Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2011 BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE: BY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT, THE RECIPIENT AGREES THAT THE DOCUMENT TOGETHER WITH ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED THEREIN IS THE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED AND INCLUDES VALUABLE TRADE SECRETS AND/OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF BAKER HUGHES (COLLECTIVELY "INFORMATION"). BAKER HUGHES RETAINS ALL RIGHTS UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS AND TRADE SECRET LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OTHER COUNTRIES. THE RECIPIENT FURTHER AGREES THAT THE DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED, TRANSMITTED, COPIED OR REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, OR OTHERWISE, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BAKER HUGHES, AND MAY NOT BE USED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY WAY DETRIMENTAL TO BAKER HUGHES INTEREST.
History
Lost circulation of Drilling Fluids have been experienced
ever since Drilling Fluids were introduced-especially when drilling porous/fractured and vuggy formations. Many types of Lost Circulation Material (LCM) have been proposed, tried (with little science) and many are still in use. Many technical papers have been written on the subject and if those concerned with minimising formation damage through bridging are also considered the list is extensive indeed So what is new regarding both our understanding and ability to seal natural fractures/vugs in limestones or induced fractures in various rock types?
2 2011 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Discontinuous
Healed
Stylolite-assoc.
f f
1 ft
f f
Quantification of Losses
Seepage Loss (<4m3/hr) Partial Loss (4 -80 m3/hr) Severe Loss (>80 m3 /hr) These numbers vary according to author and rounding up from bbl to
m3 ! (In mud man parlance loosing >60 m3 per hour is ~2 pits per hour! sufficient!). In 8 hole pumping at 2 m3 per min means returns at 50% or less. Seepage loss is normally loss to porous formations or small discontinuous fractures which may be natural or induced This type of loss can be cured either with small doses of effective LCM (possibly using the application of bridging theory with particulates)
SPE 18022
This seminal paper by Sandia Natl Labs contains some very useful information.
Converting to mm - if we look at the width of the fracture opening (b) at 0.12 in (3.05mm) we see that even if the particle size diameter is 2mm the fracture will never plug. (Multiple particle bridges do not form with the same material or can sustain the applied pressure) For half the fracture width the same size particle can plug at only 5 ppb (14.3 kg/m3) They also showed that when the particle size was shifted to a larger size distribution they achieved better bridging (next slide)
Jamming
When flakes were mixed with the particulate (rubber) Sandia
achieved even greater effectiveness this is due to the morphology of flakes and the ability to randomly orient and jam. The use of LC Lube (more elongated morphology than ground marble) at concentrations of 57 kg/m3 in OBM allowed Brent sands to be drilled significantly overbalance with pressures between 3000 and 5400 psi. The material has been used successfully at concentrations as low as 2.85 kg/m3, more often at 15-20 kg/m3 with 100 kg/hr additions while drilling 8 holes. The resiliency of the synthetic graphite is much higher than solid particulates this provides an increase in Frac pressure (wellbore strengthening) and can be used injunction with marble to lower cost
7 2011 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
25 x
of smaller particle size will not plug large fractures but can be effective for seepage loss into porous formations or into short drilling/ECD induced fractures So at what fracture width will they fail?
combination formulation of Soltex or Sulphatrol, MaxShield (latex polymer ~1 micron), LC Lube and LC lube fine designed for Saudi drilling Tested on 200 micron slots it functioned, but failed on 300 micron (next slide)
Percentage
Micron
Increasing the pressure to 900 psi and at 150 F doubled the spurt result for test 4 and 8.
No Surprise!
Multiple particle bridges will not form when none of the
80 70 Cumulative % 60 50 40 30
Fordacal 45
Fordacal 300 Fordacal 200 Fordacal 100 Fordacal 60 Fordacal 25 Fordacal 36
Baker-Squeez
This is a recent product introduction based on a fibrous pill formulation for loss circulation problems. (See SPE papers 139817 & 149120). It is a formulated one sack additive that can be weighted to 18 ppg (2.16 sg) and seals both porous sands, gravels and fractures
The fracture limitation?
From our testing ~1300-1400 micron as it failed at 1500 micron in WBM and at 1000 micron in OBM though bridged 800 micron
Useful for overburden drilling. Convenient and avoids issues of how much LCM to add, which LCM to add and in what combination. Also simplifies rig inventory.
Note E failed with more Nut Plug (the surmise is greater sphericity in the mix).
So while formulations C & D would have sealed smaller fractures as well as Baker-Squeez , the formulations are more complex to engineer and liable to failure.
15 2011 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Solu-Squeez
This material was designed where a degree of solubility in 15% HCl was desired (>90%) and seals up to ~700 micron slots although this could be extended with Soluflake
16 2011 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
17
Largest particulate size can be < than actual aperture width provided there are enough other large flakes/smaller particulates to help bridge
Solu-Flake D
This is a recent addition to our flaked Calcium carbonate line. The difference to Soluflake is the slightly lower acid solubility >80% vs~95% and a slightly harder more brittle flake. It was introduced due to the large demand for Soluflake in Saudi and supply line issues.
Intellibore
Drilling Fluids have recently introduced a methodology
that allows detailed design of drilling fluids for wellbore strengthening in areas of weak fracture pressure or low operating margins between mud weight and fracture initiation pressure. It is aimed at expensive offshore wells where the cost of the analysis and the time savings for successful implementation warrant its use. The methodology requires a variety of geomechanical inputs (15) into the Borewise model.
20
21
Functions / Capabilities Temperature effects on Formation Breakdown Pressure Formation properties data base Single point / batch analysis Range options sensitivity analysis Inclination Azimuth Youngs modulus Pore pressure
22
GeoWise
Well Data
Customer E-Log Pore Pressure Offset wells Mud System
BridgeWise Bridging
PSD Optimization Drill-In Fluid Design Wellbore Strengthening Fracture Closure Pressure
Advantage Engineering
Hydraulics Hole Cleaning ECD/ESD Bit Optimization Swab / Surge
Laboratory
Formulation Optimization Return Perm
Questions?