Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
RC beam strengthened with CFRP composite for bending
1 SYSTEM
P/2 P/2
1. SYSTEM
P/2 P/2
410
370
2
2. CROSS SECTION AND MATERIALS
RCbeam
h=40cm
b = 20 cm
FRPcomposite
b
f
=50mm
t
f
= 1 2 mm
b=20cm
d=36.7cm
A
s1
=216=4.02cm
2
4
0
t
f
1.2mm
E
fk
=165000N/mm
2
fku
=1.7%
Concrete:
C30/37
f
ck
=30N/mm
2
ck
E
c
=33000N/mm
2
f
ctm
=2.9N/mm
2
20
Steel:
f
yk
=500N/mm
2
E
s
=210000N/mm
2
3
3. LOADS AND DESIGN VALUES
1.Selfweight G=
2.Liveloadbeforestrengthening q
1
=
3.Liveloadafterstrengthening q
1
+q
2
=
n
EJ
k,]
] =1
k,1
o
cJ
ck
c
EJ
where
c
=1.5
s
= 1.15
yJ
yk
s
s
1.15
f
=1.2
J
=
k
y
=
4
4. INITIAL SITUATION
ServicemomentM
o
selfweight+q
1
Calculationoftheneutralaxisdepthx
0
:
o
2
s s2 o 2 s s1 o
Where
s
= E
s
E
c
s
5
4. INITIAL SITUATION
2 2
o
s s1 s
2
s1
2
s s1
o
Theconcretestrain
co
atthetopfibrecanbeexpressedas:
co
o o
c co
b
S
Where
I
co
=
bx
o
S
S
+(
s
-1)A
s2
(x
o
-J
2
)
2
+
s
A
s1
(J -x
o
)
2
co
co
6
4. INITIAL SITUATION
Basedonthestraincompatibility,thestrain
o
attheextremetensionfiber
canbederivedas
o co
o
o
7
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.1. Full composite action
Steelyieldingfollowedbyconcretecrushing
0.85
cJ
bx +A
s2
E
s
e
s2
= A
s1
yJ
+ A
8
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.1. Full composite action
Steelyieldingfollowedbyconcretecrushing
Onlyiterativesolvingpossible:
1
st
proposal x=90mm
cu
b-x
o
=
cu
x
o
0.85
cJ
bx = A
s1
yJ
+A
2
nd
proposal x=....cm p p
cu
b-x
x
o
=
0 85 bx = A +A E e 0.85
cJ
bx = A
s1
yJ
+A
9
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.1. Full composite action
Steelyieldingfollowedbyconcretecrushing
cu
b-x
o uJ
e
u
1
J-x
yJ
cu
x
o uJ
y
s1
cu
x E
s
) ( ) ( ) (
2 2 2 1
d x E A x h E A x d f A M
G s s s G f f f G yd s Rd
Where
G
=0.4
RJ EJ
10
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.1. Full composite action
SteelyieldingfollowedbyFRP fracture
istheoreticallypossibleifpropermechanicalanchorageareused
ISNOTTHECASE
11
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.2. Loss composite action
L d a>L+d
a
L
<a
EJ RJ RJ
12
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.2. Loss composite action
Endshearfailure
EJ RJ RJ
Where
s
s1
o
I
=
_
(1 -
p
s
)
2
p
s
JI
S
4
=
RJ
= u.1S_S
J
o
S
_1 +
_
2uu
J
_
1uup
s
ck
S
_
p
s
(designvalueofresistingshearstrengthofconcrete)
_
o
I
_
_
J
_
RJ
=
RJ
13
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Approach1:AnchorageverificationandFRP strainlimitation
cracks
A
f
A
s1
l
b
N
s1
z
N
b
N
f
14
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
ThemaximumFRP forcewhichcanbeanchored:
N k k b
_
E |N] N
o,mox
= oc
1
k
c
k
b
b
_
E
ctm
|N]
Themaximumanchorable length:
b,mox
2 ctm
15
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
Where: =0.9or =1.0 forbeamswithsufficientinternal
andexternalreinforcement
k
c
=1.0
f
k 1 u6
_
2 -
b
b
1
geometryfactor
c 0 64
k
b
= 1.u6
_
b
1 +
b
4uu
1
c
1
=0.64
c
2
=2.0
16
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
N
o,mox
=
z =
l
b,mox
=
z=
17
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
H
RJ
(z) =
H
o
(z) =
Initialsituationatthepositionofz
H
RJ
(z) =
co
o o
c co
o co
o
o
o
18
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
c
andx isunknownonlyiterativesolvingispossible
19
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
Forceequilibriumcondition:
0 85
1
st
proposal x = cm and 0 002
0.85
cJ s1 s s1
1
st
proposal x=....cm and
c
0.002
= 1uuue
c
_u.S -
1uuu
12
e
c
] _
12
]
c
20
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
1
st
proposal x=....cm and
c
0.002
b-x
s1
c
J-x
c
x
o
o
0
=
8 -1uuue
c
4(6 1uuu )
s1 c
x
0
4(6 -1uuue
c
)
) ( ) (
1 1
x h E A x d E A M
G f f f G s s s Rd
1 1 G f f f G s s s Rd
21
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
2
nd
proposal x=....cm and
c
0.002
1uuu _u S
1uuu
] = 1uuue
c
_u.S -
12
e
c
]
0.85
cJ s1 s s1
0.85
cJ s1 s s1
c
22
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
2
nd
proposal x=....cm and
c
0.002
b-x
s1
c
J-x
c
x
o
o
0
=
8 -1uuue
c
4(6 1uuu )
s1 c
x
0
4(6 -1uuue
c
)
) ( ) (
1 1
x h E A x d E A M
G f f f G s s s Rd
1 1 G f f f G s s s Rd
23
5. ANALYSIS IN ULS
5.3. Verification of peeling-off at the end anchorage and at flexural
Anchorageverification
cracks
o,mox ,J
N
o,mox
y
cb
Where
cb
=1.5