Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By Kritiko Research Series Section 1, in the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Harmonized System is the category for the importation of Live Animals * Meat & Edible Meat offal * Fish & Crustaceans, Molluscs& other aquatic invertebrates * Dairy products * Birds eggs * Natural Honey * Edible products of animal origin * Products of Animal Origin
Section 1: Chicken
In this edition, we will feature everyones favorite CHICKEN and chicken parts. Specifically, LEG QUARTERS, MDM and Machine Separated parts - all were imported from the US and Canada. None of the imports would be considered AFTA / Free Trade and should therefore be subjected to the required duties and taxes. To best understand the study, each assumption will based on a group of chicken parts as imported. Study period is July to Aug. 5, 2011 As we are not familiar with the code MDM, we will have to assume that this would be chicken parts. Hence, the total shipment of chicken will be analyzed. The shipment comprised of 12 containers of Leg Quarters + 10 containers of MDM + 24 containers of machine separated chicken = 46 containers. A total of Php3,220,155 in Taxes were paid by the importers for all 46 containers. If the ISO standard weight per 40-footer container is 27,000 kg. Then it is safe to assume that a total of 1,242,000 kg. of chicken arrived. With an average market value of Php120/kilo. That would mean Php149,040,000 worth of chicken will go into the market. Now, if 40% taxes will be charged, then the taxable amount should be Php5,916,000. Whereas, only Php3,220,155 was paid in duties and taxes. Hence, a discrepancy of at least Php2,695,845 was not collected. If Php3,220,155 was charged in taxes, divided by the 46 containers, then the average tax per container is only Php70,003. If Php70,003 average tax per container is divided by the 27,000kg. Then a 1kg chicken is worth Php2.59/kilo
What are the implications? For one, importers paid a paltry amount to the BoC for the chicken we buy in the market / grocery for Php120 per kilogram. Local poultry growers will never be able to compete with the imported chicken supply as these average a mere Php2.59 per kilo. Which would definitely be a loss for the poor farmer. While we consumers may seem to find the prices of chicken lower due to its stock importation, think about how we are literally pulling the feathers of our local growers and killing the supply chain from feeds to the actual broiler chickens.
Conclusions:
Importing beef from the US, NZ, AU, FR & India will prove more lucrative than breeding those smelly cattle locally! Assuming our revenue suffered Php21,289,918 in losses for a month x 6 imports of the same system annually, that would translate to a massive Php127,739,508 million a year! What are the economic implications on the Filipinos working in cattle farms and breeding smelly cows in their backyard? What of the many local industries crying in pain due to the difficulty of breeding? Compare that to handful of importers in their Export Entries and you will see the difference. Section 1 of the Bureau of Customs must be laughing all the way to the bank especially since the BoC Commissioner is leaving (again). Another learning curve gap is enough to squeeze more technical smuggling into the honeymoon stage of the newbie.
Unless youre allergic to milk or lactose intolerant, you and your family will require a daily dose of milk in one form or another. The Philippine has been found by the National Dairy Authority (NDA) as a huge market for milk and milk products. According to a study by SalvacionBulatao, the dairy market generates sales amounting to US$1.1billion annually. Australia, New Zealand and the USA supply 80% of milk imports. Milk powder comprises 71% of the imports. Around 8,000 dairy farming families in 223 villages are engaged in milk production. They pour milk to over 100 dairy cooperative accounting for 23% of national liquid milk supply, which translates to 11 million kilogram of milk from some 8,900 milk animals.
The NDA study states that there is a growing consumer preference for liquid milk. UHT milk imports have trebled since 1995, while milk power imports have remained constant over the same period. There is also a surge in demand for milk from local milk producers from the leading coffeeshops in Metro Manila. Some 10,774 children are fed in milk feeding programs. While countless more in the population require and consume milk in one form or another. Dissecting the import smuggling on milk and its other import cheese will our focus on this edition. Study duration covers the month of July to August 5, 2011 and shall be based on real importations covering entry numbers and passing thru Section 1 of the Bureau of Customs. For the record, Section 1 of the BoC is manned by the following personnel : Section 1-A : Principal Appraiser Emelita Morales & Principal Examiner Lourdes Guevarra. Section 1-B : Principal Appraiser Ma. Teresa Aggabao& Principal Examiner Akmad Noor. This edition will welcome their enlightenment should they provide us with a written explanation.
SPECIAL MILK (whole milk, full cream low fat, lactose, milk lactose, buttermilk) imported from New Zealand, Australia,
USA, Denmark, France & Taiwan) A total of 39 containers x 40 footers & 3 containers x 20 footers entered with total duties & taxes collected by the BoC amounting to Php14,243,116. So as not to confuse our readers, we shall only analyze the 39 x 40 footers: IF: 39 containers x 27,000 kgs. per container = 1,053,000 kgs. imported IF: Php13,247,058 was the total tax collected = average tax per container is Php339,668 IF: Php339,668 taxes 27,000 kgs = Php12.50 per kilo of milk IF: Php13,247,058 for the 39 cont. 1,053,000 kg = PHp12.58 per kilo IF: Special milk is sold in the groceries/drugstores at Php200 to Php700 per 500gms. A conservative estimate of Php400 per kilo in Market Value x 1,053,000 kg.on imports = Php 421,200,000 Market Value IF: Market Value of the imports x 40% for taxes = Php168,480,000 taxes
IF: Our mistakes /discrepancies is 50% = Php 84,240,000 in taxes Whereas, theBoC collected Php14,243,116 for the 39containers Difference: Php 69,996,884 in uncollected taxes for the 39x40footers
Cheese (Danish blue cheese, Flavored cheese, Natural Mozzarella Cheese & Asstd. Processed cheese) from
Singapore, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand A total of 6 containers x 40 footers entered the country with a total duties & taxes collected by the BoC amounting to Php2,444,183 IF: 6 containers Php2,444,183 = average taxes of Php407,363 per container IF: 6 containers x 27,000kg. = 162,000kgs. of cheese IF : 162,000kgs. Php407,363 taxes = Php15 per kilo of cheese IF: Average grocery/market value of the cheese Php3,000 per kilo x 162,0000kgs. = Php486,000,000 market value of the cheese IF : Php486,000,000 at 40% taxes = Php 194,400,000 in taxes IF: Discrepancies will be at 50% of total estimates = Php 97,200,000 in taxes
Differences: Php2,444,183 in taxes collected by the BoC Less: Php 97,200,000 = Php94,755,817
Pearl shells (including cultured pearls), sponges, sea cucumbers (trepang), shark fins, and sea turtles are exported.
Fishermen communities
Municipal fisherfolk are considered the poorest among the poor. In 2000, households whose heads were fishers had a significantly higher poverty incidence than households in general. Their daily income was roughly the retail value of 2 kg of fish. Low incomes can be attributed to declining fish catch, estimated to be about 2 kg per day, down fromthe 20 kg per day that was the average catch during the 1970s. Households of fishers and those in the fishing industry also had heads with relatively lower education levels compared with households in general. Fishers households had lower access rates to basic necessities like safe water, sanitary toilets and electricity than other households, and were more likely to live in makeshift houses or were squatting. Also, the average size of households of fishers and of those in the fishing industry was greater than the national average (Israel, 2004). According to the 2002 Census of Fisheries, there were 1.8 million municipal and commercial fishing operators. This was a three-fold increase from the 584, 000 fishing operators recorded in 1980. Municipal fishing dominated the fishing industry in terms of numbers of operators. In 2002, 1.78 million operators (99.6%) were engaged in municipal fishing compared with only 7 800 in commercial fishing operations. The vast majority of municipal fishing operations (1.752 million or 98.4%) were individual operations. At 1.7 million, male operators accounted for 94.5% of the municipal fishing operators, with a median age of 41 years. In 2002, out of 7,200 commercial fishing operations, 7,190 were operated by individuals, and almost all (98.6%) were males, with a median age of 39 years. Women have a role in fisheries and helping in the livelihood of the family (Siason, 2004). Their roles include: (1) fish marketing or vending, (2) fish processing, (3) fry gathering, (4) gear preparation, (5) fishing, (6) net mending, and (7) fishing boat ownership and operation. Source:http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Asia-and-Oceania/PhilippinesFISHING.html#ixzz1YLAbs3RB Source:http://www.fao.gov.com
This edition will cover 15 actual importations within July to August 3, 2011. All going thru Section 1 of the Bureau of Customs manned by its Prinicipal Appraiser and Principal Examiner. A total of 20 containers were released with total Duties and Taxes of merely Php656,974.
If: the standard capacity weight of a 40-footer is at a minimum of 27,000kgs. Taxes charged Php84,743 = Taxes Php3.14 per kilo If: average Supermarket Value Php 600/kilo x 27,000kgs = Php16,200,00MV If: TCCP EO334 is 5%: Php16,200,000 MV x 5% = Php810,000 should have been the Duties & Taxes. If: our Discrepancy is 50%, thenPhp405,000 should have been collected. Difference: Php320,257 in uncollected tax.
SECTION 1 : The Importers ORO CAMPO TRADING RM 3A ENRIQUETA BLDG., N. S. AMORANTO,, QUEZON CITY, NCR, SECOND DISTRICT, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION (NCR) DTI-Registered
eBNRS Search No Matching Records Found. FEDERAL FOOD CORP. SEC-Registered FEDERAL FOOD CORP. SEC-Registered
FAIRFIELD GENERAL MERCHANDISE UNIT 19 TIMOG ARCADE, # 67 TIMOG AVE., COR. SCOUT TORILLO,, SOUTH TRIANGLE, QUEZON CITY, NCR, SECOND DISTRICT, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION (NCR) DTI-Registered
MOFELS FOOD INTL. CORP. SEC-Registered FIRST CROCUS PHILIPPINES INC. SEC-Registered PURO CARNE INTL. CORP. No Records Found
TRIANGLE SISTERS TRADING DTI-Registered National Scope ZENITH FOODS CORPORATION No Records Found FRESH N FAMOUS INC. No Records Found
Section 1,
in the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Harmonized System is the category for the importation of Live Animals * Meat & Edible Meat offal * Fish & Crustaceans, Molluscs& other aquatic invertebrates * Dairy products * Birds eggs * Natural Honey * Edible products of animal origin * Products of Animal Origin
This edition will contain the figures acquired from some importations in the month of July and up to August 3, 2011 only. For clarity, presentation shall be in its mathematical format. Previous editions contain the individual breakdowns. You, dear reader, can help with the analysis later. DECLARED IMPORTS CONTAINERS (QUANTITY) TAX PAID TO SECTION 1 Frozen PORK- CA, US, FR, DK, AU, IE, NL, GB
Belly rind & skin Back skin Cutting Fat Ham Fat Minced Fat Sirloin Boneless Boneless Ham Ham / Ear Base Mask / Liver 8 x 40 footers 1 x 40 footer 3 x 40 footers 6 x 40 footers 1 X 40 footer 2 X 40 footers 4 x 40 footers 21 x 40 footers 2 x 20 footers Php1,809,348 59, 941 206,099 227,971 28,332 380,891 397,362 2,126,376
46 X 40 footers & 2 X 20 footers Php5,233,360 1,286,000 kgs. If: Taxes paid Total weight = Php 4.10 average tax per kilo Discrepancies Found: Php43,679,320 uncollected
DECLARED IMPORTS
TOTAL FROZEN CHICKEN 47 X 40 footers Php 3,340,412 1,269,000 kgs If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php2.63 average tax per kilo Discrepancies Found: Php2,695,845 uncollected
DECLARED IMPORTS
CONTAINERS (QUANTITY) TAX PAID TO SECTION 1 Frozen BEEF & BUFFALO NZ, AU, US, FR, INDIA
Boneless / Boneless Fat Tripe Scalded/ Shortplates Chuckblade / Bone in Buffalo Quarters 24 x 40 footers 648,000 kgs. 7 x 40 footers 189,000 kgs. Php2,230,272 Php1,725,262
TOTAL FROZEN BEEF & BUFFALO 837,000kgs Php3,955,534 If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php2.63 average tax per kilo Discrepancies Found: Php 44,928,000 uncollected on BEEF
DECLARED IMPORTS
CONTAINERS (QUANTITY) TAX PAID TO SECTION 1 Frozen BEEF & BUFFALO NZ, AU, US, FR, INDIA
Boneless / Boneless Fat Tripe Scalded/ Shortplates Chuckblade / Bone in Buffalo Quarters 24 x 40 footers 648,000 kgs. 7 x 40 footers 189,000 kgs. Php2,230,272 Php1,725,262
TOTAL FROZEN BEEF & BUFFALO 837,000kgs Php3,955,534 If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php2.63 average tax per kilo Discrepancies Found: Php 44,928,000 uncollected on BEEF
DECLARED IMPORTS
CONTAINERS (QUANTITY) TAX PAID TO SECTION 1 DAIRY MILK NZ, AU, TWN, US, FR, SG, DK
Filled Milk/ Whole / Full Cream /
TOTAL DAIRY MILK 1,253,000 kgs. Php 14,343,116 If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php11.44 Discrepancies Found: Php 83,330,051
DECLARED IMPORTS
CONTAINERS (QUANTITY)
CHEESE SG, DK, AU, NZ Danish Blue, Flavored, Natural Mozzarella, Asst. Processed 6 x 40 footers Php 2,444,183 TOTAL CHEESE 162,000 kgs. Php2,444,183 If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php15.08 Discrepancies Found: Php94,755,817
DECLARED IMPORTS
CONTAINERS (QUANTITY)
FROZEN SEAFOOD MY, TWN, CN, VN, CL, US Peeled Shrimp, Giant Squid, Whole Shell Mussels, Fish Cakes, Fillet, Meat Trout, Mackerel 19 x 40 footers Php 656,974 5,245,798 kgs. TOTAL SEAFOOD 438,798 kgs. Php 656,974 If: Taxes Paid Total Weight = Php 1.49 per kilo Discrepancies Found: Php 25, 670,906
Total BoC Tax Collection = Php 29,973,579 Total Est. Uncollected Taxes = Php295,059,939
(based on % Duties & Tax @ Market Value)
Sources: Philippine Bureau of Customs www-2.knu.ac.kr/~iatc/spboard/board.cgi?id=report&action... www.unctad.org The Philippines a National Case Study on Capacity Building by Alex F. Favila
IF: Market Value x 40% tax = Php3,240,000 taxes for 6 containers IF: 50% Discrepancies = Php1,620,000 tax collectibles Whereas: Total Tax collected by BoC for the 6 containers = Php61,840 Hence, the BoC Sec.1-B failed to collect Php1,558,160 in taxes Conclusion : The Bureau of Customs failed to collect a total of Php 9,825,336 in duties & taxes. While the shipments from China are covered by ACFTA, those from the US, Argentina & Chile should have been properly taxed. Assumption: If the importation of fruits should occur 4 times a year, to coincide with high frequency consumptions, then it would be safe to assume that : Php9,825,336 of tax deficits x 4 frequencies per annum = Php39,301,344 tax collection deficit of the BoC on importations of fresh apples, oranges, grapes & pears. Applicable to the 22 importations only. Limitations: The research study does not cover the general imports of fruits on a national scale as the study covered only 22 actual importations within the one month period.