Creekview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

C-FBISD VISION:
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2011-2012 Creekview High School

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District Joseph LaPuma, Principal
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
C-FBISD GOAL The Goal of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD is high achievement for all students.
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES
Supporting Objective 1:
Continuously increase student achievement
CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Creekview Early College Newman Smith R. L. Turner Ranchview
Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
MIDDLE SCHOOLS Blalack Bush Field Long Perry Polk
Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Blair Blanton Carrollton Central Country Place Davis Farmers Branch Freeman Furneaux Good Kent Landry Las Colinas La Villita McCoy McKamy McLaughlin McWhorter Rainwater Riverchase Rosemeade Sheffield Intermediate Sheffield Primary Stark Strickland Thompson CENTERS
Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Mary Grimes Education Center Salazar Transition School Kelly Pre-K Center Huie Education Center CLC Learning Complex
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES Steve Hamberger STAFF REPRESENTATIVES Stacy Lovett Abby Harrison Carolyn Chiever Darcy Perreault Emily Johnson Pete Hazzard Stacy Hunt Victor Monreal Melissa Mendoza Cindy Branson Claudia Wallace Dan Marek Sarah Jones Lars Nyberg Bryan Womack
PARENT REPRESENTATIVES Leigh Huseman Amy Fusco MaryAnn Presson
ADMINISTRATORS Joe LaPuma Ginny Biggs Phyllis Reed Kimberly Guinn Melissa Wesley Skip Barber
CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW : Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date
Chair Signature
Date
Chair Signature
Date
C-FBISD VISION
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
GRADUATE PROFILE
Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:
MISSION
Together with families and community we commit all district resources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as: A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator
Responsible individuals who:

Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members
Competent learners who:

Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products
STATEMENT OF BELIEFS
We believe that: The economic, political and societal success of our country depends upon a quality education for all. Diversity strengthens the community and enriches the fabric of our society. It is the responsibility of the entire community to partner in the educational process. Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturing environment. Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have different capacities and that each persons educational path deserves to be valued equally. Learning empowers people to reach their full potential: physically, mentally, socially, and emotionally Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.
Complex thinkers who:

Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking
Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly
TARGET AREAS
Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. TA 2. TA 3. TA 4. TA 5. TA 6. TA 7. TA 8. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs Highly qualified teachers Professional Development Increase parental involvement Coordination of federal, state, and local services
Title I School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments. TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF Performance Targets: Employee Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction Student: Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM Performance Targets: Education Productivity Index (EPI) API SPI Parent Satisfaction Employee Campus Communications
Performance Targets: Academic Performance Index (API) STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced Graduation Rate SAT Mean ACT Mean Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations AYP
Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM
Supporting Objective 1
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP
ACTION STRATEGY
Begin Instructional Rounds
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
Joe LaPuma Carolyn Chiever, Emily Johnson, Kimberly Guinn Melissa Wesley, Janet Beeler, Joe LaPuma, Admin Team Joe LaPuma, Phyllis Reed, Melissa Mendoza, Cindy Branson, SSR Team Joe LaPuma
TIMELINE
2011-2012
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
STAAR, TAKS, Survey Data STAAR Reading/ELA, TAKS, Classroom observations, 100% from 11-12 Cohort become 10th graders TAKS, Unit Assessments, Tutorial Data STAAR Reading/ELA, TAKS, Classroom observations, STAAR, TAKS
RESOURCES
Staff Time, District Resources for Subs Staff Time, PD Staff Time Staff time, Principal Budget, Math Coordinatior Library books Comp Ed Funds $22,797
TITLE I COMPONENT
Implement Readers Writers Workshop Implement 9th Grade Initiative- will focus on team, student, parent meetings for at risk students Create AYP Geometry Action Plan Team/Tutorials Implement SSR- Student Selected Reading Provide acceleration for students identified as At Risk
2011-2012 2011-2012
2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations
ACTION STRATEGY
Provide Edugence Training to help teachers make educational decisions
Begin after school tutorials- Biology
PERSON RESPONSIBLE Wes Baker, Melissa Mendoza Claudia Wallace, Cass Cartmill, Courtney Perkins, John Johnson, Charlie Liles, Jon Kitsopolous
TIMELINE
2011-2012
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
Survey
RESOURCES
TITLE I COMPONENT
Spring 2012
STAAR/EOC
Teacher Generated Lessons
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY
Continue with Graduation Team Meetings Begin 9 grade Graduation Team Meeting
th
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
Joe LaPuma Melissa Wesley
TIMELINE
2011-2012 2011-2012
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
Graduation Rate 9 Grade Passing Rate
th
RESOURCES
Staff Time Staff Time
TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

ACTION STRATEGY Offer Revolution Prep on Campus Create PSAT Lessons that are delivered through ELA Classes w/ counselors Increase participation in student SAT/ACT programs identifying top 100 students and providing them with consistent communication and advocacy. PERSON RESPONSIBLE Stacy Lovett Stacy Lovett, Stacy Lovett, Ginny Biggs TIMELINE 9/2011-7/2012 10/2011 9/2011-7/2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Improved SAT Scores Improved ACT Scores Increased # of students participating in prep programs RESOURCES Rev. Prep Released SAT Tests PSAT Data, AVID Data TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.
ACTION STRATEGY Provide instructional coaching and support for key teachers. Provide mentor teachers for new staff members. Begin Monthly breakfast meetings with 1st, 2nd, & 3rd year staff throughout year. PERSON RESPONSIBLE District Coordinators, Joe LaPuma Joe LaPuma, Campus IFs Counselors, Administrators, IFs TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Increased job satisfaction Increased job satisfaction Increased job satisfaction RESOURCES Principal budget Principal budget Principal budget TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
ACTION STRATEGY Provide opportunities for input and participation through committees, faculty meetings, and professional development. Develop leadership capacity throughout the campus PERSON RESPONSIBLE Joe LaPuma, Ginny Biggs, Phyllis Reed Joe LaPuma, Ginny Biggs, Phyllis Reed TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Increased survey results Increased survey results Decreased staff absenteeism RESOURCES TITLE I COMPONENT
10
Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.
ACTION STRATEGY Provide Positive professional development which includes setting expectations & norms Maintain Campus Improvement Committee Schedule opportunities for teacher collaboration and classroom observations Using Edugence (checkpoint data) to identifying low ses and creating lessons to target and improve those low ses PERSON RESPONSIBLE Joe LaPuma Ginny Biggs, Phyllis Reed, Kimberly Guinn, Skip Barber, Melissa Wesley Joe LaPuma DM/IFs DM/IFs TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE Increased survey results RESOURCES TITLE I COMPONENT
2011-2012
2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012
Increased survey results
Checkpoint, EOC, TAKS Data
Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

ACTION STRATEGY Focus on students with highest absences & intervene with a parent meeting after AP, Counselor, & Attendance Clerk Meeting Hold Absence Make-Up Dates Wed. & Saturday throughout the year Hold a Perfect Attendance Social 2x a Year PERSON RESPONSIBLE Phyllis Reed, Attendance Clerks, Phyllis Reed Ginny Biggs TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE AEIS Report Attendance Data Attendance Data RESOURCES TITLE I COMPONENT
11
Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

ACTION STRATEGY Monitor Referrals & Discipline Data Implement 9th Grade Initiative Develop a Repeating 9th Graders Intervention PlanPERSON RESPONSIBLE Phyllis Reed, All Administrators Melissa Wesley, Joe LaPuma, Janet Beeler Phyllis Reed, Kimberly Guinn, Skip Barber, Counselors TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Decrease in DMC, OSS, & AEP Placements Decrease by 10% # of referrals, DMC, OSS, & AEP for 9th graders Decrease by 10% # of referrals, DMC, OSS, & AEP for 9th graders RESOURCES Staff- Admin TITLE I COMPONENT
12
*
Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY Balance teacher/student schedules to make effective use of the master schedule Analyze ERG Data for top ten ranked schools with regards to API, EPI, & FPI PERSON RESPONSIBLE Ginny Biggs, Anita Leclaire, Joe LaPuma Joe LaPuma TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Good Student to teacher ratio, few classes over 30 Improvement on ERGs SPI Measure RESOURCES Master Schedule ERG- IF TITLE I COMPONENT
Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY Use online annual report for the 2011-2012 school year Increase EPI, API & SPI productivity PERSON RESPONSIBLE Cindy Randle Joe LaPuma TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Number of visits to site ERG Data RESOURCES Local Budget Local Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
13
Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

ACTION STRATEGY Use Blackboard connect system to contact parents regarding campus activities Use Creekview Home Page and Facebook Page to communicate with stakeholders Promote 100% teacher participation in PTSA & schedule PTSA meetings to coincide with other school events: Meet the Teacher, Registration, Mustang Roundup, etc. PERSON RESPONSIBLE Kimberly Guinn, Amy Fusco Meagan Gilbert, Leah Waters, Kimberly Guinn Sherry Dunn, Leigh Huseman TIMELINE 2011-2012 2011-2012 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Number of messages sent & phones called Survey Results RESOURCES BB Connect System Local Budget TITLE I COMPONENT
2011-2012
Survey Results
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest
ACTION STRATEGY Schedule Staff is informed of the district happenings through faculty meetings, CIC, email, PERSON RESPONSIBLE Joe LaPuma TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE Survey RESOURCES TITLE I COMPONENT
2011-2012
Local Budget
14
ERG Performance Index Education Productivity Index (EPI) Academic Performance Index (API) Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
2010 Rank 6 23 36
2011 Target 3 20 25
2011 Rank
2012 Target 2 15 20
2012 Rank
Employee Opinion Survey Employee Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work. Employee Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
2011 Result 84 70 82 68
2012 Target 90 80 85 80
2012 Result
on common problems.
Employee Curriculum and Instruction Support Teachers work amicably together Employee Campus Communication
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met
2012 Result
School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

AEIS Campus Rating Student Attendance Rate Students with Disciplinary Placements
2011 Result AA 95.9 (20082009) 552 (2008-09) 2011 Result Satisfied
2012 Target Recognized 96.5 500 2012 Target
Percent at Target
Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District
2012 Result
15

READING/ELA MATHEMATICS
2012 % ADV Target 25 20 30 20 10 100 20 30 Result
READING/ELA
2011
% PASS
2012
% SATIS Target Result
2011
% COM
MATHEMATICS
2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. LEP G/T Special Ed All Students
Student Group
96 89 98 91 53 100 85 94
98 90 99 93 65 100 90 96
22 13 27 14 1 100 11 22
68 73 88 73 57 100 53 80
80 80 90 85 75 100 75 85
16 16 37 18 13 100 4 28
WRITING
WRITING 2011
% PASS
SCIENCE
2012 % ADV Target Result
2012
2011
% COM
SCIENCE
2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM Target
Student Group
Student Group
2012 % ADV Result
88 86 95 86 63 99.3 68 90
90 90 96 90 75 100 75 93
19 18 45 19 4 100 10 32
SOCIAL STUDIES
SOCIAL STUDIES 2011
% PASS
2012
2011
% COM
Student Group
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target SATISFACTORY ADVANCED
96 98 99 98 89 100 94 98
98 99 100 99 95 100 96 99
59 47 77 50 30 100 22 63
16
C-FBISD
Completion Rate

COMPLETION RATE
Class of 2009
Comp Rate # of Dropouts
Class of 2010
Comp Rate # of Dropouts
Class of 2011
Comp Rate Target Results Target 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dropouts Results
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
96.6 94.0 97.5 96.8
2 6 4 4
97.1 96.3 97.9 96.9
2 4 2 4
96.8
12
97.5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dropout Rate
C-FBISD 2008-2009
Rate 3.4 5.1 1.9 3.2 0 1.9
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE

2009-2010
Rate 2.9 3.7 1.0 3.1 0 2.0 Target
2010-2011
Results
C-FBISD
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Met AYP 2008 2009 2010 2011 Target 2012 Results 2012 Met AYP Met AYP Met AYP Did Not Meet AYP Meet AYP
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS Completion # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
Dropout
17
C-FBISD
Subtests
Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Combined Score Percent (no) Tested 2009
495 534 485 1513 274
SAT MEAN SCORES

2010
501 533 488 1522 282
2011
503 540 487 1530 320
2012 Target 508 550 492 1550 350 Results
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS SAT # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
ACT
C-FBISD
Subtests
English Mathematics Reading Science Composite Percent Tested 2009
20.3 22.8 21.6 21.7 27.7 132 20.7 22.6 22.3 22.1 22.0 137
ACT MEAN SCORES

2010 2011
22.1 23.9 22.7 22.5 22.9 127 2012 Target 23 25 23 24 24 150 Results
18

Creekview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Creekview - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

C-FBISD VISION:

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2011-2012 Creekview High School

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

Continuously increase operational effectiveness

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES Leigh Huseman Amy Fusco MaryAnn Presson

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW : Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Responsible individuals who:

Competent learners who:

Complex thinkers who:

Effective communicators who:

Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Title I School-wide Components (TS)

Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

Continuously increase student achievement

2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012

Continuously increase student achievement

Begin after school tutorials- Biology

Teacher Generated Lessons

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012

Increased survey results

Checkpoint, EOC, TAKS Data

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

2011 Result AA 95.9 (20082009) 552 (2008-09) 2011 Result Satisfied

2012 Target Recognized 96.5 500 2012 Target

Continuously increase student achievement

2012 % ADV Target 20 20 40 20 20 100 10 35 Result

2012 % ADV Result

2012 % ADV Target 65 60 80 60 40 100 32 73 Result

Continuously increase student achievement

96.6 94.0 97.5 96.8

97.1 96.3 97.9 96.9

HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE

Continuously increase student achievement

SAT MEAN SCORES

2012 Target 508 550 492 1550 350 Results

ACT MEAN SCORES

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen