Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
8 8
c S c S c c 8 8 8 8
0 0 0 1 1
) 1 (
) (kc,/kg w,ter oI he,t speciIic :
) /m density(kg w,ter :
s,tur,tion w,ter :
) g oi(kc,/k oI he,t speciIic : c
) /kg gr,in(kc, Iorm,tion the oI he,t speciIic :
) /m density(kg gr,in Iorm,tion : p
:
) 1 (
3
w
0
3
s
0 0 0 1 1
C c
S
C
C c
ere
c S c S c c
8
8 8
3
3
3
8
8 8 8 8
The specific heat of the formation The specific heat of the formation 88.. is determined is determined
from: from:
The constants The constants A A00 and and BB00 and n are determined by and n are determined by
measuring the oxidation rates of different crude oil measuring the oxidation rates of different crude oilsand sand
mixtures at different temperatures and pressures. The mixtures at different temperatures and pressures. The
oxidation rate oxidation rate K K (mg O (mg O22/kg oil, sec) is related to the /kg oil, sec) is related to the
partial pressure of the oxygen partial pressure of the oxygen PPx x and the oil and the oil
temperature temperature TT00 by the following Arrhenius by the following Arrheniustype type
equation: equation:
0
B/T
n
x 0
e P A K
Therefore, from the AP! gravity of the in situ oil and with Therefore, from the AP! gravity of the in situ oil and with
the help of the previous Equation for v, the air the help of the previous Equation for v, the air
requirement per cubic foot of oil sand can be requirement per cubic foot of oil sand can be
estimated. !t should be remembered, however, that estimated. !t should be remembered, however, that
the data of figure 3B were obtained for an oil the data of figure 3B were obtained for an oil
saturation S0 of 60 of the pore volume and water saturation S0 of 60 of the pore volume and water
saturation Sw of 20.Once the volume of air required saturation Sw of 20.Once the volume of air required
per cubic foot of fuel supply is determined, the air per cubic foot of fuel supply is determined, the airoil oil
ratio (AOR) many be calculated by the following ratio (AOR) many be calculated by the following
equation(Crawford,1374): equation(Crawford,1374):
7 0 7760 37 0 3 0 ) 125 7760 (
56 0 43500 157 9 1
AOR
.
o
S . . F S
. .
o
L L L L L L L c c
L L L
porosity :
rock oI Ioot cubic per (coke) Iue oI bs : F
oi b,rreoI per Ieet cubic st,nd,rd in r,tio - oi - ,ir : AOR
: Where
As an example, let the exhaust gas analysis corrected to As an example, let the exhaust gas analysis corrected to
a methane a methanefree basis be as follows: free basis be as follows:
CO CO22((17 17. .28 28),CO( ),CO(11. .04 04),O ),O22((00). Let the fuel ). Let the fuel
availability be availability be 11. .3 3 lb/cu ft. Therefore, C/H is calculated lb/cu ft. Therefore, C/H is calculated
at at 14 14, and v is , and v is 1S7 1S7 SCF of air per lb of fuel. !f the SCF of air per lb of fuel. !f the
porosity is porosity is 30 30 and the oil saturation is and the oil saturation is 7S 7S then then
substitution in equation substitution in equation S S yields: yields:
Solution: Solution:
oi oI b,rre per ,ir oI SCF 8031
0.7 7760 0.75 0.3 0.37 125)0.3 1.9 - 7760 0.75 (0.3
56 . 0 43500 157 9 1
AOR
L L L L L L L
L L L
.
Economic Evaluation: Economic Evaluation:
Wlison and root ( Wlison and root (1366 1366) made an economic study in which ) made an economic study in which
they used a modified from chu's two they used a modified from chu's twodimensional model. dimensional model.
Their main objective was to compare cost heating of a Their main objective was to compare cost heating of a
reservoir either by steam injection or by forward reservoir either by steam injection or by forward
combustion, without regard to recovery. Their sole combustion, without regard to recovery. Their sole
consideration was the cost of heating to the same radial consideration was the cost of heating to the same radial
distance by either forward combustion or by steam distance by either forward combustion or by steam
injection. They concluded that: injection. They concluded that:
11.Except for oils which yield coke in amount less than .Except for oils which yield coke in amount less than 1 1
Lb/cu ft and reservoir thicknesses of about Lb/cu ft and reservoir thicknesses of about 10 10 ft or less, ft or less,
heating the reservoir by steam injection is cheaper than heating the reservoir by steam injection is cheaper than
by forward combustion as long as the cost of the fuel by forward combustion as long as the cost of the fuel
needed to generate the steam is low. needed to generate the steam is low.
2.For a given thickness, pressure and rate of heat 2.For a given thickness, pressure and rate of heat
injection, injection,
Either process may be cheaper, depending upon the Either process may be cheaper, depending upon the
reservoir fuel consumption and depth. How ever, as the reservoir fuel consumption and depth. How ever, as the
price of fuel increases, the cost of heating by steam price of fuel increases, the cost of heating by steam
injection increases more rapidly. injection increases more rapidly.
3.!ncreased coke deposition favors stem injection. 3.!ncreased coke deposition favors stem injection.
4.!ncreased wellbore losses by increased depth favors 4.!ncreased wellbore losses by increased depth favors
combustion. combustion.
S.As the heated distance in the reservoir increases, S.As the heated distance in the reservoir increases,
heating by combustion becomes more favorable. heating by combustion becomes more favorable.
6.As the sand thickness decreases and the pressure 6.As the sand thickness decreases and the pressure
increases, combustion is favored over steam injection. increases, combustion is favored over steam injection.
7.As the injection rates decrease, costs of steam injection 7.As the injection rates decrease, costs of steam injection
become more favorable relative to air. become more favorable relative to air.
Oil Recovery: Oil Recovery:
Average oil recovery from in situ combustion is Average oil recovery from in situ combustion is
approximately approximately S0 S0. Nost of the recovery occurs before . Nost of the recovery occurs before
breakthrough of the combustion zone. !n the case of low breakthrough of the combustion zone. !n the case of low
viscosity crudes, oil production declines very rapidly viscosity crudes, oil production declines very rapidly
following breakthrough. !n the case of viscose crudes, following breakthrough. !n the case of viscose crudes,
how ever, almost half the recovery comes after how ever, almost half the recovery comes after
breakthrough. breakthrough.
Breakthrough of the combustion zone is recognized by an Breakthrough of the combustion zone is recognized by an
increase in water cut of the produced oil and a rise in gas increase in water cut of the produced oil and a rise in gas
production rate and it's oxygen content, followed by a production rate and it's oxygen content, followed by a
sharp rise in bottom hole temperature, on the order of sharp rise in bottom hole temperature, on the order of
100 100200 200 F. At the same time, a noticeable drop occurs in F. At the same time, a noticeable drop occurs in
the PH of the produced water. This increase in the acidity the PH of the produced water. This increase in the acidity
of the water is usually accompanied by an increase in of the water is usually accompanied by an increase in
iron and sulfate. iron and sulfate.
Disadvantages: Disadvantages:
The disadvantages of the in situ combustion process can be The disadvantages of the in situ combustion process can be
summarized as follows: summarized as follows:
1.The in situ combustion process has a tendency to sweep 1.The in situ combustion process has a tendency to sweep
only the upper part of the oil zone, therefore vertical only the upper part of the oil zone, therefore vertical
sweep in very thick formations is likely to be poor. The sweep in very thick formations is likely to be poor. The
burning front produces steam both by evaporation the burning front produces steam both by evaporation the
interstitial water and by combustion reactions. The steam interstitial water and by combustion reactions. The steam
mobilizes and displaces much of the heavy oil ahead of mobilizes and displaces much of the heavy oil ahead of
the front, but when water condenses from the steam it the front, but when water condenses from the steam it
settles below steam vapors and combustions gases, thus settles below steam vapors and combustions gases, thus
causing their flow to concentrate in the upper part of the causing their flow to concentrate in the upper part of the
oil zone. oil zone.
2.Nuch of the heat generated by in situ combustion is not 2.Nuch of the heat generated by in situ combustion is not
Utilized in heating the oil, rather, it heats the oil Utilized in heating the oil, rather, it heats the oilbearing bearing
strata. !nterbedded shale and base and cap rock. strata. !nterbedded shale and base and cap rock.
Therefore, in situ combustion would be economically Therefore, in situ combustion would be economically
feasible when there is less rock material to be heated, feasible when there is less rock material to be heated,
i.e., when the porosity and oil saturation are high and i.e., when the porosity and oil saturation are high and
the sand thickness is moderate. the sand thickness is moderate.
3. Nany operators feel viscose, low 3. Nany operators feel viscose, lowgravity crudes are best gravity crudes are best
suited for in situ combustion because they provide the suited for in situ combustion because they provide the
needed fuel for combustion. How ever, the required air needed fuel for combustion. How ever, the required air
oil ratio for viscose crudes is high while they price is oil ratio for viscose crudes is high while they price is
generally lower than the high gravity crudes. Some generally lower than the high gravity crudes. Some
successful projects have also been repotted for lower successful projects have also been repotted for lower
viscosity, higher gravity crudes, such as marathon's fry viscosity, higher gravity crudes, such as marathon's fry
project. This crude has an AP! gravity of 28.6 and a project. This crude has an AP! gravity of 28.6 and a
viscosity of 40 c.p. viscosity of 40 c.p.
4. !nstallation of in situ combustion requires a large 4. !nstallation of in situ combustion requires a large
investment. How ever, surface installation consumes less investment. How ever, surface installation consumes less
fuel than hot water or steam generating units. fuel than hot water or steam generating units.
Conclusion:
!t has been demonstrated that in situ combustion is !t has been demonstrated that in situ combustion is
suitable in the recovery of oils of gravities in excess of suitable in the recovery of oils of gravities in excess of
10 AP!. How ever, it is unlikely that dry combustion per 10 AP!. How ever, it is unlikely that dry combustion per
se will find much wider application in the future . With se will find much wider application in the future . With
continued technological improvements, it is almost continued technological improvements, it is almost
certain that some form of in situ combustion such as wet certain that some form of in situ combustion such as wet
and partially quenched combustion will find greater and partially quenched combustion will find greater
application. application.