Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ananth Chikkatur
Energy Technology Innovation Policy Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
(ananth_chikkatur@harvard.edu, ap_chikkatur@yahoo.com)
Outline
1. Key Energy Challenges 2. Electricity and Coal Scenario 3. Challenges in the Coal/Coal Power Sectors 4. Coal Resource/Reserves 5. Displacement 6. Coal Power Technologies 7. Key Takeaways
Chikkatur (Platts)
Chikkatur (Platts)
Trillion kWh
3.0
Per capita consumption (kWh) World 2600 U.S. 13,600 China 1800 India 480 RoA 914
2.0
1.0
0.0 U.S.
Coal Petroleum Gas Nuclear
China
Hydro
India
Combust. Renewables
Rest of Asia
Geothermal/Solar/Wind
Source: IEA 2007; 2005 data
U.S. U.S.
China China
India India
Rest of Asia
Steam Coal Coking Coal Lignite Electricity/Heat Other Energy Industry Other Sectors
Source: IEA 2007; 2005 data
2500
2000
Low domestic resources of oil and gas, but significant domestic coal resources China: 115 billion tons; India: ~55-70 billion tons; U.S.: 247 billion tons
1500
India
10 GW of coal-power installed 2002-2007 (Planned: 20 GW) 45 GW of coal-power planned for 2007-2012 Nuclear to contribute significantly only beyond 2050
2005 Coal Oil Gas 2015 Nuclear Hydro NRE 2030
1000
500
China
135 GW of coal power 2002-2005 220 GW planned for 2006-2010; 170 GW already installed by 2007 Growth in coal power to decrease after 2030
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 7
Low domestic resources of oil and gas, but significant domestic coal 8000 resources 7000 China: 115 billion tons; India: ~55-70 billion tons; U.S.: 247 billion tons
6000 5000 4000
India
3000 10 GW of coal-power installed 2002-2007 (Planned: 20 GW) 2000 45 GW of coal-power planned for1000 2007-2012 Nuclear to contribute significantly only beyond 2050 0
China
2030
2030
135 GW of coal power 2002-2005 Coal Power growth rate (2005-2015): already installed by 220 GW planned for 2006-2010; 170 GWIndia 5.8%; China 8.3%2007 Growth in coal power to decrease after 2030
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 8
China
135 GW of coal power 2002-2005 220 GW planned for 2006-2010; 170 GW already installed by 2007
1500
1000
500
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
10
Chikkatur (Platts)
Expected domestic production: ~1.4 BT by 2030 Higher level of imports than present
WEO2007
Domestic coal companies buying/mining coal in other countries (Indonesia) Indian projections: 11%-45% of demand by 2030 (IEA: 30%)
Port infrastructure can be a key limitation Key countries: Australia, Indonesia, South Africa
Chikkatur (Platts)
11
3000
2000
1000
Production IEA 2007 Reference IEA 2007 High Growth IEA 2007 Alternative Policy EIA 2006 Reference EIA 2006 High Growth EIA 2006 Low Growth
0 2000
2010
2020
2030
In contrast to EIA, some IEA projections indicate slow down in growth of coal consumption by 2030
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 12
WEO2007
Introduce institutional and pricing reforms Increase human resources and capacity building
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 14
Coal reserve data is old and badly needs to be updated Definitions of reserves not uniform across countries Issue of Peak Coal (?)
Chikkatur (Platts)
15
Chikkatur (Platts)
16
Chikkatur (Platts)
17
Chikkatur (Platts)
18
Reserve data on coal is uncertain and not as well maintained as oil/gas Depletion not taken into account Data based on fairly old geological information Definitions of reserves not uniform across countries Issue of Peak Coal does it matter? Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts)
21
1600 1400
BAU: Same planttype distribution as 11th Plan (all using Indian coal)
Reserves matter for individual countries and their 1200 (perceived) energy security, but not globally 1000 Local Peak Coal matters for long term energy policies of 600 Asian countries, but not necessarily for coal-company 400 decision 200 making
0 Great impact on global2020 2030 2040 coal trade 1990 2000 2010
Existing Plants Existing+11th Plan
800
2050
2060
2070
2080
6% GDP grow th
8% GDP Grow th
Chikkatur (Platts)
Coal projects are being held up because of social protests against mining
Little/no information on abandoned mines; reclamation and mine closure problems
Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) should make sure that people are better off than before
R&R should include creation of social assets and benefit sharing Need for coal companies to be progressive and pro-active in dealing with their past
Main focus on particulate control; only one FGD in operation Efficiency has improved slightly, but not significantly
1-2 percentage point improvement possible in all power plants
Pollution control
FGD capacity 270 GW over 50% of total capacity Cess on sulfur emissions
Gasification
Three IGCC and two oil-electricity co-production demonstration plants under construction Developed indigenous technologies
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 26
Oxyfuel combustion
Use O2 instead of air and recycle flue gas High CO2 concentration in flue gashelpful for carbon capture
Gasification (IGCC)
Carbon capture is more economic with IGCC Current focus is on better environmental characteristics of IGCC Entrained flow slagging gasification (GE/Shell) does not work for Indian coals Need for fluidized bed gasifier (BHEL/Sasol/Southern) China has developed its own gasifiers and is testing them on chemicals production
Chikkatur (Platts)
Focus
27
Technologies
Post-combustion (PC): amine scrubbing; multi-pollutant capture Precombustion (IGCC): water-gas shift reactor + Selexol
Deterrents: high aux. consumption (lowered cap.), efficiency loss, high cost
Efficiency loss for retrofitting is about 30% for 210 MW units. Capture cost of $33-38/tCO2 doubles the price of power More coal use with addition of CCS (dilemma)
(Sonde, 2005)
High potential for storage sites in both India and China Critical need for detailed geological assessments
Chikkatur (Platts) 28
Deploy high-efficiency combustion technologies in the near term (SC and USC PC/CFBC) Long-term approach for emerging technologies
China already has much better planning than India Strategic RD3 for advancing emerging technologiestechnology roadmapping Need for different RD3 strategies for each technology Need for flexibility in technology choices (gasification vs. combustion)
Sep 16, 2008 Chikkatur (Platts) 29
Acknowledgements
Ambuj Sagar Professor of Technology and Policy (Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi) Senior Research Associate (ETIP) Lifeng Zhao Associate Professor at Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (Beijing, China) Research Fellow (ETIP)
Funding:
David and Lucille Packard Foundation BP Alternative Energy and BP Carbon Mitigation Initiative (general support grants) Shell exploration (gift) Pew Center for Global Climate Change
Chikkatur (Platts)
32