Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2005, Kostenstelle, 1
Welcome !
1
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 2
Agenda
o How we started …
o Areas of application
o Consequences of weight reduction
o Summary
How we started …
Engine bracket for T4
952 g 733 g
2
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 3
Z
Y X
Principle configuration:
Engine bearing – engine bracket
Design objective:
engine bracket
as light as possible -
made from aluminium
Forces applied:
- on longitudinal axis
- on vertical axis
Bolt-on points for engine block - for assembly
3
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 4
Computer
simulation of
casting
process.
Foundry may
demand
modifications.
4
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 5
Final design
Stress reduction
5
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 6
6
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 7
7
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 8
8
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 9
Final design:
Sheet metal thickness:
2 mm
Aluminium: 184 g
9
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 10
Design process
Topology Optimization
New development al course
Contruction by CAD
10
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 11
Original Optimized
bracket design
271 g 225 g
11
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 12
2000 g 1550 g
Original shape Design space Topology result New design Stress check
12
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 13
US-NCAP* 35mph
Frontcrash
*New Car Assessment Program
Vehicle front axle
27. September 2005 Topology Optimization at 26
Volkswagen
13
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 14
Saving: 20%
Material: steel
AQ 250 transmission
Position of hole is very sensitive to stress
14
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 15
15
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 16
Golf
Touran
Cut out
Critical areas:
stresses too high
Bearing pedestal
16
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 17
Topology
proposal
17
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 18
X
X X
In order to avoid casting defects we had
to close 3 of 5 holes (X).
18
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 19
Lower fuel
consumption
100 kg* reduction
saves 0.35 l / 100 km and
(= gain of 0.85 mpg)
8.4 g CO2/km
or
to decrease 1g CO2/km
Other parameters infuencing fuel reduce weight -12 kg
consumption:
* Reference car with 1300 kg
Rolling resistance
Aerodynamic resistance
Electricity consumption
Summary
19
Kostenstelle 04.10.2005, Kostenstelle, 20
20