The City of Northampton Department of Public Works Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MEPA Office Environmental

l Notification Form Coca-Cola Facility Expansion / Bradford Street Pumping Station Replacement
September 30, 2010

Prepared By: Kleinfelder/S E A Consultants Inc. Coca Cola North America

Submitted By: City of Northampton Department of Public Works 125 Locust Street Northampton, MA 01060

Edward S. Huntley, P.E.

Director Department of Public Works

TABLE OF CONTENTS

E NVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM

ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 E XHIBITS E XHIBIT 1 E XISTING C ONDITIONS (B RADFORD STREET P UMP STATION) E XHIBIT 2 PROPOSED C ONDITIONS (BRADFORD STREET P UMP STATION ) E XHIBIT 3 USGS L OCUS M AP E XHIBIT 4 E XISTING C ONDITIONS (C OCA -C OLA FACILITY) E XHIBIT 5 PROPOSED C ONDITIONS (COCA-C OLA FACILITY) ATTACHMENT 2 ENF C IRCULATION L IST ATTACHMENT 3 P UBLIC NOTICE OF E NVIRONMENTAL R EVIEW ATTACHMENT 4 MA HISTORIC C OMMISSION PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM (BRADFORD STREET P UMP STATION) ATTACHMENT 5 T RAFFIC IMPACT R EPORT (C OCA -COLA FACILITY E XPANSION )

Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs

For Office Use Only

Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs

ENF

MEPA Office

Environmental Notification Form

EEA No.: MEPA Analyst: Phone: 617-626-

The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00.

Project Name: Coca-Cola Expansion / Bradford Street Pump Station Replacement Street: 45 Industrial Dr Municipality: Northampton Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates:

Estimated commencement date: Oct. 2010 Approximate cost: $41.5 Million (combined) Proponent: City of Northampton DPW Street: 125 locust Street Municipality: Northampton State: MA Zip Code: 01060 Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained: Jose Lovell Firm/Agency: Kleinfelder / S E A Street: 2 Wall Street Municipality: Manchester State: NH Zip Code: 03101 Phone: 603.623.4400 Fax: 603.623.4401 E-mail: jose.lovell@seacon.com
Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Yes Has this project been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EOEA No. ) Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EOEA No. ) Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) Yes a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) Yes a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes Yes a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) No No No No No No No

Watershed: Connecticut River Latitude (pump station): 421949 Longitude (pump station): 723755 Estimated completion date: Dec. 2011 Status of project design: 75 %complete

Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, including the agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres): Coca-Cola No financial assistance. No land transfer. Bradford Street Pump Station MA Housing & Economic Development - MA Opportunity Relocation and Expansion Jobs Capital Grant ($1,125,000)
Revised 09/09 Comment period is limited. For information call 617-626-1020 Classified - Internal use

Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency? (Specify) No List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals: Local Permits and Approvals: Northampton DPW Road Opening Permit (for Bradford Street Pump Station construction to be filed) Northampton DPW Wastewater Discharge Permit (for Coca-Cola facility expansion) Order of Conditions for buffer zone disturbance (for Coca-Cola facility expansion Approved by Northampton Conservation Commission MA DEP File# 246-636) Storm Water Management Plan (for Coca-Cola facility expansion approved Jan. 14, 2010 by Northampton DPW) Major Site Plan Approval (for Coca-Cola facility expansion approved Jan. 14, 2010 by Northampton Planning Board) Federal Permits and Approvals: NPDES Dewatering General Permit (for Bradford Street Pump Station construction to be filed) Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03): Land Water Energy ACEC Rare Species Wastewater Air Regulations Wetlands, Waterways, & Tidelands Transportation Solid & Hazardous Waste Historical & Archaeological Resources

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION

Summary of Project Size & Environmental Impacts

Total site acreage New acres of land altered Acres of impervious area Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration Square feet of new other wetland alteration Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways

Existing LAND
21.77

Change

Total

State Permits & Approvals

Order of Conditions Superseding Order of Conditions Chapter 91 License 401 Water Quality Certification MHD or MDC Access Permit Water Management Act Permit New Source Approval DEP or MWRA Sewer Connection/ Extension Permit Other Permits (including Legislative Approvals) Specify: MA DEP BWP IW 38

2.5 15.7 0 0 15.7

STRUCTURES
Gross square footage Number of housing units Maximum height (in feet)
456,665 0 38 16,200 0 0 472,865 0 38

2 Classified - Internal use

TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle trips per day
57 cars, 5 trucks (PM peak hour traffic) 155 6 trucks/day, 22% car increase 0 70 cars, 11 trucks (PM peak hour traffic) 155

Parking spaces Gallons/day (GPD) of water use GPD water withdrawal GPD wastewater generation/ treatment Length of water/sewer mains (in miles)

WATER/WASTEWATER
680,000 680,000 400,000 220,000 220,000 200,000 900,000 900,000 600,000

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT

Summary of Project Size & Environmental Impacts

Total site acreage New acres of land altered Acres of impervious area Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration Square feet of new other wetland alteration Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways

Existing LAND
0.092

Change

Total

State Permits & Approvals

Order of Conditions Superseding Order of Conditions Chapter 91 License 401 Water Quality Certification MHD or MDC Access Permit Water Management Act Permit New Source Approval DEP or MWRA Sewer Connection/ Extension Permit Other Permits (including Legislative Approvals) Specify: MA DEP BRP WP 68 Treatment Works Plan Approval

0.022 0.020 0.009 0 0.029

STRUCTURES
Gross square footage Number of housing units Maximum height (in feet) Vehicle trips per day Parking spaces Gallons/day (GPD) of water use GPD water withdrawal GPD wastewater generation/ treatment
0 0 N/A 201 0 14 201 0 14

TRANSPORTATION
1 3 0 0 1 3

WATER/WASTEWATER
0 0 600,000* 0 0 200,000* 0 0 800,000*

3 Classified - Internal use

Length of water/sewer mains (in miles)

0.002

0.000

0.002

* Estimated maximum daily flow at Bradford Street PS, which conveys flow from Coca Cola and other sources. Wastewater is being transmitted only. No wastewater generation or treatment exists or is being proposed at the Bradford Street pump station.
CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public natural resources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? Yes (Specify________________________________) No Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction, or watershed preservation restriction? Yes (Specify_________________________________) No RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites of Rare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities? Yes (Specify________________________________) No HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes (Specify____________________) No (Findings from MA Historic Commission pending) If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? Yes (Specify________________________________) No AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? Yes (Specify_______________________________) No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site,
(b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative, and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach one additional page, if necessary.)
Information provided in this Environmental Notification Form pertains to impacts from the construction of a new Bradford Street Pump Station (Pump Station Project) and the Coca-Cola facility expansion. There are two separate Project Sites; one at the Coca-Cola facility and one at the existing Bradford Street Pump Station site.

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION

a) Project Site Description: Addition/ Renovation to the existing facility at 45 Industrial Dr. to add two new bottling lines with associated equipment. All expansion will occur on current property. Addition of wastewater pretreatment process required to meet local permit discharge limits. b) Alternatives: No feasible off-site alternatives for process lines. City wastewater treatment system is operating near design limits and cannot accommodate additional load, necessitating pretreatment. Therefore, wastewater required pretreatment on-site. Wastewater is too dilute to be feasible to haul off-site to alternate treatment.

4 Classified - Internal use

c) Mitigation: Facility has redesigned drainage and stormwater retention to accommodate expansion. Wastewater pretreatment area replaces an asphalt area, no change to pervious area. No further mitigations measures are required or feasible.

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT

a) Project Site Description: The purpose of the Bradford Street Pump Station Replacement Project is to expand the flow conveyance capacity of the existing wastewater pump station to accommodate the proposed expansion of the Coca-Cola facility located in the Industrial Park of Northampton (see locus plan). Coca-Cola North Americas Northampton production facility is proposing an increase in the flow discharge limit to their Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit associated with a potential new product line that will increase its average daily flow from 350,000 gallons per day (GPD) to 400,000 GPD, and increase their maximum daily flow from 400,000 GPD to 600,000 GPD. The existing Bradford Street Pump Station, which receives and conveys flow discharged from the Coca-Cola production facility, is a wet well and dry pit configuration with duplex pumps in the dry pit. The existing Bradford Street Pump Station does not have sufficient hydraulic capacity to handle the proposed increased flows from the proposed expansion of the Coca-Cola facility. After conducting an evaluation of alternatives, the replacement of the existing pump station with a new pump station with increased capacity at the existing site was recommended.

b) Alternatives Analysis: Common to each alternative discussed below is a similar pump station configuration to that shown in Exhibit 2. Three different site locations were evaluated for the new Bradford Street pump station. Alternatives 2 and 3 include lengths of additional gravity sewer and force main while Alternative 1 requires no additional length of sewer. The no-build alternative was not considered as it does not meet the programmatic requirements of the Project. Under the no-build alternative, the existing Bradford Pump Station would remain as-is, risking failure in the near future causing untreated industrial and residential wastewater SSOs. Alternative #1 This is the preferred alternative as it is a replacement of the existing pump station at the existing site, shown in Exhibit 1, and would minimize environmental impacts to the land and the existing sewer system (least amount of new gravity sewer and force main required of the three alternatives). This alternative would also result in the least amount of increase in new impervious area. Alternative #2 This alternative involves acquiring a small section of privately owned land and building on the 40 Bradford Street parcel just to the north of the existing pump station. The location of the pump station in this alternative is such that additional gravity sewer and force main would be required to extend those utilities from the current pump station site, thereby increasing the total impact to land and sewer when compared with the preferred alternative. There would also be a greater amount of impervious surface created as the proposed site is undeveloped. Alternative #3 This alternative includes construction of the new pump station within the Cityowned roundabout on Industrial Drive within the Industrial Park. This alternative results in the greatest amount of new gravity sewer, force main, land disturbance, new impervious surface and cost. Also, the new pump station would not replace the existing pump station, rather it would handle only the flow from the Coca-Cola facility while the existing pump station will remain in service and be rehabilitated to continue to handle the balance of the existing service flows.

5 Classified - Internal use

c) Mitigation: The preferred alternative will minimize environmental impacts by redeveloping the existing pump station site. Erosion and sedimentation controls including straw bales and filter fabric will be use to control stormwater runoff from the construction areas. Disturbed areas will be loamed and seeded following construction.

6 Classified - Internal use

LAND SECTION all proponents must fill out this section

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits (Coca-Cola / Pump Station) A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Coke/PS Coke/PS Coke/PS Footprint of buildings 10.48/0.000 Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 4.76/0.020 Other altered areas (landscaping) -- / 0.066 Undeveloped areas 6.531/0.000 0.372/0.005 0.06/0.006 -- / -0.011 0.436/0.000 10.86/0.005 4.819/0.026 -- / 0.055 6.096/0.000

B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils) will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM-approved forest management plan: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121B? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, describe: H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy: Impervious area to increase by 2% (approx 0.4 acres). Stormwater runoff will be collected in a newly constructed sediment forebay, infiltration and detention basin before being discharged to the city storm sewer. The city storm sewer is tributary to the Connecticut River. I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, what is the Release Tracking Number (RTN)? If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware, orWachusett subwatershed? ___ Yes X_ No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation under the Watershed Protection Act? ___ Yes ___ No

7 Classified - Internal use

J.

Describe the project's other impacts on land:

III.. Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s): Coca-Cola Facility Expansion Plant expansion is within an industrial park that is designed for this purpose with City utilities in place to support this expansion. Bradford Street Pump Station The proposed Project is consistent with the Sustainable Northampton Comprehensive Plan and the Open Space and Recreation Plan 2005-2010. The Project under its proposed alternative minimizes the impacts of infrastructure systems as it is a redevelopment project involving the replacement of an aging pump station already in place without a significant increase in footprint or impervious area. The Project proposes to aid in providing long term economic sustainability, security and opportunity as well as providing a positive business environment by allowing for potential expansion of industrial and commercial uses within the Industrial Park of Northampton which will also encourage business development for job creation and retention. This Project, as proposed, will promote the economic development of Northampton in line with the land use and environmental goals and without considerable negative impact to any of the remaining goals per the comprehensive plan. B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency and describe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan: Coca-Cola Facility Expansion Industrial/commercial growth that this expansion will provide is consistent with the Pioneer Valley Planning Commissions Regional Policy Plan Valley Vision 2 (VV2). Bradford Street Pump Station The Project, under its proposed alternative, is consistent with the Pioneer Valley Planning Commissions Regional Policy Plan Valley Vision 2 (VV2). As a redevelopment the Project conforms to the land use goals by keeping the same approximate footprint for wastewater infrastructure. It promotes commercial and industrial development in line with the VV2 by increasing the capacity of a designated industrial area to allow for more dense industrial growth within the designated area. A direct result of this Project will be that Coca-Cola will be able to move forward with an already approved expansion within its current parcel creating additional jobs without any loss of open space. This Project does not hinder the progress of any of the stated goals in the VV2. C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e. text or map amendment, special permit, or variance)? Yes ___ No ___ ; if yes, describe: Not Applicable D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe: City of Northampton Zoning approval and City of Northampton Conservation Commission approval have been received.

8 Classified - Internal use

RARE SPECIES SECTION

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? ___ Yes _X_ No C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? ___ Yes ___ No. If yes, 1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat (contact: Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information): 2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please include the results of your survey. 3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? ___ Yes ___ No B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe: C. Will the project alter "significant habitat" as designated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.30)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts (for example, stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare moth habitat):

WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? _X__ Yes _ No; if yes, specify which permit: Order of Condition Number: DEP# 246-636 C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below.
9 Classified - Internal use

II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them on the site plan: B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Land Under the Ocean Designated Port Areas Coastal Beaches Coastal Dunes Barrier Beaches Coastal Banks Rocky Intertidal Shores Salt Marshes Land Under Salt Ponds Land Containing Shellfish Fish Runs Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Inland Wetlands Bank Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Land under Water Isolated Land Subject to Flooding Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area Area (in square feet) or Length (in linear feet) _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ This project involves adding an earthen berm within the 100 buffer zone to a Bordering Vegetated Wetlands. _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________

C. Is any part of the project 1. a limited project? ___ Yes _X__ No 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? ___ Yes _X_ No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? ___ Yes _X_ No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, identify the area (in square feet): D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131A)? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order of Conditions issued? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number:__Order of Condition Number DEP# 246-636, recorded 1/27/2010. Was the Order of Conditions appealed? ___ Yes _X_ No. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations? ___ Yes _X_ No. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? _X_ Yes ___ No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)? F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or
10 Classified - Internal use

removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands): III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands) that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? ___ Yes __X_ No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 license or permit affecting the project site? ___ Yes __X_ No; if yes, list the date and number: B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water dependent use? Current ___ Change ___ Total ___

C. Is any part of the project 1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? ___ Yes ___X___ No; if yes, describe: 2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, volume of dredged material ______ 3. a solid fill, pile-supported, or bottom-anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other waterways? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, what is the base area? _______ 4. within a Designated Port Area? ___ Yes _X_ No D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands: IV. Consistency: A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? ___ Yes _X__ No; if yes, describe the project's consistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? ___ Yes __X_ No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan:

WATER SUPPLY SECTION

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and at the project site: Existing Change Withdrawal from groundwater ________ ________ Withdrawal from surface water ________ ________ Interbasin transfer ________ ________ Municipal or regional water supply ________ ________ proposed activities Total ________ ________ ________ ________

11 Classified - Internal use

B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? ___ Yes ___ No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, 1. have you submitted a permit application? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach the application 2. have you conducted a pump test? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach the pump test report D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?___ Yes ___ No E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___ Yes ___ No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Existing Water supply well(s) (capacity, in gpd) ________ Drinking water treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) ________ Water mains (length, in miles) ________ Change ________ ________ ________ Total ________ ________ ________

F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve 1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? ___ Yes ___ No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? ___ Yes ___ No H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on water resources, quality, facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services:

WASTEWATER SECTION
I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater (see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The project will exceed the threshold related to the expansion in discharge to a sewer system of 100,000 or more gpd of sewage and industrial wastewater. The maximum daily flow will increase by 200,000 gpd. B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, specify which permit: Coca-Cola Facility Expansion MA DEP Sewer Connection/Extension Permit MA DEP BWP IW 38

12 Classified - Internal use

Bradford Street Pump Station MA DEP BRP WP 68 Treatment Works Plan Approval C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation -- Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00): COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION Discharge to groundwater (Title 5) Discharge to groundwater (non-Title 5) Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water Municipal or regional wastewater facility TOTAL BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION Discharge to groundwater (Title 5) Discharge to groundwater (non-Title 5) Discharge to outstanding resource water Discharge to surface water *Municipal or regional wastewater facility Existing __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ _400,000_ _400,000_ Existing ____0___ ____0___ ____0___ ____0___ 600,000* Change __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ _200,000_ _200,000_ Change ___0____ ___0____ ___0____ ___0___ 200,000* Total _0______ _0______ _0______ _0______ _600,000_ _600,000_ Total __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ __0_____ 800,000*

TOTAL 600,000* 200,000* 800,000* * Estimated maximum daily flow at Bradford Street Pump Station, which conveys flows from Coca Cola and other sources. Wastewater is being transmitted only. No wastewater generation or treatment exists or is being proposed at the Bradford Street Pump Station site.

B.

Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project? _X_ Yes ___ No; if no, describe where capacity will be found: A hydraulic evaluation showed that there is sufficient capacity downstream of the Bradford Street Pump Station to convey the increase in flows resulting from the Coca Cola expansion. Regarding the capacity of the collection system between the Coca Cola facility and the Pump Station, Coca Cola is planning to implement engineering controls at the pretreatment facility to limit the instantaneous peak discharge to levels that are within the hydraulic capacity of the collection system.

C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_X_ Yes ___ No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _X_ Yes ___ No. If yes, describe as follows: Coca-Cola expansion project will include construction of wastewater pretreatment facility (anaerobic system) adding to the existing pH adjustment system. Bradford Street pump station project does not currently contain nor will it involve
13 Classified - Internal use

construction of a treatment or disposal facility. Neither the Coca-Cola expansion nor the Pump Station replacement involves expanding the length of the existing collection system. COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION Wastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) Sewer mains (length, in miles) Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) Existing _400,000_ _0______ _0______ Change _200,000 __0_____ __0_____ Total _600,000 _0______ _0______

E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? ___ Yes _X__ No G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residual materials? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage (Anaerobic biosolids) __0_____ _15,000_ _15,000_ Treatment, processing __0_____ ________ ________ Combustion __0_____ ________ ________ Disposal __0_____ ________ ________ H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation and treatment facilities: Coca-Cola Facility Expansion Proposed wastewater pretreatment system will treat load created by proposed additions and reduce load from existing operations. This allows for a reduced overall load but increased flow to the DPW treatment system. Bradford Street Pump Station There are no other known impacts on wastewater generation and treatment facilities stemming from the Pump Station project. III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: Coca-Cola Facility Expansion Local wastewater discharge permit is in process of being approved, state BWP IW38 permit will be submitted. Approvals confirm consistency with applicable regulations. The proponent will comply with all other federal, state, regional and local plans and policies pertaining to wastewater management. Bradford Street Pump Station The proponent will comply with all federal, state, regional and local plans and policies pertaining to wastewater management. Preliminary discussions with the City, DEP and other regulating agencies will continue as the project and related permitting evolves. A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? ___ Yes X___ No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the plan and describe the relationship of the project to the plan
14 Classified - Internal use

TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces _______ ________ _______ Number of vehicle trips per day ________ ________ ________ ITE Land Use Code(s): B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway 1. ____________________ 2. ____________________ 3. ____________________ Existing ________ ________ ________ Change ________ ________ ________ Total ________ ________ ________

C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services:

ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION

I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes X__ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II. Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total

15 Classified - Internal use

Length (in linear feet) of new or widened roadway Width (in feet) of new or widened roadway Other transportation facilities:

________ ________

________ ________

________ ________

B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)?

____________ ____________ ____________

III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan:

ENERGY SECTION
I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission Existing Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) ________ Length of fuel line (in miles) ________ Length of transmission lines (in miles) ________ Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) ________

facilities at the project site: Change Total ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________

B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services:

16 Classified - Internal use

AIR QUALITY SECTION

I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day) of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter ________ ________ ________ Carbon monoxide ________ ________ ________ Sulfur dioxide ________ ________ ________ Volatile organic compounds ________ ________ ________ Oxides of nitrogen ________ ________ ________ Lead ________ ________ ________ Any hazardous air pollutant ________ ________ ________ Carbon dioxide ________ ________ ________ B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality:

SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION

I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? ___ Yes X_ No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity:
17 Classified - Internal use

Storage Treatment, processing Combustion Disposal

Existing ________ ________ ________ ________

Change ________ ________ ________ ________

Total ________ ________ ________ ________

B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Storage Recycling Treatment Disposal Existing ________ ________ ________ ________ Change ________ ________ ________ ________ Total ________ ________ ________ ________

C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? ___ Yes ___ No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency--Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan:

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION

I. Thresholds / Impacts A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe: B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ___ Yes _X_ Findings from MHC pending for Bradford Street Pump Station; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe: C. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach correspondence E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources:
18 Classified - Internal use

II. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources:

ATTACHMENTS:
1. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate context, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality color copy (8- x 11 inches or larger) indicating the project location and boundaries List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Other:

2. 3. 4 5.

19 Classified - Internal use

ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBITS

(
8''

8'' (

12'' AC

AC

COCA-COLA FACILITY
'' 10 AC

( (

(
C PV ( 8'' (

(
8''

8'' VC

8''

( ( (
AC( 8''

8''

VC

8'' P VC

_ (
( (

_ __

_ __

_(

_ __

__

_ __

_ (

(
8''

( ( ( ( ( (
8''

( 8'' VC
V ( C

EXISTING PUMP STATION

8''

8'' RCP

8''

12'' AC

( (( (
AC 8'' (

( (
8' '

( ( (
8'' VC

((

( ( (

EXHIBIT 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS

175 1:4,000

350

700 Feet

Legend
(

Q3 FLOOD ZONES
A AE AH AO X500 UNDES

Sewer Manhole Sewer Line DEEP MARSH SHALLOW MARSH SHRUB SWAMP DECIDUOUS SWAMP CertifiedVernalPools PriorityHabitat

k j

YARD AND PARKING AREA

APPROX. DRY PIT LOCATION AND ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURE APPROX. WET WELL LOCATION

EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL FACILITIES AND BACKUP GENERATOR PAD

APPROX. PROJECT BOUNDARY

20

40

60

SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=20'

EXHIBIT 2
BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION
PROJECT ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED CONDITIONS

S E A C O NSULTA NTS INC.

COKE FACILITY

SEWER PUMP STATION

WWTP

EXHIBIT 3
USGS MAP

0 1:15,000

1,000

2,000 Feet

ATTACHMENT 2 ENF CIRCULATION L IST

ENF CIRCULATION LIST:

2 full sized copies + copy of 4 first pages to: Secretary Ian A. Bowles Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 1 copy to: Department of Environmental Protection Boston Office Commissioner's Office One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 DEP/Western Regional Office Attn: MEPA Coordinator 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 MHD Public/Private Development Unit 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116 MHD - District #2 Attn: MEPA Coordinator 811 North King Street Northampton, MA 10160 Mass Historical Commission The MA Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 60 Congress Street Springfield, MA 01104 City Council City Hall Room 18 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060

Northampton Planning Board and Conservation 210 Main St., Rm. 11, City Hall Northampton, MA 01060 Northampton Health Department 212 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 DCR Attn: MEPA Coordinator 251 Causeway Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114

ATTACHMENT 3 PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

ATTACHMENT 4 MA HISTORIC COMMISSION PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM

950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH APPENDIX A MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASS. 02125 617-727-8470, FAX: 617-727-5128 PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM
Project Name: ________________________________________________________________________________ Location / Address: ___________________________________________________________________________ City / Town: ________________________________________________________________________________ Project Proponent Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________ City/Town/Zip/Telephone: _____________________________________________________________________ Agency license or funding for the project (list all licenses, permits, approvals, grants or other entitlements being sought from state and federal agencies). Agency Name
MA DEPARTMENT OF ENV. PROTECTION MA HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Type of License or funding (specify)

BRP WP 68 TREATMENT WORKS PLAN $1.125 MILLION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT GRANT NPDES DEWATERING GENERAL PERMIT

Project Description (narrative):

Does the project include demolition? If so, specify nature of demolition and describe the building(s) which are proposed for demolition.

Does the project include rehabilitation of any existing buildings? If so, specify nature of rehabilitation and describe the building(s) which are proposed for rehabilitation.

Does the project include new construction? If so, describe (attach plans and elevations if necessary).

5/31/96 (Effective 7/1/93) - corrected

950 CMR - 275

ATTACHMENT 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDY (COCA -COLA FACILITY EXPANSION)