Sie sind auf Seite 1von 167

( PLAINTIFF: Wilh.

Werner Winther, Norway )





HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
2
addressed to the
(Strasbourg, France)
in agreement with Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms* (*i.e. the European Convention on Human
Rights), cf Articles 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, and 51 ib.































SURNAME .: Winther

FIRSTNAMES: Wilhelm Werner

GENDER.: Male

NATIONALITY..: Norwegian

BIRTHPLACE/-DATE..: NO-Aalesund / May 17, 1963

OCCUPATION...: Human rights activist

PRESENT ADDRESS: sen 4, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway

PHONE: +47 974 83 483

E-MAIL...: wwerner@airpost.net

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
3



The Kingdom of Norway




STATEMENT OF CASE


During September and October 2010 the plaintiff received a huge number of
severely threatening and explicitly morbid telephone calls and SMS-missives
from an unknown man called Geir Ove SKARB.
Mr. Skarb turned out to be a notorious psychopath and rascal born in 1950 who
had moved from NO-Brattvg to NO-Hamar several years ago most likely
because of the befittingly bad reputation he had incurred in his native district.
The plaintiff had never had any kind of contact with Mr. Skarb beforehand, and
the recurrent threats to kill and injure the complainant lacked rational foundat-
ion. Mr. Skarb and some of his disgustingly perverted/alcoholized accomplices
was repeatedly observed in the plaintiffs private garden and elsewhere right
outside his house in sen 4 (Brattvg) by night, and their general behavior
particularly the rabid and totally inappropriate threats from Mr. Skarb himself
was clearly psychopathological.
On Oct. 30, 2010, the plaintiff visited the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg and sub-
mitted a formal complaint against Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and one of his sons, the
alcoholic Tommy SKARB (b 1970). The sheriffs officer Mr. Ole Ivar
NYB didnt record corresponding testimony and evidence as mandated by
law (cf. the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 223), and his demeanor
by and large gave a sense of gross dishonesty, cannabis adherence and crimi-
nal predisposition.
In any case copies of all SMS-missives from Mr. Geir Ove Skarb was formally
handed over to Mr. Nyb, and he received a rather detailed oral account of the
various threats launched. Mr. Nyb was also time and again warned that
Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son Tommy was expected to make an attempt on
the plaintiffs life in the near future, and by reason of that should be apprehend-
ed and locked up without undue delay.

Though Mr. Nyb initially and symptomatically insisted that none outside
the police force should be informed about Mr. Geir Ove Skarbs threats, the
complainant arranged a meeting with the local Chief Municipal Social Welfare
Officer a few minutes after leaving the sheriff office. The Chief Municipal
Welfare Officer was shown the SMS threats Mr. Skarb had sent to the plain-

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
4
tiffs private cellphone, and she also received written copies of selected
missives.
As the threats per se and Mr. Skarbs abnormal demeanor in general was
indicative of dangerous and deep-seated psychiatric disorders, the welfare
officer was admonished to inform the municipal mental health care department
about the life endangering situation ASAP whereas the plaintiff demanded him
compulsory detained in a hospital under the Norwegian Mental Health Act
immediately.

However, as the days and weeks went by, it became increasingly clear neither
the police nor the psychiatric health care service did the slightest to arrest or
confine Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son. Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and Tommy
Skarb was frequently seen snooping around in the vicinity of the plaintiffs
home throughout October 2010 oftentimes at dead of night.

On November 13, 2010, a dark green Peugeot 605 slowly approached the com-
plainants house in sen 4, Brattvg, from northwest the driver was Mr.
Karl-Even INDRESTRAND (b 1967). Around 25 meters west of the plaintiffs
house hidden by snowy trees and old garages the car halted, and a
passenger holding a shotgun stepped off..crouching somewhat as he tiptoed
toward said domicile.
The person with the shotgun was not surprisingly Mr. Tommy Skarb,
and at 02:45 AM he knocked on the plaintiffs exterior door most ready to
shoot down the latter at first sight!

As earlier indicated, the complainant had certainly expected and numerous times
warned against an armed assault carried out by e.g. Mr. Tommy Skarb and/or
his crapulent father, so naturally no one opened the safely locked front
door that night!
And, as things actually turned out, Mr. Tommy Skarb proceeded to loud shout-
ing and fist hammering the door rabidly before retiring to the blackhearted Mr.
Indrestrand and the waiting car.

The attempted murder triggered several new visits to the sheriff office in NO-
Brattvg (e.g. Nov. 15, Nov. 16, and Nov. 19), and Nov. 15 the plaintiff also had
a new meeting with the local Chief Municipal Social Welfare Officer and the
section manager of the municipal mental health care department. The com-
plainants message to the police and the public health service was identical: Mr.
Geir Ove Skarb, Mr. Tommy Skarb, and their accomplices was mentally ill
criminals most likely to make new attempts on the plaintiffs life before long,
and should consequently be arrested and locked up forthwith!
While the sheriffs officer Mr. Kre BALSNES behaved execrably impu-

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
5
dent and apparently supported the attempted murder, the manager of the
municipal mental health care department acted in accordance with
administrative guidelines and promised to forward the detainment application to
her superior* (*i.e. a German physician called Dr. Mller).

Due to 19 years of completely illegal surveillance and terrorizing of the plain-
tiff in his private house etc, the police have audiovisual recordings of the att-
empted murder at their disposal.

No matter what and very much as expected; Norwegian authorities did no-
thing whatsoever to examine witnesses or arrest those directly involved in des-
cribed murder attempt..on the contrary the police indeed interfered with
witnesses through threats and slimy enticement (In this connection its particu-
larly worth mentioning Mr. Per-Narve HURLEN and his son, Tony HURLEN
[both NO-Brattvg]. Its clear Tony Hurlen opportunistically and at the expense
of his accomplices has acted as a simple police informer in order to escape
imprisonment for a number of break-ins and thefts he participated in, and his
father is suspected of willful destruction of the plaintiffs property.), and its
perfectly clear the police force AO did their best to hamper legal evidence
gathering and criminal investigation!

In connection with the attempted murder of Nov. 13, 2010, one also make furt-
her reference to a pair of crooked pro forma calls from the Special Unit for
Police Matters at NO-Hamar.
The actual telephone calls took place on Nov. 16 and 17, respectively, and the
purpose of the corresponding and malicious inquisition was undoubtedly to
collect information enabling Norwegian authorities to destroy evidence and
manipulate witnesses etc (The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police has
wholeheartedly supported the insane complot, and there has been conspiratorial
meetings between the Minister of Justice and the Police Mr. Knut STOR-
BERGET and the highly corrupted and incompetent leader of the Special
Unit for Police Matters, the former police officer Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS.).

Frequently pestered by the stark psychopathic Geir Ove Skarb et al, the next
attempted assassination came off on March 10, HA.
In the afternoon a woman identified as Ms. Linda SVENSLI* (*place of abode:
NO-6462 Raudsand) appeared outside the complainants front door in sen 4,
Brattvg, leading a small child (probably her own). In the childs satchel was
hidden a loaded handgun, and Ms. Svensli had planned to introduce herself as a
ticket selling raffle agent. On the pretext of digging out the raffle-book from the
satchel, she would grasp the handgun and pick off the plaintiff with several
shots!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
6
Nevertheless Ms. Svenslis vile plan didnt succeed; the brainsick plot had
been wholly disclosed beforehand, and none opened the door for her..after a
few minutes she and the child retired to the waiting getaway car* (*maybe
driven by the childs father) with unfinished business.

The plaintiff had never had any kind of contact with Ms. Linda Svensli before
she attempted to murder him, and she was in every single respect a complete
stranger.

The second completed assault with intent to kill the plaintiff this year, came to
pass on March 12.
Around 07:35 PM the complainant left his house in sen 4, Brattvg, to pur-
chase groceries. Making his way to the local convenience store on foot, the
plaintiff made several observations en route indicating hostile persons covertly
attempted to monitor his movements.
At 07:45 PM inside the grocery the plaintiff spotted Ms. Linda Svensli.
Ms. Svensli was wholly unaware her whereabouts and identity had been mapped
and disclosed, and she did her best to look innocent while filling her grocery tote
with a few items from the shelves. The wanna-be assassin was wearing complet-
ely dark clothes this evening, and her hair had been colored stark black Ms.
Svensli had doubtlessly tried to change her appearance somewhat!
Ms. Svensli left the shop around 07:50 PM, and the plaintiff 10 minutes later.
Outside the convenience store the complainant made new observations confirm-
ing Mr. Tommy Skarb and his mentally deranged accomplices indeed had pre-
pared to murder him with a scoped hunting rifle caliber .308 Winchester
(7.62X51mm NATO), and two undercover police agents was also spotted right
in front of corresponding commercial premises..both very clearly informed
about the planned assassination!
As the plaintiff very cautiously approached his private house, he spotted a sniper
attempting to camouflage on the nearby hillcrest. From his firing position the
apparently inept sniper overlooked the street leading to the complainants domi-
cile offering an operational firing range to the homecoming target varying be-
tween 55 and 110 meters.
Pretty much aware the exact location of corresponding sniper hide, the plaintiff
positioned himself at a strategic point beneath said hillcrest totally invisible to
the lurking sniper. After 10 minutes the perplexed sniper unsuccessfully tried to
find a new and adequate firing position, and after 20 minutes he telephonically
ordered his accomplices to localize the complainant. Around 5 minutes later an
elderly Peugeot passenger car was seen as it moved into the plaintiffs observing
sector at a snails pace the man driving the white car was identified as Mr.
ystein SOLHJELL* (*place of abode: NO-6462 Raudsand), and his passenger
as Mr. Torbjrn RAUSAND* (*place of abode: NO-6462 Raudsand).

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
7
Earlier this evening the same car had transported the sniper to the initial point*
(*i.e. a point less than 70 meters east of the high school in Brattvg) for his sub-
sequent and snow-ridden march along the ridge of the hill leading to said firing
position, and now the men in it was shocked as they unexpectedly had a face-to-
face encounter with the person they attempted to murder!
Nevertheless as soon as the lunatic villains in the car felt sure they were out
of sight, they telephonically consulted the sniper. And once again the
frustrated sniper tried to find a suitable firing position, but his endeavors was
minutely monitored and the shot he haphazardly let off at 08:45 PM was indeed
doomed to miss its target!
Less than 5 minutes after the attempted murder, the men in the white Peugeot
threw exploding fireworks from the car windows as they anxiously fluttered
around in the village center their aim, of course, was to led persons who had
heard the gunshot to believe the bang stemmed from more or less casual use of
pyrotechnics!


The offenders motives and personality

Since 1992 the plaintiff has been involuntarily involved in a most serious con-
flict with Norwegian authorities, and the total number of attempted murders and
extremely perilous onslaughts planned and executed by their officials may ex-
ceed 150 specific incidents. Some of these attacks are described or referred to in
the complainants Internet publications viz: Formal Complaint vs the
Kingdom of Norway (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9651759), UN-
Documents (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9663301), and/or Impeachment
(http://www.scribd.com/doc/9692417).
So in effect its certainly not a new trend members of the government,
(senior) civil servants or police hired hatchet men attempts to murder or seri-
ously harm the plaintiff..its merely a sinistrous continuation and confirmation
of the heinous criminality and widespread double-dealing verily characterizing
Norwegian authorities at large since 1992! And lets make it unmistakably
clear forthright: when it comes to the stark unlawful and unilaterally condemn-
able aggression abidingly nourished and actively exercised by Norwegian auth-
orities, there are no mitigating circumstances or ethically defendable aspects
whatever on the contrary there are dozens of highly aggravating factors and
nauseatingly diabolic elements affirming the willful evil-mindedness and morbid
criminality truly hallmarking the vicious terrorism and sabotage Norwegian
authorities has exposed the complainant to since 1992!

As for the etiology of this obnoxiously fiendish pleasure in hurting particularly
right-minded persons and eagerly sustaining complex lawbreaking, its natural
to point out the wide-spread though internationally unknown variant of common

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
8
psychopathy befittingly termed Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant
Syndrome* (*NPSMS) as a definitive main reason.
Considering the intrinsic meaning and make up of the NPSMS term per se, one
should be aware the Norwegian state apparatus vehemently abhors anybody
morally and intellectually qualified to serve as e.g. a police officer, senior civil
servant or politician only those markedly depraved and otherwise incompe-
tent are willing to do duty as e.g. (senior) civil servants or statesmen/-women in
nowadays Norway..and all parts of the public administration and judicial
system etc are indeed strongly influenced by this cumbersome fact.
In the Internet document Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway, the
plaintiff has given this description of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Mal-
ignant Syndrome sic:

Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2
Comments on disqualification), reasonable sane and sagacious readers
pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: Can the various
crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 've been
perpetrated by mentally sound creatures...?
Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data
on documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since
1992, it's quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query:

Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies,
criminalism, hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and
fiendishness verily characterizing the cracked personality of most
Norwegian officials are, far and away, the worst European and first
world example of gross intrapopular depravity and collective
insaneness procurable!

Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and
flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and
wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the
infected nation which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom
of Satan!

Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher
cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials,
the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality
disorders particularly psychopathy and various perversions are
predominant conditions.
The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally
typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may
however viewed as an endemic phenomenon partially rupture the

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
9
commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of
disease classification. A genetically rooted and markedly offbeat
syndrome symptomatically approaching classical psychopathy and
frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural pathology
conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly
unbecoming to introduce the acronym NPSMS* *Norwegian Police
and Statesman Malignant Syndrome (if more convenient, you may think
of NPSMS simply as Norwegian psychopathy or Norwegian folie, of
course)...!
In Doc's ##633 and 2037 pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a
number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms viz:

Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis,
rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy,
superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjust-
ment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy,
professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance,
cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect
and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia,
corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation,
religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartio-
philia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrust-
ful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned
eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability,
anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc.

The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical
but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated
diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst
the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the
thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic
misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals
are truly archetypical of regular psychoses. The severe, recurrent and
wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to
NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder,
however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous
paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism.
In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some
precipitating factors i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all
likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the
NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors as a
matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate
readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
10
obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...! Ethically indefensible,
evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically
acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious dogmas
omitted, of course).....consequently motive and means appearing
practically identical unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a
cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and
Statesman Malignant Syndrome.
As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary
metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal
cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be
crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS.
Various somatosensory structures and convergence zones in the
ventromedial prefrontal sector of the brain may be visibly damaged, and
dysfunctions of the medial/lateral orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus
accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are
common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and
capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be significantly
reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways of
neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired monoamine
based weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral
striatum may be NPSMS indicative.
Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable
of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests
working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to
be intact...


Specifically returning to the police employed miscreants and entirely condemn-
able senior civil servants guilty of provoking and actively sustaining the att-
empted murders focused on in nearby complaint, its an uncomplicated task to
establish that practically all personality traits pathognomonically associated with
NPSMS are amply present.
Moreover, it should be firmly emphasized the plaintiff had filed a number of
formal complaints against some of the police force members several years be-
fore they became involved in the endeavors to kill the complainant this and
previous year one mention by name: Mr. yvind VERPEIDE (sheriff, Haram
Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg), Mr Ove Petter FINNES (sheriffs officer, Haram
Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg), Mr. Yngve SKOVLY (jurist/prosecutor, lesund
Police Station, NO-lesund), and Mr. Ingmar FARSTAD (station chief
inspector, lesund Police Station, NO-lesund).
Mr. Jon Steven HASSELVIK (chief of police, NO lesund), Mr. Ole Ivar
NYB (sheriffs officer, Haram Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg) and Mr. Kre

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
11
BALSNES (sheriffs officer, Haram/rskog Sheriff Office, NO-Brattvg/-
Sjholt) are all newly employed in their respective posts, and had not been
reported by the plaintiff before the attempted murders in 2010 and 2011.
Its perfectly obvious formally reported police employees/executives may enter-
tain a personal feeling of hatred and vindictiveness towards the complainant!

There are assuredly quite a few negative things to mention as regards the Nor-
wegian police force, and even a modest treatise should easily fill at least 5000
printed pages! It should be evident enough, however, we cant afford to spend so
much time and space on the actual theme in a simple human rights com-
plaint.so, we shall move on to the next group of formally reported and expli-
citly suspected baddies in this case viz:

Mr. Tor-Aksel BUSCH (Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions),
Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS (leader of the Norwegian Special Unit for Police
Matters), Mr. Thorbjrn KLUNDSETER (Norwegian district attorney,
Hedmark/Oppland county), and Mr. Knut STORBERGET (Norwegian
Minister of Justice and the Police).

At the first place: everybody in this group but Mr. Storberget are former
police executives noted for their unreasonable and highly manifest favoring of
the police force!
Some of the notorious corruption and incompetence distinguishing this quartet
AO has been animadverted upon by the plaintiff beforehand sic:



FORMAL NOTIFICATION
OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY

DATE: May 01, 2008


SUBJECT:

Formal complaint against the Norwegian Director General of Public
Prosecutions,

criminal proceedings against members of the Norwegian Council of State,
the Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Parliament, AO.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
12
FROM:

Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway.


TO:

The Norwegian King in Council of State, NO-Oslo, Norway.


THROUGH:

The Sheriff Office, NO-6270 Brattvg, Norway.


REMARKS:

Nearby notification is an integral part of the official United Nations petition
FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY by Mr Wilh.
Werner WINTHER, and may consequently encompass comments and
information otherwise natural to omit in this kind of legal documents.
Whereas theres an imminent danger of new and potentially mortiferous attacks
carried out or underhandedly planned by representatives of Norwegian
authorities, judicial examination of the appellant in casu are acceptable insofar
as and only if the interrogation whereabouts are duly approved and
supervised by armed/neutral guards conscientiously appointed and directed by
the appropriate authorities of significantly healthier and more upright nations
than Norway.
Norwegian authorities should address all correspondence to counselor Johs. A.
ASPEHAUG, P.O Box 837, 6001 lesund.
Representatives of foreign governments, human rights organizations,
international tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying
themselves as authentic messengers. No letters should be forwarded through the
official postal services of Norway or DHL.
Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in sen 4,
NO-Brattvg.


REFERENCES:

a) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*here-

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
13
after referred to as FOCO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1217,

b) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as INDO) by Mr
Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1173,

c) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director
General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page,

d) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating
Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page,

e) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special
Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the
Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.


IN RE:

Lets make it perfectly plain already now;

The addressee of this legal notification the Norwegian
King and his Council of State are among the absolute
main culprits in the criminal case incident to the various
atrocities and human rights violations &c described in
FOCO/INDO....:


Before kicking off the from A to Z daffy and lawless terror-campaign against
me in Oslo, Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and her deranged partners in crime
collusively obtained operational permission from e.g the Norwegian Parliament,
Government, Supreme Court and Kings Council.....!
(cf FOCO, p 30)

Ms Harlem Brundtland and her mafiosi in turn presented the disastrous
complot for the Norwegian monarch, Mr Harald HEADLESS, who spitefully
approved the insanities in the usually hebdomadal Council of State.
(cf FOCO, p 31)

In 1992 Mr Harald HEADLESS (cf p 31) willingly sanctioned the stark illegal
and doubtlessly cracked conspiracy against me, and since then he and his
nearest family ve exhibited particular and to me wholly undesirable
interest for my personal undertakings.
The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and 4

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
14
general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway in
this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them (cf
Aphorisms ##135, 136 and 137 etc). It should also be called attention to the
disgraceful fact Harald Headless father, King Olav V, had one of his faithful
employees incarcerated and maltreated at a state controlled bedlam exclusively
because he championed the human rights of other and unseemly hounded/ex-
ploited courtiers.....
(cf FOCO, pp 6869)

Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and
flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy
diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation
which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom of Satan!
(cf FOCO, p 122)
Studying Article 1 of the Norwegian Constitution, we learn that Norway is a
limited and hereditary monarchy. The present monarch King Harald V the
Headless (cf pp 31 and 6869), was born the 21th of February 1937, and
formally swore the oath specified in Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution
Feb 21, 1958.
Mr Headless, upon the death of his father, took office as Norwegian head of
state January 17th 1991, and officially swore the oath laid down in Article 9 of
the Norwegian Constitution four days later.
To those acquainted with the innate corruptibility, judgmental maladroitness
and psychopathological temperament prevalent amongst Norwegian senior civil
servants and officials (cf pp 122124 above), it should be no surprise to find
essential parts of the Norwegian Constitution going on the rocks right from the
start..
(cf FOCO, p 169)

In any event King Harald V the Headless most flagrantly has violated the oaths
laid down in Article 9 and Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution he has
repetitively and mala fide sanctioned and awarded the most serious and disho-
norable examples of state supported rottenness and premeditated human rights
violations ever seen in modern Norway (cf pp 31, 6869 and 126 etc), and his
regal malversation are intensely disgraceful and totally condemnable indeed.
(cf FOCO, p 170)

The downright corruption and hell-destined iniquity abidingly displayed by
Norwegian magistracy in juxtaposed facts of nearby case, are unparalleled in
modern monarchic history of law, and execrable diabolism and gangrenous
ghoulishness interosculates their exceedingly opprobrious criminality.
(cf INDO, pp 12)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
15
The Kingdom of Norway have intentionally, profusely and extendedly acted in
a manner extremely deleterious and discreditable for the IHF and its various
members particularly if the obnoxious crimes and premeditated violations of
contractual provisions are accepted without adequate execution of sentence.
(cf INDO, p 67)


Studying above excerpts it should be entirely evident the Norwegian King and
his corrupted council are thoroughly incompetent when it comes to adjudging
anything at all in this case, and thats about quoad hoc precisely the
conclusion arrived at in FOCO, pp 89:

On account of preceding observations, its evident all instances/persons menti
oned beneath the heading Accused in nearby complaint are entirely disquali-
fied from exercising any degree of judicial authority in this case.....; theyre
those legally reported/charged, and should be treated as suspects.

However Norwegian authorities may correctly apply Article 93 in their Con-
stitution (sic):

In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote
the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Stor-
ting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international orga-
nization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right,
within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance
with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities,
although not the power to alter this Constitution. For the Storting to grant
such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be
present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution.
The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an
international organization, whose decisions only have application for
Norway purely under international law.

Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to fulfill their juridical
obligations as stated above and entrust impartial representatives from the
United Nations with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and
adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are
charged in this legal case unique in Norwegian history of law.


As regards the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-
Aksel BUSCH (b Mar 17, 1950), hes formally and directly subject to the
Norwegian King in Council of State. Mr Busch is the head of the Norwegian

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
16
Prosecuting Authority* (*cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act secs 55 and
56), and hes not subordinate to any government department per se though, as
the Council of State largely is composed of ministers acting in their capacity as
political supremos of their respective government ministries, many of his
decisions ex officio are explicitly marked by departmental influence.
Directly beneath the Director General of Public Prosecutions, we find the
regional public prosecutors superintending the activities of their respective
police districts in Norway.....and it should be emphasized that Mr Busch and
most public prosecutors has a past as regular police officer(-s).....and, as for
the Norwegian police force, quite a few and highly apposite remarks has
beforehand been put on paper:

While 90% of regular Norwegian police officers has clearly marked,
psychopathic personality traits, the actual prevalence of explicit
psychopathy/sadism are 100% amongst the Norwegian Police Security Service
officers
(cf FOCO, p 10)

The seemingly irresistible urge to compensate for assorted shortcomings
through stark falsehood and extensive nefariousness, soon turned out as one of
the foremost hallmarks of these fundamentally vicious ruffians....
(about officers from Majorstua Police Station in NO-Oslo, cf FOCO p 16)

The police schemed provocations which far and away may be more
comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above may
nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about
other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and
stigmatizing alone.....and in this connection the most attractive of the
alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until
the victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation.
Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding (the police may v.g
surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception
playing songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units
exacerbating sadness and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping
(may be induced e.g through intoxication, covert radiation and various accident
setups), or simply assassination.
(cf FOCO, pp 114115)

By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists,
the Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing
lengths to actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious
criminality committed by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
17
various mass media private as well as state owned are very likely to reflect
this inglorious fact!
(cf FOCO, p 115)

It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts
notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable degree
of responsibility (cf pp 104121), and as a matter of fact and course; 2000 of
the worst policemen/-women in active service should be locked up straightaway
(the overall treatment of these prisoners should be extraordinary harsh indeed),
and another 3000 of these chronic malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core
criminals who can be sentenced and enjailed somewhat later without seriously
endangering the noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses
and penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) remaining personnel,
chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very closely
superintended and permanently excluded from the national police force
whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and otherwise
competent persons!
(cf FOCO, pp 155156)

Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse of audiovisual spy-
tech in Norway ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers are now
picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to
lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human
rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption.
The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government
officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of
piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to
evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: virtually
always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal
persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or
public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually
supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential
conversations/happenings, and to
copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the
sum of documents relating to the case cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for
the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms!
(cf INDO, p 61)

Norwegian police has for years actively collected information about the
pathogenic effects of bodily/mental stress and torture, and theyve villainously
surveilled and persecuted real psychiatric patients in their private homes while
tentatively exploring techniques inflicting various degrees of disability.
(cf INDO, p 85)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
18
As for Norwegian police officers, youll get a tolerably accurate picture of
their mentality etc by studying the various documents above item my
aphorisms.
Nevertheless the striking attempts Norwegian police officers has made to
infiltrate vg humanitarian/charitable, political and health related organizations
etc in order to further professional influence, should be emphasized.
Unfortunately members of such coalitions may be easily duped, as many of them
are naturally caritative, idealistic and unbiased characteristics the police
officers, wholly undeservingly, wish to be professionally associated with.....
(cf INDO, p 97)

Ad nauseam weve witnessed how Norwegian police officers expediently
perpetrates and provokes grave criminality exclusively to ride high on the
confusion and fear thereby produced. Besides, aposematically liberticidal
bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goose-
steps towards the totalitarian, Norwegian police state.....and in major respects
the democratic government system has proven ruefully deficient.
(cf INDO, p 102)

Deposit your money in a savings bank, and receive interests; save negative
criticism of the Norwegian police, and get your due profit in hell!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #26)

No disaster so grave no circumstances so terrifying, that interference from
Norwegian police not will aggravate the situation considerably!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #28)

Lend the Norwegian police a willing hand: dig your own grave, pay the
undertaker, set fire to the cross, curse justice violently, praise the Habeas
Corpus Act of 1679 and administer the poison yourself listening
to the national anthem!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #45)

Its written in Luke 4:57 that the kingdoms of the world belongs to the Devil
and sure enough:
ample experience ve confirmed that the Kingdom of Norway indeed is ruled by
Satan.....that the Norwegian authorities vanguarded by the national police force
are his loyal disciples worshipping evildoing, deceiving the general population
and terrorizing those righteous (cf Matthew 15:89 and Isaiah 29:13)!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #48)

Wherever in Norway theres a police station youll find a satanic temple and
diabolic stronghold!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
19
(cf Aphorisms &c, #51)

Norwegian police officers will normally take great pains to get all relevant
facts of the corruption case against them on the table before throwing the
entire stuff to the dogs, assassinating the chef--cuisine, falsely accusing the
butler and closing down the whole restaurant for purported health
care reasons!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #67)

Law-abiding Norwegians should forthright join forces fully prepared to
protect themselves and suffering fellowmen against the rampageous
criminality of Norwegian police officers!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #98)

Its not entirely proper to say the Norwegian Police Security Service lacks
responsibility, care, generosity and culture.....whereas theyre positively
responsible for villainously assassinating dozens of guiltless persons, and
empirically shows marked care while generously spreading their pernicious
bacteria cultures in your private house and car (Cf Aphorism #45 etc)!
(cf Aphorisms &c, #110)

Referring to FOCO, the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions is
categorically listed amongst those accused in this case (cf p 2), and Mr Tor-
Aksel Busch is moreover explicitly named on p 34:

Supporting the psychotic complot against me from the onset, the office of the
Director General of Public Prosecutions was headed by Mr Georg Fr.
RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH.


As evident from Document #8123 (cf INDO, pp 157158), FOCO constitute an
essential part of and is enclosed with corresponding report dated and duly
handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg Aug 13 last year.
In his letter of Jan 29th HA (cf ref c) Mr Busch symptomatically evades
references to said report of Aug 13, while tellingly calling attention to my
letter of Sep 12 and formal notification of Nov 06, 2007 (cf INDO, pp 159160
and 167172, respectively). Indicated negligence is not casual, of course, and it
should be underscored that FOCO is unambiguously mentioned in both
documents referred to by Mr Busch (cf INDO, pp 159 and 168, respectively).
Mr Busch has certainly been fully aware FOCO as well as INDO was part and
parcel of and as clearly indicated enclosed with the legal reports in
question.....so, in effect theres no doubt about it; the Norwegian Director
General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel Busch, has mala fide and ex

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
20
officio acted manifestly contrary to the formal disqualification rules hes
professionally bound to obey.

Examining Mr Buschs reasons for breaking the law in the present case, we
should pay close attention to the fact two of the persons he attempts to acquit
Mr Jens STOLTENBERG and Mr Knut STORBERGET both are members
of the Kings Council*:

*The Council of State (cf Article 12 of the Norwegian Constitution) or
King's Council (cf pp 3031 above) normally consist of the Norwegian
King en personne, the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance, the Minister of
Local Government and Regional Development, the Minister of Foreign Affairs,
the Minister of Defence, the Minister of Environment, the Minister of Petroleum
and Energy, the Minister of International Development, the Minister of Trade
and Industry, the Minister of Transport and Communications, the Minister of
Education and Research, the Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion, the
Minister of Justice and the Police, the Minister of Children and Equality, the
Minister of Culture and Church Affairs, the Minister of Health and Care
Services, the Minister of Government Administration and Reform, the Minister
of Agriculture and Food, the Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs, and the
administrative head of the Office of the Prime Minister functioning as the
Council's secretary.
The various members of the Council of State represents the political core of the
Norwegian Government, and the nation's highest administrative authority are
correspondingly vested in the King's Council (cf Article 3 of the Norwegian
Constitution). Said minister councilors acts in their capacity as political
supremos of their respective government ministries e.g the Ministry of Justice
and the Police or the Ministry of Health and Care Services, and more or less
subordinate to these ministries we find a conglomerate of directorates and
different administrative organs.
(cf FOCO, p 170)


As it appears from FOCO, p 02, leading members of the Norwegian Council of
State as well as principal representatives of corresponding royal house are
amongst those explicitly culpable/accused in this case..so, in consequence:
Mr Tor-Aksel Busch is Prime Minister Jens Stoltenbergs and Minister of
Justice Knut Storbergets particeps criminis* (*cf p 182 above).
This fact naturally sheds light on Mr Buschs lawbreaking..: hes quite simply
wholly on his own initiative or on orders from political executives
backing up his partners in crime!


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
21
Of intrinsic interest and juridical importance, certain aspects of Mr Buschs
modus operandi in this case should be elucidated somewhat further:

Referring to my letters of Sep 12 and Nov 06 last year, Mr Busch launches an
altogether ludicrous attack on the actual facts of the case he writes (translated
from Norwegian, cf ref c):

..it appears that the alleged and criminal offence is attributable to Prime
Minister Jens Stoltenberg, Minister of Justice Knut Storberget, and chief of
police Arne S. Karoliussen (Sunnmre police district).

Now, in the first instance, lets take a further look at my formal notification of
Nov 06, 2007* (*cf INDO, pp 167172).
The notification is addressed to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg, and
introductorily runs as follows:


SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY REPORTED:


Oct 27, 2007:

At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my
PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus Downloader.
The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.


Oct 28, 2007:

In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggres-
sive attack aimed at ruining my PC.
The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed

.
Nov 01, 2007:

Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM while (utilizing my PC in sen 4, NO-Brattvg)
editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA,
representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT-copies of
said pics.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
22
The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be
exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried
out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.


Nov 03, 2007:

Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM while I visited the shop RS Elektronikk AS in
NO-Brattvg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middle-
aged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior.
Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively
obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly
sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program
Microsoft Word.


Indicated notification of Nov 06 ends suchwise:

Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in No-
Brattvg the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC
the 6th inst my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down
(phone #: [+47] 92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the
Norwegian company NetCom)...!
In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention to the fact I
the 5th inst visited web sites like:

UNDP Anti-Corruption Practitioners Network,
http://anticorruption.undp.sk (at 20:20 CET),

Transparency International,
http://transparency.org/ (at 20:24 CET),

Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO),
http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),

Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia,
http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),

WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network,
http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),

A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity,
http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
23
CET).


I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private
Yahoo! Mail contacts (wwerner77@yahoo.com).....and, in view of the stark
illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and
corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this
case, its quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the
sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet
activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like sabotaging my Internet
connection!


To begin with one call attention to the irrefutable fact Mr Stoltenberg, Mr
Storberget, and Mr Karoliussen has been described as the actual perpetrators of
the crimes chronologically referred to in my notification of Nov 06 precisely
nowhere said document contains nothing whatsoever pointing to a
direct/performatory connection between indicated/reported crimes and this
loathsome troika! Moreover; studying the nature of corresponding crimes we
immediately notes that these with a single exception are directly and
explicitly linked with PC usage and Internet related undertakings, and the only
persons expressively coupled with and more or less forthrightly accused of
sabotaging these activities are ....the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling
my Internet activities.... (cf foregoing section, item INDO p 172)!


It sticks out a mile that Mr Busch wholly on purpose endeavors to
obscure the facts of the case by establishing a fictive/operational and
demonstrably nonsensical link between reported crimes and aforementioned
triad, and his fraudulence becomes even more manifest on account of the fact
Mr Stoltenberg and Mr Storberget still referring to my formal notification of
Nov 06 last year both are unmistakably mentioned in conjunction with a
demand for criminal proceedings against them AO submitted before commented
offences actually took place:

It's especially discreditable but not at all surprising the hereinabove
reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian
Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and
the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian
Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of
Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*:
(cf INDO, p 169)


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
24
The fact quoted paragraph is appended to the notification in question as a mere
postscript scarcely makes Mr Buschs obvious efforts to confuse the facts of this
case less conspicuous...!

If examining the other of my documents referred to by Mr Busch the formal
complaint of Sep 12 previous year, one finds that corresponding text is
straightforward and very difficult to misunderstand (translated from
Norwegian):


Hereby all criminal acts mentioned in enclosed letter dated DD
and addressed to counselor Johs. A ASPEHAUG, lesund, are
formally reported to the police cf the Criminal Procedure Act
secs 223226.*

Those guilty should be charged/sentenced/punished.


*The actual letter to counselor Aspehaug (cf INDO, pp 159160) runs suchwise:
Sep 12, 2007

Dear Mr Aspehaug:

As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were
quite busy here in NO-Brattvg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours
these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in sen 4 13
14 times!
Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier cf Doc's ##7084 and
7090.

As regards my comprehensive report of the 13th previous month (cf Doc #8123),
this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly
corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-lesund.
Mr Karoliussen together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the
Police Mr Knut STORBERGET are, of course, amongst the numerous
malefactors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining
and natural life in this unparalleled case.

Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in
NO-lesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head
post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights
organizations addressed to your office cf Incomplete FORMAL

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
25
COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611
&c.

Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described
criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw!


As one sees, the corrupted chief of police Mr A S Karoliussen and the
Norwegian Minister of Justice (and the Police) Mr K Storberget are specifically
mentioned in a distinct section of the letter where they unequivocally and
exclusively are linked with my report of Aug 13, 2007, and the thereto
enclosed documents* (*i.e: Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the
Kingdom of Norway pp 1195, and Internet Documents pp 1156).

Before winding up our modest expatiation on Mr Buschs deliberate attempts to
corrupt essential facts of this grievous case, one call attention to the fact he has
mentioned my report of Sep 25 last year absolutely nowhere in his inculpating
letter of Jan 29, HA.

Said report was correctly handed over to Haram Sheriff Office (NO-Brattvg)
the 25th of Sep 2007, and described sabotage of and theft from one of my rental
cars. Decisively attributable to Norwegian police officers, we may rather
reasonably imagine that Mr Busch found it tactically convenient to pass over
indicated crimes in suggestive silence....!

Its altogether unnecessary to provide additional proofs testifying to Mr Buschs
premeditated and definitely illegal obfuscation of facts in this case, whereas the
documentary evidence hitherto presented comfortably enables us to draw the
following and peremptorily justifiable

CONCLUSION:

Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH, born March 17 1950, has in his
capacity as Norwegian Director General of Public Prose-
cutions premeditatedly and in explicitly aggravating manner
obstructed lawful execution of justice by intentionally cor-
rupting essential facts of the present case and mala fide sup-
pressing information he positively knew was all important as
regards e.g unbiased criminal investigation of corre-
sponding offences. In light of established facts and manifest
implications its beyond all question Mr Busch in order to evade
legal prosecution of himself and his accomplices entirely will-
fully has committed a number of procedural errors aimed at

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
26
(v.g); falsifying the genuine cause of action, impeding impartial
securing/submission/examination of evidence, and generally
covering up a most offensive array serious crimes directly as-
cribable to Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants.


Mr Buschs obnoxious malversation ex officio is certainly not limited to this
specific case, and it behooves absolutely to carry out a meticulous and wholly
unbiased expert examination of every single case he has dealt with in an official
capacity from 1981 to 2008 included.
Particular attention should be paid to Mr Buschs highly conspicuous interaction
with the Norwegian Police Security Service* (*cf FOCO, pp 104121 &c)
after 1984 and down to this very day, and his professional relations with Mr
Lars FRNSDAL* (*cf FOCO, pp 7374) has by the way been rather
offbeat most of the time...!
With reference to this matter one should bear in mind that Assistant Director
General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE, in May 2001 was
formally reported to the Norwegian King in Council of State ipsissima verba:

Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, was appointed accessary Director General of Public
Prosecutions by the Kings Council on Jan 09th 1998, and has ex officio
recidivistic and arrogantly disgraced his office by extensive and intentional
malversation particularly in civil proceedings and formal complaint
connections where the suspected party and accused persons were police
employees, senior state officials or, otherwise, public servants.
Mr Jahres absolutely unacceptable irresponsibility and loathsome corruption
are clearly manifested in his letter/decision of the 04th prev m (cf encs A, N, O,
P, R & S) where he without criminal investigation drops notifications
encompassing v.g;

premeditated homicides, attempted murder and complicity to
manslaughter/-slaying (cf encs B, C, D & Q),

gross vandalism, burglary, illicit search/seizure and aggravated thefts
(cf encs C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, N, O & P),

comprehensive/systematic corruption, forgery, misdemeanor/felony and
extensive dereliction of duty (cf encs B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P,
Q, R & S),

false accusations, illegal deprivation of liberty and unlawful detention
in custody (cf encs F, G & H),


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
27
torture/molestation, illegitimate monitoring/surveillance, defamations,
assaults and breach of precedents item duty of secrecy (cf encs B, C, E,
F, H, I, L, Q & R).


I refer to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Articles 2, 5,
6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 and demand Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq,
immediately suspended/dismissed from his present office in accordance with the
Civil Service Act secs 15, 16 and 17 cf sec 6 ib item the Constitution sec 22
and the Criminal Procedure Act sec 56 etc.

Mr Jahre should, without delay, be subjected to independent criminal
investigation/proceedings and charged/sentenced in agreement with Norwegian
law.
(cf INDO, pp 47)


Mr Jahre is a notorious police aficionado, and in INDO p 104 we find this
passage:

It should be underscored that the recent chief of the Norwegian Security
Service Police, Mr Jrn HOLME, is Mr Drums former secretary. Mr Holme
has also worked as a senior public prosecutor for the National Authority for
Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in
Norway kokrim, and thus is a former colleague of vg Mr Hans-Petter
JAHRE (cf Doc #115 above) and Mr Anstein Birger GJENGEDAL (cf Doc
#377 above entry of Oct 26, 2000).


Returning to Mr Tor-Aksel Busch and the criminal proceedings against him, its
perfectly clear his professional corruption are punishable in accordance with a
good many sections of the Norwegian Penal Code. There are a number of
aggravating circumstances to be considered, and Mr Buschs putrid decision
of Jan 29 HA (cf ref c) is most certainly invalid cf the Norwegian Criminal
Procedure Act secs 60, 314, 342, 343, 384, 385 and 390392, the Norwegian
Public Administration Act secs 1, 2, 6 and 41, item the Norwegian Courts of
Justice Act secs 106121 etc.
As regards Mr Buschs disqualification and criminality ex officio, the
Norwegian King in Council of State are according to the Norwegian Criminal
Procedure Act sec 64 supposed to handle these matters, and Article 22 of the
Norwegian Constitution reads:

The Prime Minister and the other Members of the Council of

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
28
State, together with the State Secretaries, may be dismissed
by the King without any prior court judgment, after he has
heard the opinion of the Council of State on the subject. The
same applies to senior officials employed in government offices
or in the diplomatic or consular service, to the highest-
ranking civil and ecclesiastical officials, commanders of regi-
ments and other military formations, commandants of forts
and officers commanding warships. Whether pensions should
be granted to senior officials thus dismissed shall be deter-
mined by the next Storting. In the interval they shall receive
two thirds of their previous pay.
Other senior officials may only be suspended by the King,
and must then without delay be charged before the Courts,
but they may not, except by court judgment, be dismissed nor,
against their will, transferred.
All senior officials may, without a prior court judgment,
be discharged from office upon attaining the
statutory age limit.


Cf the Norwegian Civil Service Act secs 15 and 21 (cf FOCO, pp 166168):

SECTION 15
A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily
discharged when he:
has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a
gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning
or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties,
by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves
himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or
confidence that is essential to the post.
The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to
punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving
him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation.

SECTION 21
If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to
disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal
offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution,
but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary
measures or summary discharge into consideration.


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
29
Anyhow seeing that an independent and impartial tribunal is sine qua non in
respect of a fair trial, lodging an appeal to the Norwegian King in Council of
State scarcely stands to reason at all in this case.whereas the very conspiracy
against me was enthusiastically approved by indicated monarch in person as
well as his vicious councilors (cf FOCO, pp 31 and 6869 etc)!
All decisions drawn up by the Norwegian King in Council of State should be
recorded in accordance with regulations, and telling comments on the plot
against me has been found in a special protocol reserved for matters which the
Kings Council has decided to keep secret cf the Norwegian Constitution
Articles 30 and 31 (cf FOCO, pp 163164):

ARTICLE 30
All the proceedings of the Council of State shall be entered in
its records. Diplomatic matters which the Council of State
decides to keep secret shall be entered in a special record. The
same applies to military command matters which the Council
of State decides to keep secret.
Everyone who has a seat in the Council of State has the duty
to frankly express his opinion, to which the King is bound
to listen. But it rests with the King to make a decision ac-
cording to his own judgment.
If any Member of the Council of State is of the opinion
that the King's decision conflicts with the form of govern-
ment or the laws of the Realm, or is clearly prejudicial to
the Realm, it is his duty to make strong remonstrances
against it, as well as to have his opinion entered in the
records. A Member who has not thus protested is deemed
to have been in agreement with the King, and shall be
answerable in such manner as may be subsequently de-
cided, and may be impeached by the Odelsting before
the Court of Impeachment.

ARTICLE 31
All decisions drawn up by the King shall, in order to be-
come valid, be countersigned. The decisions relating to
military command are countersigned by the person who
has presented the matter, while other decisions are counter-
signed by the Prime Minister or, if he has not been present,
by the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State present.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
30
Not only has the Norwegian King Harald V sanctioned the illegal conspiracy
against me with his personal signature, but he is in all likelihood entirely
unentitled to occupy the Norwegian Throne as well (cf FOCO, pp 169170)!
And.moreover; whereas the Norwegian King is possessed of a full-scale
Stanford-Binet IQ ominously below the absolute minimum requirement for
judges/experts (cf FOCO pp 9, 85 and 145152), his judicial authority should be
firmly rejected on that score too (with a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 137, also
the Norwegian PM Mr Jens Stoltenberg fails to meet the recommended and
corresponding noometric minimum score of 140 cf the Norwegian
Constitution Articles 12, 13 and 31 etc).

At all events Norwegian authorities the Kings Council included are
obliged to comply with the following Articles of the
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Free-
doms,
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:*



CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF
HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS


Article 13:

Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are
violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority
notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an
official capacity.


Article 14:

The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be
secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
association with a national minority, property, birth or
other status.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
31
Article 17:
Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State,
group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed
at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their
limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.

Article 18:

The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and
freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they
have been prescribed.


THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS


Article 2:

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla-
ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or
other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the
political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri-
tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-
governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 6:

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7:

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to
equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any
discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to
such discrimination.





HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
32
Article 8:

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national
tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the
constitution or by law.

Article 10:

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and
obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 28:

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and
freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29 (3):

These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the
purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30:

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State,
group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act
aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.


INTERNATIONAL COVENANT
ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS


Article 2 (1):

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure
to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights
recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as
race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or
social origin, property, birth or other status.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
33
Article 2 (3):

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein
recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding
that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official
capacity;
(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his
right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or
legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for
by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of
judicial remedy;
(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies
when granted.


Article 3:

The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right
of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in
the present Covenant.


Article 5 (1):

Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State,
group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed
at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at
their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present
Covenant.


Article 5 (2):

There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental
human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present
Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext
that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes
them to a lesser extent.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
34
Article 14 (1):

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter-
mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations
in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a
competent, independent and impartial tribunal established
by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a
trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security
in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the
parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the
court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in-
terests of justice; but any judgment rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at
law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons
otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the
guardianship of children.


Article 16:

Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be-
fore the law.


Article 26:

All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any
discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall
prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective
protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so-
cial origin, property, birth or other status.


*(In section 2 of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, it is explicitly laid
down that the Council of Europes Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms [the European Convention on Human Rights], the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights as well as the United Nations International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib its
brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in
sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation.)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
35
In this connection one call particular attention to the Norwegian Constitution
Article 110 c:

It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and
ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of
treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian
Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 secs 2 and 3).


Cf FOCO, pp 38 etc.


Studying above excerpts from various human rights conventions, it becomes
even clearer the Norwegian Council of State totally lacks the judicial power and
authority to hear and determine any thing whatever in this case (cf pp 176178
above etc)....; corresponding councilors should most determinedly be seated in
the dock theyre in all respects the malefactors, and by no means the
adjudicators!

It appears from the Norwegian Constitution Article 30 that members of the
Kings Council may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of
Impeachment (cf p 193 above), and in this connection it should be appropriate to
take a look at Articles 49, 71, 7381 and 8687 ib:


Article 49

The people exercises the Legislative Power through the Storting, which
consists of two departments, the Lagting and the Odelsting.


Article 71

The members of the Storting function as such for four successive years.


Article 73

The Storting nominates from among its members one fourth to constitute the
Lagting, the remaining three fourths to constitute the Odelsting. This
nomination shall take place at the first session of the Storting that assembles
after a new General Election, whereafter the Lagting shall remain unchanged

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
36
at all sessions of the Storting assembled after the same election, except insofar
as any vacancy which may occur among its members has to be filled by special
nomination. Each Ting holds its meetings separately and nominates its own
President and Secretary. Neither Ting may hold a meeting unless at least half
of its Members are present. However, Bills concerning amendments to the
Constitution may not be dealt with unless at least two thirds of the Members of
the Storting are present.


Article 74

As soon as the Storting is constituted, the King, or whoever he appoints for the
purpose, shall open its proceedings with a Speech, in which he shall inform it
of the state of the Realm and of the issues to which he particularly desires to
call the attention of the Storting. No deliberations may take place in the
presence of the King.
When the proceedings of the Storting have been opened, the Prime Minister
and the Members of the Council of State have the right to attend the Storting,
as well as both departments of the Storting, and, like its Members, although
without voting, to take part in any proceedings conducted in open session,
while in matters discussed in closed sessions only insofar as permitted by the
Ting concerned.


Article 75

It devolves upon the Storting:

a) to enact and repeal laws; to impose taxes, dues, customs and othe
r public charges, which shall not, however, remain operative beyond 31
December of the succeeding year, unless they are expressly renewed by
a new Storting;

b) to raise loans in the name of the Realm;

c) to supervise the monetary affairs of the Realm;

d) to appropriate the moneys necessary to meet government expenditure;

e) to decide how much shall be paid annually to the King for the Royal
Household, and to determine the Royal Familys appanage which may
not, however, consist of real property;

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
37
f) to have submitted to it the records of the Council of State, and all
public reports and documents;

g) to have communicated to it the conventions and treaties which the
King, on behalf of the State, has concluded with foreign powers;

h) to have the right to require anyone, the King and the Royal Family
excepted, to appear before it on matters of State; the exception does not,
however, apply to the Royal Princes if they hold any public office;

i) to review the provisional lists of salaries and pensions and to make
therein such alterations as it deems necessary;

j) (repealed);

k) to appoint five auditors, who shall annually examine the State
Accounts and publish extracts of the same print, for which purpose the
Accounts shall be submitted to the auditors within six months of the end
of the year for which the appropriations of the Storting have been made,
and to adopt provisions concerning the procedure for authorizing the
accounts of government accounting officials;

l) to appoint a person, not a member of the Storting, in a manner
prescribed by law, to supervise the public administration and all who
work in its service, to assure that no injustice is done against the
individual citizen;

m) to naturalize aliens.


Article 76

Every Bill shall first be proposed in the Odelsting, either by one of its own
Members, or by the government through a Member of the Council of State.
If the Bill is passed, it is sent to the Lagting, which either approves or rejects
it, and in the latter case returns it with appended comments. These are taken
into consideration by the Odelsting, which either shelves the bill or again
sends it to the Lagting, with or without alteration.
When a Bill from the Odelsting has twice been presented to the Lagting and
has been returned a second time as rejected, the Storting shall meet in plenary
session, and the bill is then decided by a majority of two thirds of its votes.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
38
Between each such deliberation there shall be an interval of at least three
days.


Article 77

When a Bill passed by the Odelsting has been approved by the Lagting or by
the Storting in plenary session, it is sent to the King, with a request that it may
receive the Royal Assent.


Article 78

If the King assents to the Bill, he appends his signature, whereby it becomes
law. If he does not assent to it, he returns it to the Odelsting with a statement
that he does not for the time being find it expedient to sanction it. In that case
the Bill must not again be submitted to the King by the Storting then
assembled.


Article 79

If a Bill has been passed unaltered by two sessions of the Storting, constituted
after two separate successive elections and separated from each other by at
least two intervening sessions of the Storting, without a divergent Bill having
been passed by any Storting in the period between the first and last adoption,
and it is then submitted to the King with a petition that His Majesty shall not
refuse his assent to a beneficial, it shall become law even if the Royal Assent is
not accorded before the Storting goes into recess.


Article 80

The Storting shall remain in session as long as it deems it necessary and shall
terminate its proceedings when it has concluded its business.
In accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the Storting, the
proceedings may be resumed, but they shall terminate not later than the last
Sunday in the month of September.
Within this time the King shall communicate his decision with regard to the
Bills that have not already been decided (cf Articles 77 to 79), by either
confirming or rejecting them. All those which he does not expressly accept are
deemed to have been rejected by him.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
39
Article 81

All Acts (with the exception of those mentioned in Article 79) are drawn up in
the name of the King, under the seal of the Realm of Norway, and in the
following terms; We, X, make it publicly known: that the decision of the
Storting of the date stated has been laid before Us: (here follows the decision).
In consequence whereof We have assented to and confirmed, as We hereby do
assent to and confirm the same as Law under Our Hand and the Seal of the
Realm.


Article 86

The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and
last instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting
against Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court
or of the Storting, for criminal offences which they may have com-
mitted in their official capacity.
The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accor-
dance with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the
limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings be-
fore the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years.
The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently app-
ointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of
Impeachment. The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the
composition of the Court of Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court
of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside.
Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of
the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he
is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court
of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases,
for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall re-
sign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if
a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of
Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.


Article 87

The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in
the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting
and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
40
Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court
as judges in the Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceed-
ings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting,
although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one
more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two. The same
shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court.
If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the
right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by
law. If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted,
as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of
fourteen and seven respectively retire following the drawing of lots.
When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of
Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that
the Court due to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of
whom at most ten are Members of the Lagting and five Justices of
the Supreme Court.
The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of
the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing
of lots.
If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Mem-
bers of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above,
the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided
that the Court numbers at least ten judges.
Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the compos-
ition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.



According to the Norwegian Constitution Article 86 the permanent members of
the Lagting and the permanently appointed members of the Supreme Court
should be judges of the Court of Impeachment thus a pro forma survey of
indicated members follows:



Members of the Norwegian Lagting AD 2008

ASPHJELL, Jorodd (Arbeiderpartiet)
BERGO, Magnar L (Sosialistisk Venstreparti)
BJRNSTAD, Vidar (Arbeiderpartiet)
BREDVOLD, Per Roar (Fremskrittspartiet)
ENG, Sigrun (Arbeiderpartiet)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
41
ENGER. Inger S (Senterpartiet)
GRIMSTAD, May-Helen M (Kristelig Folkeparti)
GUNDERSEN, Gunnar (Hyre)
HALLERAKER, yvind (Hyre)
HJEMDAL, Line Henriette H (Kristelig Folkeparti)
HOKSRUD, Brd (Fremskrittspartiet)
HOLMBERG, Kari Lise (Hyre)
JACOBSEN, Bjrn (Sosialistisk Venstreparti)
JAGLAND, Thorbjrn (Arbeiderpartiet)
JOHANSEN, Irene (Arbeiderpartiet)
JOHNSEN, Espen (Arbeiderpartiet)
KJOS, Kari K (Fremskrittspartiet)
KNUTSEN, Tove Karoline (Arbeiderpartiet)
KONGSHAUG, Leif Helge (Venstre)
KRISTOFFERSEN, Gerd Janne (Arbeiderpartiet)
LANGELAND, Hallgeir H (Sosialistisk Venstreparti)
LARSEN, Anne Margrethe (Venstre)
LYDVO, Hilde M (Arbeiderpartiet)
LNNING, Inge (Hyre)
LNKE, Ola T (Kristelig Folkeparti)
MANDT-BARTHOLSEN, Sonja (Arbeiderpartiet)
MARTHINSEN, Marianne (Arbeiderpartiet)
MOE, Ola B (Senterpartiet)
NAVARSETE, Liv Signe (Senterpartiet)
NIELSEN, Eva M (Arbeiderpartiet)
NISTAD, Thore A (Fremskrittspartiet)
PETERSEN, Jan (Hyre)
REIKVAM, Rolf (Sosialistisk Venstreparti)
RYTMAN, Jrund (Fremskrittspartiet)
SAMUELSEN, Alf Ivar (Senterpartiet)
SCHMIDT, se M (Fremskrittspartiet)
SOLHOLM, Lodve (Fremskrittspartiet)
STRM, Tor-Arne (Arbeiderpartiet)
SUND, Eirin Kristin (Arbeiderpartiet)
VAKSDAL, yvind (Fremskrittspartiet)
VALLERSNES, Finn Martin (Hyre)
WIDTH, Per Ove (Fremskrittspartiet)
AASLAND, Terje (Arbeiderpartiet)






HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
42
Members of the Norwegian Supreme Court AD 2008

SCHEI, Tore (Chief Justice, born 1946)
GJLSTAD, Liv (Justice, born 1945)
LUND, Ketil (Justice, born 1939)
GUSSGARD, Karenanne (Justice, born 1940)
TJOMSLAND, Steinar (Justice, born 1948)
COWARD, Kirsti (Justice, born 1940)
STANG LUND, Eilert (Justice, born 1939)
BROCH OFTEDAL, Lars (Justice, born 1939)
FLOCK, Hans (Justice, born 1940)
MATNINGSDAL, Magnus (Justice, born 1951)
BRUZELIUS, Karin Maria (Justice, born 1941)
SKOGHY, Jens Edvin A (Justice, born 1955)
UTGRD, Karl Arne (Justice, born 1951)
STABEL, Ingse (Justice, born 1946)
STLE, Ole Bjrn (Justice, born 1950)
IE, Toril Marie (Justice, born 1960)
TNDER, Brd (Justice, born 1948)
ENDRESEN, Clement (Justice, born 1949)
INDREBERG, Hilde (Justice, born 1957)
SVERDRUP, Tone (Justice ad hoc, born 1951)
BERGBY, Gunnar (Secretary General, born 1947)


As for the provisions regulating e.g the composition and exact procedure of the
Court of Impeachment, these was originally laid down in the Norwegian Act of
5 February 1932 relating to Punishment for Offences Indicted before the
Court of Impeachment....and this Act has in all probability been subject to a
number of tactical amendments triggered by distinct fear of nearby Complaint*
(*cf the Norwegian Act of 30 March 2007 no. 13)!
In any case the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act which still applies to the
composition etc of the Court of Impeachment provides that:

1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding assurance
obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60 cf sec 52 ib item
the Norwegian Constitution Article 21 &c);

2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury
through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (sec 76
cf secs 52, 53 and 65 &c ib);

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
43
3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances
potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 cf secs 52, 106,
107, 109 and 111 &c ib).


As is meet and proper the individual security under the law has been given a
prominent position in globally accepted human rights conventions (cf pp 194
199 above), and Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights positively lays down that:

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter-
mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and
obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and
public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal
established by law.


However...; when it comes to the competence, independence and
impartiality of Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, its certainly
in order to recall some passages found in FOCO:

The reader should constantly keep in mind Norwegian authorities
unscrupulously will exploit every adequate opportunity to erase, steal and
falsify/alter to their advantage any piece of evidence communicated
through nearby Complaint empirically theyre much prone to
manipulate, espy, harass/intimidate, incarcerate, obstruct, weaken and
explicitly harm/attack potential/actual witnesses in this and other cases
where Norwegian officials are the factual culprits.....and the presentation
of forthcoming matter are by and large accommodated these disquieting
facts.
(cf FOCO, p 10)


Since 1992 it has been a main objective for Norwegian authorities to maim my
general health, ruin my social relationships, isolate me, deny my juridical
rights, subdue/quench legal complaints to international fora, mar my reputation,
intimidate me, induce pecuniary destitution, provoke harmful tribulations,
obstruct globally lifesaving work, minimize my standard of living and if
possible incite criminality and unethical behavior (cf Doc #4588 etc).
The pernicious misconduct of Norwegian authorities in this case are precisely
described in the Bible, Isaiah 59:58 (corresponding statements are
wholly valid independent of your religious faith and theological opinions
cf Doc #2037, Norwegian Vice Spreading):

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
44

They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spiders web. Whoever
eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is
hatched.
Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover
themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and
acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are
swift to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin
and destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not
know; there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into
crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.


In many respects Mr Ivar Oftedahl and Ms Harlem Brundtland represents the
archetype of my Norwegian foes; frailty, ignoble/plebeian, crabby, evil/base,
corrupted/criminal, unstable/dishonest, lunatic/schizophrenic, hypocritical/
pharisaic, malevolent/envious, arrogant/aggressive and sickly self-assertive
miscreants attempting to compensate for their shortcomings, inferiority complex
and psychopathology through ascribing their nasty defects, wickedness, mental
derangement and systematic lawbreaking to others (cf Docs ##633
[Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome] and 2037 [Official
Norwegian Hypocrisy and Malevolence]).
Though human status correctly may be granted my Norwegian enemies, they
surely belongs to a particularly noxious subgroup bipeds strongly guided and
impressed by stark diabolism, madness, injustice and general low-mindedness
the presence and influence of these infernally vile terrorists are of course
absolutely detrimental to any civilized society respecting the human rights,
guarding righteousness, and fostering ethicality, personal magnanimity,
intellectual/scientific eminence and artistic dexterity usw.
(cf FOCO, pp 7273)


Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 Comments on
disqualification), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will
launch an almost inevitable question: Can the various crimes and atrocities
described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound
creatures...?
Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on
documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's
quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query:

Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism,
hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
45
characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials
are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of
gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!

Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and
flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy
diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation
which befittingly 've been nicknamed The Kingdom of Satan!

Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral
functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part
of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders
particularly psychopathy and various perversions are predominant
conditions.
The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying
Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however viewed as
an endemic phenomenon partially rupture the commonly accepted
boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification. A
genetically rooted and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching
classical psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the
structural pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's
hardly unbecoming to introduce the acronym NPSMS* *Norwegian
Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome (if more convenient, you may think
of NPSMS simply as Norwegian psychopathy or Norwegian folie, of
course)...!
In Doc's ##633 and 2037 pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number
of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms viz:

Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis,
rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy,
superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjust-
ment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy,
professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance,
cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect
and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia,
corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation,
religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartio-
philia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrust-
ful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned
eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability,
anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc.


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
46
The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but
not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated
diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the
distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality
distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by
some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archetypical of regular psychoses.
The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality
fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial
personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes
dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism.
In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some
precipitating factors i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all likelihood
triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually
hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors as a matter of fact one may
feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid
features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...!
Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be
a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious
dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently motive and means appearing
practically identical unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a cardinal
symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and Statesman
Malignant Syndrome.
As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic,
anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the
thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the
actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory
structures and convergence zones in the ventromedial prefrontal sector of the
brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral
orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and
thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter
functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be
significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways
of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired monoamine based
weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal
cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be
NPSMS indicative.
Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of
performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests
working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be
intact...
(cf FOCO, pp 122124)


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
47
Whereas the Hippocratic oath lay emphasis on honesty, respectfulness and
benevolence towards patients and impels physicians to champion international
human rights and exercise their professional judgment uninfluenced by political
pressure, physicians and other health personnel involved in this ill-omened
case maliciously 've displayed the most inexpiable disregard inasmuch as dutiful
compliance with ethical stipulations, the statutory rights of others and their
vocational integrity otherwise are concerned.....honestly; it's stark impossible to
find even the slightest trace of formally mitigating circumstances, respectability
or professional adequacy in the uninterrupted orgy of lawless terrorism
satanically indulged in by Norwegian medics AO since 1992!
Anyhow, let's make it perfectly clear right now; the actual and radically massive
violations of quoted articles noways applies to the Norwegian public health
service alone corresponding malversation has continuously been schemed
and illicitly ratified v.g by diverse governmental bodies (cf pp 2425, 2931,
6874 and 8388 usw), and does also largely include the other officials
and establishments referred to as Accused at page 2 of nearby Complaint.
Cf Doc #4575, p 117 etc:

All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case 've been
unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and
largely criminal clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual
double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and
fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing
most of the malefactors.

The manifestly morbid preoccupation with supernormal intelligence and human
genius constantly displayed by Norwegian physicians, psychologists, politicians,
police officers et al has been touched upon earlier in this report (v p 118 cf
Doc #1536, p 85), and it should be timely to supply foregoing information with a
few germane remarks.

Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly
ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we
are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness
characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark
fatuity as well.

Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately
evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests..and
given that we fairly correctly may equate corresponding IQ scores with our
immanent/potential ability to acceptably handle diverse practical situations and
precisely grasp more or less abstract/intricate problems/ideas professionally or

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
48
otherwise encountered, we may assuredly ascribe much of said improvidence
and btises ex officio to insufficient psychometric intelligence.
At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores
may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several
of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or
superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale (cf pp 910). IQs corresponding to
or exceeding indicated score are normally regarded as highly impressive,
and many psychologists will set the intelligence quotient for potential genius at
140 or over. In the general Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are
expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for
every woman reaching specified score.
Howbeit ; comprehensive observations here in Norway bears witness to the
fact individuals with a Stanford-Binet IQ in the 130155 range are essentially
unable to meet the dianoetic requirements necessary to acquire even passable
understanding of more intricate scientific, moral and purely logical &c
causata/implications/problems. Typically earning their university and first-class
degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically and oftentimes
professionally incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community
positions. In cases where the shortcomer has maintained his/her moral and
eunoic integrity, the psychometric inadequacy may be accidentally fatal indeed
though regularly and pragmatically amendable, as the intellectually
subpotent faultdoer will be genuinely eager to admit, correct and avoid e.g
professional mistakes induced by noometrically overtaxing demands.
Inasmuch as the dianoetic deficiency and related/professional fall downs are
directly pertinent to NPSMS afflicted individuals/officials* (*cf pp 122124)
which conspicuously often is the case in Norway, we empirically knows these
severely disordered and thoroughly dikephobic wrongdoers will do whatever
practically feasible to cover up and belittle their errors/unsuitability/corruption
frequently at the expense of wholly guiltless persons facing false accusations
and unwarranted castigation etc.
As for the latter case, special attention should be called to the average Stanford-
Binet IQ of Norwegian Parliament/Storting representatives at 127,5 (cf p 10)
which, not surprisingly, is 1014 crucial points below corresponding scores for
national/federal assembly members in any Euro-American country/state
socioeconomically comparable with Norway.
Without validating the factual foundation of his suppositions etc, it may be
thematically justifiable though to refer to assistant professor of psychology at
Princeton University* (*New Jersey, USA) Mr Carl C BRIGHAM* (*creator
of the well-known Scholastic Aptitude Test) who, in 1923, published A
Study of American Intelligence where he concluded that the IQ of immigrants
increased in proportion to the number of years of US residence a
phenomenon he ascribed to a lower proportion of Nordic blood over the years,
rather than increased familiarization with cultural and educational factors!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
49
Anyhow; the US Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 favored immigration from
northern Europe, and restricted the entry of persons from other areas referred
to as biologically inferior

At the pages 9 and 85 I've fixed the lowest acceptable Stanford-Binet IQ of
different judges/experts at 145 and 140, respectively but indeed; this does not
imply said scores are absolutely and professionally adequate! What indicated
minimum levels does mark, however, are the highest IQ scores practically
attainable a number of circumstantial factors and conventional requirements*
realistically considered (*amongst the formal prerequisites, a sufficient and
high degree of moral integrity, impartiality/independence and educational
competency are indispensable).
While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise
competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80%
of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to
keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and
multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these
appellate tribunals. Although the present courts of appeals comprises a few
judges with a Stanford-Binet IQ equaling or slightly exceeding 140, 4550% of
nowadays judgments/sentences should be overruled on account of regular
corruption and the number/severity of procedural errors..and, finally;
whereas corruption are exlex altogether and portrayed degree of erroneousness
legally unacceptable, it should be formally correct to render null and void all
verdicts and conclusions passed on by these incompetent and obscenely
pretentious kangaroo courts whatsoever cf Doc #627 item nearby Complaint
pp 28 and 8488 etc!
As for the widespread depravity amongst Norwegian judges, much of it is
reflected by The Professional Code and Ethical Philosophy of Norwegian
Judges* (*cf Aphorisms &c 107109):

Yes indeed were chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs,
forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral
lepers.....but; since we effectively ve blocked criminal investigation of
our iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and
successfully hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our
inveterate transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally
enforceable judgments against us.....and for that reason we are at
least in a profanely juridical sense not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice
Act sec 53, third per)!
Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should
bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our
allelopathic lawbreaking.....cause its an established truism that our
surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
50
scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and
Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and
objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously,
please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental
corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament
Building, and a leviathan monument at the royal palace square in Oslo
where noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and
confer dignity upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and also
squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by
our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!

Verily; though stinking, a shitfilled sack will stand upright!
(cf FOCO, pp 144147)

Behind the previously indicated and markedly pathological interest in
paranormality and genius exhibited by Norwegian authorities, we find the deep-
seated inferiority complex and narrow-minded egotism broadly explaining their
preoccupation. From the very first these natural-born villains and mountebanks
searched for esoteric and absurd ways to elevate their base intellect; perhaps
geniuses depended on some secret ingesta or regimen skyrocketing their
creativity and IQs.?!
Fatefully mixed with archetypical NPSMS symptoms* (*cf pp 122124) as v.g
psychiatric idiosyncrasies, pronounced criminalism and unjustifiable hostility,
said selfishness has in any case triggered the most pernicious chain of
wholly deliberate, systematical and decidedly ill-starred human rights violations
ever seen in Norway! It's perfectly evident many of the crimes dealt with in this
petition and corresponding documents had been very difficult to commit and
impossible to get away with in a relatively uncorrupted and otherwise healthy
society..and lo as might be expected; behind the wormy stage settings we
find the meanest herd of mentally deranged, felonious, self-aggrandizing and
utterly condemnable misfits and conspiring officials ever sighted in a claimed
not to say pretended democracy! and, behold; I'm truthfully characterizing
the innately psychopathic descendants of a notoriously fiendish people duly
mentioned by the hounded and grotesquely misknown genius William James
SIDIS (18981944):

These Norse invaders in 'Vinland,' as they named the country, treated the
native inhabitants (whom they named 'Skrellings,' or 'skinned people')
about the same way as they did in Europe as subjects for pillage and
slave-raids. They raided as far as the 'Wonderstrand' (Cape Cod), and
they usually made themselves enemies wherever they went, in America
as in Europe."
(cf FOCO, pp 151152)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
51
The heinous array of crimes habitually indulged in by Norwegian officials and
senior civil servants the latter years, are largely and manifestly ascribable to the
tremendous prevalence of indigenous sociopathy* characteristic of Norway (*cf
pp 122124 &c). Based on continuous and exacting observations since 1992, it's
perfectly evident Norwegian health personnel and police officers directly
executing and criminally liable for the atrocities partially described in nearby
Petition and elsewhere has derived sexual excitement and significant
satisfaction from their systematic nefariousness and lawbreaking.
Combined with fixed and markedly paranoic personality traits, the deep-rooted
psychopathy and sadism by and large hallmarking Norwegian senior state
officials and public servants are practically incurable* (*cf pp 122127, 155
156 and 172 &c)
.
Under otherwise normal circumstances and the disastrous ascendancy and
profane catholicity of state supported criminality considered, it's hardly
anything but a waste of time and energy to bring legal/intrastatal actions
against the slimy politicians and (senior) civil servants constituting the rotten
hard core of official Norwegian malversation.and, especially if you're a high-
principled human rights activist, the only acceptable alternative left may be to
apply for political asylum outside Norway in order to escape explicitly nocent
and unlawful persecution.
(cf FOCO, p 190)



The 2007 version of this official though tactically incomplete and slightly
unconventional human rights petition, gives a partially unique and
unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state supported
corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the Norwegian Civil
Service.
Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally
reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously
subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1, 10, 122124, item Doc
#4588 etc), and I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the
various offences only. On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically
unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations
massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian
authorities set forth in nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a
nation governed by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved
lowbrows enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has
become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand well-sett antipathy
toward these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of mankind are
significantly strengthened!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
52
Whereas as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992
Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave in
compliance with international human rights conventions and globally accepted
etiquette, its certainly high time drastic steps are taken to remove, incarcerate,
and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible for the corresponding and
state supported criminality dealt with in nearby Complaint and enclosed
documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient neutralization of these arrantly
criminal elements and preferably stabilizing international intervention,
Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants will continue to annihilate
essential human rights regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly typically
with distinct delight ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to
upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves and
their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution.

As expectable the endemic character and genetic base of the Norwegian
Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom* (*NPSMS, cf pp 122124 etc)
considered, the extensive criminalism, general ineptness, theological insecurity,
and psychopathological disregard for ethical norms usw by and large typifying
nowadays Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance
of historical parallels.
(cf FOCO, 196197)


Focusing more precisely on the specific reasons for disqualification directly
related to nearby impeachment case, special emphasis should be laid on the
intimate ties between the Kings Council and the Norwegian
Storting/Parliament.
Notwithstanding the revolting fact many Odelsting/Lagting members* (*cf
Articles 49 and 73 above) has been and are involved in the lawless
conspiracy against me (cf FOCO p 30 etc), it appears clearly from the
Norwegian Constitution Articles 7481 that the actual interaction between the
Council of State and aforementioned Parliament renders a sufficient degree of
independence and impartiality wholly unattainable as far as appointment of
judges pursuant to Articles 86 and 87 of said Constitution is concerned;
members of the Kings Council will almost daily meet and associate closely
with Norwegian Parliament members both in- and outside the Storting-
Building in Oslo indicated persons are colleagues, bosom friends, fellow
party/committee/organization/club members, and.partners in crime (
moreover, the great majority of Norwegian Parliament members are also
disqualified from the juror function on account of their intellectual insufficiency
cf FOCO, pp 9 and 146)!


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
53
When it comes to the Norwegian Supreme Court, its sufficient for the time
being to refer to FOCO pp 30 and 68; several of corresponding judges
among them Mr Tore SCHEI (the Chief Justice) should be impeached (cf
FOCO pp 33 and 6768, item pp 205206 above).

In addition to the impeachment cases, therell be legal proceedings against
numerous (senior) civil servants in the Norwegian government ministries, the
Norwegian police force, the Norwegian public health service, the Norwegian
State Church, the Norwegian armed forces, Mre og Romsdal county
municipality/council, Haram/Molde/lesund municipalities, the Norwegian
Telecommunications, the Norwegian Post Office Services, the Norwegian
Broadcasting Corporation.et alia (cf FOCO, p 2).

Although the various offences mentioned in FOCO/INDO provides a solid basis
for criminal investigation, a most substantial number of essential facts and
descriptions of illegal acts has been intentionally omitted from these tactically
incomplete books (cf FOCO pp 10 [last paragraph] and 196197 &c) in any
case unbiased and scrupulous investigation will produce more than enough
proofs that will stand up in the court.

Aforesaid and extraordinarily vile circumstances considered, its certainly
appropriate as well as obligatory to entrust impartial and otherwise competent
representatives from an international organization to which Norway adheres (e.g
the United Nations) or will adhere with the formal responsibility for
investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the
Kingdom of Norway are charged in this case cf the Norwegian Constitution
Article 93, pp 175 and 178 above, item FOCO pp 89.

The members of the actual juries in this case will face a pack well-
educated and politically experienced liars who will do their very best to
manipulate and deceive them.....so, by reason of the intellectual
challenges represented by this and other facts of the case, none
possessing a general IQ as measured on the WAIS, Stanford-Binet or
PM 47 (PM 48, Raven 40 min deadline) test subordinate to,
respectively; 142, 145 or 143 should be accepted as (lay) judges or
experts in forthcoming trials.*
(FOCO, p 9)

*Cf FOCO pp 145149 etc. 45

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
54
Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly
downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen consequently theyve kicked
off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various
human rights organizations in this case!
(INDO, Doc #5007)



Empirically the chances Norwegian authorities will fulfill their juridical
obligations and otherwise behave themselves are very small in this unique case
(cf FOCO, pp 196197 etc), but one nevertheless almost pro forma
admonish members of the Storting and Council of State to comply with
Norwegian law and international human rights conventions (cf the Norwegian
Constitution Articles 13, 21 and 110 c &c)....; theres no way whatsoever
Norwegian authorities can win this case, but they can at least endeavor to
lose it with some dignity.

Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to bring Article 93 of their
Constitution into service and to further lawful execution of justice by
entrusting qualified representatives from the United Nations with the
formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating usw
the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this
case (cf FOCO, pp 89).



NO-Brattvg, May 01 2008


Wilh. Werner WINTHER
(SIGNATURE)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
55
ENCLOSURES:


1) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*here-
after referred to as FOCO) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1217,

2) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as INDO) by Mr Wilh.
Werner WINTHER; pp 1173,

3) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director
General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page,

4) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating
Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page,

5) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special
Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the
Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.


























HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
56
This was certainly a complex and perhaps lengthy document to include, but it
does nevertheless throw necessary light on so many and weighty aspects
of nearby complaint, that an unabridged transcript is wholly justifiable (its an-
other pair of shoes, however, itll demand a certain amount of intellectual dex-
terity to grasp and correctly integrate corresponding information).


Lets proceed with the next group of suspects viz: present and former local
politicians.

As for this specific complaint, there are three names particularly worth mention-
ing:

Mr. Bjrn SANDNES (mayor, NO-Haram municipality),
Mr. Trond SETH (deputy mayor, NO-Haram municipality), and
Mr. Oddbjrn VATNE (former mayor of NO-Haram municipality, and
presently a member of adjoining county council).


One knows for sure representatives of Haram Sheriff Office under false preten-
ces and in connection with described attempts to murder the plaintiff has consul-
ted Mr. Sandnes* and Mr. Seth* (*who apparently supports said crimes), and
its an established fact both politicians just like Mr. Vatne belongs to the
complainants categorical longtime foes.
Besides their natural inclination toward pathological badass behavior and
double-dealing, Mr. Sandnes/Mr. Seth/Mr. Vatne may encourage and patronize
any attempts to assassinate the plaintiff because its politically/juridically desi-
rable to cover up serious criminality committed by themselves and other Nor-
wegian politicians/office-holders etc.


The last group of suspects as matters now stands, consists of the actual perpe-
trators and their operative accomplices/supporters.

In this group we find:

1) Mr. Geir Ove SKARB, NO-2319 Hamar (main suspect and principal
planner/organizer),
2) Mr. Tommy SKARB, NO-6270 Brattvg (main suspect and gunning
executor),
3) Ms. Linda SVENSLI, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and gunning
executrix),

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
57
4) Mr. ystein SOLHJELL, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and operative
accomplice),
5) Mr Torbjrn RAUSAND, NO-6462 Raudsand (suspect and operative
accomplice),
6) Mr. Karl-Even INDRESTRAND, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and
operative accomplice),
7) Mr. Sigmund Martin EKREM, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and
operative supporter),
8) Ms. Monica INDRESTRAND, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter),
9) Mr. Ronny JRGENSEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter/accomplice),
10) Ms. Greta HILDRE, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter),
11) Ms. Slvi K DYBVIK, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter),
12) Mr. Bo Curt WECKLAUF, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter),
13) Ms. Hanne KOI JRGENSEN , NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and
operative supporter),
14) Ms. Cathrin SKJELTEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter), and
15) Mr. Ronald SKJELTEN, NO-6270 Brattvg (suspect and operative
supporter).


The list is not complete!


Its hardly accidental four of the suspects are authentic bearers of the surnames
Skarb or Indrestrand, whereas my maternal grandfather and many of his
neighbors in NO-Brattvg was seriously/regularly vexed by the low-minded
unmannerliness, preposterousness and criminal inclination characterizing these
unsound families as early as in 1950!

The all-time low for the Indrestrand-family was reached around 40 years ago
when one of their boys actively assisted by his parents AO ritually sold
his doomed soul to Satan in order to harm the plaintiff (Before this happened,
the boys paternal grandfather Mr. Ivar INDRESTRAND attempted to
murder the complainant with a scythe, and his father Mr. Ingbert
INDRESTRAND had several times been caught redhanded as he secretly
encroached out private houses etc.).

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
58
It should be emphasized that Mr. Karl-Even Indrestrand is Ms. Monica
Indrestrands brother, and that their paternal grandfather is identical with
aforementioned Mr. Ivar Indrestrand.
Mr. K-E Indrestrand and Mr. Tommy Skarb are former and long standing
workmates, and the latter also had an affair with Ms. Indrestrand.
In addition Mr. K-E Indrestrand is leader of a local motorcycle club* (i.e.:
Haram MC) whose members/supporters played a certain role in the attempts
to murder the complainant (The police, Mr. Trond Seth, Mr. Geir Ove
Skarb, Mr. Ronny Jrgensen and Mr. K-E Indrestrand tried mala
fide to link the plaintiff to the MC club Hells Angels in a way
unjustly and maliciously denigrating his reputation.
However; the plaintiff has never been a member or supporter of any
motorcycle club, and his only contact with Hells Angels MC was in 1997
when a wholly innocent woman was killed in a bomb attack in NO-
Drammen: on June 04, 1997 20 minutes before the corresponding
bomb detonation in NO-Drammen devastated a house belonging to the
motorcycle club Bandidos three officers from the police head-
quarters in NO-lesund stealthily positioned themselves on the northern
side of the Norwegian Lutheran Home Mission Societys chapel in
Storgata 5, NO-Brattvg. Warily peeking around the chapel corners
studying the plaintiffs private house in sen 4 [the distance between the
two buildings is less than 30 meters] while using their cellular phones
two of the officers was readily identified.viz: Mr. Finn GRANLIEN
and Mr. Arne FRLAND [the third officer did probably not leave his/her
car]. And so two minutes after the bomb explosion in NO-Drammen
the spying cops suddenly became abnormally excited, and they left their
observation posts in a hurry using two civilian cars* [*i.e.: a white Volvo
passenger car, and a dark green Volkswagen Passat station wagon].
The plaintiff pretty soon learned that Norwegian authorities deliberately
broadcasted stark disinformation about the bomb attack, and that several
informed police officers in NO-Drammen had excellent opportunity to
physically stop/save the guiltless woman killed by the explosion.
The Norwegian police force unilaterally blamed the motorcycle club Hells
Angels for the bomb attack, while hiding and lying about their own deci-
sive involvement.
On account of these and other distressing facts, the plaintiff recommended
Hells Angels and their lawyers to file an official human rights complaint
against Norwegian authorities and they did [The actual complaint was
sent to the European Court of Human Rights.])!


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
59
As for the Skarb-family, most problems of earlier date was created by Ms.
Petra SKARB and her quarrelsome son Mr. Trygve SKARB the bone
of contention, as far as my closest relatives are concerned, was a prescriptive
and juridically attested right of way belonging to my maternal grandfather and
his half brother, Karl.

Mr. Bo Curt Wecklauf* (*a Swede) and Ms. Slvi K Dybvik have been living
together for several years, and Ms. Dybvik was earlier married to Mr Geir Ove
Skarb shes Mr. Tommy Skarbs mother.
Some years ago Ms. Dybvik felt seriously offended because the complainant
repeatedly refused to sell his private house to her, and she may be guilty of
stealing/embezzling more than 400 letters addressed to him (Ms. Dybvik works
as a state-employed letter-carrier).!
Ms. Dybvik and Mr. Wecklauf are both known for their intemperate alcohol
intake and moral deficiency, and its clear they were acquainted with the plots to
kill the plaintiff several days before the actual murder attempts took place.

Mr. Tommy Skarb and Mr. Sigmund M Ekrem are notorious alcoholists and
drinking companions, and theyve both antisocial personality traits.
Mr. Ekrem is also known as an incurable and ill-mannered mythomaniac drink-
ing methylated spirit, windshield wiper fluid and herbicide agents ad nauseam,
and Mr. T Skarb is legally separated from a manic-depressive woman stealing
the plaintiffs books when she worked as an assistant librarian in NO-Brattvg.

Mr. ystein Solhjell and his family formerly lived in NO-Brattvg, and he
exhibited objective symptoms of mental disease and/or brain damage as early as
in 1982.

As a child/teenager Mr. Geir Ove Skarb was known as a stuttering and notor-
ious bully exhibiting an abundance of psychopathic/antisocial personality traits,
and his younger brother Mr. Leslie SKARB (b. 1957) shared many of
his psychopathological peculiarities.
Mr. G O Skarb is also widely known for terrorizing his family members
particularly his former wife, Ms. Slvi K Dybvik.
During a beastly maniacal phone conversation* at the end of Sep. 2010 (*the
conversation mostly consisted of Mr. Skarbs brainsick threats and ear-
splitting outbursts), Mr. G O Skarb called attention to the (now verified) fact he
recently had consulted police officers guaranteeing all reports formally submit-
ted by Mr. Wilhelm Werner Winther would remain unprosecuted and be ridi-
culed/ignored by the Norwegian police force AO. Mr. G O Skarb demonstra-
tively documented said guaranty by including explicit pics of himself with his
lunatic SMS-threats!


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
60
Mr. Ronny Jrgensen is married to Ms. Hanne Koi Jrgensen theyre
living in the house formerly owned/inhabited by said Mr. Ivar Indrestrand and
his infamous family, and theyve both exerted a markedly corruptive influence
on the local society (some years ago they moved from their birthplace in the
northernmost part of Norway to NO-Brattvg).
This couple has worked really hard to compromise the plaintiffs reputation
because he, several years ago, complained of Mr. Jrgensens illegally noisy
and inappropriate manual labor on Sundays (Mr. Jrgensen was/is employed by
the Lutheran Christian Church of Norway)!

Ms. Cathrin Skjelten is married to Mr. Ronald Skjelten, and they socialize
with Mr./Ms. Jrgensen at regular intervals.
Like Ms. Monica Indrestrand and Mr. Ronny Jrgensen, Ms. Skjelten has
been employed at one of the conspiratorial epicenters in this case viz:
Brattvg Bowling & Restaurant in NO-Brattvg (cf.:
http://www.brattvaagbowling.no).



By and large all suspects have these characteristics in common:

Indiscriminate use of alcoholic beverages, marked dishonesty/spuri-
ousness/corruptness/glibness, emotional lability/outrageousness,
religious confusion/intolerance/hypocrisy, spitefulness/malevolence,
jealousness/shrewishness/low-mindedness, egocentricity/immaturity,
touchiness/peevishness, aggressive impulsiveness/destructiveness,
lack of empathy/guilt, manipulativeness/affectation, superficial charm,
criminal inclinations, inadequate self-restraint, insufficient assessment
ability, superficial knowledge, intellectual pretentiousness/bewilder-
ment/paltriness, irresponsibility, willful wrongdoing, provocativeness/
quarrelsomeness, impudence/primitivism/pervertedness,hidden racism,
anti-Muslimism, wayward ultranationalism/chauvinism/extremism,
inferiority complex and numerous psychopathological personality traits.


Considering the vast number of psychopathic personality traits verily
hallmarking all suspects in this case, further elucidation of their intrinsic
motivation for unprovoked evildoing and serious lawbreaking should be
rather needless.: these persons derives sickly pleasure from violating
the rights of others bloodshed, violence, stealing, lying, sadism and
malbehavior/wrongdoing generally turns them on and satisfies their
innate viciousness and pathologic need for destructive/antisocial
stimuli.!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
61
With the exception of Mr. Sigmund M Ekrem* (*who a number of
times have asked the plaintiff for food and help with computer-/Inter-
net-related problems), the complainant has never had any kind of per-
sonal contact with the suspects in this case..and indeed: Mr. Wilhelm
Werner Winther generally avoids ALL unnecessary interaction with
native Norwegians!




HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS


The Kingdom of Norway and their public authorities are in this
specific case guilty of premeditated, repetitive and long-standing
violations of subsequent articles of the Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms:


Article 1
Obligation to respect human rights,

Article 2
Right to life,

Article 6
Right to a fair trial,

Article 8
Right to respect for private and family life, and

Article 13
Right to an effective remedy.




A more detailed account of the various human rights violations specified above
follows:


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
62
Article 1 Obligation to respect human rights

The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their
jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this
Convention.


Legally authorized representatives of the Norwegian Government unreservedly
signed and ratified the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms on Nov. 04 1950 and Jan. 15 1952, respectively, and
did eo ipso commit their national authorities to respect and juridically enforce all
articles constituting e.g. Section 1 of said covenant.
Moreover: In section 2 of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21 1999,
it is explicitly laid down that the Council of Europes Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European
Convention on Human Rights), the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
as well as the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib its brought home
that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2
in case of controversy are prior to other legislation.
This implies among other things that the public authorities of Norway are
statutorily obliged to adapt their executive procedures suchwise the human
rights and freedoms defined in Section 1 of the Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are duly observed, and additio-
nally theyre juridically compelled to obey e.g. the following articles of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights:



THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS


Article 2:

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla-
ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property,
birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the
basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
63
territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-
selfgoverning or under any other limitation of sovereignty.


Article 6:

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before
the law.


Article 7:

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to
equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any
discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement
to such discrimination.


Article 8:

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national
tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the
constitution or by law.


Article 10:

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and
obligations and of any criminal charge against him.


Article 28:

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights
and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.


Article 29 (3):

These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the
purposes and principles of the United Nations.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
64
Article 30:

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State,
group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act
aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.




INTERNATIONAL COVENANT
ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS



Article 2 (1):

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to
ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction
the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any
kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other
opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.


Article 2 (3):

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein
recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy,
notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons
acting in an official capacity;
(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his
right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or
legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority
provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the
possibilities of judicial remedy;
(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such
remedies when granted.





HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
65
Article 3:

The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal
right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights
set forth in the present Covenant.


Article 5 (1):

Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any
State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any
act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized
herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the
present Covenant.


Article 5 (2):

There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the funda-
mental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the
present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on
the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or
that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.


Article 14 (1):

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter-
mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and
obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public
hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established
by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a
trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security
in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the
parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the
court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in-
terests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a
suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile
persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial
disputes or the guardianship of children.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
66
Article 16:

Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be-
fore the law.


Article 26:

All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any
discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law
shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and
effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race,
colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so-
cial origin, property, birth or other status.



Above information considered, its perfectly simple to ascertain that the
Kingdom of Norways wilful and explicit violations of the Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the instant case also
represents a clear-cut breach of their national laws......and it should be tho-
roughly underlined indeed that their excruciating disrespect for the human rights
and freedoms are of highly recidivistic nature sic (excerpts from Formal
Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway, by Mr. Wilh. Werner Winther):



The 2007 version of this official though tactically incomplete and
slightly unconventional human rights petition, gives a partially unique
and unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state
supported corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the
Norwegian Civil Service.
Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and
segmentally reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating,
and contemptuously subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1,
10, 122124, item Doc #4588 etc), and I've described and formally
reported a tiny fraction of the various offences only. On the whole, this
year may be seen as a practically unbroken chain of state actuated crimes,
insanities, and malicious provocations massively corroborating and
justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian authorities set forth in
nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a nation governed
by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved lowbrows
enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has
become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand well-set antipathy

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
67
toward these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of
mankind are significantly strengthened!

Whereas as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992
Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave
in compliance with international human rights conventions and globally
accepted etiquette, its certainly high time drastic steps are taken to
remove, incarcerate, and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible
for the corresponding and state supported criminality dealt with in nearby
Complaint and enclosed documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient
neutralization of these arrantly criminal elements and preferably
stabilizing international intervention, Norwegian politicians and (senior)
civil servants will continue to annihilate essential human rights
regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly typically with distinct
delight ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to
upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves
and their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution.

As expectable the endemic character and genetic base of the
Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom* (*NPSMS,
cf pp 122124 etc) considered, the extensive criminalism, general
ineptness, theological insecurity, and psychopathological disregard for
ethical norms usw by and large typifying nowadays Norwegian politicians
and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance of historical parallels.
In 1388/-89 popular vacuity, religious confusion, aristocratic
disintegration, and a fatal lack of higher leadership qualities among the
native administrators forced Norway into a political union with Denmark
lasting until 1814. During said epoch Norway more or less
functioned as a Danish province, and most administrative posts were
permanently occupied by Danes and Germans.
In July 1814 Sweden launched a military attack on Norway, and within
two weeks the Danish/Norwegian king Christian Frederick
resigned....and, in consequence, the politically fatuous Norwegians had to
accept a union with Sweden lasting until 1905 (cf the Treaty of Kiel).
One of many things worth emphasizing in this connection is the upsetting
fact the political impotence, goofiness, self-conceit, irresponsibility,
unsoundness, and general degeneration etc necessitating the unions with
Denmark and Sweden are inheritable defects very much alive and kicking
AD 2007.....and, as stated beforehand (cf p 122 &c), the state supported
criminality described in this report and enclosed documents couldnt have
been planned and carried out by mentally sound individuals. Were up
against a most felonious bunch psychopathic good-for-nothings, and
demonstrably incapable of governing themselves and others in a

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
68
juridically and otherwise acceptable manner, I firmly believe nowadays
Norwegian Government and national assembly should be forcibly and
completely replaced by way of well-accommodated international
intervention.
Notwithstanding the self-evident fact we cant accept a soiled pack
criminal insanes as administrators, official representatives and civil
servants, it may be convenient to take a further look at the United
Nations Convention against Corruption.*



Although it lies outside the scope of this improvised survey to give a
more comprehensive treatise on the legal applicability of the UN
Convention against Corruption in this specific case, theres no doubt wise
utilization of this and a couple other international conventions will
provide the means necessary to remove and replace the present members
of the Norwegian Government/Storting et al in a judicially acceptable
manner.
On account of strong historical ties and significant linguistic/sociocultural
similarities, it may be convenient to replace inter alios nowadays
Norwegian Storting/Government/Supreme Court members with highly
intelligent and reliable Swedes..and I faithfully believe international
fora like e.g the United Nations and the Council of Europe should
work systematically and fast toward indicated goal.

Oct 28 ha I officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister, Minister
of Justice and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter
alios) summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment (cf Doc
#9080).and, as expected, Norwegian authorities immediately responded
with new crimes and haughty provocations.
When it comes to the various crimes and harassments etc described in
nearby UN report and corresponding documents (cf p 2), Norwegian
authorities nervously aware itll be extremely hard to find as much as a
single sane and uncorrupted psychiatrist/psychologist/judge/politician usw
outside Norway not stamping their inordinate misconduct as violently
psychotic and totally unacceptable have collectively decided to deny
all factualities and cover up their execrable offences as best they can (cf
pp 910 &c). This preplanned flimflam represents no substantial
hindrance in any case, whereas the putrid falsehood, ignoble low-
mindedness and deep-seated criminal makeup are clearly written all over
these state employed felons wholl be utterly unable to deceive or impress
truly sophisticated, genuinely truth-seeking and highly intelligent/intuitive
persons. (Signed Nov. 29, 2007)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
69
As beforehand stated (cf p 3), it is positively laid down in sec's 2 and 3
of the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, that various and
international Human Rights conventions/covenants are fully applicable as
Norwegian law and even prior to other legislation in case of
controversy.
According to the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec's 223225,
criminal acts shall be reported to and investigated by the police..i.e;
by the slimy larrikins committing a good many of the crimes mentioned in
nearby Complaint and concatenated Documents!
It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts
notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable
degree of responsibility (cf pp 104121), and as a matter of fact and
course; 2000 of the worst policemen/-women in active service should be
locked up straightaway (the overall treatment of these prisoners should be
extraordinary harsh indeed), and another 3000 of these chronic
malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core criminals who can be sentenced
and enjailed somewhat later without seriously endangering the
noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses and
penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) remaining personnel,
chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very
closely superintended and permanently excluded from the national police
force whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and
otherwise competent persons!
The Norwegian prison service is entirely comparable with the police in
respect of downright corruption, and the actual statuses of various courts
of justice are animadverted upon e.g at pp 146147 cf Doc #627 etc.
Without specifying the exact number of severely corrupted and
particularly dangerous judges, district recorders, public prosecutors,
politicians, health professionals AO necessary to shut in forthwith, a
high-security prison camp providing adequate accommodations for 11
000* non-proliferation lifers will do in this connection (*not incl the 2000
police employees/executives beforehand indicated) another 20 000**
of the most depraved public officials and civil servants should be
summarily fired and, as far as practically possible, imprisoned later on
(**not incl the 3000 police employees/executives beforehand indicated).
While the Norwegian island Bjrnya at 74.31n 19.01e may be
singled out as a suitable location for our gargantuan prison camp(-s), I'm
afraid it's next to impossible to realize portrayed mass seizing and
subsequent incarcerations without massive and hardbought
international/military support..so, in consequence, the actual and
permanent eradication of Norwegian state corruption is ordained by the
stipulations irrevocably laid down in Doc #599 cf Doc #4000 item pp
152155 above.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
70
At any rate and for a while, we shall concentrate on certain guidelines
the self-aware citizen may observe in order to battle and protect him-
/herself against the subversive everyday corruption exerted by Norwegian
authorities.


As for anno 2008, the scandalous and grossly criminal malconduct of
Norwegian authorities throughout the year mirrors and substantially
testifies to the sinistrous but most accurate portrayal found in Formal
Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway* (*FOCO) pp 196197.
Whereas a precise and thoroughly verified description of the rotten and
assuredly morbid terrorism waged by Norwegian (senior) civil servants
already exist, it should be synoptically defensible to put forth a somewhat
cursory presentation of a few main events taking place during 2008 and
the first trisection of this year.




Article 2 Right to life

1 Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be
deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a
court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is
provided by law.

2 Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of
this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than
absolutely necessary:

a in defence of any person from unlawful violence;

b in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person
lawfully detained;

c in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or
insurrection.







HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
71
The very first line of this article clearly provides that everyones right to life
shall be protected by law, and in the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act secs
223 and 225, respectively, its explicitly laid down that:

(a) Criminal Acts should be reported to the police;
(b) criminal investigation is initiated and carried out by the police.


As for the attempted murders described in nearby complaint, however, its readily
provable that:

1) Mr. Geir Ove SKARBs batty plans/attempts to murder the plaintiff has
been significantly encouraged through his contact with Norwegian police
officers* (*Mr. Ove P FINNES, NO-Haram Sheriff Office, may be a
particularly interesting reprobate in this connection!);
2) present and former police officers/executives actively and illegally has
obstructed all criminal investigation and examination of witnesses in order
to protect those directly or indirectly involved in the various and
hereinabove specified attempts to murder the complainant;
3) its nothing new whatsoever Norwegian authorities plots, carries out and
inspires/supports serious criminality aimed at maiming/killing the plaintiff
cf pp 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69 above.


As documented by Enclosure #1* (*dated: Sep. 28, 2010) the police* (*i.e. the
police headquarters in NO-lesund) was informed of the threatening phone calls
as early as Sep. 28 2010, and as shown by Enclosure #2* (*dated: Sep. 30,
2010) the plaintiff made a formal witness statement at the sheriff office in NO-
Brattvg one day later.
It appears from Enclosure #3* (*dated: Oct. 01, 2010) that the complainant vi-
sited the sheriff office in NO-Brattvg once more on Sep. 30 2010, and corre-
sponding document also makes it unmistakably plain that Mr. Geir Ove Skarb
should be arrested and subjected to a psychiatric evaluation ASAP.
As evident from Encs. ##4 and 5* (*dated: Oct. 02, 2010) the plaintiff had
already made a formal complaint against Mr. Geir Ove Skarb on Oct. 02 2010.
Encs. ##6 and 7* (*dated: Oct. 07 and 11, 2010, respectively) shows that the
police are given additional information about Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son
Tommy, and the latter attachment also emphasizes that Mr. G O Skarb poses a
danger to others and therefore should be locked up by Norwegian authorities.
Enclosure #8* (*dated: Nov. 14, 2010) is a new and formal complaint against
Mr. Geir Ove Skarb and his son Tommy Skarb, and the attachment also con-
tains a reference to the plaintiffs report of Oct. 30, 2010.
Enclosure #8A* (*dated: Nov. 14, 2010) is a formal complaint against Mr. Geir

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
72
Ove Skarb and Mr. Tommy Skarb directly handed over to Haram Sheriff
Office (NO-Brattvg) on Nov. 14 2010; in this document the police and the
psychiatric/public health care service are criticized because they in spite of
the plaintiffs foregoing admonitions/requests have done nothing to arrest/
intern said persons.
Enclosure #9* (*dated: Nov. 16, 2010) is a formal acknowledgment of receipt*
issued by the police (*it was a tough job to acquire the actual documentation!).

As stated earlier in this human rights complaint, the first attempt to murder the
complainant anno 2010 took place on November 13!



Article 6 Right to a fair trial

1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal
charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within
a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by
law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may
be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public
order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of
juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to
the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special
circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent
until proved guilty according to law.

3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum
rights:

a to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in
detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;

b to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;

c to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own
choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance,
to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

d to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the
attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same
conditions as witnesses against him;

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
73
e to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or
speak the language used in court.


Whereas the violation of this Article essentially coincides with the various
breaches of Article 13, the commentaries on the latter and nearby Article
converges.



Article 8 Right to respect for private and
family life

1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home
and his correspondence.

2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of
this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in
a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or
the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or
crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the
rights and freedoms of others.


Serious, multifarious and long-standing violations of this Article is certainly
one of the favorite offenses copiously and scurrilously indulged in by repre-
sentatives of Norwegian authorities read what the plaintiff wrote about
this kind of criminality/terrorism in 2007 (excerpts from Incomplete Formal
Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 104121) sic:


The Norwegian 'Police Security Service' PST* (*Norwegian acronym), is an arrantly
autonomous subdivision of the Norwegian police force popularly supposed to detect, record,
counteract and prosecute etc illegal activities presumably endangering Norway's national
security.

Normally we'll find a number of PST representatives at each and all police stations and
sheriff offices in Norway, and as a rule of thumb the respective chiefs of police and sheriffs
are personally and regularly engaged in various tasks on behalf of the Police Security
Service other PST agents traditionally but not exclusively includes middle-aged
police inspectors/intendants and chief administrative officers.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
74
PST does also routinely employ younger police officers and civilians in order to infiltrate,
corrupt, espy, provoke and/or overthrow etc human rights and pacifist organizations, Red
Cross groups and medical treatment facilities, peace corps, closed institutions, charismatic
sects, students' associations, social workers' and servicemen's associations, commissions on
racial equality and ethnical minority coalitions, trade/labor unions, employers' federations,
political parties and local councils, executive committees/sessions, administrative appeal
bodies, joint councils for the welfare of immigrants, training/advisory/examining boards,
agencies for international development/cooperation, iron and steel trades confederations,
travel agents' associations, broadcasting staffs/corporations, shipbuilding and engineering
unions, commonwealth offices, public finance and accounting institutes, trade/industry
federations, associations for the care and resettlement of offenders, prison officers'
associations, foreign delegations/embassies/consulates, importers/wholesalers/retailers of
Russian merchandise/cars, free trade unions, editorial offices and publishing corporations,
civil/public services associations, municipal workers' unions, debt-collecting agencies,
Masonic lodges (esoteric brotherhoods etc on the whole), Officer Candidate Schools and
Officer's Reserve Corps, Home Guard Sub-districts and the Civil Defense Rescue/Wardens'
Service, public/mental health services, fire departments/brigades, production platforms in
the North sea, mining partnerships etc at Svalbard, the Coast Guard, signal and
telecommunications engineering departments, manufacturers/importers of security locks
and alarm systems, information bureaux, scientific/technical/managerial staffs, airtraining
corps, Special Forces and ranger units, scuba/diving clubs, aero/parachuting clubs,
motorcycle (MC) clubs, rifle/pistol clubs, athletic federations, youth clubs, research
establishments, cargo ships (tankers), shipping/offshore companies, manpower services
commissions, societies of operative printers/illustrators/typographers and other media
personnel, communications and postal headquarters, transport organizations, diplomatic
corps, equestrian federations (participation in outlandish horse/harness racing and show
jumping may like attendance at other sports events provide excellent cover-up for
espionage, break-ins, sabotage ventures, thefts and political assassinations), the highways
and port authorities, the federal aviation administration, railway express agencies, coastal
steamers, bus stations, the Customs, hotel/restaurant chains, holiday camps and travel
agencies.....usw!

The Norwegian Police Security Service has established several companies and otherwise
provided civilian jobs for many of their operative agents their officers may e.g disguise as
shop assistants, storekeepers, sales representatives,
managers/directors, dispatch clerks, electricians, telecommunications engineers,
installers/fitters, personal computer retailers/consultants, system analysts, accountants,
technical inspectors/repairmen, carpenters, cicerones, bartenders or superintendents.
Here in Brattvg they operated a seemingly unpretentious shop offering properly bugged
scanners enabling you to eavesdrop some of the radio communication between ordinary
patrol wagons etc as far as we know this is the first time PST has entered upon a regular
business venture exclusively to map the modi operandi of a single person...!

The actual prevalence of psychopathological dysfunctions amongst the general population of
Norway is truly horrendous, and as correctly stated at page 10 of 90% of regular

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
75
Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic personality traits we've
found none amongst present PST officers not explicitly afflicted with antisocial personality
traits and varying degrees of paranoia and/or melancholia.

Since 1998 the Police Security Service has expanded both their formal and irregular
cooperation with the Norwegian public health service dramatically (cf Doc #627, pp 6061),
and a substantial percentage thoroughly depraved and mentally ill politicians are largely
blameworthy for this baleful development (cf Doc #2037).
Precisely like PST the Norwegian public health service villainously misuses the devilish
cobweb-optics* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105106) and concealed microphones (clothes are
frequently bugged) etc to espy, provoke/terrorize and harm particularly upright persons
investigating, recording and legally complaining usw their diversiform criminality*
(*nosocomial/iatrogenic delicts may comprise intentional/premeditated/involuntary
homicide, sexual abuse/perversion, torture/harassment, willful poisoning/sickening, illegal
detention/hog-tying, false accusations/complaints, thefts of money/organs/documents,
illicit monitoring/eavesdropping, unlawful/offensive postmortem examinations, bill forgery,
embezzlement, drug abuse/addiction, and radical falsification of medical records...etc).
Intimate collaboration between the public health service and PST provides significant
benefits for both camps; Norwegian physicians, psychologists, sociologists and nurses etc
may e.g systematically abuse the misplaced confidence of uninformed dullards to collect
medical data and different background information on subjects of special interest to the
police, while PST may supply v.g technical know-how/equipment and bug, search, rob and
surveil etc the victims private homes/computers and also render impossible
adequate/impartial criminal investigation and legal prosecution of the various felonies
committed.

Empirically some Norwegian Police Security Service officers are likely to employ lethal
substances and spread contagious diseases in order to assassinate or disable their victims,
and PST representatives may visit or break into hospitals/morgues/laboratories and certain
factories/arsenals etc to underhandedly purchase or steal the chemicals/toxins/pathogens
necessary to accomplish these goals.
Norwegian policemen/-women permitted to associate freely with the common and
noncriminal population in pandemia struck areas generally represents a special risk, and
neither police officers, health professionals nor other Norwegian officials should normally be
allowed to stroll unrestrained around in buildings/offices/apartments usw where they
undisturbed can install and later abuse their satanic cobweb-optics and pinhole-
microphones etc (these rules also and wholly apply outside Norwegian borders/territory)
cf Doc #2037, pp 9192 etc.
The cobweb-optics per se and its damnable misapplication is properly scorned in Isaiah 59,
verses 58 (the Lords Servant speaking):


They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spiders web. Whoever
eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
76
Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves
with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence
are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed
innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and
destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know;
there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into
crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.


There are thousands of obnoxious examples illustrating the nationwide and massive abuse of
the cobweb-optics and concealed microphones by PST representatives and the Norwegian
health service, and one of the worst incidents in that respect doubtlessly took place here in my
own county, Haram, in August 2001 when Mr Hector Hugo MIRANDA murdered his wife,
children and himself in order to escape further persecution by Norwegian authorities.
Mr Miranda a political refugee who had suffered human rights violating incarceration and
torture in his fatherland, had initially been silly enough to place his confidence in Norwegian
authorities who forthrightly betrayed him and secretly surveilled his most private abodes. In
agreement with their arrogant and thoughtless disposition, the Norwegian health professionals
and police officers engaged to carry out the AV and absolutely condemnable monitoring fatally
underestimated Mr Miranda's vigilance and resoluteness; it's clear Mr Miranda had been
perfectly aware the abominable espionage several weeks before peremptorily deciding to slay
his family and himself, and that he strongly suspected other immigrants in the insular vicinity
was continuously offended in the same, iniquitous manner.
Mr Miranda certainly became severely shocked as he prudently uncovered some of the
accomplished treacherousness routinely partaken by the humanoid filth he naively had trusted
for years, and as the dreadful extension of the demoniac and acutely human rights violating
spying appeared steadily clearer, he correctly concluded his family never could acquire an
adequate degree of freedom, security and dignity etc in a nation largely governed by bloody
criminals/terrorists, sadists and lunatics....!
Subsequent to Mr Miranda's death, local health authorities and collaborating sheriff Mr Jens
Vidar BJRKEDAL (cf Doc #240) naturally did their very best to cover up the illicit and lethally
provocative maltreatment they'd exposed him to.....through their press releases and interviews
those indirectly guilty of adjoining murders despicably portrayed themselves as the true victims
deserving public sympathy usw!

The Norwegian police force overflows with insidiously double-dealing and racist jingoists
surreptitiously exerting themselves to minimize the number of immigrants in Norway, and it
should be throughly emphasized that the PST et al systematically endeavour to depict e.g
Muslims and refugees from developing countries as an especially criminal, dangerous, base-
minded and generally worthless part of the Norwegian population.
In order to publicly create and uphold a superficially believable picture of most foreigners as a
grave intrastatal threat, Norwegian police officers in increasingly degree through delinquent
and hideously opprobrious cooperation with the official health service will make industrious
efforts to provoke serious criminality and health problems etc amongst ethnic/religious
minorities and non-native individuals generally.
The standardized procedure followed by PST representatives and other police officers involved
in this kind of viperous monkey business, roughly runs like this:

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
77

( 1 )
THE VICTIM IS SINGLED OUT AS AN UNWANTED
OR PARTICULARLY EXPLOITABLE INDIVIDUAL

He/she may e.g:


Be a Rastafarian or profess the Islamic or Judaistic faith,

be an organized biker or actively engage in human rights and peacekeeping work,

belong to a colored race,

stand out as sexually attractive/abusable,

be endowed with certain talents arousing envy amongst the police officers,

possess disclosing knowledge about criminality committed by Norwegian officials
and local authorities,

be sufficiently intelligent/righteous to constitute a noteworthy menace to
corrupted/criminal officials,

appear especially suitable for terrorization and illegal experimentation,

have a conspicuously flawed character obviously susceptible to
manipulation/indoctrination, malversation and threats,

be selected more or less randomly to satisfy the explicitly criminotic and subhuman
urge many Norwegian policemen/-women harbors to humiliate, mistreat/harm,
persecute and dastardly assassinate etc those superior to or different from
themselves.











HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
78
( 2 )
PREPARATORY STEPS TO SURVEIL/TERRORIZE/
ASSASSINATE SELECTED VICTIM ARE TAKEN

The police eventually in cooperation with the Norwegian public health service are
at this stage systematically/clandestinely gathering information about the victim's
whereabouts, everyday routines, hobbies, circle of friends, family, religious faith,
political opinions/activities, educational/intellectual level, sexual inclinations,
income/debt situation, medical status, criminal record and personal peculiarities etc.
Usually there'll be photographic reconnaissance and strategical missions to detect
overall security deficiencies and to determine the exact types of
doors/windows/hinges/locks and alarms etc installed in the victim's domicile/office. The
police are rather likely to plug into central supply points, overhead connections and
main junction boxes etc in order to manipulate/surveil the victim's electricity provisions
television sets, video cassette recorders, video monitors, PCs, printers, photocopiers,
calculators, portable sound systems, ghetto blasters, CD/ROM/DVD players and phones
are eavesdropped.
If the PST agents deem it possible to approach the victim's habitat/workplace etc
without detection or arousing suspicion, pinhole-microphones may be installed near the
main entrance(-s) and perhaps immediately beneath/above windows expected to be left
ajar minuscule photocells are oftentimes embedded close to entry-/drive-/stairways,
and the infernal cobweb-optics are most likely installed above or next to all
front/back doors and on the outer side of windowpanes enabling visual monitoring of
the kitchen, sitting/living/dining room(-s), offices, bedrooms, bathroom(-s), walk-in
wardrobe(-s) and basement etc (if it's possible to break into e.g garden sheds, garages,
cottages and boathouses without leaving easily visible clues, one should expect these
places to be infected with spy accoutrements too miniature radio/microwave
transmitters and amplifiers etc may v.g be hidden between ceiling/floor joists and wall
studs, beneath wall panels/sheathing, in board/foam/blanket insulation, or in warm-air
and plumbing systems).
GPS/GSM/digital vehicle tracking units may be tucked away in the victim's cars and
motorcycles etc these units normally have a built-in motion detector and emits
digitally encrypted signals betraying geographical vehicle location and speed usw.
Tracking units may display shortest distance to target in meters/feet/yards, and are
sometimes equipped with a sensitive microphone recording e.g conversations taking
place inside or immediately outside bugged vehicle.
Letters/e-mails are secretly opened/copied, and the house refuse scrutinized those
approaching the victim's main entrance(-s) etc will be photographed and/or filmed by
employment of the cobweb-optics* (*the zooming properties and pic quality of this
satanic undercover tech are rather hellacious).




HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
79
( 3 )
ACTIVE INFORMATION GATHERING THE
VICTIMS'S DOMICILE IS BUGGED INTERIORLY

Permanently eavesdropping/tracking the unsuspecting victim's phones and vehicles will
enable the aggressors to plot his/hers quotidian schedule fairly precisely. They may e.g
learn that the victim enjoys his tennis/squash training Mondays and Thursdays from 6 to
8 PM, that he's likely to be away from home Fridays between 6 and 9 PM as he regularly
engages in voluntary/unpaid human rights work, that he's a gifted hobby mechanician
painstakingly keeping his swanky Harley-Davidson MC in tip-top condition, and very
much to the green-eyed cops discontentment that their sympathetic victim handles
far heavier loads than themselves in honored weightlifting exercises as v.g the bench
press, dead lift, squat and clean/jerk! Besides; reconnaissance has brought home that a
standard pin tumbler lock produced by the massively police infiltrated Norwegian
company TrioVing is installed in the victim's front door, and that his homely burglar
alarm will be mere piece of cake to put out of action.

Now.....: let's assume that one Thursday evening at 6:30 PM while one of their
training suit wearing agents discreetly keeps an eye on the tennis playing victim and
another plainclothesman are watching the driveway leading to the latter's dwelling from
his hideout at a nearby hill two experienced PST officers effortlessly sabotages the
victim's unsophisticated alarm system breaking into his otherwise unguarded house
utilizing one of their numerous master keys.....
Due to outlined intelligence gathering the depraved burglars will possess pretty accurate
information about the various rooms and movables taking care not to leave e.g foot-
or fingerprints in macroscopic dust and normally avoiding speaking during their
customary break-ins, the most deservedly detested intruders hardly ever throws away
their time; while one of them expeditiously are installing their pinhole-tattlers, the other
badguy may set up the fiendish cobweb-optics in a matter of minutes. Mikes are
carefully concealed in (sheathing) boards/studs/joists etc close to v.g tables, armchairs,
sofas and beds or wherever conversations are likely to take place! The cobweb-optics
are traditionally installed alongside the upper/outermost borders of rooms and just
above/behind/beside e.g; writing/executive/secretarial desks,
dressing/computer/printer/dining tables, display/filing cabinets, control/instrument
panels, message displays, combination locks, keyboards, safes and mirrors usw. The
sickly preoccupation with palli/pudenda item anorectal and scatological topics clearly
unfolds as the vicious PST officers installs their cobweb-optics in close propinquity to
private beds, shower cubicles, bathtubes, bidets, toilets and certain washbasins usw.....;
the devilish spy-optics will usually be strategically fixed 50120 centimeters above the
floor on all sides of and in immediate proximity to indicated household constructions in
order to provide maximal exposure of and prime facilities for
photographing/videotaping etc genitourinary structures/functions, defecation and
sexuality (it should be rightfully emphasized this kind of execrable/morbid/criminal sex-
espionage has been actively and extensively partaken and shockingly oftentimes

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
80
initiated by rotten nurses and senior personnel employed by the hideously corrupted
public health service in Norway cf Doc #4575 etc)...!

During their installation-break-ins, the PST thugs will bring with them some
implements; a jimmy, hammer, file, multipurpose tool, needle-nose pliers, hacksaw,
multimeter, an adjustable spanner, screws/nails, manual/electric drills/screwdrivers and
various locksmithing/picking tools...etc.
The jimmy and hammer will be utilized to carefully un-/refasten (sheathing) boards
giving access to suitable hidings inside floor/walls/ceiling usw for v.g transmitters,
transceivers, transponders, amplifiers, downconverters, repeaters, scanners, beaconing
contraptions and a few other small-scale apparatuses. Amongst the preferred places to
hide away electronic gadgetry, the extreme borders of attics/garrets should be
mentioned especially the fact access to the interior part of walls frequently are
gained by temporary removing the outer framework of doorways and windows, are also
particularly noticeable...
Since 1999 a steadily increasing number of PST officers have worn balaclavas, gloves and
a protective/concealable KEVLAR vest during their break-ins, and contrary to former
practices, a pistol firing the 9-mm Parabellum cartridge nowadays belongs to the
standard outfit brought into your home by these disgustingly state supported assassins.

( 4 )
THE VICTIM'S FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS
AND PRIVACY ARE ACUTELY VIOLATED
METHODICAL PROVOCATIONS AND ATTACKS

At this point of time the state authorized aggressors will lean back in their chairs
studying the victim's intimate indoor privacy on a number of video monitors installed
in front of them.
The thoroughly perverted and largely brainsick PST bullies will lewdly and
permanently record scenes of the nude victim taking a shower or engaging in normal,
sexual activities with his girlfriend/wife etc. Surprisingly oftentimes harboring
homosexual tendencies and nearly always morbidly obsessed with penile bulkiness
and shapes, the official paraphiliacs selectively will go for close-up shots of assholes
and penoscrotal features (It should be emphasized though that these swinish voyeurs
seldom enact their homoerotic propensities through sexual intercourse as a
matter of fact they're curiously dependent on their wives and concubines venerally
as well as for moral support! Their mistresses are frequently spying and collecting
information on behalf of their ball-fixated and most crooked under-the-cover
dicks...)!
Frowardly unwilling to distinguish clearly between well-paid and wholly consenting
pornstars and the uninformed victims whose basic privacy they've villainously ruined
through criminal intrusions and espionage, many of the PST officers 've watched

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
81
hundreds of hard-core erotic films exclusively for pleasure while their hounded
observanda are asleep or otherwise don't require constant attention. Besides their
sexually motivated malefaction, the PST terrorists will record the personalia of every
person visiting or otherwise enjoying social contact with the victim all surveillance
procedures referred to above may be extended so as to encompass the victim's
family, friends and more peripheral acquaintances.
The morally flyblown PST gangsters will also and especially register any personal
peculiarities and routines of potential value for forthcoming attacks on the victim's
health, life and belongings etc.
As the state hired and notorious badasses feel they've acquired satisfying insight into
the victim's household activities, systematical and covert provocations to spoil the
latter's mental equilibrium are launched.
In order to induce regular paranoia, the PST bugbears will design the variform
harassment suchwise an alarming feeling of beeing persecuted results...:

Though he/she changed corresponding battery less than a month ago, the victim may
wake up at the dead of night because the smoke detector in the hall right outside the
bedroom emits high-pitched beeps precisely as it's supposed to when the battery
is about to run down! The victim will either remove permanently or for security
reasons replace the battery immediately however; if the latter solution is chosen,
he or she may experience that the actual beeping reoccurs after a short period of
time....!
Inside the wall less than two meters from the victim's bed a hellish device
constantly gives off ultrasonic noises inaudible to the human ear.....though great for
keeping portrayed victim awake until daybreak (cf p 17)!
Tired and confused after the nocturnal terrorism, the victim may discover that
although it had functioned perfectly well previous evening the automatic filter
coffee maker is stone-dead.....so, 4050 minutes later, he/she will leave for work
without the customary cups of coffee necessary to expel matutinal drowsiness
Arriving at his workplace, the victim may search in vain for essential stationery and
documents etc and perhaps discover that half a pint of coffee has been ostensibly
spilled on the floor underneath his or hers computer table.....
Unaware the illegal monitoring and ongoing PSYWAR* (*psychological warfare), the
victim is likely to suspect some of his workmates are teasing him or her.....which in
turn and in perfect agreement with the evil-intended PST-plot may give rise to
peculiar questions, conflicts and groundless mistrust.
Finishing work, the victim may find his private car unlocked though he or she
knows with absolute certainty the vehicle indeed was locked when they left it.....and
returning home, the heckled thing may stumble upon a lump of wet concrete or
some queer object placed just in front of their private main entrance!
Well inside their apartment or house, the victim may observe a quizzical woman
(actually a debauched stool pigeon hired and instructed by the PST officers) wearing
a yellow sou'wester and spectacular poncho seemingly watching their residence

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
82
from a nearby parking lot, and 2030 minutes later they may receive a bizarre phone
call.
At this point of time the average victim have an impression of being recurrently
haunted by disturbingly weird incidents, and a subversive insecurity feeling normally
pervades their mind. In order to reinforce the rising paranoia and trigger a maximally
overwhelming psychosis, the PST impalers will prolong the ultrasound directed sleep
deprivation and oftentimes poison the victim's food or beverage with scarcely
traceable doses psychoactive/hallucinogenic substances.
Opportunistically striking while the iron is hot and loathsomely exploiting the
chemogenic derangement, the PST officers may now phone the local emergency
ward or mental health care personnel presenting themselves as v.g anxious
neighbors, relatives or colleagues of the victim who prefers to be anonymous either
because they fear violent reprisals or because their personal relationship with the
victim allegedly and otherwise will be spoiled if their identity usw perchance should
be betrayed.

Thereupon slyly faking genuine and warmhearted concernment the Norwegian
police skunks speciously and rather detailed reports the victim's recent behavior as
disquieting and socially offbeat with markedly psychopathological and potentially
dangerous manifestations.....typically the threat portrayed and improper conduct
represents to the surroundings and the victim's own life/health are massively
accentuated/exaggerated.
In some cases, however, the PST rats de facto will introduce themselves as police
officers falsely claiming they've received several alarming complaints from
trustworthy persons worrying about the victim's psychiatric status etc, and in other
cases the entire and venomous hotchpot is an offensively rotten mishmash of clear-
cut criminality and substantial corruption jumbled up through preplanned and
deliberately lawless cooperation between the police and the ignominiously double-
dealing public health service.
Apprehended by the police and/or mental health care personnel the nescient victim
at least initially may fancy he or she is surrounded by sincerely caring,
respectable and reliable etc individuals anxious to relieve them from snarled and
frightening circumstances. As the simplehearted victim most unwisely rattles off a
truthful account of his weird experiences the preceding days, the frequently
corrupted health professionals may nod encouragingly while launching a handful
enmeshing though seemingly innocuous questions. When the victim a few days or
weeks later possibly accompanied by their lawyer are permitted to look over
and perhaps copy the different entries in their trumped-up medical record, they
may at first feel fairly convinced they're studying the ghastly anamnesis usw of
an absolute stranger...!
The actual descriptions of their background and factual behavior etc may deviate
perversely and distinctly systematically from the truth in order to falsely justify v.g
compulsory and politically dictated commitments, diagnoses/charges and
sadistic/destructive abuse of neurotoxic chemicals etc.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
83
The police schemed provocations which far and away may be more
comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above may
nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about other
and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and
stigmatizing alone.....and in this connection the most attractive of the
alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until the
victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation.
Other frequently sought payoffs includes suiciding (the police may v.g
surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception playing
songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units exacerbating sadness
and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping (may be induced e.g through
intoxication, covert radiation and various accident setups), or simply
assassination.


( 5 )
PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF ACHIEVED RESULTS

The police and their corrupted upholders will invariably and with hell-bent
determination utilize all episodes/information real as well as fabricated and
illegally provoked/obtained commonly deemed unacceptable to harm the victim
and eventually the socioreligious/-cultural and ethnic etc subgroups pertinent to the
latter.
Most likely there'll be a number of vitiated press conferences/releases
opportunistically stressing the economic needs and counterfeited, political
downgrading of the police force the difficult and assumedly unwholesome working
conditions of Norwegian police officers will be grotesquely exaggerated, and wage
claims typically accentuated.....demands for extended access to weaponry and
immoral investigation procedures are apt to follow, and troublesome regulations
restricting human rights violating policemanship and fiendish totalitarianism
supporting the absolute police state, normally shoot down
By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists, the
Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing lengths to
actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious criminality committed
by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and various mass media private
as well as state owned are very likely to reflect this inglorious fact!

Cf Doc #2907 ANNOTATIONS.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
84
PST IN BRATTVG

Subsequent annotations may be read as an unmediated continuation of pp 8081 of nearby
gravamen :

Suspecting no criminality or irregularities aside from the satanic terrorism systematically
brought about by themselves and their festered accomplices (cf pp 1130 usw), the
facinorous PST kooks nevertheless had their own and screwed motives for dragging on the
trenchantly cranky harrying of me.
During their nefarious and formerly described aggressions in Oslo, the various PST agents
invariably reported they forthrightly had been detected whenever attempting to surveil or
stealthily pursue me.....and this obviously represented an experiential novelty to the gunky
flatfoots accustomed to undiscovered track and espy etc their usually woefully inattentive
victims.....so after plundering my attic-lodging in Oslo (stealing ready cash, my passport,
dozens of books, documents and miscellaneous thingamajigs everything perfectly legal
stuff), these demon guided swine amongst swine decided to find out how it was practically
possible to unmask their foul sleuths such and such!

In NO-Brattvg the PST goons forthwith acquired point-blank support for their wicked and
lawless insanities from the evilest mortal ever settling in NO-Haram County; Mr Thorleif
MARKEN (b Dec 16, 1940) the local sheriff!
Mr Marken was formally and permanently appointed sheriff in 1989, and held this office
until 2001 when he relinquished due to somatic illness.
It's extremely seldom even amongst the worst criminals we're encountering individuals
entirely destitute of at least a few creditable personality traits, but indeed; Mr Marken is one
of these rare creatures!
Of humble birth and without close relatives approaching his inordinate malevolence and
reasonable Stanford-Binet IQ of 143 (cf Doc #1536, p 87), Mr Marken consuetudinary
conceals his real intentions and feelings from exposure even the social interaction with
his wife and children is a purely hammy business scurvily enacted to beguile these credulous
everyday characters.

During his incumbency Mr Marken's behavior and ratiocination steadily grew more offbeat
and befuddled. Initially suspecting I was a mere fruitcake, his clodhopping mind transmuted
my markedly altruistic and human rights advocating being into a cold-blooded and superbly
adroit crimelord in a matter of months....the uncontested coordinator and spearhead of all
organized criminality particularly drug trafficking in Norway (later as he became
even more cocksure as for my fancied leadership role, he generously expanded my criminal
empire to encompass the entire Earth....)!


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
85
Mr Marken's unsound and eminently iniquitous brain almost unceasingly hatched new plots
to terrorize, harm and murder me.....: for more than a year the loaded pistol expectantly
tucked away in the drawer unit of his executive desk he impatiently waited for an
opportunity to unprovokedly gun me down if I happened to enter his office in a legal errand
(afterwards he'd planned to explain I physically had attacked him and suchwise rendered
self-defense unavoidable), and for many months he meticulously framed his damned
blueprint for slaying me while enjoying my vespertine promenade (Mr Marken were well
acquainted with several experienced big game hunters residing near his native homestead in
NO-Vestnes County, and he'd planned to employ one of these as sniper convincing the
ignorant and nationalistic marksman I was an extremely dangerous mass murderer and
mafioso seriously endangering and sapping the very foundation of the whole, democratic
nation....; You've shot bucks before, (name)!, Mr Marken cheerfully reassured himself.
There's no evidence Mr Marken ever informed other PST representatives about his deranged
designs.)!
Otherwise Mr Marken was and supposedly still is an ardent adherent of poisoning and
diversified application of maiming and lethal toxins/venoms/chemicals....: during the more
than 20 break-ins at my private house in sen 4, Brattvg, the PST butchers presumably
infected and destroyed with cardiotoxic substances alone bedclothes, towels, clothing,
books and paraphernalia etc worth at least US$5000 (cf Doc #377 entry of Sep 29, 2000
etc)....!

While Mr Marken's personal PST engagement most definitely were morbidly out-of-bounds
and totally indefensible, his established police lieutenant and second in command at the
local sheriff office, Mr Kjell Brje MOE (cf Doc #377 entries of Oct 19 and 28, 1998), wisely
maintained a significantly squarer course vis--vis other PST agents.
In striking contrast to the uniformly atrocious and radically false Mr Marken, Mr Moe is an
experienced and generally well-thought-of military senior officer of sensible empathic and
beneficent proclivity. Mr Moe never partook the attempted assassinations regularly
launched by Mr Marken and other PST officers, but alas he certainly hold back piles of
information about serious crimes committed by his colleagues...!

Many of the lawbreaking PST activities in Brattvg has been upheld, actively partaken and
sometimes initiated by the slimy whited sepulchers of the categorically scandalous and
largely condemnable public health service.
Offering suitable sheltering, personnel, matriel and vast assistance in many other respects,
sickly self-righteous and perversely wrongheaded health professionals in increasingly
degree has adopted and underhandedly adapted to meet their specific and illicit needs the
throughly unprincipled spy-tech beforehand pertinent to special and intelligence gathering
units of the police and armed forces alone!
By studying pp 1530 and 8088 of nearby report, some of the unilaterally fiendish motives
Norwegian health officials had and still have in regard to illegally surveilling, terrorizing
and injuring me etc should be readily discernible/deductible. One of the truly queerish
incentives in this connection nonetheless remains unexposed: Erelong the constantly vexing
PST hellhounds had reported they were unqualified as to determine my exact intellectual

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
86
level, but that they anyhow felt positively convinced my general IQ exceeded 150 (farther
down the mucky road as they acquired knowledge of some of my modest childhood feats,
they consulted independent experts unreservedly declaring the actual accomplishments
certainly equalled a Stanford-Binet IQ prodigiously transcending 200 and most probably
surpassing 250 on said scale) and....their assertion quickly triggered the far and away
most rabid, lawless and disgraceful quest for genius ever taking place in this wretched
nation!
So....; while vitiated PST hit men searched our private house in NO-Mauseidvg (cf Doc
#4000, entry of Jan 2005) and several other dwellings from basement to attic collecting
psychobiographical material, appallingly criminal namby-pamby toads from the public health
service systematically monitored my private activities in sen 4, Brattvg....! And once the
Doc's ##599 and 777 had been published on the Internet (on Oct 17, 2002 and Feb 22, 2003,
respectively), 3 new SIGs appeared practically overnight: the first group were morbidly
obsessed with clairvoyance/occultism and the prophecies of the French seer Nostradamus*
(*b. 1503 d. 1566); the second with medicine and pharmacology (cf Doc #599, p 55); and
the third with religion and apocalyptical exegesis etc. These illegally founded and macabre
SIGs are still kept alive by brainsick, Norwegian officials (By the way the manifestly
haywired preoccupation with parapsychological topics was not a wholly span-new craze.....:
in 1998 when I as a result of all over fraudulent accusations were incarcerated at the
political black hole at NO-Hjelset [cf Doc #377 entry of Oct 30, 1998], the Norwegian
author and schoolmaster Mr Oddbjrn MYKLEBUST together with a member of the
"fair sex" were allowed to enter corresponding spudhole. Mr Myklebust and his female
attendant had been admitted by Mr Arne RUSET* [*cf Doc #377 entry of Nov 07, 2000] et
al, and didn't introduce themselves or consult me directly they merely kept some distance
trying to look convincingly uninterested. Mr Myklebust had formerly published a book about
a moderately second sighted kinswoman Ms Olga TANDSTAD SKAUE and was currently
compiling material for a biography about her clairvoyant father, Mr Karl Johan TANDSTAD,
and other Norwegians presumably possessing paranormal faculties. Ignorant his identity,
whereabouts and objectives were duly imparted, Mr Myklebust and the accompanying
woman left the scene after a while slightly puzzled and discontended, I'm afraid...).
Personal connections with the faintest smell of romance or sexuality 've always aroused
fervent, pathological reactions amongst Norwegian PST officers and health personnel...:

In the autumn 2001 when I most presumably saved her oldest daughter from being
stabbed to death the PST fiends broke into the private apartment of Ms Katrin JSOK
(b Sep 20, 1965), NO-Brattvg.
The PST swine suspected Ms Jsok and her underaged daughters were particularly
interesting specimens since I offered them this kind of personal assistance.....so they
conscientiously installed their hellish cobweb-optics in her sitting room, bedchambers,
kitchen and bathroom.....etc! During the next weeks the exclusively male voyeurs
concluded scrutinized the perfectly unremarkable, bodily makeup of the small family
without detecting anything unusual such and such they the teenybopper and her
much younger sister had a physique altogether matching their respective age-groups,
while they described the sexual attributes and general build of Ms Jsok as less
attractive...!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
87
The emetic and secret monitoring of Ms Inga DALSEGG (b Dec 14, 1974) has been
sufficiently portrayed in Doc #4575 of April 30, 2005.
The brainsick spies were much amused by Ms Dalsegg's whimsical behavior until they
witnessed scenes described as explicitly pedophilic.....and after a while they were
bewildered by some of her apparently morbid idiosyncrasies as well.

In the end of August 2005 I commenced the construction of a literally heartsome poster
for Ms Tuva Magritt MOLVR (b Aug 21, 1985), NO-Langevg a nice girl and relative.
Illegally downloading hundreds of banal sequences from the absolutely unpretentious
composition process, the utterly ludicrous and wild-eyed psychologists/physicians etc
nodded enthusiastically as they pruriently watched the "artful integration" of quixotic
hearts and stars: "Aha so this is how a true genius works......interesting, very
interesting, indeed!"
It didn't take many hours before the nematoid apostles of Satan had bugged and
severely infected Ms Molvr's modest apartment in NO-Bergen with their infernal
cobweb-optics, of course...
AV studying the homely routines of this religious and gentle lady for a while, the
contaminators concluded Ms Molvr seemed slightly depressed and listless though
they didn't quite understand why.....and since she never sullyed herself through
improper conduct or off-putting remarks, the slimy onlookers strongly suspected she
somehow had been informed about the ongoing monitoring of her privacy.

Dec 10
th
, 2005, the Norwegian "Mensa-chick" Ms Anne Lene JOHNSEN showed up in NO-
Brattvg.
Somewhat delayed due to womanly makeup redoing, she smilingly appeared outside the
shopping center I was about to leave. A psychologist involved in the reprehensible and
totally unlawful monitoring of me had recently told Ms Johnsen I probably appreciated
military garments and nice-assed gals, so she had purchased a pair of brand-new camo
trousers and expectantly kneeling on her car seats she soon did her best to
favorably expose her yummy and warlike bum...! It was a well-disposed and charming
miss, indeed and a reasonably gifted one, too.....but alas: the lovable IQ-lass had
been contemptibly befooled by stupider persons...!
Some time ago ill-fated contaminants had broken into Ms Johnsen's private apartment
installing their notorious cobweb-optics allegedly to examine her mental health and
"mating qualifications"! Though the vile intruders left many and easily detectable
vestiges, the overconfident Ms Johnsen failed to notice anything irregular.....so she
had her sexuality and absolute privacy heinously and illegally violated by the state
sponsored crackpots she unwisely relied on...
Typically irradiating with delight when she managed to solve a given problem or
formulate a particularly smashing sentence, the truly subhuman aggressors concluded
Ms Johnsen not actually was crazy she was funny and slightly eccentric, only.....so
they naturally decided to prolong the delectable monitoring of her indefinitely!

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
88
During most of A 2006 I've had much and predominantly chummy contact with Ms
Kjrsti Elida GUSECK (b June 18, 1973).
Ms Guseck is a photogenic and rather amatorious primadonna, and the constantly
marring PST officers and health professionals 've of course criminally downloaded
dozens of strictly private photos of her from my PC and corresponding video monitor
also shots of explicitly pornographic nature...!
It goes practically unsaid Ms Guseck's private apartments 've been systematically and
massively infected with AV spy-tech all her phone conversations 've been recorded,
and comprehensive annotations on her intimate privacy journalized.....as a matter of fact
Norwegian authorities permanently, illegally and lecherously have monitored the
definite bedroom privacy of this half Austrian and sexually attractive lady for years! Cf
Doc's ## 7084 and 8017 etc.


Official and sexually motivated violations of the palsy-walsy privacy of juridically blameless
citizens are extremely commonplace in Norway today, and to the extent parts of
corresponding monitoring are formally/clandestinely logged, Norwegian authorities will go
to absolute extremes to give their monstrous criminality the slightest shine of
respectability...: empirically exhaustively fraudulent accusations and the most absurd
excuses may be recorded to cover up the principal motive of the scummy surveillance!


During their long-standing presence in Brattvg, the PST officers 've also carried out
systematic and extensive monitoring etc wholly independent of the public health service and
other official institutions....: they've e.g AV spied on health personnel engaging in sexual
intercourse, WC visits and religious observances in their private homes (one of those
suchwise espyed, Mr Sharan MOGHADDAM [cf Doc #377 entries of Oct 30, 1998 item Aug
31 and Sep 29, 2000 etc], has himself operated the cobweb-optics installed in my own and
most private dwelling in sen 4, Brattvg)...!

and ohhh...: the PST paranoiacs does of course suspect somebody somehow actively and
secretly 've watched themselves during their stay here in Brattvg it's a truly majestic
mess, is not it....?!



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
89
By studying and comparing the different documents enclosed and once in a while referred
to in this complaint, one should acquire a fairly precise idea of the abject essentials
constituting the garden-variety terrorism perfunctorily carried out by the nocuous PST
vermin.




Specifically returning to the human rights complaint at hand, the plaintiff
reported the illegal audiovisual/technical surveillance of his private house on
Nov. 16 2010 cf. Encs. ##10 and 11.
As underlined in Enclosure #11, Norwegian authorities malicious and
explicitly unlawful use of surveillance technology in the complainants home in
NO-Brattvg has increased conspicuously after his complaint to the Norwegian
Special Unit for Police Matters!

Norwegian authorities criminal abuse of electronic warfare and SIGINT
applications are most decidedly long-standing and recurrent problems com-
mented upon by the plaintiff many times earlier here are a few samples:


While I visited miscellaneous associations etc in Oslo October 6
th
, spiteful
officers from Majorstua Police Station did their best to denigrate my reputation
vis--vis my landlord and a pensioned ambassador in the immediate neighbor-
hood. A native Norwegian, the ambassador had been permanently stationed e.g
in Thailand.....and its hardly unfair to describe him as a slimy turncoat with a
clear-cut predilection for nasty intrigues, espionage and perversions.

The police arranged an appointment with aforementioned ambassador in order
to utilize his private house a modest stones throw west of my apartment as a
kind of headquarters for oncoming terrorism.....

Returning to my attic-lodging in the late afternoon, I immediately recognized
intruders employing at least ne forged key had searched the unpretentious
living room. Inspecting the small balcony adjoining the garret, I quickly discov-
ered a couple insulated wires inchoatively hidden by corresponding girders and

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
90
corner stud. Following the thin cords with the eyes, two of them ran along the
outside wall to the ground where they continued southwards, while another pair
apparently led into the apartment beneath.
I frequently employed said veranda for laundry purposes, and firmly knew none
of described wires had been there a week ago.....
Well lets see what these bullies are up to!, I said to myself.
A few hours later I put on my tracksuit and went outside it was dark.

I barely ran a kilometer before heading for my dwelling house wading across
a nearby river, I surreptitiously advanced from east.....reaching the residence
garden unseen by the hectoring enemy. Id decided to inspect depicted wires
somewhat closer.....and as supposed: from the southwesternmost part of the
foundation those reaching the ground (largely concealed) continued westward
to adjacent street before sneaking along the trunk of an aged tree almost to the
top in the dim light from a vicinal street lamp I saw the threadlike conduc-
tors traversing several meters above the road.....straight into the previously
indicated ambassadors private garden!
From my covert beneath the ambassadors domicile, I now studied the police
officer I beforehand knew had been stationed in the former diplomats lawn.
Partially hidden by surrounding shrubs he intentionally kept in the dark, but
each time he sucked his revered cigarette a tiny gleam dimly illuminated his
facial features it was one of the notorious undercover agents.

I cautiously withdrew the same way as I came, and ran around roughly 20 min-
utes before returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei* (*a street) the ordi-
nary way.

The next days the police continued their sentinelling outside the ambassadors
house theyd installed cobweb-optics (cf p 9) inside my flat, and bombarded
the attic with ultrasound by night (my landlord slept in a room underground,
and were hardly seriously affected by the terror though he was noticeably
more confused and indisposed than usual these days). The ultrasound-cannon
was mounted on a tripod in the ambassadors garden (they always removed it
before dawn), and drew electricity from a power socket inside his house he
certainly knew about it!

The ultrasound-terror wasnt a success for the police; notwithstanding a few
tactical adjustments, I carried on most of the human rights work etc as custo-

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
91
mary ( anyhow: perfectly aware the police illegally would surveil and
terrorize her if she was found, Id forbidden my girlfriend to visit/contact me
since the middle of September).
During their numerous break-ins the police had installed several electronic
hootanannies both inside and around my lodging one of these accursed
gadgets were discovered in a narrow dead end of the attic less than 50 centi-
meters from my bed...

The police behaved both ridiculous and unacceptably unethical, so Oct 10
th
(at
02:20 AM) I signalized to their guard in the ambassadors garden to go indoor
hed been seen in any case, I morsed. After fifteen minutes Id received no
reply, so flashlight in hand I entered the balcony again. Id morsed 34
characters when the brand new flashlight battery permanently went out of busi-
ness! I retreated inside, but 5 minutes later I was back on the modest veranda;
a man in his thirties frenetically struggled to remove as much of aforementioned
wires as possible! ungraciously stumbling in the jungled cords, he took flight
like a badly moonstruck cuckoo upon detecting my peering presence.....!

October 11
th
I attended a vesper service for university students at Misjons-
kirken* (*a church), Oslo, while a bearded hobgoblin from the Norwegian
Police Security Service attempted to photograph all the church visitors (the
police had also stationed two well-known plainclothesmen right outside corre-
sponding porch/aisle).

Returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei, I wasnt much surprised to learn
the police again had burglarized it. Nevertheless a new and ominous trend
had been initiated this evening; studying some vacuum-packed sausages I
quickly discovered the miniscule pinprick underneath the price tag, and the
newly baked rye bread had been contaminated with a scarcely visible granulate!
This was, however, nothing but a sinister confirmation of what Ive been told by
other human rights activists; Norwegian police verily utilized pathogens and
poisonous substances to harm/assassinate persons ideologically or otherwise
opposed to their ghastly extensive criminality suo motu and ex officio!

Going collectively bananas, the bootless police officers now launched a dozen
strikingly hatefull attacks to annoy and cripple me.

The 15
th
at 04:30 AM a toolwielding motorcyclist from Majorstua Police
Station sabotaged the streetlight outside my dwelling, and forthcoming mid-
night the entire street lay bathed in darkness!

Due to the nocturnal ultrasound-terror, I routinely took a nap in the morning be
fore going to the center of Oslo. Underneath I heard my landlord utilizing the

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
92
phone before leaving in his car, and I prepared to sleep for an hour and a half
it was the 24
th
day of October.

Laying prone on the bed relaxing, an unexpected noise reached my ears; appa-
rently the sound of water running in the domiciliary plumbing system! This was
curious, because I knew the landlord not yet had returned so, under other-
wise normal conditions, I should be the only person in just now.....
Still reclining on the bed, Id prepared mentally to go downstairs when the
oxygen evidently was sucked out of the small attic abode rendering breath-
ing impossible! I flung myself out of the room rather swiftly rushing down the
stairs heading for the exterior door.....
Outside I forthwith entered nearby garage grabbing a laid away matchbox, I
inhaled deeply before advancing upstairs. Id left the apartment door ajar, and
now I tried to light one of the safety matches in the quarter-opened doorway
it ignited, but extinguished after maximum 2 seconds. Stretching my arms 4050
centimeters into the apartment, I attempted to enkindle a couple matches.....but
they didnt strike at all! Flinging the door agape, I withdrew alfresco where I
quickly found the matches to be in perfect condition.
Staying outside nearly 20 minutes before reentering the flat, I had no difficulties
burning up one of the matches, but I unclosed a window and opened the bal-
cony door though the stuffy air had a peculiar odor.....not unlike that of
carbon dioxide gas (CO
2
).

Staying indoor watching the apartment this afternoon, one of the uniformed and
police cooperating rangers Id seen the preceding day either fell or very
uncoordinately jumped down from the lower roof as I abruptly flung open
one of my eastward windows....!

Anyhow the most pernicious assault by far this day, was planned and direct-
ed by the well-known but feckless Norwegian parascientess Ms Anna Elisabeth
WESTERLUND. A fatally improper onslaught, Ms Westerlund appeared out-
side my flat next day carrying out a certain ritual before leaving.....; I wont
characterize her as an upright or particularly wise individual!

Completely reneging juridical regulations and social codes, the cops subsequent
days exploited every manifest opportunity to make trouble.....so in the be-
ginning of November, I departed for Sweden.

Arriving in Stockholm, it became clear Norwegian police had informed their
Swedish colleagues about my presence. Anyhow my mission was a perfectly
legal one: forthcoming problems rather forecasted, Id decided to deposit some
written and particularly valuable material outside Norwegian borders.
Said stuff discreetly and successfully transmitted, I immediately returned to

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
93
Norway (Oslo/Norway 1992 excerpt from Formal Complaint vs the
Kingdom of Norway pp 1619)

When Norway is marketed abroad, potential tourists are shown magnificent
photographs of snow-covered mountains, blue fjords, gorgeous waterfalls and
picturesque valleys.....and chauvinistic hucksters slyly delude gullible visitors to
identify the national geography of Norway with the human nature of innate
Norwegians!
In view of the pestiferous aspects indigenously linked to credulous confusion of
indicated perspectives, I find prophylactic affordable to emphasize that the
Norwegians not ve created even ne of the sceneries they opportunistically and
with great enthusiasm promulgate as their territorial fixtures theyve merely
devastated and exploited terrain noncontractually feasible as semblable
property to meet specific needs.

Much in the same way as Norwegians ve deluged beautiful landscapes and
penstocked imposing freshets to generate hydroelectricity heating and
illuminating their living accommodations, theyve ruined the gentle nature of
fellowmen by confining them in lunatic asylums restraining the stream of life to
produce misery temperamentally satisfying their dull-witted crave for personal
power. In the selfsame hunt for dynamic energy to keep going their generator
units and psychiatric factories, Norwegians expediently intermingle their self-
ordained constitutional conception and corresponding notion regarding
freedom of environmental manipulation, with the edified persuasion that human
nature by analogy can be legally oppressed and liberally machinated at the
mandament of Norwegian authorities.
A concrete example of stated fallacy is found e.g in sec 37 in the Personal Data
Act (Personopplysningsloven) of April 14th, 2000, which laically provides
that Norwegian citizens can be visually monitored in their private homes and
without their knowledge/consent, inasmuch as the national authorities claim
theyre trying to establish whether the actual victims ever ve been or
prospectively can be suspected, charged, indicted or convicted formerly or
presently for factual or imaginable criminality cf secs 236 and 3841 ib!
The official English translation of section 37 runs thus:

The provisions of sections 38-41 shall apply to all video surveillance.
The same applies to sections 8, 9, 11, 31 and 32. However, video
surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover such data as are
mentioned in section 2, no. 8, litra b, is permitted even if the conditions
set out in section 9, first paragraph, are not fulfilled. When image
recordings from video surveillance are stored in a way that makes it
possible to retrieve data relating to a specific person, cf section 3, first
paragraph, the other provisions of this Act shall also apply. However, the

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
94
obligation to obtain a licence pursuant to section 33 shall not apply to
video surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover data such as are
mentioned in section 2, no 8, litra b.
Through practical application of common judicial analogy, we find that the
Personal Data Act also lay down that the use of vg hidden microphones are
permissible in order to allegedly or objectively collect information specified in
section 2 a deduction perfectly congruous with authentic detection and
destruction of dozens police installed and usually eddy currented or
piezopowered bugs in the interior sheathings, skirting boards, wall studs, head
frames, sill rails and ceilings etc of our private dwellings!
With respect to the visual surveillance in consideration, the cobweb-optic
compactly portrayed in Doc #123:VII above, invariably ve been employed.
Incontrovertible findings of larger amounts cobweb-optics in psychiatric
institutions must be seen in relation to stipulations expressed in the Personal
Data Act secs 8 and 9 (nurses are normally uninformed about the optics used).

The cobweb-optic ve been grossly misused by the Norwegian police since, at
least, 1990. Initially the Norwegian Police Security Service utilized the cobweb-
optics to secretly supervise foreign consular personnel and embassy
representatives, a few espionage suspected Norwegians, to secure Norwegian
Government institutions and to perpetrate security analyses of persons in
official key positions. Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse
of audiovisual spy-tech in Norway ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers
are now picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to
lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human
rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption.
The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government
officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of
piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to
evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: virtually
always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal
persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or
public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually
supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential
conversations/happenings and to
copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the
sum of documents relating to the case cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for
the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms!
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 6061)


As regards official criminality in Norway, the number explicit lawbreakings
recorded by adjacent branch of Hellvow Anticorruption clearly reflects the

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
95
execrable and usually well-masked contempt for human rights, democratic
standards and the basic principles of corresponding legal system distinctly
prevalent amongst Norwegian officiaries practically routinely abusing their
professional privileges to e.g seriously offend fellowmen and consequently elude
the criminal investigation and prosecution juridically pertinent.

The blatant hypocrisy and treacherous opportunism by and large characterizing
nowadays Norwegian officials, was befittingly coined bigoterie in medieval
France germanely delineating the grungy and widespread practice amongst
Norwegian Normans to worship the Christian Trinity as well as their heathen
deities out of strictly materialistic motives.....whereas following Christian
baptism, the French regularly bestowed generous gifts on converted pagans.
So, the largely marauding Norwegians shamelessly exploited Gallic
benevolence and Catholic navet maximally, and quite a few of them underwent
sacramental affusion and immersion more than seven times.....!

Ill return to described tartufferie and indecent fickleness farther down in this
document forasmuch as these are indigenous and statutorily constitutional
characteristics still indispensable to official, Norwegian corruption.

When the Norwegian prime minister Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK in 2001
and subsequent to a nervous breakdown and atypical burnout declared he had
felt like nought prior to and during the actual collapse in 1998 (cf vg the
front-page of Dagbladet [NO-Oslo] of May 19, 2001), he conspicuously
portrayed the massively preponderant inferiority complex and religious
insecurity verily typifying the Christian officials keenly advocating widespread
abuse of the cobweb-optics (cf Doc #627 above, Appendix) and given nano-
microphones etc in strictly private, Norwegian homes. Like the weeds in our
gardens, whats otherwise harmful and undesirable tends to spread
rapidly.....and the mephitic deviltry of Mr Bondevik (cf e.g Doc #1022 above)
and the official bushbilkers around him, are no exception! Let me cite one of my
own aphorisms:

Nowadays Norway most strikingly resemble a melanotic sarcoma
metastatically spreading its fatal perversion and intrinsic hellishness
worldwide!

Informed readers will recall the atypical, political contact between the
commander-in-chief of Indivisiblia, Mr Jorge Rambler SHRUB, and Mr Kjell
Magne Bondevik and his government representatives etc last year. Through my
Internet pages Mr Shrub had learnt about the cobweb-optics, and Mr Bondevik
had duly confirmed the abuse of this spytech ( for purportedly decent reasons,
of course ) in a recorded phone conversation.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
96
Mr Bondevik and his depraved accomplices was perfectly aware able and
nationally independent investigators readily would uncover dozens of heinous
and officially supported/authorized violations of vg international human rights
covenants ratified by Norway, and thus was desperately in need of obtaining
goodwill from the Indivisiblian government AO.
In this way the military powerful Indivisiblia effortlessly purchased cobweb-
optics and necessary know-how about producing it. Six months ago
corresponding spyoptics was already field operative in Mr Shrubs homeland.
The detestable and downright abuse of cobweb-optics will now accelerate
significantly, and erelong be a cursed threat and irritant hideously havocking
the privacy of guiltless citizens worldwide.....; dont forget to compli-
mentNorway for forthcoming iniquity!
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp 9091)


Though fully aware Norwegian authorities will make no honest attempts
whatsoever to clear up grave criminality committed by v.g their corrupted police
officers and judges, theyll receive a pro forma copy of nearby notification. No
pieces of evidence will be handed over to Norwegian authorities, and its
beneath the dignity of upright and informed persons to associate friendly with
their depraved representatives.
Norway will soon cease to exist altogether, and in respect of this fact were
unwilling to spend time on elaborate reports.

Shortly, Norwegian police officers are accused of:

1. ATTEMPTED ARSON (in my private house, NO-Brattvg, the 13th inst
between 12:30 and 1:00 PM),

2. SABOTAGE (of an oil-filled radiator [in my private house, NO-Brattvg, the
13th inst], an electric cooker [in my private house, NO-Brattvg, Feb 03 ha
between 9 and 9:15 PM] and my fax machine [in my private house NO-
Brattvg Nov 04, 2001]),

3. BURGLARY (in my rented cars lately May 16 ha between 10:30 and 11
PM),

4. AGGRAVATED THEFT (from the private car of my cousin in NO-
Mauseidvg Mr Knut M Skotheimsvik Oct 17, 2003), and

5. TERRORISM (more than 200 incidents....).


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
97
The police officers guilty of described criminality are demanded prosecuted,
sentenced and punished.
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp
99100)


Oversender gjenpart av en mail jeg forskte n deg med tidligere i dag (fra
werner@nowzer.com) oversendelsen ble blokkert av slimklumpene i politi-
/lensmannsetaten (brukte en PC hos Haram Folkebibliotek, Brattvg):

Hei!

Her i Brattvg har vi stadig og i kende grad problemer med snrrunger fra
politi-/lensmannsetaten som bl.a stjeler og saboterer mine private eiendeler.

Denne uken (natt til mandag kl 04:1504:30) hadde man f.eks nok et
innbruddsforsk rettet mot garasjen min i sen 4 to kvisete drittsekker fra
politietaten rev ls en lsebolt p garasjedren, men uten komme seg inn.
Tidligere har svina stjlet en nkkel til samme garasjen hvor de saboterte en
helt ny gressklipper m kjpe ny i r (nkkelen til garasjedren ble stjlet fra
en privatbolig i Mauseidvg)!

Ellers i r har disse satans, uniformerte lakeiene bl.a sabotert en kostbar
verdensradio, delagt ringeklokker, laget massevis av problemer p Internett,
brket med innbrudds-/brannalarmer, terrorisert hedersmennesker mer enn 80
r gamle og klusset med strmforsyningen i sen 4 & 7 (Brattvg)....
De har ogs begtt mer enn ett dusin innbrudd etc hos mine venner/slektninger.
Vi fr lage en formell klage p disse og noen av de andre forbrytelsene
minusvariantene har begtt....s du fr ske om fri rettshjelp for meg snarest (gi
beskjed dersom du trenger underskriften min)!

Sivilombudsmannen*/Datatilsynet skal f oversendt en kopi av dette uformelle
notatet.
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp
111112)



Mnsteret for den audiovisuelle &c monitoringen av strengt private
oppholdsrom i sen 4, Brattvg, undergikk denne uken merkbare endringer ;
de politiansatte terroristene prver n i strre grad enn tidligere skjule
korresponderende overvkning, og de har tydelig fordekt jobbet med
aktivere tidligere unyttede linker for viderefre trakasseringen.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
98
Atferdsendringen kan skyldes at sivilombudsmannen har intervenert, eller at
Kjell Magne BONDEVIK 10. ds beskte Brattvg.
For helt f slutt p den ulovlige spionasjen, er det imidlertid ndvendig frata
forbryterne alle tekniske muligheter for utve den fagre ord og lfter om
bot og bedring fra misdederne, m ingenlunde stoles p!
Mht sivilombudsmann Arne FLIFLET s er han som forutsagt i mitt
(uformelle) brev av 07. ds n satt under absolutt illegal og sterkt foraktelig
overvkning. Hr Fliflet er nok en tffing det blir vanskelig kontrollere effektivt,
men han br merke seg at utstrlingen fra f.eks digitale/personlige/portable
databanker/adresselister/dagbker samt kalkulatorer etc med noks enkelt
utstyr kan oppfanges og dekodes p temmelig lang avstand (kfr TEMPEST).
Legger han inn info p mobiltelefonen sin, vil denne oppfanges fr eventuell
videresending i det hele br alt digitalt vre nei-ting for ham n
(.....dersom han ikke nytter denne forrderske teknologien til spre nye
tilsiktet desinformasjon)!
PST har g i meget stor grad misbrukt enhver praktisk anledning til bugge
f.eks klr (srlig ytterty), bagasje og husdyr!

En av hovedmennene i denne saken teologen Kjell Magne Bondevik, har i
lang tid innstendig bedt om slippe helvetesstraff for sin opplagt forsettlige
delaktighet i de bestialske overgrepene. Vel.....; dersom hr Bondevik via
sannferdige og fyllestgjrende vitneml etc aktivt bidrar til at flest mulig av de
skyldige i sammenfallende sakskompleks sekulrt straffedmmes, har de tallrike
bnnene hans knapt vrt forgjeves ( av penbare grunner br den eventuelle
oppryddingen pbegynnes i god tid fr han gr av som sjef for regjeringen).
N fr vi se om Norges statsminister har ryggrad og vett til forfekte sannhet &
rettferd.....det vil nok lnne seg!

Saken for vrig brer utvetydig preg av at mange av de skyldige er sinnslidende
dog strafferettslig tilregnelige, og det er liten tvil om at lange
sikringsdommer er betimelig nr de fleste av disse skal straffedmmes. Det er
spesielt forstemmende men slett ikke uventet at s mye helse personell
velvillig har deltatt i de ekstremt graverende og eksplisitt morbide krenkelsene*
(*sannsynligvis pga de mange rikspolitikerne/embetsmennene etc involvert,
de verste eksemplene p systematiske menneskerettighetsbrudd i Norge etter
annen verdenskrig).

Jeg sker ufortrdent om politisk asyl selv om norske myndigheter (sikkert for
kunne plage meg ytterligere) rutinemessig forsker stjele/pne disse legale
petisjonene til utenlandske diplomater oa.


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
99
Under arbeidet med forfatte dette begrensede mementoet, har representanter
for fienden aktivt lastet ned stoffet p PCene sine.....dette vil ikke hjelpe dem
snarere tvert imot!

Redaksjonen avsluttet kl 22:15.
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, pp
114115)


Im presently composing a comprehensive United Nations petition vs the
Kingdom of Norway.

Corresponding complaint is addressed to the Committee against Torture, and
demanded dealt with in agreement with Article 21 (c) second period in the
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treat-
ment and Punishment.

Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly
downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen consequently they ve kicked
off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various
human rights organizations in this case!

Representatives for Norwegian authorities ve already decided to illegally halt
etc said petition if it proves too disclosing.....so; Im wondering if the UN can
offer me special protection against unlawful interference

The UN should send their prompt reply to my counsellor in NO-lesund:

Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG, P.O. Box 837, NO-Aalesund, NORWAY
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, p 124)



Siden 1992 har sen 4, Brattvg, vrt sted for noen av de mest forrykte og
ondsinnede terrorhandlinger som noensinne er begtt av norske kommune- og
statsansatte.

Den 03. mars 2007 drev Wilh. Werner WINTHER som siden 1993 har bebodd
anfrte adresse med malerarbeid i korresponderende privatboligs annen
etasje da han fikk besk av venninnen Kjrsti Elida GUSECK som fortalte at
hun nylig hadde vrt i hndgemeng med moren grunnet et uavklart eierforhold.
F minutter etter fr Gusecks ankomst oppstod kraftig rykutvikling og muligens
pen ild i husets kjelleretasje idet den elektriske strmforsyningen til denne

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
100
delen av huset ble angrepet og sabotert av offentlig ansatte som grovt misbrukte
tilgjengelig og i utgangspunktet militr teknologi. Klokken var p dette
tidspunktet ca 17:30, og de aktuelle deleggelsene fremgr av det fotografiske
bilaget "Enclosure S-82" som inngr i hr Winthers formelle FN-klage og
menneskerettsrapport "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway"*
(*dette dokumentet er fortsatt under utarbeidelse). At man tidligere hhv 13.
jun 2004 og 28. okt 2006 har vrt utsatt for lignende sabotasjehandlinger
iscenesatt av norske myndigheter, fremgr av FN-vedleggene "Enclosure S-80"
og "Enclosure S-81". P side 137 i ovennevnte FN-rapport fremgr at
ambulansesjfrene i Haram kommune i stor grad har medvirket til den illegale
overvkningen og terroriseringen av innboerne bl.a i sen 4, Brattvg, og det er
utvilsomt korrekt underkaste disse dypt foraktelige utskuddene samt "visse"
og ikke mindre foraktelige politiansatte grundig etterforskning ogs i
tilknytning til beskrevne branntillp den 3. ds.

Ambulansesjfrene har tidligere senest den 14. fm vist aggressiv glede
over antatte nederlag pfrt fr Guseck, og formodentlig medvirket ansatte i
helse- og sosialetaten i Haram kommune til fremprovosere hennes fars
ddsfall* den 29. sep 1992 (*i.e ved omfattende og eventuelt forsettlig
feilbehandling).

Den notoriske/offentlige kriminaliteten blant ansatte i Haram kommune er for
vrig omtalt i undertegnedes Doc's ##5817, 6009, 6097 og 7011 mv.

Man tror at innholdet i noen SMSer fr Guseck og hr Winther utvekslet
frstnevnte dato har virket ansporende p gjerningsmennene:

Tekstmelding mottatt fra tlf #908 99 829 i.e fra fr Guseck kl 12:16 den 03. mars
2007:

"Du har vel begynt m gjerdet til Ingolf tenker jeg. Jeg har vondt i halsen. Har spist mange
halslinser i hp om at det hjelper."

Svar sendt fr Guseck fra tlf #974 83 483 i.e fra hr Winther den 03. mars 2007:

"Gjerdet tja; grunnet malingen denne uken mtte jeg vaske klr i dag..og
vaskemaskin/trketrommel gr p samme strm- kursen som sag & arbeidsbelysning
jeg m nok heller male i dag!"

Ved siden av pfre ham alvorlige helseskader og merutgifter, har et av
hovedmlene for norske myndigheter siden 1992 vrt sabotere hr Winthers
inntektsgivende arbeid, boligstandard og personlige relasjoner.

Fr Guseck er omtalt p s 120 i FORMAL COMPLAINT (det er hevet over tvil at
fhv helse- og sosialsjef i Haram kommune Vegard AUSTNES [jf Doc 's

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
101
##6097 og 7011 etc] er blant de som har vrt godt kjent med og delaktig i
den illegale og uvanlig detestable monitoringen osv av fr Guseck o.a), og han
hvis gjerde mot betaling skulle repareres Ingolf Peder ABELSETH er
omtalt i Doc #5817 som utgjr en del av samme FN-klagen.

Advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, lesund, har fullmakt til politianmelde
kriminalitet beskrevet i denne orienteringen p vegne av hr Winther.
Dommere o.a som benekter eller p annet vis sker dekke over anfrte
kriminalitet mv, skal begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet f.eks etter straffeloven 110,
118, 119, 120, 123, 124, 125, 145, 145 a og 275 cf 62 og 63 ib, item
domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113 og 116 etc.
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER,
pp138140)


Dear Mr Aspehaug:

As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were
quite busy here in NO-Brattvg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours
these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in sen 4 13
14 times!
Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier cf Doc's ##7084 and
7090.

As regards my comprehensive report of the 13
t
h

previous month (cf Doc #8123),
this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly
corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-lesund.
Mr Karoliussen together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the
Police Mr Knut STORBERGET are, of course, amongst the numerous male-
factors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and
natural life in this unparalleled case.

Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in
NO-lesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head
post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights
organizations addressed to your office cf Incomplete FORMAL COM-
PLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611 &c.

Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described
criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw!

Very truly yours,
Wilh. Werner WINTHER

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
102
PS (Sep 14, 2007):

Before handing over nearby letter, I shall make mention of a dubious device
extensively and criminally abused by the public "health" service in Norway; the
"Antenna Carephone" (see illustrations below). The Antenna Carephone is
strategically installed in private domiciles by representatives of the public
"health" service, and connected to a day and night manned central through the
state-owned telecommunication network* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105107 &c).

Frequently stationed in living rooms, kitchens, and near beds, the Antenna
Care- phone provides excellent opportunities for illegally
overhearing/recording various indoor activities..and, as demonstrated by
practically innumerable incidents the last quinquennium, these "Carephones"
are systematically abused by odiously corrupted "health" personnel
eavesdropping private conversations and sexual activities etc! Those abusing
the Antenna Carephone here in NO-Brattvg has mostly been female
nurses living out their psychosexual disorders and criminal predisposition.
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER,
pp159160)


SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY
REPORTED:

Oct 27, 2007:

At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my
PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus Downloader. The attack
was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.

Oct 28, 2007:

In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggres-
sive attack aimed at ruining my PC. The attack is discovered immediately and
effectively quashed.





HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
103
Nov 01, 2007:

Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM while (utilizing my PC in sen 4, NO-Bratt-
vg) editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the
USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT-
copies of said pics.
The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be
exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried
out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.

Nov 03, 2007:

Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM while I visited the shop "RS Elektronikk AS" in
NO-Brattvg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middle-
aged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior.

Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively
obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly
sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program
"Microsoft Word".


Those guilty of described crimes should all be legally
charged/sentenced/punished.

Due to the numerous/unprovoked/illegal and intentionally life-endangering
attacks masterminded and dastardly carried through by Norwegian (senior)
civil servants since 1992 (cf "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of
Norway" by Wilh. Werner WINTHER), Norwegian authorities are denied
personal contact with me juridical questioning actively supervised by armed
and UN-appointed guards from trustworthy Member States may be allowed
though, cf the Norwegian Constitution Article 93*:

*In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote
the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the
Storting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international
organization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right,
within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance
with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities,
although not the power to alter

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
104
this Constitution. For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two
thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for
proceedings for amending the Constitution. The provisions of this Article
do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization,
whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under
international law.

Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in sen 4,
NO-Brattvg.

Norwegian authorities should address all requests/remarks etc to my lawyer in
NO-lesund, Mr Johs A ASPEHAUG.


Sincerely,
Wilh. Werner WINTHER


PS:

It's especially discreditable but not at all surprising the hereinabove
reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian
Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and
the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian
Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of
Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*:


*Article 86

The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and last
instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting against
Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court or of the
Storting, for criminal offences which they may have committed in their
official capacity.
The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accordance
with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the limitation
period for the institution of indictment proceedings before the Court of
Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years. The permanent
Members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed Members of the
Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment. The provisions
contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
105
Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court of Impeachment the
President of the Lagting shall preside.
Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the
Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is
elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of
Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases, for any
other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall resign as a judge of
the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme
Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a
Member of the Supreme Court.



*Article 87

The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the
proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting
and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen Members of
the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the
Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceedings may challenge an
equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has
the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be
challenged is not divisible by two. The same shall apply to the challenging
of the Members of the Supreme Court. If there are several accused in such
proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in
accordance with rules prescribed by law. If the right of challenge is not
exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of
the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively
retire following the drawing of lots.
When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of
Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that the Court due
to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of whom at most ten are
Members of the Lagting and five Justices of the Supreme Court.
The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of
the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots. If
the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Members of
the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may
nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court
numbers at least ten judges. Specific provisions as to the procedure to be
followed in the composition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid
down by law.



HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
106
In any case let me, finally, quote a few lines from FORMAL COMPLAINT
vs the Kingdom of Norway, p 136:

"Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap--pie Pharisaism and
scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting to
belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive
corruption. To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your
adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they can
protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking
dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.....verily; your
idealistic and perchance pusillanimous approach is nothing but an enheartening
incitement to these naturally schizoid and overly low-minded felons! Instead of
mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities mayheming the
human rights, the world community at large and international fora in particular
should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and legally punish
corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality. More precisely, we
can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and cosmopolitan intervention unit of
superbly fit and comprehensively trained police officers duly commissioned to
secure final proofs and forcibly apprehend state supported culprits e.g in
Norway... Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than
conventional counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to
prevent abuse of portrayed unit is crucial.

In any event and this point can hardly be overstressed: before international
and politically powerful alliances are willing to resolutely and with required
sternness arrest, imprison, convict and otherwise treat Norwegian officials in
accordance with the categorical condemnation the latter's satanic fiendishness,
double-dealing and odious corruption ex officio en effet calls for, the well-meant
but woefully uncharged pro forma chiding normally launched by human
rights organizations/tribunals scarcely becomes more than a waggish and
downright encouraging brutum fulmen to Norwegian authorities!"


PPS:

Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in No-Brattvg
the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC the 6th inst
my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down (phone #: [+47]
92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the Norwegian company
NetCom)...! In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention
to the fact I the 5th inst visited web sites like:


HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
107

UNDP Anti-Corruption Practitioners Network,
http://anticorruption.undp.sk (at 20:20 CET),


Transparency International,
http://transparency.org/ (at 20:24 CET),

Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO),
http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),

Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia,
http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),

WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network,
http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),

A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity,
http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42 CET).


I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private
Yahoo! Mail contacts (wwerner77@yahoo.com).....and, in view of the stark
illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and
corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this
case, its quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the
sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet
activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like sabotaging my Internet
connection!
(Excerpt from Internet Documents by Wilh. Werner WINTHER,
pp167172)







Norwegian authorities unlawful abuse of SIGINT technology anno 2011 has
clear-cut objectives:

To terrorize and harm the plaintiff;
to impede and stop nearby human rights complaint;

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
108
to steal, manipulate and destroy proofs of official corruption/criminality
in Norway;
to gather information apt for bamboozling, influencing and buying off
members of international human rights courts/tribunals;
to give their innate villainy/psychopathy/criminalism an outlet;
etc!




Article 13 Right to an effective remedy

Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are
violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority
notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting
in an official capacity.


The national police force are in all likelihood the most corrupted occu-
pational group in Norway, and the actual prevalence of psychopathy and stark
criminalism amongst its various members extremely alarming..indeed: the
responsibility for registering, investigating and prosecuting criminality in said
country are left to individuals particularly unfit for this and all kinds of work
requiring a certain degree of moral integrity.

Very much aware the deep-seated and widespread corruption amongst former
and operant police officers/executives in Norway, the complainant forthwith
filed formal complaints against (vg) Mr. Jan Egil PRESTHUS* (*leader of the
Norwegian Special Unit for Police Matters former police executive), Mr.
Tor-Aksel BUSCH* (*Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions
former police executive) and Mr. Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG* (*assistant
chief of police, NO-Hedmark county) as soon as they had turned over written/
concrete evidence of their depravity cf Encs. ##12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27.
However, in a crime case of this severity where several Norwegian politi-
cians and (senior) civil servants premeditatedly have contributed to at least
three attempted homicides and consequently done their best to protect them-
selves and the directly involved would-be assassins against all kinds of invest-
igation/examination etc, its impossible to obtain a lawful and uncorrupted
handling of the various reports as long as the procedural responsibility rests
on Norwegian authorities.
And alas; with respect to this specific case, the official procedures has

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
109
exclusively been left to former and present police officers/executives more
or less guilty of corresponding attempts to murder the complainant..and the
result has, perfectly as anticipated, been a monstrous and most nauseating
parade of state/Government supported malversation/criminality in Norway!

The Norwegian Courts of Justice Act provides that:

1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding
assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60, cf
sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21);
2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury
through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected
(sec 76, cf secs 52, 53 and 65 ib);
3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances
potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 cf secs 52
and 109 ib).

Cf. the Norwegian Public Administration Act secs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10
etc.

Moreover in the Norwegian Constitution, Article 110:c, its stressed that
(sic):
It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and
ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of
treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian
Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 secs 2 and 3).


On account of preceding observations it should be evident to the nth degree that
e.g. Mr. Tor-Aksel Busch and Mr. Jan Egil Presthus are entirely disqualified
from exercising any kind of judicial authority in this case, whereas they both
are formally reported and responsible for wilfully provoking at least two of
described attempts on the plaintiffs life cf. Encs. ##10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17,
18, 21, 22, 23 and 26 etc.
In addition, as underlined in Encl. #26, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the
Police Mr. Knut STORBERGET are amongst the plug-uglies actively
supporting the despicable and utterly criminal conspiration against the com-
plainant...!


Norwegian authorities premeditated and recidivous violations of Article 13 are
absolutely obvious and easily provable...; instead of offering the plaintiff an

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
110
effective and impartial/competent remedy enabling him to enforce/recover his
statutory rights and freedoms, Norwegian authorities have done their best to
illegally terrorize/persecute him and ensure his well-founded complaints against
government-employed/-supported criminals are grossly mishandled!
Whenever the plaintiff files a complaint against Mr. Tor-Aksel Busch, the Nor-
wegian Director General of Public Prosecutions attempts to pass over corre-
sponding prosecution and suspension demand in silence or, alternatively, for-
wards the report etc to Mr. Jan Egil Presthus who of course perfunctorily
drops the case forthright.......and, vice versa; when the plaintiff files a formal
complaint against Mr. Jan Egil Presthus and the Special Unit for Police Matters,
the totally corrupted Director General of Public Prosecutions are the only and
highest appellate body.......and needless to say Mr. Busch will immediately
drop all accusations/charges against Mr. Presthus and his special unit
without investigation and justified reasons!






ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


It appears from Encs. ##20, 24 and 26 that Norwegian authorities decision not
to institute legal proceedings are final and inappealable cf. Article 35 1 of
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The plaintiffs appeal of July 08 this year (cf. Encl. #26) has never been ans-
wered, and Norwegian authorities last decision not to prosecute is dated June
21, 2011 (cf. Encl. #25) cf. Article 35 1 of the Convention for the Protec-
tion of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.


Nearby complaint is well-founded and clearly admissible in agreement with
Article 34 and 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms, and the plaintiff hereby certifies the correct-
ness of submitted information:






HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
From: Wilhelm Werner Winther (Norway) Date: Oct. 01, 2011
111
The plaintiff doesnt use the state controlled postal
services of Norway, and all written communications
addressed to him should be sent to:
wwerner@airpost.net






Brattvg/Norway Oct. 01, 2011



Wilhelm Werner Winther
(Plaintiff)





PS:







Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
DlIte: 28.09.2010 05:50:54
To: post .sunnmore!Cl! po IitieLno
Bee: wwerner(clJairposLnet
Subject: Fw: [SPAM] SMS-TRUSLER
ANMELDELSE/ORIENTERING
Politiet bes f01ge opp saken --- hr Tommy
SKARB" begjceres eventuelt (jf strl 44) siktet,
tiltalt og straffet.
Politiet kan fa kopi av korresponderende trussel
ved a oppgi et mobiltelefon# denne kan sendes
til.
Hilsen
Wilh. W WINTHER
-------Origina/ Message-----
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 28.09.2010 05:42:16
To: post@thermotank.no; post@metpro.no
Subject: [SPAM] SMS-TRUSLER
THERMOTANK A/S
6220 Straumgjerde
METPROA/S
6260 Skodje
SMS-TRUSLER FRA
TOMMY SKARB0,
BRATTVAG
Undertegnede har i natt mottatt alvorlige SMS
trusler fra Tommy SKARB", 6270 Brattvag, og ber
om en snarlig forklaring pa hvorfor vedkommende
nytter en mobiltelefon registrert pa Thermotank A/S
til kriminell virksomhet (det aktuelle tlf.nr er:
99286641).
28.08.2011
ENCL. #1
Hr SKARB0 har ogsa sendt undertegnede SMS
henvendelser fra en mobiltelefon registrert pa
METPRO A/S (det aktuelle tlf.nr er: 90977398).
SMS-sendingene viser at hr Skarb0 er sinnslidende,
og at han utgj0r en fare for allmenheten --- forholdet
er innrapportert til norske myndigheter.
Det understrekes for 0vrig at undertegnede aldri har
hatt personlig kontakt med hr SKARB0 og dennes
familie, og at det foreligger opplysninger om at
nevnte person er nyseparert og sliter med alvorlige
alkoholproblemer etc.
Med hilsen
Wilh. W WINTHER
Side 2 av 2
28.08.2011
ENCL. #1
Side 1 av 3
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 30.09.20 I 0 12:22:21
To: post.slInnlllOreci;poIitiet.no: \\ wcrncrfclairpost.net
Subject: NYE OPPLYSNINGER
Lensmannen i Haram
o
6270 Brattvag
NYE SAKSOPPLYSNINGER
Jf avh0r av undertegnede ved
lennsmannskontoret i Brattvag av i
o
gar.
Man pr0ver a finne et mulig motiv for
de ulike truslene som er fremsatt, og
vii i den anledning nevne f0lgende:
Sf2Jlvi DYBVIK, skilt fra Geir Ove
SKARB0 og mor til Tommy
SKARB0, ville for noen ar sid en kj0pe
huset i Asen 4, Brattvag, hvor jeg bor
na. Fr Dybvik spurte gjentatte ganger
om hun ikke kunne flytte inn i huset
jeg bodde i, men svaret var alltid
"nei" --- det er fullstendig klart at hun
bcerer et visst nag til meg pga dette.
Fr Dybvi k jobbet for Posten Norge BA,
og leverte/hentet post i gaten hvor jeg
bor (under avh0ret ble det nevt at jeg
ikke nyttet postkassen min lenger
fordi sa mange brev hadde
forsvunnet). Man regner med --
fordelt pa 4 ar --- at ca 400 brev
adressert til meg ble stjalet (mange av
disse brevene var sendt av advokater,
ambassader og
menneskerettighetsorganisasjoner). I
tillegg kommer tyveri av rundt
200 brev jeg sendte selv --- dette var
for en stor del registrerte sendinger
med mottakingsbevis etc.
Det er vanskelig a si med absolutt
28.08.2011
ENCL. #2
Side 2 av 3
sikkerhet om fr Dybvik har hatt noe
med anforte brevtyverier a gjOre, men
man kan trygt si at hun er mistenkt i
saken ... !
Den 28. ds mottok undertegnede
svcert mange oppringninger fra et
ukjent nummer, og personen som
ringte snakket nordlandsdialekt.
Tidligere samme kveld hadde Solvi
DYBVIK pa eget initiativ kontaktet
undertegnede i Storgata, Brattvag --
hun hadde da folge med en
svensktalende mann, og var synlig
beruset. Man antar at fr Dybvik og den
svensktalende mannen nylig had de
oppholdt seg ved BrattvAg Bowling.
Under korresponderende
telefonsamtaler fremholdt personen
med nordlandsdialekt at man hadde
Iyst pa huset i Asen 4, Brattvag, og at
man antok jeg var pa vei til a flytte ut
etc. Personen kom med flere mer eller
mindre tilslorte trusler under
telefonsamtalene, og viste til noen
SMS-sendinger som var mottatt/sendt
--- man oppfatter det slik at han eller
andre fryktet a bli rettsforfulgt el.l.
Oppringeren oppfattes ellers som
psykisk ustabil og potensielt
sinnslidende.
Det er mulig at oppringningene fra
personen med nordlandsdialekt har
blitt iscenesatt av Solvi Dybvik, og at
de kan tilbakefores til personer ved
Brattvag Bowling u_ f.eks Ronny
J0RGENSEN (Sistnevnte er min nabo,
og fortsatt gretten fordi jeg for noen
ar siden paklaget det stoyende
sondagsarbeidet han bedrev. Hr
Jorgensen og hans kone har bl.a vcert
bosatt i Finnmark fylke.).
28.08.2011
ENCL. #2
Nar det gjelder truslene fra Geir
Ove SKARB0, er det liten tvil am at
Tommy SKARB0, hans s0nn, har gjort
sitt beste for a hisse opp faren --- det
er fortsatt noe usikkert am det var
Tommy eller faren sam sendte de
aktuelle SMS-truslene etc. Det synes
for 0vrig klart at Tommy bes0kte faren
pa det tidspunktet SMS-truslene ble
sendt.
Det er sannsynlig at Tommy SKARB0s
oppf0rsel kan tilskrives sjalusi
(fordi hans fraseparerte kane,
Kimberly, har snakket med
meg), misunnelse (fordi han ikke kan
skape like bra kunst sam meg --- eller
10fte like tunge vekter etc), hevnlyst
(fordi han er persona non grata i Asen
4, Brattvag), og/eller sinnssykdom
(denne kan eventuelt va=re knyttet til
hans alkoholisme m.m).
Ellers viser man til det sam ble sagt
under avh0ret.
Med hilsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
Side 3 av 3
28.08.2011
ENCL. #2
Side 1 av 3
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 01.10.2010 03:22:55
To: post.sunnmoreqpolitiet.no; \V\verner((vairpost.net
Bee: wintheri{v lavabit.com
Subject: NYE TRUSLER OG OPPRlNGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0, BRATrVAG
Haram lensmannskontor
6270 Brattvag
NYE SMS-TRUSLER OG
OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE
SKARB0 (6270 Brattvag)
Jf undertegnedes beS0k ved Iensmannskontoret i Brattvag 30.
fmmv.
I gar ble f0Igende SMS-trusler sendt undertegnede fra Geir
Ove SKARB0:
"hr. werner fucking winter! Etter den sote kloe kommer
den sure svie ! Ver beredt.
30 Sep 2010 21:50
Fra: +4799286641"
"Dersom du i din vilfarelse skulle tro at "du"er under
beskyttelse av "norske myndigheter" kommer skuffelsen
bli stor nar du oppdager at aile heIst vii kvidt degfor
godt!Et godt rad!KOMDEG TIL IRAN sA FORT SOM
MULIG!!
Fra: +4799286641"
(bilde av avsender)
28.08.2011
ENCL. #3
Side 2 av 3
I lepet av dette og foregaende degn er inntil na, kl 03: 16,
mottattlavvist felgende oppringninger fra Geir Ove SKARB0:
01. 30. sep 2010 kl19:12
02. 30. sep 2010 k122:20
03. 30. sep 2010 k122:21
04. 30. sep 2010 k122:21
OS. 30. sep 2010 k122:21
06. 30. sep 2010 kl 22:21
07. 30. sep 2010 k122:22
08. 30. sep 2010 k123:40
09. 30. sep 2010 k123:S8
10. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9
11. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9
12. 30. sep 2010 k123:S9
13. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00
14. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00
IS. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00
16. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:00
17. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:01
18. 01. okt 2010 kl 00:28
19. 01. okt 2010 kl 01: 17
20. 01. okt 2010 kl 01 :18
21. 01. okt 2010 kl 02:19 (fra tlf926 98 991, reg. pa Leslie
SKARB0)
22. ureg. sending
Man anmoder lensmannskontoret o.a om a pagripe hr Skarbe
snarest --- en psykiatrisk evaluering er definitivt pa sin plass!
Med hilsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
28.08.2011
ENCL. #3
Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 02.10.2010 16:43:02
To: post .slIllnmore({(ipoIitiet.no; wwerner/fl'airpost .net
Bcc: \vintber({v lavabit.eolll; ari Idkvam!(h,pnai I.enm; no
Subject: U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (se vedlegg)
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Undertegnede har politianmeldt Geir Ove SKARBrzJ, 6270
Brattvag, for en rekke drapstrusler etc --- PDF-vedlegget
viser de siste oppringningene fra sistnevnte.
Med hilsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
file:IIIC:/UsersiWerner/AppData/LocallIMlRuntime/Message/%7B3D9C5934-F485-4 ... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #4
Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 02.10.201016:46:29
To: post.sllnnnlOre1l)pol itiet.no; wwernerrZl)airpost. net
Subject: Fw: [SPAM] U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNlNGER FRA GEIR OVE SKARB0 (se vedlegg)
Lensmannen i Sykkylven
6230 Sykkylven
-------Origina/ Message--
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 02.10.201016:43:21
To: post.sunnmore@politiet.no; wwerner@ai[post.net
Subject: [SPAM] U0NSKEDE OPPRINGNINGER FRA GEIR OVE
SKARB0 (se vedlegg)
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Undertegnede har politianmeldt Geir ave SKARB", 6270
Brattvag, for en rekke drapstrusler etc --- PDF-vedlegget
viser de siste oppringningene fra sistnevnte.
Med hilsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
file:IIIC:lUsers/Wemer/AppDatalLocal/IMIRuntimelMessage/%7B98B98C41-0EB4-... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #5
Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 07.10.201019:18:10
To: post.sllnnmorer(l)politieLno: wwernerr(!)airposLnct
Bee: \vinther(lillavabiLcol11
Suh;ect: GEIR OVE SKARBO --- YTTERLlGERE INFO OM
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Lensmannen i Sykkylven
6230 Sykkylven
GEIR OVE SKARB0 - YTTERLIGERE INFO
OM
Undertegnede har i 10pet av dagen vrert i kontakt med et potensielt
vitne som har forklart at bade Geir Ove SKARB0 og sistnevntes
S0nn, Tommy SKARB0, har deltatt aktivt i mishandlingen av
Kimberly L STUBBS SKARB0* (*bostedsadresse: 6270
Brattvag. Fr Skarb0 er pt separert fra Tommy SKARB0.).
Mishandlingen skal ha pagatt over lang tid, og det foreligger
angivelig en rekke konkrete eksempler - bade i denne og andre
sammenhenger - som anskueliggjm Geir Ove SKARB0s
psykopatiske personlighet.
Det potensielle vitnet fortalte at G 0 SKARB0 tyranniserer sin
nrere familie, og at Tommy SKARB0 pa ulikt vis underkues og
hundses av sin far.
I 1970 var undertegnede vitne til at G 0 SKARB0s bror, Leslie
SKARB0 (f 1957), helt umotivert angrep 0yvind
DRIVEKLEPP fYsisk og truet ham pa livet mens sistnevnte lekte
i nrerheten av sitt hjem i Brattvag. Idette tilfellet ble 0yvind
DRIVEKLEPPs eldre bror - Andor DRIVEKLEPP (f 1954)
tilkalt omgaende, og Leslie SKARB0 fikk en velfortjent omgang
juling.
Bade Andor og 0yvind DRIVKLEPP kunne bekrefte at Leslie
SKARB0 var en notorisk og primitiv b011e de seiv og andre hadde
hatt mye problemer med i Brattvag.
Undertegnedes morfar, Osvald AARSUND, gjorde ved flere
anledninger observasjoner av Tryeve SKARB0 (onkel til Leslie
og Geir Ove SKARB0) som overbeviste ham om at sistnevnte var
aivorlig forstyrret og kanskje sinnssyk. Hr AARSUND hadde i
file:IIIC:lUsers/WernerlAppDatalLocallIMIRuntime/Message/% 7B03DACEI C-E248-... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #6
Side 2 av 2
mange ar en konflikt med moren til Trygve SKARB0, Petra
SKARB0, grunnet en gammel veirett han hadde. Det er hevet over
tvil at fr P SKARB0s absurde argumentasjon og oppf0rsel i
konflikten manglet ethvert holdbart grunnlag, og at kveruleringen
og den kompulsive fiendtligheten hennes sannsynligvis var
psykopatologisk betinget.
Med hilsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
file:/ / /C:/U sersIW erner/ AppData/LocalIIMIRuntime/Message/% 7B03 DACE1 C-E248-... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #6
Side 1 av 1
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 11.10.2010 23:58: 12
To: post.sunnmoretIlpol itieLno; \\werner(Zt:airpost.net
Bee: wintherrci lavabit.co111
S l l ~ i e e t : GEJR OVE SKARB0 EN NOTORJSK KONEMJSHANDLER
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Lensmannen i Sykkylven
6230 Sykky Iven
GEIR OVE SKARBO - KONEMISHANDLING
Undertegnede har i dag samtalet med et vitne som fremholdt at Geir Ove
SKARB0, 6270 Brattvag, mishandlet sin tidligere ektefelle - Salvi DYBVIK
- systematisk gjennom flere ar.
Mishandlingen skal ha f0rt til at S0lvi DYBVIK begjrerte skilsmisse.
Vitnet er for 0Vrig helt enig i at hr SKARB0 er en tyrann /psykopat.
Det er interessant og patognomonisk at hr SKARB0 i sine forrykte SMS
meidinger anklaget mel: - som aldri har hatt kontakt med noen i hans nrere
familie - for a terrorisere personene han selv har mishandlet i arevis.
Geir Ove SKARB0 utgj0r en trussel mot andre og uskyldige mennesker, og man
ber norske myndigheter ta de juridiske skritt som er n0dvendig for a sperre ham
lnne.
Norske myndigheter viI neppe lykkes med a kurere en 60 ar gammel psykopat.
11. okt20IO
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
file:///C:/Users/Wemer/AppDatalLocaIIlM/Runtime/Message/%7B6BDE3508-3883-4 ... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #7
Side 1 av 2
From: Wi Ihelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 14.11.2010 13:46:31
To: itiet.no: post(il'spesialenhcten.no
Ce: aspehaugf(/'gjortz.no: wwernerrttiairpost.net
Bee: wintheri(l)lavabiLcom
Subject: NY POLITIANMELDELSE AV GEIR-OVE/TOMMY SKARB0 (adr Hamar/Brattvag)
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Lensnlannen i Sykkylven
6230 Sykkylven
Ny politianmeldelse av Geir
Ove/Tommy SKARB0
-
Geir-ave/Tommy SKARB0 (adr
HamarlBrattvag) ble den 30. okt d.a
politianmeldt til ansatte ved Haram
lensmannskontor for a ha fremsatt en rekke
drapstrusler mot undertegnede via
SMSer/telefonsamtaler.
Mellom kl 02:45 og 02:50 den 13. ds ble Geir
ave/Tommy SKARB0 observert
av undertegnede o.a vitner utenfor
hovedinngangsdoren i Asen 4, Brattvag. Hr
SKARB0 provde forst a apne eller bryte opp
nevnte dor for han flere ganger banket pa med
en pamontert dorhammer - han var apenbart
lettere beruset, og bar pa et skytevapen
(muligens et haglgevrer). En personbil med
tente hovedlys og motoren pa tomgang (dette
kan ha vrert en morkegronn Pegeuot av litt
eidre modell) ventet pa hr SKARB0 utenfor
porten til Asen 4, Brattvag
registreringsskiltene var gjort uleselige, og det
satt en sjafor i kjoretoyet.
Undertegnede har i sine tidligere
politianmeldelser og samtaler med ansatte ved
Haram/Sykkylven lensmannskontor
understreket at Geir-ave SKARB0 utgjor en
file:///C:/Users/Wemer/AppDatafLocal/IMIRuntime/Message/%7B38CO2F7E-OE8E-4 ... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #8
Side 2 av 2
eksplisitt fare for allmennheten, og urtrykkelig
bedt om at han pagripes umiddlebart.
Anmelderen har ogsa innrapportert hr
SKARB0s sinnssykeligel kriminelle oppf0rsel
til helsevesenet i Haram kommune. Inntil dd
har ikke politi-/lensmannsetaten eller
helsevesenet tart effektive skrirt for a
pagripe/intemere mv Geir-Ove/Tommy
SKARB0.
Hermed politianmeldes ovennevnte angrep, og
man anmoder pa nyrt politi-/lensmannsetaten
og helsevesenet om 0Yeblikkelig a
pagripe/intemere etc Geir-Ove/T ommy
SKARB0.
Geir-Ove og Tommy SKARB0 begjreres
begge siktetl tiltaU/straffet.
14. nov 2010
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
file:/ //C:/U sers/Wemer/ AppDatalLocaIIIMlRuntime/Message/% 7B3 8C02F7E-OE8E-4... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #8
Lensmannen i Haram
6270 Brattvag
Lensmannen i Sykkylven
6230 Sykkylven
Ny politianmeldelse av Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0
Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0 (adr Hamar/Brattvag) ble den 30. okt d.a
politianmeldt til ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor for a ha fremsatt en rekke
drapstrusler mot undertegnede via SMSer/telefonsamtaler.
Mellom kl 02:45 og 02:50 den 13. ds ble Geir-Ove/Tommy SKARB0 observert
av undertegnede o.a vitner utenfor hovedinngangsd0ren i Asen 4, Brattvag. Hr
SKARB0 pr0Vde f0rst a apne eller bryte opp nevnte d0r f0r han flere ganger
banket pa med en pamontert d0rhammer - han var apenbart lettere beruset, og
bar pa et skytevapen (muligens et haglgevrer). En personbil med tente hovedlys
og motoren pa tomgang (dette kan ha vrert en m0rkegr0nn Pegeuot av litt eldre
modell) ventet pa hr SKARB0 utenfor porten til Asen 4, Brattvag
registreringsskiltene var gjort uleselige, og det satt en sjaf0r i kj0ret0Yet.
Undertegnede har i sine tidligere politianmeldelser og samtaler med ansatte ved
Haram/Sykkylven lensmannskontor understreket at Geir-Ove SKARB0 utgj0r
en eksplisitt fare for allmennheten, og uttrykkelig bedt om at han pagripes
umiddlebart. Anmelderen har ogsa innrapportert hr SKARB0s sinnssykeligel
kriminelle oppf0rsel til helsevesenet i Haram kommune. Inntil dd har ikke politi
Ilensmannsetaten eller helsevesenet tatt effektive skritt for a pagripe/intemere
mv Geir-OvelTommy SKARB0.
Hermed politianmeldes ovennevnte angrep, og man anmoder pa nytt politi
Ilensmannsetaten og helsevesenet om 0yeblikkelig a pagripe/intemere etc Geir
Ove/Tommy SKARB0.
Geir-Ove OK Tommy SKARB0 begjreres begge siktetl tiltalt/straffet.
14. nov 2010
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
ENCL. #8A
Wilhelm Werner Wmther
Asen4
6270 BRATfVAG
Veres n{eranse Varn{eranse Dam Dde.nr:
11120097 5127/10-38 16.11.2010 07
ForIxldets art Etter/(J{Sker
Trusler, diverse ( 227) N iB0, Ole Ivar
Sakenerwgfstrert mi PJtaie:tnsUlriigjurist
Driftsenhet Nordre ESeksjon SKOVLY, Yngve
G j ~ d a t n
27.09.2010
GjemiYlSud
ken 4,6270 BRATIVAG
Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold
-P"ariiemyndigheten ka:n [ferilIne erstalii.ings"k.r.lv tor Dem 1 forbindeIse med en eventuell straifesak.
Dette ~ i sa fall dokumenteres. Dersom De ikke allerede har levert en skriftlig dokurnentasjon pa
et eventuelt hav, ~ dette gj0res snarest, og senest innen tre uker. Dersom fristen ikke overholdes,
kan De ikke paregne at havet blir tatt med i forbindeIse med en eventuelI straffesak Hvis De
0nsker fristen forlenget, ~ politiet kontaktes.
Ved all henvendeIse til politiet ~ var referanse oppgis.
Det er ikke oodvendig a kontakte politiet med mindre De har nye opplysninger i saken. Politiet vil
S0ke aetterlorske saken slik at den er best mulig belyst nar avgj0relse tas. Dersom De kontakter et
forsikringsselskap i sakens anledrllng, ~ dette skriv tas med, da dette er oodvendig bekreftelse pa at
forholdet er mmeldt.
Dersom De har innlevert mmeldelsen pa vegne av en annen person, gjelder det ovenstiende ogsa
ham/henne.
Nar saken er ferdig behandlet, viI De fa en skriftlig underretning om patalemyndighetens avgj0relse.
Medhilsen
SUNNM0RE POUTIDISlRIKT
ENCL. #9
Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 16.11.201017:26:51
To: wwerner@airpost.net
Cc: aspehaug@gjortz.no
Bcc: winther@lavabit.com
Subject: UTVIDET ANMELDELSE AV POLITI-/LENSMANNSANSATTE (PDF-versjon
vedlegges)
Spesialenheten for politfsaker
Grennegata 82
2317 HAMAR
UTVIDET ANMELDELSE AV POLITI
ILENSMANNSANSATTE MFL
Undertegnede ble i dag oppringt av Spesialenheten for politi saker, Hamar, og man
har i den aniedning - av praktiske o.a grunner - besiuttet a utvide an
meldelsen av politi-/lensmannsansatte mfl.
Med dette anmeldes enhver embets-/tjenestemann som pa noe vis har deitatt i eller
sanksjonert den mangearige audiovisuelle/tekniske/elektroniske mv overvakingen
av undertegnede i Asen 4,6270 Brattvag. Enhver stats-/kommuneansatt som
direkte eller indirekte har medvirket til nevnte overvaking begjreres
siktet/til tal t/straffet.
28.08.2011
ENCL. #10
Side 1 av 2
From: Wilhelm \Vemer WINTHER
Date: 08.12.20 I 0 13:47:37
To: pOSl'"c1Jspesialeni1eten.no: aspehaug(i'i
1
gjortz.no; wwemer(,.:t)a irpost. net
Bee: winther!u;lavabit.coll1
Subject: ORIENTERING
Spesialenheten for politisaker
Hamar
ORIENTERING
Den 16. f.m. ble undertegnede oppringt av en representant for
Spesialenheten for politisaker pa Hamar som mottok en
muntlig --- senere samme dag en skriftlig --- anmeldelse av
politi-/lensmannsansatte.
En betjent ved Haram lensmannskontor viste bade i for- og
etterkant av nevnte anmeldelser stor ringeakt for
Spesialenheten, og denne lensmannsbetjenten --- som nytter
etternavnet IIBalsnes
ll
--- oppleves pa flere mater som klart
uskikket til bl.a politiarbeid.
Norske myndigheters grovt sjikan0se og eksplisitt illegale bruk
av overvakingsteknologi i Asen 4, Brattvag, har 0kt pafallende
etter anmeldelsen til Spesialenheten, og man har ogsa fatt
bekreftet at politi-/lensmannsetaten disponerer fotografiske
beviser pa drapsfors0ket mot undertegnede den 13. f.m.
Man erfarer videre at navngitte og lett tilgjengelige
vitner/mistenkte i saken ikke har blitt avh0rt1pagrepet, og ber
Spesialenheten om en skriftlig bekreftelse pa anmeldelsen de
mottok 16. f.m. (undertegnede ma --- som tidligere opplyst --
kontaktes via e-mail)!
Med hilsen
Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
file:IIIC:/Users/Werner/AppData/Local/IMlRuntime/Message/%7B36DOED36-1697-4 ... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #11
1







Dette dokumentet inngr i samlingen av strategisk ufullstendige
skriv som skal forelegges internasjonale menneskerettighets-
tribunaler o.a.
Undertegnede er politisk flyktning og asylsker, og har siden 1992
manglet diplomatiske og vennligsinnede relasjoner med det
norske statsapparatet.





Hedmark politidistrikt
v/ Kjell Kristian Ukkelberg
Hamar



POLITIANMELDELSE AV KJELL KRISTIAN
UKKELBERG OG PANKE AV ANMELDELSE
NR. 11568421 4100/11-9 : HEDMARK
POLITIDISTRIKT


I samsvar med det moralske og i stor grad intellektuelle lavml man med
rimelighet kan forvente av et gjennomkorrupt og sterkt mindreverdig stats- og
administrasjonsapparat, har lederen for retts- og ptaleavsnittet ved Hedmark
politidistrikt, Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG, valgt eller av overordnede blitt
presset til henlegge anmeldelsen av Spesialenhetens leder (jf Hedmark
politidistrikt : Anmeldelse nr. 11568421), Jan Egil PRESTHUS, med
ENCL. #12
2

begrunnelse i at man ikke finner rimelig grunn til iverksette etterforskning
jf strpl 224.

I den totalt fordmmelige og klart korrumperte henleggelsen unnlater hr
Ukkelberg beleilig nevne f.eks undertegnedes anmeldelse av 12. ds (denne ble
oversendt Hedmark politidistrikt o.a. elektronisk kl 02:38 samt kl 16:57 sist-
nevnte dato se PDF-vedlegg, 06 sider. Hr Ukkelbergs henleggelse ble sendt
med elektronisk post fra Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Karin HESTNES kl 10:50 den
13. ds.), og han prver p megetsigende vis gi inntrykk av at man kun har
anmeldt hr Presthus og Tor-Aksel BUSCH for ett kriminelt forhold nemlig
Spesialenhetens korrupte vedtak av 08. des. f.*:


* Spesialenheten for politisaker
Grnnegata 82
Hamar

PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK

Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens
avgjrelse datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse
10168094/10-123.

Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er
undertegnet av den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og
oppfattes som et dypt foraktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig
kriminalitet.

Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig
krenkelse av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og
63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16 etc.

Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte
Riksadvokat jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.



Brattvg, 04. jan 2011

Wilhelm Werner Winther
Sign.
ENCL. #12
3


La det vre fullstendig klart at Jan Egil Presthus og Tor-Aksel Busch er anmeldt
for medvirkning til drapsforskene som fant sted 10. og 12. fm*:


* Politianmeldelse


Alle som p noe vis har vrt delaktig i planlegge, skjule,
og/eller gjennomfre de ovenfor beskrevne drapsforskene
begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet.

Blant de man begjrer avhrt som mistenkte i saken nevnes
spesielt:

ystein SOLHJELL, 6462 Raudsand
Linda SVENSLI, 6462 Raudsand
Torbjrn RAUSAND, 6462 Raudsand
Sigmund Martin EKREM, 6270 Brattvg

Nr dette dokumentet publiseres har politiet i Molde hatt god anledning til
avhre/pgripe etc de mistenkte med bostedsadresse i Nesset kommune.
Etterforskningen i saken er enkel, og faren for bevisforspillelse liten.

Man understreker at de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove
SKARB og Tommy SKARB ble begjrt pgrepet/internert
allerede i slutten av september f.., og at man i den forbindelse
bl.a varslet spesialhelsetjenesten i Haram kommune.

Mht. Tommy SKARB og Geir Ove SKARB er det aktuelt
nytte strl 39 c. mv om forvaring i anstalt under kriminal-
omsorgen cf strl 62 mv.

Riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH (jf saksnr. 10168094 mv),
lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker Jan Egil PREST-
HUS (jf sak nr 10168094 882/10-123 mv), samt betjentene
Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES ved Haram lensmanns-
kontor begjres alle siktet/tiltalt/straffet for medvirkning
ENCL. #12
4

til ovennevnte drapsforsk idet man understreker at
forsettlig og illegal pliktunnlatelse i dette tilfellet sees
som en medvirkningshandling.

Empirisk legger man til grunn at sentrale deler av det
norske statsapparatet nsker fremprovosere og eventuelt
belnne ulike overgrep og forbrytelser mot under-
tegnede.


Brattvg, 29. mars 2011

Wilh. Werner WINTHER


APPENDIKS

Den pgende og overveiende private etterforskningen viser at man til de
eksplisitt mistenkte i saken m tilfye:

yvind VERPEIDE, lensmann, Haram lensmannskontor
Ove P FINNES, betjent, Haram lensmannskontor

Det er i dag hevet over tvil at de sistnevnte personene var godt orientert
om de planlagte drapsforskene mot undertegnede den 10. og 12. fm.
De ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor oast har hovedsakelig ftt
kjennskap til drapsplanene via telefon- og romavlytting.

I sakens anledning skal man ogs understreke at:

1) Betjent Ole Ivar NYB ved Haram lensmannskontor unnlot
kontakte undertegnede i henhold til avtale den 03. fm i pvente av at
jeg skulle drepes den 10. eller 12. samme mned.
2) Betjent Kre BALSNES ved Haram/rskog lensmannskontor ly da
han i telefonsamtale med undertegnede den 10. fm hevdet at nevnte
Ole Ivar NYB ikke var ved kontoret da samtalen fant sted (P dette
ENCL. #12
5

tidspunktet hadde undertegnede i et brev til Spesialenheten anfrt at
man oppfattet hr BALSNES som uskikket til politiarbeid. Et forsk p
drepe undertegnede med pistol/revolver fant sted i sen 4,
Brattvg, noen f timer etter telefonsamtalen med betjent
BALSNES.).
3) Spesialenheten for politisaker med Jan Egil PRESTHUS i spissen
sker hindre ukorrumpert/lovlig/adekvat etterforskning av
drapsforskene mot meg bl.a for unng at organets leder og
riksadvokat BUSCH skal straffeforflges.
4) Man i en e-mail til Spesialenheten datert 08. ds har anfrt at nevnte
organ er fullstendig inhabile i denne saken og ikke skal etterforske
Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte jf forvaltningsloven 6,
9 og 10 mv, item domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 og 111 mv.
5) Jan Egil PRESTHUS, Tor-Aksel BUSCH, yvind VERPEIDE, Ove P
FINNES, Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES omgende br
suspenderes fra sine stillinger etter tjenestemannslovens 16, jf tjml
15 mv.


Brattvg, 12. april 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther


Nr det gjelder drapsforsket av 13. nov f.., finner man liten grunn til laste hr
Presthus og hr Busch for dette (politi-/lensmannsetaten samt helsevesenet i
Haram kommune derimot, m opplagt tillegges skyld og eventuelt straffansvar i
den sammenheng).

Som det fremgr av undertegnedes anmeldelser, ble de to hovedmistenkte i
saken Geir Ove og Tommy SKARB begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede
i slutten av september f.., og alle drapsforskene undertegnede hittil har
politianmeldt fant sted etter dette.

Man skal ellers anfre at Geir Ove Skarb i en fullstendig forrykt telefonsamtale
med undertegnede (u sep 2010) hevdet at han hadde hatt kontakt med politi-
/lensmannsansatte som garanterte at undertegnedes anmeldelser ville bli henlagt
hr Skarbs troverdighet p dette punktet styrkes ved at han t.o.m. oversendte
bilder av seg selv med de sinnssykelige SMS-truslene han fremsatte.


ENCL. #12
6

Henleggelsen av Anmeldelse nr. 11568421 : Hedmark politidistrikt pankes
med dette til Statsadvokaten i Hedmark og Oppland, og Kjell Kristian
UKKELBERG begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet etter straffeloven 118, 120,
124, 125, 324 og 325 etc, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16.



Brattvg, 14. april 2011

Wilh. Werner Winther
(sign)



































ENCL. #12
7

Dette er fluktbilen Tommy Skarb nyttet under drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. nov 2010.
Bilen kjres/eies av Karl-Even Indrestrand (Brattvg).
APPENDIKS II


Av hensyn til etterforskningen i saken, frigjres strategisk viktig informasjon
gradvis og tilsiktet ufullstendig.

Man understreker n at fluktbilen Tommy SKARB var passasjer i under
drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. nov i fjor kjres og eies av Karl-Even
INDRESTRAND, Storgata 7, Brattvg.

Karl-Even Indrestrand begjres med dette siktet/tiltalt/straffet for aktiv
medvirkning til drapsforsket mot undertegnede 13. november 2010.



































ENCL. #12
8

Huset den hovedmistenkte i saken, Geir Ove Skarb, tidligere bebodde.
Eneboligen i Storgata, Brattvg, bebos fortsatt av Skarb-familien.


















































Fluktbilen parkert utenfor Karl-Even Indrestrands bolig i Storgata, Brattvg.
ENCL. #12
9

Boligen til en av de hovedmistenkte i saken, Tommy Skarb. Foran husets hovedinngang i Vgshaugen,
Brattvg, er parkert en tjenestebil fra firmaet Thermotank AS i Straumgjerde/Sykkylven. Den hoved-
mistenkte i saken, Geir Ove Skarb, jobber som sjfr for dette firmaet.
Lensmannskontoret i Brattvg hvor tre av de mistenkte i saken --- yvind Verpeide, Ove Finnes, og
Ole Ivar Nyb --- er ansatt. Betjent Kre Balsnes er angivelig overfrt til lensmannskontoret i
rskog kommune.















































ENCL. #12
10




Brattvg, 31. mai 2011



Wilh. Werner Winther
sig.



ENCL. #12
ENCL. #13
ENCL. #13
ENCL. #13
ENCL. #14
ENCL. #14
ENCL. #14
Side 2 av 3
politimesteren pa Sunnmore --- personlig!
---Original Message------
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 23.03.20 II J8:55:05
To: post/(rspesia len hetell.no; postmottakfilriksadvokaten .no
Subject: Fw: NYTT DRAPSFORSOK --- ANMELDELSER
Som det fremger av vedlagte PDF-dokument, er Jan E2iI
PRESTHUS og Tor-Aksel BUSCH betimelig anmeldt for
medvirkning tiI drapsforsok.
Med det kjennskap man har tiI navngitte personer o.a,
frykter man at Spesialenheten for politisaker og
riksadvokatens kontor ikke viI folge opp sakene pa lovlydig
.
VIS.
Man ber om en bekreftelse pa anmeldte forhold, og en
redegjorelse for hvordan korrupsjonssakene blir
behandlet.
Med hiIsen
Wilh. Werner WINTHER
-------Original A4essage------
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 15.03.2011 0 1:33:57
To: post(c[';spesialenheten.no:
Subject: NYTT DRAPSFORS0K --- ANMELDELSER
file:IIIC:/Users/Wemer/AppDatalLocaI/IM/Runtime/Message/%7B194B033F-80AO-4 ... 28.08.2011
ENCL. #15
ENCL. #16
ENCL. #17
ENCL. #18
ENCL. #18
ENCL. #19
ENCL. #20
ENCL. #21






Spesialenheten for politisaker
Grnnegata 82
Hamar



PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK

Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens avgjrelse
datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse 10168094/10-123.

Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er undertegnet av
den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og oppfattes som et dypt for-
aktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig kriminalitet.

Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig krenkelse
av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml
1, 15 og 16 etc.

Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte Riksadvokat
jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.



Brattvg, 04. jan 2011



Wilhelm Werner Winther
Sign.
ENCL. #22
Side 1 av 1
From: Wilhelm Werner WINTHER
Date: 08.04.2011 20:12:15
To: post@spesialenheten.no; aspehaug@gjortz.no; gjortz@gjortz.no
Bee: wwerner@airpost.net
Subject: Fw: Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold
Spesialenhetens leder, Jan Egil PRESTHUS, er
anmeldt for korrupsjon, og la dette vcere klinkende
klart:
1) Spesialenheten er fullstendig INHABIL i denne
saken, og skal selvf01gelig l K K _ ~
etterforske Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte!
2) Spesialenheten fremstar i dag som en ren
forhanelse mot aile sunne og vitale rettsprinsipper!
WERNER WINTHER
-------Origina/ Message------
From: post
Date: 04/08/11 13:34:01
To: winther@lavabit.com
Subject: Bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold
Vedlagt f01ger bekreftelse pa anmeldt forhold.
Med vennlig hilsen
Mie Willumsen
konsulent
28.08.2011
ENCL. #23
ENCL. #24
ENCL. #25
ENCL. #25
Spesialenheten for politisaker
Grnnegata 82
Hamar




PROFORMA-PANKE AV KORRUPT PTALE-
VEDTAK (forenklet e-mail-versjon)


Jf Sak nr 10248348 255/11-123 : Spesialenheten for politisaker datert 23. f.m.

Idet man fremholder at det administrative og juridisk overordnede ansvaret for
riksadvokaten og Spesialenheten for politisaker underligger Justis- og politidept,
legges til grunn som bevist at:

1) Lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker, Jan Egil PRESTHUS,
personlig har mottatt direktiver fra justisminister Knut STORBERGET
mht hvordan undertegnedes anmeldelser av politiansatte o.a. skal
korrumperes,
2) Jan Egil Presthus ovennevnte ptalevedtak er et straffbart forsk p
forkludre og underkjenne saksrelaterte fakta,
3) riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH aktivt og mala fide understtter et politisk
fundamentert komplott som bl.a. tar sikte p undergrave anmelderens
rettssikkerhet,
4) ansatte i politi- og lensmannsetaten ved ulovlig passivitet og underfundige
tilskyndelser mv har skt fremprovosere drapsforskene mot
undertegnede,
5) lensmann yvind VERPEIDE ved Haram lensmannskontor har mottatt
sttte for sin eksplisitt kriminelle oppfrsel i denne saken fra topp-
politikere i Haram kommune,
6) justisminister Knut Storberget, lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker
Jan Egil Presthus, og riksadvokat Tor-Aksel Busch er moralsk og p annet
vis uskikket til inneha sine respektive stillinger, og at
7) store deler av det norske statsapparatet tilhrer anmelderens definitive
fiender.


Sakens pankes med dette i all enkelhet til landets korrupte riksadvokat.

ENCL. #26
Spesialenheten for politisaker og riksadvokaten er godt kjent med bl.a.
forvaltningslovens krav til habil saksbehandling, men vil naturligvis unnlate
etterkomme disse bestemmelsene.


Brattvg, 08. juli 2011

Wilh. Werner WINTHER

ENCL. #26
1







Dette dokumentet inngr i samlingen av strategisk ufullstendige
skriv som skal forelegges internasjonale menneskerettighets-
tribunaler o.a.
Undertegnede er politisk flyktning og asylsker, og har siden 1992
manglet diplomatiske og vennligsinnede relasjoner med det
norske statsapparatet.





Hedmark politidistrikt
v/ Kjell Kristian Ukkelberg
Hamar



POLITIANMELDELSE AV KJELL KRISTIAN
UKKELBERG OG PANKE AV ANMELDELSE
NR. 11568421 4100/11-9 : HEDMARK
POLITIDISTRIKT


I samsvar med det moralske og i stor grad intellektuelle lavml man med
rimelighet kan forvente av et gjennomkorrupt og sterkt mindreverdig stats- og
administrasjonsapparat, har lederen for retts- og ptaleavsnittet ved Hedmark
politidistrikt, Kjell Kristian UKKELBERG, valgt eller av overordnede blitt
presset til henlegge anmeldelsen av Spesialenhetens leder (jf Hedmark
politidistrikt : Anmeldelse nr. 11568421), Jan Egil PRESTHUS, med
ENCL. #27
2

begrunnelse i at man ikke finner rimelig grunn til iverksette etterforskning
jf strpl 224.

I den totalt fordmmelige og klart korrumperte henleggelsen unnlater hr
Ukkelberg beleilig nevne f.eks undertegnedes anmeldelse av 12. ds (denne ble
oversendt Hedmark politidistrikt o.a. elektronisk kl 02:38 samt kl 16:57 sist-
nevnte dato se PDF-vedlegg, 06 sider. Hr Ukkelbergs henleggelse ble sendt
med elektronisk post fra Hedmark politidistrikt v/ Karin HESTNES kl 10:50 den
13. ds.), og han prver p megetsigende vis gi inntrykk av at man kun har
anmeldt hr Presthus og Tor-Aksel BUSCH for ett kriminelt forhold nemlig
Spesialenhetens korrupte vedtak av 08. des. f.*:


* Spesialenheten for politisaker
Grnnegata 82
Hamar

PANKE AV KORRUPT VEDTAK

Undertegnede mottok den 21. f.m. underretning om Spesialenhetens
avgjrelse datert 8. desember 2010 jf Spesialenhetens referanse
10168094/10-123.

Spesialenhetens avgjrelse om henlegge pklagede forhold er
undertegnet av den tidligere politiansatte Jan Egil PRESTHUS, og
oppfattes som et dypt foraktelig og klart lovstridig hndslag til offentlig
kriminalitet.

Hr Presthus begjres uten opphold siktet/tiltalt/straffet for forsettlig
krenkelse av strl 110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124 og 125, jf strl 62 og
63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16 etc.

Spesialenhetens henleggelse pankes for vrig til landets korrupte
Riksadvokat jf strpl 59, 59a og 60.



Brattvg, 04. jan 2011

Wilhelm Werner Winther
Sign.
ENCL. #27
3


La det vre fullstendig klart at Jan Egil Presthus og Tor-Aksel Busch er anmeldt
for medvirkning til drapsforskene som fant sted 10. og 12. fm*:


* Politianmeldelse


Alle som p noe vis har vrt delaktig i planlegge, skjule,
og/eller gjennomfre de ovenfor beskrevne drapsforskene
begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet.

Blant de man begjrer avhrt som mistenkte i saken nevnes
spesielt:

ystein SOLHJELL, 6462 Raudsand
Linda SVENSLI, 6462 Raudsand
Torbjrn RAUSAND, 6462 Raudsand
Sigmund Martin EKREM, 6270 Brattvg

Nr dette dokumentet publiseres har politiet i Molde hatt god anledning til
avhre/pgripe etc de mistenkte med bostedsadresse i Nesset kommune.
Etterforskningen i saken er enkel, og faren for bevisforspillelse liten.

Man understreker at de to hovedmistenkte i saken Geir Ove
SKARB og Tommy SKARB ble begjrt pgrepet/internert
allerede i slutten av september f.., og at man i den forbindelse
bl.a varslet spesialhelsetjenesten i Haram kommune.

Mht. Tommy SKARB og Geir Ove SKARB er det aktuelt
nytte strl 39 c. mv om forvaring i anstalt under kriminal-
omsorgen cf strl 62 mv.

Riksadvokat Tor-Aksel BUSCH (jf saksnr. 10168094 mv),
lederen for Spesialenheten for politisaker Jan Egil PREST-
HUS (jf sak nr 10168094 882/10-123 mv), samt betjentene
Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES ved Haram lensmanns-
kontor begjres alle siktet/tiltalt/straffet for medvirkning
ENCL. #27
4

til ovennevnte drapsforsk idet man understreker at
forsettlig og illegal pliktunnlatelse i dette tilfellet sees
som en medvirkningshandling.

Empirisk legger man til grunn at sentrale deler av det
norske statsapparatet nsker fremprovosere og eventuelt
belnne ulike overgrep og forbrytelser mot under-
tegnede.


Brattvg, 29. mars 2011

Wilh. Werner WINTHER


APPENDIKS

Den pgende og overveiende private etterforskningen viser at man til de
eksplisitt mistenkte i saken m tilfye:

yvind VERPEIDE, lensmann, Haram lensmannskontor
Ove P FINNES, betjent, Haram lensmannskontor

Det er i dag hevet over tvil at de sistnevnte personene var godt orientert
om de planlagte drapsforskene mot undertegnede den 10. og 12. fm.
De ansatte ved Haram lensmannskontor oast har hovedsakelig ftt
kjennskap til drapsplanene via telefon- og romavlytting.

I sakens anledning skal man ogs understreke at:

1) Betjent Ole Ivar NYB ved Haram lensmannskontor unnlot
kontakte undertegnede i henhold til avtale den 03. fm i pvente av at
jeg skulle drepes den 10. eller 12. samme mned.
2) Betjent Kre BALSNES ved Haram/rskog lensmannskontor ly da
han i telefonsamtale med undertegnede den 10. fm hevdet at nevnte
Ole Ivar NYB ikke var ved kontoret da samtalen fant sted (P dette
ENCL. #27
5

tidspunktet hadde undertegnede i et brev til Spesialenheten anfrt at
man oppfattet hr BALSNES som uskikket til politiarbeid. Et forsk p
drepe undertegnede med pistol/revolver fant sted i sen 4,
Brattvg, noen f timer etter telefonsamtalen med betjent
BALSNES.).
3) Spesialenheten for politisaker med Jan Egil PRESTHUS i spissen
sker hindre ukorrumpert/lovlig/adekvat etterforskning av
drapsforskene mot meg bl.a for unng at organets leder og
riksadvokat BUSCH skal straffeforflges.
4) Man i en e-mail til Spesialenheten datert 08. ds har anfrt at nevnte
organ er fullstendig inhabile i denne saken og ikke skal etterforske
Tor-Aksel BUSCH eller andre mistenkte jf forvaltningsloven 6,
9 og 10 mv, item domstolloven 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 og 111 mv.
5) Jan Egil PRESTHUS, Tor-Aksel BUSCH, yvind VERPEIDE, Ove P
FINNES, Ole Ivar NYB og Kre BALSNES omgende br
suspenderes fra sine stillinger etter tjenestemannslovens 16, jf tjml
15 mv.


Brattvg, 12. april 2011
Wilhelm Werner Winther


Nr det gjelder drapsforsket av 13. nov f.., finner man liten grunn til laste hr
Presthus og hr Busch for dette (politi-/lensmannsetaten samt helsevesenet i
Haram kommune derimot, m opplagt tillegges skyld og eventuelt straffansvar i
den sammenheng).

Som det fremgr av undertegnedes anmeldelser, ble de to hovedmistenkte i
saken Geir Ove og Tommy SKARB begjrt pgrepet/internert allerede
i slutten av september f.., og alle drapsforskene undertegnede hittil har
politianmeldt fant sted etter dette.

Man skal ellers anfre at Geir Ove Skarb i en fullstendig forrykt telefonsamtale
med undertegnede (u sep 2010) hevdet at han hadde hatt kontakt med politi-
/lensmannsansatte som garanterte at undertegnedes anmeldelser ville bli henlagt
hr Skarbs troverdighet p dette punktet styrkes ved at han t.o.m. oversendte
bilder av seg selv med de sinnssykelige SMS-truslene han fremsatte.


ENCL. #27
6

Henleggelsen av Anmeldelse nr. 11568421 : Hedmark politidistrikt pankes
med dette til Statsadvokaten i Hedmark og Oppland, og Kjell Kristian
UKKELBERG begjres siktet/tiltalt/straffet etter straffeloven 118, 120,
124, 125, 324 og 325 etc, jf strl 62 og 63 mv item tjml 1, 15 og 16.



Brattvg, 14. april 2011

Wilh. Werner Winther
(sign)
ENCL. #27

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen