Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Smart Separation Devices for Particle Concentration

in Water using Ultrasonic Standing Wave


Young-Sup Lee, Dong-Jin Yoon, Jaehwa Kwon and Dae-Cheol Seo
Smart Measurement Group
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science
Daejeon, South Korea
yslee@kriss.re.kr

Abstract—This paper presents the theory, design, manufacture, On this basis in this paper, a theoretical consideration and
experiment and evaluation of a smart device for enhanced modelling of an ultrasonic separation device are described in
separability of tiny particles in water. The smart device takes methods section, which contains the concept and electro-
advantage of the ultrasonic standing wave, which was generated acoustical modelling. Especially, the modelling of the
by the operation of a piezoceramic PZT patch installed on the piezoceramic transducer in terms of the acoustic impedance
separation device. Since the devices were developed for the and transfer matrix is analyzed in detail. In design and analysis
concentration of particles, the design and manufacture of them section, the design of the separation device is written with
were targetted to the improvement of conventional separation actual operation methodology and initial measurement. The
processes. experimental set-up and results are discussed in results and
The details of the device design including the electro-acoustical discussion section with relevant data and observed
modelling for separation and PZT transducers are described at
phenomenon.
first. An ultrasonic wavelength in half (1/2) for a nodal line in the
middle of the separation channel was applied in the design to
compare its separation performance of the particles. The II. METHODS
separation channel has 740 micrometers width with the operating
frequencies of 1 MH. Based on this design, the smart separation A. Concept of Separation with Standing Wave
device was analyzed with finite element approach to confirm the The concept of the separation device in this study can be
design parameters and to predict the acoustic pressure field in the illustrated as shown in Figure 1. The cavity channel in the
separation channel of the device.
separation device is designed to generate acoustic pressure
Results of the experiment showed that the separation channel of
field with standing wave. A half-wavelength of acoustic wave
the device gave a nice performance in concentration of particles.
Also the electric impedance of the PZT patch bonded on the
in the channel makes a nodal line of zero acoustic pressure at
separation device was measured to compare with theoretical the middle of the channel. The acoustic wave is primarily
analysis. activated by a piezoceramic PZT (piezoelectric zirconate
titanate) patch which is bonded on the top of the device.
Keywords-ultrasonic standing wave; particle separation; (Desilets, 1978)
piezoeletric transducer; impedance matching; The separation device for ultrasonic standing wave
formation consists of a PZT patch, matching layer of SUS316,
I. INTRODUCTION separation channel and reflection channel of SUS316 as can be
Ultrasonic standing wave has been widely used in various seen from Figure 2. The PZT patch of Fuji Ceramics C-7 was
fields including environmental technology, cell handling in length × width × thickness = 20 × 5 × 2 mm, which rosonates
biotechnology, microfluidics and so on. (Hawkes and Coakley, at about 1.0 MHz for its first thickness vibration mode. The
2001; Hill et al, 2002) Since standing waves in high frequency PZT patch was bonded on the matching layer, which transfers
has been known that they can separate, concentrate and mix PZT's vibration to the separation channel. The thickness of the
particles with relevant fluids in a given channel, the research matching layer was designed to be 18.6 mm, which is exactly
area is getting broader and broader quickly. three times of the unit wavelength of 6.2 mm at 1.0 MHz in
SUS316.
The technology of an ultrasonic standing wave device is
very much related with piezoelectric transducers and fluid B. Electro-Acoustical Modelling
flow, especially when the device is designed with micro
electro-mechanical systems (MEMS). Hill et al (2002) showed The schematic diagram for electro-acoustical modelling of
the importance of the modelling of the piezoelectric an ultrasonic separator is shown in Figure 2. It consists of a
transducers and the wave propagation in a multi-layered device PZT plate, air backing, matching layer (SUS316), separation
in order to generate an exact standing wave field in a separation channel layer (water), reflection layer (SUS316) and another
channel. air backing. If Zf and Zb denote the front and back load
impedance of the piezoceramic PZT patch respectively, the
acoustic impedance from the PZT to the backing Zib and the

0-7803-9383-X/05/$20.00 (c) 2005 IEEE 1522 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium


PZT patch PZ T
Separation channel
(w ater)
Aligned particles

Inlet

R eflectio n
M atching layer layer
(S U S 316) (S U S 316)

Water mixed with Outlet 1


particles Outlet 2
Generated
standing wave (Collection of
patcicles by
gravity) 2 18.6 0.74 7.4

(a) (b)
Figure 1. A smart separation device with ultrasonic standing wave. (a) Concept. (b) Separator design.

Z 2 f + jZt tanθt
w a te r
Ztf = Zt + (4)
P Z T (Z c ) (Z t)
Zt + jZ 2 f tanθt
where Z2f is the impedance to the front reflection layer at the
R efle c to r
boundary of the separation channel layer and the reflection
M a tc hing
A ir(Z b )
(ste e l 1 ) (S te e l 2 )
A ir(Z b ) layer, which is expressed with
(Z 1) (Z 2) Zb + jZ 2 tan θ 2
Z2f = Z2 + (5)
t1
Z 2 + jZb tan θ 2
tc tt t2
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of ultrasonic separator for electro- where. θ i = t i ω / v i
acoustical analysis.

acoustic impedance from the PZT to the front matching layer III. DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
Zif are given by[4]
A. Design and Finite elment analysise of Separation Device
Zb + jZc tanθc Zf + jZc tan θc . (1) In order to demonstrate the separation of wet sand particles
Zib = Zc + Zif = Zc
Zc + jZb tanθc Zc + jZf tan θc from mixed water, a smart separation devise has been
manufactured based on the description in the previous section.
The acoustic input impedance in the center of the PZT The particle separation device has been designed as plotted in
patch Zin is the summation of Zib and Zif in parallel, therefore
Figure 3(a), which is 115 mm long, 26.74 mm high except the
Zin is given by PZT patch and 7 mm wide. The device is made of SUS316 and
ZibZif has a separation channel of 97 mm long, and one inlet and two
Zin = (2) outlets. One of the outlets is for the collection of sand particles
Zib + Zif
and the other is for clean water. The cross-sectional area of
The impedance to the front matching layer at piezoceramic each outlet is 1.5 × 0.74 mm and is exactly the half of inlet's
plate, Zf in equation (4) is written with (3.0 × 0.74 mm), which allows the continuity of fluid flow in
the separation channel.
Ztf + jZ 1 tan θ 1
Zf = Z 1 (3)
Z 1 + jZtf tan θ 1 The PZT patch was bonded on the top side of the device
and is positioned 30 mm away from the end of the inlet hole in
where Ztf is the impedance to the front separation channel the separation channel as shown in Figure 3(a). Because the
layer at the boundary between the matching layer and the fluid flow inside the separation channel could be turbulent after
separation channel layer, which is given by the passing through the inlet hole and the turbulent flow could
be sustained up to a certain distance. As the ultrasonic
sym m etric
20 20 20 PZT
PZT
matching layer p7
p6
(SUS 316) p5
p4
p3
18.6 p2 m atching
p1 layer
20

water 0.74
reflection layer S e p aratio n
(SUS 316) 7.4 c han nel

reflectio n
layer

finite element modelled part Unit (mm)

(a) (b)
Figure 3. Finite element model. (a) Modelled part. (b) Modelling (1/2 with symmetry).

0-7803-9383-X/05/$20.00 (c) 2005 IEEE 1523 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium


1 7

P1
0.8 P3
P4
P5 6
0.6 P7
Elapsed Time = 5 µsec
Elapsed Time = 15 µsec
0.4 Elapsed Time = 25 µsec

Normalised Acoustic Pressure


5

0.2

Point No
4
0

−0.2
3

−0.4

−0.6 2

−0.8

1
−1 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 5 10 15 20 25 Normalised Acoustic Pressure
Elapsed Time (µsec)

(a) (b)
Figure 4. Finite element analysis results. (a) Pressure field vs elapsed time. (b) Standing wave formation with time.

separator requires laminar flow at its standing wave field in the As the frequency designed to make standing wave is 1.0 MHz,
channel to be operated properly, the distance of 30 mm allows a clear resonance has been observed at the frequency as plotted
the turbulent flow changes into laminar flow. in Figure 5. It is noted that the impedance with water is a little
bit different from that with air. This is because the water in the
A finite element model has been created to estimate the channel has larger impedance than air..
acoustic pressure response inside the separation channel in
terms of time. Figure 3(b) is the 2-dimensional finite element
model, which includes the PZT plate, matching and reflection IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
layers and separation filled with fresh water. Especially the As shown in Figure 6, the ultrasonic smart separation
separation channel with water has modelled with 7 points (p1 - device was installed with fittings on a flat test bed. The device
p7) to show acoustic variation. was clamped partly by a mechanical vice to hold it firmly and
The finite element analysis shows that the acoustic standing inlet and outlet tubes with the inner diameter of 2.5 mm were
wave in the channel can be constructed within a very short time connected to and from it. The power amplifier used in the
after the excitation of the PZT patch. As shown in Figure 4(a), experiment is T&C Power Conversion Inc.'s AG Series
it takes about 5 µsec to form a minute standing wave field and Ultrasonic Amplifier for the actuation of the PZT patch with
1.0 MHz. The power signal to the PZT has been monitored
more 10 µsec makes the field 5 times stronger, and another 10
with a LeCroy 9354A oscilloscope.
µsec develops it 10 times stronger. The acoustic pressure nodal
point of 1/2 wavelength is constructed at p4 of the channel as The particle for separation in the experiment was sand
plotted in Figure 4(b), where particles in water can be gathered. which is about 50 microns in diameter. The particles were
If the thickness of each layer in the separation device is not mixed with water and were delivered to the separation device
carefully chosen, the effective standing wave field cannot be by gravity. The valves were used to control the flow speed of
generated. the mixed water. A CCD camera with an optical zoom lense
was installed to observe and record the separation during the
B. Measured impedance experiment.
Electrical impedance of the PZT patch bonded the A levitation test of sand particles has been made in order to
separation device has been measured before separation observe the formation of 1.0 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in
experiment with a Hewlett-Packard 4194A Impedance the separation channel at the device. After sand mixed water
Analyzer in the frequency range of 0.5 MHz - 1.5 MHz as was full in the separation channel, all of the inlet and outlet
shown in Figure 5. The impedance was measured both when valves were closed. The levitation test was begun after the sand
the separation channel is empty (with air) and full with water. particles were settled on bottom of the channel as shown in

(a) (b)
Figure 5.. Measured impedance of the PZT patch bonded on the smart separation device.

0-7803-9383-X/05/$20.00 (c) 2005 IEEE 1524 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium


change of frequency in a limit range, say ±10 - 20 kHz, made
the cloud shift in parallel, rotate and mix

V. CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the design, modelling and experiment of a
smart separation device suing ultrasonic standing wave device
has been described. The device design including the electro-
acoustical modelling for separation and PZT transducer are
Separation Device investigated and discussed. In the experiments, the electric
(115 * 26.74 * 7 mm) impedance of the PZT patch bonded on the separation device
Figure 6. Experimental set-up with the smart separation device.
was measured at first, which showed a clear resonance at the
designed frequency of 1.0 MHz. Experimental results showed
Figure 7(a). As shown in Figure 7(b), the particles were that the device can levitate settled sand particles on the bottom
arranged in a line at the nodal line of the standing wave when to the nodal line of the standing wave field of the separation
channel.
the PZT was oscillated at its thickness mode with ±50 V.
Because the particles used in the experiment were more or less
sticky, the particles in photographs of Figure 7 were aggregated REFERENCES
each other as a cloud.
[1] Desilets C. S., Fraser J. D. and Kino G. S., "The design of efficient
Also the particles in Figure 8 are relatively heavy and are broad-band piezoelectric transducers," IEEE Trans. On Sonics and
shown that they are a little bit low located from the nodal line Ultrasonics, 25(3), 115-125, 1978
(the middle of the separation channel) of the generated standing [2] Hawkes J. J. and Coakley W. T., "Force field particle filter, combining
wave field. The movement of the cloud of the particles from ultrasound standing waves and laminar flow," Sensors and Actuators B,
the bottom to the nodal line was very quick at the given 75, 213-222, 2001.
frequency of 1.0 MHz when the electric power was applied to [3] Hill M., Shen Y., Hawkes J. J., "Modelling of layered resonators for
the PZT actuator. The experiment with light particles is shown ultrasonic separation,". Ultrasonics, 40, 385-392, 2002.
in Figure 8, which can be compared with Figure 7. [4] Kinsler L. E., Frey A. R., Coppens A. B. and Sanders J. V.,
Fundamentals of Acoustics, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York,
It is noted that the continuous levitation and drop of the USA, 1982
particle clouds by on and off of the power amplifier with the

Water generated standing wave

0.74 m m

gravity
Bottomed cloud of sand particles Levitated cloud of sand particles

(a) (b)
Figure 7.. Levitation of light sand particles cloud using ultrasonic standing wave. (a) Before. (b) After.

Water generated standing wave

0.74 m m

gravity
Bottomed cloud of sand particles Levitated cloud of sand particles

(a) (b)
Figure 8. Levitation of heavy sand particles cloud using ultrasonic standing wave. (a) Before. (b) After.

0-7803-9383-X/05/$20.00 (c) 2005 IEEE 1525 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen