs mainly in the Norrish-Trommsdorff
region and corresponds to a factor of % 3 in the area. The measured area of the
spectrum of the methacrylate propagating radical can then be corrected accord-
ing to the change in area of the Mn2 + peak.
An additional aspect of using Mn2 + to measure the changing sensitivity of the
spectrometer during the polymerization of methyl methacrylate was found to be
that the field position of the Mn 2+ peak also varied, and this variation could be
correlated with the C = C conversion. The position of the propagating radical
showed an identical variation in resonance frequency. Thus, the concentrations
of both R* and C = C can be obtained throughout the polymerization from the
ESR spectra. Typical data obtained for the polymerization of MMA at 600C with
AIBN initiator are shown in Figure 10.5.
Time / min
Time / min
Figure 10.7 Dependence of radical concentration [R#] on polymerization time for (a)
MMA and (b) a MMA-EGDMA mixture (36% EGDMA): polymerization temperature
600C; initiator 0.05 M AIBN. Note that the concentration scales differ by a factor of 40
has been the subject of much debate, but it is now generally accepted to be due to
the methacrylate propagating radical with two conformations.
The ESR spectrum after irradiation at 77 K, shown in Figure 10.8(b), is quite
different from the spectrum after irradiation at 300K. It is evidently due to
a number of radicals; the propagating radical is not a significant component at
this temperature, and must be formed by subsequent reactions of the radicals
produced at 77 K.
Analysis of spectra
A variety of techniques can be used to analyse for the component radicals in an
ESR spectrum. They include:
(1) dose saturation—spectra are obtained after irradiation to a series of
radiation doses. The yield of trapped radicals does not increase linearly with dose
above certain doses which are characteristic of particular radicals. In particular,
radical ions show 'dose-saturation' at low doses;
(2) microwave power saturation—the observation of an ESR spectrum de-
pends on the relaxation of the radicals (which are excited into the higher energy
level by the microwave radiation) back to the lower energy level in accordance
with the requirements of the Boltzmann distribution. Some radicals, and particu-
larly radical ions, have a slow relaxation and hence they will not be observed at
high microwave powers;
(3) Photobleaching—radical ions can be distinguished from neutral radicals
by irradiation with visible light above a critical wavelength, which is usually
«500nm. The radical ions are bleached and disappear, whereas the neutral
radicals are unaffected. The efficiency of this technique does depend on the
interaction of the light with the radicals and hence requires a transparent or finely
powdered sample;
(4) Fourier transform masking—the ESR spectrum can be converted to its
Fourier transform in the frequency domain. Lines in the original spectrum with
different line-widths can be separated by masking of different parts of the
spectrum and then conversion back into the original domain;
(5) accumulation of spectra—the signal to noise ratio must be high to enable
separation of different radicals in a spectrum, especially if some of the radicals are
present in small proportion of the total spectrum. Accumulation of the spectra,
possible with high stability of the magnetic field, enables the signal to noise ratio
to be enhanced. The effect of spectral accumulation is illustrated in Figure 10.9
for poly(a-methylstyrene);
CH 3 CH 3 O
I I Il
^ C H 2 - C ^ - - C H 2 C - C H 2 - + - C - O — C H 3 + OTHERS
#CH
C=O 3
O -CHO
(LjJ3 -CO-O-CH2
CH 3 CH 3 CH 3
I I I
SCISSION
-CH2C-CH2- • -CH2-C- + CH2=C-CH2-
C=O
O
I
CH 3
-CO-O-CH3 CO + CO 2 + CH 4 + CH 3 OH
Scheme 1 Mechanism of degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate) by y-radiation de-
duced from ESR studies of radical intermediates
10.3.2.2 Polystyrene
The ESR spectrum of polystyrene after y-irradiation in vacuum at 77 K is shown
in Figure 10.12(a). The spectrum is quite different from that of poly(methyl
methacrylate). It can be assigned to three species: (1) the oc-carbon radical, (2) the
cyclohexadienyl radical, and (3) a radical anion. The proportions of cyclo-
a-carbon cyclohexadienyl
Figure 10.10 ESR spectra of poly(methyl methacrylate) after y-irradiation at 77 K and
progressive wanning to 300 K. All spectra (except that at 77 K) were recorded on cooling
back to 140K after 10 min at the specified temperature
T / K
Figure 10.11 Decrease in radical concentration in poly(methyl methacrylate) after 1 kGy
of y-irradiation at 77 K on progressive warming to 360K. The numbers refer to stages of
radical reactions during wanning
100% STY
Figure 10.13 ESR spectra of random copolymers of styrene and methyl methacrylate
after y-irradiation in vacuum at 300K. Radiation dose 3kGy. The compositions of the
copolymers are specified in mol% styrene
G(R)
G(R-)
% STYRENE
10.4 CONCLUSIONS
ESR provides a powerful technique for developing a fundamental understanding
of the mechanism and kinetics of free radical polymerization and of the mechan-
ism of degradation of polymers by high-energy radiation. The assignment of ESR
spectra to component radicals and the measurement of the concentrations of
these radicals require a variety of experimental and computational procedures,
which have been greatly enhanced by improvements in spectrometer perform-
ance and computer capabilities.
10.5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Australian Research Council and the Australian
Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering for supporting this research, and to
the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization for the provision
of irradiation facilities.
10.6 REFERENCES
[1] P.B. Ayscough, Electron Spin Resonance in Chemistry, Methuen, London, 1967.
[2] D.J.T. Hill, J.H. O'Donnell and PJ. Pomery, in Electron Spin Resonance, Royal
Society of Chemistry Specialist Periodical Reports, Vol. i3A, Cambridge, 1992,
p. 202.
[3] O.F. Olaj, I. Bitai and F. Hinkelman, Makromol. Chem., 1987,188,1689.
[4] T.P. Davis, K.F. O'Driscoll, M.C. Piton and M.A. Winnik, Macromolecules, 1989,
22, 2785.
[5] S.K. Soh and D.C. Sundberg, J. Polym. ScL, Polym. Chem. Ed., 1982,20,1345.
[6] MJ. Ballard, R.G. Gilbert, D.H. Napper, PJ. Pomery, P.W. O'Sullivan and J.H.
O'Donnell, Macromolecules, 1986,19,1303.
[7] G.T. Russell, D.H. Napper and R.G. Gilbert, Macromolecules, 1988, 21, 2141.
[8] R.W. Garrett, DJ.T. Hill, J.H. O'Donnell, PJ. Pomery and CL. Winzor, Polym.
Bull, 1989,22,611.
[9] M. Dole (Ed.), The Radiation Chemistry of Macromolecules, Academic Press, New
York, 1972.
[10] R.W. Garrett, DJ.T. Hill, TT. Le, J.H. O'Donnell and PJ. Pomery, Radiat. Phys.
Chem., 1992,39,215.
[11] DJ.T. Hill, S.Y. Ho, J.H. O'Donnell and PJ. Pomery, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1990,36,
467.
[12] T.G. Carswell, DJ.T. Hill, D.S. Hunter, PJ. Pomery, J.H. O'Donnell and CL.
Winzor, Eur. Polym. J., 1990, 26, 541.
[13] T.G. Carswell, DJ.T. Hill, D.I. Londero, J.H. O'Donnell, PJ. Pomery and CL.
Winzor, Polymer, 1992,33,137.
[14] T.G. Carswell, DJ.T. Hill, R. Kellman, D.I. Londero, J.H. O'Donnell, PJ. Pomery
and CL. Winzor, Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp., 1991,51,183.