HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 2 addressed to the (Strasbourg, France) in agreement with Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms* (*i.e. the European Convention on Human Rights), cf Articles 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, and 51 ib.
SURNAME .: Winther
FIRSTNAMES: Wilhelm Werner
GENDER.: Male
NATIONALITY..: Norwegian
BIRTHPLACE/-DATE..: NO-Aalesund / May 17, 1963
OCCUPATION...: Human rights activist
PRESENT ADDRESS: sen 4, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway
PHONE: +47 974 83 483
E-MAIL...: wwerner@airpost.net
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 3
The Kingdom of Norway
STATEMENT OF CASE
During September and October 2010 the plaintiff received a huge number of severely threatening and explicitly morbid telephone calls and SMS-missives from an unknown man called Geir Ove SKARB. Mr. Skarb turned out to be a notorious psychopath and rascal born in 1950 who had moved from NO-Brattvg to NO-Hamar several years ago most likely because of the befittingly bad reputation he had incurred in his native district. The plaintiff had never had any kind of contact with Mr. Skarb beforehand, and the recurrent threats to kill and injure the complainant lacked rational foundat- ion. Mr. Skarb and some of his disgustingly perverted/alcoholized accomplices was repeatedly observed in the plaintiffs private garden and elsewhere right outside his house in sen 4 (Brattvg) by night, and their general behavior particularly the rabid and totally inappropriate threats from Mr. Skarb himself was clearly psychopathological. On Oct. 30, 2010, the plaintiff visited the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg and sub- mitted a formal complaint against Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and one of his sons, the alcoholic Tommy SKARB (b 1970). The sheriffs officer Mr. Ole Ivar NYB didnt record corresponding testimony and evidence as mandated by law (cf. the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 223), and his demeanor by and large gave a sense of gross dishonesty, cannabis adherence and crimi- nal predisposition. In any case copies of all SMS-missives from Mr. Geir Ove Skarb was formally handed over to Mr. Nyb, and he received a rather detailed oral account of the various threats launched. Mr. Nyb was also time and again warned that Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son Tommy was expected to make an attempt on the plaintiffs life in the near future, and by reason of that should be apprehend- ed and locked up without undue delay.
Though Mr. Nyb initially and symptomatically insisted that none outside the police force should be informed about Mr. Geir Ove Skarbs threats, the complainant arranged a meeting with the local Chief Municipal Social Welfare Officer a few minutes after leaving the sheriff office. The Chief Municipal Welfare Officer was shown the SMS threats Mr. Skarb had sent to the plain-
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 4 tiffs private cellphone, and she also received written copies of selected missives. As the threats per se and Mr. Skarbs abnormal demeanor in general was indicative of dangerous and deep-seated psychiatric disorders, the welfare officer was admonished to inform the municipal mental health care department about the life endangering situation ASAP whereas the plaintiff demanded him compulsory detained in a hospital under the Norwegian Mental Health Act immediately.
However, as the days and weeks went by, it became increasingly clear neither the police nor the psychiatric health care service did the slightest to arrest or confine Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son. Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and Tommy Skarb was frequently seen snooping around in the vicinity of the plaintiffs home throughout October 2010 oftentimes at dead of night.
On November 13, 2010, a dark green Peugeot 605 slowly approached the com- plainants house in sen 4, Brattvg, from northwest the driver was Mr. Karl-Even INDRESTRAND (b 1967). Around 25 meters west of the plaintiffs house hidden by snowy trees and old garages the car halted, and a passenger holding a shotgun stepped off..crouching somewhat as he tiptoed toward said domicile. The person with the shotgun was not surprisingly Mr. Tommy Skarb, and at 02:45 AM he knocked on the plaintiffs exterior door most ready to shoot down the latter at first sight!
As earlier indicated, the complainant had certainly expected and numerous times warned against an armed assault carried out by e.g. Mr. Tommy Skarb and/or his crapulent father, so naturally no one opened the safely locked front door that night! And, as things actually turned out, Mr. Tommy Skarb proceeded to loud shout- ing and fist hammering the door rabidly before retiring to the blackhearted Mr. Indrestrand and the waiting car.
The attempted murder triggered several new visits to the sheriff office in NO- Brattvg (e.g. Nov. 15, Nov. 16, and Nov. 19), and Nov. 15 the plaintiff also had a new meeting with the local Chief Municipal Social Welfare Officer and the section manager of the municipal mental health care department. The com- plainants message to the police and the public health service was identical: Mr. Geir Ove Skarb, Mr. Tommy Skarb, and their accomplices was mentally ill criminals most likely to make new attempts on the plaintiffs life before long, and should consequently be arrested and locked up forthwith! While the sheriffs officer Mr. Kre BALSNES behaved execrably impu-
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 5 dent and apparently supported the attempted murder, the manager of the municipal mental health care department acted in accordance with administrative guidelines and promised to forward the detainment application to her superior* (*i.e. a German physician called Dr. Mller).
Due to 19 years of completely illegal surveillance and terrorizing of the plain- tiff in his private house etc, the police have audiovisual recordings of the att- empted murder at their disposal.
No matter what and very much as expected; Norwegian authorities did no- thing whatsoever to examine witnesses or arrest those directly involved in des- cribed murder attempt..on the contrary the police indeed interfered with witnesses through threats and slimy enticement (In this connection its particu- larly worth mentioning Mr. Per-Narve HURLEN and his son, Tony HURLEN [both NO-Brattvg]. Its clear Tony Hurlen opportunistically and at the expense of his accomplices has acted as a simple police informer in order to escape imprisonment for a number of break-ins and thefts he participated in, and his father is suspected of willful destruction of the plaintiffs property.), and its perfectly clear the police force AO did their best to hamper legal evidence gathering and criminal investigation!
In connection with the attempted murder of Nov. 13, 2010, one also make furt- her reference to a pair of crooked pro forma calls from the Special Unit for Police Matters at NO-Hamar. The actual telephone calls took place on Nov. 16 and 17, respectively, and the purpose of the corresponding and malicious inquisition was undoubtedly to collect information enabling Norwegian authorities to destroy evidence and manipulate witnesses etc (The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police has wholeheartedly supported the insane complot, and there has been conspiratorial meetings between the Minister of Justice and the Police Mr. Knut STOR- BERGET and the highly corrupted and incompetent leader of the Special Unit for Police Matters, the former police officer Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS.).
Frequently pestered by the stark psychopathic Geir Ove Skarb et al, the next attempted assassination came off on March 10, HA. In the afternoon a woman identified as Ms. Linda SVENSLI* (*place of abode: NO-6462 Raudsand) appeared outside the complainants front door in sen 4, Brattvg, leading a small child (probably her own). In the childs satchel was hidden a loaded handgun, and Ms. Svensli had planned to introduce herself as a ticket selling raffle agent. On the pretext of digging out the raffle-book from the satchel, she would grasp the handgun and pick off the plaintiff with several shots!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 6 Nevertheless Ms. Svenslis vile plan didnt succeed; the brainsick plot had been wholly disclosed beforehand, and none opened the door for her..after a few minutes she and the child retired to the waiting getaway car* (*maybe driven by the childs father) with unfinished business.
The plaintiff had never had any kind of contact with Ms. Linda Svensli before she attempted to murder him, and she was in every single respect a complete stranger.
The second completed assault with intent to kill the plaintiff this year, came to pass on March 12. Around 07:35 PM the complainant left his house in sen 4, Brattvg, to pur- chase groceries. Making his way to the local convenience store on foot, the plaintiff made several observations en route indicating hostile persons covertly attempted to monitor his movements. At 07:45 PM inside the grocery the plaintiff spotted Ms. Linda Svensli. Ms. Svensli was wholly unaware her whereabouts and identity had been mapped and disclosed, and she did her best to look innocent while filling her grocery tote with a few items from the shelves. The wanna-be assassin was wearing complet- ely dark clothes this evening, and her hair had been colored stark black Ms. Svensli had doubtlessly tried to change her appearance somewhat! Ms. Svensli left the shop around 07:50 PM, and the plaintiff 10 minutes later. Outside the convenience store the complainant made new observations confirm- ing Mr. Tommy Skarb and his mentally deranged accomplices indeed had pre- pared to murder him with a scoped hunting rifle caliber .308 Winchester (7.62X51mm NATO), and two undercover police agents was also spotted right in front of corresponding commercial premises..both very clearly informed about the planned assassination! As the plaintiff very cautiously approached his private house, he spotted a sniper attempting to camouflage on the nearby hillcrest. From his firing position the apparently inept sniper overlooked the street leading to the complainants domi- cile offering an operational firing range to the homecoming target varying be- tween 55 and 110 meters. Pretty much aware the exact location of corresponding sniper hide, the plaintiff positioned himself at a strategic point beneath said hillcrest totally invisible to the lurking sniper. After 10 minutes the perplexed sniper unsuccessfully tried to find a new and adequate firing position, and after 20 minutes he telephonically ordered his accomplices to localize the complainant. Around 5 minutes later an elderly Peugeot passenger car was seen as it moved into the plaintiffs observing sector at a snails pace the man driving the white car was identified as Mr. ystein SOLHJELL* (*place of abode: NO-6462 Raudsand), and his passenger as Mr. Torbjrn RAUSAND* (*place of abode: NO-6462 Raudsand).
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 7 Earlier this evening the same car had transported the sniper to the initial point* (*i.e. a point less than 70 meters east of the high school in Brattvg) for his sub- sequent and snow-ridden march along the ridge of the hill leading to said firing position, and now the men in it was shocked as they unexpectedly had a face-to- face encounter with the person they attempted to murder! Nevertheless as soon as the lunatic villains in the car felt sure they were out of sight, they telephonically consulted the sniper. And once again the frustrated sniper tried to find a suitable firing position, but his endeavors was minutely monitored and the shot he haphazardly let off at 08:45 PM was indeed doomed to miss its target! Less than 5 minutes after the attempted murder, the men in the white Peugeot threw exploding fireworks from the car windows as they anxiously fluttered around in the village center their aim, of course, was to led persons who had heard the gunshot to believe the bang stemmed from more or less casual use of pyrotechnics!
The offenders motives and personality
Since 1992 the plaintiff has been involuntarily involved in a most serious con- flict with Norwegian authorities, and the total number of attempted murders and extremely perilous onslaughts planned and executed by their officials may ex- ceed 150 specific incidents. Some of these attacks are described or referred to in the complainants Internet publications viz: Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9651759), UN- Documents (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9663301), and/or Impeachment (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9692417). So in effect its certainly not a new trend members of the government, (senior) civil servants or police hired hatchet men attempts to murder or seri- ously harm the plaintiff..its merely a sinistrous continuation and confirmation of the heinous criminality and widespread double-dealing verily characterizing Norwegian authorities at large since 1992! And lets make it unmistakably clear forthright: when it comes to the stark unlawful and unilaterally condemn- able aggression abidingly nourished and actively exercised by Norwegian auth- orities, there are no mitigating circumstances or ethically defendable aspects whatever on the contrary there are dozens of highly aggravating factors and nauseatingly diabolic elements affirming the willful evil-mindedness and morbid criminality truly hallmarking the vicious terrorism and sabotage Norwegian authorities has exposed the complainant to since 1992!
As for the etiology of this obnoxiously fiendish pleasure in hurting particularly right-minded persons and eagerly sustaining complex lawbreaking, its natural to point out the wide-spread though internationally unknown variant of common
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 8 psychopathy befittingly termed Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome* (*NPSMS) as a definitive main reason. Considering the intrinsic meaning and make up of the NPSMS term per se, one should be aware the Norwegian state apparatus vehemently abhors anybody morally and intellectually qualified to serve as e.g. a police officer, senior civil servant or politician only those markedly depraved and otherwise incompe- tent are willing to do duty as e.g. (senior) civil servants or statesmen/-women in nowadays Norway..and all parts of the public administration and judicial system etc are indeed strongly influenced by this cumbersome fact. In the Internet document Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway, the plaintiff has given this description of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Mal- ignant Syndrome sic:
Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 Comments on disqualification), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: Can the various crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound creatures...? Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query:
Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism, hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!
Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom of Satan!
Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders particularly psychopathy and various perversions are predominant conditions. The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however viewed as an endemic phenomenon partially rupture the
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 9 commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification. A genetically rooted and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching classical psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly unbecoming to introduce the acronym NPSMS* *Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome (if more convenient, you may think of NPSMS simply as Norwegian psychopathy or Norwegian folie, of course)...! In Doc's ##633 and 2037 pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms viz:
Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis, rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy, superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjust- ment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy, professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance, cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia, corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation, religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartio- philia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrust- ful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability, anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc.
The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archetypical of regular psychoses. The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism. In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 10 obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...! Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently motive and means appearing practically identical unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome. As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory structures and convergence zones in the ventromedial prefrontal sector of the brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired monoamine based weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be NPSMS indicative. Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact...
Specifically returning to the police employed miscreants and entirely condemn- able senior civil servants guilty of provoking and actively sustaining the att- empted murders focused on in nearby complaint, its an uncomplicated task to establish that practically all personality traits pathognomonically associated with NPSMS are amply present. Moreover, it should be firmly emphasized the plaintiff had filed a number of formal complaints against some of the police force members several years be- fore they became involved in the endeavors to kill the complainant this and previous year one mention by name: Mr. yvind VERPEIDE (sheriff, Haram Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg), Mr Ove Petter FINNES (sheriffs officer, Haram Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg), Mr. Yngve SKOVLY (jurist/prosecutor, lesund Police Station, NO-lesund), and Mr. Ingmar FARSTAD (station chief inspector, lesund Police Station, NO-lesund). Mr. Jon Steven HASSELVIK (chief of police, NO lesund), Mr. Ole Ivar NYB (sheriffs officer, Haram Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg) and Mr. Kre
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 11 BALSNES (sheriffs officer, Haram/rskog Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg/- Sjholt) are all newly employed in their respective posts, and had not been reported by the plaintiff before the attempted murders in 2010 and 2011. Its perfectly obvious formally reported police employees/executives may enter- tain a personal feeling of hatred and vindictiveness towards the complainant!
There are assuredly quite a few negative things to mention as regards the Nor- wegian police force, and even a modest treatise should easily fill at least 5000 printed pages! It should be evident enough, however, we cant afford to spend so much time and space on the actual theme in a simple human rights com- plaint.so, we shall move on to the next group of formally reported and expli- citly suspected baddies in this case viz:
Mr. Tor-Aksel BUSCH (Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions), Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS (leader of the Norwegian Special Unit for Police Matters), Mr. Thorbjrn KLUNDSETER (Norwegian district attorney, Hedmark/Oppland county), and Mr. Knut STORBERGET (Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police).
At the first place: everybody in this group but Mr. Storberget are former police executives noted for their unreasonable and highly manifest favoring of the police force! Some of the notorious corruption and incompetence distinguishing this quartet AO has been animadverted upon by the plaintiff beforehand sic:
FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY
DATE: May 01, 2008
SUBJECT:
Formal complaint against the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions,
criminal proceedings against members of the Norwegian Council of State, the Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Parliament, AO.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 12 FROM:
Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway.
TO:
The Norwegian King in Council of State, NO-Oslo, Norway.
THROUGH:
The Sheriff Office, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway.
REMARKS:
Nearby notification is an integral part of the official United Nations petition FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER, and may consequently encompass comments and information otherwise natural to omit in this kind of legal documents. Whereas theres an imminent danger of new and potentially mortiferous attacks carried out or underhandedly planned by representatives of Norwegian authorities, judicial examination of the appellant in casu are acceptable insofar as and only if the interrogation whereabouts are duly approved and supervised by armed/neutral guards conscientiously appointed and directed by the appropriate authorities of significantly healthier and more upright nations than Norway. Norwegian authorities should address all correspondence to counselor Johs. A. ASPEHAUG, P.O Box 837, 6001 lesund. Representatives of foreign governments, human rights organizations, international tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers. No letters should be forwarded through the official postal services of Norway or DHL. Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in sen 4, NO-Brattvg.
REFERENCES:
a) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*here-
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 13 after referred to as FOCO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1217,
b) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as INDO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1173,
c) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page,
d) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page,
e) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.
IN RE:
Lets make it perfectly plain already now;
The addressee of this legal notification the Norwegian King and his Council of State are among the absolute main culprits in the criminal case incident to the various atrocities and human rights violations &c described in FOCO/INDO....:
Before kicking off the from A to Z daffy and lawless terror-campaign against me in Oslo, Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and her deranged partners in crime collusively obtained operational permission from e.g the Norwegian Parliament, Government, Supreme Court and Kings Council.....! (cf FOCO, p 30)
Ms Harlem Brundtland and her mafiosi in turn presented the disastrous complot for the Norwegian monarch, Mr Harald HEADLESS, who spitefully approved the insanities in the usually hebdomadal Council of State. (cf FOCO, p 31)
In 1992 Mr Harald HEADLESS (cf p 31) willingly sanctioned the stark illegal and doubtlessly cracked conspiracy against me, and since then he and his nearest family ve exhibited particular and to me wholly undesirable interest for my personal undertakings. The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and 4
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 14 general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway in this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them (cf Aphorisms ##135, 136 and 137 etc). It should also be called attention to the disgraceful fact Harald Headless father, King Olav V, had one of his faithful employees incarcerated and maltreated at a state controlled bedlam exclusively because he championed the human rights of other and unseemly hounded/ex- ploited courtiers..... (cf FOCO, pp 6869)
Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom of Satan! (cf FOCO, p 122) Studying Article 1 of the Norwegian Constitution, we learn that Norway is a limited and hereditary monarchy. The present monarch King Harald V the Headless (cf pp 31 and 6869), was born the 21th of February 1937, and formally swore the oath specified in Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution Feb 21, 1958. Mr Headless, upon the death of his father, took office as Norwegian head of state January 17th 1991, and officially swore the oath laid down in Article 9 of the Norwegian Constitution four days later. To those acquainted with the innate corruptibility, judgmental maladroitness and psychopathological temperament prevalent amongst Norwegian senior civil servants and officials (cf pp 122124 above), it should be no surprise to find essential parts of the Norwegian Constitution going on the rocks right from the start.. (cf FOCO, p 169)
In any event King Harald V the Headless most flagrantly has violated the oaths laid down in Article 9 and Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution he has repetitively and mala fide sanctioned and awarded the most serious and disho- norable examples of state supported rottenness and premeditated human rights violations ever seen in modern Norway (cf pp 31, 6869 and 126 etc), and his regal malversation are intensely disgraceful and totally condemnable indeed. (cf FOCO, p 170)
The downright corruption and hell-destined iniquity abidingly displayed by Norwegian magistracy in juxtaposed facts of nearby case, are unparalleled in modern monarchic history of law, and execrable diabolism and gangrenous ghoulishness interosculates their exceedingly opprobrious criminality. (cf INDO, pp 12)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 15 The Kingdom of Norway have intentionally, profusely and extendedly acted in a manner extremely deleterious and discreditable for the IHF and its various members particularly if the obnoxious crimes and premeditated violations of contractual provisions are accepted without adequate execution of sentence. (cf INDO, p 67)
Studying above excerpts it should be entirely evident the Norwegian King and his corrupted council are thoroughly incompetent when it comes to adjudging anything at all in this case, and thats about quoad hoc precisely the conclusion arrived at in FOCO, pp 89:
On account of preceding observations, its evident all instances/persons menti oned beneath the heading Accused in nearby complaint are entirely disquali- fied from exercising any degree of judicial authority in this case.....; theyre those legally reported/charged, and should be treated as suspects.
However Norwegian authorities may correctly apply Article 93 in their Con- stitution (sic):
In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Stor- ting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international orga- nization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right, within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities, although not the power to alter this Constitution. For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution. The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.
Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to fulfill their juridical obligations as stated above and entrust impartial representatives from the United Nations with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this legal case unique in Norwegian history of law.
As regards the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor- Aksel BUSCH (b Mar 17, 1950), hes formally and directly subject to the Norwegian King in Council of State. Mr Busch is the head of the Norwegian
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 16 Prosecuting Authority* (*cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act secs 55 and 56), and hes not subordinate to any government department per se though, as the Council of State largely is composed of ministers acting in their capacity as political supremos of their respective government ministries, many of his decisions ex officio are explicitly marked by departmental influence. Directly beneath the Director General of Public Prosecutions, we find the regional public prosecutors superintending the activities of their respective police districts in Norway.....and it should be emphasized that Mr Busch and most public prosecutors has a past as regular police officer(-s).....and, as for the Norwegian police force, quite a few and highly apposite remarks has beforehand been put on paper:
While 90% of regular Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic personality traits, the actual prevalence of explicit psychopathy/sadism are 100% amongst the Norwegian Police Security Service officers (cf FOCO, p 10)
The seemingly irresistible urge to compensate for assorted shortcomings through stark falsehood and extensive nefariousness, soon turned out as one of the foremost hallmarks of these fundamentally vicious ruffians.... (about officers from Majorstua Police Station in NO-Oslo, cf FOCO p 16)
The police schemed provocations which far and away may be more comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above may nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and stigmatizing alone.....and in this connection the most attractive of the alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until the victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation. Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding (the police may v.g surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception playing songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units exacerbating sadness and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping (may be induced e.g through intoxication, covert radiation and various accident setups), or simply assassination. (cf FOCO, pp 114115)
By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists, the Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing lengths to actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious criminality committed by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 17 various mass media private as well as state owned are very likely to reflect this inglorious fact! (cf FOCO, p 115)
It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable degree of responsibility (cf pp 104121), and as a matter of fact and course; 2000 of the worst policemen/-women in active service should be locked up straightaway (the overall treatment of these prisoners should be extraordinary harsh indeed), and another 3000 of these chronic malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core criminals who can be sentenced and enjailed somewhat later without seriously endangering the noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses and penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) remaining personnel, chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very closely superintended and permanently excluded from the national police force whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and otherwise competent persons! (cf FOCO, pp 155156)
Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse of audiovisual spy- tech in Norway ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers are now picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption. The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: virtually always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential conversations/happenings, and to copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the sum of documents relating to the case cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms! (cf INDO, p 61)
Norwegian police has for years actively collected information about the pathogenic effects of bodily/mental stress and torture, and theyve villainously surveilled and persecuted real psychiatric patients in their private homes while tentatively exploring techniques inflicting various degrees of disability. (cf INDO, p 85)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 18 As for Norwegian police officers, youll get a tolerably accurate picture of their mentality etc by studying the various documents above item my aphorisms. Nevertheless the striking attempts Norwegian police officers has made to infiltrate vg humanitarian/charitable, political and health related organizations etc in order to further professional influence, should be emphasized. Unfortunately members of such coalitions may be easily duped, as many of them are naturally caritative, idealistic and unbiased characteristics the police officers, wholly undeservingly, wish to be professionally associated with..... (cf INDO, p 97)
Ad nauseam weve witnessed how Norwegian police officers expediently perpetrates and provokes grave criminality exclusively to ride high on the confusion and fear thereby produced. Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goose- steps towards the totalitarian, Norwegian police state.....and in major respects the democratic government system has proven ruefully deficient. (cf INDO, p 102)
Deposit your money in a savings bank, and receive interests; save negative criticism of the Norwegian police, and get your due profit in hell! (cf Aphorisms &c, #26)
No disaster so grave no circumstances so terrifying, that interference from Norwegian police not will aggravate the situation considerably! (cf Aphorisms &c, #28)
Lend the Norwegian police a willing hand: dig your own grave, pay the undertaker, set fire to the cross, curse justice violently, praise the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 and administer the poison yourself listening to the national anthem! (cf Aphorisms &c, #45)
Its written in Luke 4:57 that the kingdoms of the world belongs to the Devil and sure enough: ample experience ve confirmed that the Kingdom of Norway indeed is ruled by Satan.....that the Norwegian authorities vanguarded by the national police force are his loyal disciples worshipping evildoing, deceiving the general population and terrorizing those righteous (cf Matthew 15:89 and Isaiah 29:13)! (cf Aphorisms &c, #48)
Wherever in Norway theres a police station youll find a satanic temple and diabolic stronghold!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 19 (cf Aphorisms &c, #51)
Norwegian police officers will normally take great pains to get all relevant facts of the corruption case against them on the table before throwing the entire stuff to the dogs, assassinating the chef--cuisine, falsely accusing the butler and closing down the whole restaurant for purported health care reasons! (cf Aphorisms &c, #67)
Law-abiding Norwegians should forthright join forces fully prepared to protect themselves and suffering fellowmen against the rampageous criminality of Norwegian police officers! (cf Aphorisms &c, #98)
Its not entirely proper to say the Norwegian Police Security Service lacks responsibility, care, generosity and culture.....whereas theyre positively responsible for villainously assassinating dozens of guiltless persons, and empirically shows marked care while generously spreading their pernicious bacteria cultures in your private house and car (Cf Aphorism #45 etc)! (cf Aphorisms &c, #110)
Referring to FOCO, the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions is categorically listed amongst those accused in this case (cf p 2), and Mr Tor- Aksel Busch is moreover explicitly named on p 34:
Supporting the psychotic complot against me from the onset, the office of the Director General of Public Prosecutions was headed by Mr Georg Fr. RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH.
As evident from Document #8123 (cf INDO, pp 157158), FOCO constitute an essential part of and is enclosed with corresponding report dated and duly handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg Aug 13 last year. In his letter of Jan 29th HA (cf ref c) Mr Busch symptomatically evades references to said report of Aug 13, while tellingly calling attention to my letter of Sep 12 and formal notification of Nov 06, 2007 (cf INDO, pp 159160 and 167172, respectively). Indicated negligence is not casual, of course, and it should be underscored that FOCO is unambiguously mentioned in both documents referred to by Mr Busch (cf INDO, pp 159 and 168, respectively). Mr Busch has certainly been fully aware FOCO as well as INDO was part and parcel of and as clearly indicated enclosed with the legal reports in question.....so, in effect theres no doubt about it; the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel Busch, has mala fide and ex
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 20 officio acted manifestly contrary to the formal disqualification rules hes professionally bound to obey.
Examining Mr Buschs reasons for breaking the law in the present case, we should pay close attention to the fact two of the persons he attempts to acquit Mr Jens STOLTENBERG and Mr Knut STORBERGET both are members of the Kings Council*:
*The Council of State (cf Article 12 of the Norwegian Constitution) or King's Council (cf pp 3031 above) normally consist of the Norwegian King en personne, the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Defence, the Minister of Environment, the Minister of Petroleum and Energy, the Minister of International Development, the Minister of Trade and Industry, the Minister of Transport and Communications, the Minister of Education and Research, the Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion, the Minister of Justice and the Police, the Minister of Children and Equality, the Minister of Culture and Church Affairs, the Minister of Health and Care Services, the Minister of Government Administration and Reform, the Minister of Agriculture and Food, the Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs, and the administrative head of the Office of the Prime Minister functioning as the Council's secretary. The various members of the Council of State represents the political core of the Norwegian Government, and the nation's highest administrative authority are correspondingly vested in the King's Council (cf Article 3 of the Norwegian Constitution). Said minister councilors acts in their capacity as political supremos of their respective government ministries e.g the Ministry of Justice and the Police or the Ministry of Health and Care Services, and more or less subordinate to these ministries we find a conglomerate of directorates and different administrative organs. (cf FOCO, p 170)
As it appears from FOCO, p 02, leading members of the Norwegian Council of State as well as principal representatives of corresponding royal house are amongst those explicitly culpable/accused in this case..so, in consequence: Mr Tor-Aksel Busch is Prime Minister Jens Stoltenbergs and Minister of Justice Knut Storbergets particeps criminis* (*cf p 182 above). This fact naturally sheds light on Mr Buschs lawbreaking..: hes quite simply wholly on his own initiative or on orders from political executives backing up his partners in crime!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 21 Of intrinsic interest and juridical importance, certain aspects of Mr Buschs modus operandi in this case should be elucidated somewhat further:
Referring to my letters of Sep 12 and Nov 06 last year, Mr Busch launches an altogether ludicrous attack on the actual facts of the case he writes (translated from Norwegian, cf ref c):
..it appears that the alleged and criminal offence is attributable to Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, Minister of Justice Knut Storberget, and chief of police Arne S. Karoliussen (Sunnmre police district).
Now, in the first instance, lets take a further look at my formal notification of Nov 06, 2007* (*cf INDO, pp 167172). The notification is addressed to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg, and introductorily runs as follows:
SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY REPORTED:
Oct 27, 2007:
At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus Downloader. The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.
Oct 28, 2007:
In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggres- sive attack aimed at ruining my PC. The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed
. Nov 01, 2007:
Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM while (utilizing my PC in sen 4, NO-Brattvg) editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT-copies of said pics.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 22 The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.
Nov 03, 2007:
Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM while I visited the shop RS Elektronikk AS in NO-Brattvg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middle- aged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior. Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program Microsoft Word.
Indicated notification of Nov 06 ends suchwise:
Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in No- Brattvg the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC the 6th inst my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down (phone #: [+47] 92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the Norwegian company NetCom)...! In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention to the fact I the 5th inst visited web sites like:
Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO), http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),
Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia, http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),
WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network, http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),
A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity, http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 23 CET).
I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private Yahoo! Mail contacts (wwerner77@yahoo.com).....and, in view of the stark illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this case, its quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like sabotaging my Internet connection!
To begin with one call attention to the irrefutable fact Mr Stoltenberg, Mr Storberget, and Mr Karoliussen has been described as the actual perpetrators of the crimes chronologically referred to in my notification of Nov 06 precisely nowhere said document contains nothing whatsoever pointing to a direct/performatory connection between indicated/reported crimes and this loathsome troika! Moreover; studying the nature of corresponding crimes we immediately notes that these with a single exception are directly and explicitly linked with PC usage and Internet related undertakings, and the only persons expressively coupled with and more or less forthrightly accused of sabotaging these activities are ....the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities.... (cf foregoing section, item INDO p 172)!
It sticks out a mile that Mr Busch wholly on purpose endeavors to obscure the facts of the case by establishing a fictive/operational and demonstrably nonsensical link between reported crimes and aforementioned triad, and his fraudulence becomes even more manifest on account of the fact Mr Stoltenberg and Mr Storberget still referring to my formal notification of Nov 06 last year both are unmistakably mentioned in conjunction with a demand for criminal proceedings against them AO submitted before commented offences actually took place:
It's especially discreditable but not at all surprising the hereinabove reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*: (cf INDO, p 169)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 24 The fact quoted paragraph is appended to the notification in question as a mere postscript scarcely makes Mr Buschs obvious efforts to confuse the facts of this case less conspicuous...!
If examining the other of my documents referred to by Mr Busch the formal complaint of Sep 12 previous year, one finds that corresponding text is straightforward and very difficult to misunderstand (translated from Norwegian):
Hereby all criminal acts mentioned in enclosed letter dated DD and addressed to counselor Johs. A ASPEHAUG, lesund, are formally reported to the police cf the Criminal Procedure Act secs 223226.*
Those guilty should be charged/sentenced/punished.
*The actual letter to counselor Aspehaug (cf INDO, pp 159160) runs suchwise: Sep 12, 2007
Dear Mr Aspehaug:
As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were quite busy here in NO-Brattvg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in sen 4 13 14 times! Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier cf Doc's ##7084 and 7090.
As regards my comprehensive report of the 13th previous month (cf Doc #8123), this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-lesund. Mr Karoliussen together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr Knut STORBERGET are, of course, amongst the numerous malefactors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and natural life in this unparalleled case.
Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in NO-lesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights organizations addressed to your office cf Incomplete FORMAL
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 25 COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611 &c.
Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw!
As one sees, the corrupted chief of police Mr A S Karoliussen and the Norwegian Minister of Justice (and the Police) Mr K Storberget are specifically mentioned in a distinct section of the letter where they unequivocally and exclusively are linked with my report of Aug 13, 2007, and the thereto enclosed documents* (*i.e: Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1195, and Internet Documents pp 1156).
Before winding up our modest expatiation on Mr Buschs deliberate attempts to corrupt essential facts of this grievous case, one call attention to the fact he has mentioned my report of Sep 25 last year absolutely nowhere in his inculpating letter of Jan 29, HA.
Said report was correctly handed over to Haram Sheriff Office (NO-Brattvg) the 25th of Sep 2007, and described sabotage of and theft from one of my rental cars. Decisively attributable to Norwegian police officers, we may rather reasonably imagine that Mr Busch found it tactically convenient to pass over indicated crimes in suggestive silence....!
Its altogether unnecessary to provide additional proofs testifying to Mr Buschs premeditated and definitely illegal obfuscation of facts in this case, whereas the documentary evidence hitherto presented comfortably enables us to draw the following and peremptorily justifiable
CONCLUSION:
Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH, born March 17 1950, has in his capacity as Norwegian Director General of Public Prose- cutions premeditatedly and in explicitly aggravating manner obstructed lawful execution of justice by intentionally cor- rupting essential facts of the present case and mala fide sup- pressing information he positively knew was all important as regards e.g unbiased criminal investigation of corre- sponding offences. In light of established facts and manifest implications its beyond all question Mr Busch in order to evade legal prosecution of himself and his accomplices entirely will- fully has committed a number of procedural errors aimed at
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 26 (v.g); falsifying the genuine cause of action, impeding impartial securing/submission/examination of evidence, and generally covering up a most offensive array serious crimes directly as- cribable to Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants.
Mr Buschs obnoxious malversation ex officio is certainly not limited to this specific case, and it behooves absolutely to carry out a meticulous and wholly unbiased expert examination of every single case he has dealt with in an official capacity from 1981 to 2008 included. Particular attention should be paid to Mr Buschs highly conspicuous interaction with the Norwegian Police Security Service* (*cf FOCO, pp 104121 &c) after 1984 and down to this very day, and his professional relations with Mr Lars FRNSDAL* (*cf FOCO, pp 7374) has by the way been rather offbeat most of the time...! With reference to this matter one should bear in mind that Assistant Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE, in May 2001 was formally reported to the Norwegian King in Council of State ipsissima verba:
Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, was appointed accessary Director General of Public Prosecutions by the Kings Council on Jan 09th 1998, and has ex officio recidivistic and arrogantly disgraced his office by extensive and intentional malversation particularly in civil proceedings and formal complaint connections where the suspected party and accused persons were police employees, senior state officials or, otherwise, public servants. Mr Jahres absolutely unacceptable irresponsibility and loathsome corruption are clearly manifested in his letter/decision of the 04th prev m (cf encs A, N, O, P, R & S) where he without criminal investigation drops notifications encompassing v.g;
premeditated homicides, attempted murder and complicity to manslaughter/-slaying (cf encs B, C, D & Q),
gross vandalism, burglary, illicit search/seizure and aggravated thefts (cf encs C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, N, O & P),
comprehensive/systematic corruption, forgery, misdemeanor/felony and extensive dereliction of duty (cf encs B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R & S),
false accusations, illegal deprivation of liberty and unlawful detention in custody (cf encs F, G & H),
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 27 torture/molestation, illegitimate monitoring/surveillance, defamations, assaults and breach of precedents item duty of secrecy (cf encs B, C, E, F, H, I, L, Q & R).
I refer to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Articles 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 and demand Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, immediately suspended/dismissed from his present office in accordance with the Civil Service Act secs 15, 16 and 17 cf sec 6 ib item the Constitution sec 22 and the Criminal Procedure Act sec 56 etc.
Mr Jahre should, without delay, be subjected to independent criminal investigation/proceedings and charged/sentenced in agreement with Norwegian law. (cf INDO, pp 47)
Mr Jahre is a notorious police aficionado, and in INDO p 104 we find this passage:
It should be underscored that the recent chief of the Norwegian Security Service Police, Mr Jrn HOLME, is Mr Drums former secretary. Mr Holme has also worked as a senior public prosecutor for the National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in Norway kokrim, and thus is a former colleague of vg Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE (cf Doc #115 above) and Mr Anstein Birger GJENGEDAL (cf Doc #377 above entry of Oct 26, 2000).
Returning to Mr Tor-Aksel Busch and the criminal proceedings against him, its perfectly clear his professional corruption are punishable in accordance with a good many sections of the Norwegian Penal Code. There are a number of aggravating circumstances to be considered, and Mr Buschs putrid decision of Jan 29 HA (cf ref c) is most certainly invalid cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act secs 60, 314, 342, 343, 384, 385 and 390392, the Norwegian Public Administration Act secs 1, 2, 6 and 41, item the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act secs 106121 etc. As regards Mr Buschs disqualification and criminality ex officio, the Norwegian King in Council of State are according to the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 64 supposed to handle these matters, and Article 22 of the Norwegian Constitution reads:
The Prime Minister and the other Members of the Council of
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 28 State, together with the State Secretaries, may be dismissed by the King without any prior court judgment, after he has heard the opinion of the Council of State on the subject. The same applies to senior officials employed in government offices or in the diplomatic or consular service, to the highest- ranking civil and ecclesiastical officials, commanders of regi- ments and other military formations, commandants of forts and officers commanding warships. Whether pensions should be granted to senior officials thus dismissed shall be deter- mined by the next Storting. In the interval they shall receive two thirds of their previous pay. Other senior officials may only be suspended by the King, and must then without delay be charged before the Courts, but they may not, except by court judgment, be dismissed nor, against their will, transferred. All senior officials may, without a prior court judgment, be discharged from office upon attaining the statutory age limit.
Cf the Norwegian Civil Service Act secs 15 and 21 (cf FOCO, pp 166168):
SECTION 15 A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily discharged when he: has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties, by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or confidence that is essential to the post. The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation.
SECTION 21 If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution, but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary measures or summary discharge into consideration.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 29 Anyhow seeing that an independent and impartial tribunal is sine qua non in respect of a fair trial, lodging an appeal to the Norwegian King in Council of State scarcely stands to reason at all in this case.whereas the very conspiracy against me was enthusiastically approved by indicated monarch in person as well as his vicious councilors (cf FOCO, pp 31 and 6869 etc)! All decisions drawn up by the Norwegian King in Council of State should be recorded in accordance with regulations, and telling comments on the plot against me has been found in a special protocol reserved for matters which the Kings Council has decided to keep secret cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 30 and 31 (cf FOCO, pp 163164):
ARTICLE 30 All the proceedings of the Council of State shall be entered in its records. Diplomatic matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret shall be entered in a special record. The same applies to military command matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret. Everyone who has a seat in the Council of State has the duty to frankly express his opinion, to which the King is bound to listen. But it rests with the King to make a decision ac- cording to his own judgment. If any Member of the Council of State is of the opinion that the King's decision conflicts with the form of govern- ment or the laws of the Realm, or is clearly prejudicial to the Realm, it is his duty to make strong remonstrances against it, as well as to have his opinion entered in the records. A Member who has not thus protested is deemed to have been in agreement with the King, and shall be answerable in such manner as may be subsequently de- cided, and may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of Impeachment.
ARTICLE 31 All decisions drawn up by the King shall, in order to be- come valid, be countersigned. The decisions relating to military command are countersigned by the person who has presented the matter, while other decisions are counter- signed by the Prime Minister or, if he has not been present, by the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State present.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 30 Not only has the Norwegian King Harald V sanctioned the illegal conspiracy against me with his personal signature, but he is in all likelihood entirely unentitled to occupy the Norwegian Throne as well (cf FOCO, pp 169170)! And.moreover; whereas the Norwegian King is possessed of a full-scale Stanford-Binet IQ ominously below the absolute minimum requirement for judges/experts (cf FOCO pp 9, 85 and 145152), his judicial authority should be firmly rejected on that score too (with a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 137, also the Norwegian PM Mr Jens Stoltenberg fails to meet the recommended and corresponding noometric minimum score of 140 cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 12, 13 and 31 etc).
At all events Norwegian authorities the Kings Council included are obliged to comply with the following Articles of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Free- doms, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:*
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS
Article 13:
Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.
Article 14:
The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 31 Article 17: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.
Article 18:
The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed.
THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 2:
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla- ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 6:
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7:
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 32 Article 8:
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 10:
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 28:
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29 (3):
These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30:
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
Article 2 (1):
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 33 Article 2 (3):
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
Article 3:
The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.
Article 5 (1):
Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
Article 5 (2):
There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 34 Article 14 (1):
All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in- terests of justice; but any judgment rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
Article 16:
Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be- fore the law.
Article 26:
All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so- cial origin, property, birth or other status.
*(In section 2 of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, it is explicitly laid down that the Council of Europes Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [the European Convention on Human Rights], the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib its brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation.)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 35 In this connection one call particular attention to the Norwegian Constitution Article 110 c:
It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 secs 2 and 3).
Cf FOCO, pp 38 etc.
Studying above excerpts from various human rights conventions, it becomes even clearer the Norwegian Council of State totally lacks the judicial power and authority to hear and determine any thing whatever in this case (cf pp 176178 above etc)....; corresponding councilors should most determinedly be seated in the dock theyre in all respects the malefactors, and by no means the adjudicators!
It appears from the Norwegian Constitution Article 30 that members of the Kings Council may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of Impeachment (cf p 193 above), and in this connection it should be appropriate to take a look at Articles 49, 71, 7381 and 8687 ib:
Article 49
The people exercises the Legislative Power through the Storting, which consists of two departments, the Lagting and the Odelsting.
Article 71
The members of the Storting function as such for four successive years.
Article 73
The Storting nominates from among its members one fourth to constitute the Lagting, the remaining three fourths to constitute the Odelsting. This nomination shall take place at the first session of the Storting that assembles after a new General Election, whereafter the Lagting shall remain unchanged
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 36 at all sessions of the Storting assembled after the same election, except insofar as any vacancy which may occur among its members has to be filled by special nomination. Each Ting holds its meetings separately and nominates its own President and Secretary. Neither Ting may hold a meeting unless at least half of its Members are present. However, Bills concerning amendments to the Constitution may not be dealt with unless at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting are present.
Article 74
As soon as the Storting is constituted, the King, or whoever he appoints for the purpose, shall open its proceedings with a Speech, in which he shall inform it of the state of the Realm and of the issues to which he particularly desires to call the attention of the Storting. No deliberations may take place in the presence of the King. When the proceedings of the Storting have been opened, the Prime Minister and the Members of the Council of State have the right to attend the Storting, as well as both departments of the Storting, and, like its Members, although without voting, to take part in any proceedings conducted in open session, while in matters discussed in closed sessions only insofar as permitted by the Ting concerned.
Article 75
It devolves upon the Storting:
a) to enact and repeal laws; to impose taxes, dues, customs and othe r public charges, which shall not, however, remain operative beyond 31 December of the succeeding year, unless they are expressly renewed by a new Storting;
b) to raise loans in the name of the Realm;
c) to supervise the monetary affairs of the Realm;
d) to appropriate the moneys necessary to meet government expenditure;
e) to decide how much shall be paid annually to the King for the Royal Household, and to determine the Royal Familys appanage which may not, however, consist of real property;
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 37 f) to have submitted to it the records of the Council of State, and all public reports and documents;
g) to have communicated to it the conventions and treaties which the King, on behalf of the State, has concluded with foreign powers;
h) to have the right to require anyone, the King and the Royal Family excepted, to appear before it on matters of State; the exception does not, however, apply to the Royal Princes if they hold any public office;
i) to review the provisional lists of salaries and pensions and to make therein such alterations as it deems necessary;
j) (repealed);
k) to appoint five auditors, who shall annually examine the State Accounts and publish extracts of the same print, for which purpose the Accounts shall be submitted to the auditors within six months of the end of the year for which the appropriations of the Storting have been made, and to adopt provisions concerning the procedure for authorizing the accounts of government accounting officials;
l) to appoint a person, not a member of the Storting, in a manner prescribed by law, to supervise the public administration and all who work in its service, to assure that no injustice is done against the individual citizen;
m) to naturalize aliens.
Article 76
Every Bill shall first be proposed in the Odelsting, either by one of its own Members, or by the government through a Member of the Council of State. If the Bill is passed, it is sent to the Lagting, which either approves or rejects it, and in the latter case returns it with appended comments. These are taken into consideration by the Odelsting, which either shelves the bill or again sends it to the Lagting, with or without alteration. When a Bill from the Odelsting has twice been presented to the Lagting and has been returned a second time as rejected, the Storting shall meet in plenary session, and the bill is then decided by a majority of two thirds of its votes.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 38 Between each such deliberation there shall be an interval of at least three days.
Article 77
When a Bill passed by the Odelsting has been approved by the Lagting or by the Storting in plenary session, it is sent to the King, with a request that it may receive the Royal Assent.
Article 78
If the King assents to the Bill, he appends his signature, whereby it becomes law. If he does not assent to it, he returns it to the Odelsting with a statement that he does not for the time being find it expedient to sanction it. In that case the Bill must not again be submitted to the King by the Storting then assembled.
Article 79
If a Bill has been passed unaltered by two sessions of the Storting, constituted after two separate successive elections and separated from each other by at least two intervening sessions of the Storting, without a divergent Bill having been passed by any Storting in the period between the first and last adoption, and it is then submitted to the King with a petition that His Majesty shall not refuse his assent to a beneficial, it shall become law even if the Royal Assent is not accorded before the Storting goes into recess.
Article 80
The Storting shall remain in session as long as it deems it necessary and shall terminate its proceedings when it has concluded its business. In accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the Storting, the proceedings may be resumed, but they shall terminate not later than the last Sunday in the month of September. Within this time the King shall communicate his decision with regard to the Bills that have not already been decided (cf Articles 77 to 79), by either confirming or rejecting them. All those which he does not expressly accept are deemed to have been rejected by him.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 39 Article 81
All Acts (with the exception of those mentioned in Article 79) are drawn up in the name of the King, under the seal of the Realm of Norway, and in the following terms; We, X, make it publicly known: that the decision of the Storting of the date stated has been laid before Us: (here follows the decision). In consequence whereof We have assented to and confirmed, as We hereby do assent to and confirm the same as Law under Our Hand and the Seal of the Realm.
Article 86
The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and last instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting against Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court or of the Storting, for criminal offences which they may have com- mitted in their official capacity. The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accor- dance with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings be- fore the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years. The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently app- ointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment. The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside. Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases, for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall re- sign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.
Article 87
The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 40 Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceed- ings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two. The same shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court. If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by law. If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively retire following the drawing of lots. When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that the Court due to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of whom at most ten are Members of the Lagting and five Justices of the Supreme Court. The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots. If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Mem- bers of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court numbers at least ten judges. Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the compos- ition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.
According to the Norwegian Constitution Article 86 the permanent members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed members of the Supreme Court should be judges of the Court of Impeachment thus a pro forma survey of indicated members follows:
Members of the Norwegian Lagting AD 2008
ASPHJELL, Jorodd (Arbeiderpartiet) BERGO, Magnar L (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) BJRNSTAD, Vidar (Arbeiderpartiet) BREDVOLD, Per Roar (Fremskrittspartiet) ENG, Sigrun (Arbeiderpartiet)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 41 ENGER. Inger S (Senterpartiet) GRIMSTAD, May-Helen M (Kristelig Folkeparti) GUNDERSEN, Gunnar (Hyre) HALLERAKER, yvind (Hyre) HJEMDAL, Line Henriette H (Kristelig Folkeparti) HOKSRUD, Brd (Fremskrittspartiet) HOLMBERG, Kari Lise (Hyre) JACOBSEN, Bjrn (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) JAGLAND, Thorbjrn (Arbeiderpartiet) JOHANSEN, Irene (Arbeiderpartiet) JOHNSEN, Espen (Arbeiderpartiet) KJOS, Kari K (Fremskrittspartiet) KNUTSEN, Tove Karoline (Arbeiderpartiet) KONGSHAUG, Leif Helge (Venstre) KRISTOFFERSEN, Gerd Janne (Arbeiderpartiet) LANGELAND, Hallgeir H (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) LARSEN, Anne Margrethe (Venstre) LYDVO, Hilde M (Arbeiderpartiet) LNNING, Inge (Hyre) LNKE, Ola T (Kristelig Folkeparti) MANDT-BARTHOLSEN, Sonja (Arbeiderpartiet) MARTHINSEN, Marianne (Arbeiderpartiet) MOE, Ola B (Senterpartiet) NAVARSETE, Liv Signe (Senterpartiet) NIELSEN, Eva M (Arbeiderpartiet) NISTAD, Thore A (Fremskrittspartiet) PETERSEN, Jan (Hyre) REIKVAM, Rolf (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) RYTMAN, Jrund (Fremskrittspartiet) SAMUELSEN, Alf Ivar (Senterpartiet) SCHMIDT, se M (Fremskrittspartiet) SOLHOLM, Lodve (Fremskrittspartiet) STRM, Tor-Arne (Arbeiderpartiet) SUND, Eirin Kristin (Arbeiderpartiet) VAKSDAL, yvind (Fremskrittspartiet) VALLERSNES, Finn Martin (Hyre) WIDTH, Per Ove (Fremskrittspartiet) AASLAND, Terje (Arbeiderpartiet)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 42 Members of the Norwegian Supreme Court AD 2008
SCHEI, Tore (Chief Justice, born 1946) GJLSTAD, Liv (Justice, born 1945) LUND, Ketil (Justice, born 1939) GUSSGARD, Karenanne (Justice, born 1940) TJOMSLAND, Steinar (Justice, born 1948) COWARD, Kirsti (Justice, born 1940) STANG LUND, Eilert (Justice, born 1939) BROCH OFTEDAL, Lars (Justice, born 1939) FLOCK, Hans (Justice, born 1940) MATNINGSDAL, Magnus (Justice, born 1951) BRUZELIUS, Karin Maria (Justice, born 1941) SKOGHY, Jens Edvin A (Justice, born 1955) UTGRD, Karl Arne (Justice, born 1951) STABEL, Ingse (Justice, born 1946) STLE, Ole Bjrn (Justice, born 1950) IE, Toril Marie (Justice, born 1960) TNDER, Brd (Justice, born 1948) ENDRESEN, Clement (Justice, born 1949) INDREBERG, Hilde (Justice, born 1957) SVERDRUP, Tone (Justice ad hoc, born 1951) BERGBY, Gunnar (Secretary General, born 1947)
As for the provisions regulating e.g the composition and exact procedure of the Court of Impeachment, these was originally laid down in the Norwegian Act of 5 February 1932 relating to Punishment for Offences Indicted before the Court of Impeachment....and this Act has in all probability been subject to a number of tactical amendments triggered by distinct fear of nearby Complaint* (*cf the Norwegian Act of 30 March 2007 no. 13)! In any case the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act which still applies to the composition etc of the Court of Impeachment provides that:
1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60 cf sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21 &c);
2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (sec 76 cf secs 52, 53 and 65 &c ib);
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 43 3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 cf secs 52, 106, 107, 109 and 111 &c ib).
As is meet and proper the individual security under the law has been given a prominent position in globally accepted human rights conventions (cf pp 194 199 above), and Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights positively lays down that:
All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
However...; when it comes to the competence, independence and impartiality of Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, its certainly in order to recall some passages found in FOCO:
The reader should constantly keep in mind Norwegian authorities unscrupulously will exploit every adequate opportunity to erase, steal and falsify/alter to their advantage any piece of evidence communicated through nearby Complaint empirically theyre much prone to manipulate, espy, harass/intimidate, incarcerate, obstruct, weaken and explicitly harm/attack potential/actual witnesses in this and other cases where Norwegian officials are the factual culprits.....and the presentation of forthcoming matter are by and large accommodated these disquieting facts. (cf FOCO, p 10)
Since 1992 it has been a main objective for Norwegian authorities to maim my general health, ruin my social relationships, isolate me, deny my juridical rights, subdue/quench legal complaints to international fora, mar my reputation, intimidate me, induce pecuniary destitution, provoke harmful tribulations, obstruct globally lifesaving work, minimize my standard of living and if possible incite criminality and unethical behavior (cf Doc #4588 etc). The pernicious misconduct of Norwegian authorities in this case are precisely described in the Bible, Isaiah 59:58 (corresponding statements are wholly valid independent of your religious faith and theological opinions cf Doc #2037, Norwegian Vice Spreading):
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 44
They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spiders web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.
In many respects Mr Ivar Oftedahl and Ms Harlem Brundtland represents the archetype of my Norwegian foes; frailty, ignoble/plebeian, crabby, evil/base, corrupted/criminal, unstable/dishonest, lunatic/schizophrenic, hypocritical/ pharisaic, malevolent/envious, arrogant/aggressive and sickly self-assertive miscreants attempting to compensate for their shortcomings, inferiority complex and psychopathology through ascribing their nasty defects, wickedness, mental derangement and systematic lawbreaking to others (cf Docs ##633 [Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome] and 2037 [Official Norwegian Hypocrisy and Malevolence]). Though human status correctly may be granted my Norwegian enemies, they surely belongs to a particularly noxious subgroup bipeds strongly guided and impressed by stark diabolism, madness, injustice and general low-mindedness the presence and influence of these infernally vile terrorists are of course absolutely detrimental to any civilized society respecting the human rights, guarding righteousness, and fostering ethicality, personal magnanimity, intellectual/scientific eminence and artistic dexterity usw. (cf FOCO, pp 7273)
Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 Comments on disqualification), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: Can the various crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound creatures...? Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query:
Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism, hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 45 characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!
Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom of Satan!
Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders particularly psychopathy and various perversions are predominant conditions. The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however viewed as an endemic phenomenon partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification. A genetically rooted and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching classical psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly unbecoming to introduce the acronym NPSMS* *Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome (if more convenient, you may think of NPSMS simply as Norwegian psychopathy or Norwegian folie, of course)...! In Doc's ##633 and 2037 pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms viz:
Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis, rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy, superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjust- ment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy, professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance, cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia, corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation, religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartio- philia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrust- ful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability, anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 46 The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archetypical of regular psychoses. The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism. In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...! Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently motive and means appearing practically identical unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome. As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory structures and convergence zones in the ventromedial prefrontal sector of the brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired monoamine based weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be NPSMS indicative. Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact... (cf FOCO, pp 122124)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 47 Whereas the Hippocratic oath lay emphasis on honesty, respectfulness and benevolence towards patients and impels physicians to champion international human rights and exercise their professional judgment uninfluenced by political pressure, physicians and other health personnel involved in this ill-omened case maliciously 've displayed the most inexpiable disregard inasmuch as dutiful compliance with ethical stipulations, the statutory rights of others and their vocational integrity otherwise are concerned.....honestly; it's stark impossible to find even the slightest trace of formally mitigating circumstances, respectability or professional adequacy in the uninterrupted orgy of lawless terrorism satanically indulged in by Norwegian medics AO since 1992! Anyhow, let's make it perfectly clear right now; the actual and radically massive violations of quoted articles noways applies to the Norwegian public health service alone corresponding malversation has continuously been schemed and illicitly ratified v.g by diverse governmental bodies (cf pp 2425, 2931, 6874 and 8388 usw), and does also largely include the other officials and establishments referred to as Accused at page 2 of nearby Complaint. Cf Doc #4575, p 117 etc:
All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case 've been unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and largely criminal clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing most of the malefactors.
The manifestly morbid preoccupation with supernormal intelligence and human genius constantly displayed by Norwegian physicians, psychologists, politicians, police officers et al has been touched upon earlier in this report (v p 118 cf Doc #1536, p 85), and it should be timely to supply foregoing information with a few germane remarks.
Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark fatuity as well.
Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests..and given that we fairly correctly may equate corresponding IQ scores with our immanent/potential ability to acceptably handle diverse practical situations and precisely grasp more or less abstract/intricate problems/ideas professionally or
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 48 otherwise encountered, we may assuredly ascribe much of said improvidence and btises ex officio to insufficient psychometric intelligence. At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale (cf pp 910). IQs corresponding to or exceeding indicated score are normally regarded as highly impressive, and many psychologists will set the intelligence quotient for potential genius at 140 or over. In the general Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for every woman reaching specified score. Howbeit ; comprehensive observations here in Norway bears witness to the fact individuals with a Stanford-Binet IQ in the 130155 range are essentially unable to meet the dianoetic requirements necessary to acquire even passable understanding of more intricate scientific, moral and purely logical &c causata/implications/problems. Typically earning their university and first-class degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically and oftentimes professionally incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community positions. In cases where the shortcomer has maintained his/her moral and eunoic integrity, the psychometric inadequacy may be accidentally fatal indeed though regularly and pragmatically amendable, as the intellectually subpotent faultdoer will be genuinely eager to admit, correct and avoid e.g professional mistakes induced by noometrically overtaxing demands. Inasmuch as the dianoetic deficiency and related/professional fall downs are directly pertinent to NPSMS afflicted individuals/officials* (*cf pp 122124) which conspicuously often is the case in Norway, we empirically knows these severely disordered and thoroughly dikephobic wrongdoers will do whatever practically feasible to cover up and belittle their errors/unsuitability/corruption frequently at the expense of wholly guiltless persons facing false accusations and unwarranted castigation etc. As for the latter case, special attention should be called to the average Stanford- Binet IQ of Norwegian Parliament/Storting representatives at 127,5 (cf p 10) which, not surprisingly, is 1014 crucial points below corresponding scores for national/federal assembly members in any Euro-American country/state socioeconomically comparable with Norway. Without validating the factual foundation of his suppositions etc, it may be thematically justifiable though to refer to assistant professor of psychology at Princeton University* (*New Jersey, USA) Mr Carl C BRIGHAM* (*creator of the well-known Scholastic Aptitude Test) who, in 1923, published A Study of American Intelligence where he concluded that the IQ of immigrants increased in proportion to the number of years of US residence a phenomenon he ascribed to a lower proportion of Nordic blood over the years, rather than increased familiarization with cultural and educational factors!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 49 Anyhow; the US Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 favored immigration from northern Europe, and restricted the entry of persons from other areas referred to as biologically inferior
At the pages 9 and 85 I've fixed the lowest acceptable Stanford-Binet IQ of different judges/experts at 145 and 140, respectively but indeed; this does not imply said scores are absolutely and professionally adequate! What indicated minimum levels does mark, however, are the highest IQ scores practically attainable a number of circumstantial factors and conventional requirements* realistically considered (*amongst the formal prerequisites, a sufficient and high degree of moral integrity, impartiality/independence and educational competency are indispensable). While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80% of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these appellate tribunals. Although the present courts of appeals comprises a few judges with a Stanford-Binet IQ equaling or slightly exceeding 140, 4550% of nowadays judgments/sentences should be overruled on account of regular corruption and the number/severity of procedural errors..and, finally; whereas corruption are exlex altogether and portrayed degree of erroneousness legally unacceptable, it should be formally correct to render null and void all verdicts and conclusions passed on by these incompetent and obscenely pretentious kangaroo courts whatsoever cf Doc #627 item nearby Complaint pp 28 and 8488 etc! As for the widespread depravity amongst Norwegian judges, much of it is reflected by The Professional Code and Ethical Philosophy of Norwegian Judges* (*cf Aphorisms &c 107109):
Yes indeed were chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs, forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral lepers.....but; since we effectively ve blocked criminal investigation of our iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and successfully hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our inveterate transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally enforceable judgments against us.....and for that reason we are at least in a profanely juridical sense not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice Act sec 53, third per)! Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our allelopathic lawbreaking.....cause its an established truism that our surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 50 scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously, please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament Building, and a leviathan monument at the royal palace square in Oslo where noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and confer dignity upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and also squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!
Verily; though stinking, a shitfilled sack will stand upright! (cf FOCO, pp 144147)
Behind the previously indicated and markedly pathological interest in paranormality and genius exhibited by Norwegian authorities, we find the deep- seated inferiority complex and narrow-minded egotism broadly explaining their preoccupation. From the very first these natural-born villains and mountebanks searched for esoteric and absurd ways to elevate their base intellect; perhaps geniuses depended on some secret ingesta or regimen skyrocketing their creativity and IQs.?! Fatefully mixed with archetypical NPSMS symptoms* (*cf pp 122124) as v.g psychiatric idiosyncrasies, pronounced criminalism and unjustifiable hostility, said selfishness has in any case triggered the most pernicious chain of wholly deliberate, systematical and decidedly ill-starred human rights violations ever seen in Norway! It's perfectly evident many of the crimes dealt with in this petition and corresponding documents had been very difficult to commit and impossible to get away with in a relatively uncorrupted and otherwise healthy society..and lo as might be expected; behind the wormy stage settings we find the meanest herd of mentally deranged, felonious, self-aggrandizing and utterly condemnable misfits and conspiring officials ever sighted in a claimed not to say pretended democracy! and, behold; I'm truthfully characterizing the innately psychopathic descendants of a notoriously fiendish people duly mentioned by the hounded and grotesquely misknown genius William James SIDIS (18981944):
These Norse invaders in 'Vinland,' as they named the country, treated the native inhabitants (whom they named 'Skrellings,' or 'skinned people') about the same way as they did in Europe as subjects for pillage and slave-raids. They raided as far as the 'Wonderstrand' (Cape Cod), and they usually made themselves enemies wherever they went, in America as in Europe." (cf FOCO, pp 151152)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 51 The heinous array of crimes habitually indulged in by Norwegian officials and senior civil servants the latter years, are largely and manifestly ascribable to the tremendous prevalence of indigenous sociopathy* characteristic of Norway (*cf pp 122124 &c). Based on continuous and exacting observations since 1992, it's perfectly evident Norwegian health personnel and police officers directly executing and criminally liable for the atrocities partially described in nearby Petition and elsewhere has derived sexual excitement and significant satisfaction from their systematic nefariousness and lawbreaking. Combined with fixed and markedly paranoic personality traits, the deep-rooted psychopathy and sadism by and large hallmarking Norwegian senior state officials and public servants are practically incurable* (*cf pp 122127, 155 156 and 172 &c) . Under otherwise normal circumstances and the disastrous ascendancy and profane catholicity of state supported criminality considered, it's hardly anything but a waste of time and energy to bring legal/intrastatal actions against the slimy politicians and (senior) civil servants constituting the rotten hard core of official Norwegian malversation.and, especially if you're a high- principled human rights activist, the only acceptable alternative left may be to apply for political asylum outside Norway in order to escape explicitly nocent and unlawful persecution. (cf FOCO, p 190)
The 2007 version of this official though tactically incomplete and slightly unconventional human rights petition, gives a partially unique and unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state supported corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the Norwegian Civil Service. Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1, 10, 122124, item Doc #4588 etc), and I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the various offences only. On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian authorities set forth in nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a nation governed by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved lowbrows enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand well-sett antipathy toward these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of mankind are significantly strengthened!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 52 Whereas as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992 Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave in compliance with international human rights conventions and globally accepted etiquette, its certainly high time drastic steps are taken to remove, incarcerate, and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible for the corresponding and state supported criminality dealt with in nearby Complaint and enclosed documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient neutralization of these arrantly criminal elements and preferably stabilizing international intervention, Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants will continue to annihilate essential human rights regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly typically with distinct delight ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves and their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution.
As expectable the endemic character and genetic base of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom* (*NPSMS, cf pp 122124 etc) considered, the extensive criminalism, general ineptness, theological insecurity, and psychopathological disregard for ethical norms usw by and large typifying nowadays Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance of historical parallels. (cf FOCO, 196197)
Focusing more precisely on the specific reasons for disqualification directly related to nearby impeachment case, special emphasis should be laid on the intimate ties between the Kings Council and the Norwegian Storting/Parliament. Notwithstanding the revolting fact many Odelsting/Lagting members* (*cf Articles 49 and 73 above) has been and are involved in the lawless conspiracy against me (cf FOCO p 30 etc), it appears clearly from the Norwegian Constitution Articles 7481 that the actual interaction between the Council of State and aforementioned Parliament renders a sufficient degree of independence and impartiality wholly unattainable as far as appointment of judges pursuant to Articles 86 and 87 of said Constitution is concerned; members of the Kings Council will almost daily meet and associate closely with Norwegian Parliament members both in- and outside the Storting- Building in Oslo indicated persons are colleagues, bosom friends, fellow party/committee/organization/club members, and.partners in crime ( moreover, the great majority of Norwegian Parliament members are also disqualified from the juror function on account of their intellectual insufficiency cf FOCO, pp 9 and 146)!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 53 When it comes to the Norwegian Supreme Court, its sufficient for the time being to refer to FOCO pp 30 and 68; several of corresponding judges among them Mr Tore SCHEI (the Chief Justice) should be impeached (cf FOCO pp 33 and 6768, item pp 205206 above).
In addition to the impeachment cases, therell be legal proceedings against numerous (senior) civil servants in the Norwegian government ministries, the Norwegian police force, the Norwegian public health service, the Norwegian State Church, the Norwegian armed forces, Mre og Romsdal county municipality/council, Haram/Molde/lesund municipalities, the Norwegian Telecommunications, the Norwegian Post Office Services, the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation.et alia (cf FOCO, p 2).
Although the various offences mentioned in FOCO/INDO provides a solid basis for criminal investigation, a most substantial number of essential facts and descriptions of illegal acts has been intentionally omitted from these tactically incomplete books (cf FOCO pp 10 [last paragraph] and 196197 &c) in any case unbiased and scrupulous investigation will produce more than enough proofs that will stand up in the court.
Aforesaid and extraordinarily vile circumstances considered, its certainly appropriate as well as obligatory to entrust impartial and otherwise competent representatives from an international organization to which Norway adheres (e.g the United Nations) or will adhere with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this case cf the Norwegian Constitution Article 93, pp 175 and 178 above, item FOCO pp 89.
The members of the actual juries in this case will face a pack well- educated and politically experienced liars who will do their very best to manipulate and deceive them.....so, by reason of the intellectual challenges represented by this and other facts of the case, none possessing a general IQ as measured on the WAIS, Stanford-Binet or PM 47 (PM 48, Raven 40 min deadline) test subordinate to, respectively; 142, 145 or 143 should be accepted as (lay) judges or experts in forthcoming trials.* (FOCO, p 9)
*Cf FOCO pp 145149 etc. 45
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 54 Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen consequently theyve kicked off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various human rights organizations in this case! (INDO, Doc #5007)
Empirically the chances Norwegian authorities will fulfill their juridical obligations and otherwise behave themselves are very small in this unique case (cf FOCO, pp 196197 etc), but one nevertheless almost pro forma admonish members of the Storting and Council of State to comply with Norwegian law and international human rights conventions (cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 13, 21 and 110 c &c)....; theres no way whatsoever Norwegian authorities can win this case, but they can at least endeavor to lose it with some dignity.
Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to bring Article 93 of their Constitution into service and to further lawful execution of justice by entrusting qualified representatives from the United Nations with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating usw the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this case (cf FOCO, pp 89).
NO-Brattvg, May 01 2008
Wilh. Werner WINTHER (SIGNATURE)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 55 ENCLOSURES:
1) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*here- after referred to as FOCO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1217,
2) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as INDO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1173,
3) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page,
4) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page,
5) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 56 This was certainly a complex and perhaps lengthy document to include, but it does nevertheless throw necessary light on so many and weighty aspects of nearby complaint, that an unabridged transcript is wholly justifiable (its an- other pair of shoes, however, itll demand a certain amount of intellectual dex- terity to grasp and correctly integrate corresponding information).
Lets proceed with the next group of suspects viz: present and former local politicians.
As for this specific complaint, there are three names particularly worth mention- ing:
Mr. Bjrn SANDNES (mayor, NO-Haram municipality), Mr. Trond SETH (deputy mayor, NO-Haram municipality), and Mr. Oddbjrn VATNE (former mayor of NO-Haram municipality, and presently a member of adjoining county council).
One knows for sure representatives of Haram Sheriff Office under false preten- ces and in connection with described attempts to murder the plaintiff has consul- ted Mr. Sandnes* and Mr. Seth* (*who apparently supports said crimes), and its an established fact both politicians just like Mr. Vatne belongs to the complainants categorical longtime foes. Besides their natural inclination toward pathological badass behavior and double-dealing, Mr. Sandnes/Mr. Seth/Mr. Vatne may encourage and patronize any attempts to assassinate the plaintiff because its politically/juridically desi- rable to cover up serious criminality committed by themselves and other Nor- wegian politicians/office-holders etc.
The last group of suspects as matters now stands, consists of the actual perpe- trators and their operative accomplices/supporters.
In this group we find:
1) Mr. Geir Ove SKARB, NO-2319 Hamar (main suspect and principal planner/organizer), 2) Mr. Tommy SKARB, NO-6270 Brattvg (main suspect and gunning executor), 3) Ms. Linda SVENSLI, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and gunning executrix),
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 57 4) Mr. ystein SOLHJELL, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and operative accomplice), 5) Mr Torbjrn RAUSAND, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and operative accomplice), 6) Mr. Karl-Even INDRESTRAND, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative accomplice), 7) Mr. Sigmund Martin EKREM, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 8) Ms. Monica INDRESTRAND, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 9) Mr. Ronny JRGENSEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter/accomplice), 10) Ms. Greta HILDRE, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 11) Ms. Slvi K DYBVIK, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 12) Mr. Bo Curt WECKLAUF, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 13) Ms. Hanne KOI JRGENSEN , NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), 14) Ms. Cathrin SKJELTEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter), and 15) Mr. Ronald SKJELTEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative supporter).
The list is not complete!
Its hardly accidental four of the suspects are authentic bearers of the surnames Skarb or Indrestrand, whereas my maternal grandfather and many of his neighbors in NO-Brattvg was seriously/regularly vexed by the low-minded unmannerliness, preposterousness and criminal inclination characterizing these unsound families as early as in 1950!
The all-time low for the Indrestrand-family was reached around 40 years ago when one of their boys actively assisted by his parents AO ritually sold his doomed soul to Satan in order to harm the plaintiff (Before this happened, the boys paternal grandfather Mr. Ivar INDRESTRAND attempted to murder the complainant with a scythe, and his father Mr. Ingbert INDRESTRAND had several times been caught redhanded as he secretly encroached out private houses etc.).
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 58 It should be emphasized that Mr. Karl-Even Indrestrand is Ms. Monica Indrestrands brother, and that their paternal grandfather is identical with aforementioned Mr. Ivar Indrestrand. Mr. K-E Indrestrand and Mr. Tommy Skarb are former and long standing workmates, and the latter also had an affair with Ms. Indrestrand. In addition Mr. K-E Indrestrand is leader of a local motorcycle club* (i.e.: Haram MC) whose members/supporters played a certain role in the attempts to murder the complainant (The police, Mr. Trond Seth, Mr. Geir Ove Skarb, Mr. Ronny Jrgensen and Mr. K-E Indrestrand tried mala fide to link the plaintiff to the MC club Hells Angels in a way unjustly and maliciously denigrating his reputation. However; the plaintiff has never been a member or supporter of any motorcycle club, and his only contact with Hells Angels MC was in 1997 when a wholly innocent woman was killed in a bomb attack in NO- Drammen: on June 04, 1997 20 minutes before the corresponding bomb detonation in NO-Drammen devastated a house belonging to the motorcycle club Bandidos three officers from the police head- quarters in NO-lesund stealthily positioned themselves on the northern side of the Norwegian Lutheran Home Mission Societys chapel in Storgata 5, NO-Brattvg. Warily peeking around the chapel corners studying the plaintiffs private house in sen 4 [the distance between the two buildings is less than 30 meters] while using their cellular phones two of the officers was readily identified.viz: Mr. Finn GRANLIEN and Mr. Arne FRLAND [the third officer did probably not leave his/her car]. And so two minutes after the bomb explosion in NO-Drammen the spying cops suddenly became abnormally excited, and they left their observation posts in a hurry using two civilian cars* [*i.e.: a white Volvo passenger car, and a dark green Volkswagen Passat station wagon]. The plaintiff pretty soon learned that Norwegian authorities deliberately broadcasted stark disinformation about the bomb attack, and that several informed police officers in NO-Drammen had excellent opportunity to physically stop/save the guiltless woman killed by the explosion. The Norwegian police force unilaterally blamed the motorcycle club Hells Angels for the bomb attack, while hiding and lying about their own deci- sive involvement. On account of these and other distressing facts, the plaintiff recommended Hells Angels and their lawyers to file an official human rights complaint against Norwegian authorities and they did [The actual complaint was sent to the European Court of Human Rights.])!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 59 As for the Skarb-family, most problems of earlier date was created by Ms. Petra SKARB and her quarrelsome son Mr. Trygve SKARB the bone of contention, as far as my closest relatives are concerned, was a prescriptive and juridically attested right of way belonging to my maternal grandfather and his half brother, Karl.
Mr. Bo Curt Wecklauf* (*a Swede) and Ms. Slvi K Dybvik have been living together for several years, and Ms. Dybvik was earlier married to Mr Geir Ove Skarb shes Mr. Tommy Skarbs mother. Some years ago Ms. Dybvik felt seriously offended because the complainant repeatedly refused to sell his private house to her, and she may be guilty of stealing/embezzling more than 400 letters addressed to him (Ms. Dybvik works as a state-employed letter-carrier).! Ms. Dybvik and Mr. Wecklauf are both known for their intemperate alcohol intake and moral deficiency, and its clear they were acquainted with the plots to kill the plaintiff several days before the actual murder attempts took place.
Mr. Tommy Skarb and Mr. Sigmund M Ekrem are notorious alcoholists and drinking companions, and theyve both antisocial personality traits. Mr. Ekrem is also known as an incurable and ill-mannered mythomaniac drink- ing methylated spirit, windshield wiper fluid and herbicide agents ad nauseam, and Mr. T Skarb is legally separated from a manic-depressive woman stealing the plaintiffs books when she worked as an assistant librarian in NO-Brattvg.
Mr. ystein Solhjell and his family formerly lived in NO-Brattvg, and he exhibited objective symptoms of mental disease and/or brain damage as early as in 1982.
As a child/teenager Mr. Geir Ove Skarb was known as a stuttering and notor- ious bully exhibiting an abundance of psychopathic/antisocial personality traits, and his younger brother Mr. Leslie SKARB (b. 1957) shared many of his psychopathological peculiarities. Mr. G O Skarb is also widely known for terrorizing his family members particularly his former wife, Ms. Slvi K Dybvik. During a beastly maniacal phone conversation* at the end of Sep. 2010 (*the conversation mostly consisted of Mr. Skarbs brainsick threats and ear- splitting outbursts), Mr. G O Skarb called attention to the (now verified) fact he recently had consulted police officers guaranteeing all reports formally submit- ted by Mr. Wilhelm Werner Winther would remain unprosecuted and be ridi- culed/ignored by the Norwegian police force AO. Mr. G O Skarb demonstra- tively documented said guaranty by including explicit pics of himself with his lunatic SMS-threats!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 60 Mr. Ronny Jrgensen is married to Ms. Hanne Koi Jrgensen theyre living in the house formerly owned/inhabited by said Mr. Ivar Indrestrand and his infamous family, and theyve both exerted a markedly corruptive influence on the local society (some years ago they moved from their birthplace in the northernmost part of Norway to NO-Brattvg). This couple has worked really hard to compromise the plaintiffs reputation because he, several years ago, complained of Mr. Jrgensens illegally noisy and inappropriate manual labor on Sundays (Mr. Jrgensen was/is employed by the Lutheran Christian Church of Norway)!
Ms. Cathrin Skjelten is married to Mr. Ronald Skjelten, and they socialize with Mr./Ms. Jrgensen at regular intervals. Like Ms. Monica Indrestrand and Mr. Ronny Jrgensen, Ms. Skjelten has been employed at one of the conspiratorial epicenters in this case viz: Brattvg Bowling & Restaurant in NO-Brattvg (cf.: http://www.brattvaagbowling.no).
By and large all suspects have these characteristics in common:
Considering the vast number of psychopathic personality traits verily hallmarking all suspects in this case, further elucidation of their intrinsic motivation for unprovoked evildoing and serious lawbreaking should be rather needless.: these persons derives sickly pleasure from violating the rights of others bloodshed, violence, stealing, lying, sadism and malbehavior/wrongdoing generally turns them on and satisfies their innate viciousness and pathologic need for destructive/antisocial stimuli.!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 61 With the exception of Mr. Sigmund M Ekrem* (*who a number of times have asked the plaintiff for food and help with computer-/Inter- net-related problems), the complainant has never had any kind of per- sonal contact with the suspects in this case..and indeed: Mr. Wilhelm Werner Winther generally avoids ALL unnecessary interaction with native Norwegians!
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
The Kingdom of Norway and their public authorities are in this specific case guilty of premeditated, repetitive and long-standing violations of subsequent articles of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms:
Article 1 Obligation to respect human rights,
Article 2 Right to life,
Article 6 Right to a fair trial,
Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 13 Right to an effective remedy.
A more detailed account of the various human rights violations specified above follows:
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 62 Article 1 Obligation to respect human rights
The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this Convention.
Legally authorized representatives of the Norwegian Government unreservedly signed and ratified the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on Nov. 04 1950 and Jan. 15 1952, respectively, and did eo ipso commit their national authorities to respect and juridically enforce all articles constituting e.g. Section 1 of said covenant. Moreover: In section 2 of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21 1999, it is explicitly laid down that the Council of Europes Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European Convention on Human Rights), the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib its brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation. This implies among other things that the public authorities of Norway are statutorily obliged to adapt their executive procedures suchwise the human rights and freedoms defined in Section 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are duly observed, and additio- nally theyre juridically compelled to obey e.g. the following articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 2:
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla- ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 63 territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non- selfgoverning or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 6:
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7:
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8:
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 10:
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 28:
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29 (3):
These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 64 Article 30:
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
Article 2 (1):
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Article 2 (3):
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 65 Article 3:
The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.
Article 5 (1):
Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
Article 5 (2):
There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the funda- mental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 14 (1):
All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter- mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in- terests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 66 Article 16:
Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be- fore the law.
Article 26:
All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so- cial origin, property, birth or other status.
Above information considered, its perfectly simple to ascertain that the Kingdom of Norways wilful and explicit violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the instant case also represents a clear-cut breach of their national laws......and it should be tho- roughly underlined indeed that their excruciating disrespect for the human rights and freedoms are of highly recidivistic nature sic (excerpts from Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway, by Mr. Wilh. Werner Winther):
The 2007 version of this official though tactically incomplete and slightly unconventional human rights petition, gives a partially unique and unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state supported corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the Norwegian Civil Service. Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1, 10, 122124, item Doc #4588 etc), and I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the various offences only. On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian authorities set forth in nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a nation governed by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved lowbrows enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand well-set antipathy
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 67 toward these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of mankind are significantly strengthened!
Whereas as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992 Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave in compliance with international human rights conventions and globally accepted etiquette, its certainly high time drastic steps are taken to remove, incarcerate, and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible for the corresponding and state supported criminality dealt with in nearby Complaint and enclosed documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient neutralization of these arrantly criminal elements and preferably stabilizing international intervention, Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants will continue to annihilate essential human rights regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly typically with distinct delight ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves and their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution.
As expectable the endemic character and genetic base of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom* (*NPSMS, cf pp 122124 etc) considered, the extensive criminalism, general ineptness, theological insecurity, and psychopathological disregard for ethical norms usw by and large typifying nowadays Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance of historical parallels. In 1388/-89 popular vacuity, religious confusion, aristocratic disintegration, and a fatal lack of higher leadership qualities among the native administrators forced Norway into a political union with Denmark lasting until 1814. During said epoch Norway more or less functioned as a Danish province, and most administrative posts were permanently occupied by Danes and Germans. In July 1814 Sweden launched a military attack on Norway, and within two weeks the Danish/Norwegian king Christian Frederick resigned....and, in consequence, the politically fatuous Norwegians had to accept a union with Sweden lasting until 1905 (cf the Treaty of Kiel). One of many things worth emphasizing in this connection is the upsetting fact the political impotence, goofiness, self-conceit, irresponsibility, unsoundness, and general degeneration etc necessitating the unions with Denmark and Sweden are inheritable defects very much alive and kicking AD 2007.....and, as stated beforehand (cf p 122 &c), the state supported criminality described in this report and enclosed documents couldnt have been planned and carried out by mentally sound individuals. Were up against a most felonious bunch psychopathic good-for-nothings, and demonstrably incapable of governing themselves and others in a
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 68 juridically and otherwise acceptable manner, I firmly believe nowadays Norwegian Government and national assembly should be forcibly and completely replaced by way of well-accommodated international intervention. Notwithstanding the self-evident fact we cant accept a soiled pack criminal insanes as administrators, official representatives and civil servants, it may be convenient to take a further look at the United Nations Convention against Corruption.*
Although it lies outside the scope of this improvised survey to give a more comprehensive treatise on the legal applicability of the UN Convention against Corruption in this specific case, theres no doubt wise utilization of this and a couple other international conventions will provide the means necessary to remove and replace the present members of the Norwegian Government/Storting et al in a judicially acceptable manner. On account of strong historical ties and significant linguistic/sociocultural similarities, it may be convenient to replace inter alios nowadays Norwegian Storting/Government/Supreme Court members with highly intelligent and reliable Swedes..and I faithfully believe international fora like e.g the United Nations and the Council of Europe should work systematically and fast toward indicated goal.
Oct 28 ha I officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister, Minister of Justice and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment (cf Doc #9080).and, as expected, Norwegian authorities immediately responded with new crimes and haughty provocations. When it comes to the various crimes and harassments etc described in nearby UN report and corresponding documents (cf p 2), Norwegian authorities nervously aware itll be extremely hard to find as much as a single sane and uncorrupted psychiatrist/psychologist/judge/politician usw outside Norway not stamping their inordinate misconduct as violently psychotic and totally unacceptable have collectively decided to deny all factualities and cover up their execrable offences as best they can (cf pp 910 &c). This preplanned flimflam represents no substantial hindrance in any case, whereas the putrid falsehood, ignoble low- mindedness and deep-seated criminal makeup are clearly written all over these state employed felons wholl be utterly unable to deceive or impress truly sophisticated, genuinely truth-seeking and highly intelligent/intuitive persons. (Signed Nov. 29, 2007)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 69 As beforehand stated (cf p 3), it is positively laid down in sec's 2 and 3 of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, that various and international Human Rights conventions/covenants are fully applicable as Norwegian law and even prior to other legislation in case of controversy. According to the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec's 223225, criminal acts shall be reported to and investigated by the police..i.e; by the slimy larrikins committing a good many of the crimes mentioned in nearby Complaint and concatenated Documents! It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable degree of responsibility (cf pp 104121), and as a matter of fact and course; 2000 of the worst policemen/-women in active service should be locked up straightaway (the overall treatment of these prisoners should be extraordinary harsh indeed), and another 3000 of these chronic malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core criminals who can be sentenced and enjailed somewhat later without seriously endangering the noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses and penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) remaining personnel, chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very closely superintended and permanently excluded from the national police force whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and otherwise competent persons! The Norwegian prison service is entirely comparable with the police in respect of downright corruption, and the actual statuses of various courts of justice are animadverted upon e.g at pp 146147 cf Doc #627 etc. Without specifying the exact number of severely corrupted and particularly dangerous judges, district recorders, public prosecutors, politicians, health professionals AO necessary to shut in forthwith, a high-security prison camp providing adequate accommodations for 11 000* non-proliferation lifers will do in this connection (*not incl the 2000 police employees/executives beforehand indicated) another 20 000** of the most depraved public officials and civil servants should be summarily fired and, as far as practically possible, imprisoned later on (**not incl the 3000 police employees/executives beforehand indicated). While the Norwegian island Bjrnya at 74.31n 19.01e may be singled out as a suitable location for our gargantuan prison camp(-s), I'm afraid it's next to impossible to realize portrayed mass seizing and subsequent incarcerations without massive and hardbought international/military support..so, in consequence, the actual and permanent eradication of Norwegian state corruption is ordained by the stipulations irrevocably laid down in Doc #599 cf Doc #4000 item pp 152155 above.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 70 At any rate and for a while, we shall concentrate on certain guidelines the self-aware citizen may observe in order to battle and protect him- /herself against the subversive everyday corruption exerted by Norwegian authorities.
As for anno 2008, the scandalous and grossly criminal malconduct of Norwegian authorities throughout the year mirrors and substantially testifies to the sinistrous but most accurate portrayal found in Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway* (*FOCO) pp 196197. Whereas a precise and thoroughly verified description of the rotten and assuredly morbid terrorism waged by Norwegian (senior) civil servants already exist, it should be synoptically defensible to put forth a somewhat cursory presentation of a few main events taking place during 2008 and the first trisection of this year.
Article 2 Right to life
1 Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.
2 Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
a in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
b in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
c in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 71 The very first line of this article clearly provides that everyones right to life shall be protected by law, and in the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act secs 223 and 225, respectively, its explicitly laid down that:
(a) Criminal Acts should be reported to the police; (b) criminal investigation is initiated and carried out by the police.
As for the attempted murders described in nearby complaint, however, its readily provable that:
1) Mr. Geir Ove SKARBs batty plans/attempts to murder the plaintiff has been significantly encouraged through his contact with Norwegian police officers* (*Mr. Ove P FINNES, NO-Haram Sheriff Office, may be a particularly interesting reprobate in this connection!); 2) present and former police officers/executives actively and illegally has obstructed all criminal investigation and examination of witnesses in order to protect those directly or indirectly involved in the various and hereinabove specified attempts to murder the complainant; 3) its nothing new whatsoever Norwegian authorities plots, carries out and inspires/supports serious criminality aimed at maiming/killing the plaintiff cf pp 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69 above.
As documented by Enclosure #1* (*dated: Sep. 28, 2010) the police* (*i.e. the police headquarters in NO-lesund) was informed of the threatening phone calls as early as Sep. 28 2010, and as shown by Enclosure #2* (*dated: Sep. 30, 2010) the plaintiff made a formal witness statement at the sheriff office in NO- Brattvg one day later. It appears from Enclosure #3* (*dated: Oct. 01, 2010) that the complainant vi- sited the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg once more on Sep. 30 2010, and corre- sponding document also makes it unmistakably plain that Mr. Geir Ove Skarb should be arrested and subjected to a psychiatric evaluation ASAP. As evident from Encs. ##4 and 5* (*dated: Oct. 02, 2010) the plaintiff had already made a formal complaint against Mr. Geir Ove Skarb on Oct. 02 2010. Encs. ##6 and 7* (*dated: Oct. 07 and 11, 2010, respectively) shows that the police are given additional information about Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son Tommy, and the latter attachment also emphasizes that Mr. G O Skarb poses a danger to others and therefore should be locked up by Norwegian authorities. Enclosure #8* (*dated: Nov. 14, 2010) is a new and formal complaint against Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son Tommy Skarb, and the attachment also con- tains a reference to the plaintiffs report of Oct. 30, 2010. Enclosure #8A* (*dated: Nov. 14, 2010) is a formal complaint against Mr. Geir
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 72 Ove Skarb and Mr. Tommy Skarb directly handed over to Haram Sheriff Office (NO-Brattvg) on Nov. 14 2010; in this document the police and the psychiatric/public health care service are criticized because they in spite of the plaintiffs foregoing admonitions/requests have done nothing to arrest/ intern said persons. Enclosure #9* (*dated: Nov. 16, 2010) is a formal acknowledgment of receipt* issued by the police (*it was a tough job to acquire the actual documentation!).
As stated earlier in this human rights complaint, the first attempt to murder the complainant anno 2010 took place on November 13!
Article 6 Right to a fair trial
1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.
2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
a to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
b to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
c to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
d to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 73 e to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.
Whereas the violation of this Article essentially coincides with the various breaches of Article 13, the commentaries on the latter and nearby Article converges.
Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life
1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
Serious, multifarious and long-standing violations of this Article is certainly one of the favorite offenses copiously and scurrilously indulged in by repre- sentatives of Norwegian authorities read what the plaintiff wrote about this kind of criminality/terrorism in 2007 (excerpts from Incomplete Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 104121) sic:
The Norwegian 'Police Security Service' PST* (*Norwegian acronym), is an arrantly autonomous subdivision of the Norwegian police force popularly supposed to detect, record, counteract and prosecute etc illegal activities presumably endangering Norway's national security.
Normally we'll find a number of PST representatives at each and all police stations and sheriff offices in Norway, and as a rule of thumb the respective chiefs of police and sheriffs are personally and regularly engaged in various tasks on behalf of the Police Security Service other PST agents traditionally but not exclusively includes middle-aged police inspectors/intendants and chief administrative officers.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 74 PST does also routinely employ younger police officers and civilians in order to infiltrate, corrupt, espy, provoke and/or overthrow etc human rights and pacifist organizations, Red Cross groups and medical treatment facilities, peace corps, closed institutions, charismatic sects, students' associations, social workers' and servicemen's associations, commissions on racial equality and ethnical minority coalitions, trade/labor unions, employers' federations, political parties and local councils, executive committees/sessions, administrative appeal bodies, joint councils for the welfare of immigrants, training/advisory/examining boards, agencies for international development/cooperation, iron and steel trades confederations, travel agents' associations, broadcasting staffs/corporations, shipbuilding and engineering unions, commonwealth offices, public finance and accounting institutes, trade/industry federations, associations for the care and resettlement of offenders, prison officers' associations, foreign delegations/embassies/consulates, importers/wholesalers/retailers of Russian merchandise/cars, free trade unions, editorial offices and publishing corporations, civil/public services associations, municipal workers' unions, debt-collecting agencies, Masonic lodges (esoteric brotherhoods etc on the whole), Officer Candidate Schools and Officer's Reserve Corps, Home Guard Sub-districts and the Civil Defense Rescue/Wardens' Service, public/mental health services, fire departments/brigades, production platforms in the North sea, mining partnerships etc at Svalbard, the Coast Guard, signal and telecommunications engineering departments, manufacturers/importers of security locks and alarm systems, information bureaux, scientific/technical/managerial staffs, airtraining corps, Special Forces and ranger units, scuba/diving clubs, aero/parachuting clubs, motorcycle (MC) clubs, rifle/pistol clubs, athletic federations, youth clubs, research establishments, cargo ships (tankers), shipping/offshore companies, manpower services commissions, societies of operative printers/illustrators/typographers and other media personnel, communications and postal headquarters, transport organizations, diplomatic corps, equestrian federations (participation in outlandish horse/harness racing and show jumping may like attendance at other sports events provide excellent cover-up for espionage, break-ins, sabotage ventures, thefts and political assassinations), the highways and port authorities, the federal aviation administration, railway express agencies, coastal steamers, bus stations, the Customs, hotel/restaurant chains, holiday camps and travel agencies.....usw!
The Norwegian Police Security Service has established several companies and otherwise provided civilian jobs for many of their operative agents their officers may e.g disguise as shop assistants, storekeepers, sales representatives, managers/directors, dispatch clerks, electricians, telecommunications engineers, installers/fitters, personal computer retailers/consultants, system analysts, accountants, technical inspectors/repairmen, carpenters, cicerones, bartenders or superintendents. Here in Brattvg they operated a seemingly unpretentious shop offering properly bugged scanners enabling you to eavesdrop some of the radio communication between ordinary patrol wagons etc as far as we know this is the first time PST has entered upon a regular business venture exclusively to map the modi operandi of a single person...!
The actual prevalence of psychopathological dysfunctions amongst the general population of Norway is truly horrendous, and as correctly stated at page 10 of 90% of regular
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 75 Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic personality traits we've found none amongst present PST officers not explicitly afflicted with antisocial personality traits and varying degrees of paranoia and/or melancholia.
Since 1998 the Police Security Service has expanded both their formal and irregular cooperation with the Norwegian public health service dramatically (cf Doc #627, pp 6061), and a substantial percentage thoroughly depraved and mentally ill politicians are largely blameworthy for this baleful development (cf Doc #2037). Precisely like PST the Norwegian public health service villainously misuses the devilish cobweb-optics* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105106) and concealed microphones (clothes are frequently bugged) etc to espy, provoke/terrorize and harm particularly upright persons investigating, recording and legally complaining usw their diversiform criminality* (*nosocomial/iatrogenic delicts may comprise intentional/premeditated/involuntary homicide, sexual abuse/perversion, torture/harassment, willful poisoning/sickening, illegal detention/hog-tying, false accusations/complaints, thefts of money/organs/documents, illicit monitoring/eavesdropping, unlawful/offensive postmortem examinations, bill forgery, embezzlement, drug abuse/addiction, and radical falsification of medical records...etc). Intimate collaboration between the public health service and PST provides significant benefits for both camps; Norwegian physicians, psychologists, sociologists and nurses etc may e.g systematically abuse the misplaced confidence of uninformed dullards to collect medical data and different background information on subjects of special interest to the police, while PST may supply v.g technical know-how/equipment and bug, search, rob and surveil etc the victims private homes/computers and also render impossible adequate/impartial criminal investigation and legal prosecution of the various felonies committed.
Empirically some Norwegian Police Security Service officers are likely to employ lethal substances and spread contagious diseases in order to assassinate or disable their victims, and PST representatives may visit or break into hospitals/morgues/laboratories and certain factories/arsenals etc to underhandedly purchase or steal the chemicals/toxins/pathogens necessary to accomplish these goals. Norwegian policemen/-women permitted to associate freely with the common and noncriminal population in pandemia struck areas generally represents a special risk, and neither police officers, health professionals nor other Norwegian officials should normally be allowed to stroll unrestrained around in buildings/offices/apartments usw where they undisturbed can install and later abuse their satanic cobweb-optics and pinhole- microphones etc (these rules also and wholly apply outside Norwegian borders/territory) cf Doc #2037, pp 9192 etc. The cobweb-optics per se and its damnable misapplication is properly scorned in Isaiah 59, verses 58 (the Lords Servant speaking):
They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spiders web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 76 Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.
There are thousands of obnoxious examples illustrating the nationwide and massive abuse of the cobweb-optics and concealed microphones by PST representatives and the Norwegian health service, and one of the worst incidents in that respect doubtlessly took place here in my own county, Haram, in August 2001 when Mr Hector Hugo MIRANDA murdered his wife, children and himself in order to escape further persecution by Norwegian authorities. Mr Miranda a political refugee who had suffered human rights violating incarceration and torture in his fatherland, had initially been silly enough to place his confidence in Norwegian authorities who forthrightly betrayed him and secretly surveilled his most private abodes. In agreement with their arrogant and thoughtless disposition, the Norwegian health professionals and police officers engaged to carry out the AV and absolutely condemnable monitoring fatally underestimated Mr Miranda's vigilance and resoluteness; it's clear Mr Miranda had been perfectly aware the abominable espionage several weeks before peremptorily deciding to slay his family and himself, and that he strongly suspected other immigrants in the insular vicinity was continuously offended in the same, iniquitous manner. Mr Miranda certainly became severely shocked as he prudently uncovered some of the accomplished treacherousness routinely partaken by the humanoid filth he naively had trusted for years, and as the dreadful extension of the demoniac and acutely human rights violating spying appeared steadily clearer, he correctly concluded his family never could acquire an adequate degree of freedom, security and dignity etc in a nation largely governed by bloody criminals/terrorists, sadists and lunatics....! Subsequent to Mr Miranda's death, local health authorities and collaborating sheriff Mr Jens Vidar BJRKEDAL (cf Doc #240) naturally did their very best to cover up the illicit and lethally provocative maltreatment they'd exposed him to.....through their press releases and interviews those indirectly guilty of adjoining murders despicably portrayed themselves as the true victims deserving public sympathy usw!
The Norwegian police force overflows with insidiously double-dealing and racist jingoists surreptitiously exerting themselves to minimize the number of immigrants in Norway, and it should be throughly emphasized that the PST et al systematically endeavour to depict e.g Muslims and refugees from developing countries as an especially criminal, dangerous, base- minded and generally worthless part of the Norwegian population. In order to publicly create and uphold a superficially believable picture of most foreigners as a grave intrastatal threat, Norwegian police officers in increasingly degree through delinquent and hideously opprobrious cooperation with the official health service will make industrious efforts to provoke serious criminality and health problems etc amongst ethnic/religious minorities and non-native individuals generally. The standardized procedure followed by PST representatives and other police officers involved in this kind of viperous monkey business, roughly runs like this:
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 77
( 1 ) THE VICTIM IS SINGLED OUT AS AN UNWANTED OR PARTICULARLY EXPLOITABLE INDIVIDUAL
He/she may e.g:
Be a Rastafarian or profess the Islamic or Judaistic faith,
be an organized biker or actively engage in human rights and peacekeeping work,
belong to a colored race,
stand out as sexually attractive/abusable,
be endowed with certain talents arousing envy amongst the police officers,
possess disclosing knowledge about criminality committed by Norwegian officials and local authorities,
be sufficiently intelligent/righteous to constitute a noteworthy menace to corrupted/criminal officials,
appear especially suitable for terrorization and illegal experimentation,
have a conspicuously flawed character obviously susceptible to manipulation/indoctrination, malversation and threats,
be selected more or less randomly to satisfy the explicitly criminotic and subhuman urge many Norwegian policemen/-women harbors to humiliate, mistreat/harm, persecute and dastardly assassinate etc those superior to or different from themselves.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 78 ( 2 ) PREPARATORY STEPS TO SURVEIL/TERRORIZE/ ASSASSINATE SELECTED VICTIM ARE TAKEN
The police eventually in cooperation with the Norwegian public health service are at this stage systematically/clandestinely gathering information about the victim's whereabouts, everyday routines, hobbies, circle of friends, family, religious faith, political opinions/activities, educational/intellectual level, sexual inclinations, income/debt situation, medical status, criminal record and personal peculiarities etc. Usually there'll be photographic reconnaissance and strategical missions to detect overall security deficiencies and to determine the exact types of doors/windows/hinges/locks and alarms etc installed in the victim's domicile/office. The police are rather likely to plug into central supply points, overhead connections and main junction boxes etc in order to manipulate/surveil the victim's electricity provisions television sets, video cassette recorders, video monitors, PCs, printers, photocopiers, calculators, portable sound systems, ghetto blasters, CD/ROM/DVD players and phones are eavesdropped. If the PST agents deem it possible to approach the victim's habitat/workplace etc without detection or arousing suspicion, pinhole-microphones may be installed near the main entrance(-s) and perhaps immediately beneath/above windows expected to be left ajar minuscule photocells are oftentimes embedded close to entry-/drive-/stairways, and the infernal cobweb-optics are most likely installed above or next to all front/back doors and on the outer side of windowpanes enabling visual monitoring of the kitchen, sitting/living/dining room(-s), offices, bedrooms, bathroom(-s), walk-in wardrobe(-s) and basement etc (if it's possible to break into e.g garden sheds, garages, cottages and boathouses without leaving easily visible clues, one should expect these places to be infected with spy accoutrements too miniature radio/microwave transmitters and amplifiers etc may v.g be hidden between ceiling/floor joists and wall studs, beneath wall panels/sheathing, in board/foam/blanket insulation, or in warm-air and plumbing systems). GPS/GSM/digital vehicle tracking units may be tucked away in the victim's cars and motorcycles etc these units normally have a built-in motion detector and emits digitally encrypted signals betraying geographical vehicle location and speed usw. Tracking units may display shortest distance to target in meters/feet/yards, and are sometimes equipped with a sensitive microphone recording e.g conversations taking place inside or immediately outside bugged vehicle. Letters/e-mails are secretly opened/copied, and the house refuse scrutinized those approaching the victim's main entrance(-s) etc will be photographed and/or filmed by employment of the cobweb-optics* (*the zooming properties and pic quality of this satanic undercover tech are rather hellacious).
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 79 ( 3 ) ACTIVE INFORMATION GATHERING THE VICTIMS'S DOMICILE IS BUGGED INTERIORLY
Permanently eavesdropping/tracking the unsuspecting victim's phones and vehicles will enable the aggressors to plot his/hers quotidian schedule fairly precisely. They may e.g learn that the victim enjoys his tennis/squash training Mondays and Thursdays from 6 to 8 PM, that he's likely to be away from home Fridays between 6 and 9 PM as he regularly engages in voluntary/unpaid human rights work, that he's a gifted hobby mechanician painstakingly keeping his swanky Harley-Davidson MC in tip-top condition, and very much to the green-eyed cops discontentment that their sympathetic victim handles far heavier loads than themselves in honored weightlifting exercises as v.g the bench press, dead lift, squat and clean/jerk! Besides; reconnaissance has brought home that a standard pin tumbler lock produced by the massively police infiltrated Norwegian company TrioVing is installed in the victim's front door, and that his homely burglar alarm will be mere piece of cake to put out of action.
Now.....: let's assume that one Thursday evening at 6:30 PM while one of their training suit wearing agents discreetly keeps an eye on the tennis playing victim and another plainclothesman are watching the driveway leading to the latter's dwelling from his hideout at a nearby hill two experienced PST officers effortlessly sabotages the victim's unsophisticated alarm system breaking into his otherwise unguarded house utilizing one of their numerous master keys..... Due to outlined intelligence gathering the depraved burglars will possess pretty accurate information about the various rooms and movables taking care not to leave e.g foot- or fingerprints in macroscopic dust and normally avoiding speaking during their customary break-ins, the most deservedly detested intruders hardly ever throws away their time; while one of them expeditiously are installing their pinhole-tattlers, the other badguy may set up the fiendish cobweb-optics in a matter of minutes. Mikes are carefully concealed in (sheathing) boards/studs/joists etc close to v.g tables, armchairs, sofas and beds or wherever conversations are likely to take place! The cobweb-optics are traditionally installed alongside the upper/outermost borders of rooms and just above/behind/beside e.g; writing/executive/secretarial desks, dressing/computer/printer/dining tables, display/filing cabinets, control/instrument panels, message displays, combination locks, keyboards, safes and mirrors usw. The sickly preoccupation with palli/pudenda item anorectal and scatological topics clearly unfolds as the vicious PST officers installs their cobweb-optics in close propinquity to private beds, shower cubicles, bathtubes, bidets, toilets and certain washbasins usw.....; the devilish spy-optics will usually be strategically fixed 50120 centimeters above the floor on all sides of and in immediate proximity to indicated household constructions in order to provide maximal exposure of and prime facilities for photographing/videotaping etc genitourinary structures/functions, defecation and sexuality (it should be rightfully emphasized this kind of execrable/morbid/criminal sex- espionage has been actively and extensively partaken and shockingly oftentimes
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 80 initiated by rotten nurses and senior personnel employed by the hideously corrupted public health service in Norway cf Doc #4575 etc)...!
During their installation-break-ins, the PST thugs will bring with them some implements; a jimmy, hammer, file, multipurpose tool, needle-nose pliers, hacksaw, multimeter, an adjustable spanner, screws/nails, manual/electric drills/screwdrivers and various locksmithing/picking tools...etc. The jimmy and hammer will be utilized to carefully un-/refasten (sheathing) boards giving access to suitable hidings inside floor/walls/ceiling usw for v.g transmitters, transceivers, transponders, amplifiers, downconverters, repeaters, scanners, beaconing contraptions and a few other small-scale apparatuses. Amongst the preferred places to hide away electronic gadgetry, the extreme borders of attics/garrets should be mentioned especially the fact access to the interior part of walls frequently are gained by temporary removing the outer framework of doorways and windows, are also particularly noticeable... Since 1999 a steadily increasing number of PST officers have worn balaclavas, gloves and a protective/concealable KEVLAR vest during their break-ins, and contrary to former practices, a pistol firing the 9-mm Parabellum cartridge nowadays belongs to the standard outfit brought into your home by these disgustingly state supported assassins.
( 4 ) THE VICTIM'S FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ARE ACUTELY VIOLATED METHODICAL PROVOCATIONS AND ATTACKS
At this point of time the state authorized aggressors will lean back in their chairs studying the victim's intimate indoor privacy on a number of video monitors installed in front of them. The thoroughly perverted and largely brainsick PST bullies will lewdly and permanently record scenes of the nude victim taking a shower or engaging in normal, sexual activities with his girlfriend/wife etc. Surprisingly oftentimes harboring homosexual tendencies and nearly always morbidly obsessed with penile bulkiness and shapes, the official paraphiliacs selectively will go for close-up shots of assholes and penoscrotal features (It should be emphasized though that these swinish voyeurs seldom enact their homoerotic propensities through sexual intercourse as a matter of fact they're curiously dependent on their wives and concubines venerally as well as for moral support! Their mistresses are frequently spying and collecting information on behalf of their ball-fixated and most crooked under-the-cover dicks...)! Frowardly unwilling to distinguish clearly between well-paid and wholly consenting pornstars and the uninformed victims whose basic privacy they've villainously ruined through criminal intrusions and espionage, many of the PST officers 've watched
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 81 hundreds of hard-core erotic films exclusively for pleasure while their hounded observanda are asleep or otherwise don't require constant attention. Besides their sexually motivated malefaction, the PST terrorists will record the personalia of every person visiting or otherwise enjoying social contact with the victim all surveillance procedures referred to above may be extended so as to encompass the victim's family, friends and more peripheral acquaintances. The morally flyblown PST gangsters will also and especially register any personal peculiarities and routines of potential value for forthcoming attacks on the victim's health, life and belongings etc. As the state hired and notorious badasses feel they've acquired satisfying insight into the victim's household activities, systematical and covert provocations to spoil the latter's mental equilibrium are launched. In order to induce regular paranoia, the PST bugbears will design the variform harassment suchwise an alarming feeling of beeing persecuted results...:
Though he/she changed corresponding battery less than a month ago, the victim may wake up at the dead of night because the smoke detector in the hall right outside the bedroom emits high-pitched beeps precisely as it's supposed to when the battery is about to run down! The victim will either remove permanently or for security reasons replace the battery immediately however; if the latter solution is chosen, he or she may experience that the actual beeping reoccurs after a short period of time....! Inside the wall less than two meters from the victim's bed a hellish device constantly gives off ultrasonic noises inaudible to the human ear.....though great for keeping portrayed victim awake until daybreak (cf p 17)! Tired and confused after the nocturnal terrorism, the victim may discover that although it had functioned perfectly well previous evening the automatic filter coffee maker is stone-dead.....so, 4050 minutes later, he/she will leave for work without the customary cups of coffee necessary to expel matutinal drowsiness Arriving at his workplace, the victim may search in vain for essential stationery and documents etc and perhaps discover that half a pint of coffee has been ostensibly spilled on the floor underneath his or hers computer table..... Unaware the illegal monitoring and ongoing PSYWAR* (*psychological warfare), the victim is likely to suspect some of his workmates are teasing him or her.....which in turn and in perfect agreement with the evil-intended PST-plot may give rise to peculiar questions, conflicts and groundless mistrust. Finishing work, the victim may find his private car unlocked though he or she knows with absolute certainty the vehicle indeed was locked when they left it.....and returning home, the heckled thing may stumble upon a lump of wet concrete or some queer object placed just in front of their private main entrance! Well inside their apartment or house, the victim may observe a quizzical woman (actually a debauched stool pigeon hired and instructed by the PST officers) wearing a yellow sou'wester and spectacular poncho seemingly watching their residence
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 82 from a nearby parking lot, and 2030 minutes later they may receive a bizarre phone call. At this point of time the average victim have an impression of being recurrently haunted by disturbingly weird incidents, and a subversive insecurity feeling normally pervades their mind. In order to reinforce the rising paranoia and trigger a maximally overwhelming psychosis, the PST impalers will prolong the ultrasound directed sleep deprivation and oftentimes poison the victim's food or beverage with scarcely traceable doses psychoactive/hallucinogenic substances. Opportunistically striking while the iron is hot and loathsomely exploiting the chemogenic derangement, the PST officers may now phone the local emergency ward or mental health care personnel presenting themselves as v.g anxious neighbors, relatives or colleagues of the victim who prefers to be anonymous either because they fear violent reprisals or because their personal relationship with the victim allegedly and otherwise will be spoiled if their identity usw perchance should be betrayed.
Thereupon slyly faking genuine and warmhearted concernment the Norwegian police skunks speciously and rather detailed reports the victim's recent behavior as disquieting and socially offbeat with markedly psychopathological and potentially dangerous manifestations.....typically the threat portrayed and improper conduct represents to the surroundings and the victim's own life/health are massively accentuated/exaggerated. In some cases, however, the PST rats de facto will introduce themselves as police officers falsely claiming they've received several alarming complaints from trustworthy persons worrying about the victim's psychiatric status etc, and in other cases the entire and venomous hotchpot is an offensively rotten mishmash of clear- cut criminality and substantial corruption jumbled up through preplanned and deliberately lawless cooperation between the police and the ignominiously double- dealing public health service. Apprehended by the police and/or mental health care personnel the nescient victim at least initially may fancy he or she is surrounded by sincerely caring, respectable and reliable etc individuals anxious to relieve them from snarled and frightening circumstances. As the simplehearted victim most unwisely rattles off a truthful account of his weird experiences the preceding days, the frequently corrupted health professionals may nod encouragingly while launching a handful enmeshing though seemingly innocuous questions. When the victim a few days or weeks later possibly accompanied by their lawyer are permitted to look over and perhaps copy the different entries in their trumped-up medical record, they may at first feel fairly convinced they're studying the ghastly anamnesis usw of an absolute stranger...! The actual descriptions of their background and factual behavior etc may deviate perversely and distinctly systematically from the truth in order to falsely justify v.g compulsory and politically dictated commitments, diagnoses/charges and sadistic/destructive abuse of neurotoxic chemicals etc.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 83 The police schemed provocations which far and away may be more comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above may nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and stigmatizing alone.....and in this connection the most attractive of the alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until the victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation. Other frequently sought payoffs includes suiciding (the police may v.g surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception playing songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units exacerbating sadness and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping (may be induced e.g through intoxication, covert radiation and various accident setups), or simply assassination.
( 5 ) PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF ACHIEVED RESULTS
The police and their corrupted upholders will invariably and with hell-bent determination utilize all episodes/information real as well as fabricated and illegally provoked/obtained commonly deemed unacceptable to harm the victim and eventually the socioreligious/-cultural and ethnic etc subgroups pertinent to the latter. Most likely there'll be a number of vitiated press conferences/releases opportunistically stressing the economic needs and counterfeited, political downgrading of the police force the difficult and assumedly unwholesome working conditions of Norwegian police officers will be grotesquely exaggerated, and wage claims typically accentuated.....demands for extended access to weaponry and immoral investigation procedures are apt to follow, and troublesome regulations restricting human rights violating policemanship and fiendish totalitarianism supporting the absolute police state, normally shoot down By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists, the Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing lengths to actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious criminality committed by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and various mass media private as well as state owned are very likely to reflect this inglorious fact!
Cf Doc #2907 ANNOTATIONS.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 84 PST IN BRATTVG
Subsequent annotations may be read as an unmediated continuation of pp 8081 of nearby gravamen :
Suspecting no criminality or irregularities aside from the satanic terrorism systematically brought about by themselves and their festered accomplices (cf pp 1130 usw), the facinorous PST kooks nevertheless had their own and screwed motives for dragging on the trenchantly cranky harrying of me. During their nefarious and formerly described aggressions in Oslo, the various PST agents invariably reported they forthrightly had been detected whenever attempting to surveil or stealthily pursue me.....and this obviously represented an experiential novelty to the gunky flatfoots accustomed to undiscovered track and espy etc their usually woefully inattentive victims.....so after plundering my attic-lodging in Oslo (stealing ready cash, my passport, dozens of books, documents and miscellaneous thingamajigs everything perfectly legal stuff), these demon guided swine amongst swine decided to find out how it was practically possible to unmask their foul sleuths such and such!
In NO-Brattvg the PST goons forthwith acquired point-blank support for their wicked and lawless insanities from the evilest mortal ever settling in NO-Haram County; Mr Thorleif MARKEN (b Dec 16, 1940) the local sheriff! Mr Marken was formally and permanently appointed sheriff in 1989, and held this office until 2001 when he relinquished due to somatic illness. It's extremely seldom even amongst the worst criminals we're encountering individuals entirely destitute of at least a few creditable personality traits, but indeed; Mr Marken is one of these rare creatures! Of humble birth and without close relatives approaching his inordinate malevolence and reasonable Stanford-Binet IQ of 143 (cf Doc #1536, p 87), Mr Marken consuetudinary conceals his real intentions and feelings from exposure even the social interaction with his wife and children is a purely hammy business scurvily enacted to beguile these credulous everyday characters.
During his incumbency Mr Marken's behavior and ratiocination steadily grew more offbeat and befuddled. Initially suspecting I was a mere fruitcake, his clodhopping mind transmuted my markedly altruistic and human rights advocating being into a cold-blooded and superbly adroit crimelord in a matter of months....the uncontested coordinator and spearhead of all organized criminality particularly drug trafficking in Norway (later as he became even more cocksure as for my fancied leadership role, he generously expanded my criminal empire to encompass the entire Earth....)!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 85 Mr Marken's unsound and eminently iniquitous brain almost unceasingly hatched new plots to terrorize, harm and murder me.....: for more than a year the loaded pistol expectantly tucked away in the drawer unit of his executive desk he impatiently waited for an opportunity to unprovokedly gun me down if I happened to enter his office in a legal errand (afterwards he'd planned to explain I physically had attacked him and suchwise rendered self-defense unavoidable), and for many months he meticulously framed his damned blueprint for slaying me while enjoying my vespertine promenade (Mr Marken were well acquainted with several experienced big game hunters residing near his native homestead in NO-Vestnes County, and he'd planned to employ one of these as sniper convincing the ignorant and nationalistic marksman I was an extremely dangerous mass murderer and mafioso seriously endangering and sapping the very foundation of the whole, democratic nation....; You've shot bucks before, (name)!, Mr Marken cheerfully reassured himself. There's no evidence Mr Marken ever informed other PST representatives about his deranged designs.)! Otherwise Mr Marken was and supposedly still is an ardent adherent of poisoning and diversified application of maiming and lethal toxins/venoms/chemicals....: during the more than 20 break-ins at my private house in sen 4, Brattvg, the PST butchers presumably infected and destroyed with cardiotoxic substances alone bedclothes, towels, clothing, books and paraphernalia etc worth at least US$5000 (cf Doc #377 entry of Sep 29, 2000 etc)....!
While Mr Marken's personal PST engagement most definitely were morbidly out-of-bounds and totally indefensible, his established police lieutenant and second in command at the local sheriff office, Mr Kjell Brje MOE (cf Doc #377 entries of Oct 19 and 28, 1998), wisely maintained a significantly squarer course vis--vis other PST agents. In striking contrast to the uniformly atrocious and radically false Mr Marken, Mr Moe is an experienced and generally well-thought-of military senior officer of sensible empathic and beneficent proclivity. Mr Moe never partook the attempted assassinations regularly launched by Mr Marken and other PST officers, but alas he certainly hold back piles of information about serious crimes committed by his colleagues...!
Many of the lawbreaking PST activities in Brattvg has been upheld, actively partaken and sometimes initiated by the slimy whited sepulchers of the categorically scandalous and largely condemnable public health service. Offering suitable sheltering, personnel, matriel and vast assistance in many other respects, sickly self-righteous and perversely wrongheaded health professionals in increasingly degree has adopted and underhandedly adapted to meet their specific and illicit needs the throughly unprincipled spy-tech beforehand pertinent to special and intelligence gathering units of the police and armed forces alone! By studying pp 1530 and 8088 of nearby report, some of the unilaterally fiendish motives Norwegian health officials had and still have in regard to illegally surveilling, terrorizing and injuring me etc should be readily discernible/deductible. One of the truly queerish incentives in this connection nonetheless remains unexposed: Erelong the constantly vexing PST hellhounds had reported they were unqualified as to determine my exact intellectual
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 86 level, but that they anyhow felt positively convinced my general IQ exceeded 150 (farther down the mucky road as they acquired knowledge of some of my modest childhood feats, they consulted independent experts unreservedly declaring the actual accomplishments certainly equalled a Stanford-Binet IQ prodigiously transcending 200 and most probably surpassing 250 on said scale) and....their assertion quickly triggered the far and away most rabid, lawless and disgraceful quest for genius ever taking place in this wretched nation! So....; while vitiated PST hit men searched our private house in NO-Mauseidvg (cf Doc #4000, entry of Jan 2005) and several other dwellings from basement to attic collecting psychobiographical material, appallingly criminal namby-pamby toads from the public health service systematically monitored my private activities in sen 4, Brattvg....! And once the Doc's ##599 and 777 had been published on the Internet (on Oct 17, 2002 and Feb 22, 2003, respectively), 3 new SIGs appeared practically overnight: the first group were morbidly obsessed with clairvoyance/occultism and the prophecies of the French seer Nostradamus* (*b. 1503 d. 1566); the second with medicine and pharmacology (cf Doc #599, p 55); and the third with religion and apocalyptical exegesis etc. These illegally founded and macabre SIGs are still kept alive by brainsick, Norwegian officials (By the way the manifestly haywired preoccupation with parapsychological topics was not a wholly span-new craze.....: in 1998 when I as a result of all over fraudulent accusations were incarcerated at the political black hole at NO-Hjelset [cf Doc #377 entry of Oct 30, 1998], the Norwegian author and schoolmaster Mr Oddbjrn MYKLEBUST together with a member of the "fair sex" were allowed to enter corresponding spudhole. Mr Myklebust and his female attendant had been admitted by Mr Arne RUSET* [*cf Doc #377 entry of Nov 07, 2000] et al, and didn't introduce themselves or consult me directly they merely kept some distance trying to look convincingly uninterested. Mr Myklebust had formerly published a book about a moderately second sighted kinswoman Ms Olga TANDSTAD SKAUE and was currently compiling material for a biography about her clairvoyant father, Mr Karl Johan TANDSTAD, and other Norwegians presumably possessing paranormal faculties. Ignorant his identity, whereabouts and objectives were duly imparted, Mr Myklebust and the accompanying woman left the scene after a while slightly puzzled and discontended, I'm afraid...). Personal connections with the faintest smell of romance or sexuality 've always aroused fervent, pathological reactions amongst Norwegian PST officers and health personnel...:
In the autumn 2001 when I most presumably saved her oldest daughter from being stabbed to death the PST fiends broke into the private apartment of Ms Katrin JSOK (b Sep 20, 1965), NO-Brattvg. The PST swine suspected Ms Jsok and her underaged daughters were particularly interesting specimens since I offered them this kind of personal assistance.....so they conscientiously installed their hellish cobweb-optics in her sitting room, bedchambers, kitchen and bathroom.....etc! During the next weeks the exclusively male voyeurs concluded scrutinized the perfectly unremarkable, bodily makeup of the small family without detecting anything unusual such and such they the teenybopper and her much younger sister had a physique altogether matching their respective age-groups, while they described the sexual attributes and general build of Ms Jsok as less attractive...!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 87 The emetic and secret monitoring of Ms Inga DALSEGG (b Dec 14, 1974) has been sufficiently portrayed in Doc #4575 of April 30, 2005. The brainsick spies were much amused by Ms Dalsegg's whimsical behavior until they witnessed scenes described as explicitly pedophilic.....and after a while they were bewildered by some of her apparently morbid idiosyncrasies as well.
In the end of August 2005 I commenced the construction of a literally heartsome poster for Ms Tuva Magritt MOLVR (b Aug 21, 1985), NO-Langevg a nice girl and relative. Illegally downloading hundreds of banal sequences from the absolutely unpretentious composition process, the utterly ludicrous and wild-eyed psychologists/physicians etc nodded enthusiastically as they pruriently watched the "artful integration" of quixotic hearts and stars: "Aha so this is how a true genius works......interesting, very interesting, indeed!" It didn't take many hours before the nematoid apostles of Satan had bugged and severely infected Ms Molvr's modest apartment in NO-Bergen with their infernal cobweb-optics, of course... AV studying the homely routines of this religious and gentle lady for a while, the contaminators concluded Ms Molvr seemed slightly depressed and listless though they didn't quite understand why.....and since she never sullyed herself through improper conduct or off-putting remarks, the slimy onlookers strongly suspected she somehow had been informed about the ongoing monitoring of her privacy.
Dec 10 th , 2005, the Norwegian "Mensa-chick" Ms Anne Lene JOHNSEN showed up in NO- Brattvg. Somewhat delayed due to womanly makeup redoing, she smilingly appeared outside the shopping center I was about to leave. A psychologist involved in the reprehensible and totally unlawful monitoring of me had recently told Ms Johnsen I probably appreciated military garments and nice-assed gals, so she had purchased a pair of brand-new camo trousers and expectantly kneeling on her car seats she soon did her best to favorably expose her yummy and warlike bum...! It was a well-disposed and charming miss, indeed and a reasonably gifted one, too.....but alas: the lovable IQ-lass had been contemptibly befooled by stupider persons...! Some time ago ill-fated contaminants had broken into Ms Johnsen's private apartment installing their notorious cobweb-optics allegedly to examine her mental health and "mating qualifications"! Though the vile intruders left many and easily detectable vestiges, the overconfident Ms Johnsen failed to notice anything irregular.....so she had her sexuality and absolute privacy heinously and illegally violated by the state sponsored crackpots she unwisely relied on... Typically irradiating with delight when she managed to solve a given problem or formulate a particularly smashing sentence, the truly subhuman aggressors concluded Ms Johnsen not actually was crazy she was funny and slightly eccentric, only.....so they naturally decided to prolong the delectable monitoring of her indefinitely!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 88 During most of A 2006 I've had much and predominantly chummy contact with Ms Kjrsti Elida GUSECK (b June 18, 1973). Ms Guseck is a photogenic and rather amatorious primadonna, and the constantly marring PST officers and health professionals 've of course criminally downloaded dozens of strictly private photos of her from my PC and corresponding video monitor also shots of explicitly pornographic nature...! It goes practically unsaid Ms Guseck's private apartments 've been systematically and massively infected with AV spy-tech all her phone conversations 've been recorded, and comprehensive annotations on her intimate privacy journalized.....as a matter of fact Norwegian authorities permanently, illegally and lecherously have monitored the definite bedroom privacy of this half Austrian and sexually attractive lady for years! Cf Doc's ## 7084 and 8017 etc.
Official and sexually motivated violations of the palsy-walsy privacy of juridically blameless citizens are extremely commonplace in Norway today, and to the extent parts of corresponding monitoring are formally/clandestinely logged, Norwegian authorities will go to absolute extremes to give their monstrous criminality the slightest shine of respectability...: empirically exhaustively fraudulent accusations and the most absurd excuses may be recorded to cover up the principal motive of the scummy surveillance!
During their long-standing presence in Brattvg, the PST officers 've also carried out systematic and extensive monitoring etc wholly independent of the public health service and other official institutions....: they've e.g AV spied on health personnel engaging in sexual intercourse, WC visits and religious observances in their private homes (one of those suchwise espyed, Mr Sharan MOGHADDAM [cf Doc #377 entries of Oct 30, 1998 item Aug 31 and Sep 29, 2000 etc], has himself operated the cobweb-optics installed in my own and most private dwelling in sen 4, Brattvg)...!
and ohhh...: the PST paranoiacs does of course suspect somebody somehow actively and secretly 've watched themselves during their stay here in Brattvg it's a truly majestic mess, is not it....?!
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 89 By studying and comparing the different documents enclosed and once in a while referred to in this complaint, one should acquire a fairly precise idea of the abject essentials constituting the garden-variety terrorism perfunctorily carried out by the nocuous PST vermin.
Specifically returning to the human rights complaint at hand, the plaintiff reported the illegal audiovisual/technical surveillance of his private house on Nov. 16 2010 cf. Encs. ##10 and 11. As underlined in Enclosure #11, Norwegian authorities malicious and explicitly unlawful use of surveillance technology in the complainants home in NO-Brattvg has increased conspicuously after his complaint to the Norwegian Special Unit for Police Matters!
Norwegian authorities criminal abuse of electronic warfare and SIGINT applications are most decidedly long-standing and recurrent problems com- mented upon by the plaintiff many times earlier here are a few samples:
While I visited miscellaneous associations etc in Oslo October 6 th , spiteful officers from Majorstua Police Station did their best to denigrate my reputation vis--vis my landlord and a pensioned ambassador in the immediate neighbor- hood. A native Norwegian, the ambassador had been permanently stationed e.g in Thailand.....and its hardly unfair to describe him as a slimy turncoat with a clear-cut predilection for nasty intrigues, espionage and perversions.
The police arranged an appointment with aforementioned ambassador in order to utilize his private house a modest stones throw west of my apartment as a kind of headquarters for oncoming terrorism.....
Returning to my attic-lodging in the late afternoon, I immediately recognized intruders employing at least ne forged key had searched the unpretentious living room. Inspecting the small balcony adjoining the garret, I quickly discov- ered a couple insulated wires inchoatively hidden by corresponding girders and
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 90 corner stud. Following the thin cords with the eyes, two of them ran along the outside wall to the ground where they continued southwards, while another pair apparently led into the apartment beneath. I frequently employed said veranda for laundry purposes, and firmly knew none of described wires had been there a week ago..... Well lets see what these bullies are up to!, I said to myself. A few hours later I put on my tracksuit and went outside it was dark.
I barely ran a kilometer before heading for my dwelling house wading across a nearby river, I surreptitiously advanced from east.....reaching the residence garden unseen by the hectoring enemy. Id decided to inspect depicted wires somewhat closer.....and as supposed: from the southwesternmost part of the foundation those reaching the ground (largely concealed) continued westward to adjacent street before sneaking along the trunk of an aged tree almost to the top in the dim light from a vicinal street lamp I saw the threadlike conduc- tors traversing several meters above the road.....straight into the previously indicated ambassadors private garden! From my covert beneath the ambassadors domicile, I now studied the police officer I beforehand knew had been stationed in the former diplomats lawn. Partially hidden by surrounding shrubs he intentionally kept in the dark, but each time he sucked his revered cigarette a tiny gleam dimly illuminated his facial features it was one of the notorious undercover agents.
I cautiously withdrew the same way as I came, and ran around roughly 20 min- utes before returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei* (*a street) the ordi- nary way.
The next days the police continued their sentinelling outside the ambassadors house theyd installed cobweb-optics (cf p 9) inside my flat, and bombarded the attic with ultrasound by night (my landlord slept in a room underground, and were hardly seriously affected by the terror though he was noticeably more confused and indisposed than usual these days). The ultrasound-cannon was mounted on a tripod in the ambassadors garden (they always removed it before dawn), and drew electricity from a power socket inside his house he certainly knew about it!
The ultrasound-terror wasnt a success for the police; notwithstanding a few tactical adjustments, I carried on most of the human rights work etc as custo-
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 91 mary ( anyhow: perfectly aware the police illegally would surveil and terrorize her if she was found, Id forbidden my girlfriend to visit/contact me since the middle of September). During their numerous break-ins the police had installed several electronic hootanannies both inside and around my lodging one of these accursed gadgets were discovered in a narrow dead end of the attic less than 50 centi- meters from my bed...
The police behaved both ridiculous and unacceptably unethical, so Oct 10 th (at 02:20 AM) I signalized to their guard in the ambassadors garden to go indoor hed been seen in any case, I morsed. After fifteen minutes Id received no reply, so flashlight in hand I entered the balcony again. Id morsed 34 characters when the brand new flashlight battery permanently went out of busi- ness! I retreated inside, but 5 minutes later I was back on the modest veranda; a man in his thirties frenetically struggled to remove as much of aforementioned wires as possible! ungraciously stumbling in the jungled cords, he took flight like a badly moonstruck cuckoo upon detecting my peering presence.....!
October 11 th I attended a vesper service for university students at Misjons- kirken* (*a church), Oslo, while a bearded hobgoblin from the Norwegian Police Security Service attempted to photograph all the church visitors (the police had also stationed two well-known plainclothesmen right outside corre- sponding porch/aisle).
Returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei, I wasnt much surprised to learn the police again had burglarized it. Nevertheless a new and ominous trend had been initiated this evening; studying some vacuum-packed sausages I quickly discovered the miniscule pinprick underneath the price tag, and the newly baked rye bread had been contaminated with a scarcely visible granulate! This was, however, nothing but a sinister confirmation of what Ive been told by other human rights activists; Norwegian police verily utilized pathogens and poisonous substances to harm/assassinate persons ideologically or otherwise opposed to their ghastly extensive criminality suo motu and ex officio!
Going collectively bananas, the bootless police officers now launched a dozen strikingly hatefull attacks to annoy and cripple me.
The 15 th at 04:30 AM a toolwielding motorcyclist from Majorstua Police Station sabotaged the streetlight outside my dwelling, and forthcoming mid- night the entire street lay bathed in darkness!
Due to the nocturnal ultrasound-terror, I routinely took a nap in the morning be fore going to the center of Oslo. Underneath I heard my landlord utilizing the
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 92 phone before leaving in his car, and I prepared to sleep for an hour and a half it was the 24 th day of October.
Laying prone on the bed relaxing, an unexpected noise reached my ears; appa- rently the sound of water running in the domiciliary plumbing system! This was curious, because I knew the landlord not yet had returned so, under other- wise normal conditions, I should be the only person in just now..... Still reclining on the bed, Id prepared mentally to go downstairs when the oxygen evidently was sucked out of the small attic abode rendering breath- ing impossible! I flung myself out of the room rather swiftly rushing down the stairs heading for the exterior door..... Outside I forthwith entered nearby garage grabbing a laid away matchbox, I inhaled deeply before advancing upstairs. Id left the apartment door ajar, and now I tried to light one of the safety matches in the quarter-opened doorway it ignited, but extinguished after maximum 2 seconds. Stretching my arms 4050 centimeters into the apartment, I attempted to enkindle a couple matches.....but they didnt strike at all! Flinging the door agape, I withdrew alfresco where I quickly found the matches to be in perfect condition. Staying outside nearly 20 minutes before reentering the flat, I had no difficulties burning up one of the matches, but I unclosed a window and opened the bal- cony door though the stuffy air had a peculiar odor.....not unlike that of carbon dioxide gas (CO 2 ).
Staying indoor watching the apartment this afternoon, one of the uniformed and police cooperating rangers Id seen the preceding day either fell or very uncoordinately jumped down from the lower roof as I abruptly flung open one of my eastward windows....!
Anyhow the most pernicious assault by far this day, was planned and direct- ed by the well-known but feckless Norwegian parascientess Ms Anna Elisabeth WESTERLUND. A fatally improper onslaught, Ms Westerlund appeared out- side my flat next day carrying out a certain ritual before leaving.....; I wont characterize her as an upright or particularly wise individual!
Completely reneging juridical regulations and social codes, the cops subsequent days exploited every manifest opportunity to make trouble.....so in the be- ginning of November, I departed for Sweden.
Arriving in Stockholm, it became clear Norwegian police had informed their Swedish colleagues about my presence. Anyhow my mission was a perfectly legal one: forthcoming problems rather forecasted, Id decided to deposit some written and particularly valuable material outside Norwegian borders. Said stuff discreetly and successfully transmitted, I immediately returned to
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 93 Norway (Oslo/Norway 1992 excerpt from Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1619)
When Norway is marketed abroad, potential tourists are shown magnificent photographs of snow-covered mountains, blue fjords, gorgeous waterfalls and picturesque valleys.....and chauvinistic hucksters slyly delude gullible visitors to identify the national geography of Norway with the human nature of innate Norwegians! In view of the pestiferous aspects indigenously linked to credulous confusion of indicated perspectives, I find prophylactic affordable to emphasize that the Norwegians not ve created even ne of the sceneries they opportunistically and with great enthusiasm promulgate as their territorial fixtures theyve merely devastated and exploited terrain noncontractually feasible as semblable property to meet specific needs.
Much in the same way as Norwegians ve deluged beautiful landscapes and penstocked imposing freshets to generate hydroelectricity heating and illuminating their living accommodations, theyve ruined the gentle nature of fellowmen by confining them in lunatic asylums restraining the stream of life to produce misery temperamentally satisfying their dull-witted crave for personal power. In the selfsame hunt for dynamic energy to keep going their generator units and psychiatric factories, Norwegians expediently intermingle their self- ordained constitutional conception and corresponding notion regarding freedom of environmental manipulation, with the edified persuasion that human nature by analogy can be legally oppressed and liberally machinated at the mandament of Norwegian authorities. A concrete example of stated fallacy is found e.g in sec 37 in the Personal Data Act (Personopplysningsloven) of April 14th, 2000, which laically provides that Norwegian citizens can be visually monitored in their private homes and without their knowledge/consent, inasmuch as the national authorities claim theyre trying to establish whether the actual victims ever ve been or prospectively can be suspected, charged, indicted or convicted formerly or presently for factual or imaginable criminality cf secs 236 and 3841 ib! The official English translation of section 37 runs thus:
The provisions of sections 38-41 shall apply to all video surveillance. The same applies to sections 8, 9, 11, 31 and 32. However, video surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover such data as are mentioned in section 2, no. 8, litra b, is permitted even if the conditions set out in section 9, first paragraph, are not fulfilled. When image recordings from video surveillance are stored in a way that makes it possible to retrieve data relating to a specific person, cf section 3, first paragraph, the other provisions of this Act shall also apply. However, the
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 94 obligation to obtain a licence pursuant to section 33 shall not apply to video surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover data such as are mentioned in section 2, no 8, litra b. Through practical application of common judicial analogy, we find that the Personal Data Act also lay down that the use of vg hidden microphones are permissible in order to allegedly or objectively collect information specified in section 2 a deduction perfectly congruous with authentic detection and destruction of dozens police installed and usually eddy currented or piezopowered bugs in the interior sheathings, skirting boards, wall studs, head frames, sill rails and ceilings etc of our private dwellings! With respect to the visual surveillance in consideration, the cobweb-optic compactly portrayed in Doc #123:VII above, invariably ve been employed. Incontrovertible findings of larger amounts cobweb-optics in psychiatric institutions must be seen in relation to stipulations expressed in the Personal Data Act secs 8 and 9 (nurses are normally uninformed about the optics used).
The cobweb-optic ve been grossly misused by the Norwegian police since, at least, 1990. Initially the Norwegian Police Security Service utilized the cobweb- optics to secretly supervise foreign consular personnel and embassy representatives, a few espionage suspected Norwegians, to secure Norwegian Government institutions and to perpetrate security analyses of persons in official key positions. Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse of audiovisual spy-tech in Norway ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers are now picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption. The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: virtually always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential conversations/happenings and to copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the sum of documents relating to the case cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms! (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 6061)
As regards official criminality in Norway, the number explicit lawbreakings recorded by adjacent branch of Hellvow Anticorruption clearly reflects the
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 95 execrable and usually well-masked contempt for human rights, democratic standards and the basic principles of corresponding legal system distinctly prevalent amongst Norwegian officiaries practically routinely abusing their professional privileges to e.g seriously offend fellowmen and consequently elude the criminal investigation and prosecution juridically pertinent.
The blatant hypocrisy and treacherous opportunism by and large characterizing nowadays Norwegian officials, was befittingly coined bigoterie in medieval France germanely delineating the grungy and widespread practice amongst Norwegian Normans to worship the Christian Trinity as well as their heathen deities out of strictly materialistic motives.....whereas following Christian baptism, the French regularly bestowed generous gifts on converted pagans. So, the largely marauding Norwegians shamelessly exploited Gallic benevolence and Catholic navet maximally, and quite a few of them underwent sacramental affusion and immersion more than seven times.....!
Ill return to described tartufferie and indecent fickleness farther down in this document forasmuch as these are indigenous and statutorily constitutional characteristics still indispensable to official, Norwegian corruption.
When the Norwegian prime minister Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK in 2001 and subsequent to a nervous breakdown and atypical burnout declared he had felt like nought prior to and during the actual collapse in 1998 (cf vg the front-page of Dagbladet [NO-Oslo] of May 19, 2001), he conspicuously portrayed the massively preponderant inferiority complex and religious insecurity verily typifying the Christian officials keenly advocating widespread abuse of the cobweb-optics (cf Doc #627 above, Appendix) and given nano- microphones etc in strictly private, Norwegian homes. Like the weeds in our gardens, whats otherwise harmful and undesirable tends to spread rapidly.....and the mephitic deviltry of Mr Bondevik (cf e.g Doc #1022 above) and the official bushbilkers around him, are no exception! Let me cite one of my own aphorisms:
Nowadays Norway most strikingly resemble a melanotic sarcoma metastatically spreading its fatal perversion and intrinsic hellishness worldwide!
Informed readers will recall the atypical, political contact between the commander-in-chief of Indivisiblia, Mr Jorge Rambler SHRUB, and Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik and his government representatives etc last year. Through my Internet pages Mr Shrub had learnt about the cobweb-optics, and Mr Bondevik had duly confirmed the abuse of this spytech ( for purportedly decent reasons, of course ) in a recorded phone conversation.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 96 Mr Bondevik and his depraved accomplices was perfectly aware able and nationally independent investigators readily would uncover dozens of heinous and officially supported/authorized violations of vg international human rights covenants ratified by Norway, and thus was desperately in need of obtaining goodwill from the Indivisiblian government AO. In this way the military powerful Indivisiblia effortlessly purchased cobweb- optics and necessary know-how about producing it. Six months ago corresponding spyoptics was already field operative in Mr Shrubs homeland. The detestable and downright abuse of cobweb-optics will now accelerate significantly, and erelong be a cursed threat and irritant hideously havocking the privacy of guiltless citizens worldwide.....; dont forget to compli- mentNorway for forthcoming iniquity! (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 9091)
Though fully aware Norwegian authorities will make no honest attempts whatsoever to clear up grave criminality committed by v.g their corrupted police officers and judges, theyll receive a pro forma copy of nearby notification. No pieces of evidence will be handed over to Norwegian authorities, and its beneath the dignity of upright and informed persons to associate friendly with their depraved representatives. Norway will soon cease to exist altogether, and in respect of this fact were unwilling to spend time on elaborate reports.
Shortly, Norwegian police officers are accused of:
1. ATTEMPTED ARSON (in my private house, NO-Brattvg, the 13th inst between 12:30 and 1:00 PM),
2. SABOTAGE (of an oil-filled radiator [in my private house, NO-Brattvg, the 13th inst], an electric cooker [in my private house, NO-Brattvg, Feb 03 ha between 9 and 9:15 PM] and my fax machine [in my private house NO- Brattvg Nov 04, 2001]),
3. BURGLARY (in my rented cars lately May 16 ha between 10:30 and 11 PM),
4. AGGRAVATED THEFT (from the private car of my cousin in NO- Mauseidvg Mr Knut M Skotheimsvik Oct 17, 2003), and
5. TERRORISM (more than 200 incidents....).
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 97 The police officers guilty of described criminality are demanded prosecuted, sentenced and punished. (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 99100)
Oversender gjenpart av en mail jeg forskte n deg med tidligere i dag (fra werner@nowzer.com) oversendelsen ble blokkert av slimklumpene i politi- /lensmannsetaten (brukte en PC hos Haram Folkebibliotek, Brattvg):
Hei!
Her i Brattvg har vi stadig og i kende grad problemer med snrrunger fra politi-/lensmannsetaten som bl.a stjeler og saboterer mine private eiendeler.
Denne uken (natt til mandag kl 04:1504:30) hadde man f.eks nok et innbruddsforsk rettet mot garasjen min i sen 4 to kvisete drittsekker fra politietaten rev ls en lsebolt p garasjedren, men uten komme seg inn. Tidligere har svina stjlet en nkkel til samme garasjen hvor de saboterte en helt ny gressklipper m kjpe ny i r (nkkelen til garasjedren ble stjlet fra en privatbolig i Mauseidvg)!
Ellers i r har disse satans, uniformerte lakeiene bl.a sabotert en kostbar verdensradio, delagt ringeklokker, laget massevis av problemer p Internett, brket med innbrudds-/brannalarmer, terrorisert hedersmennesker mer enn 80 r gamle og klusset med strmforsyningen i sen 4 & 7 (Brattvg).... De har ogs begtt mer enn ett dusin innbrudd etc hos mine venner/slektninger. Vi fr lage en formell klage p disse og noen av de andre forbrytelsene minusvariantene har begtt....s du fr ske om fri rettshjelp for meg snarest (gi beskjed dersom du trenger underskriften min)!
Sivilombudsmannen*/Datatilsynet skal f oversendt en kopi av dette uformelle notatet. (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 111112)
Mnsteret for den audiovisuelle &c monitoringen av strengt private oppholdsrom i sen 4, Brattvg, undergikk denne uken merkbare endringer ; de politiansatte terroristene prver n i strre grad enn tidligere skjule korresponderende overvkning, og de har tydelig fordekt jobbet med aktivere tidligere unyttede linker for viderefre trakasseringen.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 98 Atferdsendringen kan skyldes at sivilombudsmannen har intervenert, eller at Kjell Magne BONDEVIK 10. ds beskte Brattvg. For helt f slutt p den ulovlige spionasjen, er det imidlertid ndvendig frata forbryterne alle tekniske muligheter for utve den fagre ord og lfter om bot og bedring fra misdederne, m ingenlunde stoles p! Mht sivilombudsmann Arne FLIFLET s er han som forutsagt i mitt (uformelle) brev av 07. ds n satt under absolutt illegal og sterkt foraktelig overvkning. Hr Fliflet er nok en tffing det blir vanskelig kontrollere effektivt, men han br merke seg at utstrlingen fra f.eks digitale/personlige/portable databanker/adresselister/dagbker samt kalkulatorer etc med noks enkelt utstyr kan oppfanges og dekodes p temmelig lang avstand (kfr TEMPEST). Legger han inn info p mobiltelefonen sin, vil denne oppfanges fr eventuell videresending i det hele br alt digitalt vre nei-ting for ham n (.....dersom han ikke nytter denne forrderske teknologien til spre nye tilsiktet desinformasjon)! PST har g i meget stor grad misbrukt enhver praktisk anledning til bugge f.eks klr (srlig ytterty), bagasje og husdyr!
En av hovedmennene i denne saken teologen Kjell Magne Bondevik, har i lang tid innstendig bedt om slippe helvetesstraff for sin opplagt forsettlige delaktighet i de bestialske overgrepene. Vel.....; dersom hr Bondevik via sannferdige og fyllestgjrende vitneml etc aktivt bidrar til at flest mulig av de skyldige i sammenfallende sakskompleks sekulrt straffedmmes, har de tallrike bnnene hans knapt vrt forgjeves ( av penbare grunner br den eventuelle oppryddingen pbegynnes i god tid fr han gr av som sjef for regjeringen). N fr vi se om Norges statsminister har ryggrad og vett til forfekte sannhet & rettferd.....det vil nok lnne seg!
Saken for vrig brer utvetydig preg av at mange av de skyldige er sinnslidende dog strafferettslig tilregnelige, og det er liten tvil om at lange sikringsdommer er betimelig nr de fleste av disse skal straffedmmes. Det er spesielt forstemmende men slett ikke uventet at s mye helse personell velvillig har deltatt i de ekstremt graverende og eksplisitt morbide krenkelsene* (*sannsynligvis pga de mange rikspolitikerne/embetsmennene etc involvert, de verste eksemplene p systematiske menneskerettighetsbrudd i Norge etter annen verdenskrig).
Jeg sker ufortrdent om politisk asyl selv om norske myndigheter (sikkert for kunne plage meg ytterligere) rutinemessig forsker stjele/pne disse legale petisjonene til utenlandske diplomater oa.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 99 Under arbeidet med forfatte dette begrensede mementoet, har representanter for fienden aktivt lastet ned stoffet p PCene sine.....dette vil ikke hjelpe dem snarere tvert imot!
Redaksjonen avsluttet kl 22:15. (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 114115)
Im presently composing a comprehensive United Nations petition vs the Kingdom of Norway.
Corresponding complaint is addressed to the Committee against Torture, and demanded dealt with in agreement with Article 21 (c) second period in the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treat- ment and Punishment.
Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen consequently they ve kicked off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various human rights organizations in this case!
Representatives for Norwegian authorities ve already decided to illegally halt etc said petition if it proves too disclosing.....so; Im wondering if the UN can offer me special protection against unlawful interference
The UN should send their prompt reply to my counsellor in NO-lesund:
Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG, P.O. Box 837, NO-Aalesund, NORWAY (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, p 124)
Siden 1992 har sen 4, Brattvg, vrt sted for noen av de mest forrykte og ondsinnede terrorhandlinger som noensinne er begtt av norske kommune- og statsansatte.
Den 03. mars 2007 drev Wilh. Werner WINTHER som siden 1993 har bebodd anfrte adresse med malerarbeid i korresponderende privatboligs annen etasje da han fikk besk av venninnen Kjrsti Elida GUSECK som fortalte at hun nylig hadde vrt i hndgemeng med moren grunnet et uavklart eierforhold. F minutter etter fr Gusecks ankomst oppstod kraftig rykutvikling og muligens pen ild i husets kjelleretasje idet den elektriske strmforsyningen til denne
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 100 delen av huset ble angrepet og sabotert av offentlig ansatte som grovt misbrukte tilgjengelig og i utgangspunktet militr teknologi. Klokken var p dette tidspunktet ca 17:30, og de aktuelle deleggelsene fremgr av det fotografiske bilaget "Enclosure S-82" som inngr i hr Winthers formelle FN-klage og menneskerettsrapport "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway"* (*dette dokumentet er fortsatt under utarbeidelse). At man tidligere hhv 13. jun 2004 og 28. okt 2006 har vrt utsatt for lignende sabotasjehandlinger iscenesatt av norske myndigheter, fremgr av FN-vedleggene "Enclosure S-80" og "Enclosure S-81". P side 137 i ovennevnte FN-rapport fremgr at ambulansesjfrene i Haram kommune i stor grad har medvirket til den illegale overvkningen og terroriseringen av innboerne bl.a i sen 4, Brattvg, og det er utvilsomt korrekt underkaste disse dypt foraktelige utskuddene samt "visse" og ikke mindre foraktelige politiansatte grundig etterforskning ogs i tilknytning til beskrevne branntillp den 3. ds.
Ambulansesjfrene har tidligere senest den 14. fm vist aggressiv glede over antatte nederlag pfrt fr Guseck, og formodentlig medvirket ansatte i helse- og sosialetaten i Haram kommune til fremprovosere hennes fars ddsfall* den 29. sep 1992 (*i.e ved omfattende og eventuelt forsettlig feilbehandling).
Den notoriske/offentlige kriminaliteten blant ansatte i Haram kommune er for vrig omtalt i undertegnedes Doc's ##5817, 6009, 6097 og 7011 mv.
Man tror at innholdet i noen SMSer fr Guseck og hr Winther utvekslet frstnevnte dato har virket ansporende p gjerningsmennene:
Tekstmelding mottatt fra tlf #908 99 829 i.e fra fr Guseck kl 12:16 den 03. mars 2007:
"Du har vel begynt m gjerdet til Ingolf tenker jeg. Jeg har vondt i halsen. Har spist mange halslinser i hp om at det hjelper."
Svar sendt fr Guseck fra tlf #974 83 483 i.e fra hr Winther den 03. mars 2007:
"Gjerdet tja; grunnet malingen denne uken mtte jeg vaske klr i dag..og vaskemaskin/trketrommel gr p samme strm- kursen som sag & arbeidsbelysning jeg m nok heller male i dag!"
Ved siden av pfre ham alvorlige helseskader og merutgifter, har et av hovedmlene for norske myndigheter siden 1992 vrt sabotere hr Winthers inntektsgivende arbeid, boligstandard og personlige relasjoner.
Fr Guseck er omtalt p s 120 i FORMAL COMPLAINT (det er hevet over tvil at fhv helse- og sosialsjef i Haram kommune Vegard AUSTNES [jf Doc 's
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 101 ##6097 og 7011 etc] er blant de som har vrt godt kjent med og delaktig i den illegale og uvanlig detestable monitoringen osv av fr Guseck o.a), og han hvis gjerde mot betaling skulle repareres Ingolf Peder ABELSETH er omtalt i Doc #5817 som utgjr en del av samme FN-klagen.
Advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, lesund, har fullmakt til politianmelde kriminalitet beskrevet i denne orienteringen p vegne av hr Winther. Dommere o.a som benekter eller p annet vis sker dekke over anfrte kriminalitet mv, skal begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet f.eks etter straffeloven 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124, 125, 145, 145 a og 275 cf 62 og 63 ib, item domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113 og 116 etc. (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp138140)
Dear Mr Aspehaug:
As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were quite busy here in NO-Brattvg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in sen 4 13 14 times! Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier cf Doc's ##7084 and 7090.
As regards my comprehensive report of the 13 t h
previous month (cf Doc #8123), this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-lesund. Mr Karoliussen together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr Knut STORBERGET are, of course, amongst the numerous male- factors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and natural life in this unparalleled case.
Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in NO-lesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights organizations addressed to your office cf Incomplete FORMAL COM- PLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611 &c.
Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw!
Very truly yours, Wilh. Werner WINTHER
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 102 PS (Sep 14, 2007):
Before handing over nearby letter, I shall make mention of a dubious device extensively and criminally abused by the public "health" service in Norway; the "Antenna Carephone" (see illustrations below). The Antenna Carephone is strategically installed in private domiciles by representatives of the public "health" service, and connected to a day and night manned central through the state-owned telecommunication network* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105107 &c).
Frequently stationed in living rooms, kitchens, and near beds, the Antenna Care- phone provides excellent opportunities for illegally overhearing/recording various indoor activities..and, as demonstrated by practically innumerable incidents the last quinquennium, these "Carephones" are systematically abused by odiously corrupted "health" personnel eavesdropping private conversations and sexual activities etc! Those abusing the Antenna Carephone here in NO-Brattvg has mostly been female nurses living out their psychosexual disorders and criminal predisposition. (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp159160)
SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY REPORTED:
Oct 27, 2007:
At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus Downloader. The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.
Oct 28, 2007:
In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggres- sive attack aimed at ruining my PC. The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 103 Nov 01, 2007:
Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM while (utilizing my PC in sen 4, NO-Bratt- vg) editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT- copies of said pics. The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.
Nov 03, 2007:
Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM while I visited the shop "RS Elektronikk AS" in NO-Brattvg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middle- aged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior.
Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program "Microsoft Word".
Those guilty of described crimes should all be legally charged/sentenced/punished.
Due to the numerous/unprovoked/illegal and intentionally life-endangering attacks masterminded and dastardly carried through by Norwegian (senior) civil servants since 1992 (cf "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway" by Wilh. Werner WINTHER), Norwegian authorities are denied personal contact with me juridical questioning actively supervised by armed and UN-appointed guards from trustworthy Member States may be allowed though, cf the Norwegian Constitution Article 93*:
*In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Storting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international organization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right, within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities, although not the power to alter
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 104 this Constitution. For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution. The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.
Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in sen 4, NO-Brattvg.
Norwegian authorities should address all requests/remarks etc to my lawyer in NO-lesund, Mr Johs A ASPEHAUG.
Sincerely, Wilh. Werner WINTHER
PS:
It's especially discreditable but not at all surprising the hereinabove reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*:
*Article 86
The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and last instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting against Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court or of the Storting, for criminal offences which they may have committed in their official capacity. The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accordance with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings before the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years. The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment. The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 105 Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside. Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases, for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall resign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.
*Article 87
The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceedings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two. The same shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court. If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by law. If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively retire following the drawing of lots. When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that the Court due to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of whom at most ten are Members of the Lagting and five Justices of the Supreme Court. The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots. If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Members of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court numbers at least ten judges. Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the composition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 106 In any case let me, finally, quote a few lines from FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway, p 136:
"Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap--pie Pharisaism and scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting to belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive corruption. To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they can protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.....verily; your idealistic and perchance pusillanimous approach is nothing but an enheartening incitement to these naturally schizoid and overly low-minded felons! Instead of mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities mayheming the human rights, the world community at large and international fora in particular should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and legally punish corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality. More precisely, we can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and cosmopolitan intervention unit of superbly fit and comprehensively trained police officers duly commissioned to secure final proofs and forcibly apprehend state supported culprits e.g in Norway... Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than conventional counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to prevent abuse of portrayed unit is crucial.
In any event and this point can hardly be overstressed: before international and politically powerful alliances are willing to resolutely and with required sternness arrest, imprison, convict and otherwise treat Norwegian officials in accordance with the categorical condemnation the latter's satanic fiendishness, double-dealing and odious corruption ex officio en effet calls for, the well-meant but woefully uncharged pro forma chiding normally launched by human rights organizations/tribunals scarcely becomes more than a waggish and downright encouraging brutum fulmen to Norwegian authorities!"
PPS:
Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in No-Brattvg the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC the 6th inst my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down (phone #: [+47] 92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the Norwegian company NetCom)...! In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention to the fact I the 5th inst visited web sites like:
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 107
Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO), http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),
Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia, http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),
WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network, http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),
A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity, http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42 CET).
I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private Yahoo! Mail contacts (wwerner77@yahoo.com).....and, in view of the stark illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this case, its quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like sabotaging my Internet connection! (Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp167172)
Norwegian authorities unlawful abuse of SIGINT technology anno 2011 has clear-cut objectives:
To terrorize and harm the plaintiff; to impede and stop nearby human rights complaint;
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 108 to steal, manipulate and destroy proofs of official corruption/criminality in Norway; to gather information apt for bamboozling, influencing and buying off members of international human rights courts/tribunals; to give their innate villainy/psychopathy/criminalism an outlet; etc!
Article 13 Right to an effective remedy
Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.
The national police force are in all likelihood the most corrupted occu- pational group in Norway, and the actual prevalence of psychopathy and stark criminalism amongst its various members extremely alarming..indeed: the responsibility for registering, investigating and prosecuting criminality in said country are left to individuals particularly unfit for this and all kinds of work requiring a certain degree of moral integrity.
Very much aware the deep-seated and widespread corruption amongst former and operant police officers/executives in Norway, the complainant forthwith filed formal complaints against (vg) Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS* (*leader of the Norwegian Special Unit for Police Matters former police executive), Mr. Tor-Aksel BUSCH* (*Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions former police executive) and Mr. Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG* (*assistant chief of police, NO-Hedmark county) as soon as they had turned over written/ concrete evidence of their depravity cf Encs. ##12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27. However, in a crime case of this severity where several Norwegian politi- cians and (senior) civil servants premeditatedly have contributed to at least three attempted homicides and consequently done their best to protect them- selves and the directly involved would-be assassins against all kinds of invest- igation/examination etc, its impossible to obtain a lawful and uncorrupted handling of the various reports as long as the procedural responsibility rests on Norwegian authorities. And alas; with respect to this specific case, the official procedures has
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 109 exclusively been left to former and present police officers/executives more or less guilty of corresponding attempts to murder the complainant..and the result has, perfectly as anticipated, been a monstrous and most nauseating parade of state/Government supported malversation/criminality in Norway!
The Norwegian Courts of Justice Act provides that:
1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60, cf sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21); 2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (sec 76, cf secs 52, 53 and 65 ib); 3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 cf secs 52 and 109 ib).
Cf. the Norwegian Public Administration Act secs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 etc.
Moreover in the Norwegian Constitution, Article 110:c, its stressed that (sic): It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 secs 2 and 3).
On account of preceding observations it should be evident to the nth degree that e.g. Mr. Tor-Aksel Busch and Mr. Jan Egil Presthus are entirely disqualified from exercising any kind of judicial authority in this case, whereas they both are formally reported and responsible for wilfully provoking at least two of described attempts on the plaintiffs life cf. Encs. ##10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 26 etc. In addition, as underlined in Encl. #26, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr. Knut STORBERGET are amongst the plug-uglies actively supporting the despicable and utterly criminal conspiration against the com- plainant...!
Norwegian authorities premeditated and recidivous violations of Article 13 are absolutely obvious and easily provable...; instead of offering the plaintiff an
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 110 effective and impartial/competent remedy enabling him to enforce/recover his statutory rights and freedoms, Norwegian authorities have done their best to illegally terrorize/persecute him and ensure his well-founded complaints against government-employed/-supported criminals are grossly mishandled! Whenever the plaintiff files a complaint against Mr. Tor-Aksel Busch, the Nor- wegian Director General of Public Prosecutions attempts to pass over corre- sponding prosecution and suspension demand in silence or, alternatively, for- wards the report etc to Mr. Jan Egil Presthus who of course perfunctorily drops the case forthright.......and, vice versa; when the plaintiff files a formal complaint against Mr. Jan Egil Presthus and the Special Unit for Police Matters, the totally corrupted Director General of Public Prosecutions are the only and highest appellate body.......and needless to say Mr. Busch will immediately drop all accusations/charges against Mr. Presthus and his special unit without investigation and justified reasons!
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
It appears from Encs. ##20, 24 and 26 that Norwegian authorities decision not to institute legal proceedings are final and inappealable cf. Article 35 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
The plaintiffs appeal of July 08 this year (cf. Encl. #26) has never been ans- wered, and Norwegian authorities last decision not to prosecute is dated June 21, 2011 (cf. Encl. #25) cf. Article 35 1 of the Convention for the Protec- tion of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Nearby complaint is well-founded and clearly admissible in agreement with Article 34 and 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the plaintiff hereby certifies the correct- ness of submitted information:
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011 111 The plaintiff doesnt use the state controlled postal services of Norway, and all written communications addressed to him should be sent to: wwerner@airpost.net
Brattvg/Norway Oct. 01, 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther (Plaintiff)
PS:
Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER DlIte: 28.09.2010 05:50:54 To: post .sunnmore!Cl! po IitieLno Bee: wwerner(clJairposLnet Subject: Fw: [SPAM] SMS-TRUSLER ANMELDELSE/ORIENTERING Politiet bes f01ge opp saken --- hr Tommy SKARB" begjceres eventuelt (jf strl 44) siktet, tiltalt og straffet. Politiet kan fa kopi av korresponderende trussel ved a oppgi et mobiltelefon# denne kan sendes til. Hilsen Wilh. W WINTHER -------Origina/ Message----- From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 28.09.2010 05:42:16 To: post@thermotank.no; post@metpro.no Subject: [SPAM] SMS-TRUSLER THERMOTANK A/S 6220 Straumgjerde METPROA/S 6260 Skodje SMS-TRUSLER FRA TOMMY SKARB0, BRATTVAG Undertegnede har i natt mottatt alvorlige SMS trusler fra Tommy SKARB", 6270 Brattvag, og ber om en snarlig forklaring pa hvorfor vedkommende nytter en mobiltelefon registrert pa Thermotank A/S til kriminell virksomhet (det aktuelle tlf.nr er: 99286641). 28.08.2011 ENCL. #1 Hr SKARB0 har ogsa sendt undertegnede SMS henvendelser fra en mobiltelefon registrert pa METPRO A/S (det aktuelle tlf.nr er: 90977398). SMS-sendingene viser at hr Skarb0 er sinnslidende, og at han utgj0r en fare for allmenheten --- forholdet er innrapportert til norske myndigheter. Det understrekes for 0vrig at undertegnede aldri har hatt personlig kontakt med hr SKARB0 og dennes familie, og at det foreligger opplysninger om at nevnte person er nyseparert og sliter med alvorlige alkoholproblemer etc. Med hilsen Wilh. W WINTHER Side 2 av 2 28.08.2011 ENCL. #1 Side 1 av 3 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 30.09.20 I 0 12:22:21 To: post.slInnlllOreci;poIitiet.no: \\ wcrncrfclairpost.net Subject: NYE OPPLYSNINGER Lensmannen i Haram o 6270 Brattvag NYE SAKSOPPLYSNINGER Jf avh0r av undertegnede ved lennsmannskontoret i Brattvag av i o gar. Man pr0ver a finne et mulig motiv for de ulike truslene som er fremsatt, og vii i den anledning nevne f0lgende: Sf2Jlvi DYBVIK, skilt fra Geir Ove SKARB0 og mor til Tommy SKARB0, ville for noen ar sid en kj0pe huset i Asen 4, Brattvag, hvor jeg bor na. Fr Dybvik spurte gjentatte ganger om hun ikke kunne flytte inn i huset jeg bodde i, men svaret var alltid "nei" --- det er fullstendig klart at hun bcerer et visst nag til meg pga dette. Fr Dybvi k jobbet for Posten Norge BA, og leverte/hentet post i gaten hvor jeg bor (under avh0ret ble det nevt at jeg ikke nyttet postkassen min lenger fordi sa mange brev hadde forsvunnet). Man regner med -- fordelt pa 4 ar --- at ca 400 brev adressert til meg ble stjalet (mange av disse brevene var sendt av advokater, ambassader og menneskerettighetsorganisasjoner). I tillegg kommer tyveri av rundt 200 brev jeg sendte selv --- dette var for en stor del registrerte sendinger med mottakingsbevis etc. Det er vanskelig a si med absolutt 28.08.2011 ENCL. #2 Side 2 av 3 sikkerhet om fr Dybvik har hatt noe med anforte brevtyverier a gjOre, men man kan trygt si at hun er mistenkt i saken ... ! Den 28. ds mottok undertegnede svcert mange oppringninger fra et ukjent nummer, og personen som ringte snakket nordlandsdialekt. Tidligere samme kveld hadde Solvi DYBVIK pa eget initiativ kontaktet undertegnede i Storgata, Brattvag -- hun hadde da folge med en svensktalende mann, og var synlig beruset. Man antar at fr Dybvik og den svensktalende mannen nylig had de oppholdt seg ved BrattvAg Bowling. Under korresponderende telefonsamtaler fremholdt personen med nordlandsdialekt at man hadde Iyst pa huset i Asen 4, Brattvag, og at man antok jeg var pa vei til a flytte ut etc. Personen kom med flere mer eller mindre tilslorte trusler under telefonsamtalene, og viste til noen SMS-sendinger som var mottatt/sendt --- man oppfatter det slik at han eller andre fryktet a bli rettsforfulgt el.l. Oppringeren oppfattes ellers som psykisk ustabil og potensielt sinnslidende. Det er mulig at oppringningene fra personen med nordlandsdialekt har blitt iscenesatt av Solvi Dybvik, og at de kan tilbakefores til personer ved Brattvag Bowling u_ f.eks Ronny J0RGENSEN (Sistnevnte er min nabo, og fortsatt gretten fordi jeg for noen ar siden paklaget det stoyende sondagsarbeidet han bedrev. Hr Jorgensen og hans kone har bl.a vcert bosatt i Finnmark fylke.). 28.08.2011 ENCL. #2 Nar det gjelder truslene fra Geir Ove SKARB0, er det liten tvil am at Tommy SKARB0, hans s0nn, har gjort sitt beste for a hisse opp faren --- det er fortsatt noe usikkert am det var Tommy eller faren sam sendte de aktuelle SMS-truslene etc. Det synes for 0vrig klart at Tommy bes0kte faren pa det tidspunktet SMS-truslene ble sendt. Det er sannsynlig at Tommy SKARB0s oppf0rsel kan tilskrives sjalusi (fordi hans fraseparerte kane, Kimberly, har snakket med meg), misunnelse (fordi han ikke kan skape like bra kunst sam meg --- eller 10fte like tunge vekter etc), hevnlyst (fordi han er persona non grata i Asen 4, Brattvag), og/eller sinnssykdom (denne kan eventuelt va=re knyttet til hans alkoholisme m.m). Ellers viser man til det sam ble sagt under avh0ret. Med hilsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER Side 3 av 3 28.08.2011 ENCL. #2 Side 1 av 3 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 01.10.2010 03:22:55 To: post.sunnmoreqpolitiet.no; \V\verner((vairpost.net Bee: wintheri{v lavabit.com Subject: NYE TRUSLER OG OPPRlNGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0, BRATrVAG Haram lensmannskontor 6270 Brattvag NYE SMS-TRUSLER OG OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (6270 Brattvag) Jf undertegnedes beS0k ved Iensmannskontoret i Brattvag 30. fmmv. I gar ble f0Igende SMS-trusler sendt undertegnede fra Geir Ove SKARB0: "hr. werner fucking winter! Etter den sote kloe kommer den sure svie ! Ver beredt. 30 Sep 2010 21:50 Fra: +4799286641" "Dersom du i din vilfarelse skulle tro at "du"er under beskyttelse av "norske myndigheter" kommer skuffelsen bli stor nar du oppdager at aile heIst vii kvidt degfor godt!Et godt rad!KOMDEG TIL IRAN sA FORT SOM MULIG!! Fra: +4799286641" (bilde av avsender) 28.08.2011 ENCL. #3 Side 2 av 3 I lepet av dette og foregaende degn er inntil na, kl 03: 16, mottattlavvist felgende oppringninger fra Geir Ove SKARB0: 01. 30. sep 2010 kl19:12 02. 30. sep 2010 k122:20 03. 30. sep 2010 k122:21 04. 30. sep 2010 k122:21 OS. 30. sep 2010 k122:21 06. 30. sep 2010 kl 22:21 07. 30. sep 2010 k122:22 08. 30. sep 2010 k123:40 09. 30. sep 2010 k123:S8 10. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9 11. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9 12. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9 13. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00 14. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00 IS. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00 16. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00 17. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:01 18. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:28 19. 01. okt 2010 kl 01: 17 20. 01. okt 2010 kl 01 :18 21. 01. okt 2010 kl 02:19 (fra tlf926 98 991, reg. pa Leslie SKARB0) 22. ureg. sending Man anmoder lensmannskontoret o.a om a pagripe hr Skarbe snarest --- en psykiatrisk evaluering er definitivt pa sin plass! Med hilsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER 28.08.2011 ENCL. #3 Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 02.10.2010 16:43:02 To: post .slIllnmore({(ipoIitiet.no; wwerner/fl'airpost .net Bcc: \vintber({v lavabit.eolll; ari Idkvam!(h,pnai I.enm; no Subject: U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (se vedlegg) Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Undertegnede har politianmeldt Geir Ove SKARBrzJ, 6270 Brattvag, for en rekke drapstrusler etc --- PDF-vedlegget viser de siste oppringningene fra sistnevnte. Med hilsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER file:IIIC:/UsersiWerner/AppData/LocallIMlRuntime/Message/%7B3D9C5934-F485-4 ... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #4 Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 02.10.201016:46:29 To: post.sllnnnlOre1l)pol itiet.no; wwernerrZl)airpost. net Subject: Fw: [SPAM] U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNlNGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (se vedlegg) Lensmannen i Sykkylven 6230 Sykkylven -------Origina/ Message-- From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 02.10.201016:43:21 To: post.sunnmore@politiet.no; wwerner@ai[post.net Subject: [SPAM] U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (se vedlegg) Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Undertegnede har politianmeldt Geir ave SKARB", 6270 Brattvag, for en rekke drapstrusler etc --- PDF-vedlegget viser de siste oppringningene fra sistnevnte. Med hilsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER file:IIIC:lUsers/Wemer/AppDatalLocal/IMIRuntimelMessage/%7B98B98C41-0EB4-... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #5 Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 07.10.201019:18:10 To: post.sllnnmorer(l)politieLno: wwernerr(!)airposLnct Bee: \vinther(lillavabiLcol11 Suh;ect: GEIR OVE SKARBO --- YTTERLlGERE INFO OM Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Lensmannen i Sykkylven 6230 Sykkylven GEIR OVE SKARB0 - YTTERLIGERE INFO OM Undertegnede har i 10pet av dagen vrert i kontakt med et potensielt vitne som har forklart at bade Geir Ove SKARB0 og sistnevntes S0nn, Tommy SKARB0, har deltatt aktivt i mishandlingen av Kimberly L STUBBS SKARB0* (*bostedsadresse: 6270 Brattvag. Fr Skarb0 er pt separert fra Tommy SKARB0.). Mishandlingen skal ha pagatt over lang tid, og det foreligger angivelig en rekke konkrete eksempler - bade i denne og andre sammenhenger - som anskueliggjm Geir Ove SKARB0s psykopatiske personlighet. Det potensielle vitnet fortalte at G 0 SKARB0 tyranniserer sin nrere familie, og at Tommy SKARB0 pa ulikt vis underkues og hundses av sin far. I 1970 var undertegnede vitne til at G 0 SKARB0s bror, Leslie SKARB0 (f 1957), helt umotivert angrep 0yvind DRIVEKLEPP fYsisk og truet ham pa livet mens sistnevnte lekte i nrerheten av sitt hjem i Brattvag. Idette tilfellet ble 0yvind DRIVEKLEPPs eldre bror - Andor DRIVEKLEPP (f 1954) tilkalt omgaende, og Leslie SKARB0 fikk en velfortjent omgang juling. Bade Andor og 0yvind DRIVKLEPP kunne bekrefte at Leslie SKARB0 var en notorisk og primitiv b011e de seiv og andre hadde hatt mye problemer med i Brattvag. Undertegnedes morfar, Osvald AARSUND, gjorde ved flere anledninger observasjoner av Tryeve SKARB0 (onkel til Leslie og Geir Ove SKARB0) som overbeviste ham om at sistnevnte var aivorlig forstyrret og kanskje sinnssyk. Hr AARSUND hadde i file:IIIC:lUsers/WernerlAppDatalLocallIMIRuntime/Message/% 7B03DACEI C-E248-... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #6 Side 2 av 2 mange ar en konflikt med moren til Trygve SKARB0, Petra SKARB0, grunnet en gammel veirett han hadde. Det er hevet over tvil at fr P SKARB0s absurde argumentasjon og oppf0rsel i konflikten manglet ethvert holdbart grunnlag, og at kveruleringen og den kompulsive fiendtligheten hennes sannsynligvis var psykopatologisk betinget. Med hilsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER file:/ / /C:/U sersIW erner/ AppData/LocalIIMIRuntime/Message/% 7B03 DACE1 C-E248-... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #6 Side 1 av 1 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 11.10.2010 23:58: 12 To: post.sunnmoretIlpol itieLno; \\werner(Zt:airpost.net Bee: wintherrci lavabit.co111 S l l ~ i e e t : GEJR OVE SKARB0 EN NOTORJSK KONEMJSHANDLER Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Lensmannen i Sykkylven 6230 Sykky Iven GEIR OVE SKARBO - KONEMISHANDLING Undertegnede har i dag samtalet med et vitne som fremholdt at Geir Ove SKARB0, 6270 Brattvag, mishandlet sin tidligere ektefelle - Salvi DYBVIK - systematisk gjennom flere ar. Mishandlingen skal ha f0rt til at S0lvi DYBVIK begjrerte skilsmisse. Vitnet er for 0Vrig helt enig i at hr SKARB0 er en tyrann /psykopat. Det er interessant og patognomonisk at hr SKARB0 i sine forrykte SMS meidinger anklaget mel: - som aldri har hatt kontakt med noen i hans nrere familie - for a terrorisere personene han selv har mishandlet i arevis. Geir Ove SKARB0 utgj0r en trussel mot andre og uskyldige mennesker, og man ber norske myndigheter ta de juridiske skritt som er n0dvendig for a sperre ham lnne. Norske myndigheter viI neppe lykkes med a kurere en 60 ar gammel psykopat. 11. okt20IO Wilh. Werner WINTHER file:///C:/Users/Wemer/AppDatalLocaIIlM/Runtime/Message/%7B6BDE3508-3883-4 ... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #7 Side 1 av 2 From: Wi Ihelm Werner WINTHER Date: 14.11.2010 13:46:31 To: itiet.no: post(il'spesialenhcten.no Ce: aspehaugf(/'gjortz.no: wwernerrttiairpost.net Bee: wintheri(l)lavabiLcom Subject: NY POLITIANMELDELSE AV GEIR-OVE/TOMMY SKARB0 (adr Hamar/Brattvag) Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Lensnlannen i Sykkylven 6230 Sykkylven Ny politianmeldelse av Geir Ove/Tommy SKARB0 - Geir-ave/Tommy SKARB0 (adr HamarlBrattvag) ble den 30. okt d.a politianmeldt til ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor for a ha fremsatt en rekke drapstrusler mot undertegnede via SMSer/telefonsamtaler. Mellom kl 02:45 og 02:50 den 13. ds ble Geir ave/Tommy SKARB0 observert av undertegnede o.a vitner utenfor hovedinngangsdoren i Asen 4, Brattvag. Hr SKARB0 provde forst a apne eller bryte opp nevnte dor for han flere ganger banket pa med en pamontert dorhammer - han var apenbart lettere beruset, og bar pa et skytevapen (muligens et haglgevrer). En personbil med tente hovedlys og motoren pa tomgang (dette kan ha vrert en morkegronn Pegeuot av litt eidre modell) ventet pa hr SKARB0 utenfor porten til Asen 4, Brattvag registreringsskiltene var gjort uleselige, og det satt en sjafor i kjoretoyet. Undertegnede har i sine tidligere politianmeldelser og samtaler med ansatte ved Haram/Sykkylven lensmannskontor understreket at Geir-ave SKARB0 utgjor en file:///C:/Users/Wemer/AppDatafLocal/IMIRuntime/Message/%7B38CO2F7E-OE8E-4 ... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #8 Side 2 av 2 eksplisitt fare for allmennheten, og urtrykkelig bedt om at han pagripes umiddlebart. Anmelderen har ogsa innrapportert hr SKARB0s sinnssykeligel kriminelle oppf0rsel til helsevesenet i Haram kommune. Inntil dd har ikke politi-/lensmannsetaten eller helsevesenet tart effektive skrirt for a pagripe/intemere mv Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0. Hermed politianmeldes ovennevnte angrep, og man anmoder pa nyrt politi-/lensmannsetaten og helsevesenet om 0Yeblikkelig a pagripe/intemere etc Geir-Ove/T ommy SKARB0. Geir-Ove og Tommy SKARB0 begjreres begge siktetl tiltaU/straffet. 14. nov 2010 Wilh. Werner WINTHER file:/ //C:/U sers/Wemer/ AppDatalLocaIIIMlRuntime/Message/% 7B3 8C02F7E-OE8E-4... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #8 Lensmannen i Haram 6270 Brattvag Lensmannen i Sykkylven 6230 Sykkylven Ny politianmeldelse av Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0 Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0 (adr Hamar/Brattvag) ble den 30. okt d.a politianmeldt til ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor for a ha fremsatt en rekke drapstrusler mot undertegnede via SMSer/telefonsamtaler. Mellom kl 02:45 og 02:50 den 13. ds ble Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0 observert av undertegnede o.a vitner utenfor hovedinngangsd0ren i Asen 4, Brattvag. Hr SKARB0 pr0Vde f0rst a apne eller bryte opp nevnte d0r f0r han flere ganger banket pa med en pamontert d0rhammer - han var apenbart lettere beruset, og bar pa et skytevapen (muligens et haglgevrer). En personbil med tente hovedlys og motoren pa tomgang (dette kan ha vrert en m0rkegr0nn Pegeuot av litt eldre modell) ventet pa hr SKARB0 utenfor porten til Asen 4, Brattvag registreringsskiltene var gjort uleselige, og det satt en sjaf0r i kj0ret0Yet. Undertegnede har i sine tidligere politianmeldelser og samtaler med ansatte ved Haram/Sykkylven lensmannskontor understreket at Geir-Ove SKARB0 utgj0r en eksplisitt fare for allmennheten, og uttrykkelig bedt om at han pagripes umiddlebart. Anmelderen har ogsa innrapportert hr SKARB0s sinnssykeligel kriminelle oppf0rsel til helsevesenet i Haram kommune. Inntil dd har ikke politi Ilensmannsetaten eller helsevesenet tatt effektive skritt for a pagripe/intemere mv Geir-OvelTommy SKARB0. Hermed politianmeldes ovennevnte angrep, og man anmoder pa nytt politi Ilensmannsetaten og helsevesenet om 0yeblikkelig a pagripe/intemere etc Geir Ove/Tommy SKARB0. Geir-Ove OK Tommy SKARB0 begjreres begge siktetl tiltalt/straffet. 14. nov 2010 Wilh. Werner WINTHER ENCL. #8A Wilhelm Werner Wmther Asen4 6270 BRATfVAG Veres n{eranse Varn{eranse Dam Dde.nr: 11120097 5127/10-38 16.11.2010 07 ForIxldets art Etter/(J{Sker Trusler, diverse ( 227) N iB0, Ole Ivar Sakenerwgfstrert mi PJtaie:tnsUlriigjurist Driftsenhet Nordre ESeksjon SKOVLY, Yngve G j ~ d a t n 27.09.2010 GjemiYlSud ken 4,6270 BRATIVAG Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold -P"ariiemyndigheten ka:n [ferilIne erstalii.ings"k.r.lv tor Dem 1 forbindeIse med en eventuell straifesak. Dette ~ i sa fall dokumenteres. Dersom De ikke allerede har levert en skriftlig dokurnentasjon pa et eventuelt hav, ~ dette gj0res snarest, og senest innen tre uker. Dersom fristen ikke overholdes, kan De ikke paregne at havet blir tatt med i forbindeIse med en eventuelI straffesak Hvis De 0nsker fristen forlenget, ~ politiet kontaktes. Ved all henvendeIse til politiet ~ var referanse oppgis. Det er ikke oodvendig a kontakte politiet med mindre De har nye opplysninger i saken. Politiet vil S0ke aetterlorske saken slik at den er best mulig belyst nar avgj0relse tas. Dersom De kontakter et forsikringsselskap i sakens anledrllng, ~ dette skriv tas med, da dette er oodvendig bekreftelse pa at forholdet er mmeldt. Dersom De har innlevert mmeldelsen pa vegne av en annen person, gjelder det ovenstiende ogsa ham/henne. Nar saken er ferdig behandlet, viI De fa en skriftlig underretning om patalemyndighetens avgj0relse. Medhilsen SUNNM0RE POUTIDISlRIKT ENCL. #9 Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 16.11.201017:26:51 To: wwerner@airpost.net Cc: aspehaug@gjortz.no Bcc: winther@lavabit.com Subject: UTVIDET ANMELDELSE AV POLITI-/LENSMANNSANSATTE (PDF-versjon vedlegges) Spesialenheten for politfsaker Grennegata 82 2317 HAMAR UTVIDET ANMELDELSE AV POLITI ILENSMANNSANSATTE MFL Undertegnede ble i dag oppringt av Spesialenheten for politi saker, Hamar, og man har i den aniedning - av praktiske o.a grunner - besiuttet a utvide an meldelsen av politi-/lensmannsansatte mfl. Med dette anmeldes enhver embets-/tjenestemann som pa noe vis har deitatt i eller sanksjonert den mangearige audiovisuelle/tekniske/elektroniske mv overvakingen av undertegnede i Asen 4,6270 Brattvag. Enhver stats-/kommuneansatt som direkte eller indirekte har medvirket til nevnte overvaking begjreres siktet/til tal t/straffet. 28.08.2011 ENCL. #10 Side 1 av 2 From: Wilhelm \Vemer WINTHER Date: 08.12.20 I 0 13:47:37 To: pOSl'"c1Jspesialeni1eten.no: aspehaug(i'i 1 gjortz.no; wwemer(,.:t)a irpost. net Bee: winther!u;lavabit.coll1 Subject: ORIENTERING Spesialenheten for politisaker Hamar ORIENTERING Den 16. f.m. ble undertegnede oppringt av en representant for Spesialenheten for politisaker pa Hamar som mottok en muntlig --- senere samme dag en skriftlig --- anmeldelse av politi-/lensmannsansatte. En betjent ved Haram lensmannskontor viste bade i for- og etterkant av nevnte anmeldelser stor ringeakt for Spesialenheten, og denne lensmannsbetjenten --- som nytter etternavnet IIBalsnes ll --- oppleves pa flere mater som klart uskikket til bl.a politiarbeid. Norske myndigheters grovt sjikan0se og eksplisitt illegale bruk av overvakingsteknologi i Asen 4, Brattvag, har 0kt pafallende etter anmeldelsen til Spesialenheten, og man har ogsa fatt bekreftet at politi-/lensmannsetaten disponerer fotografiske beviser pa drapsfors0ket mot undertegnede den 13. f.m. Man erfarer videre at navngitte og lett tilgjengelige vitner/mistenkte i saken ikke har blitt avh0rt1pagrepet, og ber Spesialenheten om en skriftlig bekreftelse pa anmeldelsen de mottok 16. f.m. (undertegnede ma --- som tidligere opplyst -- kontaktes via e-mail)! Med hilsen Wilhelm Werner WINTHER file:IIIC:/Users/Werner/AppData/Local/IMlRuntime/Message/%7B36DOED36-1697-4 ... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #11 1
Dette dokumentet inngr i samlingen av strategisk ufullstendige skriv som skal forelegges internasjonale menneskerettighets- tribunaler o.a. Undertegnede er politisk flyktning og asylsker, og har siden 1992 manglet diplomatiske og vennligsinnede relasjoner med det norske statsapparatet.
Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Kjell Kristian Ukkelberg Hamar
POLITIANMELDELSE AV KJELL KRISTIAN UKKELBERG OG PANKE AV ANMELDELSE NR. 11568421 4100/11-9 : HEDMARK POLITIDISTRIKT
I samsvar med det moralske og i stor grad intellektuelle lavml man med rimelighet kan forvente av et gjennomkorrupt og sterkt mindreverdig stats- og administrasjonsapparat, har lederen for retts- og ptaleavsnittet ved Hedmark politidistrikt, Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG, valgt eller av overordnede blitt presset til henlegge anmeldelsen av Spesialenhetens leder (jf Hedmark politidistrikt : Anmeldelse nr. 11568421), Jan Egil PRESTHUS, med ENCL. #12 2
begrunnelse i at man ikke finner rimelig grunn til iverksette etterforskning jf strpl 224.
I den totalt fordmmelige og klart korrumperte henleggelsen unnlater hr Ukkelberg beleilig nevne f.eks undertegnedes anmeldelse av 12. ds (denne ble oversendt Hedmark politidistrikt o.a. elektronisk kl 02:38 samt kl 16:57 sist- nevnte dato se PDF-vedlegg, 06 sider. Hr Ukkelbergs henleggelse ble sendt med elektronisk post fra Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Karin HESTNES kl 10:50 den 13. ds.), og han prver p megetsigende vis gi inntrykk av at man kun har anmeldt hr Presthus og Tor-Aksel BUSCH for ett kriminelt forhold nemlig Spesialenhetens korrupte vedtak av 08. des. f.*:
* Spesialenheten for politisaker Grnnegata 82 Hamar
PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK
Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens avgjrelse datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse 10168094/10-123.
Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er undertegnet av den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og oppfattes som et dypt foraktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig kriminalitet.
Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig krenkelse av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16 etc.
Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte Riksadvokat jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.
Brattvg, 04. jan 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther Sign. ENCL. #12 3
La det vre fullstendig klart at Jan Egil Presthus og Tor-Aksel Busch er anmeldt for medvirkning til drapsforskene som fant sted 10. og 12. fm*:
* Politianmeldelse
Alle som p noe vis har vrt delaktig i planlegge, skjule, og/eller gjennomfre de ovenfor beskrevne drapsforskene begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet.
Blant de man begjrer avhrt som mistenkte i saken nevnes spesielt:
ystein SOLHJELL, 6462 Raudsand Linda SVENSLI, 6462 Raudsand Torbjrn RAUSAND, 6462 Raudsand Sigmund Martin EKREM, 6270 Brattvg
Nr dette dokumentet publiseres har politiet i Molde hatt god anledning til avhre/pgripe etc de mistenkte med bostedsadresse i Nesset kommune. Etterforskningen i saken er enkel, og faren for bevisforspillelse liten.
Man understreker at de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove SKARB og Tommy SKARB ble begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede i slutten av september f.., og at man i den forbindelse bl.a varslet spesialhelsetjenesten i Haram kommune.
Mht. Tommy SKARB og Geir Ove SKARB er det aktuelt nytte strl 39 c. mv om forvaring i anstalt under kriminal- omsorgen cf strl 62 mv.
Riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH (jf saksnr. 10168094 mv), lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker Jan Egil PREST- HUS (jf sak nr 10168094 882/10-123 mv), samt betjentene Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES ved Haram lensmanns- kontor begjres alle siktet/tiltalt/straffet for medvirkning ENCL. #12 4
til ovennevnte drapsforsk idet man understreker at forsettlig og illegal pliktunnlatelse i dette tilfellet sees som en medvirkningshandling.
Empirisk legger man til grunn at sentrale deler av det norske statsapparatet nsker fremprovosere og eventuelt belnne ulike overgrep og forbrytelser mot under- tegnede.
Brattvg, 29. mars 2011
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
APPENDIKS
Den pgende og overveiende private etterforskningen viser at man til de eksplisitt mistenkte i saken m tilfye:
yvind VERPEIDE, lensmann, Haram lensmannskontor Ove P FINNES, betjent, Haram lensmannskontor
Det er i dag hevet over tvil at de sistnevnte personene var godt orientert om de planlagte drapsforskene mot undertegnede den 10. og 12. fm. De ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor oast har hovedsakelig ftt kjennskap til drapsplanene via telefon- og romavlytting.
I sakens anledning skal man ogs understreke at:
1) Betjent Ole Ivar NYB ved Haram lensmannskontor unnlot kontakte undertegnede i henhold til avtale den 03. fm i pvente av at jeg skulle drepes den 10. eller 12. samme mned. 2) Betjent Kre BALSNES ved Haram/rskog lensmannskontor ly da han i telefonsamtale med undertegnede den 10. fm hevdet at nevnte Ole Ivar NYB ikke var ved kontoret da samtalen fant sted (P dette ENCL. #12 5
tidspunktet hadde undertegnede i et brev til Spesialenheten anfrt at man oppfattet hr BALSNES som uskikket til politiarbeid. Et forsk p drepe undertegnede med pistol/revolver fant sted i sen 4, Brattvg, noen f timer etter telefonsamtalen med betjent BALSNES.). 3) Spesialenheten for politisaker med Jan Egil PRESTHUS i spissen sker hindre ukorrumpert/lovlig/adekvat etterforskning av drapsforskene mot meg bl.a for unng at organets leder og riksadvokat BUSCH skal straffeforflges. 4) Man i en e-mail til Spesialenheten datert 08. ds har anfrt at nevnte organ er fullstendig inhabile i denne saken og ikke skal etterforske Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte jf forvaltningsloven 6, 9 og 10 mv, item domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 og 111 mv. 5) Jan Egil PRESTHUS, Tor-Aksel BUSCH, yvind VERPEIDE, Ove P FINNES, Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES omgende br suspenderes fra sine stillinger etter tjenestemannslovens 16, jf tjml 15 mv.
Brattvg, 12. april 2011 Wilhelm Werner Winther
Nr det gjelder drapsforsket av 13. nov f.., finner man liten grunn til laste hr Presthus og hr Busch for dette (politi-/lensmannsetaten samt helsevesenet i Haram kommune derimot, m opplagt tillegges skyld og eventuelt straffansvar i den sammenheng).
Som det fremgr av undertegnedes anmeldelser, ble de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove og Tommy SKARB begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede i slutten av september f.., og alle drapsforskene undertegnede hittil har politianmeldt fant sted etter dette.
Man skal ellers anfre at Geir Ove Skarb i en fullstendig forrykt telefonsamtale med undertegnede (u sep 2010) hevdet at han hadde hatt kontakt med politi- /lensmannsansatte som garanterte at undertegnedes anmeldelser ville bli henlagt hr Skarbs troverdighet p dette punktet styrkes ved at han t.o.m. oversendte bilder av seg selv med de sinnssykelige SMS-truslene han fremsatte.
ENCL. #12 6
Henleggelsen av Anmeldelse nr. 11568421 : Hedmark politidistrikt pankes med dette til Statsadvokaten i Hedmark og Oppland, og Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet etter straffeloven 118, 120, 124, 125, 324 og 325 etc, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16.
Brattvg, 14. april 2011
Wilh. Werner Winther (sign)
ENCL. #12 7
Dette er fluktbilen Tommy Skarb nyttet under drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. nov 2010. Bilen kjres/eies av Karl-Even Indrestrand (Brattvg). APPENDIKS II
Av hensyn til etterforskningen i saken, frigjres strategisk viktig informasjon gradvis og tilsiktet ufullstendig.
Man understreker n at fluktbilen Tommy SKARB var passasjer i under drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. nov i fjor kjres og eies av Karl-Even INDRESTRAND, Storgata 7, Brattvg.
Karl-Even Indrestrand begjres med dette siktet/tiltalt/straffet for aktiv medvirkning til drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. november 2010.
ENCL. #12 8
Huset den hovedmistenkte i saken, Geir Ove Skarb, tidligere bebodde. Eneboligen i Storgata, Brattvg, bebos fortsatt av Skarb-familien.
Fluktbilen parkert utenfor Karl-Even Indrestrands bolig i Storgata, Brattvg. ENCL. #12 9
Boligen til en av de hovedmistenkte i saken, Tommy Skarb. Foran husets hovedinngang i Vgshaugen, Brattvg, er parkert en tjenestebil fra firmaet Thermotank AS i Straumgjerde/Sykkylven. Den hoved- mistenkte i saken, Geir Ove Skarb, jobber som sjfr for dette firmaet. Lensmannskontoret i Brattvg hvor tre av de mistenkte i saken --- yvind Verpeide, Ove Finnes, og Ole Ivar Nyb --- er ansatt. Betjent Kre Balsnes er angivelig overfrt til lensmannskontoret i rskog kommune.
ENCL. #12 10
Brattvg, 31. mai 2011
Wilh. Werner Winther sig.
ENCL. #12 ENCL. #13 ENCL. #13 ENCL. #13 ENCL. #14 ENCL. #14 ENCL. #14 Side 2 av 3 politimesteren pa Sunnmore --- personlig! ---Original Message------ From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 23.03.20 II J8:55:05 To: post/(rspesia len hetell.no; postmottakfilriksadvokaten .no Subject: Fw: NYTT DRAPSFORSOK --- ANMELDELSER Som det fremger av vedlagte PDF-dokument, er Jan E2iI PRESTHUS og Tor-Aksel BUSCH betimelig anmeldt for medvirkning tiI drapsforsok. Med det kjennskap man har tiI navngitte personer o.a, frykter man at Spesialenheten for politisaker og riksadvokatens kontor ikke viI folge opp sakene pa lovlydig . VIS. Man ber om en bekreftelse pa anmeldte forhold, og en redegjorelse for hvordan korrupsjonssakene blir behandlet. Med hiIsen Wilh. Werner WINTHER -------Original A4essage------ From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 15.03.2011 0 1:33:57 To: post(c[';spesialenheten.no: Subject: NYTT DRAPSFORS0K --- ANMELDELSER file:IIIC:/Users/Wemer/AppDatalLocaI/IM/Runtime/Message/%7B194B033F-80AO-4 ... 28.08.2011 ENCL. #15 ENCL. #16 ENCL. #17 ENCL. #18 ENCL. #18 ENCL. #19 ENCL. #20 ENCL. #21
Spesialenheten for politisaker Grnnegata 82 Hamar
PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK
Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens avgjrelse datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse 10168094/10-123.
Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er undertegnet av den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og oppfattes som et dypt for- aktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig kriminalitet.
Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig krenkelse av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16 etc.
Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte Riksadvokat jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.
Brattvg, 04. jan 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther Sign. ENCL. #22 Side 1 av 1 From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER Date: 08.04.2011 20:12:15 To: post@spesialenheten.no; aspehaug@gjortz.no; gjortz@gjortz.no Bee: wwerner@airpost.net Subject: Fw: Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold Spesialenhetens leder, Jan Egil PRESTHUS, er anmeldt for korrupsjon, og la dette vcere klinkende klart: 1) Spesialenheten er fullstendig INHABIL i denne saken, og skal selvf01gelig l K K _ ~ etterforske Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte! 2) Spesialenheten fremstar i dag som en ren forhanelse mot aile sunne og vitale rettsprinsipper! WERNER WINTHER -------Origina/ Message------ From: post Date: 04/08/11 13:34:01 To: winther@lavabit.com Subject: Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold Vedlagt f01ger bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold. Med vennlig hilsen Mie Willumsen konsulent 28.08.2011 ENCL. #23 ENCL. #24 ENCL. #25 ENCL. #25 Spesialenheten for politisaker Grnnegata 82 Hamar
PROFORMA-PANKE AV KORRUPT PTALE- VEDTAK (forenklet e-mail-versjon)
Jf Sak nr 10248348 255/11-123 : Spesialenheten for politisaker datert 23. f.m.
Idet man fremholder at det administrative og juridisk overordnede ansvaret for riksadvokaten og Spesialenheten for politisaker underligger Justis- og politidept, legges til grunn som bevist at:
1) Lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker, Jan Egil PRESTHUS, personlig har mottatt direktiver fra justisminister Knut STORBERGET mht hvordan undertegnedes anmeldelser av politiansatte o.a. skal korrumperes, 2) Jan Egil Presthus ovennevnte ptalevedtak er et straffbart forsk p forkludre og underkjenne saksrelaterte fakta, 3) riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH aktivt og mala fide understtter et politisk fundamentert komplott som bl.a. tar sikte p undergrave anmelderens rettssikkerhet, 4) ansatte i politi- og lensmannsetaten ved ulovlig passivitet og underfundige tilskyndelser mv har skt fremprovosere drapsforskene mot undertegnede, 5) lensmann yvind VERPEIDE ved Haram lensmannskontor har mottatt sttte for sin eksplisitt kriminelle oppfrsel i denne saken fra topp- politikere i Haram kommune, 6) justisminister Knut Storberget, lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker Jan Egil Presthus, og riksadvokat Tor-Aksel Busch er moralsk og p annet vis uskikket til inneha sine respektive stillinger, og at 7) store deler av det norske statsapparatet tilhrer anmelderens definitive fiender.
Sakens pankes med dette i all enkelhet til landets korrupte riksadvokat.
ENCL. #26 Spesialenheten for politisaker og riksadvokaten er godt kjent med bl.a. forvaltningslovens krav til habil saksbehandling, men vil naturligvis unnlate etterkomme disse bestemmelsene.
Brattvg, 08. juli 2011
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
ENCL. #26 1
Dette dokumentet inngr i samlingen av strategisk ufullstendige skriv som skal forelegges internasjonale menneskerettighets- tribunaler o.a. Undertegnede er politisk flyktning og asylsker, og har siden 1992 manglet diplomatiske og vennligsinnede relasjoner med det norske statsapparatet.
Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Kjell Kristian Ukkelberg Hamar
POLITIANMELDELSE AV KJELL KRISTIAN UKKELBERG OG PANKE AV ANMELDELSE NR. 11568421 4100/11-9 : HEDMARK POLITIDISTRIKT
I samsvar med det moralske og i stor grad intellektuelle lavml man med rimelighet kan forvente av et gjennomkorrupt og sterkt mindreverdig stats- og administrasjonsapparat, har lederen for retts- og ptaleavsnittet ved Hedmark politidistrikt, Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG, valgt eller av overordnede blitt presset til henlegge anmeldelsen av Spesialenhetens leder (jf Hedmark politidistrikt : Anmeldelse nr. 11568421), Jan Egil PRESTHUS, med ENCL. #27 2
begrunnelse i at man ikke finner rimelig grunn til iverksette etterforskning jf strpl 224.
I den totalt fordmmelige og klart korrumperte henleggelsen unnlater hr Ukkelberg beleilig nevne f.eks undertegnedes anmeldelse av 12. ds (denne ble oversendt Hedmark politidistrikt o.a. elektronisk kl 02:38 samt kl 16:57 sist- nevnte dato se PDF-vedlegg, 06 sider. Hr Ukkelbergs henleggelse ble sendt med elektronisk post fra Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Karin HESTNES kl 10:50 den 13. ds.), og han prver p megetsigende vis gi inntrykk av at man kun har anmeldt hr Presthus og Tor-Aksel BUSCH for ett kriminelt forhold nemlig Spesialenhetens korrupte vedtak av 08. des. f.*:
* Spesialenheten for politisaker Grnnegata 82 Hamar
PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK
Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens avgjrelse datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse 10168094/10-123.
Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er undertegnet av den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og oppfattes som et dypt foraktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig kriminalitet.
Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig krenkelse av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16 etc.
Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte Riksadvokat jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.
Brattvg, 04. jan 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther Sign. ENCL. #27 3
La det vre fullstendig klart at Jan Egil Presthus og Tor-Aksel Busch er anmeldt for medvirkning til drapsforskene som fant sted 10. og 12. fm*:
* Politianmeldelse
Alle som p noe vis har vrt delaktig i planlegge, skjule, og/eller gjennomfre de ovenfor beskrevne drapsforskene begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet.
Blant de man begjrer avhrt som mistenkte i saken nevnes spesielt:
ystein SOLHJELL, 6462 Raudsand Linda SVENSLI, 6462 Raudsand Torbjrn RAUSAND, 6462 Raudsand Sigmund Martin EKREM, 6270 Brattvg
Nr dette dokumentet publiseres har politiet i Molde hatt god anledning til avhre/pgripe etc de mistenkte med bostedsadresse i Nesset kommune. Etterforskningen i saken er enkel, og faren for bevisforspillelse liten.
Man understreker at de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove SKARB og Tommy SKARB ble begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede i slutten av september f.., og at man i den forbindelse bl.a varslet spesialhelsetjenesten i Haram kommune.
Mht. Tommy SKARB og Geir Ove SKARB er det aktuelt nytte strl 39 c. mv om forvaring i anstalt under kriminal- omsorgen cf strl 62 mv.
Riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH (jf saksnr. 10168094 mv), lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker Jan Egil PREST- HUS (jf sak nr 10168094 882/10-123 mv), samt betjentene Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES ved Haram lensmanns- kontor begjres alle siktet/tiltalt/straffet for medvirkning ENCL. #27 4
til ovennevnte drapsforsk idet man understreker at forsettlig og illegal pliktunnlatelse i dette tilfellet sees som en medvirkningshandling.
Empirisk legger man til grunn at sentrale deler av det norske statsapparatet nsker fremprovosere og eventuelt belnne ulike overgrep og forbrytelser mot under- tegnede.
Brattvg, 29. mars 2011
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
APPENDIKS
Den pgende og overveiende private etterforskningen viser at man til de eksplisitt mistenkte i saken m tilfye:
yvind VERPEIDE, lensmann, Haram lensmannskontor Ove P FINNES, betjent, Haram lensmannskontor
Det er i dag hevet over tvil at de sistnevnte personene var godt orientert om de planlagte drapsforskene mot undertegnede den 10. og 12. fm. De ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor oast har hovedsakelig ftt kjennskap til drapsplanene via telefon- og romavlytting.
I sakens anledning skal man ogs understreke at:
1) Betjent Ole Ivar NYB ved Haram lensmannskontor unnlot kontakte undertegnede i henhold til avtale den 03. fm i pvente av at jeg skulle drepes den 10. eller 12. samme mned. 2) Betjent Kre BALSNES ved Haram/rskog lensmannskontor ly da han i telefonsamtale med undertegnede den 10. fm hevdet at nevnte Ole Ivar NYB ikke var ved kontoret da samtalen fant sted (P dette ENCL. #27 5
tidspunktet hadde undertegnede i et brev til Spesialenheten anfrt at man oppfattet hr BALSNES som uskikket til politiarbeid. Et forsk p drepe undertegnede med pistol/revolver fant sted i sen 4, Brattvg, noen f timer etter telefonsamtalen med betjent BALSNES.). 3) Spesialenheten for politisaker med Jan Egil PRESTHUS i spissen sker hindre ukorrumpert/lovlig/adekvat etterforskning av drapsforskene mot meg bl.a for unng at organets leder og riksadvokat BUSCH skal straffeforflges. 4) Man i en e-mail til Spesialenheten datert 08. ds har anfrt at nevnte organ er fullstendig inhabile i denne saken og ikke skal etterforske Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte jf forvaltningsloven 6, 9 og 10 mv, item domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 og 111 mv. 5) Jan Egil PRESTHUS, Tor-Aksel BUSCH, yvind VERPEIDE, Ove P FINNES, Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES omgende br suspenderes fra sine stillinger etter tjenestemannslovens 16, jf tjml 15 mv.
Brattvg, 12. april 2011 Wilhelm Werner Winther
Nr det gjelder drapsforsket av 13. nov f.., finner man liten grunn til laste hr Presthus og hr Busch for dette (politi-/lensmannsetaten samt helsevesenet i Haram kommune derimot, m opplagt tillegges skyld og eventuelt straffansvar i den sammenheng).
Som det fremgr av undertegnedes anmeldelser, ble de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove og Tommy SKARB begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede i slutten av september f.., og alle drapsforskene undertegnede hittil har politianmeldt fant sted etter dette.
Man skal ellers anfre at Geir Ove Skarb i en fullstendig forrykt telefonsamtale med undertegnede (u sep 2010) hevdet at han hadde hatt kontakt med politi- /lensmannsansatte som garanterte at undertegnedes anmeldelser ville bli henlagt hr Skarbs troverdighet p dette punktet styrkes ved at han t.o.m. oversendte bilder av seg selv med de sinnssykelige SMS-truslene han fremsatte.
ENCL. #27 6
Henleggelsen av Anmeldelse nr. 11568421 : Hedmark politidistrikt pankes med dette til Statsadvokaten i Hedmark og Oppland, og Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet etter straffeloven 118, 120, 124, 125, 324 og 325 etc, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16.