Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FOR GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES IN
BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) ALONG THE PACIFIC
COASTS OF CALIFORNIA AND BAJA CALIFORNIA NORTE
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off the Pacific coast of California and Baja
California Norte are highly nomadic, regularly ranging over extensive distances (Wells et
al. 1990, Defran et al. 1999). Recent investigations have shown that a majority of
dolphins in this coastal population utilize an area extending from at least Ensenada, Baja
California Norte in the south, to Monterey Bay, California in the north (Feinholz 1996,
Defran and Weller 1999, Defran et al. 1999). Historical records suggest this species once
occurred as far north as San Francisco Bay, California (Orr 1963); however, more
contemporary accounts have considered southern Los Angeles County, with occasional
sightings extending as far north as Point Dume, California (Dohl et al. 1981), to be the
typical northern distribution limit (Norris and Prescott 1961, Leatherwood and Reeves
1982, Hansen 1990). Following the 1982-1983 El Niño event, bottlenose dolphins
extended their northern distribution to Monterey Bay, and perhaps as far as San Francisco
(Wells et al. 1990, Feinholz 1996). This range extension appears permanent, as dolphins
continue to regularly occur off central California1 and occasional sightings further north
suggest that the distribution of this population may have returned to its known historical
limit (Ferrero and Tsunoda 1989, Feinholz 1996, Wells and Scott 1999).
While the northern range limit for bottlenose dolphins along the California coast may
be determined by cold water tolerance limits, such a temperature barrier does not
1Personal Communication from Lisa Giesick and Tom Kieckhefer, Pacific Cetacean Group, 3239 Imjin
Road #122, Marina, CA 93933, January 2000.
Defran, Caldwell, Lang and Weller
2
occur to the south until the presumed southern extent of bottlenose dolphin distribution
off central Chile (Jefferson et al. 1993, Wells and Scott 1999). Research by Curry (1997)
found no genetic differences between bottlenose dolphins off California and South
America, indicating that some level of population mixing was probably occurring along
the entire range of the species. Population distinctions within this distribution, however,
identified in several study sites off southern and central California (Fig. 1), a series of
photo-identification surveys were conducted off Ensenada, Baja California Norte (Defran
et al. 1999). A high percentage (88%) of 68 dolphins identified off Ensenada (Table 1)
were matched to a catalog of 516 known individuals identified during a long-term study
(1981-1998) off San Diego (Hansen 1990, Weller 1991, Defran and Weller 1999, Dudzik
1999). In addition, a high number of dolphins sighted in Ensenada were also sighted in
more northern study sites off Orange County, Santa Barbara, and Monterey Bay
(Feinholz 1996, Defran et al. 1999). These results suggested that if a southern range
boundary for coastal bottlenose dolphins off California existed, it was likely to be south
of Ensenada.
The research presented here was conducted in the coastal waters 32 km south of San
Quintín, Baja California Norte (30o 18’ N, 115o 50’ W) between April and August 1990.
Our San Quintín study area was located approximately 376 km south of San Diego and
200 km south of Ensenada. The study area consisted of a 38 km coastal region from
Punta Azufre, near the entrance to San Quintín Bay, to Cañon del Rosario, and extended
detailed elsewhere (Defran et al. 1990, Weller 1991, Defran and Weller 1999).
Quintín study area during three sampling periods: April 9 to 12 (n = 2); June 13 to 16 (n
= 3); and August 8 to 11 (n = 3). During the first survey on 9 April 1990, the research
boat was launched at Punta Azufre, and the survey track extended south to El Socorro
(Fig. 1). For all subsequent surveys, the boat was launched from the beach off our base
camp, and surveyed south to Cañon del Rosario. Two hundred bottlenose dolphins in 14
schools were observed during the study. The average school size was 14.3 dolphins (SD
= 7.53), and ranged from 5 - 30 individuals. A total of 105 individual dolphins were
identified, and 38% (n = 40) of these dolphins were photographed on two or more
sampling period (i.e., within days), reflecting short-term site fidelity similar to that
displayed by dolphins off more northern study sites (Defran and Weller 1999, Defran et
al. 1999).
Dorsal fin photographs collected during each survey in San Quintín were compared
to an existing catalog of 545 dolphins identified in southern and central California and off
Ensenada from 1981 to 1998 (Hansen 1990, Weller 1991, Feinholz 1996, Defran and
Weller 1999, Defran et al. 1999, Dudzik 1999). In contrast to the high levels of
photographic match-up reported for dolphins identified in study sites between Ensenada
and Monterey Bay (Table 1), only two (2%) of the 105 dolphins identified in San Quintín
were previously or subsequently identified in any northern study site. Dolphin 006, first
photographed in 1982 off San Diego by Hansen (1990), was also photographed twice in
Defran, Caldwell, Lang and Weller
4
Ensenada and five times in San Diego between 1982-1989. This dolphin was then
photographed twice in San Quintín during August 1990, twice in San Diego during
February 1991, and eight times in San Diego between March 1996 and August 1998.
Dolphin 739, first photographed in San Quintín in June 1990, was subsequently
photographed in the same school as dolphin 006 off San Diego on 14 August 1998.
Several aspects of the present study may have contributed to the low level of
photographic mixing observed between coastal locations. For example, the limited
number of surveys (n = 8) conducted in San Quintín may not have been adequate to
California Norte and in Southern California (Defran and Weller 1999, Defran et al. 1999)
indicated that the San Quintín sample size was sufficient to detect photographic matches
between coastal locations. For example, a relatively low number of surveys were also
conducted off Santa Barbara (n = 12) and Ensenada (n = 11). When photographs from
each of these study sites were compared to a catalog of 516 dolphins identified off San
Diego between 1981-1998 (Caldwell 1992, Defran and Weller 1999, Dudzik 1999),
resighting rates of 88% (Ensenada) and 92% (Santa Barbara) were documented (Table 1).
Further, more dolphins were identified in San Quintín (n = 105) than in either Santa
Barbara (n = 49) or Ensenada (n = 68) (Table 1), making the probability of finding an
The spring-summer seasonal sampling bias off San Quintín was also unlikely to have
had a significant influence on the low photographic overlap detected between coastal
study areas, because the occurrence and distribution patterns for dolphins off San Diego,
our most intensively sampled study area (Table 1), were not seasonally-based (Defran
Defran, Caldwell, Lang and Weller
5
and Weller 1999). Therefore, we conclude that the photo-identification techniques
employed during the present study were sufficient to detect greater inter-study area
It is also improbable that the 376 km distance between the northern San Quintín and
southern San Diego study area borders represented a significant barrier. Coastal
movements of 450 km were commonly observed for dolphins off Baja California Norte
and California (Defran et al. 1999), and travel distances in excess of 900 km were
recorded for dolphins moving between Ensenada and Monterey Bay (Feinholz 1996).
The findings presented here, in combination with results from previous longitudinal
research on Pacific coast bottlenose dolphins (Defran and Weller 1999, Defran et al.
1999), suggest that at least two Tursiops populations may occur off the coastline of
California and Baja California Norte. We hypothesize that the coastal region between
Ensenada and San Quintín functions as the southern range boundary for most members of
Monterey Bay, and as the northern range boundary for a “Baja California Norte”
population.
Range boundaries typically occur where there are breaks in resources, where
movement (Mayr 1970). Our review of the literature regarding the ecology,
oceanography, and marine geology of the eastern Pacific seaboard between San Quintín
and Ensenada2 (see also Caldwell 1992) revealed no apparent explanation for the range
2Personal Communication from Eduardo Morteo, Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja
California, Km 103 Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada, 22800 Ensenada, Baja California Norte, January 2000.
Defran, Caldwell, Lang and Weller
6
boundary proposed here. The determination of two potentially discrete Tursiops
populations along the Pacific coast of California and Baja California Norte provides the
basis for better defining management and conservation efforts regarding this delphinid
species, and functions as an important reference point in continued basic science studies
genetic comparisons along the California and Baja California Norte coast, and boat-based
photo-identification surveys between Ensenada and San Quintín may help to better
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors extend their sincere gratitude to the many individuals who made
important contributions to the field, laboratory, and manuscript phases of this research.
Superior De Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California Norte, and J. Bullis and A. French of
San Diego State University provided essential logistical support in the field. A. Bassett,
L. Barre, and numerous members of the Cetacean Behavior Laboratory maintained and
reviewed Spanish language publications on the marine biology of the Southern California
Bight and San Quintín regions and J. Barlow made valuable suggestions about
terminology. This study was conducted under the provisions of a research permit issued
the Southern California Bight. M.S. thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego,
CA. 59 pp.
Defran, R. H., G. M. Shultz and D. W. Weller. 1990. A technique for the photographic
55.
Defran, R. H., and D. W. Weller. 1999. The occurrence, distribution, site fidelity and
school size of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off San Diego, California.
of marine mammal and seabird surveys of the Southern California Bight area, 1975-
1978. Volume III. Investigator’s Reports. Part II. Cetacea of the Southern California
(Tursiops truncatus). M.S. thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA. 63
pp.
Monterey Bay, California. M.S. thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA. 78
pp.
Ferrero, R. C., and L. M. Tsunoda. 1989. First record of a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops
Leatherwood and R. R. Reeves, eds. The bottlenose dolphin. Academic Press, San
Diego, CA.
Leatherwood, S., and R. R. Reeves. 1982. Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and
Mayr, E. 1970. Population, species, and evolution: an abridgment of animal species and
Mammalogy 44:424.
Weller, D. W. 1991. The social ecology of Pacific coast bottlenose dolphins. M.S.
Wells, R. S., and M. D. Scott. 1999. Bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus (Montagu,
mammals. Volume 6. The second book of dolphins and the porpoises. Academic
Northward extension of the range of bottlenose dolphins along the California coast.
Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego,
Figure 1. San Quintín study area. Inset shows Pacific coast study area locations
mentioned in the text.
Defran, Caldwell, Lang and Weller
13