Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 1 of 6

1 Gregory P. Stone (State Bar No. 078329) Rollin A. Ransom (State Bar No. 196126)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
2 355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Los Angeles, California 90013-1010
3 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
4 Email: gregory.stone@mto.com; Email: rransom@sidley.com
steven.perry@mto.com; sean.eskovitz@mto.com
5 Pierre J. Hubert (Pro Hac Vice)
Peter A. Detre (State Bar No. 182619) Craig N. Tolliver (Pro Hac Vice)
6 Rosemarie T. Ring (State Bar No. 220769) McKOOL SMITH PC
Jennifer L. Polse (State Bar No. 219202) 300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700
7 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP Austin, Texas 78701
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor Telephone: (512) 692-8700
8 San Francisco, California 94105 Facsimile: (512) 692-8744
Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Email: phubert@mckoolsmith.com;
9 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 ctolliver@mckoolsmith.com
Email: peter.detre@mto.com;
10 carolyn.luedtke@mto.com; jen.polse@mto.com
11 Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW
15
Plaintiff, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF
16 PETER A. DETRE IN SUPPORT OF
vs. RAMBUS INC.’S MOTION TO
17 PRECLUDE THE MANUFACTURERS’
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS ON
18 INFRINGEMENT AND RELATED TRIAL
Defendants. TESTIMONY
19
Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
20 Location: Courtroom 6
Date: October 17, 2008
21 Time: 9:00 a.m.
22
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW
23 Plaintiff,
24 v.

25 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

26 et al.,
Defendants.
27

28
SUPP. DETRE DECL. ISO RAMBUS’S MOTION TO
6144717.1 PRECLUDE NON-INFRINGEMENT REPORTS
C 05-00334 RMW; C 05-02298 RMW; C-06-00244 RMW
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 2 of 6

2 RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C-06-00244 RMW

3 Plaintiff,
4 vs.
5 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al,
6 Defendants.
7

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
SUPP. DETRE DECL. ISO RAMBUS’S MOTION TO
6144717.1 PRECLUDE NON-INFRINGEMENT REPORTS
C 05-00334 RMW; C 05-02298 RMW; C-06-00244 RMW
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 3 of 6

1 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF PETER A. DETRE

2
I, Peter A. Detre, declare as follows:
3
1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, counsel for
4
Rambus, Inc. in the above-captioned actions. The contents of this declaration are within my
5
personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
6
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a letter I sent to counsel
7
for the Manufacturers regarding representative parts.
8
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
9
foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 14, 2008, at San
10
Francisco, California.
11

12

13
By: /s/ Peter A. Detre
14 PETER A. DETRE

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
SUPP. DETRE DECL. ISO RAMBUS’S MOTION TO
6144717.1 -1- PRECLUDE NON-INFRINGEMENT REPORTS
C 05-00334 RMW; C 05-02298 RMW; C-06-00244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 4 of 6
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 5 of 6
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON L L P
5 6 0 MISSION STREET
ROBERT K JOHNSON' GAPW T VItICLNT AARON M MAY DAVID W. SWIFT
ALAN v FRIEDMAN' TED DANE TWENTY-SEVENTH FLOOR SHONT E. MILLER JEAN Y. RHEE
RONALD L OLSON' MARK SHINLEAMAN MARIA SEFERIAN ALEXANDRA LANG SUSMAN
RICHARD 5 VOLPERT STUART N SENATOR MANUEL F CACHAN GENEVlEVE A COX
DENNIS C BROWN M A M l N D BERN
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9 4 1 0 5 - 2 9 0 7 ERIC J LORENZlNl MIRIAM KIM
ROBERT E DENHAM DANIEL P COLLINS KATHERINE K . HUANG MISTY M SANFORD
JEFFREY I WEINBERGER RICHARD E DRODYAN TELEPHONE ( 4 15) 5 1 2 - 4 0 0 0 KATHERINE M FORSER BRIAN P DUFF
ROBERT L ADLER ROBEAT L DELL ANGEL0 ROSEMARIE T RING AlMEE FEINBERG
C A R I B LERMAN BRUCE A AilBOTT JOSEPH J YBARRA JOEL o wrnm
FACSIMILE ( 4 15) 5 1 2 - 4 0 7 7 B L A N U FROMM YOUNG JEFFREI E ZINSMEISTER
CHARLES D SIEGAL JONATHAN E A L M A N
RONALD K M M R MARY ANN TODO 6ZGE GULELSU MONICA DIGGS MANGE
GREGORY P 5 m N E MICHAEL J O'SULUVAN KATE K ANDERSON KATHERINE L HALL
VlLMA 5 MARTINEZ KELLY M KLAUS AUSON J. M A R K O V m KATHERINE KU
BRAD 0 BRIAN DAVID a GOLDMAN E DORS€YHEINE KIMBERLY A CHI
B R A D L M S PHILLIPS a u m N A GROSS SAMUEL N WEINSTEIN SHOSHANA E B A N N E l l
GEORGE M GARVEV KEVlN S MASUDA PAUL M ROHRER TlNA CHAROENPONG
WILLIAM D TEMKO HOJOON HWANG 3 5 5 S O U T H G R A N D A V E N U E KIT JOHNSON TERIANN E S NAGATA
STEVEN L GUISE' KRISTIN s L S C A L A r n JAY K GHNA ADAM 8 BADAWl
ROBERT B KNAUSS DAVID C DlNlELU L O S A N G E L E S . C A L I F O R N I A 90071 1560 SUSAN TRAUB BOYD ASHFAO G CHOWDHURl
STEPHEN M KRlSmVlCil ANDREA M I S S JEFFRIES JENNIFER L POLSE LEE 5 TAYLOR
JOHN W SPIEGEL P E E R A DITRE TODD J ROSEN DEREK J KAUFMAN
T E L E P H O N E 1 2 1 3 ) 6 8 3 - 9 1 0 0 n w a f n.r u E ~ c . ~ ( \ s
TERRY E SANCHEZ
5TEVtN M PERRY
MARK B HELM
PAUL J WAFORD
DANA 5 TRl l m R
CARL H MOOR F A C S I M I L E ( 2 1 3 ) 6 8 7 ~ 3 7 0 2
DANIEL L GEISER
BRIAN R H O C H L E r n E R
DEAN N KAWAMOTO
MARCJS - 5 + CGC-
GABHlLL P S A h C U L I
JOSEPH 0 LEE OAVIO M RC,SENZWEIG GRANT A DAVIS-DENNY B L I H A h l C NOOUAHU
MICHAEL R DOYEN DAVID H FRY E MARTIN ESTRAOA PAULA I? Fr.*
MICHAEL E SOLOFF LISA J DEMSKY JASON RANTANEN CONNIE Y CHIANG
GREGORY D PHILLIPS MALCOLM A HElNlCKE AMI c mvm DAVID C YANG
LAWRENCE C B A m GREGORY J WINGART REBECCA GOSE LYNCH WILLIAM E CAN0
KKTHLEEN M MEOOWLLL TAMERLIN J GODLEY JONATHAN H BLAVlN EMILY PAN
GLENN O POMFRANTL JAMES C R-N JOHN R GRIFFIN BILL WARD
M O M A S B WALPER J MARnN K I L U l l E KAREN J FESSLER HENRY E ORREN
RONALD C HAUSMANN RICHARD n JOHN MICHELLE T FRIEDLAND M A l l H m J SPENCE
PATRjCK J CAFFEFTY JH ROHrr K S11IGLA J RAZA LAWRENCE BENJAMIN W HOWELL
JAY M FUJIIANI
O'MALLEY M MILLER
LUIS LI
CAROLYN HOECKER LUEOTKE
June 7,2007 MELINDA
- -
LIKA C MIYAKE
EAOES LCMOlNE
WESLEY SHIH
JACOB S KREILKAMP
SANDRA SEVILLE~JONES C DAVID LEE ANDREW W SONG PAUL J KATZ
MARK H LPSTEIN MARK H KIM DANIELA BECK ARIEL A NEUMAN
H E N W WEISSMANN B R m J ROODA YOHANCE C EDWARDS
KEVIN S ALLREO SEAN E S K O V m JULIE D CAhTOR
B A p r H WILLIAMS SUSAN R S U B 0 SN GOLDMAN RICHARD D ESBENSHADE'
JEFFREIA H E l K n LINDA S GDLDMAN FAOIA ISSAM RAFEEDIE ALLISON B STEIN
JUDIW T KITANO NATALIE PA&S STONE DANIEL J POWELL PEER R TAFT'
KRISTIN LINSLEY MILES FRED A ROWLEY JR DANIEL B LEVlN OF COUNSEL
MARK T G OWORSKY JOSEPH 5 KLAPACH JOSHUA P. GROBAN -
JEROME C ROTH MONIKA S WlENER VlCrORlA L BOEBCH
STEPHEN D ROSE LYNN HEALEY S C A D m HAlLYN J CHEN E LEROY TOLL85
JEFFREI L BLENCH RANDALL G SOMMLR BRAD SCHNEIOER RrnRED

'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

W R m R ' S DIRECT LINE
(415) 512-4013
(415) 644-69 13 FAX
Peter Detre@hnto coln

Theodore G. Brown, 111

'l'ounscnd and Townsend and Crew LLP
370 Lytton A ~ e n u e
Palo Alto. CA 94301-1431

Re: Rambus Northern District of California Cases

Dear Ted:

I am writing in response to your letter of June 5 , 2007 regarding representative parts. Let
nit. respond to your paragraphs in order:

First. nly letter of May 3 1, 2007, was intended to be a response to Hynix's representative
parts proposal As I indicated there, subject to working out details, we can likely agree on
Hynix's proposed DDR2 part as being representative of Hynix's accused DDR2, Graphics
DDR:! and GDDR3 parts. While you had proposed a separate representative GDDR3 part, you
indicated that once Rambus had identified its 25 claims. you could determine whether, in
Hynix's view, a single representative part would suffice. Since Rambus did identify its 25
claims a week ago. there should be no impediment to your letting us know Hynix's views on
this.

Seconcl. the caveat in my May 3 1 letter "subject to agreement as to precisely what

[agreeing on a representative part] will mean" simply meant that we had yet to agree on the exact
language of a stipulation. Presumably, such a stipulation would provide that a determination of
 Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2367-2 Filed 10/14/2008 Page 6 of 6
MUNGER,
TOLLES
ti OLSONLLP
Theodore G. Brown, 111
June 7, 2007
Page 2

infringement or noninfringement of the representative part would bind the parties as to all other
Hynix parts for purposes of the '334 case. Likely, Hynix will want the agreement to provide that
Hynix would need to produce complete schematics only for its representative part. I am
confident that we will be able to agree on precise language for a stipulation along these lines.

Third, as previously noted, Rambus would like the manufacturers to propose a single part
as representative of their DDR2, Graphics DDR2 and GDDR3 parts or, if they are unable to do
so, explain the differences among the parts that, in the manufacturers' view, preclude such a
proposal. Judge Whyte has ordered the manufacturers to do this. See Tr. (5124107) at 19
(indicating that the manufacturers should disclose to Rambus "their basic thoughts on what
makes a difference as to representative products so that hopefully we can avoid a problem").
Judge Whyte also indicated that if the manufacturers ultimately propose "a number of products
that they think are involved, I will be willing to reconsider the identification of claims." Id. Of
course. Rambus does not intend Hynix to develop such a proposal alone, but, rather, as you
suggest to confer with the other manufacturers and make a joint proposal. We expect that the
manufacturers should be able to designate a single representative part - or explain why not - no
later than Thursday, June 14 (at which point they will have had Rambus's list of 25 claims for
two weeks).

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss these issues.

Sincerely,

Peter A. Detre

cc : Viclti I ,. Feeman (vfeeman@;orrick.con~)

-
Jared H. Bobrow Cjared.bobrow@weil.com)
Anita Kadala (anita.kadalaiii)weil.coin)