Sie sind auf Seite 1von 664

ESTUDIO DE TRNSITO PARA EL

NUEVO CONECTOR ENTRE CIDRA Y


CAYEY
AC-017242
REPORTE FINAL
FECHA:
12 de junio de 2010

PREPARADO PARA:
Gregory L. Morris Engineering
San Juan, Puerto Rico
y
La Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacin
de Puerto Rico
San Juan, Puerto Rico

PREPARADO POR:
EFGB Consulting Engineers P.S.C.

19-22 Ave. Ramrez de Arrellano


Suite 7, PMB 49
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, 00966-3175

Tel. (787) 637-2651, e-mail efgb71@onelinkpr.net

TABLA DE CONTENIDOS
I-

INTRODUCCION ......................................................................................... 1
Introduccin ....................................................................................................... 1
Objetivos ........................................................................................................... 1
Enfoque del estudio ........................................................................................... 2
Alcance del Trabajo ........................................................................................... 2
Descripcin del Proyecto ................................................................................. 10
Localizacin del Proyecto ................................................................................ 11
Informacin de Contexto ................................................................................. 11
Organizacin del Estudio ................................................................................. 13

II-

CONDICIONES EXISTENTES .................................................................. 14

Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 14
Rutas de Acceso ............................................................................................. 14
Condiciones Geomtricas ............................................................................... 15
Volumen de Trnsito ....................................................................................... 16
Seguridad Vial ................................................................................................. 16
Tiempos de viaje ............................................................................................. 18
Anlisis Operacional ........................................................................................ 19
Conclusiones ................................................................................................... 25
III-

CONDICION FUTURANO ACCIN ...................................................... 26

Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 26
Factores de Proyeccin ................................................................................... 26
Volmenes Proyectados .................................................................................. 26
No-Accin 2018 ............................................................................................... 27
No-Accin 2028 ............................................................................................... 35
Conclusiones ................................................................................................... 42
IV-

EVALUACION DE ALTERNATIVAS ........................................................ 43

Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 43
Modelo de Asignacin de Trnsito .................................................................. 43
Red Modelada ................................................................................................. 44
Codificacin de las Zonas ............................................................................... 45
i

Generacin de la Matriz .................................................................................. 47


Parmetros de Modelo .................................................................................... 47
Determinacin de Hora Pico ............................................................................ 48
Calibracin del Modelo .................................................................................... 49
Aplicacin del Modelo de Trnsito ................................................................... 50
Ajuste de Tiempos de Viaje ............................................................................. 52
Resultados de Asignacin de Trnsito ............................................................ 54
Resultados de Tiempos de Viaje ..................................................................... 57
Conclusiones ................................................................................................... 61
V-

SECCIONES PROPUESTAS .................................................................... 62

Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 62
Seccin Bsica de Carretera ........................................................................... 62
Geometra propuesta para las Intersecciones ................................................. 65
VI-

EVALUACION DE ALTERNATIVAS FUTURAS ...................................... 74

Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 74
Anlisis Operacional, Alternativa 1 .................................................................. 75
Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 2 ................................................................... 78
Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 3 ................................................................... 81
Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 4 ................................................................... 84
Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 5 ................................................................... 86
Comparativa de Resultados ............................................................................ 89
Conclusiones ................................................................................................... 95
VII- MEJORAS ADICIONALES ....................................................................... 97
Introduccin ..................................................................................................... 97
Mejoras Geomtricas Propuestas ................................................................... 97
Anlisis Operacional ...................................................................................... 100
Conclusiones ................................................................................................. 106
VIII- CONCLUSIONES .................................................................................... 108

ii

Listado de Figuras
Figura

Pagina

Figura 1: Mapa de las Estaciones de Conteo Automtico ............................................... 7


Figura 2: Mapa de las localizaciones de Conteo Manual ................................................ 8
Figura 3: Mapa de las rutas estudiadas para tiempos de viaje ....................................... 9
Figura 4: Alternativas Propuestas ..................................................................................10
Figura 5: Localizacin de Puerto Rico ...........................................................................11
Figura 6: Localizacin de Cidra y Cayey........................................................................12
Figura 7: Red Base SATURN ........................................................................................46
Figura 8: Proceso de Calibracin...................................................................................50
Figura 9: Nivel de ajuste Base pico AM ......................................................................51
Figura 10: Nivel de ajuste Base pico PM ....................................................................52
Figura 11: Geometra Propuesta para la Interseccin de la PR-1 con la PR-184 y el
Nuevo Conector .....................................................................................68
Figura 12: Geometra Propuesta para la Interseccin de la PR-7733 con el Nuevo
Conector para las Alternativas 1, 2, y 3 .................................................69
Figura 13: Geometra Propuesta para la PR-7733 con el Nuevo Conector para las
Alternativas 4 & 5 ...................................................................................70
Figura 14: Geometra Propuesta de la PR-1 con el Nuevo Conector para las Alternativas
4 & 5.......................................................................................................71
Figura 15: Geometra Propuesta para la PR-52 con el Nuevo Conector para la
Alternativa 4 ...........................................................................................72
Figura 16: Geometria Propuesta para la PR-52 y PR-743 con el Nuevo Conector para la
Alternativa 5 ...........................................................................................73
Figura 17: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-171 y PR-7733 ...........................................98
Figura 18: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-734 con PR-7733 .......................................98
Figura 19: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-184 con las Rampas Norte de la PR-52......99
Figura 20: Mejoras Propuestas a la PR-1 con el Nuevo Conector Alt. 5 ........................99

iii

Listado de Tablas
Tabla

Pagina

Tabla 1: Estaciones de Conteo de Trnsito Automticas ................................................ 3


Tabla 2: Estaciones de Conteo Manual .......................................................................... 4
Tabla 3: Volumen de trnsito en las principales rutas de acceso 2008 ..........................17
Tabla 4: Resumen de accidentes fatales .......................................................................17
Tabla 5: Resumen de Tiempos de Viaje ........................................................................18
Tabla 6: Condiciones Existentes en horas pico AM por interseccin .............................21
Tabla 7: Condiciones Existentes de Nivel de Servicio en la accesos para Hora Pico AM
...............................................................................................................22
Tabla 8: Condicin Existente de Niveles de Servicio en horas pico PM por interseccin
...............................................................................................................23
Tabla 9: Condiciones Existentes de Nivel de Servicio en la accesos para Hora Pico PM
...............................................................................................................24
Tabla 10: Factores de proyeccin a 10 y 20 aos .........................................................27
Tabla 11: Volmenes de trnsito proyectados para el 2018 y 2028 ...............................28
Tabla 12: 2018 Nivel de Servicio Condicin de No-Accin Horas Pico AM por
Interseccin ............................................................................................29
Tabla 13: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2018, Hora Pico AM por Acceso a Cada
Interseccin ............................................................................................31
Tabla 14: NS para el 2018 para la condicin de no-accin en la hora pico PM por
interseccin ............................................................................................33
Tabla 15: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2018, Hora Pico PM por Acceso a Cada
Interseccin ............................................................................................34
Tabla 16: NS para el 2028 para la condicin de no-accin en la hora pico AM por
interseccin ............................................................................................36
Tabla 17: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2028, Hora Pico AM por Acceso a Cada
Interseccin ............................................................................................37
Tabla 18: NS por interseccin para la condicin de no-accin del 2028 ........................39
Tabla 19: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2028, Hora Pico PM por Acceso a Cada
Interseccin ............................................................................................41
Tabla 20: Codificacion de las zonas para O/D ...............................................................47

iv

Tabla 21: VOT para cada tipo de usuario ($/Hora) ........................................................48


Tabla 22: Comparativa de tiempos de viaje Observados y Modelados ..........................53
Tabla 23: Pico AM- Trnsito Entrando a Cidra...............................................................55
Tabla 24: Pico AM- Trnsito Saliendo de Cidra .............................................................55
Tabla 25: Pico PM- Trnsito Entrando a Cidra...............................................................56
Tabla 26: Pico PM - Trnsito Saliendo de Cidra ............................................................56
Tabla 27: Longitud de Rutas de Acceso ........................................................................57
Tabla 28: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Entrando a Cidra ..........................................58
Tabla 29: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Saliendo de Cidra .........................................58
Tabla 30: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Ida y Vuelta ..................................................59
Tabla 31: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico PM Entrando a Cidra ..........................................59
Tabla 32: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico Saliendo de Cidra ...............................................60
Tabla 33: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico PM Ida y Vuelta ..................................................60
Tabla 34: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico AM .................................................62
Tabla 35: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico PM .................................................63
Tabla 36: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico AM .................................................63
Tabla 37: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico PM .................................................63
Tabla 38: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico AM ............63
Tabla 39: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico PM ............63
Tabla 40: Seccin de Carretera Recomendada para el Nuevo Conector 2018 ..............64
Tabla 41: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico AM ............64
Tabla 42: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico PM ............64
Tabla 43: Seccin Recomendada para el Nuevo Conector 2028 ...................................64
Tabla 44: Nueva Seccin del Conector 2028 Pico AM con un NS de C ........................65
Tabla 45: Alternativa 1- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM..........................................76
Tabla 46: Alternativa 1- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM..........................................77
Tabla 47: Alternativa 2- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM..........................................79
Tabla 48: Alternativa 2- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM..........................................80
Tabla 49: Alternativa 3- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM..........................................82
Tabla 50: Alternativa 3- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM..........................................83
Tabla 51: Alternativa 4- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM..........................................85

Tabla 52: Alternativa 4- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM..........................................86


Tabla 53: Alternativa 5- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM..........................................87
Tabla 54: Alternativa 5- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM..........................................88
Tabla 55: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico AM 2018 .91
Tabla 56: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico PM 2018 .92
Tabla 57: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico AM 2028 .93
Tabla 58: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico PM 2028 .94
Tabla 59: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 1 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin ...........101
Tabla 60: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 2 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin ...........102
Tabla 61: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 3 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin ...........103
Tabla 62: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 4 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin ...........104
Tabla 63: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 5 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin ...........105

vi

I-

INTRODUCCION

Introduccin
1.1

Este informe tcnico, presenta la data, los procedimientos y los resultados del
estudio de anlisis de trnsito realizado para el proyecto AC-017242, del nuevo
conector entre los municipios de Cidra y Cayey.

1.2

La Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacin de Puerto Rico (ACT) ha contratado


los servicios de Gregory L. Morris y asociados para realizar la declaracin de
impacto ambiental del proyecto AC-017242. El estudio de impacto de trnsito es
parte de los requisitos establecidos en el contrato mencionado y es un esfuerzo
conjunto entre Gregory L. Morris y EFGB Consulting Engineers.

1.3

Este informe presenta los resultados de la condicin existente, las condiciones de


no-accin para 2018 y 2028, el modelo de asignacin de trnsito y evaluacin de
las cinco alternativas, mejoras adicionales, la seccin de la carretera propuesta y
geometra de la interseccin propuesta para dicho proyecto.

1.4

Este informe presentar a las condiciones de trnsito existentes (ao 2008),


patrones de flujo de trnsito, conteos de trnsito, niveles de servicio existentes y
el tiempo de viaje a Cidra para las rutas de acceso existentes.

1.5

La data presentada en este informe fue recopilada por DataRus y el Ing. Paxie
Crdoba bajo la supervisin de EFGB Consulting Engineers.

En adicin, los

modelos de asignacin de viajes en SATURN fueron preparados por la oficina de


Puerto Rico de Steer Davies Gleave (SDG) en coordinacin con EFGB Consulting
Engineers.

Objetivos
1.6

Los objetivos de este informe son:


1.6.1

Determinar la condicin de trnsito existente en el municipio de Cidra y


algunas intersecciones claves del municipio de Cayey.

1.6.2

Proyectar las condiciones existentes a dos aos horizonte, el 2018 y 2028.

1.6.3

Evaluar las 5 alternativas de rutas propuestas para el proyecto y determinar


cual presenta el mayor beneficio con respecto a transporte y trnsito hacia y
desde Cidra.

Enfoque del estudio


1.7

La pregunta subyacente es: qu impacto en las condiciones de trnsito existente


tendr el proyecto propuesto?

1.8

Para responder a esta pregunta debe documentarse las condiciones de trnsito


existente a travs de la data recopilada de los volmenes de trnsito, los tiempos
de viaje y la seguridad del trnsito en lugares claves de la regin. Como parte de
este anlisis se han calculado los niveles existentes de congestin de trnsito y de
servicio.

1.9

Una vez que se ha evaluado la condicin existente, se introducen al modelo los 5


proyectos alternativos propuestos y se realiza la reasignacin del trnsito en la red
para determinar el cambio en los patrones de viaje que se espera se produzcan
debido a la construccin del proyecto. Los cambios propuestos se calculan para
cada alternativa incluyendo la alternativa de no-accin.

1.10 Una vez se ha reasignado el trnsito, se evalan las condiciones de trnsito


esperado para cada alternativa individual basado en los niveles previstos de
servicio de las mismas ubicaciones donde se evalu la condicin existente.
1.11 Basado en los resultados obtenidos, se discutir la alternativa preferida y se
propondrn las directrices bsicas para el diseo, en relacin al nmero de
carriles, tipo de intersecciones, y otras caractersticas geomtricas.

Alcance del Trabajo


1.12 Recopilacin de data
1.12.1 Se instalaron estaciones de conteo de trnsito automticas y se recopilo data
por espacio de una semana (de Domingo a Domingo) en las siguientes
localizaciones; PR-1 entre PR-184 y PR-787, PR-738 entre PR-1 y PR-735, PR735 al Norte de PR-738, PR-734 al Sur de PR-7733, PR-171 al Sur de PR-7733,
PR-172 al Sur de PR-7733, PR-171 al Norte de PR-14, PR-14 al este de PR171, PR-172 al oeste de PR-785, PR-172 al Norte de PR 787, PR-172 al oeste
2

de la calle Nm. 2, PR 1 al Norte de PR-787, PR-787 al oeste de PR-1, PR-1 al


Norte de la rampa de salida de la PR-52, PR-184 entre PR-1 y PR-52, y PR-743
al Norte de PR-742. Para las localizaciones detalladas ver la Figura 1 y la Tabla
1, y para la data completa ver el Apndice A.
Tabla 1: Estaciones de Conteo de Trnsito Automticas (ATC)

Numero de
Estacin

Descripcin de la Estacin

Numero de
Estacin

Descripcin de la Estacin

ATC-1

PR-1 entre PR-184 y PR787

ATC -9

PR-172 al oeste de PR-785

ATC -2

PR-738 entre PR-1 y PR735

ATC -10

PR-172 al Norte de PR 787

ATC -3

PR-735 al oeste de PR734

ATC -11

PR-172 al oeste de la calle Nm. 2

ATC -4

PR-734 al Sur de
7733

PR-

ATC -12

PR 1 al Norte de PR-787

ATC -5

PR-171 al Sur de
7733

PR-

ATC -13

PR-787 al oeste de PR-1

ATC -6

PR-172 al Sur-este de
PR-7733

ATC -14

PR-1 al Norte de la rampa de salida


de PR-52

ATC -7

PR-171 al Norte de PR-14

ATC -15

PR-184 entre PR-1 y PR-52

ATC -8

PR-14 al este de PR-171

ATC -16

PR-743 al Norte de PR-742

1.12.2 Se realizaron conteos de trnsito manuales por un espacio de tiempo


consecutivo de 12 horas desde las 6:00 am a 6:00 pm en las siguientes
intersecciones; PR-1 con PR-184, PR-1 con PR-14, PR-7733 con PR-734, PR7733 con PR-171, PR-7733 con PR-172, PR-171 con PR14, PR-734 con PR735, PR-735 con PR-1 (Norte), PR735 con PR-1 (Sur), PR-735 con PR-738, PR172 con PR-787, PR-1 con PR-787, PR-7733 con la entrada a la fabrica, PR-184
con la rampa de salida de PR-52 hacia el Norte, PR-184 con la rampa de salida
de PR-52 SB hacia el Sur, y PR-743 con PR-742 .

Para las localizaciones en

detalle ver la Figura 2 y la Tabla 2 para el conjunto completo de data consulte el


Apndice B.
3

Tabla 2: Estaciones de Conteo Manual (MTC)

Numero de
Estacin

Descripcin de la
Estacin

Numero de
Estacin

Descripcin de la Estacin

MTC -1

PR-1 con PR-184

MTC -9

PR735 con PR-1 (sur)

MTC -2

PR-1 con PR-14

MTC -10

PR-735 con PR-738

MTC -3

PR-7733 con PR-734

MTC -11

PR-172 con PR-787

MTC -4

PR-7733 con PR-171

MTC -12

PR-1 con PR-787

MTC -5

PR-7733 con PR-172

MTC -13

PR-743 con PR-742

MTC -6

PR-171 con PR14

MTC -14

PR-184 con la rampa de salida


hacia el Norte de PR-52

MTC -7

PR-734 con PR-735

MTC -15

PR-184 con la rampa de salida


hacia el Sur de PR-52

MTC -8

PR-735
(Norte)

MTC -16

PR-7733 la entrada a la fabrica

con

PR-1

1.12.3 Se realizaron estudios de tiempo de viaje y demoras en seis rutas que sirven
como rutas de acceso para Cidra desde Caguas y Cayey. Para rutas detalladas
ver la Figura 3, para el conjunto completo de data consulte el Apndice C.
1.12.3.1

Ruta A se inicia en la interseccin de PR-1 con PR-184, toma PR-1 hasta


su interseccin con PR-787, toma PR-787 hasta su interseccin con PR-172,
toma PR-172, hasta que cruza con PR-7733.

1.12.3.2

Ruta B se inicia en la interseccin de PR-1 con las rampas de salida de


PR-52, sigue PR-1 hasta que cruza con PR-14, toma PR-14 hasta que cruza
con PR-171 y toma PR-171 hasta su interseccin con PR - 7733.

1.12.3.3

Ruta C-comienza en la interseccin de PR-1 con las rampas de salida de


PR-52, sigue PR-1 hasta que cruza con PR-738, PR-738 hasta que cruza
con PR-735, sigue PR-735, hasta que cruza con PR-734 y sigue PR-734
hasta su interseccin con PR-7733.

1.12.3.4

Ruta D-comienza en la interseccin de PR-1 con PR-184 sigue PR-1 hasta


que cruza con PR-14, toma PR-14 hasta que cruza con PR-171 y toma PR171 hasta su interseccin con PR - 7733.

1.12.3.5

Ruta E-comienza en la interseccin de PR-172 con las rampas de salida de


PR-52 en Caguas y sigue 172 hasta su interseccin con PR-7733.

1.12.3.6

Ruta F-interseccin de PR-52 con PR-172 a la interseccin de PR-52 con


PR-184.

1.13 Reduccin de data y proyeccin


1.13.1 La data recopilada ser procesada y codificada para su uso en programas de
computadora que analizarn las condiciones de trnsito bajo diferentes
escenarios.
1.13.2 En las estaciones de conteo automtico, de la data obtenida en el rea, se
calculo una proyeccin de la media semanal de trnsito en cada localizacin,
basado en al menos un conteo de trnsito de 24 horas por siete das.
1.13.3 En las localizaciones de conteo manual de trnsito, una vez procesada la data
obtenida en el rea se obtuvo toda la informacin necesaria para realizar el
anlisis operacional. Tal como las horas pico, volmenes de hora pico,
clasificaciones de vehculo, factores de hora pico entre otros.
1.13.4 A partir del estudio de los tiempos de viaje una vez se reduce y analiza la data,
se obtiene el tiempo medio de viaje entre Cidra y Cayey o Cidra y Caguas.
1.13.5 Adems, dichos datos se proyectarn para los escenarios de 2018 y 2028
basados en los factores de proyeccin desarrollados por la Autoridad de
Carreteras y Transporte de Puerto Rico.
1.14 Anlisis de Data
1.14.1 Una vez que la data se ha reducido y evaluado para cada localizacin de conteo
manual, ser la base para la evaluacin operacional de la regin.
1.14.2 Se realizar un anlisis operacional en cada localizacin de conteo manual,
basado en los procedimientos establecidos en Manual de Capacidad de
Autopistas 2000 (Highway Capacity Manual 2000, HCM), a travs de una serie
de aplicaciones de software que estn disponibles en el mercado, principalmente
SIDRA o SYNCHRO.
5

1.14.3 El anlisis incluir las condiciones existentes y nivel de servicio (ao base 2008)
y las condiciones futuras para cada alternativa que se est evaluando (aos
2018 y 2028) y para la condicin de no-accin.
1.14.4 El informe final incluir el nivel operacional de servicio para las alternativas que
se estn evaluando, distribuciones direccionales, volmenes de trnsito de hora
pico y la distincin entre el trnsito pesado y el trnsito de vehculos de
pasajeros.
1.15 Reporte Final
1.15.1 A final report will be prepared with the results and recommendations based on
the data collected, the projected data and the analysis performed. Se preparar
un informe final con los resultados y recomendaciones basadas en la data
recopilada, la data proyectada y el anlisis realizado.

Figura 1: Mapa de las Estaciones de Conteo Automtico

Figura 2: Mapa de las localizaciones de Conteo Manual

Figura 3: Mapa de las rutas estudiadas para tiempos de viaje

Descripcin del Proyecto


1.16 El proyecto propuesto es una nueva carretera, de aproximadamente 4 millas de
longitud, que conectar a los municipios de Cidra y Cayey, como puede verse en la
Figura 4.
Figura 4: Alternativas Propuestas

1.17 Como parte de este proyecto se desarrollaron 5 alternativas comenzando en la


interseccin de la PR-7733 y la entrada a la zona industrial y terminando en tres
lugares diferentes a lo largo de la PR-52, vase la figura 4. En adicin a las cinco
alternativas, la alternativa de no-accin tambin ser evaluada.
1.18 Las alternativas 1, 2 y 3 se inician en la entrada al rea industrial y al finalizan en la
interseccin de la PR-52 y la PR-184.
1.19 Las Alternativas 4 y 5 comienzan en la entrada a la zona industrial y terminan en la
PR-52.
10

Localizacin del Proyecto


1.20 Puerto Rico es una isla caribea que mide aproximadamente 100 por 35 millas o
3,500 millas cuadradas y tiene una poblacin de ms de 3.8 millones de personas.
Puerto Rico est localizado aproximadamente 1,000 millas al Sureste de Miami,
Florida. La Figura 5 presenta la ubicacin relativa de Puerto Rico en relacin al resto
del Caribe y el extremo Sur del estado de Florida.

Figura 5: Localizacin de Puerto Rico

1.21 Los municipios de Cidra y Cayey se encuentran en las montaas de la regin centro
oriental de Puerto Rico, aproximadamente 22 y 25 millas al Sur-Suroeste de San
Juan, respectivamente. La Figura 6 muestra la ubicacin relativa de estos municipios
a San Juan, Caguas y el resto de la regin oriental de Puerto Rico.

Informacin de Contexto
1.22 Municipio de Cidra
1.22.1 El municipio de Cidra tiene una extensin territorial de aproximadamente 36,1
millas cuadradas o 94 kilmetros cuadrados.

11

1.22.2 Basado en el censo del 2000, la poblacin de Cidra era de 42,753. Basado en
las proyecciones oficiales, se espera que la poblacin de Cidra crezca a 48,250
para el ao 2010; a 49,220 en 2012; a 51,374 para el ao 2020 y a 53,051 en el
ao 2030 para un aumento de 24.09%.
Figura 6: Localizacin de Cidra y Cayey

1.22.3 Basado en el censo del 2000 Cidra cuenta con 13,204 unidades de vivienda con
un ingreso per cpita promedio de $ 7,877.00.
1.22.4 En relacin a los empleos, el censo del 2000 Cidra reporta 7,742 puestos de
trabajo y las proyecciones oficiales esperan un incremento a 8,252 puestos de
trabajo para un aumento de 6,59% para el 2030.
1.23 Municipio de Cayey
1.23.1 El municipio de Cayey tiene una extensin territorial de aproximadamente 50.0
millas cuadradas o 130.0 kilmetros cuadrados

12

1.23.2 Basado en el censo del 2000, la poblacin de Cayey era de 47,370. Basada en
las proyecciones oficiales, se espera que la poblacin de Cayey crezca a 48,495
para el ao 2010; a 48,711 para el ao 2012; a 49,553 para el ao 2020 y a
50,254 en el ao 2030 para un aumento de 6.09%.
1.23.3 Basado en el censo del 2000 Cayey cuenta con 15,634 unidades de vivienda
con un ingreso per cpita promedio de $ 7,027.00
1.23.4 En relacin a los empleos, el censo del 2000 Cayey reporta 11,314 puestos de
trabajo y las proyecciones oficiales esperan un incremento a 12,066 puestos de
trabajo para el ao 2030 para un aumento de 6.64%.

Organizacin del Estudio


1.24 Este informe tcnico est organizado en 8 captulos, de los cuales el primer captulo
incluye la introduccin al estudio.

La descripcin de los captulos restantes se

enumeran a continuacin:
1.25 El Captulo 2 presenta las condiciones existentes.
1.26 El captulo 3 presenta la condicin futura en el escenario de no-accin.
1.27 El Captulo 4 presenta la evaluacin de alternativas, el modelo de asignacin de
trnsito y los resultados de tiempos de y viaje.
1.28 El Captulo 5 presenta la seccin de carreteras propuestas para las 5 alternativas bajo
evaluacin.
1.29 El Captulo 6 presenta la evaluacin de la condicin futura con la incorporacin de las
5 alternativas, individualmente y comparando una y otra.
1.30 El

Captulo

presenta

algunas

mejoras

adicionales

que

tratarn

ciertas

consideraciones no abordadas directamente por las 5 alternativas.


1.31 El Captulo 8 presenta las conclusiones del estudio.

13

II- CONDICIONES EXISTENTES


Introduccin
2.1

Este captulo presenta la data recopilada como parte de este proyecto.

2.2

La data de las estaciones de conteo automtico de trnsito relacionada a los


volmenes de viaje en las rutas de acceso principales fue recopilada del 24 de enero
de 2008 al 14 de febrero de 2008. Para fechas especficas de cada localizacin
consulte la data resumida en el Apndice A.

2.3

La data de las estaciones de conteo manual en las intersecciones principales


recopilada en las siguientes fechas; 29, 30 y 31 de enero; 5 de febrero y el 2 de abril
del 2008. Para fechas especficas en cada interseccin consulte la data resumida en
el Apndice B.

2.4

La data en relacin a los tiempos de viaje fue recopilada durante los das 11, 12 y 13
de marzo del 2008, cada da se estudiaron dos rutas, en el siguiente orden A y B, C y
D y E y F respectivamente.

2.5

La data relacionada a la seguridad del trnsito fue obtenida de la Comisin de


seguridad en el Trnsito de Puerto Rico.

Rutas de Acceso
2.6

Al evaluar la regin, el Municipio de Cidra tiene cuatro rutas de acceso principales que
se vern afectadas por el proyecto propuesto, una desde el municipio de Caguas y
tres desde el municipio de Cayey.

2.7

La primera ruta de acceso es la PR-172 de Caguas a Cidra; esta ruta conecta el


centro de Cidra a la PR-52 en Caguas. Esta ruta es el principal acceso para trnsito
ms pesado y trnsito viajando de la Zona Metropolitana de San Juan a Cidra.

2.8

La segunda ruta de acceso es la PR-734 de Cidra a Cayey; esta ruta conecta a la


ciudad de Cidra a la PR-735, que a su vez se conecta con la PR-1. Esta es la
principal ruta de acceso de Cayey a Cidra, y partiendo de los conteos de trnsito en
las estaciones de conteo automtico, representa aproximadamente el 48% de los
viajes entre Cidra y Cayey.

14

2.9

La tercera ruta de acceso es la PR-171 de Cidra a Cayey; esta ruta conecta la ciudad
de Cidra a la PR-14 al Norte de Cayey y a travs de la PR-14 a la PR-1, que se
conecta a la PR-52 en dos lugares, en la interseccin de la PR-52 y PR-184, y las
rampas de la PR-52. Esta es la ruta de acceso secundaria entre Cidra y Cayey y
basado en la data de trnsito recopilada, es responsable de aproximadamente el 34%
de los viajes entre los dos municipios.

2.10 La cuarta ruta de acceso es la PR-787 de Cidra a Cayey; esta ruta conecta a la ciudad
de Cidra a la PR-1 en la seccin Norte de la PR-1, en el municipio de Cayey. Esta es
la ruta menos usada entre los dos municipios con aproximadamente el 18% de los
viajes.

Condiciones Geomtricas
2.11 La PR-171, PR-734 y PR-787 presentan una condicin geomtrica similar con un
carril en cada direccin, carriles muy estrechos, pendientes empinadas, curvas
sinuosas y sin paseo. Esta configuracin geomtrica se presta para que el trnsito de
automviles de pasajeros se vea atrapado detrs de trnsito de camiones sin la
posibilidad de realizar movimientos de paso seguro.
2.12 La PR-172 presenta una condicin geomtrica similar en relacin a las pendientes y
curvas en comparacin con las otras tres rutas de acceso; pero a diferencia de las
otras tres carreteras presenta secciones de cuatro carriles no divididos en la mayor
parte del viaje entre Caguas y Cidra. La seccin bsica cambia a dos carriles justo al
este de la interseccin de PR-172 y PR-785 y contina como una carretera de dos
carriles hasta Cidra.
2.13 La pendiente y curvas del la PR-172, combinado con el alto porcentaje de trnsito de
camiones que la utiliza, ha obligado al Gobierno a construir dos rampas de seguridad
en grava en direccin de Cidra a Caguas, para ayudar a detener vehculos,
especialmente camiones, cuyo sistema de frenos ha fallado.
2.14 Las condiciones geomtricas existentes de las carreteras de acceso a Cidra no son
favorables e incluso peligrosas en muchos casos para el automovilista que las utiliza
da tras da. Las condiciones se acentan an ms cuando se toma en consideracin
el nmero de camiones que utilizan estas carreteras diariamente para tener acceso a
la municipalidad de Cidra.

15

Volumen de Trnsito
2.15 Para este proyecto se recopilaron los volmenes de trnsito en las vas de acceso
principales y las intersecciones, tal como se indica en el alcance del trabajo de la
introduccin, por medio de las estaciones de conteo automtico de trnsito y cuentas
manuales de 12 horas para proporcionar movimientos de viraje en las principales
intersecciones y las clasificaciones de vehculo.
2.16 La data recopilada manualmente ser utilizada en el anlisis operacional de las de las
intersecciones existentes y futuras ms adelante en este informe.
2.17 Utilizando la data obtenida de las estaciones de conteo automtico de trnsito, se
determino el trnsito diario promedio en las principales carreteras en el rea y se
utilizo en la calibracin del modelo de SATURN, consulte la Tabla 3.
2.18 De acuerdo a la data, se puede determinar que la principal ruta de acceso utilizada
para viajar a o desde Cidra es la PR-734 con un volumen de trnsito promedio de ms
de 13,000 vehculos de trnsito en ambas direcciones. La segunda ruta ms utilizada
es la PR-172, con un volumen promedio de 11,909 vehculos de trnsito en ambas
direcciones.
2.19 En relacin a todos los tramos de carretera donde se recopilo data, el volumen ms
alto se obtuvo en la PR-172 cerca de Caguas, con un volumen promedio de ms de
27,000 vehculos de trnsito en ambas direcciones. El segundo ms alto fue la PR-14
al oeste de la interseccin de la PR-14 y PR-171, que presento un volumen promedio
de poco ms de 20,000 vehculos de trnsito en ambas direcciones.

Seguridad Vial
2.20 Se obtuvieron y evaluaron datos de la Comisin de Seguridad en el Transito de Puerto
Rico, vase la Tabla 4. Como parte de estos datos, se obtuvo informacin de los
ltimos 7 aos, del 2000 al 2007, de los accidentes de trnsito en los que ocurri una
fatalidad.
2.21 Como resultado, se observ que la PR-172 tuvo un total de 27 muertes durante este
intervalo de tiempo, para un promedio de 3.375 muertes por ao.

Cuando se

analizaron los datos se puede determinar que el 77.7% o 21 muertes fueron en los
ltimos 5 aos y el 2006 presenta un total de 8 muertes.

16

Tabla 3: Volumen de trnsito en las principales rutas de acceso 2008

Descripcin de la localizacin

Conteo
Promedio
de trafico
2008

Direccin A Direccin B

PR-1 entre PR-184 y PR-787

12,427

6,485

5,942

PR-738 entre PR-1 y PR-735

7,624

3,478

4,146

PR-735 al Norte de PR-738

6,134

2,951

3,183

PR-734 al Sur de PR-7733

13,275

5,756

7,519

PR-171 al Sur de PR-7733

9,704

4,229

5,475

PR-172 al Sur de PR-7733

9,362

4,179

5,183

PR-171 al Norte de PR-14

7,367

3,945

3,422

PR-14 al este de PR-171

20,827

10,198

10,629

PR-172 al oeste de PR-785

7,527

3,785

3,742

PR-172 al Norte de PR 787

11,909

5,494

6,415

PR-172 al oeste de la Calle Nm. 2

27,548

14,977

12,571

PR-1 al Norte de PR-787

7,932

4,902

3,030

PR-787 al oeste de PR-1

5,038

2,604

2,434

PR-1 al Norte de la rampa de salida PR-52

19,866

8,817

11,049

PR-184 entre PR-1 y PR-52

15,416

7,865

7,551

PR-743 al Norte de PR-742

6,036

2,475

3,561

2.22 En relacin a las otras tres rutas de acceso la PR-171 y PR-734 presentaron 4
muertes en 8 aos y la PR-787 haba presentado 2 muertes.
Tabla 4: Resumen de accidentes fatales

Ruta
Ao
De acceso 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Promedio
PR 172
2
8
4
3
4
3
0
3
27
3.375
PR 171
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
4
0.5
PR 734
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
4
0.5
PR 787
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0.25

17

Tiempos de viaje
2.23 Los tiempos de viaje para las principales rutas de acceso para el municipio de Cidra
fueron recopilados durante las horas pico de A.M. y P.M. vase la Tabla 5.
2.24 De los resultados obtenidos para la ruta A, que, en resumen, se inicia en la PR-184
utiliza la PR-1, PR-787 y PR-172 para llegar a la PR-7733; puede verse que el viaje
promedio fue de 17.75 minutos, mientras que la hora pico de la maana promedi
aproximadamente 20 minutos y la media de la hora pico de la tarde fue 15.5 minutos.
2.25 De los resultados obtenidos para la ruta B, que, en resumen, se inicia en la
interseccin de la PR-1 y las rampas de salida de la PR-52 y utiliza la PR-1, PR-14 y
PR-171 para llegar a la PR-7733; puede verse que el viaje promedio fue de 24.25
minutos, mientras que la hora pico de la maana, promedi aproximadamente 24
minutos y aproximadamente 24.5 minutos para la hora pico de la tarde.
2.26 De los resultados obtenidos para ruta C, que, en resumen, se inicia en la interseccin
de la PR-1 y las rampas de salida de la PR-52 y utiliza la PR-1, PR-738, PR-735 y PR734 para llegar a la PR-7733; puede verse que el viaje promedio es de
aproximadamente 17.75 minutos, mientras que la hora pico maana promedi
aproximadamente 18 minutos y la hora pico de la tarde promedi 17.25 minutos.
2.27 De los resultados obtenidos para la ruta D, que, en resumen, se inicia en la
interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-184 y utiliza la PR-1, PR-14 y PR-171 para llegar a la
PR-7733; puede verse que el viaje promedio es de aproximadamente 27.25 minutos,
mientras el viaje de hora pico de la maana es de aproximadamente 29.5 minutos, la
hora pico de la tarde muestra aproximadamente 25.5 minutos.
Tabla 5: Resumen de Tiempos de Viaje

Ruta

A
B
C
D
E
F

Hora Pico
AM
Direccin A

Hora Pico
AM
Direccin B

Hora Pico
AM
Promedio

Hora Pico
PM
Direccin A

Hora Pico
PM
Direccin B

Hora Pico
PM
Promedio

Promedio
General

18:12
25:07
19:09
24:45
20:42
7:18

21:43
22:59
16:53
33:01
27:52
6:53

19:58
24:03
18:01
28:53
24:17
7:06

16:03
21:58
18:32
21:47
23:35
7:29

14:59
27:12
16:23
29:29
21:22
6:56

15:31
24:35
17:27
25:38
22:28
7:13

17:44
24:19
17:44
27:15
23:23
7:09

18

2.28 De los resultados obtenidos para la ruta E, que, en resumen, se inicia en la


interseccin de la PR-52 con la PR-172 y viaja a lo largo de la PR-172 a su
interseccin con la PR-7733; puede verse que el viaje promedio fue de 23.25 minutos,
mientras el promedio de viaje en la hora pico de la maana fue de aproximadamente
23.25 minutos y la hora pico de la tarde promedi aproximadamente 22.5 minutos.
2.29 De los resultados obtenidos para ruta F, que en resumen va de la interseccin de la
PR-52 con la PR-172 en Caguas a la interseccin de la PR-52 y PR-184 en Cayey;
puede verse que el viaje promedio es de aproximadamente de 7 minutos y 10
segundos, mientras el promedio de hora pico de la maana es de 7 minutos y 6
segundos y la hora pico de tarde era de 7 minutos y 13 segundos.

Anlisis Operacional
2.30 Esta seccin incluye toda la informacin relativa al anlisis operacional de las
intersecciones seleccionadas para este estudio. El alcance de este estudio se limita al
trnsito motorizado.
2.31 Las

evaluaciones

operacionales

se realizaron siguiendo los procedimientos

establecidos en el Manual de Capacidad de Carreteras del 2000 (HCM), y el nivel de


servicio de cada interseccin se determin utilizando SYNCHRO V7.0, un modelo de
simulacin de trnsito basado en el HCM del 2000.
2.32 La sealizacin, frecuencia y fases del trnsito se obtuvieron de la oficina de la
Oficina de

Regulacin de Trnsito del departamento de Transportacin y Obras

Pblicas.
2.33 Las siguientes intersecciones se evaluaron como parte de este estudio, la PR-1 con
PR-184, PR-1 con PR-14, PR-7733 con PR-734, PR-7733 con PR-171, PR-7733 con
PR-172, PR-171 con PR 14, PR-734 con PR-735, PR-735 con PR-1 (Norte), PR 735
con PR-1 (Sur), PR-735 con PR-738, PR-172 con PR-787, PR-1 con PR-787, PR-743
con PR-742, PR-184 con la rampa de salida hacia el Norte de la PR-52, PR-184 con
rampa de salida hacia el Sur de la PR-52 y PR-7733 con la entrada de la fbrica.
2.34 Partiendo de los conteos manuales de trnsito realizados, se identificaron las horas
pico de la maana y la tarde para cada interseccin y se calcularon los volmenes de
trnsito y el factor de hora pico correspondiente. Utilizando los datos de clasificacin
el porcentaje de vehculos pesados tambin se calcul para cada interseccin. El
19

Apndice B presenta un resumen de todos los datos de trnsito recopilados y el


clculo de los valores antes mencionados.
2.35 El volumen de trnsito y los valores adicionales que se calcularon a partir de la data
se entraron al programa SYNCHRO V7.0 para evaluar el funcionamiento de cada
interseccin para la hora pico de la maana y la tarde.
2.36 Los resultados de condiciones existentes en intersecciones obtenidos durante la hora
de pico de la maana se presentan en la Tabla 6.
2.36.1 Como puede verse en la Tabla 6, las intersecciones que operan en el peor nivel
de servicio son las de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la PR-52 y la PR-171
con PR-7733, con un promedio de demora en la interseccin de 3764.2 y 420.6
segundos respectivamente; seguido por la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR7733 con una demora promedio de 287.2 segundos y la PR-14 con PR-171 con
una demora promedio de 121.0 segundos.
2.37 En la siguiente etapa evaluaremos cada acceso por interseccin para identificar los
movimientos crticos en cada interseccin durante la hora pico de la maana. La
Tabla 7 presenta un resumen del nivel de servicio (NS) y demoras promedio para los
accesos de cada interseccin que se est evaluando.
2.37.1 En el caso de la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733, cabe sealar que 3 de
los 4 accesos operan a un NS de F, con demoras promedio sobre los 250
segundos. Si evaluamos cada acceso individual puede verse que el acceso
crtico en esta interseccin es el que va direccin Norte o autos que estn
viajando de Cayey a Cidra, que presenta un demora promedio de 763.9
segundos. En esta interseccin el acceso en direccin Sur tambin presenta
demoras que son inaceptables con un demora medio de 632.2 segundos.
2.37.2 En el caso de la PR-734 y PR-7733, cabe sealar que la acceso crtico es hacia
el Norte en la PR-734 o los autos que estn viajando de Cayey a Cidra, que
exhibe un NS de F con una demora medio de 640.6 segundos.

En esta

interseccin los otros 3 accesos presentan niveles de servicio que son


aceptables.

20

Tabla 6: Condiciones Existentes en horas pico AM por interseccin

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS /
Demora)

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS /
Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

D / 39.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

A / 4.9

PR-1

PR-14

C / 29.1

10

PR-1

PR-738

A / 6.6

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 287.2

11

PR-172

PR-787

B / 13.0

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 420.6

12

PR-1

PR-787

B / 12.6

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 29.9

13

PR-743

PR-742

E / 59.3

PR-14

PR-171

F / 121.0

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

F / 3764.2

PR-734

PR-735

A / 8.5

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Sur

E / 61.7

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

A / 4.4

16

PR-7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

B / 19.9

2.37.3 La tercera interseccin que exhibe algn nivel de congestin vehicular es la


interseccin de la PR-14 y PR-171 donde el acceso hacia el Sur presenta un NS
de F con demoras promedio alrededor de 350 segundos.

Todos los otros

accesos operan con niveles aceptables de servicio.


2.37.4 La cuarta y quinta interseccin, que presentan altos niveles de congestin
vehicular son las intersecciones de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la
PR-52 en Cayey, donde los movimientos de direccin este y oeste presentan un
NS de F con demoras promedio de sobre 8000 y 140 segundos
respectivamente.
2.37.5 De las otras intersecciones en el estudio, un acceso individual de rea presenta
niveles de servicio NS que no es aceptable, el acceso hacia el oeste en la
interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-184, que presenta demoras promedio de ms de
100 segundos.

21

Tabla 7: Condiciones Existentes de Nivel de Servicio en la accesos para Hora Pico AM


Int.

Principal

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

PR-1
PR-1
PR-734
PR-171
PR-172
PR-14
PR-734
PR-1

PR-1

10
11
12
13

PR-1
PR-172
PR-1
PR-743

Secundaria

PR-184
PR-14
PR-7733
PR-7733
PR-7733
PR-171
PR-735
PR-735
(Norte)
PR-735
(Sur)
PR-738
PR-787
PR-787
PR-742

Direccin de
Acceso
critica

NS
Acceso
Norte
(NS/ Demora)

NS
Acceso
Sur
(NS/ Demora)

NS
Acceso
Este
(NS/
Demora)

NS
Acceso
Oeste
(NS/
Demora)

Oeste
Este
Norte
Norte
Norte
Sur
Sur
Este

B / 15,4
C / 24.2
F / 640.6
F / 763.9
D / 41.1
---------

----B / 19.7
C / 34.5
F / 632.2
----F / 355.2
C / 24.0

B / 11.1
D / 37.9
A / 8.9
F / 269.9
B / 15.2
A / 4.5
A / 5.7

F / 101.1
D / 38.2
C / 21.9
B / 15.5
C / 21.7
A / 0.0
A / 0.0

A / 1.5

A / 0.0

C / 17.4

-----

B / 11.7

A / 3.2

A / 2.7

-----

A / 1.0
A / 8.1
A / 4.6

A / 0.8
B / 10.1
A / 0.0

C / 16.1
C / 21.8
C / 20.9

C / 17.2
---------

A / 0.0

A / 0.9

----

F / 117.4

A / 0.0

A / 7.1

F / 8885.8

-----

B / 9.8

A / 0.0

----

F / 140.3

E / 39.4

F / 153.3

A / 2.9

A / 0.0

Norte
Oeste
Sur
Este
Oeste
Este

PR-184

PR-52 NB
Rampas
Norte

Oeste

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Sur

16

PR-7733

Entrada a
fabrica

14

Sur

2.38 La Tabla 8 presenta un resumen de las conclusiones para las condiciones existentes
a la hora pico de la tarde, en relacin al nivel de servicio y demora promedio en las
intersecciones. Como puede verse, el NS de las intersecciones mejora para la hora
pico de la tarde y slo tres de las intersecciones continan funcionando a un nivel
inaceptable de servicio. Estas son las intersecciones de la PR-184 con las rampas
Norte de la PR-52, la PR-7733 con la entrada de la fbrica y la PR-14 con PR-171,
dos presentan un NS de F y una presenta un NS de E con demoras promedio
superiores a 100 y 60 segundos respectivamente.

22

Tabla 8: Condicin Existente de Niveles de Servicio en horas pico PM por interseccin


Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

D / 38.6

PR-1

PR-735 (Sur)

A / 6.3

PR-1

PR-14

C / 31.9

10

PR-1

PR-738

A / 7.5

PR-734

PR-7733

C / 32.3

11

PR-172

PR-787

C / 23.8

PR-171

PR-7733

D / 52.5

12

PR-1

PR-787

A / 6.3

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 23.0

13

PR-743

PR-742

A / 6.4

PR-14

PR-171

E / 63.0

14

PR-184

PR-184
PR7733

PR-734

PR-735

A / 7.5

15

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

A / 4.6

16

PR-52
Rampas Norte
PR-52
Rampas Sur
Entrada a la
fabrica

F / 143.3

B / 17.7
F / 174.1

2.39 Las intersecciones de la PR-171 con PR-7733 y PR-734 con PR-7733 presentan una
gran mejora para la hora de pico de la tarde en comparacin con el pico de la
maana. En ambos casos las intersecciones mejoran a un NS de D o mejor, con
demoras promedio bajo la marca de 60 segundos.
2.40 En la prxima etapa evaluaremos los accesos en cada interseccin para identificar los
movimientos crticos de la hora pico de la tarde. La Tabla 9 presenta un resumen de
los NS y las demoras promedio por acceso a las intersecciones que se estn
evaluando.
2.40.1 En la hora pico de la tarde hay una mejora, en general, en el NS cuando se
compara a la hora pico de la maana. El mejor ejemplo de esto es la mejora en
la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733, en la que tres de los cuatro accesos a la
interseccin mejoraron su nivel de servicio y slo el acceso hacia el Sur sigue
operando en un nivel de servicio de F.
2.40.2 En la interseccin de la PR-14 y PR-171, cuando evaluamos los accesos, los
movimientos crticos siguen siendo hacia el Sur izquierda y derecha en la PR23

171. Durante la hora pico de la tarde este movimiento presenta un NS de F con


demoras promedio de ms de 360 segundos por vehculo.

Tabla 9: Condiciones Existentes de Nivel de Servicio en la accesos para Hora Pico PM


Int.

Principal

Secundaria

Direccin de
Acceso critica

NS
Acceso
Norte
(NS/
Demora)

NS
Acceso
Sur
(NS/
Demora)

NS
Acceso
Este
(NS/
Demora)

NS
Acceso
Oeste
(NS/
Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

Norte

E / 62.3

-----

A / 9.4

C / 33.8

PR-1

PR-14

Norte

D / 36.0

C / 22.4

C / 34.0

D / 39.0

PR-734

PR-7733

Norte

D / 40.7

C / 30.9

B / 17.9

D / 35.3

PR-171

PR-7733

Sur

B / 13.5

F / 114.5

D / 37.7

B / 19.1

PR-172

PR-7733

Oeste

C / 24.7

-----

B / 10.6

D / 35.4

PR-14

PR-171

Sur

-----

F / 367.7

B / 10.4

A / 0.0

PR-734

PR-735

Sur

-----

C / 24.1

A / 4.2

A / 0.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

Este

A / 3.6

A / 0.0

C / 19.3

-----

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

Norte

B / 16.6

A / 2.9

A / 6.4

-----

10

PR-1

PR-738

Este

A / 2.3

A / 2.9

D / 27.0

C / 21.4

11

PR-172

PR-787

Este

B / 17.9

A / 4.1

D / 46.6

-----

12

PR-1

PR-787

Este

A / 7.4

A / 0.0

B / 14.2

-----

13

PR-743

PR-742

Oeste

A /0.0

A / 0.7

----

C / 18.2

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

Este

A / 0.0

A / 6.6

F / 402.6

-----

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Sur

Oeste

A / 5.3

A / 0.0

----

E / 39.6

16

PR-7733

Entrada a
la fabrica

F / 116.7

F / 884.2

A / 4.5

A / 0.0

Sur

2.40.3 Cuando evaluamos el acceso a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas


hacia el Norte de la PR-52, durante la hora pico de la tarde, el movimiento crtico
sigue siendo el viraje a la izquierda direccin este hacia la PR-184, con demoras
24

promedio de ms de 400 segundos por vehculo. Este movimiento representa a


las personas que utilizan esta rampa como acceso a la parte Norte de Cayey y
Guavate.
2.40.4 En cuanto a la interseccin de la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fbrica, durante la
hora pico de la tarde el acceso crtico contina siendo en direccin Sur con una
F en nivel de servicio y demoras promedio de ms de 850 segundos por
vehculo.
2.40.5 Cuando evaluamos el resto de los accesos, slo dos otros presentan un nivel
inaceptable de servicio, el movimiento hacia el Sur de la PR-171 y PR-7733 y el
movimiento en direccin este en la PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la PR-52,
con un NS de F y demoras promedio de 119.9 y 402.6 segundos por vehculo
respectivamente.
2.40.6 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-734 y PR-7733, se observa una mejora
general en el nivel de servicio cuando se compara la hora pico de la tarde a la
hora pico de la maana, con una mejora de la acceso Norte de un nivel F a un
nivel D y demoras promedio reducidos de casi 600 segundos a casi 40
segundos. El resto de las intersecciones evaluadas operan a niveles aceptables
a la hora de pico de la tarde.

Conclusiones
2.41 En general, se puede determinar que la mayor parte de la regin estudiada opera a un
nivel aceptable de servicio con ciertas excepciones, como la hora pico de la maana
de las intersecciones de la PR-734 y PR-171 con PR-7733 en el municipio de Cidra y
las intersecciones de la PR-14 con PR-171 y PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la PR52 en el municipio de Cayey.
2.42 Los movimientos crticos para la hora pico de la maana son los de la PR-171 y PR734 en direccin Norte o el trnsito que viaja hacia Cidra y en direccin este el
movimiento en la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la PR-52.
2.43 En general la hora pico de la tarde present un mejor NS que la hora pico de la
maana.

25

III- CONDICION FUTURANO ACCIN


Introduccin
3.1

En este captulo los volmenes de trnsito existente se proyectarn para las


condiciones de aos futuros, se evaluaran las alternativas de no-accin y se
compararan con la condicin existente.

3.2

Para este estudio las condiciones de dos aos futuros sern evaluadas, una
proyeccin de 10 aos y una proyeccin de 20 aos. Partiendo del ao base del 2008
esto nos lleva a los aos 2018 y 2028.

Factores de Proyeccin
3.3

Los factores de proyeccin que se utilizaron en este estudio fueron suministrados por
la Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacin de Puerto Rico

3.4

Los factores de proyeccin fueron desarrollados utilizando la metodologa de la ACT


basada en el promedio anual de trfico diario histrico (PATDH) de la estaciones
permanentes que se encuentran a travs de la isla y la proyeccin de poblacin y
vehculos matriculados

3.5

Los factores de proyeccin se calculan para cada clasificacin de carretera, tales


como, Interestatal, arterias menores y arterias principales. La Tabla 10 presenta los
factores de proyeccin segn calculados para cada segmento de carretera que se
est evaluando en la regin.

Volmenes Proyectados
3.6

Basado en los factores de proyeccin antes mencionados, el promedio de trnsito


diario obtenido de las estaciones de conteo automtico utilizadas para este estudio se
proyectar para las dos condiciones de ao futuro.

3.7

La Tabla 11 presenta el promedio semanal de volumen de trnsito proyectado para


los horizontes de 10 y 20 aos.

26

Tabla 10: Factores de proyeccin a 10 y 20 aos

Segmento de carretera

FP 10 Aos

FP 20 Aos

1.125

1.25

PR-1 del KM 55.20 (PR-735 Sur) al KM 56.58 (PR-52 Arterial Principal


Rampas)

1.19

1.38

PR- 52 de la interseccin de PR-172 a las rampas de salida Interestatal


de Cayey

1.20

1.40

PR-14 de la UPR-Cayey a la interseccin con la PR-1

Arterial Menor

1.125

1.25

PR-171 de la interseccin con la PR-7733 a la interseccin Arterial Menor


con PR-14

1.125

1.25

PR-734 de la interseccin con la PR-7733 a la interseccin Arterial Menor


con PR-735

1.125

1.25

PR-787 de la interseccin con la PR-172 a la interseccin Arterial Menor


con PR-1

1.125

1.25

PR-172 del KM 10.95 (PR-7733) al KM 12.30 (calle B. de Colectora


Castro)

1.21

1.42

PR-172 del KM 12.30 (Calle B. de Castro) al KM 13.40

Arterial Menor

1.125

1.25

PR-172 del KM 13.40 al KM 27.60 (PR-52)

Arterial Principal

1.19

1.38

PR-735 del KM 0.0 (PR-1) al KM 1.20 (PR-734)

Arterial Menor

1.125

1.25

PR-735 del KM 1.20 (PR-734) al KM 2.8 (PR-1)

Arterial Principal

1.19

1.38

PR-184 de la PR-1 al este de la PR-52

Arterial Menor

1.125

1.25

PR-743

Colectora

1.21

1.42

PR-738 del KM 0.0 (PR-735) al KM 0.35 (PR-1)

Local

1.225

1.45

PR-738 del KM 0.35 (PR-1) al KM 2.2 (PR-743)

Colectora

1.21

1.42

PR-7733 del KM 0.0 (PR-171) al KM 2.34 (PR-734)

Arterial Menor

1.125

1.25

PR-7733 del KM 2.34 (PR-734) al KM 3.04 (PR-172)

Arterial Principal

1.19

1.38

PR-1 del KM 48.30 (PR-787) al KM 55.20 (PR-735 Sur)

Clasificacin
Arterial Menor

No-Accin 2018
3.8

Basado en los factores de proyeccin enumerados en la Tabla 10 , se proyectarn los


volmenes de trnsito de la maana y la tarde para la condicin existente para el ao
horizonte 2018 y las intersecciones fueron reevaluadas.

27

Tabla 11: Volmenes de trnsito proyectados para el 2018 y 2028

2008 Trnsito
promedio

2018 Trnsito
promedio
proyectado

2028 Trnsito
promedio
proyectado

PR-1 entre la PR-184 y PR-787

12,427

13,980

15,534

PR-738 entre la PR-1 y PR-735

7,624

9,339

11,055

PR-735 Norte de la PR-738

6,134

7,299

8,465

PR-734 Sur de la PR-7733

13,275

14,934

16,594

PR-171 Sur de la PR-7733

9,704

10,917

12,130

PR-172 Sur de la PR-7733

9,362

11,328

13,294

PR-171 Norte de la PR-14

7,367

8,288

9,209

PR-14 este de la PR-171

20,827

23,430

26,034

PR-172 oeste de la PR-785

7,527

8,957

10,387

PR-172 Norte de la PR 787

11,909

13,398

14,886

PR-172 oeste de la Calle Nm. 2

27,548

32,782

38,016

PR 1 Norte de la PR-787

7,932

8,924

9,915

PR-787 oeste de la PR-1

5,038

5,668

6,298

PR-1 Norte de la rampa de salida de


la PR-52

19,866

23,641

27,415

PR-184 entre la PR-1 y PR-52

15,416

17421

19270

6036

7304

8572

Descripcin de la localizacin

PR-743 Norte de la PR-742

3.9

Los resultados del anlisis operacional para el ao horizonte 2018 y la condicin


existente se comparar para determinar el impacto de la no-accin en la red de
carreteras existentes.

3.10 Cambios Geomtricos


3.10.1 Al comienzo de la fase de recopilacin de data de este estudio, La ACT se
encontraba en el proceso de construir un nuevo puente sobre el embalse de
Cidra cerca de la interseccin de la PR-172 y PR-7733. Como parte de este
proyecto se cambiar el diseo geomtrico existente para la interseccin de PR172 y PR-7733. Como parte de la proyeccin para el 2018 y 2028 y dado que el

28

proyecto se completar en el 2008, el nuevo diseo geomtrico y la frecuencia


de sealizacin fueron incluidos en el anlisis operacional.
3.11 Anlisis Operacional de no-accin para el 2018
3.11.1 Para realizar el anlisis operacional para la condicin de no-accin para el 2018,
los factores de proyeccin de aumento de trnsito en el 2018 fue entrada a
SYNCHRO V7.0 y se recalculo el modelo.
3.11.2 Los resultados obtenidos durante la hora pico de la maana para la condicin de
no-accin del 2018 en las intersecciones se presentan en la Tabla 12.
Tabla 12: 2018 Nivel de Servicio Condicin de No-Accin Horas Pico AM por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

PR-1

PR-184

NS
Interseccin
(NS /
demora)
E / 58.7

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

PR-1

PR-735 (Sur)

NS
Interseccin
(NS /
demora)
B / 12.9

PR-1

PR-14

D / 37.5

10

PR-1

PR-738

A / 9.9

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

11

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1080.7

12

PR-1

PR-787

B / 18.9

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

13

PR-743

PR-742

F / 161.9

PR-14

PR-171

F / 203.1

14

PR-184

Rampas Norte
PR-52

F / 3895.2

PR-734

PR-735

B / 13.5

15

PR-184

Rampas Sur
PR-52

F / 589.8

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

A / 5.5

16

PR7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

F / 79.2

3.11.3 Cuando se compara a la condicin existente, es notable cmo las intersecciones


de la PR-171 y PR-734 con la PR-7733 seguirn deteriorndose en NS y la
demora promedio sigue aumentando. Esto es especialmente significativo en la
interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 donde la demora promedio aument de
420 a 1080 segundos.
3.11.4 Cuando se compara a la condicin existente, es notable cmo sigue
deteriorndose en NS la interseccin de la PR-7733 con la entrada de la fbrica
y la demora promedio sigue en aumento. Durante la hora pico de la maana el
29

NS cae de un B a un NS de F con un aumento promedio de los demoras de


aproximadamente 60 segundos; de 19.9 segundos a 79.2 segundos.
3.11.5 Cuando se compara a la condicin existente, es notable cmo la interseccin de
la PR-184 con las rampas Sur de la PR-52 sigue empeorando en NS y la
demora promedio sigue en aumento. Durante la hora pico de la maana el NS
cae de un E a un NS de F con un aumento promedio de las demoras de
aproximadamente 525 segundos de 61.7 segundos a 589.8 segundos.
3.11.6 Otra Interseccin que presenta un deterioro significativo en NS es la interseccin
de la PR-1 con PR-184, donde el NS cay de E a F y la demora promedio
aument a casi 80 segundos.
3.11.7 Todas las otras las intersecciones evaluadas presentan cambios menores que
no fueron significativos en su impacto sobre el NS.
3.11.8 Un cambio importante a considerar fue el cambio en la geometra y el plan de
sincronizacin en la interseccin de la PR-172 y PR-7733 como parte del
proyecto de construccin en marcha cuando el estudio fue realizado. Estas
mejoras permiten a esta interseccin presentar una reduccin en la demora, a
pesar de que hay un aumento proyectado en el trnsito.
3.11.9 En la prxima etapa evaluaremos cada acceso en cada interseccin para
identificar los movimientos crticos en cada interseccin durante la hora pico de
la maana para la condicin de no-accin del 2018. La Tabla 13 presenta un
resumen del NS y las demoras promedio por acceso a las intersecciones que se
est evaluando.
3.11.9.1

Si los resultados, por acceso, para la condicin existente se comparan con los
resultados de la proyeccin del 2018 de hora pico de la maana, se nota un
deterioro significativo en el nivel de servicio en los siguientes accesos; la PR-1 y
PR-184 en los accesos en direccin oeste y este, en los accesos en direccin
oeste y norte de la PR-734 y PR-7733, en los accesos en direccin Norte, Sur y
este de la PR-171 y el acceso de la PR-7733, acceso en direccin Sur de la PR14 y PR-171 y el acceso en direccin Sur de la PR-734 y PR-735.

3.11.9.2

Adems, cuando se compara la hora pico AM de la condicin existente a la


condicin proyectada del 2018, se puede ver un gran deterioro en NS en el
acceso en direccin oeste de la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Sur
30

de la PR-52 y en el acceso en direccin Sur en la interseccin de la PR-7733


con la entrada a la fbrica.

Tabla 13: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2018, Hora Pico AM por Acceso a Cada Interseccin

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

Grupo
de
Acceso
Critico

NS Acceso
Direccin
Norte

NS Acceso
Direccin
Sur

NS Acceso
Direccin
Este

NS Acceso
Direccin
Oeste

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

Oeste

C / 20.6

-----

B / 12.0

F / 160.6

PR-1

PR-14

Este

C / 26.6

C / 21.8

E / 56.1

D / 38.8

PR-734

PR-7733

Norte

F / 784.1

D / 51.6

B / 10.9

F / 78.8

PR-171

PR-7733

Norte

F / 3178.5

F / 1124.7

F / 357.6

B / 16.7

PR-172

PR-7733

Norte

D /38.1

D / 40.0

B / 14.7

B / 15.3

PR-14

PR-171

Sur

-----

F / 598.3

A / 5.4

A / 0.0

PR-734

PR-735

Sur

-----

E / 43.0

A / 6.5

A / 0.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

Este

A / 1.7

A / 0.0

C / 22.1

-----

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

Norte

D / 46.4

A / 2.9

A / 3.3

-----

10

PR-1

PR-738

Oeste

A / 1.1

A / 0.9

C / 23.4

D / 25.0

11

PR-172

PR-787

Sur

A / 4.7

C / 20.4

C / 22.1

-----

12

PR-1

PR-787

Este

A / 4.8

A / 0.0

D / 32.2

-----

13

PR-743

PR-742

Oeste

A / 0.0

A / 1.0

-----

F / 321.4

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

Este

A / 0.0

B / 7.6

F / 8885.8

----

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Sur

Oeste

B / 12.1

A / 0.0

----

F/ 1359.0

16

PR7733

Entrada a la
Fabrica

F / 98.8

F / 706.4

A / 5.0

A / 0.0

3.11.9.3

Sur

De todas las intersecciones el mayor aumento en la demora fue exhibido en la


interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733, con los accesos Norte y Sur presentando
ms de 3000 y 1000 segundos respectivamente.

En este momento esta

31

interseccin no tiene la configuracin geomtrica para manejar el volumen de


trnsito que est atravesando o intentando atravesar la interseccin.
3.11.10

Los resultados obtenidos durante la hora pico de la tarde para la condicin

de no-accin del 2018, a nivel de interseccin se presentan en la Tabla 14


3.11.10.1 Como puede verse en la Tabla 14, las intersecciones que operan en el peor
nivel de servicio son la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la
PR-52, la PR-7733 con la entrada de la fbrica y la PR-171 con PR-7733;
seguido por las intersecciones de la PR-14 con PR-171 y la PR-1 con PR-184.
3.11.10.2 Cuando se comparan los resultados de condicin existente a los resultados de
no-accin del 2018, el mayor impacto se ve en las intersecciones de la PR-184
con las Rampas Norte de la PR-52, con un aumento en la demora promedio de
143.3 segundos a ms de 6900 segundos.
3.11.10.3 Adems se notaron grandes impactos en las intersecciones de la PR-7733 con
la entrada a la fbrica y la PR-171 con PR-7733, estas intersecciones exhiben
un aumento promedio en demoras de 174.1 a ms de 1900 y de 52.5 segundos
a 94.3 segundos respectivamente. Para la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR7733 el NS baj de un NS D a F.
3.11.10.4 En el caso de la PR-1 con PR-184, presenta un descenso en NS de D a E con
un aumento en demora de 38.6 segundos a 68.9 segundos. En el caso de la
interseccin de la PR-14 con PR-171 no hubo ningn cambio en NS pero la
demora promedio aument de 63.0 segundos a 74.5 segundos por vehculo.
3.11.10.5 Todas las otras intersecciones siguen operando a un NS aceptable, con poco o
ningn impacto en el aumento del promedio de demoras a nivel de interseccin.

32

Tabla 14: NS para el 2018 para la condicin de no-accin en la hora pico PM por interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

E / 68.9

PR-1

PR-735 (Sur)

C / 22.9

PR-1

PR-14

D / 42.4

10

PR-1

PR-738

B / 15.9

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

11

PR-172

PR-787

C / 20.8

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 93.5

12

PR-1

PR-787

A / 7.2

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

13

PR-743

PR-742

A / 9.9

PR-14

PR-171

E / 74.5

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Norte

F / 2539.2

PR-734

PR-735

A / 7.9

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Sur

D / 41.3

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

A / 6.9

16

PR7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

F / 1950.6

3.11.11

El siguiente paso nos presentar y evaluara los resultados para la hora pico

de la tarde en el escenario de no-accin para el 2018. La Tabla 15 presenta los


resultados para el anlisis operacional de cada interseccin durante la hora pico
de la tarde, basado en los resultados obtenidos de los volmenes de trnsito
proyectados.
3.11.11.1 Si se comparan los resultados de la condicin existente a los resultados de la
proyeccin del 2018 para la hora pico de la tarde, se puede observar deterioro
significativo en el nivel de servicio en los siguientes accesos; acceso en
direccin Norte de la PR-1 y la PR-184, accesos en direccin Norte y oeste de la
PR-734 y la PR-7733, accesos en direccin Sur y este de la PR-171 y la PR7733, acceso direccin Sur de la PR-14 con la PR-171, el viraje a la izquierda
direccin Norte de la PR-1 y PR-735 Sur y los accesos direccin este y oeste de
la PR-1 y PR-738.
3.11.11.2 Adems, se experiment deterioro significativo en el acceso direccin este de la
interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte de la PR-52 y el acceso
direccin oeste de la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Sur de la PR-52
33

con un aumento en la demora promedio de 402.6 a ms de 6900 segundos y de


39.6 a 94.4 segundos respectivamente.
Tabla 15: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2018, Hora Pico PM por Acceso a Cada Interseccin
Int.

Principal

Secundaria

Grupo
de
Acceso
Critico

NS Acceso
Direccin
Norte
(NS/Demora)

NS Acceso
Direccin Sur
(NS/Demora)

NS Acceso
Direccin
Este

NS Acceso
Direccin
Oeste

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

Norte

F / 105.5

-----

A / 9.9

E / 74.2

PR-1

PR-14

Norte

D / 49.9

C / 23.8

D / 48.6

D / 39.9

PR-734

PR-7733

Oeste

E / 55.8

D / 35.1

B / 18.0

E / 59.8

PR-171

PR-7733

Sur

C / 60.5

F / 196.3

E / 69.2

C / 19.9

PR-172

PR-7733

Oeste

B / 15.3

C / 28.6

B / 10.6

C / 25.0

PR-14

PR-171

Sur

-----

F / 425.7

C 15.8

A / 0.0

PR-734

PR-735

Sur

-----

C / 24.7

A / 4.9

A / 0.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

Este

A / 4.3

A / 0.0

D / 31.5

-----

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

Norte

F / 93.7

A / 3.1

A / 6.6

-----

10

PR-1

PR-738

Este

A / 2.8

A / 3.7

F / 73.5

E / 39.3

11

PR-172

PR-787

Sur

B / 13.8

C / 33.6

C / 21.5

-----

12

PR-1

PR-787

Este

A / 8.1

A / 0.0

C / 17.2

-----

13

PR-743

PR-742

Oeste

A / 0.0

A / 0.8

-----

D / 28.2

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

Este

A / 0.0

A / 6.9

F / 6986.9

----

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Sur

Oeste

B / 5.6

A / 0.0

----

F / 94.4

16

PR-7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

Sur

F / 407.7

F / 10,000

A / 5.7

A / 0.0

34

3.11.11.3 En el caso de la interseccin de la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fbrica; cuando


se compara la condicin existente para la hora pico de la tarde con la proyeccin
del 2018 se puede ver un deterioro significativo en el acceso con direccin Sur
mostrando un aumento en la demora promedio de 884.2 segundos a ms de
10,000 segundos.
3.11.11.4 En el caso de la PR-1 con PR-184 el acceso direccin Norte presenta un
aumento en la demora promedio de 62.3 segundos a 105.5 segundos. En el
caso de la PR-734 con PR-7733 el aumento promedio de las demoras para el
acceso direccin Norte va de 40.7 segundos a 55.8 segundos, mientras que el
acceso direccin oeste va de 35.3 segundos a 59.8 segundos. En el caso de la
interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 el acceso direccin Sur aumenta de
114.5 a 196.3 segundos, y el acceso direccin este aumenta de 37.7 a 69.2
segundos.

No-Accin 2028
3.12 Basndose en los factores de proyeccin enumerados en la Tabla 10, se proyectarn
los volmenes de trnsito para la condicin existente de la maana y la tarde para el
ao horizonte 2028 y las intersecciones sern re-evaluadas.
3.13 Los resultados del anlisis operacional para el ao horizonte 2028, resultados para el
2018 y los de condicin existente se compararn para determinar el impacto de noaccin en la red de carreteras existentes.
3.14 Anlisis operacional no-accin para el 2028
3.14.1 Para realizar el anlisis operacional para la condicin de no-accin del 2028, los
factores de proyeccin para el aumento en el trnsito al 2028 fueron entrados a
SYNCHRO V7.0 y se recalcul el modelo.
3.14.2 Los resultados obtenidos para la condicin de no-accin para la hora pico de la
maana del 2028, a nivel de interseccin, se presentan en la Tabla 16.
3.14.3 Como puede verse en la Tabla 16, las intersecciones que operan en el peor nivel
de servicio para la hora de pico de la maana en el escenario de no-accin del
2028 son; la PR-1 con PR-184 con una demora promedio en la interseccin de

35

80.0 segundos, la PR-734 con PR-7733 con una demora promedio en la


interseccin de 449.7 segundos, la PR-171 con PR-7733 con una demora
promedio en la interseccin de 1,422.2 segundos y la PR-14 con PR-171 con
una demora promedio de 302.2 segundos.
3.14.4 Adems, las intersecciones de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR52 y la interseccin de la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fbrica tambin presentan
niveles de demora promedio inaceptables, todas ellas superior a 600 segundos.

Tabla 16: NS para el 2028 para la condicin de no-accin en la hora pico AM por interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

PR-1

PR-184

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)
F / 80.0

PR-1

PR-14

PR-734

Int. Principal

Secundaria

PR-1

PR-735 (Sur)

NS de la
Interseccin
(NS / Demora)
D / 45.6

D / 48.6

10

PR-1

PR-738

C / 30.6

PR-7733

F / 449.7

11

PR-172

PR-787

B / 16.1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1,422.2

12

PR-1

PR-787

C / 32.4

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 24.2

13

PR-743

PR-742

F / 302.4

PR-14

PR-171

F / 302.2

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Norte

F / 4012.2

PR-734

PR-735

C / 27.0

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Sur

F / 637.6

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

A / 7.4

16

PR7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

F / 10,000

3.14.5 En el caso de la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-735 (Sur), a pesar de que el NS


es todava aceptable, la interseccin present un incremento significativo en la
demora promedio de 12.9 segundos para el escenario de no-accin del 2018 y a
45.6 segundos para el escenario de no-accin del 2028; que representa un
descenso en el nivel de servicio de B a D.
3.15 La Tabla 17 presenta un resumen del NS y las demoras promedio por acceso de las
intersecciones que se est evaluando.

36

Tabla 17: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2028, Hora Pico AM por Acceso a Cada Interseccin

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

Grupo de
Acceso
Critico

NS Acceso
Direccin
Norte

NS Acceso
Direccin Sur
(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

NS Acceso
Direccin
Este

NS Acceso
Direccin
Oeste

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

Oeste

C / 31.3

-----

B / 13.1

F / 219.8

PR-1

PR-14

Este

C / 29.7

C / 24.2

F / 81.1

D / 39.4

PR-734

PR-7733

Norte

F / 914.7

F / 81.0

D / 38.4

F / 312.8

PR-171

PR-7733

Norte

F / 3549.1

F / 2045.6

F / 437.9

B / 18.0

PR-172

PR-7733

Norte

C / 32.9

D / 39.2

B / 14.6

B / 16.1

PR-14

PR-171

Sur

-----

F / 891.8

A / 6.5

A / 0.0

PR-734

PR-735

Sur

-----

F / 97.2

A / 7.5

A / 0.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

Este

A / 1.8

A / 0.0

D / 30.1

-----

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

Norte

F / 188.7

A / 3.2

A / 3.3

-----

10

PR-1

PR-738

Este

A / 1.2

A / 1.0

F / 87.6

E / 48.4

11

PR-172

PR-787

Sur

A / 5.7

C / 23.5

C / 24.6

-----

12

PR-1

PR-787

Este

A / 5.0

A / 0.0

F / 56.5

-----

13

PR-743

PR-742

Oeste

A / 0.0

A / 1.1

-----

F / 600.7

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

Este

A / 0.0

B / 8.2

F / 8885.9

-----

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Sur

Oeste

C / 16.1

A / 0.0

-----

F / 1423

16

PR7733

Entrada a
la fabrica

Norte/Sur

F / 10,000

F / 10,000

F / 388.2

A / 0.0

37

3.15.1 Si se comparan los resultados de condicin existente a los resultados de la


proyeccin para el 2028 de la hora pico de la maana se puede observar
deterioro significativo en el nivel de servicio en las siguientes intersecciones; en
la PR-1 y PR-184 en acceso en direccin oeste, en los accesos en direccin
Norte, Sur y oeste de la PR-734 y PR-7733, en los accesos Norte, Sur y este de
la PR-171 y PR-7733, el acceso en direccin Sur de la PR-14 y PR-171, el
acceso en direccin Sur de la PR-734 y PR-735, la direccin Norte, izquierda, de
la PR-1 y PR-735 Sur, los accesos en direccin este y oeste de la PR-1 y PR738 y el acceso direccin este de la PR-1 y PR-787.
3.15.2 En el caso de la PR-1 con PR-184 el acceso con el mayor impacto es en
direccin oeste presenta un NS inaceptable para el escenario de no-accin del
2028, con un NS de F y aumento en demoras promedio de 101.1 a 219.8
segundos.
3.15.3 En el caso de la PR-734 con PR-7733, todos los accesos presentan impactos
significativos, el cambio ms importante se produce en el acceso direccin este,
a pesar de que el NS es todava aceptable, el NS cay de una A a D, con un
aumento en la demora promedio de 8.9 segundos a 38.4 segundos. Todos los
otros accesos funcionan a un NS de F con demoras promedio superiores a 80
segundos por vehculo.
3.15.4 En el caso de la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733, tres accesos; direccin
Norte, Sur y este, operan a NS inaceptables con demoras promedio superiores a
los 400 segundos por vehculo. De lo anterior, el acceso direccin Norte
presenta el mayor nivel de congestin con demoras superiores a 3,000
segundos
3.15.5 En el caso de las intersecciones de la PR-184 con la rampa direccin Norte y
Sur de la PR-52, slo el acceso hacia el oeste de las rampas direccin Sur
presenta un aumento en la demora promedio de 140 segundos a ms de 1,400
segundos.
3.15.6 En el caso de la interseccin de la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fbrica, los
accesos Norte, Sur y este presentan un gran nivel de deterioro con aumentos en
la demora promedio superior a los 350 segundos.

El mayor deterioro fue

38

exhibido por el acceso direccin este con una disminucin en NS de A a F y un


incremento de ms de 350 segundos.
3.16 Los resultados obtenidos para la hora pico de la tarde de la condicin de no-accin del
2028, a nivel de interseccin se presentan en la Tabla 18.
3.16.1 De los resultados que aparecen en la Tabla 18; 10 de las 16 intersecciones
evaluadas presentan un NS inaceptable de E o F, en la condicin de no-accin
del 2028 para la hora pico de la tarde.
3.16.2 De los resultados obtenidos, las intersecciones de la PR-184 con la PR-52
Rampas direccin Norte, la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fabrica, la PR-171 con
la PR-7733 y la PR-14 con la PR-171 sigue siendo la interseccin con los niveles
ms altos de demora, seguida de la interseccin de la PR-1 con la PR-184.
3.16.3 Las mejoras en construccin de la interseccin de la PR-172 con PR-7733
presentan la geometra necesaria a la interseccin para manejar las condiciones
futuras proyectadas con un NS aceptable.

Tabla 18: NS por interseccin para la condicin de no-accin del 2028 Hora Pico PM

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
interseccin
(NS / Demora)

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la
interseccin
(NS / Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

F / 103.3

PR-1

PR-735 (Sur)

E / 67.7

PR-1

PR-14

E / 58.5

10

PR-1

PR-738

E / 55.9

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

11

PR-172

PR-787

C / 23.7

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

12

PR-1

PR-787

A / 8.7

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 20.0

13

PR-743

PR-742

C / 21.3
F / 2625.9

PR-14

PR-171

F / 117.7

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

PR-734

PR-735

B / 11.8

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Sur

F / 84.8

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

B / 13.6

16

PR-7733

Entrada a la
fabrica

F / 2010.5

39

3.17 En la prxima etapa evaluaremos cada acceso de cada interseccin para identificar
los movimientos crticos en cada interseccin para la hora pico de la tarde en la
condicin de no-accin del 2028.

La Tabla 19 presenta un resumen del NS y se

evalan las demoras promedio por acceso a las intersecciones.


3.18 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-184 las
accesos crticas son en direccin Norte y oeste, con demoras de 148.4 y 127.6
segundos respectivamente y un NS de F.
3.19 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-14 las
accesos crticas son en direccin Norte y este, con demoras de 72.8 y 70.7 segundos
respectivamente y un NS de E.
3.20 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-734 y PR-7733
los accesos crticos son en direccin oeste y Norte, con demoras de 114.1 y 83.1
segundos respectivamente.
3.21 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-184 y las rampas
direccin Norte y Sur de la PR-52 los accesos crticos son en direccin este y oeste,
con demoras promedio de 6987.0 y 192.1 segundos respectivamente.
3.22 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-7733 y la entrada
a la fbrica los accesos crticos son en direccin Norte y Sur, con demoras promedio
de ms de 10,000 segundos por vehculo.
3.23 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733
los accesos crticos son en direccin Norte, Sur y este, con demoras promedio de
320.2, 284.8 y 111.7 segundos respectivamente.
3.24 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-14 con la PR-171
y PR-734 con la PR-735 la acceso crtica sigue siendo en direccin Sur, con demoras
promedio de 681.9 y 39.7 segundos respectivamente.
3.25 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-735
direccin Norte y Sur las accesos crticas son en direccin este para la interseccin
Norte y a la izquierda en direccin Norte para la interseccin Sur, con demoras
promedio de 68.4 y 303.3 segundos respectivamente.

40

3.26 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, para la interseccin de la PR-1 y PR-738 los
accesos crticos son las calles en direccin este y oeste, que operan a un NS de F y E
con demoras promedio de 328.2 y 103.8 segundos respectivamente.
3.27 En el escenario de no-accin del 2028, las intersecciones de la PR-172 con la PR-787
y la PR-1 con la PR-787 operan a un nivel de servicio aceptable.
Tabla 19: NS Proyectado para el Ao 2028, Hora Pico PM por Acceso a Cada Interseccin
Int.

Principal

Secundaria

Grupo de
Acceso
Critico

NS Acceso
Direccin
Norte

NS Acceso
Direccin Sur
(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

NS Acceso
Direccin
Este

NS Acceso
Direccin
Oeste

(NS/Demora)

(NS/Demora)

PR-1

PR-184

Norte

F / 148.4

-----

B / 10.3

F / 127.6

PR-1

PR-14

Norte

E / 72.8

C / 25.4

E / 70.7

D / 40.7

PR-734

PR-7733

Oeste

F / 83.1

D / 41.5

B / 19.9

F / 114.1

PR-171

PR-7733

Sur

F / 320.2

F / 284.8

F / 111.7

C / 28.3

PR-172

PR-7733

Sur

C / 22.4

C / 30.5

B / 10.3

C / 26.8

PR-14

PR-171

Sur

-----

F / 681.9

C / 21.6

A / 0.0

PR-734

PR-735

Sur

-----

E / 39.7

A / 5.6

A / 0.0

PR-1

PR-735
(Norte)

Este

A / 5.0

A / 0.0

F / 68.4

-----

PR-1

PR-735
(Sur)

Norte

F / 303.3

A / 3.5

A / 6.8

-----

10

PR-1

PR-738

Este

A / 3.4

A / 4.7

F / 328.2

E / 103.8

11

PR-172

PR-787

Sur

B / 17.7

C / 36.0

C / 23.5

-----

12

PR-1

PR-787

Este

A / 9.0

A / 0.0

D / 22.4

-----

13

PR-743

PR-742

A / 0.0

A / 0.8

-----

F / 61.5

14

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas
Norte

Este

A / 0.0

A / 7.3

F / 6987.0

-----

15

PR-184

PR-52
Rampas Sur

Oeste

A / 6.0

A / 0.0

-----

F / 192.1

16

PR-7733

Entrada a la
Fabrica

Norte/Sur

F / 10,000

F / 10,000

A / 7.2

A / 0.0

41

Conclusiones
3.28 Los resultados obtenidos para la proyeccin del 2018 y la proyeccin del 2028 bajo la
condicin de no-accin muestran que el NS en la regin seguir deteriorndose
durante ese intervalo de tiempo.
3.29 Las mejoras realizadas a la interseccin de la PR-172 y PR-7733, despus de
realizado el estudio, proporcionaron la configuracin geomtrica necesaria para
absorber el incremento en el trnsito a lo largo del tiempo sin presentar deterioro en
NS.

42

IV- EVALUACION DE ALTERNATIVAS


Introduccin
4.1

El siguiente paso en el estudio es la evaluacin de las alternativas basada en la


capacidad que tengan para atraer trnsito de la red de carreteras existente y el tiempo
de viaje. Las cinco alternativas se modelararn y se simular su capacidad para atraer
trnsito de la red existente basado en modelos computarizados.

4.2

Esta tarea se realiza a travs de la aplicacin de modelos de asignacin de trnsito


computarizados.

Modelo de Asignacin de Trnsito


4.3

Los modelos de asignacin de trnsito, son programas de computadora que permiten


la simulacin de trnsito en una red de carreteras y el anlisis del efecto que tendr
un cambio en la red en la asignacin de trnsito a esta red.

4.4

Los modelos se componen de una representacin de la red de carreteras, matrices de


viaje origen y destino (segmentado para diferentes usuarios); los parmetros que
definen las carreteras de la red tales como curvas en la demanda de flujo de trnsito y
otros que caracterizan la demanda (usuarios) como el valor de su tiempo.

4.5

SATURN (Simulation and Assignment of Traffic to Urban Road Networks) (simulacin


y asignacin de trnsito para redes de carreteras urbanas), un programa de
asignacin aplicando la micro simulacin de trnsito fue seleccionado para la creacin
del modelo. SATURN permite combinar simultneamente todos los elementos que
son necesarios para la creacin del modelo.

4.6

SATURN tiene la capacidad para combinar varios tipos de usuarios simultneamente


de (matrices mltiples, diferentes voluntades de pagar diferentes prohibiciones y
sanciones por arcos diferentes (carreteras en la red) y realizar el anlisis en virtud de
la teora de la Wardorp de equilibrio determinstico y Equilibrio Estocstico de Usuario.
Ambos permiten una mejor evaluacin del subjetivo valor del tiempo a travs de la
segmentacin de las matrices multiusuario.

4.7

SATURN tambin permite ajustar las matrices de viaje basado en los conteos de
trnsito reales realizados a lo largo de la red, a travs de la aplicacin del mdulo

43

SATME2.

Esta tcnica desarrolla las matrices que representan la condicin real

basada en los conteos observados, as que representa de mejor forma la circulacin


de vehculos a travs de la red.
4.8

Es importante reconocer que el ajuste de las matrices basado en conteos reales


puede ocultar algunas limitaciones del modelo, que puede incluir algunos errores en
los resultados ajustados entre trnsito modelado y observado. Debido a lo anterior es
nuestra prctica realizar el ajuste simultneamente en el nmero mximo de nodos de
la red para identificar cualquier resultado inesperado y obtener un ajuste vlido para el
sistema.

4.9

La red en un modelo de SATURN est representada por un conjunto de vnculos y


nodos a travs de los cuales estn representadas las caractersticas fiscales y
operativas importantes de las carreteras existentes.

Red Modelada
4.10 La red modelada considera todas las carreteras importantes en la regin de influencia
para el estudio. Para este estudio especfico, la red modelada se define como sigue:
4.10.1 PR-1 de la interseccin con la PR-172 a la interseccin con la PR-15
4.10.2 PR-52 de las rampas en la interseccin de la PR-172 hasta el cruce con la
PR-15
4.10.3 PR-14 entre la PR-1 y la PR-15
4.10.4 PR-171 de la PR-14 a la PR-7733
4.10.5 PR-734 de la PR-1 a la PR-7733
4.10.6 PR-787 de la PR-1 a la PR-172
4.10.7 PR-172 de laPR-1 a la entrada a Cidra
4.10.8 PR-15 de la PR-14 al paso con la PR-52
4.10.9 PR-7733 entre la PR-171 y la PR-172
4.11 Se modelaron un total de seis (6) redes:

44

4.11.1 Red Base representa la condicin existente y est sujeto al proceso de


calibracin en el que los parmetros del modelo de asignacin se ajustan para
representar adecuadamente el trnsito observado.
4.11.2 Los otros 5 modelos incluyen la red base con cada una de las cinco
alternativas para el conector 1 al 5 de Cidra-Cayey.
4.12 El cdigo de modelo para SATURN fue preparado basado en los siguientes
elementos:
4.12.1 Especificacin general de los parmetros de la red
4.12.2 Definicin de las zonas de desazolve de la red: nodos, enlaces y conectores
4.12.3 Definicin de las coordenadas geogrficas o referencias para cada nodo y el
centroide de la red.
4.12.4 Entrada de volmenes de trnsito de los cuestionarios y conteos sobre enlaces
y movimientos de viraje en nodos utilizados en el proceso de calibracin.
4.13 Los datos que se aplicacin en la construccin de la red para el modelo se basa en la
informacin que est disponible en la red de carreteras georreferenciada al rea de
estudio, conocimiento general de la zona, estudios de trnsito realizados; como la
velocidad de viaje y los volmenes de trnsito segregados por tipo de vehculo. En la
Figura 7 se presenta el modelo base que se implement en SATURN.

Codificacin de las Zonas


4.14 El modelo fue desarrollado utilizando 18 zonas correspondientes a los municipios
vecinos, basados en la siguiente gua de codificacin, consulte la Tabla 20 para
obtener una descripcin de las zonas.
4.15 For the Trip Assignment model, different to the O/D study Cidra was sub-divided into 5
zones and Cayey was sub-divided into 3 zones, to better represent the movement of
the people.

45

Figura 7: Red Base SATURN

46

Tabla 20: Codificacin de las zonas para O/D

Zona
Numero

Nombre Zona

Descripcin

Cidra

Viajes internos de Cidra

Cayey

Viajes originados o con destino de Cayey

Caguas

Viajes originados o con destino de Caguas

San Lorenzo

Viajes originados o con destino de San Lorenzo

Gurabo

Viajes originados o con destino de Gurabo

Humacao

Guayama

Aibonito

Bayamn

10

San Juan

Viajes originado en o con destino de todos los


municipios al este de San Lorenzo y Gurabo.
Viajes originado en o con destino de todos los
municipios al Sur de Cayey.
Viajes originado en o con destino de todos los
municipios al oeste de Cidra y Cayey.
Viajes originado en o con destino de todos los
municipios al oeste de San Juan y Norte de
Aguas Buenas.
Viajes originado en o con destino de San Juan.

11

Carolina

12

Aguas Buenas

Viajes originados o con destino de todos los


municipios al este de San Juan y Norte de
Gurabo
Viajes originado en o con destino de Aguas
Buenas.

Generacin de la Matriz
4.16 La Data de las 13 estaciones de encuesta de origen y destino se utiliz como la matriz
de viaje de base o la matriz a priori. La matriz a priori se ampli con la data recogida
en las estaciones de conteo de trnsito automtico y manual. Durante los procesos
de modelado y calibracin que se actualizar la matriz mediante el mdulo de
SATME2, para obtener la matriz de viaje que mejor representa la data observada.

Parmetros de Modelo
4.17 Los principales parmetros para el modelo son: tipo de usuario, valor de su tiempo
(VOT), los costos operacionales y los parmetros de la curva de demanda de flujo.
4.18 Tpicamente se le asigna un tipo de usuario individual a cada tipo de vehculo
principalmente, vehculos de pasajeros (PC), camiones sencillos y vehculos pesados.

47

Adems, puede utilizarse una segmentacin ms detallada que puede permitir la


diferenciacin de tipos de vehculos basado en la disposicin a pagar, propsito de
viaje a, quien paga por el viaje, costos operacionales, entre otras variables.
4.19 Por lo general, se puede definir una segmentacin ms detallada de los usuarios
mediante la evaluacin de la disposicin para pagar de vehculos de pasajeros, que a
su vez depende de la finalidad del viaje (trabajo, escuela, compras, otros) y el nivel de
ingresos del conductor (alto, medio, bajo).
4.20 Para este estudio fueron definidos 5 tipos de usuarios: PC altos ingresos, PC ingresos
medianos, PC bajos ingresos, camiones sencillos y vehculos pesados. Las
proporciones basadas en los ingresos se derivan de estudios previos. El parmetro
de valor de tiempo inicial tambin fue derivado de estudios previos y ajustado a travs
de la calibracin de la fase de modelo (Tabla 21).
Tabla 21: VOT para cada tipo de usuario ($/Hora)

Tipo de
usuario

Usuario

Nivel de
ingreso

VOT

VOT promedio

(US$/hora)

(US$/hora)

$0 - $1,300

11.01

PC bajos ingresos

PC Ingresos
medios

$1,300 $3,000

28.13

PC Ingresos altos

Mas de $3,000

47.86

Camiones sencillos

60.0

60.0

Vehculos pesados

60.0

60.0

29.0

Determinacin de Hora Pico


4.21 Antes de iniciar el proceso de calibracin se determinaron las horas pico de la
maana y la tarde para la regin de influencia basado en los conteos automticos de
trnsito.
4.22 Esto se realiz sumando la data de las 14 estaciones de conteo automtico de trnsito
para los das tpicos de la semana (martes al jueves) y se identifico la hora con el
mayor flujo de trnsito de la maana y la tarde. La hora pico de la maana fue
identificada de las 7:00-8:00 AM y la hora de pico de la tarde fue identificada de las
16:45-17: 45.
48

4.23 El proceso de calibracin fue basado en los flujos observados durante las horas pico
de am y pm, y una matriz de viaje basada en el promedio de 3 horas de la maana y 3
horas de la tarde. Basado en el pequeo tamao de la red y la matriz de viaje y la
presuncin de que los patrones de viaje son similares para el intervalo de tiempo de 3
horas, la matriz de 3 horas promedio fue usada para obtener un mayor nmero de
entradas.

Calibracin del Modelo


4.24 El proceso de calibracin para redes y matrices consiste en la introduccin de
modificaciones a los diferentes parmetros obtenidos de la data, hasta que el modelo
puede replicar los flujos de trnsito y tiempos de viajes observados en la regin.
4.25 Los principales pasos en el proceso se muestran en la Figura 8.
4.26 El establecimiento de las matrices iniciales basadas en la encuesta O/D, ampliada por
los conteos de trnsito. En caso de que algunos pares de O/D no se hayan medido
en la encuesta, se calcularon utilizando el mdulo de SATME2. El proceso result en
6 matrices, tres para la hora pico AM y tres de la hora pico de la tarde para las
siguientes clasificaciones de vehculo: pasajeros, camiones de hasta 3 ejes y
vehculos pesados con 4 ejes o ms.
4.27 La construccin y la incorporacin de la red base del 2008 para el modelo.
4.28 Asignacin de las matrices iniciales, modificar los parmetros de red para obtener un
mejor ajuste a la data observada.
4.29 Aplicar el algoritmo de ajuste de matriz utilizando el mdulo de SATME2 en SATURN.
4.30 The final step in the calibration process is the verification of the level of model fitness
(observed vs. modeled). El paso final en el proceso de calibracin es la verificacin
del nivel de aplicacin del modelo (observada vs modelados).

49

Matriz
Prioria
Priori

Parmetros /
Redes Iniciales
Asignacin y
Ajuste de
Parmetros
Nueva Red
New Network

Modulo
SATME2SATME2
Module
Ajuste de Matriz

Asignacin
Final
Final
Figura 8: Proceso de Calibracin

Aplicacin del Modelo de Trnsito


4.31 Normalmente los flujos de trnsito, modelados y asignados a la red se comparan
utilizando dos indicadores: la relacin entre los flujos y la diferencia (error del modelo)
y mediante la aplicacin de la estadstica de GEH. Para evaluar el ajuste de los
valores modelados en los valores observados, la estadstica de GEH tiene algunas
ventajas sobre los otros mtodos, debido al hecho de que combina cambios relativos
y absolutos. La estadstica de GES se calcula utilizando la siguiente frmula:

GEH =

(V2 V1 )2 / (0.5 (V1 + V2 ))

4.32 Basado en la aplicacin de SATURN, un valor de GEH igual o inferior a 5 indican un


muy buen ajuste, y valores de ms de 10 requieren revisin del modelo.
4.33 Las siguientes tablas presentan las diferencias entre los valores modelados y los
valores observados tras el proceso de calibracin.

50

Figura 9: Nivel de ajuste Base pico AM


Regresion LinealTotal AM
1400

1200

F lu jo M o d e lad o

1000

800

y = 0.7398x + 109.13
2
R = 0.8215
600

400

200

0
0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Flujo Observado

4.34 En general puede decirse que el ajuste obtenido despus de que el proceso de
calibracin es satisfactorio. Se puede observar que para ambas horas pico AM y PM
sobre un 80% de los enlaces tienen un GEH menor a 5 y ms del 92% tienen un GEH
menor a 10. Debido al nmero reducido de camiones que fueron entrevistados, estos
porcentajes son ms bajos para la clasificacin de vehculos pesados, pero los
valores de GEH son todava menores de 10 para un 92% de los enlaces. Adems, las
regresiones lineales por la suma de todos los tipos de vehculo presentan un Rcuadrado sobre 0.82 para ambas horas pico (Figura 9 y Figura 10).
4.35 El ajuste del modelo se considera adecuado; por lo tanto, se considera que el modelo
refleja los patrones de trnsito observados y los cambios debido a la incorporacin de
nuevo conector entre Cidra y Cayey. Adems, otros cambios que podran afectar a la
red existente podran estudiarse mediante la aplicacin del modelo.

51

Figura 10: Nivel de ajuste Base pico PM

Regresion Lineal Total PM


1200

1000

F lu jo M o d e la d o

800

y = 0.8808x + 22.749
R2 = 0.8718
600

400

200

0
0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Flujo Observado

Ajuste de Tiempos de Viaje


4.36 Los resultados del estudio de los tiempos de viaje fueron comparados con los
resultados de tiempos de viaje del modelo, todos los tiempos de viaje se consideran
en segundos.
4.37 Basado en la comparacin, los tiempos de viaje modelados emulan los tiempos de
viaje observados en un 87 por ciento durante la hora pico de la maana y un 82 por
ciento de la hora pico de la tarde con diferencias bajo las 19 mph (30 kph). Los
resultados pueden verse en la Tabla 22.

52

Tabla 22: Comparativa de tiempos de viaje Observados y Modelados

Nodo A

Nodo B

9002

Observado

Modelado

AM

PM

AM

PM

9008

438

449

483

685

9002

9003

460

509

562

509

9003

9004

113

125

212

160

9003

9002

623

454

679

1020

9004

9005

597

660

861

812

9004

9003

152

111

166

288

9005

9004

808

588

894

907

9005

9006

924

557

300

284

9006

9007

233

209

103

119

9006

9005

635

630

327

335

9008

9002

413

416

423

560

9009

9019

272

491

69

75

9009

9014

339

464

88

89

9009

9010

131

135

181

183

9010

9009

49

129

162

146

9010

9011

733

662

397

405

9011

9010

619

499

249

231

9012

9013

468

831

1769

1523

9013

9014

568

477

1578

1603

9013

9012

400

260

396

390

9014

9009

202

310

113

117

9014

9013

485

316

481

473

9019

9009

228

319

147

143

53

Resultados de Asignacin de Trnsito


4.38 Utilizando los modelos calibrados para los picos de A.M. y P.M. Se modelaron las
cinco alternativas del nuevo conector entre Cidra y Cayey. Estos nuevos modelos slo
consideran el cambio geomtrico al incorporar el nuevo conector, los flujos de trnsito
se consideraron constantes en esta fase del proyecto.
4.39 Los resultados del modelo se presentan como el nmero total de vehculos entrando y
saliendo del centro de la municipalidad de Cidra.
4.40 Las siguientes tablas resumen los resultados obtenidos para cada alternativa como el
porcentaje de trnsito que entra o sale de Cidra.
4.41 Basado en los resultados obtenidos se puede determinar que la alternativa que capta
ms trnsito en ambas direcciones es la alternativa #5, seguida por la alternativa #4.
4.42 En general, la alternativa #5 capta un 20% ms que la alternativa #1, un 34% ms que
la alternativa #2, un 21% ms que la alternativa #3 y un 4% ms que la alternativa #4.
4.43 La capacidad de las alternativas #4 y #5 para captar ms vehculos es debido
principalmente a la interseccin con la PR-1 en Cayey, que atrae a muchas de las
personas viajando de Cayey a Cidra
4.44 El volumen Proyectado de para la hora pico AM es de 958 vehculos, y el volumen
proyectado durante la hora pico PM es de 610. A partir de la data recopilada se ha
calculado que la hora pico AM representa aproximadamente el 8% del trnsito diario
promedio, por lo tanto basado en el trnsito diario promedio anterior la proyeccin
para el nuevo conector sera aproximadamente 11,000 a 12,000 vehculos
considerando los volmenes del 2008.
4.45 Si los factores de proyeccin de la ACTPR se aplican para obtener el AADT
proyectado para el 2018 y 2028, basado en el factor de 1.40 de proyeccin para la
interestatal, el AADT resultante son entre 13,000 y 14,000 para el ao proyeccin
2018 y entre 15,000 y 16,000 para el ao proyeccin 2028.

54

Tabla 23: Pico AM- Trnsito Entrando a Cidra

PR-172
PR-787
PR-734
PR-171
Nuevo Conector
TOTAL

Base

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

429

391

406

391

434

431

31%

29%

30%

29%

32%

32%

203

199

202

15%

0%

0%

0%

15%

15%

489

490

490

490

200

162

36%

36%

36%

36%

15%

12%

242

241

242

241

235

235

18%

18%

18%

18%

17%

17%

242

227

242

296

334

0%

18%

17%

18%

22%

25%

1,364

1,364

1,364

1,364

1,364

1,364

Tabla 24: Pico AM- Trnsito Saliendo de Cidra

PR-172
PR-787
PR-734
PR-171
Nuevo Conector
TOTAL

Base

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

259

99

99

99

231

232

14%

5%

5%

5%

12%

12%

368

117

118

118

20%

0%

6%

0%

6%

6%

716

696

696

696

377

370

39%

37%

37%

37%

20%

20%

516

516

516

516

516

516

28%

28%

28%

28%

28%

28%

549

431

549

619

624

0%

30%

23%

30%

33%

34%

1,860

1,860

1,860

1,860

1,860

1,860

55

Tabla 25: Pico PM- Trnsito Entrando a Cidra

PR-172
PR-787
PR-734
PR-171
Nuevo Conector
TOTAL

Base

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

353

324

334

324

331

334

27%

24%

25%

24%

25%

25%

282

27

31

28

21%

0%

2%

0%

2%

2%

500

492

492

492

379

395

38%

37%

37%

37%

28%

30%

195

187

187

187

184

186

15%

14%

14%

14%

14%

14%

326

289

326

405

388

0%

25%

22%

25%

30%

29%

1,330

1,330

1,330

1,330

1,330

1,330

Tabla 26: Pico PM - Trnsito Saliendo de Cidra

PR-172
PR-787
PR-734
PR-171
Nuevo Conector
TOTAL

Base

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

288

285

285

285

288

287

21%

21%

21%

21%

21%

21%

122

50

18

53

55

9%

0%

4%

1%

4%

4%

576

565

565

565

456

422

42%

42%

42%

42%

34%

31%

374

374

374

374

374

374

28%

28%

28%

28%

28%

28%

135

86

118

188

222

0%

10%

6%

9%

14%

16%

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

1,360

56

Resultados de Tiempos de Viaje


4.46 Adems de estimar el nmero de vehculos que entran y salen de Cidra por cada va
de acceso tambin se estim los tiempos de viaje para cada ruta de acceso.
4.47 Los tiempos de viaje presentadas en esta seccin son resultados proporcionados por
el modelo de SATURN basado en la calibracin y el trnsito reasignado. Como se
mencion anteriormente el modelo fue calibrado utilizando los resultados del estudio
de tiempo de viajes presentados en el captulo 2.
4.48 Basado en informacin proporcionada por Gregory L Morris y Asociados y mapas
areos del rea, se calcularon las siguientes longitudes para cada ruta de acceso, ver
la Tabla 27.
4.49 Las longitudes que se enumeran a continuacin se normalizan a la interseccin con la
PR-52 en Cayey y la PR-7733 en Cidra, con la excepcin de la PR-787 para la cual se
presentan dos longitudes en Cayey. Para la PR-172 en Caguas, la ruta comienza en
la interseccin con la PR-52.
Tabla 27: Longitud de Rutas de Acceso

Ruta de Acceso

Longitud (metros)

Ruta de Acceso Longitud (metros)

PR-172

14,013

Alt.1

6,419

PR-787 de la PR-184
PR-787 de la PR-1

9,452
7,401

Alt.2
Alt.3

6,938
6,548

274

Alt.4

6,374

PR-734

7,140

Alt.5

6,735

PR-171

9,655

PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

4.50 El siguiente paso fue la estimacin de los tiempos de viaje para cada ruta de acceso
por separado para los vehculos entrando a Cidra y saliendo de Cidra. Resultados de
la hora pico AM pueden verse en las Tabla 28 a la Tabla 30.
4.51 Como puede verse, durante la hora pico de la maana entrando a Cidra, el tiempo de
viaje a lo largo del nuevo conector se estim en alrededor de 332 segundos o 5.53
minutos para las cinco alternativas entrando a Cidra. Mientras tanto para el trnsito

57

de salida de Cidra para todas cinco alternativas, el tiempo medio de viaje fue de 338
segundos o 5.63minutos.
Tabla 28: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Entrando a Cidra
Original

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)


PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

18

19

19

19

18

18

1,663

1,625

1,638

1,625

1,668

1,665

PR-787 de la PR-184
PR-787 de la PR-1

500
355

485
346

484
345

485
346

500
355

500
355

PR-734

578

579

578

579

494

488

PR-171

1,135

1,138

1,141

1,138

1,125

1,126

n/a

322

348

329

321

339

Alt.1
Alt.2
Alt.3
Alt.4
Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)

Alt.5

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

Tabla 29: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Saliendo de Cidra


Original
PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

20

21

21

21

20

20

1,781

1,619

1,619

1,619

1,741

1,743

PR-787 a la PR-184
PR-787 a la PR-1

445
342

405
318

410
319

405
318

411
320

411
320

PR-734

411

408

408

408

341

340

PR-171

3,926

3,922

3,904

3,922

3,905

3,903

n/a

329

352

335

327

345

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

4.52 En el viaje de ida y vuelta para las cinco alternativas, los resultados presentan un
promedio de 669 segundos o 11.16minutos. En comparacin con el promedio de ida
y vuelta para la PR-172 representa una reduccin de aproximadamente 55 minutos.
En comparacin con el promedio de ida y vuelta para la PR-171 representa una
reduccin de aproximadamente 84 minutos. En comparacin con el promedio de ida y
vuelta para la PR-734 representa una reduccin de aproximadamente 16 minutos.
58

4.53 For the morning peak hour alternative 4 presents the shortest travel time followed by
alternatives 1 and 3. On the other hand, alternative 2 presents the longest travel time.
Para la hora pico de la maana, la alternativa 4 presenta el tiempo de viaje ms corto,
seguido por las alternativas 1 y 3. Por otro lado, la alternativa 2 presenta el tiempo de
viaje ms largo
Tabla 30: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico AM Ida y Vuelta
Original
Alt.1
Alt.2
Alt.3
Alt.4
Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)
PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

Alt.5

39

40

40

40

39

39

3,444

3,243

3,257

3,243

3,409

3,408

PR-787 a la PR-184
PR-787 a laPR-1

945
697

889
663

894
664

889
663

911
674

911
675

PR-734

988

987

986

987

835

828

PR-171

5,061

5,061

5,044

5,061

5,030

5,029

n/a

651

700

664

648

685

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

4.54 Para la hora pico de la tarde, los resultados se presentan de la Tabla 31 a la Tabla 33.
Los tiempos de viaje entrando a Cidra durante la hora pico de la tarde para las cinco
alternativas fue de aproximadamente 333 segundos o 5.53 minutos.
Tabla 31: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico PM Entrando a Cidra
Original

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)


PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

19

18

18

18

18

18

1,513

1,486

1,494

1,486

1,492

1,494

PR-787 de la PR-184
PR-787 de la PR-1

520
367

483
345

481
346

482
345

482
346

481
346

PR-734

588

587

587

587

539

541

PR-171

1,131

1,129

1,130

1,129

1,142

1,136

n/a

324

349

330

322

340

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

59

4.55 Para el trnsito saliendo de Cidra en la hora de pico de la tarde, el tiempo medio de
viaje a lo largo de las cinco alternativas fue de 331 segundos o 5.51 minutos, para ida
y vuelta a la hora de pico PM, el tiempo medio de viaje para las cinco alternativas fue
de 664 segundos o 11.06 minutos.
Tabla 32: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico Saliendo de Cidra
Original
PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

Alt.1
Alt.2
Alt.3
Alt.4
Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)

Alt.5

19

19

19

19

19

19

2,256

2,241

2,242

2,241

2,257

2,252

PR-787 a la PR-184
PR-787 a la PR-1

444
325

433
320

432
322

434
321

432
322

431
322

PR-734

377

376

376

376

355

349

PR-171

3,723

3,722

3,721

3,722

3,724

3,707

n/a

321

347

328

319

338

Tabla 33: Tiempo de Viaje Hora Pico PM Ida y Vuelta


Original
Alt.1
Alt.2
Alt.3
Alt.4
Tiempos de Viaje (segundos)

Alt.5

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

PR-184 (PR-1 a la PR-52)

37

37

37

37

37

37

3,769

3,727

3,736

3,728

3,748

3,746

PR-787 a la PR-184
PR-787 a la PR-1

964
692

916
665

913
667

916
665

914
668

912
667

PR-734

965

963

963

963

893

891

PR-171

4,854

4,851

4,850

4,851

4,866

4,843

n/a

645

696

658

642

678

PR-172

Nuevo Conector

4.56 Para el viaje de ida y vuelta para las cinco alternativas a la hora pico de la tarde, los
resultados presentan un promedio de 664 segundos o 11.06 minutos.

Comparado

con el promedio de ida y vuelta para la PR-172 presenta una reduccin de


aproximadamente 62 minutos. Comparado con el promedio de ida y vuelta para la
60

PR-171 presenta una reduccin de aproximadamente 81 minutos. Comparado con el


promedio de ida y vuelta para la PR-734 presenta una reduccin de aproximadamente
16 minutos.
4.57 Para la hora de pico de la tarde, los resultados obtenidos fueron similares a los de la
hora pico de la maana, la alternativa 4 proporciona el menor tiempo de viaje, seguido
de la alternativa 1 y 3. Como fue el caso durante la hora pico de la maana, la
alternativa 2 present el tiempo de viaje ms largo.
4.58 As can be seen the results in travel time along the new connector are similar for the
AM and PM peak hours, in summary a round trip in the morning present an average of
11.16 minutes for all five alternatives compared to the afternoon peak hour with 11.06
minutes. Como puede verse los resultados en tiempo de viaje a lo largo del nuevo
conector son similares durante las horas pico de A.M. y P.M., en resumen, el viaje ida
y vuelta en la maana presenta un promedio de 11.16 minutos para las cinco
alternativas en comparacin de 11.06 minutos a la hora de pico de la tarde.

Conclusiones
4.59 Basado en los resultados obtenidos del modelo de asignacin de trnsito la alternativa
#5 captura el mayor trnsito, proporcionando as ms beneficios a la regin con
respecto a la reasignacin del trnsito y la mitigacin de la congestin de trnsito
proyectado para el ao horizonte.
4.60 Para la hora pico de la maana y de la tarde la alternativa 4 presenta el menor tiempo
de viaje para el nuevo conector con casi 1 minuto menos que la alternativa 2 que
present el tiempo de viaje ms largo.

61

V- SECCIONES PROPUESTAS
Introduccin
5.1

En esta seccin del informe se propondr las secciones bsicas de carretera para las
cinco alternativas y alternativas para cada una de las intersecciones nuevas, basado
en los resultados obtenidos en la fase de asignacin de trnsito.

Seccin Bsica de Carretera


5.2

Para determinar la seccin bsica de carretera propuesta, se aplicar el mdulo Multicarril de HCS+ versin 5.3 en la modalidad de diseo para evaluar la seccin de
carretera requerida basada en los volmenes asignados.

5.3

Debido a que el modelo fue calibrado con volmenes existentes, los volmenes
asignados se multiplicarn por los factores de crecimiento proporcionados por la
Autoridad de Carreteras y Transporte de Puerto Rico para el trnsito esperado del
proyecto para los aos proyectados, 2018 y 2028.

5.4

Para el ao de proyeccin 2018, basndose en los resultados obtenidos para las


cinco alternativas, los volmenes a utilizarse en la evaluacin de la hora pico de la
maana se enumeran en la Tabla 34, y los volmenes proyectados para la hora pico
de la tarde se enumeran en la Tabla 35.

5.5

Para el ao de proyeccin 2028, basndose en los resultados obtenidos para las


cinco alternativas, los volmenes a utilizarse en la evaluacin de la hora pico de la
maana se enumeran en la Tabla 36, y los volmenes proyectados para la hora pico
de la tarde se enumeran en la Tabla 37.

5.6

Para la evaluacin de la seccin bsica recomendada se aplicar un NS de B para


ambos aos de proyeccin y ambas horas pico de AM y PM.

Tabla 34: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico AM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

293

275

293

358

404

Saliendo de Cidra

664

522

664

749

755

TOTAL

957

797

957

1107

1159

62

Tabla 35: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico PM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

394

350

394

490

469

Saliendo de Cidra

163

104

143

227

269

TOTAL

557

454

537

717

738

Tabla 36: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico AM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

344

322

344

420

474

Saliendo de Cidra

780

612

780

879

886

TOTAL

1124

934

1124

1299

1360

Tabla 37: Volumen del Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico PM

5.7

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

463

410

463

575

551

Saliendo de Cidra

192

122

168

267

315

TOTAL

655

532

631

842

866

Para el ao proyeccin 2018, basado en los volmenes anteriormente presentados, la


seccin bsica de carretera necesaria para manejar el volumen de trnsito proyectado
se enumera a continuacin.

Tabla 38: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico AM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Carriles entrando a Cidra

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.6

Carriles saliendo de Cidra

0.9

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.0

Tabla 39: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2018 Pico PM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Carriles entrando a Cidra

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.6

Carriles saliendo de Cidra

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

63

Tabla 40: Seccin de Carretera Recomendada para el Nuevo Conector 2018

5.8

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Carriles entrando a Cidra

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Carriles saliendo de Cidra

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Para el ao de proyeccin 2018, una seccin bsica de 2 carriles; un carril en cada


direccin proporcionar la capacidad necesaria para manejar el trnsito proyectado y
operar en un NS de B.

5.9

Para el ao proyeccin 2028, basado en los volmenes anteriormente presentados, la


seccin bsica de carretera necesaria para manejar el volumen de trnsito proyectado
se enumera a continuacin.

Tabla 41: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico AM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.6

Saliendo de Cidra

1.1

0.8

1.1

1.2

1.2

Tabla 42: Seccin Bsica de Carretera para el Nuevo Conector 2028 Pico PM

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.8

0.8

Saliendo de Cidra

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.4

Tabla 43: Seccin Recomendada para el Nuevo Conector 2028

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Saliendo de Cidra

2.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

64

5.10 Para el ao de proyeccin 2028, una seccin bsica de 4 carriles; dos carriles en cada
direccin proporcionar la capacidad necesaria para manejar el trnsito proyectado y
operar en un NS de B.
5.11 Si se evala la proyeccin del 2028 partiendo de un NS de C para las alternativas 1,
3, 4 y 5, deteriorando un poco la comodidad de los conductores, la hora pico de la
maana requerir una seccin bsica de 2 carriles; uno en cada direccin la cual
proporcionar la capacidad necesaria para manejar el trnsito proyectado, consulte la
Tabla 44.
Tabla 44: Nueva Seccin del Conector 2028 Pico AM con un NS de C

Alt.1

Alt.3

Alt.4

Alt.5

Entrando a Cidra

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

Saliendo de Cidra

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.8

5.12 Adems de la evaluacin de volmenes de trnsito, las pendientes propuestas


tambin fueron evaluadas para determinar el posible impacto en los vehculos
pesados. Basado en el HCM 2000 cualquier pendiente de 3 por ciento, o menor, pero
ms de una milla de longitud o cualquier pendiente superior al 3 por ciento y ms de
0.50 millas de longitud debe ser evaluada, ya que tendr un efecto sobre el flujo de
trnsito.
5.13 Basado en lo anterior, para la seccin bsica de 2 carriles, recomendamos que se
aada un carril adicional subiendo para cualquier segmento de carretera superior a los
parmetros HCM, al proporcionar un carril extra los vehculos pesados tendrn un
carril y los vehculos de pasajeros, un carril.

Geometra propuesta para las Intersecciones


5.14 Para las alternativas 1, 2, y 3 se deben proporcionar modificaciones en dos
intersecciones; primero en la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-184 en Cayey y segundo
en la interseccin de la PR-7733 y la entrada a la fbrica en Cidra.
5.15 La interseccin existente en la PR-1 con PR-184 es una interseccin tipo T con
semforo, que se debe convertir a una interseccin completa aadiendo los

65

movimientos en direccin este que presentan la adicin del nuevo conector entre
Cidra y Cayey, para la geometra propuesta vase la Figura 11.
5.16 La interseccin existente de la PR-7733 con la entrada a la fbrica tambin ser
convertida de una interseccin de T a una interseccin en cruz completa aadiendo
los movimientos en direccin Norte que presentan la adicin del nuevo conector entre
Cidra y Cayey, para la geometra propuesta vase la Figura 12.
5.17 A lo largo de la alternativa 4 para el nuevo conector entre Cidra y Cayey, tres nuevas
intersecciones sern creadas, stas son: la PR-7733 con el nuevo conector, la PR-1
con el nuevo conector y la PR-52 con el nuevo conector.
5.18 A lo largo de la alternativa 5 para el nuevo conector entre Cidra y Cayey, cuatro
nuevas intersecciones sern creadas, stas son: la PR-7733 con el nuevo conector, la
PR-1 con el nuevo conector, la PR-52 con el nuevo conector, y la PR-7733 con el
nuevo conector.
5.19 Para la interseccin de la PR-7733 con el nuevo conector se evaluar una
interseccin en cruz a nivel, ver la Figura 13, proporcionando la siguiente geometra:
en la acceso Norte un carril combinado izquierda-directo y un carril que de viraje a la
derecha de 100 pies; en la acceso Sur un carril de viraje a la izquierda de 100 pies, un
carril directo, y un carril de viraje a la derecha de 100 pies con un radio de
deslizamiento de 50 pies; en la acceso este un carril de viraje a la izquierda de 200
pies y un carril combinado de viraje a la derecha directo; en la acceso oeste un carril
de viraje a la izquierda de 200 pies, un carril directo y un carril de viraje a la derecha
de 200 pies con radio de deslizamiento de 50 pies. Ver la Figura 13 para la geometra
propuesta.
5.20 Para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo conector ser evaluada una interseccin
en cruz a nivel, ver la
5.21 Figura 14, proporcionando la geometra siguiente: en las accesos Norte y Sur un carril
combinado de viraje a la izquierda y directo, un carril directo y un carril de viraje a la
derecha de 100 pies; en las accesos este y oeste un carril de viraje a la izquierda de
200 pies, un carril directo y un carril de viraje a la derecha de 100 pies. Ver la
5.22 Figura 14 para la geometra propuesta.

66

5.23 Para la interseccin de la PR-52 con el nuevo conector para la alternativa 4, aun
cuando los volmenes proyectados se podran manejar con una interseccin a nivel
se evaluar una interseccin tipo diamante debido a que la PR-52 es una carretera
interestatal con acceso controlado y peaje, ver la Figura 15.
5.24 Para la interseccin de la PR-52 con el nuevo conector para la alternativa 5, aun
cuando los volmenes proyectados se podran manejar con una interseccin a nivel
ser evaluada una interseccin de trbol parcial, debido a que la PR-52 es una
carretera interestatal con acceso controlado y peaje, ver la Figura 16. En la
interseccin Norte la acceso direccin Norte tiene dos carriles uno directo y uno
combinado directo-viraje a la derecha; la acceso Sur tiene tres carriles, un carril corto
para manejar el movimiento de viraje a la izquierda, el carril medio ser un carril
combinado para viraje a la izquierda y directo

y el carril derecho manejar los

movimientos directos. Las accesos direccin oeste son las rampas de entrada y salida
de la PR-52 que tiene dos carriles; uno para manejar el movimiento de viraje a la
derecha y uno a los movimientos de viraje a la izquierda.
5.25 Como parte de la alternativa 5 el nuevo conector ser extendido hasta la PR-743.
Para la interseccin de la PR-743 con el nuevo conector la interseccin propuesta es
tipo T a nivel en la cual la PR-743 permanece sin cambio, una seccin de dos
carriles y el nuevo conector propuesto es una seccin de 4 carriles, vase la Figura
16.

67

Figura 11: Geometra Propuesta para la Interseccin de la PR-1 con la PR-184 y el Nuevo Conector

68

Figura 12: Geometra Propuesta para la Interseccin de la PR-7733 con el Nuevo Conector para las Alternativas 1, 2, y 3

69

Figura 13: Geometra Propuesta para la PR-7733 con el Nuevo Conector para las Alternativas 4 & 5

70

.
Figura 14: Geometra Propuesta de la PR-1 con el Nuevo Conector para las Alternativas 4 & 5

71

Figura 15: Geometra Propuesta para la PR-52 con el Nuevo Conector para la Alternativa 4

72

Figura 16: Geometra Propuesta para la PR-52 y PR-743 con el Nuevo Conector para la Alternativa 5

73

VI- EVALUACION DE ALTERNATIVAS


FUTURAS
Introduccin
6.1

El siguiente paso es el anlisis operacional de la nueva interseccin y las


modificaciones a la interseccin existente en Cidra, basado en la construccin del
nuevo conector y la redistribucin del trnsito.

6.2

Las cinco alternativas propuestas fueron modelados en SYNCHRO V7.0 y las nuevas
intersecciones se evalan en cuanto a nivel de servicio operacional.

6.3

Los viajes asignados en la fase anterior ahora se distribuyen a lo largo de la red futura
propuesta, se reevala la red futura y se determina el nuevo nivel del servicio.

6.4

En esta fase nos enfocaremos en el nuevo conector y el efecto que tendr en las
intersecciones a lo largo de la PR-7733 en Cidra para las cinco alternativas, para las
alternativas 1, 2, y 3 los cambios a la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-184 en Cayey
tambin fueron evaluados, para la alternativa 4 y 5 la nueva interseccin con la PR-1
tambin fue evaluada y para la alternativa 5 el tramo propuesto para conectar la PR-1,
PR-52 y PR-743.

6.5

Para la evaluacin de la alternativa 5 y de las intersecciones del nuevo conector con


la PR-1, PR-52 y PR-743; adems de los volmenes de trnsito recogidos y
generados por este estudio, fueron incorporados en el anlisis volmenes de trnsito,
generacin del viaje y asignacin del viaje del estudio de trnsito para la construccin
de la carretera PR-158 entre PR-1 y PR-52 en Cayey preparado por PLC Traffic
Consulting Engineers & Planners.

6.6

Una de las grandes incgnitas en la evaluacin futura de una red existente es el factor
de hora pico futuro (PHF). El PHF es una medida de la uniformidad en el flujo de
trnsito que va desde 0.25 a 1.00, 0.25 es una hora pico, que presenta el trnsito en
un marco de tiempo de 15 minutos y 1.00 una hora pico, que presenta el mismo
trnsito para los 4 perodos de 15 minutos. De una revista literaria de Manuales de
Administracin de Acceso de varios Estados, se constat que muchos Estados

74

aplican un PHF estndar a la proyeccin futura. Basado en lo anterior se aplicar un


PHF estndar de 0.92 a los escenarios futuros.
6.7

Adems sern evaluadas las condiciones futuras incorporando el nuevo conector


mediante un nuevo plan de coordinacin de seal para minimizar demoras en las
intersecciones.

Dicho plan; incluyendo la longitud de fase y el ciclo se calcular

utilizando SYNCHRO V7.0 para cada alternativa.

Anlisis Operacional, Alternativa 1


6.8

Los prximos pasos son la incorporacin de la alternativa 1 en el modelo de


computadora y la redistribucin del trnsito basado en la asignacin de trnsito
realizada en la fase previa.

6.9

Se incorporan nuevos volmenes de trnsito en cada interseccin en el modelo


SYNCHRO y se evalan todas las intersecciones. Las tablas 45 y 46, presentan los
resultados para la condicin futura incorporando la alternativa 1, con las condiciones
de no-accin para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y 2028.

6.10 Del anlisis de la hora de pico AM, cabe sealar que cuando se incorpora en el
anlisis la alternativa 1 del nuevo conector y se redistribuye el trnsito, todas las
intersecciones presentan mejoras o un impacto mnimo en comparacin con los
escenarios de no-accin proyectados para el 2018 y 2028; con la excepcin de la PR734 con PR-7733 en Cidra y la proyeccin para el 2028 de la interseccin de la PR184 con la PR-52 Rampas direccin Sur.
6.10.1 Basado en las proyecciones, la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733 sigue
funcionando en un NS de F, pero la demora promedio modelada para esta
interseccin mejora significativamente de los miles de segundos a los cientos
de segundos debido a la redistribucin de trnsito en la interseccin.
6.10.2 Las intersecciones de la PR-734 con PR-7733 y la PR-184 con las rampas
direccin Sur de la PR-52 son las nicas intersecciones que presentan
deterioro en NS para el ao de proyeccin 2028. Esto es debido en parte a la
redistribucin de trnsito que sola utilizar la PR-172 para tener acceso a Cidra

75

y utilizar el nuevo conector, poniendo un mayor volumen de trnsito en los


tramos de la PR-7733 de esta interseccin.
Tabla 45: Alternativa 1- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 1

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1080.7

F / 181.0

F / 1422.2

F / 256.0

PR7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 79.2

C / 27.1

F / 10000

D / 36.3

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

F / 539.6

F / 449.7

F / 1893.4

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

C / 32.2

C / 24.2

C / 32.8

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

B / 10.1

B / 16.1

B / 10.6

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

F / 98.1

B / 18.4

F / 142.3

C / 26.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

F/ 589.8

F / 481.6

F / 637.6

F / 10000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 3895.2

F / 3217.7

F / 4012.2

F / 3331.0

6.10.3 Por otro lado, se puede observar que la geometra propuesta de la interseccin
del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 opera a un NS aceptable de C con
demoras promedio de aproximadamente 30 segundos.
6.10.4 Respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el
nuevo conector y la PR-184, la interseccin a nivel con una seal de trnsito
tendr un NS proyectado de C para el ao 2028 con demoras promedio de
unos 26 segundos por vehculo, por lo tanto funciona a un NS aceptable.
6.10.5 Como se puede ver para el ao de proyeccin 2028, las intersecciones de la
PR-184 con las rampas en direccin Norte y Sur de la PR-52 operan en un NS
inaceptable con demoras promedio en exceso de los 3000 segundos por
vehculo.

76

6.11 Del anlisis de la hora pico PM se puede notar tambin que la interseccin de la PR734 con PR-7733 tambin se deteriora en NS; de un NS proyectado de D en el 2018
No-Accin, a NS de F en el escenario con la alternativa # 1 para el 2018 y de un
proyectado NS de E en el escenario de No-Accin para el 2028 a un NS de F en el
escenario con la alternativa # 1 para el 2028.
6.12 Como fue el caso de la hora pico AM durante la hora pico PM, la interseccin de la
PR-171 con PR-7733 mejora ligeramente con una reduccin de ms de 40 segundos
en demoras promedio cuando se comparan, el escenario de No-Accin con la
alternativa # 1 para el 2018 y 2028.
Tabla 46: Alternativa 1- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 1

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 1

F / 93.5

D / 45.3

F / 171.9

E / 77.1

F / 1950.6

C / 24.1

F / 2010.5

C / 32.1

PR-171

PR-7733

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

F / 446.5

E / 68.5

F / 1023.7

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

C / 22.8

C / 20.0

C / 30.6

PR-172

PR-787

B / 20.8

B / 11.5

B / 23.7

B / 11.5

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

E / 61.0

B / 16.5

F / 88.9

C / 23.3

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

D / 41.3

F / 81.2

F / 84.8

F / 835.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 2539.2

F / 2956.2

F / 2625.9

F / 3053.3

6.13 Como fue el caso de la hora pico de la maana, las intersecciones de la PR-184 con
las rampas en direccin Sur de la PR-52 presentan un deterioro en el nivel de servicio
que va desde una D con demoras promedio de 41.3 segundos en el escenario de NoAccin del 2018 a un NS de F con demoras promedio de ms de 800 segundos para
el ao de proyeccin 2028 incluyendo la redistribucin utilizando la alternativa #1.

77

6.14 Como fue el caso en la hora pico de la maana, las intersecciones de la PR-184 con
las rampas direccin Norte de la PR-52 contina funcionando a un NS inaceptable de
F con demoras promedio superiores a los 2500 segundos en cada escenario.
6.15 Durante la hora pico PM la interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 presenta
un NS de C con demoras promedio de alrededor de 30 segundos por vehculo. Por lo
tanto la geometra propuesta es adecuada para operar la interseccin a un NS
aceptable para las proyecciones de 2018 y 2028.
6.16 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector y PR-184, se proyecta que la interseccin opere en un NS de B para el ao
2018 y un NS de C para el ao 2028 con alrededor de 20 segundos de demora
promedio por vehculo.
6.17 Basado en los resultados para la alternativa 1, slo la interseccin de la PR-734 y PR7733 presenta deterioro en NS causado principalmente por la concentracin de
trnsito en la interseccin destinado a la PR-734 y PR-172.
6.18 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 con la redistribucin del
trnsito el NS mejora a un nivel aceptable de E proyectado para el ao 2028.

Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 2


6.19 Los prximos pasos son la incorporacin de la alternativa 2 en el modelo de
computadora y la redistribucin del trnsito basado en la asignacin de trnsito
realizada en la fase previa.
6.20 Se incorporan nuevos volmenes de trnsito en cada interseccin en el modelo
SYNCHRO y se evalan todas las intersecciones.
6.21 Las tablas 47 y 48, presentan los resultados para la condicin futura incorporando la
alternativa 2, con las condiciones de no-accin para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y
2028.
6.22 Del anlisis de la hora pico AM, cabe sealar que cuando se incorpora el nuevo
conector en el anlisis y se redistribuye el trnsito, todas las intersecciones con la
excepcin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en Cidra presentan mejoras o un impacto

78

mnimo en comparacin con los escenarios de No-Accin proyectados para 2018 y


2028.
Tabla 47: Alternativa 2- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 2

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 2

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1080.7

F / 188.1

F / 1422.2

F / 259.4

PR7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 79.2

B / 12.4

F / 10000

B / 15.5

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

F / 709.1

F / 449.7

F / 1565.1

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

B / 14.9

C / 24.2

B / 19.0

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

A / 9.0

B / 16.1

B / 12.3

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

F / 98.1

B / 17.0

F / 142.3

C / 23.9

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

F/ 589.8

F / 481.6

F / 637.6

F / 10,000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 3895.2

F/ 3217.7

F / 4012.2

F / 3331.0

6.22.1 Basado en las proyecciones para la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733


sigue funcionando en un NS de F, pero la demora promedio modelada para
esta interseccin mejora significativamente de los miles de segundos a los
cientos de segundos.
6.22.2 La interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 es la nica que presenta un leve
deterioro en NS para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y 2028. Esto es debido, en
parte, a la redistribucin de trnsito que sola utilizar la PR-172 para tener
acceso a Cidra y utilizar el nuevo conector, causando un mayor volumen de
trnsito en los tramos de la PR-7733 en esta interseccin.
6.22.3 Por otro lado, se puede observar que la geometra propuesta para la
interseccin del conector nuevo con la PR-7733 opera a un NS aceptable de B
con demora promedio de menos de 15 segundos por vehculo.

79

6.22.4 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el


nuevo conector y la PR-184, la interseccin a nivel con el semforo tendr un
NS proyectado de C para el ao 2028 con demoras promedio de
aproximadamente 25 segundos por vehculo, por lo tanto opera a un NS
aceptable.
6.23 Del anlisis de la hora pico PM, para la alternativa 2, se puede observar tambin que
la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 tambin presenta un deterioro en NS; de un
NS proyectado de E en el escenario de No-Accin para el 2028 a un NS de F en el
escenario que incluyen la alternativa # 2 para el 2028.
Tabla 48: Alternativa 2- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 2

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 2

F / 93.5

D / 45.7

F / 171.9

E / 77.6

F / 1950.6

C / 23.4

F / 2010.5

C / 32.4

PR-171

PR-7733

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

F / 405.8

E / 65.8

F / 948.3

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

C / 21.5

C / 20.0

D / 30.7

PR-172

PR-787

B / 20.8

B / 11.6

B / 23.7

C / 11.6

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

E / 61.0

B / 15.5

F / 88.9

C / 21.7

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

D / 41.3

E / 75.5

F / 84.8

F / 855.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 2539.2

F / 3018.8

F / 2625.9

F / 3116.5

6.24 Como fue el caso en la hora pico AM durante la hora pico PM la interseccin de la PR171 con PR-7733 mejora ligeramente con una reduccin de ms de 50 segundos en
demora promedio cuando se comparan los escenarios del 2028.
6.25 Durante la hora pico PM la interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 presenta
un NS de C con demoras promedio de alrededor de 30 segundos por vehculo. Por lo

80

tanto la geometra propuesta es suficiente para operar la interseccin

un NS

aceptable para la proyeccin del 2028.


6.26 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector y PR-184, se proyecta que la interseccin opere a un NS de C para el ao
2028 con un promedio de 20 segundos de demora.
6.27 Basado en los resultados para la alternativa 2; slo la interseccin de la PR-734 y PR7733 presenta deterioro en NS causado principalmente por la concentracin de
trnsito en la interseccin destinado a la PR-734 y PR-172.
6.28 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 la redistribucin del trnsito
mejora el NS a un nivel aceptable de E, proyectado para el ao 2028.

Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 3


6.29 Los prximos pasos son la incorporacin de la alternativa 3 en el modelo de
computadora y la redistribucin del trnsito basado en la asignacin de trnsito
realizada en la fase previa.
6.30 Se incorporan nuevos volmenes de trnsito en cada interseccin en el modelo
SYNCHRO y se evalan todas las intersecciones. Las tablas 49 y 50, presentan los
resultados para la condicin futura incorporando la alternativa 3, con las condiciones
de no-accin para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y 2028.
6.31 Del anlisis de la hora pico AM, cabe sealar que cuando se incorpora el nuevo
conector en el anlisis y se redistribuye el trnsito, todas las intersecciones con la
excepcin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en Cidra y la interseccin de la PR-184 con las
rampas direccin Sur de la PR-52

presentan mejoras o un impacto mnimo en

comparacin con los escenarios de No-Accin proyectados para 2018 y 2028.


6.31.1 Basado en las proyecciones la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733 sigue
funcionando en un NS de F, pero la demora promedio modelada para esta
interseccin mejora significativamente de los miles de segundos a los cientos
de segundos.
6.31.2 La interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 presenta un leve deterioro en NS
para el ao de proyeccin 2028. Esto es debido, en parte, a la redistribucin
81

de trnsito que sola utilizar la PR-172 para tener acceso a Cidra y utilizar el
nuevo conector, causando un mayor volumen de trnsito en los tramos de la
PR-7733 en esta interseccin.
Tabla 49: Alternativa 3- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 3

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 3

F / 1080.7

F / 200.7

F / 1422.2

F / 276.3

F / 79.2

C / 33.1

F / 10000

D / 36.2

PR-171

PR-7733

PR7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

F / 561.6

F / 449.7

F / 1893.0

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

C / 20.1

C / 24.2

C / 33.4

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

A / 9.6

B / 16.1

B / 10.8

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

F / 98.1

B / 18.4

F / 142.3

C / 26.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

F/ 589.8

F / 481.6

F / 637.6

F / 10000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 3895.2

F / 3217.1

F / 4012.2

F / 3331.0

6.31.3 La interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur de la PR-52


tambin presenta gran deterioro en NS para el ao de proyeccin 2028, con
demoras promedio superiores a los 10,000 segundos.
6.31.4 Por otro lado, se puede observar que la geometra propuesta para la
interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 opera a un NS aceptable de D
con demoras promedio en el rango de 37 segundos para el ao proyeccin
2028.
6.31.5 Para la alternativa 3; la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1
con el nuevo conector y la PR-184, la interseccin a nivel con semforo tendr
un NS proyectado de C para el ao 2028 con demoras promedio de
aproximadamente 27 segundos, por lo tanto opera a un NS aceptable.

82

6.32 Del anlisis de la hora pico PM para la alternativa 3, se puede observar tambin que
la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 se deteriora en NS; de un NS proyectado
de E en el escenario de No-Accin para el 2028 a un NS de F en el escenario con la
alternativa #3 para el ao 2028.
6.33 Como fue el caso de la hora pico AM; en la hora pico PM la interseccin de la PR-171
con PR-7733 mejora ligeramente con una reduccin de casi 50 segundos en demora
promedio cuando se compara los escenarios del 2028.
Tabla 50: Alternativa 3- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 3

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 3

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 93.5

D / 45.0

F / 171.9

E / 73.1

PR-7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 1950.6

C / 23.9

F / 2010.5

C / 28.8

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

F / 447.4

E / 65.8

F / 1092.3

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

C / 23.7

C / 20.0

C / 27.2

PR-172

PR-787

B / 20.8

B / 12.0

B / 23.7

A / 9.7

PR-1

PR-184/ Nuevo
Conector

E / 61.0

B / 16.1

F / 88.9

C / 23.0

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

D / 41.3

F / 79.8

F / 84.8

F / 842.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

F / 2539.2

F/ 2979.3

F / 2625.9

F / 3076.7

6.34 La interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 presenta un NS de C durante la


hora pico PM con demoras promedio alrededor de 30 segundos por vehculo. Por lo
tanto la geometra propuesta es adecuada para operar la interseccin en un NS
aceptable para la proyeccin del 2028.
6.35 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector y PR-184, se proyecta que la interseccin opere a un NS de C para el ao
2028 con un promedio de 23 segundos de demora.

83

Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 4


6.36 Los prximos pasos son la incorporacin de la alternativa 4 en el modelo de
computadora y la redistribucin del trnsito basado en la asignacin de trnsito
realizada en la fase previa.
6.37 Se incorporan nuevos volmenes de trnsito en cada interseccin en el modelo
SYNCHRO y se evalan todas las intersecciones. Las tablas 51 y 52, presentan los
resultados para la condicin futura incorporando la alternativa 4, con las condiciones
de no-accin para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y 2028.
6.38 Del anlisis de la hora pico AM, cabe sealar que cuando se incorpora el nuevo
conector en el anlisis y se redistribuye el trnsito, todas las intersecciones con la
excepcin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en Cidra presentan mejoras en comparacin
con los escenarios de No-Accin proyectados para 2018 y 2028.
6.39 Basado en las proyecciones la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733 sigue
funcionando en un NS de F, pero el demora promedio modelado para esta
interseccin mejora significativamente de los miles de segundos a los cientos de
segundos.
6.40 La interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 es la nica que presenta un leve deterioro
en NS para el ao de proyeccin 2028. Esto es debido, en parte, a la redistribucin
de trnsito que sola utilizar la PR-172 para tener acceso a Cidra y utilizar el nuevo
conector, causando un mayor volumen de trnsito en los tramos de la PR-7733 en
esta interseccin.
6.41 Por otro lado, se puede observar que la geometra propuesta para la interseccin del
nuevo conector con la PR-7733 opera a un NS aceptable de C con demoras promedio
en el rango de 30 segundos para el ao proyeccin 2028.
6.42 En relacin a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector, la interseccin a nivel con semforo tendr un NS proyectado de D para el
ao 2028 con demoras promedio de aproximadamente 42 segundos, por lo tanto
opera a un NS aceptable.

84

Tabla 51: Alternativa 4- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 4

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 4

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1080.7

F / 189.1

F / 1422.2

F / 278.7

PR-7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 79.2

B / 15.4

F / 10000

C / 28.1

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

F / 534.4

F / 449.7

F / 1546.6

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

B / 16.7

C / 24.2

B / 15.9

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

A / 9.2

B / 16.1

B / 10.9

PR-1

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

B / 20.0

N/A

D / 42.2

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Sur

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

A / 7.0

N/A

A / 7.0

PR-52 Rampas
Direccin Norte

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

A / 7.2

N/A

A /7.2

6.43 Del anlisis de la hora pico PM para la alternativa 4, se puede observar tambin que
la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 presenta un deterioro en NS; de un NS
proyectado de E en el escenario de No-Accin para el 2028 a un NS de F en la
alternativa #4 para el ao 2028.
6.44 Como fue el caso de la hora pico AM; en la hora pico PM la interseccin de la PR-171
con PR-7733 mejora ligeramente con una reduccin de casi 100 segundos en demora
promedio cuando se compara los escenarios del 2028.
6.45 La interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 presenta un NS de C durante la
hora pico PM con demoras promedio alrededor de 30 segundos por vehculo. Por lo
tanto la geometra propuesta es suficiente para operar la interseccin en un NS
aceptable para la proyeccin del 2028.

85

6.46 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector y PR-184, se proyecta que la interseccin opere a un NS de B para el ao
2028 con un promedio de 16 segundos de demora.
Tabla 52: Alternativa 4- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 4

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 4

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 93.5

D / 37.4

F / 171.9

E / 60.8

PR-7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 1950.6

C / 33.2

F / 2010.5

C / 31.7

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

F / 672.1

E / 65.8

F / 945.0

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

B / 17.0

C / 20.0

C / 21.7

PR-172

PR-787

B / 20.8

A / 9.5

B / 23.7

B / 10.0

PR-1

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

B / 12.8

N/A

B / 16.0

PR-52 Rampas Nuevo


Direccin Sur
Conector

N/A

A / 7.0

N/A

A / 7.0

PR-52 Rampas Nuevo


Direccin Norte Conector

N/A

A / 7.0

N/A

A / 7.3

Anlisis Operacional Alternativa 5


6.47 Los prximos pasos son la incorporacin de la alternativa 5 en el modelo de
computadora y la redistribucin del trnsito basado en la asignacin de trnsito
realizada en la fase previa.
6.48 Se incorporan nuevos volmenes de trnsito en cada interseccin en el modelo
SYNCHRO y se evalan todas las intersecciones. La Tabla 53 y Tabla 54, presentan
los resultados para la condicin futura incorporando la alternativa 5, con las
condiciones de no-accin para los aos de proyeccin 2018 y 2028.
6.49 Del anlisis de la hora pico AM, cabe sealar que cuando se incorpora el nuevo
conector en el anlisis y se redistribuye el trnsito, todas las intersecciones con la
86

excepcin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en Cidra presentan mejoras en comparacin


con los escenarios de No-Accin proyectados para 2018 y 2028.
6.50 Basado en las proyecciones la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733 sigue
funcionando en un NS de F, pero la demora promedio modelada para esta
interseccin mejora significativamente de los miles de segundos a los cientos de
segundos.
6.51 La interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 es la nica que presenta un leve deterioro
en NS para el ao de proyeccin 2028. Esto es debido, en parte, a la redistribucin
de trnsito que sola utilizar la PR-172 para tener acceso a Cidra y utilizar el nuevo
conector, causando un mayor volumen de trnsito en los tramos de la PR-7733 en
esta interseccin.
Tabla 53: Alternativa 5- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico AM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 5

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 5

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1080.7

F / 272.9

F / 1422.2

F / 418.6

PR-7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 79.2

C / 24.6

F / 10000

C / 31.5

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 361.5

F / 324.6

F / 449.7

F / 498.6

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 26.4

B / 16.3

C / 24.2

B / 18.8

PR-172

PR-787

B / 14.3

A / 9.4

B / 16.1

A / 9.7

PR-1

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

C / 29.6

N/A

E / 56.9

PR-743

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

B / 12.0

N/A

B / 14.6

PR-52 Rampas Nuevo


Sur
Conector

N/A

B / 17.7

N/A

C / 33.0

PR-52 Rampas Nuevo


Norte
Conector

N/A

B / 11.7

N/A

B /13.2

87

6.52 Por otro lado, se puede observar que la geometra propuesta para la interseccin del
nuevo conector con la PR-7733 opera a un NS aceptable de C con demoras promedio
en el rango de 24 segundos para el ao proyeccin 2028.
6.53 En relacin a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector, la interseccin a nivel con semforo tendr un NS proyectado de E para el
ao 2028 con demoras promedio de aproximadamente 56.9 segundos, por lo tanto
opera a un NS inaceptable.
6.54 Del anlisis de la hora pico PM para la alternativa 5, se puede notar tambin que la
interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 presenta un deterioro en NS; de un NS
proyectado de E en el escenario de No-Accin para el 2028 a un NS de F en el
escenario con la alternativa #5 del 2028.
Tabla 54: Alternativa 5- NS por Interseccin- Hora Pico PM

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-accin

2018
Alt. 5

2028
No-accin

2028
Alt. 5

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 93.5

D / 53.7

F / 171.9

F / 88.1

PR-7733

Nuevo
Conector

F / 1950.6

C / 26.2

F / 2010.5

D / 47.0

PR-734

PR-7733

D / 43.5

F / 712.7

E / 65.8

F / 1000.6

PR-172

PR-7733

B / 16.6

B / 16.8

C / 20.0

C / 29.2

PR-172

PR-787

B / 20.8

A / 9.4

C 23.7

B / 11.1

PR-1

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

C / 21.4

N/A

C / 33.5

PR-743

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

B / 11.0

N/A

B / 12.4

PR-52
Rampas Sur

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

B / 17.8

N/A

C / 28.4

PR-52
Rampas Norte

Nuevo
Conector

N/A

A / 9.8

N/A

B / 12.5

88

6.55 Como fue el caso de la hora pico AM; en la hora pico PM la interseccin de la PR-171
con PR-7733 mejora ligeramente con una reduccin de casi 50 segundos en demora
promedio cuando se compara los escenarios del 2028.
6.56 La interseccin del nuevo conector con la PR-7733 presenta un NS de C durante la
hora pico PM con demoras promedio alrededor de 26 segundos por vehculo. Por lo
tanto la geometra propuesta es suficiente para operar la interseccin en un NS
aceptable para la proyeccin del 2028.
6.57 Con respecto a la geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo
conector, se proyecta que la interseccin opere a un NS de C para el ao 2028 con un
promedio de 30 segundos de demora.

Comparativa de Resultados
6.58 El siguiente paso ser la comparacin de los resultados obtenidos en cada
interseccin para las cinco alternativas, la tabla 55 a la Tabla 58 presentan el
resumen de los resultados.
6.59 Como puede verse en la Tabla 55, para la hora de pico del maana del ao de
proyeccin 2018; se obtuvieron resultados similares para las 5 alternativas en
comparacin con el escenario de No-Accin, cuatro intersecciones continan
funcionando en un NS de F y slo uno presento deterioro en NS, la interseccin de la
PR-734 con PR-7733 en Cidra.
6.60 Como puede verse en la Tabla 556, para la hora de pico de la tarde del ao de
proyeccin 2018; se obtuvieron resultados similares para las 5 alternativas en
comparacin con el escenario de No-Accin, solo tres intersecciones continan
funcionando en un NS de F y dos presentan deterioro en NS, la interseccin de la PR734 con PR-7733 en Cidra y la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin
Sur de la PR-52 en Cayey.
6.61 Como puede verse en la Tabla 57 , para la hora de pico de la maana del ao de
proyeccin 2028; se obtuvieron resultados similares para las 5 alternativas en
comparacin con el escenario de No-Accin, solo cuatro intersecciones continan
funcionando en un NS de F y dos presentan deterioro en NS, la interseccin de la PR89

734 con PR-7733 en Cidra y la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin
Sur de la PR-52 en Cayey.
6.62 Tambin para alternativa 5 se puede observar que la interseccin de la PR-1 con el
nuevo conector presenta un NS de E con demoras promedio de ms de 55 segundos,
por lo tanto se considerar y evaluar una seccin de 4 carriles en la PR-1 o una
interseccin de tipo intercambio ser considerada.
6.63 Como puede verse en la Tabla 58 para la hora pico de la tarde del ao de proyeccin
2028; se obtuvieron resultados similares para las 5 alternativas en comparacin con el
escenario de No-Accin, tres intersecciones continan funcionando en un NS de F y
las tres presentan deterioro en NS, la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en
Cidra y la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur y Norte de la PR52 en Cayey.
6.64 Para la hora de pico AM del ao proyeccin 2028, la alternativa 5 presenta la demora
promedio ms alto para la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 y las demoras
promedio ms bajos en la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733. Con respecto a las
intersecciones restantes, los resultados fueron similares para las cinco alternativas.
6.65 Para la hora de pico PM del ao proyeccin 2028, la alternativa 4 presenta las
demoras promedio ms bajos en las intersecciones a lo largo de la PR-7733 con la
excepcin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 en la qu la alternativa #2 presenta una demora
promedio inferior; con 866.2 segundos, en comparacin con 945.0 segundos para la
alternativa #4.

90

Tabla 55: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico AM 2018

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-Accin

2018
Alt. 1

2018
Alt. 2

2018
Alt. 3

2018
Alt. 4

2018
Alt. 5

F / 1080.7

F / 181.0

F / 188.1

F / 200.7

F / 189.1 F / 272.9

F / 79.2

C / 27.1

B / 12.4

C / 33.1

B / 15.4

F / 361.5

F / 539.6

F / 709.1

F / 561.6

F / 534.4 F / 324.6

C / 26.4

C / 32.2

B / 14.9

C / 20.1

B / 16.7

B / 16.3

B / 14.3

B / 10.1

A / 9.0

A / 9.6

A / 9.2

A / 9.4

E / 58.7

B / 18.4

B / 17.0

B / 18.4

N/A

N/A

F/ 589.8

F / 481.6

F / 481.6

F / 481.6

N/A

N/A

F / 3895.2

F / 3217.7 F/ 3217.7 F / 3217.1

N/A

N/A

PR-171

PR-7733

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-787

PR-1

PR-184 / Nuevo Conector

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte

PR-1

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 20.0

C / 29.6

10

PR-743

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 12.0

11

PR-52 Rampas Sur

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.0

B / 17.7

12

PR-52 Rampas Norte Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.2

B / 11.7

C / 24.6

91

Tabla 56: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico PM 2018

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la interseccin (NS / Demora)


2018
No-Accin

2018
Alt. 1

2018
Alt. 2

2018
Alt. 3

2018
Alt. 4

2018
Alt. 5

F / 93.5

D / 45.3

D / 45.7

D / 45.0

D / 37.4

D / 53.7

F / 1950.6

C / 24.1

C / 23.4

C / 23.9

C / 33.2

C / 26.2

D / 43.5

F / 446.5

F / 405.8

F / 447.4

F / 672.1 F / 712.7

B / 16.6

C / 22.8

C / 21.5

C / 23.7

B / 17.0

B / 16.8

B / 20.8

B / 11.5

B / 11.6

B / 12.0

A / 9.5

A / 9.4

E / 68.9

B / 16.5

B / 15.5

B / 16.1

N/A

N/A

D / 41.3

F / 81.2

E / 75.5

F / 79.8

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

PR-171

PR-7733

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-787

PR-1

PR-184 / Nuevo Conector

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte

PR-1

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 12.8

C / 21.4

10

PR-743

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 11.0

11

PR-52 Rampas Sur

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.0

B / 17.8

12

PR-52 Rampas Norte Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.3

A / 9.8

F / 2539.2

F / 2956.2 F / 3018.8 F/ 2979.3

92

Tabla 57: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico AM 2028

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 1

2028
Alt. 2

2028
Alt. 3

2028
Alt. 4

2028
Alt. 5

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 256.0

F / 259.4

F / 276.3

F / 278.7

F / 418.6

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

F / 10000

D / 36.3

B / 15.5

D / 36.2

C / 28.1

C / 31.5

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

PR-172

PR-7733

C / 24.2

C / 32.8

B / 19.0

C / 33.4

B / 15.9

B / 18.8

PR-172

PR-787

B / 16.1

B / 10.6

B / 12.3

B / 10.8

B / 10.9

A / 9.7

PR-1

PR-184 / Nuevo Conector

F / 80.0

C / 26.4

C / 23.9

C / 26.4

N/A

N/A

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 637.6

F / 10000

F / 10000

F / 10000

N/A

N/A

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte

F / 4012.2

F / 3331.0 F / 3331.0 F / 3331.0

N/A

N/A

PR-1

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

D / 42.2

E / 56.9

10

PR-743

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 14.6

11

PR-52 Rampas Sur

Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.0

C / 33.0

12

PR-52 Rampas Norte Nuevo Conector

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.2

B /13.2

F / 1893.4 F / 1565.1 F / 1893.0 F / 1546.6 F / 498.6

93

Tabla 58: Comparativa de las 5 alternativas- NS por interseccin Hora Pico PM 2028

Int.

Principal

Secundaria

NS de la interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

PR-171

PR-7733

PR-7733

Nuevo Conector

PR-734

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-7733

PR-172

PR-787

PR-1

PR-184 / Nuevo Conector

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte

PR-1

Nuevo Conector

PR-743

Nuevo Conector

PR-52 Rampas Sur

Nuevo Conector

PR-52 Rampas Norte Nuevo Conector

2028
Alt. 1

2028
Alt. 2

2028
Alt. 3

2028
Alt. 4

2028
Alt. 5

F / 171.9

E / 77.1

E / 77.6

E / 73.1

E / 60.8

F / 88.1

F / 2010.5

C / 32.1

C / 32.4

C / 28.8

C / 31.7

D / 47.0

E / 65.8

F / 1023.7 F / 948.3

F / 1092.3 F / 945.0 F / 1000.6

C / 20.0

C / 30.6

D / 30.7

C / 27.2

C / 21.7

C / 29.2

B / 23.7

B / 11.5

C / 11.6

A / 9.7

B / 10.0

B / 11.0

F / 103.3

C / 23.3

C / 21.7

C / 23.0

N/A

N/A

F / 84.8

F / 835.4

F / 855.4

F / 842.4

N/A

N/A

F / 2625.9 F / 3053.3 F / 3116.5 F / 3076.7 N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B /16.0

C / 33.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

B / 12.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.0

C / 28.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

A / 7.3

B / 12.5

94

Conclusiones
6.66 Para la hora pico de la maana del ao proyeccin 2028, para las cinco alternativas la
geometra propuesta para la interseccin de la PR-7733 y el Nuevo Conector presenta
niveles de servicio aceptables con demoras promedio de menos de 36 segundos por
vehculo, la ms alta sera la alternativa 3 con 36.2 y la ms baja siendo la alternativa
2 con 15.5 segundos.
6.67 Para la hora pico de la maana del ao de proyeccin 2028, la geometra propuesta
para las alternativas 1,2 y 3 para la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-184 y el Nuevo
Conector presenta muy buenos niveles de servicio con demoras promedio de menos
de 30 segundos, con las ms altas siendo las alternativas 1 y 3 con 26.4 y la menor
siendo la alternativa 2 con 23.9 segundos.
6.68 Para la hora pico de la maana del ao de proyeccin 2028 la geometra propuesta
para las alternativas 4 y 5 para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo conector, la
alternativa 4 presenta un NS aceptable con demoras promedio de 42.2, mientras que
la alternativa 5 presenta un NS inaceptable de E con 56.9 segundos.
6.69 Para la hora pico de la maana del ao de proyeccin 2028, la geometra propuesta
para las alternativas 4 y 5 para la interseccin de la PR-52 con el nuevo conector,
presenta buenos niveles de servicio con demoras promedio menores a 35 segundos,
con la ms alta siendo las Rampas direccin Sur de la alternativa 5 con 33.0
segundos.
6.70 Para la hora pico de la tarde del ao de proyeccin 2028, la geometra propuesta para
las cinco alternativas para la interseccin de la PR-7733 y el Nuevo Conector presenta
buenos niveles de servicio con demoras promedio menores a 47 segundos, con la
alternativa ms alta siendo la 5 con 47.0 segundos y la menor siendo la alternativa 3
con 28.8 segundos.
6.71 Para la hora pico de la tarde del ao de proyeccin 2028, la geometra propuesta para
las alternativas 1,2 y 3 de la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-184 y el nuevo conector
presenta muy buenos niveles de servicio con demoras promedio de menos de 25
segundos, la ms alta siendo la alternativa 1 con 23.3 y la menor siendo la alternativa
2 con 21.7 segundos.

95

6.72 Para la hora pico de la tarde del ao de proyeccin 2028, la geometra propuesta para
las alternativas 4 y 5 para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo conector presenta
buenos niveles de servicio con demoras promedio de menos de 35 segundos, siendo
la ms alta la alternativa 5 con 33.5 y la menor siendo la alternativa 4 con 16.0
segundos.
6.73 Cuatro intersecciones requerirn estudios adicionales para tratar de mejorar sus NS;
las intersecciones de la PR-171 y PR-734 con la PR-7733 en Cidra, la PR-184 con las
rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52 en Cayey.

96

VII- MEJORAS ADICIONALES


Introduccin
7.1

Como parte del anlisis operacional realizado con la incorporacin de las cinco
alternativas, se identific que las intersecciones de la PR-171 con PR-7733, PR-734
con PR-7733, PR-184 con PR-52 Rampas Sur y PR-184 con PR-52 Rampas Norte
siguen presentando NS inaceptables.

7.2

En esta seccin se evaluarn mejoras adicionales a esas cuatro intersecciones para


mejorar su NS para el ao de proyeccin 2028.

Mejoras Geomtricas Propuestas


7.3

Para la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 las mejoras propuestas consisten en


la creacin de carriles de viraje a la derecha en la PR-7733, y la creacin de carriles
de viraje a la izquierda en la PR-171, como puede verse en la Figura 17.

7.4

Para la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 las mejoras propuestas consisten en


la creacin de un carril de viraje a la derecha en la acceso Norte sobre la PR-734, la
creacin de carriles de viraje a la izquierda y derecha sobre la acceso Sur de la PR734 y la creacin de carriles de viraje a la izquierda en la PR-7733, como puede verse
en la Figura 18.

7.5

Para la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Sur de la PR-52 las mejoras
propuestas consisten en la instalacin de un sistema de semforos.

7.6

Para la interseccin de la PR-184 con las Rampas Norte de la PR-52 las mejoras
propuestas consisten en la construccin de un carril de viraje a la derecha en
direccin Norte y una carril doble de viraje a la izquierda en direccin Sur, como
puede verse en la Figura 19.

7.7

Para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo conector en la alternativa 5 para la hora


pico de la maana, se evaluar una seccin de cuatro carriles en la PR-1, como
puede verse en la Figura 20.

97

Figura 17: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-171 y PR-7733

Figura 18: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-734 con PR-7733

98

Figura 19: Mejoras Propuestas para la PR-184 con las Rampas Norte de la PR-52

Figura 20: Mejoras Propuestas a la PR-1 con el Nuevo Conector Alt. 5

99

Anlisis Operacional
7.8

El siguiente paso es el anlisis operacional de las mejoras propuestas para las cinco
intersecciones, utilizando las diferentes distribuciones de viaje asociadas a cada
alternativa evaluada.

7.9

Como se mencion en la introduccin a este captulo, las mejoras sern evaluadas


slo para el ao de proyeccin 2028.

Si las mejoras son adecuadas para la

proyeccin dicho ao se presume que sern ms que suficiente para el ao de


proyeccin intermedio de 2018.
7.10 Cuando se evalan las mejoras adicionales utilizando

la alternativa #1 y su

distribucin de viaje asociado; la hora pico de la maana proporciona una ligera


mejora para la interseccin de la PR-734 con la PR-7733 obteniendo un NS de D con
demoras promedio de aproximadamente 42 segundos, como puede verse en la Tabla
59. Mientras que para la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733, bsicamente no hay
mejora porque el NS permaneci en F a pesar de que la demora promedio se redujo
de 256.0 a 89.7 segundos. Mientras tanto, para la hora pico de la tarde se puede ver
gran mejora con un NS de C para la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 y D para
la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 con promedio de demoras de 25.9 y 50.1
segundos respectivamente.
7.11 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 59, para la hora pico de la maana ambas
intersecciones presentan una gran mejora en NS yendo de un F a un muy buen NS
de D o mejor. La interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas de direccin Sur presenta
una mejora a C con demoras promedio de 22.2 segundos; mientras tanto la
interseccin con las Rampas Norte mejora a un NS de D con 37.5 segundos.
7.12 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 59, para la hora pico de la tarde ambas intersecciones
presentan una gran mejora en NS yendo de un F a un muy buen NS de D o mejor.
La interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas de direccin Sur presenta una mejora a
D con demoras promedio de 50.6 segundos; mientras tanto la interseccin con las
Rampas Norte mejora a un NS de B con 16.6 segundos.

100

Tabla 59: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 1 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 1

2028 Mejoras
Adicionales

Hora Pico AM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 256.0

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

F / 1893.4 D / 42.9

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 637.6

F / 10000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte

F / 4012.2

F / 3331.0 D / 37.5

F / 89.7

C / 22.2

Hora Pico PM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

E / 77.1

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

F / 1023.7 D / 50.1

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 84.8

F / 835.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte F / 2625.9 F / 3053.3 B / 16.6

C / 25.9

D / 50.6

7.13 Cuando se evalan las mejoras adicionales utilizando la alternativa #2 y su


distribucin de viaje asociada, como puede verse en la Tabla 60, la hora pico de la
maana presenta mejoras en la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 con un NS de
D con demoras promedio de aproximadamente 50 segundos y bsicamente no mejora
en la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 donde el NS permaneci en F a pesar
de que el demora promedio se redujo de 1565.1 a 139.5 segundos. Mientras tanto, la
hora pico tarde muestra gran mejora con un NS de C para la interseccin de la PR171 con PR-7733 y D para la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 con demoras
promedio de 25.6 y 49.8 segundos respectivamente.
7.14 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 60, para la hora pico de la maana ambas
intersecciones presentan una gran mejora en NS, de una F a un muy buen NS de D o
mejor.

La interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur presenta una

mejora a C con demoras promedio de 21 segundos; mientras tanto la interseccin con


las Rampas direccin Norte mejora a un NS de D con 36.0 segundos.

101

7.15 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 60, para la hora pico de la tarde ambas intersecciones
presentan una gran mejora en NS de una F a un muy buen NS de D o mejor. La
interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur presenta una mejora a D con
demoras promedio de 47.8 segundos; mientras tanto la interseccin con las Rampas
direccin Norte mejora a un NS de B con 16.5 segundos.
Tabla 60: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 2 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 2

2028 Mejoras
Adicionales

Hora Pico AM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 259.4

D / 52.9

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

F / 1565.1 F / 139.5

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 637.6

F / 10000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte F / 4012.2

C / 21.1

F / 3331.0 D / 36.0

Hora Pico PM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

E / 77.6

C / 25.6

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

F / 948.0

D / 49.8

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 84.8

F / 855.4

D / 47.8

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte F / 2625.9 F / 3116.5 B / 16.5

7.16 Cuando se evalan las mejoras adicionales utilizando la alternativa #3 y su


distribucin de viaje asociada, como puede verse en la Tabla 61 la hora pico de la
maana presenta mejoras en la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 con un NS de
D con demoras promedio de aproximadamente 39 segundos y bsicamente no mejora
en la interseccin de la PR-171 con PR-7733 donde el NS permaneci en F a pesar
de que el demora promedio se redujo de 276.3 segundos a 95.8. Mientras tanto, para
la hora pico tarde se aprecia gran mejora con un NS de C para la interseccin de la
PR-171 con PR-7733 y D para la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 con
demoras promedio de 20.4 y 52.6 segundos respectivamente.

102

7.17 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 61, para la hora pico de la maana ambas
intersecciones presentan una gran mejora en NS de una F a una muy buena D o
mejor.

La interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur presenta una

mejora a C con demoras promedio de 23.3 segundos; mientras tanto la interseccin


con las Rampas direccin Norte mejora a un NS de D con 38.0 segundos.
7.18 Con respecto a la interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52,
como puede verse en la Tabla 61, para la hora pico de la tarde ambas intersecciones
presentan una gran mejora en NS de una F a una muy buena D o mejor.

La

interseccin de la PR-184 con las rampas direccin Sur presenta una mejora a D con
demoras promedio de 43.9 segundos; mientras tanto la interseccin con las Rampas
direccin Norte mejora a un NS de C con 23.0 segundos.
Tabla 61: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 3 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 3

2028 Mejoras
Adicionales

Hora Pico AM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 276.3

F / 95.8

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

F / 1893.0 D / 39.3

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 637.6

F / 10000

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte F / 4012.2

C / 23.3

F / 3331.0 D / 38.0

Hora Pico PM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

E / 73.1

C / 20.4

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

F / 1092.3 D / 52.6

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Sur

F / 84.8

F / 842.4

PR-184

PR-52 Rampas Norte F / 2625.9 F / 3076.7 C / 23.0

D / 43.9

7.19 Cuando se evalan las mejoras adicionales utilizando la alternativa #4 y su


distribucin de viaje asociada, como puede verse en la Tabla 62, la hora pico de la
maana presenta una ligera mejora en las intersecciones de la PR-171 con PR-7733

103

para obtener un NS de E con demoras promedio de aproximadamente 60 segundos y


una mejora significativa en la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733, que presenta
un NS de D con aproximadamente 50 segundos de demora.

Mientras tanto para la

hora pico de la tarde se puede ver gran mejora en la interseccin de la PR-171 con
PR-7733 con un NS de B y una demora promedio de menos de 20 segundos y
bsicamente ninguna mejora en la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 donde el
NS sigue siendo de F, pero los demoras promedio se redujeron de 945.0 segundos a
102.9 segundos.
Tabla 62: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 4 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 4

2028 Mejoras Adicionales

Hora Pico AM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 278.7

E / 59.7

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

F / 1546.6

D / 50.4

Hora Pico PM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

E / 60.8

B / 18.3

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

F / 945.0

F / 102.9

7.20 Cuando se evalan las mejoras adicionales utilizando la alternativa # 5 y su


distribucin de viaje asociada, como puede verse en la Tabla 63 para la hora pico AM
las mejoras proporcionan un NS de D con un demora promedio de 52.3 segundos
para la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733, una gran mejora de los 1422.2 y 228.4
segundos cuando se evalu las intersecciones para la alternativa 5 de y el escenario
de No-Accin para el 2028 respectivamente.
7.21 Para la interseccin de la de la PR-734 y la PR-7733 para la hora pico AM se
obtuvieron resultados similares. Para el escenario del ao de proyeccin 2028 con las
mejoras adicionales se obtuvo un NI de D con demoras promedio de 48.2 segundos,
una gran mejora cuando se compara con los cerca de 450 segundos de demora
estimada para el ao 2028 No-accin y el escenario de 2028 con la Alt. 5.

104

7.22 Para la hora pico PM, la interseccin de la PR-171 y PR-7733 presenta mejoras
similares a las obtenidas para la hora pico AM. En el caso del escenario de mejoras
adicionales para el 2028 se obtuvo un NS de C con demoras promedio de 34.9
segundos, una gran mejora de los ms de 88 segundos de demora que se estimaron
para los escenarios de No-Accin y alternativa 5 para el 2028.
Tabla 63: Mejoras Adicionales Alternativa 5 Nivel de Servicio por Interseccin

Int. Principal

Secundaria

NS de la Interseccin (NS / Demora)


2028
No-Accin

2028
Alt. 5

2028 Mejoras Adicionales

Hora Pico AM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 1422.2

F / 418.6

D / 52.3

PR-734

PR-7733

F / 449.7

F / 498.6

D / 48.2

PR-1

Nuevo Conector N/A

E / 56.9

D / 44.2

Hora Pico PM
1

PR-171

PR-7733

F / 171.9

F / 88.1

C / 34.9

PR-734

PR-7733

E / 65.8

F / 1000.6

E / 70.7

PR-1

Nuevo Conector N/A

C / 33.5

C / 23.5

7.23 Para la hora pico PM, la interseccin de la PR-734 y PR-7733 tampoco presenta
mejoras similares a las obtenidas para la hora pico AM. En el caso del escenario de
mejoras adicionales para el 2028, se obtuvo un NS de E con demoras promedio de
70.7 segundos, que no presenta ningn cambio en NS en comparacin con el
escenario de No-Accin y a una mejora en NS de F a E en comparacin con la
alternativa 5 por s sola, con una reduccin en el promedio de los demoras de ms de
1000 segundos a 70.7 segundos.
7.24 Como puede verse en la Tabla 63, la adicin de un carril directo adicional en la PR-1,
para la interseccin de la PR-1 con el nuevo conector ofrece la capacidad adicional
para mejorar el NS en la hora de pico de la maana de E a D y reducir el demora
promedio de 56.9 segundos a 44.2 segundos. Mientras tanto para la hora pico de la
tarde hay poca o ninguna mejora en NS con una reduccin mnima de 10 segundos
en demora promedio.
105

7.25 Como puede verse, la alta concentracin de trnsito redirigido a la interseccin de la


PR-734 con PR-7733 afecta al NS para la hora pico de la maana de las alternativas
1, 2 y 3 y la hora pico de la tarde de las alternativas 4 y 5.
7.26 Una evaluacin adicional de la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733 muestra que
los volmenes de conflicto mayores son los virajes a la izquierda hacia el Oeste con el
trnsito directo hacia el Este. Para mitigar dicho conflicto, la inclusin de un carril de
viraje a la izquierda en direccin Norte y la inclusin de dos carriles de trnsito directo
en la PR-7733 proporciona la capacidad necesaria para reducir el NS de la hora pico
de la tarde en las alternativas 4 y 5 a un NS de D.
7.27 Con respecto a la hora pico de la maana para la alternativa 2 las mejoras
mencionadas en el prrafo 7.26 proporcionan mejoras para un NS de E.

Conclusiones
7.28 Las mejoras adicionales propuestas proporcionan un NS muy bueno en la interseccin
de la PR-171 con PR-7733 para la hora pico de la tarde y NS buenos para la hora pico
de la maana para las alternativas 4 y 5.
7.29 Las mejoras adicionales propuestas para la interseccin de la PR-734 con PR-7733
proporcionan resultados aceptables para la hora pico de la maana en todas las
alternativas con la excepcin de la alternativa 2 y las alternativas 1 y 2 para la hora
pico de la tarde. Para alternativas 3, 4 y 5, los resultados obtenidos para la hora pico
de la tarde no fueron aceptables.
7.30 Basado en los resultados obtenidos para las mejoras adicionales en las intersecciones
de la PR-171 y PR-734 con PR-7733, la creacin de dos carriles de trnsito directo en
la PR-7733 en la interseccin con la PR-734 es necesaria para obtener an ms
beneficios que los obtenidos con la construccin del nuevo conector.
7.31 Basado en los resultados obtenidos para la interseccin de PR-184 con las rampas
Norte y Sur de la PR-52, las mejoras adicionales propuestas y la instalacin de los
sistemas de semforo proporcionan la capacidad necesaria y un muy buen NS para el
ao de proyeccin 2028.

106

7.32 Para la interseccin de la PR-1, con la alternativa #5 del nuevo conector, para la hora
pico de la maana el carril directo adicional proporciona la capacidad necesaria para
operar en un buen nivel de servicio para el ao de proyeccin 2028.

107

VIII8.1

CONCLUSIONES

Basado en los resultados obtenidos para los escenarios de No-Accin del 2018 y
2028 el nivel de servicio en las carreteras de acceso a Cidra seguir deteriorndose,
especialmente en las intersecciones a lo largo de la PR-7733, por ende la No-Accin
no es una alternativa viable.

8.2

Las condiciones geomtricas existentes de las rutas de acceso a Cidra no


proporcionan una geometra adecuada para el aumento de trnsito proyectado.

8.3

Las condiciones geomtricas existentes presentan un alto riesgo de accidentes de


trnsito, exhibida por la cantidad existente de accidentes fatales que se reportaron en
los ltimos 8 aos. Las condiciones geomtricas actuales aunadas al aumento en el
trnsito solamente proporcionaran un aumento en el riesgo de accidentes fatales y
no-fatales.

8.4

Basado en el modelo de asignacin de trnsito la alternativa con la mayor capacidad


de atraer trnsito y aliviar la condicin futura proyectada bajo el escenario de NoAccin es la alternativa #5, seguida por la alternativa #4

8.5

Basado en el tiempo de viaje, las cinco alternativas presentan resultados similares


con un promedio de 11.16 minutos para la hora pico de la maana y 11.06 minutos
para la hora de pico de la tarde. Para el pico de la maana el menor tiempo de ida y
vuelta lo mostr la alternativa 4 con aproximadamente 10.8 minutos. Para la hora pico
PM, el menor tiempo de ida y vuelta tambin fue la alternativa 4 con aproximadamente
10.7 minutos.

8.6

En comparacin con las rutas existentes a Cidra, las alternativas propuestas


representan una reduccin significativa en tiempo viaje en comparacin con la PR172 y PR-171 con aproximadamente 45 y 70 minutos respectivamente. Cuando se
compara a la PR-734 la reduccin en el tiempo de viaje es aproximadamente de 4 a 5
minutos.

8.7

Basado en la capacidad del diseo, teniendo en cuenta un NS de partida de B, la


seccin de carretera propuesta para las alternativas 1 a la 4 ser 1 carril en cada
direccin; mientras que para la alternativa 5 deber contar con 2 carriles en cada

108

direccin. Si partimos de un NS de C para la alternativa 5, la seccin de la carretera


propuesta puede reducirse a una seccin de 2 carriles, uno en cada direccin.
8.8

Una seccin de carretera alterna propuesta, con un carril en cada direccin y la


inclusin de carriles de subida donde la pendiente de la carretera propuesta supera el
3 por ciento y es ms larga que 0.50 millas o es menor de 3 por ciento y ms larga de
una milla, puede ser considerada y controlar el trnsito proyectado para el ao
horizonte 2028 ms adecuadamente.

8.9

Las intersecciones propuestas discutidas en el informe adecuadamente manejan el


trnsito proyectado para el ao horizonte 2028. Para las alternativas 1, 2 y 3 son: una
interseccin a nivel sealizada para la interseccin de la PR-7733 con el nuevo
conector y la interseccin de la PR-1 con PR-184 y el nuevo conector. Para las
alternativas 4 y 5, las recomendaciones son: una interseccin a nivel sealizada para
la interseccin de la PR-7733 con el nuevo conector, la interseccin de la PR-1 con el
nuevo conector en Cayey y un diamante sealizado de intercambio para la
interseccin de la PR-52 con el nuevo conector. Adems, para la alternativa 5 una
interseccin a nivel sealizada para la interseccin de la PR-743 con el nuevo
conector.

8.10 Con respecto a las operaciones las 5 alternativas resultaron viables mejorando la
movilidad del trnsito en la regin, con la excepcin de las intersecciones de la PR171 con PR-7733 y la PR-734 con PR-7733, que continu presentando niveles
inaceptables de servicio.
8.11 Las mejoras adicionales para las intersecciones de la PR-171 con PR-7733 y la PR734 con PR-7733 proporcionan mayores beneficios que los beneficios proporcionados
por la incorporacin de las cinco alternativas por s solas.
8.12 Para las intersecciones de la PR-184 con las rampas Norte y Sur de la PR-52; las
mejoras propuestas y la instalacin del sistema de seales de trnsito proporcionan
una capacidad adecuada para el ao de proyeccin 2028.

109

TABLA DE CONTENIDO
APENDICE - A ................................................................................................. A-1
RESUMENES DE LAS ESTACIONES DE CONTEO AUTIMTICAS ............A-1
APENDICE B ................................................................................................ B-1
RESUMEN DE LAS ESTACIONES DE CONTEO MANUEALES..................B-1
APENDICE C ................................................................................................ C-1
RESUMEN DE LOS DATOS DE TIEMPO DE VIAJE................................... C-1
APENDICE D ................................................................................................ D-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Condicin Existente ......................... D-1
APENDICE E..................................................................................................E-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Condicin Existente ..........................E-1
APENDICE F .................................................................................................. F-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 No Accin ................. F-1
APENDICE G ................................................................................................ G-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 No Accin ................ G-1
APENDICE H ................................................................................................ H-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 No Accin ................ H-1
APENDICE I .................................................................................................... I-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 No Accin .................. I-1
APENDICE J .................................................................................................. J-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 1 ............. J-1
APENDICE K ................................................................................................ K-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 1 .............K-1
ii

APENDICE L .................................................................................................. L-1


Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa ................ L-1
APENDICE M ................................................................................................ M-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1 ............ M-1
APENDICE N ................................................................................................ N-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1 con
Mejoras Adicionales ...................................................................................... N-1
APENDICE O ................................................................................................ O-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1 con
Mejoras Adicionales ...................................................................................... O-1
APENDICE P..................................................................................................P-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 2 .............P-1
APENDICE Q ................................................................................................ Q-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 2 ............ Q-1
APENDICE R ................................................................................................ R-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2 ............ R-1
APENDICE S..................................................................................................S-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2 .............S-1
APENDICE T .................................................................................................. T-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2 con
Mejoras Adicionales ....................................................................................... T-1

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
APENDICE U ................................................................................................ U-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2 con
Mejoras Adicionales ...................................................................................... U-1
APENDICE V..................................................................................................V-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 3 .............V-1
APENDICE W................................................................................................W-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 3 ............W-1
APENDICE X..................................................................................................X-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3 .............X-1
APENDICE Y..................................................................................................Y-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3 .............Y-1
APENDICE Z .................................................................................................. Z-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3 con
Mejoras Adicionales ....................................................................................... Z-1
APENDICE AA ............................................................................................ AA-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3 con
Mejoras Adicionales .................................................................................... AA-1
APENDICE AB ............................................................................................ AB-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 4 .......... AB-1
APENDICE AC ............................................................................................ AC-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 4 .......... AC-1
APENDICE AD ............................................................................................ AD-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4 .......... AD-1
APENDICE AE ............................................................................................ AE-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4 .......... AE-1
i

APENDICE AF ............................................................................................ AF-1


Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4 con
Mejoras Adicionales .................................................................................... AF-1
APENDICE AG ............................................................................................AG-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4 con
Mejoras Adicionales .................................................................................... AG-1
APENDICE AH ............................................................................................ AH-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 5 .......... AH-1
APENDICE AI .............................................................................................. AI-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2018 Alternativa 5 ............AI-1
APENDICE AJ ............................................................................................ AJ-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5 .......... AJ_1
APENDICE AK ............................................................................................ AK-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5 .......... AK-1
APENDICE AL ............................................................................................ AL-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5 con
Mejoras Adicionales .....................................................................................AL-1
APENDICE AM .......................................................................................... AM-1
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5 con
Mejoras Adicionales ....................................................................................AM-1
APENDICE AN ............................................................................................ AN-1
Anlisis de Diseo Multi-Carril ..................................................................... AN-1
APENDICE AO ............................................................................................AO-1
Resultados del Modelo SATURN ................................................................ AO-1

ii

STATION 1
PR-1 between PR-184 and PR-787
NORTHBOUND (TO CAGUAS)
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
53
20
18
8
11
29
25
0:15
70
16
9
8
16
17
26
0:30
52
17
10
7
7
20
12
0:45
57
10
11
8
20
12
21
1:00
32
8
9
7
5
13
20
1:15
48
8
3
10
5
20
24
1:30
40
1
5
4
3
7
10
1:45
44
5
3
9
7
14
32
2:00
25
3
4
6
5
14
14
2:15
36
4
6
4
1
8
11
2:30
17
7
3
8
2
11
9
2:45
30
5
0
1
1
4
10
3:00
21
3
4
4
5
12
5
3:15
20
5
6
3
6
5
5
3:30
22
2
6
2
3
17
9
3:45
29
5
10
6
9
21
8
4:00
18
1
3
8
6
15
12
4:15
20
11
6
6
9
24
11
4:30
18
9
14
11
6
45
10
4:45
27
19
20
16
19
42
11
5:00
28
25
21
26
30
68
14
5:15
20
22
37
24
31
86
10
5:30
17
42
33
31
31
88
13
5:45
31
38
36
42
37
83
11
6:00
23
50
35
57
48
93
10
6:15
19
60
69
66
53
78
25
6:30
46
56
81
62
45
47
20
6:45
45
76
92
72
72
58
23
7:00
34
67
67
75
76
29
22
7:15
44
95
53
83
87
57
41
7:30
44
90
85
83
86
110
40
7:45
45
94
89
80
87
71
40
8:00
50
85
87
96
92
86
45
8:15
51
93
109
59
75
103
50
8:30
55
74
63
60
68
53
32
8:45
47
72
27
63
75
76
33
9:00
62
74
30
68
71
64
36
9:15
43
64
55
68
52
78
30
9:30
40
59
51
72
52
74
33
9:45
50
47
53
69
58
76
66
10:00
41
51
54
50
56
63
79
10:15
35
60
53
53
70
84
79
10:30
33
56
55
61
74
81
71
10:45
69
76
60
61
56
60
87

A-2

SOUTHBOUND (TO CAYEY)


Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
16
6
1
4
6
5
30
0:15
18
4
4
7
14
8
20
0:30
13
4
1
3
6
4
20
0:45
23
4
6
1
1
3
30
1:00
20
5
3
1
2
3
30
1:15
18
3
4
2
1
3
10
1:30
28
3
2
3
0
2
10
1:45
27
3
2
2
2
3
10
2:00
25
3
5
5
3
4
10
2:15
36
4
4
5
0
4
8
2:30
25
2
1
0
1
1
20
2:45
20
0
0
3
1
1
10
3:00
11
3
3
1
2
3
12
3:15
16
9
4
7
7
7
18
3:30
7
7
9
8
9
9
5
3:45
8
10
6
7
6
8
17
4:00
8
6
4
10
1
6
7
4:15
3
16
16
13
14
15
7
4:30
7
37
38
32
28
34
13
4:45
13
23
33
35
38
33
21
5:00
20
56
41
41
37
44
20
5:15
17
40
56
39
67
51
24
5:30
11
75
81
78
72
77
30
5:45
22
76
78
72
78
76
30
6:00
39
77
64
61
78
70
34
6:15
29
89
80
84
73
82
31
6:30
28
119
106
110
104
110
38
6:45
21
157
150
155
169
158
50
7:00
20
202
197
203
202
201
53
7:15
52
155
166
160
173
164
57
7:30
59
120
130
135
127
128
45
7:45
59
123
153
129
132
135
46
8:00
70
119
123
118
130
123
41
8:15
61
111
117
121
124
119
39
8:30
65
87
91
107
84
93
40
8:45
50
76
61
52
78
67
43
9:00
72
85
64
74
71
74
54
9:15
52
77
67
72
69
72
21
9:30
65
70
59
82
75
72
39
9:45
66
58
64
81
80
71
128
10:00
81
77
65
74
88
76
92
10:15
101
52
77
76
80
72
93
10:30
86
77
59
71
77
71
98
10:45
95
74
65
85
58
71
114

STA 1 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STATION 1
PR-1 between PR-184 and PR-787
NORTHBOUND (TO CAGUAS)
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
11:00
100
76
66
69
64
45
77
11:15
120
75
58
78
92
102
87
11:30
65
83
65
69
79
106
99
11:45
52
73
63
67
75
106
93
12:00
41
80
80
80
82
107
87
12:15
44
113
68
80
75
110
79
12:30
42
89
82
64
77
78
100
12:45
52
73
79
81
90
134
105
13:00
55
98
76
92
69
116
114
13:15
59
91
97
54
83
99
96
13:30
41
97
72
72
80
138
90
13:45
47
80
66
96
66
127
93
14:00
43
79
89
84
115
133
90
14:15
66
117
95
91
130
142
99
14:30
66
79
113
86
158
118
93
14:45
50
97
96
98
162
136
94
15:00
52
151
139
140
152
142
100
15:15
102
138
149
131
164
177
105
15:30
84
133
137
144
200
130
109
15:45
98
132
133
142
220
157
104
16:00
116
125
107
126
233
121
100
16:15
91
104
122
103
234
129
105
16:30
110
103
137
123
213
129
115
16:45
106
117
93
144
218
134
102
17:00
101
154
121
123
242
155
133
17:15
119
144
144
141
271
149
120
17:30
95
142
126
131
264
124
98
17:45
106
119
120
131
231
165
99
18:00
82
101
123
118
208
165
104
18:15
96
125
97
123
224
160
66
18:30
104
157
118
101
212
156
79
18:45
91
151
106
131
173
133
66
19:00
73
116
89
120
193
151
52
19:15
89
104
101
105
158
141
50
19:30
103
92
92
89
127
141
53
19:45
94
100
70
58
130
114
53
20:00
84
75
54
70
113
131
77
20:15
78
72
73
77
134
100
39
20:30
83
62
69
56
111
95
32
20:45
51
52
66
67
115
107
36
21:00
71
53
52
66
89
112
49
21:15
69
55
77
59
100
105
44
21:30
53
54
66
56
77
108
46
21:45
42
37
57
45
67
76
45

A-3

SOUTHBOUND (TO CAYEY)


Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
11:00
100
71
92
57
97
80
105
11:15
94
65
59
73
98
74
94
11:30
81
82
65
70
81
75
106
11:45
89
67
79
72
68
72
108
12:00
91
96
76
64
107
86
112
12:15
82
73
79
65
79
74
96
12:30
129
107
89
70
86
88
121
12:45
138
82
79
80
76
80
111
13:00
104
67
65
92
94
80
110
13:15
105
72
76
78
77
76
117
13:30
94
62
78
89
93
81
113
13:45
84
81
94
98
74
87
120
14:00
76
108
96
83
109
99
116
14:15
103
101
100
90
103
99
104
14:30
76
93
98
87
88
92
107
14:45
62
96
79
102
108
97
96
15:00
78
98
83
107
121
103
112
15:15
90
105
92
107
84
97
116
15:30
86
84
76
92
80
83
103
15:45
82
93
95
127
96
103
108
16:00
79
93
85
97
115
98
118
16:15
68
86
91
93
112
96
97
16:30
80
119
106
109
105
110
110
16:45
71
116
83
108
130
110
115
17:00
62
144
111
109
114
120
61
17:15
63
140
115
89
99
111
72
17:30
87
109
92
96
94
98
120
17:45
67
132
75
98
96
101
114
18:00
90
136
73
70
75
89
113
18:15
81
111
73
84
84
88
120
18:30
94
137
72
65
73
87
130
18:45
78
136
76
54
51
80
90
19:00
69
99
61
70
70
75
158
19:15
70
64
58
71
71
66
155
19:30
60
60
53
51
71
59
120
19:45
69
39
33
29
39
35
100
20:00
62
45
39
36
44
41
100
20:15
45
41
35
54
44
44
92
20:30
42
48
37
46
41
43
100
20:45
41
43
34
35
40
38
97
21:00
57
45
41
49
41
44
85
21:15
36
44
38
37
30
38
78
21:30
35
26
26
37
33
31
70
21:45
21
19
24
23
39
27
56

STA 1 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STATION 1
PR-1 between PR-184 and PR-787
NORTHBOUND (TO CAGUAS)
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
22:00
42
51
50
47
72
63
40
22:15
44
37
47
59
69
78
44
22:30
42
37
38
41
99
61
40
22:45
30
33
25
40
56
59
41
23:00
37
28
23
25
39
72
40
23:15
33
18
21
35
40
65
33
23:30
19
31
25
39
47
69
39
23:45
17
17
23
23
32
67
30
5301

6305

5900

6107

8452

8154

SOUTHBOUND (TO CAYEY)


Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
22:00
40
31
24
18
25
25
54
22:15
28
19
23
25
20
22
60
22:30
18
15
15
28
25
21
34
22:45
11
11
5
18
20
14
48
23:00
8
7
12
6
22
12
43
23:15
9
9
7
9
20
12
52
23:30
13
5
11
16
11
11
42
23:45
12
3
5
6
11
7
42

5179

Resumen de Datos
Average Northbound
Average Southbound
ADT

A-4

6485
5942

PERCENT OF ADT
52.18%
47.82%

12427

STA 1 / ATC_ALL_Stations

5093

6239

5643

5868

6152

6012

6589

STATION 2
PR 738 between PR-1 and PR-735
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
0:00
10
9
19
81
98
15
3
0:15
2
0
14
17
58
10
1
0:30
4
5
5
17
26
5
0
0:45
2
0
8
4
15
8
1
1:00
2
3
11
12
10
3
1
1:15
1
2
7
9
8
2
1
1:30
1
4
4
10
5
1
1
1:45
3
6
3
6
9
6
0
2:00
1
2
3
4
5
1
0
2:15
0
1
5
8
9
1
1
2:30
4
3
0
4
2
1
0
2:45
1
2
4
3
7
1
1
3:00
2
0
1
4
7
2
3
3:15
2
4
3
5
10
5
2
3:30
6
2
3
1
3
3
4
3:45
3
2
6
6
2
4
1
4:00
1
3
3
3
3
2
1
4:15
10
13
8
3
4
11
8
4:30
11
8
12
8
4
8
11
4:45
19
17
16
6
6
16
11
5:00
16
20
20
8
1
18
21
5:15
21
29
25
11
13
29
31
5:30
49
49
42
12
7
52
45
5:45
48
48
44
16
16
45
50
6:00
56
58
55
12
6
50
58
6:15
51
52
49
19
10
50
45
6:30
62
47
43
22
5
54
54
6:45
66
76
62
25
8
80
73
7:00
97
105
89
23
10
92
112
7:15
108
94
115
29
14
103
97
7:30
76
69
94
43
19
69
77
7:45
67
77
76
50
23
70
67
8:00
50
65
57
41
18
75
46
8:15
47
56
53
50
23
51
47
8:30
52
43
55
53
29
40
56
8:45
39
46
42
59
33
58
40
9:00
32
32
44
49
25
49
44
9:15
35
32
46
60
45
30
42
9:30
43
47
52
47
44
34
42
9:45
39
29
33
62
37
33
38
10:00
45
41
37
55
46
24
47
10:15
28
36
33
50
44
34
40
10:30
44
39
33
52
38
44
40
10:45
43
42
50
38
58
40
34

A-5

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
0:00
15
14
6
73
88
4
8
0:15
5
7
8
17
58
5
6
0:30
5
7
14
15
22
14
11
0:45
5
3
14
2
7
14
10
1:00
5
7
10
10
8
2
5
1:15
1
4
11
5
4
3
4
1:30
1
4
8
13
6
2
3
1:45
2
0
5
4
6
10
6
2:00
3
1
5
3
3
1
2
2:15
2
4
4
7
7
5
2
2:30
3
2
6
3
1
5
4
2:45
0
3
11
2
4
2
3
3:00
5
1
4
2
3
8
5
3:15
3
1
2
3
6
3
2
3:30
2
1
5
1
3
5
3
3:45
1
3
6
3
1
4
3
4:00
1
0
5
1
1
3
2
4:15
4
4
5
3
4
6
5
4:30
4
2
5
5
2
3
3
4:45
3
3
6
5
5
6
5
5:00
3
4
4
6
0
3
3
5:15
10
6
9
15
17
10
9
5:30
14
11
12
11
6
14
13
5:45
12
12
10
17
17
10
10
6:00
22
18
15
10
5
13
15
6:15
17
25
18
15
7
18
19
6:30
25
19
21
16
3
26
24
6:45
33
19
32
19
6
41
34
7:00
52
38
34
12
5
35
38
7:15
39
41
34
16
7
30
34
7:30
44
37
50
30
13
36
40
7:45
42
37
36
35
16
33
35
8:00
35
44
46
13
5
60
51
8:15
33
21
33
39
17
31
30
8:30
29
36
34
35
19
24
28
8:45
34
25
42
36
20
58
45
9:00
35
36
32
36
18
35
34
9:15
26
23
31
33
24
20
23
9:30
32
31
35
35
32
22
27
9:45
37
34
37
32
19
37
36
10:00
25
31
29
34
28
18
23
10:15
41
35
49
46
40
50
46
10:30
37
34
39
33
24
52
44
10:45
34
39
46
42
64
36
38

STA 2 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STATION 2
PR 738 between PR-1 and PR-735
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
11:00
36
44
38
60
49
23
34
11:15
41
40
46
63
49
27
49
11:30
38
48
50
51
45
40
48
11:45
46
42
47
49
36
53
54
12:00
44
56
51
68
48
49
46
12:15
50
36
49
41
62
31
37
12:30
48
51
45
62
62
57
42
12:45
54
57
62
55
60
58
58
13:00
67
52
56
56
65
63
59
13:15
45
44
47
50
62
46
52
13:30
65
43
46
53
57
64
51
13:45
41
46
56
68
56
47
45
14:00
45
49
66
68
56
64
46
14:15
49
41
73
49
59
37
50
14:30
47
47
51
59
55
35
41
14:45
35
35
54
59
60
46
34
15:00
60
50
62
66
46
47
61
15:15
69
64
65
39
43
71
50
15:30
45
47
46
52
48
42
53
15:45
35
54
61
48
59
44
46
16:00
47
39
57
64
37
31
34
16:15
44
41
38
45
32
37
53
16:30
42
49
41
52
46
47
46
16:45
40
50
49
57
44
60
44
17:00
43
48
45
49
38
46
43
17:15
41
46
59
49
51
47
46
17:30
41
51
58
54
63
57
42
17:45
53
57
55
60
58
62
51
18:00
59
43
62
66
54
57
38
18:15
51
52
65
67
61
48
59
18:30
46
54
62
81
55
49
55
18:45
54
68
70
62
73
45
53
19:00
53
46
67
53
70
48
36
19:15
56
51
67
48
58
37
50
19:30
42
45
52
51
41
46
39
19:45
38
38
53
32
36
37
30
20:00
41
43
50
41
40
27
35
20:15
32
25
43
53
43
22
33
20:30
31
29
57
57
45
35
30
20:45
26
30
48
41
44
34
28
21:00
30
29
49
41
46
28
44
21:15
19
42
46
55
49
24
20
21:30
23
36
38
50
23
28
23
21:45
27
23
29
45
38
14
12

A-6

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
11:00
29
39
48
43
35
29
33
11:15
37
56
53
63
49
31
39
11:30
45
34
60
60
52
48
47
11:45
39
55
51
55
40
57
52
12:00
66
60
66
60
42
63
63
12:15
58
56
69
60
90
43
52
12:30
51
61
55
52
52
69
62
12:45
53
50
63
60
65
58
57
13:00
48
58
83
70
81
93
78
13:15
43
56
71
70
86
69
63
13:30
62
42
53
54
58
73
63
13:45
42
42
74
63
51
62
57
14:00
41
50
58
68
56
56
52
14:15
49
56
73
74
89
37
48
14:30
66
61
83
80
74
56
63
14:45
73
70
79
71
72
67
70
15:00
55
78
111
105
73
84
82
15:15
78
58
79
100
110
86
78
15:30
76
76
108
94
86
98
92
15:45
82
82
97
90
110
69
78
16:00
66
68
96
93
53
52
64
16:15
76
69
83
80
56
80
78
16:30
68
66
75
80
70
85
77
16:45
57
82
119
110
84
145
115
17:00
84
76
83
90
69
84
82
17:15
78
86
101
100
104
80
84
17:30
89
87
100
90
105
98
95
17:45
75
74
120
115
111
135
112
18:00
68
79
112
124
101
102
94
18:15
65
92
88
90
81
64
73
18:30
71
73
110
111
75
86
85
18:45
82
55
122
120
141
78
82
19:00
68
68
101
110
145
72
75
19:15
68
67
120
125
151
66
75
19:30
67
77
114
115
92
100
93
19:45
67
56
92
90
101
64
67
20:00
52
67
89
99
96
48
58
20:15
52
61
91
93
75
46
57
20:30
51
60
96
100
78
58
63
20:45
55
46
75
85
91
53
55
21:00
42
39
93
90
100
53
55
21:15
34
44
77
80
71
40
45
21:30
53
40
55
60
27
40
44
21:45
39
46
49
55
46
23
34

STA 2 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STATION 2
PR 738 between PR-1 and PR-735
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
22:00
19
32
31
34
30
19
14
22:15
16
31
33
37
21
18
10
22:30
12
18
34
50
16
9
11
22:45
9
15
38
40
23
8
13
23:00
10
15
21
32
17
6
12
23:15
8
10
38
32
11
7
9
23:30
13
8
26
30
10
11
6
23:45
7
16
37
24
20
5
7
3332

3444

3973

3765

3233

3322

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
22:00
36
53
41
53
46
25
34
22:15
31
37
38
54
30
20
28
22:30
28
30
38
40
12
10
21
22:45
25
29
35
44
25
7
18
23:00
13
33
17
30
15
4
12
23:15
12
26
30
28
9
5
14
23:30
28
18
25
25
8
10
17
23:45
13
15
34
20
16
4
12

3279

Resumen de Datos
Average Eastbound
Average Westbound
ADT

A-7

3478
4146

PERCENT OF ADT
45.62%
54.38%

7624

STA 2 / ATC_ALL_Stations

3587

3686

4821

4784

4306

3902

3938

STATION 3
PR 735 west of PR-734

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
0:00
9
6
12
18
3
1
1
0:15
8
5
11
19
4
2
3
0:30
5
2
11
11
4
0
1
0:45
4
5
11
11
1
1
2
1:00
2
2
16
12
2
1
2
1:15
3
3
9
16
1
1
1
1:30
2
3
13
19
1
1
1
1:45
2
1
14
10
1
0
0
2:00
1
3
8
7
0
0
1
2:15
2
1
7
5
1
1
1
2:30
1
1
5
3
1
0
1
2:45
4
3
4
8
2
1
1
3:00
1
2
5
4
1
0
0
3:15
2
2
5
3
0
1
1
3:30
3
2
3
2
1
0
2
3:45
3
6
2
2
4
3
3
4:00
2
2
3
5
2
1
3
4:15
5
5
2
3
3
4
5
4:30
7
5
4
6
8
8
5
4:45
12
11
5
4
12
12
13
5:00
8
9
7
2
10
10
9
5:15
17
17
7
7
13
15
16
5:30
27
19
10
3
21
23
21
5:45
31
38
21
9
33
41
42
6:00
34
30
16
7
33
34
31
6:15
31
28
13
5
28
28
31
6:30
37
37
18
5
40
44
36
6:45
49
49
25
8
48
59
59
7:00
59
56
23
10
60
65
66
7:15
66
65
23
11
73
65
68
7:30
69
70
29
13
65
80
76
7:45
57
57
37
16
57
65
54
8:00
49
45
34
11
45
47
62
8:15
44
56
35
17
43
49
60
8:30
39
60
36
15
52
44
48
8:45
43
51
51
22
49
44
52
9:00
42
39
44
24
43
38
34
9:15
38
44
44
29
40
35
47
9:30
37
52
55
27
36
37
46
9:45
44
38
47
30
36
41
47

A-8

STA 3 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
11
11
5
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
0
2
0
3
4
4
3
6
7
14
18
12
24
35
35
40
44
40
41
53
55
37
27
38
36
38
36
33
36

11
12
8
6
6
1
6
2
3
4
4
2
2
1
1
2
5
4
3
5
3
7
14
16
26
25
32
34
28
40
47
32
46
42
38
38
32
42
40
33

31
27
21
16
12
9
8
8
8
5
3
3
4
4
3
4
5
3
3
4
5
4
5
8
11
11
14
13
14
17
20
27
22
26
28
27
31
36
36
41

27
32
28
11
19
13
13
13
10
12
3
7
9
5
5
5
3
4
1
4
2
3
5
4
7
4
7
4
8
9
7
13
12
14
15
21
25
22
27
24

8
4
2
7
4
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
4
7
8
13
19
24
24
32
32
34
28
48
50
38
44
35
29
31
37
37
35
41

9
6
1
1
3
2
1
2
0
1
5
1
2
1
1
2
1
5
3
5
8
13
19
16
28
29
29
36
39
41
56
44
35
41
39
29
45
45
37
41

11
6
6
4
3
4
2
1
1
1
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
4
5
8
13
16
18
27
40
35
29
39
48
50
47
46
46
48
41
37
36
43
35

STATION 3
PR 735 west of PR-734

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
10:00
37
39
54
28
45
40
43
10:15
41
31
43
28
33
37
43
10:30
45
37
53
40
39
40
48
10:45
35
40
50
61
38
37
40
11:00
34
36
46
42
42
37
46
11:15
42
33
44
48
41
42
39
11:30
42
45
44
43
46
43
37
11:45
41
38
49
53
39
43
39
12:00
45
39
44
40
50
45
49
12:15
44
45
46
44
50
47
46
12:30
39
49
52
56
44
46
37
12:45
45
54
45
50
49
39
53
13:00
39
42
52
47
32
39
53
13:15
42
44
48
49
39
34
41
13:30
43
41
52
52
46
38
36
13:45
47
44
50
48
36
43
45
14:00
48
50
43
53
42
42
53
14:15
47
55
39
50
48
51
43
14:30
42
44
44
58
41
42
41
14:45
46
51
39
47
46
44
44
15:00
44
51
43
56
44
44
41
15:15
50
64
38
48
53
53
48
15:30
70
54
42
45
53
50
50
15:45
51
39
44
38
45
54
50
16:00
48
47
47
40
37
51
47
16:15
43
50
47
40
43
43
46
16:30
53
54
44
41
39
38
45
16:45
49
61
46
29
55
52
46
17:00
53
55
41
31
55
57
45
17:15
45
54
43
29
55
47
50
17:30
45
58
56
34
57
52
56
17:45
47
50
42
33
40
52
46
18:00
47
49
41
38
39
54
51
18:15
48
52
53
33
43
52
55
18:30
49
55
39
39
43
52
51
18:45
47
48
50
42
47
50
43
19:00
37
46
54
46
42
46
54
19:15
38
45
53
39
42
37
45
19:30
38
43
45
32
33
33
44
19:45
35
40
43
34
39
41
42

A-9

STA 3 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
41
42
35
47
45
44
46
49
48
36
40
41
50
51
50
54
44
67
41
43
65
73
41
46
49
47
43
57
47
51
50
45
50
52
48
53
54
46
52
35

35
35
33
40
38
45
41
46
50
44
46
34
47
40
50
46
44
34
65
54
57
48
48
53
53
49
58
51
53
63
49
52
52
52
56
54
61
52
57
39

49
39
40
43
50
52
46
50
54
46
50
50
57
51
50
51
49
57
49
47
53
53
51
51
51
40
51
49
42
58
51
50
46
53
58
55
64
58
58
49

33
31
37
28
28
27
35
32
36
39
38
37
42
49
44
54
57
41
47
52
45
40
47
49
48
53
58
47
60
63
47
49
47
43
60
51
52
52
56
40

44
34
38
35
52
37
52
53
56
46
41
37
44
43
38
47
44
41
56
42
49
46
43
40
43
47
56
54
49
50
52
55
57
50
55
70
63
47
41
58

44
38
47
45
38
49
42
46
51
43
47
45
45
35
46
44
38
39
59
46
47
53
51
49
55
53
48
55
50
64
62
68
61
71
63
56
60
83
59
51

44
38
50
35
49
47
45
51
46
43
44
47
39
44
57
45
48
40
64
53
53
49
58
53
46
65
72
64
75
71
49
64
65
69
62
69
78
83
66
64

STATION 3
PR 735 west of PR-734

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
20:00
30
42
34
29
25
28
35
20:15
30
42
43
29
29
30
32
20:30
35
35
37
28
21
25
31
20:45
26
31
42
21
26
26
32
21:00
22
36
48
23
18
29
31
21:15
22
36
36
25
23
22
26
21:30
20
34
29
19
29
18
24
21:45
19
34
34
16
19
22
21
22:00
29
28
20
13
15
14
18
22:15
22
22
18
12
12
20
17
22:30
20
27
22
10
14
18
17
22:45
13
24
30
11
8
16
16
23:00
11
15
10
8
6
7
10
23:15
7
15
16
6
7
8
10
23:30
7
12
14
3
4
5
5
23:45
7
11
20
3
6
3
7
3000

3246

3026

2399

2889

2980

3115

Resumen de Datos
Average Northbound
Average Southbound
ADT

A-10

2951
3183

PERCENT OF ADT
48.11%
51.89%

6134

STA 3 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
34
38
46
36
41
27
39
28
25
29
34
15
14
13
14
15

40
51
46
38
48
45
49
38
30
39
34
28
22
25
33
34

52
55
44
64
45
41
40
34
32
29
35
30
26
25
33
22

44
53
52
44
36
35
29
28
20
20
26
16
14
10
10
5

46
43
44
39
36
40
35
28
25
24
26
15
18
7
18
10

62
53
60
47
55
47
49
39
31
24
35
26
22
12
16
12

59
50
49
40
47
48
56
48
26
32
35
19
23
16
20
20

3139

3227

3205

2693

3056

3358

3560

STATION # 4
PR 734 SOUTH OF PR-7733
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
2
8
6
7
8
7
20
0:15
4
3
4
3
6
3
12
0:30
1
10
4
6
6
6
29
0:45
1
3
2
2
2
2
12
1:00
0
2
1
2
3
2
6
1:15
1
3
2
2
6
2
17
1:30
2
6
5
7
5
5
24
1:45
2
4
1
1
3
2
8
2:00
2
3
2
1
3
2
6
2:15
2
6
6
14
10
8
34
2:30
0
9
14
23
32
14
81
2:45
1
11
6
19
15
11
32
3:00
1
3
3
8
4
5
8
3:15
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3:30
2
6
6
6
5
6
12
3:45
0
10
6
14
20
10
32
4:00
0
9
6
15
22
9
20
4:15
0
13
8
19
10
13
10
4:30
2
14
12
23
28
15
16
4:45
0
19
13
23
21
17
5
5:00
1
24
24
42
41
29
21
5:15
1
46
48
66
70
49
30
5:30
2
55
36
72
73
50
18
5:45
1
71
50
91
108
65
27
6:00
1
61
32
63
86
46
24
6:15
2
77
69
134
114
86
29
6:30
5
101
60
104
114
78
23
6:45
3
152
110
100
187
136
56
7:00
4
143
70
69
183
148
51
7:15
0
153
100
100
197
179
50
7:30
3
78
87
80
78
74
28
7:45
2
84
79
86
73
75
35
8:00
11
109
69
87
119
78
53
8:15
8
95
110
102
95
94
55
8:30
16
88
88
103
98
85
62
8:45
13
103
84
102
108
87
81
9:00
5
82
92
103
89
84
82
9:15
11
88
90
93
103
83
79
9:30
16
82
77
101
101
79
86
9:45
33
86
66
89
80
72
61
10:00
34
65
64
60
71
58
58

A-11

STA 4 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
51
54
48
45
38
42
41
45
33
36
39
19
19
19
29
18
27
17
18
15
14
10
17
15
23
21
24
25
29
22
24
44
37
47
49
66
79
74
77
116
92

12
8
12
8
11
5
6
8
7
3
2
6
4
12
7
5
5
10
14
22
16
31
66
57
72
71
143
126
134
150
193
173
157
116
97
103
87
89
90
116
91

8
9
4
4
3
2
5
2
3
3
3
3
4
10
6
3
3
6
12
14
16
32
43
40
37
63
84
91
159
215
215
162
98
134
96
84
97
91
84
88
89

10
7
7
3
7
3
7
2
2
7
5
10
10
7
6
7
8
14
23
26
28
44
86
73
74
123
147
154
158
202
196
176
124
124
113
102
109
94
110
120
84

12
14
7
3
15
9
5
6
7
5
7
8
5
11
5
10
12
7
28
24
27
47
87
86
101
105
161
155
171
193
192
149
170
115
108
108
94
104
110
107
99

10
7
7
5
7
3
5
3
4
4
3
6
6
9
6
5
5
10
15
19
19
33
59
52
54
79
110
112
138
175
182
154
111
114
93
87
89
83
86
97
80

29
31
34
30
31
27
24
16
14
17
18
17
10
10
13
16
11
7
16
5
14
20
21
21
28
26
32
46
47
49
68
72
75
66
68
81
86
79
94
82
81

STATION # 4
PR 734 SOUTH OF PR-7733
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
10:15
30
86
99
102
99
87
110
10:30
25
77
142
156
126
119
159
10:45
23
89
72
91
72
75
78
11:00
39
80
69
86
85
71
77
11:15
55
87
81
122
85
88
98
11:30
50
90
76
109
83
82
76
11:45
60
73
64
69
67
62
67
12:00
71
111
108
116
108
101
118
12:15
91
93
88
90
108
82
113
12:30
87
91
108
107
119
93
108
12:45
87
108
104
138
126
106
133
13:00
89
91
98
91
105
85
109
13:15
108
87
88
86
81
79
98
13:30
89
93
93
99
115
86
111
13:45
107
89
108
97
112
90
88
14:00
81
134
125
108
125
110
93
14:15
88
105
126
116
142
106
103
14:30
97
116
122
140
164
115
123
14:45
103
108
121
103
105
100
98
15:00
101
123
123
62
90
92
78
15:15
81
110
104
113
113
98
120
15:30
71
143
135
123
108
121
106
15:45
82
98
117
83
93
91
96
16:00
80
124
147
102
140
112
115
16:15
76
86
99
84
104
81
96
16:30
62
99
116
82
111
89
87
16:45
53
88
87
110
102
87
85
17:00
64
114
133
160
136
125
134
17:15
55
109
126
131
130
111
94
17:30
73
100
84
103
93
85
85
17:45
60
77
91
85
89
77
78
18:00
77
82
86
89
101
78
81
18:15
67
76
91
73
101
73
103
18:30
82
70
71
77
78
66
84
18:45
86
65
74
84
83
68
88
19:00
78
90
83
96
112
81
113
19:15
67
63
60
67
59
57
66
19:30
70
49
63
70
60
56
91
19:45
51
42
46
49
37
42
63
20:00
70
59
34
42
54
40
75
20:15
45
40
48
39
44
39
77

A-12

STA 4 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
95
98
83
90
85
80
88
82
108
98
81
101
114
113
102
116
106
104
93
117
106
107
122
114
101
109
97
108
121
126
115
99
104
115
98
119
90
79
75
98
82

90
56
134
109
115
123
120
114
107
104
106
107
111
102
116
161
128
113
130
177
119
156
111
103
116
123
112
101
118
146
116
109
88
106
87
97
94
66
69
86
62

103
103
107
93
106
103
104
110
101
123
102
115
112
101
140
150
153
118
145
177
112
147
132
122
133
143
110
117
136
122
136
114
105
107
99
89
89
84
75
49
74

106
113
136
116
161
148
113
119
103
122
135
106
109
108
126
129
141
136
123
89
122
134
94
84
112
101
140
141
141
149
127
118
84
116
112
103
99
93
79
61
59

103
91
108
115
112
113
110
110
124
136
123
123
103
126
145
150
173
159
126
129
122
117
105
116
140
137
129
120
140
135
133
133
116
117
110
120
87
80
60
78
67

91
86
112
96
116
112
101
103
94
106
104
99
100
94
117
131
129
112
120
131
106
131
102
93
109
110
110
110
120
124
115
103
84
99
91
87
85
75
68
57
59

115
115
116
104
129
103
109
121
129
123
130
127
125
121
114
111
125
119
117
111
129
115
108
95
129
108
108
118
101
124
117
107
119
127
117
121
98
122
102
108
118

STATION # 4
PR 734 SOUTH OF PR-7733
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
20:30
51
31
33
35
34
30
45
20:45
39
36
26
34
32
28
45
21:00
35
45
58
48
49
46
73
21:15
32
33
38
42
45
35
77
21:30
35
21
33
35
30
28
53
21:45
38
21
23
25
24
21
35
22:00
35
21
34
39
35
30
55
22:15
30
26
38
44
39
34
64
22:30
10
10
8
12
13
9
16
22:45
18
16
15
19
19
16
40
23:00
11
14
15
20
19
15
39
23:15
11
14
15
16
17
14
33
23:30
11
9
14
13
14
11
22
23:45
9
8
6
8
8
7
16
3492

6007

5880

6384

6842

5706

5983

Resumen de Datos
Average Northbound
Average Southbound
ADT

A-13

5756
7519

PERCENT OF ADT
43.36%
56.64%

13275

STA 4 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
78
72
65
64
50
40
46
45
34
31
27
24
29
14

66
70
63
44
36
44
27
28
37
27
22
24
23
26

70
49
81
50
55
48
43
40
26
24
23
25
34
18

73
65
67
56
59
52
49
47
43
32
30
27
31
25

71
62
68
60
51
50
45
42
47
31
29
28
35
26

63
54
64
46
47
44
38
36
32
26
23
24
27
21

95
86
102
102
90
72
70
68
59
67
61
56
54
50

6316

7390

7372

7976

8175

6883

7319

STATION # 5
PR 171 SOUTH OF 7733

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
1
5
4
4
5
5
14
0:15
2
2
3
2
4
2
9
0:30
0
7
2
4
4
4
22
0:45
0
2
1
1
1
1
9
1:00
0
1
0
1
2
1
4
1:15
0
2
1
1
4
1
11
1:30
1
4
3
4
3
3
17
1:45
1
3
0
0
2
1
5
2:00
1
2
1
0
2
1
4
2:15
1
4
4
10
7
5
25
2:30
0
6
10
16
22
10
60
2:45
0
7
4
13
11
8
22
3:00
0
2
2
6
2
3
5
3:15
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
3:30
1
4
4
4
3
4
8
3:45
0
6
4
10
15
7
24
4:00
0
6
4
11
16
6
15
4:15
0
9
6
13
7
9
6
4:30
1
10
8
17
20
11
11
4:45
0
13
9
17
15
12
3
5:00
0
16
17
30
28
21
15
5:15
0
33
34
46
48
35
21
5:30
1
42
27
51
54
38
12
5:45
10
49
35
67
81
50
19
6:00
14
42
24
47
66
33
17
6:15
11
53
52
97
84
60
21
6:30
13
74
44
77
83
57
17
6:45
22
105
77
72
135
101
39
7:00
22
99
49
52
132
107
36
7:15
20
118
74
73
136
135
38
7:30
22
54
60
58
59
52
20
7:45
21
64
55
60
50
55
24
8:00
28
79
52
64
83
55
37
8:15
36
68
79
73
67
69
42
8:30
34
65
67
76
70
60
46
8:45
39
76
59
72
83
65
62
9:00
3
57
69
72
65
60
61
9:15
33
61
64
64
78
63
57
9:30
41
58
57
71
71
58
65
9:45
42
62
46
65
60
51
44

A-14

STA 5 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
37
39
37
34
27
30
28
31
25
27
27
14
14
14
21
13
19
11
12
10
10
7
12
10
16
14
18
18
20
16
17
30
27
34
34
47
60
54
55
88

8
5
8
5
7
3
4
5
4
2
1
4
2
9
5
3
3
7
9
16
11
23
49
39
52
54
104
96
102
116
139
130
117
86
73
78
66
67
68
87

5
6
3
3
2
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
7
4
2
2
4
8
9
12
24
32
29
27
47
59
65
122
162
151
125
71
96
68
59
75
70
60
66

7
4
5
2
4
2
5
1
1
5
3
7
6
5
4
5
5
10
16
18
21
33
61
54
55
91
108
109
120
139
135
129
89
86
85
72
82
70
81
91

9
10
5
2
10
6
3
4
5
3
4
5
3
8
3
6
8
4
19
17
20
33
66
64
76
79
119
116
124
137
147
106
122
83
77
78
72
76
80
76

7
5
5
3
5
2
3
2
3
3
2
4
4
6
4
3
3
7
11
13
13
23
41
39
37
57
84
83
103
124
132
109
82
82
66
61
66
62
63
67

21
21
24
22
21
18
18
11
9
12
13
12
7
7
9
12
7
5
11
3
10
15
15
14
20
19
23
32
34
36
46
51
55
45
47
58
66
59
67
58

STATION # 5
PR 171 SOUTH OF 7733

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
10:00
35
44
49
44
50
40
43
10:15
33
62
68
78
76
61
84
10:30
37
55
101
116
93
85
119
10:45
33
65
54
69
55
54
58
11:00
35
56
48
60
62
49
54
11:15
41
64
60
94
63
62
68
11:30
35
66
53
82
64
61
57
11:45
46
55
46
52
47
46
50
12:00
54
84
77
84
80
76
90
12:15
70
64
61
65
75
57
86
12:30
65
67
82
74
87
66
74
12:45
62
81
73
97
89
78
99
13:00
62
67
69
64
80
64
76
13:15
77
66
61
61
58
59
70
13:30
65
65
69
73
80
64
79
13:45
78
66
79
71
79
67
62
14:00
60
103
95
79
87
78
71
14:15
67
74
90
85
106
76
77
14:30
72
89
92
107
122
88
89
14:45
75
79
92
71
80
73
71
15:00
73
91
94
43
67
68
57
15:15
58
78
79
79
78
71
84
15:30
49
100
98
93
74
90
80
15:45
61
74
85
62
65
68
70
16:00
59
89
113
76
103
84
85
16:15
57
66
70
58
79
58
71
16:30
47
73
82
56
78
66
66
16:45
39
64
60
80
72
65
58
17:00
48
86
92
110
104
95
101
17:15
38
81
97
97
96
79
66
17:30
51
76
64
76
67
61
60
17:45
45
59
64
58
64
55
56
18:00
53
60
66
68
78
58
59
18:15
48
52
64
56
77
54
75
18:30
57
54
50
55
58
49
59
18:45
60
48
55
64
59
50
64
19:00
56
66
61
69
80
59
78
19:15
47
46
41
48
42
39
50
19:30
52
37
46
53
42
40
64
19:45
38
30
32
37
25
29
45

A-15

STA 5 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
70
66
74
61
66
65
57
63
59
79
71
58
75
81
78
75
82
75
79
71
83
73
78
86
81
75
80
73
78
92
91
86
75
77
80
74
88
66
60
54

69
62
40
103
80
85
84
87
82
75
72
78
74
84
74
88
124
94
85
91
135
91
120
85
76
82
86
81
72
89
102
83
82
62
73
67
70
68
50
53

65
72
79
81
71
76
77
80
85
77
87
78
84
86
78
106
107
107
85
104
133
79
104
102
90
102
103
84
85
101
86
105
84
72
74
69
62
63
59
55

62
74
80
97
88
123
108
79
92
72
90
95
77
75
81
91
99
101
101
89
65
90
100
66
62
80
72
107
98
105
114
90
90
61
84
83
79
72
65
56

73
75
67
82
86
79
79
84
76
95
98
91
89
77
90
104
113
123
114
87
91
84
81
80
84
105
105
89
85
100
103
97
96
89
85
79
85
62
57
45

57
70
64
85
69
84
81
71
72
67
73
75
74
74
70
89
92
96
84
82
101
80
90
71
71
78
80
78
83
88
92
80
74
60
69
64
64
61
55
47

60
84
86
82
76
92
79
83
89
97
88
99
89
86
87
87
83
90
91
83
84
97
79
77
69
89
77
82
89
72
93
84
77
84
88
89
90
69
86
72

STATION # 5
PR 171 SOUTH OF 7733

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
20:00
51
42
25
31
38
29
57
20:15
33
30
37
28
31
29
56
20:30
39
22
23
24
25
22
32
20:45
27
27
19
23
23
19
33
21:00
24
32
44
36
35
32
56
21:15
22
22
26
29
32
26
57
21:30
26
14
23
24
20
19
40
21:45
28
15
17
19
17
14
25
22:00
25
16
24
28
27
23
42
22:15
21
17
26
32
28
26
47
22:30
7
7
5
8
9
6
11
22:45
13
12
11
13
13
11
27
23:00
8
10
11
13
14
11
27
23:15
8
10
11
11
12
10
22
23:30
8
6
9
9
10
8
15
23:45
6
5
4
5
5
4
11
2905

4360

4259

4619

4959

4151

4351

Resumen de Datos
Average Northbound
Average Southbound
ADT

A-16

4229
5475

PERCENT OF ADT
43.58%
56.42%

9704

STA 5 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
74
60
59
53
49
48
37
30
34
33
24
23
19
17
21
10

63
47
50
51
46
31
25
33
18
20
28
20
15
17
17
18

36
54
49
35
61
35
38
35
33
30
20
17
16
18
26
12

43
45
55
45
50
40
41
36
37
33
31
24
21
18
22
18

55
48
52
45
48
41
36
37
34
31
35
22
21
21
24
19

44
41
46
38
46
34
32
33
29
25
23
19
15
17
20
15

76
83
67
65
76
76
65
52
52
51
44
49
45
39
38
36

4603

5424

5402

5798

5938

4981

5305

Station 6
PR 172 SOUTH-EAST OF PR 7733

0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30

A-17

WESTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
30
19
45
28
19
23
18
27
16
42
17
19
24
16
10
13
10
18
22
22
8
31
45
18
7
12
7
19
9
42
15
19
37
12
3
8
3
18
15
34
30
15
33
4
4
4
4
13
3
30
12
9
36
13
4
9
4
10
9
33
11
6
27
10
6
8
6
1
13
25
7
15
24
9
3
6
3
10
10
22
7
13
25
4
4
4
4
3
7
24
8
9
19
3
4
7
4
7
6
18
5
13
21
6
3
11
3
7
10
19
0
13
19
6
3
10
3
9
6
18
12
10
19
12
3
10
3
7
3
18
2
3
13
4
6
26
6
3
7
13
10
6
13
9
7
36
7
10
4
13
11
4
10
6
10
39
10
7
3
10
21
10
18
10
3
38
3
7
6
16
8
3
10
9
12
33
12
9
9
10
13
13
7
16
4
21
4
6
6
7
13
1
19
12
7
29
7
21
1
18
44
4
27
25
28
35
27
19
9
25
43
7
12
33
45
35
42
39
4
12
66
7
19
37
46
44
43
39
7
18
76
9
28
42
39
46
36
39
12
27
94
19
21
45
82
55
75
40
22
19
63
19
10
34
39
49
36
37
13
10
90
19
16
49
63
58
58
49
9
15
102
28
22
66
58
52
54
63
15
21
153
18
25
55
66
52
60
64
16
24
176
16
24
63
99
71
90
73
25
22
181
24
42
66
93
65
85
73
22
39
156
30
37
90
79
66
73
114
28
34
171
64
34
69
73
67
67
114
22
31
178
42
33
84
100
69
91
117
39
30
136
75
27
112
84
61
76
93
19
25
160
52
45
109
63
78
58
99
18
42
163
97
60
126
90
66
82
124
54
55
171
73
57
90
51
63
46
150
64
52
142
75
79
103
57
60
52
99
79
73
194
78
61
105
73
61
67
136
48
57
156
70
108
73
90
65
82
120
46
99
179
91
78
102
69
83
63
97
46
72
130
82
67
121
72
83
66
174
57
61
164
88
73
103
82
80
75
108
54
67
145
111
70
106
69
81
63
91
64
64
143
69
55
102
93
78
85
78
58
51
160
142
90
120
61
80
57
82
39
82
150
78
78
123
76
73
70
103
36
72
169
73
120
118
87
78
79
151
54
109
153
84
90
124
120
68
109
147
46
82
150
54
87
121
94
79
87
156
52
79
156
66
75
141
103
77
94
144
54
69
153
81
84
139
84
83
76
136
58
76
92
85
61
96
108
77
99
178
58
57
5
70
76
135
58
85
54
135
57
70
2
55
72
106
75
84
69
183
58
66
38
61
88
88
93
68
85
120
46
81
26
60
90
145
90
73
82
121
57
82
8
93
94
111
102
71
93
114
66
87
16
66
94
99
87
76
79
120
43
87
20
114
67
96
88
90
81
112
40
61
13
70
60
124
100
76
91
108
46
55
22
49
66
123
106
77
97
91
43
60
31
103
87
102
63
67
58
69
43
79
28
127
94
126
55
81
51
72
49
87
40
91
75
123
67
73
61
67
45
69
38
135
87
129
78
78
72
57
51
79

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
20
5
21
11
5
8
9
8
35
17
12
5
20
9
41
11
9
14
11
17
27
14
12
9
16
9
33
6
5
6
21
15
23
18
2
9
11
8
21
0
6
8
15
12
12
17
8
8
11
6
30
8
2
0
8
5
9
8
8
6
2
2
17
8
2
0
8
3
8
12
2
2
19
3
20
6
6
2
5
3
21
14
2
3
3
2
17
3
2
5
3
3
20
9
6
2
6
2
15
0
8
3
0
5
9
5
0
2
1
0
9
3
5
0
2
5
18
8
0
0
1
3
5
3
2
0
5
6
14
8
0
3
3
0
12
6
5
3
5
6
17
12
2
0
4
0
6
0
3
2
2
3
8
11
0
0
3
9
11
8
11
12
8
9
8
12
6
9
3
3
11
8
3
8
5
6
6
8
8
3
4
3
6
5
3
0
5
8
6
6
6
3
13
6
8
8
9
6
6
5
8
8
8
6
12
3
3
12
5
8
6
8
2
8
0
3
8
8
9
8
8
9
8
5
6
5
11
8
13
32
17
32
42
33
26
27
3
3
29
33
16
32
6
33
38
30
26
24
5
5
36
33
37
48
9
54
56
44
50
50
8
2
62
51
56
45
12
57
50
62
60
38
17
8
44
48
49
48
9
39
51
54
68
42
23
8
35
51
42
11
3
2
20
14
12
23
6
3
9
11
52
29
0
0
42
27
24
26
9
0
29
30
58
42
0
6
41
44
30
56
12
0
30
45
69
44
6
8
57
38
33
33
17
6
36
47
92
38
3
15
65
35
38
33
11
3
32
39
78
42
9
17
78
51
48
57
29
9
53
45
88
62
6
42
92
59
63
48
24
6
65
66
143
60
6
9
102
63
57
72
39
6
54
65
94
44
9
3
119
48
56
51
21
9
48
47
110
56
5
20
92
60
57
62
45
5
62
59
62
47
12
30
69
57
51
66
26
11
59
50
94
38
17
21
72
54
48
56
51
15
68
39
94
78
18
63
60
62
62
57
33
17
47
83
90
50
21
48
71
50
56
38
38
20
60
53
90
42
29
68
81
54
68
54
33
26
65
45
85
41
18
53
47
45
48
48
39
17
44
44
95
47
15
48
50
50
48
42
57
14
57
50
109
69
30
75
59
53
62
38
45
27
50
74
103
53
18
98
69
62
75
63
45
17
68
56
103
68
20
48
69
74
63
75
51
18
74
72
104
62
27
92
81
77
83
83
69
24
84
66
127
53
56
95
66
59
72
56
81
50
66
56
135
74
41
140
99
87
108
87
71
36
98
78
127
68
51
137
92
80
102
75
66
45
92
72
157
90
50
120
113
110
114
119
68
44
116
96
155
72
51
123
105
99
108
116
71
45
105
77
132
78
54
164
113
99
125
111
60
48
104
83
132
68
54
120
92
84
98
93
62
48
89
72
133
87
50
123
93
86
99
65
74
44
99
93
98
104
42
116
99
93
89
81
53
38
90
111
106
69
62
165
99
83
90
89
65
54
86
74
76
53
48
114
72
60
81
51
59
42
77
56
88
59
53
134
87
74
65
77
74
47
84
62
92
60
48
120
92
84
75
89
56
42
101
63
89
80
59
125
89
78
74
78
53
51
72
84
93
77
47
137
87
74
86
81
68
41
62
81
85
60
50
113
80
71
78
80
65
44
69
65
109
77
59
167
107
90
90
90
77
51
99
81
97
80
42
146
96
83
72
87
81
38
80
84
93
74
30
128
83
71
111
72
81
27
63
78
93
81
62
126
92
83
86
75
71
54
87
86
78
47
47
137
78
62
63
47
56
41
90
50
88
66
42
143
89
74
62
69
59
38
83
71

STA 6 / ATC_ALL_Stations

Station 6
PR 172 SOUTH-EAST OF PR 7733

16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45

WESTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
39
102
96
123
94
65
87
78
84
88
51
84
99
91
75
62
69
67
78
90
40
79
108
102
69
61
63
58
81
99
39
78
102
87
49
57
45
63
72
93
48
52
94
103
94
54
87
78
51
87
54
67
82
106
88
64
81
54
49
75
33
55
60
103
67
45
61
78
84
55
36
57
91
78
61
51
57
54
72
84
31
70
85
82
52
41
48
46
69
78
36
34
61
84
51
43
46
54
84
57
49
22
84
73
51
37
46
58
94
76
53
21
75
69
49
40
45
66
94
69
40
42
90
79
58
35
54
46
70
82
20
46
82
67
30
35
28
48
55
75
33
40
91
60
51
41
46
57
81
84
35
34
69
49
40
35
37
51
49
63
25
18
87
54
40
29
37
46
72
79
22
31
63
46
33
31
30
42
48
58
22
31
63
54
34
22
31
39
51
58
36
16
78
39
37
16
34
48
46
72
26
22
49
42
34
35
31
46
67
45
28
19
40
55
33
41
30
45
36
37
30
22
30
54
22
35
21
33
70
28
18
24
28
30
33
29
30
39
33
27
30
24
18
30
36
31
33
31
39
16
22
15
33
25
21
22
19
31
31
30
20
19
22
18
18
16
16
31
27
21
28
16
19
21
18
18
16
22
42
18
12
18
30
18
27
21
25
30
27
28
6142

4413

5258

6548

5085

4696

4670

6366

3812

4840

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/30/2008 1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
97
83
59
149
98
84
65
86
50
51
80
89
89
69
54
102
90
87
96
69
50
48
119
74
85
68
65
105
84
78
87
71
48
57
93
72
64
41
51
78
68
65
48
60
47
45
90
44
68
54
48
95
71
63
50
60
56
42
75
57
61
42
63
77
60
56
59
50
39
56
72
45
65
44
59
78
62
56
65
60
51
51
62
47
55
45
48
78
54
47
45
48
59
42
45
48
50
47
41
51
51
50
53
44
36
36
56
50
47
56
56
44
47
47
51
44
57
50
41
59
46
42
39
38
50
51
41
48
38
35
62
45
49
41
29
62
48
44
38
50
59
26
42
42
57
39
38
66
53
48
48
66
51
33
39
41
44
36
53
41
38
36
51
51
32
47
23
38
33
39
26
29
33
33
39
29
44
23
30
41
27
18
36
18
26
26
38
27
59
32
35
18
25
23
38
18
27
29
26
24
42
33
38
24
37
21
20
36
36
35
33
42
36
18
39
23
35
29
26
42
38
35
21
38
27
23
38
30
34
30
27
29
30
30
39
42
30
24
17
32
29
20
26
36
26
21
29
30
24
23
17
20
18
20
18
6
18
20
12
30
24
17
11
20
22
20
5
9
23
24
12
38
14
5
18
20
20
12
9
12
21
23
12
32
12
9
27
12
10
8
6
8
9
8
14
11
17
6
8
8
11
6
14
8
9
9
12
15
9
12
8
6
7
3
2
6
6
5
8
9
14
2
2
3
5
3
2
9
5
3
2
5
8
2
3
3
6
6
3
0
6
6
5
9
9
3
3
6
5765

Resumen de Datos

A-18

Average westbound
Average eastbound

5183
4179

ADT

9362

PERCENT OF ADT
55.36%
44.64%

STA 6 / ATC_ALL_Stations

3851

2679

5318

4982

4297

4491

4370

3526

2298

4498

4073

STA 7
PR 171 NORTH OF PR 14

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
0:00
21
18
17
17
8
6
8
0:15
15
13
17
21
3
6
12
0:30
10
12
15
22
7
2
6
0:45
8
10
10
13
4
1
6
1:00
4
7
14
19
2
1
5
1:15
5
9
9
19
7
2
3
1:30
3
6
6
15
0
1
4
1:45
3
4
9
13
3
1
2
2:00
5
5
8
11
1
2
1
2:15
5
4
7
9
2
0
4
2:30
4
1
5
5
1
0
3
2:45
1
5
3
4
3
1
1
3:00
2
3
3
5
1
0
4
3:15
1
1
4
4
1
0
2
3:30
3
5
3
3
1
1
3
3:45
4
3
2
3
2
1
4
4:00
3
2
2
5
3
3
2
4:15
3
3
4
4
4
3
5
4:30
5
4
4
5
4
5
6
4:45
5
6
5
1
3
5
8
5:00
9
5
4
3
9
11
9
5:15
20
16
6
6
16
18
19
5:30
37
32
13
6
29
31
36
5:45
46
44
16
10
41
46
43
6:00
35
41
15
10
39
41
45
6:15
41
41
18
11
32
39
41
6:30
51
46
23
8
50
44
48
6:45
62
47
25
9
45
64
58
7:00
59
55
20
9
48
52
51
7:15
61
60
26
13
57
58
64
7:30
61
55
31
20
63
55
69
7:45
60
57
40
21
51
61
74
8:00
54
48
36
14
48
49
49
8:15
56
56
33
14
44
53
65
8:30
57
60
40
17
52
52
65
8:45
59
61
51
25
50
46
57
9:00
47
56
52
28
42
55
57
9:15
60
49
52
36
51
55
66
9:30
61
54
49
41
56
45
65
9:45
54
46
52
32
50
48
68

A-19

STA 7 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
15
17
12
8
8
7
6
6
6
4
1
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
9
7
11
14
16
21
34
25
35
34
34
29
35
48
56
38
51
45
39
41
47
45

17
30
19
24
16
16
16
14
10
11
7
13
3
10
6
6
6
6
8
12
7
17
26
26
31
43
36
54
42
48
41
51
70
50
60
59
54
57
54
49

15
22
16
14
15
13
12
13
13
9
8
12
8
6
6
6
2
3
4
5
4
9
13
13
12
13
16
22
18
21
26
34
42
34
48
57
45
48
45
54

19
22
21
18
15
20
17
12
14
10
8
8
4
5
3
5
3
5
5
4
1
6
7
7
6
5
4
6
6
17
14
13
15
19
19
28
38
26
31
28

9
5
9
5
4
5
2
3
1
1
2
0
4
3
2
2
2
7
6
9
11
14
16
25
32
29
31
33
31
35
33
46
63
44
44
39
45
53
49
42

10
6
2
3
1
4
2
2
4
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
3
4
11
8
10
16
18
23
32
30
30
36
34
35
34
40
57
51
40
48
60
46
50
52

10
7
8
3
3
3
1
2
2
4
3
3
1
1
2
3
2
3
7
10
16
12
17
25
27
39
29
38
45
33
35
46
52
51
55
50
56
48
50
50

STA 7
PR 171 NORTH OF PR 14

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
10:00
53
63
50
32
61
45
58
10:15
58
54
56
36
48
57
69
10:30
58
58
65
38
55
59
77
10:45
61
59
68
49
57
67
58
11:00
61
52
71
35
57
60
69
11:15
67
58
71
41
55
59
62
11:30
60
59
62
44
63
75
78
11:45
68
58
65
41
75
64
77
12:00
70
65
71
44
67
67
72
12:15
71
58
70
46
68
79
77
12:30
74
61
72
48
62
66
75
12:45
67
69
67
60
69
63
71
13:00
70
61
73
71
62
62
85
13:15
70
67
62
66
52
61
72
13:30
63
57
66
65
56
66
80
13:45
63
73
75
53
69
61
71
14:00
67
67
61
69
66
67
83
14:15
68
65
72
75
75
78
76
14:30
64
75
70
57
67
62
80
14:45
63
63
63
56
52
50
67
15:00
62
53
70
52
53
60
66
15:15
63
66
64
54
63
59
56
15:30
69
57
61
48
53
59
59
15:45
68
59
63
49
60
69
63
16:00
60
70
65
57
58
80
74
16:15
55
70
57
64
75
81
77
16:30
75
71
57
57
75
70
66
16:45
68
66
60
51
80
73
76
17:00
70
65
58
65
72
65
79
17:15
70
69
54
56
68
74
78
17:30
58
75
49
49
72
67
83
17:45
56
57
50
55
75
77
79
18:00
64
76
56
46
65
71
82
18:15
67
58
56
48
67
72
74
18:30
63
59
58
58
59
77
72
18:45
60
67
59
48
64
77
74
19:00
53
54
51
52
62
72
76
19:15
58
64
45
42
56
63
71
19:30
44
58
48
44
60
70
79
19:45
45
37
41
40
56
56
80

A-20

STA 7 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
47
53
55
54
54
55
54
55
53
39
47
54
51
53
52
48
50
50
52
54
58
57
55
58
53
48
58
66
62
59
48
56
65
54
67
80
62
65
57
56

54
50
57
46
52
54
55
63
60
59
50
50
52
51
44
48
60
52
51
47
56
55
49
55
64
62
58
59
60
61
51
48
59
72
67
65
73
56
59
61

59
52
55
53
62
68
63
62
57
62
68
53
59
48
54
55
56
58
42
49
60
51
46
49
51
50
51
51
49
45
61
47
50
43
59
52
62
62
51
62

33
34
46
47
35
45
46
46
47
51
49
51
61
61
45
45
51
47
51
44
43
45
49
47
46
42
47
42
45
45
33
38
36
44
51
42
49
43
39
40

50
45
43
48
52
51
60
54
62
60
54
49
46
54
51
53
51
49
53
50
54
58
56
57
50
50
59
55
57
57
58
51
54
60
58
51
57
62
51
37

50
59
59
56
52
55
55
52
56
52
54
55
43
50
54
52
48
51
54
52
49
48
40
41
53
41
45
34
36
44
39
44
48
45
45
52
54
39
44
42

47
43
55
53
61
38
54
62
51
47
53
51
55
48
49
44
44
44
52
41
59
49
52
52
49
43
48
46
42
51
52
51
55
48
44
52
52
55
55
54

STA 7
PR 171 NORTH OF PR 14

NORTHBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
20:00
48
46
45
33
44
68
62
20:15
33
42
43
38
39
55
56
20:30
35
40
33
33
34
50
49
20:45
36
39
40
36
37
52
47
21:00
35
42
33
39
34
55
55
21:15
39
40
39
32
36
51
46
21:30
27
48
40
26
39
49
40
21:45
21
34
28
22
27
33
38
22:00
28
33
27
24
28
40
35
22:15
28
31
21
23
20
32
36
22:30
25
35
29
15
25
41
34
22:45
18
26
26
17
15
26
23
23:00
20
23
21
15
13
21
26
23:15
14
20
20
10
16
22
19
23:30
15
23
24
17
10
17
22
23:45
12
20
20
6
11
18
14
4058

4085

3690

2978

3890

4254

4661

Resumen de Datos
Average Northbound
Average Southbound
ADT

A-21

3945
3422

PERCENT OF ADT
53.55%
46.45%

7367

STA 7 / ATC_ALL_Stations

SOUTHBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
51
61
51
52
60
49
34
41
40
37
24
25
18
19
46
24

62
56
48
41
46
49
43
52
39
39
31
22
19
28
46
40

56
75
73
62
51
46
42
44
29
37
28
23
25
23
21
18

66
66
44
37
32
34
26
24
22
26
27
18
15
10
12
10

44
43
37
42
39
42
26
30
29
23
22
14
15
12
37
16

43
46
46
57
44
43
38
32
36
27
19
20
22
10
43
18

57
35
40
50
37
39
39
36
39
35
23
23
20
18
43
22

3671

4031

3616

2784

3394

3299

3409

STA 8
PR 14 EAST OF PR 171

WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
0:00
34
35
58
67
21
23
33
0:15
18
36
52
69
29
17
27
0:30
14
17
48
71
24
15
33
0:45
15
23
34
56
9
15
13
1:00
7
16
28
44
16
6
10
1:15
9
19
22
29
2
4
21
1:30
2
12
20
26
12
6
4
1:45
1
10
18
35
6
4
2
2:00
4
6
20
27
1
2
6
2:15
6
9
16
36
12
12
3
2:30
3
5
22
27
5
5
10
2:45
0
4
15
22
9
12
4
3:00
5
9
21
15
11
9
1
3:15
4
10
17
19
2
6
5
3:30
3
13
11
14
4
2
8
3:45
2
17
13
16
2
5
8
4:00
2
5
17
15
6
0
8
4:15
8
10
13
12
17
9
8
4:30
2
24
12
6
14
13
27
4:45
9
15
15
5
16
21
11
5:00
12
21
16
13
27
26
41
5:15
10
36
17
18
23
27
25
5:30
15
45
27
11
20
26
20
5:45
27
58
42
27
55
56
43
6:00
31
82
40
25
53
58
45
6:15
33
91
56
31
49
61
91
6:30
27
124
67
30
62
80
82
6:45
47
156
90
45
95
90
99
7:00
53
188
100
35
100
117
108
7:15
52
218
97
43
147
118
142
7:30
75
270
133
35
134
159
182
7:45
88
250
157
50
169
211
138
8:00
71
239
137
62
163
159
166
8:15
62
199
170
55
157
167
127
8:30
68
250
179
68
32
121
167
8:45
64
200
187
78
45
161
125
9:00
54
175
183
82
80
133
136
9:15
68
155
184
90
71
126
91
9:30
56
176
171
108
39
150
149
9:45
75
158
161
104
54
146
84

A-22

STA 8 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
17
16
12
16
8
3
4
9
2
6
8
5
18
17
1
8
11
33
53
50
88
135
138
175
173
187
260
241
309
263
212
220
217
199
162
143
124
142
127
144

31
19
11
11
15
9
2
8
9
6
9
12
9
15
6
7
11
8
19
19
22
33
53
64
62
90
62
96
133
121
130
166
119
145
97
133
146
157
161
163

37
26
22
12
15
17
15
14
12
8
6
7
8
9
2
8
2
9
9
11
8
12
8
21
24
34
29
37
42
54
69
90
64
61
109
123
134
118
148
158

25
31
30
23
26
22
28
22
13
11
8
23
3
2
5
11
3
3
5
6
6
9
9
14
14
15
20
11
26
25
19
17
40
56
43
39
62
59
43
46

18
19
5
6
11
7
12
4
11
15
5
8
13
2
11
9
13
36
34
49
89
121
168
177
155
185
225
301
280
236
270
163
184
204
203
205
245
217
208
244

14
8
3
9
3
0
2
0
3
5
3
6
10
5
5
6
11
38
33
70
97
119
179
150
180
202
237
310
298
287
200
196
172
203
169
175
165
177
128
138

11
11
4
5
6
5
6
5
2
5
6
4
3
9
4
14
11
34
48
71
100
112
178
161
159
173
221
332
282
274
228
196
187
162
139
166
149
171
167
192

STA 8
PR 14 EAST OF PR 171

WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
10:00
72
142
209
116
53
139
100
10:15
39
196
173
93
90
92
144
10:30
71
186
187
106
110
163
109
10:45
78
175
149
110
143
138
147
11:00
82
195
209
122
196
104
154
11:15
89
222
226
113
155
145
144
11:30
87
168
248
101
157
62
144
11:45
82
196
203
118
145
48
209
12:00
129
227
268
120
193
46
218
12:15
139
221
253
119
201
100
178
12:30
134
212
202
131
158
156
174
12:45
121
181
194
135
163
120
130
13:00
123
193
183
170
126
197
182
13:15
120
179
162
119
188
144
167
13:30
121
188
169
100
202
183
164
13:45
123
217
180
99
189
131
239
14:00
120
163
149
93
118
219
148
14:15
211
236
166
73
166
191
129
14:30
205
231
162
96
211
229
283
14:45
238
206
166
73
218
259
250
15:00
238
185
150
93
302
345
250
15:15
257
222
162
104
343
324
317
15:30
266
267
132
82
245
169
213
15:45
235
244
171
109
233
178
255
16:00
192
217
159
100
176
216
295
16:15
183
205
135
104
188
289
252
16:30
168
166
143
79
206
176
234
16:45
177
192
162
95
193
202
272
17:00
250
190
122
81
267
195
207
17:15
265
186
147
103
268
230
235
17:30
179
189
150
109
208
283
217
17:45
182
204
162
90
210
195
275
18:00
180
156
166
89
253
256
301
18:15
157
163
128
84
221
228
228
18:30
149
170
153
105
232
268
263
18:45
132
164
125
79
298
242
230
19:00
150
167
157
82
283
227
246
19:15
150
155
132
75
223
257
230
19:30
117
128
105
91
253
241
283
19:45
120
137
111
99
175
208
170

A-23

STA 8 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
140
143
123
127
131
106
135
170
204
165
203
160
203
217
202
180
216
224
197
188
156
80
97
104
203
154
221
174
161
82
167
145
154
150
163
143
128
124
114
80

142
99
149
190
197
181
198
198
167
158
173
182
221
202
197
190
187
216
197
230
111
21
40
157
172
164
157
176
213
204
175
163
182
140
123
113
119
111
105
94

165
203
177
202
136
97
101
98
109
97
154
218
205
200
186
144
190
180
176
177
175
158
194
174
181
163
207
151
132
165
135
148
138
122
136
135
153
124
127
103

54
99
93
99
102
88
141
157
129
151
158
154
157
162
148
182
196
185
206
123
106
161
142
126
147
126
137
114
125
141
124
125
154
154
157
176
182
124
127
110

218
162
197
161
155
147
136
123
133
115
185
143
172
124
143
194
186
147
172
155
149
149
134
181
244
232
186
139
193
226
204
131
156
157
121
171
135
151
124
93

110
149
142
128
174
168
210
229
245
228
122
168
128
145
140
146
149
152
150
156
158
133
252
181
182
167
221
146
204
176
156
162
167
144
151
175
175
112
121
104

184
146
181
137
140
192
172
153
120
155
161
192
133
148
178
128
210
232
194
157
206
146
148
192
136
188
158
176
201
204
202
169
145
157
170
184
128
139
119
120

STA 8
PR 14 EAST OF PR 171

WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
20:00
97
123
130
87
170
165
196
20:15
111
119
133
93
164
169
232
20:30
78
98
151
76
161
169
161
20:45
89
119
122
74
140
169
143
21:00
78
91
131
78
141
175
173
21:15
93
108
108
67
117
173
170
21:30
79
104
113
72
130
146
130
21:45
48
85
100
47
146
151
126
22:00
78
82
97
62
109
129
108
22:15
44
76
82
40
133
120
100
22:30
73
56
74
29
73
90
91
22:45
60
97
66
28
50
69
80
23:00
57
62
61
23
61
72
92
23:15
35
51
51
26
50
59
72
23:30
30
54
68
17
70
70
74
23:45
33
37
42
18
46
62
89
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8350
12389
10945
6518
11513
11961
12726

Resumen de Datos
Average westbound
Average eastbound
ADT

A-24

10629
10198

PERCENT OF ADT
51.03%
48.97%

20827

STA 8 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
80
87
90
107
99
92
82
53
62
55
36
29
57
18
43
31

119
113
109
110
99
99
86
62
54
57
46
44
61
31
30
31

133
112
121
87
71
111
70
65
53
75
48
42
47
34
35
37

114
113
100
71
99
68
79
79
68
50
38
33
23
25
16
15

82
100
118
88
70
88
84
54
39
44
42
28
24
15
16
23

130
119
98
66
84
68
77
66
64
34
37
38
22
19
23
15

119
107
120
92
86
104
78
31
64
46
49
28
26
21
28
15

11211

9954

8969

7406

11727

11502

11628

STA 9
PR 172 WEST OF PR 785
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008 2/7/2008 2/8/2008 2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008 2/13/2008 2/14/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
of Period
0:00
8
9
6
26
36
7
7
9
12
0:15
4
5
4
30
34
4
4
3
9
0:30
5
4
8
19
35
7
5
5
6
0:45
3
3
9
23
27
3
2
5
7
1:00
2
2
3
9
17
4
4
5
3
1:15
2
3
7
10
16
3
2
2
3
1:30
3
2
10
13
13
2
2
1
4
1:45
1
2
5
9
14
3
1
2
2
2:00
2
3
7
9
12
3
0
3
3
2:15
2
2
7
7
10
2
1
2
3
2:30
0
2
5
4
8
2
2
2
4
2:45
4
4
4
7
7
1
2
2
3
3:00
1
2
4
6
7
2
2
1
1
3:15
3
1
5
4
9
0
1
2
2
3:30
1
1
5
2
8
2
1
4
2
3:45
3
2
4
7
4
3
4
2
4
4:00
1
2
3
2
5
2
2
3
2
4:15
3
4
4
4
5
3
3
4
4
4:30
4
6
6
2
4
8
8
8
6
4:45
7
9
9
4
3
7
8
9
8
5:00
8
11
9
6
2
9
12
7
10
5:15
13
12
11
5
2
21
15
20
15
5:30
33
27
31
9
5
21
27
27
26
5:45
19
22
25
10
4
23
24
23
25
6:00
34
23
24
11
4
26
35
33
29
6:15
30
30
28
10
4
26
27
30
35
6:30
46
46
49
24
8
35
43
41
46
6:45
36
41
42
16
6
38
29
47
42
7:00
46
46
36
24
8
42
40
45
43
7:15
56
51
49
26
7
49
53
54
49
7:30
49
50
52
28
9
53
42
56
51
7:45
44
45
49
34
19
53
52
47
37
8:00
55
54
56
30
17
57
57
56
54
8:15
38
50
53
40
18
45
57
46
39
8:30
46
46
48
41
21
35
40
28
44
8:45
48
52
39
38
28
41
36
64
51
9:00
44
43
52
40
30
42
54
47
56
9:15
50
39
45
44
29
46
46
46
38
9:30
45
43
44
49
39
37
44
40
55
9:45
43
39
50
40
32
39
47
51
51
10:00
51
44
43
52
44
43
42
49
44
10:15
41
50
40
50
38
41
52
48
56
10:30
48
40
58
54
37
52
57
43
51
10:45
42
52
42
45
40
56
51
44
49
11:00
47
42
48
54
45
45
41
56
46
11:15
47
52
56
58
46
49
58
42
67
11:30
49
56
56
61
40
56
48
42
49
11:45
46
51
47
60
39
49
58
56
54
12:00
62
38
53
60
46
53
49
57
55
12:15
48
58
54
58
48
57
53
63
58
12:30
56
57
61
50
61
53
57
59
64
12:45
57
42
61
71
54
64
61
63
61
13:00
58
53
59
67
59
63
58
53
73
13:15
46
53
58
75
67
57
46
61
62
13:30
57
55
62
76
69
53
55
69
61
13:45
51
62
53
61
56
52
60
64
61

A-25

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008 2/7/2008 2/8/2008 2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008 2/13/2008 2/14/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
of Period
0:00
4
3
7
20
26
3
4
4
8
0:15
4
6
5
13
29
3
2
5
5
0:30
1
2
6
13
23
4
2
3
6
0:45
1
2
3
12
17
1
1
2
4
1:00
2
3
3
8
16
2
2
2
3
1:15
3
1
3
7
13
1
0
2
2
1:30
1
1
5
11
13
1
2
1
2
1:45
1
1
1
11
17
2
0
1
3
2:00
1
2
2
10
16
1
0
1
1
2:15
2
0
2
8
8
2
1
2
1
2:30
0
2
1
6
8
1
1
0
2
2:45
1
1
3
6
5
1
1
1
4
3:00
0
1
2
3
5
1
0
0
2
3:15
1
2
2
5
5
0
0
0
2
3:30
3
0
4
6
2
2
2
4
4
3:45
3
3
4
6
4
4
4
3
3
4:00
2
3
4
4
3
3
2
2
4
4:15
4
5
6
2
4
4
6
6
5
4:30
7
8
8
3
3
7
6
5
8
4:45
12
9
11
4
2
11
12
14
12
5:00
11
10
10
5
4
10
11
10
14
5:15
13
14
15
7
2
20
16
22
16
5:30
30
27
22
9
4
25
29
30
25
5:45
39
34
26
12
2
36
38
40
40
6:00
38
32
31
13
5
32
31
37
32
6:15
32
29
30
15
5
28
32
35
35
6:30
44
34
39
22
7
38
42
45
45
6:45
52
49
46
20
7
45
51
62
59
7:00
55
53
58
20
4
61
60
64
65
7:15
82
54
66
28
7
68
71
76
75
7:30
84
64
73
38
8
74
78
68
82
7:45
75
61
63
33
12
73
72
75
68
8:00
66
49
46
41
13
69
68
71
58
8:15
53
38
54
46
15
49
54
51
52
8:30
50
40
46
51
18
51
51
46
55
8:45
52
40
42
50
23
48
52
58
61
9:00
51
40
49
44
31
43
53
48
52
9:15
50
38
48
50
30
51
49
51
47
9:30
44
30
48
60
37
48
51
43
50
9:45
48
41
47
54
33
44
48
58
46
10:00
42
42
48
58
38
50
52
52
45
10:15
49
37
43
62
40
46
48
52
40
10:30
45
40
51
64
41
56
44
46
41
10:45
50
44
51
57
52
51
50
44
44
11:00
46
34
51
57
51
49
45
54
46
11:15
46
38
56
73
49
43
52
51
53
11:30
46
37
57
70
46
48
49
41
46
11:45
47
43
59
61
55
51
48
55
44
12:00
62
38
56
66
55
59
57
59
49
12:15
48
47
62
70
54
57
58
58
51
12:30
57
40
68
58
69
56
58
61
48
12:45
57
46
60
70
66
62
62
62
47
13:00
60
42
63
74
67
57
63
53
48
13:15
50
55
59
78
78
55
48
55
45
13:30
60
57
64
74
76
50
50
67
46
13:45
55
63
61
65
70
53
51
72
58

STA 9 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STA 9
PR 172 WEST OF PR 785
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008 2/7/2008 2/8/2008 2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008 2/13/2008 2/14/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
of Period
14:00
47
46
68
61
69
55
51
65
51
14:15
59
52
57
68
61
56
47
62
53
14:30
64
85
77
59
51
71
65
66
56
14:45
63
71
73
54
69
63
67
80
82
15:00
77
85
80
73
63
79
70
72
94
15:15
65
71
77
73
67
68
75
70
77
15:30
65
61
78
70
62
70
70
74
74
15:45
60
71
60
59
56
62
72
77
84
16:00
68
70
73
66
62
65
72
69
70
16:15
63
72
82
65
72
76
71
67
84
16:30
76
65
80
57
69
67
83
79
76
16:45
57
61
81
74
74
82
64
72
68
17:00
70
72
68
65
69
60
69
81
76
17:15
79
73
66
67
65
84
81
78
80
17:30
75
70
72
64
58
81
66
77
16
17:45
70
77
76
60
58
65
66
68
60
18:00
79
66
59
60
49
69
68
78
55
18:15
62
75
75
67
51
65
66
72
65
18:30
48
56
79
77
55
55
64
79
68
18:45
44
59
58
57
56
62
63
65
70
19:00
54
58
71
78
54
68
61
72
83
19:15
52
56
67
62
55
48
58
73
67
19:30
45
51
69
59
52
44
51
59
59
19:45
40
45
59
63
50
36
42
59
65
20:00
40
42
54
62
46
38
44
62
61
20:15
49
41
52
56
39
49
39
49
50
20:30
44
36
56
62
52
41
45
45
59
20:45
44
41
56
51
32
33
39
58
56
21:00
33
43
53
53
35
38
51
48
51
21:15
28
42
54
60
25
37
40
41
57
21:30
32
41
49
39
29
34
35
42
42
21:45
30
26
34
46
24
29
30
38
41
22:00
25
32
38
36
21
28
32
29
35
22:15
24
25
40
40
18
24
22
29
35
22:30
27
27
36
31
16
27
20
34
26
22:45
19
18
31
28
14
19
16
29
28
23:00
17
24
38
33
5
14
19
20
24
23:15
9
14
31
38
16
13
12
23
16
23:30
23
26
43
28
16
21
24
25
30
23:45
17
20
28
22
7
14
10
13
20
3591

3709

4156

3917

3197

3659

3727

4050

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008 2/7/2008 2/8/2008 2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008 2/13/2008 2/14/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
of Period
14:00
54
52
69
68
71
57
52
62
44
14:15
65
59
66
70
70
57
50
66
57
14:30
59
68
74
64
66
61
57
64
55
14:45
61
66
76
49
64
62
62
77
66
15:00
69
76
84
54
62
66
60
76
67
15:15
69
80
65
62
65
68
80
74
64
15:30
58
67
53
77
61
59
64
72
78
15:45
61
70
68
68
55
66
65
73
75
16:00
70
61
71
64
58
64
65
76
71
16:15
66
70
61
61
65
65
59
75
62
16:30
73
67
77
62
56
67
76
78
49
16:45
68
67
68
72
57
81
68
82
59
17:00
77
73
69
72
57
75
70
80
64
17:15
81
82
76
62
53
71
82
74
74
17:30
71
72
74
60
58
66
71
76
52
17:45
67
79
76
72
56
65
71
64
44
18:00
75
64
66
63
47
68
68
66
48
18:15
60
62
73
58
56
68
72
77
48
18:30
50
57
76
73
55
60
56
65
62
18:45
52
64
63
57
52
58
68
76
60
19:00
52
56
65
54
55
66
66
70
68
19:15
52
55
64
62
54
48
64
72
57
19:30
38
47
62
61
52
47
45
59
47
19:45
32
43
54
55
48
42
37
56
46
20:00
34
38
60
54
39
33
41
50
46
20:15
41
41
52
56
38
43
38
46
43
20:30
26
40
49
57
45
35
38
43
43
20:45
35
40
59
50
30
37
36
43
43
21:00
26
43
49
43
31
35
42
42
42
21:15
31
37
50
49
26
34
33
36
33
21:30
20
34
38
35
29
27
28
31
34
21:45
21
29
35
43
23
25
26
31
35
22:00
21
29
36
33
19
24
28
30
32
22:15
16
23
36
31
18
24
18
28
21
22:30
14
24
32
30
12
20
18
26
21
22:45
11
20
27
27
10
12
13
21
21
23:00
6
19
25
32
6
7
13
16
16
23:15
6
10
26
31
10
9
7
14
9
23:30
9
11
24
24
6
8
10
10
19
23:45
6
13
18
21
5
8
8
7
14

4059

Resumen de Datos

A-26

Average Eastbound
Average Westbound

3785

ADT

7527

3742

PERCENT OF ADT
50.29%
49.71%

STA 9 / ATC_ALL_Stations

3645

3543

4116

3969

3133

3698

3765

4114

3698

STATION 10
PR 172 NORTH OF PR 787
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
45
20
22
20
23
21
40
0:15
49
18
12
20
24
26
58
0:30
40
17
10
11
23
22
32
0:45
41
9
6
12
8
13
35
1:00
25
10
6
13
9
17
37
1:15
42
9
8
7
12
4
29
1:30
59
12
10
7
8
12
44
1:45
43
6
6
4
6
10
39
2:00
23
6
9
4
7
12
25
2:15
26
4
3
4
6
1
27
2:30
27
4
10
5
7
4
18
2:45
31
7
5
5
4
5
26
3:00
10
6
3
5
7
8
24
3:15
17
5
3
6
4
11
14
3:30
14
9
9
8
10
6
19
3:45
19
8
12
12
7
7
13
4:00
13
7
12
8
6
11
11
4:15
9
8
8
5
3
16
18
4:30
13
21
27
17
20
21
14
4:45
16
26
32
28
31
21
10
5:00
14
25
33
24
28
24
16
5:15
12
32
43
47
45
35
14
5:30
20
47
41
55
45
46
26
5:45
16
35
62
54
63
60
19
6:00
30
67
67
81
71
57
40
6:15
13
91
75
91
90
87
31
6:30
17
60
70
79
70
100
49
6:45
20
87
27
62
65
110
81
7:00
26
118
62
40
64
132
55
7:15
20
119
36
37
108
101
64
7:30
35
77
48
44
72
64
102
7:45
36
79
34
22
71
76
80
8:00
37
81
25
35
29
79
95
8:15
43
100
39
94
27
64
95
8:30
33
99
76
124
37
34
116
8:45
63
103
84
86
65
79
97
9:00
86
106
79
120
105
84
129
9:15
146
127
99
106
112
90
95
9:30
171
119
105
88
110
90
62
9:45
133
105
71
83
106
101
72
10:00
159
96
86
111
121
109
113

A-27

STA 10 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAGUAS
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
44
27
36
28
20
34
19
6
16
12
8
8
19
16
10
7
0
10
12
4
10
14
16
14
10
16
19
18
18
35
19
27
32
27
24
15
22
74
79
36
71

8
16
7
7
8
4
6
11
0
6
0
3
6
24
20
20
16
30
30
58
74
96
127
149
90
67
83
39
42
64
86
153
123
66
86
31
72
52
46
42
84

7
4
7
12
-2
4
2
3
2
7
2
4
6
22
28
20
19
31
35
66
74
104
124
128
82
67
82
103
68
106
107
107
145
122
98
78
68
58
63
90
86

3
0
4
2
14
11
6
0
3
0
4
3
6
16
32
24
23
27
43
51
99
87
149
131
88
71
59
72
106
83
128
116
161
102
38
60
42
47
46
58
59

10
4
2
3
7
8
0
3
2
4
7
3
4
22
31
30
24
20
51
64
78
115
137
152
108
87
95
50
72
76
116
127
135
137
122
104
90
80
52
46
36

6
3
4
4
3
7
3
3
3
11
7
10
8
11
31
27
24
14
55
58
74
128
102
147
87
71
54
62
79
59
122
127
108
104
135
76
64
36
44
51
28

35
24
32
24
24
18
23
7
12
18
24
12
19
19
27
22
11
11
22
27
20
40
36
42
28
52
42
68
52
62
34
80
72
91
79
86
40
50
60
55
40

STATION 10
PR 172 NORTH OF PR 787
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
10:15
119
118
87
99
102
113
86
10:30
131
116
81
100
90
76
78
10:45
120
106
97
100
97
121
43
11:00
115
45
98
124
107
118
47
11:15
96
52
101
104
116
62
38
11:30
112
89
96
135
147
38
46
11:45
132
69
102
114
114
22
52
12:00
126
74
112
120
117
16
28
12:15
119
102
104
110
127
15
56
12:30
139
138
126
117
128
11
57
12:45
126
118
110
65
102
20
39
13:00
138
111
128
111
78
31
51
13:15
103
125
108
86
100
35
103
13:30
124
112
107
105
123
26
86
13:45
131
145
124
151
100
22
82
14:00
92
111
95
106
127
17
66
14:15
109
88
111
126
141
7
60
14:30
120
62
106
148
95
26
128
14:45
81
96
47
118
54
31
115
15:00
134
102
69
98
55
62
113
15:15
114
86
155
125
24
47
141
15:30
106
75
131
132
84
93
117
15:45
120
129
98
105
31
109
98
16:00
108
143
99
128
38
103
131
16:15
118
129
102
85
61
94
121
16:30
121
126
130
130
43
108
116
16:45
102
119
95
107
86
75
134
17:00
93
134
135
146
132
120
110
17:15
116
108
109
102
104
93
102
17:30
115
101
116
124
117
88
115
17:45
111
119
92
96
97
89
100
18:00
103
114
95
99
99
104
106
18:15
94
103
106
92
43
105
102
18:30
90
116
95
93
106
110
54
18:45
88
112
89
96
56
105
37
19:00
113
121
79
78
41
99
33
19:15
81
96
94
45
68
113
36
19:30
95
82
82
86
69
103
62
19:45
89
75
89
78
78
105
73
20:00
80
82
64
82
72
77
86
20:15
84
66
66
83
77
78
84

A-28

STA 10 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAGUAS
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
23
39
27
27
51
31
15
18
48
46
88
66
100
74
55
63
58
31
71
64
86
100
83
78
72
87
108
116
84
91
71
71
104
104
96
83
95
90
92
87
74

59
52
18
74
55
51
64
82
47
42
48
91
58
63
46
48
66
83
50
42
66
114
95
66
60
90
42
64
104
91
92
79
95
51
98
42
71
59
64
59
75

86
63
51
50
72
80
78
50
76
39
70
46
62
54
-2
32
42
52
79
95
39
62
84
78
111
111
94
91
72
90
83
88
98
72
82
62
64
51
23
55
59

62
60
72
48
55
26
59
50
70
59
66
63
46
71
23
63
16
51
39
70
55
54
40
75
160
59
110
47
84
114
96
88
56
72
47
58
63
39
76
56
76

62
82
87
50
59
55
102
55
60
67
74
68
39
54
19
44
31
40
52
70
96
60
35
83
87
103
78
74
68
54
78
52
91
67
40
71
95
86
63
56
39

32
59
23
2
40
92
68
68
75
86
48
76
66
62
64
74
84
55
59
44
108
82
128
86
107
84
66
58
126
111
71
84
68
75
82
75
71
83
47
74
60

74
87
72
78
72
98
82
104
103
153
133
92
71
106
70
72
59
83
80
60
43
95
87
47
111
74
78
95
86
88
143
119
130
112
103
123
124
83
103
96
66

STATION 10
PR 172 NORTH OF PR 787
HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
20:30
75
72
80
74
63
88
76
20:45
83
66
59
60
63
71
67
21:00
62
71
68
79
67
92
71
21:15
56
68
70
59
55
84
89
21:30
66
58
68
66
60
77
63
21:45
44
71
52
71
72
71
80
22:00
40
60
67
63
62
59
63
22:15
45
58
47
63
70
74
65
22:30
28
49
45
55
61
68
55
22:45
34
34
31
39
48
64
48
23:00
27
44
48
44
43
61
55
23:15
28
24
30
35
35
61
41
23:30
27
22
27
31
34
50
47
23:45
19
19
29
20
18
43
56
6834

6916

6326

6792

6126

5720

6192

Resumen de Datos
Average Southbound
Average Northbound
ADT

A-29

6415
5494

PERCENT OF ADT
53.87%
46.13%

11909

STA 10 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAGUAS
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
66
54
51
75
62
66
28
63
18
28
40
3
11
20

34
66
43
50
55
30
32
22
10
8
3
12
20
11

51
24
54
74
38
54
11
27
10
0
10
10
12
12

56
60
42
50
52
16
54
23
30
28
20
12
22
24

31
42
72
51
40
39
38
20
30
15
15
16
10
24

60
88
63
51
64
47
83
58
67
31
48
26
40
27

75
118
82
51
83
66
60
54
84
56
80
51
20
66

4384

5064

5370

5157

5403

5726

6241

STA # 11
PR 172 West of Street Num.2 in Caguas
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
0:00
14
48
81
113
118
56
47
0:15
26
48
94
110
133
38
38
0:30
15
46
56
70
92
41
28
0:45
14
24
54
73
99
29
12
1:00
6
19
59
90
101
23
12
1:15
8
19
27
74
84
32
21
1:30
5
30
27
72
106
22
24
1:45
15
18
34
84
114
6
16
2:00
3
18
32
74
110
30
14
2:15
11
13
4
57
107
11
5
2:30
11
13
15
36
100
31
21
2:45
14
16
9
45
74
18
12
3:00
8
13
18
48
30
10
6
3:15
7
6
19
34
53
8
4
3:30
6
12
10
34
61
14
10
3:45
14
11
13
30
69
17
21
4:00
10
12
21
36
66
20
18
4:15
9
10
46
38
30
23
15
4:30
23
29
31
24
29
43
49
4:45
42
43
32
18
37
41
40
5:00
24
49
41
31
30
42
56
5:15
73
69
51
20
27
64
74
5:30
76
84
102
45
32
89
76
5:45
91
100
89
37
37
65
106
6:00
132
136
154
69
42
158
191
6:15
164
196
200
52
36
208
177
6:30
148
163
250
80
42
166
196
6:45
124
240
288
102
48
281
90
7:00
88
232
335
97
52
362
251
7:15
102
340
356
120
36
359
140
7:30
76
206
190
211
73
240
175
7:45
35
178
188
159
68
172
121
8:00
30
94
201
206
101
181
74
8:15
100
82
178
181
96
262
107
8:30
151
94
88
215
106
221
189
8:45
135
185
201
197
147
294
221
9:00
179
206
230
258
157
210
217
9:15
140
210
270
240
167
284
207
9:30
141
285
264
187
148
254
218
9:45
116
272
241
214
189
278
162
10:00
115
274
344
297
175
205
187
10:15
133
246
269
210
255
238
163
10:30
113
208
210
198
233
255
183
10:45
102
180
306
155
249
294
225

A-30

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
0:00
2
20
22
98
114
22
14
0:15
0
8
10
45
73
32
12
0:30
5
3
10
69
81
16
18
0:45
2
9
16
49
66
21
23
1:00
6
14
10
57
80
18
12
1:15
12
12
46
45
68
13
10
1:30
4
0
6
37
33
10
4
1:45
0
8
10
14
15
10
8
2:00
2
5
7
35
76
0
2
2:15
0
8
38
38
49
15
11
2:30
8
12
25
48
29
0
4
2:45
7
12
17
20
19
7
9
3:00
8
6
17
38
57
9
11
3:15
18
29
19
44
49
38
26
3:30
23
34
50
48
42
29
31
3:45
28
44
47
50
25
41
35
4:00
28
48
44
35
0
45
27
4:15
46
66
39
22
33
82
55
4:30
58
73
78
36
25
60
63
4:45
74
88
88
45
9
90
80
5:00
99
135
123
38
21
124
125
5:15
135
174
183
55
30
192
178
5:30
204
252
226
60
24
240
226
5:45
219
238
218
79
32
275
216
6:00
142
206
233
48
14
211
233
6:15
127
188
162
86
43
152
157
6:30
109
219
135
68
46
228
229
6:45
144
184
162
84
43
125
341
7:00
230
260
199
90
36
128
275
7:15
227
239
207
116
63
193
410
7:30
218
330
361
70
39
266
390
7:45
181
317
312
159
50
333
378
8:00
134
435
274
156
87
273
423
8:15
108
415
288
173
59
172
334
8:30
45
308
348
145
77
191
243
8:45
93
295
192
174
34
88
205
9:00
62
176
175
80
40
141
185
9:15
62
150
107
126
84
115
120
9:30
73
134
129
180
68
97
130
9:45
81
118
121
163
50
110
204
10:00
60
81
88
105
77
179
187
10:15
83
148
76
180
49
119
161
10:30
67
189
163
220
69
114
142
10:45
73
160
57
258
56
49
118

STA 11 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STA # 11
PR 172 West of Street Num.2 in Caguas
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
11:00
142
266
397
158
230
139
226
11:15
131
246
251
150
183
189
235
11:30
161
253
117
141
229
247
189
11:45
138
200
88
162
275
183
198
12:00
135
243
82
95
313
191
267
12:15
110
265
63
175
321
284
221
12:30
117
249
49
129
290
302
307
12:45
105
221
125
101
249
274
242
13:00
119
207
118
171
281
229
279
13:15
134
295
151
286
206
256
241
13:30
108
287
128
217
248
279
235
13:45
164
358
115
225
288
323
417
14:00
127
317
93
218
244
301
320
14:15
271
371
39
235
264
275
329
14:30
354
363
163
294
307
199
317
14:45
354
258
166
253
208
319
177
15:00
249
207
292
297
255
356
188
15:15
332
101
152
357
226
272
386
15:30
325
297
250
247
188
193
313
15:45
318
243
228
245
215
270
241
16:00
285
152
255
323
208
313
277
16:15
155
205
231
241
218
313
214
16:30
295
143
250
242
189
273
243
16:45
228
264
224
260
184
346
228
17:00
348
281
324
213
169
317
260
17:15
238
303
220
212
223
242
292
17:30
242
332
205
249
205
243
269
17:45
215
275
236
179
198
270
239
18:00
211
309
266
206
228
269
238
18:15
263
125
267
190
189
210
226
18:30
230
262
266
149
182
245
220
18:45
253
248
269
115
195
221
215
19:00
198
155
271
87
214
280
227
19:15
165
173
281
94
180
199
217
19:30
231
166
260
154
168
185
218
19:45
169
178
264
168
163
155
249
20:00
168
166
200
160
139
161
130
20:15
168
188
222
196
162
131
160
20:30
160
205
198
166
155
179
172
20:45
140
158
153
119
169
125
172
21:00
186
135
202
156
157
164
165
21:15
140
154
195
199
124
161
152
21:30
151
196
167
146
120
131
199
21:45
197
168
185
156
82
151
131

A-31

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
11:00
54
123
6
262
53
226
114
11:15
68
124
161
282
97
198
167
11:30
30
94
280
299
63
141
157
11:45
71
178
268
255
31
169
151
12:00
55
113
344
350
44
211
119
12:15
70
124
315
321
129
130
161
12:30
59
130
375
343
95
91
94
12:45
105
160
298
344
173
111
153
13:00
66
179
286
307
133
187
99
13:15
71
114
283
197
199
118
138
13:30
73
126
305
267
148
156
118
13:45
24
68
332
191
120
102
-6
14:00
74
109
401
236
167
129
107
14:15
34
81
463
230
139
205
124
14:30
121
152
344
189
79
266
155
14:45
116
248
315
175
181
165
296
15:00
177
263
206
157
121
146
257
15:15
145
402
346
108
170
208
96
15:30
132
211
220
199
177
292
147
15:45
121
274
266
217
148
198
205
16:00
166
330
212
115
150
144
218
16:15
291
290
262
220
132
145
232
16:30
133
340
193
154
135
194
207
16:45
233
238
196
150
194
121
225
17:00
112
156
156
183
210
150
174
17:15
195
198
297
178
160
233
192
17:30
221
153
258
190
162
218
208
17:45
215
221
188
255
126
208
215
18:00
187
162
214
230
156
185
220
18:15
159
262
172
241
208
192
208
18:30
178
164
180
309
210
107
166
18:45
123
177
209
318
211
193
197
19:00
147
266
205
323
156
96
177
19:15
229
240
175
321
209
147
147
19:30
104
206
209
204
159
132
134
19:45
163
143
118
237
168
131
64
20:00
114
128
191
178
150
115
111
20:15
153
95
170
154
142
148
143
20:30
121
100
135
163
135
84
109
20:45
140
105
189
209
109
125
69
21:00
98
144
137
180
128
98
130
21:15
118
142
118
113
164
118
159
21:30
118
130
138
191
111
123
110
21:45
44
90
122
127
122
63
135

STA 11 / ATC_ALL_Stations

STA # 11
PR 172 West of Street Num.2 in Caguas
EASTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
22:00
118
158
121
153
91
146
204
22:15
167
213
158
164
75
144
128
22:30
132
147
126
101
106
153
158
22:45
97
136
175
119
73
95
170
23:00
96
116
112
112
50
123
109
23:15
91
86
134
112
107
75
81
23:30
54
89
105
157
69
39
78
23:45
42
42
110
113
36
52
71
12576

15952

15447

14308

14007

16887

WESTBOUND
Date
2/6/2008
2/7/2008
2/8/2008
2/9/2008 2/10/2008 2/11/2008 2/12/2008
Beginning Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
of Period
22:00
100
96
170
145
63
77
33
22:15
60
60
123
136
103
54
73
22:30
71
71
123
152
67
31
34
22:45
69
42
84
137
59
22
0
23:00
43
40
88
162
73
8
22
23:15
30
38
56
138
11
37
26
23:30
38
26
84
66
27
35
34
23:45
50
55
69
133
37
30
28

15659

Resumen de Datos

A-32

PERCENT OF ADT
54.37%
12571
45.63%

Average Eastbound
Average Westbound

14977

ADT

27548

STA 11 / ATC_ALL_Stations

9196

14031

16193

14727

8848

11886

13117

STATION # 12
PR 1 NORTH OF PR 787

SOUTHBOUND
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
28
8
3
5
3
6
21
0:15
44
6
4
3
10
6
15
0:30
30
6
3
2
5
6
15
0:45
30
4
3
4
9
3
20
1:00
21
1
3
3
3
4
16
1:15
19
5
3
5
3
9
10
1:30
23
1
3
2
3
3
10
1:45
24
2
3
3
4
3
15
2:00
18
3
2
4
0
6
8
2:15
22
3
2
2
0
5
9
2:30
10
5
2
3
0
2
10
2:45
21
2
0
1
0
3
5
3:00
9
3
2
2
3
3
8
3:15
13
6
1
6
2
4
9
3:30
10
5
7
7
7
6
4
3:45
10
6
5
6
5
10
12
4:00
3
4
3
10
2
9
8
4:15
10
9
7
8
12
15
5
4:30
11
19
18
12
15
20
15
4:45
12
10
16
18
21
18
8
5:00
9
23
12
17
19
23
15
5:15
12
22
21
20
31
25
11
5:30
12
40
28
32
36
38
15
5:45
21
33
24
44
38
37
12
6:00
13
29
19
37
42
42
20
6:15
23
43
30
63
54
51
24
6:30
37
61
43
68
65
65
24
6:45
24
69
56
80
78
69
24
7:00
25
76
42
90
84
81
34
7:15
31
60
41
78
81
65
54
7:30
50
68
48
87
90
93
52
7:45
66
80
65
78
95
78
45
8:00
90
74
77
83
93
94
60
8:15
106
74
67
72
63
86
57
8:30
92
59
60
66
58
63
72
8:45
102
47
50
47
71
51
75
9:00
100
52
43
69
57
73
85
9:15
117
62
45
51
52
46
71
9:30
174
40
54
69
46
63
63
9:45
135
46
51
60
48
66
86

A-33

STA 12 / ATC_ALL_Stations

NORTHBOUND
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
8
9
8
8
9
4
7
4
6
4
5
3
4
5
7
3
5
6
6
7
4
3
3
8
9
11
15
17
19
23
25
16
15
22
25
30
23
18
16
15

4
3
3
5
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
3
6
6
10
9
12
12
16
20
22
35
27
28
42
27
39
32
23
21
28
23
24
18

4
3
3
8
3
2
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
2
2
3
3
6
7
12
12
13
14
18
27
31
30
47
38
42
66
36
57
40
30
30
43
24
41
27

3
2
2
6
3
2
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
2
2
3
6
4
6
13
10
12
13
22
27
39
33
54
43
48
71
36
57
42
34
27
49
25
54
30

3
6
3
13
3
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
6
7
15
12
18
15
19
30
33
31
52
41
51
74
43
65
36
30
41
42
26
36
24

4
3
5
5
4
3
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
1
2
4
5
7
9
13
13
14
15
18
31
32
31
46
39
41
76
36
66
49
33
30
53
23
50
33

13
8
10
30
16
3
0
8
0
3
3
3
0
2
1
4
4
3
7
6
9
6
6
6
15
15
12
17
17
33
42
21
42
33
37
44
61
35
50
43

STATION # 12
PR 1 NORTH OF PR 787

SOUTHBOUND
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
10:00
68
47
46
58
63
52
79
10:15
95
44
67
75
66
57
74
10:30
81
50
42
67
65
54
70
10:45
72
49
64
58
60
69
75
11:00
85
56
53
46
66
56
71
11:15
59
55
55
66
70
75
92
11:30
70
61
59
60
64
77
68
11:45
61
46
55
65
51
64
74
12:00
48
68
60
52
75
84
75
12:15
78
56
62
58
59
71
81
12:30
104
66
60
60
77
66
98
12:45
145
45
69
68
69
82
100
13:00
75
62
60
66
63
81
108
13:15
89
60
69
65
84
78
87
13:30
69
54
76
74
78
71
102
13:45
63
61
78
81
74
86
81
14:00
64
73
75
80
113
101
96
14:15
77
75
83
82
72
91
92
14:30
52
73
86
90
91
80
96
14:45
49
82
74
111
78
97
71
15:00
62
83
103
121
90
107
92
15:15
72
75
93
120
81
94
88
15:30
65
73
96
101
73
89
101
15:45
64
86
99
148
95
103
84
16:00
65
71
81
102
79
93
81
16:15
66
76
93
93
94
90
82
16:30
56
83
94
99
93
97
89
16:45
60
87
78
87
72
124
82
17:00
52
106
108
80
113
112
96
17:15
59
106
96
93
114
99
87
17:30
71
110
87
107
99
80
106
17:45
50
115
63
96
111
99
103
18:00
64
100
90
84
107
84
97
18:15
62
109
72
88
110
96
78
18:30
59
133
87
65
86
87
91
18:45
50
119
83
100
76
96
86
19:00
59
73
64
92
65
84
75
19:15
47
53
66
80
72
82
96
19:30
59
39
60
58
60
103
69
19:45
60
43
50
35
46
72
64

A-34

STA 12 / ATC_ALL_Stations

NORTHBOUND
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
33
48
42
54
41
27
43
24
33
45
31
42
36
42
29
37
39
39
50
36
44
41
42
36
48
41
40
39
37
53
45
52
33
35
40
20
24
27
41
31

22
21
30
25
23
32
30
23
26
39
27
24
31
21
25
25
31
31
27
35
55
42
46
45
41
32
34
31
44
41
40
24
37
36
49
47
25
29
23
36

33
36
45
39
29
49
41
36
33
54
34
45
43
33
41
39
50
42
39
50
84
66
67
72
63
47
48
42
54
50
45
28
44
41
42
48
34
50
49
51

36
47
53
39
25
51
40
43
27
54
32
47
45
31
45
45
45
45
44
63
107
90
84
104
78
52
54
42
44
48
52
27
42
39
33
53
42
57
45
39

39
41
51
41
36
54
42
33
38
55
42
48
42
40
48
41
64
39
45
44
80
61
62
66
60
53
51
34
63
58
48
31
53
48
42
40
30
52
46
51

33
36
43
47
30
57
51
42
42
66
36
57
54
37
44
47
57
51
39
55
94
71
75
72
71
51
53
59
62
51
39
28
42
42
43
51
39
60
80
78

49
46
55
51
39
71
45
48
38
76
52
69
72
41
63
44
54
51
47
40
81
66
84
60
62
46
48
39
54
45
51
30
48
34
45
45
34
69
54
70

STATION # 12
PR 1 NORTH OF PR 787

SOUTHBOUND
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
20:00
42
27
42
36
37
63
57
20:15
46
27
34
64
59
58
64
20:30
35
33
45
40
56
60
63
20:45
37
36
48
48
50
50
66
21:00
40
37
48
49
36
65
65
21:15
28
36
62
55
46
74
61
21:30
29
29
36
44
25
45
48
21:45
18
15
36
21
32
42
51
22:00
32
26
33
18
35
39
38
22:15
25
13
29
19
21
37
37
22:30
15
18
16
25
39
36
26
22:45
15
9
9
21
22
28
42
23:00
12
5
15
13
16
27
31
23:15
5
6
11
13
9
27
29
23:30
10
4
12
13
20
30
24
23:45
9
4
5
19
11
28
39
4711

4414

4403

5046

4996

5442

5300

Resumen de Datos
Average Southbound
Average Northbound
ADT

A-35

4902
3030

PERCENT OF ADT
61.80%
38.20%

7932

STA 12 / ATC_ALL_Stations

NORTHBOUND
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
33
23
30
22
21
22
17
12
14
9
8
11
11
6
6
3

24
12
21
21
24
14
13
9
18
6
14
3
6
5
7
3

45
29
38
35
38
26
21
21
25
12
29
9
24
14
37
9

2223

2015

2977

41
36
33
37
42
28
26
16
17
11
25
10
21
13
30
12
0
3172

43
33
46
39
30
24
15
24
31
12
39
10
26
9
45
7

73
33
50
39
55
37
27
32
35
21
36
13
42
27
66
16

66
36
51
51
55
31
28
38
34
21
26
19
50
29
54
23

3130

3488

3396

STA 13
PR 787 WEST OF PR 1

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
0:00
2
4
1
0
2
2
5
0:15
4
1
1
3
1
2
2
0:30
5
2
5
1
2
2
4
0:45
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1:00
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
1:15
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
1:30
4
0
0
1
1
1
4
1:45
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
2:00
3
0
0
0
1
1
3
2:15
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
2:30
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
2:45
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
3:00
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
3:15
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
3:30
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
3:45
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
4:00
5
1
0
2
1
2
2
4:15
4
4
3
1
2
3
3
4:30
2
5
5
0
4
3
7
4:45
1
2
8
1
2
2
2
5:00
2
6
7
3
7
6
4
5:15
5
7
15
10
12
10
4
5:30
7
15
18
13
13
14
6
5:45
8
15
16
19
8
14
3
6:00
9
20
20
21
17
20
4
6:15
5
37
27
33
27
33
13
6:30
20
37
27
36
30
35
14
6:45
21
35
38
42
42
40
14
7:00
22
40
46
49
35
42
11
7:15
23
52
32
49
39
47
19
7:30
25
56
55
52
32
47
15
7:45
20
45
37
42
35
41
17
8:00
22
35
31
34
43
38
22
8:15
19
38
40
27
26
31
18
8:30
33
41
23
26
30
33
15
8:45
34
30
29
24
28
28
13
9:00
30
32
19
19
19
24
10
9:15
33
26
21
26
33
29
20
9:30
30
23
19
30
32
29
21
9:45
35
16
25
30
40
29
46

A-36

STA 13 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
23
16
15
19
9
14
5
0
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
2
4
2
3
0
2
16
25
30
30
30
34
42
37
27
35
18
25
19
7
5
6
33
25

15
11
9
9
5
1
4
4
5
1
0
3
5
2
8
6
5
17
32
31
44
41
49
52
46
48
69
114
125
78
46
41
55
45
13
31
36
31
24
41

12
2
3
7
5
1
5
4
4
3
2
0
5
7
7
9
5
11
31
26
36
36
58
65
56
51
78
107
99
105
51
81
75
42
60
20
33
29
37
13

7
9
7
5
4
-1
3
3
5
5
1
4
2
6
6
7
9
15
42
43
36
27
66
56
57
53
68
120
108
76
79
53
83
73
28
34
39
33
30
47

11
14
9
6
0
3
1
5
8
1
3
2
4
4
10
8
8
16
36
32
35
48
54
71
60
68
73
119
133
83
98
75
59
60
57
29
43
33
31
39

11
7
7
6
5
1
4
3
4
3
1
3
3
5
7
7
6
14
36
35
38
36
59
61
54
50
70
112
114
84
66
59
67
58
31
28
36
27
26
29

5
3
5
6
5
15
3
13
10
11
14
5
4
4
3
8
6
9
12
8
6
9
23
21
13
32
32
38
38
39
46
34
28
40
26
13
22
19
19
44

STA 13
PR 787 WEST OF PR 1

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
10:00
35
29
18
26
29
28
41
10:15
37
20
19
23
32
25
37
10:30
24
24
20
20
30
25
29
10:45
34
38
25
27
30
32
47
11:00
32
27
32
27
33
29
40
11:15
29
38
30
29
35
34
34
11:30
45
40
26
30
31
34
39
11:45
39
39
35
30
25
32
31
12:00
36
39
35
39
41
40
44
12:15
37
54
30
37
32
41
34
12:30
50
44
33
37
41
41
54
12:45
70
38
32
35
38
37
45
13:00
52
41
31
36
33
37
55
13:15
55
52
35
27
26
35
31
13:30
56
46
35
40
39
42
44
13:45
42
30
43
43
35
36
50
14:00
46
33
39
44
36
38
29
14:15
65
58
44
41
44
48
34
14:30
47
39
50
42
35
39
21
14:45
50
47
55
43
41
44
24
15:00
56
68
72
54
52
58
35
15:15
67
70
70
75
76
74
49
15:30
41
65
79
65
72
68
40
15:45
39
58
55
70
77
69
37
16:00
75
69
58
71
76
72
33
16:15
49
54
59
63
64
61
29
16:30
51
52
90
72
66
64
36
16:45
48
57
50
74
74
69
35
17:00
55
88
64
74
74
79
41
17:15
60
81
90
84
78
81
35
17:30
32
79
60
99
79
86
30
17:45
48
73
75
64
78
72
34
18:00
37
49
63
50
73
58
37
18:15
39
50
53
65
74
63
22
18:30
61
63
55
40
75
60
28
18:45
49
76
44
45
75
66
29
19:00
47
68
35
58
71
66
20
19:15
34
37
36
41
48
42
16
19:30
38
37
35
34
15
29
7
19:45
44
43
29
28
19
30
8

A-37

STA 13 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
31
36
42
32
29
55
34
29
49
14
26
4
24
22
16
32
17
12
24
20
29
10
52
33
14
29
44
33
18
16
64
32
45
35
17
20
21
41
30
30

27
33
37
12
22
10
20
24
17
7
29
37
12
1
22
32
40
19
28
31
23
15
5
21
23
38
36
30
37
37
33
31
30
32
33
33
33
26
16
6

28
26
36
21
28
28
30
20
24
36
50
23
24
26
20
30
22
20
23
12
4
22
-3
22
20
27
8
20
37
6
16
5
22
29
20
34
26
36
27
24

28
26
35
36
26
29
27
36
33
18
27
28
27
29
25
18
33
37
23
37
32
5
21
17
20
10
13
28
32
11
-9
29
29
12
49
39
37
41
21
12

35
41
54
43
53
47
48
40
30
30
30
25
23
40
22
39
30
39
40
32
39
33
34
39
50
33
33
26
35
29
38
15
39
50
13
23
29
18
10
15

24
24
33
21
25
21
24
30
15
20
33
28
20
22
21
30
33
25
30
31
27
12
10
12
15
23
27
18
22
12
15
10
23
8
24
15
8
31
28
18

50
46
52
20
24
22
20
24
23
20
25
21
29
22
30
13
18
18
21
20
22
20
26
21
23
23
21
20
24
20
14
6
19
15
5
2
7
2
4
2

STA 13
PR 787 WEST OF PR 1

HACIA CIDRA
Date
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Beginning Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
of Period
20:00
33
31
30
22
24
26
17
20:15
28
31
31
23
11
22
4
20:30
37
32
30
24
5
21
2
20:45
31
24
27
28
9
21
3
21:00
23
25
31
32
3
20
2
21:15
23
23
31
29
5
19
3
21:30
19
22
33
22
4
16
3
21:45
10
15
26
24
1
14
1
22:00
12
19
21
23
2
15
2
22:15
11
10
17
19
0
10
0
22:30
13
11
12
12
6
10
3
22:45
6
15
7
9
4
10
3
23:00
6
7
6
3
0
4
0
23:15
10
2
3
11
1
5
1
23:30
1
5
5
6
1
4
1
23:45
7
3
3
8
0
4
0
2580

2922

2723

2796

2646

2824

1735

Resumen de Datos
Average Westbound
Average Eastbound
ADT

A-38

2604
2434

PERCENT OF ADT
51.69%
48.31%

5038

STA 13 / ATC_ALL_Stations

HACIA CAYEY
1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008
2/1/2008
2/2/2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
21
37
22
21
19
27
23
25
33
26
14
22
22
17
24
16

19
37
16
24
40
14
5
13
21
17
14
10
10
16
12
10

14
21
25
17
20
18
3
8
6
14
23
14
9
11
14
7

33
22
24
18
20
12
20
6
10
16
25
19
8
11
17
4

14
18
22
22
36
33
34
20
5
2
4
9
10
5
5
0

24
23
30
25
36
24
19
17
19
21
23
15
11
13
16
8

3
5
5
6
5
4
2
3
5
2
4
2
2
1
2
2

2098

2478

2434

2640

3030

2465

1558

STA 14
PR 1 Between PR-185 and PR-787
WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
0:00
39
36
61
70
20
21
29
0:15
27
24
50
73
13
14
17
0:30
15
24
45
61
20
7
15
0:45
7
21
24
39
9
9
5
1:00
12
25
28
42
7
5
17
1:15
12
23
20
28
8
3
4
1:30
3
10
19
23
3
4
5
1:45
8
11
20
37
0
1
3
2:00
6
8
23
27
5
3
5
2:15
7
13
21
47
2
5
2
2:30
5
6
10
13
1
4
5
2:45
6
12
6
8
2
3
2
3:00
5
3
12
9
6
5
3
3:15
6
5
6
7
4
2
4
3:30
7
7
11
17
7
4
7
3:45
13
6
12
15
10
8
14
4:00
9
7
5
5
8
3
6
4:15
13
8
9
9
11
14
10
4:30
17
16
9
6
23
28
19
4:45
24
29
13
4
34
29
29
5:00
39
38
9
9
31
43
44
5:15
57
35
12
12
55
57
46
5:30
51
54
29
14
60
65
64
5:45
66
60
31
21
83
74
68
6:00
78
87
29
19
79
92
82
6:15
96
107
39
22
106
85
126
6:30
119
168
48
22
125
119
126
6:45
149
194
54
33
125
165
179
7:00
181
229
59
21
186
188
188
7:15
216
270
67
30
229
209
238
7:30
202
215
88
24
167
203
221
7:45
139
216
88
29
161
208
211
8:00
188
193
95
44
171
183
168
8:15
169
210
137
39
151
162
212
8:30
146
180
111
46
157
166
203
8:45
174
188
157
66
161
160
181
9:00
135
170
156
70
162
185
157
9:15
128
163
106
45
145
154
166
9:30
158
134
129
81
139
166
155
9:45
157
151
168
102
149
152
161
10:00
131
172
130
86
153
158
183

A-39

STA 14 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
21
23
12
14
12
13
11
11
6
5
7
6
7
7
9
12
12
11
16
29
31
33
84
79
75
69
91
158
161
185
195
173
122
144
124
139
103
121
108
122
114

20
29
21
24
18
21
10
12
8
4
6
10
2
8
8
9
9
9
26
27
26
35
68
77
92
73
98
116
173
241
187
164
135
176
152
130
133
113
107
140
129

31
35
38
24
20
21
20
27
16
12
22
12
14
17
10
17
7
21
16
17
16
19
39
42
42
40
52
66
73
67
80
99
80
115
118
116
116
108
101
120
113

20
40
52
41
38
23
38
37
17
18
31
37
5
3
34
26
13
6
8
8
11
13
50
25
30
17
32
20
41
25
21
20
45
89
42
42
69
47
32
36
42

14
15
20
11
6
7
2
6
0
3
6
5
6
3
6
10
12
16
24
27
23
38
65
76
80
75
103
134
165
163
204
162
140
139
143
115
92
87
119
113
135

14
10
3
5
10
3
2
4
6
3
5
5
4
6
4
6
5
7
23
20
29
37
66
93
87
74
117
176
136
205
190
196
153
122
140
126
121
141
131
124
119

18
18
13
10
19
8
11
3
9
2
7
5
17
5
5
8
5
12
19
25
19
38
82
94
83
82
93
155
149
187
233
238
149
157
167
155
121
139
149
107
133

STA 14
PR 1 Between PR-185 and PR-787
WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
10:15
152
138
171
91
141
181
190
10:30
156
172
185
93
167
160
173
10:45
123
174
212
138
167
143
170
11:00
168
183
175
100
177
143
214
11:15
150
152
177
88
137
177
186
11:30
147
144
173
72
145
137
185
11:45
171
200
203
112
158
162
196
12:00
197
171
189
90
193
206
212
12:15
193
218
179
85
175
175
212
12:30
202
172
235
179
174
208
199
12:45
188
170
177
145
169
191
206
13:00
183
204
214
178
147
179
206
13:15
188
168
193
160
192
199
192
13:30
181
188
188
111
142
182
184
13:45
179
158
158
83
153
172
175
14:00
182
203
196
134
209
160
163
14:15
206
215
164
80
190
187
168
14:30
212
227
196
114
205
222
197
14:45
221
185
162
74
196
212
248
15:00
236
200
193
118
209
218
241
15:15
264
213
201
139
221
258
259
15:30
269
247
155
95
201
240
207
15:45
225
223
187
126
209
214
251
16:00
202
214
206
111
207
231
219
16:15
193
226
188
141
188
197
194
16:30
194
215
187
108
209
225
243
16:45
208
237
160
87
187
183
236
17:00
218
232
192
139
240
269
234
17:15
233
258
154
105
210
247
268
17:30
192
216
159
116
199
214
223
17:45
152
207
140
80
161
205
218
18:00
193
218
182
87
198
200
206
18:15
199
198
154
109
188
212
166
18:30
190
167
170
120
167
184
188
18:45
148
195
158
103
156
199
176
19:00
149
186
152
99
165
175
183
19:15
121
178
179
113
160
172
166
19:30
115
155
154
135
148
188
139
19:45
114
163
126
125
152
146
129
20:00
91
145
121
90
109
155
126
20:15
94
145
126
81
101
113
119

A-40

STA 14 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
96
96
107
118
127
134
135
121
131
133
150
134
149
161
172
151
167
150
152
138
208
174
149
176
149
159
160
150
132
125
147
125
134
116
114
125
104
103
81
103
74

110
122
126
122
150
115
125
143
143
136
131
145
120
173
139
200
186
173
156
144
176
198
171
157
140
164
149
172
125
148
156
146
107
114
145
144
124
131
105
110
99

136
120
136
118
115
133
140
154
151
132
124
133
116
137
127
131
125
117
130
157
126
131
135
149
154
129
141
125
148
114
119
129
130
160
130
121
121
90
117
96
108

59
56
68
91
108
181
197
185
190
139
87
104
82
109
167
117
139
128
96
90
122
113
107
126
112
86
116
114
137
107
101
149
153
171
158
135
130
104
125
81
109

121
114
124
111
128
112
131
149
131
154
139
125
126
133
136
147
135
159
111
144
184
174
146
146
132
119
126
179
140
151
134
129
163
133
158
150
146
144
118
99
74

155
123
103
135
101
133
134
155
140
125
140
135
150
155
164
134
177
158
140
189
197
175
141
159
151
169
169
169
147
161
141
158
137
112
149
126
111
136
93
88
83

147
139
146
132
155
173
129
167
131
120
147
158
132
122
175
167
193
130
172
167
201
176
178
132
180
158
177
160
165
143
128
148
140
130
127
133
131
128
132
95
77

STA 14
PR 1 Between PR-185 and PR-787
WESTBOUND
Date
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Beginning
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
of Period
20:30
89
116
152
76
105
119
126
20:45
107
106
126
84
103
113
106
21:00
96
127
108
78
104
97
117
21:15
112
123
140
91
72
103
101
21:30
86
140
99
64
71
113
93
21:45
72
122
115
55
67
74
86
22:00
74
86
99
67
66
82
80
22:15
59
93
84
40
75
66
69
22:30
63
98
80
31
64
68
77
22:45
62
85
67
26
32
56
55
23:00
48
77
75
29
40
47
56
23:15
63
73
61
29
24
35
47
23:30
67
86
70
23
58
56
61
23:45
57
77
45
17
26
42
38
11474

12817

10658

6639

11117

Resumen de Datos
Weekly Data
Average westbound
Average eastbound
ADT

A-41

12078

11049
8817

12559

PERCENT OF ADT
55.62%
44.38%

19866

STA 14 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND
1/24/2008 1/25/2008 1/26/2008 1/27/2008 1/28/2008 1/29/2008 1/30/2008
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
66
85
70
70
61
64
62
54
35
35
38
26
32
35

92
92
98
89
87
71
74
63
77
72
55
61
42
43

104
88
72
74
93
73
60
59
54
50
49
37
63
31

98
74
88
52
93
80
69
39
47
42
25
30
30
12

73
69
62
61
65
55
48
55
32
33
30
18
28
18

102
84
72
85
69
95
108
66
33
27
44
31
20
23

71
83
78
79
75
71
64
62
41
31
49
27
41
35

8938

9702

8231

6972

8792

9405

9797

STATION 15
PR-184 between PR-1 and PR-52
WESTBOUND (DESDE PR 52)
Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
0:00
8
8
5
10
5
48
32
0:15
5
5
5
8
5
13
20
0:30
5
5
5
5
5
20
22
0:45
5
8
8
5
5
29
29
1:00
5
0
5
5
5
17
20
1:15
5
5
8
5
8
17
13
1:30
5
8
8
8
5
22
17
1:45
5
5
8
5
8
22
5
2:00
8
8
5
5
13
10
8
2:15
5
0
8
5
5
10
5
2:30
5
0
8
5
8
10
10
2:45
5
5
5
5
8
8
17
3:00
5
0
5
5
8
10
13
3:15
5
8
5
5
5
5
17
3:30
5
10
5
5
5
10
8
3:45
8
8
5
10
5
0
10
4:00
8
5
5
5
13
10
22
4:15
10
8
10
10
10
17
10
4:30
10
5
8
13
13
8
5
4:45
10
8
0
8
22
8
8
5:00
13
5
8
22
13
5
5
5:15
29
42
17
36
45
13
13
5:30
53
38
25
97
83
29
5
5:45
53
50
38
83
73
48
22
6:00
76
83
48
142
93
38
36
6:15
79
91
57
119
107
48
38
6:30
97
119
53
131
170
65
8
6:45
88
131
128
131
113
88
25
7:00
139
100
119
184
142
91
22
7:15
156
179
147
193
172
79
36
7:30
207
211
189
196
213
142
65
7:45
166
199
199
205
144
133
50
8:00
188
187
133
184
184
111
32
8:15
182
159
116
175
166
133
57
8:30
178
179
123
119
139
125
53
8:45
179
172
113
128
147
196
97
9:00
166
159
79
93
151
156
128
9:15
179
159
85
125
113
159
113
9:30
180
139
104
111
97
170
76
9:45
93
172
113
100
111
170
91
10:00
88
159
107
113
97
172
91
10:15
88
156
93
131
88
142
111
10:30
71
111
91
100
65
125
100
10:45
85
113
88
91
123
113
85
11:00
79
79
73
131
88
142
97

A-42

Sta 15 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND (HACIA PR 52)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
16
11
13
6
7
6
6
7
4
6
6
4
4
4
6
9
7
16
11
20
22
24
24
29
29
37
52
75
63
77
104
93
75
72
66
60
69
66
64
72
70
77
75
81
92

13
18
7
4
7
6
4
7
2
6
9
4
2
2
2
4
2
11
9
24
20
31
18
32
29
40
49
55
63
92
104
86
86
75
32
29
40
49
55
63
92
104
86
86
75

11
7
11
6
7
6
6
2
4
7
6
2
6
4
9
11
9
16
16
14
20
18
24
29
22
35
46
58
55
72
113
96
75
83
64
54
70
63
63
54
66
69
83
75
92

21
6
19
6
7
6
7
9
4
4
2
2
4
2
2
9
9
16
8
22
26
22
26
22
35
35
55
107
69
63
93
98
64
58
69
64
52
66
64
93
70
98
75
90
77

28
16
21
11
13
14
7
9
14
25
16
6
7
4
9
4
6
24
14
20
22
40
29
31
31
37
31
47
49
49
63
46
40
47
83
87
54
55
69
79
77
79
60
83
79

54
54
44
33
33
18
19
23
35
21
13
9
9
16
13
14
14
11
24
22
11
14
9
26
14
31
35
32
29
37
41
64
63
63
70
49
92
87
70
81
113
101
144
125
127

51
44
37
42
38
33
37
23
14
14
18
16
16
21
9
7
13
14
14
9
3
26
11
11
22
18
14
20
32
16
41
20
40
41
31
54
83
58
70
77
69
86
81
79
77

STATION 15
PR-184 between PR-1 and PR-52
WESTBOUND (DESDE PR 52)
Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
11:15
60
85
76
48
85
119
116
11:30
85
79
48
142
97
166
76
11:45
73
85
29
104
93
123
83
12:00
65
65
32
107
88
123
123
12:15
85
71
79
100
133
166
151
12:30
97
71
100
119
131
151
119
12:45
104
125
139
100
133
133
100
13:00
97
133
104
119
100
131
170
13:15
79
97
62
79
128
128
119
13:30
88
65
76
131
104
175
162
13:45
104
83
123
83
154
131
154
14:00
93
104
88
76
144
97
133
14:15
104
123
71
142
142
116
175
14:30
97
111
107
104
125
113
119
14:45
88
107
93
116
91
154
100
15:00
91
111
62
139
111
113
97
15:15
97
133
79
128
139
139
93
15:30
83
139
91
91
107
156
111
15:45
83
162
85
100
100
142
88
16:00
88
154
119
111
91
116
147
16:15
104
144
119
93
147
147
123
16:30
93
128
111
116
83
154
116
16:45
113
147
116
116
162
182
147
17:00
107
128
116
88
154
119
156
17:15
111
139
111
156
97
100
156
17:30
113
147
123
116
156
128
97
17:45
113
123
125
154
113
172
142
18:00
142
88
131
175
159
191
111
18:15
119
79
142
139
111
166
113
18:30
104
71
85
125
131
156
159
18:45
123
71
131
154
131
144
139
19:00
147
104
166
128
184
196
205
19:15
142
131
131
116
182
175
125
19:30
107
48
91
113
166
125
175
19:45
88
20
83
76
166
162
131
20:00
104
36
93
119
156
151
144
20:15
97
57
104
100
128
139
144
20:30
71
62
65
53
91
116
85
20:45
79
45
104
76
85
151
125
21:00
79
32
83
65
133
83
71
21:15
79
36
85
111
85
71
88
21:30
62
20
42
53
131
113
91
21:45
48
20
36
79
57
60
83
22:00
48
10
50
50
71
65
76
22:15
29
13
22
32
48
60
42

A-43

Sta 15 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND (HACIA PR 52)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
101
107
102
101
90
66
90
113
83
116
93
107
93
104
140
170
176
180
121
140
155
151
185
130
147
157
163
163
147
147
127
182
153
132
132
102
142
93
107
104
72
87
77
55
52

66
60
81
70
63
70
70
63
64
79
69
107
69
90
83
93
77
64
77
92
92
92
102
93
102
125
191
199
185
130
188
168
163
147
170
148
130
102
101
104
86
87
64
72
41

157
170
203
151
92
81
102
110
77
98
93
96
104
119
142
157
171
182
127
162
142
162
136
136
179
165
147
148
170
136
151
121
138
159
109
119
119
130
115
125
83
87
79
104
58

130
93
102
124
72
104
116
79
98
93
130
107
130
98
92
170
168
124
157
155
144
144
163
138
165
162
194
115
136
165
144
133
147
147
110
127
102
101
107
90
115
92
98
66
86

121
96
96
96
125
102
96
102
140
109
127
96
102
125
140
142
124
136
132
155
165
142
168
170
191
168
144
170
159
153
147
176
168
151
136
113
162
109
121
132
121
93
81
104
98

132
110
133
144
142
144
138
130
116
124
155
148
153
148
136
148
170
147
119
153
113
136
130
90
133
163
136
115
132
132
107
162
130
157
138
125
127
136
121
119
98
104
130
110
98

109
87
75
81
116
130
147
142
168
171
142
136
151
148
151
171
127
125
113
110
132
109
92
119
109
115
75
87
87
90
113
107
153
153
138
127
115
125
116
116
79
96
90
79
69

STATION 15
PR-184 between PR-1 and PR-52
WESTBOUND (DESDE PR 52)
Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
22:30
32
8
25
36
57
71
42
22:45
29
8
10
36
62
53
45
23:00
32
5
20
38
62
45
17
23:15
17
8
8
20
38
88
13
23:30
17
5
17
8
36
20
5
23:45
20
8
10
25
38
22
13
7369

7345

6685

8177

8814

9304

7362

Resumen de Datos
Average Westbound 7865.1429
Average Eastbound 7550.5714
ADT

A-44

PERCENT OF ADT
51.02%
48.98%

15415.714

Sta 15 / ATC_ALL_Stations

EASTBOUND (HACIA PR 52)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
60
46
31
32
35
14

64
40
37
35
31
22

66
40
40
52
41
46

64
79
46
47
35
35

115
107
87
83
90
90

81
92
75
98
70
66

75
63
46
40
26
18

7410

6452

7756

7595

8111

8421

7109

STATION 16
PR-743 north of PR-742

SOUTHBOUND (HACIA PR 738)


Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
0:00
2
2
1
3
0
15
10
0:15
1
1
0
2
0
4
6
0:30
1
0
0
0
1
6
7
0:45
1
2
0
0
0
9
9
1:00
1
0
1
0
1
5
6
1:15
1
1
0
0
0
5
4
1:30
1
2
0
2
0
7
5
1:45
1
1
0
0
2
7
0
2:00
2
2
1
1
4
3
2
2:15
1
0
0
0
1
3
0
2:30
1
0
1
1
2
3
3
2:45
1
1
0
0
2
2
5
3:00
1
0
0
0
2
3
4
3:15
1
2
0
0
1
0
5
3:30
1
3
0
0
1
3
2
3:45
2
2
0
3
1
0
3
4:00
2
1
0
1
4
3
7
4:15
3
2
3
3
3
5
3
4:30
3
1
2
4
4
2
1
4:45
3
2
0
2
7
2
2
5:00
4
1
2
7
4
1
1
5:15
9
13
5
11
14
4
4
5:30
17
12
8
31
26
9
1
5:45
17
16
12
26
23
15
7
6:00
24
26
15
45
30
12
11
6:15
25
29
18
38
34
15
12
6:30
31
38
17
42
54
21
2
6:45
28
42
41
42
36
28
8
7:00
44
32
38
59
45
29
7
7:15
50
57
47
81
55
25
11
7:30
66
87
84
63
68
45
21
7:45
53
64
75
65
46
43
16
8:00
46
60
43
59
59
35
10
8:15
30
51
37
56
53
43
18
8:30
35
57
39
38
44
40
17
8:45
35
55
36
41
47
63
31
9:00
29
51
25
30
48
50
41
9:15
29
51
27
40
36
51
36
9:30
29
44
33
35
31
54
24
9:45
30
55
36
32
35
54
29
10:00
28
51
34
36
31
55
29
10:15
28
50
30
42
28
45
35
10:30
22
35
29
32
21
40
32
10:45
27
36
28
29
39
36
27

A-45

NORTHBOUND (DESDE PR 738)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun

Sta 016 / ATC_ALL_Stations

9
6
7
3
4
3
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
5
4
7
5
9
10
11
11
13
13
17
24
35
29
36
49
44
35
34
31
28
32
31
30
34
33
36
35
38

7
10
4
2
4
3
2
4
1
3
5
2
1
1
1
2
1
5
4
11
9
14
8
15
13
18
23
26
29
43
49
40
40
35
15
13
18
23
26
29
43
49
40
40

6
4
6
3
4
3
3
1
2
4
3
1
3
2
5
6
5
7
7
6
9
8
11
13
10
16
21
27
26
34
53
45
35
39
30
25
33
29
29
25
31
32
39
35

12
3
11
3
4
3
4
5
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
5
5
7
3
10
12
10
12
10
16
16
26
50
32
29
44
46
30
27
32
30
24
31
30
44
33
46
35
42

16
9
12
6
7
8
4
5
8
14
9
3
4
2
5
2
3
11
6
9
10
18
13
14
14
17
14
22
23
23
29
21
18
22
39
41
25
26
32
37
36
37
28
39

31
31
25
19
19
10
11
13
20
12
7
5
5
9
7
8
8
5
11
10
5
6
4
12
6
14
16
15
13
17
19
30
29
29
33
23
43
41
33
38
53
47
68
59

29
25
21
24
22
19
21
13
8
8
10
9
9
12
5
4
7
6
6
4
1
12
5
5
10
8
6
9
15
7
19
9
18
19
14
25
39
27
33
36
32
40
38
37

STATION 16
PR-743 north of PR-742

SOUTHBOUND (HACIA PR 738)


Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
11:00
25
25
23
42
28
45
31
11:15
19
27
24
15
27
38
37
11:30
27
25
15
45
31
53
24
11:45
23
27
9
33
30
39
26
12:00
21
21
10
34
28
39
39
12:15
27
22
25
32
43
53
48
12:30
31
22
32
38
42
48
38
12:45
33
40
44
32
43
43
32
13:00
31
43
33
38
32
42
54
13:15
25
31
20
25
41
41
38
13:30
28
21
24
42
33
56
52
13:45
33
26
39
26
49
42
49
14:00
30
33
28
24
46
31
43
14:15
33
39
22
45
45
37
56
14:30
31
35
34
33
40
36
38
14:45
28
34
30
37
29
49
32
15:00
29
35
20
44
35
36
31
15:15
31
43
25
41
44
44
30
15:30
26
44
29
29
34
50
35
15:45
26
52
27
32
32
45
28
16:00
28
49
38
35
29
37
47
16:15
33
46
38
30
47
47
39
16:30
30
41
35
37
26
49
37
16:45
36
47
37
37
52
58
47
17:00
34
41
37
28
49
38
50
17:15
35
44
35
50
31
32
50
17:30
36
47
39
37
50
41
31
17:45
36
39
40
49
36
55
45
18:00
45
28
42
56
51
61
35
18:15
38
25
45
44
35
53
36
18:30
33
22
27
40
42
50
51
18:45
39
22
42
49
42
46
44
19:00
47
33
53
41
59
63
65
19:15
45
42
42
37
58
56
40
19:30
34
15
29
36
53
40
56
19:45
28
6
26
24
53
52
42
20:00
33
11
30
38
50
48
46
20:15
31
18
33
32
41
44
46
20:30
22
20
21
17
29
37
27
20:45
25
14
33
24
27
48
40
21:00
25
10
26
21
43
26
22
21:15
25
11
27
35
27
22
28
21:30
20
6
13
17
42
36
29
21:45
15
6
11
25
18
19
26

A-46

NORTHBOUND (DESDE PR 738)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun

Sta 016 / ATC_ALL_Stations

43
47
50
48
47
42
31
42
53
39
55
44
50
44
49
66
80
83
85
57
66
73
71
87
61
69
74
77
77
69
69
60
86
72
62
62
48
67
44
50
49
34
41
36

35
31
28
38
33
29
33
33
29
30
37
32
50
32
42
39
44
36
30
36
43
43
43
48
44
48
59
90
94
87
61
89
79
77
69
80
70
61
48
47
49
40
41
30

43
74
80
96
71
43
38
48
52
36
46
44
45
49
56
67
74
81
86
60
76
67
76
64
64
84
78
69
70
80
64
71
57
65
75
51
56
56
61
54
59
39
41
37

36
61
44
48
58
34
49
55
37
46
44
61
50
61
46
43
80
79
58
74
73
68
68
77
65
78
76
92
54
64
78
68
63
69
69
52
60
48
47
50
42
54
43
46

37
57
45
45
45
59
48
45
48
66
51
60
45
48
59
66
67
58
64
62
73
78
67
79
80
90
79
68
80
75
72
69
83
79
71
64
53
76
51
57
62
57
44
38

60
62
52
63
68
67
68
65
61
55
58
73
70
72
70
64
70
80
69
56
72
53
64
61
42
63
77
64
54
62
62
50
76
61
74
65
59
60
64
57
56
46
49
61

36
51
41
35
38
55
61
69
67
79
81
67
64
71
70
71
81
60
59
53
52
62
51
43
56
51
54
35
41
41
42
53
50
72
72
65
60
54
59
55
55
37
45
42

STATION 16
PR-743 north of PR-742

SOUTHBOUND (HACIA PR 738)


Date
5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Beginning Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
of Period
22:00
15
3
16
16
22
21
24
22:15
9
4
7
10
15
19
13
22:30
10
2
8
11
18
22
13
22:45
9
2
3
11
20
17
14
23:00
10
1
6
12
20
14
5
23:15
5
0
2
6
12
28
4
23:30
5
1
5
2
11
6
1
23:45
6
0
3
8
12
7
4
2165

2339

2130

2604

2795

2959

NORTHBOUND (DESDE PR 738)


5/5/2008
5/6/2008
5/7/2008
5/8/2008
5/9/2008 5/10/2008 5/11/2008
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun

2332

Resumen de Datos
Average Southbound 2474.8571
Average Northbound 3560.7143
ADT

A-47

PERCENT OF ADT
41.00%
59.00%

6035.5714

Sta 016 / ATC_ALL_Stations

26
24
28
21
14
15
16
6

34
19
30
18
17
16
14
10

49
27
31
18
18
24
19
21

31
40
30
37
21
22
16
16

49
46
54
50
41
39
42
42

52
46
38
43
35
46
33
31

37
32
35
29
21
18
12
8

3484

3026

3646

3573

3824

3998

3374

APENDICE B
RESUMEN DE LAS ESTACIONES
DE CONTEO MANUEALES

B-1

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:
INTERSECTION:

3
5
7
9
11

07:45
Peak Hour Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30

Movement
6
7
36 143
77 127
42 125

4
6
8
10
12

E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

3
129
208
201

4
129
149
98

41

166

87

30

116

58

180

704

463

185

511

172

0.85

0.78

2
56
65
55
81

3
97
93
84
112

4
161
172
208
151

257

386

692

0.86

2
43
50
46

0.79

Left

S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

0.90

Peak Hour Volume


(A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

WEATHER: CLEAR

PR-1 WITH PR-184

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:00
07:15
07:30

DAY: TUESDAY

01/29/08

0.60

2
3
4
2476 5198 5556

Movement
6
7
66
72
57
96
63
84
73
84
259

0.83

0.89

0.89

336
0.88

8
36
43
35

10

Through

11

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
516
654
547

498
2215

0.74

8
75
80
125
86

10

11

12

366

TOTAL
15 MIN
527
563
619
587
2296

0.73

Movement
6
7
8
1859 3617 3145

MC_Int1 / All Intersections Manual Summary

10

11

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
21851

B-2

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

01/29/08

DAY:

INTERSECTION:

TUESDAY

WEATHER:

CLEAR

PR-1 WITH PR-184

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M. Peak
Hour

PC

07:00
493
07:15
625
07:30
522
07:45
475
Total
2115
Percent 95.49%

HEAVY
23
29
25
23
100
4.51%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
516
654
547
498
2215

PC

14:45
514
15:00
552
15:15
607
15:30
569
Total
2242
Percent 97.65%

HEAVY
13
11
12
18
54
2.35%

Total
527
563
619
587
2296

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access
PR 184
PR 1 North
PR 1 South
TOTAL

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY
7180

235

6478
7365
21023

266
309
810

7415

96.83%

3.17%

6744
96.06%
7674
95.97%
21833 0.9629002

3.94%
4.03%
0.0370998

MC_Int1 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-3

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

04/02/08

INTERSECTION:

PR-1 WITH PR-14

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11
A.M.
Peak
Hour
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

P.M.
Peak
Hour
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

12
HOUR
VOLUM
Total

1
19
26
33
31

2
207
241
245
231

109

924

0.83

0.94

60
50
58
56

2
301
326
299
243

224

1169

0.93

1
1509

0.90

2
10482

DAY:

WEDNESDAY

WEATHER:

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

2
4
6
8
10
12

5
4
4
4

16
16
9
16

3
9
14
16

17

57

42

0.85

0.89

0.66

14
16
11
11

10
11
8
10

12
14
15
12

52

39

53

0.81

3
382

0.89

0.88

4
492

CLEAR

5
547

Movement
6
7
7
6
4
10
6
9
5
11

22
0.79

36
0.82

Movement
6
7
16
11
18
11

56
0.78

8
215
200
181
174

770
0.90

20
14
17
24

8
172
188
197
169

75

726

0.78

Movement
6
7
382
671

0.92

8
9459

MC_Int 2 / All Intersections Manual Summary

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

9
54
43
38
33

10
184
187
222
246

168

839

0.78

0.85

53
54
58
73

10
172
152
192
186

238

702

0.82

9
1676

0.91

10
8200

11
6
5
11
9

31
0.70

11
28
34
36
24

122
0.85

11
646

TOTAL
15 MIN
12
194
916
199
944
138
910
143
919

674

3689

0.85

TOTAL
15 MIN
12
195 1053
171 1041
136 1045
146 965

648

4104

0.83

TOTAL
15 MIN
12
7753 42199

B-4

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

01/31/08

INTERSECTION:

DAY: THURSDAY

PR-734 WITH PR-7733

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1

3
5
7
9
11

Left

S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

Movement
6
7
18
16
14
17
16
30

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:15
07:30
07:45

1
28
23
24

2
37
44
40

3
87
100
85

4
63
64
49

5
32
26
33

08:00

27

40

103

34

28

102

161

375

210

119

54

Peak Hour Volume


(A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
Peak Hour Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

WEATHER: CLEAR

0.91

1
25
28
27
20
100
0.89

0.91

2
31
24
18
26
99
0.80

0.91

3
83
84
113
77
357
0.79

0.82

4
40
63
55
44
202
0.80

0.90

5
58
65
65
64
252
0.97

1
2
3
4
5
720 1114 2785 1902 2191

0.75

48

Through

4
6
8
10
12

E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
32 494
32 508
30 553

8
49
53
80

9
23
22
22

10
20
28
40

11
89
85
104

34

50

17

28

95

23

97

232

84

116

373

117

0.71

Movement
6
7
16
48
14
53
9
73
9
66

0.75

240
0.82

0.73

8
63
56
54
42
215
0.85

Movement
6
7
8
497 1257 1741

0.91

9
29
36
56
44
165
0.74

9
960

MC_Int 3 / All Intersections Manual Summary

0.73

10
16
9
3
8
36
0.56

0.90

11
54
63
70
50
237
0.85

10
11
513 2761

485
2040

0.91

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
23 486
20 515
13 556
8 458
64

2015

0.70

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
579 17020

B-5

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

01/31/08

INTERSECTION:

DAY:

THURSDAY

WEATHER:

CLEAR

PR-734 WITH PR-7733

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M.
Peak
Hour

PC

07:15
258
07:30
261
07:45
233
08:00
230
Total
982
Percent 96.18%

HEAVY
7
10
14
8
39
3.82%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
265
271
247
238
1021

PC

HEAVY

15:00
241
15:15
265
15:30
277
15:45
232
Total
1015
Percent 95.94%

12
13
10
8
43
4.06%

Total
253
278
287
240
1058

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES

PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY

PR734

4428

191

4619

95.86%

4.14%

PR 7733
TOTAL

4448
8876

142
333

4590
9209

96.91%
96.38%

3.09%
3.62%

MC_Int 3 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-6

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

01/30/08

INTERSECTION:

DAY: WEDNESDAY

PR-7733 WITH PR-171

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1

3
5
7
9
11

Left

S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

Movement
6
7
26
39
41
49
51
73

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:45
08:00
08:15

1
40
17
19

2
128
80
57

3
33
24
29

4
14
22
14

5
42
32
73

08:30

17

62

20

14

50

34

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

93

327

106

64

197

152

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

WEATHER: CLEAR

0.58

0.64

0.80

1
14
16
18
15

2
33
36
62
56

3
13
8
17
13

63

187

51

0.88

0.75

1
2
924 2711

0.75

3
878

0.73

0.67

8
14
15
17

5
50
35
57
46

54

188

0.79

0.82

0.75

0.66

Through

4
6
8
10
12

E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
66 593
69 550
121 763

8
89
110
115

9
12
14
24

10
10
12
50

11
94
80
137

48

121

32

39

75

50

209

435

82

111

386

306

0.72

Movement
6
7
42
59
32
63
95 100
83
79
252

301
0.75

0.90

0.64

8
55
62
68
78

9
10
6
9
14

263

39

0.84

Movement
4
5
6
7
8
654 2047 1941 2847 2860

0.70

9
474

0.56

0.70

562
2468

0.63

5
10
34
17

11
78
115
108
85

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
45 412
46 443
51 634
57 560

66

386

199

10

0.49

0.84

2049

0.87

TOTAL
10
11
12 15 MIN
648 3033 2228 21245

MC_Int 4 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-7

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/30/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

DAY:

WEATHER: CLEAR

WEDNESDAY

PR-7733 WITH PR-171

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M.
Peak
Hour

PC

07:45
272
08:00
206
08:15
230
08:30
190
Total
898
Percent 95.63%

HEAVY
11
10
13
7
41
4.37%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
283
216
243
197
939

PC

14:45
155
15:00
137
15:15
258
15:30
224
Total
774
Percent 97.36%

HEAVY
5
4
6
6
21
2.64%

Total
160
141
264
230
795

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY

PR-171

4374

139

4513

96.92%

3.08%

PR-7733
TOTAL

4477
8851

142
281

4619
9132

96.93%
96.92%

3.07%
3.08%

MC_Int 4 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-8

TRAFFIC COUNTS
02/05/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

WEATHER

DAY: TUESDAY

CLEAR

PR- 7733 WITH PR-172

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:30
07:45

1
52
61

2
43
48

08:00
08:15

68
39
220

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

0.81

35
54

57
51

30
33

157
123

63
51

180

223

106

542

241

0.83

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

164

301

0.88

Movement
6
7

0.86

1
2
1986 3453

Movement
6
7

0.86

8
86
96
94
102

9
50
52
60
48

10
186
118
157
103

378

210

564

0.93

0.80

0.88

410
351
1512

0.93

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
57 513
54 442
52 468
50 407
213

0.76

8
9
10
3444 1600 5156

MC_Int 5 / All Intersections Manual Summary

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
62 355
65 396

10
124
138

2
88
81
68
64

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

Movement
6
7

9
22
21

1
46
41
37
40

0.89

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

8
52
63

P.M. Peak
Hour
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

2
4
6
8
10
12

1830

0.93

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
2340 17979

B-9

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

02/05/08

INTERSECTION:

DAY:

TUESDAY

WEATHER CLEAR

PR- 733 WITH PR-172

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour

A.M. Peak
Hour

PC

07:30
272
07:45
206
08:00
230
08:15
190
Total
898
Percent 95.63%

HEAVY
11
10
13
7
41
4.37%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
283
216
243
197
939

PC

14:15
155
14:30
137
14:45
258
15:00
224
Total
774
Percent 97.36%

HEAVY
5
4
6
6
21
2.64%

Total
160
141
264
230
795

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY

PR-171

4374

139

4513

96.92%

3.08%

PR-7733

4477

142

4619

96.93%

3.07%

TOTAL

8851

281

9132

96.92%

3.08%

MC_Int 5 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-10

TRAFFIC COUNTS
Date

Day

Intersection Name:

3
5
7
9
11

Weather

CLEAR

PR 14 -- PR 171

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:15
07:30
07:45

WEDNESDAY

Left

S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

5
151
138
127

Movement
6
7
25
41
32
42
29
39

4
6
8
10
12

E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

8
122
132
123

10
116
115
114

Through

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
83 538
61 520
48 480

08:00

131

25

51

141

75

68

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

547

111

173

518

420

260

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45

0.91

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

5
151
144
121
152
568
0.93

0.87

0.85

Movement
6
7
106
73
89
56
84
79
80
49
359
0.85

257
0.81

0.92

8
167
143
152
171

0.91

633

11

10
2435

MC_Int 6 / All Intersections Manual Summary

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
48 579
45 516
32 500
47 556
172

0.71

2029

0.78

162

0.93

Movement
5
6
7
8
6492 2205 2017 6523

10
34
39
32
57

491

2151

0.90

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
2394 22066

B-11

TRAFFIC COUNTS

Date

Day

WEDNESDAY

Intersection Name:

PR 14 -- PR 171

Weather

CLEAR

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M. Peak
Hour

PC

07:15
525
07:30
506
07:45
466
08:00
478
Total
1975
Percent 97.34%

HEAVY
13
14
14
13
54
2.66%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
538
520
480
491
2029

16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
Total
Percent

PC
549
481
488
538
2056
95.58%

HEAVY
30
35
12
18
95
4.42%

Total
579
516
500
556
2151

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access

TOTAL
PC

TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT
HEAVY VEHIVLES
PC

PERCENT
HEAVY

PR-171

4698

131

4829

97.29%

2.71%

PR-14
TOTAL

16713
21411

524
655

17237
22066

96.96%
97.03%

3.04%
2.97%

MC_Int 6 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-12

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/31/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

WEATHER: CLEAR

DAY: THURSDAY

PR-734 WITH PR-735

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:00
07:15

5
25
24

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

2
4
6
8
10
12

Movement
6
7
69
40
75
44

9
29
39

10
81
79

11
112
112

07:30
07:45

18
31

61
79

55
32

31
26

66
64

105
110

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

98

284

171

125

290

439

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15

0.79

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

64

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

5
18
10
26
10

0.62

0.90

0.78

Movement
6
7
108
24
106
29
115
30
123
42
452
0.92

0.80

125
0.74

Movement
5
6
7
960 3712 1064

10
49
41
45
27

11
110
102
101
95

155

162

408

0.83

336
342
1407

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
349
309
369
339
1366

0.93

9
10
11
1340 1920 3587

MC_Int 7 / All Intersections Manual Summary

TOTAL
15 MIN
356
373

0.98

9
40
21
52
42

0.75

0.90

12

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
12583

B-13

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

01/31/08

INTERSECTION:

DAY:

THURSDAY

WEATHER:

CLEAR

PR-734 WITH PR-735

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour

A.M. Peak
Hour

PC

07:00
342
07:15
361
07:30
324
07:45
332
Total
1359
Percent 96.59%

HEAVY
14
12
12
10
48
3.41%

P.M. Peak
Hour

Total
356
373
336
342
1407

PC

HEAVY

16:30
343
16:45
301
17:00
363
17:15
333
Total
1340
Percent 98.10%

6
8
6
6
26
1.90%

Total
349
309
369
339
1366

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY

PR-734

2334

70

2404

97.09%

2.91%

PR-735

9873

306

10179

96.99%

3.01%

TOTAL

12207

376

12583

97.01%

2.99%

MC_Int 7 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-14

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/31/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

WEATHER:

DAY: THURSDAY

CLEAR

PR 735 WITH PR 1 -- NORTH

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION

1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:15
07:30

Movement
6
7

96
88

80
99

26
49

33
39

32
23

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

54

360

357

116

142

112

0.94

P.M. Peak
Hour
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15

1
55
24
24
22

2
103
114
98
114

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

125

429

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

9
23
18

10
39
31

0.90

Movement
6
7

0.94

1
2
902 4597

8
87
91

Movement
6
7

0.91

8
150
121
126
166

9
10
11
31
93

10
38
41
42
36

563

145

157

0.85

0.59

0.39

284
314
1141

0.88

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
27 383
32 343
38 359
23 454
120

0.93

8
9
10
5238 1259 1125

MC_Int 8 / All Intersections Manual Summary

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
27 280
30 263

17
16

0.57

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

07:45
08:00

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

9
12

0.79

2
4
6
8
10
12

2
95
81

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

1539

0.79

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
1069 14190

B-15

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/31/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

DAY:

WEATHER:

THURSDAY

CLEAR

PR 735 WITH PR 1 -- NORTH

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M.
Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
07:15
271
9
07:30
253
10
07:45
274
10
08:00
301
13
Total
1099
42
Percent 96.32% 3.68%

P.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
14:30
376
7
14:45
333
10
15:00
352
7
15:15
442
12
Total
1503
36
Percent 97.66% 2.34%

Total
280
263
284
314
1141

Total
383
343
359
454
1539

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access
PR-1

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
11533
463
11996
96.14%
3.86%

PR-735

2136

58

2194

97.36%

2.64%

TOTAL

13669

521

14190

96.33%

3.67%

MC_Int 8 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-16

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/30/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION:

PR 735 WITH PR 1 -- SOUTH

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:15
07:30
07:45
08:00

1
32
32
28
32

2
113
114
128
106

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

124

461

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

0.97

1
74
79
77
63

2
161
175
114
112

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

293

562

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

0.93

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

Movement
6
7

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

8
214
129
127
132

0.70

Movement
6
7

Movement
6
7

20

1214

11

0.50

5
1
2
2

8
10
9
11

10

38

1446

10

11

0.50

8
5644

MC_Int 9 / All Intersections Manual Summary

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
385
360
337
364

543

2
10
4
4

10

0.88

8
137
95
135
176

0.77

2
1
2
2

TOTAL
15 MIN
363
286
289
276

602

0.80

1
2
1836 5057

2
4
6
8
10
12

0.90

P.M. Peak
Hour
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

WEATHER: CLEAR

DAY: WEDNESDAY

9
156

12

0.86

10

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
299 12992

B-17

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/30/08

Date
Intersection Name

Day

Weather

WEDNESDAY

CLEAR

PR-1 WITH PR-735

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION

1
3
5
7
9
11

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

2
4
6
8
10
12

Movement
6
7
3
7
5
8

A.M. Peak
Hour
07:00
07:15

1
12
11

2
103
85

3
14
19

4
18
29

5
12
5

07:30
07:45

11
3

92
95

21
34

22
15

10
14

13
13

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

37

375

88

84

41

34

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

0.77

0.91

0.65

0.72

0.73

1
12
22
19
15

2
91
103
109
117

3
13
13
8
11

4
24
11
19
8

5
22
15
12
15

68

420

45

62

64

0.77

0.90

1
2
543 4271

0.87

3
542

0.65

4
554

0.73

5
427

0.65

0.86

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
21 345
52 418

8
69
135

9
14
18

10
54
35

11
18
16

5
8

80
84

17
26

34
28

14
11

28
30

28

368

75

151

59

131

0.88

Movement
6
7
21
23
24
30
17
33
21
36
83

122
0.85

0.68

0.72

0.70

0.82

8
148
164
150
124

9
59
56
53
59

10
17
21
26
22

11
10
15
10
8

586

227

86

43

0.89

0.96

Movement
6
7
8
9
814 981 4543 1562

MC_Int 10 / All Intersections Manual Summary

0.83

10
999

0.72

11
397

347
361
1471

0.63

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
20 460
13 487
9 465
6 442
48

1854

0.60

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
703 16336

B-18

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/30/08

Date
Intersection Name

Day

Weather

WEDNESDAY

CLEAR

PR-1 WITH PR-735

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M.
Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
07:00
301
11
07:15
367
12
07:30
291
11
07:45
308
11
Total
1267
45
Percent 96.57% 3.43%

P.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
15:00
381
12
15:15
423
14
15:30
401
16
15:45
387
11
Total
1592
53
Percent 96.78% 3.22%

Total
312
379
302
319
1312

Total
393
437
417
398
1645

Vehicle Distribution by Access

Access
PR-1

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
12171
403
12442
97.82%
3.24%

PR-735

2035

58

2099

96.95%

2.76%

TOTAL

14206

461

14541

97.70%

3.17%

MC_Int 10 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-19

TRAFFIC COUNTS
02/05/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION

WEATHER

DAY: TUESDAY

CLEAR

PR 172 WITH PR 787

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION

1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M. Peak
Hour
08:30
08:45

09:00
09:15
Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

P.M. Peak
Hour
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

4
15
20

68
30

22
20

20
25

59
74

66
66

38
35

234

78

80

253

296

136

0.80

2
36
53
47
56

3
17
30
35
40

4
32
28
32
27

192

122

119

0.86

Movement
6
7
57
72
63
92

3
20
16

0.89

0.76

2
4
6
8
10
12

2
74
62

0.79

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

0.85

2
3
4
2291 1123 1163

Movement
6
7
94
93
92 100
90 105
70 117
346

0.93

0.92

0.80

415
0.89

8
35
28

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

10

11

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
273
281
273
250
1077

0.89

8
69
49
59
47

10

11

12

224

TOTAL
15 MIN
341
352
368
357
1418

0.81

Movement
6
7
8
3292 3808 1981

MC_Int 11 / All Intersections Manual Summary

10

11

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
13658

B-20

TRAFFIC COUNTS
02/05/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION

DAY:

WEATHER

TUESDAY

CLEAR

PR 172 WITH PR 787

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
08:30
159
2
08:45
155
4
09:00
163
5
09:15
143
4
Total
620
15
Percent 97.64% 2.36%

P.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
12:30
173
6
12:45
194
6
13:00
197
5
13:15
185
5
Total
749
22
Percent 97.15% 2.85%

Total
161
159
168
147
635

Total
179
200
202
190
771

Vehicle Distribution by Access


Access
PR-172

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY
4301
137
4438
96.91%
3.09%

PR-787

3283

94

3377

97.22%

2.78%

TOTAL

7584

231

7815

97.04%

2.96%

MC_Int 11 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-21

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/31/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION

WEATHER: CLEAR

DAY: THURSDAY

PR --1 WITH PR -- 787

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

A.M. Peak
Hour
06:45
07:00

1
32
24

2
17
24

07:15
07:30

38
19
113

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)
PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

0.74

Movement
6
7

27
38

41
37

4
13

20
10

128
83

106

183

48

54

461

0.70

Peak Hour
Volume (A.M.)

291

159

0.78

Movement
6
7

0.81

1
2
2078 1508

Movement
6
7

0.68

8
63
64
81
70

9
20
20
24
16

10
12
11
5
10

278

80

38

0.86

0.63

8
1802

0.83

9
508

MC_Int 012 / All Intersections Manual Summary

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
101 228
149 279

10
13
11

2
32
40
49
38

12 HOUR
VOLUME
Total

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

9
19
12

1
72
92
72
55

0.79

8
46
59

P.M. Peak
Hour
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45

PEAK HOUR
FACTOR (A.M.)

2
4
6
8
10
12

965

0.77

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
37 236
49 276
51 282
40 229
177

0.79

10
485

258
200

1023

0.87

11

TOTAL
12 15 MIN
2528
8909

B-22

TRAFFIC COUNTS
01/31/08

DATE:
INTERSECTION

DAY:

THURSDAY

WEATHER: CLEAR

PR --1 WITH PR -- 787

Vehicle Distribution by Peak Hour


A.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY
06:45
106
2
07:00
152
1
07:15
143
2
07:30
89
1
Total
490
6
Percent 98.79% 1.21%

P.M. Peak
Hour
PC
HEAVY Total
17:00
48
1
49
17:15
59
1
60
17:30
55
1
56
17:45
49
1
50
Total
211
4 215
Percent 98.14% 1.86%

Total
108
153
145
90
496

Vehicle Distribution by Access


Access
PR-787

TOTAL

TOTAL TOTAL
TOTAL
PERCENT PERCENT
PC
HEAVY VEHICLES
PC
HEAVY
2870
67
2937
97.72%
2.28%

2870

67

2937

97.72%

2.28%

MC_Int 012 / All Intersections Manual Summary

B-23

TRAFFIC COUNTS
05/06/08

DATE:

DAY:

TUESDAY

INTERSECTION:

134
120
102
81

8
3
2
3

4
8
6
2

39
30
52
78

120

33

437

16

20

199

825

0.55

0.82

Movement
6
7

0.50

0.63

10

11

12

0.64

69
60
62
60

3
5
3
3

56
61
54
56

4
3
3
2

4
2
3
4

43
46
47
44

TOTAL
15 MIN
179
177
172
169

251

14

227

12

13

180

697

0.91

0.77

17:00

12
HOUR
Total

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

7
15
3
8

16:45
17:15
17:30
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

2
4
6
8
10
12

25
24
39
32

07:30

P.M.
Peak

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

TOTAL
15 MIN
217
200
204
204

07:15
07:45
08:00
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

CLEAR

PR 743 -- PR 742

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M.
Peak

WEATHER:

2
1813

0.70

3
173

0.93

Movement
6
7

0.75

4
2258

0.81

Movement
6
7
219
188

10

11

12

0.96

8
1833

MC_Int 013 / All Intersections Manual Summary

10

11

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
6484

B-24

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

05/07/08

INTERSECTION:

PR 52 with PR184 EAST Ramps

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M.
Peak

Movement
6
7

5
34

149
138

545

62

133

07:15
07:30
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

0.91

0.25

0.82

31
28

44
51
50
48

124

193

31

0.91

28

29

30

59
76

23
33

280

113

72

16:30
16:45
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

0.92

1
4130

#DIV/0!

2
7

0.86

3
992

10

11

12

83

32

92

38

89
109

32
28

373

130

0.86

0.86

10

11
90

27

94

32

33
32

76
85

24
30

123

152

345

113

5
1079

0.93

Movement
6
7
1338

0.92

8
0

9
0

MC_Int 014 / All Intersections Manual Summary

10
3382

TOTAL
15 MIN
333
364
368
363

1428

12

40
36
35
41

0.93

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

Movement
6
7

28

73

16:15

0.95

0
0
0
0

16:00

12
HOUR
Total

CLEAR

2
4
6
8
10
12

15
19
16
12

125

07:00

WEATHER:

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

0
0
1
0

06:45

P.M.
Peak

Wednesday

DAY:

TOTAL
15 MIN
286
293
250
297

1126

0.88

11
1141

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
0 12069

B-25

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

05/07/08

INTERSECTION:

PR 52 PR 184 WEST

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M.
Peak

Wednesday

DAY:

WEATHER:

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

CLEAR

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

2
4
6
8
10
12

Movement
6
7

10

11

12

06:45

121

38

25

189

90

07:00

114

50

29

165

101

28

07:15
07:30
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

125
126

55
40

23
24

0
0

201
176

98
113

29
24

486

183

101

731

402

103

P.M.
Peak

0.96

0.83

0.87

Movement
6
7

0.25

0.91

10

22

0.89

0.89

11

12

16:45

52

56

40

124

75

33

17:00

54

44

36

124

63

35

17:15
17:30
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

69
72

31
36

31
33

0
0

122
121

66
79

34
29

247

167

140

491

283

131

12
HOUR
Total

0.86

0.75

5
3299

0.88

Movement
6
7
1910
1186

#DIV/0!

8
11

MC_Int 015 / All Intersections Manual Summary

0.99

9
5764

0.90

10
962

11
3337

TOTAL
15 MIN
486
487
531
503

2007

TOTAL
15 MIN
380
356
353
370

1459

0.94

12

TOTAL
15 MIN
16785

B-26

TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE:

05/06/08

INTERSECTION:

PR 7733 with Factory Entrance

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION
1
3
5
7
9
11

A.M.
Peak

16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

12
HOUR
Total

26

Through
E Left
E Right
N Through
W Left
W Right

20
22
23
26

23
19
18
23

41
42
28
48

182
195
211
200

0
0
0
1

1
2
0
0

472

118

91

83

159

788

1715

Movement
6
7

0.78

0.82

0.88

0.90

0.83

10

0.93

11

12

0.25

0.38

10

11

199
235
185
193

24
21
18
27

23
33
35
33

56
59
44
56

33
28
25
37

132
139
136
145

1
0
0
0

TOTAL
15 MIN
468
515
443
491

812

90

124

215

123

552

1917

0.86

2
4
6
8
10
12

30
31
21
36

07:30

S Left
S Right
E Through
N Left
N Right
W Through

CLEAR

105
111
151
105

07:15

P.M.
Peak

WEATHER:

TOTAL
15 MIN
402
422
452
439

07:45
08:00
Peak
Hour
Volume
(A.M.)
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR
(A.M.)

TUESDAY

DAY:

2
5064

0.83

3
1256

Movement
6
7

0.89

0.91

4
1199

5
8

0.83

Movement
6
7
1651
1700

12

0.95

8
5825

MC_Int 016 / All Intersections Manual Summary

0.25

10
25

11
9

12
16

TOTAL
15 MIN
6 16785

B-27

APENDICE C
RESUMEN DE LOS DATOS
DE TIEMPO DE VIAJE

C-1

"

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

!#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

&

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

&

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

"

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

! "#

'

'

! "#

'

! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

$ %# ! "#

!#

!#

!#

!#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

"

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

! "#

APENDICE D
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Condicin Existente

D-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
159
0
159
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1722
1.00
1722
0.70
551
33
955

306
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.75
85
0
85
pm+pt
3
8
35.2
35.2
0.48
4.0
3.0
247
0.03
0.14
0.34
14.9
1.00
0.8
15.8
B

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1724
1.00
1724
0.75
263
38
428

152
1900

93
1900

0.80
116
0
0
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.80
132
18
114
Perm

209
1900

0.75
203
0
0

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.23
422
0.80
409
0
525

435
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1815
0.38
694
0.90
483
0
715

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
91
9
82
Perm

25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
600
0.09
0.27
17.4
1.00
1.1
18.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
437
0
0

4
25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
590
c0.55
1.62
24.1
1.00
286.2
310.3
F
269.9
F
420.6
2.21
73.3
114.1%
15

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8!

2
2

35.2
35.2
0.48
4.0
3.0
828
c0.25
0.52
13.2
1.00
2.3
15.5
B
15.5
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

0.90
232
0
0
Perm

30.1
30.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
173
c1.25
3.03
21.6
1.00
930.9
952.5
F
763.9
F

6
2
30.1
30.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
644
0.07
0.18
13.7
1.00
0.1
13.9
B

6
30.1
30.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
285
1.03
2.51
21.6
1.00
689.3
710.9
F
632.2
F

6
30.1
30.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
644
0.05
0.13
13.4
1.00
0.4
13.8
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
D2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106

593
Free
0%
0.93
638

118

91

0.88
134

0.25
4

0.92
1

0.88
103

0
Stop
0%
0.93
0

83

0.92
1

3
Stop
0%
0.25
12

0.92
1

270
Free
0%
0.78
346

0.92
90

0.83
128

None

None

480

639

1399

1376

638

1316

1310

413

480
4.1

639
4.1

1399
7.1

1376
6.5

638
6.2

1316
7.1

1310
6.5

413
6.2

2.2
88
1077

2.2
100
940

3.5
96
92

4.0
91
127

3.3
100
475

3.5
8
113

4.0
100
139

3.3
86
637

EB 1
766
128
1
1077
0.12
10
2.9
A
2.9

WB 1
481
1
134
940
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
17
4
1
122
0.14
12
39.4
E
39.4
E

SB 1
194
103
90
183
1.06
230
135.3
F
135.3
F

19.9
85.4%
15

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

ICU Level of Service

Synchro 7 - Report
D3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

97
1900

232
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1725
0.96
1725
0.91
255
17
437

84
1900

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.88
1.00
1612
1.00
1612
0.91
112
37
1131

161
1900

375
1900

116
1900

0.91
412
0
0

0.91
127
0
0
Perm

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
129
57
72
Perm

210
1900

0.25
644
0
0

373
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1823
0.83
1540
0.91
410
0
537

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.44
809
0.90
132
0
365

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
60
20
40
Perm

0.91
107
0
0
Perm

0.91
92
0
0

6!

2!

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
511

16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
478
c0.70

0.25
0.86
17.9
1.00
16.6
34.5
C
34.5
C

30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
856
0.35
0.63
8.2
1.00
1.4
9.6
A
8.9
A

2.37
19.0
1.00
621.6
640.6
F
640.6
F
287.2
1.35
54.0
119.3%
15

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.90
233
0
0
Perm

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

8
4
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.05
0.08
5.6
1.00
0.0
5.6
A

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
449
c0.45
0.81
9.7
1.00
14.8
24.5
C
21.9
C

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.03
0.05
5.5
1.00
0.1
5.6
A

F
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
D4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NEL

NER

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.88
253
0
253

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
120
78
42
Perm

220
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1795
0.52
959
0.83
217
0
482

542
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
583
0
583

241
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
259
41
218
Perm

31.4
31.4
0.53
4.0
8.0
597
c0.09
c0.34
0.81
11.6
1.00
10.2
21.7
C
21.7
C

20.1
20.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
592
c0.33

2
20.9
20.9
0.35
4.0
8.0
648
0.14
0.39
14.5
1.00
1.7
16.2
B
15.2
B

2
20.9
20.9
0.35
4.0
8.0
551

0.83
265
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.03
0.08
12.9
1.00
0.3
13.1
B

29.9
0.87
59.5
74.2%
15

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.98
19.5
1.00
32.9
52.4
D
41.1
D

8
20.1
20.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
530
0.14
0.41
15.1
1.00
0.5
15.7
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
D5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
94
0
94

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
298
247
51
Perm

296
1900

136
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1784
0.47
859
0.89
153
0
486

234
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1782
1.00
1782
0.89
263
12
339

78
1900

41.6
41.6
0.69
4.0
4.0
723
c0.09
c0.37
0.67
5.2
1.00
2.7
7.9
A
7.9
A

29.4
29.4
0.49
4.0
4.0
875
0.19

4
10.3
10.3
0.17
4.0
4.0
301
c0.05
0.31
21.7
1.00
0.8
22.5
C
21.9
C

4
10.3
10.3
0.17
4.0
4.0
270

0.89
333
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.03
0.19
21.2
1.00
0.5
21.7
C

13.0
0.59
59.9
57.3%
15

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.89
88
0
0

0.39
9.6
1.00
0.4
10.0
A
10.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
D6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SBL

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

20
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
22
0
22

200
296
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1583
1770
1.00
0.33
1583
607
0.92
0.92
217
322
0
0
217
322
Free custom

0
1900

774
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
841
0
841

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
8
2
6
Perm

0.92
0
0
0

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
213
0.01
0.10
32.5
1.00
1.0
33.5
C
3.2
A

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1583

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
475

c0.14
0.14
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

c0.53
0.68
4.2
1.00
7.6
11.7
B

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2772
0.24

11.7
B
4.9
0.58
83.0
52.8%
15

0.30
2.6
1.00
0.2
2.7
A
2.7
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1240
0.00
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

A
4.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
D7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

839
1900
4.0
0.97
0.99
0.95
3429
0.95
3429
0.92
912
0
946

31
1900

647
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
703
0
703
Free

57
1900

42
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1746
0.96
1746
0.92
46
6
126

22
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
118
0
118
Prot
5

924
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
1004
0
1004

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
18
7
11
Perm

36
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
39
0
39
Prot
1

770
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
837
0
837

168
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
183
0
183
Free

8.4
8.4
0.06
4.0
3.0
109
0.02

70.6
70.6
0.52
4.0
8.0
1824
0.24

0.36
61.7
1.00
2.0
63.7
E

0.46
21.1
1.00
0.8
21.9
C
19.7
B

0.92
34
0
0

0.92
62
0
0
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
1001
c0.28
0.95
47.4
1.00
17.9
65.4
E
37.9
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
24
0
0

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
510

1583
0.44
0.44
0.0
1.00
0.9
0.9
A

29.1
0.65
137.0
74.8%
15

0.07
0.25
37.0
1.00
1.2
38.2
D
38.2
D

14.4
14.4
0.11
4.0
3.0
186
c0.07

76.6
76.6
0.56
4.0
8.0
1979
c0.28

0.63
58.8
1.00
6.9
65.7
E

0.51
18.6
1.00
0.9
19.5
B
24.2
C

2
76.6
76.6
0.56
4.0
8.0
885
0.01
0.01
13.4
1.00
0.0
13.4
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
D

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.12
0.12
0.0
1.00
0.1
0.1
A

Synchro 7 - Report
D8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

142
Stop
0%
0.91
156

112

54

0.94
57

357
Free
0%
0.90
397

116

0.91
123

360
Free
0%
0.94
383

None

None

895

397

397

895
*4.2

397
6.2

397
4.1

3.5
70
513

3.3
81
651

2.2
95
1151

EB 1
279
156
123
566
0.49
68
17.4
C
17.4
C

NE 1
440
57
0
1151
0.05
4
1.5
A
1.5

SW 1
397
0
0
1700
0.23
0
0.0

0.90
129

SW 2
129
0
129
1700
0.08
0
0.0

0.0

4.4
65.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North AM PEAK 4/3/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
D9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

54
Stop
0%
0.77
70

461

113

0.81
140

183
Free
0%
0.86
213

48

0.77
599

106
Free
0%
0.81
131

None

None

651

241

269

651
*4.1

241
*4.1

269
*4.1

*3.3
89
616

*3.3
35
924

2.2
89
1297

EB 1
669
70
599
878
0.76
186
20.9
C
20.9
C

NB 1
270
140
0
1297
0.11
9
4.6
A
4.6

SB 1
269
0
56
1700
0.16
0
0.0

0.86
56

0.0

12.6
65.9%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

173

518
Free
0%
0.92
563

547
Free
0%
0.91
601

111

420
Stop
0%
0.91
462

260

0.91
286

None

None

601

1601

662

601
4.1

1601
*3.5

662
*3.5

2.2
81
971

3.5
0
344

3.3
62
760

0.92
188

EB 1
751
188
0
971
0.19
18
4.5
A
4.5

WB 1
723
0
122
1700
0.43
0
0.0
0.0

0.91
122

SB 1
747
462
286
435
1.72
1131
355.2
F
355.2
F
121.0
121.5%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

180
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.90
200
0
200
4%

704
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.85
828
497
331
4%
Perm

511
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.63
1155
0.89
574
0
574
4%
Perm

172
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.74
232
0
232
4%

463
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.78
594
0
594
3%

185
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.60
308
185
123
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
462

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.12

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.32

0.20
0.50
9.0
1.00
2.7
11.7
B

c0.50
1.24
12.0
1.00
126.3
138.3
F

0.30
8.2
1.00
1.0
9.1
A
101.1
F

0.79
10.6
1.00
8.5
19.1
B
15.4
B

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.10
0.24
8.0
1.00
0.7
8.7
A
11.1
B

39.0
1.02
40.0
78.6%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.07
0.18
7.8
1.00
0.6
8.4
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
D

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline co1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
4

731

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.89
546

402
Free
0%
0.96
419

103

0.91
803

183
Free
0%
0.89
206

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.87
116

None

0.83
124

None
716

1507

1841

103

543

206

2481

1779

1507
7.6

1841
6.6

103
7.0

543
4.2

206
4.2

2481
7.5

1779
6.5

3.5
0
47

4.0
88
34

3.3
14
929

2.2
46
1015

2.2
100
1356

3.5
100
1

4.0
100
38

WB 1
120
116
0
47
2.56
317
893.4
F
140.3
F

WB 2
803
0
803
929
0.86
280
27.8
D

NB 1
615
546
0
1015
0.54
83
12.0
B
9.8

NB 2
137
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

61.7
78.9%
15

SB 1
279
0
0
1700
0.16
0
0.0

SB 2
264
0
124
1700
0.16
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline co1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
4

62

373

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.95
203

0.86
434

130
Free
0%
0.86
151

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.91
136

193

0.82
76

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.91
599

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1256

1358

151

1334

1256

238

151

339

1256
7.1

1358
6.5

151
6.2

1334
7.1

1256
6.5

238
6.2

151
4.1

339
4.1

3.5
0
107

4.0
96
95

3.3
92
893

3.5
100
84

4.0
100
110

3.3
100
801

2.2
100
1424

2.2
64
1214

EB 1
603
599
0
107
5.66
Err
Err
F
8885.8
F

EB 2
76
0
76
893
0.08
7
9.4
A

NB 1
339
0
203
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 1
434
434
0
1214
0.36
41
9.6
A
7.1

SB 2
151
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3764.2
79.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline co1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

290

439
Free
0%
0.98
448

98
Free
0%
0.90
109

284

171
Stop
0%
0.80
214

125

0.80
156

None

None

424

1306

267

424
4.1

1306
*3.2

267
*3.2

2.2
74
1129

3.5
49
418

3.3
84
963

0.98
296

EB 1
744
296
0
1129
0.26
26
5.7
A
5.7

WB 1
424
0
316
1700
0.25
0
0.0
0.0

0.90
316

SB 1
370
214
156
549
0.67
126
24.0
C
24.0
C
8.5
88.9%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

151

59
Stop
0%
0.82
72

131

84

34

37

28

0.73
47

0.91
41

0.91
97

0.88
32

368
Free
0%
0.88
418

75

0.73
115

375
Free
0%
0.91
412

88

0.82
160

41
Stop
0%
0.73
56

0.82
184

0.88
85

4
None

None

1046

1018

461

1134

1060

412

503

412

1046
*3.5

1018
*3.5

461
*3.5

1134
*3.5

1060
*3.5

412
*3.5

503
4.1

412
4.1

3.5
62
486

4.0
86
520

3.3
81
849

3.5
70
388

4.0
89
509

3.3
95
872

2.2
96
1056

2.2
97
1141

EB 1
416
184
160
805
0.52
75
16.1
C
16.1
C

WB 1
171
115
0
420
0.41
49
19.3
C
17.2
C

WB 2
47
0
47
872
0.05
4
9.4
A

NE 1
453
41
0
1056
0.04
3
1.2
A
1.0

NE 2
97
0
97
1700
0.06
0
0.0

SW 1
535
32
85
1141
0.03
2
0.8
A
0.8

6.6
72.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
D 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

120
Free
0%
0.77
156

33

20

0.63
32

437
Stop
0%
0.82
533

16

0.55
60

199
Free
0%
0.64
311

0.50
32

216

560

186

216
4.1

560
6.4

186
6.2

2.2
98
1354

3.5
0
478

3.3
96
856

None

NB 1
216
0
60
1700
0.13
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
343
32
0
1354
0.02
2
0.9
A
0.9

NW 1
565
533
32
490
1.15
499
117.4
F
117.4
F
59.3
55.1%
15

PR-743 int PR-743 AM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

ICU Level of Service

Synchro 7 - Report
D 17

APENDICE E
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Condicin Existente

E-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
76
0
76
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1751
1.00
1751
0.87
444
37
636
3%

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
388
0.82
66
0
66
3%
Perm

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1686
1.00
1686
0.82
229
97
439
3%

252
1900

63
1900

0.88
72
0
0
3%
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
58
26
32
3%
Perm

301
1900

0.82
307
0
0
3%

187
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1822
0.58
1072
0.88
212
0
284
3%

263
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1797
0.66
1210
0.84
313
0
671
3%

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.84
46
9
37
3%
Perm

19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
666
0.04
0.11
10.0
1.00
0.3
10.4
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.87
229
0
0
3%

8!
4
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
665

8
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
147

c0.36
0.96
15.1
1.00
25.6
40.7
D
37.7
D

0.17
0.45
11.6
1.00
9.6
21.2
C

52.5
1.09
50.0
92.9%
15

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

2
2

19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
641
0.26
0.69
13.0
1.00
5.9
18.9
B
19.1
B

0.84
358
0
0
3%
Perm

23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
493
0.27
0.58
9.9
1.00
4.8
14.8
B
13.5
B

6
2
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
721
0.02
0.04
7.4
1.00
0.1
7.6
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
557
c0.55
1.20
13.5
1.00
108.3
121.8
F
114.5
F

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
721
0.02
0.05
7.5
1.00
0.1
7.6
A

Synchro 7 - Report
E2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory Entrance

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123

552
Free
0%
0.95
581

90

125

0.83
108

0.25
4

0.25
4

0.89
140

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

215

0.92
1

1
Stop
0%
0.25
4

0.92
1

616
Free
0%
0.86
716

0.91
236

0.83
148

None

None

825

582

1887

1705

582

1657

1651

770

825
4.1

582
4.1

1887
7.1

1705
6.5

582
6.2

1657
7.1

1651
6.5

770
6.2

2.2
82
806

2.2
100
992

3.5
79
19

4.0
95
74

3.3
99
513

3.5
0
64

4.0
99
80

3.3
41
400

EB 1
730
148
1
806
0.18
17
4.5
A
4.5

WB 1
826
1
108
992
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
12
4
4
44
0.28
23
116.7
F
116.7
F

SB 1
378
140
236
135
2.81
863
884.2
F
884.2
F

174.1
110.7%
15

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

ICU Level of Service

Synchro 7 - Report
E3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

240
1900

215
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
253
0
535
3%

165
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
194
20
174
3%
Perm

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.89
0.99
1626
0.99
1626
0.89
112
56
568
3%

99
1900

357
1900

36
1900

0.89
401
0
0
3%

0.85
42
0
0
3%
Perm

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
75
37
38
3%
Perm

202
1900

0.89
111
0
0
3%

237
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1833
0.90
1662
0.85
279
0
321
3%

252
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1805
0.61
1123
0.97
260
0
468
3%

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.97
49
6
43
3%
Perm

0.85
282
0
0
3%
Perm

6!
6

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
740
0.31
0.72
27.9
1.00
6.1
33.9
C
30.9
C

2!
6
49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
662
0.11
0.26
21.8
1.00
1.0
22.7
C

4
4

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
687
c0.35

59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
845

0.83
29.7
1.00
11.0
40.7
D
40.7
D

32.3
0.82
116.0
111.1%
15

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.97
208
0
0
3%
Perm

0.19
0.38
17.4
1.00
1.3
18.7
B
17.9
B

8
4
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
798
0.02
0.05
14.4
1.00
0.1
14.5
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
H

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
571
c0.42
0.82
24.0
1.07
11.5
37.3
D
35.3
D

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
798
0.03
0.05
14.4
1.10
0.1
15.9
B

Synchro 7 - Report
E4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NEL

NER

378
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.93
406
0
406
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
226
117
109
3%
Perm

164
1900

301
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1813
0.64
1178
0.89
338
0
522
3%

564
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
606
0
606
3%

213
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
229
52
177
3%
Perm

28.0
28.0
0.48
4.0
569

22.0
22.0
0.38
4.0
665
c0.35

0.89
184
0
0
3%
Perm

4
28.0
28.0
0.48
4.0
891
0.22
0.46
9.9
1.00
1.7
11.6
B
10.6
B

4
28.0
28.0
0.48
4.0
757

0.07
0.14
8.3
1.00
0.4
8.7
A

c0.44
0.92
13.9
1.11
19.9
35.4
D
35.4
D
23.0
0.92
58.0
86.1%
15

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.91
17.1
0.91
14.8
30.4
C
24.7
C

2
22.0
22.0
0.38
4.0
595
0.11
0.30
12.6
0.70
0.9
9.8
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
E5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
128
0
128
3%

346
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
372
314
58
3%
Perm

415
1900

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.59
1082
0.89
252
0
718
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1748
1.00
1748
0.86
223
20
345
3%

122
1900

90.0
90.0
0.78
4.0
839

90.0
90.0
0.78
4.0
1356
0.20

0.89
466
0
0
3%
Perm

6
18.0
18.0
0.16
4.0
272
c0.07
0.47
44.7
1.00
5.7
50.4
D
46.6
D

6
18.0
18.0
0.16
4.0
243

0.86
142
0
0
3%

0.04
0.24
43.0
1.00
2.3
45.3
D

c0.66
0.86
8.7
0.87
10.4
17.9
B
17.9
B
23.8
0.79
116.0
68.9%
15

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.25
3.6
1.00
0.5
4.1
A
4.1
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
E6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SBL

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

38
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
41
0
41

170
293
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1583
1770
1.00
0.29
1583
539
0.92
0.92
185
318
0
0
185
318
Free custom

0
1900

869
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
945
0
945

10
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
11
2
9
Perm

0.92
0
0
0

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
213
c0.02
0.19
32.9
1.00
2.0
34.9
C
6.4
A

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1583

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
422

0.12
0.12
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

c0.59
0.75
4.8
1.00
11.8
16.6
B

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2772
0.27

16.6
B
6.3
0.68
83.0
55.3%
15

0.34
2.7
1.00
0.2
2.9
A
2.9
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1240
0.01
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
E7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

702
1900
4.0
0.97
0.98
0.96
3389
0.96
3389
0.92
763
0
896

122
1900

648
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
704
0
704
Free

39
1900

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.97
1714
0.97
1714
0.92
58
16
145

56
1900

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
243
0
243
Prot
5

1169
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
1271
0
1271

52
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
57
18
39
Perm

75
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
82
0
82
Prot
1

726
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
789
0
789

238
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
259
0
259
Free

11.7
11.7
0.09
4.0
3.0
151
0.05

65.0
65.0
0.47
4.0
8.0
1679
0.22

0.54
60.1
1.00
3.9
64.0
E

0.47
24.3
1.00
0.9
25.3
C
22.4
C

0.92
133
0
0

0.92
42
0
0
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
989
c0.26
0.91
46.7
1.00
13.3
60.0
E
34.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
61
0
0

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
500

1583
0.44
0.44
0.0
1.00
0.9
0.9
A

31.9
0.78
137.0
82.2%
15

0.08
0.29
37.5
1.00
1.5
39.0
D
39.0
D

20.0
20.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
258
c0.14

73.3
73.3
0.54
4.0
8.0
1893
c0.36

0.94
57.9
1.00
40.3
98.2
F

0.67
23.1
1.00
1.9
25.0
C
36.0
D

2
73.3
73.3
0.54
4.0
8.0
847
0.02
0.05
15.2
1.00
0.1
15.3
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.16
0.16
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

Synchro 7 - Report
E8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

157
Stop
0%
0.93
169

120

125

0.94
133

563
Free
0%
0.85
662

145

0.93
129

429
Free
0%
0.94
456

None

None

1385

662

662

1385
*4.2

662
*4.1

662
4.1

*2.2
59
412

*2.2
86
936

2.2
85
917

EB 1
298
169
129
544
0.55
82
19.3
C
19.3
C

NE 1
589
133
0
917
0.15
13
3.6
A
3.6

SW 1
662
0
0
1700
0.39
0
0.0

0.85
171

SW 2
171
0
171
1700
0.10
0
0.0

0.0

4.6
85.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North PM PEAK 4/3/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
E9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

38
Stop
0%
0.87
44

177

291

0.81
359

278
Free
0%
0.86
323

80

0.87
203

159
Free
0%
0.81
196

None

None

1285

370

416

1285
*4.1

370
*4.1

416
*4.1

*3.3
85
295

*3.3
76
844

2.2
69
1145

EB 1
247
44
203
635
0.39
46
14.2
B
14.2
B

NB 1
556
359
0
1145
0.31
34
7.4
A
7.4

SB 1
416
0
93
1700
0.24
0
0.0

0.86
93

0.0

6.3
67.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

257

633
Free
0%
0.93
681

568
Free
0%
0.93
611

359

162
Stop
0%
0.90
180

172

0.90
191

None

None

997

2037

804

997
4.1

2037
*4.2

804
*4.2

2.2
60
690

3.5
0
131

3.3
68
600

0.93
276

EB 1
957
276
0
690
0.40
48
10.4
B
10.4

WB 1
997
0
386
1700
0.59
0
0.0
0.0

0.93
386

SB 1
371
180
191
220
1.69
615
367.7
F
367.7
F
63.0
128.9%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

257
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.79
325
0
325
4%

386
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.86
449
269
180
4%
Perm

336
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.52
947
0.88
382
0
382
4%
Perm

366
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.73
501
0
501
4%

692
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.83
834
0
834
3%

259
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.89
291
175
116
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
379

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.26

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.45

0.11
0.27
8.1
1.00
1.0
9.1
A

c0.40
1.01
12.0
1.00
48.2
60.2
E

0.64
9.7
1.00
4.0
13.7
B
33.8
C

1.11
12.0
1.00
69.2
81.2
F
62.3
E

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.16
0.39
8.5
1.00
1.4
9.9
A
9.4
A

38.6
1.06
40.0
80.5%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.07
0.17
7.7
1.00
0.6
8.3
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
D

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

491

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
287

283
Free
0%
0.90
314

131

0.99
496

167
Free
0%
0.75
223

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.88
159

None

0.94
139

None
716

954

1251

223

454

223

1677

1181

954
7.6

1251
6.6

223
7.0

454
4.2

223
4.2

1677
7.5

1181
6.5

3.5
6
169

4.0
100
126

3.3
36
778

2.2
74
1096

2.2
100
1336

3.5
100
18

4.0
100
139

WB 1
159
159
0
169
0.94
178
108.8
F
39.6
E

WB 2
496
0
496
778
0.64
117
17.4
C

NB 1
287
287
0
1096
0.26
26
9.4
A
5.3

NB 2
223
0
0
1700
0.13
0
0.0

17.7
60.4%
15

SB 1
210
0
0
1700
0.12
0
0.0

SB 2
244
0
139
1700
0.14
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

280

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

113

345

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
163

0.92
375

113
Free
0%
0.80
141

0.92
0

123
Free
0%
0.93
132

152

0.86
131

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
304

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1105

1187

141

1237

1105

214

141

296

1105
7.1

1187
6.5

141
6.2

1237
7.1

1105
6.5

214
6.2

141
4.1

296
4.1

3.5
0
144

4.0
100
132

3.3
85
904

3.5
100
101

4.0
100
148

3.3
100
826

2.2
100
1436

2.2
70
1260

EB 1
304
304
0
144
2.11
616
572.2
F
402.6
F

EB 2
131
0
131
904
0.15
13
9.7
A

NB 1
296
0
163
1700
0.17
0
0.0

SB 1
375
375
0
1260
0.30
31
9.1
A
6.6

SB 2
141
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

0.0

143.3
60.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Baseline CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

162

408
Free
0%
0.93
439

64
Free
0%
0.92
70

452

125
Stop
0%
0.75
167

155

0.75
207

None

None

561

1102

315

561
4.1

1102
*4.2

315
*4.2

2.2
83
1005

3.5
56
381

3.3
76
863

0.93
174

EB 1
613
174
0
1005
0.17
16
4.2
A
4.2

WB 1
561
0
491
1700
0.33
0
0.0
0.0

0.92
491

SB 1
373
167
207
552
0.68
128
24.1
C
24.1
C
7.5
88.1%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

86

43
Stop
0%
0.83
52

48

62

83

68

122

0.86
97

0.90
76

0.90
50

0.96
127

586
Free
0%
0.96
610

227

0.86
72

420
Free
0%
0.90
467

45

0.83
58

64
Stop
0%
0.86
74

0.83
104

0.96
236

4
None

None

1638

1601

729

1655

1719

467

847

467

1638
*3.5

1601
*3.5

729
*3.5

1655
*3.5

1719
*3.5

467
*3.5

847
4.1

467
4.1

3.5
59
255

4.0
84
324

3.3
92
732

3.5
75
283

4.0
75
302

3.3
89
846

2.2
90
786

2.2
88
1090

EB 1
213
104
58
381
0.56
82
27.0
D
27.0
D

WB 1
147
72
0
292
0.50
66
29.1
D
21.4
C

WB 2
97
0
97
846
0.11
10
9.8
A

NE 1
542
76
0
786
0.10
8
2.6
A
2.3

NE 2
50
0
50
1700
0.03
0
0.0

SW 1
974
127
236
1090
0.12
10
2.9
A
2.9

7.5
101.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Baseline


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
E 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

251
Free
0%
0.91
276

14

13

0.81
16

227
Stop
0%
0.93
244

12

0.70
20

180
Free
0%
0.96
188

0.75
16

296

505

286

296
4.1

505
6.4

286
6.2

2.2
99
1266

3.5
53
520

3.3
98
753

None

NB 1
296
0
20
1700
0.17
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
204
16
0
1266
0.01
1
0.7
A
0.7

NW 1
260
244
16
530
0.49
67
18.2
C
18.2
C
6.4
40.1%
15

PR-743 int PR-743 PM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Baseline CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

ICU Level of Service

Synchro 7 - Report
E 17

APENDICE F
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 No Accin

F-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
113%
179
0
179
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1722
1.00
1722
0.70
113%
623
33
1084
3%

306
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.75
113%
96
0
96
3%
pm+pt
3
8
35.4
35.4
0.48
4.0
3.0
250
0.03
0.15
0.38
15.0
1.00
1.0
16.0
B

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1724
1.00
1724
0.75
113%
297
38
488
3%

152
1900

93
1900

0.80
113%
131
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.80
113%
150
19
131
3%
Perm

209
1900

0.75
113%
229
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.08
149
0.80
113%
462
0
593
3%

435
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1815
0.29
527
0.90
113%
546
0
808
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
113%
103
7
96
3%
Perm

25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
597
0.10
0.30
17.8
1.00
1.3
19.1
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
113%
494
0
0
3%

4
25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
587
c0.63
1.85
24.2
1.00
387.6
411.9
F
357.6
F
1080.7
5.58
73.6
126.6%
15

8!

2
2

35.4
35.4
0.48
4.0
3.0
829
c0.28
0.59
13.8
1.00
3.1
16.9
B
16.7
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.90
113%
262
0
0
3%
Perm

30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
61
c3.98
9.72
21.7
1.00
3957.2
3978.9
F
3178.5
F

6
2
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
643
0.08
0.20
14.0
1.00
0.2
14.1
B

6
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
216
1.53
3.74
21.7
1.00
1244.6
1266.3
F
1124.7
F

6
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
643
0.06
0.15
13.6
1.00
0.5
14.1
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
F2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106

593
Free
0%
0.93
721

118

91

0.25
533

0.25
5

0.92
1

0.88
117

1
Stop
0%
0.93
1

83

0.92
1

3
Stop
0%
0.38
9

0.92
1

270
Free
0%
0.78
391

0.93
101

0.83
144

None

None

925

722

1772

1937

721

1676

1671

658

925
4.1

722
4.1

1772
7.1

1937
6.5

721
6.2

1676
7.1

1671
6.5

658
6.2

2.2
80
735

2.2
100
876

3.5
89
42

4.0
83
52

3.3
100
426

3.5
0
56

4.0
98
77

3.3
78
463

EB 1
866
144
1
735
0.20
18
5.0
A
5.0

WB 1
926
1
533
876
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
15
5
1
52
0.28
24
98.8
F
98.8
F
79.2
94.4%
15

SB 1
219
117
101
94
2.34
495
706.4
F
706.4
F

ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

97
1900

232
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1725
0.96
1725
0.91
113%
288
17
495
3%

84
1900

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.88
1.00
1612
1.00
1612
0.91
113%
127
37
1284
3%

161
1900

375
1900

116
1900

0.91
113%
466
0
0
3%

0.91
113%
144
0
0
3%
Perm

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
113%
145
64
81
3%
Perm

210
1900

0.25
113%
728
0
0
3%

373
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1823
0.82
1504
0.91
113%
463
0
607
3%

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.36
672
0.90
113%
149
0
413
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
113%
68
15
53
3%
Perm

0.91
113%
120
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
113%
104
0
0
3%

6!

2!

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
511

16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
478
c0.80

0.29
0.97
18.8
1.00
32.8
51.6
D
51.6
D

30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
836
0.40
0.73
8.9
1.00
3.2
12.1
B
10.9
B

2.69
19.0
1.00
765.1
784.1
F
784.1
F
361.5
1.66
54.0
133.1%
15

0.90
113%
264
0
0
3%
Perm

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8
4
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.05
0.09
5.6
1.00
0.0
5.7
A

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
373
c0.61
1.11
12.0
1.00
78.8
90.8
F
78.7
E

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.03
0.06
5.5
1.00
0.1
5.7
A

F
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
F4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

1
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3504
0.95
3342
0.88
113%
286
0
287
3%

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
113%
136
0
136
3%
Free

264
1900

214
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3411
0.63
2205
0.83
113%
291
0
650
3%

0
1900

557
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
119%
713
0
535
3%
Split
8

2
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1558
0.98
1558
0.92
119%
3
50
443
2%

244
1900

2
1900

0
1900

0.93
119%
312
0
0
3%

0.92
119%
3
0
0
2%
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1832
1.00
1863
0.92
119%
6
0
9
2%

0.92
113%
1
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
20.5
20.5
0.28
4.0
8.0
935
0.09
0.31
20.8
1.00
0.8
21.6
C
14.7
B

Free
73.3
73.3
1.00

1568
c0.09
0.09
0.0
1.00
0.1
0.1
A

26.4
0.65
73.3
68.8%
15

0.83
113%
359
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

4
4

34.6
34.6
0.47
4.0
8.0
1207
c0.07
c0.18
0.54
13.7
1.00
1.6
15.3
B
15.3
B

25.4
25.4
0.35
4.0
3.0
577
c0.32

25.4
25.4
0.35
4.0
3.0
540
0.28

0.93
23.1
1.00
21.1
44.1
D

0.82
21.9
1.00
9.7
31.6
C
38.1
D

1.3
1.3
0.02
4.0
3.0
33
0.00
0.27
35.5
1.00
4.4
40.0
D
40.0
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
C

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
113%
106
0
106
3%

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
113%
336
278
58
3%
Perm

331
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.33
602
0.89
113%
420
0
420
3%
pm+pt
5
2
41.7
41.7
0.69
4.0
4.0
833
c0.18
0.17
0.50
4.7
1.00
0.7
5.4
A

148
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
113%
188
0
188
3%

234
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
113%
297
0
297
3%

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.89
113%
99
73
26
3%
Perm

41.7
41.7
0.69
4.0
4.0
1280
0.10

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
4.0
491
c0.16

0.15
3.1
1.00
0.1
3.2
A
4.7
A

0.60
19.3
1.00
2.4
21.7
C
20.4
C

4
10.4
10.4
0.17
4.0
4.0
303
c0.06
0.35
21.9
1.00
1.0
22.8
C
22.1
C

4
10.4
10.4
0.17
4.0
4.0
271
0.04
0.21
21.3
1.00
0.5
21.9
C

14.3
0.51
60.1
50.5%
15

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
4.0
417
0.02
0.06
16.5
1.00
0.1
16.5
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

B
12.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
F6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

SBL
20
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
119%
26
0
26

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

200
296
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1583
1770
1.00
0.27
1583
505
0.92
0.92
119% 119%
259
383
0
0
259
383
Free custom

0
1900

774
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
119%
1001
0
1001

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
119%
9
2
7
Perm

0.92
119%
0
0
0

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
213
0.01
0.12
32.6
1.00
1.2
33.8
C
3.3
A

4/23/2010

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1583

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
395

c0.16
0.16
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

c0.76
0.97
8.1
1.00
38.3
46.4
D

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2772
0.28

46.4
D
12.9
0.83
83.0
60.0%
15

0.36
2.7
1.00
0.2
2.9
A
2.9
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1240
0.00
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
4.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
F7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

839
1900
4.0
0.97
0.99
0.95
3429
0.95
3429
0.92
113%
1031
0
1069

31
1900

647
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
795
0
795
Free

57
1900

42
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1746
0.96
1746
0.92
113%
52
6
143

22
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
119%
141
0
141
Prot
5

924
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
119%
1195
0
1195

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
119%
22
7
15
Perm

36
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
119%
47
0
47
Prot
1

770
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
119%
996
0
996

168
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
119%
217
0
217
Free

9.0
9.0
0.07
4.0
3.0
116
0.03

69.3
69.3
0.51
4.0
8.0
1790
0.28

0.41
61.4
1.00
2.3
63.7
E

0.56
23.3
1.00
1.3
24.5
C
21.8
C

0.92
113%
38
0
0

0.92
113%
70
0
0
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
1001
c0.31
1.07
48.5
1.00
48.4
96.9
F
56.1
E

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
27
0
0

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.50
0.50
0.0
1.00
1.1
1.1
A

37.5
0.75
137.0
83.8%
15

8
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
510
0.08
0.28
37.4
1.00
1.4
38.8
D
38.8
D

15.7
15.7
0.11
4.0
3.0
203
c0.08

76.0
76.0
0.55
4.0
8.0
1963
c0.34

0.69
58.3
1.00
9.9
68.2
E

0.61
20.5
1.00
1.4
21.9
C
26.6
C

2
76.0
76.0
0.55
4.0
8.0
878
0.01
0.02
13.7
1.00
0.0
13.7
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.14
0.14
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

Synchro 7 - Report
F8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

142
Stop
0%
0.91
176

112

54

0.94
65

357
Free
0%
0.90
448

116

0.91
139

360
Free
0%
0.94
433

None

None

1011

448

448

1011
*4.2

448
6.2

448
4.1

3.5
62
465

3.3
77
608

2.2
94
1102

EB 1
315
176
139
519
0.61
100
22.1
C
22.1
C

NE 1
498
65
0
1102
0.06
5
1.7
A
1.7

SW 1
448
0
0
1700
0.26
0
0.0

0.90
146

SW 2
146
0
146
1700
0.09
0
0.0

0.0

5.5
72.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North AM PEAK 4/3/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

54
Stop
0%
0.77
79

461

113

0.81
158

183
Free
0%
0.86
240

48

0.77
677

106
Free
0%
0.81
148

None

None

735

272

304

735
*4.1

272
*4.1

304
*4.1

*3.3
86
568

*3.3
25
904

2.2
87
1259

EB 1
756
79
677
851
0.89
297
32.2
D
32.2
D

NB 1
306
158
0
1259
0.13
11
4.8
A
4.8

SB 1
304
0
63
1700
0.18
0
0.0

0.86
63

0.0

18.9
73.1%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

173

518
Free
0%
0.92
636

547
Free
0%
0.91
679

111

420
Stop
0%
0.91
522

260

0.91
323

None

None

679

1809

748

679
4.1

1809
*3.5

748
*3.5

2.2
77
908

3.5
0
288

3.3
55
724

0.92
212

EB 1
849
212
0
908
0.23
23
5.4
A
5.4

WB 1
817
0
138
1700
0.48
0
0.0
0.0

0.91
138

SB 1
844
522
323
374
2.26
1595
598.3
F
598.3
F
203.1
136.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

180
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.90
113%
226
0
226
4%

704
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.85
113%
936
562
374
4%
Perm

511
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.62
1128
0.89
113%
649
0
649
4%
Perm

172
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.74
113%
263
0
263
4%

463
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.78
113%
671
0
671
3%

185
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.60
113%
348
209
139
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
451

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.13

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.36

0.23
0.57
9.3
1.00
3.5
12.8
B

c0.58
1.44
12.0
1.00
209.9
221.9
F

0.34
8.3
1.00
1.2
9.5
A
160.6
F

0.90
11.2
1.00
15.7
26.9
C
20.6
C

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.11
0.27
8.1
1.00
0.8
8.9
A
12.0
B

58.7
1.17
40.0
87.9%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.08
0.21
7.9
1.00
0.7
8.6
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

E
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
F 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
5

731

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.89
617

402
Free
0%
0.96
473

103

0.91
964

183
Free
0%
0.89
232

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.87
139

None

0.83
140

None
716

1703

2080

116

613

232

2860

2010

1703
7.6

2080
6.6

116
7.0

613
4.2

232
4.2

2860
7.5

2010
6.5

3.5
0
28

4.0
74
18

3.3
0
911

2.2
35
955

2.2
100
1325

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
21

WB 1
144
139
0
28
5.18
Err
Err
F
1359.0
F

WB 2
964
0
964
911
1.06
565
67.4
F

NB 1
695
617
0
955
0.65
123
14.8
B
12.1

NB 2
155
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

589.8
91.4%
15

SB 1
315
0
0
1700
0.19
0
0.0

SB 2
298
0
140
1700
0.18
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
5

62

373

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.95
230

0.86
490

130
Free
0%
0.86
171

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.91
154

193

0.82
91

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.91
719

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1420

1535

171

1513

1420

269

171

384

1420
7.1

1535
6.5

171
6.2

1513
7.1

1420
6.5

269
6.2

171
4.1

384
4.1

3.5
0
77

4.0
93
67

3.3
90
870

3.5
100
56

4.0
100
79

3.3
100
770

2.2
100
1400

2.2
58
1169

EB 1
723
719
0
77
9.46
Err
Err
F
8885.8
F

EB 2
91
0
91
870
0.10
9
9.6
A

NB 1
384
0
230
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 1
490
490
0
1169
0.42
53
10.3
B
7.6

SB 2
171
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3895.2
90.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

290

439
Free
0%
0.98
506

98
Free
0%
0.90
123

284

171
Stop
0%
0.80
242

125

0.80
177

None

None

480

1476

301

480
4.1

1476
*3.2

301
*3.2

2.2
69
1078

3.5
33
359

3.3
81
948

0.98
334

EB 1
841
334
0
1078
0.31
33
6.5
A
6.5

WB 1
480
0
357
1700
0.28
0
0.0
0.0

0.90
357

SB 1
418
242
177
486
0.86
224
43.0
E
43.0
E
13.5
99.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

151

59
Stop
0%
0.82
88

131

84

34

37

28

0.73
57

0.91
46

0.91
109

0.88
36

368
Free
0%
0.88
473

75

0.73
142

375
Free
0%
0.91
466

88

0.82
196

41
Stop
0%
0.73
69

0.82
226

0.88
96

4
None

None

1185

1150

521

1293

1198

466

569

466

1185
*3.5

1150
*3.5

521
*3.5

1293
*3.5

1198
*3.5

466
*3.5

569
4.1

466
4.1

3.5
47
425

4.0
82
479

3.3
76
822

3.5
55
315

4.0
85
467

3.3
93
847

2.2
95
998

2.2
97
1091

EB 1
512
226
196
714
0.72
152
23.4
C
23.4
C

WB 1
211
142
0
353
0.60
92
29.2
D
25.0
D

WB 2
57
0
57
847
0.07
5
9.6
A

NE 1
512
46
0
998
0.05
4
1.3
A
1.1

NE 2
109
0
109
1700
0.06
0
0.0

SW 1
605
36
96
1091
0.03
3
0.9
A
0.9

9.9
81.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothign 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
F 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

120
Free
0%
0.77
189

33

20

0.63
38

437
Stop
0%
0.82
645

16

0.55
73

199
Free
0%
0.64
376

0.50
39

261

678

225

261
4.1

678
6.4

225
6.2

2.2
97
1303

3.5
0
405

3.3
95
815

None

NB 1
261
0
73
1700
0.15
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
415
38
0
1303
0.03
2
1.0
A
1.0

NW 1
684
645
39
417
1.64
993
321.4
F
321.4
F
161.9
64.6%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-743 int PR-743 AM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Do Notinh 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

Synchro 7 - Report
F 17

APENDICE G
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 No Accin

G-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
113%
86
0
86
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1751
1.00
1751
0.87
113%
501
37
722
3%

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
388
0.82
113%
74
0
74
3%
Perm

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1686
1.00
1686
0.82
113%
259
97
509
3%

252
1900

63
1900

51
1900

301
1900

0.82
113%
347
0
0
3%

0.88
113%
81
0
0
3%
Perm

187
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1784
0.45
807
0.88
113%
240
15
371
3%

0.88
113%
65
0
0
3%

0.84
113%
405
0
0
3%
Perm

263
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1797
0.63
1169
0.84
113%
354
0
759
3%

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.84
113%
52
9
43
3%
Perm

19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
666
0.05
0.13
10.1
1.00
0.1
10.2
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.87
113%
258
0
0
3%

8!
4
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
665

8
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
147

c0.41
1.09
15.5
1.00
60.3
75.8
E
69.2
E

0.19
0.50
11.9
1.00
2.7
14.6
B

93.5
1.26
50.0
106.4%
15

2
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
641
0.30
0.79
13.8
1.00
6.7
20.5
C
19.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
371

23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
538

0.46
1.00
13.5
1.00
47.0
60.5
E
60.5
E

c0.65
1.41
13.5
1.00
195.7
209.2
F
196.3
F

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
721
0.03
0.06
7.5
1.00
0.2
7.7
A

F
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
G2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123

552
Free
0%
0.95
657

90

125

0.83
123

0.25
5

0.25
5

0.89
159

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

215

0.92
1

1
Stop
0%
0.25
5

0.92
1

612
Free
0%
0.86
804

0.91
267

0.83
167

None

None

927

658

2128

1921

657

1867

1861

865

927
4.1

658
4.1

2128
7.1

1921
6.5

657
6.2

1867
7.1

1861
6.5

865
6.2

2.2
77
734

2.2
100
925

3.5
35
7

4.0
91
51

3.3
99
463

3.5
0
42

4.0
98
56

3.3
24
352

EB 1
825
167
1
734
0.23
22
5.7
A
5.7

WB 1
928
1
123
925
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
14
5
5
18
0.74
50
407.7
F
407.7
F
1950.6
122.7%
15

SB 1
427
159
267
94
4.56
Err
Err
F
Err
F

ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

240
1900

215
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
113%
286
0
605
3%

165
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
113%
219
20
199
3%
Perm

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.89
0.99
1626
0.99
1626
0.89
113%
127
55
651
3%

99
1900

357
1900

36
1900

0.89
113%
453
0
0
3%

0.85
113%
48
0
0
3%
Perm

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
113%
85
42
43
3%
Perm

202
1900

0.89
113%
126
0
0
3%

237
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1833
0.82
1510
0.85
113%
315
0
363
3%

252
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1805
0.57
1050
0.97
113%
294
0
529
3%

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.97
113%
56
6
50
3%
Perm

0.85
113%
319
0
0
3%
Perm

6!
6

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
740
0.35
0.82
29.6
1.00
9.7
39.3
D
35.1
D

2!
6
49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
662
0.13
0.30
22.2
1.00
1.2
23.3
C

43.5
0.97
116.0
123.8%
15

0.97
113%
235
0
0
3%
Perm

4
4

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
687
c0.40

59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
768

0.95
32.2
1.00
23.5
55.8
E
55.8
E

0.24
0.47
18.4
1.00
0.5
18.9
B
18.0
B

8
4
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.03
0.05
14.4
1.00
0.0
14.4
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
H

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
534
c0.50
0.99
28.2
1.00
36.4
64.6
E
59.8
E

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.03
0.06
14.5
1.00
0.0
14.5
B

Synchro 7 - Report
G4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

1
1900

398
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
0.95
3344
0.93
113%
484
0
485
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
113%
255
0
255
3%
Free

180
1900

351
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3446
0.65
2271
0.89
113%
446
0
675
3%

0
1900

564
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.72
1261
0.93
119%
722
0
527
3%
pm+pt
3
8
34.9
34.9
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
c0.25
c0.09
0.66
11.9
1.00
4.3
16.2
B

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1564
0.89
1418
0.92
100%
0
37
450
2%

228
1900

1
1900

0
1900

0.93
119%
292
0
0
3%

0.92
100%
1
0
0
2%
Split
4!

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1817
0.98
1817
0.92
100%
1
0
2
2%

0.92
100%
1
0
0
2%
pm+pt
5
2

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

2
25.0
25.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
1231
0.15
0.39
15.9
1.00
0.2
16.1
B
10.6
B

Free
67.9
67.9
1.00

0.89
113%
229
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

6
25.0
25.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
836

1568
0.16
0.16
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

16.6
0.72
67.9
72.9%
15

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%

c0.30
0.81
19.3
1.00
5.8
25.0
C
25.0
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8!
34.9
34.9
0.51
4.0
3.0
783
0.21
0.08
0.57
11.4
1.00
3.1
14.4
B
15.3
B

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%

4
5.7
5.7
0.08
4.0
3.0
153
0.00
0.01
28.5
1.00
0.0
28.6
C
28.6
C

B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
G5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
113%
145
0
145
3%

346
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
113%
420
284
136
3%
Perm

415
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.27
501
0.89
113%
527
0
527
3%
pm+pt
5
2
46.9
46.9
0.58
4.0
3.0
711
c0.25
c0.18
0.74
12.3
1.00
4.2
16.5
B

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
113%
284
0
284
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.86
113%
252
0
252
3%

122
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.86
113%
160
129
31
3%
Perm

46.9
46.9
0.58
4.0
3.0
1064
0.15

15.5
15.5
0.19
4.0
3.0
352
0.14

0.27
8.6
1.00
0.1
8.7
A
13.8
B

0.72
30.8
1.00
6.8
37.6
D
33.6
C

4
26.4
26.4
0.32
4.0
3.0
569
0.08
0.25
20.2
1.00
1.1
21.3
C
21.5
C

4
26.4
26.4
0.32
4.0
3.0
509
c0.09
0.27
20.3
1.00
1.3
21.6
C

20.8
0.56
81.3
54.8%
15

6
15.5
15.5
0.19
4.0
3.0
299
0.02
0.10
27.2
1.00
0.2
27.3
C

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
A

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

SBL
38
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
49
0
49
3%

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

170
293
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1568
1752
1.00
0.23
1568
433
0.92
0.92
119% 119%
220
379
0
0
220
379
3%
3%
Free custom

0
1900

869
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
1124
0
1124
3%

10
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
13
3
10
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
0
0
0
3%

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
211
c0.03
0.23
33.0
1.00
2.6
35.6
D
6.6
A

4/23/2010

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1568

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
339

0.14
0.14
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

c0.88
1.12
9.0
1.00
84.7
93.7
F

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2745
0.32

93.7
F
22.9
1.00
83.0
62.9%
15

0.41
2.9
1.00
0.3
3.2
A
3.1
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1228
0.01
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
B

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2018
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

702
1900
4.0
0.97
0.98
0.96
3356
0.96
3356
0.92
113%
862
0
1012
3%

122
1900

648
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
796
0
796
3%
Free

39
1900

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.97
1698
0.97
1698
0.92
113%
65
16
166
3%

56
1900

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
290
0
290
3%
Prot
5

1169
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
1512
0
1512
3%

52
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
67
18
49
3%
Perm

75
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
97
0
97
3%
Prot
1

726
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
939
0
939
3%

238
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
308
0
308
3%
Free

12.9
12.9
0.09
4.0
3.0
165
0.06

65.0
65.0
0.47
4.0
8.0
1663
0.27

0.59
59.5
1.00
5.3
64.8
E

0.56
25.8
1.00
1.4
27.2
C
23.8
C

0.92
113%
150
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
48
0
0
3%
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
980
c0.30
1.03
48.5
1.00
37.5
86.0
F
48.6
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
69
0
0
3%

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1568
0.51
0.51
0.0
1.00
1.2
1.2
A

42.4
0.92
137.0
93.3%
15

8
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
496
0.10
0.33
38.1
1.00
1.8
39.9
D
39.9
D

20.0
20.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
256
c0.17

72.1
72.1
0.53
4.0
8.0
1845
c0.43

1.13
58.5
1.00
96.8
155.3
F

0.82
27.0
1.00
4.2
31.2
C
49.9
D

2
72.1
72.1
0.53
4.0
8.0
825
0.03
0.06
15.9
1.00
0.1
16.0
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1568
0.20
0.20
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A

Synchro 7 - Report
G8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

157
Stop
0%
0.93
191

120

125

0.94
150

563
Free
0%
0.85
748

145

0.93
146

429
Free
0%
0.94
516

None

None

1565

748

748

1565
*4.2

748
*4.1

748
4.1

*2.2
43
337

*2.2
83
869

2.2
82
851

EB 1
337
191
146
459
0.73
149
31.5
D
31.5
D

NE 1
666
150
0
851
0.18
16
4.3
A
4.3

SW 1
748
0
0
1700
0.44
0
0.0

0.85
193

SW 2
193
0
193
1700
0.11
0
0.0

0.0

6.9
94.9%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North PM PEAK 4/3/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

38
Stop
0%
0.87
49

177

291

0.81
406

278
Free
0%
0.86
365

80

0.87
230

159
Free
0%
0.81
222

None

None

1452

418

470

1452
*4.1

418
*4.1

470
*4.1

*3.3
79
238

*3.3
72
816

2.2
63
1094

EB 1
279
49
230
570
0.49
67
17.2
C
17.2
C

NB 1
628
406
0
1094
0.37
43
8.1
A
8.1

SB 1
470
0
105
1700
0.28
0
0.0

0.86
105

0.0

7.2
74.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

257

633
Free
0%
0.93
769

568
Free
0%
0.93
690

359

162
Stop
0%
0.90
203

172

0.90
216

None

None

1126

2302

908

1126
4.1

2302
*3.5

908
*3.5

2.2
49
617

3.5
0
135

3.3
67
661

0.93
312

EB 1
1081
312
0
617
0.51
72
15.8
C
15.8

WB 1
1126
0
436
1700
0.66
0
0.0
0.0

0.93
436

SB 1
419
203
216
229
1.83
729
425.7
F
425.7
F
74.5
144.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

257
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.79
113%
368
0
368
4%

386
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.86
113%
507
304
203
4%
Perm

336
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.47
856
0.88
113%
431
0
431
4%
Perm

366
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.73
113%
567
0
567
4%

692
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.83
113%
942
0
942
3%

259
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.89
113%
329
197
132
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
342

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.29

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.50

0.12
0.31
8.2
1.00
1.2
9.4
A

c0.50
1.26
12.0
1.00
138.6
150.6
F

0.73
10.2
1.00
5.9
16.0
B
74.2
E

1.26
12.0
1.00
127.4
139.4
F
105.5
F

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.18
0.44
8.8
1.00
1.7
10.5
B
9.9
A

68.9
1.26
40.0
89.6%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.08
0.20
7.8
1.00
0.7
8.5
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

E
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
G 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

491

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
325

283
Free
0%
0.90
355

131

0.99
595

167
Free
0%
0.75
252

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.88
191

None

0.94
157

None
716

1078

1414

252

513

252

1930

1335

1078
7.6

1414
6.6

252
7.0

513
4.2

252
4.2

1930
7.5

1335
6.5

3.5
0
130

4.0
100
93

3.3
20
745

2.2
69
1042

2.2
100
1304

3.5
100
6

4.0
100
105

WB 1
191
191
0
130
1.46
326
307.3
F
94.4
F

WB 2
595
0
595
745
0.80
207
26.1
D

NB 1
325
325
0
1042
0.31
33
10.0
B
5.6

NB 2
252
0
0
1700
0.15
0
0.0

41.3
68.0%
15

SB 1
237
0
0
1700
0.14
0
0.0

SB 2
276
0
157
1700
0.16
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

280

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

113

345

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
185

0.92
424

113
Free
0%
0.80
160

0.92
0

123
Free
0%
0.93
149

152

0.86
158

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
365

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1249

1341

160

1407

1249

242

160

334

1249
7.1

1341
6.5

160
6.2

1407
7.1

1249
6.5

242
6.2

160
4.1

334
4.1

3.5
0
109

4.0
100
99

3.3
82
883

3.5
100
70

4.0
100
113

3.3
100
797

2.2
100
1414

2.2
65
1220

EB 1
365
365
0
109
3.35
Err
Err
F
6986.9
F

EB 2
158
0
158
883
0.18
16
10.0
A

NB 1
334
0
185
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 1
424
424
0
1220
0.35
39
9.5
A
6.9

SB 2
160
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

2539.2
68.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

162

408
Free
0%
0.93
496

64
Free
0%
0.92
79

452

125
Stop
0%
0.75
188

155

0.75
234

None

None

634

1246

356

634
4.1

1246
*3.5

356
*3.5

2.2
79
944

3.5
55
417

3.3
74
898

0.93
197

EB 1
693
197
0
944
0.21
20
4.9
A
4.9

WB 1
634
0
555
1700
0.37
0
0.0
0.0

0.92
555

SB 1
422
188
234
593
0.71
146
24.7
C
24.7
C
7.9
98.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

86

43
Stop
0%
0.83
64

48

62

83

68

122

0.86
119

0.90
85

0.90
56

0.96
144

586
Free
0%
0.96
690

227

0.86
89

420
Free
0%
0.90
527

45

0.83
71

64
Stop
0%
0.86
92

0.83
127

0.96
267

4
None

None

1854

1809

823

1876

1942

527

957

527

1854
*3.5

1809
*3.5

823
*3.5

1876
*3.5

1942
*3.5

527
*3.5

957
4.1

527
4.1

3.5
31
185

4.0
77
272

3.3
90
694

3.5
59
217

4.0
64
252

3.3
86
819

2.2
88
715

2.2
86
1035

EB 1
262
127
71
286
0.92
214
73.5
F
73.5
F

WB 1
180
89
0
233
0.77
139
58.5
F
39.3
E

WB 2
119
0
119
819
0.14
13
10.1
B

NE 1
613
85
0
715
0.12
10
3.1
A
2.8

NE 2
56
0
56
1700
0.03
0
0.0

SW 1
1101
144
267
1035
0.14
12
3.7
A
3.7

15.9
112.6%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2018


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
G 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

251
Free
0%
0.91
334

14

13

0.81
19

227
Stop
0%
0.93
295

12

0.70
24

180
Free
0%
0.96
227

0.75
19

358

612

346

358
4.1

612
6.4

346
6.2

2.2
98
1201

3.5
34
449

3.3
97
697

None

NB 1
358
0
24
1700
0.21
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
246
19
0
1201
0.02
1
0.8
A
0.8

NW 1
315
295
19
459
0.69
127
28.2
D
28.2
D
9.9
47.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-743 int PR-743 PM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Do Nothing 2018 CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

Synchro 7 - Report
G 17

APENDICE H
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 No Accin

H-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
125%
198
0
198
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1722
1.00
1722
0.70
125%
689
33
1202
3%

306
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.75
125%
107
0
107
3%
pm+pt
3
8
35.7
35.7
0.48
4.0
3.0
256
0.04
0.16
0.42
15.0
1.00
1.1
16.1
B

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1724
1.00
1724
0.75
125%
328
38
543
3%

152
1900

93
1900

0.80
125%
145
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.80
125%
166
19
147
3%
Perm

209
1900

0.75
125%
253
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.08
149
0.80
125%
511
0
656
3%

435
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1815
0.20
361
0.90
125%
604
0
894
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
125%
114
7
107
3%
Perm

25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
595
0.11
0.33
18.2
1.00
1.5
19.7
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
125%
546
0
0
3%

4
25.1
25.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
585
c0.70
2.05
24.4
1.00
480.5
504.9
F
437.9
F
1422.2
6.17
73.9
138.1%
15

8!

2
2

35.7
35.7
0.48
4.0
3.0
833
c0.32
0.65
14.4
1.00
4.0
18.4
B
18.0
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.90
125%
290
0
0
3%
Perm

30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
61
c4.40
10.75
21.9
1.00
4421.6
4443.5
F
3549.1
F

6
2
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
641
0.09
0.23
14.3
1.00
0.2
14.4
B

6
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
148
2.47
6.04
21.9
1.00
2282.7
2304.6
F
2045.6
F

6
30.2
30.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
641
0.07
0.17
13.9
1.00
0.6
14.4
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
H2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106

593
Free
0%
0.93
797

118

91

0.25
590

0.92
1

0.92
1

0.88
129

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

83

0.92
1

3
Stop
0%
0.92
4

0.92
1

270
Free
0%
0.25
1350

0.90
115

0.25
530

None

None

1940

798

3621

3800

798

3509

3506

1645

1940
4.1

798
4.1

3621
7.1

3800
6.5

798
6.2

3509
7.1

3506
6.5

1645
6.2

2.2
0
300

2.2
100
820

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

3.3
100
385

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

3.3
6
122

EB 1
1328
530
1
300
1.77
863
388.2
F
388.2

WB 1
1941
1
590
820
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
7
1
1
0
Err
Err
Err
F
Err
F
Err
102.6%
15

SB 1
246
129
115
0
Err
Err
Err
F
Err
F

ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

97
1900

232
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1725
0.96
1725
0.91
125%
319
17
550
3%

84
1900

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.88
1.00
1612
1.00
1612
0.91
125%
140
37
1423
3%

161
1900

375
1900

136
1900

0.91
125%
515
0
0
3%

0.91
125%
187
0
0
3%
Perm

159
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
125%
218
97
121
3%
Perm

210
1900

0.25
125%
805
0
0
3%

406
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1822
0.72
1327
0.91
125%
558
0
745
3%

120
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.26
472
0.90
125%
167
0
459
3%

57
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
125%
79
10
69
3%
Perm

0.91
125%
133
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
125%
115
0
0
3%

6!

2!

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
511

16.0
16.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
478
c0.88

0.32
1.08
19.0
1.00
62.0
81.0
F
81.0
F

30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
737
0.56
1.01
12.0
1.00
35.9
47.9
D
38.4
D

2.98
19.0
1.00
895.7
914.7
F
914.7
F
449.7
2.18
54.0
149.5%
15

0.90
125%
292
0
0
3%
Perm

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8
4
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.08
0.14
5.8
1.00
0.1
5.9
A

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
262
c0.97
1.75
12.0
1.00
353.7
365.7
F
312.8
F

8
30.0
30.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
871
0.04
0.08
5.6
1.00
0.2
5.8
A

F
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
H4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

1
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3504
0.95
3342
0.88
125%
317
0
318
3%

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
151
0
151
3%
Free

280
1900

200
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3405
0.61
2141
0.83
125%
301
0
723
3%

0
1900

540
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.78
1374
0.93
138%
801
0
617
3%
pm+pt
3
8
30.4
30.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
667
c0.32
c0.06
0.93
20.2
1.00
18.7
38.9
D

1
1900
4.0
0.95
0.90
0.98
1551
0.89
1410
0.92
138%
2
58
506
2%

255
1900

2
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
378
0
0
3%

0.92
138%
3
0
0
2%
custom
4!
4

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1808
0.97
1808
0.92
138%
2
0
5
2%

0.92
125%
1
0
0
2%
pm+pt
5
2

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

2
21.2
21.2
0.29
4.0
8.0
961
0.10
0.33
20.7
1.00
0.9
21.5
C
14.6
B

Free
73.7
73.7
1.00

1568
0.10
0.10
0.0
1.00
0.1
0.1
A

24.2
0.74
73.7
74.5%
15

0.83
125%
422
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%

6
35.3
35.3
0.48
4.0
8.0
1199
c0.08
c0.21
0.60
14.1
1.00
2.1
16.1
B
16.1
B

8!
30.4
30.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
630
0.28
0.06
0.80
19.0
1.00
7.3
26.3
C
32.9
C

4
1.1
1.1
0.01
4.0
3.0
27
0.00
0.19
35.9
1.00
3.3
39.2
D
39.2
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
D

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

Synchro 7 - Report
H5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
125%
118
0
118
3%

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
372
308
64
3%
Perm

343
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.28
522
0.89
125%
482
0
482
3%
pm+pt
5
2
47.0
47.0
0.71
4.0
4.0
833
c0.22
0.19
0.58
5.6
1.00
1.2
6.8
A

164
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
125%
230
0
230
3%

234
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
125%
329
0
329
3%

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.89
125%
110
80
30
3%
Perm

47.0
47.0
0.71
4.0
4.0
1304
0.12

17.9
17.9
0.27
4.0
4.0
497
c0.18

0.18
3.3
1.00
0.1
3.4
A
5.7
A

0.66
21.6
1.00
3.6
25.2
C
23.5
C

4
11.5
11.5
0.17
4.0
4.0
303
c0.07
0.39
24.4
1.00
1.1
25.5
C
24.6
C

4
11.5
11.5
0.17
4.0
4.0
271
0.04
0.24
23.7
1.00
0.6
24.3
C

16.1
0.57
66.5
55.0%
15

6
17.9
17.9
0.27
4.0
4.0
422
0.02
0.07
18.1
1.00
0.1
18.2
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

B
12.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
H6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

SBL
20
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
138%
30
0
30

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

200
296
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1583
1770
1.00
0.22
1583
418
0.92
0.92
138% 138%
300
444
0
0
300
444
Free custom

0
1900

774
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
138%
1161
0
1161

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
138%
10
2
8
Perm

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
213
0.02
0.14
32.7
1.00
1.4
34.0
C
3.3
A

4/23/2010

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1583

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
327

c0.19
0.19
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A

c1.06
1.36
9.0
1.00
179.7
188.7
F

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2772
0.33

188.7
F
45.6
1.15
83.0
67.2%
15

0.42
2.9
1.00
0.3
3.2
A
3.2
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1240
0.00
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

4.0
C

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2028
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

839
1900
4.0
0.97
0.99
0.95
3429
0.95
3429
0.92
125%
1140
0
1182

31
1900

647
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
879
0
879
Free

57
1900

42
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1745
0.96
1745
0.92
125%
57
6
158

22
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
138%
164
0
164
Prot
5

924
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
138%
1386
0
1386

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
138%
26
7
19
Perm

36
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
138%
54
0
54
Prot
1

770
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
138%
1155
0
1155

168
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
138%
252
0
252
Free

9.6
9.6
0.07
4.0
3.0
124
0.03

68.1
68.1
0.50
4.0
8.0
1759
0.33

0.44
61.1
1.00
2.4
63.5
E

0.66
25.7
1.00
1.9
27.7
C
24.2
C

0.92
125%
42
0
0

0.92
125%
77
0
0
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
1001
c0.34
1.18
48.5
1.00
91.8
140.3
F
81.1
F

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
30
0
0

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.56
0.56
0.0
1.00
1.4
1.4
A

48.6
0.85
137.0
92.4%
15

8
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
509
0.09
0.31
37.8
1.00
1.6
39.4
D
39.4
D

16.9
16.9
0.12
4.0
3.0
218
c0.09

75.4
75.4
0.55
4.0
8.0
1948
c0.39

0.75
58.0
1.00
13.6
71.7
E

0.71
22.8
1.00
2.2
25.0
C
29.7
C

2
75.4
75.4
0.55
4.0
8.0
871
0.01
0.02
14.0
1.00
0.0
14.1
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 AM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1583
0.16
0.16
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

Synchro 7 - Report
H8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

142
Stop
0%
0.91
195

112

54

0.94
72

357
Free
0%
0.90
496

116

0.91
154

360
Free
0%
0.94
479

None

None

1118

496

496

1118
*4.2

496
6.2

496
4.1

3.5
54
425

3.3
73
572

2.2
93
1058

EB 1
349
195
154
479
0.73
147
30.1
D
30.1
D

NE 1
551
72
0
1058
0.07
5
1.8
A
1.8

SW 1
496
0
0
1700
0.29
0
0.0

0.90
161

SW 2
161
0
161
1700
0.09
0
0.0

0.0

7.4
79.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North AM PEAK 4/3/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

54
Stop
0%
0.77
88

461

113

0.81
174

183
Free
0%
0.86
266

48

0.77
748

106
Free
0%
0.81
164

None

None

813

301

336

813
*4.1

301
*4.1

336
*4.1

*3.3
83
526

*3.3
16
886

2.2
86
1226

EB 1
836
88
748
827
1.01
458
56.5
F
56.5
F

NB 1
338
174
0
1226
0.14
12
5.0
A
5.0

SB 1
336
0
70
1700
0.20
0
0.0

0.86
70

0.0

32.4
79.8%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

173

518
Free
0%
0.92
704

547
Free
0%
0.91
751

111

420
Stop
0%
0.91
577

260

0.91
357

None

None

751

2002

828

751
4.1

2002
*3.5

828
*3.5

2.2
72
854

3.5
0
241

3.3
48
692

0.92
235

EB 1
939
235
0
854
0.28
28
6.5
A
6.5

WB 1
904
0
152
1700
0.53
0
0.0
0.0

0.91
152

SB 1
934
577
357
321
2.91
2024
891.8
F
891.8
F
302.2
149.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

180
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.90
125%
250
0
250
4%

704
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.85
125%
1035
621
414
4%
Perm

511
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.60
1103
0.89
125%
718
0
718
4%
Perm

172
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.74
125%
291
0
291
4%

463
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.78
125%
742
0
742
3%

185
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.60
125%
385
231
154
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
441

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.15

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.40

0.25
0.63
9.6
1.00
4.4
14.0
B

c0.65
1.63
12.0
1.00
292.9
304.9
F

0.37
8.5
1.00
1.4
9.8
A
219.8
F

0.99
11.9
1.00
31.0
43.0
D
31.3
C

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.12
0.30
8.2
1.00
0.9
9.1
A
13.1
B

80.0
1.31
40.0
96.5%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.09
0.23
7.9
1.00
0.8
8.7
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

F
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
H 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
6

731

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.89
683

402
Free
0%
0.96
523

103

0.91
1125

183
Free
0%
0.89
257

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.87
163

None

0.83
155

None
716

1884

2301

129

679

257

3222

2223

1884
7.6

2301
6.6

129
7.0

679
4.2

257
4.2

3222
7.5

2223
6.5

3.5
0
16

4.0
39
9

3.3
0
894

2.2
24
903

2.2
100
1298

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
10

WB 1
168
163
0
16
10.58
Err
Err
F
1423.9
F

WB 2
1125
0
1125
894
1.26
986
141.9
F

NB 1
768
683
0
903
0.76
184
19.7
C
16.1

NB 2
171
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

637.6
103.7%
15

SB 1
349
0
0
1700
0.21
0
0.0

SB 2
330
0
155
1700
0.19
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
-3%
0.25
6

62

373

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.95
254

0.86
542

130
Free
0%
0.86
189

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.91
170

193

0.82
106

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.91
838

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1571

1698

189

1679

1571

297

189

424

1571
7.1

1698
6.5

189
6.2

1679
7.1

1571
6.5

297
6.2

189
4.1

424
4.1

3.5
0
56

4.0
88
48

3.3
88
850

3.5
100
38

4.0
100
57

3.3
100
742

2.2
100
1379

2.2
52
1130

EB 1
844
838
0
56
15.18
Err
Err
F
8885.9
F

EB 2
106
0
106
850
0.12
11
9.8
A

NB 1
424
0
254
1700
0.25
0
0.0

SB 1
542
542
0
1130
0.48
67
11.1
B
8.2

SB 2
189
0
0
1700
0.11
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

4012.2
101.1%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps AM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

290

439
Free
0%
0.98
560

98
Free
0%
0.90
136

284

171
Stop
0%
0.80
267

125

0.80
195

None

None

531

1633

333

531
4.1

1633
*3.2

333
*3.2

2.2
64
1032

3.5
13
307

3.3
79
935

0.98
370

EB 1
930
370
0
1032
0.36
41
7.5
A
7.5

WB 1
531
0
394
1700
0.31
0
0.0
0.0

0.90
394

SB 1
462
267
195
429
1.08
386
97.2
F
97.2
F
27.0
108.6%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

151

59
Stop
0%
0.82
104

131

84

34

37

28

0.73
68

0.91
51

0.91
121

0.88
40

368
Free
0%
0.88
523

75

0.73
167

375
Free
0%
0.91
515

88

0.82
232

41
Stop
0%
0.73
81

0.82
267

0.88
107

4
None

None

1313

1272

576

1440

1326

515

629

515

1313
*3.5

1272
*3.5

576
*3.5

1440
*3.5

1326
*3.5

515
*3.5

629
4.1

515
4.1

3.5
28
371

4.0
76
443

3.3
71
797

3.5
34
255

4.0
81
430

3.3
92
824

2.2
95
948

2.2
96
1045

EB 1
603
267
232
559
1.08
450
87.6
F
87.6
F

WB 1
248
167
0
294
0.84
180
58.9
F
48.4
E

WB 2
68
0
68
824
0.08
7
9.8
A

NE 1
566
51
0
948
0.05
4
1.4
A
1.2

NE 2
121
0
121
1700
0.07
0
0.0

SW 1
669
40
107
1045
0.04
3
1.0
A
1.0

30.6
89.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 AM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothign 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
H 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

120
Free
0%
0.77
221

33

20

0.63
45

437
Stop
0%
0.82
757

16

0.55
85

199
Free
0%
0.64
442

0.50
45

306

796

264

306
4.1

796
6.4

264
6.2

2.2
96
1254

3.5
0
343

3.3
94
775

None

NB 1
306
0
85
1700
0.18
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
487
45
0
1254
0.04
3
1.1
A
1.1

NW 1
802
757
45
355
2.26
1522
600.7
F
600.7
F
302.4
74.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-743 int PR-743 AM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Do Notinh 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

Synchro 7 - Report
H 17

APENDICE I
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 No Accin

I-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
125%
95
0
95
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1751
1.00
1751
0.87
125%
555
37
804
3%

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
388
0.82
125%
82
0
82
3%
Perm

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1686
1.00
1686
0.82
125%
287
96
575
3%

252
1900

63
1900

51
1900

301
1900

0.82
125%
384
0
0
3%

0.88
125%
89
0
0
3%
Perm

187
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1784
0.30
545
0.88
125%
266
15
412
3%

0.88
125%
72
0
0
3%

0.84
125%
448
0
0
3%
Perm

263
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1797
0.61
1122
0.84
125%
391
0
839
3%

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.84
125%
58
9
49
3%
Perm

19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
666
0.05
0.14
10.2
1.00
0.1
10.3
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.87
125%
286
0
0
3%

8!
4
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
665

8
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
147

c0.46
1.21
15.5
1.00
107.6
123.1
F
111.7
F

0.21
0.56
12.2
1.00
4.5
16.7
B

171.9
1.45
50.0
116.3%
15

2
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
641
0.34
0.90
14.6
1.00
15.2
29.7
C
28.3
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
251

23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
516

c0.76
1.64
13.5
1.00
306.7
320.2
F
320.2
F

0.75
1.63
13.5
1.00
290.5
304.0
F
284.8
F

6
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
721
0.03
0.07
7.5
1.00
0.2
7.7
A

F
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
I2

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123

552
Free
0%
0.95
726

90

125

0.83
136

0.25
5

0.25
5

0.89
176

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

215

0.92
1

1
Stop
0%
0.25
5

0.92
1

612
Free
0%
0.86
890

0.91
295

0.83
185

None

None

1025

728

2354

2125

727

2065

2058

957

1025
4.1

728
4.1

2354
7.1

2125
6.5

727
6.2

2065
7.1

2058
6.5

957
6.2

2.2
72
673

2.2
100
871

3.5
0
1

4.0
86
36

3.3
99
422

3.5
0
28

4.0
97
40

3.3
5
311

EB 1
913
185
1
673
0.28
28
7.2
A
7.2

WB 1
1026
1
136
871
0.00
0
0.0
A
0.0

NB 1
15
5
5
3
5.38
Err
Err
F
Err
F
2010.5
134.0%
15

SB 1
472
176
295
65
7.30
Err
Err
F
Err
F

ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL2

SBL

SBR

NWL

NWR NWR2

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

240
1900

215
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
125%
316
0
669
3%

165
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
243
20
223
3%
Perm

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.89
0.99
1626
0.99
1626
0.89
125%
140
55
725
3%

99
1900

357
1900

36
1900

0.89
125%
501
0
0
3%

0.85
125%
53
0
0
3%
Perm

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
94
46
48
3%
Perm

202
1900

0.89
125%
139
0
0
3%

237
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1833
0.74
1356
0.85
125%
349
0
402
3%

252
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1805
0.53
983
0.97
125%
325
0
585
3%

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.97
125%
62
6
56
3%
Perm

0.85
125%
353
0
0
3%
Perm

6!
6

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
740
0.38
0.90
31.3
1.00
16.6
47.9
D
41.5
D

2!
6
49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
662
0.14
0.34
22.6
1.00
1.4
23.9
C

65.8
1.12
116.0
135.6%
15

0.97
125%
260
0
0
3%
Perm

4
4

49.0
49.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
687
c0.45

59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
690
0.30
0.58
19.9
1.00
1.3
21.2
C
19.9
B

1.05
33.5
1.00
49.6
83.1
F
83.1
F
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8
4
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.03
0.06
14.4
1.00
0.0
14.5
B

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
500
c0.60
1.17
28.5
1.00
96.2
124.7
F
114.1
F

8
59.0
59.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.04
0.07
14.5
1.00
0.0
14.6
B

E
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
I4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

1
1900

398
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
0.95
3345
0.93
125%
535
0
536
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
125%
282
0
282
3%
Free

180
1900

351
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3446
0.63
2204
0.89
125%
493
0
746
3%

0
1900

564
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.72
1261
0.93
138%
837
0
611
3%
pm+pt
3
8
35.1
35.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
755
c0.28
c0.11
0.81
15.2
1.00
9.1
24.3
C

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1564
0.85
1361
0.92
138%
0
40
524
2%

228
1900

1
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
338
0
0
3%

0.92
138%
2
0
0
2%
Split
4!

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1817
0.98
1817
0.92
138%
2
0
4
2%

0.92
125%
1
0
0
2%
pm+pt
5
2

2
29.0
29.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
1345
0.16
0.40
15.3
1.00
0.2
15.5
B
10.3
B

Free
72.1
72.1
1.00

0.89
125%
253
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

6
29.0
29.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
886

1568
0.18
0.18
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A

c0.34
0.88dl
19.5
1.00
7.3
26.8
C
26.8
C

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
20.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.82
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
72.1
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
80.3%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

8!
35.1
35.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
734
0.25
0.10
0.71
14.6
1.00
5.9
20.4
C
22.4
C

0.92
139%
0
0
0
2%

4
5.9
5.9
0.08
4.0
3.0
149
0.00
0.03
30.5
1.00
0.1
30.5
C
30.5
C

C
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
I5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
125%
160
0
160
3%

346
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
125%
465
320
145
3%
Perm

415
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.24
435
0.89
125%
583
0
583
3%
pm+pt
5
2
50.0
50.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
716
c0.28
c0.20
0.81
15.5
1.00
7.1
22.6
C

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.89
125%
315
0
315
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.86
125%
279
0
279
3%

122
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.86
125%
177
142
35
3%
Perm

50.0
50.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
1094
0.17

16.7
16.7
0.20
4.0
3.0
365
0.15

0.29
8.4
1.00
0.1
8.6
A
17.7
B

0.76
31.9
1.00
9.2
41.1
D
36.0
D

4
26.3
26.3
0.31
4.0
3.0
547
0.09
0.29
22.0
1.00
1.4
23.3
C
23.5
C

4
26.3
26.3
0.31
4.0
3.0
489
c0.09
0.30
22.0
1.00
1.5
23.5
C

23.7
0.62
84.3
59.6%
15

6
16.7
16.7
0.20
4.0
3.0
311
0.02
0.11
27.7
1.00
0.2
27.9
C

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
B

Cidra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

SBL
38
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
57
0
57
3%

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

170
293
1900
1900
4.0
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.00
0.95
1568
1752
1.00
0.19
1568
347
0.92
0.92
138% 138%
255
440
0
0
255
440
3%
3%
Free custom

0
1900

869
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
1304
0
1304
3%

10
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
15
3
12
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
0
0
0
3%

6
10.0
10.0
0.12
4.0
4.0
211
c0.03
0.27
33.2
1.00
3.1
36.3
D
6.8
A

4/23/2010

8
Free
83.0
83.0
1.00

1568

4
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
4.0
272

0.16
0.16
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A

c1.27
1.62
9.0
1.00
294.3
303.3
F

65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
2745
0.37

303.3
F
67.7
1.44
83.0
70.6%
15

0.48
3.1
1.00
0.4
3.5
A
3.5
A

8
65.0
65.0
0.78
4.0
6.0
1228
0.01
0.01
2.0
1.00
0.0
2.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2028
Evan Gonzalez

E
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
I7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


6: PR-14 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

EBR2

NWL2

NWL

NWR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

702
1900
4.0
0.97
0.98
0.96
3356
0.96
3356
0.92
125%
954
0
1120
3%

122
1900

648
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
880
0
880
3%
Free

39
1900

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.97
1698
0.97
1698
0.92
125%
72
16
185
3%

56
1900

224
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
336
0
336
3%
Prot
5

1169
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
1754
0
1754
3%

52
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
78
18
60
3%
Perm

75
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
112
0
112
3%
Prot
1

726
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
1089
0
1089
3%

238
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
357
0
357
3%
Free

14.0
14.0
0.10
4.0
3.0
179
0.06

65.0
65.0
0.47
4.0
8.0
1663
0.31

0.63
59.0
1.00
6.7
65.6
E

0.65
27.4
1.00
2.0
29.5
C
25.4
C

0.92
125%
166
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
53
0
0
3%
Perm

4!
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
980
c0.33
1.14
48.5
1.00
76.6
125.1
F
70.7
E

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
76
0
0
3%

8!
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1568
0.56
0.56
0.0
1.00
1.5
1.5
A

58.5
1.06
137.0
104.1%
15

8
40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
496
0.11
0.37
38.5
1.00
2.1
40.7
D
40.7
D
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Intersection PR-1 with PR-14 and 735 PM peak 4/18/2008 Do Nothing 2028
Evan Gonzalez

20.0
20.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
256
c0.19

71.0
71.0
0.52
4.0
8.0
1816
c0.50

1.31
58.5
1.00
165.7
224.2
F

0.97
31.8
1.00
14.5
46.3
D
72.8
E

2
71.0
71.0
0.52
4.0
8.0
813
0.04
0.07
16.5
1.00
0.2
16.7
B

6
Free
137.0
137.0
1.00

1568
0.23
0.23
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A

E
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
I8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-735 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

157
Stop
0%
0.93
211

120

125

0.94
166

563
Free
0%
0.85
828

145

0.93
161

429
Free
0%
0.94
570

None

None

1731

828

828

1731
*4.2

828
*4.1

828
4.1

*2.2
24
278

*2.2
80
812

2.2
79
795

EB 1
372
211
161
389
0.96
270
68.4
F
68.4
F

NE 1
737
166
0
795
0.21
20
5.0
A
5.0

SW 1
828
0
0
1700
0.49
0
0.0

0.85
213

SW 2
213
0
213
1700
0.13
0
0.0

0.0

13.6
104.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

PR-1 & PR-735 North PM PEAK 4/3/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I9

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-787 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

38
Stop
0%
0.87
55

177

291

0.81
449

278
Free
0%
0.86
404

80

0.87
254

159
Free
0%
0.81
245

None

None

1606

462

520

1606
*4.1

462
*4.1

520
*4.1

*3.3
71
191

*3.3
68
791

2.2
57
1049

EB 1
309
55
254
509
0.61
100
22.4
C
22.4
C

NB 1
694
449
0
1049
0.43
55
9.0
A
9.0

SB 1
520
0
116
1700
0.31
0
0.0

0.86
116

0.0

8.7
81.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-787 PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 10

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


4: PR-14 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

257

633
Free
0%
0.93
851

568
Free
0%
0.93
763

359

162
Stop
0%
0.90
225

172

0.90
239

None

None

1246

2546

1005

1246
4.1

2546
*3.2

1005
*3.0

2.2
38
555

3.5
0
109

3.3
67
719

0.93
345

EB 1
1196
345
0
555
0.62
106
21.6
C
21.6

WB 1
1246
0
483
1700
0.73
0
0.0
0.0

0.93
483

SB 1
464
225
239
194
2.40
958
681.9
F
681.9
F
117.7
158.6%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-14 and PR-171 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 11

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


3: PR-1 & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Lane Width
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

NBL

NBR

257
1900
16
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
2071
1.00
2071
0.79
125%
407
0
407
4%

386
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1656
1.00
1656
0.86
125%
561
337
224
4%
Perm

336
1900
12
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1736
0.42
776
0.88
125%
477
0
477
4%
Perm

366
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1949
1.00
1949
0.73
125%
627
0
627
4%

692
1900
14
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1869
0.95
1869
0.83
125%
1042
0
1042
3%

259
1900
14
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1672
1.00
1672
0.89
125%
364
175
189
3%
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
662

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
310

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
780
0.32

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
748
c0.56

0.14
0.34
8.3
1.00
1.4
9.7
A

c0.61
1.54
12.0
1.00
258.0
270.0
F

0.80
10.6
1.00
8.6
19.2
B
127.6
F

1.39
12.0
1.00
185.0
197.0
F
148.4
F

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
828
0.20
0.49
9.0
1.00
2.1
11.0
B
10.3
B

103.3
1.47
40.0
98.1%
15

2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
669
0.11
0.28
8.1
1.00
1.1
9.2
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

F
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
I 12

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


5: PR-52 SB Off ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

491

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
359

283
Free
0%
0.90
393

131

0.99
694

167
Free
0%
0.75
278

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.88
223

None

0.94
174

None
716

1193

1564

278

567

278

2171

1477

1193
7.6

1564
6.6

278
7.0

567
4.2

278
4.2

2171
7.5

1477
6.5

3.5
0
102

4.0
100
70

3.3
3
716

2.2
64
994

2.2
100
1274

3.5
100
1

4.0
100
80

WB 1
223
223
0
102
2.19
485
633.4
F
192.1
F

WB 2
694
0
694
716
0.97
371
50.5
F

NB 1
359
359
0
994
0.36
42
10.7
B
6.0

NB 2
278
0
0
1700
0.16
0
0.0

84.8
93.2%
15

SB 1
262
0
0
1700
0.15
0
0.0

SB 2
305
0
174
1700
0.18
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 13

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


7: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

280

0
Stop
-3%
1.00
0

113

345

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
204

0.92
469

113
Free
0%
0.80
177

0.92
0

123
Free
0%
0.93
165

152

0.86
184

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
426

None

0.92
0

None
1222

1382

1484

177

1565

1382

267

177

370

1382
7.1

1484
6.5

177
6.2

1565
7.1

1382
6.5

267
6.2

177
4.1

370
4.1

3.5
0
84

4.0
100
75

3.3
79
864

3.5
100
49

4.0
100
87

3.3
100
771

2.2
100
1394

2.2
60
1183

EB 1
426
426
0
84
5.09
Err
Err
F
6987.0
F

EB 2
184
0
184
864
0.21
20
10.3
B

NB 1
370
0
204
1700
0.22
0
0.0

SB 1
469
469
0
1183
0.40
48
10.0
B
7.3

SB 2
177
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

2625.9
93.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-184 with PR-1 and PR-52 Ramps PM Peak Hour 7/2/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzlez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 14

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-735 & PR-734

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

WBT

WBR

SBL

SBR

162

408
Free
0%
0.93
548

64
Free
0%
0.92
87

452

125
Stop
0%
0.75
208

155

0.75
258

None

None

701

1378

394

701
4.1

1378
*3.5

394
*3.5

2.2
76
891

3.5
43
368

3.3
71
880

0.93
218

EB 1
766
218
0
891
0.24
24
5.6
A
5.6

WB 1
701
0
614
1700
0.41
0
0.0
0.0

0.92
614

SB 1
467
208
258
543
0.86
232
39.7
E
39.7
E
11.8
107.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-735 and PR-734 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 15

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


2: PR-738 & PR-1

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

86

43
Stop
0%
0.83
75

48

62

83

68

122

0.86
140

0.90
94

0.90
62

0.96
159

586
Free
0%
0.96
763

227

0.86
105

420
Free
0%
0.90
583

45

0.83
84

64
Stop
0%
0.86
108

0.83
150

0.96
296

4
None

None

2055

2001

911

2080

2149

583

1059

583

2055
*3.5

2001
*3.5

911
*3.5

2080
*3.5

2149
*3.5

583
*3.5

1059
4.1

583
4.1

3.5
0
126

4.0
67
230

3.3
87
660

3.5
36
164

4.0
49
210

3.3
82
794

2.2
86
654

2.2
84
986

EB 1
309
150
84
195
1.58
500
328.2
F
328.2
F

WB 1
212
105
0
184
1.15
271
165.2
F
103.8
F

WB 2
140
0
140
794
0.18
16
10.5
B

NE 1
678
94
0
654
0.14
13
3.8
A
3.4

NE 2
62
0
62
1700
0.04
0
0.0

SW 1
1217
159
296
986
0.16
14
4.7
A
4.7

55.9
123.4%
15

ICU Level of Service

* User Entered Value

Intersection PR-1 and PR-738 PM Peak 4/16/2008 Do Nothing 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
I 16

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-743 & PR-742

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/23/2010

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

NWL

NWR

251
Free
0%
0.91
392

14

13

0.81
23

227
Stop
0%
0.93
347

12

0.70
28

180
Free
0%
0.96
266

0.75
23

420

718

406

420
4.1

718
6.4

406
6.2

2.2
98
1139

3.5
11
388

3.3
96
645

None

NB 1
420
0
28
1700
0.25
0
0.0
0.0

None

SB 1
289
23
0
1139
0.02
2
0.8
A
0.8

NW 1
369
347
23
398
0.93
253
61.5
F
61.5
F
21.3
54.2%
15

ICU Level of Service

PR-743 int PR-743 PM Peak Hour 7/12/2009 Do Nothing 2028 CO1


Evan Gonzalez Baker

Synchro 7 - Report
I 17

APENDICE J
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 1

J-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
136
0
136
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.92
113%
593
10
840
3%

209
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.08
142
0.92
113%
79
0
79
3%
pm+pt
3
8
58.0
58.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
115
0.03
0.23
0.69
70.7
0.83
14.5
73.1
E

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1716
1.00
1716
0.92
113%
242
20
432
3%

171
1900

93
1900

0.92
113%
114
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
130
11
119
3%
Perm

353
1900

0.92
113%
210
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.49
909
0.92
113%
402
0
516
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.40
741
0.92
113%
236
0
670
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
101
6
95
3%
Perm

48.0
48.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
539
0.08
0.25
40.5
1.00
1.1
41.7
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
257
0
0
3%

4
48.0
48.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
542
c0.48
1.55
54.0
1.00
256.7
310.7
F
273.6
F
181.0
1.49
156.0
120.2%
15

8!

2
2

58.0
58.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
638
c0.25
0.68
41.1
0.78
5.2
37.5
D
42.8
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
434
0
0
3%
Perm

90.0
90.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
524
0.57
0.98
32.3
1.00
35.7
68.1
E
57.5
E

6
2
90.0
90.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
905
0.08
0.13
15.1
1.00
0.3
15.4
B

6
90.0
90.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
428
c0.90
1.57
33.0
1.00
265.6
298.6
F
261.5
F

6
90.0
90.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
905
0.06
0.10
14.9
1.00
0.2
15.1
B

F
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
J2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.41
770
0.92
113%
130
0
130
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
728
0
728

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
298
92
206
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.26
485
0.92
113%
305
0
305
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
113%
332
11
466

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
121%
141
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
143
91
52
Perm

61
1900

0.92
113%
145
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
121%
34
0
175

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1816
0.75
1394
0.92
113%
71
0
146

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
68
54
14
Perm

4
101.0
101.0
0.65
4.0
3.0
1025

8
101.0
101.0
0.65
4.0
3.0
314

0.13
0.20
11.1
0.22
0.0
2.4
A

c0.63
0.97
26.1
0.96
9.6
34.7
C

4
4
101.0
101.0
0.65
4.0
3.0
499
0.17
0.26
11.7
0.72
0.0
8.5
A

101.0
101.0
0.65
4.0
3.0
1206
0.39
0.60
15.9
0.65
0.1
10.5
B
8.2
A

27.1
0.90
156.0
76.3%
15

101.0
101.0
0.65
4.0
3.0
1151
0.26

24.7
24.7
0.16
4.0
3.0
284
c0.10

0.40
13.1
0.97
0.0
12.8
B
21.4
C

0.62
61.2
1.00
9.6
70.9
E
65.5
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
75
0
0
Perm

6
2
24.7
24.7
0.16
4.0
3.0
251
0.03
0.21
57.1
1.00
1.9
59.0
E

6
18.3
18.3
0.12
4.0
3.0
164
c0.10
0.89
67.9
1.00
40.4
108.2
F
93.4
F

6
18.3
18.3
0.12
4.0
3.0
186
0.01
0.08
61.3
1.00
0.2
61.5
E

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
J3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1690
0.99
1690
0.92
119%
129
26
621
3%

265
1900

97
1900

156
1900

177
1900

0.92
119%
125
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
202
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
217
0
0
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.40
746
0.92
113%
576
0
793
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
144
38
106
3%
Perm

144
1900

0.92
119%
343
0
0
3%

160
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1730
0.72
1261
0.92
119%
207
14
520
3%

345
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1818
0.23
428
0.92
119%
446
0
632
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
70
5
65
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
175
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

30.0
30.0
0.19
4.0
3.0
325
c0.37
1.91
63.0
1.00
421.4
484.4
F
484.4
F
539.6
2.44
156.0
128.5%
15

4
4

30.0
30.0
0.19
4.0
3.0
243

84.0
84.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
402

c0.41
2.14
63.0
1.00
527.0
590.0
F
590.0
F

1.06
1.97
36.0
0.51
445.0
463.4
F
393.1
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
186
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
84.0
84.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
844
0.07
0.13
17.8
0.30
0.1
5.4
A

8
84.0
84.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
230
c1.48
2.75
36.0
0.88
797.9
829.4
F
747.9
F

8
84.0
84.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
844
0.04
0.08
17.3
0.71
0.2
12.4
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
J4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
288
0
288
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
344
197
147
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.61
2123
0.92
119%
116
0
465
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
119%
701
0
561
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
119%
0
72
442
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
119%
374
0
0
3%

0.92
119%
3
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1822
0.99
1822
0.92
119%
9
1
12
2%

63.9
63.9
0.41
4.0
3.0
682
c0.34

63.9
63.9
0.41
4.0
3.0
631
0.29

3.1
3.1
0.02
4.0
3.0
36
c0.01

0.82
41.0
0.94
0.8
39.1
D

0.70
38.1
0.92
0.3
35.4
D
37.3
D

0.33
75.4
1.00
5.4
80.8
F
80.8
F

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
66.5
66.5
0.43
4.0
8.0
1494
0.08
0.19
28.0
1.00
0.3
28.3
C
28.7
C

2
66.5
66.5
0.43
4.0
8.0
668
0.09
0.22
28.3
1.00
0.8
29.1
C

32.2
0.60
156.0
75.3%
15

0.92
119%
349
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

6
77.0
77.0
0.49
4.0
8.0
1100
c0.02
c0.19
0.42
25.3
0.92
0.4
23.6
C
23.6
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
1
0
0
2%

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
J5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
103
0
103
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
185
159
26
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3388
0.62
2164
0.92
119%
208
0
665
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
113%
287
32
351
3%

78
1900

59.0
59.0
0.76
4.0
4.0
1762
c0.04
c0.25
0.38
3.2
0.85
0.2
2.9
A
2.9
A

47.0
47.0
0.60
4.0
4.0
2032
0.10

4
11.0
11.0
0.14
4.0
4.0
247
c0.06
0.42
30.6
1.00
1.6
32.1
C
30.5
C

4
11.0
11.0
0.14
4.0
4.0
221

0.92
119%
457
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.02
0.12
29.3
1.00
0.3
29.6
C

10.1
0.38
78.0
50.1%
15

0.92
113%
96
0
0
3%

0.17
6.9
1.00
0.2
7.1
A
7.1
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
J6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
113%
221
0
227

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
606
96
510
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.62
1146
0.92
113%
440
0
440
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1852
1.00
1852
0.92
113%
147
3
150

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
113%
6
0
0

0.92
113%
398
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.60
2129
0.92
113%
285
0
683

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
160
94
66
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.33
615
0.92
121%
7
0
7
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
571
0
571

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
145
85
60
Perm

4
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
671

8
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
486

2
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
652

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
253

0.32
0.76
11.9
1.00
4.9
16.9
B

c0.38
0.91
13.1
1.00
20.2
33.3
C

0.04
0.10
8.8
1.00
0.3
9.1
A

0.01
0.03
8.5
1.00
0.2
8.7
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
786
0.12
0.29
9.2
1.00
0.2
9.4
A
14.9
B

2
2

20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
786
0.08
0.19
8.8
1.00
0.1
8.9
A
27.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
18.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.84
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
48.8
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
94.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
877
c0.32
2.15dl
12.4
1.00
6.8
19.2
B
17.3
B

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
767
0.31
0.74
12.2
1.00
6.5
18.6
B
16.6
B

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
652
0.04
0.09
8.8
1.00
0.3
9.0
A

B
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
J7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


45: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
597

742
Free
0%
0.92
911

197

0.92
783

183
Free
0%
0.92
225

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.92
132

None

0.92
242

None
669

1874

2572

112

1153

225

3122

2451

1874
7.5

2572
6.5

112
6.9

1153
4.1

225
4.1

3122
7.5

2451
6.5

3.5
0
2

4.0
0
0

3.3
15
919

2.2
1
602

2.2
100
1341

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
0

WB 1
133
132
0
2
61.28
Err
Err
F
1475.6
F

WB 2
783
0
783
919
0.85
265
26.7
D

NB 1
672
597
0
602
0.99
367
61.0
F
49.9

NB 2
150
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

481.6
81.7%
15

SB 1
608
0
0
1700
0.36
0
0.0

SB 2
546
0
242
1700
0.32
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
J8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
237

0.92
876

130
Free
0%
0.92
160

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
152

193

0.92
81

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
711

None

0.92
0

None
1167

2182

2301

160

2264

2182

271

160

389

2182
7.1

2301
6.5

160
6.2

2264
7.1

2182
6.5

271
6.2

160
4.1

389
4.1

3.5
0
13

4.0
87
10

3.3
91
885

3.5
100
9

4.0
100
12

3.3
100
768

2.2
100
1420

2.2
25
1169

EB 1
712
711
0
13
55.75
Err
Err
F
8980.3
F

EB 2
81
0
81
885
0.09
8
9.5
A

NB 1
389
0
237
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 1
876
876
0
1169
0.75
186
16.6
C
14.1

SB 2
160
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3217.7
111.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
J9

APENDICE K
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 1

K-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
81
0
81
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1734
1.00
1734
0.92
113%
364
31
577

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.92
113%
117
0
117
pm+pt
3
8
33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
208
0.04
0.21
0.56
30.2
0.80
2.7
26.7
C

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1677
1.00
1677
0.92
113%
274
72
623

343
1900

63
1900

0.92
113%
77
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
63
28
35
Perm

275
1900

0.92
113%
421
0
0

96
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1809
0.49
909
0.92
113%
118
0
195

225
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1795
0.70
1295
0.92
113%
276
0
614

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
48
7
41
Perm

25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
576
0.05
0.14
17.9
1.00
0.5
18.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
244
0
0

4
25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
570
c0.33
1.01
25.5
1.00
40.9
66.4
E
60.7
E
45.3
0.99
76.0
97.3%
15

8!

2
2

33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
746
c0.37
0.84
18.6
0.68
8.6
21.4
C
22.1
C

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
409
0.21
0.48
14.6
1.00
3.9
18.6
B
16.9
B

6
2
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.02
0.05
11.8
1.00
0.1
11.9
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
338
0
0
Perm
6

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
583
c0.47
1.05
20.9
1.00
52.0
72.9
E
68.5
E

6
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.03
0.06
11.8
1.00
0.2
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
K2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
421
0.92
113%
151
0
151
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
566
0
566

38
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
47
27
20
Perm

76
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
412
0.92
113%
93
0
93
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
113%
450
12
549

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
121%
120
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
242
191
51
Perm

115
1900

0.92
113%
111
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.97
1787
0.92
121%
67
0
187

21
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1770
0.64
1175
0.92
113%
26
0
167

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
251
198
53
Perm

4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
660

8
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
173

0.01
0.03
12.9
0.72
0.0
9.4
A

0.23
0.54
16.5
1.00
11.5
27.9
C

4
4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
177
c0.36
0.85
19.9
0.66
16.0
29.1
C

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
777
0.31
0.73
18.4
0.66
2.1
14.2
B
16.9
B

24.1
0.72
76.0
61.7%
15

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
754
0.31

16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
376
c0.10

0.73
18.4
1.00
6.1
24.5
C
25.0
C

0.50
26.5
1.00
4.6
31.1
C
27.9
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
141
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.15
24.5
1.00
1.0
25.5
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
247
c0.14
0.68
27.6
1.00
13.9
41.5
D
31.9
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.16
24.5
1.00
1.0
25.5
C

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
K3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
119%
128
25
496

204
1900

181
1900

204
1900

104
1900

0.92
119%
234
0
0
Perm

0.92
119%
264
0
0

0.92
113%
128
0
0
Perm

492
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.58
1073
0.92
113%
604
0
732

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
201
59
142
Perm

161
1900

0.92
119%
264
0
0

176
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1726
0.70
1223
0.92
119%
228
14
712

228
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1807
0.22
399
0.92
119%
295
0
503

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
62
5
57
Perm

0.92
119%
129
0
0
Split
2

6
6

22.0
22.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
249
c0.29
1.99
64.0
1.00
460.9
524.9
F
524.9
F
446.5
2.32
150.0
126.5%
15

4
4

40.0
40.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
326

76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
544

c0.58
2.18
55.0
1.00
542.9
597.9
F
597.9
F

0.68
1.35
37.0
1.00
167.5
204.5
F
164.8
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
208
0
0
Perm

8
4
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
794
0.09
0.18
20.1
1.00
0.1
20.2
C

8
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
202
c1.26
2.49
37.0
1.00
685.1
722.1
F
645.0
F

8
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
794
0.04
0.07
18.9
1.00
0.2
19.1
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
K4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

341
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
441
0
441

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
272
222
50
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.59
2065
0.92
119%
274
0
559

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
119%
859
0
584
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
119%
0
33
518

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
119%
276
0
0

0.92
119%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1805
0.99
1805
0.92
119%
9
1
12

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
865
c0.35

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
822
0.33

1.4
1.4
0.02
4.0
3.0
33
c0.01

0.68
13.5
1.00
2.1
15.6
B

0.63
13.0
1.00
1.6
14.6
B
15.1
B

0.36
36.9
1.00
6.7
43.6
D
43.6
D

0.92
119%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
14.1
14.1
0.19
4.0
8.0
650
0.13
0.68
28.8
1.00
5.6
34.5
C
31.7
C

2
14.1
14.1
0.19
4.0
8.0
291
0.03
0.17
26.0
1.00
1.3
27.3
C

0.92
119%
285
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0

6
23.1
23.1
0.30
4.0
8.0
717
c0.05
c0.19
0.96dl
24.1
0.87
5.5
26.5
C
26.5
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
22.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.69
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
73.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
K5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
154
0
154

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
332
273
59
Perm

345
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.63
2200
0.92
119%
273
0
719

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.92
113%
236
66
320

122
1900

54.6
54.6
0.72
4.0
4.0
1707
c0.04
c0.26
0.42
4.3
0.42
0.2
2.0
A
2.0
A

42.6
42.6
0.56
4.0
4.0
1850
0.10

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
309
c0.09
0.50
28.3
1.00
1.7
30.0
C
28.2
C

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
276

0.92
119%
446
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.21
26.8
1.00
0.5
27.3
C

11.5
0.43
76.0
51.0%
15

0.92
113%
150
0
0

0.17
8.1
1.00
0.2
8.3
A
8.3
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
K6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1833
0.92
113%
316
0
322

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
332
199
133
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.49
911
0.92
113%
289
0
289
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1818
1.00
1818
0.92
113%
314
8
340

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
113%
34
0
0

0.92
113%
594
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.73
2559
0.92
113%
360
0
954

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
222
124
98
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
382
0.92
121%
7
0
7
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
121%
138
0
138

25
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
33
18
15
Perm

4
20.0
20.0
0.40
4.0
627

8
20.0
20.0
0.40
4.0
364

2
22.0
22.0
0.44
4.0
690

6
22.0
22.0
0.44
4.0
168

0.08
0.21
9.8
1.00
0.8
10.6
B

c0.32
0.79
13.2
1.00
16.2
29.4
C

0.06
0.14
8.4
1.00
0.4
8.8
A

0.02
0.04
8.0
1.00
0.5
8.5
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
20.0
20.0
0.40
4.0
733
0.18
0.44
10.9
1.00
1.9
12.8
B
11.7
B

2
2

20.0
20.0
0.40
4.0
727
0.19
0.47
11.1
1.00
2.2
13.2
B
20.6
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
16.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.82
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
50.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
83.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

22.0
22.0
0.44
4.0
1126
c0.37
1.09dl
12.5
1.00
7.9
20.4
C
18.2
B

6
22.0
22.0
0.44
4.0
812
0.07
0.17
8.5
1.00
0.5
8.9
A
8.7
A

6
22.0
22.0
0.44
4.0
690
0.01
0.02
7.9
1.00
0.1
8.0
A

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
K7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/30/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
0%
1.00
0

689

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
325

430
Free
0%
0.90
540

180

0.99
835

269
Free
0%
0.75
405

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.88
191

None

0.94
216

None
654

1324

1811

203

756

405

2335

1702

1324
7.6

1811
6.6

203
7.0

756
4.2

405
4.2

2335
7.6

1702
6.6

3.5
0
79

4.0
100
47

3.3
0
801

2.2
62
844

2.2
100
1143

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
55

WB 1
191
191
0
79
2.41
449
757.1
F
194.5
F

WB 2
835
0
835
801
1.04
499
65.9
F

NB 1
460
325
0
844
0.38
46
9.9
A
6.2

NB 2
270
0
0
1700
0.16
0
0.0

81.2
74.4%
15

SB 1
360
0
0
1700
0.21
0
0.0

SB 2
396
0
216
1700
0.23
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
K8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

464

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
185

0.92
570

106
Free
0%
0.88
136

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
157

152

0.86
158

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
505

None

0.92
0

None
1168

1525

1617

136

1683

1525

249

136

341

1525
7.1

1617
6.5

136
6.2

1683
7.1

1525
6.5

249
6.2

136
4.1

341
4.1

3.5
0
61

4.0
100
55

3.3
83
910

3.5
100
39

4.0
100
62

3.3
100
787

2.2
100
1442

2.2
53
1212

EB 1
505
505
0
61
8.34
Err
Err
F
7621.4
F

EB 2
158
0
158
910
0.17
16
9.8
A

NB 1
341
0
185
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 1
570
570
0
1212
0.47
64
10.6
B
8.5

SB 2
136
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

2956.2
83.0%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
K9

APENDICE L
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa

L-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
151
0
151
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.92
125%
656
11
929
3%

209
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.09
160
0.92
125%
87
0
87
3%
pm+pt
3
8
52.0
52.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
122
0.03
0.22
0.71
38.2
0.86
15.1
48.1
D

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1716
1.00
1716
0.92
125%
268
21
479
3%

171
1900

93
1900

0.92
125%
126
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
144
11
133
3%
Perm

353
1900

0.92
125%
232
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.44
806
0.92
125%
444
0
570
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.37
685
0.92
125%
261
0
741
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
111
7
104
3%
Perm

42.0
42.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
504
0.09
0.30
40.5
1.00
1.5
42.1
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
284
0
0
3%

4
42.0
42.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
507
c0.53
1.83
52.0
1.00
382.5
434.5
F
380.2
F
256.0
1.80
146.0
131.0%
15

8!

2
2

52.0
52.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
611
c0.28
0.78
42.0
0.75
8.2
39.7
D
40.9
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
480
0
0
3%
Perm

86.0
86.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
475
0.71
1.20
30.0
1.00
108.8
138.8
F
113.6
F

6
2
86.0
86.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
924
0.08
0.14
13.5
1.00
0.3
13.8
B

6
86.0
86.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
403
c1.08
1.84
30.0
1.00
387.0
417.0
F
364.4
F

6
86.0
86.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
924
0.07
0.11
13.2
1.00
0.2
13.5
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
L2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.40
746
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
806
0
806

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
330
91
239
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
457
0.92
125%
337
0
337
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
11
516

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
142%
165
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
168
101
67
Perm

61
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
142%
40
0
205

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.73
1367
0.92
125%
79
0
162

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
75
57
18
Perm

4
101.0
101.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1095

8
101.0
101.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
316

0.15
0.22
8.2
0.41
0.0
3.4
A

c0.74
1.07
22.5
0.96
36.6
58.2
E

4
4
101.0
101.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
516
0.19
0.28
8.6
0.77
0.0
6.6
A

101.0
101.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1289
0.43
0.63
12.2
0.68
0.1
8.4
A
6.9
A

36.3
1.06
146.0
83.2%
15

101.0
101.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1230
0.29

17.0
17.0
0.12
4.0
3.0
209
c0.11

0.42
9.8
0.95
0.0
9.3
A
28.4
C

0.98
64.3
1.00
57.5
121.8
F
96.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
83
0
0
Perm

6
2
17.0
17.0
0.12
4.0
3.0
184
0.04
0.37
59.5
1.00
5.5
65.1
E

6
16.0
16.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
150
c0.12
1.08
65.0
1.00
96.5
161.5
F
129.0
F

6
16.0
16.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
173
0.01
0.10
58.5
1.00
0.3
58.8
E

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
L3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1690
0.99
1690
0.92
138%
150
56
694
3%

265
1900

97
1900

156
1900

177
1900

0.92
138%
146
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
234
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
240
0
0
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.19
348
0.92
125%
637
0
877
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
159
81
78
3%
Perm

144
1900

0.92
138%
398
0
0
3%

160
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1730
0.69
1203
0.92
138%
240
30
590
3%

345
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1818
0.08
145
0.92
138%
518
0
734
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
81
10
71
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
202
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

14.0
14.0
0.19
4.0
3.0
324
c0.41
2.14
29.5
1.00
524.4
553.9
F
553.9
F
1893.4
7.14
73.0
145.4%
15

4
4

14.0
14.0
0.19
4.0
3.0
231

33.0
33.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
157

c0.49
2.55
29.5
1.00
712.1
741.6
F
741.6
F

2.52
5.59
20.0
0.87
2074.1
2091.6
F
1772.0
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
216
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
33.0
33.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
709
0.05
0.11
11.5
0.78
0.1
9.0
A

8
33.0
33.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
66
c5.07
11.12
20.0
1.66
4580.7
4614.0
F
4156.6
F

8
33.0
33.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
709
0.05
0.10
11.5
1.00
0.2
11.8
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
L4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
334
0
334
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
399
240
159
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.60
2096
0.92
138%
135
0
540
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
813
0
650
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
138%
0
68
529
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
434
0
0
3%

0.92
138%
3
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1811
0.99
1811
0.92
138%
10
2
13
2%

66.7
66.7
0.46
4.0
3.0
761
c0.39

66.7
66.7
0.46
4.0
3.0
704
0.34

3.2
3.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
40
c0.01

0.85
35.3
0.97
0.9
35.1
D

0.75
32.8
0.96
0.4
31.9
C
33.6
C

0.33
70.3
1.00
4.7
75.1
E
75.1
E

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
54.0
54.0
0.37
4.0
8.0
1296
0.10
0.26
32.0
1.00
0.5
32.5
C
33.0
C

2
54.0
54.0
0.37
4.0
8.0
580
0.10
0.27
32.3
1.00
1.2
33.4
C

0.92
138%
405
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
64.1
64.1
0.44
4.0
8.0
974
c0.02
c0.22
0.90dl
30.4
0.94
0.8
29.4
C
29.4
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
32.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.69
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
146.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
82.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
2
0
0
2%

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
L5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
214
180
34
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.59
2059
0.92
138%
242
0
772
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
37
387
3%

78
1900

53.5
53.5
0.73
4.0
4.0
1655
c0.05
c0.29
0.47
4.0
1.14
0.2
4.8
A
4.8
A

41.5
41.5
0.57
4.0
4.0
1918
0.11

4
11.5
11.5
0.16
4.0
4.0
276
c0.07
0.43
27.8
1.00
1.5
29.3
C
27.7
C

4
11.5
11.5
0.16
4.0
4.0
247

0.92
138%
530
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.02
0.14
26.5
1.00
0.3
26.8
C

10.6
0.46
73.0
54.9%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.20
7.7
1.00
0.2
7.9
A
7.9
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
L6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1851
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
65
605
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.58
1083
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
3
167

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.62
2177
0.92
125%
315
0
755

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
106
71
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.28
515
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
670
0
670

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
170
83
87
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
720

8
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
492

2
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
206

0.38
0.84
13.2
1.00
8.7
22.0
C

c0.45
0.99
14.8
1.00
37.0
51.9
D

0.04
0.11
10.4
1.00
0.4
10.7
B

0.02
0.04
10.1
1.00
0.4
10.4
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.14
0.30
9.5
1.00
0.2
9.7
A
18.6
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.09
0.20
9.0
1.00
0.1
9.1
A
40.8
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
26.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
105.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
871
0.35
3.24dl
15.2
1.00
11.3
26.5
C
23.5
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
745
c0.36
0.90
15.5
1.00
16.0
31.4
C
27.1
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633
0.06
0.14
10.5
1.00
0.5
10.9
B

C
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
L7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


45: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
660

742
Free
0%
0.92
1008

197

0.92
913

183
Free
0%
0.92
249

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.92
154

None

0.92
268

None
669

2073

2845

124

1276

249

3501

2711

2073
7.5

2845
6.5

124
6.9

1276
4.1

249
4.1

3501
7.5

2711
6.5

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

3.3
0
903

2.2
0
540

2.2
100
1314

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

WB 1
155
154
0
0
Err
Err
Err
F
Err
F

WB 2
913
0
913
903
1.01
478
54.1
F

NB 1
743
660
0
540
1.22
624
140.4
F
114.8

NB 2
166
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Err
92.3%
15

SB 1
672
0
0
1700
0.40
0
0.0

SB 2
604
0
268
1700
0.36
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
L8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
262

0.92
969

130
Free
0%
0.92
177

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
168

193

0.92
94

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
829

None

0.92
0

None
1167

2414

2545

177

2509

2414

300

177

431

2414
7.1

2545
6.5

177
6.2

2509
7.1

2414
6.5

300
6.2

177
4.1

431
4.1

3.5
0
6

4.0
60
4

3.3
89
866

3.5
100
3

4.0
100
5

3.3
100
740

2.2
100
1399

2.2
14
1129

EB 1
831
829
0
6
135.31
Err
Err
F
8980.4
F

EB 2
94
0
94
866
0.11
9
9.7
A

NB 1
431
0
262
1700
0.25
0
0.0

SB 1
969
969
0
1129
0.86
288
23.7
C
20.1

SB 2
177
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3331.0
124.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
L9

APENDICE M
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1

M-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1733
1.00
1733
0.92
125%
402
22
650

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.10
180
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
47.0
47.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
163
0.04
0.30
0.79
48.1
1.00
22.5
70.6
E

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1677
1.00
1677
0.92
125%
303
50
719

343
1900

63
1900

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
19
50
Perm

275
1900

0.92
125%
466
0
0

96
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1809
0.41
753
0.92
125%
130
0
216

225
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1795
0.67
1234
0.92
125%
306
0
680

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
53
5
49
Perm

37.0
37.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
589
0.05
0.15
25.5
1.00
0.6
26.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
270
0
0

4
37.0
37.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
583
c0.38
1.12
36.5
1.00
73.0
109.5
F
99.7
F
77.1
1.08
110.0
105.5%
15

8!

2
2

47.0
47.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
717
c0.43
1.00
31.5
1.00
34.2
65.7
E
66.4
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
374
0
0
Perm

55.0
55.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
377
0.29
0.57
19.3
1.00
2.1
21.4
C
19.6
B

6
2
55.0
55.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.03
0.06
14.2
1.00
0.0
14.2
B

6
55.0
55.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
617
c0.55
1.10
27.5
1.00
67.4
94.9
F
89.1
F

6
55.0
55.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.03
0.06
14.2
1.00
0.2
14.3
B

E
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
M2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
413
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
626
0
626

38
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
52
27
25
Perm

76
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
402
0.92
125%
103
0
103
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
10
609

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
142%
140
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
284
198
86
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
79
0
219

21
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1770
0.62
1141
0.92
125%
29
0
185

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
225
52
Perm

4
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
749

8
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
192

0.02
0.03
12.5
1.00
0.1
12.6
B

0.26
0.54
16.5
1.00
10.3
26.8
C

4
4
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
197
c0.40
0.85
20.6
1.00
34.0
54.6
D

43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
882
0.34
0.71
18.6
1.00
4.8
23.4
C
28.9
C

32.1
0.79
90.0
67.7%
15

43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
855
0.34

18.0
18.0
0.20
4.0
358
c0.12

0.71
18.6
1.00
5.0
23.6
C
24.1
C

0.61
32.8
1.00
7.6
40.4
D
36.0
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

6
2
18.0
18.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.06
0.28
30.5
1.00
2.2
32.6
C

6
17.0
17.0
0.19
4.0
216
c0.16
0.86
35.3
1.00
32.9
68.3
E
46.5
D

6
17.0
17.0
0.19
4.0
296
0.03
0.18
30.6
1.00
1.3
31.9
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
M3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
138%
148
59
545

204
1900

181
1900

204
1900

104
1900

0.92
138%
272
0
0
Perm

0.92
138%
306
0
0

0.92
125%
141
0
0
Perm

492
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.44
809
0.92
125%
668
0
809

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
223
131
92
Perm

161
1900

0.92
138%
306
0
0

176
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1726
0.67
1170
0.92
138%
264
33
809

228
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1807
0.11
201
0.92
138%
342
0
584

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
72
13
59
Perm

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

6
6

10.0
10.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
269
c0.32
2.03
26.5
1.00
474.7
501.2
F
501.2
F
1023.7
4.84
63.0
143.2%
15

4
4

15.0
15.0
0.24
4.0
3.0
279

26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
334

c0.69
2.90
24.0
1.00
865.0
889.0
F
889.0
F

1.00
2.42
18.5
1.00
649.0
667.5
F
525.8
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
242
0
0
Perm

8
4
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
647
0.06
0.14
11.5
1.00
0.1
11.6
B

8
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
83
c2.91
7.04
18.5
1.41
2737.1
2763.3
F
2461.1
F

8
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
647
0.04
0.09
11.3
0.91
0.2
10.5
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
M4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

341
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
512
0
512

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
315
154
161
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.57
1990
0.92
138%
318
0
648

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
996
0
677
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
27
612

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
138%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1794
0.99
1794
0.92
138%
10
2
13

58.7
58.7
0.47
4.0
3.0
776
c0.41

58.7
58.7
0.47
4.0
3.0
737
0.39

3.1
3.1
0.02
4.0
3.0
44
c0.01

0.87
30.3
0.92
1.1
28.9
C

0.83
29.3
0.91
0.8
27.5
C
28.2
C

0.30
60.4
1.00
3.8
64.1
E
64.1
E

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
42.6
42.6
0.34
4.0
8.0
1185
0.15
0.43
32.3
1.00
1.2
33.5
C
33.0
C

2
42.6
42.6
0.34
4.0
8.0
530
0.10
0.30
30.8
1.00
1.5
32.3
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
52.2
52.2
0.41
4.0
8.0
888
c0.03
c0.27
0.99dl
31.0
0.93
3.1
31.7
C
31.7
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
30.6
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
126.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
80.9%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
2
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
M5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
386
305
81
Perm

345
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.62
2162
0.92
138%
316
0
834

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
87
340

122
1900

41.8
41.8
0.66
4.0
4.0
1592
c0.07
c0.28
0.52
5.5
0.87
0.4
5.1
A
5.1
A

29.8
29.8
0.47
4.0
4.0
1561
0.10

4
13.2
13.2
0.21
4.0
4.0
367
c0.10
0.49
21.9
1.00
1.4
23.3
C
21.9
C

4
13.2
13.2
0.21
4.0
4.0
329

0.92
138%
518
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.25
20.8
1.00
0.5
21.3
C

11.5
0.51
63.0
57.0%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.22
9.8
1.00
0.3
10.1
B
10.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
M6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1831
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
214
153
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.45
824
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1817
1.00
1817
0.92
125%
348
6
380

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
38
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.72
2514
0.92
125%
398
0
1056

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
135
111
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
301
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
162
0
162

25
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
39
21
18
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
653

8
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
343

2
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
135

0.10
0.23
11.3
1.00
0.8
12.2
B

c0.39
0.93
16.7
1.00
33.7
50.4
D

0.07
0.16
9.8
1.00
0.5
10.2
B

0.03
0.06
9.3
1.00
0.8
10.2
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
763
0.19
0.47
12.7
1.00
2.0
14.7
B
13.4
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
757
0.21
0.50
12.9
1.00
2.4
15.3
B
31.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.3
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
60.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
90.9%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
1131
c0.42
1.21dl
15.7
1.00
14.9
30.6
C
26.7
C

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
830
0.09
0.20
9.9
1.00
0.5
10.5
B
10.2
B

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706
0.01
0.02
9.2
1.00
0.1
9.2
A

C
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
M7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/30/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
0%
1.00
0

689

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
359

430
Free
0%
0.90
597

180

0.99
974

269
Free
0%
0.75
448

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.88
223

None

0.94
239

None
654

1465

2003

224

837

448

2633

1883

1465
7.6

2003
6.6

224
7.0

837
4.2

448
4.2

2633
7.6

1883
6.6

3.5
0
57

4.0
100
32

3.3
0
776

2.2
54
787

2.2
100
1101

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
38

WB 1
223
223
0
57
3.91
Err
Err
F
1977.7
F

WB 2
974
0
974
776
1.26
879
144.1
F

NB 1
508
359
0
787
0.46
60
11.4
B
7.2

NB 2
299
0
0
1700
0.18
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

835.4
84.7%
15

SB 1
398
0
0
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 2
438
0
239
1700
0.26
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
M8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

464

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
204

0.92
630

106
Free
0%
0.88
151

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
173

152

0.86
184

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
589

None

0.92
0

None
1168

1687

1789

151

1871

1687

276

151

378

1687
7.1

1789
6.5

151
6.2

1871
7.1

1687
6.5

276
6.2

151
4.1

378
4.1

3.5
0
43

4.0
100
37

3.3
79
893

3.5
100
25

4.0
100
43

3.3
100
761

2.2
100
1424

2.2
46
1175

EB 1
589
589
0
43
13.84
Err
Err
F
7621.5
F

EB 2
184
0
184
893
0.21
19
10.1
B

NB 1
378
0
204
1700
0.22
0
0.0

SB 1
630
630
0
1175
0.54
83
11.5
B
9.3

SB 2
151
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3053.3
92.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
M9

APENDICE N
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1
con Mejoras Adicionales

N-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
151
0
151
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
656
0
656
3%

209
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
284
52
232
3%
custom

197
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
268
0
268
3%

171
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
232
104
128
3%
Perm

93
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.47
872
0.92
125%
126
0
126
3%
Perm

327
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1777
1.00
1777
0.92
125%
444
8
580
3%

106
1900

353
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.32
596
0.92
125%
480
0
480
3%
Perm

192
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1762
1.00
1762
0.92
125%
261
10
362
3%

82
1900

4
41.0
41.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
504

4
41.0
41.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
429

8
51.0
51.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
533

2
91.0
91.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
529

c0.36
1.30
54.5
1.00
149.7
204.2
F
142.4
F

0.15
0.54
46.5
1.00
4.8
51.3
D

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.09
164
0.92
125%
87
0
87
3%
pm+pt
3
8
51.0
51.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
119
c0.03
0.22
0.73
40.3
1.00
20.5
60.7
E

0.08
0.24
35.6
1.00
1.1
36.7
D

0.14
0.24
13.6
1.00
0.2
13.8
B

41.0
41.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
479
0.09
0.32
43.3
1.00
1.7
45.1
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

89.7
1.29
150.0
104.1%
15

8!
51.0
51.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
627
0.15
0.43
38.2
1.00
2.1
40.4
D
41.9
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
144
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
111
0
0
3%

6
6
91.0
91.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
362

91.0
91.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
1078
0.33

c0.81
1.33
29.5
1.00
164.7
194.2
F

0.54
17.2
1.00
0.5
17.7
B
17.1
B

91.0
91.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
1069
0.21
0.34
14.6
1.00
0.9
15.5
B
116.2
F

F
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
N2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.40
746
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
806
0
806

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
330
88
242
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
458
0.92
125%
337
0
337
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
10
517

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
142%
165
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
168
98
70
Perm

61
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
142%
40
0
205

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.73
1367
0.92
125%
79
0
162

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
75
56
19
Perm

4
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1098

8
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
318

0.15
0.22
8.3
1.00
0.1
8.4
A

c0.74
1.06
23.0
1.00
67.1
90.1
F

4
4
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
517
0.19
0.28
8.7
1.00
0.3
9.0
A

104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1292
0.43
0.62
12.4
1.00
0.9
13.4
B
11.6
B

42.9
1.05
150.0
83.2%
15

104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1233
0.29

17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
203
c0.11

0.42
9.9
1.00
0.2
10.2
B
41.4
D

1.01
66.5
1.00
65.7
132.2
F
103.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
83
0
0
Perm

6
2
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
179
0.04
0.39
61.7
1.00
6.3
67.9
E

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
155
c0.12
1.05
66.5
1.00
84.8
151.3
F
122.4
F

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
179
0.01
0.11
59.7
1.00
0.3
60.0
E

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
N3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1793
0.97
1793
0.92
138%
150
0
352
3%

265
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
398
161
237
3%
Perm

97
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.55
964
0.92
138%
146
0
131
3%
Perm

160
1900
4.0
0.91
0.99
1.00
1653
0.97
1601
0.92
138%
240
4
274
3%

156
1900
4.0
0.95
0.85
1.00
1490
1.00
1490
0.92
138%
234
178
33
3%
Perm

177
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.26
471
0.92
125%
240
0
240
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
637
0
637
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
159
82
77
3%
Perm

144
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
414
0.92
138%
216
0
216
3%
Perm

345
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1807
1.00
1807
0.92
138%
518
7
592
3%

54
1900

2
15.0
15.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
309

6
12.0
12.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
152

6
12.0
12.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
235

4
37.0
37.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
229

4
37.0
37.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
763

8
37.0
37.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
202

0.15
0.77
28.9
1.00
16.7
45.5
D

0.14
0.86
31.2
1.00
43.5
74.7
E

0.02
0.14
27.6
1.00
1.3
28.8
C

0.51
1.05
19.5
1.00
72.6
92.1
F

0.05
0.10
10.5
1.00
0.1
10.6
B

c0.52
1.07
19.5
0.45
74.4
83.1
F

0.92
138%
202
0
0
3%
Split
2

2
15.0
15.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
354
c0.20
0.99
30.5
1.00
46.4
76.9
E
60.3
E

46.7
1.06
76.0
84.8%
15

12.0
12.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
253
c0.17
1.08
32.0
1.00
80.2
112.2
F
75.9
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

37.0
37.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
898
0.35
0.71
15.3
1.00
2.6
17.9
B
34.0
C

0.92
138%
81
0
0
3%

8
37.0
37.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
880
0.33
0.67
14.9
0.35
3.1
8.3
A
28.1
C

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
N4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
334
0
334
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
399
337
62
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.64
2228
0.92
138%
135
0
540
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
813
0
650
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
138%
0
83
514
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
434
0
0
3%

0.92
138%
3
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1811
0.99
1811
0.92
138%
10
2
13
2%

41.7
41.7
0.55
4.0
3.0
914
c0.39

41.7
41.7
0.55
4.0
3.0
845
0.33

1.5
1.5
0.02
4.0
3.0
36
c0.01

0.71
12.7
1.18
1.7
16.7
B

0.61
11.6
1.23
0.8
15.2
B
16.0
B

0.36
36.8
1.00
6.1
42.9
D
42.9
D

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.16
4.0
8.0
544
0.10
0.61
30.0
1.00
5.1
35.1
D
32.7
C

2
11.8
11.8
0.16
4.0
8.0
243
0.04
0.25
28.2
1.00
2.5
30.7
C

0.92
138%
405
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
20.8
20.8
0.27
4.0
8.0
685
c0.05
c0.16
1.26dl
25.6
0.83
6.2
27.4
C
27.4
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.72
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
82.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
2
0
0
2%

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
N5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
214
181
33
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.60
2120
0.92
138%
242
0
772
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
36
388
3%

78
1900

56.3
56.3
0.74
4.0
4.0
1704
c0.05
c0.29
0.45
3.8
0.37
0.2
1.7
A
1.7
A

44.3
44.3
0.58
4.0
4.0
1966
0.12

4
11.7
11.7
0.15
4.0
4.0
270
c0.07
0.44
29.2
1.00
1.6
30.8
C
29.1
C

4
11.7
11.7
0.15
4.0
4.0
241

0.92
138%
530
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.02
0.14
27.8
1.00
0.4
28.1
C

9.3
0.45
76.0
54.9%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.20
7.5
1.00
0.2
7.7
A
7.7
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
N6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
65
605
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.56
1047
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
2
168

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.58
2054
0.92
125%
315
0
755

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
103
74
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.27
497
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
670
0
670

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
170
59
111
Perm

4
36.3
36.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
756

8
36.3
36.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
500

2
31.7
31.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
660

6
31.7
31.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
207

0.38
0.80
16.8
1.00
5.9
22.7
C

c0.46
0.97
19.4
1.00
32.9
52.3
D

0.05
0.11
13.5
1.22
0.1
16.7
B

0.02
0.04
13.1
1.00
0.3
13.5
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
36.3
36.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
885
0.14
0.28
12.0
1.00
0.2
12.2
B
19.8
B

2
2

36.3
36.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
884
0.09
0.19
11.4
1.00
0.1
11.5
B
41.7
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
27.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
105.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

31.7
31.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
857
c0.37
4.49dl
20.4
0.98
5.5
25.4
C
23.7
C

6
31.7
31.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
777
0.36
0.86
20.2
1.00
12.1
32.3
C
28.5
C

6
31.7
31.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
660
0.07
0.17
13.9
1.00
0.6
14.4
B

C
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
N7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


45: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
140%
2
0
156

600
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
913
387
526
Perm

486
1900

183
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3415
0.58
2042
0.92
125%
249
0
909

0
1900

0
1900

197
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

742
1900
4.0
0.95
0.97
1.00
3428
1.00
3428
0.92
125%
1008
30
1246

0.92
125%
268
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
140%
154
0
0
Perm

0.92
125%
660
0
0
Perm

8
8
26.6
26.6
0.35
4.0
3.0
620
0.09
0.25
17.6
1.00
0.2
17.8
B
45.3
D

8
26.6
26.6
0.35
4.0
3.0
554
c0.33
0.95
24.1
1.00
25.9
50.0
D

41.4
41.4
0.54
4.0
3.0
1112

41.4
41.4
0.54
4.0
3.0
1867
0.36

c0.45
5.00dl
14.2
0.44
3.1
9.3
A
9.3
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
22.2
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.87
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.3%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.67
12.4
0.89
0.9
11.9
B
11.9
B

0.0
A
C
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
N8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1774
0.95
1774
0.92
140%
2
0
831

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
94
51
43
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

193
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
262
148
114
Perm

713
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.64
1089
0.92
125%
969
0
484
Perm

130
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.96
3270
0.69
2333
0.92
125%
177
0
662

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

124
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
168
0
168

2
33.0
33.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
687

6
33.0
33.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
473

0.07
0.17
13.1
1.00
0.5
13.6
B

c0.44
1.02
21.5
0.83
42.9
60.8
E

0.92
140%
829
0
0
Perm

4
4
35.0
35.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
817
0.47
1.02
20.5
1.00
35.8
56.3
E
51.8
D

2
4
35.0
35.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
729

33.0
33.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
809
0.09

0.03
0.06
11.4
1.00
0.0
11.4
B
0.0
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
37.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.21
13.4
1.00
0.6
14.0
B
13.8
B

0.92
125%
0
0
0

6
33.0
33.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
1013
0.28
0.98dl
17.0
0.78
2.6
15.9
B
34.9
C

D
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
N9

APENDICE O
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 1
con Mejoras Adicionales

O-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
402
0
402

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
110
160
custom

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
303
0
303

343
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
466
252
214
Perm

63
1900

96
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1809
0.74
1358
0.92
125%
130
0
216

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
33
36
Perm

275
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.59
1084
0.92
125%
374
0
374
Perm

225
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1804
1.00
1804
0.92
125%
306
6
353

39
1900

4
35.0
35.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
587

4
35.0
35.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
499

2
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
813

6
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
562

c0.22
0.68
32.7
1.00
6.4
39.1
D
34.6
C

0.10
0.32
28.5
1.00
1.7
30.2
C

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.29
533
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
285
0.02
0.16
0.45
35.7
1.00
1.1
36.9
D

0.02
0.04
13.1
1.00
0.0
13.1
B

c0.34
0.67
19.5
1.00
6.1
25.6
C

35.0
35.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
557
0.05
0.16
27.0
1.00
0.6
27.6
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

25.9
0.64
110.0
69.1%
15

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

8!
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
755
c0.16
0.40
23.0
1.00
1.6
24.6
C
25.9
C

2
8
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
641
0.14
0.33
22.2
1.00
1.4
23.7
C

2
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
704
0.16
0.31
15.2
1.00
0.2
15.4
B
14.9
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
C

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
53
0
0

57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
935
0.20
0.38
15.9
1.00
1.2
17.0
B
21.4
C

Synchro 7 - Report
O2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
413
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
626
0
626

38
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
52
27
25
Perm

76
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
402
0.92
125%
103
0
103
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
10
609

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
142%
140
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
284
198
86
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
79
0
219

21
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1770
0.62
1141
0.92
125%
29
0
185

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
225
52
Perm

4
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
749

8
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
192

0.02
0.03
12.5
1.00
0.1
12.6
B

0.26
0.54
16.5
1.00
10.3
26.8
C

4
4
43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
197
c0.40
0.85
20.6
1.00
34.0
54.6
D

43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
882
0.34
0.71
18.6
1.00
4.8
23.4
C
28.9
C

32.1
0.79
90.0
67.7%
15

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

43.0
43.0
0.48
4.0
855
0.34

18.0
18.0
0.20
4.0
358
c0.12

0.71
18.6
1.00
5.0
23.6
C
24.1
C

0.61
32.8
1.00
7.6
40.4
D
36.0
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
18.0
18.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.06
0.28
30.5
1.00
2.2
32.6
C

6
17.0
17.0
0.19
4.0
216
c0.16
0.86
35.3
1.00
32.9
68.3
E
46.5
D

6
17.0
17.0
0.19
4.0
296
0.03
0.18
30.6
1.00
1.3
31.9
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
O3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1799
0.98
1799
0.92
138%
148
0
298

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
306
138
168
Perm

181
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.58
1066
0.92
138%
272
0
272
Perm

176
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
264
0
264

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
306
245
61
Perm

104
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.40
739
0.92
125%
141
0
141
Perm

492
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
668
47
844

164
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
416
0.92
138%
242
0
242
Perm

228
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1797
1.00
1797
0.92
138%
342
11
403

48
1900

2
12.0
12.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
269

6
14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
213

6
14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
314

4
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
338

0.11
0.62
26.9
1.00
10.4
37.3
D

c0.26
1.28
28.0
1.00
155.8
183.8
F

0.04
0.19
23.3
1.00
1.4
24.7
C

0.19
0.42
12.7
1.00
0.8
13.6
B

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

2
12.0
12.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
308
c0.17
0.97
28.8
1.00
43.7
72.5
E
54.7
D

50.1
1.21
70.0
77.9%
15

14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
369
0.14
0.72
26.1
1.00
11.3
37.4
D
80.1
F

0.92
125%
223
0
0

8
8
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
190

32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
1542
0.25

c0.58
1.27
19.0
0.61
150.3
161.9
F

0.55
13.8
1.00
0.4
14.2
B
14.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
72
0
0

32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
821
0.22
0.49
13.3
0.41
1.6
7.0
A
64.2
E

D
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
O4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

341
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
512
0
512

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
315
262
53
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.61
2146
0.92
138%
318
0
648

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
996
0
677
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
34
605

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
138%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.99
1794
0.99
1794
0.92
138%
10
2
13

35.7
35.7
0.51
4.0
3.0
849
c0.41

35.7
35.7
0.51
4.0
3.0
806
0.38

1.5
1.5
0.02
4.0
3.0
38
c0.01

0.80
14.2
1.10
3.6
19.2
B

0.75
13.6
1.11
2.7
17.8
B
18.5
B

0.34
33.8
1.00
5.3
39.1
D
39.1
D

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.17
4.0
8.0
591
0.15
0.87
28.3
1.00
15.7
44.0
D
37.4
D

2
11.8
11.8
0.17
4.0
8.0
264
0.03
0.20
25.0
1.00
1.7
26.8
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
20.8
20.8
0.30
4.0
8.0
729
c0.06
c0.20
1.25dl
23.5
0.90
12.5
33.7
C
33.7
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
27.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
80.9%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
2
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
O5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
386
309
77
Perm

345
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.61
2154
0.92
138%
316
0
834

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
80
347

122
1900

48.1
48.1
0.69
4.0
4.0
1622
c0.06
c0.29
0.51
5.3
0.51
0.3
3.0
A
3.0
A

36.1
36.1
0.52
4.0
4.0
1702
0.11

4
13.9
13.9
0.20
4.0
4.0
348
c0.10
0.51
25.0
1.00
1.7
26.7
C
25.0
C

4
13.9
13.9
0.20
4.0
4.0
311

0.92
138%
518
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.25
23.6
1.00
0.6
24.2
C

11.3
0.51
70.0
57.0%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.20
9.2
1.00
0.3
9.4
A
9.4
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
O6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1832
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
210
157
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.44
814
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1817
1.00
1817
0.92
125%
348
6
380

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
38
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.71
2506
0.92
125%
398
0
1056

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
134
112
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
297
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
162
0
162

25
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
39
21
18
Perm

4
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
672

8
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
349

2
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
717

6
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
136

0.10
0.23
12.7
1.00
0.8
13.5
B

c0.39
0.91
18.8
1.00
30.6
49.4
D

0.07
0.16
11.1
1.42
0.0
15.8
B

0.03
0.06
10.6
1.00
0.8
11.4
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
785
0.19
0.45
14.2
1.00
1.9
16.1
B
14.8
B

2
2

30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
779
0.21
0.49
14.5
1.00
2.2
16.6
B
31.5
C

32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
1146
c0.42
1.19dl
17.8
1.01
1.6
19.5
B
18.8
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
20.3
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.92
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
90.9%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
843
0.09
0.19
11.3
1.00
0.5
11.8
B
11.6
B

6
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
717
0.01
0.02
10.4
1.00
0.1
10.5
B

C
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
O7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140
1900

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
1.00
140%
0
0
223

689
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.99
140%
974
163
811
Perm

247
1900

269
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3429
0.54
1901
0.75
125%
448
0
807

0
1900

0
1900

180
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

430
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3355
1.00
3355
0.90
125%
597
61
775

0.94
125%
239
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.88
140%
223
0
0
Perm

0.86
125%
359
0
0
Perm

8
8
31.1
31.1
0.44
4.0
3.0
778
0.13
0.29
12.4
1.00
0.2
12.6
B
90.5
F

8
31.1
31.1
0.44
4.0
3.0
697
c0.52
1.16
19.4
1.00
88.9
108.4
F

30.9
30.9
0.44
4.0
3.0
839

30.9
30.9
0.44
4.0
3.0
1481
0.23

c0.42
1.82dl
19.0
0.70
20.1
33.4
C
33.4
C

0.52
14.2
0.62
1.1
9.9
A
9.9
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
50.6
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.06
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
84.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
D
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
O8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387
1900

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
140%
0
0
589

113
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.86
140%
184
111
73
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

152
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
125%
204
104
100
Perm

464
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.65
1088
0.92
125%
630
0
315
Perm

106
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3248
0.70
2349
0.88
125%
151
0
466

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

129
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.93
125%
173
0
173

2
34.2
34.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
766

6
34.2
34.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
532

0.06
0.13
9.8
1.00
0.4
10.1
B

c0.29
0.59
12.9
0.77
4.3
14.3
B

0.92
140%
589
0
0
Perm

4
4
27.8
27.8
0.40
4.0
3.0
696
0.34
0.85
19.2
1.00
9.3
28.5
C
24.9
C

2
4
27.8
27.8
0.40
4.0
3.0
623

34.2
34.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
901
0.09

0.05
0.12
13.3
1.00
0.1
13.4
B
0.0
A
16.6
0.71
70.0
67.8%
15

0.19
10.1
1.00
0.5
10.6
B
10.3
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 1 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

6
34.2
34.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
1148
0.20
0.41
11.4
0.75
1.0
9.5
A
11.4
B

B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
O9

APENDICE P
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 2

P-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
113%
179
0
179
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1722
1.00
1722
0.70
113%
623
20
1097
3%

306
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.07
123
0.75
113%
96
0
96
3%
pm+pt
3
8
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
128
0.03
0.32
0.75
32.5
1.00
21.6
54.1
D

214
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1730
1.00
1730
0.75
113%
322
19
533
3%

152
1900

93
1900

106
1900

137
1900

0.75
113%
229
0
0
3%

0.80
113%
131
0
0
3%
Perm

227
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1763
0.46
828
0.80
113%
321
8
594
3%

0.80
113%
150
0
0
3%

0.90
113%
172
0
0
3%
Perm

301
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.61
1121
0.90
113%
378
0
550
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
113%
103
8
95
3%
Perm

56.0
56.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
701
0.10
0.26
28.1
1.00
0.9
28.9
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
113%
494
0
0
3%

4
56.0
56.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
689
c0.64
1.59
42.0
1.00
273.1
315.1
F
275.5
F
188.1
1.52
140.0
115.5%
15

8!

2
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
816
c0.31
0.65
28.2
1.00
4.0
32.3
C
35.5
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

6
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
390

66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
528

c0.72
1.52
37.0
1.00
247.6
284.6
F
284.6
F

0.49
1.04
37.0
1.00
50.4
87.4
F
77.0
E

6
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
739
0.06
0.13
20.8
1.00
0.4
21.2
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
P2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.33
616
0.92
113%
130
0
130
Perm

332
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
408
0
408

191
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
235
147
88
Perm

194
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.41
766
0.92
113%
238
0
238
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
113%
332
41
436

118
1900

100
1900

0.92
121%
132
0
0
Perm

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
134
78
56
Perm

68
1900

0.92
113%
145
0
0

24
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.71
1317
0.92
121%
32
0
164

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1808
0.78
1451
0.92
113%
56
0
140

60
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
74
43
31
Perm

4
14.4
14.4
0.37
4.0
3.0
592

8
14.4
14.4
0.37
4.0
3.0
287

0.06
0.15
8.0
1.00
0.1
8.1
A

c0.31
0.83
10.9
1.00
17.6
28.6
C

4
4
14.4
14.4
0.37
4.0
3.0
230
0.21
0.57
9.6
1.00
3.2
12.7
B

14.4
14.4
0.37
4.0
3.0
697
0.22
0.59
9.7
1.00
1.3
10.9
B
10.4
B

12.4
0.55
38.5
56.8%
15

2
2

14.4
14.4
0.37
4.0
3.0
665
0.25
0.66
10.0
1.00
2.3
12.3
B
17.7
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
84
0
0
Perm

16.1
16.1
0.42
4.0
3.0
551
c0.12
0.30
7.4
1.00
1.4
8.8
A
8.0
A

6
2
16.1
16.1
0.42
4.0
3.0
662
0.04
0.08
6.8
1.00
0.3
7.0
A

6
16.1
16.1
0.42
4.0
3.0
607
0.10
0.23
7.2
1.00
0.9
8.1
A
7.6
A

6
16.1
16.1
0.42
4.0
3.0
662
0.02
0.05
6.6
1.00
0.1
6.8
A

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
P3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

102
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.99
1757
0.99
1757
0.25
119%
766
15
1300
3%

318
1900

97
1900

192
1900

116
1900

0.91
119%
127
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
119%
251
0
0
3%

0.91
113%
144
0
0
3%
Perm

321
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1821
0.32
596
0.91
113%
399
0
543
3%

65
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
113%
81
44
37
3%
Perm

124
1900

0.91
119%
416
0
0
3%

124
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
0.99
1709
0.51
887
0.91
119%
162
28
512
3%

288
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1817
0.30
546
0.90
119%
381
0
545
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
119%
71
8
63
3%
Perm

0.91
119%
133
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

32.0
32.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
511
c0.74
2.54
39.0
1.00
700.7
739.7
F
739.7
F
709.1
2.60
110.0
111.7%
15

4
4

23.0
23.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
185

43.0
43.0
0.39
4.0
3.0
233

c0.58
2.77
43.5
1.00
809.2
852.7
F
852.7
F

0.91
2.33
33.5
1.00
612.0
645.5
F
564.4
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
119%
164
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
43.0
43.0
0.39
4.0
3.0
613
0.02
0.06
20.9
1.00
0.0
20.9
C

8
43.0
43.0
0.39
4.0
3.0
213
c1.00
2.56
33.5
1.00
715.0
748.5
F
664.7
F

8
43.0
43.0
0.39
4.0
3.0
613
0.04
0.10
21.3
1.00
0.3
21.6
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
P4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
119%
302
0
302
3%

246
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
119%
333
241
92
3%
Perm

220
1900

180
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3411
0.63
2197
0.83
113%
245
0
545
3%

0
1900

495
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
119%
633
0
487
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.90
0.98
1549
0.98
1549
0.92
119%
0
86
368
2%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
119%
308
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

22.2
22.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
682
c0.29

22.2
22.2
0.41
4.0
3.0
634
0.24

0.71
13.4
1.00
3.6
16.9
B

0.58
12.4
1.00
1.4
13.7
B
15.4
B

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
15.0
15.0
0.28
4.0
8.0
970
0.09
0.31
15.5
1.00
0.8
16.3
B
16.2
B

2
15.0
15.0
0.28
4.0
8.0
434
0.06
0.21
15.1
1.00
1.0
16.1
B

14.9
0.60
54.2
61.4%
15

0.83
113%
300
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

6
24.0
24.0
0.44
4.0
8.0
1085
c0.05
c0.18
0.50
10.8
1.00
1.6
12.4
B
12.4
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
P5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
119%
112
0
112
3%

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
119%
350
270
80
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.67
2343
0.89
119%
195
0
620
3%

150
1900
4.0
0.95
0.95
1.00
3325
1.00
3325
0.89
113%
190
74
215
3%

78
1900

22.0
22.0
0.57
4.0
4.0
1540
c0.08
c0.14
0.40
4.8
1.00
0.2
5.0
A
5.0
A

10.0
10.0
0.26
4.0
4.0
855
0.06

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
401
c0.06
0.28
12.4
1.00
0.5
12.9
B
12.7
B

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
359

0.89
119%
425
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.22
12.2
1.00
0.4
12.6
B

9.0
0.36
38.9
46.0%
15

0.89
113%
99
0
0
3%

0.25
11.5
1.00
0.2
11.7
B
11.7
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
P6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
113%
221
0
227

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
606
151
455
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.62
1149
0.92
113%
440
0
440
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1852
1.00
1852
0.92
113%
147
4
149

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
113%
6
0
0

0.92
113%
398
0
0
Perm

217
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3436
0.60
2128
0.92
113%
267
0
665

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
160
95
65
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.35
645
0.92
121%
7
0
7
Perm

337
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
443
0
443

89
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
117
70
47
Perm

4
18.4
18.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
656

8
18.4
18.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
476

2
18.0
18.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
642

6
18.0
18.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
261

0.29
0.69
10.7
1.00
3.2
13.9
B

c0.38
0.92
12.3
1.00
23.7
36.1
D

0.04
0.10
8.2
1.00
0.3
8.5
A

0.01
0.03
7.9
1.00
0.2
8.1
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
18.4
18.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
767
0.12
0.30
8.7
1.00
0.2
8.9
A
12.5
B

2
2

18.4
18.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
767
0.08
0.19
8.3
1.00
0.1
8.4
A
28.9
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
17.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.85
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
44.4
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
88.5%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

18.0
18.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
863
c0.31
1.40dl
11.4
1.00
6.6
18.0
B
16.2
B

6
18.0
18.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
755
0.24
0.59
10.3
1.00
3.3
13.6
B
12.5
B

6
18.0
18.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
642
0.03
0.07
8.1
1.00
0.2
8.3
A

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
P7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
597

742
Free
0%
0.92
911

197

0.92
783

183
Free
0%
0.92
225

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.92
132

None

0.92
242

None
663

1874

2572

112

1153

225

3122

2451

1874
7.5

2572
6.5

112
6.9

1153
4.1

225
4.1

3122
7.5

2451
6.5

3.5
0
2

4.0
0
0

3.3
15
919

2.2
1
602

2.2
100
1341

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
0

WB 1
133
132
0
2
61.28
Err
Err
F
1475.6
F

WB 2
783
0
783
919
0.85
265
26.7
D

NB 1
672
597
0
602
0.99
367
61.0
F
49.9

NB 2
150
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

481.6
81.7%
15

SB 1
608
0
0
1700
0.36
0
0.0

SB 2
546
0
242
1700
0.32
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
P8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
237

0.92
876

130
Free
0%
0.92
160

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
152

193

0.92
81

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
711

None

0.92
0

None
1160

2182

2301

160

2264

2182

271

160

389

2182
7.1

2301
6.5

160
6.2

2264
7.1

2182
6.5

271
6.2

160
4.1

389
4.1

3.5
0
13

4.0
87
10

3.3
91
885

3.5
100
9

4.0
100
12

3.3
100
768

2.2
100
1420

2.2
25
1169

EB 1
712
711
0
13
55.75
Err
Err
F
8980.3
F

EB 2
81
0
81
885
0.09
8
9.5
A

NB 1
389
0
237
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 1
876
876
0
1169
0.75
186
16.6
C
14.1

SB 2
160
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3217.7
111.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
P9

APENDICE Q
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 2

Q-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
81
0
81
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1734
1.00
1734
0.92
113%
364
31
577

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.92
113%
117
0
117
pm+pt
3
8
33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
208
0.04
0.21
0.56
30.2
0.79
2.7
26.7
C

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1679
1.00
1679
0.92
113%
274
69
614

333
1900

63
1900

0.92
113%
77
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
63
26
37
Perm

261
1900

0.92
113%
409
0
0

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1811
0.50
920
0.92
113%
130
0
207

239
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1798
0.70
1289
0.92
113%
294
0
615

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
48
7
41
Perm

25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
576
0.05
0.14
17.9
1.00
0.5
18.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
244
0
0

4
25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
570
c0.33
1.01
25.5
1.00
40.9
66.4
E
60.7
E
45.7
0.99
76.0
97.1%
15

8!

2
2

33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
747
c0.37
0.82
18.5
0.69
8.0
20.7
C
21.6
C

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
414
0.23
0.50
14.8
1.00
4.3
19.1
B
17.4
B

6
2
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.02
0.05
11.8
1.00
0.1
11.9
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
321
0
0
Perm
6

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
580
c0.48
1.06
20.9
1.00
54.4
75.3
E
70.7
E

6
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.03
0.06
11.8
1.00
0.2
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
Q2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
421
0.92
113%
151
0
151
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
566
0
566

24
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
29
17
12
Perm

49
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
412
0.92
113%
60
0
60
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
113%
450
12
549

90
1900

81
1900

0.92
121%
107
0
0
Split
2

162
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
213
168
45
Perm

115
1900

0.92
113%
111
0
0

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.97
1787
0.92
121%
60
0
167

14
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1766
0.64
1173
0.92
113%
17
0
158

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
251
198
53
Perm

4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
660

8
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
173

0.01
0.02
12.8
0.67
0.0
8.7
A

0.15
0.35
14.9
1.00
5.4
20.3
C

4
4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
177
c0.36
0.85
19.9
0.64
15.9
28.8
C

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
777
0.31
0.73
18.4
0.65
2.0
14.0
B
16.8
B

23.4
0.70
76.0
60.7%
15

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
754
0.31

16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
376
c0.09

0.73
18.4
1.00
6.1
24.5
C
24.1
C

0.44
26.1
1.00
3.8
29.9
C
27.3
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
141
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.14
24.4
1.00
0.9
25.2
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
247
c0.13
0.64
27.4
1.00
12.0
39.4
D
30.9
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.16
24.5
1.00
1.0
25.5
C

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
Q3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
119%
128
25
496

204
1900

181
1900

190
1900

93
1900

0.92
119%
234
0
0
Perm

0.92
119%
246
0
0

0.92
113%
114
0
0
Perm

481
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1830
0.62
1150
0.92
113%
591
0
705

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
201
62
139
Perm

161
1900

0.92
119%
264
0
0

190
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1732
0.70
1227
0.92
119%
246
12
714

215
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1806
0.24
442
0.92
119%
278
0
486

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
62
5
57
Perm

0.92
119%
129
0
0
Split
2

6
6

22.0
22.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
249
c0.29
1.99
64.0
1.00
460.9
524.9
F
524.9
F
405.8
2.15
150.0
124.2%
15

4
4

40.0
40.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
327

76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
583

c0.58
2.18
55.0
1.00
541.9
596.9
F
596.9
F

0.61
1.21
37.0
1.00
109.5
146.5
F
118.5
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
208
0
0
Perm

8
4
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
794
0.09
0.18
20.0
1.00
0.1
20.1
C

8
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
224
c1.10
2.17
37.0
1.00
540.8
577.8
F
514.6
F

8
76.0
76.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
794
0.04
0.07
18.9
1.00
0.2
19.1
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
Q4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

354
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
458
0
458

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
255
195
60
Perm

220
1900

222
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3420
0.59
2077
0.92
119%
287
0
572

0
1900

653
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
112%
795
0
556
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1575
0.98
1575
0.92
119%
0
42
473

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
119%
276
0
0

0.92
113%
2
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1809
0.99
1809
0.92
113%
9
1
11

35.8
35.8
0.47
4.0
3.0
784
c0.33

35.8
35.8
0.47
4.0
3.0
742
0.30

1.4
1.4
0.02
4.0
3.0
33
c0.01

0.71
16.0
1.00
3.0
18.9
B

0.64
15.2
1.00
1.8
17.0
B
18.0
B

0.33
36.8
1.00
5.9
42.7
D
42.7
D

0.92
119%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
17.8
17.8
0.23
4.0
8.0
821
0.13
0.56
25.6
1.00
2.7
28.4
C
26.8
C

2
17.8
17.8
0.23
4.0
8.0
367
0.04
0.16
23.2
1.00
1.0
24.1
C

21.5
0.68
76.0
72.1%
15

0.92
119%
285
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
191%
0
0
0

6
26.8
26.8
0.35
4.0
8.0
821
c0.05
c0.20
0.70
21.1
0.87
2.7
21.0
C
21.0
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
1
0
0

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
Q5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
154
0
154

267
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
345
284
61
Perm

358
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3398
0.63
2195
0.92
119%
273
0
736

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.92
113%
236
66
320

122
1900

54.6
54.6
0.72
4.0
4.0
1704
c0.05
c0.26
0.43
4.4
0.44
0.2
2.1
A
2.1
A

42.6
42.6
0.56
4.0
4.0
1850
0.10

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
309
c0.09
0.50
28.3
1.00
1.7
30.0
C
28.2
C

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
276

0.92
119%
463
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.22
26.8
1.00
0.6
27.4
C

11.6
0.44
76.0
51.9%
15

0.92
113%
150
0
0

0.17
8.1
1.00
0.2
8.3
A
8.3
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
Q6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1833
0.92
113%
316
0
322

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
332
199
133
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.51
934
0.92
113%
289
0
289
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1839
1.00
1839
0.92
113%
314
2
318

5
1900

484
1900

0.92
113%
6
0
0

0.92
113%
594
0
0
Perm

279
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3397
0.75
2637
0.92
113%
343
0
937

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
222
128
94
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
391
0.92
121%
7
0
7
Perm

65
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
121%
85
0
85

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
22
13
9
Perm

4
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
627

8
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
374

2
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
662

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
165

0.08
0.21
8.8
1.00
0.8
9.6
A

c0.31
0.77
11.7
1.00
14.4
26.1
C

0.06
0.14
8.0
1.00
0.4
8.4
A

0.02
0.04
7.6
1.00
0.5
8.1
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
733
0.18
0.44
9.8
1.00
1.9
11.7
B
10.7
B

2
2

18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
736
0.17
0.43
9.8
1.00
1.8
11.6
B
18.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
15.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.81
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
45.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
78.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
1113
c0.36
1.09dl
11.7
1.00
7.8
19.4
B
17.3
B

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
779
0.05
0.11
7.9
1.00
0.3
8.2
A
8.0
A

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
662
0.01
0.01
7.6
1.00
0.0
7.6
A

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
Q7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB On Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

140

675

247

0.99
818

0.86
325

0.92
0

0.92
0

401
Free
0%
0.92
493

169

0.88
191

269
Free
0%
0.75
405

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
0

None

0.92
208

None
657

2266

1651

350

1301

1754

203

700

405

2266
7.6

1651
6.6

350
7.0

1301
7.6

1754
6.6

203
7.0

700
4.2

405
4.2

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
61

3.3
100
643

3.5
0
84

4.0
100
53

3.3
0
801

2.2
63
886

2.2
100
1143

WB 1
191
191
0
84
2.27
436
688.2
F
178.8
F

WB 2
818
0
818
801
1.02
465
59.9
F

NB 1
460
325
0
886
0.37
42
9.4
A
5.9

NB 2
270
0
0
1700
0.16
0
0.0

SB 1
328
0
0
1700
0.19
0
0.0

SB 2
372
0
208
1700
0.22
0
0.0

75.7
73.3%
15

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
Q8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

435

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
185

0.92
534

106
Free
0%
0.88
136

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
157

152

0.86
158

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
505

None

0.92
0

None
1131

1454

1546

136

1611

1454

249

136

341

1454
7.1

1546
6.5

136
6.2

1611
7.1

1454
6.5

249
6.2

136
4.1

341
4.1

3.5
0
70

4.0
100
64

3.3
83
910

3.5
100
45

4.0
100
72

3.3
100
787

2.2
100
1442

2.2
56
1212

EB 1
505
505
0
70
7.17
Err
Err
F
7621.4
F

EB 2
158
0
158
910
0.17
16
9.8
A

NB 1
341
0
185
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 1
534
534
0
1212
0.44
58
10.3
B
8.2

SB 2
136
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3018.8
81.1%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
Q9

APENDICE R
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2

R-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
125%
198
0
198
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1722
1.00
1722
0.70
125%
689
21
1214
3%

306
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.07
129
0.75
125%
107
0
107
3%
pm+pt
3
8
63.0
63.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
128
0.04
0.34
0.84
33.2
1.00
35.3
68.5
E

214
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1730
1.00
1730
0.75
125%
357
18
592
3%

152
1900

93
1900

106
1900

137
1900

0.75
125%
253
0
0
3%

0.80
125%
145
0
0
3%
Perm

227
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1763
0.42
745
0.80
125%
355
9
657
3%

0.80
125%
166
0
0
3%

0.90
125%
190
0
0
3%
Perm

301
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.59
1094
0.90
125%
418
0
608
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
125%
114
9
105
3%
Perm

53.0
53.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
663
0.11
0.30
30.5
1.00
1.2
31.6
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
125%
546
0
0
3%

4
53.0
53.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
652
c0.71
1.86
43.5
1.00
394.1
437.6
F
381.5
F
259.4
1.78
140.0
125.8%
15

8!

2
63.0
63.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
779
c0.34
0.76
32.2
1.00
6.9
39.0
D
43.4
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

6
69.0
69.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
367

69.0
69.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
539

c0.88
1.79
35.5
1.00
366.8
402.3
F
402.3
F

0.56
1.13
35.5
1.00
79.1
114.6
F
99.6
F

6
69.0
69.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
773
0.07
0.14
19.3
1.00
0.4
19.7
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
R2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.29
549
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

332
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
451
0
451

191
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
260
156
104
Perm

194
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.38
700
0.92
125%
264
0
264
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
39
488

118
1900

100
1900

0.92
142%
154
0
0
Perm

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
157
94
63
Perm

68
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

24
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.68
1273
0.92
142%
37
0
191

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1809
0.76
1414
0.92
125%
62
0
154

60
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
82
49
33
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633

8
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
280

0.07
0.16
7.7
1.00
0.1
7.8
A

c0.38
0.94
11.6
1.00
38.4
50.0
D

4
4
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
220
0.26
0.65
9.8
1.00
6.8
16.6
B

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
745
0.24
0.61
9.5
1.00
1.4
10.9
B
10.9
B

15.5
0.66
40.0
61.6%
15

2
2

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
711
0.27
0.69
9.9
1.00
2.8
12.7
B
25.1
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
92
0
0
Perm

16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
509
c0.15
0.38
8.5
1.00
2.1
10.6
B
9.3
A

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633
0.04
0.10
7.5
1.00
0.3
7.8
A

6
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
566
0.11
0.27
8.1
1.00
1.2
9.3
A
8.7
A

6
16.0
16.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633
0.02
0.05
7.4
1.00
0.2
7.5
A

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
R3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

102
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.99
1757
0.99
1757
0.25
138%
889
15
1511
3%

318
1900

97
1900

192
1900

116
1900

0.91
138%
147
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
138%
291
0
0
3%

0.91
125%
159
0
0
3%
Perm

321
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1821
0.11
198
0.91
125%
441
0
600
3%

65
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
125%
89
44
45
3%
Perm

124
1900

0.91
138%
482
0
0
3%

124
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
0.99
1709
0.45
783
0.91
138%
188
29
597
3%

288
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1817
0.15
284
0.90
138%
442
0
632
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
138%
83
8
75
3%
Perm

0.91
138%
155
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

33.0
33.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
527
c0.86
2.87
38.5
1.00
845.1
883.6
F
883.6
F
1565.1
5.22
110.0
126.5%
15

4
4

25.0
25.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
178

40.0
40.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
72

c0.76
3.36
42.5
1.00
1074.5
1117.0
F
1117.0
F

c3.04
8.33
35.0
1.00
3328.2
3363.2
F
2931.7
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
138%
190
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
40.0
40.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
570
0.03
0.08
22.9
1.00
0.1
23.0
C

8
40.0
40.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
103
2.23
6.14
35.0
1.00
2331.9
2366.9
F
2094.9
F

8
40.0
40.0
0.36
4.0
3.0
570
0.05
0.13
23.4
1.00
0.5
23.9
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
R4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
138%
350
0
350
3%

246
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
138%
386
287
99
3%
Perm

220
1900

180
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3411
0.64
2234
0.83
138%
299
0
665
3%

0
1900

495
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
735
0
566
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.90
0.98
1549
0.98
1549
0.92
138%
0
71
456
2%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
358
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
865
c0.34

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
805
0.29

0.65
13.3
1.00
1.8
15.1
B

0.57
12.4
1.00
0.9
13.3
B
14.2
B

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
19.5
19.5
0.26
4.0
8.0
899
0.10
0.39
23.3
1.00
1.3
24.6
C
24.2
C

2
19.5
19.5
0.26
4.0
8.0
402
0.06
0.25
22.4
1.00
1.5
23.9
C

0.83
138%
366
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
28.5
28.5
0.38
4.0
8.0
915
c0.05
c0.22
0.93dl
20.4
0.89
3.0
21.1
C
21.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
19.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.68
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
68.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
R5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
138%
130
0
130
3%

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
138%
406
338
68
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.64
2233
0.89
138%
226
0
719
3%

150
1900
4.0
0.95
0.95
1.00
3325
1.00
3325
0.89
125%
211
47
274
3%

78
1900

55.2
55.2
0.73
4.0
4.0
1744
c0.04
c0.26
0.41
4.1
0.50
0.2
2.2
A
2.2
A

43.2
43.2
0.57
4.0
4.0
1890
0.08

4
12.8
12.8
0.17
4.0
4.0
295
c0.07
0.44
28.4
1.00
1.4
29.8
C
28.6
C

4
12.8
12.8
0.17
4.0
4.0
264

0.89
138%
493
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.26
27.5
1.00
0.7
28.2
C

12.3
0.41
76.0
49.3%
15

0.89
125%
110
0
0
3%

0.14
7.7
1.00
0.2
7.9
A
7.9
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
R6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1851
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
109
561
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.58
1083
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
3
167

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

217
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3436
0.59
2088
0.92
125%
295
0
735

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
106
71
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.29
535
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

337
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
520
0
520

89
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
137
82
55
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
720

8
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
492

2
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
214

0.35
0.78
12.7
1.00
5.4
18.0
B

c0.45
0.99
14.8
1.00
37.0
51.9
D

0.04
0.11
10.4
1.00
0.4
10.7
B

0.01
0.04
10.1
1.00
0.3
10.4
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.14
0.30
9.5
1.00
0.2
9.7
A
15.7
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.09
0.20
9.0
1.00
0.1
9.1
A
40.8
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.9
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.94
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
98.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
835
c0.35
2.19dl
15.3
1.00
12.8
28.1
C
24.7
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
745
0.28
0.70
13.7
1.00
5.4
19.1
B
17.2
B

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633
0.03
0.09
10.3
1.00
0.3
10.5
B

C
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
R7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
660

742
Free
0%
0.92
1008

197

0.92
913

183
Free
0%
0.92
249

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.92
154

None

0.92
268

None
663

2073

2845

124

1276

249

3501

2711

2073
7.5

2845
6.5

124
6.9

1276
4.1

249
4.1

3501
7.5

2711
6.5

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

3.3
0
903

2.2
0
540

2.2
100
1314

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

WB 1
155
154
0
0
Err
Err
Err
F
Err
F

WB 2
913
0
913
903
1.01
478
54.1
F

NB 1
743
660
0
540
1.22
624
140.4
F
114.8

NB 2
166
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Err
92.3%
15

SB 1
672
0
0
1700
0.40
0
0.0

SB 2
604
0
268
1700
0.36
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
R8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
262

0.92
969

130
Free
0%
0.92
177

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
168

193

0.92
94

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
829

None

0.92
0

None
1160

2414

2545

177

2509

2414

300

177

431

2414
7.1

2545
6.5

177
6.2

2509
7.1

2414
6.5

300
6.2

177
4.1

431
4.1

3.5
0
6

4.0
60
4

3.3
89
866

3.5
100
3

4.0
100
5

3.3
100
740

2.2
100
1399

2.2
14
1129

EB 1
831
829
0
6
135.31
Err
Err
F
8980.4
F

EB 2
94
0
94
866
0.11
9
9.7
A

NB 1
431
0
262
1700
0.25
0
0.0

SB 1
969
969
0
1129
0.86
288
23.7
C
20.1

SB 2
177
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3331.0
124.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
R9

APENDICE S
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2

S-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1733
1.00
1733
0.92
125%
402
22
650

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.10
184
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
46.0
46.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
162
0.04
0.29
0.80
26.4
1.00
23.1
49.5
D

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1679
1.00
1679
0.92
125%
303
49
706

333
1900

63
1900

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
18
51
Perm

261
1900

0.92
125%
452
0
0

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1811
0.43
791
0.92
125%
144
0
230

239
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1798
0.67
1232
0.92
125%
325
0
680

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
53
4
49
Perm

36.0
36.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
573
0.05
0.16
26.2
1.00
0.6
26.8
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
270
0
0

4
36.0
36.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
567
c0.37
1.15
37.0
1.00
85.0
122.0
F
110.7
F
77.6
1.12
110.0
105.3%
15

8!

2
2

46.0
46.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
702
c0.42
1.01
32.0
1.00
35.4
67.4
E
64.8
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
355
0
0
Perm

56.0
56.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
403
0.29
0.57
18.7
1.00
2.0
20.6
C
19.0
B

6
2
56.0
56.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.03
0.06
13.7
1.00
0.0
13.7
B

6
56.0
56.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
627
c0.55
1.08
27.0
1.00
61.0
88.0
F
82.6
F

6
56.0
56.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
798
0.03
0.06
13.7
1.00
0.1
13.8
B

E
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
S2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.20
373
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
626
0
626

24
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
33
18
15
Perm

49
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.20
362
0.92
125%
67
0
67
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
11
608

90
1900

81
1900

0.92
142%
125
0
0
Split
2

162
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
250
195
55
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
71
0
196

14
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1766
0.62
1141
0.92
125%
19
0
175

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
222
55
Perm

4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
706

8
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
163

0.01
0.02
12.2
1.00
0.1
12.3
B

0.19
0.41
14.8
1.00
7.5
22.3
C

4
4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
168
c0.45
0.99
21.9
1.00
67.9
89.8
F

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
830
0.34
0.75
18.3
1.00
6.3
24.6
C
37.3
D

32.4
0.84
80.0
66.5%
15

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
806
0.34

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
358
c0.11

0.75
18.3
1.00
6.5
24.8
C
24.6
C

0.55
28.7
1.00
5.9
34.7
C
30.8
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.03
0.17
26.5
1.00
1.2
27.7
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
228
c0.15
0.77
30.2
1.00
21.6
51.8
D
37.1
D

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.04
0.18
26.5
1.00
1.2
27.8
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
S3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
138%
148
59
545

204
1900

181
1900

190
1900

93
1900

0.92
138%
272
0
0
Perm

0.92
138%
285
0
0

0.92
125%
126
0
0
Perm

481
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1830
0.50
919
0.92
125%
654
0
780

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
223
131
92
Perm

161
1900

0.92
138%
306
0
0

190
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1732
0.67
1174
0.92
138%
285
29
813

215
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1806
0.11
203
0.92
138%
322
0
564

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
72
13
59
Perm

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

6
6

10.0
10.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
269
c0.32
2.03
26.5
1.00
474.7
501.2
F
501.2
F
948.3
4.68
63.0
140.5%
15

4
4

15.0
15.0
0.24
4.0
3.0
280

26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
379

c0.69
2.90
24.0
1.00
866.4
890.4
F
890.4
F

0.85
2.06
18.5
1.00
485.2
503.7
F
394.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
242
0
0
Perm

8
4
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
647
0.06
0.14
11.5
1.00
0.1
11.6
B

8
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
84
c2.78
6.71
18.5
1.41
2592.2
2618.3
F
2323.1
F

8
26.0
26.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
647
0.04
0.09
11.3
0.91
0.2
10.5
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
S4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

354
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
531
0
531

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
296
139
157
Perm

220
1900

222
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3420
0.56
1978
0.92
138%
333
0
663

0
1900

653
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
980
0
666
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
27
607

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
125%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1808
0.99
1808
0.92
125%
10
1
13

57.9
57.9
0.46
4.0
3.0
765
c0.40

57.9
57.9
0.46
4.0
3.0
727
0.38

3.0
3.0
0.02
4.0
3.0
43
c0.01

0.87
30.7
0.92
1.1
29.3
C

0.83
29.9
0.91
0.8
28.1
C
28.7
C

0.30
60.5
1.00
4.0
64.4
E
64.4
E

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
43.3
43.3
0.34
4.0
8.0
1204
0.15
0.44
32.0
1.00
1.2
33.2
C
32.6
C

2
43.3
43.3
0.34
4.0
8.0
539
0.10
0.29
30.2
1.00
1.4
31.5
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
53.1
53.1
0.42
4.0
8.0
900
c0.03
c0.28
0.99dl
30.6
0.93
3.2
31.5
C
31.5
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
30.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.79
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
126.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
81.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
S5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

267
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
400
316
84
Perm

358
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3398
0.62
2156
0.92
138%
316
0
853

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
87
340

122
1900

41.8
41.8
0.66
4.0
4.0
1588
c0.07
c0.29
0.54
5.5
0.90
0.4
5.4
A
5.4
A

29.8
29.8
0.47
4.0
4.0
1561
0.10

4
13.2
13.2
0.21
4.0
4.0
367
c0.10
0.49
21.9
1.00
1.4
23.3
C
21.9
C

4
13.2
13.2
0.21
4.0
4.0
329

0.92
138%
537
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.25
20.8
1.00
0.6
21.4
C

11.6
0.52
63.0
58.0%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.22
9.8
1.00
0.3
10.1
B
10.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
S6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1832
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
214
153
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.45
824
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1839
1.00
1839
0.92
125%
348
1
354

5
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

279
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3397
0.74
2596
0.92
125%
379
0
1037

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
135
111
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.17
314
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

65
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
100
0
100

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
26
14
12
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
653

8
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
343

2
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
141

0.10
0.23
11.3
1.00
0.8
12.2
B

c0.39
0.93
16.7
1.00
33.7
50.4
D

0.07
0.16
9.8
1.00
0.5
10.2
B

0.03
0.06
9.3
1.00
0.8
10.1
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
763
0.19
0.47
12.7
1.00
2.0
14.7
B
13.4
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
766
0.19
0.46
12.6
1.00
2.0
14.6
B
31.5
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
21.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.91
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
60.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
84.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
1168
c0.40
1.14dl
15.1
1.00
10.2
25.3
C
22.4
C

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
830
0.05
0.12
9.6
1.00
0.3
9.9
A
9.8
A

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706
0.01
0.02
9.1
1.00
0.0
9.2
A

C
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
S7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB On Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

140

675

247

0.99
955

0.86
359

0.92
0

0.92
0

401
Free
0%
0.92
545

169

0.88
223

269
Free
0%
0.75
448

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
0

None

0.92
230

None
657

2556

1826

387

1439

1941

224

774

448

2556
7.6

1826
6.6

387
7.0

1439
7.6

1941
6.6

224
7.0

774
4.2

448
4.2

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
43

3.3
100
608

3.5
0
61

4.0
100
36

3.3
0
776

2.2
57
831

2.2
100
1101

WB 1
223
223
0
61
3.63
Err
Err
F
2000.2
F

WB 2
955
0
955
776
1.23
828
133.8
F

NB 1
508
359
0
831
0.43
55
10.6
B
6.7

NB 2
299
0
0
1700
0.18
0
0.0

SB 1
363
0
0
1700
0.21
0
0.0

SB 2
411
0
230
1700
0.24
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

855.4
83.4%
15

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
S8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

435

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
204

0.92
591

106
Free
0%
0.88
151

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
173

152

0.86
184

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
589

None

0.92
0

None
1131

1608

1710

151

1792

1608

276

151

378

1608
7.1

1710
6.5

151
6.2

1792
7.1

1608
6.5

276
6.2

151
4.1

378
4.1

3.5
0
51

4.0
100
45

3.3
79
893

3.5
100
30

4.0
100
52

3.3
100
761

2.2
100
1424

2.2
50
1175

EB 1
589
589
0
51
11.62
Err
Err
F
7621.5
F

EB 2
184
0
184
893
0.21
19
10.1
B

NB 1
378
0
204
1700
0.22
0
0.0

SB 1
591
591
0
1175
0.50
73
11.1
B
8.9

SB 2
151
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3116.5
90.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
S9

APENDICE T
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2
con Mejoras Adicionales

T-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
125%
198
0
198
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.70
125%
689
0
689
3%

306
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.70
125%
546
119
427
3%
custom

214
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.75
125%
357
0
357
3%

152
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.75
125%
253
106
147
3%
Perm

93
1900

227
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1818
0.50
931
0.80
125%
355
0
500
3%

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.80
125%
166
50
116
3%
Perm

137
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.33
614
0.90
125%
190
0
190
3%
Perm

301
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1785
1.00
1785
0.90
125%
418
8
524
3%

82
1900

4
41.0
41.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
630

4
41.0
41.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
536

2
61.0
61.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
797

6
61.0
61.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
312

c0.37
1.09
39.5
1.00
64.1
103.6
F
72.1
E

0.27
0.80
35.7
1.00
11.7
47.4
D

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.09
164
0.75
125%
107
0
107
3%
pm+pt
3
8
51.0
51.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
149
c0.04
0.27
0.72
28.6
1.00
15.2
43.8
D

0.07
0.15
15.7
1.00
0.1
15.8
B

0.31
0.61
21.0
1.00
8.6
29.6
C

41.0
41.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
599
0.11
0.33
29.3
1.00
1.5
30.8
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

52.9
1.05
120.0
91.1%
15

0.80
125%
145
0
0
3%
Perm

8!
51.0
51.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
784
0.19
0.46
24.6
1.00
1.9
26.5
C
27.7
C

2
8
51.0
51.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
666
0.09
0.22
21.9
1.00
0.8
22.6
C

2
61.0
61.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
473
c0.54
1.06
29.5
1.00
57.3
86.8
F
69.1
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
125%
114
0
0
3%

6
61.0
61.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
907
0.29
0.58
20.5
1.00
2.7
23.2
C
24.9
C

D
12.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
T2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.32
592
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

332
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
451
0
451

191
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
260
144
116
Perm

194
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.39
728
0.92
125%
264
0
264
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
35
492

118
1900

100
1900

0.92
142%
154
0
0
Perm

102
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
157
97
60
Perm

68
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

24
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.68
1267
0.92
142%
37
0
191

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1809
0.76
1408
0.92
125%
62
0
154

60
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
82
51
31
Perm

4
20.4
20.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
704

8
20.4
20.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
324

0.07
0.16
7.6
1.00
0.1
7.8
A

c0.36
0.81
11.1
1.00
14.5
25.6
C

4
4
20.4
20.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
263
0.24
0.55
9.4
1.00
2.3
11.7
B

20.4
20.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
828
0.24
0.54
9.3
1.00
0.7
10.1
B
9.6
A

12.3
0.62
45.9
61.6%
15

2
2

20.4
20.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
790
0.28
0.62
9.8
1.00
1.5
11.3
B
16.1
B

0.92
125%
92
0
0
Perm

17.5
17.5
0.38
4.0
3.0
483
c0.15
0.40
10.3
1.00
2.4
12.8
B
11.3
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
17.5
17.5
0.38
4.0
3.0
604
0.04
0.10
9.1
1.00
0.3
9.5
A

6
17.5
17.5
0.38
4.0
3.0
537
0.11
0.29
9.9
1.00
1.3
11.2
B
10.5
B

6
17.5
17.5
0.38
4.0
3.0
604
0.02
0.05
9.0
1.00
0.2
9.1
A

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
T3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

102
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1831
0.99
1831
0.25
138%
889
0
1044
3%

318
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
138%
482
64
418
3%
Perm

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.29
533
0.91
138%
147
0
147
3%
Perm

124
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.91
138%
188
0
188
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
138%
291
214
77
3%
Perm

116
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
290
0.91
125%
159
0
159
3%
Perm

321
1900
4.0
0.95
0.97
1.00
3417
1.00
3417
0.91
125%
441
13
517
3%

65
1900

124
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.34
631
0.90
138%
190
0
190
3%
Perm

288
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1801
1.00
1801
0.90
138%
442
5
520
3%

54
1900

2
49.0
49.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
591

6
23.0
23.0
0.18
4.0
3.0
94

6
23.0
23.0
0.18
4.0
3.0
277

4
46.0
46.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
103

0.27
0.71
34.4
1.00
7.0
41.4
D

c0.28
1.56
53.5
1.00
298.8
352.3
F

0.05
0.28
46.3
1.00
2.5
48.8
D

c0.55
1.54
42.0
1.00
287.0
329.0
F

0.91
138%
155
0
0
3%
Split
2

2
49.0
49.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
690
c0.57
1.51
40.5
1.00
238.3
278.8
F
203.8
F

139.5
1.54
130.0
75.3%
15

23.0
23.0
0.18
4.0
3.0
326
0.10
0.58
49.0
1.00
7.2
56.3
E
122.3
F

0.91
125%
89
0
0
3%

8
8
46.0
46.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
223

46.0
46.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
1209
0.15

0.30
0.85
38.9
1.00
31.5
70.4
E

0.43
32.0
1.00
0.2
32.2
C
100.7
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
138%
83
0
0
3%

46.0
46.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
637
0.29
0.82
38.2
1.00
11.1
49.2
D
54.8
D

F
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
T4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
138%
350
0
350
3%

246
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
138%
386
303
83
3%
Perm

220
1900

180
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3411
0.64
2236
0.83
138%
299
0
665
3%

0
1900

495
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
735
0
566
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.90
0.98
1549
0.98
1549
0.92
138%
0
67
460
2%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
358
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

38.0
38.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
904
c0.34

38.0
38.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
841
0.30

0.63
11.1
1.00
1.4
12.4
B

0.55
10.4
1.00
0.7
11.1
B
11.8
B

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
15.0
15.0
0.21
4.0
8.0
751
0.10
0.47
24.0
1.00
2.1
26.1
C
25.3
C

2
15.0
15.0
0.21
4.0
8.0
336
0.05
0.25
22.8
1.00
1.7
24.6
C

0.83
138%
366
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
24.0
24.0
0.34
4.0
8.0
851
c0.06
c0.21
1.01dl
20.6
0.88
4.8
23.0
C
23.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
18.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.68
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
68.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
T5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
138%
130
0
130
3%

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
138%
406
334
72
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.64
2238
0.89
138%
226
0
719
3%

150
1900
4.0
0.95
0.95
1.00
3325
1.00
3325
0.89
125%
211
51
270
3%

78
1900

49.6
49.6
0.71
4.0
4.0
1717
c0.05
c0.25
0.42
4.2
0.41
0.2
1.9
A
1.9
A

37.6
37.6
0.54
4.0
4.0
1786
0.08

4
12.4
12.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
310
c0.07
0.42
25.6
1.00
1.3
26.9
C
25.8
C

4
12.4
12.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
278

0.89
138%
493
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.26
24.8
1.00
0.7
25.5
C

11.4
0.41
70.0
49.3%
15

0.89
125%
110
0
0
3%

0.15
8.2
1.00
0.2
8.3
A
8.3
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
T6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
104
566
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.57
1056
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
2
168

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

217
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3436
0.56
2000
0.92
125%
295
0
735

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
104
73
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.28
517
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

337
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
520
0
520

89
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
137
67
70
Perm

4
33.3
33.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
753

8
33.3
33.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
502

2
28.7
28.7
0.41
4.0
3.0
649

6
28.7
28.7
0.41
4.0
3.0
212

0.36
0.75
15.0
1.00
4.2
19.2
B

c0.46
0.97
17.8
1.00
31.7
49.6
D

0.05
0.11
12.8
1.88
0.1
24.1
C

0.02
0.04
12.4
1.00
0.3
12.7
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
33.3
33.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
881
0.14
0.29
11.1
1.00
0.2
11.3
B
17.1
B

2
2

33.3
33.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
881
0.09
0.19
10.6
1.00
0.1
10.7
B
39.5
D

28.7
28.7
0.41
4.0
3.0
820
c0.37
2.20dl
19.3
1.16
6.2
28.7
C
27.8
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
25.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
98.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
28.7
28.7
0.41
4.0
3.0
764
0.28
0.68
16.9
1.00
4.9
21.8
C
19.9
B

6
28.7
28.7
0.41
4.0
3.0
649
0.04
0.11
12.7
1.00
0.3
13.1
B

C
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
T7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
140%
2
0
156

600
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
913
391
522
Perm

486
1900

183
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3415
0.58
2069
0.92
125%
249
0
909

0
1900

0
1900

197
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

742
1900
4.0
0.95
0.97
1.00
3428
1.00
3428
0.92
125%
1008
33
1243

0.92
125%
268
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
140%
154
0
0
Perm

0.92
125%
660
0
0
Perm

8
8
24.1
24.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
609
0.09
0.26
16.5
1.00
0.2
16.7
B
45.3
D

8
24.1
24.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
545
c0.33
0.96
22.4
1.00
27.8
50.2
D

37.9
37.9
0.54
4.0
3.0
1120

37.9
37.9
0.54
4.0
3.0
1856
0.36

c0.44
5.00dl
13.1
0.45
2.9
8.9
A
8.9
A

0.67
11.5
0.72
1.1
9.5
A
9.5
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
21.1
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.87
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.3%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
C
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
T8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1774
0.95
1774
0.92
140%
2
0
831

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
94
51
43
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

193
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
262
150
112
Perm

713
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.65
1099
0.92
125%
969
0
484
Perm

130
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.96
3270
0.69
2346
0.92
125%
177
0
662

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

124
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
168
0
168

2
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
678

6
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
471

0.07
0.17
12.3
1.00
0.5
12.8
B

c0.44
1.03
20.0
0.68
44.1
57.7
E

0.92
140%
829
0
0
Perm

4
4
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
811
0.47
1.02
19.0
1.00
38.0
57.0
E
52.3
D

2
4
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
724

30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
798
0.09

0.03
0.06
10.6
1.00
0.0
10.6
B
0.0
A

0.21
12.6
1.00
0.6
13.2
B
13.0
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
36.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

6
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
1005
0.28
0.99dl
15.9
0.60
2.7
12.3
B
31.5
C

D
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
T9

APENDICE U
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 2
con Mejoras Adicionales

U-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
402
0
402

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
110
160
custom

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
303
0
303

333
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
452
244
208
Perm

63
1900

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1811
0.73
1345
0.92
125%
144
0
230

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
33
36
Perm

261
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.57
1060
0.92
125%
355
0
355
Perm

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1806
1.00
1806
0.92
125%
325
5
373

39
1900

4
34.0
34.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
570

4
34.0
34.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
485

2
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
813

6
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
549

c0.22
0.71
33.6
1.00
7.2
40.7
D
35.8
D

0.10
0.33
29.2
1.00
1.8
31.1
C

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
412
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
254
c0.03
0.18
0.51
23.2
1.00
1.6
24.8
C

0.02
0.04
13.1
1.00
0.0
13.1
B

c0.33
0.65
19.2
1.00
5.8
25.0
C

34.0
34.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
542
0.05
0.17
27.7
1.00
0.7
28.3
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

25.6
0.66
110.0
69.4%
15

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

8!
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
755
0.16
0.40
23.0
1.00
1.6
24.6
C
24.1
C

2
8
45.0
45.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
641
0.13
0.32
22.1
1.00
1.3
23.5
C

2
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
697
0.17
0.33
15.4
1.00
0.3
15.7
B
15.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
53
0
0

6
57.0
57.0
0.52
4.0
3.0
936
0.21
0.40
16.1
1.00
1.3
17.4
B
21.1
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
U2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.20
373
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
626
0
626

24
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
33
18
15
Perm

49
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.20
362
0.92
125%
67
0
67
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
11
608

90
1900

81
1900

0.92
142%
125
0
0
Split
2

162
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
250
195
55
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

46
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
71
0
196

14
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1766
0.62
1141
0.92
125%
19
0
175

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
222
55
Perm

4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
706

8
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
163

0.01
0.02
12.2
1.00
0.1
12.3
B

0.19
0.41
14.8
1.00
7.5
22.3
C

4
4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
168
c0.45
0.99
21.9
1.00
67.9
89.8
F

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
830
0.34
0.75
18.3
1.00
6.3
24.6
C
37.3
D

32.4
0.84
80.0
66.5%
15

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
806
0.34

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
358
c0.11

0.75
18.3
1.00
6.5
24.8
C
24.6
C

0.55
28.7
1.00
5.9
34.7
C
30.8
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.03
0.17
26.5
1.00
1.2
27.7
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
228
c0.15
0.77
30.2
1.00
21.6
51.8
D
37.1
D

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
314
0.04
0.18
26.5
1.00
1.2
27.8
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
U3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1799
0.98
1799
0.92
138%
148
0
298

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
306
143
163
Perm

181
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.58
1066
0.92
138%
272
0
272
Perm

190
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
285
0
285

190
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
285
228
57
Perm

93
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.42
774
0.92
125%
126
0
126
Perm

481
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3371
1.00
3371
0.92
125%
654
48
829

164
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
427
0.92
138%
242
0
242
Perm

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1794
1.00
1794
0.92
138%
322
11
383

48
1900

2
12.0
12.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
269

6
14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
213

6
14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
314

4
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
354

0.10
0.61
26.8
1.00
9.8
36.6
D

c0.26
1.28
28.0
1.00
155.8
183.8
F

0.04
0.18
23.2
1.00
1.3
24.5
C

0.16
0.36
12.3
1.00
0.6
12.9
B

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

2
12.0
12.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
308
c0.17
0.97
28.8
1.00
43.7
72.5
E
54.3
D

49.8
1.19
70.0
77.5%
15

14.0
14.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
369
0.15
0.77
26.5
1.00
14.5
41.0
D
81.6
F

0.92
125%
223
0
0

8
8
32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
195

32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
1541
0.25

c0.57
1.24
19.0
0.59
136.6
147.9
F

0.54
13.7
1.00
0.4
14.0
B
13.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
72
0
0

32.0
32.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
820
0.21
0.47
13.1
0.38
1.4
6.4
A
60.3
E

D
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
U4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

354
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
531
0
531

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
296
246
50
Perm

220
1900

222
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3420
0.61
2146
0.92
138%
333
0
663

0
1900

653
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
980
0
666
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
35
599

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
125%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1808
0.99
1808
0.92
125%
10
1
13

35.8
35.8
0.51
4.0
3.0
852
c0.40

35.8
35.8
0.51
4.0
3.0
809
0.38

1.4
1.4
0.02
4.0
3.0
36
c0.01

0.78
13.9
1.11
3.2
18.7
B

0.74
13.5
1.11
2.5
17.5
B
18.1
B

0.36
33.9
1.00
6.1
40.0
D
40.0
D

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.17
4.0
8.0
591
0.15
0.90
28.5
1.00
19.0
47.5
D
40.0
D

2
11.8
11.8
0.17
4.0
8.0
264
0.03
0.19
25.0
1.00
1.6
26.6
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
20.8
20.8
0.30
4.0
8.0
729
c0.06
c0.21
1.29dl
23.7
0.91
14.8
36.3
D
36.3
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
29.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
81.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
U5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

267
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
400
321
79
Perm

358
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3398
0.61
2149
0.92
138%
316
0
853

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
80
347

122
1900

48.1
48.1
0.69
4.0
4.0
1619
c0.06
c0.30
0.53
5.4
0.56
0.3
3.3
A
3.3
A

36.1
36.1
0.52
4.0
4.0
1702
0.11

4
13.9
13.9
0.20
4.0
4.0
348
c0.10
0.51
25.0
1.00
1.7
26.7
C
25.0
C

4
13.9
13.9
0.20
4.0
4.0
311

0.92
138%
537
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.26
23.7
1.00
0.6
24.3
C

11.5
0.52
70.0
58.0%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.20
9.2
1.00
0.3
9.4
A
9.4
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
U6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1832
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
204
163
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.45
828
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1839
1.00
1839
0.92
125%
348
1
354

5
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

279
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3397
0.74
2590
0.92
125%
379
0
1037

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
137
109
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
296
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

65
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
100
0
100

17
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
26
14
12
Perm

4
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
694

8
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
367

2
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
694

6
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
131

0.10
0.23
12.1
1.00
0.8
12.9
B

c0.39
0.87
17.7
1.00
23.3
41.0
D

0.07
0.16
11.7
1.25
0.0
14.6
B

0.03
0.06
11.2
1.00
0.9
12.1
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
811
0.19
0.44
13.5
1.00
1.7
15.2
B
14.0
B

2
2

31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
814
0.19
0.43
13.5
1.00
1.7
15.1
B
27.4
C

31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
1147
c0.40
1.16dl
18.1
0.97
1.3
19.0
B
18.1
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
19.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
84.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
817
0.05
0.12
11.5
1.00
0.3
11.8
B
11.7
B

6
31.0
31.0
0.44
4.0
694
0.01
0.02
10.9
1.00
0.0
11.0
B

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
U7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB On Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

140
1900

0
1900

0.88
140%
223
0
0
Perm

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

401
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3349
1.00
3349
0.92
125%
545
66
709

169
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

269
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3429
0.54
1894
0.75
125%
448
0
807

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

675
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.99
140%
955
163
792
Perm

247
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
140%
0
0
223

0.86
125%
359
0
0
Perm

8
8
31.1
31.1
0.44
4.0
3.0
778

0.0
A

0.13
0.29
12.4
1.00
0.2
12.6
B
81.6
F

8
31.1
31.1
0.44
4.0
3.0
697
c0.51
1.14
19.4
1.00
78.3
97.8
F

30.9
30.9
0.44
4.0
3.0
836

30.9
30.9
0.44
4.0
3.0
1478
0.21

0.92
125%
230
0
0

c0.43
1.62dl
19.0
0.71
21.0
34.4
C
34.4
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
47.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.05
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
83.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.48
13.9
0.67
0.9
10.2
B
10.2
B
D
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
U8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387
1900

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
140%
0
0
589

113
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.86
140%
184
110
74
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

152
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
125%
204
105
99
Perm

435
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.65
1088
0.92
125%
591
0
295
Perm

106
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3250
0.70
2358
0.88
125%
151
0
447

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

129
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.93
125%
173
0
173

2
33.8
33.8
0.48
4.0
3.0
757

6
33.8
33.8
0.48
4.0
3.0
525

0.06
0.13
10.0
1.00
0.4
10.3
B

c0.27
0.56
12.8
0.81
3.9
14.4
B

0.92
140%
589
0
0
Perm

4
4
28.2
28.2
0.40
4.0
3.0
706
0.34
0.83
18.8
1.00
8.4
27.2
C
23.9
C

2
4
28.2
28.2
0.40
4.0
3.0
632

33.8
33.8
0.48
4.0
3.0
891
0.09

0.05
0.12
13.1
1.00
0.1
13.2
B
0.0
A
16.5
0.69
70.0
66.8%
15

0.19
10.3
1.00
0.5
10.8
B
10.6
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 2 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

6
33.8
33.8
0.48
4.0
3.0
1139
0.19
0.39
11.5
0.80
0.9
10.1
B
11.8
B

B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
U9

APENDICE V
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 3

V-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
113%
148
0
148
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.85
113%
642
10
910
3%

209
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.08
145
0.85
113%
85
0
85
3%
pm+pt
3
8
57.0
57.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
119
0.03
0.24
0.71
38.0
1.00
18.3
56.4
E

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1716
1.00
1716
0.85
113%
262
21
468
3%

171
1900

93
1900

0.92
113%
114
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
130
11
119
3%
Perm

353
1900

0.85
113%
227
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.48
894
0.92
113%
402
0
516
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.40
732
0.92
113%
236
0
670
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
101
7
95
3%
Perm

47.0
47.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
549
0.08
0.27
38.6
1.00
1.2
39.8
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.85
113%
278
0
0
3%

4
47.0
47.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
552
c0.52
1.65
51.5
1.00
299.7
351.2
F
308.0
F
200.7
1.60
150.0
120.2%
15

8!

2
2

57.0
57.0
0.38
4.0
3.0
652
c0.27
0.72
39.6
1.00
6.7
46.3
D
47.8
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
434
0
0
3%
Perm

85.0
85.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
507
0.58
1.02
32.5
1.00
44.5
77.0
E
64.6
E

6
2
85.0
85.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
889
0.08
0.13
15.2
1.00
0.1
15.3
B

6
85.0
85.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
415
c0.92
1.61
32.5
1.00
287.5
320.0
F
280.0
F

6
85.0
85.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
889
0.06
0.11
15.0
1.00
0.2
15.2
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
V2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.41
757
0.92
113%
130
0
130
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
728
0
728

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
298
117
181
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.24
451
0.92
113%
305
0
305
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
113%
332
14
463

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
121%
141
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
143
122
21
Perm

61
1900

0.92
113%
145
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
121%
34
0
175

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1816
0.75
1394
0.92
113%
71
0
146

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
68
59
9
Perm

4
66.0
66.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
963

8
66.0
66.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
274

0.11
0.19
9.4
1.00
0.1
9.5
A

c0.68
1.11
21.2
1.00
88.2
109.5
F

4
4
66.0
66.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
460
0.17
0.28
10.1
1.00
0.3
10.4
B

66.0
66.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
1133
0.39
0.64
13.7
1.00
1.3
14.9
B
13.0
B

33.1
0.99
108.5
76.3%
15

66.0
66.0
0.61
4.0
3.0
1082
0.26

16.0
16.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
264
c0.10

0.43
11.3
1.00
0.3
11.5
B
49.7
D

0.66
43.7
1.00
12.4
56.1
E
49.2
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
75
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
233
0.01
0.09
40.0
1.00
0.8
40.7
D

6
14.5
14.5
0.13
4.0
3.0
186
c0.10
0.78
45.5
1.00
19.2
64.7
E
57.2
E

6
14.5
14.5
0.13
4.0
3.0
212
0.01
0.04
41.0
1.00
0.1
41.0
D

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
V3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1690
0.99
1690
0.92
119%
129
27
620
3%

265
1900

97
1900

156
1900

177
1900

0.92
119%
125
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
202
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
217
0
0
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.40
737
0.92
113%
576
0
793
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
144
39
105
3%
Perm

144
1900

0.92
119%
343
0
0
3%

160
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1730
0.72
1261
0.92
119%
207
14
520
3%

345
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1818
0.22
415
0.92
119%
446
0
632
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
70
5
65
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
175
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

28.0
28.0
0.19
4.0
3.0
315
c0.37
1.97
61.0
1.00
447.3
508.3
F
508.3
F
561.6
2.50
150.0
128.5%
15

4
4

30.0
30.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
252

80.0
80.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
393

c0.41
2.06
60.0
1.00
491.3
551.3
F
551.3
F

1.08
2.02
35.0
1.00
466.9
501.9
F
427.5
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
186
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
80.0
80.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
836
0.07
0.13
17.5
1.00
0.1
17.6
B

8
80.0
80.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
221
c1.52
2.86
35.0
1.00
849.2
884.2
F
797.8
F

8
80.0
80.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
836
0.04
0.08
17.0
1.00
0.2
17.2
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
V4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
288
0
288
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
344
258
86
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.59
2080
0.92
119%
116
0
465
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
113%
666
0
533
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
113%
0
104
384
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
113%
355
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
2
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1827
0.99
1827
0.92
113%
9
1
11
2%

33.4
33.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
732
c0.32

33.4
33.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
677
0.25

1.4
1.4
0.02
4.0
3.0
34
c0.01

0.73
17.6
1.00
3.6
21.2
C

0.57
15.9
1.00
1.1
17.0
B
19.2
B

0.32
36.8
1.00
5.5
42.3
D
42.3
D

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
19.0
19.0
0.25
4.0
8.0
876
0.08
0.33
23.3
1.00
1.0
24.3
C
24.1
C

2
19.0
19.0
0.25
4.0
8.0
392
0.05
0.22
22.6
1.00
1.3
23.9
C

20.1
0.62
76.0
73.9%
15

0.92
119%
349
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

6
29.2
29.2
0.38
4.0
8.0
905
c0.04
c0.16
0.51
18.0
0.86
0.6
16.1
B
16.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
1
0
0
2%

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
V5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
103
0
103
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
185
158
27
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3387
0.60
2097
0.92
113%
198
0
655
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
113%
287
33
350
3%

78
1900

57.1
57.1
0.75
4.0
4.0
1711
c0.04
c0.25
0.38
3.3
0.61
0.2
2.2
A
2.2
A

45.1
45.1
0.59
4.0
4.0
2002
0.10

4
10.9
10.9
0.14
4.0
4.0
251
c0.06
0.41
29.6
1.00
1.5
31.1
C
29.6
C

4
10.9
10.9
0.14
4.0
4.0
225

0.92
119%
457
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.02
0.12
28.4
1.00
0.3
28.7
C

9.6
0.38
76.0
50.1%
15

0.92
113%
96
0
0
3%

0.17
7.0
1.00
0.2
7.2
A
7.2
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
V6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
113%
221
0
227

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
606
96
510
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.62
1146
0.92
113%
440
0
440
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1852
1.00
1852
0.92
113%
147
3
150

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
113%
6
0
0

0.92
113%
398
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.60
2129
0.92
113%
285
0
683

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
160
94
66
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.33
615
0.92
121%
7
0
7
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
571
0
571

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
145
85
60
Perm

4
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
671

8
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
486

2
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
652

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
253

0.32
0.76
11.9
1.00
4.9
16.9
B

c0.38
0.91
13.1
1.00
20.2
33.3
C

0.04
0.10
8.8
1.00
0.3
9.1
A

0.01
0.03
8.5
1.00
0.2
8.7
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
786
0.12
0.29
9.2
1.00
0.2
9.4
A
14.9
B

2
2

20.7
20.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
786
0.08
0.19
8.8
1.00
0.1
8.9
A
27.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
18.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.84
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
48.8
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
94.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
877
c0.32
2.15dl
12.4
1.00
6.8
19.2
B
17.3
B

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
767
0.31
0.74
12.2
1.00
6.5
18.6
B
16.6
B

6
20.1
20.1
0.41
4.0
3.0
652
0.04
0.09
8.8
1.00
0.3
9.0
A

B
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
V7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
597

742
Free
0%
0.92
911

197

0.92
783

183
Free
0%
0.92
225

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.92
132

None

0.92
242

None
654

1874

2572

112

1153

225

3122

2451

1874
7.5

2572
6.5

112
6.9

1153
4.1

225
4.1

3122
7.5

2451
6.5

3.5
0
2

4.0
0
0

3.3
15
919

2.2
1
602

2.2
100
1341

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
0

WB 1
133
132
0
2
61.28
Err
Err
F
1475.6
F

WB 2
783
0
783
919
0.85
265
26.7
D

NB 1
672
597
0
602
0.99
367
61.0
F
49.9

NB 2
150
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

481.6
81.7%
15

SB 1
608
0
0
1700
0.36
0
0.0

SB 2
546
0
242
1700
0.32
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
V8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
1

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
237

0.92
876

130
Free
0%
0.92
160

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
152

193

0.92
81

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
711

None

0.92
0

None
1141

2182

2301

160

2264

2182

271

160

389

2182
7.1

2301
6.5

160
6.2

2264
7.1

2182
6.5

271
6.2

160
4.1

389
4.1

3.5
0
13

4.0
87
10

3.3
91
885

3.5
100
9

4.0
100
12

3.3
100
768

2.2
100
1420

2.2
25
1169

EB 1
712
711
0
13
55.75
Err
Err
F
8980.3
F

EB 2
81
0
81
885
0.09
8
9.5
A

NB 1
389
0
237
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 1
876
876
0
1169
0.75
186
16.6
C
14.1

SB 2
160
0
0
1700
0.09
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3217.7
111.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
V9

APENDICE W
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 3

W-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
81
0
81
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1734
1.00
1734
0.92
113%
364
31
577

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.14
254
0.92
113%
117
0
117
pm+pt
3
8
33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
208
0.04
0.21
0.56
30.2
0.80
2.7
26.7
C

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1677
1.00
1677
0.92
113%
274
72
623

343
1900

63
1900

0.92
113%
77
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
63
28
35
Perm

270
1900

0.92
113%
421
0
0

96
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1809
0.49
909
0.92
113%
118
0
195

230
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1796
0.71
1301
0.92
113%
282
0
614

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
48
7
41
Perm

25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
576
0.05
0.14
17.9
1.00
0.5
18.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
244
0
0

4
25.0
25.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
570
c0.33
1.01
25.5
1.00
40.9
66.4
E
60.7
E
45.0
0.99
76.0
97.2%
15

8!

2
2

33.8
33.8
0.44
4.0
3.0
746
c0.37
0.84
18.6
0.68
8.6
21.4
C
22.1
C

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
409
0.21
0.48
14.6
1.00
3.9
18.6
B
16.9
B

6
2
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.02
0.05
11.8
1.00
0.1
11.9
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
332
0
0
Perm
6

34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
585
c0.47
1.05
20.9
1.00
50.9
71.8
E
67.4
E

6
34.2
34.2
0.45
4.0
3.0
706
0.03
0.06
11.8
1.00
0.2
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
W2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
421
0.92
113%
151
0
151
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
566
0
566

33
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
41
24
17
Perm

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
412
0.92
113%
81
0
81
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
113%
450
12
549

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
121%
120
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
242
191
51
Perm

115
1900

0.92
113%
111
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.97
1787
0.92
121%
67
0
187

19
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1769
0.63
1167
0.92
113%
23
0
164

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
251
198
53
Perm

4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
660

8
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
173

0.01
0.03
12.9
0.70
0.0
9.1
A

0.20
0.47
15.9
1.00
8.8
24.7
C

4
4
32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
177
c0.36
0.85
19.9
0.65
16.2
29.1
C

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
777
0.31
0.73
18.4
0.66
2.1
14.2
B
16.9
B

23.9
0.72
76.0
61.7%
15

32.0
32.0
0.42
4.0
754
0.31

16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
376
c0.10

0.73
18.4
1.00
6.1
24.5
C
24.5
C

0.50
26.5
1.00
4.6
31.1
C
27.9
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
141
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.15
24.5
1.00
1.0
25.5
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
246
c0.14
0.67
27.6
1.00
13.4
41.0
D
31.6
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
330
0.03
0.16
24.5
1.00
1.0
25.5
C

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
W3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
119%
128
26
495

204
1900

181
1900

199
1900

104
1900

0.92
119%
234
0
0
Perm

0.92
119%
257
0
0

0.92
113%
128
0
0
Perm

492
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.59
1087
0.92
113%
604
0
732

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
201
64
138
Perm

161
1900

0.92
119%
264
0
0

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1728
0.70
1224
0.92
119%
234
14
711

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1807
0.21
383
0.92
119%
288
0
496

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
62
6
56
Perm

0.92
119%
129
0
0
Split
2

6
6

22.0
22.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
267
c0.29
1.85
59.0
1.00
398.2
457.2
F
457.2
F
447.4
2.37
140.0
126.1%
15

4
4

36.0
36.0
0.26
4.0
3.0
315

70.0
70.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
544

c0.58
2.26
52.0
1.00
575.6
627.6
F
627.6
F

0.67
1.35
35.0
1.00
167.5
202.5
F
163.0
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
208
0
0
Perm

8
4
70.0
70.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.09
0.18
19.2
1.00
0.1
19.3
B

8
70.0
70.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
192
c1.30
2.58
35.0
1.00
727.5
762.5
F
679.8
F

8
70.0
70.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.04
0.07
18.1
1.00
0.2
18.3
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
W4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

346
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
119%
448
0
448

205
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
265
219
46
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.61
2138
0.92
119%
274
0
559

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
119%
859
0
584
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
119%
0
33
518

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
119%
276
0
0

0.92
113%
2
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1809
0.99
1809
0.92
113%
9
1
11

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
865
c0.35

39.5
39.5
0.52
4.0
3.0
822
0.33

1.4
1.4
0.02
4.0
3.0
33
c0.01

0.68
13.5
1.00
2.1
15.6
B

0.63
13.0
1.00
1.6
14.6
B
15.1
B

0.33
36.8
1.00
5.9
42.7
D
42.7
D

0.92
119%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
13.1
13.1
0.17
4.0
8.0
604
0.13
0.74
29.8
1.00
8.0
37.9
D
34.3
C

2
13.1
13.1
0.17
4.0
8.0
270
0.03
0.17
26.8
1.00
1.4
28.2
C

0.92
119%
285
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0

6
23.1
23.1
0.30
4.0
8.0
751
c0.06
c0.17
1.13dl
23.8
0.96
4.2
27.1
C
27.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.69
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
76.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
73.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
W5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
154
0
154

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
332
273
59
Perm

350
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.61
2128
0.92
119%
273
0
726

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.92
113%
236
66
320

122
1900

54.6
54.6
0.72
4.0
4.0
1663
c0.05
c0.27
0.44
4.4
0.65
0.2
3.1
A
3.1
A

42.6
42.6
0.56
4.0
4.0
1850
0.10

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
309
c0.09
0.50
28.3
1.00
1.7
30.0
C
28.2
C

4
13.4
13.4
0.18
4.0
4.0
276

0.92
119%
453
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.21
26.8
1.00
0.5
27.3
C

12.0
0.45
76.0
51.3%
15

0.92
113%
150
0
0

0.17
8.1
1.00
0.2
8.3
A
8.3
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
W6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1832
0.92
113%
316
0
322

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
332
199
133
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.51
934
0.92
113%
289
0
289
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1818
1.00
1818
0.92
113%
314
8
340

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
113%
34
0
0

0.92
113%
594
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.74
2601
0.92
113%
360
0
954

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
222
128
94
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
388
0.92
113%
6
0
6
Perm

93
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
114
0
114

20
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
25
14
11
Perm

4
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
627

8
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
374

2
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
662

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
164

0.08
0.21
8.8
1.00
0.8
9.6
A

c0.31
0.77
11.7
1.00
14.4
26.1
C

0.06
0.14
8.0
1.00
0.4
8.4
A

0.02
0.04
7.6
1.00
0.4
8.0
A

0.92
113%
6
0
0
Perm

4
4
18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
733
0.18
0.44
9.8
1.00
1.9
11.7
B
10.7
B

2
2

18.0
18.0
0.40
4.0
727
0.19
0.47
10.0
1.00
2.2
12.1
B
18.4
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
16.1
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.82
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
45.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
79.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
1098
c0.37
1.11dl
11.9
1.00
9.4
21.2
C
18.8
B

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
779
0.06
0.15
8.0
1.00
0.4
8.4
A
8.2
A

6
19.0
19.0
0.42
4.0
662
0.01
0.02
7.6
1.00
0.0
7.6
A

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
W7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/30/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

689

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
325

424
Free
0%
0.92
521

174

0.99
835

269
Free
0%
0.75
405

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.88
191

None

0.92
214

None
663

1315

1789

203

734

405

2315

1682

1315
7.6

1789
6.6

203
7.0

734
4.2

405
4.2

2315
7.6

1682
6.6

3.5
0
81

4.0
100
49

3.3
0
801

2.2
62
860

2.2
100
1143

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
58

WB 1
191
191
0
81
2.36
444
728.9
F
189.3
F

WB 2
835
0
835
801
1.04
499
65.9
F

NB 1
460
325
0
860
0.38
44
9.7
A
6.1

NB 2
270
0
0
1700
0.16
0
0.0

79.8
74.4%
15

SB 1
347
0
0
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 2
387
0
214
1700
0.23
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
W8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

458

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
185

0.92
563

106
Free
0%
0.92
130

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
157

152

0.86
158

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
505

None

0.92
0

None
1130

1504

1597

130

1662

1504

249

130

341

1504
7.1

1597
6.5

130
6.2

1662
7.1

1504
6.5

249
6.2

130
4.1

341
4.1

3.5
0
63

4.0
100
57

3.3
83
917

3.5
100
40

4.0
100
65

3.3
100
787

2.2
100
1449

2.2
54
1212

EB 1
505
505
0
63
8.00
Err
Err
F
7621.4
F

EB 2
158
0
158
917
0.17
15
9.7
A

NB 1
341
0
185
1700
0.20
0
0.0

SB 1
563
563
0
1212
0.46
63
10.5
B
8.5

SB 2
130
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

2979.3
82.6%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2018 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
W9

APENDICE X
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3

X-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
125%
163
0
163
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.85
125%
710
10
1007
3%

209
1900

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.08
145
0.85
125%
94
0
94
3%
pm+pt
3
8
57.0
57.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
115
0.03
0.27
0.82
40.7
0.91
30.3
67.4
E

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1716
1.00
1716
0.85
125%
290
20
521
3%

171
1900

93
1900

0.92
125%
126
0
0
3%
Perm

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
144
10
134
3%
Perm

353
1900

0.85
125%
251
0
0
3%

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.42
776
0.92
125%
444
0
570
3%

192
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1787
0.37
675
0.92
125%
261
0
741
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
111
6
105
3%
Perm

47.0
47.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
528
0.09
0.31
42.0
1.00
1.5
43.5
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.85
125%
307
0
0
3%

4
47.0
47.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
531
c0.57
1.90
54.5
1.00
410.6
465.1
F
406.9
F
276.3
1.85
156.0
131.0%
15

8!

2
2

57.0
57.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
627
c0.30
0.83
45.1
0.77
10.6
45.5
D
48.8
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
480
0
0
3%
Perm

91.0
91.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
453
0.73
1.26
32.5
1.00
133.1
165.6
F
135.3
F

6
2
91.0
91.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
915
0.09
0.15
14.8
1.00
0.3
15.1
B

6
91.0
91.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
394
c1.10
1.88
32.5
1.00
405.8
438.3
F
383.2
F

6
91.0
91.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
915
0.07
0.11
14.5
1.00
0.3
14.8
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
X2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.40
749
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
806
0
806

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
330
85
245
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
462
0.92
125%
337
0
337
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
10
517

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
142%
165
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
168
95
73
Perm

61
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
142%
40
0
205

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.73
1367
0.92
125%
79
0
162

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
75
53
22
Perm

4
109.0
109.0
0.70
4.0
3.0
1106

8
109.0
109.0
0.70
4.0
3.0
323

0.15
0.22
8.4
0.16
0.0
1.3
A

c0.73
1.04
23.5
0.97
27.9
50.8
D

4
4
109.0
109.0
0.70
4.0
3.0
523
0.19
0.28
8.8
0.69
0.0
6.1
A

109.0
109.0
0.70
4.0
3.0
1302
0.43
0.62
12.5
0.61
0.1
7.7
A
5.9
A

36.2
1.04
156.0
83.2%
15

109.0
109.0
0.70
4.0
3.0
1242
0.29

18.0
18.0
0.12
4.0
3.0
207
c0.11

0.42
10.0
0.88
0.0
8.8
A
25.2
C

0.99
68.9
1.00
60.1
129.0
F
102.6
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
83
0
0
Perm

6
2
18.0
18.0
0.12
4.0
3.0
183
0.05
0.40
64.0
1.00
6.4
70.4
E

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
149
c0.12
1.09
69.5
1.00
99.0
168.5
F
135.1
F

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
173
0.01
0.12
62.8
1.00
0.3
63.1
E

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
X3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1690
0.99
1690
0.92
138%
150
26
724
3%

265
1900

97
1900

156
1900

177
1900

0.92
138%
146
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
234
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
240
0
0
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.24
441
0.92
125%
637
0
877
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
159
38
122
3%
Perm

144
1900

0.92
138%
398
0
0
3%

160
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1730
0.69
1203
0.92
138%
240
14
606
3%

345
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1818
0.06
111
0.92
138%
518
0
734
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
81
5
77
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
202
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

32.0
32.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
347
c0.43
2.09
62.0
1.00
498.4
560.4
F
560.4
F
1893.0
8.17
156.0
145.4%
15

4
4

34.0
34.0
0.22
4.0
3.0
262

78.0
78.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
221

c0.50
2.31
61.0
1.00
602.6
663.6
F
663.6
F

1.99
3.97
39.0
0.77
1343.9
1373.7
F
1165.2
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
216
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
78.0
78.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.08
0.15
21.1
0.71
0.1
15.0
B

8
78.0
78.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
56
c6.62
13.11
39.0
1.21
5478.7
5525.7
F
4979.9
F

8
78.0
78.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.05
0.10
20.5
1.63
0.2
33.6
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
X4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
334
0
334
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
399
225
174
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.60
2092
0.92
138%
135
0
540
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
813
0
650
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
138%
0
65
532
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
434
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
3
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1825
0.99
1825
0.92
125%
10
1
13
2%

71.4
71.4
0.46
4.0
3.0
762
c0.39

71.4
71.4
0.46
4.0
3.0
705
0.35

3.2
3.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
37
c0.01

0.85
37.6
0.90
0.9
34.9
C

0.75
35.0
0.87
0.4
31.0
C
33.0
C

0.35
75.4
1.00
5.7
81.1
F
81.1
F

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
58.6
58.6
0.38
4.0
8.0
1317
0.10
0.25
33.6
1.00
0.5
34.1
C
34.8
C

2
58.6
58.6
0.38
4.0
8.0
589
0.11
0.29
34.2
1.00
1.3
35.5
D

0.92
138%
405
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
69.4
69.4
0.44
4.0
8.0
987
c0.02
c0.22
0.89dl
31.8
0.95
0.8
31.0
C
31.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
33.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.69
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
156.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
82.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0
2%

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
X5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
214
182
32
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.59
2061
0.92
138%
242
0
772
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
34
390
3%

78
1900

58.2
58.2
0.75
4.0
4.0
1674
c0.05
c0.30
0.46
3.8
1.04
0.3
4.2
A
4.2
A

46.2
46.2
0.59
4.0
4.0
1998
0.12

4
11.8
11.8
0.15
4.0
4.0
265
c0.07
0.45
30.2
1.00
1.7
31.8
C
30.0
C

4
11.8
11.8
0.15
4.0
4.0
237

0.92
138%
530
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.02
0.14
28.7
1.00
0.4
29.0
C

10.8
0.46
78.0
54.9%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.20
7.3
1.00
0.2
7.5
A
7.5
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
X6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1851
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
65
605
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.58
1083
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
3
167

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.62
2177
0.92
125%
315
0
755

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
106
71
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.28
515
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
670
0
670

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
170
83
87
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
720

8
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
492

2
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
206

0.38
0.84
13.2
1.00
8.7
22.0
C

c0.45
0.99
14.8
1.00
37.0
51.9
D

0.04
0.11
10.4
1.00
0.4
10.7
B

0.02
0.04
10.1
1.00
0.4
10.4
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.14
0.30
9.5
1.00
0.2
9.7
A
18.6
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.45
4.0
3.0
841
0.09
0.20
9.0
1.00
0.1
9.1
A
40.8
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
26.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
105.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
871
0.35
3.24dl
15.2
1.00
11.3
26.5
C
23.5
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
745
c0.36
0.90
15.5
1.00
16.0
31.4
C
27.1
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
633
0.06
0.14
10.5
1.00
0.5
10.9
B

C
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
X7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

600

486

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
660

742
Free
0%
0.92
1008

197

0.92
913

183
Free
0%
0.92
249

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.92
154

None

0.92
268

None
654

2073

2845

124

1276

249

3501

2711

2073
7.5

2845
6.5

124
6.9

1276
4.1

249
4.1

3501
7.5

2711
6.5

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

3.3
0
903

2.2
0
540

2.2
100
1314

3.5
0
0

4.0
0
0

WB 1
155
154
0
0
Err
Err
Err
F
Err
F

WB 2
913
0
913
903
1.01
478
54.1
F

NB 1
743
660
0
540
1.22
624
140.4
F
114.8

NB 2
166
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Err
92.3%
15

SB 1
672
0
0
1700
0.40
0
0.0

SB 2
604
0
268
1700
0.36
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
X8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545

1
Stop
0%
0.92
2

62

713

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.92
262

0.92
969

130
Free
0%
0.92
177

0.92
0

124
Free
0%
0.92
168

193

0.92
94

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
829

None

0.92
0

None
1141

2414

2545

177

2509

2414

300

177

431

2414
7.1

2545
6.5

177
6.2

2509
7.1

2414
6.5

300
6.2

177
4.1

431
4.1

3.5
0
6

4.0
60
4

3.3
89
866

3.5
100
3

4.0
100
5

3.3
100
740

2.2
100
1399

2.2
14
1129

EB 1
831
829
0
6
135.31
Err
Err
F
8980.4
F

EB 2
94
0
94
866
0.11
9
9.7
A

NB 1
431
0
262
1700
0.25
0
0.0

SB 1
969
969
0
1129
0.86
288
23.7
C
20.1

SB 2
177
0
0
1700
0.10
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3331.0
124.7%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
X9

APENDICE Y
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3

Y-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1733
1.00
1733
0.92
125%
402
25
647

199
1900

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.11
211
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
41.0
41.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
186
0.04
0.25
0.69
22.4
0.74
8.3
24.9
C

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.91
1.00
1677
1.00
1677
0.92
125%
303
58
711

343
1900

63
1900

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
21
48
Perm

270
1900

0.92
125%
466
0
0

96
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1809
0.42
770
0.92
125%
130
0
216

230
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1796
0.68
1249
0.92
125%
312
0
679

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
53
5
48
Perm

31.0
31.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
566
0.05
0.16
23.2
1.00
0.6
23.8
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
270
0
0

4
31.0
31.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
560
c0.37
1.16
32.5
1.00
88.7
121.2
F
109.7
F
73.1
1.14
96.0
105.4%
15

8!

2
2

41.0
41.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
716
c0.42
0.99
27.4
0.76
27.9
48.8
D
45.4
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
367
0
0
Perm

47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
377
0.28
0.57
17.4
1.00
6.2
23.6
C
21.0
C

6
2
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
768
0.03
0.06
12.9
1.00
0.2
13.1
B

6
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
611
c0.54
1.11
24.5
1.00
70.9
95.4
F
89.4
F

6
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
768
0.03
0.06
12.9
1.00
0.2
13.1
B

E
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
Y2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
427
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
626
0
626

33
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
45
23
22
Perm

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
417
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
9
610

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
142%
140
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
284
210
74
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
79
0
219

19
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1769
0.61
1134
0.92
125%
26
0
182

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
222
55
Perm

4
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
768

8
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
204

0.01
0.03
12.7
0.95
0.0
12.0
B

0.22
0.44
16.0
1.00
6.8
22.7
C

4
4
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
209
c0.39
0.80
20.5
0.89
3.0
21.3
C

47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
903
0.34
0.69
18.9
0.89
0.4
17.2
B
17.7
B

28.8
0.77
96.0
67.7%
15

47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
876
0.34

18.0
18.0
0.19
4.0
335
c0.12

0.70
19.0
1.00
4.6
23.5
C
23.4
C

0.65
36.1
1.00
9.6
45.7
D
39.8
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

6
2
18.0
18.0
0.19
4.0
294
0.05
0.25
33.2
1.00
2.0
35.3
D

6
19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
224
c0.16
0.81
36.8
1.00
26.5
63.3
E
45.2
D

6
19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
310
0.03
0.18
32.0
1.00
1.2
33.2
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
Y3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1697
0.99
1697
0.92
138%
148
26
578

204
1900

181
1900

199
1900

104
1900

0.92
138%
272
0
0
Perm

0.92
138%
298
0
0

0.92
125%
141
0
0
Perm

492
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.44
820
0.92
125%
668
0
809

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
223
64
159
Perm

161
1900

0.92
138%
306
0
0

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.98
1729
0.67
1171
0.92
138%
272
14
828

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1807
0.08
142
0.92
138%
334
0
576

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
72
6
66
Perm

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

6
6

22.0
22.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
267
c0.34
2.16
59.0
1.00
536.2
595.2
F
595.2
F
1092.3
5.58
140.0
142.8%
15

4
4

40.0
40.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
335

66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
387

c0.71
2.47
50.0
1.00
670.8
720.8
F
720.8
F

0.99
2.09
37.0
1.00
499.5
536.5
F
425.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
242
0
0
Perm

8
4
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
739
0.10
0.22
21.8
1.00
0.1
21.9
C

8
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
67
c4.05
8.60
37.0
1.00
3448.8
3485.8
F
3100.8
F

8
66.0
66.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
739
0.04
0.09
20.4
1.00
0.2
20.7
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
Y4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

346
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
519
0
519

205
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
308
216
92
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.59
2076
0.92
138%
318
0
648

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
996
0
677
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
35
604

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
125%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1808
0.99
1808
0.92
125%
10
1
13

37.1
37.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
818
c0.41

37.1
37.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
777
0.38

1.3
1.3
0.02
4.0
3.0
31
c0.01

0.83
16.5
1.00
6.9
23.4
C

0.78
15.8
1.00
4.9
20.7
C
22.1
C

0.42
36.7
1.00
8.9
45.7
D
45.7
D

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
16.1
16.1
0.21
4.0
8.0
747
0.15
0.69
27.4
1.00
5.3
32.7
C
30.5
C

2
16.1
16.1
0.21
4.0
8.0
334
0.06
0.28
24.8
1.00
1.9
26.8
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
25.1
25.1
0.33
4.0
8.0
779
c0.06
c0.22
1.42dl
23.3
1.00
9.5
32.8
C
32.8
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
27.2
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.81
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
75.5
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
81.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
Y5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
386
295
91
Perm

350
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.64
2252
0.92
138%
316
0
841

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
124
303

122
1900

22.0
22.0
0.56
4.0
4.0
1494
c0.11
c0.20
0.89dl
5.6
1.00
0.6
6.2
A
6.2
A

10.0
10.0
0.25
4.0
4.0
840
0.09

4
9.3
9.3
0.24
4.0
4.0
415
c0.10
0.43
12.7
1.00
1.0
13.7
B
13.0
B

4
9.3
9.3
0.24
4.0
4.0
371
0.06
0.25
12.2
1.00
0.5
12.6
B

0.92
138%
525
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.36
12.0
1.00
0.4
12.4
B
12.4
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
9.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.51
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
39.3
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
57.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
Y6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1831
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
214
153
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.45
824
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1817
1.00
1817
0.92
125%
348
6
380

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
38
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.72
2539
0.92
125%
398
0
1056

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
135
111
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
301
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

93
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
144
0
144

20
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
31
17
14
Perm

4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
653

8
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
343

2
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
135

0.10
0.23
11.3
1.00
0.8
12.2
B

c0.39
0.93
16.7
1.00
33.7
50.4
D

0.07
0.16
9.8
1.00
0.5
10.2
B

0.03
0.06
9.3
1.00
0.8
10.2
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
763
0.19
0.47
12.7
1.00
2.0
14.7
B
13.4
B

2
2

25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
757
0.21
0.50
12.9
1.00
2.4
15.3
B
31.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
60.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
90.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
1143
c0.42
1.19dl
15.5
1.00
13.7
29.2
C
25.6
C

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
830
0.08
0.17
9.8
1.00
0.5
10.3
B
10.1
B

6
27.0
27.0
0.45
4.0
706
0.01
0.02
9.2
1.00
0.1
9.2
A

C
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
Y7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

4/30/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

689

247

0.92
0

0.92
0

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.86
359

424
Free
0%
0.92
576

174

0.99
974

269
Free
0%
0.75
448

0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

0.88
223

None

0.92
236

None
663

1454

1979

224

812

448

2611

1861

1454
7.6

1979
6.6

224
7.0

812
4.2

448
4.2

2611
7.6

1861
6.6

3.5
0
59

4.0
100
33

3.3
0
776

2.2
55
803

2.2
100
1101

3.5
0
0

4.0
100
40

WB 1
223
223
0
59
3.79
Err
Err
F
1977.7
F

WB 2
974
0
974
776
1.26
879
144.1
F

NB 1
508
359
0
803
0.45
58
11.1
B
7.0

NB 2
299
0
0
1700
0.18
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

842.4
84.7%
15

SB 1
384
0
0
1700
0.23
0
0.0

SB 2
428
0
236
1700
0.25
0
0.0

0.0

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
Y8

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (veh/h)
Sign Control
Grade
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
p0 queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
Direction, Lane #
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Control Delay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

113

458

0.92
0

0.92
0

0.93
204

0.92
622

106
Free
0%
0.92
144

0.92
0

129
Free
0%
0.93
173

152

0.86
184

0
Stop
0%
0.92
0

0.92
589

None

0.92
0

None
1130

1664

1766

144

1848

1664

276

144

378

1664
7.1

1766
6.5

144
6.2

1848
7.1

1664
6.5

276
6.2

144
4.1

378
4.1

3.5
0
45

4.0
100
39

3.3
80
901

3.5
100
26

4.0
100
45

3.3
100
761

2.2
100
1432

2.2
47
1175

EB 1
589
589
0
45
13.21
Err
Err
F
7621.5
F

EB 2
184
0
184
901
0.20
19
10.0
B

NB 1
378
0
204
1700
0.22
0
0.0

SB 1
622
622
0
1175
0.53
81
11.5
B
9.3

SB 2
144
0
0
1700
0.08
0
0.0

Intersection Summary
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

0.0

3076.7
91.9%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
Y9

APENDICE Z
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3
con Mejoras Adicionales

Z-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
125%
163
0
163
3%
Prot
4!

483
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.85
125%
710
0
710
3%

209
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
307
52
255
3%
custom

197
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.85
125%
290
0
290
3%

171
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
251
104
147
3%
Perm

93
1900

327
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.75
1381
0.92
125%
444
0
570
3%

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
144
31
114
3%
Perm

353
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.33
604
0.92
125%
480
0
480
3%
Perm

192
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1762
1.00
1762
0.92
125%
261
10
362
3%

82
1900

4
43.0
43.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
529

4
43.0
43.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
449

2
89.0
89.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
930

6
89.0
89.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
358

c0.38
1.34
53.5
1.00
166.3
219.8
F
151.5
F

0.16
0.57
45.6
1.00
5.1
50.7
D

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.09
157
0.85
125%
94
0
94
3%
pm+pt
3
8
53.0
53.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
119
c0.03
0.25
0.79
39.6
1.00
28.5
68.1
E

0.07
0.12
13.4
1.00
0.1
13.4
B

c0.79
1.34
30.5
1.00
171.1
201.6
F

43.0
43.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
502
0.09
0.32
42.1
1.00
1.7
43.8
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

95.8
1.32
150.0
102.5%
15

0.92
125%
126
0
0
3%
Perm

8!
53.0
53.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
652
0.16
0.44
37.2
1.00
2.2
39.4
D
42.2
D

2
8
53.0
53.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
554
0.09
0.27
34.6
1.00
1.2
35.8
D

2
89.0
89.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
819
0.41
0.70
21.1
1.00
2.6
23.7
C
21.6
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
111
0
0
3%

6
89.0
89.0
0.59
4.0
3.0
1045
0.21
0.35
15.6
1.00
0.9
16.5
B
120.8
F

F
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
Z2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.40
746
0.92
125%
144
0
144
Perm

593
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
806
0
806

243
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
330
88
242
Perm

248
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
458
0.92
125%
337
0
337
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
125%
367
10
517

118
1900

107
1900

0.92
142%
165
0
0
Split
2

109
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
168
98
70
Perm

61
1900

0.92
125%
160
0
0

26
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1791
0.96
1791
0.92
142%
40
0
205

58
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1816
0.73
1367
0.92
125%
79
0
162

55
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
75
56
19
Perm

4
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1098

8
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
318

0.15
0.22
8.3
1.00
0.1
8.4
A

c0.74
1.06
23.0
1.00
67.1
90.1
F

4
4
104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
517
0.19
0.28
8.7
1.00
0.3
9.0
A

104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1292
0.43
0.62
12.4
1.00
0.9
13.4
B
11.6
B

42.9
1.05
150.0
83.2%
15

0.92
125%
83
0
0
Perm

104.0
104.0
0.69
4.0
3.0
1233
0.29

17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
203
c0.11

0.42
9.9
1.00
0.2
10.2
B
41.4
D

1.01
66.5
1.00
65.7
132.2
F
103.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
179
0.04
0.39
61.7
1.00
6.3
67.9
E

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
155
c0.12
1.05
66.5
1.00
84.8
151.3
F
122.4
F

6
17.0
17.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
179
0.01
0.11
59.7
1.00
0.3
60.0
E

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
Z3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

135
1900

100
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1793
0.97
1793
0.92
138%
150
0
352
3%

265
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
398
174
224
3%
Perm

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.55
1015
0.92
138%
146
0
146
3%
Perm

160
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
240
0
240
3%

156
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
234
202
32
3%
Perm

177
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.26
486
0.92
125%
240
0
240
3%
Perm

469
1900
4.0
0.95
0.97
1.00
3400
1.00
3400
0.92
125%
637
28
769
3%

117
1900

144
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.28
515
0.92
138%
216
0
216
3%
Perm

345
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1807
1.00
1807
0.92
138%
518
7
592
3%

54
1900

2
17.0
17.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
333

6
11.0
11.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
140

6
11.0
11.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
216

4
40.0
40.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
243

0.14
0.67
28.9
1.00
10.4
39.3
D

c0.14
1.04
34.5
1.00
87.9
122.4
F

0.02
0.15
30.4
1.00
1.5
31.8
C

c0.49
0.99
19.8
1.00
53.7
73.5
E

0.92
138%
202
0
0
3%
Split
2

2
17.0
17.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
381
c0.20
0.92
30.9
1.00
30.4
61.3
E
49.6
D

39.3
0.98
80.0
84.4%
15

11.0
11.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
254
0.13
0.94
34.2
1.00
43.9
78.1
E
71.1
E

0.92
125%
159
0
0
3%

8
8
40.0
40.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
258

40.0
40.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
1700
0.23

0.42
0.84
17.2
0.99
20.8
37.8
D

0.45
12.9
1.00
0.2
13.1
B
27.1
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
81
0
0
3%

40.0
40.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
904
0.33
0.65
14.9
0.83
2.8
15.0
B
21.1
C

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
Z4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
334
0
334
3%

266
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
399
340
59
3%
Perm

270
1900

90
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3378
0.65
2293
0.92
138%
135
0
540
3%

0
1900

542
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
813
0
650
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.89
0.99
1540
0.99
1540
0.92
138%
0
80
517
2%

289
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
434
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
3
0
0
2%
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1825
0.99
1825
0.92
125%
10
1
13
2%

45.2
45.2
0.57
4.0
3.0
941
c0.39

45.2
45.2
0.57
4.0
3.0
870
0.34

1.5
1.5
0.02
4.0
3.0
34
c0.01

0.69
12.4
0.74
1.8
10.9
B

0.59
11.4
0.67
0.9
8.5
A
9.8
A

0.38
38.8
1.00
7.0
45.8
D
45.8
D

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.15
4.0
8.0
517
0.10
0.65
32.1
1.00
6.1
38.3
D
35.3
D

2
11.8
11.8
0.15
4.0
8.0
231
0.04
0.25
30.2
1.00
2.6
32.8
C

0.92
138%
405
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
21.3
21.3
0.27
4.0
8.0
685
c0.05
c0.16
1.63dl
27.3
0.85
6.0
29.0
C
29.0
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
21.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.71
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
80.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
82.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0
2%

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
Z5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

143
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
214
171
43
3%
Perm

353
1900

161
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.63
2193
0.92
138%
242
0
772
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
74
350
3%

78
1900

24.0
24.0
0.60
4.0
4.0
1555
c0.10
c0.20
0.50
4.6
0.87
0.3
4.3
A
4.3
A

12.0
12.0
0.30
4.0
4.0
1012
0.10

4
8.0
8.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
350
c0.07
0.34
13.7
1.00
0.8
14.5
B
13.8
B

4
8.0
8.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
314

0.92
138%
530
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.03
0.14
13.2
1.00
0.3
13.4
B

8.5
0.44
40.0
54.9%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.35
10.9
1.00
0.9
11.9
B
11.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
Z6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

180
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1860
0.99
1852
0.92
125%
245
0
252

493
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
670
67
603
Perm

358
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.56
1041
0.92
125%
486
0
486
Perm

120
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1851
1.00
1851
0.92
125%
163
2
168

5
1900

324
1900

0.92
125%
7
0
0

0.92
125%
440
0
0
Perm

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3439
0.57
2034
0.92
125%
315
0
755

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
177
102
75
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.27
496
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

434
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
670
0
670

110
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
170
56
114
Perm

4
38.3
38.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
758

8
38.3
38.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
498

2
33.7
33.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
667

6
33.7
33.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
209

0.38
0.80
17.6
1.00
5.8
23.4
C

c0.47
0.98
20.4
1.00
33.8
54.2
D

0.05
0.11
14.1
0.89
0.1
12.6
B

0.02
0.04
13.6
1.00
0.3
14.0
B

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
38.3
38.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
887
0.14
0.28
12.6
1.00
0.2
12.8
B
20.5
C

2
2

38.3
38.3
0.48
4.0
3.0
886
0.09
0.19
12.0
1.00
0.1
12.1
B
43.3
D

33.7
33.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
857
c0.37
4.49dl
21.3
0.93
5.5
25.3
C
22.9
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
27.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
80.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
105.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
33.7
33.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
785
0.36
0.85
20.9
1.00
11.4
32.3
C
28.7
C

6
33.7
33.7
0.42
4.0
3.0
667
0.07
0.17
14.4
1.00
0.6
15.0
B

C
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
Z7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
140%
2
0
156

600
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
913
396
517
Perm

486
1900

183
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3415
0.57
2017
0.92
125%
249
0
909

0
1900

0
1900

197
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

742
1900
4.0
0.95
0.97
1.00
3428
1.00
3428
0.92
125%
1008
29
1247

0.92
125%
268
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
140%
154
0
0
Perm

0.92
125%
660
0
0
Perm

8
8
27.5
27.5
0.34
4.0
3.0
608
0.09
0.26
18.9
1.00
0.2
19.1
B
47.4
D

8
27.5
27.5
0.34
4.0
3.0
544
c0.33
0.95
25.6
1.00
26.7
52.3
D

44.5
44.5
0.56
4.0
3.0
1122

44.5
44.5
0.56
4.0
3.0
1907
0.36

c0.45
4.75dl
14.3
0.39
3.0
8.6
A
8.6
A

0.65
12.4
1.02
0.8
13.5
B
13.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.3
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.86
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
80.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.3%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
C
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
Z8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

545
1900

1
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1774
0.95
1774
0.92
140%
2
0
831

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
140%
94
51
43
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

193
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
262
147
115
Perm

713
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.64
1083
0.92
125%
969
0
484
Perm

130
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.96
3270
0.69
2325
0.92
125%
177
0
662

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

124
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
168
0
168

2
35.0
35.0
0.44
4.0
3.0
693

6
35.0
35.0
0.44
4.0
3.0
474

0.07
0.17
13.6
1.00
0.5
14.2
B

c0.45
1.02
22.5
0.85
42.5
61.7
E

0.92
140%
829
0
0
Perm

4
4
37.0
37.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
820
0.47
1.01
21.5
1.00
34.8
56.3
E
51.8
D

2
4
37.0
37.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
732

35.0
35.0
0.44
4.0
3.0
815
0.09

0.03
0.06
11.9
1.00
0.0
11.9
B
0.0
A

0.21
13.9
1.00
0.6
14.5
B
14.3
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
38.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
80.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
92.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

6
35.0
35.0
0.44
4.0
3.0
1017
0.28
0.98dl
17.7
0.81
2.6
16.9
B
35.8
D

D
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
Z9

APENDICE AA
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 3
con Mejoras Adicionales

AA-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

296
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
402
0
402

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
126
144
custom

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
303
0
303

343
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
466
272
194
Perm

63
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.45
831
0.92
125%
86
0
86
Perm

96
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1749
1.00
1749
0.92
125%
130
20
179

51
1900

270
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.61
1119
0.92
125%
367
0
367
Perm

230
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1804
1.00
1804
0.92
125%
312
7
359

39
1900

4
30.0
30.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
577

4
30.0
30.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
490

8
40.0
40.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
653

2
48.0
48.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
416

c0.22
0.70
29.0
1.00
6.8
35.8
D
31.2
C

0.09
0.29
25.0
1.00
1.5
26.5
C

95
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
428
0.92
125%
129
0
129
pm+pt
3
8
40.0
40.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
261
c0.03
0.17
0.49
19.8
0.78
1.1
16.5
B

0.12
0.30
18.6
0.53
0.9
10.8
B

0.10
0.21
13.4
1.00
1.1
14.5
B

30.0
30.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
548
0.05
0.16
23.9
1.00
0.6
24.6
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

20.4
0.66
96.0
68.3%
15

8!
40.0
40.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
769
0.16
0.39
19.5
0.78
1.2
16.3
B
13.5
B

0.92
125%
69
0
0

6
6
48.0
48.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
560

48.0
48.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
875
0.10

c0.33
0.66
17.8
1.00
5.9
23.7
C

0.20
13.4
1.00
0.5
13.9
B
14.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
53
0
0

48.0
48.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
902
0.20
0.40
15.0
1.00
1.3
16.3
B
20.0
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
427
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

461
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1826
1.00
1826
0.92
125%
626
3
668

33
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.19
352
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Perm

366
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
497
9
610

90
1900

91
1900

0.92
142%
140
0
0
Split
2

184
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
284
210
74
Perm

115
1900

0.92
125%
122
0
0

51
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1788
0.97
1788
0.92
142%
79
0
219

19
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1769
0.61
1134
0.92
125%
26
0
182

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
277
222
55
Perm

0.92
125%
45
0
0

4
4
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
209
c0.39
0.80
20.5
0.72
21.2
36.0
D

8
8
47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
172

47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
894
0.37

0.26
0.52
16.8
1.19
9.1
29.1
C

0.75
19.7
0.71
4.4
18.3
B
21.8
C
30.3
0.77
96.0
68.2%
15

0.92
125%
156
0
0
Perm

47.0
47.0
0.49
4.0
876
0.34

18.0
18.0
0.19
4.0
335
c0.12

0.70
19.0
1.11
3.8
24.9
C
25.5
C

0.65
36.1
0.78
5.7
34.0
C
37.8
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
18.0
18.0
0.19
4.0
294
0.05
0.25
33.2
1.19
1.2
40.8
D

6
19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
224
c0.16
0.81
36.8
1.00
26.5
63.3
E
45.2
D

6
19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
310
0.03
0.18
32.0
1.00
1.2
33.2
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1799
0.98
1799
0.92
138%
148
0
298

204
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
306
166
140
Perm

181
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.58
1066
0.92
138%
272
0
272
Perm

181
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
272
0
272

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
298
205
93
Perm

104
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.48
891
0.92
125%
141
0
141
Perm

492
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
668
0
668

164
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
223
109
114
Perm

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.21
391
0.92
138%
242
0
242
Perm

223
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
334
0
334

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
72
35
37
Perm

2
15.0
15.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
245

6
20.0
20.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
222

6
20.0
20.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
327

4
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
455

4
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
800

8
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
200

0.09
0.57
37.5
1.00
9.3
46.8
D

c0.26
1.23
38.0
1.00
134.6
172.6
F

0.06
0.28
32.0
1.00
2.2
34.1
C

0.16
0.31
13.7
0.60
0.3
8.5
A

0.07
0.14
12.4
0.20
0.1
2.6
A

c0.62
1.21
23.5
0.73
125.3
142.6
F

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

2
15.0
15.0
0.16
4.0
3.0
281
c0.17
1.06
40.5
1.00
70.6
111.1
F
78.5
E

52.6
1.19
96.0
86.7%
15

20.0
20.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
384
0.15
0.71
35.3
1.00
10.5
45.8
D
82.6
F

4
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
942
0.36
0.71
18.0
0.57
1.7
11.9
B
9.4
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

8
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
942
0.18
0.35
14.0
0.56
0.8
8.7
A
58.2
E

8
49.0
49.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
800
0.02
0.05
11.8
0.33
0.1
4.0
A

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

346
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
138%
519
0
519

205
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
308
198
110
Perm

220
1900

212
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3418
0.56
1952
0.92
138%
318
0
648

0
1900

664
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
996
0
677
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.92
0.98
1581
0.98
1581
0.92
138%
0
32
607

213
1900

2
1900

1
1900

0.92
138%
320
0
0

0.92
125%
3
0
0
Split
4

7
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
0.99
1808
0.99
1808
0.92
125%
10
1
13

48.2
48.2
0.50
4.0
3.0
836
c0.41

48.2
48.2
0.50
4.0
3.0
794
0.38

1.5
1.5
0.02
4.0
3.0
28
c0.01

0.81
20.1
0.85
3.5
20.6
C

0.76
19.3
0.85
2.7
19.0
B
19.8
B

0.46
46.9
1.00
11.7
58.6
E
58.6
E

0.92
138%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
24.1
24.1
0.25
4.0
8.0
880
0.15
0.59
31.6
1.00
2.9
34.5
C
33.1
C

2
24.1
24.1
0.25
4.0
8.0
394
0.07
0.28
29.0
1.00
1.8
30.7
C

0.92
138%
330
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
34.3
34.3
0.36
4.0
8.0
792
c0.05
c0.24
1.25dl
28.0
0.95
6.7
33.3
C
33.3
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
27.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
96.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
81.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
1
0
0

C
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
386
294
92
Perm

350
1900

211
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.59
2062
0.92
138%
316
0
841

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
109
318

122
1900

28.5
28.5
0.59
4.0
4.0
1447
c0.10
c0.25
0.87dl
6.0
0.80
0.6
5.5
A
5.5
A

16.5
16.5
0.34
4.0
4.0
1134
0.10

4
11.5
11.5
0.24
4.0
4.0
420
c0.10
0.42
15.4
1.00
0.9
16.4
B
15.6
B

4
11.5
11.5
0.24
4.0
4.0
376
0.06
0.25
14.7
1.00
0.5
15.2
B

0.92
138%
525
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.28
11.4
1.00
0.6
12.1
B
12.1
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
10.1
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.53
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
48.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
57.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


42: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

5
1900

257
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1843
0.99
1830
0.92
125%
349
0
356

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
367
222
145
Perm

235
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.46
844
0.92
125%
319
0
319
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.99
1.00
1817
1.00
1817
0.92
125%
348
8
378

28
1900

484
1900

0.92
125%
38
0
0

0.92
125%
658
0
0
Perm

293
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3399
0.73
2553
0.92
125%
398
0
1056

181
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
246
138
108
Perm

5
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.19
351
0.92
142%
8
0
8
Perm

93
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
144
0
144

20
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
31
17
14
Perm

4
19.0
19.0
0.40
4.0
621

8
19.0
19.0
0.40
4.0
334

2
21.0
21.0
0.44
4.0
686

6
21.0
21.0
0.44
4.0
154

0.09
0.23
9.7
1.00
0.9
10.5
B

c0.38
0.96
14.1
1.00
39.1
53.2
D

0.07
0.16
8.2
0.83
0.0
6.8
A

0.02
0.05
7.8
1.08
0.5
9.0
A

0.92
125%
7
0
0
Perm

4
4
19.0
19.0
0.40
4.0
724
0.19
0.49
10.9
1.00
2.4
13.3
B
11.9
B

2
2

19.0
19.0
0.40
4.0
719
0.21
0.53
11.1
1.00
2.7
13.8
B
31.6
C

21.0
21.0
0.44
4.0
1117
c0.41
1.23dl
12.9
1.01
2.3
15.3
B
13.7
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
17.3
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
48.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
90.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
21.0
21.0
0.44
4.0
807
0.08
0.18
8.2
1.05
0.4
9.0
A
9.7
A

6
21.0
21.0
0.44
4.0
686
0.01
0.02
7.7
1.65
0.0
12.7
B

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


46: PR-52 SB Off Ramp & PR-52 SB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL2

WBL

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

140
1900

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
140%
0
0
223

689
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.99
140%
974
146
828
Perm

247
1900

269
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3429
0.58
2031
0.75
125%
448
0
807

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

174
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
236
136
100
Perm

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

424
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
125%
576
0
576

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.88
140%
223
0
0
Perm

0.86
125%
359
0
0
Perm

8
8
47.2
47.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
861
0.13
0.26
14.2
1.00
0.2
14.4
B
66.4
E

8
47.2
47.2
0.49
4.0
3.0
771
c0.53
1.07
24.4
1.00
53.9
78.3
E

40.8
40.8
0.42
4.0
3.0
863

40.8
40.8
0.42
4.0
3.0
1490
0.16

c0.40
1.27dl
26.3
0.75
15.7
35.4
D
35.4
D

0.39
19.0
0.91
0.6
17.9
B
18.6
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
43.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.01
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
96.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
84.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
40.8
40.8
0.42
4.0
3.0
666
0.06
0.15
17.0
1.17
0.4
20.3
C
0.0
A
D
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


49: PR-52 NB Off Ramp & PR-184

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

387
1900

0
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
140%
0
0
589

113
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.86
140%
184
112
72
Perm

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0

152
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
125%
204
97
107
Perm

458
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.64
1116
0.92
125%
622
0
367
Perm

106
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
1698
0.69
1216
0.92
125%
144
0
399

0
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0

129
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.93
125%
173
0
173

2
50.3
50.3
0.52
4.0
3.0
822

6
50.3
50.3
0.52
4.0
3.0
585

0.07
0.13
11.7
1.00
0.3
12.0
B

c0.33
0.63
16.2
0.88
4.8
19.0
B

0.92
140%
589
0
0
Perm

4
4
37.7
37.7
0.39
4.0
3.0
688
0.34
0.86
26.7
1.00
10.2
36.9
D
32.5
C

2
4
37.7
37.7
0.39
4.0
3.0
616

50.3
50.3
0.52
4.0
3.0
967
0.09

0.05
0.12
18.6
1.00
0.1
18.6
B
0.0
A
23.0
0.73
96.0
71.1%
15

0.18
12.0
1.00
0.4
12.4
B
12.2
B

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
C

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 3 2028 CO1 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

50.3
50.3
0.52
4.0
3.0
637
0.33
0.63
16.2
0.88
4.4
18.6
B
18.8
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AA 9

APENDICE AB
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 4

AB-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
136
0
136
3%
Prot
4!

448
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1752
1.00
1752
0.92
113%
550
12
813
3%

224
1900

31
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.08
142
0.92
113%
38
0
38
3%
pm+pt
3
8
56.8
56.8
0.38
4.0
3.0
105
0.01
0.13
0.36
37.7
1.00
2.1
39.9
D

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.92
1.00
1698
1.00
1698
0.92
113%
242
27
489
3%

223
1900

93
1900

106
1900

374
1900

0.92
113%
274
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
114
0
0
3%
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1769
0.41
728
0.92
113%
314
7
551
3%

0.92
113%
130
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
459
0
0
3%
Perm

245
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1791
0.49
910
0.92
113%
301
0
760
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
101
6
95
3%
Perm

48.0
48.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
558
0.08
0.24
38.0
1.00
1.0
39.0
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
275
0
0
3%

4
48.0
48.0
0.32
4.0
3.0
558
c0.46
1.46
51.4
1.00
215.8
267.2
F
234.9
F
189.1
1.45
150.8
126.7%
15

8!

2
56.8
56.8
0.38
4.0
3.0
640
c0.29
0.76
41.1
1.00
8.5
49.6
D
48.9
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
86.0
86.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
415

86.0
86.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
519

0.76
1.33
32.4
1.00
163.0
195.4
F
195.4
F

c0.84
1.46
32.4
1.00
219.4
251.8
F
224.0
F

6
86.0
86.0
0.57
4.0
3.0
894
0.06
0.11
14.8
1.00
0.2
15.1
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.44
821
0.92
113%
130
0
130
2%
Perm

548
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
673
0
673
2%

274
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
337
116
221
2%
Perm

280
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.32
591
0.92
113%
344
0
344
2%
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1778
1.00
1778
0.92
113%
332
23
454
2%

118
1900

131
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.62
1144
0.92
121%
172
0
172
3%
Perm

32
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
121%
42
0
42
3%

133
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
175
135
40
3%
Perm

58
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1820
0.85
1577
0.92
113%
81
0
152
2%

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
61
47
14
2%
Perm

4
46.0
46.0
0.66
4.0
1040

8
46.0
46.0
0.66
4.0
388

0.14
0.21
4.8
1.00
0.5
5.3
A

c0.58
0.89
9.9
1.00
24.5
34.4
C

4
4
46.0
46.0
0.66
4.0
540
0.16
0.24
4.9
1.00
1.1
5.9
A

46.0
46.0
0.66
4.0
1224
0.36
0.55
6.4
1.00
1.8
8.2
A
7.1
A

0.92
113%
145
0
0
2%

15.4
0.83
70.0
75.6%
15

46.0
46.0
0.66
4.0
1168
0.26
0.39
5.5
1.00
1.0
6.5
A
18.2
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
71
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
261
c0.15
0.66
24.5
1.00
12.3
36.9
D

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
422
0.02
0.10
21.3
1.00
0.5
21.8
C
28.5
C

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
358
0.03
0.11
21.4
1.00
0.6
22.0
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
360
0.10
0.42
23.1
1.00
3.6
26.7
C
25.1
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
362
0.01
0.04
21.0
1.00
0.2
21.2
C

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

142
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1699
0.99
1699
0.92
119%
208
25
772
3%

313
1900

97
1900

193
1900

190
1900

0.92
119%
125
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
250
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
233
0
0
3%
Perm

432
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1817
0.42
771
0.92
113%
531
0
764
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
144
41
104
3%
Perm

100
1900

0.92
119%
405
0
0
3%

123
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
0.99
1708
0.67
1164
0.92
119%
159
21
513
3%

333
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.25
457
0.92
119%
431
0
560
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
70
6
65
3%
Perm

0.92
119%
184
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

33.0
33.0
0.22
4.0
3.0
374
c0.45
2.06
58.5
1.00
488.1
546.6
F
546.6
F
534.4
2.31
150.0
131.1%
15

4
4

30.0
30.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
233

75.0
75.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
386

c0.44
2.20
60.0
1.00
555.0
615.0
F
615.0
F

0.99
1.98
37.5
1.00
449.9
487.4
F
413.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
129
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
75.0
75.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.07
0.13
20.1
1.00
0.1
20.2
C

8
75.0
75.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
229
c1.23
2.45
37.5
1.00
663.5
701.0
F
625.3
F

8
75.0
75.0
0.50
4.0
3.0
784
0.04
0.08
19.6
1.00
0.2
19.8
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
113%
274
0
274
3%

227
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
279
209
70
3%
Perm

260
1900

227
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3414
0.64
2233
0.92
119%
294
0
630
3%

0
1900

601
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
119%
777
0
567
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1564
0.98
1564
0.92
119%
0
55
467
2%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
119%
312
0
0
3%

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

27.5
27.5
0.46
4.0
3.0
770
c0.34

27.5
27.5
0.46
4.0
3.0
723
0.30

0.74
13.0
1.00
3.7
16.7
B

0.65
12.3
1.00
2.0
14.2
B
15.5
B

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%

2
15.0
15.0
0.25
4.0
8.0
884
0.08
0.31
18.1
1.00
0.9
18.9
B
18.6
B

2
15.0
15.0
0.25
4.0
8.0
395
0.04
0.18
17.4
1.00
0.9
18.3
B

16.7
0.68
59.5
68.2%
15

0.92
119%
336
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

6
24.0
24.0
0.40
4.0
8.0
1000
c0.05
c0.20
0.63
14.2
1.00
2.9
17.1
B
17.1
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
103
0
103
3%

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
327
252
75
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.64
2244
0.92
119%
189
0
600
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
113%
287
71
312
3%

78
1900

22.0
22.0
0.57
4.0
4.0
1505
c0.08
c0.14
0.40
4.7
1.00
0.2
5.0
A
5.0
A

10.0
10.0
0.26
4.0
4.0
867
0.09

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
401
c0.06
0.26
12.3
1.00
0.5
12.8
B
12.6
B

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
359

0.92
119%
411
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.21
12.1
1.00
0.4
12.5
B

9.2
0.35
38.9
47.8%
15

0.92
113%
96
0
0
3%

0.36
11.8
1.00
0.3
12.2
B
12.2
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB Off Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBR

SWL

SWR

0
0.92
0

Stop
6
0.92
8

0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
8
0.92
11

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
8
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
905
7.0
7.0
A

WB 1
11
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
908
7.0
7.0
A

SW 1
0
0
0
0.00
3.9
0.00
900
6.9
0.0
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.0
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
6
0.92
8

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

8
0.92
11

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
8
8
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
854
7.2
7.2
A

NE 1
11
11
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
849
7.2
7.2
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.2
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

4/23/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


41: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.29
540
0.92
113%
231
0
231
3%
Perm

502
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
617
0
617
3%

0
1900

0
1900

8
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
121%
11
0
11
3%

295
1900

0.92
113%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

100
0
1900
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
0.92
113% 121%
123
0
62
0
62
0
3%
3%
Perm custom

0
1900

0.92
113%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

473
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
581
0
581
3%

0.92
121%
0
0
0
3%

0.92
121%
388
0
0
3%
Perm

6
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1759
0.72
1333
0.92
121%
8
0
396
3%

319
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
420
152
268
3%
Perm

4
4
30.0
30.0
0.50
4.0
270
c0.43
0.86
13.1
1.00
27.7
40.8
D

30.0
30.0
0.50
4.0
923
0.33

30.0
30.0
0.50
4.0
923
0.31

0.67
11.3
1.00
3.8
15.1
B
22.1
C

0.63
10.9
1.00
3.2
14.2
B
13.1
B
20.0
0.84
60.0
76.7%
15

6
8
30.0
30.0
0.50
4.0
784
0.04
0.08
7.8
1.00
0.2
8.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

2
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
677

6
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
489

0.01
0.02
12.1
1.00
0.0
12.1
B
12.1
B

c0.30
0.81
17.1
1.00
13.5
30.6
C
23.7
C

6
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
575
0.17
0.47
14.5
1.00
2.7
17.2
B

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AB 9

APENDICE AC
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 4

AC-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
113%
81
0
81
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1711
1.00
1711
0.92
113%
260
51
453

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.18
335
0.92
113%
66
0
66
pm+pt
3
8
25.6
25.6
0.43
4.0
3.0
228
0.02
0.11
0.29
12.6
0.66
0.6
8.9
A

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
1.00
1664
1.00
1664
0.92
113%
231
107
556

352
1900

63
1900

51
1900

292
1900

0.92
113%
432
0
0

0.92
113%
77
0
0
Perm

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1750
0.55
978
0.92
113%
96
23
213

0.92
113%
63
0
0

0.92
113%
359
0
0
Perm

201
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1792
0.70
1287
0.92
113%
247
0
606

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
48
9
39
Perm

18.0
18.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
526
0.05
0.15
15.4
1.00
0.6
16.0
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
113%
244
0
0

4
18.0
18.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
513
0.26
0.88
20.0
1.00
19.3
39.3
D
36.1
D
37.4
0.93
60.0
97.9%
15

8!

2
25.6
25.6
0.43
4.0
3.0
710
c0.33
0.78
14.8
0.65
6.9
16.5
B
15.8
B

6
26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
430

26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
566

0.22
0.50
12.0
1.00
4.0
16.1
B
16.1
B

c0.47
1.07
16.8
1.00
58.2
75.0
E
70.2
E

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
690
0.02
0.06
9.6
1.00
0.2
9.8
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.25
461
0.92
113%
151
0
151
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
467
0
467

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
65
48
17
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.25
461
0.92
113%
129
0
129
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1773
1.00
1773
0.92
113%
316
21
406

90
1900

114
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
121%
150
0
150
Split
2

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
121%
84
0
84

228
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
300
220
80
Perm

125
1900

30
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1773
0.71
1312
0.92
113%
37
0
191

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
264
194
70
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
418

8
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
123

0.01
0.04
16.3
0.81
0.1
13.2
B

0.28
1.05
22.0
0.95
38.2
59.2
E

4
4
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
123
c0.33
1.23
22.0
0.75
127.0
143.5
F

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
492
0.25
0.95
21.6
0.76
15.6
32.0
C
54.9
D

0.92
113%
111
0
0

33.2
0.70
60.0
59.3%
15

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
473
0.23

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
467
c0.09

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
492
0.05

0.86
20.9
0.95
2.0
21.8
C
30.5
C

0.32
17.6
0.98
1.8
19.0
B

0.17
16.9
0.99
0.7
17.4
B
18.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
154
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
418
0.05
0.19
17.0
1.08
1.0
19.3
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
350
c0.15
0.55
18.9
1.00
6.0
24.9
C
20.8
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
418
0.04
0.17
16.9
1.00
0.9
17.8
B

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1688
0.99
1688
0.92
119%
128
74
500

245
1900

240
1900

156
1900

118
1900

0.92
119%
310
0
0
Perm

0.92
119%
202
0
0

0.92
113%
145
0
0
Perm

567
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.68
1249
0.92
113%
696
0
841

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
79
46
33
Perm

152
1900

0.92
119%
317
0
0

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1735
0.61
1077
0.92
119%
195
24
683

173
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1802
0.12
217
0.92
119%
224
0
421

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
62
16
46
Perm

0.92
119%
129
0
0
Split
2

6
6

9.0
9.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
253
c0.30
1.98
25.5
1.00
453.4
478.9
F
478.9
F
672.1
3.59
60.0
139.1%
15

4
4

14.0
14.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
251

25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
520

c0.63
2.72
23.0
1.00
786.1
809.1
F
809.1
F

0.67
1.62
17.5
0.47
283.7
292.1
F
267.2
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
119%
197
0
0
Perm

8
4
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
653
0.02
0.05
10.4
0.27
0.0
2.9
A

8
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
90
c1.94
4.68
17.5
0.65
1677.5
1688.8
F
1472.2
F

8
25.0
25.0
0.42
4.0
3.0
653
0.03
0.07
10.5
0.16
0.2
1.9
A

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
113%
391
0
391

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
244
196
48
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3430
0.65
2278
0.92
119%
300
0
535

0
1900

724
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
119%
936
0
683
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
119%
0
60
581

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
119%
388
0
0

0.92
100%
0
0
0
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
100%
2
0
2

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
722
c0.41

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
677
0.37

1.2
1.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
37
c0.00

0.95
16.3
0.75
3.1
15.5
B

0.86
15.3
0.72
1.1
12.2
B
13.9
B

0.05
28.8
1.00
0.6
29.5
C
29.5
C

0.92
113%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
689
0.11
0.57
21.8
1.00
3.4
25.2
C
23.6
C

2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
308
0.03
0.16
20.0
1.00
1.1
21.0
C

17.0
0.77
60.0
77.9%
15

0.92
119%
235
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0

6
20.8
20.8
0.35
4.0
8.0
886
c0.05
c0.16
0.60
16.2
0.96
1.3
16.8
B
16.8
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
100%
0
0
0

B
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
119%
154
0
154

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
119%
309
247
62
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.60
2108
0.92
119%
279
0
778

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.92
113%
236
80
306

122
1900

40.0
40.0
0.67
4.0
4.0
1577
c0.07
c0.26
0.49
5.0
0.44
0.2
2.5
A
2.5
A

28.0
28.0
0.47
4.0
4.0
1540
0.09

4
12.0
12.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
350
c0.09
0.44
21.1
1.00
1.2
22.3
C
21.0
C

4
12.0
12.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
314

0.92
119%
499
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.20
20.0
1.00
0.4
20.4
C

9.5
0.48
60.0
53.7%
15

0.92
113%
150
0
0

0.20
9.4
1.00
0.3
9.7
A
9.7
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB OFF Ramp

4/30/2010

Intersection Sign configuration not allowed in HCM analysis.

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


43: New Connector & PR-52 NB ON Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
15
0.92
20

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

19
0.92
25

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
20
20
0
0.25
4.2
0.02
844
7.3
7.3
A

NE 1
25
25
0
0.25
4.2
0.03
841
7.3
7.3
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.3
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

4/30/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.25
467
0.92
113%
119
0
119
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
948
0
948

0
1900

0
1900

45
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1840
0.99
1826
0.92
121%
59
0
62

0
1900

77
1900

0.92
113%
0
0
0
Perm

263
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
113%
323
129
194
Perm

2
1900

0.92
113%
0
0
0
Perm

596
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
113%
732
0
732

0.92
121%
0
0
0

0.92
121%
101
0
0
Perm

15
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1771
0.73
1353
0.92
121%
20
0
121

96
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
121%
126
92
34
Perm

4
4
36.0
36.0
0.60
4.0
280
0.25
0.42
6.4
1.00
4.7
11.1
B

0.92
121%
3
0
0
Perm

36.0
36.0
0.60
4.0
1107
c0.51

36.0
36.0
0.60
4.0
1107
0.40

0.86
9.9
1.00
8.6
18.4
B
17.6
B

0.66
8.0
1.00
3.1
11.1
B
9.5
A
12.8
0.70
60.0
72.0%
15

2
8
36.0
36.0
0.60
4.0
941
0.12
0.21
5.5
1.00
0.5
6.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
487

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
361

0.03
0.13
16.7
1.00
0.5
17.2
B
17.2
B

c0.09
0.34
17.7
0.34
1.8
7.9
A
4.9
A

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
418
0.02
0.08
16.5
0.11
0.3
2.1
A

B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AC 9

APENDICE AD
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4

AD-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
151
0
151
3%
Prot
4!

448
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1753
1.00
1753
0.92
125%
609
12
901
3%

224
1900

31
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.08
148
0.92
125%
42
0
42
3%
pm+pt
3
8
54.8
54.8
0.36
4.0
3.0
105
0.01
0.13
0.40
38.5
1.00
2.5
41.0
D

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.92
1.00
1698
1.00
1698
0.92
125%
268
27
544
3%

223
1900

93
1900

106
1900

374
1900

0.92
125%
303
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
126
0
0
3%
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1769
0.33
590
0.92
125%
348
7
611
3%

0.92
125%
144
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
508
0
0
3%
Perm

245
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1791
0.47
870
0.92
125%
333
0
841
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
111
6
105
3%
Perm

46.0
46.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
534
0.09
0.28
39.9
1.00
1.3
41.2
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
304
0
0
3%

4
46.0
46.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
535
c0.51
1.68
52.4
1.00
316.1
368.5
F
322.0
F
278.7
1.72
150.8
138.2%
15

8!

2
54.8
54.8
0.36
4.0
3.0
617
c0.32
0.88
45.0
1.00
16.6
61.6
E
60.2
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
88.0
88.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
344

88.0
88.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
508

c1.03
1.77
31.4
1.00
360.2
391.6
F
391.6
F

0.97
1.66
31.4
1.00
303.7
335.1
F
297.7
F

6
88.0
88.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
915
0.07
0.11
14.0
1.00
0.3
14.3
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.41
758
0.92
125%
144
0
144
3%
Perm

548
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
745
0
745
3%

274
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
372
107
265
3%
Perm

280
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.29
536
0.92
125%
380
0
380
3%
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.92
125%
367
13
514
3%

118
1900

131
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.51
940
0.92
142%
202
0
202
3%
Perm

32
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
49
0
49
3%

133
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
205
159
46
3%
Perm

58
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1803
0.84
1542
0.92
125%
90
0
169
3%

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
68
53
15
3%
Perm

4
89.0
89.0
0.71
4.0
1116

8
89.0
89.0
0.71
4.0
382

0.17
0.24
6.2
1.00
0.5
6.7
A

c0.71
0.99
17.8
1.00
44.8
62.5
E

4
4
89.0
89.0
0.71
4.0
540
0.19
0.27
6.4
1.00
1.2
7.6
A

89.0
89.0
0.71
4.0
1314
0.40
0.57
8.7
1.00
1.8
10.5
B
9.0
A

0.92
125%
160
0
0
3%

28.1
0.99
125.0
82.4%
15

89.0
89.0
0.71
4.0
1254
0.29
0.41
7.3
1.00
1.0
8.3
A
31.0
C

2
2
28.0
28.0
0.22
4.0
211
c0.21
0.96
47.9
1.00
51.8
99.7
F

28.0
28.0
0.22
4.0
413
0.03
0.12
38.7
1.00
0.6
39.2
D
66.2
E

6
2
28.0
28.0
0.22
4.0
351
0.03
0.13
38.8
1.00
0.8
39.5
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
79
0
0
3%
Perm
6

28.0
28.0
0.22
4.0
345
0.11
0.49
42.3
1.00
4.9
47.2
D
44.6
D

6
28.0
28.0
0.22
4.0
351
0.01
0.04
38.0
1.00
0.2
38.2
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

142
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1699
0.99
1699
0.92
138%
242
53
872
3%

313
1900

97
1900

193
1900

190
1900

0.92
138%
146
0
0
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
290
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
258
0
0
3%
Perm

432
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1817
0.25
464
0.92
125%
587
0
845
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
159
87
72
3%
Perm

100
1900

0.92
138%
470
0
0
3%

123
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
0.99
1708
0.63
1092
0.92
138%
184
46
574
3%

333
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1824
0.08
151
0.92
138%
500
0
650
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
81
11
70
3%
Perm

0.92
138%
213
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
388
c0.51
2.25
27.0
1.00
569.3
596.3
F
596.3
F
1546.6
6.45
70.0
148.4%
15

4
4

12.0
12.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
187

30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
199

c0.53
3.07
29.0
1.00
946.4
975.4
F
975.4
F

1.82
4.25
20.0
1.00
1472.5
1492.5
F
1258.1
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
150
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
672
0.05
0.11
12.0
1.00
0.1
12.1
B

8
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
65
c4.29
10.00
20.0
0.45
4072.6
4081.6
F
3629.6
F

8
30.0
30.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
672
0.04
0.10
12.0
0.22
0.2
2.9
A

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
125%
303
0
303
3%

227
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
308
242
66
3%
Perm

260
1900

227
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3414
0.67
2340
0.92
138%
340
0
730
3%

0
1900

601
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
902
0
658
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1564
0.98
1564
0.92
138%
0
47
559
3%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
138%
362
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%
Split
4

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

38.0
38.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
904
c0.40

38.0
38.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
849
0.36

0.73
12.1
0.60
0.3
7.5
A

0.66
11.4
0.52
0.2
6.1
A
6.8
A

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

2
15.0
15.0
0.21
4.0
8.0
751
0.09
0.40
23.7
1.00
1.6
25.3
C
24.6
C

2
15.0
15.0
0.21
4.0
8.0
336
0.04
0.20
22.6
1.00
1.3
23.9
C

0.92
138%
390
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
3%

6
24.0
24.0
0.34
4.0
8.0
879
c0.06
c0.23
1.00dl
21.1
0.83
6.7
24.4
C
24.4
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
15.9
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.76
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
70.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
75.5%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
380
314
66
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.61
2124
0.92
138%
219
0
696
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
33
391
3%

78
1900

49.9
49.9
0.71
4.0
4.0
1659
c0.05
c0.25
0.42
4.1
0.34
0.2
1.6
A
1.6
A

37.9
37.9
0.54
4.0
4.0
1826
0.12

4
12.1
12.1
0.17
4.0
4.0
303
c0.07
0.40
25.7
1.00
1.2
26.9
C
25.9
C

4
12.1
12.1
0.17
4.0
4.0
271

0.92
138%
477
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.24
25.0
1.00
0.6
25.6
C

10.9
0.41
70.0
52.2%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.21
8.3
1.00
0.3
8.6
A
8.6
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB Off Ramp

4/23/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBR

SWL

SWR

0
0.92
0

Stop
6
0.92
9

0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
8
0.92
12

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
9
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
905
7.0
7.0
A

WB 1
12
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
907
7.0
7.0
A

SW 1
0
0
0
0.00
3.9
0.00
900
6.9
0.0
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.0
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB On Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
6
0.92
9

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

8
0.92
12

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
9
9
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
853
7.2
7.2
A

NE 1
12
12
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
848
7.2
7.2
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.2
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

4/23/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


41: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.24
443
0.92
142%
290
0
290
3%
Perm

502
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
775
0
775
3%

0
1900

0
1900

8
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
12
0
12
3%

295
1900

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

100
0
1900
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
0.92
142% 142%
154
0
42
0
112
0
3%
3%
Perm custom

0
1900

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

473
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
730
0
730
3%

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%

0.92
142%
455
0
0
3%
Perm

6
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1758
0.72
1332
0.92
142%
9
0
464
3%

319
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
492
154
338
3%
Perm

4
4
54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
266
c0.65
1.09
18.0
1.00
81.4
99.4
F

54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
1107
0.42

54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
1107
0.40

0.70
12.4
1.00
3.7
16.1
B
38.8
D

0.66
11.9
1.00
3.1
15.0
B
13.8
B
42.2
1.10
90.0
90.5%
15

6
8
54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
941
0.07
0.12
7.8
1.00
0.3
8.0
A

2
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
574

6
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
414

0.01
0.02
21.5
1.00
0.1
21.6
C
21.6
C

c0.35
1.12
31.0
1.00
81.3
112.3
F
72.6
E

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
488
0.22
0.69
27.2
1.00
7.9
35.1
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AD 9

APENDICE AE
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4

AE-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1711
1.00
1711
0.92
125%
288
33
525

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.11
211
0.92
125%
73
0
73
pm+pt
3
8
39.8
39.8
0.39
4.0
3.0
157
0.02
0.16
0.46
41.9
1.00
2.2
44.1
D

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
1.00
1664
1.00
1664
0.92
125%
255
67
666

352
1900

63
1900

51
1900

292
1900

0.92
125%
478
0
0

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1750
0.49
879
0.92
125%
106
13
248

0.92
125%
69
0
0

0.92
125%
397
0
0
Perm

201
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1792
0.67
1230
0.92
125%
273
0
670

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
53
5
48
Perm

31.0
31.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
539
0.05
0.17
25.5
1.00
0.7
26.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
125%
270
0
0

4
31.0
31.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
526
0.31
1.00
34.9
1.00
38.7
73.5
E
67.0
E
60.8
1.03
100.8
106.2%
15

8!

2
39.8
39.8
0.39
4.0
3.0
657
c0.40
1.01
30.5
1.00
38.5
69.0
E
66.7
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
53.0
53.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
462

53.0
53.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
647

0.28
0.54
15.8
1.00
1.2
17.0
B
17.0
B

c0.54
1.04
23.9
1.00
44.9
68.8
E
64.6
E

6
53.0
53.0
0.53
4.0
3.0
824
0.03
0.06
11.7
1.00
0.1
11.8
B

E
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.27
504
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
516
0
516

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
72
45
27
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
413
0.92
125%
143
0
143
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1773
1.00
1773
0.92
125%
349
18
453

90
1900

114
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
142%
176
0
176
Split
2

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
99
0
99

228
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
352
207
145
Perm

125
1900

30
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1773
0.70
1294
0.92
125%
41
0
211

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
292
225
67
Perm

4
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
582

8
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
153

0.02
0.05
14.1
1.00
0.1
14.2
B

c0.35
0.93
21.2
1.00
57.2
78.3
E

4
4
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
187
0.33
0.89
20.7
1.00
42.6
63.3
E

26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
685
0.28
0.75
19.2
1.00
7.5
26.7
C
33.6
C

0.92
125%
122
0
0

31.7
0.74
70.0
65.7%
15

26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
659
0.26

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
400
c0.10

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
422
0.05

0.69
18.6
1.00
5.8
24.3
C
36.9
D

0.44
23.2
1.00
3.5
26.6
C

0.23
22.0
1.00
1.3
23.3
C
26.0
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
170
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
358
0.09
0.41
23.0
1.00
3.4
26.3
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
296
c0.16
0.71
24.9
1.00
13.7
38.5
D
29.5
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
358
0.04
0.19
21.8
1.00
1.1
22.9
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1688
0.99
1688
0.92
138%
148
69
597

245
1900

240
1900

156
1900

118
1900

0.92
138%
360
0
0
Perm

0.92
138%
234
0
0

0.92
125%
160
0
0
Perm

567
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.52
963
0.92
125%
770
0
930

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
87
47
40
Perm

152
1900

0.92
138%
368
0
0

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1735
0.57
1014
0.92
138%
226
22
798

173
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1803
0.11
208
0.92
138%
260
0
488

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
72
15
57
Perm

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

6
6

10.0
10.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
260
c0.35
2.30
27.5
1.00
596.1
623.6
F
623.6
F
945.0
4.28
65.0
157.5%
15

4
4

17.0
17.0
0.26
4.0
3.0
265

26.0
26.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
385

c0.79
3.01
24.0
1.00
914.9
938.9
F
938.9
F

0.97
2.42
19.5
1.00
644.9
664.4
F
608.6
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
228
0
0
Perm

8
4
26.0
26.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
627
0.03
0.06
12.0
1.00
0.0
12.1
B

8
26.0
26.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
83
c2.34
5.88
19.5
0.85
2217.3
2233.8
F
1947.3
F

8
26.0
26.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
627
0.04
0.09
12.1
0.46
0.2
5.8
A

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
125%
432
0
432

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
221
49
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3429
0.62
2159
0.92
138%
348
0
621

0
1900

724
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
1086
0
793
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
138%
0
55
688

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
138%
450
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
3
0
3

31.0
31.0
0.48
4.0
3.0
794
c0.48

31.0
31.0
0.48
4.0
3.0
745
0.44

1.2
1.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
34
c0.00

1.00
17.0
0.75
9.2
22.0
C

0.92
15.9
0.72
2.1
13.6
B
17.9
B

0.09
31.4
1.00
1.1
32.5
C
32.5
C

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.18
4.0
8.0
636
0.12
0.68
24.8
1.00
5.8
30.6
C
28.0
C

2
11.8
11.8
0.18
4.0
8.0
285
0.03
0.17
22.5
1.00
1.3
23.8
C

21.7
0.88
65.0
85.6%
15

0.92
138%
273
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
20.8
20.8
0.32
4.0
8.0
789
c0.06
c0.19
0.79
20.1
0.93
5.2
23.9
C
23.9
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
358
285
73
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.61
2148
0.92
138%
324
0
903

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
85
342

122
1900

43.8
43.8
0.67
4.0
4.0
1601
c0.07
c0.31
0.56
5.6
0.37
0.4
2.5
A
2.5
A

31.8
31.8
0.49
4.0
4.0
1614
0.10

4
13.2
13.2
0.20
4.0
4.0
356
c0.10
0.50
23.0
1.00
1.5
24.5
C
22.9
C

4
13.2
13.2
0.20
4.0
4.0
318

0.92
138%
579
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.23
21.6
1.00
0.5
22.1
C

10.0
0.54
65.0
60.1%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.21
9.5
1.00
0.3
9.8
A
9.8
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB OFF Ramp

4/30/2010

Intersection Sign configuration not allowed in HCM analysis.

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


43: New Connector & PR-52 NB ON Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
15
0.92
23

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

19
0.92
29

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
23
23
0
0.25
4.2
0.03
842
7.3
7.3
A

NE 1
29
29
0
0.25
4.2
0.03
839
7.4
7.4
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.3
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

4/30/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
411
0.92
125%
132
0
132
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
1049
0
1049

0
1900

0
1900

45
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1841
0.99
1828
0.92
142%
69
0
72

0
1900

77
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

263
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
357
122
235
Perm

2
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

596
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
810
0
810

0.92
142%
0
0
0

0.92
142%
119
0
0
Perm

15
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1770
0.77
1423
0.92
142%
23
0
142

96
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
148
112
36
Perm

4
4
41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
259
0.32
0.51
6.5
1.00
7.0
13.5
B

0.92
142%
3
0
0
Perm

41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
1164
c0.57

41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
1164
0.44

0.90
10.3
1.00
11.3
21.5
C
20.6
C

0.70
7.9
1.00
3.5
11.3
B
9.6
A
16.0
0.76
65.0
78.0%
15

2
8
41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
989
0.15
0.24
5.2
1.00
0.6
5.8
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
450

16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
350

0.04
0.16
19.2
1.00
0.8
20.0
B
20.0
B

c0.10
0.41
20.5
1.00
3.5
24.0
C
21.6
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
386
0.02
0.09
18.9
1.00
0.5
19.4
B

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AE 9

APENDICE AF
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4
con Mejoras Adicionales

AF-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
151
0
151
3%
Prot
4!

448
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
609
0
609
3%

224
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
304
78
226
3%
custom

197
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
268
0
268
3%

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
303
191
112
3%
Perm

93
1900

256
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.68
1260
0.92
125%
348
0
474
3%

106
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
144
51
93
3%
Perm

374
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.38
710
0.92
125%
508
0
508
3%
Perm

245
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1775
1.00
1775
0.92
125%
333
11
433
3%

82
1900

4
33.0
33.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
554

4
33.0
33.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
470

2
61.4
61.4
0.56
4.0
3.0
875

6
61.4
61.4
0.56
4.0
3.0
396

c0.33
1.10
38.5
1.00
68.2
106.7
F
75.5
E

0.14
0.48
31.5
1.00
3.5
35.0
D

31
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.11
199
0.92
125%
42
0
42
3%
pm+pt
3
8
40.6
40.6
0.37
4.0
3.0
124
0.01
0.11
0.34
48.8
0.74
1.4
37.7
D

0.06
0.11
11.4
1.00
0.2
11.7
B

c0.72
1.28
24.3
1.00
145.3
169.6
F

33.0
33.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
526
0.09
0.29
29.5
1.00
1.4
30.9
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

59.7
1.15
110.0
97.0%
15

0.92
125%
126
0
0
3%
Perm

8!
40.6
40.6
0.37
4.0
3.0
681
c0.15
0.39
25.6
0.70
1.4
19.4
B
13.5
B

2
8
40.6
40.6
0.37
4.0
3.0
579
0.07
0.19
23.6
0.19
0.6
5.1
A

2
61.4
61.4
0.56
4.0
3.0
703
0.38
0.67
17.2
1.00
5.1
22.3
C
19.8
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
111
0
0
3%

6
61.4
61.4
0.56
4.0
3.0
991
0.24
0.44
14.2
1.00
1.4
15.6
B
97.8
F

E
8.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

106
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.41
762
0.92
125%
144
0
144
3%
Perm

548
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
745
0
745
3%

274
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
372
108
264
3%
Perm

280
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.29
537
0.92
125%
380
0
380
3%
Perm

270
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
1.00
1761
1.00
1761
0.92
125%
367
14
513
3%

118
1900

131
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.52
954
0.92
142%
202
0
202
3%
Perm

32
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
49
0
49
3%

133
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
205
160
45
3%
Perm

58
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1803
0.84
1543
0.92
125%
90
0
169
3%

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
68
53
15
3%
Perm

4
78.0
78.0
0.71
4.0
1112

8
78.0
78.0
0.71
4.0
381

0.17
0.24
5.6
0.39
0.0
2.2
A

c0.71
1.00
15.9
0.83
37.7
50.9
D

4
4
78.0
78.0
0.71
4.0
540
0.19
0.27
5.7
0.41
0.1
2.5
A

78.0
78.0
0.71
4.0
1308
0.40
0.57
7.8
0.40
0.2
3.3
A
2.9
A

0.92
125%
160
0
0
3%

22.3
0.99
110.0
82.4%
15

78.0
78.0
0.71
4.0
1249
0.29
0.41
6.6
0.59
0.7
4.6
A
24.0
C

0.92
125%
79
0
0
3%
Perm

2
2
24.0
24.0
0.22
4.0
208
c0.21
0.97
42.7
1.00
55.3
98.0
F

24.0
24.0
0.22
4.0
403
0.03
0.12
34.5
1.00
0.6
35.2
D
63.1
E

6
2
24.0
24.0
0.22
4.0
342
0.03
0.13
34.6
1.00
0.8
35.4
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
24.0
24.0
0.22
4.0
337
0.11
0.50
37.7
1.00
5.3
43.0
D
40.5
D

6
24.0
24.0
0.22
4.0
342
0.01
0.04
33.9
1.00
0.2
34.2
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

142
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1802
0.98
1802
0.92
138%
242
0
455
3%

313
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
470
169
301
3%
Perm

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.50
923
0.92
138%
146
0
146
3%
Perm

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
184
0
184
3%

193
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
290
250
40
3%
Perm

190
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.26
477
0.92
125%
258
0
258
3%
Perm

432
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
587
0
587
3%

117
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
159
80
79
3%
Perm

100
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.25
468
0.92
138%
150
0
150
3%
Perm

333
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1806
1.00
1806
0.92
138%
500
5
576
3%

54
1900

2
29.0
29.0
0.26
4.0
3.0
413

6
15.0
15.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
126

6
15.0
15.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
214

4
54.0
54.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
234

4
54.0
54.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
770

8
54.0
54.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
230

0.19
0.73
36.9
1.00
10.7
47.6
D

c0.16
1.16
47.5
1.00
129.1
176.6
F

0.03
0.18
42.1
1.00
1.9
44.0
D

c0.54
1.10
28.0
1.08
84.7
114.9
F

0.05
0.10
15.0
1.85
0.1
27.8
C

0.32
0.65
21.0
0.63
11.5
24.8
C

0.92
138%
213
0
0
3%
Split
2

2
29.0
29.0
0.26
4.0
3.0
475
c0.25
0.96
39.9
1.00
32.0
71.9
E
59.6
E

50.4
1.07
110.0
86.7%
15

15.0
15.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
252
0.10
0.73
45.6
1.00
17.0
62.5
E
80.7
F

4
54.0
54.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
906
0.32
0.65
20.9
1.08
1.4
24.0
C
47.9
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
81
0
0
3%

8
54.0
54.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
887
0.32
0.65
20.9
0.55
3.1
14.5
B
16.6
B

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
125%
303
0
303
3%

227
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
308
201
107
3%
Perm

260
1900

227
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3414
0.63
2202
0.92
138%
340
0
730
3%

0
1900

601
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
902
0
658
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1564
0.98
1564
0.92
138%
0
42
564
3%

241
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
138%
362
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%
Split
4

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

53.7
53.7
0.49
4.0
3.0
813
c0.40

53.7
53.7
0.49
4.0
3.0
764
0.36

0.81
23.8
0.68
4.0
20.2
C

0.74
22.5
0.64
2.5
16.9
B
18.6
B

0.92
125%
0
0
0
3%

2
38.1
38.1
0.35
4.0
8.0
1214
0.09
0.25
25.7
1.00
0.5
26.2
C
26.1
C

2
38.1
38.1
0.35
4.0
8.0
543
0.07
0.20
25.2
1.00
0.8
26.0
C

0.92
138%
390
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
3%

6
48.3
48.3
0.44
4.0
8.0
1035
c0.04
c0.27
0.90dl
25.1
0.93
2.3
25.5
C
25.5
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
22.3
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.76
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
110.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
75.5%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.0
A
C
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
120
0
120
3%

253
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
380
330
50
3%
Perm

318
1900

146
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3389
0.60
2104
0.92
138%
219
0
696
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.92
125%
318
17
407
3%

78
1900

87.6
87.6
0.80
4.0
4.0
1769
c0.03
c0.28
0.39
3.3
0.87
0.2
3.1
A
3.1
A

75.6
75.6
0.69
4.0
4.0
2318
0.12

4
14.4
14.4
0.13
4.0
4.0
229
c0.07
0.52
44.6
1.00
2.8
47.4
D
44.6
D

4
14.4
14.4
0.13
4.0
4.0
205

0.92
138%
477
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.03
0.24
42.9
1.00
0.8
43.7
D

16.7
0.41
110.0
52.2%
15

0.92
125%
106
0
0
3%

0.18
6.1
1.00
0.2
6.3
A
6.3
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB Off Ramp

4/30/2010

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBR

SWL

SWR

0
0.92
0

Stop
6
0.92
9

0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
8
0.92
12

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
9
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
905
7.0
7.0
A

WB 1
12
0
0
0.03
3.9
0.01
907
7.0
7.0
A

SW 1
0
0
0
0.00
3.9
0.00
900
6.9
0.0
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.0
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB ON Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
6
0.92
9

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

8
0.92
12

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
9
9
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
853
7.2
7.2
A

NE 1
12
12
0
0.25
4.2
0.01
848
7.2
7.2
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.2
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

4/30/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


41: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.24
443
0.92
142%
290
0
290
3%
Perm

502
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
775
0
775
3%

0
1900

0
1900

8
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
12
0
12
3%

295
1900

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

100
0
1900
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
0.92
142% 142%
154
0
42
0
112
0
3%
3%
Perm custom

0
1900

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%
Perm

473
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
730
0
730
3%

0.92
142%
0
0
0
3%

0.92
142%
455
0
0
3%
Perm

6
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1758
0.72
1332
0.92
142%
9
0
464
3%

319
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
492
154
338
3%
Perm

4
4
54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
266
c0.65
1.09
18.0
1.00
81.4
99.4
F

54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
1107
0.42

54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
1107
0.40

0.70
12.4
1.00
3.7
16.1
B
38.8
D

0.66
11.9
1.00
3.1
15.0
B
13.8
B
42.2
1.10
90.0
90.5%
15

6
8
54.0
54.0
0.60
4.0
941
0.07
0.12
7.8
1.00
0.3
8.0
A

2
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
574

6
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
414

0.01
0.02
21.5
1.00
0.1
21.6
C
21.6
C

c0.35
1.12
31.0
1.00
81.3
112.3
F
72.6
E

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
E

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Fuuture Alternative 4 year 2028 with improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
488
0.22
0.69
27.2
1.00
7.9
35.1
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AF 9

APENDICE AG
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 4
con Mejoras Adicionales

AG-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
125%
90
0
90
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
288
0
288

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
198
72
custom

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
255
0
255

352
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
478
294
184
Perm

63
1900

78
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1804
0.76
1402
0.92
125%
106
0
192

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
69
34
35
Perm

292
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.63
1163
0.92
125%
397
0
397
Perm

201
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1800
1.00
1800
0.92
125%
273
9
317

39
1900

4
20.0
20.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
492

4
20.0
20.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
418

2
38.2
38.2
0.51
4.0
3.0
799

6
38.2
38.2
0.51
4.0
3.0
592

c0.16
0.59
23.9
1.00
5.0
28.9
C
25.1
C

0.05
0.17
21.1
1.00
0.9
22.0
C

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.43
786
0.92
125%
73
0
73
pm+pt
3
8
28.8
28.8
0.38
4.0
3.0
364
0.01
0.06
0.20
19.8
0.73
0.2
14.6
B

0.02
0.04
9.2
1.00
0.1
9.3
A

c0.34
0.67
13.7
1.00
6.0
19.7
B

20.0
20.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
467
0.05
0.19
21.3
1.00
0.9
22.2
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

18.3
0.60
75.0
62.1%
15

0.92
125%
86
0
0
Perm

8!
28.8
28.8
0.38
4.0
3.0
708
c0.14
0.36
16.5
0.72
1.2
13.1
B
17.1
B

2
8
28.8
28.8
0.38
4.0
3.0
602
0.12
0.30
16.1
1.15
1.1
19.6
B

2
38.2
38.2
0.51
4.0
3.0
714
0.14
0.27
10.5
1.00
0.9
11.4
B
10.8
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
53
0
0

6
38.2
38.2
0.51
4.0
3.0
917
0.18
0.35
11.0
1.00
1.0
12.0
B
16.2
B

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.30
547
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
516
0
516

53
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
72
43
29
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.25
463
0.92
125%
143
0
143
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1773
1.00
1773
0.92
125%
349
17
454

90
1900

114
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
142%
176
0
176
Split
2

64
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
142%
99
0
99

228
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
352
206
146
Perm

125
1900

30
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1773
0.70
1294
0.92
125%
41
0
211

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
292
230
62
Perm

4
30.0
30.0
0.40
4.0
627

8
30.0
30.0
0.40
4.0
185

0.02
0.05
13.8
0.99
0.1
13.7
B

c0.31
0.77
19.5
1.00
26.3
45.9
D

4
4
30.0
30.0
0.40
4.0
219
0.31
0.76
19.4
0.72
18.5
32.4
C

30.0
30.0
0.40
4.0
738
0.28
0.70
18.7
0.72
4.5
18.0
B
20.8
C

0.92
125%
122
0
0

27.0
0.68
75.0
65.7%
15

0.92
125%
170
0
0
Perm

30.0
30.0
0.40
4.0
709
0.26

17.0
17.0
0.23
4.0
397
c0.10

17.0
17.0
0.23
4.0
418
0.05

0.64
18.2
1.00
4.4
22.6
C
28.0
C

0.44
24.9
1.00
3.6
28.5
C

0.24
23.7
1.00
1.3
25.0
C
27.8
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
17.0
17.0
0.23
4.0
355
0.09
0.41
24.7
1.00
3.5
28.2
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
276
c0.16
0.76
27.7
1.00
18.1
45.8
D
34.0
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.21
4.0
335
0.04
0.19
24.2
1.00
1.2
25.4
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1799
0.98
1799
0.92
138%
148
0
298

245
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
368
137
231
Perm

240
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.58
1066
0.92
138%
360
0
360
Perm

151
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
138%
226
0
226

156
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
234
133
101
Perm

118
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.48
891
0.92
125%
160
0
160
Perm

567
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
770
0
770

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
87
26
61
Perm

152
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.16
292
0.92
138%
228
0
228
Perm

173
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1785
1.00
1785
0.92
138%
260
7
325

48
1900

2
20.0
20.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
224

6
32.0
32.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
244

6
32.0
32.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
358

4
76.0
76.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
484

4
76.0
76.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
851

8
76.0
76.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
159

0.15
1.03
60.0
1.00
68.3
128.3
F

c0.34
1.48
54.0
1.00
234.8
288.8
F

0.06
0.28
44.5
1.00
2.0
46.5
D

0.18
0.33
17.8
1.00
0.4
18.2
B

0.04
0.07
15.2
1.00
0.0
15.3
B

c0.78
1.43
32.0
1.00
227.4
259.4
F

0.92
138%
150
0
0
Split
2

2
20.0
20.0
0.14
4.0
3.0
257
c0.17
1.16
60.0
1.00
106.2
166.2
F
145.3
F

102.9
1.40
140.0
95.4%
15

32.0
32.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
422
0.12
0.54
47.5
1.00
4.8
52.3
D
154.5
F

4
76.0
76.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
1002
0.42
0.77
25.1
1.00
3.6
28.7
C
25.9
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
138%
72
0
0

8
76.0
76.0
0.54
4.0
3.0
969
0.18
0.34
17.9
1.00
0.9
18.8
B
116.8
F

F
12.0
F

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
125%
432
0
432

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
270
228
42
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3429
0.59
2084
0.92
138%
348
0
621

0
1900

724
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.92
138%
1086
0
793
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
138%
0
48
695

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.92
138%
450
0
0

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
3
0
3

41.0
41.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
910
c0.48

41.0
41.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
854
0.44

1.2
1.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
30
c0.00

0.87
14.7
1.00
9.2
23.9
C

0.81
13.9
1.00
6.0
19.9
B
21.9
C

0.10
36.4
1.00
1.5
37.8
D
37.8
D

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.16
4.0
8.0
551
0.12
0.78
30.4
1.00
10.7
41.1
D
36.4
D

2
11.8
11.8
0.16
4.0
8.0
247
0.03
0.17
27.4
1.00
1.5
28.9
C

0.92
138%
273
0
0
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0

6
20.8
20.8
0.28
4.0
8.0
668
c0.06
c0.20
0.99dl
26.4
0.88
18.7
41.9
D
41.9
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
29.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.86
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
75.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
85.6%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.92
138%
178
0
178

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
138%
358
290
68
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.61
2138
0.92
138%
324
0
903

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3300
1.00
3300
0.92
125%
261
76
351

122
1900

52.8
52.8
0.70
4.0
4.0
1639
c0.06
c0.33
0.55
5.4
0.41
0.3
2.6
A
2.6
A

40.8
40.8
0.54
4.0
4.0
1795
0.11

4
14.2
14.2
0.19
4.0
4.0
332
c0.10
0.54
27.4
1.00
2.1
29.6
C
27.4
C

4
14.2
14.2
0.19
4.0
4.0
297

0.92
138%
579
0
0
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.23
25.8
1.00
0.5
26.3
C

11.2
0.54
75.0
60.1%
15

0.92
125%
166
0
0

0.20
8.7
1.00
0.2
9.0
A
9.0
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 6

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB OFF Ramp

4/30/2010

Intersection Sign configuration not allowed in HCM analysis.

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 7

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


43: New Connector & PR-52 NB ON Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Sign Control
Volume (vph)
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate (vph)

EBL

EBR

SBR

NEL2

NEL

Stop
15
0.92
23

0
0.92
0

Stop
0
0.92
0

19
0.92
29

Stop
0
0.92
0

Direction, Lane #
Volume Total (vph)
Volume Left (vph)
Volume Right (vph)
Hadj (s)
Departure Headway (s)
Degree Utilization, x
Capacity (veh/h)
Control Delay (s)
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

EB 1
23
23
0
0.25
4.2
0.03
842
7.3
7.3
A

NE 1
29
29
0
0.25
4.2
0.03
839
7.4
7.4
A

Intersection Summary
Delay
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)

7.3
A
13.3%
15

ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

4/30/2010

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.22
411
0.92
125%
132
0
132
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
1049
0
1049

0
1900

0
1900

45
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1841
0.99
1828
0.92
142%
69
0
72

0
1900

77
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

263
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
357
122
235
Perm

2
1900

0.92
125%
0
0
0
Perm

596
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.92
125%
810
0
810

0.92
142%
0
0
0

0.92
142%
119
0
0
Perm

15
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1770
0.77
1423
0.92
142%
23
0
142

96
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
148
112
36
Perm

4
4
41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
259
0.32
0.51
6.5
1.00
7.0
13.5
B

0.92
142%
3
0
0
Perm

41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
1164
c0.57

41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
1164
0.44

0.90
10.3
1.00
11.3
21.5
C
20.6
C

0.70
7.9
1.00
3.5
11.3
B
9.6
A
16.0
0.76
65.0
78.0%
15

2
8
41.0
41.0
0.63
4.0
989
0.15
0.24
5.2
1.00
0.6
5.8
A

6
16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
450

16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
350

0.04
0.16
19.2
1.00
0.8
20.0
B
20.0
B

c0.10
0.41
20.5
1.00
3.5
24.0
C
21.6
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 4 year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
16.0
16.0
0.25
4.0
386
0.02
0.09
18.9
1.00
0.5
19.4
B

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AG 9

APENDICE AH
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 5

AH-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
113%
179
0
179
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1730
1.00
1730
0.70
113%
623
17
1050
3%

275
1900

44
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.75
113%
66
0
66
3%
Prot
3

157
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1715
1.00
1715
0.75
113%
237
21
425
3%

139
1900

93
1900

107
1900

209
1900

0.75
113%
209
0
0
3%

0.80
113%
131
0
0
3%
Perm

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1767
0.35
624
0.80
113%
353
8
627
3%

0.80
113%
151
0
0
3%

0.90
113%
262
0
0
3%
Perm

396
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1813
0.59
1090
0.90
113%
497
0
759
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
113%
103
6
97
3%
Perm

50.0
50.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
584
0.10
0.31
37.1
1.00
1.4
38.5
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
113%
444
0
0
3%

4
50.0
50.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
577

8!

c0.61
1.82
50.0
1.00
375.4
425.4
F
369.8
F
272.9
1.79
150.0
124.9%
15

6.0
6.0
0.04
4.0
3.0
70
c0.04

60.0
60.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
686
0.25

0.94
71.8
1.00
87.3
159.1
F

0.62
35.9
1.00
4.2
40.1
D
55.4
E
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
341

82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
596

c1.01
1.84
34.0
1.00
389.0
423.0
F
423.0
F

0.70
1.27
34.0
1.00
135.8
169.8
F
151.5
F

6
82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
857
0.06
0.11
16.4
1.00
0.3
16.7
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory Entrance

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

159
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.54
1011
0.92
113%
195
0
195
Perm

266
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
327
0
327

276
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
339
186
153
Perm

282
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.47
881
0.92
113%
346
0
346
Perm

131
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1757
1.00
1757
0.92
113%
161
28
232

80
1900

148
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
121%
195
0
195
Split
2

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
46
0
46

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
199
159
40
Perm

57
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1821
0.84
1567
0.92
113%
81
0
151

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
61
49
12
Perm

4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
712

8
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
396

0.10
0.21
13.4
1.00
0.7
14.1
B

c0.39
0.87
19.9
1.00
22.5
42.5
D

4
4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
455
0.19
0.43
15.0
1.00
2.9
17.9
B

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
838
0.18
0.39
14.7
1.00
1.4
16.0
B
15.7
B

0.92
113%
98
0
0

24.6
0.71
80.0
60.1%
15

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
791
0.13

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
354
c0.11

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
373
0.02

0.29
13.9
1.00
0.9
14.9
B
30.7
C

0.55
28.8
1.00
6.1
34.8
C

0.12
26.2
1.00
0.7
26.9
C
30.5
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
70
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
317
0.03
0.13
26.3
1.00
0.8
27.1
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
313
c0.10
0.48
28.3
1.00
5.2
33.6
C
31.4
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
317
0.01
0.04
25.8
1.00
0.2
26.0
C

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

148
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1722
0.99
1722
0.91
119%
211
17
651
3%

200
1900

97
1900

157
1900

83
1900

0.91
119%
127
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
119%
205
0
0
3%

0.91
113%
103
0
0
3%
Perm

297
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.48
894
0.91
113%
369
0
472
3%

104
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
113%
129
63
66
3%
Perm

256
1900

0.91
119%
262
0
0
3%

175
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1734
0.72
1265
0.91
119%
229
15
546
3%

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1790
0.37
685
0.90
119%
216
0
554
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
119%
71
6
65
3%
Perm

0.91
119%
194
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

30.0
30.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
369
c0.38
1.76
55.0
1.00
354.2
409.2
F
409.2
F
324.6
1.77
140.0
110.6%
15

4
4

33.0
33.0
0.24
4.0
3.0
298

65.0
65.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
415

c0.43
1.83
53.5
1.00
388.1
441.6
F
441.6
F

0.53
1.14
37.5
1.00
87.3
124.8
F
102.5
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
119%
338
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
65.0
65.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
728
0.04
0.09
21.0
1.00
0.1
21.0
C

8
65.0
65.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
318
c0.81
1.74
37.5
1.00
346.8
384.3
F
343.0
F

8
65.0
65.0
0.46
4.0
3.0
728
0.04
0.09
21.0
1.00
0.2
21.2
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
113%
286
0
286
3%

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
113%
286
206
80
3%
Perm

260
1900

220
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3412
0.63
2218
0.83
119%
315
0
688
3%

0
1900

340
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
119%
435
0
391
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.87
0.99
1513
0.99
1513
0.92
119%
0
209
141
2%

239
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
119%
306
0
0
3%

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
100%
2
0
2
2%

17.2
17.2
0.32
4.0
3.0
526
c0.23

17.2
17.2
0.32
4.0
3.0
478
0.09

1.0
1.0
0.02
4.0
3.0
34
c0.00

0.74
16.6
1.00
5.6
22.3
C

0.29
14.0
1.00
0.3
14.4
B
18.5
B

0.06
26.2
1.00
0.7
27.0
C
27.0
C

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
15.2
15.2
0.28
4.0
8.0
979
0.08
0.29
15.4
1.00
0.7
16.1
B
15.9
B

2
15.2
15.2
0.28
4.0
8.0
438
0.05
0.18
14.9
1.00
0.9
15.7
B

16.3
0.65
54.4
66.2%
15

0.83
119%
373
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

6
24.2
24.2
0.44
4.0
8.0
1096
c0.06
c0.22
0.63
11.6
1.00
2.6
14.2
B
14.2
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%

B
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
119%
112
0
112
3%

265
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
119%
371
286
85
3%
Perm

272
1900

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3402
0.65
2283
0.89
119%
238
0
602
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.89
113%
297
74
322
3%

78
1900

22.0
22.0
0.57
4.0
4.0
1521
c0.08
c0.14
0.40
4.7
1.00
0.2
5.0
A
5.0
A

10.0
10.0
0.26
4.0
4.0
867
0.10

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
401
c0.06
0.28
12.4
1.00
0.5
12.9
B
12.7
B

4
8.9
8.9
0.23
4.0
4.0
359

0.89
119%
364
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.05
0.24
12.2
1.00
0.5
12.7
B

9.4
0.35
38.9
44.7%
15

0.89
113%
99
0
0
3%

0.37
11.9
1.00
0.4
12.2
B
12.2
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: PR-52 SB ON RAMP & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBR

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

551
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1746
0.96
1746
0.92
120%
719
13
866

123
1900

589
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
121%
775
0
775

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
259
186
73
Perm

137
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
121%
180
0
121
Prot
2!

145
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3351
0.95
3238
0.92
121%
191
0
250

31.5
31.5
0.57
4.0
3.0
922
0.08

47.0
47.0
0.85
4.0
3.0
2832
0.05
0.02
0.09
0.6
2.76
0.0
1.8
A
5.3
A

2!

0.92
120%
160
0
0

31.5
31.5
0.57
4.0
3.0
1000
c0.50

15.5
15.5
0.28
4.0
3.0
997
c0.22

0.87
10.0
1.00
10.0
20.0
B
20.0
B

0.78
18.2
1.00
3.9
22.0
C
20.3
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

17.7
0.84
55.0
81.8%
15

4
15.5
15.5
0.28
4.0
3.0
446
0.05
0.16
14.9
1.00
0.2
15.0
B

0.13
5.4
2.30
0.3
12.8
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF RAMP

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NEL

NER

177
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
121%
233
0
233

535
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
704
153
551
Perm

234
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
121%
308
0
154
Prot
5!

108
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3304
0.46
1543
0.92
121%
142
0
296

175
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1738
0.96
1738
0.92
120%
228
16
279

51
1900

22.6
22.6
0.41
4.0
3.0
662
0.10

22.6
22.6
0.41
4.0
3.0
1358
0.09

0.23
10.6
1.01
0.1
10.8
B

0.22
10.5
1.00
0.1
10.6
B
10.6
B

4
24.4
24.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
1570
0.07
0.15
9.1
0.38
0.0
3.5
A
11.9
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
24.4
24.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
702
c0.35
0.78
13.1
0.84
3.6
14.6
B

11.7
0.60
55.0
54.6%
15

0.92
120%
67
0
0

2!
2!
22.6
22.6
0.41
4.0
3.0
714
c0.16
0.39
11.4
1.00
1.6
13.0
B
13.0
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: New Connector & PR-743

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
121%
247
0
247

40
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
53
39
14
Perm

62
1900

176
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1839
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
231
0
313

240
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1727
1.00
1727
0.92
121%
316
68
616

280
1900

4!

14.1
14.1
0.26
4.0
3.0
478

32.9
32.9
0.60
4.0
3.0
1033
c0.36

0.92
121%
82
0
0
Perm

4!
14.1
14.1
0.26
4.0
3.0
454
0.14
0.54
17.7
0.42
1.3
8.8
A
7.8
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
14.1
14.1
0.26
4.0
3.0
406

0.92
121%
368
0
0

4!

0.01
0.03
15.3
0.20
0.0
3.1
A

c0.17
0.65
18.3
1.00
3.2
21.5
C
21.5
C
12.0
0.61
55.0
74.0%
15

0.60
6.9
1.00
2.5
9.4
A
9.4
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

101
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.30
562
0.92
113%
124
0
124
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
113%
872
0
872

572
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
113%
646
297
349
Perm

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.19
355
1.00
113%
184
0
184
Perm

500
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
113%
565
0
565

6
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
7
4
3
Perm

394
1900

234
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3435
0.63
2238
0.92
121%
308
0
785

63
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
121%
76
49
27
Perm

233
1900

100
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3420
0.65
2302
0.92
121%
132
0
438

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
329
144
185
Perm

4
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
739

8
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
166

0.22
0.47
8.2
1.00
2.2
10.4
B

c0.52
1.11
12.0
1.00
101.9
113.9
F

4
4
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
262
0.22
0.47
8.2
1.00
6.0
14.2
B

21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
869
0.47
1.00
12.0
1.00
31.4
43.4
D
28.2
C

1.00
121%
477
0
0
Perm

8
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
869
0.30
0.65
9.2
1.00
3.8
12.9
B
37.5
D

2
8
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
739
0.00
0.00
6.4
1.00
0.0
6.4
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
29.6
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.06
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
45.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
111.5%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
121%
306
0
0
Perm

2
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
796
c0.35
1.47dl
14.4
1.00
28.7
43.1
D
40.2
D

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
563
0.02
0.05
9.5
1.00
0.2
9.7
A

6
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
818
0.19
1.83dl
11.5
1.00
2.5
14.0
B
13.2
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
563
0.12
0.33
10.6
1.00
1.6
12.1
B

C
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AH 10

APENDICE AI
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2018 Alternativa 5

AI-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.82
113%
91
0
91
3%
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1711
1.00
1711
0.82
113%
292
37
529
3%

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
113%
70
0
70
3%
Prot
3

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
1.00
1665
1.00
1665
0.87
113%
244
73
622
3%

347
1900

63
1900

51
1900

301
1900

0.87
113%
451
0
0
3%

0.84
113%
85
0
0
3%
Perm

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1750
0.51
915
0.84
113%
105
15
244
3%

0.84
113%
69
0
0
3%

0.88
113%
387
0
0
3%
Perm

201
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1791
0.67
1229
0.88
113%
258
0
645
3%

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
113%
50
5
45
3%
Perm

28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
540
0.05
0.17
22.9
1.00
0.7
23.6
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.82
113%
274
0
0
3%

4
28.0
28.0
0.31
4.0
3.0
528

8!

0.31
1.00
31.4
1.00
39.8
71.2
E
64.6
E
53.7
0.99
90.8
98.1%
15

4.8
4.8
0.05
4.0
3.0
93
0.04

36.8
36.8
0.41
4.0
3.0
675
c0.37

0.75
42.4
1.00
28.6
71.0
E

0.92
25.6
1.00
20.0
45.6
D
47.9
D

6
46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
464

46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
623

0.27
0.53
15.1
1.00
1.1
16.2
B
16.2
B

c0.53
1.04
22.4
1.00
45.5
67.9
E
63.8
E

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

6
46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
3.0
794
0.03
0.06
11.4
1.00
0.1
11.5
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.32
600
0.92
113%
151
0
151
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
113%
467
0
467

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
76
48
28
Perm

125
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.28
517
0.92
113%
154
0
154
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
113%
316
18
409

90
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
121%
143
0
143
Split
2

61
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
121%
80
0
80

218
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
287
221
66
Perm

125
1900

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1793
0.72
1341
0.92
113%
43
0
197

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
264
204
60
Perm

4
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
588

8
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
192

0.02
0.05
14.1
1.00
0.2
14.2
B

c0.30
0.80
19.7
1.00
28.7
48.4
D

4
4
26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
223
0.25
0.68
18.5
1.00
15.3
33.8
C

26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
692
0.25
0.67
18.5
1.00
5.2
23.7
C
24.8
C

0.92
113%
111
0
0

26.2
0.63
70.0
58.8%
15

26.0
26.0
0.37
4.0
665
0.23

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
405
c0.08

16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
426
0.04

0.61
17.9
1.00
4.2
22.1
C
29.1
C

0.35
22.7
1.00
2.4
25.1
C

0.19
21.8
1.00
1.0
22.7
C
23.4
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
113%
154
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
362
0.04
0.18
21.7
1.00
1.1
22.8
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
307
c0.15
0.64
24.4
1.00
9.9
34.3
C
27.6
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.23
4.0
362
0.04
0.17
21.7
1.00
1.0
22.6
C

C
12.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1688
0.99
1688
0.89
119%
132
74
520
3%

245
1900

240
1900

165
1900

112
1900

0.85
119%
336
0
0
3%
Perm

0.85
119%
231
0
0
3%

0.85
113%
149
0
0
3%
Perm

562
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.66
1221
0.85
113%
747
0
896
3%

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
113%
85
51
34
3%
Perm

152
1900

0.89
119%
328
0
0
3%

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1733
0.60
1068
0.85
119%
211
26
753
3%

183
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1804
0.12
223
0.97
119%
225
0
411
3%

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.97
119%
59
16
43
3%
Perm

0.89
119%
134
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

9.0
9.0
0.15
4.0
3.0
253
c0.31
2.06
25.5
1.00
488.5
514.0
F
514.0
F
712.7
3.57
60.0
139.6%
15

4
4

15.0
15.0
0.25
4.0
3.0
267

24.0
24.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
488

c0.70
2.82
22.5
1.00
828.6
851.1
F
851.1
F

0.73
1.84
18.0
1.00
384.2
402.2
F
368.3
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.97
119%
186
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
24.0
24.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
627
0.02
0.05
11.0
1.00
0.0
11.1
B

8
24.0
24.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
89
c1.84
4.62
18.0
0.66
1650.5
1662.4
F
1454.0
F

8
24.0
24.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
627
0.03
0.07
11.1
0.19
0.2
2.3
A

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
113%
408
0
408
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
113%
270
217
53
3%
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3430
0.64
2245
0.89
119%
310
0
553
3%

0
1900

719
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
119%
920
0
672
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
119%
0
61
571
2%

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
119%
384
0
0
3%

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
100%
2
0
2
2%

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
722
c0.40

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
677
0.37

1.2
1.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
37
c0.00

0.93
16.1
0.72
2.5
14.1
B

0.84
15.2
0.68
1.0
11.3
B
12.8
B

0.05
28.8
1.00
0.6
29.5
C
29.5
C

0.92
113%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
689
0.12
0.59
21.9
1.00
3.7
25.6
C
23.9
C

2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
308
0.03
0.17
20.0
1.00
1.2
21.3
C

16.8
0.77
60.0
77.7%
15

0.89
119%
243
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
119%
0
0
0
2%

6
20.8
20.8
0.35
4.0
8.0
877
c0.05
c0.17
0.63
16.4
0.97
1.6
17.5
B
17.5
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
100%
0
0
0
2%

B
12.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
119%
152
0
152
3%

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
119%
306
245
61
3%
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.59
2079
0.89
119%
289
0
805
3%

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.86
113%
252
85
327
3%

122
1900

40.0
40.0
0.67
4.0
4.0
1562
c0.07
c0.27
0.52
5.1
0.47
0.3
2.7
A
2.7
A

28.0
28.0
0.47
4.0
4.0
1540
0.10

4
12.0
12.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
350
c0.09
0.43
21.0
1.00
1.2
22.2
C
21.0
C

4
12.0
12.0
0.20
4.0
4.0
314

0.89
119%
516
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.04
0.19
20.0
1.00
0.4
20.4
C

9.4
0.49
60.0
53.7%
15

0.86
113%
160
0
0
3%

0.21
9.5
1.00
0.3
9.8
A
9.8
A

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: PR-52 SB ON Ramp & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

442
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.96
1731
0.96
1731
0.92
120%
577
22
770

165
1900

191
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3368
0.95
3238
0.92
121%
251
0
290

506
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3388
1.00
3388
0.92
121%
666
72
860

202
1900

2!

135
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
121%
178
0
139
Prot
2!

33.3
33.3
0.55
4.0
3.0
961
c0.44

33.3
33.3
0.55
4.0
3.0
894
0.09

18.7
18.7
0.31
4.0
3.0
1056
c0.25

0.80
10.7
1.00
7.0
17.7
B
17.7
B

0.16
6.5
1.83
0.3
12.3
B

52.0
52.0
0.87
4.0
3.0
2878
0.06
0.03
0.10
0.6
1.11
0.0
0.7
A
4.4
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
120%
215
0
0

17.8
0.81
60.0
83.6%
15

0.92
121%
266
0
0

0.81
19.1
1.00
4.9
24.0
C
24.0
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

276
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
121%
363
0
181
Prot
5!

104
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3296
0.46
1543
0.92
121%
137
0
319

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
121%
234
0
234

492
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
647
250
397
Perm

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.97
1726
0.88
1566
0.92
120%
291
21
397

97
1900

2!

32.5
32.5
0.54
4.0
3.0
872
0.11

32.5
32.5
0.54
4.0
3.0
1785
0.10

19.5
19.5
0.32
4.0
3.0
1150
0.07

4
19.5
19.5
0.32
4.0
3.0
514

2!
32.5
32.5
0.54
4.0
3.0
848

0.21
7.1
0.85
0.1
6.1
A

0.18
7.0
0.85
0.0
6.0
A
6.0
A

0.20
14.6
0.55
0.1
8.1
A
11.8
B

c0.25
0.77
18.3
0.49
4.2
13.1
B

c0.25
0.47
8.4
1.00
1.9
10.3
B
10.3
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

9.8
0.58
60.0
52.8%
15

0.92
120%
127
0
0

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: PR-743 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL

WBR

SBL

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
0.99
1657
0.99
1657
0.92
121%
133
163
332

275
1900

193
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
121%
254
0
254

80
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
105
70
35
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.98
1695
1.00
1737
0.92
121%
138
60
216

105
1900

4
20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
528

4!
20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
579

0.02
0.07
13.6
0.31
0.2
4.4
A

0.12
0.37
15.2
1.00
1.8
17.1
B
17.1
B

0.92
121%
362
0
0

4!

32.0
32.0
0.53
4.0
884
c0.20

20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
590
c0.14

0.38
8.2
1.00
1.2
9.4
A
9.4
A

0.43
15.6
0.51
2.2
10.2
B
8.5
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

11.0
0.40
60.0
65.0%
15

0.92
121%
138
0
0

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

70
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.29
541
0.92
113%
86
0
86
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
113%
872
0
872

539
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
113%
609
167
442
Perm

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.17
313
1.00
113%
184
0
184
Perm

596
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
113%
673
0
673

279
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
113%
343
122
221
Perm

436
1900

63
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3393
0.66
2327
0.92
121%
83
0
611

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
121%
157
113
44
Perm

111
1900

52
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3422
0.61
2155
0.92
121%
68
0
214

45
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
121%
59
42
17
Perm

4
46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
971

8
46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
192

0.28
0.45
7.8
1.00
1.5
9.3
A

c0.59
0.96
13.6
1.00
54.9
68.5
E

4
4
46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
332
0.16
0.26
6.7
1.00
1.9
8.6
A

46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
1143
0.47
0.76
10.5
1.00
4.8
15.4
B
12.6
B

1.00
121%
528
0
0
Perm

8
46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
1143
0.36
0.59
8.8
1.00
2.2
11.0
B
18.7
B

2
8
46.0
46.0
0.61
4.0
971
0.14
0.23
6.5
1.00
0.5
7.1
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
21.4
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.95
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
75.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
102.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2018
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
121%
146
0
0
Perm

2
21.0
21.0
0.28
4.0
652
c0.26
1.64dl
26.4
1.00
22.8
49.1
D
43.3
D

6
2
21.0
21.0
0.28
4.0
443
0.03
0.10
20.0
1.00
0.4
20.4
C

6
21.0
21.0
0.28
4.0
603
0.10
1.06dl
21.6
1.00
1.6
23.2
C
22.5
C

6
21.0
21.0
0.28
4.0
443
0.01
0.04
19.6
1.00
0.2
19.8
B

C
8.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
AI 10

APENDICE AJ
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5

AJ-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
125%
198
0
198
3%
Prot
4!

386
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1730
1.00
1730
0.70
125%
689
17
1163
3%

275
1900

44
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.75
125%
73
0
73
3%
Prot
3

157
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1715
1.00
1715
0.75
125%
262
21
473
3%

139
1900

93
1900

107
1900

209
1900

0.75
125%
232
0
0
3%

0.80
125%
145
0
0
3%
Perm

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.99
1767
0.24
434
0.80
125%
391
7
696
3%

0.80
125%
167
0
0
3%

0.90
125%
290
0
0
3%
Perm

396
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1813
0.57
1047
0.90
125%
550
0
840
3%

82
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
125%
114
6
108
3%
Perm

50.0
50.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
584
0.11
0.34
37.6
1.00
1.6
39.2
D

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.70
125%
491
0
0
3%

4
50.0
50.0
0.33
4.0
3.0
577

8!

c0.67
2.02
50.0
1.00
462.9
512.9
F
444.8
F
418.6
2.52
150.0
136.2%
15

6.0
6.0
0.04
4.0
3.0
70
c0.04

60.0
60.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
686
0.28

1.04
72.0
1.00
119.9
191.9
F

0.69
37.3
1.00
5.6
42.9
D
62.1
E
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

6
82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
237

82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
572

c1.60
2.94
34.0
1.00
882.4
916.4
F
916.4
F

0.80
1.47
34.0
1.00
220.3
254.3
F
225.9
F

6
82.0
82.0
0.55
4.0
3.0
857
0.07
0.13
16.6
1.00
0.3
16.9
B

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory Entrance

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

159
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.51
956
0.92
125%
216
0
216
Perm

266
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
361
0
361

276
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
375
206
169
Perm

282
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.44
818
0.92
125%
383
0
383
Perm

131
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1757
1.00
1757
0.92
125%
178
28
260

80
1900

148
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
228
0
228
Split
2

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
54
0
54

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
233
186
47
Perm

57
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1821
0.83
1555
0.92
125%
90
0
167

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
68
54
14
Perm

4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
712

8
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
368

0.11
0.24
13.5
1.00
0.8
14.3
B

c0.47
1.04
22.0
1.00
57.9
79.9
E

4
4
36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
430
0.23
0.50
15.6
1.00
4.1
19.8
B

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
838
0.19
0.43
15.0
1.00
1.6
16.6
B
16.4
B

0.92
125%
109
0
0

31.5
0.83
80.0
65.3%
15

36.0
36.0
0.45
4.0
791
0.15

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
354
c0.13

16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
373
0.03

0.33
14.2
1.00
1.1
15.3
B
52.2
D

0.64
29.4
1.00
8.7
38.1
D

0.14
26.4
1.00
0.8
27.2
C
32.1
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
77
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
317
0.03
0.15
26.4
1.00
1.0
27.4
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
311
c0.11
0.54
28.7
1.00
6.5
35.2
D
32.6
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.20
4.0
317
0.01
0.04
25.8
1.00
0.3
26.1
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

148
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1722
0.99
1722
0.91
138%
244
16
755
3%

200
1900

97
1900

157
1900

83
1900

0.91
138%
147
0
0
3%
Perm

0.91
138%
238
0
0
3%

0.91
125%
114
0
0
3%
Perm

297
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1825
0.37
677
0.91
125%
408
0
522
3%

104
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
125%
143
59
84
3%
Perm

256
1900

0.91
138%
303
0
0
3%

175
1900
4.0
1.00
0.95
0.99
1734
0.69
1208
0.91
138%
265
14
636
3%

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1790
0.33
608
0.90
138%
250
0
643
3%

54
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.90
138%
83
6
77
3%
Perm

0.91
138%
224
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

32.0
32.0
0.21
4.0
3.0
367
c0.44
2.06
59.0
1.00
485.4
544.4
F
544.4
F
498.6
2.20
150.0
125.4%
15

4
4

35.0
35.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
282

71.0
71.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
320

c0.53
2.26
57.5
1.00
576.5
634.0
F
634.0
F

0.77
1.63
39.5
1.00
297.9
337.4
F
269.6
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.90
138%
393
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
71.0
71.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
742
0.05
0.11
22.0
1.00
0.1
22.0
C

8
71.0
71.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
288
c1.06
2.23
39.5
1.00
565.8
605.3
F
538.6
F

8
71.0
71.0
0.47
4.0
3.0
742
0.05
0.10
21.9
1.00
0.3
22.2
C

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
125%
317
0
317
3%

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
317
230
87
3%
Perm

260
1900

220
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3412
0.62
2185
0.83
138%
366
0
798
3%

0
1900

340
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
505
0
454
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.87
0.99
1513
0.99
1513
0.92
138%
0
239
167
2%

239
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
355
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
3
0
3
2%

18.1
18.1
0.33
4.0
3.0
546
c0.27

18.1
18.1
0.33
4.0
3.0
496
0.11

1.0
1.0
0.02
4.0
3.0
34
c0.00

0.83
17.1
1.00
10.4
27.6
C

0.34
14.0
1.00
0.4
14.4
B
21.4
C

0.09
26.7
1.00
1.1
27.8
C
27.8
C

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
15.1
15.1
0.27
4.0
8.0
959
0.09
0.33
16.0
1.00
0.9
16.9
B
16.6
B

2
15.1
15.1
0.27
4.0
8.0
429
0.06
0.20
15.4
1.00
1.0
16.4
B

0.83
138%
432
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
24.1
24.1
0.44
4.0
8.0
1065
c0.07
c0.26
0.92dl
13.0
1.00
4.8
17.8
B
17.8
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
18.8
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.76
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.2
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
72.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

B
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/23/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
138%
130
0
130
3%

265
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
138%
430
329
101
3%
Perm

272
1900

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3402
0.63
2225
0.89
138%
276
0
698
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.89
125%
329
81
358
3%

78
1900

22.0
22.0
0.56
4.0
4.0
1489
c0.10
c0.17
0.47
5.1
1.00
0.3
5.4
A
5.4
A

10.0
10.0
0.26
4.0
4.0
860
0.11

4
9.2
9.2
0.23
4.0
4.0
411
c0.07
0.32
12.4
1.00
0.6
13.0
B
12.9
B

4
9.2
9.2
0.23
4.0
4.0
368

0.89
138%
422
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.06
0.27
12.3
1.00
0.6
12.8
B

9.7
0.41
39.2
48.7%
15

0.89
125%
110
0
0
3%

0.42
12.2
1.00
0.4
12.6
B
12.6
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB ON RAMP

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NEL

NER

589
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
142%
909
0
909
3%

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
304
216
88
3%
Perm

137
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.95
1595
0.92
142%
211
0
141
3%
Prot
2!

145
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3318
0.93
3130
0.92
142%
224
0
294
3%

551
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1729
0.96
1729
0.92
140%
838
7
1018
3%

123
1900

2!

31.0
31.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
899
0.09

47.0
47.0
0.85
4.0
3.0
2781
0.06
0.03
0.11
0.6
4.79
0.0
3.1
A
7.3
A

31.0
31.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
975
c0.59

4
16.0
16.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
1020
c0.26
0.89
18.7
1.00
9.9
28.6
C
25.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
16.0
16.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
456
0.06
0.19
14.7
1.00
0.2
14.9
B

0.16
5.7
2.73
0.3
16.0
B

33.0
0.99
55.0
93.9%
15

0.92
140%
187
0
0
3%

1.04
12.0
1.00
41.1
53.1
D
53.1
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF RAMP

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NEL

NER

177
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
142%
273
0
273
3%

535
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
826
131
695
3%
Perm

234
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.95
1595
0.92
142%
361
0
180
3%
Prot
5!

108
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3272
0.46
1528
0.92
142%
167
0
348
3%

175
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1722
0.96
1722
0.92
140%
266
19
325
3%

51
1900

19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
577
0.11

19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
1184
0.11

0.31
12.6
1.14
0.2
14.6
B

0.29
12.5
1.14
0.1
14.3
B
14.4
B

4
27.1
27.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
1727
0.08
0.16
7.7
0.30
0.0
2.3
A
11.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
27.1
27.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
773
c0.44
0.90
12.7
0.68
5.8
14.5
B

13.2
0.74
55.0
63.0%
15

0.92
140%
78
0
0
3%

2!
2!
19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
623
c0.19
0.52
13.8
1.00
3.1
16.9
B
16.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: New Connector & PR-743

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

SBL

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
290
0
290

40
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
62
46
16
Perm

62
1900

176
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1839
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
272
0
368

240
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1727
1.00
1727
0.92
142%
370
72
730

280
1900

4!

14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
495

32.4
32.4
0.59
4.0
3.0
1017
c0.42

0.92
142%
96
0
0
Perm

4!
14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
470
0.16
0.62
17.7
0.47
2.4
10.8
B
9.4
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
420

0.92
142%
432
0
0

4!

0.01
0.04
15.0
0.20
0.0
3.0
A

c0.20
0.74
18.5
1.00
6.0
24.5
C
24.5
C
14.6
0.73
55.0
85.1%
15

0.72
8.0
1.00
4.4
12.4
B
12.4
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/23/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

101
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.23
422
0.92
125%
137
0
137
3%
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
1.00
125%
965
0
965
3%

572
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
1.00
125%
715
296
419
3%
Perm

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.20
369
1.00
125%
204
0
204
3%
Perm

500
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
1.00
125%
625
0
625
3%

6
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
125%
8
4
4
3%
Perm

394
1900

234
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3402
0.61
2121
0.92
142%
361
0
920
3%

63
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
1.00
142%
89
37
52
3%
Perm

233
1900

100
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3386
0.65
2286
0.92
142%
154
0
514
3%

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
386
107
279
3%
Perm

4
20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
697

8
20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
164

0.27
0.60
9.5
1.00
3.8
13.3
B

c0.55
1.24
12.5
1.00
150.6
163.1
F

4
4
20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
188
0.32
0.73
10.3
1.00
21.8
32.1
C

20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
820
0.52
1.18
12.5
1.00
92.2
104.7
F
63.2
E

1.00
142%
559
0
0
3%
Perm

8
20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
820
0.34
0.76
10.5
1.00
6.6
17.1
B
52.6
D

2
8
20.0
20.0
0.44
4.0
697
0.00
0.01
7.0
1.00
0.0
7.0
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
56.9
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.20
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
45.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
124.7%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
142%
360
0
0
3%
Perm

2
17.0
17.0
0.38
4.0
801
c0.43
1.84dl
14.0
1.00
81.2
95.2
F
87.6
F

6
2
17.0
17.0
0.38
4.0
592
0.03
0.09
9.0
1.00
0.3
9.3
A

6
17.0
17.0
0.38
4.0
864
0.22
2.20dl
11.2
1.00
3.0
14.2
B
13.8
B

6
17.0
17.0
0.38
4.0
592
0.18
0.47
10.6
1.00
2.7
13.3
B

E
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AJ 10

APENDICE AK
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5

AK-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.82
125%
101
0
101
3%
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1711
1.00
1711
0.82
125%
323
51
575
3%

199
1900

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
125%
78
0
78
3%
Prot
3

188
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
1.00
1665
1.00
1665
0.87
125%
270
106
663
3%

347
1900

63
1900

51
1900

301
1900

0.87
125%
499
0
0
3%

0.84
125%
94
0
0
3%
Perm

78
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1750
0.36
648
0.84
125%
116
23
263
3%

0.84
125%
76
0
0
3%

0.88
125%
428
0
0
3%
Perm

201
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1791
0.66
1218
0.88
125%
286
0
714
3%

39
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
55
9
46
3%
Perm

18.0
18.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
526
0.06
0.19
15.6
1.00
0.8
16.4
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.82
125%
303
0
0
3%

4
18.0
18.0
0.30
4.0
3.0
513

8!

c0.34
1.12
21.0
1.00
77.2
98.2
F
86.8
F
88.1
1.25
60.0
106.4%
15

3.6
3.6
0.06
4.0
3.0
105
0.04

25.6
25.6
0.43
4.0
3.0
710
c0.40

0.74
27.7
0.85
19.8
43.5
D

0.93
16.4
0.67
17.6
28.6
C
30.0
C

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

6
26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
285

26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
536

0.41
0.92
15.8
1.00
36.7
52.6
D
52.6
D

c0.59
1.33
16.8
1.00
161.9
178.7
F
166.6
F

6
26.4
26.4
0.44
4.0
3.0
690
0.03
0.07
9.7
1.00
0.2
9.9
A

F
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
466
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
516
0
516

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
84
62
22
Perm

125
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.25
466
0.92
125%
170
0
170
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
349
21
450

90
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
168
0
168
Split
2

61
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
94
0
94

218
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
336
207
129
Perm

125
1900

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1793
0.71
1325
0.92
125%
48
0
218

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
292
214
78
Perm

4
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
422

8
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
124

0.01
0.05
16.4
0.85
0.0
14.0
B

c0.37
1.37
22.0
0.91
171.6
191.7
F

4
4
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
124
0.36
1.35
22.0
0.75
161.0
177.5
F

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
497
0.28
1.04
22.0
0.76
23.6
40.3
D
67.3
E

0.92
125%
122
0
0

47.0
0.78
60.0
65.1%
15

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
472
c0.09

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
497
0.05

0.94
21.6
0.91
4.7
24.2
C
68.7
E

0.36
17.8
1.00
2.1
19.9
B

0.19
17.0
1.00
0.8
17.8
B
19.3
B

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
477
0.25

HCM Level of Service

0.92
125%
170
0
0
Perm

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
422
0.08
0.31
17.6
1.00
1.9
19.4
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
353
c0.16
0.62
19.3
1.00
7.9
27.2
C
21.9
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
422
0.05
0.18
17.0
1.00
1.0
17.9
B

D
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1688
0.99
1688
0.89
138%
154
74
615
3%

245
1900

240
1900

165
1900

112
1900

0.85
138%
390
0
0
3%
Perm

0.85
138%
268
0
0
3%

0.85
125%
165
0
0
3%
Perm

562
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1829
0.48
885
0.85
125%
826
0
991
3%

64
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
94
51
43
3%
Perm

152
1900

0.89
138%
380
0
0
3%

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1733
0.57
1004
0.85
138%
245
26
877
3%

183
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1804
0.13
244
0.97
138%
260
0
476
3%

48
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.97
138%
68
15
53
3%
Perm

0.89
138%
155
0
0
3%
Split
2

6
6

2.19
25.0
1.00
546.2
571.2
F
571.2
F
1000.6
3.99
60.0
158.1%
15

4
4

10.0
10.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
281
c0.36

16.0
16.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
268

22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
325

c0.87
3.27
22.0
1.00
1032.7
1054.7
F
1054.7
F

1.12
3.05
19.0
0.56
927.3
937.9
F
857.0
F

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

0.97
138%
216
0
0
3%
Perm

8
4
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
575
0.03
0.07
12.4
0.37
0.0
4.6
A

8
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
89
c1.95
5.35
19.0
0.64
1977.1
1989.3
F
1741.0
F

8
22.0
22.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
575
0.03
0.09
12.5
0.26
0.3
3.4
A

F
12.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
125%
452
0
452
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
298
239
59
3%
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3430
0.60
2106
0.89
138%
360
0
642
3%

0
1900

719
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
1067
0
779
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
138%
0
61
672
2%

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
445
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
3
0
3
2%

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
722
c0.47

26.0
26.0
0.43
4.0
3.0
677
0.43

1.2
1.2
0.02
4.0
3.0
37
c0.00

1.08
17.0
0.70
38.4
50.2
D

0.99
16.9
0.66
8.8
19.9
B
35.5
D

0.08
28.9
1.00
0.9
29.8
C
29.8
C

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
689
0.13
0.66
22.2
1.00
4.8
27.1
C
24.8
C

2
11.8
11.8
0.20
4.0
8.0
308

0.89
138%
282
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.04
0.19
20.1
1.00
1.4
21.5
C

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
20.8
20.8
0.35
4.0
8.0
840
c0.06
c0.20
0.94dl
17.4
0.86
4.2
19.2
B
19.2
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
29.2
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.91
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
60.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
85.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

C
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
138%
177
0
177
3%

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
138%
355
281
74
3%
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.58
2030
0.89
138%
335
0
934
3%

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.86
125%
279
96
360
3%

122
1900

39.5
39.5
0.66
4.0
4.0
1519
c0.08
c0.32
0.95dl
5.9
0.89
0.6
5.8
A
5.8
A

27.5
27.5
0.46
4.0
4.0
1513
0.11

4
12.5
12.5
0.21
4.0
4.0
365
c0.10
0.48
20.9
1.00
1.4
22.3
C
20.9
C

4
12.5
12.5
0.21
4.0
4.0
327
0.05
0.23
19.7
1.00
0.5
20.2
C

0.89
138%
599
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.86
125%
177
0
0
3%

0.24
9.9
1.00
0.4
10.3
B
10.3
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
11.0
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
60.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
60.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: PR-52 SB ON Ramp & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

442
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.96
1731
0.96
1731
0.92
140%
673
18
906

165
1900

191
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3367
0.95
3238
0.92
142%
295
0
341

506
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3388
1.00
3388
0.92
142%
781
70
1023

202
1900

2!

135
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
142%
208
0
162
Prot
2!

32.6
32.6
0.54
4.0
3.0
941
c0.52

32.6
32.6
0.54
4.0
3.0
875
0.10

19.4
19.4
0.32
4.0
3.0
1095
c0.30

0.96
13.1
1.00
21.6
34.8
C
34.8
C

0.19
7.0
1.84
0.4
13.2
B

52.0
52.0
0.87
4.0
3.0
2876
0.06
0.04
0.12
0.6
2.72
0.0
1.6
A
5.4
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
140%
251
0
0

28.4
0.95
60.0
96.1%
15

0.92
142%
312
0
0

0.93
19.7
1.00
14.0
33.7
C
33.7
C

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

276
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
142%
426
0
213
Prot
5!

104
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3296
0.46
1543
0.92
142%
161
0
374

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
142%
275
0
275

492
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
759
181
578
Perm

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.97
1726
0.86
1527
0.92
140%
339
25
462

97
1900

2!

27.6
27.6
0.46
4.0
3.0
741
0.13

27.6
27.6
0.46
4.0
3.0
1516
0.11

24.4
24.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
1439
0.08

4
24.4
24.4
0.41
4.0
3.0
644

2!
27.6
27.6
0.46
4.0
3.0
702

0.29
10.1
0.96
0.2
9.8
A

0.25
9.9
0.95
0.1
9.5
A
9.6
A

0.19
11.5
0.60
0.0
6.9
A
11.9
B

c0.37
0.90
16.6
0.46
6.2
13.8
B

c0.30
0.66
12.5
1.00
4.8
17.3
B
17.3
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

12.5
0.77
60.0
60.8%
15

0.92
140%
148
0
0

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: PR-743 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL

WBR

SBL

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
0.99
1665
0.99
1665
0.92
142%
156
163
417
0%

275
1900

193
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
298
0
298
2%

80
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
123
82
41
2%
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.98
1695
1.00
1737
0.92
142%
162
60
264
2%

105
1900

4
20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
528

4!
20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
579

0.03
0.08
13.7
0.31
0.3
4.5
A

0.15
0.46
15.7
1.00
2.6
18.3
B
18.3
B

0.92
142%
424
0
0
2%

4!

32.0
32.0
0.53
4.0
888
c0.25

20.0
20.0
0.33
4.0
590
c0.17

0.47
8.7
1.00
1.8
10.5
B
10.5
B

0.51
16.0
0.64
2.9
13.1
B
10.6
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

12.4
0.48
60.0
74.6%
15

0.92
142%
162
0
0
2%

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

70
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.19
358
0.92
125%
95
0
95
Perm

772
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
125%
965
0
965

539
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
125%
674
252
422
Perm

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.15
287
1.00
125%
204
0
204
Perm

596
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
1.00
125%
745
0
745

279
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
379
182
197
Perm

436
1900

63
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3393
0.65
2300
0.92
142%
97
0
716

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
142%
185
63
122
Perm

111
1900

52
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3423
0.65
2285
0.92
142%
80
0
251

45
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
69
47
22
Perm

4
26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
823

8
26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
149

0.27
0.51
7.9
1.00
2.3
10.1
B

c0.71
1.37
12.0
1.00
202.8
214.8
F

4
4
26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
186
0.27
0.51
7.8
1.00
9.7
17.5
B

26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
969
0.52
1.00
11.9
1.00
27.9
39.9
D
27.1
C

1.00
142%
619
0
0
Perm

8
26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
969
0.40
0.77
9.6
1.00
5.8
15.4
B
43.7
D

2
8
26.0
26.0
0.52
4.0
823
0.12
0.24
6.6
1.00
0.7
7.3
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
33.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.22
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
50.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
113.0%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Alternative 5 2028


Evan Gonzalez

0.92
142%
171
0
0
Perm

2
16.0
16.0
0.32
4.0
736
c0.31
1.74dl
16.8
1.00
27.2
44.0
D
37.7
D

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.32
4.0
507
0.08
0.24
12.5
1.00
1.1
13.6
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.32
4.0
731
0.11
1.10dl
13.0
1.00
1.3
14.3
B
13.8
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.32
4.0
507
0.01
0.04
11.7
1.00
0.2
11.9
B

C
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AK 10

APENDICE AL
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico AM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5
con Mejoras Adicionales

AL-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

111
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.70
125%
198
0
198
3%
Prot
7

386
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.70
125%
689
0
689
3%

275
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.70
125%
491
139
352
3%
custom

157
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.75
125%
262
0
262
3%

139
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.75
125%
232
192
40
3%
Perm

93
1900

250
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1820
0.57
1056
0.80
125%
391
0
536
3%

107
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.80
125%
167
38
129
3%
Perm

82
1900

4
31.0
31.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
528

c0.37
1.11
30.5
1.00
69.3
99.8
F
74.0
E

0.22
0.67
26.1
1.00
6.5
32.6
C

0.12
21.1
1.00
0.4
21.5
C

0.82
36.6
1.00
20.0
56.6
E
42.6
D

209
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.28
508
0.90
125%
290
0
290
3%
pm+pt
1
6
53.0
53.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
347
c0.04
0.45
0.84
19.9
1.00
15.8
35.8
D

396
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1797
1.00
1797
0.90
125%
550
7
657
3%

4!
31.0
31.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
622

44
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.00
0
0.75
125%
73
0
73
3%
pm+pt
4!
8
31.0
31.0
0.34
4.0
3.0
590
0.04

11.0
11.0
0.12
4.0
3.0
209
0.11
0.95
40.2
1.00
47.0
87.2
F

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

52.3
1.06
92.0
100.5%
15

8
16.0
16.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
321
0.14

8
16.0
16.0
0.17
4.0
3.0
273

0.80
125%
145
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.03
0.15
32.2
1.00
1.1
33.4
C

2
45.0
45.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
517
c0.51
1.04
23.5
1.00
49.4
72.9
E
58.7
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

2
45.0
45.0
0.49
4.0
3.0
767
0.08
0.17
13.1
1.00
0.1
13.2
B

0.90
125%
114
0
0
3%

6
53.0
53.0
0.58
4.0
3.0
1035
0.37
0.63
13.0
1.00
3.0
16.0
B
22.0
C

D
12.0
G

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & Factory Entrance

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

159
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.53
985
0.92
125%
216
0
216
Perm

266
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
361
0
361

276
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
375
183
192
Perm

282
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.46
861
0.92
125%
383
0
383
Perm

131
1900
4.0
1.00
0.94
1.00
1757
1.00
1757
0.92
125%
178
24
263

80
1900

148
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
228
0
228
Split
2

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
54
0
54

151
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
233
192
41
Perm

57
1900

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1821
0.83
1546
0.92
125%
90
0
167

50
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
68
49
19
Perm

4
46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
809

8
46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
440

0.12
0.24
12.2
1.00
0.7
12.9
B

c0.44
0.87
19.4
1.00
20.4
39.7
D

4
4
46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
503
0.22
0.43
13.8
1.00
2.7
16.4
B

46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
952
0.19
0.38
13.3
1.00
1.2
14.5
B
14.3
B

0.92
125%
109
0
0

26.3
0.79
90.0
65.3%
15

0.92
125%
77
0
0
Perm

46.0
46.0
0.51
4.0
898
0.15

16.0
16.0
0.18
4.0
315
c0.13

16.0
16.0
0.18
4.0
331
0.03

0.29
12.6
1.00
0.8
13.5
B
28.5
C

0.72
34.9
1.00
13.5
48.4
D

0.16
31.3
1.00
1.1
32.4
C
39.5
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.18
4.0
281
0.03
0.15
31.2
1.00
1.1
32.3
C

6
16.0
16.0
0.18
4.0
275
c0.11
0.61
34.1
1.00
9.6
43.7
D
40.1
D

6
16.0
16.0
0.18
4.0
281
0.01
0.07
30.8
1.00
0.5
31.3
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

148
1900

161
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1802
0.98
1802
0.91
138%
244
0
468
3%

200
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
138%
303
130
173
3%
Perm

97
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.91
138%
147
0
147
3%
Prot
1

175
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.91
138%
265
0
265
3%

157
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
138%
238
141
97
3%
Perm

83
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.91
125%
114
0
114
3%
Prot
7

297
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.91
125%
408
0
408
3%

104
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.91
125%
143
110
33
3%
Perm

256
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.90
138%
393
0
393
3%
Prot
3

163
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1776
1.00
1776
0.90
138%
250
13
320
3%

54
1900

21.0
21.0
0.23
4.0
3.0
405
c0.22

32.9
32.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
644
0.18

0.97
34.6
1.00
36.8
71.4
E

0.50
22.5
1.00
2.7
25.2
C
50.2
D

0.91
138%
224
0
0
3%
Split
2!

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

2
25.0
25.0
0.28
4.0
3.0
496
c0.26
0.94
32.2
1.00
28.6
60.8
E
48.5
D

2
25.0
25.0
0.28
4.0
3.0
432
0.11
0.40
26.8
1.00
2.8
29.6
C

48.2
0.96
90.8
88.1%
15

6!

8.0
8.0
0.09
4.0
3.0
154
c0.08

37.0
37.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
752
0.14

0.95
41.2
1.00
58.5
99.7
F

0.35
18.6
1.00
1.3
19.9
B
37.1
D

6
37.0
37.0
0.41
4.0
3.0
639
0.06
0.15
17.0
1.00
0.5
17.5
B

8.9
8.9
0.10
4.0
3.0
172
0.07

20.8
20.8
0.23
4.0
3.0
423
c0.22

0.66
39.5
1.00
9.2
48.7
D

0.96
34.6
1.00
34.4
69.0
E
56.6
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

4
20.8
20.8
0.23
4.0
3.0
359
0.02
0.09
27.6
1.00
0.1
27.7
C

0.90
138%
83
0
0
3%

D
16.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

223
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
125%
317
0
317
3%

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
317
207
110
3%
Perm

260
1900

220
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3412
0.63
2203
0.83
138%
366
0
798
3%

0
1900

340
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
505
0
454
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.87
0.99
1513
0.99
1513
0.92
138%
0
232
174
2%

239
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
355
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
3
0
3
2%

25.0
25.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
575
c0.27

25.0
25.0
0.35
4.0
3.0
522
0.11

1.1
1.1
0.02
4.0
3.0
28
c0.00

0.79
21.3
1.00
7.1
28.5
C

0.33
17.5
1.00
0.4
17.9
B
23.5
C

0.11
35.2
1.00
1.7
36.9
D
36.9
D

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
25.2
25.2
0.35
4.0
8.0
1220
0.09
0.26
16.9
1.00
0.5
17.4
B
17.4
B

2
25.2
25.2
0.35
4.0
8.0
546
0.07
0.20
16.5
1.00
0.8
17.3
B

0.83
138%
432
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
34.3
34.3
0.47
4.0
8.0
1129
c0.05
c0.29
0.88dl
15.1
1.00
3.7
18.8
B
18.8
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
20.2
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.72
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
72.4
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
72.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

80
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
138%
130
0
130
3%

265
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
138%
430
329
101
3%
Perm

272
1900

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3402
0.64
2242
0.89
138%
276
0
698
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3373
1.00
3373
0.89
125%
329
81
358
3%

78
1900

22.0
22.0
0.56
4.0
4.0
1495
c0.10
c0.17
0.47
5.1
1.00
0.3
5.4
A
5.4
A

10.0
10.0
0.26
4.0
4.0
860
0.11

4
9.2
9.2
0.23
4.0
4.0
411
c0.07
0.32
12.4
1.00
0.6
13.0
B
12.9
B

4
9.2
9.2
0.23
4.0
4.0
368

0.89
138%
422
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.06
0.27
12.3
1.00
0.6
12.8
B

9.7
0.41
39.2
48.7%
15

0.89
125%
110
0
0
3%

0.42
12.2
1.00
0.4
12.6
B
12.6
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

A
8.0
A

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: New Connector & PR-52 SB ON RAMP

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NEL

NER

589
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
142%
909
0
909
3%

197
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
304
216
88
3%
Perm

137
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.95
1595
0.92
142%
211
0
141
3%
Prot
2!

145
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3318
0.93
3130
0.92
142%
224
0
294
3%

551
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
0.96
1729
0.96
1729
0.92
140%
838
7
1018
3%

123
1900

2!

31.0
31.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
899
0.09

47.0
47.0
0.85
4.0
3.0
2781
0.06
0.03
0.11
0.6
4.79
0.0
3.1
A
7.3
A

31.0
31.0
0.56
4.0
3.0
975
c0.59

4
16.0
16.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
1020
c0.26
0.89
18.7
1.00
9.9
28.6
C
25.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
16.0
16.0
0.29
4.0
3.0
456
0.06
0.19
14.7
1.00
0.2
14.9
B

0.16
5.7
2.73
0.3
16.0
B

33.0
0.99
55.0
93.9%
15

0.92
140%
187
0
0
3%

1.04
12.0
1.00
41.1
53.1
D
53.1
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF RAMP

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NEL

NER

177
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.92
142%
273
0
273
3%

535
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
826
131
695
3%
Perm

234
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1595
0.95
1595
0.92
142%
361
0
180
3%
Prot
5!

108
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3272
0.46
1528
0.92
142%
167
0
348
3%

175
1900
4.0
1.00
0.97
0.96
1722
0.96
1722
0.92
140%
266
19
325
3%

51
1900

19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
577
0.11

19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
1184
0.11

0.31
12.6
1.14
0.2
14.6
B

0.29
12.5
1.14
0.1
14.3
B
14.4
B

4
27.1
27.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
1727
0.08
0.16
7.7
0.30
0.0
2.3
A
11.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
27.1
27.1
0.49
4.0
3.0
773
c0.44
0.90
12.7
0.68
5.8
14.5
B

13.2
0.74
55.0
63.0%
15

0.92
140%
78
0
0
3%

2!
2!
19.9
19.9
0.36
4.0
3.0
623
c0.19
0.52
13.8
1.00
3.1
16.9
B
16.9
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: New Connector & PR-743

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SBL

SBR

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
290
0
290

40
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
62
46
16
Perm

62
1900

176
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.99
1839
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
272
0
368

240
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
1.00
1727
1.00
1727
0.92
142%
370
72
730

280
1900

4!

14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
495

32.4
32.4
0.59
4.0
3.0
1017
c0.42

0.92
142%
96
0
0
Perm

4!
14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
470
0.16
0.62
17.7
0.47
2.4
10.8
B
9.4
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

4
14.6
14.6
0.27
4.0
3.0
420

0.92
142%
432
0
0

4!

0.01
0.04
15.0
0.20
0.0
3.0
A

c0.20
0.74
18.5
1.00
6.0
24.5
C
24.5
C
14.6
0.73
55.0
85.1%
15

0.72
8.0
1.00
4.4
12.4
B
12.4
B

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

101
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.37
689
0.92
125%
137
0
137
3%
Perm

772
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3281
1.00
3281
1.00
125%
965
267
1413
3%

572
1900

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.17
321
1.00
125%
204
0
204
3%
Perm

500
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3498
1.00
3498
1.00
125%
625
2
631
3%

6
1900

394
1900

1.00
142%
559
0
0
3%
Perm

63
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
1.00
142%
89
41
48
3%
Perm

233
1900

0.92
125%
8
0
0
3%

234
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3402
0.60
2093
0.92
142%
361
0
920
3%

100
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3386
0.64
2238
0.92
142%
154
0
514
3%

250
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.92
142%
386
114
272
3%
Perm

1.00
125%
715
0
0
3%

4
4
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
317
0.20
0.43
9.1
1.00
4.3
13.3
B

23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
1509
0.43
0.94
12.8
1.00
12.3
25.1
C
24.2
C

8
8
23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
148
c0.64
1.38
13.5
1.00
206.8
220.3
F

2
2

23.0
23.0
0.46
4.0
1609
0.18
0.39
8.9
1.00
0.7
9.6
A
61.0
E

0.92
142%
360
0
0
3%
Perm

19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
795
c0.44
1.87dl
15.5
1.00
84.7
100.2
F
92.2
F

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
44.2
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.28
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
50.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
123.6%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network AM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
596
0.03
0.08
9.9
1.00
0.3
10.2
B

6
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
850
0.23
2.43dl
12.5
1.00
3.2
15.7
B
15.0
B

6
19.0
19.0
0.38
4.0
596
0.17
0.46
11.6
1.00
2.5
14.1
B

D
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AL 10

APENDICE AM
Resultados del Modelo Hora Pico PM
Escenario 2028 Alternativa 5
con Mejoras Adicionales

AM-1

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


1: PR-7733 & PR-171

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

66
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.82
125%
101
0
101
3%
Prot
4!

212
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.82
125%
323
0
323
3%

199
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.82
125%
303
229
74
3%
custom

54
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.87
125%
78
0
78
3%
Prot
3

188
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.87
125%
270
0
270
3%

347
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.87
125%
499
327
172
3%
Perm

63
1900

78
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.98
1804
0.72
1319
0.84
125%
116
0
210
3%

51
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.84
125%
76
57
19
3%
Perm

301
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.88
125%
428
0
428
3%
Prot
1

201
1900
4.0
1.00
0.98
1.00
1800
1.00
1800
0.88
125%
286
7
334
3%

39
1900

4
23.2
23.2
0.24
4.0
3.0
451

4
23.2
23.2
0.24
4.0
3.0
383

26.0
26.0
0.27
4.0
3.0
479
c0.24

54.2
54.2
0.57
4.0
3.0
1027
0.19

c0.18
0.72
32.9
1.00
9.4
42.3
D
35.3
D

0.05
0.19
28.5
1.00
1.1
29.6
C

0.89
33.2
1.00
18.7
51.9
D

0.32
10.8
1.00
0.8
11.6
B
34.0
C

23.2
23.2
0.24
4.0
3.0
428
0.06
0.24
28.8
1.00
1.3
30.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

34.9
0.75
95.0
62.7%
15

0.84
125%
94
0
0
3%
Perm

8!

5.6
5.6
0.06
4.0
3.0
103
c0.04

32.8
32.8
0.35
4.0
3.0
637
0.15

0.76
44.0
1.15
23.9
74.6
E

0.42
23.9
0.96
1.8
24.8
C
34.8
C

2
8
32.8
32.8
0.35
4.0
3.0
541
0.11
0.32
22.9
1.43
1.4
34.1
C

2
24.2
24.2
0.25
4.0
3.0
336
c0.16
0.62
31.4
1.00
8.5
39.9
D
36.4
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

2
24.2
24.2
0.25
4.0
3.0
399
0.01
0.05
26.7
1.00
0.2
26.9
C

0.88
125%
55
0
0
3%

C
16.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 2

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


9: PR-7733 & New Connector / Factory

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

123
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.33
610
0.92
125%
167
0
167
Perm

380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
516
0
516

62
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
84
46
38
Perm

125
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.29
535
0.92
125%
170
0
170
Perm

257
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
1.00
1790
1.00
1790
0.92
125%
349
13
458

90
1900

109
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
168
0
168
Split
2

61
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
142%
94
0
94

218
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
336
239
97
Perm

125
1900

35
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1793
0.71
1325
0.92
125%
48
0
218

215
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
125%
292
227
65
Perm

4
43.0
43.0
0.45
4.0
717

8
43.0
43.0
0.45
4.0
242

0.02
0.05
14.6
0.54
0.1
8.0
A

c0.32
0.70
20.9
0.68
14.1
28.4
C

4
4
43.0
43.0
0.45
4.0
276
0.27
0.61
19.6
0.42
6.5
14.7
B

43.0
43.0
0.45
4.0
843
0.28
0.61
19.7
0.40
2.2
10.2
B
10.9
B

0.92
125%
122
0
0

24.6
0.66
95.0
65.1%
15

0.92
125%
170
0
0
Perm

43.0
43.0
0.45
4.0
810
0.26

19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
354
c0.09

19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
373
0.05

0.57
19.1
0.68
2.5
15.6
B
19.0
B

0.47
33.6
1.00
4.5
38.1
D

0.25
32.0
1.00
1.6
33.6
C
35.6
D

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
317
0.06
0.31
32.4
1.00
2.5
34.9
C

6
21.0
21.0
0.22
4.0
293
c0.16
0.74
34.5
1.00
15.7
50.2
D
39.3
D

6
21.0
21.0
0.22
4.0
350
0.04
0.18
30.0
1.00
1.2
31.2
C

C
12.0
C

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


13: PR-734 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Grade (%)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

100
1900

99
1900
3%
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
1718
1.00
1718
0.89
138%
154
0
170
3%

245
1900

240
1900

165
1900

112
1900

152
1900

4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
138%
268
169
99
3%
Perm

4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
125%
165
0
165
3%
Prot
7

4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.85
125%
94
39
55
3%
Perm

4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.97
138%
216
0
216
3%
Prot
3

183
1900
0%
4.0
1.00
0.97
1.00
1787
1.00
1787
0.97
138%
260
10
318
3%

48
1900

4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.85
138%
390
0
390
3%
Prot
1

562
1900
0%
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.85
125%
826
0
826
3%

64
1900

4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1544
1.00
1544
0.89
138%
380
205
175
3%
Perm

151
1900
0%
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1845
1.00
1845
0.85
138%
245
0
245
3%

4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1640
0.95
1640
0.89
138%
155
0
139
3%
Split
2!

12.0
12.0
0.13
4.0
3.0
207
0.08

12.0
12.0
0.13
4.0
3.0
217
0.10

0.67
39.6
1.00
16.0
55.7
E

0.78
40.2
1.00
24.1
64.3
E
72.8
E

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

2
12.0
12.0
0.13
4.0
3.0
195
c0.11
0.90
40.9
1.00
41.9
82.8
F

70.3
1.09
95.0
87.7%
15

6!

19.0
19.0
0.20
4.0
3.0
350
c0.22

35.0
35.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
680
0.13

1.11
38.0
1.00
82.6
120.6
F

0.36
21.8
1.00
1.5
23.3
C
64.6
E

6
35.0
35.0
0.37
4.0
3.0
578
0.06
0.17
20.2
1.00
0.6
20.9
C

13.4
13.4
0.14
4.0
3.0
247
0.09

38.0
38.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
738
c0.45

0.67
38.7
1.15
5.4
49.8
D

1.12
28.5
0.62
68.2
85.9
F
73.7
E

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

4
38.0
38.0
0.40
4.0
3.0
627
0.04
0.09
17.7
0.50
0.0
9.0
A

0.97
138%
68
0
0
3%

10.0
10.0
0.11
4.0
3.0
184
c0.12

34.6
34.6
0.36
4.0
3.0
651
0.18

1.17
42.5
0.58
106.7
131.5
F

0.49
23.4
1.19
1.5
29.3
C
69.9
E

E
16.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 4

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


23: PR-172 & PR-7733

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NEL

NET

NER

SWL

SWT

SWR

0
1900

318
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3505
1.00
3505
0.88
125%
452
0
452
3%

210
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.88
125%
298
247
51
3%
Perm

182
1900

232
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.98
3430
0.61
2145
0.89
138%
360
0
642
3%

0
1900

719
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.95
1665
0.95
1665
0.93
138%
1067
0
779
3%
Split
8

0
1900
4.0
0.95
0.91
0.98
1562
0.98
1562
0.92
138%
0
39
694
2%

300
1900

0
1900

0
1900

0.93
138%
445
0
0
3%

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Split
4

2
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1863
1.00
1863
0.92
125%
3
0
3
2%

59.7
59.7
0.63
4.0
3.0
1046
c0.47

59.7
59.7
0.63
4.0
3.0
982
0.44

1.3
1.3
0.01
4.0
3.0
25
c0.00

0.74
12.3
0.60
0.3
7.7
A

0.71
11.8
0.54
0.2
6.6
A
7.2
A

0.12
46.3
1.00
2.1
48.4
D
48.4
D

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%
Perm

2
2
12.8
12.8
0.13
4.0
8.0
472
0.13
0.96
40.8
1.00
32.1
72.9
E
59.7
E

2
12.8
12.8
0.13
4.0
8.0
211
0.03
0.24
36.8
1.00
2.7
39.5
D

0.89
138%
282
0
0
3%
pm+pt
1
6

0.92
138%
0
0
0
2%

6
22.0
22.0
0.23
4.0
8.0
567
c0.06
c0.20
1.49dl
36.5
0.99
78.9
114.9
F
114.9
F

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
44.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.83
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
95.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
85.4%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

0.92
125%
0
0
0
2%

D
12.0
E

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


29: PR-172 & PR-787

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

SEL

SER

NEL

NET

SWT

SWR

119
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1752
0.95
1752
0.93
138%
177
0
177
3%

239
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1568
1.00
1568
0.93
138%
355
294
61
3%
Perm

386
1900

216
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3396
0.58
2050
0.89
138%
335
0
934
3%

192
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3301
1.00
3301
0.86
125%
279
68
388
3%

122
1900

70.7
70.7
0.74
4.0
4.0
1639
c0.05
c0.38
0.87dl
5.4
0.98
0.4
5.7
A
5.7
A

58.7
58.7
0.62
4.0
4.0
2040
0.12

4
16.3
16.3
0.17
4.0
4.0
301
c0.10
0.59
36.3
1.00
3.5
39.7
D
36.2
D

4
16.3
16.3
0.17
4.0
4.0
269
0.04
0.23
33.9
1.00
0.6
34.5
C

0.89
138%
599
0
0
3%
pm+pt
5
2

0.86
125%
177
0
0
3%

0.19
7.9
1.00
0.2
8.1
A
8.1
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
14.7
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.57
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
95.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
60.1%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 6

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


39: PR-52 SB ON Ramp & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBR

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

442
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.96
1731
0.96
1731
0.92
140%
673
14
910

165
1900

191
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.99
3367
0.92
3126
0.92
142%
295
0
341

506
1900
4.0
0.95
0.96
1.00
3388
1.00
3388
0.92
142%
781
45
1048

202
1900

2!

135
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
142%
208
0
162
Prot
2!

54.9
54.9
0.58
4.0
3.0
1000
c0.53

54.9
54.9
0.58
4.0
3.0
930
0.10

32.1
32.1
0.34
4.0
3.0
1145
c0.31

0.91
17.8
1.00
13.6
31.4
C
31.4
C

0.17
9.4
1.00
0.4
9.8
A

87.0
87.0
0.92
4.0
3.0
3002
0.07
0.04
0.11
0.4
1.84
0.0
0.7
A
3.6
A

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

0.92
140%
251
0
0

30.2
0.91
95.0
96.1%
15

0.92
142%
312
0
0

0.92
30.1
1.00
11.2
41.4
D
41.4
D

HCM Level of Service

Sum of lost time (s)


ICU Level of Service

8.0
F

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 7

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


40: New Connector & PR-52 NB OFF Ramp

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

NBL

NBT

SBT

SBR

NEL

NER

276
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.95
1610
0.95
1610
0.92
142%
426
0
213
Prot
5!

104
1900
4.0
0.91
1.00
0.97
3296
0.46
1543
0.92
142%
161
0
374

178
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
0.92
142%
275
0
275

492
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
759
190
569
Perm

223
1900
4.0
1.00
0.96
0.97
1726
0.92
1638
0.92
140%
339
15
472

97
1900

2!

48.1
48.1
0.51
4.0
3.0
815
0.13

48.1
48.1
0.51
4.0
3.0
1669
0.11

38.9
38.9
0.41
4.0
3.0
1449
0.08

4
38.9
38.9
0.41
4.0
3.0
648

2!
48.1
48.1
0.51
4.0
3.0
829

0.26
13.3
0.84
0.1
11.4
B

0.22
13.1
0.86
0.1
11.2
B
11.3
B

0.19
18.0
0.65
0.0
11.6
B
18.2
B

c0.36
0.88
25.9
0.58
5.7
20.6
C

c0.29
0.57
16.3
1.00
2.8
19.1
B
19.1
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

16.5
0.71
95.0
60.8%
15

0.92
140%
148
0
0

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
B

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 8

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


58: PR-743 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Heavy Vehicles (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

WBL

WBR

SBL

SBR

NEL

NER

101
1900
4.0
1.00
0.90
0.99
1665
0.99
1665
0.92
142%
156
103
477
0%

275
1900

193
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
0.92
142%
298
0
298
2%

80
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
123
80
43
2%
Perm

105
1900
4.0
1.00
0.93
0.98
1695
1.00
1737
0.92
142%
162
38
286
2%

105
1900

4
33.0
33.0
0.35
4.0
550

4!
33.0
33.0
0.35
4.0
603

0.03
0.08
20.8
0.58
0.3
12.3
B

0.16
0.47
24.2
1.00
2.7
26.9
C
26.9
C

0.92
142%
424
0
0
2%

4!

54.0
54.0
0.57
4.0
946
c0.29

33.0
33.0
0.35
4.0
615
c0.17

0.50
12.4
1.00
1.9
14.3
B
14.3
B

0.48
24.3
0.70
2.6
19.6
B
17.5
B

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
! Phase conflict between lane groups.
c Critical Lane Group

18.4
0.50
95.0
74.6%
15

0.92
142%
162
0
0
2%

HCM Level of Service


Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

B
8.0
D

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 9

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis


67: PR-1 & New Connector

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Growth Factor (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS

4/30/2010

EBL

EBT

EBR

WBL

WBT

WBR

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

70
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.19
355
0.92
125%
95
0
95
Perm

772
1900
4.0
0.95
0.94
1.00
3321
1.00
3321
1.00
125%
965
279
1360

539
1900

163
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.19
355
1.00
125%
204
0
204
Perm

596
1900
4.0
0.95
0.95
1.00
3360
1.00
3360
1.00
125%
745
142
982

279
1900

436
1900

1.00
142%
619
0
0
Perm

130
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
1.00
142%
185
44
141
Perm

111
1900

0.92
125%
379
0
0

63
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.96
3393
0.65
2300
0.92
142%
97
0
716

52
1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
0.97
3423
0.64
2269
0.92
142%
80
0
251

45
1900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1583
1.00
1583
0.92
142%
69
44
25
Perm

1.00
125%
674
0
0

4
4
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
166
0.27
0.57
8.7
1.00
13.6
22.3
C

21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
1550
0.41
0.88
10.8
1.00
7.3
18.2
B
18.4
B

8
8
21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
166
c0.57
1.23
12.0
1.00
144.5
156.5
F

2
2

21.0
21.0
0.47
4.0
1568
0.29
0.63
9.0
1.00
1.9
10.9
B
33.3
C

0.92
142%
171
0
0
Perm

16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
818
c0.31
1.57dl
13.6
1.00
12.6
26.2
C
23.1
C

Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
23.5
HCM Level of Service
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
1.08
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
45.0
Sum of lost time (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
110.5%
ICU Level of Service
Analysis Period (min)
15
dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.
c Critical Lane Group

Cirdra Road Network PM Peak Hour 4/19/2008 Future Alternative 5 Year 2028 with Improvements
Evan Gonzalez

6
2
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
563
0.09
0.25
10.3
1.00
1.1
11.3
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
807
0.11
0.89dl
10.5
1.00
1.0
11.5
B
11.1
B

6
16.0
16.0
0.36
4.0
563
0.02
0.04
9.5
1.00
0.1
9.6
A

C
8.0
H

Synchro 7 - Report
AM 10

APENDICE AN
Anlisis de Diseo Multi-Carril

AN-1

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

_____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS________________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 1

_____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

_____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED_______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-1

____________________________________VOLUME_________________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
293
vph
0.90
81
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
382
pcph

2
664
vph
0.90
184
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
866
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS__________________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
382
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
866
53.2
956
0.9

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices for


N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45 mph.

AN-2

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 1

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-3

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
394
vph
0.90
109
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
514
pcph

2
163
vph
0.90
45
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
212
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
514
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
212
53.2
956
0.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-4

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 1

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-5

____________________________________VOLUME______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
344
vph
0.90
96
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
449
pcph

2
780
vph
0.90
217
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1018
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
449
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
1018
53.2
956
1.1

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-6

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 1-B

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
C

2
C

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-7

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
344
vph
0.90
96
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
449
pcph

2
780
vph
0.90
217
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1018
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
C
449
53.2
1381
0.3

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
C
1018
53.2
1381
0.7

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-8

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 1

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-9

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
463
vph
0.90
129
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
604
pcph

2
192
vph
0.90
53
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
250
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
604
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
250
53.2
956
0.3

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-10

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 2

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-11

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
1
2
Volume, V
275
vph
522
vph
Peak-hour factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
76
145
Trucks and buses
5
%
5
%
Recreational vehicles
0
%
0
%
Terrain type
Mountainous
Mountainous
Grade
0.00
%
0.00
%
Segment length
0.00
mi
0.00
mi
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
4.5
4.5
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
4.0
4.0
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
0.851
0.851
Driver population adjustment, fP
1.00
1.00
Flow rate, vp
359
pcph
681
pcph
___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
359
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
681
53.2
956
0.7

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-12

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 2

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-13

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
350
vph
0.90
97
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
456
pcph

2
104
vph
0.90
29
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
135
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
456
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
135
53.2
956
0.1

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-14

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 2

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED_____________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-15

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
322
vph
0.90
89
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
420
pcph

2
612
vph
0.90
170
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
799
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
1
2
Desired LOS
B
B
Flow rate, vp
420
pcph
799
pcph
Free-flow speed, FFS
53.2
mph
53.2
mph
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
956
pcphpl
956
pcphpl
Number of lanes required, N
0.4
0.8
Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices
for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-16

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 2

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-17

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
410
vph
0.90
114
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
535
pcph

2
122
vph
0.90
34
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
159
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
535
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
159
53.2
956
0.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-18

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 3

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-19

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
293
vph
0.90
81
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
382
pcph

2
664
vph
0.90
184
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
866
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
382
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
866
53.2
956
0.9

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-20

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 3

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-21

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
394
vph
0.90
109
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
514
pcph

2
143
vph
0.90
40
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
186
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
514
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
186
53.2
956
0.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-22

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 3

___________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-23

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
344
vph
0.90
96
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
449
pcph

2
780
vph
0.90
217
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1018
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
449
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
1018
53.2
956
1.1

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-24

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 3-B

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
C

2
C

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-25

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
344
vph
0.90
96
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
449
pcph

2
780
vph
0.90
217
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1018
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
C
449
53.2
1381
0.3

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
C
1018
53.2
1381
0.7

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-26

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 3

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-27

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
463
vph
0.90
129
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
604
pcph

2
168
vph
0.90
47
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
219
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
604
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
219
53.2
956
0.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-28

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 4

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-29

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
358
vph
0.90
99
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
467
pcph

2
749
vph
0.90
208
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
977
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
467
53.2
956
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
977
53.2
956
1.0

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-30

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 4

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-31

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
490
vph
0.90
136
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
639
pcph

2
227
vph
0.90
63
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
296
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
639
53.2
956
0.7

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
296
53.2
956
0.3

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-32

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 4

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-33

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
420
vph
0.90
117
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
548
pcph

2
879
vph
0.90
244
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1147
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
548
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
1147
53.2
956
1.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-34

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 4

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-35

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
575
vph
0.90
160
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
750
pcph

2
267
vph
0.90
74
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
348
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
750
53.2
956
0.8

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
348
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-36

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-37

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
404
vph
0.90
112
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
527
pcph

2
755
vph
0.90
210
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
985
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
527
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
985
53.2
956
1.0

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-38

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2018
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-39

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
469
vph
0.90
130
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
612
pcph

2
269
vph
0.90
75
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
351
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
612
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
351
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-40

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-41

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
474
vph
0.90
132
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
618
pcph

2
886
vph
0.90
246
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1156
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
618
53.2
956
0.6

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
1156
53.2
956
1.2

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-42

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
AM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5-B

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
C

2
C

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-43

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
474
vph
0.90
132
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
618
pcph

2
886
vph
0.90
246
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
1156
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
C
618
53.2
1381
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
C
1156
53.2
1381
0.8

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-44

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5

___________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
B

2
B

___________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-45

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
551
vph
0.90
153
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
719
pcph

2
315
vph
0.90
88
5
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.851
1.00
411
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
B
719
53.2
956
0.8

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
B
411
53.2
956
0.4

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-46

HCS+: Multilane Highways Release 5.3

Phone:
E-mail:

Fax:

____________________________DESIGN ANALYSIS______________________________
Analyst:
Agency/Co:
Date:
Analysis Period:
Highway:
From/To:
Jurisdiction:
Analysis Year:
Project ID:

Evan Gonzalez
EFGB Consulting Engineers
8/17/2008
PM Peak
New Connector
Cidra to Cayey
2028
New Connector between Cidra and Cayey Alternative 5

____________________________LEVEL OF SERVICE_____________________________
Direction
Desired LOS

1
C

2
C

____________________________FREE-FLOW SPEED______________________________
Direction
Lane width
Lateral clearance:
Right edge
Left edge
Total lateral clearance
Access points per mile
Median type
Free-flow speed:
FFS or BFFS
Lane width adjustment, FLW
Lateral clearance adjustment, FLC
Access points adjustment, FA
Median type adjustment, FM
Free-flow speed

1
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

2
12.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
1
Undivided
Base
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.6
53.2

ft
ft
ft
ft

mph
mph
mph
mph
mph
mph

AN-47

____________________________________VOLUME_______________________________
Direction
Volume, V
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Peak 15-minute volume, v15
Trucks and buses
Recreational vehicles
Terrain type
Grade
Segment length
Trucks and buses PCE, ET
Recreational vehicles PCE, ER
Heavy vehicle adjustment, fHV
Driver population adjustment, fP
Flow rate, vp

1
551
vph
0.90
153
3
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.905
1.00
676
pcph

2
315
vph
0.90
88
3
%
0
%
Mountainous
0.00
%
0.00
mi
4.5
4.0
0.905
1.00
386
pcph

___________________________________RESULTS_______________________________
Direction
Desired LOS
Flow rate, vp
Free-flow speed, FFS
Allowable maximum service flow rate
for desired LOS, MSF
Number of lanes required, N

1
C
676
53.2
1381
0.5

pcph
mph
pcphpl

2
C
386
53.2
1381
0.3

pcph
mph
pcphpl

Designers should perform an operational analysis on the possible choices


for N.
Overall results are not computed when free-flow speed is less than 45
mph.

AN-48

APENDICE AO
Resultados del Modelo SATURN

AO-1

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 1 - AM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
1,348
853
992
1,427
950
0
0
742
275
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
51
0
0
16
639
0
0
115
820
602
248
0
0
142
580
0
0
208
93
0
0
40
733
44
89
1,012
102
1,085
439
0
387
1,286
162
516

CamS
31
36
27
57
36
0
0
33
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
9
0
3
3
13
3
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
17
10
4
7
1
0
4
0
0

CamP
39
27
29
103
43
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
25
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
1418
1,376
916
880
1047
1,015
1586
1,489
1029
983
0
0
0
0
792
764
299
287
0
0
0
0
45
45
152
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
53
0
0
0
0
16
16
660
647
34
13
0
0
123
118
822
821
615
609
251
250
0
0
0
0
156
148
582
580
0
0
0
0
214
211
93
93
0
0
0
0
40
40
758
745
44
44
89
89
1030
1,021
112
107
1089
1,087
450
444
1
1
387
387
1290
1,288
162
162
516
516

AO-1

18
9056 C
1001
1001
1001
1002
1002
1003
1003

9056
18
1002
9012
9011
1003
1001
9007
1002

180
180
65.2
73.7
71.25
105.18
63.97
158.15
103.18

1000
1000
1274
612
645
2055
1274
3090
2055

284
210
540
619
493
540
238
540
238

0
0
18
28
13
18
7
18
7

0
0
0
17
39
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

284
210
558
665
545
558
245
558
245

284
210
549
639
513
549
242
549
242

AO-2

9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019

9002
9002
9056
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9056
9021
9008
9006
1003
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
1001
9013
1001
9014
9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009

82.07
90.15
257.4
496.07
555.19
82.07
58.14
204.61
592.98
837
145
27.73
845.94
282.56
87.05
317.88
387.43
206.52
21.22
139.14
155.15
269.82
429.03
18.66
68.29
87.48
232.16
181.22
161.91
40
397.63
246.1
61.71
75.16
1769.41
89.36
1578.43
395.93
354.06
114.65
480.35
220.25
201.9
138.13
60.17
69.97
65.61
313.97
42.67
135.35
28.31
148.41

2029
835
5711
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
5711
3256
274
2051
3090
6532
10768
274
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155

0
2,327
22
1,296
1,031
0
1,172
1,031
449
386
449
386
98
0
261
0
187
444
1,385
187
238
850
723
756
633
489
697
479
678
0
479
678
98
582
516
832
162
234
651
682
234
162
916
886
210
639
115
1,470
1,234
1,368
891
493

0
63
0
63
0
0
42
0
24
10
24
10
4
0
0
0
0
9
18
0
7
47
18
16
19
0
0
11
10
0
11
10
4
21
0
31
0
8
0
0
8
0
8
22
18
3
3
21
57
61
25
11

0
45
0
45
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
38
25
7
46
0
0
17
39
0
17
39
0
17
0
39
0
10
0
0
10
0
10
19
10
18
6
25
51
78
21
17

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
2435
22
1404
1031
0
1239
1031
474
396
474
396
101
0
261
0
187
460
1403
187
245
934
765
779
698
489
697
507
726
0
507
726
101
621
516
902
162
252
651
682
252
162
934
926
238
660
123
1,515
1341.27
1507.08
936.45
521.5

0
2,374
22
1,343
1,031
0
1,201
1,031
461
391
461
391
99
0
261
0
187
451
1,394
187
242
886
740
766
658
489
697
490
696
0
490
696
99
599
516
860
162
241
651
682
241
162
924
903
223
647
118
1,488
1,279
1,425
910
505

AO-3

9020
9020
9021
9021
9021
9056
9056

9011
9005
9009
9010
9007
9006
9001

68.98
35.04
81.72
45
304.18
277.49
367.82

595
337
1775
1000
3256
5711
5711

386
98
444
0
697.03
261.43
22.4

10
4
9
0
0
0
0

0
0
7
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

396.14
101.23
460.25
0
697.03
261.43
22.4

391
99
451

AO-4

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 1 - PM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
937
889
2,865
2,112
1,435
198
231
1,439
249
0
0
59
459
7
0
0
111
1
0
38
378
0
0
53
591
684
569
2
0
736
833
5
1
570
98
1
0
332
250
238
1,410
2,110
1,100
755
360
330
269
1,370
191
374

CamS CamP
23
46
45
80
2
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
12
0
0
4
0
24
0
0
16
4
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
24
32
0
0

19
41
61
72
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
33
7
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
21
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
979
955
976
925
2971
2,908
2263
2,175
1438
1,437
198
198
236
233
1449
1,443
249
249
0
0
0
0
59
59
459
459
7
7
0
0
0
0
111
111
1
1
0
0
44
40
442
405
19
8
0
0
53
53
596
593
684
684
620
590
2
2
0
0
773
751
867
845
5
5
1
1
572
571
100
99
1
1
0
0
332
332
250
250
238
238
1410
1,410
2110
2,110
1100
1,100
755
755
372
366
330
330
293
281
1432
1,396
191
191
374
374

AO-5

1001
1001
1001
1002
1002
1003
1003
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016

1002
9012
9011
1003
1001
9007
1002
9002
9002
9006
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9001
9021
9008
9006
1003
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
1001
9013
1001
9014
9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015

63.78
80.7
67.76
102.88
64.21
154.69
103.57
82.34
429.76
768.88
630.29
505.62
82.4
455.26
156.13
1014.86
797.68
282.98
26.92
905.34
282.56
113.21
317.88
768.79
291.33
18.72
138.04
155.73
281.9
557.61
18.26
75.51
88.7
228.19
184.32
145.83
40
403.09
229.97
65.23
66.92
1522.66
70.5
1602.68
389.14
373.58
117.7
472.1
223.37
199.09
484.67
68.66

1274
612
645
2055
1274
3090
2055
2029
835
11422
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
11422
3256
274
2051
3090
6532
10768
274
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897

134
707
429
134
320
134
320
214
3,005
750
2,510
708
232
3,045
708
1,026
324
1,026
324
285
0
750
0
130
904
748
130
320
1,432
2,251
598
930
523
621
468
549
0
468
549
285
387
374
563
191
181
714
669
181
203
851
2,579
432

4
39
19
4
13
4
13
0
4
29
4
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
0
19
15
22
19
13
29
7
18
35
0
19
26
19
0
26
19
0
26
0
23
0
7
0
19
7
4
27
18
27

0
34
19
0
0
0
0
0
5
41
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
0
20
28
31
20
0
18
2
4
46
0
33
34
19
0
34
19
0
34
0
19
0
7
0
33
7
0
41
20
41

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

137
780
468
137
333
137
333
214
3014
819
2519
708
237
3050
708
1026
324
1026
324
285
0
819
0
169
947
801
169
333
1480
2261
620
1011
523
673
528
588
0
528
588
285
447
374
605
191
196
714
722
196
207
918
2618
499

135
738
445
135
326
135
326
214
3,008
778
2,514
708
234
3,047
708
1,026
324
1,026
324
285
0
778
0
146
921
769
146
326
1,453
2,256
608
963
523
641
492
565
0
492
565
285
412
374
581
191
187
714
690
187
205
877
2,595
459

AO-6

9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021

9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
9007

67.48
65.48
480.44
83.69
172.49
46.37
144.21
66.42
37.64
105
45
298.99

1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
3256

378
53
2,823
1,584
2,055
2,620
419
324
285
904
0
621

31
0
36
54
63
17
26
0
0
15
0
19

33
0
20
51
65
20
34
0
0
28
0
33

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

442
53
2878
1689
2,183
2656.53
478.81
324.33
285.02
946.76
0
672.92

405
53
2,848
1,628
2,108
2,635
443
324
285
921
0
641

AO-7

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 - AM PEAK HOUR

Travel
Time
C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16

50
50
50
50
720
849.44
849.44
720
1103.55
1301.95
1301.95
1103.55
1158.72
1367.03
1367.03
1158.72
1714.29
2022.47
2022.47
1714.29
1092.13
1735.71
1735.71
1092.13
1241.49
1241.49
1611.43
1901.12
1901.12
1611.43
1645.71
1941.57
1941.57
1645.71
1931.21
2278.4
2278.4
1931.21
3621.02
3621.02
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50

Distan
ce
1000
1000
1000
1000
21000
21000
21000
21000
32187
32187
32187
32187
33796
33796
33796
33796
50000
50000
50000
50000
27000
27000
27000
27000
19312
19312
47000
47000
47000
47000
48000
48000
48000
48000
56327
56327
56327
56327
56327
56327
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000

Liv
1,348
853
992
1,427
950
0
0
742
275
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
51
0
0
16
639
0
0
115
820
602
248
0
0
142
580
0
0
208
93
0
0
40
733
44
89
1,012
102
1,085
439
0
387
1,286

CamS
31
36
27
57
36
0
0
33
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
9
0
3
3
13
3
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
17
10
4
7
1
0
4

Ff
TotalFlo
Total
CamP lo
w
(veh/hr)
w
39
27
29
103
43
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
25
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1418
916
1047
1586
1029
0
0
792
299
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
54
0
0
16
660
34
0
123
822
615
251
0
0
156
582
0
0
214
93
0
0
40
758
44
89
1030
112
1089
450
1
387
1290

1,376
880
1,015
1,489
983
0
0
764
287
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
53
0
0
16
647
13
0
118
821
609
250
0
0
148
580
0
0
211
93
0
0
40
745
44
89
1,021
107
1,087
444
1
387
1,288

AO-8

C
C

17
9013 C
18
9056 C
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014

9013
17
9056
18
2002
9012
9011
2003
2001
2004
2002
9007
2003
9002
9002
9056
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9056
9021
9008
9006
2004
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
2001
9013
2001
9014
9012
9015

62.07 1000
62.07 1000
180 1000
180 1000
64.62 1274
73.63
612
71.25
645
104.23 2055
63.93 1274
94.74 1868
103.13 2055
88.3 1741
93.74 1868
82.07 2029
90.15
835
257.4 5711
494.79 10768
557.91 5382
82.07 2029
58.14
835
207.28 1316
592.98 5382
846.12 6978
145 1316
26.63
337
845.94 6978
284.29 7064
91.12 2051
317.88 7064
387.43 5711
236.75 3256
21.22
274
139.14 2051
87.37 1741
267.3 6532
429.03 10768
19.27
274
74.26 1155
85.37 1977
231.12 1775
181.04 1602
161.91 1602
40 1000
397.3 5538
246.1 5538
61.71
595
69.91
645
1769.41 3471
89.36
612
1578.43 4211
396.11 3471
335.71 1076

162
516
284
210
422
619
493
422
223
422
223
422
223
0
2,327
22
1,281
1,046
0
1,172
1,046
449
401
449
283
98
117
379
0
187
649
1,386
187
223
644
723
953
904
423
691
479
678
0
479
678
98
480
516
832
162
234
586

0
0
0
0
18
28
13
18
7
18
7
18
7
0
63
0
63
0
0
42
0
24
10
24
10
4
0
0
0
0
5
18
0
7
51
18
12
15
0
0
11
10
0
11
10
4
21
0
31
0
8
0

0
0
0
0
0
16
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
0
45
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
41
25
4
43
0
0
16
39
0
16
39
0
16
0
39
0
11
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

162
516
284
210
440
663
545
440
230
440
230
440
230
0
2435
22
1389
1046
0
1239
1046
474
411
474
294
101
117
379
0
187
659
1404
187
230
736
765
970
962
423
691
506
726
0
506
726
101
517
516
902
162
253
586

162
516
284
210
431
639
513
431
227
431
227
431
227
0
2,374
22
1,328
1,046
0
1,201
1,046
461
406
461
288
99
117
379
0
187
653
1,395
187
227
683
740
961
926
423
691
490
696
0
490
696
99
496
516
860
162
242
586

AO-9

9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021
9056
9056

9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
9007
9006
9001

114.65
480.56
220.25
202.12
138.07
61.78
69.97
65.61
314.5
37.83
138.6
28.32
147.65
65.47
35.04
90.02
45
302.83
277.49
367.82

1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
3256
5711
5711

682
234
162
916
886
276
639
115
1,476
1,024
1,434
892
487
283
98
649
0
690.79
261.43
22.4

0
8
0
8
21
19
3
3
21
61
61
25
11
10
4
5
0
0
0
0

0
11
0
11
18
11
18
6
25
54
78
21
16
0
0
4
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

682
253
162
935
925
305
660
123.4
1521.42
1138.38
1572.77
938.09
513.97
293.57
101.23
658.53
0
690.79
261.43
22.4

682
242
162
924
902
289
647
118
1,495
1,072
1,490
912
498
288
99
653
0
691
261
22

AO-10

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 - PM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
937
889
2,865
2,112
1,434
199
229
1,441
249
0
0
59
459
7
0
0
111
1
0
38
378
0
0
53
591
684
569
2
0
736
833
5
1
570
98
1
0
332
250
238
1,410
2,110
1,100
755
360
330
269
1,370
191
374

CamS CamP
23
46
45
80
2
0
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
12
0
0
4
0
24
0
0
16
4
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
24
32
0
0

19
41
61
72
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
33
7
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
21
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
979
955
976
925
2971
2,908
2263
2,175
1437
1,436
199
199
234
232
1451
1,445
249
249
0
0
0
0
59
59
459
459
7
7
0
0
0
0
111
111
1
1
0
0
44
40
442
405
19
8
0
0
53
53
596
593
684
684
620
590
2
2
0
0
773
751
868
845
5
5
1
1
572
571
100
99
1
1
0
0
332
332
250
250
238
238
1410
1,410
2110
2,110
1100
1,100
755
755
372
366
330
330
293
281
1432
1,396
191
191
374
374

AO-11

2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015

2002
9012
9011
2003
2001
2004
2002
9007
2003
9002
9002
9006
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9001
9021
9008
9006
2004
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
2001
9013
2001
9014
9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014

63.73
80.69
70.01
102.8
64.08
93.44
103.36
87.09
93.96
82.34
441.9
760.2
631.51
506.84
82.39
450
157.33
1014.86
802.52
282.98
27.39
905.34
282.89
110.19
318.11
771.73
286.93
18.69
135.75
87.57
282.54
556.47
18.22
75.1
88.51
228.52
184.31
145.83
40
403.06
229.97
66.81
68.69
1522.66
70.5
1602.68
389.15
371.95
117.92
472.11
223.32
199.58

1274
612
645
2055
1274
1868
2055
1741
1868
2029
835
11422
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
11422
3256
274
2051
1741
6532
10768
274
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076

86
707
477
86
288
86
288
86
288
214
3,022
732
2,518
718
230
3,038
718
1,026
334
1,026
356
285
48
710
22
139
883
734
92
288
1,454
2,242
579
914
518
623
468
549
0
468
549
333
419
374
563
191
181
709
672
181
203
854

0
38
23
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
4
29
4
0
5
3
0
0
0
0
11
0
3
18
11
18
16
22
15
2
28
8
18
35
0
19
26
19
0
26
19
3
37
0
23
0
7
0
19
7
4
26

0
34
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
41
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
0
20
27
31
20
0
19
2
4
46
0
33
34
19
0
34
19
0
34
0
19
0
7
0
33
7
0
40

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

86
779
519
86
290
86
290
86
290
214
3031
802
2527
718
235
3042
718
1026
334
1026
367
285
51
769
33
178
926
788
127
290
1501
2252
600
995
518
675
528
588
0
528
588
336
489
374
605
191
196
709
725
196
207
921

86
738
495
86
289
86
289
86
289
214
3,026
760
2,522
718
232
3,040
718
1,026
334
1,026
361
285
50
732
27
155
900
756
106
289
1,474
2,246
589
947
518
643
492
565
0
492
565
335
449
374
581
191
187
709
693
187
205
880

AO-12

9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021

9019
9015
9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
9007

482.43
68.99
67.48
65.48
480.12
106.65
172.8
46.34
144.13
67.88
38.81
103.79
45
299.42

1739
897
1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
3256

2,576
440
378
53
2,821
1,605
2,060
2,617
419
356
333
883
0
623

18
26
31
0
36
53
63
18
26
11
3
16
0
19

20
40
33
0
20
52
65
20
34
0
0
27
0
33

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2615
506
442
53
2,876
1710.33
2187.75
2654.51
477.99
366.98
336.22
925.58
0
674.94

2,592
466
405
53
2,845
1,649
2,113
2,633
443
361
335
900
0
643

AO-13

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 3 - AM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
936.93
888.58
2865.28
2111.62
1435.76
197.28
229.26
1440.96
249.1
0
0
59.49
459.38
7.48
0
0
111.03
0.74
0
37.97
378
0
0
53.43
591.47
684.2
568.71
1.81
0
736.19
832.72
4.98
0.83
570.28
98.04
1.04
0
331.78
249.54
237.96
1410.23
2109.52
1100.4
755.42
360.42
329.7
269.29
1369.8
191.34
374

CamS
23
45.87
44.69
79.7
2.1
0
4.84
3.96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31.19
12.39
0
0
4.03
0
24.19
0
0
15.76
4.32
0
0
2.04
2.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.91
0
24.05
31.77
0
0

CamP
18.87
41.09
60.74
71.53
0
0
0.31
5.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.01
33.02
6.64
0
0
0
0
26.83
0
0
21.39
30.38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30.45
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
978.81
955
975.54
925
2970.71
2,908
2262.85
2,175
1437.85
1,437
197.28
197
234.41
232
1450.62
1,445
249.1
249
0
0
0
0
59.49
59
459.38
459
7.48
7
0
0
0
0
111.03
111
0.74
1
0
0
43.97
40
442.21
405
19.03
8
0
0
53.43
53
595.5
593
684.2
684
619.73
590
1.81
2
0
0
773.35
751
867.42
845
4.98
5
0.83
1
572.33
571
100.13
99
1.04
1
0
0
331.78
332
249.54
250
237.96
238
1410.23
1,410
2109.52
2,110
1100.4
1,100
755.42
755
372.33
366
329.7
330
293.34
281
1432.02
1,396
191.34
191
374
374

AO-14

18
9056 C
3001
3001
3001
3002
3002
3003
3003
3004
3004
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014
9014
9014

9056
18
3002
9012
9011
3003
3001
3004
3002
9007
3003
9002
9002
9056
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9056
9021
9008
9006
3004
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
3001
9013
3001
9014
9012
9015
9009
9013

180
180
65.2
73.7
71.25
123.19
63.97
57.63
120.86
89.11
56.54
82.07
90.15
257.4
496.07
555.19
82.07
58.14
204.61
592.98
837
145
27.73
845.94
282.56
87.05
317.88
387.43
206.52
21.22
139.14
87.42
269.82
429.03
18.66
68.29
87.48
232.16
181.22
161.91
40
397.63
246.1
61.71
75.16
1769.41
89.36
1578.43
395.93
354.06
114.65
480.35

1000
1000
1274
612
645
2407
1274
1126
2407
1741
1126
2029
835
5711
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
5711
3256
274
2051
1741
6532
10768
274
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076
1977
4211

283.83
209.51
539.76
619.44
493.35
539.76
238.17
539.76
238.17
539.76
238.17
0
2327.2
22.4
1295.99
1031.21
0
1171.82
1031.21
449.21
385.99
449.21
385.99
97.7
0
261.43
0
187.11
443.62
1385.03
187.11
238.17
849.75
722.61
755.7
632.9
488.8
697.03
478.88
678.09
0
478.88
678.09
97.7
582.43
516
831.96
162.4
234
651.2
682.42
234

0
0
18.07
28.2
13.09
18.07
7
18.07
7
18.07
7
0
62.93
0
62.93
0
0
42.06
0
24.3
10.16
24.3
10.16
3.53
0
0
0
0
9.4
18.07
0
7
46.53
17.76
16.4
18.96
0
0
11.04
9.56
0
11.04
9.56
3.53
21.2
0
31.16
0
7.96
0
0
7.96

0
0
0
16.97
38.58
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
45.25
0
45.25
0
0
24.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.23
0
0
0.01
38.02
24.97
7.24
45.82
0
0
16.97
38.58
0
16.97
38.58
0
16.97
0
38.58
0
9.73
0
0
9.73

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

283.83
209.51
557.84
664.61
545.02
557.84
245.17
557.84
245.17
557.84
245.17
0
2435.38
22.4
1404.17
1031.21
0
1238.86
1031.21
473.51
396.14
473.51
396.14
101.23
0
261.43
0
187.11
460.25
1403.11
187.11
245.17
934.3
765.35
779.33
697.67
488.8
697.03
506.88
726.23
0
506.88
726.23
101.23
620.59
516
901.7
162.4
251.69
651.2
682.42
251.69

284
210
549
639
513
549
242
549
242
549
242
0
2,374
22
1,343
1,031
0
1,201
1,031
461
391
461
391
99
0
261
0
187
451
1,394
187
242
886
740
766
658
489
697
490
696
0
490
696
99
599
516
860
162
241
651
682
241

AO-15

9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021
9056
9056

9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
9007
9006
9001

220.25
201.9
138.13
60.17
69.97
65.61
313.97
42.67
135.35
28.31
148.41
68.98
35.04
81.72
45
304.18
277.49
367.82

897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
3256
5711
5711

162.4
916.42
885.6
210.43
638.86
114.5
1469.68
1233.92
1368.15
890.78
493.49
385.99
97.7
443.62
0
697.03
261.43
22.4

0
7.96
21.57
18.26
3.33
2.8
20.53
56.53
61.2
24.82
11.04
10.16
3.53
9.4
0
0
0
0

0
9.73
18.92
9.73
18.28
6.1
24.97
50.82
77.74
20.85
16.97
0
0
7.23
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

162.4
934.1
926.09
238.42
660.47
123.4
1515.17
1341.27
1507.08
936.45
521.5
396.14
101.23
460.25
0
697.03
261.43
22.4

162
924
903
223
647
118
1,488
1,279
1,425
910
505
391
99
451
0
697
261
22

AO-16

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 3 - PM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
936.93
888.58
2865.28
2111.62
1435.76
197.28
229.26
1440.96
249.1
0
0
59.49
459.38
7.48
0
0
111.03
0.74
0
37.97
378
0
0
53.43
591.47
684.2
568.71
1.81
0
736.19
832.72
4.98
0.83
570.28
98.04
1.04
0
331.78
249.54
237.96
1410.23
2109.52
1100.4
755.42
360.42
329.7
269.29
1369.8
191.34
374

CamS
23
45.87
44.69
79.7
2.1
0
4.84
3.96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31.19
12.39
0
0
4.03
0
24.19
0
0
15.76
4.32
0
0
2.04
2.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.91
0
24.05
31.77
0
0

CamP Fflow
18.87
41.09
60.74
71.53
0
0
0.31
5.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.01
33.02
6.64
0
0
0
0
26.83
0
0
21.39
30.38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30.45
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
978.81
955
975.54
925
2970.71
2,908
2262.85
2,175
1437.85
1,437
197.28
197
234.41
232
1450.62
1,445
249.1
249
0
0
0
0
59.49
59
459.38
459
7.48
7
0
0
0
0
111.03
111
0.74
1
0
0
43.97
40
442.21
405
19.03
8
0
0
53.43
53
595.5
593
684.2
684
619.73
590
1.81
2
0
0
773.35
751
867.42
845
4.98
5
0.83
1
572.33
571
100.13
99
1.04
1
0
0
331.78
332
249.54
250
237.96
238
1410.23
1,410
2109.52
2,110
1100.4
1,100
755.42
755
372.33
366
329.7
330
293.34
281
1432.02
1,396
191.34
191
374
374

AO-17

3001
3001
3001
3002
3002
3003
3003
3004
3004
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015

3002
9012
9011
3003
3001
3004
3002
9007
3003
9002
9002
9006
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9001
9021
9008
9006
3004
9018
9002
9007
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
3001
9013
3001
9014
9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014

63.76
80.7
68.59
120.46
64.21
56.35
121.31
87.13
56.75
82.34
429.94
768.9
630.28
505.62
82.39
454.66
156.13
1014.86
797.68
282.98
26.92
905.34
282.61
113.21
317.88
769.51
291.38
18.72
137.07
87.74
281.89
557.32
18.26
75.51
88.7
228.19
184.32
145.83
40
403.08
229.97
65.8
66.92
1522.66
70.5
1602.68
389.14
373.61
117.7
472.1
223.37
199.1

1274
612
645
2407
1274
1126
2407
1741
1126
2029
835
11422
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
11422
3256
274
2051
1741
6532
10768
274
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076

117.47
707.28
445.46
117.47
319.82
117.47
319.82
117.47
319.82
213.33
3005.09
749.65
2509.97
708.45
230.1
3044
708.45
1025.61
324.33
1025.61
324.33
284.92
16.21
749.65
0
132.66
904.15
744.95
116.46
319.82
1432.2
2248.49
597.71
930.36
523.21
620.54
468.22
549.42
0
468.22
549.42
301.13
387.46
374
562.93
191.34
181.3
714.55
669.39
181.3
203.19
850.69

0.4
38.52
22.6
0.4
12.82
0.4
12.82
0.4
12.82
0
3.75
28.94
3.75
0
4.84
3.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.24
28.94
0
18.67
15.25
22.48
15.43
12.82
28.67
7.94
17.41
34.61
0
19.23
25.69
19.36
0
25.69
19.36
3.24
25.69
0
23
0
7.35
0
19.23
7.35
4.03
26.58

0
33.71
18.87
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.28
40.73
5.28
0
0.31
1.92
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40.73
0
19.99
27.58
30.61
19.99
0
18.44
2.22
4.28
46.45
0
33.16
33.71
18.87
0
33.71
18.87
0
33.71
0
18.87
0
7.38
0
33.16
7.38
0
40.54

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

117.87
779.51
486.94
117.87
332.64
117.87
332.64
117.87
332.64
213.33
3014.13
819.32
2519.01
708.45
235.25
3049.02
708.45
1025.61
324.33
1025.61
324.33
284.92
19.45
819.32
0
171.32
946.97
798.04
151.87
332.64
1479.31
2258.65
619.4
1011.41
523.21
672.93
527.63
587.65
0
527.63
587.65
304.37
446.87
374
604.81
191.34
196.03
714.55
721.78
196.03
207.23
917.81

118
738
463
118
326
118
326
118
326
213
3,009
778
2,514
708
233
3,046
708
1,026
324
1,026
324
285
18
778
0
149
921
766
131
326
1,453
2,253
608
963
523
641
492
565
0
492
565
303
412
374
581
191
187
715
690
187
205
877

AO-18

9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021

9019
9015
9018
9017
9008
9019
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
9007

484.63
68.66
67.48
65.48
480.44
83.45
172.48
46.37
144.2
66.42
38.06
105.01
45
298.99

1739
897
1618
1618
6532
405
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
3256

2579.23
432.06
378
53.43
2823.28
1583.81
2054.42
2619.6
419.37
324.33
301.13
904.15
0
620.54

18.11
26.58
31.19
0
35.51
53.67
63.28
17.42
25.69
0
3.24
15.25
0
19.23

20.2
40.54
33.02
0
19.5
51.45
64.89
19.5
33.71
0
0
27.58
0
33.16

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2617.53
499.18
442.21
53.43
2878.29
1688.94
2182.59
2656.52
478.78
324.33
304.37
946.97
0
672.93

2,595
459
405
53
2,848
1,628
2,108
2,635
443
324
303
921
0
641

AO-19

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 4 - AM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
1,348
853
992
1,427
950
0
0
742
275
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
51
0
0
16
639
0
0
115
820
602
248
0
0
142
580
0
0
208
93
0
0
40
733
44
89
1,012
102
1,085
439
0
387
1,286
162
516

CamS
31
36
27
57
36
0
0
33
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
9
0
3
3
13
3
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
17
10
4
7
1
0
4
0
0

CamP
39
27
29
103
43
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
25
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
1418
1,376
916
880
1047
1,015
1586
1,489
1029
983
0
0
0
0
792
764
299
287
0
0
0
0
45
45
152
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
53
0
0
0
0
16
16
660
647
34
13
0
0
123
118
822
821
615
609
251
250
0
0
0
0
156
148
582
580
0
0
0
0
214
211
93
93
0
0
0
0
40
40
758
745
44
44
89
89
1030
1,021
112
107
1089
1,087
450
444
1
1
387
387
1290
1,288
162
162
516
516

AO-20

18
9056 C
4001
4001
4001
4002
4002
4003
4003
4004
4004
4004
4004
4005
4005
4005
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013

9056
18
4002
9012
9011
4003
4001
4004
4002
4005
4003
9021
9007
4004
9018
9008
9002
9002
9056
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9056
9008
9006
4004
9002
9007
4005
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
4001
9013
4001
9014

180
180
65.75
74.55
60.96
124.22
64.15
77.51
121.2
59.55
75.63
66.23
275.18
59.55
178.25
136.49
82.07
86.03
264.65
482.95
563.09
82.07
58.13
212.35
661.55
864
161.76
28.31
882.62
284.31
91.12
326.39
387.56
20.26
145.02
190.64
423.79
18.39
104.91
71.05
85.16
276.32
150.44
128.68
40
343.32
212.76
62.31
64
1769.41
89.36
1578.43

1000
1000
1274
612
645
2407
1274
1502
2407
1191
1502
710
2546
1191
4112
2420
2029
835
5711
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
5711
274
2051
2546
10768
274
2420
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211

284
210
599
619
233
599
284
599
284
0
284
824
938
0
778
1,520
0
2,215
134
1,142
1,074
0
1,172
1,074
580
429
580
423
229
117
379
196
187
1,206
271
515
591
676
778
778
416
931
195
370
0
195
370
145
335
516
832
162

0
0
23
33
8
23
12
23
12
12
12
6
5
9
56
32
0
56
7
56
0
0
41
0
24
10
24
17
4
1
0
7
1
5
0
0
17
0
56
10
0
3
5
4
0
5
4
4
22
0
31
0

0
0
24
27
15
24
18
24
18
0
18
24
0
13
45
25
0
45
0
45
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
45
39
0
5
9
15
0
9
15
0
9
0
39
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

284
210
646
680
256
646
313
646
313
12
313
853
943
22
879
1577
0
2316
141
1243
1074
0
1238
1074
605
439
605
440
233
118
379
203
188
1212
271
515
633
676
879
826
416
939
208
389
0
208
389
150
366
516
902
162

284
210
619
645
242
619
296
619
296
6
296
834
941
9
821
1,544
0
2,258
138
1,185
1,074
0
1,201
1,074
593
434
593
432
231
118
379
199
187
1,209
271
515
608
676
821
795
416
934
200
377
0
200
377
147
349
516
860
162

AO-21

9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021
9056
9056

9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9019
4005
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
4004
9006
9001

393.95
333.84
111.22
477.94
223.56
191.51
141.01
61.54
69.97
65.61
40.47
232.73
138.95
28.52
147.43
70.81
35.48
99.78
45
76.43
294.33
367.85

3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
405
4112
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
710
5711
5711

234
578
635
234
210
869
933
283
639
115
1,151
1,520
1,441
930
491
423
145
824
0
930.98
373.33
22.4

3
0
0
3
0
3
27
13
3
3
57
29
61
25
8
17
4
6
0
2.85
7
0.76

0
0
0
0
0
0
29
0
18
6
45
38
78
21
14
0
0
24
0
4.86
0.01
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

237
578
635
237
210
872.01
988.19
296.31
660.47
123.4
1253.61
1586.97
1579.86
975.83
511.79
440.16
149.55
853.01
0
938.69
380.33
23.16

235
578
635
235
210
871
956
290
647
118
1,195
1,547
1,497
950
499
432
147
834
0
934
377
23

AO-22

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 4 - PM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
937
889
2,865
2,112
1,467
166
210
1,461
249
0
0
59
461
5
0
0
111
1
0
38
378
0
0
53
591
684
569
2
0
736
833
5
1
570
98
1
0
332
250
238
1,410
2,110
1,100
755
360
330
269
1,370
191
374

CamS CamP
23
46
45
80
2
0
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
12
0
0
4
0
24
0
0
16
4
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
24
32
0
0

19
41
61
72
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
33
7
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
21
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
979
955
976
925
2971
2,908
2263
2,175
1469
1,468
166
166
215
212
1470
1,464
249
249
0
0
0
0
59
59
461
461
5
5
0
0
0
0
111
111
1
1
0
0
44
40
442
405
19
8
0
0
53
53
596
593
684
684
620
590
2
2
0
0
773
751
867
845
5
5
1
1
572
571
100
99
1
1
0
0
332
332
250
250
238
238
1410
1,410
2110
2,110
1100
1,100
755
755
372
366
330
330
293
281
1432
1,396
191
191
374
374

AO-23

4001
4001
4001
4002
4002
4003
4003
4004
4004
4004
4004
4005
4005
4005
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014

4002
9012
9011
4003
4001
4004
4002
4005
4003
9021
9007
4004
9018
9008
9002
9002
9006
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9001
9008
9006
4004
9002
9007
4005
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
4001
9013
4001
9014
9012
9015

63.86
80.92
65.69
120.65
64.6
75.28
122.05
59.55
76.16
71.96
287.91
59.57
204.52
264.75
82.26
462.08
762.88
631.14
506.45
82.34
451.39
156.95
1021.24
800.96
289.36
27.4
907.04
282.94
110.24
318.17
777.68
19.36
136.44
289.44
553.83
18
121.18
73.05
88.91
286.19
168.95
135.38
40.02
369.59
219.48
67.05
63.38
1522.66
70.5
1602.68
388.78
375.47

1274
612
645
2407
1274
1502
2407
1191
1502
710
2546
1191
4112
2420
2029
835
11422
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
11422
274
2051
2546
10768
274
2420
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076

187
711
376
187
384
187
384
2
384
918
951
26
1,527
2,571
180
3,052
736
2,517
715
210
3,039
715
1,029
331
1,029
356
288
52
711
25
157
954
105
1,072
2,221
470
1,553
830
529
949
397
441
21
376
441
340
327
374
563
191
178
720

2
39
21
2
23
2
23
0
23
16
16
23
29
39
0
2
30
2
0
6
3
0
0
0
0
13
0
3
18
13
18
17
15
12
9
10
32
34
0
14
7
18
4
3
18
3
16
0
23
0
7
0

1
34
18
1
30
1
30
0
30
30
29
27
17
24
0
5
41
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
0
20
23
20
29
2
2
17
48
0
25
11
18
7
4
18
0
4
0
19
0
7
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

190
783
415
190
436
190
436
2
436
964
996
76
1573
2634
180
3059
807
2525
715
216
3044
715
1029
331
1029
369
288
55
770
38
195
994
140
1113
2231
482
1601
912
529
988
414
476
31
383
476
343
346
374
605
191
193
720

188
741
392
188
405
188
405
2
405
936
969
46
1,547
2,599
180
3,055
765
2,520
715
213
3,042
715
1,029
331
1,029
362
288
53
734
31
173
970
119
1,088
2,226
475
1,574
863
529
964
404
456
25
379
456
342
336
374
581
191
184
720

AO-24

9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021

9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9019
4005
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
4004

123.27
471.67
223.49
210.28
434.63
71.43
67.48
65.48
139.28
435.75
172.14
42.7
158.17
67.94
38.99
106.02
45
81.92

1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
405
4112
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
710

745
178
205
923
2,507
500
378
53
1,684
2,569
2,049
2,371
602
356
340
918
0
970

15
7
4
23
22
23
31
0
34
60
63
21
5
13
3
16
0
18

29
7
0
36
25
36
33
0
23
51
65
24
6
0
0
30
0
31

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

789
193
209
981
2,554
558.5
442.21
53.43
1740.43
2680.14
2176.88
2415.95
613.42
368.56
343.43
964.33
0
1019.04

762
184
207
946
2,527
523
405
53
1,708
2,616
2,102
2,389
606
362
342
936
0
989

AO-25

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 5 - AM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
1,348
853
992
1,427
950
0
0
742
275
0
0
45
152
0
0
0
51
0
0
16
639
0
0
115
820
602
248
0
0
142
580
0
0
208
93
0
0
40
733
44
89
1,012
102
1,085
439
0
387
1,286
162
516

CamS
31
36
27
57
36
0
0
33
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
9
0
3
3
13
3
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
17
10
4
7
1
0
4
0
0

CamP
39
27
29
103
43
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
25
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
1418
1,376
916
880
1047
1,015
1586
1,489
1029
983
0
0
0
0
792
764
299
287
0
0
0
0
45
45
152
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
53
0
0
0
0
16
16
660
647
34
13
0
0
123
118
822
821
615
609
251
250
0
0
0
0
156
148
582
580
0
0
0
0
214
211
93
93
0
0
0
0
40
40
758
745
44
44
89
89
1030
1,021
112
107
1089
1,087
450
444
1
1
387
387
1290
1,288
162
162
516
516

AO-26

18
9056 C
5001
5001
5001
5002
5002
5003
5003
5004
5004
5004
5004
5005
5005
5005
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013

9056
18
5002
9012
9011
5003
5001
5004
5002
5005
5003
9021
9007
5004
9018
9008
9002
9002
9056
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9056
9008
9006
5004
9002
9007
5005
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
5001
9013
5001
9014

180
180
65.79
74.55
60.81
124.3
64.27
77.56
121.43
77.6
75.77
64.64
279.02
77.94
152.7
169.95
82.07
85.95
264.88
482.95
562.59
82.07
58.13
211.86
662.18
862.23
161.91
28.31
883.04
284.31
91.12
326.61
387.56
20.33
145.02
186.5
423.75
18.29
132.28
70.27
84.97
241.98
148.35
128.17
40
339.64
212.24
62.33
62.83
1769.41
89.36
1578.43

1000
1000
1274
612
645
2407
1274
1502
2407
1552
1502
710
2546
1552
3500
3032
2029
835
5711
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
5711
274
2051
2546
10768
274
3032
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211

284
210
605
619
227
605
323
605
323
0
323
789
942
224
819
1,514
0
2,213
137
1,142
1,071
0
1,172
1,071
582
426
582
423
230
117
379
198
187
1,210
271
474
590
634
819
743
409
751
156
363
0
156
363
146
297
516
832
162

0
0
23
33
8
23
11
23
11
0
11
6
17
10
56
21
0
56
7
56
0
0
41
0
24
10
24
17
4
1
0
7
1
17
0
0
17
0
56
10
0
1
5
3
0
5
3
4
22
0
31
0

0
0
24
27
14
24
17
24
17
0
17
24
0
15
45
25
0
45
0
45
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
45
39
0
2
9
14
0
9
14
0
9
0
39
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

284
210
652
680
249
652
352
652
352
0
352
819
960
249
920
1560
0
2314
144
1243
1071
0
1238
1071
606
436
606
440
234
118
379
205
188
1228
271
474
632
634
920
791
409
755
170
381
0
170
381
151
328
516
902
162

284
210
624
645
236
624
334
624
334
0
334
800
951
234
862
1,533
0
2,256
140
1,185
1,071
0
1,201
1,071
594
431
594
432
232
118
379
202
187
1,219
271
474
607
634
862
761
409
752
162
370
0
162
370
148
311
516
860
162

AO-27

9013
9014
9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021
9056
9056

9012
9015
9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9019
5005
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
5004
9006
9001

393.95
332.14
111.66
477.94
223.07
192.52
140.72
61.71
69.97
65.61
36.33
215.03
139.28
28.49
127.9
70.81
35.5
97.99
45
65.54
294.75
367.85

3471
1076
1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
405
3500
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
710
5711
5711

234
572
641
234
203
875
927
290
639
115
968
1,739
1,447
925
265
423
146
789
0
750.93
375.99
22.4

3
0
0
3
0
3
27
13
3
3
56
31
61
25
6
17
4
6
0
1.32
7
0.77

0
0
0
0
0
0
29
0
18
6
43
40
78
21
12
0
0
24
0
2.48
0.01
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

237
572
641
237
203
878.25
981.95
302.87
660.47
123.4
1067.23
1809.16
1586.41
970.44
283.37
440.16
150.63
819.43
0
754.73
383
23.17

235
572
641
235
203
877
949
296
647
118
1,011
1,767
1,504
944
272
432
148
800
0
752
379
23

AO-28

SATURN RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 5 - PM PEAK HOUR

C
C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C

1
9012
2
9016
3
3
9000
9001
4
4
9000
9001
5
5
9000
9001
6
6
9000
9001
7
7
9016
9017
8
9015
9
9
9000
9001
10
10
9000
9001
11
11
9000
9001
12
9004
13
9008
14
9004
15
9018
16
9008
17
9013

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C

C
C

C
C

C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C

9012
1
9016
2
9001
9000
3
3
9001
9000
4
4
9001
9000
5
5
9001
9000
6
6
9017
9016
7
7
9015
8
9001
9000
9
9
9001
9000
10
10
9001
9000
11
11
9004
12
9008
13
9004
14
9018
15
9008
16
9013
17

Travel
Distance
Time
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
720
21000
849.44
21000
849.44
21000
720
21000
1103.55
32187
1301.95
32187
1301.95
32187
1103.55
32187
1158.72
33796
1367.03
33796
1367.03
33796
1158.72
33796
1714.29
50000
2022.47
50000
2022.47
50000
1714.29
50000
1092.13
27000
1735.71
27000
1735.71
27000
1092.13
27000
1241.49
19312
1241.49
19312
1611.43
47000
1901.12
47000
1901.12
47000
1611.43
47000
1645.71
48000
1941.57
48000
1941.57
48000
1645.71
48000
1931.21
56327
2278.4
56327
2278.4
56327
1931.21
56327
3621.02
56327
3621.02
56327
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
50
1000
62.07
1000
62.07
1000

Liv
937
889
2,865
2,112
1,469
164
198
1,473
249
0
0
59
463
4
0
0
111
1
0
38
378
0
0
53
591
684
569
1
0
736
834
3
1
571
98
1
0
332
250
238
1,410
2,110
1,100
755
360
330
269
1,370
191
374

CamS CamP
23
46
45
80
2
0
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
12
0
0
4
0
24
0
0
16
4
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
24
32
0
0

19
41
61
72
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
33
7
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
21
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0

Fflow
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

TotalFlo
Total
w
(veh/hr)
979
955
976
925
2971
2,908
2263
2,175
1471
1,470
164
164
203
200
1482
1,476
249
249
0
0
0
0
59
59
463
463
4
4
0
0
0
0
111
111
1
1
0
0
44
40
442
405
19
8
0
0
53
53
596
593
684
684
620
590
1
1
0
0
773
751
869
847
3
3
1
1
573
572
100
99
1
1
0
0
332
332
250
250
238
238
1410
1,410
2110
2,110
1100
1,100
755
755
372
366
330
330
293
281
1432
1,396
191
191
374
374

AO-29

5001
5001
5001
5002
5002
5003
5003
5004
5004
5004
5004
5005
5005
5005
9000
9001
9001
9002
9002
9002
9002
9003
9003
9004
9004
9005
9005
9005
9006
9006
9006
9007
9007
9007
9008
9008
9008
9009
9009
9009
9009
9010
9010
9010
9011
9011
9011
9012
9012
9013
9013
9014

5002
9012
9011
5003
5001
5004
5002
5005
5003
9021
9007
5004
9018
9008
9002
9002
9006
9008
9003
9000
9001
9004
9002
9005
9003
9020
9004
9006
9007
9005
9001
9008
9006
5004
9002
9007
5005
9019
9014
9021
9010
9009
9021
9011
9010
9020
5001
9013
5001
9014
9012
9015

63.92
80.81
64.5
120.77
64.53
75.36
121.92
77.6
76.08
72.61
281.83
77.62
175
332.26
82.25
480.83
752.94
633.87
506.8
82.31
469.53
157.29
1019.06
802.36
287.18
27.4
906.46
282.96
109.22
318.13
772.96
19.25
135.69
288.73
555.71
17.99
151.94
73.83
87
277.84
168.88
132.64
40.01
372.34
216.73
67.05
63.82
1522.66
70.5
1602.68
388.96
358.52

1274
612
645
2407
1274
1502
2407
1552
1502
710
2546
1552
3500
3032
2029
835
11422
10768
5382
2029
835
1316
5382
6978
1316
337
6978
7064
2051
7064
11422
274
2051
2546
10768
274
3032
1155
1977
1775
1602
1602
1000
5538
5538
595
645
3471
612
4211
3471
1076

222
709
341
222
365
222
365
0
365
944
900
16
1,535
2,623
174
3,081
713
2,537
718
198
3,067
718
1,028
334
1,028
356
287
53
691
22
142
885
89
1,081
2,237
464
1,544
876
475
876
409
406
15
394
406
340
344
374
563
191
179
666

1
38
22
1
24
1
24
0
24
10
29
24
35
26
0
2
31
2
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
13
0
3
18
13
19
34
15
9
8
11
35
28
0
28
2
18
1
1
18
3
14
0
23
0
8
0

1
33
18
1
32
1
32
0
32
21
43
31
26
10
0
4
42
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
0
21
45
21
20
1
2
26
39
0
42
3
18
1
2
18
0
2
0
19
0
8
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

224
781
381
224
421
224
421
0
421
976
971
71
1595
2659
174
3086
787
2542
718
204
3070
718
1028
334
1028
369
287
56
752
35
182
964
125
1110
2246
477
1605
944
475
946
414
443
17
397
443
344
360
374
605
191
194
666

222
740
358
222
388
222
388
0
388
957
928
38
1,561
2,639
174
3,083
743
2,539
718
201
3,068
718
1,028
334
1,028
362
287
55
715
28
158
917
104
1,092
2,241
470
1,570
903
475
904
411
422
16
395
422
342
352
374
581
191
186
666

AO-30

9014
9014
9015
9015
9016
9016
9017
9018
9018
9018
9019
9019
9019
9020
9020
9021
9021
9021

9009
9013
9016
9014
9019
9015
9018
9017
9019
5005
9016
9018
9009
9011
9005
9009
9010
5004

119.68
471.88
223.12
203.03
466.67
71.86
67.48
65.48
146.4
414.15
175.45
43.06
158.23
67.94
38.99
106.7
45
78.06

1977
4211
897
1076
1739
897
1618
1618
405
3500
1739
405
1155
595
337
1775
1000
710

675
179
200
854
2,576
481
378
53
1,683
2,630
2,103
2,423
609
356
340
944
0
891

29
8
4
36
9
36
31
0
36
50
63
8
2
13
3
10
0
29

43
8
0
50
10
50
33
0
28
41
65
10
2
0
0
21
0
43

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

746
194
204
941
2,595
567.15
442.21
53.43
1746.99
2720.31
2230.96
2440.71
613.94
368.56
343.51
976.12
0
963.32

704
186
202
889
2,583
516
405
53
1,710
2,668
2,156
2,430
611
362
342
957
0
920

AO-31

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen