Is Human Cloning Acceptable In Today's Society

Browse essays using search option Access free essay links resource page Need help with paper writing services? Bookmark our site for future reference

Is Human Cloning Acceptable in Todays Society? Imagine a twelve-year-old girl that has been diagnosed with an illness that will be fatal in the next ten years. This disease targets the heart and slowly deteriorates the myocardium of the heart. The twelve-year-old girl is placed behind fifty people on a list for a heart transplant. For that little girl, there seems to be no faith to which she can depend on for her heart transplant. What options does this girl have besides waiting for a heart transplant or waiting to die? Now, imagine a set of parents who are about to have a baby that was cloned from the father. The parents went for a regular check-up with their doctor and found out that their child was going to be physically retarded due to the cloning of the child. The parents are devastated and outraged that the cloning did not turn out successfully. Unfortunately, the responsibility of raising a physically retarded child has been put into their hands. Would this type of genetic altering be acceptable in todays society? How can cloning a person be ethical if the risks of retardation come into play? These two scenarios draw just a few of the questions that scientists and people all over the world are faced with as human cloning is introduced to the world. In the past few years, many people all over

the world have read about the cloned sheep called Dolly. Dolly has been one of the most talked about experiments in the twentieth century. When the concept of cloning emerged, the possibilities that could emerge from it floated in the minds of scientists all around the world. Could we really create an exact copy of any living thing by altering the DNA of the particular organism? To many people, the possibilities are endless but to others, it seems like one of the biggest mistakes that man may have stumbled on throughout our entire human existence. In an article in the The Sunday Times written by Steven Connor and Deborah Cadbury, the issue of human cloning is addressed in a positive way. Scientists have created an embryo of a frog without a head, raising the prospect of engineering headless human clones which could be used to grow organs and tissues for transplant surgery. This type of engineering could bring many answers to questions and problems concerning organ transplanting. With any organ transplant, the patient is required to stay on drugs, which lower the immune system in order to keep the transplanted organ from rejecting its recipient. By using the method that scientists predict will soon be available, the recipient would have no problem accepting the newly transplanted organ. With any type of cloning, the issue of ethical behavior arises. Researchers believe that because without a brain or central nervous system the organ sacs may not meet the technical definition of an embryo. In order to produce the headless frogs, scientists have to pinpoint a certain gene and alter that

gene. Fortunately, the frogs could be applied to human embryos because the same genes perform similar functions in both frogs and humans (1A). In Scotland, scientists are trying to create a genetically altered cloned pig that can produce harvestable pig organs that the human body will not reject (Better 19). The cloning of pigs could one day benefit humans but in order to insure success, the headless human clone would be the guaranteed project. This type of cloning could save hundreds of people everyday but it is a question of whether its acceptable or not to the public. In an article from The Atlanta Constitution by Jeff Nesmith, scientists are trying to reach a decision on whether human cloning should be legal and how best to prevent it. The article stresses the importance of how human cloning should not be allowed for the use of parents to clone themselves. At a cloning forum sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, participants grappled about ethical and moral issues raised by the unexpected appearance of Scotlands cloned sheep, Dolly. At the forum, the total consensus was directly pointed at making the procedure illegal for human cloning. The real question was how human cloning is going to be prevented. If human cloning becomes illegal, the research toward making clones as organ donors will come to a dead end (18A). If human cloning was to be outlawed, there would have to be some conditions and regulations to where human cloning would be necessary in some situations. In an article from The New York

Times written by Barbara Whitaker, the owners of a dog named Missy gave Texas A&M $2.3 million dollars to clone their pet. Earlier, Missy had died from a tumor found in her neck, which caused the dog to die at an early age (16A). The article about cloning a dog goes to prove that if for some reason a child dies at an early age and the parents are unable to produce another child, a clone of that child could potentially live even though it didnt make it the first time. This method of human cloning can bring up many issues about the ethical value of cloning. As stated in the beginning, certain conditions and regulations should be put on human cloning before it is completely abolished. Another major question that continues to be addressed is whether the clone will have the same type of behaviors and personalities as the person who is cloned. In the development of a child, whether human or animal, the environment plays a large role in the childs development. For instance, a Triple Crown winner named Cigar turned out to be sterile and cost his owner, Allen Paulson, millions of dollars because of the loss of his stud fees (Field 1). One large question is whether the sterile trait would be passed to the offspring. We dont know yet if its transferable to other species, says Dr. Harry Griffin of Scotlands Roslin Institute (qtd. in Field 1). According to Ernest Bailey, even if it were scientifically possible to clone Cigar, we probably wouldnt get any horses as good as Cigar (Bailey 17). As stated before, in order for a clone to be an exact clone, the clone must experience all the environments

that were introduced to the parent. This argues the point that cloning can be ethical in the aspect that it will have its own personality and behaviors. I had an interview with Dr. Mike Harry who is a licensed veterinarian who practices at a successful walking horse farm in Shelbyville, Tennessee. While talking to Dr. Harry, I noticed a few similarities with a few of the walking horses he is associated with and Cigar. A world grand champion walking horse is not only valuable for his shows, but for his stud fees also. I asked Dr. Harry a few questions about human cloning and cloning in general. He believes that cloning is ethical because a clone has its own environment to grow which makes it different from its parent. He also stressed how during its maturing phase; the embryo can tend to change its chemical makeup. When I asked Dr. Harry if he would clone an animal, he said he would in order to help experimental data to be statistically significant. Dr. Harry said that human cloning for medical reasons should be attempted but the problems will be with the public perception. As the majority said, he believes that cloning humans for personal reasons is a misuse of the scientific findings. I asked Dr. Harry to give me a statement about the future of genetic cloning and he explained his detailed work with embryo transferring. With an embryo transfer, a fertilized egg is removed from the fetus of one female and replaced in another fetus. As the interview ended, Dr. Harry stated, With my experiences with embryo transfers, the limitations will make cloning a very difficult process. In an article

from the The Baltimore Sun written by Jonathan Bor and Frank D. Roylance, the author bring up interesting points about how cloning can be used to produce pharmaceuticals and how genetic diseases can be studied. One of the most exciting prospects is the creation of barnyard animals that are living factories of pharmaceuticals. For example, the milk of cow can be made to produce certain compounds, which could include cancer-fighting interferons or clotting factors that are needed by hemophiliacs. One problem with testing pharmaceuticals is that the experimental data is not extremely precise because of the variation of subjects in which are tested. If certain cloned subjects were tested, the experimental data would be more precise because of the loss of a variable. The other aspect of cloning that can be extremely helpful in the medical field is the ability to make exact copies to observe. There is interest in producing exact copies of animals that carry genetic diseases that would give scientists better models to watch the ways human diseases progress. So much could be learned from the cloned subjects that have inherited diseases that plaque humans (Bor and Roylance 1A). The possibilities are endless when cloning is applied to the medical field and the future of medical technology. In an article from The Washington Post written by Michael Laris, scientists want to use cloning to keep the endangered giant panda from becoming extinct. Scientists at Chinas most respected research institute are attempting to clone a giant panda, making the creatures the focus of a biting

debate on the merits of cloning as a strategy for saving endangered species. As the debate of human cloning for medical use continues, the cloning of endanger species is also becoming an issue among scientists and animal activists. Some researchers do not agree with the cloning of the endanger species of pandas. Pan Wenshi, a Beijing University biologist doubts pandas can be cloned because basic elements of their reproduction process still baffle researchers. The problem is that a fertilized panda egg will float around for six to 16 weeks before implanting itself in the uterus. By trying to clone pandas, the population will propagate a narrow set of genes rather than increase the hereditary diversity needed to ensure the pandas natural survival. Although many scientists disagree with the cloning of the panda, they still hope that more research can effectively produce a way to clone pandas, which will take them off the endangered species list (13A). As technology advances in the future, the process of cloning individuals whether human or not will probably get more efficient. There are so many possibilities that can emerge from what is known today but there is no way to tell what will be effective and what will not be. By analyzing the progress of cloning, the medical field will one-day be able to use cloned animals to aid in medical research. They may also be able to use human clones to produce organs that can be transplanted with little or no complications. The major problem with human cloning though is if it will be accepted into todays society. With many

complications, the task at hand will be difficult to accomplish but as technology has proven, the possibilities are endless.

Have your teacher assigned you to write an essay on cloning? Are you struggling to write an inspirational opening sentence for your cloning essay? Or though, you are much educated about human cloning but you have been assigned to write an anti human cloning essay! You shouldnt worry about your cloning essays assignment. All that you need for your anti human cloning essays are some ideas. Here are some ideas for you:

Idea # 1: You may ask an introductory question to the audience regarding your essays on cloning to catch the attention of your audience. Example: What was the ethics behind the first human embryo clone?

Idea # 2: You should give a strong and valid argument to support the thesis statement of your anti human cloning essay. Example: Cloning is a moral problem as much as technical problem. It is just like playing with nature for no reason.

Idea # 3: You should support your thoughts against human cloning with adequate evidences. An ideal way to justify that human cloning is wrong would be the use of Book of Genesis in lights of the verses quoted in its Sec 2:6 and 2:8:

God entrusts humans with dominion over the animals, but humans are never told to have the same kind of dominion over other humans.

Idea # 4: You should highlight the fact that even if a super human being is made by cloning; even then human cloning would be a problem. Example: If a super human being is made through cloning; then there would exist no genetic need for men.

Idea # 5: Your conclusion should cover each and every point that you have discussed in your cloning essay persuasively. Example: Human cloning is a worst sin which should be banned as cloning is not only against the religion but also against the morality.

You would have understood that how easily you can generate ideas and write an anti human cloning essay by following up a thorough research.

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children. Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Is cloning necessary for advancements in improving the quality of life? People often question whether or not we as a scientific nation are trying to play the role of god by the diverse issue of human cloning. Early in 1997 Scottish scientist Ian Wilmut revealed to the world that he had successfully cloned an adult sheep, known to the world as Dolly. With this invention the world made a collective gasp at the realization that cloning was no longer an element of a science fiction movie. Since then the cloning of human beings has been one of the most largely debated topics in the world. From the schoolhouse to the White House discussions have begun regarding the ethical implications of cloning. In several recent polls by Time magazine (The Ethics of Human Cloning 1998) it was shown that 75% of the responding population thought that human cloning was a bad idea. Furthermore, 74% of the respondents believed that cloning was against gods' will, and when asked if they would clone themselves if presented with an opportunity, 91% responded with no. However when asked to define human cloning an estimated 95% could not do it correctly. Opponents of human cloning often argue that it is immoral and unethical to clone human beings for both religious and

humanitarian reasons. Moreover others describe human cloning as a luxury for the wealthy and as a tool for the Organ Market Development. Conversely, I feel that cloning is immoral and a bad idea for the following reasons. First of all cloning may reduce genetic variability. Producing many clones runs the risk of creating a population that is entirely the same. This population would be susceptible to the same diseases. That means that one disease could devastate an entire population. One could easily picture the human race being wiped out by a single virus. However, less drastic but more probable events could occur from lack of genetic diversity. For example, if a large percent of the nation cattle population are clones, a particular strain of mad cow disease could affect the entire population. The result could be catastrophic food shortages. If human identical clones are made and disease strikes, what could we do to stop it from devastating our entire population? How many people would have to suffer and die for the sake of technology? Second, cloning is currently a very expensive process. It requires large amounts of money and biological expertise. It took Ian Wilmut and his associates 277

tries to successfully create Dolly. Since then a new cloning technique has been created that I is proven to be more reliable. Although, even this technique has a 2% to 3% success rate. How much money would the United States be willing to spend on this project? Money that could otherwise be spent on things such as social security, Medicare, defense, roads, education, and towards our environment. Any research would eventually need to be tested on human beings. The ability to clone humans may lead to the genetic tailoring of offspring. It is conceivable that a scientist will be able to determine a baby's eye and hair color. In most cases even the baby's gender, or its' resistance to a certain disease. Last but not least, let it be known that a clone is not an exact replica of another, it is simply a delayed identical twin. As with an identical twin the clone would have a different set of fingerprints. Scientists are concerned with the medical risks and uncertainty associated with the cloning of humans. Because clones are derived from an already existing adult cell, it has older genes. One fear is that if a baby is cloned, its chromosomes would match that of the donors. Meaning that a 5-year-old would look like a 10-year-old and a 10-year-old would look like a 20-year-old, with potential for heart disease

and cancer to develop. Will the clones' life expectancy be shorter? Don't ask me, I don't know. Yet, neither do the scientists that are pushing to create them. Of all the things that cloning might be used for, it could be used to create a genetic underclass that could be used as slaves in the years to come, or on a more positive note it could be used to create humans with sub normal intelligence and above normal strength that could someday rule the world. A person can not change what has happened in the past. Although they can influence what will happen in the future. If the United States government would decide to legalize cloning the results on our nation could be catastrophic to the future generations of America. As I previously mentioned, 91% of the responding population in Time magazine responded no to cloning themselves. Now for my pole, would you?

Human Cloning Summary: Debates the issue of human cloning. Considers how the practice might be beneficial. Describes how it would save lives and lead to a number of advancements in scientific research, and improve the quality of life. Should humans be cloned? That is the question that many people all over the world have been debating. Some say it is morally wrong, that we would be nefariously attempting to "Play the role of God." However, the facts have shown that there is nothing inherently wrong with human cloning. Scientists have proved a number of times that human cloning would be nothing but beneficial to the human race, if only it was legal. If the law allowed human cloning, it would not only save lives, but it would lead to a number of advancements in scientific research, and improve the quality of life. Human cloning would be a positive harbinger for mankind, and an excellent opportunity for the advancement of science. In the past century, scientists have been assiduous workers in making numerous achievements, discoveries, and inventions, giving us the knowledge we have acquired about ourselves and about the world around us. For years, scientists have studied and made tremendous progress in cloning. Experts say that if cloning research was legal we could find better treatments, and perhaps even cures for many terrible

diseases that so many of us suffer and die from each year. For example, AIDS. This is a well-known illness that damages the human immune system. There are treatments available, but statistics show that three million people die from AIDS each year, and yet so far, no one has been able to find a cure. With cloning, scientists could copy and create more white blood cells to fight off and kill the deadly virus. This would save millions of innocent lives. It would also help in making new medical discoveries and expand our knowledge. With new advancements, we could continue to explore, research, and learn- just as we have been doing for several years. Clones would be the best organ donors. Imagine your mother suddenly gets cancer in her kidneys and she needs to have a transplant. Assuming you love your mother and would do anything for her, you decide to be her donor. Then after the operation, her body rejects the new, foreign organ, and the kidney fails. The doctor says that the only way she would survive would be to find a kidney with the same type of tissue as her original, healthy tissue. The solution to your mother's problem and the answer to your prayers would be cloning. Because a clone is an exact copy, she would have no worries about her body accepting the organ or not. This would be the only way to save her. But there is just one problem, cloning humans is not legal. What is going to happen to your mother"

Infertile couples could have biologically related children. For years, couples everywhere have been facing problems of infertility, meaning they are unable to reproduce. Many of these unfortunate couples still want children, so they settle for adoption. The problem with that is that the kids are not actually blood related, and this leaves an empty hole in so many people's lives. With cloning, these couples could finally have children with their genes. They would be exact copies of one parent's DNA. Cloning is the perfect solution for making many people incredibly happy, and helping the human race grow. A handful of wary people say that cloning is unethical and would be deleterious to the human race. They say that there should only be one of each person in this world, because our individuality is what makes each person special and unique. I too believe that our individuality is what makes us special. So what do these people say about identical twins? It is proven that twins have the same genetic information. That would mean that twins are not unique or special individuals. Their minds, personalities, health, and fitness grow and change depending on how they are raised, the things they are exposed to and the activities they become interested in. Expert, James Trefil said, "Clones would be just like twins. The only difference being that the twin is born later." It would be impossible for a clone to grow up to be exactly like his original. He would be brought up differently, have different life experiences,

and have relationships entirely unique to that person. Also, as researcher, Wes Carrington says, "A clone and its donor would be very different, they would even have different fingerprints." Human cloning would be entirely beneficial for science, and the quality of life, in addition to helping the prosperity of the human race. It would save, create, and improve lives all over the world. This would be an amazing accomplishment for scientists and following this major milestone, who knows what we will discover next! Human cloning would help the human race, the world of science, and the age of technology. The government would be blind not to see the benefits and allow human cloning. It is only a matter of time before they

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a

constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be

chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary. With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Some topics in this essay: Jewish Muslim, , Michael Jordan, Human Embryos, Catholicism Protestantism, human cloning, infertile couples, religious beliefs, human clone, human cloning banned, human race terms, obtain organs, clone human, cloning technology, human race, race terms, birth control, 991 4

PROFESSIONAL

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children. Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human

rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary.

With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Some topics in this essay: Jewish Muslim, , Michael Jordan, Human Embryos, Catholicism Protestantism, human cloning, infertile couples, religious beliefs, human clone, human cloning banned, human race terms, obtain organs, clone human, cloning technology, human race, race terms, birth control, 991 4 PROFESSIONAL ESSAYS:

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and

organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children. Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as

someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary. With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Some topics in this essay: Jewish Muslim, , Michael Jordan, Human Embryos, Catholicism Protestantism, human cloning, infertile couples, religious beliefs, human clone, human cloning banned, human race terms, obtain organs, clone human,

cloning technology, human race, race terms, birth control, 991 4 PROFESSIONAL ESSAYS:

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children. Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile

couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life

begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human

being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary. With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Some topics in this essay: Jewish Muslim, , Michael Jordan, Human Embryos, Catholicism Protestantism, human cloning, infertile couples, religious beliefs, human clone, human cloning banned, human race terms, obtain organs, clone human, cloning technology, human race, race terms, birth control, 991 4 PROFESSIONAL ES

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children. Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human

rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary.

With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Arguement for Human Cloning Even the idea of a human clone sounds intriguing. The concept of having someone similar to you, both physically and somewhat emotionally, is mind blowing. While the first human clone is no doubt years away, the fact remains that this is an inevitable step for mankind. Though many Americans may hold fears or unrealistic assumptions about human cloning, cloning can in fact be beneficial to our society. Human cloning should not be banned because it can be beneficial for the human race in terms of infertile couples, genetic research, and organ cloning. The benefits of human cloning are numerous and waiting to be discovered, some even say that human cloning could have the power it cure infertility. Infertile men often feel like they are not "not holding up their part of the bargain," while women are made to feel as if they are useless barren vessels. The current options for infertile couples are inefficient, painful, expensive, and heart breaking. Many couples run out of time and money without successfully having children.

Cloning could make it possible for many more infertile couples to have children than ever before by boosting efficiency through nuclear transfer, rather than in invitro fertilization, which is very often ineffec

Arguement for Human Cloning

Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods .... ordered to practice this by the god, as I affirm, from divinations, and from dreams, and in every way that any divine allotment ever ordered a human being to .... (1365 5 )

Multiculturalism, Individualism And Human Rights:Case Study Of .... Some of my own arguement and opinion according to the paper I think the .... Thus the individual human rights should be embeded in every individual of the society .... (1493 6 )

Gene Modification .... The arguement contra germline gene therapy The arguements against germline gene therapy are taken from David M. Danks, 1994. .... Human Gene Therapy 5: 151-152. .... (1720 7 )

Negligent Hiring/Retention .... under the right to privacy arguement, a constitutional arguement employing fourth amendment illegal search and siezure guarantees. Human resources managers can .... (3335 13 )

pro-life vs. pro-choice .... On the first day of the unborn baby 's fertilization, all human chromosomes are present; unique human life

begins .... The arguement was decided on December 13, 1971 .... (3570 14 )

Many people are on waiting lists for organ transplants for sometimes years, only to die because the organs they need do not become available or are rejected by their bodies. A clones kidney, would have the recipients exact DNA, so there would be little to no chance of rejection of the organ or need from immune suppressing drugs. It could also provide medical advancements, such as repairing damaged nerves by cloning the nerve cells from an injured person, such as someone with spinal cord damage. There is fear though that human cloning would be used corruptly, that the doubles would be used as slaves for organ banks, to be chopped up whenever a part is needed. Some think that millionaires might clone themselves to obtain organs for transplant. These are not unimaginable things, for decades in China, prisoners have unwillingly had organs removed for sale on the black market. These were humans, not clones. However, a human clone is a human being. In a free society, you cannot force another human being to give up one of their internal organs, and you certainly cannot kill another human

being to obtain one of their organs. Existing laws already prevent such abuses. In fact, the removal of an organ from anyone, clone or not, for transplant into another person is a very questionable practice which must be stringently regulated, and totally voluntary. With human cloning scientists are working on ways to perfect methods to clone individual organs, without creating an e

Some topics in this essay: Jewish Muslim, , Michael Jordan, Human Embryos, Catholicism Protestantism, human cloning, infertile couples, religious beliefs, human clone, human cloning banned, human race terms, obtain organs, clone human, cloning technology, human race, race terms, birth control, 991 4 PROFESSIONAL ES