Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PACS: 43.25.Uv
ABSTRACT
The present research is an overview of acoustic particle manipulation devices that are
constructed from resonantly-excited cylindrical structures. These devices, in their most efficient
mode of excitation, rely upon matching the structural mode of an elastic cylindrical shell to a cavity
mode set up in its confined volume. In applications, discussed for both particles in air and liquids,
the structural vibrations are tuned such that desired modal responses are obtained. Lowest order
axisymmetric modes will be discussed as well as more localized particle concentration modes that
result from breaking the cylindrical symmetry of the system. Specific designs have demonstrated
that these devices can be engineered into power efficient assemblies for aerosol manipulation.
Examples of applications include line-driven cylindrical capillaries for real-time sample positioning
of biological samples in flow cytometers and cylindrical piezoelectric shells driven under multiple
symmetry conditions for aerosol concentration and positioning.
INTRODUCTION
Particle handling and trapping based upon acoustic radiation pressure is becoming an
important tool in biology, chemistry, environmental monitoring and clinical research. Capture of
particles at predetermined locations within flow channels (fluid streams or gas streams) or
modification of their trajectories has found increasing utility in many applications. In early
research in aerosol applications, scientists implemented acoustics to position macroscopic
samples (usually on the order of a millimeter or larger) in applications where the sample must
not contact the wall of a containment vessel. Many studies in containerless processing have
been conducted to observe, for example, the growth of freely forming crystals and
measurements of the physical properties of substances in both terrestrial and low gravity
environments.1,2 More recently, an interest in in-line monitoring of aerosols has made the
promise of using acoustics to position particles in flow streams for real time analysis appealing
for environmental monitoring applications. With the popularity of microfluidic systems, acoustic
trapping, transport, and positioning of particles in fluid streams has become an expanded field
of research.3-7
Over the past several decades a number of acoustic particle manipulation systems
based upon planar geometries have been proposed and successfully demonstrated, but
systems with cylindrical geometries are few. This paper gives a general overview of the
development of acoustic particle handling and trapping devices that are based upon cylindrical
geometries.
Force on particles
The force on a particle resulting from acoustic radiation pressure depends upon
frequency of excitation, pressure amplitude within the medium, particle size, and the
density/compressibility contrast between the particle and the host medium. Within an acoustic
standing wave, it is a time-averaged drift force which transports the particles to a stable
equilibrium resting position. The expression for the acoustic radiation force FU(x) on a
compressible, spherical particle in an acoustic standing wave is given by:8
FU = − ∇U (1)
⎧⎪ ⎡ p 'in 2 v 'in 2 ⎤ ⎫⎪
FU = −∇ ⎨2π a ρ ⎢ 2 2 f1 −
3
f2 ⎥ ⎬ (2)
⎩⎪ ⎢⎣ 3ρ c 2 ⎥⎦ ⎪⎭
where p’in2 and v’in2 are the mean square fluctuations of the fluid pressure and velocity at the
location of the particle,
c2 ρ
f1 = 1 − (3)
c02 ρ 0
ρ0 − ρ
f2 = 2 , (4)
2ρ0 + ρ
and
ρ = mass density of the fluid
ρ0 = mass density of the particle
a = radius of the particle
c = speed of sound in the fluid
c0 = speed of sound in the particle.
For pressure wave in planar devices, general solutions (plane waves) possess a spatial
dependence where the velocity antinodes and pressure nodes coincide. When plane wave
solutions are used to compute the force potential in Eq. (2), the potential minima occur at the
locations of either pressure nodes or pressure antinodes (or equivalently, velocity antinodes or
velocity nodes) depending upon the signs of the contrast factors f1 and f2.9 When analyzing
wavefields with different symmetries such as a cylindrical wavefield, collocation of pressure nodes
and velocity antinodes is no longer generally valid and the calculation of the positions to where
particles migrate becomes more complex. A good description showing the complexities of the
force potential generated by cylindrical and spherical wavefields (in a modal format) in rigid-
walled resonators is given by Barmatz.10
2
th
19 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS – ICA2007MADRID
aerosol particles in a flowing air stream for detectors that require knowledge of the aerosol
particle location for proper detection and classification.
PZT
tube
concentrated
aerosol
The cylindrical concentrator is constructed from a hollow, cylindrical piezoelectric tube. The
tube vibrates in a quasi-breathing mode wherein the wall of the tube vibrates with an
appreciable radial component. Within the cavity, aerosol particles experience a time-averaged
force that directs them to the vicinity of a pressure node or antinode within the resident sound
field depending on the particle size, particle density and compressibility, excitation frequency,
and the sound pressure level within the cavity.
low particle
concentration
elsewhere
antinode
particle
concentration
along 100 microns
antinode
Figure 2. – Photograph of 10 micron particles trapped onto a filter after passing through an
axisymmetric driven cylindrical device like shown in Fig. 1. The particles are aligned tightly
along a pressure antinode that was created as an annular ring about the central axis of the
tube.
piezo-ceramic
pressure nodes
b
PZT
tube
concentrated
aerosol
Figure 3. – Cross section of ‘three node’ acoustic concentrator. (a) By symmetry breaking the
acoustic cavity, it is possible to create localized nodal configurations. (b) Experiment
demonstrating the symmetry breaking effect within the cavity of a cylindrical acoustic
concentrator. Symmetry is broken by inserting a small perturbation into the cavity. Aerosol is
pumped into the cavity and instantaneously transported to three localized pressure nodes. The
device is 27 mm in diameter and operates at 52 kHz.
4
th
19 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS – ICA2007MADRID
geometry (e.g. by making the cross section slightly oblate as shown in Fig. 3(a)), can reduce the
concentric rings displayed in the experimental results in Fig. 1 to localized potential minima.
Experimental results demonstrating this effect are shown in Fig. 3(b). The creation of localized
minima allows for aerosol particles to be forced into several parallel streams for parallel
processing in detection and identification platforms. The number of aerosol streams can be
adjusted by altering the cavity design and the drive frequency of the tube. Designs with as few
as one and as many as six streams have been demonstrated.
Line-driven capillary
Using the properties of acoustic radiation pressure in a
line-driven capillary, an acoustic focusing flow cell has
been developed that uses ultrasonic radiation pressure to
tightly focus micron size (and above) particles to the
center of a flowing stream. This device has been
constructed to replace hydrodynamic particle focusing in
flow cytometry systems. It is constructed from a capillary
that is driven by a piezoceramic source in line-contact
with its outer wall. Vibration of the structure creates a
localized pressure node along the central axis where an
axial particle trap is formed. A diagram of this device is
Figure 4. – Diagram of line- given in Fig. 4. Particles in a dilute suspension enter the
driven capillary. Forces due to device from the top and experience a radial force that
acoustic radiation pressure carry transports them to the pressure node as they flow through
particles to the location of an the system. In a flow cytometer, the particles contained in
axial pressure node along the a sample are simultaneously concentrated and aligned in
central axis of a glass capillary. single file as they are then transported through the
interrogation laser.
focused
particle
stream
Figure 5. – Sequence of photographs showing 3 micron latex spheres focused along the axis
of a line-drive capillary. On the far left, the particles are sparsely distributed throughout the
capillary and cannot be seen. The middle scene is 0.1 seconds after activation of the
ultrasonic field. The particles transport to the center of the capillary. After 0.2 seconds
elapsed time (far right), the particles are focused in a tight line approximately 1-2 particles in
width.
This type of drive methodology yields large acoustic energy transfer into the flow
chamber due to the large source aperture. Because the entire structure is acoustically driven,
the system performs concentration over the entire length of the flow chamber thus increasing
the residence time of the particles in the acoustic field and allowing the use of lower power
levels (100’s of milliWatts). Low power levels alleviate problems that may arise from thermal
convection or cavitation.
5
th
19 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS – ICA2007MADRID
flow through the capillary. Single file registration and positioning are necessary for high
sensitivity flow cytometry applications.
CONCLUSIONS
Examples of ultrasonic particle manipulation devices
that possess cylindrical geometry have been shown.
These devices include line-driven cylindrical capillaries
for real-time sample positioning of biological samples
in flow cytometers and cylindrical piezoelectric shells
driven under multiple symmetry conditions for aerosol
concentration and positioning.
References:
[1] Trinh, E. H., “Compact acoustic levitation device for
studies in fluid dynamics and material science in the
laboratory and microgravity,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 2059-
2065 (1985).
[2] Tuckermann, R., B. Neidhart, E. G. Lierke, and S.
Figure 6. – (Left) Flowing solution Bauerecker, “Trapping of heavy gases in stationary
containing particles in a glass ultrasonic fields,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 363, 349-354 (2002).
capillary with acoustic field OFF. [3] G. Goddard, J. C. Martin, S. W. Graves, G. Kaduchak,
(Right) Same solution once acoustic “Ultrasonic particle concentration for sheathless focusing of
field is turned ON. Spheres are 20 particles for analysis in a flow cytometer,” Cytometry 69, 66-
µm diameter, capillary ID 480 µm, 74 (2006).
[4] A. Haake, J. Dual, “Positioning of small particles by an
and excitation frequency 1.8 MHz.
ultrasound field excited by surface waves,” Ultrasonics 42,
75-80 (2004).
[5] W. T. Coakley, J. J. Hawkes, M. A. Sobanski, C. M. Cousins, J. Spengler, “Analytical scale ultrasonic
standing wave manipulation of cells and microparticles,”, Ultrasonics, 38, 638-641 (2000).
[6] Z. Wang, P. Grabenstetter, D. L. Feke, J. M. Belovich, “Retention and viability characteristics of
mammalian cells in an acoustically driven polymer mesh,” Biotechnol. Prog. 20, 384-387 (2004).
[7] J. J. Hawkes, M. J. Long, W. T. Coakley, M. B. McDonnell, “Ultrasonic deposition of cells on a surface,”
Biosensors and Bioelectronics 19, 1021-1028 (2004).
[8] L.P. Gor'kov, “On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid”, Soviet Phys.
Dokl., 6, no. 9, 773 (1962).
[9] P. L. Marston and D. B. Thiessen, “Manipulation of fluid objects with acoustic radiation pressure,” Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1027, 414-434 (2004).
[10] M. Barmatz and P. Collas,” Acoustic radiation potential on a sphere in plane, cylindrical, and speherical
standing wave fields”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 928-945 (1985).
[11] Holwill, I. L. J., “The use of ultrasonic standing waves to enhance optical particle sizing equipment,”
Ultrasonics 38, 650-653 (2000).
[12] Doinikov, A., “Acoustic radiation force on a spherical particle in a viscous heat-conducting fluid. I.
General formula,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 713-721 (1997); Doinikov, A., “Acoustic radiation force on a
spherical particle in a viscous heat-conducting fluid. II. Force on a rigid sphere,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101,
722-730 (1997); Doinikov, A., “Acoustic radiation force on a spherical particle in a viscous heat-conducting
fluid. III. Force on a liquid drop,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 713-721 (1997).
[13] Danilov, SD; Mironov, MA, Mean force on a small sphere in a sound field in a viscous fluid, J. Acoust.
Soc. Am. 107, 143-53 (2000).
[14] Mazumder, M. K., and K. J. Kirsch, “Single particle aerodynamic relaxation time analyzer,” Rev. Sci.
Instr. 48, 622-624 (1977).
[15] Mazumder, M. K., et al., “SPART Analyzer: Its applicatoin to aerodynamic size distribution
measurement,” Aerosol Sci. 10, 561-569 (1979).
[16] Kaduchak, G., D. N. Sinha, and D. C. Lizon, “Novel cylindrical, air-coupled acoustic
levitation/concentration devices,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 1332-1336 (2002).
[17] Kaduchak, G., and D. N. Sinha, “Low-power acoustic harvesting of aerosols,” 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics
Symposium, 607-610 (2001).
[18] Kogan, Sh., G. Kaduchak, and D. N. Sinha, “Acoustic concentration of particles in piezoelectric tubes:
Theoretical modeling of cavity shape and symmetry breaking,” accepted for publication in J. Acoust. Soc.
Am. (2004).
[19] G. Goddard and G. Kaduchak, "Particle concentration in a line driven cylindrical tube," J. Acoust. Soc.
Am. 117, 3440-3447 (2005).
6
th
19 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS – ICA2007MADRID