Weekly Report - Refusal Reason Page 74

PLANNING SERVICES
WEEKLY REPORT No. 1484 Week ending 15th April 2011 The attached Weekly Report incorporates the following sections: CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 Reports on applications SECTION 2 Reports on enforcement cases SECTION 3 List of applications referred from Weekly Report No. 1482 SECTION 4 List of minor amendments to plans approved under delegated powers SECTION 5 List of appeals received SECTION 6 Reports on appeal decisions received SECTION 7 List of enforcement complaints where possible breach of planning control has been identified SECTION 8 List of enforcement complaints where NO breach of planning control has been identified OR where any breach of planning control has ceased or been remedied
CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1 - REPORTS ON APPLICATIONS Reference BRW/123/2011 BRW/130/2011 Address 96 KNIGHTS WAY BRENTWOOD 106A HIGH STREET BRENTWOOD 92 BILLERICAY ROAD HERONGATE BRENTWOOD LAND REAR OF 4 LODGE CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD 7 CLOCK TOWER THE GALLERIES WARLEY BRENTWOOD 7 CLOCK TOWER THE GALLERIES WARLEY BRENTWOOD Ward BRENTWOOD SOUTH BRENTWOOD SOUTH HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON HUTTON EAST Parish Page 9 10
BRW/133/2011
14
BRW/137/2011
16
BRW/138/2011
WARLEY
19
LB/BRW/4/2011
WARLEY
21
BRW/139/2011
1 CHELMER DRIVE HUTTON EAST HUTTON BRENTWOOD FARRIERS THE ALLEY BLACKMORE INGATESTONE BRENTWOOD 19 SUNRAY AVENUE HUTTON BRENTWOOD TIPPS CROSS Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green Parish Council
23
BRW/141/2011
27
BRW/144/2011
HUTTON EAST
30
1484/2
15 2011
BRW/148/2011
40 KING GEORGES ROAD PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD 46B CROSSWAYS SHENFIELD BRENTWOOD GRAYLINGS COTTAGE HORSEMAN SIDE NAVESTOCKSIDE BRENTWOOD 8 HOLDEN GARDENS WARLEY BRENTWOOD CARINTHIA WYATTS GREEN ROAD WYATTS GREEN BRENTWOOD 27 COTSWOLD GARDENS HUTTON BRENTWOOD 7 CLAVERING GARDENS WEST HORNDON BRENTWOOD
PILGRIMS HATCH
32
BRW/150/2011
SHENFIELD
38
BRW/151/2011
BRIZES AND DODDINGHURST
Navestock Parish Council
41
BRW/154/2011
WARLEY
43
BRW/155/2011
TIPPS CROSS
Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green Parish Council
46
BRW/156/2011
HUTTON EAST
48
BRW/162/2011
HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON
West Horndon Parish Council
51
BRW/165/2011
36 LONG MEADOW HUTTON CENTRAL HUTTON BRENTWOOD 13 PRIESTS LANE BRENTWOOD 9 HAYWARDS CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD BRENTWOOD SOUTH HUTTON EAST
53
BRW/167/2011 BRW/168/2011
55 57
1484/3
15 2011
BRW/169/2011
17 SURMAN CRESCENT HUTTON BRENTWOOD 3A ST. JOHNS AVENUE WARLEY BRENTWOOD CHAIN BRIDGE FARM ROMAN ROAD SHENFIELD BRENTWOOD 10 CARPENTER PATH HUTTON BRENTWOOD TREVERVOE BROCKLEY GROVE HUTTON BRENTWOOD 4 INGRAVE ROAD BRENTWOOD 8 WALTHAM CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD FAIRHOLME HIGHLAND AVENUE BRENTWOOD
HUTTON CENTRAL
59
BRW/170/2011
WARLEY
60
BRW/171/2011
SHENFIELD
62
BRW/173/2011
HUTTON NORTH
65
BRW/174/2011
HUTTON SOUTH
66
BRW/175/2011 BRW/186/2011
BRENTWOOD SOUTH HUTTON NORTH
69 71
BRW/83/2011
BRENTWOOD NORTH
73
EXT/BRW/7/2011
11 STUART CLOSE PILGRIMS HATCH PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD NAVESTOCK BRIZES AND WOODHOUSE DODDINGHURST DUDBROOK ROAD KELVEDON COMMON BRENTWOOD Navestock Parish Council
83
LB/BRW/6/2011
85
1484/4
15 2011
LB/BRW/7/2011
THE BOARS HEAD HERONGATE, 15 BILLERICAY INGRAVE & WEST ROAD HORNDON HERONGATE BRENTWOOD WARLEY
Herongate & Ingrave Parish Council
87
TPO/BRW/28/2011 11 THE DELL GREAT WARLEY BRENTWOOD
89
SECTION 2 - REPORTS ON ENFORCEMENT CASES None SECTION 3 - LIST OF APPLICATIONS REFERRED FROM WEEKLY REPORT NO. 1482 Reference BRW/790/2010 Address 48-52 QUEENS ROAD BRENTWOOD Development DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION OF 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS (TWO FLATS, FIVE DUPLEXES AND THREE TOWN HOUSES) INCLUDING VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM COPTFOLD ROAD AND PARKING SPACES Referred Page By Cllr LeSurf 92
BRW/84/2011
THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD
CHANGE OF USE, EXTENSION Cllr Mrs AND CONVERSION OF Pound EXISTING FORGE BUILDING TO RESIDENTIAL DWELLNG AND ERECTION OF 6 NEW DWELLINGS AND A CARTLODGE, NEW ACCESS, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING Cllr Mrs Pound
92
CAC/BRW/1/2011 THE FORGE DEMOLITION OF WORKSHOP GREAT BUILDINGS WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD
92
1484/5
15 2011
SECTION 4 - LIST OF MINOR AMENDMENTS TO PLANS APPROVED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS None SECTION 5 - NOTIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING APPEALS HAS BEEN RECEIVED None SECTION 6 - NOTIFICATION OF THE DECISION ON THE FOLLOWING APPEALS HAS BEEN RECEIVED Reference Address Development OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED BARN BUILDING FOR USE AS AN INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, LEISURE FACILITY AND GYMNASIUM, INCIDENTAL TO THE RESIDENTIAL USE OF THE MAIN PROPERTY. Page 93
ENF/BRW/268/2009 HOLMFIELD BROOK LANE DODDINGHURST BRENTWOOD
SECTION 7 - LIST OF ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS WHERE POSSIBLE BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED None
1484/6
15 2011
SECTION 8 - LIST OF ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS WHERE NO BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED OR WHERE ANY BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS CEASED OR BEEN REMEDIED Reference Address Ward Parish West Horndon Parish Council Page 95
ENF/BRW/141/2007 HALFWAY HOUSE HERONGATE, A127 WEST HORNDON INGRAVE & WEST BRENTWOOD HORNDON ENF/BRW/163/2011 LAND BEHIND SANTANDER BANK CROWN STREET BRENTWOOD BRENTWOOD SOUTH
96
ENF/BRW/342/2010 CROW GREEN FARM PILGRIMS HATCH DAYS LANE PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD ENF/BRW/7/2011 59, RAYLEIGH ROAD HUTTON BRENTWOOD HUTTON CENTRAL
96
96
1484/7
15 2011
SECTION 1
PLANNING SERVICES REPORTS ON APPLICATIONS Applications delegated to the Interim Built Environment Manager for decision subject to the concurrence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Planning Development Control Committee.
Decision Notices will be issued in accordance with the attached recommendations unless an application is referred to the Planning Committee by a MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL for the Ward in which the application is submitted or by the appropriate PARISH COUNCIL. The referral of applications to the Planning Development Control Committee will be in accordance with the protocol agreed by the Committee in December 2008 and any application that is referred will be reported to the next available meeting of that Committee. Where a Member for the Ward within which the proposal is located or a Parish Council is considering the referral of an application the Member or a representative of the Parish Council must speak to the case officer, the Principal Planning Officer or the Interim Built Environment Manager in order to discuss the matter. Applications may be referred in writing or by E mailing the Planning Department (referrals@brentwood.gov.uk) giving a valid Planning Reason for referring the Application. Planning Services Administration Support must be notified of any application which is to be referred by 12 Noon on 25th April 2011. You will receive an acknowledgement of any referral that is made. Copies of plans and all background documents (including letters of objection, supporting letters, consultation responses, Parish Council observations and other representations) are available for inspection at the Planning Office.
1484/8
15 2011
96 KNIGHTS WAY BRENTWOOD SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION AND INCREASE HEIGHT OF EXISTING REAR EXTENSION. BRW/123/2011 Ward: BRENTWOOD SOUTH Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 8/13 Week Date: 22nd April 2011
Single storey rear extension with a flat roof and three roof lights. Raise roof of existing single storey rear building up to the height of the existing parapet walls. Demolish outbuilding and shed.
2. Relevant History
BRW/38/88 - Single storey extension and canopy at front. Approved.
3. Consultation Responses
None.
4. Neighbour Responses
None.
5. Summary of Issues

This application relates to a mid-terraced property located in a residential area. The existing shed would be removed and the extension proposed would be the same depth as the existing as well as no.98 Knights Way's extension. It is considered it would not have an unacceptable detrimental affect on the adjoining occupiers by way of overbearing or loss of light. The proposed works would extend the full width of the property, would not extend any deeper than the existing kitchen and no higher than the top of the parapet wall. Although no. 94 has no rear extension along the boundary, taking into consideration the existing kitchen extension, it is considered this would not have an unacceptable detrimental affect by way of overbearing or loss of light. In light of the above, it is considered the proposal would comply with Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
1484/9
15 2011
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) The plans relevant to this permission are: Drg No. 101 P 2011 01 Rev A, Extra B, Extra A. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
106A HIGH STREET BRENTWOOD CHANGE OF USE FROM A1 TO A3/A4/A5 AND ALTERED REAR BIN ENCLOSURE. BRW/130/2011 Ward: BRENTWOOD SOUTH Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential/Office/Shopping Policies: C14 CP1 TC7 8/13 Week Date: 27th April 2011
This application is for a change of use from A1(Retail) to A3/A4 and A5. The small second floor would be used as ancillary staff accommodation. Opening hours for the proposed use would be Monday to Sunday 07:30 to 02:00.
2. Relevant History
None directly relevant to the application site, but it is worth noting that the adjacent unit at 106 High Street was granted planning permission for a change of use from A2 to A5 in January 2011.
1484/10 2011
15

Highways: No comment at time of report Environmental health: No objection subject to suitable conditions
None
The application site is a unit located at the southern end of Brentwood High Street within a conservation area. The unit is currently vacant, but has a lawful A1 retail use. Policy TC7 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan aims to ensure a wide range of shopping opportunities within the town centre, dispersal of non retail uses and integration of nonretail uses, in order to protect the vitality of the town centre and the viability of retail uses. In order to achieve this, policy TC7 restricts the number of nonretail uses permitted within the different blocks to no more than 40% and the number of nonretail uses in a row to no more than two adjacent nonretail uses. The change of use to 106A High Street would result in more than two adjacent nonretail uses, as the unit at 106 High Street was granted planning permission for A5 use while the unit at 108 High Street is trading as a lawful A3/A5 use. In addition it is noted that the established situation is that 46% of the properties within the block 56 to 114 High Street are non-retail and an additional no-retail unit as proposed would increase this percentage. For the above reasons it is considered that the proposed change of use would be contrary to Policy TC7. In support of the application the applicants have indicated in their design and access statement that this double unit has been vacant for over two years and is located in a part of the High Street associated with non-retail which reduces the prospect of a retailer occupying the unit. It is further suggested that a vacant unit of this size unacceptably detracts from the character and appearance of the streetscene and the Conservation Area. Comment: Whilst this double unit is located within the Brentwood Town Centre it falls outside of the area identified as Prime Shopping Frontage which lies further to the North. This part of High Street has a relatively high proportion of non A1 retail uses and performs an important function as part of the leisure offer within the town centre. It is considered that the size of the unit would result in it being less attractive for small retail uses and whilst the proposed use would not result in A1 floorspace it would boost the number of people visiting this part of the High Street.
1484/11 2011
15
Overall the town centre remains reasonably buoyant in the current difficult trading conditions. However this vacant unit detracts from this part of the High Street and whilst the proposal would be contrary to Policy TC7 it is considered that the active use of these premises would enhance the commercial character of the area and contribute to the vitality and viability of the town centre as a whole. Neighbouring amenity The proposed A3/A4 and A5 use is generally associated with late night activity as well as noise and disturbance from clientele, deliveries and refuse disposal. There are flats to the rear of the application site and any application for change of use should consider the amenity of the occupiers of the flats. In this regard it is considered that the general activity generated by the proposed use would be concentrated in the High Street while the proposed opening hours would be similar to those hours of similar use in the immediate vicinity. The opening hours of the premises will be controlled through the licensing process. In addition the submitted plans indicate that a new refuse area would be constructed with internal access from the main building hereby reducing general activity to the rear of the site. For the above reasons it is considered that the proposed change of use would not result in an unacceptable level of noise and disturbance and would not detract from the amenities of the occupiers of the flats. Conclusion Whilst the proposed change of use would be contrary to Policy TC7 it is considered that the matters raised by the applicants are of sufficient weight to overcome the policy objection to the proposal whilst resulting in a development that would be likely to maintain the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and be compliant with the general aims and objectives of the Local Plan. In addition the proposed change of use would not detract from the amenities of the occupiers of the flats to the rear of the application site compliant with Policy CP1.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The rating level of the noise emitted from the extractor ventilation unit shall be lower than the background level by at least 5dB when measured from the nearest residential property. The measurements and assessment shall be made according to BS4142:1990. (Reason: To ensure that disturbance by way of excessive noise does not occur, in the interest of the amenities of nearby occupiers.)
1484/12 2011
15
3) Notwithstanding the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 or the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any subsequent re-enacting Acts or Orders) no floodlighting or any other form of external lighting shall be provided on the site. (Reason: To safeguard the living conditions of nearby residents and to safeguard the character and appearance of the area ) 4) The use hereby permitted shall not commence until the facilities to be provided for the storage of refuse have been provided in accordance with the details shown on the approved drawings. Thereafter the use shall not be shall not continue unless those facilities are retained. (Reason: To ensure that adequate provision is made in order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.) 5) Prior to the commencement of the use hereby permitted, a grease trap shall be installed to the foul drainage system in accordance with details to be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority and shall thereafter be permanently retained in the agreed form and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. (Reason: In the interests of amenity and public health.) 6) Unless formally permitted by the local planning authority the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawings numbered 11-011/01 and 11-011/02 and specifications. (Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would not accord with Policy TC7 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan; however having had regard to all material considerations it is considered that the benefit arising from the proposed change of use would outweigh the Policy harm identified. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/13 2011
15
92 BILLERICAY ROAD HERONGATE BRENTWOOD DEMOLITION OF EXISTING HOUSE AND GARAGE AND ERECTION OF SINGLE STOREY DWELLING AND ASSOCIATED GARAGE. BRW/133/2011 Ward: HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON Zoning: Metropolitan Green Belt
Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals

Policies: CP1 GB1 GB2 GB6 8/13 Week Date: 27th April 2011
Demolition of existing house and garage. Erection of single storey dwelling and associated garage and carport linked to the dwelling.
2. Relevant History

BRE/13/72 - Extension and alterations. Refused. BRE/196/72 - Extensions and alterations. Refused. S192/BRW/104/2010 - Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed use: Single storey side and rear extensions. Approved 14/01/11.
Highways: would not wish to raise an objection to this application given the existing dwelling and its accesses and the area to be available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council adopted parking standards, for the proposed dwelling. Herongate and Ingrave Parish Council: No objection.
None.
The application lies within a large site within the Metropolitan Green Belt and as such PPG2 and Local Plan Policies GB1, GB2, and GB6 are relevant.
1484/14 2011
15
This proposal is for the demolition of a bungalow and the erection of a new single storey dwellinghouse. The proposed dwelling would be approximately 1.6m higher than the existing dwelling and would not be situated any closer to the highway. Planning Policy Guidance note 2 states that the replacement of existing dwellings need not be inappropriate, provided the new dwelling is not materially larger than the dwelling it replaces. The new dwelling would be higher, wider and more bulky than the existing and would result in an approximate doubling of the habitable floorspace. As the proposed dwelling would be materially larger than the existing dwelling it replaces it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, contrary to Policy GB6 and PPG2. Local Plan Policy GB2 states that when considering proposals for development within the Green Belt, the Local Planning Authority will need to be satisfied that they do not harm the openness of the Green Belt. The width of the dwelling would be much greater than the existing dwelling and the dwelling would be higher. This would detract from the openness of the countryside as the overall visual mass would be greater than that of the original dwelling, contrary to Policy GB2. The proposal would also conflict with policy CP1. A certificate of lawful use was submitted and approved for rear and side extensions, showing approximately 72.5sq.m of additional floorspace could be created without the need for planning permission. The applicant indicates that this matter should be taken into account in the determination of this application and argues that the "permitted development" additions would be unattractive and thermally inefficient. Whilst these comments are noted it is considered that the proposal would have a significantly greater effect on the green belt countryside and that the potential for "PD" extensions to the existing dwelling does not clearly outweigh the harm due to inappropriateness and the other harm identified. It is therefore considered that the "very special circumstances" needed to justify inappropriate development in the green belt do not exist.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) Policy GB1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan as well as PPG2 provides that planning permission will not be given, except in very special circumstances, for the construction of new buildings other than for those uses appropriate to the Green Belt. The proposed replacement dwelling would be materially larger than the original dwelling and are as such would represent inappropriate development. The proposal would therefore conflict with Policy GB1 of the Local Plan as well as with PPG2. 2) The proposal would detract from the openness of the Metropolitan Green Belt and would be harmful to the character and appearance of the countryside and would conflict with policies GB2, GB5, GB6 and CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
1484/15 2011
15
3) No very special circumstances have been advanced that are of sufficient weight to clearly outweigh the harm due to inappropriateness and the other harm arising from the proposal contrary to PPG2. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal
LAND REAR OF 4 LODGE CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD CONTINUATION OF USE OF LAND AS RESIDENTIAL GARDEN. BRW/137/2011 Ward: HUTTON EAST Zoning: Residential Metropolitan Green Belt Policies: CP1 GB1 GB8 8/13 Week Date: 28th April 2011
Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals

This is a retrospective application for the retention of the 700sq.m piece of land to the rear of 4 Lodge Close as a domestic garden. No part of the 700sq.m piece of land at any time formed part of the residential curtilage of the property. All of the land lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt.
2. Relevant History
ENF/BRW/232/2003 - Use of the land has changed to domestic garden.
None
One letter of objection has been received and the matters raised can be summarised as follows: 1) Continued use of the land would detract from the character and appearance of the Green Belt in this location. 2) Use of the land as garden area is against planning policy. 3) If permission was granted it would set a precedent.
15 2011
1484/16

The site lies within the country side and also forms part of the Metropolitan Green Belt and as such PPG2 and Local Plan Policies GB1 and GB8 are relevant. Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate within the Green Belt National policy on Green Belts is set out in PPG2. Paragraph 1.5 of PPG2 indicates that one of the purposes of including land in the Green Belts is to assist in the safeguarding of the countryside from encroachment. PPG2 indicates that there is a presumption against inappropriate development in Green Belts and that very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development will not exist unless the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations. PPG2 indicates that unless they maintain openness and do not conflict with the purposes of including land in the Green Belt material changes of use of land are inappropriate. Paragraph 7.35 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan 2005 states that the extension of domestic curtilages into the Green Belt leads to further urbanisation through the construction of hard standings, walls, sheds, etc as well as increased general activity and a change from rural to suburban character which are contrary to the aims of the Green Belt. Policy GB8 (Extensions to Gardens) states: Applications to allow extensions of a domestic curtilage into the Green Belt will not be allowed. It is considered that in this instance a material change of use has occurred. That change, from agricultural land to an extended domestic curtilage represents an encroachment of the residential character of the gardens into the countryside which conflicts with one of the reasons for including land in Green Belts. For that reason the development that has occurred is inappropriate as defined by PPG2 and is also directly in conflict with Policy GB8. PPG2 indicates that inappropriate development should not be permitted in Green Belts unless the harm due to inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other matters. The applicants have submitted a planning statement through their agent in which the following matters in support of the application are raised: The land was sold by the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance. Council failed to take action in terms of breaches that occurred between 2003 and 2005. Property with land to the rear was bought by Mr. Bozza in 2006. No structures have been erected on the land, while no other form of landscaping treatment has taken place. The current situation has continued unchallenged for 9 years
1484/17 2011
15
Comments The enforcement history for this site shows that officers have met the current owners as well as previous owners of the land at various times between 2003 and 2010 and in addition have been in correspondence with them. This correspondence appears to indicate that there may have been a breach of planning control and suggests that planning permission would be required to regularise the current situation. No other matters have been raised by the owners of the land that outweigh the harm identified. Very special circumstances do not exist and there would be no justification for the granting of planning permission. Conclusion: On the basis of the information in the officers report it is considered that the continued use of the land would represent encroachment of the residential character of the garden into the countryside and would for this reason fail to comply with PPG2 and Local Plan Policy GB8.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The site lies outside the areas allocated for development in the Adopted Brentwood Local Plan and, furthermore, forms part of the Metropolitan Green Belt. The Adopted Replacement Brentwood Local Plan indicates, interalia, that in order to achieve the objectives of the Green Belt, planning permission will not be given, except in very special circumstances, for development for purposes other than those appropriate to a Green Belt. The continued use of the land would result in the extension of the domestic curtilage which represents encroachment of the residential character of the gardens into the countryside which conflicts with one of the reasons for including land in Green Belts. For this reason the development represents inappropriate development as defined by PPG2 and there are no very special circumstances in this case to warrant a departure from Policy GB8 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal
1484/18 2011
15
7 CLOCK TOWER THE GALLERIES WARLEY BRENTWOOD CHANGE OF USE FROM OFFICE TO RESIDENTIAL BRW/138/2011 Ward: WARLEY Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Major Housing Site Policies: C15 CP1 8/13 Week Date: 28th April 2011
The application seeks planning permission for the conversion of the existing ground floor office area into a study, shower room and incorporating these into the current residential unit at this Grade II Listed Building.
2. Relevant History
Whilst the greater Warley Hospital site has an extensive planning history there is no planning history directly relevant to this particular application site. LB/BRW/4/2011: Internal alterations to allow existing ground floor office to be converted to a study, shower room and to be incorporated into the residential unit - Recommended for approval elsewhere on this list
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application given the scale of the proposal, the location, the existence of the office and Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards Essex County Council Historic Planner: Has no objection to this application
None

The Clock Tower forms part of the greater Warley Hospital development which is a Grade II Listed Building. The works that are proposed would serve to convert the exiting ground floor office area to a study and a shower room and to incorporate it into the existing residential unit.
1484/19 2011
15
Having regard to the comments from the Historic Buildings Advisor in combination with the fact that the works would all be internal it is considered that the proposed works would not detract from the character and appearance of the Listed Building and would be compliant with Policy C15 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. For the reasons set out above it is considered that the proposed works would comply with Policy CP1 and C15 of the Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission (Reason: To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.) 2) Unless formally permitted by the local planning authority the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawing numbered 62811.01 and specifications. (Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/20 2011
15
7 CLOCK TOWER THE GALLERIES WARLEY BRENTWOOD INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO FACILITATE CHANGE OF USE FROM OFFICE TO RESIDENTIAL LB/BRW/4/2011 Ward: WARLEY Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Major Housing Site Policies: C15 8/13 Week Date: 28th April 2011
The application seeks listed building consent for the conversion of the existing ground floor office area into a study, shower room and incorporating these into the current residential unit at this Grade II Listed Building.
2. Relevant History
Whilst the greater Warley Hospital site has an extensive planning history there is no planning history directly relevant to this particular application site. BRW/138/2011: Change of use from office to residential - Recommended for approval elsewhere on this list
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application given the scale of the proposal, the location, the existence of the office and Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards Essex County Council Historic Planner: Has no objection to this application
None

The Clock Tower forms part of the greater Warley Hospital development which is a Grade II Listed Building. The works that are proposed would serve to convert the exiting ground floor office area to a study and a shower room and to incorporate it into the existing residential unit.
1484/21 2011
15
Having regard to the comments from the Historic Buildings Advisor in combination with the fact that the works would all be internal it is considered that the proposed works would not detract from the character and appearance of the Listed Building and would be compliant with Policy C15 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) The works hereby granted consent shall be begun on or before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission (Reason: To comply with Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 ) 2) The works hereby granted consent shall (unless any other condition attached to this consent requires otherwise) be carried out, and thereafter permanently be retained in strict accordance with the description of works and with the details indicated on the plans returned herewith, without any amendments, additions or variations whatsoever. (Reason: In the interests of the character and integrity of this listed building.) 3) The materials to be used during the internal conversion of the building hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interest of the character and integrity of the listed building.) 4) Unless formally permitted by the local planning authority the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawing(s) numbered 62811.01 and specifications. (Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/22 2011
15
1 CHELMER DRIVE HUTTON BRENTWOOD ERECTION OF TWO NEW DWELLINGS BRW/139/2011 Ward: HUTTON EAST Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 H14 T2 8/13 Week Date: 29th April 2011
Erection of a pair of terraced 2 bedroom properties attached to existing terraced property, each with a single parking space access from Chelmer Drive. 1 Property measuring 4.3m wide x 10.2m deep x 7.2m high (max dimensions) and the second property 4.3m wide x 9.4m deep x 7.2m high (max dimensions). The extensions are to be finished with a hipped roof and would in addition result in the creation of a double gable to the rear of the property. Erection of front extension to existing dwelling to form new front door measuring 4.25m wide x 1m deep x 3.1m high with mono pitch roof. The application is accompanied by a Design and Access Statement which comments: o the area of the proposed site for the new dwellings is 400sqm. o the private amenity spaces will be 75sq.m and 100sq.m respectively, 1 Chelmer Drive would retain 95sq.m of private amenity space. o The aspect of 1 Chelmer Drive would be revised to face Fairview Avenue. o The design reflects the style and scale of the adjacent existing house being in a neo-Georgian style.
2. Relevant History

BRW/431/2003 - Retention of two metre high fence at the side. Approved. BRW/204/2008 Erection of 2 No. two bedroom terraced dwellings attached to existing dwelling and front extension to existing dwelling Refused and dismissed at appeal
1484/23 2011
15
Highways: The Highway Authority would wish to raise an objection to the above application for the following reasons: - The proposed number of parking spaces within the site would not comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards, for the proposed and existing dwellings. This proposal would therefore be contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy DM8 of Essex County Councils Development Management Policies. - The width of the parking spaces shown on the drawing submitted with the application would not comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards. This proposal would therefore be contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy DM8 of Essex County Councils Development Management Policies. - The lack of inter-visibility between pedestrians in the highway and users of the proposed southern parking space would constitute a danger within the highway, in particular to children on the footway. This proposal would therefore be contrary to highway/pedestrian safety.
One letter of objection was received and the matters raised can be summarised as follows: 1. Loss of privacy due to rear facing windows 2. Access to the rear of the proposed development raises security concerns as pedestrians would have access to the side of the property at No. 3 Chelmer Drive 3. Overdevelopment of the site would detract from the character of the street scene. 4. Lack of parking provision A separate matter in relation to covenants was raised, but as this is not a material planning consideration.
Principle of development Policy H14 of the Local Plan indicates that residential densities will be expected to be no less than 30 dwellings per hectare net unless the special character of the surrounding area determines that such densities would be inappropriate. The proposed development has a density of 50 dwellings per hectare which is consistent with the provisions of Policy H14 and for this reason it is considered that the principle of developing two properties on this site is acceptable. Character and appearance The area is characterised by blocks of terrace properties on Fairview Avenue, and on the western side of Chelmer Drive at the junction with Fairview Avenue. In addition there are semi-detached houses adjacent to the application site.
15 2011
1484/24
The proposed development would result in the creation of two dwellings, attached to the side of No 1 Chelmer Drive, which is an end-terraced house, situated on the north side of Fairview Avenue on the junction with Chelmer Drive. The terraced design of the proposed dwellings is in keeping with the character of the surrounding development in the locality. In addition to the terraced character and the open nature of the junctions the corner houses at the junctions in the immediate vicinity are turned at 90 degrees from the rest to form bookends to the terraces. This characteristic finish to the row of terraces would be lost as a result of the new dwellings being stepped back as well as the two storey rearward projection that has been introduced. The existing front elevation of the terraced block is defied by the evenly spaced door openings and porch areas to each residential unit. The new dwelling immediately adjacent to No.1 would have its entrance facing Fairview Avenue in close proximity to the entrance to No.1 whilst the second dwelling would have its main access facing Chelmer Drive. As a result of these works the even spacing between the residential units would be lost further detracting from the character of the terraced block detrimental to the visual amenity of the street scene contrary to policy CP1. To the rear the proposed dwellings have each been finished with a pitched roof rear extension to match that of No 1. It is however considered that this roof design would result in three gabled features to the rear which unbalances the terrace when viewed from the north. The existing dwelling is a corner plot and its front elevation currently faces Chelmer Drive and is set about 11 metres from the edge of the footpath. The proposed dwellings would extend to approximately 2 metres from the edge of the footpath and it is considered that this would result in the closing down of the junction detracting from the character and appearance of the area. On the basis of the above it is considered that the proposed dwellings would appear cramped on the site harmful to the character and appearance of the immediate area contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy CP1 of the Local Plan. This view was shared by the Inspector when he dismissed the appeal in October 2008. Neighbouring Amenity The proposed rear elevations of the new dwellings would be set 15.8m from the boundary with the neighbouring property on Chelmer Drive. It is considered that this distance would be sufficient to not allow unacceptable levels of overlooking from first floor windows in this urban area. A pathway separates the rear garden areas of the proposed development from the property immediately to the rear of the application site. This pathway gives access from the parking area on Chelmer Drive to the rear gardens while in addition allowing the bins to be moved from the rear garden to the highway verge. It is considered that the uncontrolled use of this pathway at all times would be likely to result in unacceptable noise and disturbance in close proximity to the immediate neighbour detracting from their amenity contrary to Policy CP1.
1484/25 2011
15
Amenity Space Appendix 5 of the Local Plan indicates that 2 bedroom properties should provide for 75sq.m of amenity space. The proposed development satisfies this requirement. Highways The proposed works would result in the creation of 2 No. two bedroom properties which would require two parking spaces per dwelling. In addition two parking spaces would be required for the retained property at No.1 Chelmer Drive. For the proposed development to comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards, 6 spaces would be required. The submitted plans indicate that 3 spaces would be provided on a new parking area with access from Chelmer Drive. Whilst the applicants indicate that the area is served by public transport and that local amenities are within walking distance it is considered that a shortfall of 3 spaces would result in a substandard parking provision contrary to the aims and objectives of Local Plan Policies. In addition the Highways Officer indicates that the proposed spaces would fail to comply with the size requirements as set out in the adopted standards and it is considered that insufficient space is available to allow for the provision of parking spaces that would comply with the required standards. On the basis of the above the proposed development would result in a development with a substandard parking provision which is likely to give rise to on-street parking detrimental to highway and pedestrian safety. Conclusion Having regard to the matters raised in this report it is considered that the proposal would result in a development that would appear cramped on its site and would detract from the character and appearance of the area detrimental to the appearance of the street scene in the immediate vicinity of the application site contrary to Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
It is further also considered that the proposed works would result in a development that development with a substandard parking provision which is likely to give rise to on-street parking detrimental to highway and pedestrian safety contrary to Policy T2 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
1484/26 2011
15
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The proposal would result in a development that would appear cramped on its site and would not reflect or enhance the character and appearance of the area around Chelmer Drive and Fairview Avenue and would for this reason be detrimental to the visual amenity and character of the area and would, therefore conflict with policy CP1 of the adopted Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. 2) The proposed works would result in a development that development with a substandard parking provision which is likely to give rise to on-street parking detrimental to highway and pedestrian safety contrary to Policy T2 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal
FARRIERS THE ALLEY BLACKMORE INGATESTONE BRENTWOOD TWO STOREY AND FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION BRW/141/2011 Ward: Parish: TIPPS CROSS Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green Parish Council Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Policies:
Residential C14 CP1
8/13 Week Date: 28th April 2011
This application is for an extension over the existing garage and a two storey extension in front of the garage.
2. Relevant History

BRW/725/2001: Erection of attached double garage and single storey extension at the front - Approved. BRW/1083/2001: Amendment to planning permission BRW/725/2001 - Approved.
1484/27 2011
15
BRW/65/2003: Single storey side extension and erection of detached garage Refused. The development by reason of mass, scale, siting and design would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the conservation area. BRW/451/2003: Single storey side extension and erection of detached garage Refused. The development by reason of mass, scale, siting and design would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the conservation area.
Historic buildings advisor: I am not opposed in principle to the design of the proposed extension apart from the problem that the existing garage block ends up jutting out from the side of the building, which is visually confusing. Therefore, I am unable to recommend approval because the proposal will be detrimental to the character of the conservation area. Historic environment officer: The proposed development lies within the historic core of Blackmore and little archaeological fieldwork has been undertaken in Blackmore until recently which uncovered medieval activity dating to the 13th Century. As such a condition should be imposed regarding the implementation of a programme of archaeological work and an associated informative. Highways: No objection. Blackmore, Hook End and Wyatts Green Parish Council: Due to the property's close proximity to Blacksmiths Alley the new gable end will appear very dominant and overbearing from the Alley.
None.
The application property is a detached dwelling located within the Blackmore conservation area. The property is located on a corner plot, the house is situated to the rear of the plot with the main garden areas to the side. This part of the conservation area comprises houses of mixed design, period and size. A number of the dwellings in the area are of little architectural merit and make a limited contribution to the character and appearance of the conservation area. The proposed extension would result in a gable projection that would be approximately 3m from the edge of Blacksmiths Alley. Although the road is narrow it is considered that, by reason of the open character of the plot and the location of the dwelling it would not have a detrimental affect on the character and appearance of the street scene. The historic buildings advisor has commented on the poor design as a result of the garage projection. However, it is considered that side elevation at ground floor level would appear similar to existing and as such would preserve the character of the conservation area; therefore notwithstanding the comments of the historic buildings advisor it is considered that a refusal on this basis would not be justified.
15 2011
1484/28
Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policies CP1 and C14 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) No development or preliminary groundworks of any kind shall take place until the applicant has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological work in accordance with a written scheme of investigation that has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: To investigate whether there is archeologically important material on site.) 3) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos. 001A and 002A. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) The Historic Environment Officer advices that the archaeological work should be carried out by a team of professional archaeologists. An archaeological briefing outlining the level of investigation will be issued from Essex County Council on request.
1484/29 2011
15
19 SUNRAY AVENUE HUTTON BRENTWOOD TWO STOREY SIDE AND REAR EXTENSION, LOFT CONVERSION INCORPORATING FRONT AND REAR DORMER WINDOWS AND PITCHED ROOF OVER ENTRANCE AND BAY WINDOWS BRW/144/2011 Ward: HUTTON EAST Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 H17 H7 8/13 Week Date: 27th April 2011
Two storey side extension with a half hipped roof and increasing the roof by 0.30m; Loft conversion incorporating a front and rear dormer window with pitched roofs; Rear extension; New pitched roof over bay windows. Painted render finish to proposed extension.
2. Relevant History
None relevant.
Highways - The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to this application as the area available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council adopted planning standards, for the proposed extended dwelling.
None.
This application relates to one of the smallest detached bungalows in the street which does not have accommodation in the roofspace. The street comprises two storey dwellings and chalet bungalows some of which have had extensions to the roof.
1484/30 2011
15
This application proposes to raise the roof of the bungalow to a half hipped roof on one side of the property and erect a front and rear dormer window with pitched roofs. The proposal is similar to the roof extension at no.14 Sunray Avenue. As the existing roof would have the head height to convert the loft without the need for planning permission, policy H7 would not apply. The dormer windows would be subsidiary features of the roof and would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, complying with policy H17. The two storey proposed development would be set off the boundary adjoining no. 23 by 1 metre. It is considered the proposal would not have an unacceptable affect by way of being overbearing, loss of light or overlooking on the occupiers of no. 23. The proposed rear extension would be set approximately 2.7m from the boundary adjoining no.17 and approximately 3m past their rear wall. No. 23 has an adjoining garage building along the boundary and the proposed extension would not be as deep as this. It is considered the rear extension would not have an unacceptable detrimental affect on the occupiers of either adjoining properties and is considered to comply with policy CP1. In light of the above, it is considered the proposal would comply with Local Plan Policies CP1 and H17 and is recommended for approval.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) The plans relevant to this permission are: Dwg. No. 5772-01, 5772-02, 577203 and 5772-04. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/31 2011
15
40 KING GEORGES ROAD PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD PROPOSED NEW END TERRACE DWELLING ADJACENT TO 40 KING GEORGES ROAD BRW/148/2011 Ward: PILGRIMS HATCH Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 T2 8/13 Week Date: 27th April 2011
The proposed development would result in a two storey side and single storey rear extension to the side of No. 40 King Georges Road. These extensions would facilitate the creation of a new attached 3 bedroom dwelling. The extensions would have the following maximum dimensions: 6m in width, 10.15m in depth at ground floor and 7m at first floor and will be finished with a ridge height of 8.4m similar to that of No. 40. The proposed development would have a garden area of 148sq.m which leaves the donor property with 221sq.m of garden. Both the proposed dwelling and the donor property would have two parking spaces
2. Relevant History
BRW/7/2011 Erection of a detached two storey three bedroom dwelling Withdrawn
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application, subject to suitable conditions being attached to any approval, given that the existing layout and the area available for parking within the site will comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards, for the proposed dwelling.
1484/32 2011
15
4. Neighbour Responses Three letters of objection and a petition signed by 10 residents have been received. The matters raised in the letters were also duplicated in the petition and these can be summarized as follows: - Congestion due to lack of parking Change the character and appearance of the area Loss of habitat for Great Crested Newts. Proposal would be harmful to the character of the street scene Overdevelopment of the site contrary to PPS3 Loss of light and privacy to and the development being overbearing on the outside dining area of No. 38 Loss of privacy to rear garden space, including the patio, the barbeque area and conservatory at No. 38 as a result of direct overlooking from the side facing windows proposed. Increased pressure on storm water drainage Proximity to electricity substation Loss of wildlife to the area The matter of loss to property value was also raised, but this is not a material planning consideration.
5. Summary of Issues The application site forms part of the residential curtilage of No. 40 King Georges Road and will result in an attached dwelling being constructed on the area of hardstanding currently occupied by a detached garage and a flat roofed single storey side extension. Character and appearance: The area in the immediate vicinity of the application site is characterised by semidetached and terraced properties. Some of these properties have been extended through the addition of two storey side extensions. In addition the application site is located in a prominent location opposite the junction of Osborne and King Georges Roads. The submitted plans indicate that the proposed dwelling would be of a similar width to No. 40 while it would be finished with a hipped roof similar to that of the existing pair. The proposed works would be separated from the nearest neighbour at No. 38 by a substation thereby maintaining an open aspect when approaching from Osborne Road. The proposed parking arrangements to the front of the proposed development as well as No. 40 would result in most of this area being covered in hardstanding. Whilst this would result in a parking dominated frontage it is noted that properties in the immediate vicinity have had similar works done to accommodate the parking of vehicles and for this reason the parking to the front of the application site would maintain the character and appearance of the street scene.
1484/33 2011
15
For the above reasons it is considered that the proposed scheme due to its scale, bulk and design would not unbalance the existing properties and would not detract from the character and appearance of the immediate area or the street scene in general. Neighbouring amenity: The proposed development would result in a single storey rear extension which would extend 3m beyond the rear elevation of the attached neighbour at No. 40 and would be finished with a sloping roof. It is considered that this extension given its overall depth and height would not detract from the amenities of the attached neighbours. Any deeper extensions in close proximity to the boundary could however result in a loss of amenity through being overbearing and for this reason it is considered that a condition removing permitted development rights for extensions should be included in any approval. A letter of objection has been received form the occupiers of No. 38 King Georges Road raising concerns about loss of light, loss of privacy and the development being overbearing in relation to an undercover dinning area. In addition there is concern that there would be a loss of privacy to the patio area, the barbeque area, the private rear garden and conservatory due to direct overlooking from side facing windows in the proposed development. With regard to these matters, the proposed dwelling would be separated from the undercover dining area of No. 38 by the electricity substation. It is considered that this separation distance allows sufficient room between the proposed dwelling and No. 38 to ensure that this neighbour would not experience any harmful loss of amenity due to a loss of light or the development being overbearing. A further matter relating to a loss of privacy is also raised. The submitted plans indicate that two sets of windows would be included in the side elevation facing No. 38 one of these would be at ground floor with the second at first floor serving the stairwell. Views from the ground floor window would be screened by a 1.8m high fence which would be required by condition between the proposed development and the adjoining neighbours at No. 38. The first floor window serving the stairwell would due to the alignment of the properties allow oblique views across to the rear garden, patio area and barbeque area of No. 38. For this reason it is considered that a suitably worded condition to obscure glaze this stairwell window should be included to any approval to prevent overlooking of these rear amenity areas. On the basis of the above it is considered that the proposed development would comply with the requirements of Policy CP1 (ii). Amenity space: The submitted plans indicate that the proposed dwelling would have an amenity area of 148sq.m while the donor property would maintain 221sq.m of amenity area which complies with the requirements as set out in Appendix 5 of The Local Plan.
1484/34 2011
15
Protected Species: In the letters of objection as well as in the petition that was received mention is made of the presence of Great Crested Newts on the application site and that the proposed development would result in the loss of habitat for Great Crested Newts. Natural England indicate that for minor developments (as is the case here) it should be established whether there is suitable Newt habitat within 100m of the application site. If suitable habitat does exist then a survey would be required to establish the extent of the population. A site visit was conducted at the application site and no pond or any other suitable habitat was found. In addition local enquiries were made and no evidence was found to suggest that there are likely to be Great Crested Newts in the immediate area of the application site. Highways: It is indicated that both the application site and the donor property would have two parking spaces available. Whilst the spaces as shown on the submitted plans fail to comply with the dimensions for parking bays as set out in Brentwood Borough Councils adopted standards it is considered that there is sufficient space to provide parking bays which would comply and these can be secured by a suitably worded condition to any approval. These spaces would then provide sufficient off street parking compliant with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards. This view is supported by comments from the Highways Officer. On the basis of the above it is considered that the proposed development would comply with Policy T2 of The Local Plan. Conclusion: It is consider that the proposed development of an attached end terrace dwelling would comply with the aims and objectives of the relevant Brentwood Replacement Local Plan Policies and approval is recommended on this basis.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) Notwithstanding the details on the approved plans, the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the new dwelling hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing semidetached pair unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority. (Reason: In the interests of the character and appearance of the terrace as well as the immediate area.)
1484/35 2011
15
3) Prior to the commencement of the development, revised details of the replacement access and parking area for No. 40 King Georges Road shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Prior to the construction of the proposed dwelling the access and parking area shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details. (Reason: To ensure that on street parking of vehicles in the adjoining streets does not occur in the interests of highway safety and that appropriate parking is provided in accordance with Policy DM8 of Essex County Councils Development Management policies.) 4) Prior to construction of the access to the proposed dwelling the existing street lighting column in the area of the proposed access shall be relocated. (Reason: To ensure the access is not obstructed and the existing street lighting column is not damaged in the interest of highway safety.) 5) The stairwell window shall be:- a) glazed using obscured glass to a minimum of level 3 of the Pilkington scale of obscuration and b) non-opening below a height of 1.7m above the highest point of the treads of the immediately adjacent staircase. And that window shall remain so glazed and nonopenable. (Note the application of translucent film to clear glazed windows does not satisfy the requirements of this condition). (Reason: Reason - In order to prevent an unacceptable degree of overlooking of nearby residential properties.) 6) Details of the facilities to be provided for the storage of bicycles shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority prior to the commencement of the development. The approved facilities shall be provided in accordance with the those details prior to the first use of any of the accommodation hereby permitted and thereafter the accommodation shall not be occupied unless those facilities are retained. (Reason: To ensure that adequate provision is made in order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.) 7) Details of the surfacing materials of driveways and parking areas shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved and construction shall be in strict accordance with those approved details. (Reason: In order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.) 8) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking, re-enacting or modifying that Order), the dwelling hereby permitted shall not be extended or enlarged in any way without the prior grant of specific planning permission by the local planning authority. (Reason: To safeguard the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings.)
1484/36 2011
15
9) Aside from those indicated on the approved drawings, and notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking, re-enacting or modifying that Order), no windows, dormer windows, glazed doors or rooflights shall be constructed without the prior grant of specific planning permission by the local planning authority. (Reason: To safeguard the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings.) 10) Prior to the commencement of the development details of a screen wall or fence of not less than 1.8 metres in height to be erected on the boundaries with No's 38 and 40 King Georges Road shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall not be occupied until the wall or fence has been erected in accordance with the approved details and the wall or fence shall thereafter be permanently retained and maintained. (Reason: To safeguard the living conditions of adjacent occupiers.) 11) Unless formally permitted by the local planning authority the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawing numbered C10164/02 Rev A and specifications. (Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. The Council has had regard to the concerns raised by nearby residents but is considered that any harm to living conditions that may result from the proposal would not be sufficient to justify the refusal of permission. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/37 2011
15
46B CROSSWAYS SHENFIELD BRENTWOOD CHANGE OF USE FROM B1 TO D2 (FOR USE AS A PERSONAL TRAINING STUDIO) BRW/150/2011 Ward: SHENFIELD Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Shops/Offices Policies: CP1 E2 8/13 Week Date: 29th April 2011
Change of use from Class B1 (Offices) to Class D2 (Assembly and Leisure) for a private gymnasium. The applicant has submitted a short statement stating interalia: - No external changes are proposed to the existing building. There might be a need in future to include external air-conditioning units. In addition signage would be required on the outside of the building. - The building would provide and exclusive personal training studio used by the applicant as well as 2 or 3 other personal trainers. - The proposed hours are Monday to Thursday 06:00 22:00, Friday 06:00 20:00 and Saturday and Sunday 08:00 17:00 (It should be noted that Drg's no. 02 and 04 submitted as part of this application, showing the North Elevation, is inaccurate as this elevation only has the small bathroom windows shown on the floor plans and does not have the large windows shown).
2. Relevant History
BRW/108/2007 Partial demolition of ground floor offices to form 2no. parking spaces, construction of first floor offices above, changes to fenestration Withdrawn
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application given the previous use of the site, the location, guidance in PPG 13 and the Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards.
1484/38 2011
15
Environmental Health: This department has concerns regarding potential noise disturbance to the adjoining business as well as the adjacent residential premises. Although the applicant states he intends to have background music only, once the premises has changed to this D2 Class use, the occupier can change to noisy activities from amplified sound like a concert hall, dance hall, aerobics studio etc. Amplified sound could carry through the building structure (ceiling etc.) causing disturbance to the front commercial premises or could escape through the roof, doors, windows etc. causing disturbance to the neighbouring residential property. As such, this Service would recommend that a report is submitted to this Service demonstrating that noise from this Class use can be controlled so as not to cause disturbance to neighbouring properties, bearing in mind the opening hours applied for. In addition, details of all plant and machinery associated with the proposed buildings within the development (especially all air handling equipment) to be agreed with the Council to ensure noise levels do not adversely affect local residents.
Three letters of objection have been received. The matters raised can be summarised as follows: - Public would now have access to the site - Lack of parking - Use of load music with early and late opening times - Alterations to the outside of the building in the form of signage would detract from the character and appearance of the area.
The site is situated on the edge of the Shenfield shopping centre with shops and offices to the south and residential property to the north. The two storey building fronting onto Crossways has the appearance of a traditional single detached dwelling and is in character with the adjoining houses. The single storey section to the rear also has a pitched roof and a traditional appearance. It has been identified within the Local Plan for shops and or office uses. Policy E2 of the Local Plan seeks to retain office development areas. Whilst the Council has allowed similar changes of use in employment areas, these units had been vacant for an extended period of time with little prospect of attracting employment generating uses. In this instance the building is currently being used as offices and the applicant indicates that the lease is becoming available. There is no indication of any marketing exercise to enable the continued use of the premises for offices.
1484/39 2011
15
Given the location of the building in relation to Shenfield Town Centre and Shenfield Station it is considered that it forms an important source of primary employment floor space that should be retained. Small units of this nature are considered to be suitable for small starter businesses and no evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation of this unit not being retained for office use. On this basis it is considered that the proposal would lead to the loss of premises allocated for office employment purposes contrary to Policy E2 and no matters of sufficient weight have been identified to overcome the policy harm. Neighbouring amenity: Use of this unit as a personal training studio would be likely to result in music being played, whilst air-conditioning units might also be required in future. All these elements are likely to result in an increase in the general noise and disturbance associated with this location. It is however considered that, the absence of main window openings in the elevation facing the immediate neighbour, the presence of loading areas to the rear of the shops and the ability to include conditions to control noise levels from air-conditioning units, any additional noise generated by the change of use would not detract from the amenities of the neighbouring properties. Parking: The existing office building is located in close proximity to Shenfield High Street, as well as a car parking area in Hunter Avenue. For this reason it is considered that there would be sufficient parking available within walking distance of the site a view that is shared by the Highways Officer. Conclusion: In light of the above it is considered the proposal fails to comply with the provisions of policy E2 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan and no matters of sufficient weight have been identified to overcome the policy harm.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The proposed change of use would result in the loss of an office unit within an area allocated for office purposes and is therefore contrary to Policy E2 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Approval would undermine the Local Planning Authority's policy to retain office space within the area so allocated thereby diminishing the scope of accommodation for a primary employment use. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal
1484/40 2011
15
GRAYLINGS COTTAGE HORSEMAN SIDE NAVESTOCKSIDE BRENTWOOD ROOF ALTERATIONS INCORPORATING THREE FRONT DORMER WINDOWS BRW/151/2011 Ward: BRIZES AND DODDINGHURST Parish: Navestock Parish Council Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals
Zoning:
Metropolitan Green Belt
Policies: CP1 GB2 GB5 H17 8/13 Week Date: 29th April 2011
Raising the height of the roof by approximately 1.5m on the west side of the property with a half hipped roof and three new dormer windows with pitched roofs. Raising the height of the roof by approximately 1m from the front and approximately 2.2m from the existing flat roof on the east side of the property with a hipped roof.
2. Relevant History

BRW/818/99 - Erection of single storey side extension incorporating a balcony together with erection of car port at front. Approved 13/12/99. BRW/43/96 - Two storey side extension. Refused 11/03/96. BRW/278/97 - Retention of barn. Refused 2/06/97. BRW/658/06 - Erection of 2no. two storey extensions at the front together with a dormer window and open porch at the front. Refused 4/09/06. BRW/565/07 - Erection of two storey and single storey extensions at the front and incorporating a dormer window at the front. Awaiting section 106 agreement. BRW/20/08 - Two storey and single storey extensions at the front incorporating a dormer window and bay window. Approved subject to section 106 agreement. 7/01/11.
Highways - The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to this application as the area available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council adopted parking standards, for the proposed extended dwelling. Navestock Parish Council - Object on the grounds this application is making a relatively low key building into a large scale building, inappropriate development for a rural location, over development and object to extensions to the property.
15 2011
1484/41
None.

This application relates to a detached chalet style bungalow located in the Metropolitan Green Belt, which has previously been extended. The three front dormers proposed would create approximately 3.24m2 of additional habitable floorspace. The dormers would remain a subsidiary feature of the roof, be set in from any wall of the property and below the ridge height and would comply with Local Plan Policy H17. Whilst the proposal would increase the height and bulk of parts of the dwelling, it is considered that the alterations proposed would not materially reduce the openness of the Green Belt compared with the existing dwelling. It appears that some elements of the existing building may not have had the necessary permissions however this application is only for the development described above. The "table top" roof over part of the building would create the potential for additional floorspace which would be a significant breach of the policies of constraint in the green belt. It is recommended that a condition is imposed to prevent the use of that area apart from domestic storage. As there are no nearby properties adjoining Graylings Cottage or immediately opposite, the proposed works would not adversely affect any neighbours. It is considered the proposal would comply with Policy CP1, GB2, GB5 and H17.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) This permission relates only to the matters set out in the description of development . The plans relevant to this permission are: JTS/7266/01, 265216 and 2652-02. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) 4) The proposed roof area above the area described as living room, cinema and study shall not be adapted or used for any purpose other than domestic storage associated with the dwelling. (Reason: To prevent a disproportionate enlargement of the dwelling that would conflict with the policies of restraint of development in the Green Belt.)
1484/42 2011
15
5) Aside from those indicated on the approved drawings, and notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking, re-enacting or modifying that Order) no dormer windows, or rooflights shall be constructed and no change shall be made to the shape of the roofs without the prior grant of specific planning permission by the local planning authority. (Reason: To prevent the creation of additional habitable accommodation that would result in disproportionate enlargement of the dwelling that would conflict with the policies of restraint of development in the Green Belt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. The Council has had regard to the concerns raised by Navestock Parish Council but is considered that the resulting building would not have an unacceptable affect on the character and appearance of the street scene and would not justify the refusal of permission. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
8 HOLDEN GARDENS WARLEY BRENTWOOD PART TWO STOREY, PART SINGLE STOREY FRONT, SIDE AND REAR EXTENSIONS. BRW/154/2011 Ward: WARLEY Parish: Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 8/13 Week Date: 2nd May 2011
The part two storey and part single storey extension extends the full width at the rear of the property and the full depth of the North side of the property, the extension wraps round to the front of the property and includes a forward projection of 1.9m. Alterations to the front of the property also include a new bay window, new porch and new pitched roof over both these elements.
1484/43 2011
15
2. Relevant History

PD/77/66: Conservatory- Permitted Development PD/427/69: Porch- Permitted Development.
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application as the area available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council adopted parking standards for the proposed extended dwelling.
One letter of representation: o The 4m extension would significantly reduce the natural light to the rear of their property. o Does not want the side extension to extend over the boundary, including the soffits or guttering.

The part two storey and single storey 'wrap around' extension is proposed to the rear, North side and front of a detached property, in a residential area. The property is located in a cul-de-sac, which has detached houses and bungalows, all constructed at roughly the same time, although of varying designs. Some of the properties have been extended already and these alterations can be seen from the highway. The alterations to the front and side of the property would considerably change the look of the property. The new pitched roofs above the porch and new bay window would be in keeping with other extended properties in the area. The front extensions also include a new forward projection with a re-positioned garage door. The garage door is off set to one side of the new forward projection, which results in an unbalanced appearance. However, taking into account the varied designs of properties and previous extensions to neighbouring properties it is considered that the proposal would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The rear extension is to be part two storey and part single storey. The properties are staggered and 10 Holden Gardens extends deeper to the rear and 6 Holden Gardens is slightly shallower. The two storey element is proposed to be closer to the side boundary with 10 Holden Garden and would not extend any deeper than this neighbouring property. 10 Holden Gardens is a bungalow and has a side window which would face the proposed extension. This window is an obscure glazed and secondary window. It is considered that the extensions would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the general amenities of 10 Holden Gardens.
15 2011
1484/44
The other neighbouring property, 6 Holden Gardens, already has a single storey rear extension and a conservatory, but, the part of the property closest to the extension does not extend as deep to the rear as the application property. The proposed single storey rear extension would extend 4m beyond the neighbouring single storey extension and would be located 1m from the side boundary. The nearest rear door of the neighbouring property serves an open plan; lounge, kitchen and dining room, there are large glass doors to the rear of the property, as well as a conservatory to the back of the single storey extension. The side boundary between 6 and 8 Holden Gardens is well landscaped with bushes and trees, although some of these would have to be removed to construct the extensions. Due to the proximity, design and overall size of the proposed extension and taking into account the neighbours extension, it is considered that it would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the neighbouring property and it is considered that it would not give rise to an unacceptable loss of light to the rear of the neighbouring property. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal would comply with Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture to those used in the existing building, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) M10 - Retention of window pattern 4) The following plans are relevant to this permission: drawing numbers, 2511:01, 2511:02. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would comply with the development plan policies that are set out below. The Council has had regard to the concerns expressed by residents but the matters raised are not sufficient to justify the refusal of permission. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/45 2011
15
CARINTHIA WYATTS GREEN ROAD WYATTS GREEN BRENTWOOD FRONT AND REAR DORMER WINDOWS, SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION AND ALTERATION FROM GABLE TO MANSARD ROOF INCORPORATING A ROOM IN THE ROOF OF THE FRONT PROJECTION. BRW/155/2011 Ward: Parish: TIPPS CROSS Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green Parish Council Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Policies:
Residential CP1 H17 H7
8/13 Week Date: 2nd May 2011
This application is for a loft conversion, incorporating a hip to gable extension; Front and rear dormer windows; An increase in height and alteration of the shape of the existing gable projection; A single storey rear extension
2. Relevant History
None.

Highways: No objection Blackmore, Hook End and Wyatts Green Parish Council: No objection.
None.
The application property is a semi detached single storey dwelling located within a ribbon of residential development. The area comprises houses of mixed design and size, the neighbouring houses are single storey dwellings, most of which have had loft conversions and are set back from the highway. Policy H7 aims to retain single storey dwellings to meet the needs of elderly and less mobile residents. However, rooms in the roof could be created in the property without express planning permission from Brentwood Council and as such it is considered that a refusal on this basis would not be justified.
15 2011
1484/46
Nevertheless, the proposed gable extension in conjunction with the extension to the existing front projection incorporating a mansard roof would result in bulky additions to the property that would be out of character with the host dwelling. As a result of the distance of the dwelling from the highway and the open frontage, the extension would be highly visible from Wyatts Green Road and it is considered that it would appear incongruous in the street scene and have a detrimental affect on the character and appearance of the street scene. The property to the east has a conservatory at the rear with a partially glazed side elevation. Although this would be obstructed by the proposed extension it is considered that by reason of the position of the property and the depth of the extension it would not have an unacceptably detrimental affect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers by way of being overbearing or loss of light. Notwithstanding the above, it is considered that the extensions to the front of the property are disproportionate to the existing dwelling and would appear incongruous in the street scene which would have a detrimental affect on the character and appearance of the area, contrary to policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The proposed gable extension in conjunction with the extension and alteration of the front projection would create bulky additions which would result in the property appearing incongruous in the street scene which would have a detrimental affect on the character and appearance of the area, contrary to policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) Drawing no. 1 dated 1st Feb 2011 and no.3 dated 1st March 2011 are relevant to this refusal. 2) I12 - Policies related to refusal
1484/47 2011
15
27 COTSWOLD GARDENS HUTTON BRENTWOOD ERECTION OF NEW DWELLING, GARAGE AND NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS FORMING NEW END OF TERRACE BRW/156/2011 Ward: HUTTON EAST Parish: Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 T5 8/13 Week Date: 3rd May 2011
Erection of new three bedroom, two storey dwellinghouse, attached to the side of an existing terrace property. A side conservatory is to be removed and the dwellinghouse is to be built partially in its position. The new dwelling is to extend slightly wider than the existing terraced property it is attached to, 1.2m wider to the West side and 0.2m wider to the East. The dwelling is proposed to be 1m from the footpath. One car parking space is proposed for the existing property, as well as a garage and a space for the new property.
2. Relevant History
BRW/942/2002: Retention of conservatory at side- Approved.
Highways: 1. The proposed parking provision for the existing dwelling would not comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards. This proposal would therefore be contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy DM8 of Essex County Councils Development Management Policies. 2. The dimensions of the parking space for the existing dwelling and the parking space and garage for the proposed dwelling shown on the drawing submitted with the application would not comply with Brentwood Borough Councils adopted parking standards. This proposal would therefore be contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy DM8 of Essex County Councils Development Management Policies. 3. The lack of inter-visibility between pedestrians in the highway and users of the parking space and garage for the proposed dwelling would constitute a danger within the highway, in particular to children on the footway. This proposal would therefore be contrary to highway/pedestrian safety.
15 2011
1484/48
One letter of objection: o Will be out of current building line. o Will be close to house opposite effecting privacy and light. o No need for more houses.
5. Summary of Issues The proposed new dwelling is to be attached to an existing end of terrace property. The area is characterised by mainly terrace and semi-detached properties, which are all of a similar size and are set similar distances from the highway. There are a number of corner sites and other areas on the estate which have open greens, one of which is to the West of the proposed dwelling. These open spaces contribute towards an open and pleasant environment. The terrace properties opposite and the houses that the new dwelling would be attached to have gable end roofs, some of which are staggered. The new dwelling is proposed to turned 90 degrees in comparison to the property it is to be attached to and would face the highway. The new dwelling would be located 1m from the pedestrian footpath. Although the new dwelling would be larger and of a different orientation to the properties it is attached to, it considered that this design would not be out of keeping with the existing properties. Close to the application site, there is another house of a similar design and, although orientated 90 degrees, the design of the house is similar to the house it is attached it. The property would be located 1m from the highway, not only are the other neighbouring properties set back from the highway, but, in addition, the new property would be located close to an open green. It is considered that the proposed dwelling would be in a prominent location. The space to the side of the existing house makes an important contribution to the open character of the area. It is noted that there is an existing conservatory partially in the location of the new dwelling. However this conservatory is single storey only and does not extend as close to the highway, resulting in a much more open feel to that part of the street. It is considered that the proposed dwelling, which would extend significantly forward, compared to neighbouring dwellings would have a detrimental effect on the character of the area.
1484/49 2011
15
The proposal includes new car parking spaces for the existing dwelling and the proposed dwelling. The recently adopted car parking standards require dwellings of more than 2 bedrooms to have at least 2 car parking spaces. The proposed dwelling would not comply with these standards, as the existing property would only be provided with 1 space. The spaces would also not comply with the size requirements of the parking standards. In addition, there is a concern regarding the lack of inter-visibility between pedestrians in the highway and the users of the parking space and garage. Although the size and number of the car parking spaces, do not comply with the parking standards, as this would result in an increase in parking spaces from the situation currently, it is considered that a refusal on these reasons only could not substantiate a refusal. However when also taking into account, the concern regarding highway safety, due to the position of the parking spaces and garage, it indicates that overall the parking is unsatisfactory, and that the site is not large enough to accommodate adequate, or safe parking for a new dwelling. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal fails to comply with Policies CP1 and T5 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The proposed new dwelling, by reason of its overall prominent position and particularly its proximity to the highway and forward position in relation to nearby properties, would result in the loss in the sense of openness in that area and would be out of keeping with the character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. 2) The proposed parking spaces, by reason of their size, number and position would have a detrimental effect on highway safety due to inadequate visibility and would not comply with the Vehicle Parking Standards for the proposed new dwelling or the existing dwelling, indicating that the plot cannot accommodate a new dwelling, contrary to Policy T5 and CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal 2) The following plans are relevant to this decision: 160-01, 160-02, 160-03, 160-04, 160-05, 160-06, 160-07.
1484/50 2011
15
7 CLAVERING GARDENS WEST HORNDON BRENTWOOD REPLACEMENT SIDE EXTENSION. PART FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION, REAR DORMER WINDOW, FRONT DORMER WINDOW AND ROOFLIGHTS BRW/162/2011 Ward: HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON Parish: West Horndon Parish Council Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Policies:
Residential CP1 H17 H7
8/13 Week Date: 4th May 2011
This application is for a loft conversion incorporating front and rear dormer windows; A part first floor side extension; Replacement ground floor side extension.
2. Relevant History
BRW/806/2010: Loft conversion comprising new roof with first floor addition and front dormer window. Replacement side extension - Refused. 31st January 2011. The rear extension would by reason of its scale and depth add an unacceptable amount of bulk to the dwelling and would appear out of character with the existing dwelling. The hip to gable extension and the side extension would result in an awkward relationship which would make the dwelling appear out of character with the street.

Highways: No objection. West Horndon Parish Council: Objection - The building would unduly overlook neighbouring properties and be out of keeping with the street scene.
Two letters of representation have been received stating that; o The rear dormer window is too big and imposing; o The property overlooks neighbouring properties and the building will result in an invasion of privacy; o The area comprises bungalows not two storey dwellings.
1484/51 2011
15
The application property is a semi detached bungalow that has rooms in the roof with rooflights in the side roof plane. This side of the road comprises mostly semi detached bungalows, some of which have rooms in the roof. Opposite there are two storey dwellings. Policy H7 aims to retain single storey dwellings to provide for elderly and less mobile residents. However, in this case rooms in the roof have been provided without the need for express planning permission and it is considered that refusal on this basis would not be justified. The proposed front dormer window would satisfactorily relate to the roof in terms of size and scale and having regard to other front dormer windows in the street it is considered that it would not have a detrimental affect on the appearance of the street scene. The replacement side extension would be in the same position as the existing and it is considered that it would not have a detrimental affect on the character and appearance of the street scene. The rear dormer window would be a large addition, however, structures similar to this can be developed without the express permission of the Local Planning Authority and it is considered that it would not result in unacceptable levels of overlooking into the rear gardens of neighbouring properties. Having regard to the position of the adjacent property no.5 Clavering Gardens, the flank wall of the extension would be highly visible from the road. The dormer window would be set in from the edge of the roof which breaks up the side elevation and it is considered that it would appear less bulky than the previously refused planning application ref. BRW/806/2010. The hip to gable extension would partly extend over the ground floor side extension but it would not extend forward of the roof plane. It would lead to an awkward relationship but having regard to the position of the rear dormer and the scale of the extension it is considered that it would not unacceptably detract from the character and appearance of the street scene. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policies H7, H17 and CP1.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The windows in the first floor side elevation shall be glazed using obscured glass to a minimum of level 3 of the 'Pilkington' scale of obscuration. (Note. the application of translucent film to clear glazed windows does not satisfy the requirements of this condition) (Reason: In order to prevent an unacceptable degree of overlooking of nearby properties.) 3) M10 - Retention of window pattern
1484/52 2011 15
4) The development hereby granted consent shall be carried out in accordance with drawing no. D1361/P/101 Rev b dated 7th March 2011. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. The Council has had regard to the concerns raised by nearby residents but is considered that any harm to living conditions that may result from the proposal would not be sufficient to justify the refusal of permission. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
36 LONG MEADOW HUTTON BRENTWOOD SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION BRW/165/2011 Ward: HUTTON CENTRAL Parish: Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 8/13 Week Date: 5th May 2011
This application is for a single storey rear extension.
2. Relevant History

BRW/23/2009: Single storey side/rear extension - Approved and implemented. BRW/705/99: Single storey extension at the rear - Approved and implemented.
Highways: No objection.
1484/53 2011
15
One letter of representation has been received stating; o The use of the room is a broad spectrum for the use, it is very close to the boundary with no.9 Widworthy Hayes and the occupier of that property has raised concerns about noise; o The room could be potentially turned into a swimming pool which would increase the amount of water coming through the drains of no.9; o The burning of building rubbish would result in smoke coming into no.9.

The application property is a detached bungalow located at the end of a cul de sac, it is situated on a short but wide plot. The adjacent dwelling is situated at right angles to no.36 and it is considered that by reason of the distance between the properties the proposal would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the occupiers of that property. No. 9 Widworthy Hayes is situated away from the boundary with the properties in Long Meadow and although the proposal would result in the living accommodation of no.36 being closer to the boundary with no.9 Widworthy Hayes, it is considered that by reason of this distance it would not materially increase level of noise reaching that property and so would not unacceptably detract form the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. The room is described as a games room but it would form part of the dwelling and there is no justification for seeking to control its precise use. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing no. 2011/02/04. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/54 2011
15
13 PRIESTS LANE BRENTWOOD SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION, FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION. BRW/167/2011 Ward: BRENTWOOD SOUTH Parish: Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 H17 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011
Single storey rear extension, to the central section of the rear elevations, which is currently recessed, extending 1.4m beyond the existing main rear wall. First floor side extension, extending the full depth of the existing property, above the existing garage and study including the removal of the existing first floor side dormer window and installation of a new dormer window to the rear of the property.
2. Relevant History

BRW/837/93: Extension to side of existing garage- Approved. BRW/89/2008: Conversion of part of existing garage and infill of existing rear canopy area- Approved.
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application as the area available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council adopted parking standards, for the proposed extended dwelling.
None

The extensions are proposed to a detached property located within a residential area. The area in which the property is located is characterised by mostly detached properties of varying designs and of varying, but mainly substantial in size. The proposed side extension, would be clearly visible from the highway, but has been designed to be in keeping with the existing property and would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the character of the surrounding area.
15 2011
1484/55
The new single storey rear extension, due to its position and limited depth, would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the neighbouring occupiers. The nearest neighbouring property to the proposed side extension is 15 Priests Lane. The first floor side extension would be located 2.2m from the side boundary at the nearest point. This neighbouring property extends deeper at the rear than the proposed side extension and the nearest part of the property to the proposed extension is a single storey garage. This property has three large first floor side windows which face towards the proposed extension. Two of these serve bedrooms and one serves a bathroom. However both the bedrooms also have other windows which face towards either the front or the rear of the property and the extension would be approximately 6.5m from these windows. It is therefore considered that the proposal would not have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the amenities of the neighbouring occupiers. However, to avoid overlooking from the proposed new windows, it is considered that a condition should be imposed requiring the first floor side windows to be obscure glazed. One pitched roof rear dormer window is proposed in the roof of the new first floor extension. The dormer is smaller than the existing dormer windows and is of a similar design. It is considered that the dormer window would relate well in design to the roof in which it is to be installed and would remain as a subsidiary feature of the roof. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal would comply with Policy CP1 and H17 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The three first floor side windows which serve the dressing room and en-suite as shown on the approved plans shall be:- a) glazed using obscured glass to a minimum of level 3 of the Pilkington scale of obscuration and b) nonopening below a height of 1.7m above the floor of the room in which the window is installed. And those windows shall remain so glazed and nonopenable. (Note the application of translucent film to clear glazed windows does not satisfy the requirements of this condition). (Reason: In the interest of the privacy and amenity of adjacent occupiers.) 3) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building. (Reason: In order to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.) 4) M10 - Retention of window pattern 5) The following plans are relevant to this permission: 932/01, 932/02, 932/03, 932/04. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.)
1484/56 2011 15
Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would comply with the development plan policies that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
9 HAYWARDS CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD SINGLE STOREY FRONT AND REAR EXTENSIONS BRW/168/2011 Ward: HUTTON EAST Parish: Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals

Single storey front extension, projecting forward approximately 1.3m Single storey rear extension, extending to a depth of 3.6m.
2. Relevant History
PD/118/79: Enclose porch- Permitted Development.
None
None

The front and rear extensions are proposed to a detached property in a residential area. The surrounding properties are all of similar designs, however as the front extension is of a small size and is of a good design and in keeping with the property, it is considered that it would not have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the area.
15 2011
1484/57
The nearest neighbouring property to the extensions is 7 Haywards Close. The nearest part of this property to the proposed extensions is its garage. The extensions would be some distance from the habitable rooms of the neighbours house, and this, combined with the overall size of the extensions would result in no unacceptable detrimental effect on the general amenities of the neighbouring occupiers. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal would comply with Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture to those used in the existing building, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) The following plans are relevant to this permission: drawing numbers, 1462/1, the block plan and the location plan. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would comply with the development plan policies that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/58 2011
15
17 SURMAN CRESCENT HUTTON BRENTWOOD SINGLE STOREY SIDE AND REAR EXTENSION BRW/169/2011 Ward: HUTTON CENTRAL Parish: Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

This application is for a single storey side and rear extension The existing garage would be demolished
2. Relevant History
None.
Highways: No comment.
None.
The application property is a detached bungalow located in a residential area that comprises both single storey and two storey properties; the bungalows within the street are not uniform. The adjacent property to the east is set further back than the application property, the proposed rear extension would project past the rear of this house by approximately 1m. It is considered that the proposal would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the occupiers of no.19. The proposed side extension would extend up to the boundary with no. 15, which has windows in the side elevation at ground floor level. It is considered that by reason of the distance between the properties and the position of the property the side extension would not unacceptably detract from the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers by way of being overbearing. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
15 2011
1484/59
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) M10 - Retention of window pattern 3) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing no.s DS/09/3, DS/09/4. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
3A ST. JOHNS AVENUE WARLEY BRENTWOOD PROPOSED SINGLE STOREY SIDE EXTENSION AND GARAGE BRW/170/2011 Ward: WARLEY Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals
Single storey side/rear extension with a parapet wall and roof light.
2. Relevant History
None relevant.
Highways - The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to this application given the nature of the proposal and the area available for parking within the site.
1484/60 2011
15
None.

This application relates to a detached property located in a residential area. The proposed extension would be located along the boundary adjoining no .3 St Johns Avenue, adjacent to their existing garage. Taking into consideration the height and depth of the extension, it is considered the proposal would not have an unacceptable adverse effect on the occupiers of no.3. In light of the above, it is considered the proposal complies with Policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan and is recommended for approval.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) The plans relevant to this permission are: Dwg. AC.01, AC.02. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/61 2011
15
CHAIN BRIDGE FARM ROMAN ROAD SHENFIELD BRENTWOOD CHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURAL BARNS TO WOODWORKING/JOINERY WORKSHOP - REUSING EXISTING SERIES OF BARNS BRW/171/2011 Ward: SHENFIELD Parish: Case Officer: Morne Van Rooyen (Tel: 01277 312607) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Metropolitan Green Belt Policies: CP1 GB1 GB15 GB2 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011
Retrospective application for the retention of the use of the existing building as a woodworking/joinery workshop. Access to the site is off of Roman Road and comprises a 4m wide concrete road suitable for goods vehicles.
2. Relevant History
Planning history for the site relates to the residential property with no planning history directly relevant to the barns.
None
None

The site is located in the Metropolitan Green Belt and comprises various single storey buildings associated with the agricultural use of the farm. Government advice on the re-use of existing rural buildings, as set out in PPG 2 takes a positive attitude to the re-use of rural buildings for business uses.
1484/62 2011
15
In line with government advice Policy GB15 allows for the re-use and adaptation of rural buildings for small scale employment, tourism, leisure and community uses provided the following criteria are met: - i) There is no materially greater impact than the original use upon the openness of the Green Belt; - ii) Buildings should be of a permanent substantial construction and should be capable of conversion without major or complete reconstruction or alteration to its external appearance; - iii) New use should not require the extension of the building or additional 'open elements' which might conflict with the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it; - iv) There is no unacceptable detrimental impact upon the surrounding countryside, its landscape or wildlife; - v) The new use should not give rise to future requirements for further substantial areas of open land and operational development to be added to the reused building and its immediate surroundings for inappropriate development. Comment: The building is set between 50m and 70m away from the A12 and is partially screened by large mature conifers and appears as an agricultural barn from available views. In addition the application site has an area of hardstanding which can adequately accommodate the loading areas required for he woodworking/joinery workshop. Whilst the use of the barns as a workshop has required the insertion of velux windows which are uncharacteristic to agricultural buildings these are hidden from view due to their location within the buildings courtyard area and would for this reason not detract from the agricultural character and appearance of the building. For these reasons it is considered that the continued use of the buildings as a woodworking/ joinery workshop would comply with the requirements of Policy GB15. On the basis of the above, it is considered that the proposal is not inappropriate development in the Green Belt as defined by PPG2 and would not materially reduce the openness of the Green Belt or conflict with the purposes of including land within it. Conclusion: In light of the above it is considered that the continued use of the building as a woodworking/joinery workshop would comply with the relevant Local Plan Policies related to the re-use of rural buildings and the openness of the Green Belt compliant with the aims and objectives of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
1484/63 2011
15
6. Recommendation Approve 1) This permission relates solely to the building outlined in red on the approved 1:1250 site location plan, which shall be used solely for purposes of a woodworking/joinery workshop falling within Class B2 of the Schedule to the Town & Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended) and for no other purpose including any other purpose that may be permitted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 as amended. (Reason: The site lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt wherein the Local Planning Authority seeks to limit the re-use or adaptation of rural buildings for small scale employment, tourism leisure and community uses.) 2) No goods, articles or any materials whatsoever shall be stacked, stored or deposited outside of the building(s) on the site. (Reason: The site lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt wherein the Local Planning Authority seeks to prevent the encroachment of uses onto open land and to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.) 3) Unless formally permitted by the local planning authority the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the approved drawing showing the plan of the existing barn and the 1:1250 site location plan and specifications. (Reason: To ensure that the development is as permitted by the local planning authority and for the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would not be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and would accord with PPG 2 and the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/64 2011
15
10 CARPENTER PATH HUTTON BRENTWOOD LOFT CONVERSION INCORPORATING TWO FRONT DORMER WINDOWS BRW/173/2011 Ward: HUTTON NORTH Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 H17 8/13 Week Date: 5th May 2011
Loft conversion incorporating two front dormer windows with pitched roofs.
2. Relevant History
S192/BRW/18/2011 - Certificate of lawful development for a proposed residential loft conversion. Approved 30/03/11.
Highways - The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to this application given the existence and size of the dwelling and Brentwood Borough Council's adopted parking standards.
4. Neighbour Responses One letter of objection received with the following comments:

The proposed development will become an eye sore and will be totally out of character to the area. I have also spoken to other neighbours and people in the area and they also are of the same opinion.
This application relates to a semi-detached property opposite a Green and located in a residential area. There are a mix of houses and flats surrounding the Green, none of which have had front dormer windows. The front dormers would be a subsidiary feature of the roof, however, they would be positioned up to the ridge and detract from the appearance and profile of the property. As there are no other front dormer windows in the streetscene, it is considered the proposal would detract from the character and appearance of the area.
15 2011
1484/65
It is considered that as a result the proposal it would conflict with Policy H17 and CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) As a result of the proposed front dormer windows the development would fail to respect the character and appearance of the area in conflict with Policy H17 and CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal
TREVERVOE BROCKLEY GROVE HUTTON BRENTWOOD RAISE THE ROOF TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FIRST FLOOR AND ROOF SPACE ACCOMMODATION, TWO STOREY FRONT EXTENSION AND A SINGLE STOREY REAR ORANGERY EXTENSION BRW/174/2011 Ward: HUTTON SOUTH Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 H15 8/13 Week Date: 3rd May 2011
Raise the roof to provide additional first floor and roof space accommodation, two storey front extension and a single storey rear orangery extension.
2. Relevant History

BRW/142/93 - Erection of Garage. Approved 20/04/93. BRW/49/2011 - Raise the roof to provide additional first floor and roof space accommodation, two storey front extension and a single storey rear orangery. Withdrawn.
1484/66 2011
15
Highways - The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to this application as the area available for parking within the site, will comply with the Brentwood Borough Council's adopted parking standards, for the proposed extended dwelling.
None.
The proposal relates to a detached chalet bungalow located in a residential area. The street comprises large detached properties of two and three storey dwelling houses with a variety of styles. This application proposes to convert the chalet bungalow to a two storey dwellinghouse with rooms in the roof and a single storey rear orangery. The property is screened by a 1.8m high Leylandii and Laurel hedge. Policy H15 and the guidance in appendix 5 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan indicates that within Hutton Mount no part of any extension shall be closer than 1.2m to the plot boundary. This is to retain the generous distance between buildings which is a significant factor in contributing to the character of the area. The bungalow on the application site is 1.2 to the plot boundary and would comply with the aims of H15. The front elevation with the proposed pitched roofs would have a similar design to dwelling houses within the streetscene. Although the proposed dwelling would be taller and bulkier than the existing it would reflect similar designs in the street and is considered this would not detract from the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The north east elevation facing the neighbouring property at Penhallow would have ground floor windows which would be screened by a fence and two obscured glass first floor windows. It is considered this would not have an unacceptable overlooking affect on the occupiers of Penhallow. Due to the orientation of the dwellinghouse, there would be no unacceptable loss of light to 3 Brockley Grove side window serving a utility room. The proposed secondary window serving a bedroom would be obscure-glazed and not result in overlooking the utility room. The bay window would have nine panels, two of which would be obscure glazed on the side closest to no.3 Brockley Grove. This would reduce the impact by way of loss of privacy to the neighbouring occupiers when sitting in their rear garden. The single storey rear orangery is proposed approximately 1.2m from the boundary adjoining Penhallow. The height of the eaves would be approximately 2.2m and the pitched roof would slope away from the neighbouring property and would not have an unacceptable overbearing affect. The side elevation facing Penhallow would have obscured glass and screened by a 2m high Leylandii hedge and would not have an unacceptable affect by way of overlooking.
15 2011
1484/67
Highways do not have any objections to this proposal. In light of the above, it is considered the proposal would comply with Policy CP1 and H15 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match in colour and texture those used in the existing building. (Reason: In the interests of amenity.) 3) The obscure glazed windows indicated on the approved plans returned herewith shall be obscure glazed to a minimum of level 3 of the Pilkington scale of obscuration and shall be permanently retained as such notwithstanding the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 or any subsequent re-enacting Order. (Reason: In the interest of the privacy and amenity of adjacent occupiers.) 4) The plans relevant to this permission are: Dwg. No. 1018/PL/300, 1018/PL/200 B, 1018/PL/100, 1018/PL/400 B, 1018/PL Statement revised 04/04/2011. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/68 2011
15
4 INGRAVE ROAD BRENTWOOD REPLACEMENT SHOP FRONT. BRW/175/2011 Ward: BRENTWOOD SOUTH Parish: Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential/Office/Shopping Policies: C14 CP1 8/13 Week Date: 5th May 2011
Replacement shop front, including the removal of the existing bay window, bringing part of the shop front forward to increase the retail floor space and so the entire shop front is flush to the front of the store. Painting of the pillars flanking the shop in Grey.
2. Relevant History
A/BRW/9/95: Continued display of internally illuminated projecting box signRefused.
Highways: The Highway Authority would not wish to raise an objection to the above application, subject to the following condition being attached to any approval, given the location: The proposed door shall be inward opening only. Reason: To avoid obstruction of the footway in the interest of highway/pedestrian safety. Historic Buildings Advisor: It is possible that No 4 Ingrave Road contains the sole surviving original shopfront of the group (i.e., Nos 2 to 6 Ingrave Road). The building probably dates from the 1960s. Set back entrances with large displays areas either side are typical of this period.
1484/69 2011
15
Despite this, I do not believe that the block comprising Nos 2-6 Ingrave Road is historically or architecturally significant. I also note that the original shopfronts of Nos 2 and 6 have already been lost. Therefore with some misgivings, I have concluded that the loss of the existing shopfront to No 4 is acceptable. The proposed new painted timber shopfront is, I believe, acceptable for this location. Accordingly I recommend approval of this application. 4. Neighbour Responses
One letter of representation: o No objection providing the door opening is wide enough for wheelchair access.

The application property is within the Town Centre Conservation Area. This part of the Conservation Area has mostly modern shop fronts. The two shops either side have already changed their shop fronts and are both of a different design, as a result, the new shop front would not appear out of place and would preserve the character of this part of the Conservation Area. Concern has been raised regarding access to the shop. The new door opening is proposed to be 900mm wide. External doors to buildings to which the public are admitted require a minimum clear opening width of 800mm so that they are wide enough for wheelchair access; it is considered therefore that the building will be acceptable in this respect. The Highways Authority has suggested a condition requiring the door to be inward opening only to avoid obstruction of the footway. As this area is fairly busy at certain times of the day and the door would be abutting the highway it is considered that this condition should be imposed. In light of the above, the proposal complies with Policies CP1 and C14 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) The front entrance door, as shown on the approved plans, shall be inward opening only, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: To avoid obstruction of the footway in the interest of highway/pedestrian safety.)
1484/70 2011
15
3) The following plans are relevant to this permission: drawings titled, '4 Ingrave Road existing and proposed shop front and plan- Harvey Jones- 7th March 2011' and the site plan. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would comply with the development plan policies that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
8 WALTHAM CLOSE HUTTON BRENTWOOD PART SINGLE STOREY PART TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION BRW/186/2011 Ward: HUTTON NORTH Parish: Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

This application is for a part two storey and part single storey rear extension. The existing conservatory would be demolished.
2. Relevant History
None relevant.
None.
1484/71 2011
15

The application property is a detached dwelling situated in a cul de sac location with the Hutton Poplars development. The houses are of similar design. The proposed two storey element would be close to the boundary with no.9 Waltham Close and would be 2.5m deep. No.9 Waltham Close has a double garage on the boundary with no.8. It is considered that the two storey element by reason of its depth and distance away from the living accommodation of no.9 would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. The proposed single storey element would be approximately 4.4m away from the boundary and it is considered that the proposal by reason of this distance would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers. There would be a window in the side elevation facing no.7 Waltham Close, it is considered that a condition should be imposed to prevent unacceptable level of overlooking in order to safeguard the amenities of nearby occupiers. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal would comply with policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) Notwithstanding the details on the approved plans, the window in the first floor west side elevation shall be obscure glazed to a minimum of level 3 of the 'Pilkington' scale of obscuration and non-opening below a height of 1.7m above floor of the room in which the window is installed. And that window shall remain so glazed and non-openable. (Note. The application of translucent film to clear glazed windows does not satisfy the requirements of this condition) (Reason: In order to prevent an unacceptable degree of overlooking of nearby residential properties.) 3) The development hereby granted consent shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos. LJM09110 002B and KJM09110 003B. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/72 2011
15
FAIRHOLME HIGHLAND AVENUE BRENTWOOD DEMOLISH EXISTING HOUSE AND CONSTRUCT NEW BUILDING CONTAINING 10 APARTMENTS WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING, AMENITY AND REFUSE STORAGE AREAS [bm1]BRW/83/2011 Ward: BRENTWOOD NORTH Parish: Case Officer: Kathryn Mathews (Tel: 01277 312616) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: CP1 CP2 CP4 H14 H6 T2 8/13 Week Date: 10th May 2011
Demolish existing detached two storey house (known as 'Fairholme') and the erection of new building containing 10 apartments (one with one bedroom and nine with two bedrooms): 19.3m wide x 21.8m deep (maximum dimensions) with an 'L-shaped' footprint; 11.7m in height (maximum dimension); pitched roofs. The building is generally two storey with accommodation provided within the roof space (maximum height 10.4m). The proposed three storey element (a maximum height of 11.7m), which would have accommodation within the roof space in the form of a mezzanine floor, would be located on the corner of Ongar Road and Highland Avenue. The materials to be used to construct the external surfaces of the building would consist of red brick and white render for the walls, and grey slates and red/orange tiles for the roof. A total of 10 parking spaces are shown to be provided within the site along the north-western boundary of the site, along with 2 motorcycle spaces and 10 cycle spaces. Vehicular access to the site would be located in the eastern corner of the site, off Highlands Avenue; the accessway to the parking spaces would be located along the north-eastern boundary of the site with Rockland House. A 2m high wall along with a bank of soil is proposed along the site's boundary with 2 Treetops as an acoustic screen. A refuse storage area is also proposed attached to the rear elevation of the proposed building: 7.1m long x 1.8m wide and 2.4m high (maximum dimensions); lean-to roof. Amenity space for the occupiers of the proposed residential units would be provided in the form of a garden measuring 75sq.m. to be shared by three of the two bedroom units proposed, a 40sq.m. garden for the one bedroom unit proposed, balconies measuring at least 5sq.m. for four of the two bedroom units and balconies measuring just under 5sq.m (4.8sq.m.) for the remaining two, two bedroom units. The area of the site is stated as being 0.096ha.
1484/73 2011
15
The application is accompanied by a Design and Access Statement in which it states that the proposed three storey element has been designed as a focal point at the road junction, and that the scheme has been designed to reflect the Edwardian houses in Highlands Avenue. It is also stated that the lower elements would respect the development's neighbours and the roof's articulation maintains a domestic scale of the building proposed.
2. Relevant History

BRW/621/98 - erection of fence along Ongar Road - approved BRW/202/99 - two storey side, two storey rear, first floor rear, single storey rear and single storey side extensions - approved BRW/110/2001 - two storey side, two storey rear, first floor rear, single storey rear and single storey side extensions - approved BRW/215/2005 - erection of two and three storey building containing 1no. one bedroom flat and 9no. two bedroom flats - withdrawn
Arboriculturalist: there is a preserved Oak to the rear corner of the property, where it is proposed to construct the car park. The tree is showing signs of decline, to prevent any further stress to the tree the construction of the car park should be of a no-dig construction with a geo web base and a permeable surface. Environmental Health & Enforcement Manager: no objection subject to conditions requiring that the noise levels within the habitable rooms in units 2, 3, 6 and 7 will not exceed 35dB LAeq (23.00 to 07.00) and 45dB LAeq (07.00 to 23.00), and that the acoustic wall proposed extends along the length of the northern boundary of the site. County Planner (Education): according to their forecasts, there should be sufficient secondary places at a local school serving this development but the development would add to the existing need for primary places on the basis of which a developer contribution prior to commencement of 10,230 is requested. Anglian Water: no objection subject to the imposition of a condition requiring that details of surface water drainage are submitted and carried out prior to the occupation of any of the proposed flats. Operational Services Manager: no response at the time of writing report.
1484/74 2011
15
Highways: no objection given the location with good access to public transport and local facilities, the existing use of the site and the Highway Authority, Essex County Council, parking standards subject to the following conditions and informatives being attached to any approval: Prior to the occupation of each individual dwelling unit the developer shall provide a Travel Information and Marketing Pack for sustainable transport, with information covering bus and rail travel and including scratch cards for free bus travel within the applicable zone (covering the relevant zone as set out by the local operator and Essex County Councils Travel Plan Team) for each eligible member of every residential household. The scratch cards to be valid for exchange during the first 6 months following the occupation of the individual dwelling unit. Reason: In the interests of promoting sustainable development and transport in accordance with policy DM10 in Essex County Councils Development Management Policies 2011. Prior to commencement of the development the sites existing western dropped kerb vehicular access shall be widened to at least 5.5 metres at right angles to the carriageway in Highland Avenue in accordance with the terms, conditions and specification of the Highway Authority, Essex County Council. Reason: To ease the ingress of vehicles entering the site and ensure that vehicles can leave the highway in a controlled manner in the interest of highway safety. Prior to occupation of the development 1.5 metre x 1.5 metre pedestrian visibility splays on either side of the widened vehicular access as measured from and along the boundary of the site and the back of the footway in Highland Avenue, shall be provided and thereafter maintained. No obstruction above 600 mm in height shall be permitted within these splays in perpetuity. Reason: To provide adequate inter-visibility between the users of the accesses and pedestrians in the adjoining public highway in the interest of highway safety. Prior to occupation of the development the sites redundant vehicular access in Highland Avenue, adjacent to its junction with Ongar Road, shall be permanently closed by raising the kerbs and footway to conform with adjacent levels in accordance with the terms, conditions and specification of the Highway Authority, Essex County Council. Reason: To ensure the removal of and to preclude the creation of unnecessary points of traffic conflict in the highway in the interests of highway safety.
1484/75 2011
15
Prior to the commencement of the development, construction and layout details of the access drive and parking area within the site shown on Drawing No. 903 030G, illustrating the access drive with a width of 5.5 metres for the first 6 metres from Highland Avenue and vehicle spaces measuring at least 2.5 metres by 5 metres, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Prior to occupation of the development the access drive and parking area shall be hard surfaced, sealed and marked out in parking bays in accordance with the approved details. The vehicle parking area shall be retained in this form at all times and shall not be used for any purpose other than the parking of vehicles that are related to the use of the development unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that vehicles can enter and leave the highway in a controlled manner, to ensure that opposing vehicles can pass and to ensure that appropriate parking is provided in the interests of highway safety. Prior to the commencement of the development, details of the design and layout of the cycle parking facilities shown on submitted Drawing No. 903 030G shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved facility shall be secure, convenient and covered and provided prior to occupation of the development and retained at all times. Reason: To ensure appropriate cycle parking is provided in the interest of highway safety and amenity. Prior to the commencement of the development, details of the design and layout of the motorcycle parking facilities shown on submitted Drawing No. 903 030G shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved facility shall be secure and provided prior to occupation of the development and retained at all times. Reason: To ensure appropriate motorcycle parking is provided in the interest of highway safety and amenity. During the construction period all construction traffic and materials, including contractors and sub-contractors vehicles shall be accommodated on properly compacted hard surfaced areas within the site. Reason: To ensure adequate space for parking and the storage of materials off the highway is provided in the interest of highway safety.
1484/76 2011
15
Prior to commencement of the proposed development details of a wheel cleaning facility located within the site and adjacent to the egress onto the highway shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The wheel cleaning facility shall be provided at the commencement of the development and maintained during the construction period. Reason: To avoid displacement of loose material onto the highway, in the interests of highway safety. Informatives: o It is recommended that an informative should be attached to any approval stating that, in accordance with Brentwood Borough Council policy, residents of the proposed dwellings will not be allowed permits in Brentwood Borough Councils Residents Parking Scheme. o All works affecting the highway shall be carried out by prior arrangement with, and to the requirements and satisfaction of, the Highway Authority and application for the necessary works shall be made to the Area Highways Office, Essex County Council (West Area), Goodman House, Station Approach, Harlow, Essex CM20 2ET. (Tel: 0845 603 7631 Email: highways.westarea@essex.gov.uk).
63 letters of objection have been received on the basis of the following concerns:o lovely old house should not be knocked down o on busy corner near pedestrian crossing, catering company, post box and the public house opposite o additional traffic would make traffic problems worse o too many flats already o would be dangerous exit onto Highland Avenue which is used by buses, coaches and cars o Highland Avenue already congested especially at school times; pedestrians, including school children, would be put at risk o insufficient on-street parking available o current pot holes in Highland Avenue o would potentially cause problems for emergency access o preposterous o concern that dead ivy would be left on garage for Rockland House which would be unsightly o size of parking spaces proposed do not meet required standards o unclear whether current fence and laurel bushes on the boundary with Rockland House are to be removed - plans suggest that laurel would be reduced in height (8m to 2.9m) o documents submitted misleading as they do not accurately reflect the roof heights of adjacent buildings o concern regarding the potential for overlooking of neighbouring properties o development too large for site
15 2011
1484/77
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o o o o
o o o
concern that existing 2-way section of Highland Avenue may need to be removed may affect property values and reduction in Council Tax would be requested if development allowed concern could cause loss of light to and overlooking of the rear gardens of some dwellings on opposite side of Ongar Road and Tree Tops would put strain on current weak water pressure would be visually incongruous and would not be in keeping with the other properties in the area would set precedent for future would add to extra traffic resulting from housing being built at Highwood Hospital and William Hunter Way a two storey building containing six flats would be more appropriate would increase noise levels in summer large garden with wildlife would be lost concern that development would adversely affect the protected tree on site gardens should not be treated as Brownfield sites overdevelopment and building too high next to small industrial building which was understood to harbor dangerous industrial gases would be forward of building line in Highlands Avenue flats would have inadequate storage; use of balconies for storage would be unsightly if approved, existing parking restrictions in Tree Tops and Highlands Avenue should remain unchanged, part of the parking bays in Tree Tops need removing as they cause vehicles to drive down the wrong side of the road, and further traffic calming measures are required for Highland Avenue use of car park next to their garden would cause disturbance no other four storey buildings nearby refuse stores would add to vermin problem lack of amenity space for occupiers of proposed flats, living areas incredibly small submitted plans contain errors would be very close to the pavement and overbearing insufficient turning space within site no acoustic wall proposed on the boundary with no.2 Treetops as previously proposed plans show a greater height than in previous plans developers should be asked to pay for a new zebra crossing in Sawyers Hall Lane, new pavements, cycle paths and resurfacing, cycle parking and parent waiting shelters to encourage more parents to walk to school residents of the proposed flats should have a safer way of accessing their parking spaces and refuse storage; not along the proposed driveway would increase likelihood of noise disturbance and damage to property as residents likely to be young people would object to any of the flats being occupied by council house tenants
15 2011
1484/78
o o o o o o o o
loss of landscaping would make development more prominent does not support a sense of local pride and civic identity lacks a fence around the garden area for safety and parking area not secure seen bats and badgers in their garden; development would remove badger foraging ground no consideration of renewable energy concern that piled foundations may have an impact on the foundations of their Victorian property there is a Facebook group opposed to this development with over 70 supporters will not know who is watching them in the adjacent garden
The application site is located at a prominent location at the junction of Highland Avenue and Ongar Road. The site is located in a predominantly residential area consisting of variety of house types, styles and sizes, although there are also commercial properties in the vicinity of the site including a catering company adjacent to the site's Ongar Road boundary, a public house opposite and Travis Perkins on the other side of Highlands Avenue. The site contains a mature Oak tree in the western corner of the site which is subject to a Tree Preservation Order. Character and Appearance Whilst the height of the proposed building is directly comparable to the height of existing buildings within the locality (such as Glenhurst and Rhodesia Lodge on Highland Avenue and no.142 Ongar Road) it would be higher than those buildings immediately adjacent (Rockland House and no.133 Ongar Road). However, given the mixture of building types, sizes and heights in the vicinity of the site, and the size, design, height and position of the proposed building, it is considered that the building would not be out of character with its surroundings. Furthermore, the building has clear and strong visual references to the existing Edwardian accommodation in Highland Avenue. Residential Amenity The building is located at least 1m away from the plot boundaries except for at three points along the buildings Ongar Road elevation where the building would be at least 0.5m from the sites boundary. There would be no infringement of the 45 degree guidance. By reason of its varying height, L-shaped layout and position at least 5.1m from the boundary of any neighbouring residential curtilage, it is not considered that it would appear unduly dominant or overbearing to the occupiers of the existing adjacent properties. The proposed building has also been fenestrated so as to minimise overlooking, with windows facing into the rear of the site i.e. towards adjacent residential properties, limited in both number and size. In assessing overlooking, the advice contained in the Essex Design Guide (which has been adopted by this Council as Supplementary Planning Guidance) has been used to assess the proposal.
15 2011
1484/79
On the northern elevation of the proposed building, which would face 133 Ongar Road, there would be two living room windows, a balcony and one bedroom window at first floor level as well as a bedroom window at second floor level. These windows and balcony would be within 15m of the side garden of 133 Ongar Road and within 35m of the first floor bedroom windows contained within the side elevation of a recent extension to this neighbouring property (reference BRW/247/2009). However, the existing and proposed windows would be at least 21m apart and would not be directly opposite each other. Also, there is a large, mature, preserved Oak tree which would be located in between the proposed windows/balcony and the boundary of 133 Ongar Road. As a result, it is considered that, subject to the imposition of conditions, the opportunities for overlooking 133 Ongar Road would be minimal. The conditions considered necessary would require the provision of a privacy screen along the northern edge of the balcony and require that the first floor windows on the northern elevation of the proposed building are obscure glazed and fixed closed below eye-level. On the eastern elevation of the proposed building, which would face Rockland House, there are no windows which would be face and be within 15m of the curtilage of Rockland House. There is one first floor balcony proposed but a privacy screen could be provided along the eastern edge of the balcony which would mitigate the potential for overlooking of the occupiers of Rockland House. In order to limit any noise and disturbance arising from use of the car parking facilities, an acoustic wall and landscaped earth bund are proposed on the rear boundary with no. 2 Treetops. The extension of this wall so as to include the boundary with no. 133 Ongar Road would be necessary to minimise noise disturbance to 133 Ongar Road, as recommended by the Environmental Health Officer. Highway Safety and Parking The proposed development would make sufficient provision cycle parking (6no. spaces) and motorcycle parking (2no. spaces) in accordance with the adopted standards. With respect to off-street parking, there is sufficient space within the site to provide only 9no. parking spaces at the recommended minimum size of 2.5m x 5m. According to the Council's adopted parking policy, a scheme of this size would normally be expected to provide a total of 21 parking spaces (one for the one bedroom flat, two each for the two bedroom flats and 3 visitor parking spaces). The adopted parking policy states that a reduction in the normal offstreet parking provision may be considered if it relates to development within an urban area (including town centre locations) that has good links to sustainable transport. Main urban areas are defined as those having frequent and extensive public transport, cycling and walking links, accessing education, healthcare, food shopping and employment. The Highways Officer does not raise objection to the parking provision which could made within the site as he considers that the site has good access to public transport and local facilities.
1484/80 2011
15
Whilst the County Highways Officer indicates that the parking proposed would be adequate it is considered that this site, whilst being on a public transport route, is not sufficiently close to Brentwood Town Centre to benefit from all of the attributes associated with a central location. For this reason it is considered that within this predominantly residential area of Brentwood there is a reasonable expectation that the occupiers of the flats would possess cars. Although almost one space would be provided for each flat this would fall well short of the recently adopted standards which are based on recent research. Within town centres there may be other factors to weigh in the balance, such as the benefits of introducing more residential use into central areas; however it is considered that no such benefits would arise here and it is therefore considered that there is no reason to depart from the adopted parking standards. The inadequate provision of off street parking spaces would be likely to increase the pressure for on street parking in the area which would be detrimental to highway safety and the general amenities of people living in the area. In light of the comments of the above, it is recommended below that planning permission is refused on the basis of the inadequacy of off-street parking provision being made.
Quality of Life With respect to the quality of life of the occupiers of the proposed flats, all are at least the recommended minimum size i.e. at least 40sq.m for the one bedroom flat and at least 52sq.m for the two bedroom flats. Amenity space is proposed to be provided via private and communal gardens and balconies. All but two of the proposed flats would either have access to an outdoor amenity area of at least 25sq.m for each flat or a balcony measuring at least 5sq.m in area. Two of the flats would have a balcony measuring less than 5sq.m (around 4.8sq.m) but it is considered that this small shortfall would not justify a refusal of planning permission for the development proposed. It is also considered that the development includes adequate provision for refuse storage. Based on the advice of the Environmental Health Officer, it is considered that any planning permission granted should be conditional on appropriate measures being taken to ensure that noise levels within the habitable rooms in units 2, 3, 6 and 7 not exceeding 35dB LAeq (23.00 to 07.00) and 45dB LAeq (07.00 to 23.00), in the interests of the amenity of the occupiers of these units which would front the heavily trafficked Ongar Road. Other Matters The scheme proposed complies with Local Plan Policy H6 as all of the units proposed are either one or two bedroom units. The applicant has confirmed that they would be willing to enter into a Section 106 Agreement to secure the payment of 10,230 to Essex County Council towards the provision of primary school places and so the proposal complies with Local Plan Policy CP4.
1484/81 2011
15
Based on the advice of Anglian Water, it is considered that the proposed development would not cause drainage problems, subject to the imposition of a condition as recommended by Anglian Water. A local resident has stated that bats and badgers have been observed in the gardens of neighbouring properties but none have been observed within the application site. On this basis, it is considered that a refusal of planning permission could not be justified on the basis of potential damage to the sites ecology. However, the applicant has commissioned an ecologist to assess the site. Letters of Representation Most of the issues raised by local residents have been addressed above. However, in response to those matters not covered, the following comments are made: The existing building within the site is not located within a Conservation Area and is not a listed building. Hence, a refusal of planning permission based on the loss of the existing building could not be justified; A condition could be imposed requiring details of landscaping and fencing to be erected within and around the site, to be submitted for approval; Since the receipt of the original planning application, further drawings have been received which have corrected the errors identified; A potential reduction in property values, possible dangerous gases in an adjacent building and potential damage to neighbouring properties are not considered to be material planning considerations in the case; Details of the occupiers of the proposed flats are outside the control of the local planning authority; There is inadequate Local Plan Policy support for any requirement for renewable energy measures to be incorporated into the scheme. Conclusion In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal would not harm the amenity of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, local visual amenity or protected species and would provide an adequate quality of life for the occupiers of the proposed flats. The applicant has agreed to enter into a Section 106 Agreement to make the necessary contribution to the provision of primary school places. As a result of the above, it is considered that the proposal complies with satisfies Policies CP2, CP4, C3, C7, H6 and H14. However, on the basis that the proposed development would make inadequate provision for off-street parking, contrary to Local Plan Policy T2 and the relevant criteria of Policy CP1, it is recommended below that planning permission is refused for this reason.
1484/82 2011
15
6. Recommendation Refuse 1) The proposed development would make inadequate provision for off-street parking which would be likely to inappropriate on-street parking in the area to the detriment of highway safety and the general amenities of the area contrary to Policies CP1 and T2 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan. Informatives 1) I12 - Policies related to refusal 2) This decision is based on drawings numbered 030rev.G, 031rev.G, 032rev.F, 033rev.C, 034rev.E, 035rev.C, 036rev.D, 037rev.D, 038rev.D, 039rev.B, 0505-1, and specifications, which accompanied the planning application.
11 STUART CLOSE PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD PART TWO STOREY PART SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION (RENEWAL OF PLANNING PERMISSION BRW/228/2008) [bm1]EXT/BRW/7/2011 Ward: PILGRIMS HATCH Parish: Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

This application is for a part two storey part single storey rear extension This application is a renewal of planning permission BRW/228/2008.
2. Relevant History
BRW/228/2008: Part two storey part single storey rear extension - Approved. 21st April 2008.
1484/83 2011
15
None.

The application property is a mid terraced house located within a residential area. The two storey element would be set off the boundary with the neighbouring houses and it is considered that by reason of the distance away from the living accommodation in the adjacent houses it would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the occupiers of those properties. The adjacent houses have single storey rear extensions and although the proposed extension would project further it is considered that the proposal by reason of its depth would not have a detrimental affect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers by way of being overbearing. In addition, there has not been a material change in the site circumstances or planning policy that would justify refusal of planning permission. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policy CP1 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T1 - Standard time 2) M10 - Retention of window pattern 3) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos. VGAS/526/1A, VGAS/526/2A and VGAS/526/3. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/84 2011
15
NAVESTOCK WOODHOUSE DUDBROOK ROAD KELVEDON COMMON BRENTWOOD FORMATION OF LIGHTWELL TO THE REAR AND NEW WINDOW TO THE BACK WALL AT BASEMENT LEVEL [bm1]LB/BRW/6/2011 Ward: BRIZES AND DODDINGHURST Parish: Navestock Parish Council Case Officer: Helen Bealey (Tel: 01277 312604) 1. Proposals
Zoning:
Metropolitan Green Belt
Policies: C15 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011
Formation of light well to the rear, the light well will include a low retaining wall. New window to the back wall at basement level and alterations to the internal walls.
2. Relevant History
No relevant planning history.

Navestock Parish Council: No objections Historic Buildings Advisor: I recommend approval of this application subject to the following conditions: o Specification details of the proposed waterproofing to the interior walls should be submitted for approval. Note: the system should ensure that the wall continues to 'breathe'. o Construction details of the proposed new window should be submitted for approval, scale 1:1 to 1:20 as necessary.
None
The new window and light well is proposed to a large, detached grade II Listed Building. The works will also create an additional habitable room within the basement area, with works being carried out to the interior walls.
15 2011
1484/85
The new window is to be at the rear of the property and in an inconspicuous location. The creation of the light well would result in the loss of some plants and bushes and the installation of a low retaining wall. The Historic Buildings Advisor has no objection to the proposed works and it is considered that the proposal would not detract from the character or setting of the listed building. However, to ensure that the proposed new window is in keeping with the other windows on the property it is considered necessary to impose a condition requiring construction details of the proposed new window. In addition, as the works include plastering the internal walls specification details of the proposed waterproofing should be submitted to ensure the wall continues to 'breathe'. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal complies with Policy C15 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T2 - Standard time - Listed buildings 2) Prior to the commencement of the development, specification details of the proposed waterproofing to the interior walls should be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: To safeguard the integrity of the Listed Building.) 3) Prior to the commencement of the development, construction details of the proposed new window, at a scale of 1:1 to 1:20 as necessary, should be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (Reason: To safeguard the character and integrity of the Listed Building.) 4) The following plans are relevant to this permission: drawing numbers, 916/01/A, the block plan and the location plan. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval: The proposal would comply with the development plan policies that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/86 2011
15
THE BOARS HEAD 15 BILLERICAY ROAD HERONGATE BRENTWOOD REFURBISHMENT OF PUBLIC HOUSE [bm1]LB/BRW/7/2011 Ward: HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON Parish: Herongate & Ingrave Parish Council Case Officer: Catherine Williams (Tel: 01277 312617) 1. Proposals

Zoning: Policies:
Residential C14 C15 CP1
8/13 Week Date: 3rd May 2011
This application is for listed building consent for the refurbishment of a public house. The alterations include painting of the exterior of the building; Replacement flooring, erection of an internal wall to block up opening to glass wash; Reduction in the size of the bar
2. Relevant History

LB/BRW/8/2011: Internal alterations to first floor and new fire door and external staircase to fire escape - Current application A/BRW/7/2011 and LB/BRW/12/2007: Application for numerous advertisements Current application

Herongate and Ingrave Parish Council: No objection. Historic Buildings Advisor: No objection subject to condition.
One letter of representation has been received stating that the plans do not include the addition of an accessible toilet and as the pub is under going refurbishment it would be a good opportunity to include one.
1484/87 2011
15
The application property is a public house that it a listed building within the conservation area. The property originates from the 17th century and forms part of a group of properties around the pond. It occupies a wide plot in a prominent location which is highly visible from Billericay Road. The property is currently painted white with black finishing to the window and door frames, the proposal includes the public house being painted sage green. On the basis of the comments received from the historic buildings advisor it is considered that this part of the proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the listed building and the conservation area. The internal alterations do not include structural alterations to the building and it is considered that a condition should be imposed to inspect the existing floor once it is exposed to ensure that any timbers of historic value are not damaged during the refurbishment. Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with policies CP1, C14, C15 of the Brentwood Replacement Local Plan.
6. Recommendation Approve 1) T2 - Standard time - Listed buildings 2) The Local Planning Authority shall be notified of the removal of the flooring and exposure of the floor in the bar area in order that arrangements can be made to inspect the floor. The approved flooring shall not be commenced until the exposed floor has been inspected by the Local Planning Authority and written authority has been given to commence the work. (Reason: In the interest of the character and integrity of the listed building.) 3) The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos. PT172-11-LO2. (Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.) Informatives 1) Reason for approval:- The proposal would accord with the development plan policies relevant to this proposal that are set out below. 2) I11 - Policies related to approval 3) I8 - Accordance with approved plans
1484/88 2011
15
11 THE DELL GREAT WARLEY BRENTWOOD CROWN REDUCE BY 30% , CROWN THIN BY 20% AND CROWN LIFT BY 3M ONE ASH SUBJECT TO TREE PRESERVATION ORDER No. 57 OF 1991 [bm1]TPO/BRW/28/2011 Ward: WARLEY Parish: Case Officer: Andrew Laing (Tel: 01277 312611) 1. Proposals
Zoning: Residential Policies: C6 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011
Crown reduce by 30%, crown thin by 20% and crown lift by 3m one Ash located to the rear of the property.
NOTE THIS APPLICATION WOULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS IF THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE POLICY, PERFORMANCE AND RESOURCES BOARD IN JANUARY 2011 HAD BEEN AGREED. 2. Relevant History
TPO/BRW/10/1995: Crown reduce by 30% one Ash: Approved
Arboriculturalist: The tree is a mature specimen that dominates the rear garden. A crown reduction by 30% and a crown lift by 3m will keep the tree in scale with the garden whilst maintaining its amenity. A crown thin by 20% will allow light and air into the crown of the tree.
None

In light of the comments of the Arboriculturalist, it is considered that the proposed works are justified It is considered that the proposal would not adversely affect the visual amenities of the area and Policy C6 is met
1484/89 2011
15
6. Recommendation Approve 1) TR1 - Works to trees with supervision Informatives 1) I11 - Policies related to approval
1484/90 2011
15
SECTION 2 PLANNING SERVICES REPORTS ON ENFORCEMENT CASES Subject to concurrence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Planning Development Control Committee, Head of Planning Services delegated to request Borough Solicitor to take legal action in respect of Planning Control contravention, subject to the Borough Solicitor being satisfied with the evidence.
Legal action will be taken in accordance with the attached recommendations unless a case is referred to the Planning Development Control Committee by ANY MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL, or by a PARISH COUNCIL. Any case that is referred will be reported the next available Planning Development Control Committee Planning Services Administration support must be notified of any case which is to be referred by 12 Noon on 25th April 2011 Cases may be referred in writing or by telephoning Planning Services Administration Support (01277 312620). (Please do not hesitate to contact the case officer or Area Planning Officer if you have any queries prior to referring any item.) You will receive a written acknowledgement of any referral that is made, advising you of the date of the Committee when the application will be considered. The attached reports relate to cases where a breach of planning control has been identified and no retrospective application submitted in an attempt to remedy that breach. In all cases, either the owner/occupier of the property/land has been given 21 days to submit a planning application, but this has not been received at the time of the publication of this Weekly Report, or, a planning application has previously been submitted and refused (in which case details of that application will be referred to in the report item). Reference in the recommendations to 'legal action', includes (as appropriate to the individual cases) enforcement action, prosecutions and any other appropriate legal action.
There are no items to report this week
1484/91 2011
15
SECTION 3 Applications REFERRED from Weekly Report No. 1482
Reference BRW/790/2010
Address 48-52 QUEENS ROAD BRENTWOOD
Development DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION OF 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS (TWO FLATS, FIVE DUPLEXES AND THREE TOWN HOUSES) INCLUDING VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM COPTFOLD ROAD AND PARKING SPACES
Referred by Cllr Le-Surf
BRW/84/2011
THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD
CHANGE OF USE, EXTENSION Cllr Mrs AND CONVERSION OF EXISTING Pound FORGE BUILDING TO RESIDENTIAL DWELLNG AND ERECTION OF 6 NEW DWELLINGS AND A CARTLODGE, NEW ACCESS, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING DEMOLITION OF WORKSHOP BUILDINGS Cllr Mrs Pound
CAC/BRW/1/2011 THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD
1484/92 2011
15
SECTION 4 MINOR AMENDMENTS to plans approved under delegated powers There are no items to report this week
SECTION 5 APPEALS - LIST OF APPEALS RECEIVED There are no items to report this week
SECTION 6 APPEALS - REPORTS ON APPEAL DECISIONS RECEIVED
Address: HOLMFIELD BROOK LANE DODDINGHURST BRENTWOOD Development: OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED BARN BUILDING FOR USE AS AN INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, LEISURE FACILITY AND GYMNASIUM, INCIDENTAL TO THE RESIDENTIAL USE OF THE MAIN PROPERTY. Decision: Dismissed Ward: Parish: Reference: Zoning: Relevant Policies: Brief Analysis: BRIZES AND DODDINGHURST Doddinghurst Parish Council ENF/BRW/268/2009
GB1 ,GB2 ,CP1 This enforcement appeal results from the refusal of retrospective planning permission for a 'barn' building that is being used as an indoor swimming pool, leisure facility and gymnasium. An enforcement notice requiring demolition of the barn was served and appealed. The Inspector has dismissed the appeal. Ground A appeal: In dismissing the appeal, the Inspector considered that the main issue to the appeal was whether the 'barn' constituted inappropriate development and, if so, whether there were any very special circumstances outweighed the harm caused.
15 2011
1484/93
The Inspector stated that in terms of size and scale the 'barn' competed with the bungalow and represented a disproportionate addition to the dwelling. The Inspector concluded that the building therefore constituted inappropriate development which would be harmful to the Green Belt and that there were no very special circumstances that would warrant the granting of permission for the building. Ground G appeal: The appellant contended that the two month period given for compliance was inadequate. The Inspector felt that was no compelling reason to vary the period for compliance. The Inspector dismissed the appeal and upheld the enforcement notice and refused to grant planning permission on the application deemed to have been made.
SECTION 7 ENFORCEMENT - LIST OF ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS WHERE POSSIBLE BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED There are no items to report this week
1484/94 2011
15
SECTION 8
ENFORCEMENT - LIST OF ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS WHERE NO BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED OR WHERE ANY BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL HAS CEASED OR BEEN REMEDIED Set out below is a list of enforcement complaints investigated where no breach of planning control has been identified and the complainant written to during the week ending 15th April 2011 and advised accordingly. Please contact the case officer for any further information (quoting the reference no.) Address: Reference: Officer: Ward: Parish: Alleged breach: HALFWAY HOUSE A127 WEST HORNDON BRENTWOOD ENF/BRW/141/2007 Russell Butchers HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON West Horndon Parish Council MARQUEE ERECTED IN REAR GARDEN IN BREACH OF ENFORCEMENT NOTICE. Case history has been reviewed. The enforcement notice that was served did not relate to the marquee, only a storage building that was on the land. There was reference to the marquee in the file, but the marquee was not included in the wording of the notice. I believe that this is because the marquee had, at that time, been taken down. The marquee was subsequently reerected on the land, possibly in a different location. The Council did not serve a subsequent enforcement notice requiring the removal of the marquee. The marquee has been on the land since at least 2000, as depicted in aerial photographs. The marquee is considered to be lawful and no enforcement action can be taken by the Council. Case recommended for closure.
1484/95 2011
15
Address:
Reference: Officer: Ward: Parish: Alleged breach: Complaint received regarding rubbish in the car park at this site. Whilst this privately owned land does contain some rubbish, the effect on the amenity is not sufficiently injurious to warrant the serving of an 'Untidy Site' notice. Case recommended for closure. Address: CROW GREEN FARM DAYS LANE PILGRIMS HATCH BRENTWOOD ENF/BRW/342/2010 Russell Butchers PILGRIMS HATCH
LAND BEHIND SANTANDER BANK CROWN STREET BRENTWOOD ENF/BRW/163/2011 Russell Butchers BRENTWOOD SOUTH
Reference: Officer: Ward: Parish: Alleged breach: Repair works were undertaken to the fishing ponds at this property as a result of damage caused to the banks by crayfish. A significant volume of silt was removed from the ponds and deposited on adjacent land. This is considered to be an environmental issue and as such the Environment Agency were alerted who are now overseeing the case. No further action is required from Brentwood Borough Council at this time. Case recommended for closure. Address: Reference: Officer: Ward: Parish: Alleged breach: 59, RAYLEIGH ROAD HUTTON BRENTWOOD ENF/BRW/7/2011 Russell Butchers HUTTON CENTRAL Non compliance with conditions to planning permission BRW/246/2009. Condition discharge notice has been granted for this property. All conditions are being complied with at this time. Case recommended for closure.
1484/96 2011
15

Weekly Report - Refusal Reason Page 74

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Weekly Report - Refusal Reason Page 74

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

PLANNING SERVICES

BRIZES AND DODDINGHURST

Navestock Parish Council

Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green Parish Council

HERONGATE, INGRAVE & WEST HORNDON

West Horndon Parish Council

BRENTWOOD SOUTH HUTTON NORTH

Herongate & Ingrave Parish Council

TPO/BRW/28/2011 11 THE DELL GREAT WARLEY BRENTWOOD

THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD

ENF/BRW/268/2009 HOLMFIELD BROOK LANE DODDINGHURST BRENTWOOD

BRW/38/88 - Single storey extension and canopy at front. Approved.

Parish: Case Officer: Mandeep Chaggar (Tel: 01277 312608) 1. Proposals

ENF/BRW/232/2003 - Use of the land has changed to domestic garden.

Residential C14 CP1

8/13 Week Date: 28th April 2011

BRW/7/2011 Erection of a detached two storey three bedroom dwelling Withdrawn

Metropolitan Green Belt

PD/77/66: Conservatory- Permitted Development PD/427/69: Porch- Permitted Development.

Residential CP1 H17 H7

8/13 Week Date: 2nd May 2011

BRW/942/2002: Retention of conservatory at side- Approved.

Residential CP1 H17 H7

8/13 Week Date: 4th May 2011

This application is for a single storey rear extension.

PD/118/79: Enclose porch- Permitted Development.

A/BRW/9/95: Continued display of internally illuminated projecting box signRefused.

Metropolitan Green Belt

Policies: C15 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011

No relevant planning history.

Residential C14 C15 CP1

8/13 Week Date: 3rd May 2011

Zoning: Residential Policies: C6 8/13 Week Date: 6th May 2011

TPO/BRW/10/1995: Crown reduce by 30% one Ash: Approved

There are no items to report this week

SECTION 3 Applications REFERRED from Weekly Report No. 1482

Address 48-52 QUEENS ROAD BRENTWOOD

Referred by Cllr Le-Surf

THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD

CAC/BRW/1/2011 THE FORGE GREAT WARLEY STREET WARLEY BRENTWOOD

SECTION 6 APPEALS - REPORTS ON APPEAL DECISIONS RECEIVED

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen