Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:50 Apr 02, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 64 / Thursday, April 3, 2003 / Notices 16293
I. Background guidance practices regulation (21 CFR review, call the HRSA Reports
FDA is announcing the availability of 10.115). The draft guidance, when Clearance Office on (301) 443–1129.
a draft guidance for industry entitled finalized, will represent the agency’s The following request has been
‘‘Bioavailability and Bioequivalence current thinking on BA and BE product submitted to the Office of Management
Studies for Nasal Aerosols and Nasal quality information related to nasal and Budget for review under the
Sprays for Local Action.’’ This draft inhalation aerosols and nasal metered- Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
guidance provides recommendations to dose spray pumps. It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person Proposed Project: The Uniform Progress
applicants planning product quality Report (UPR) for HRSA Continuation
studies to document BA or BE in and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. Alternative approaches to Training Grants (OMB No. 0915–
support of NDAs or ANDAs for locally 0061)—Revision
acting drugs in nasal aerosols and nasal documentation of BA and BE may be
sprays. This guidance addresses BA and used if such approaches satisfy the The HRSA Progress Reports for
BE studies of prescription requirements of the applicable statutes Continuation Training Grants are used
corticosteroids, antihistamines, and regulations. for the preparation and submission of
anticholinergic drug products, and the continuation applications for Titles VII
II. Comments
over-the-counter (OTC) mast-cell and VIII health professions and nursing
Interested persons may submit to the education and training programs. The
stabilizer cromolyn sodium. The
Dockets Management Branch written or Uniform Progress Report measures
guidance does not address studies of
electronic comments regarding this grantee success in meeting (1) the
nasal sprays included in applicable OTC
document. Submit a single copy of objectives of the grant project and (2)
monographs or studies of: (1) Metered-
electronic comments to http:// the cross-cutting outcomes developed
dose products intended to deliver drugs
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments or for the Bureau’s education and training
systemically via the nasal route, or (2)
two hard copies of any written programs. Part I of the progress report is
drugs in nasal nonmetered dose
comments, except that individuals may designed to collect information to
atomizer (squeeze) bottles that require
submit one hard copy. Comments are to determine whether sufficient progress
premarket approval.
be indentified with the docket number has been made on the approved project
Because many substantive changes
found in brackets in the heading of this objectives, as grantees must demonstrate
were made to the guidance after it
document. The draft guidance and satisfactory progress to warrant
issued in 1999, the guidance is being
received comments may be seen in the continuation of funding. Part II collects
reissued at this time for comment as a
Dockets Management Branch between 9 information on activities specific to a
level 1 draft guidance. We encourage
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through given program. Part III, Comprehensive
applicants to submit any evidence that
Friday. Performance Management System,
supports or refutes the approaches
outlined in this guidance to the docket III. Electronic Access collects data on overall project
number given in brackets in the heading performance related to the Bureau of
Persons with access to the Internet Health Professions’ strategic goals,
of this document. may obtain the document at either http:/
The changes made were based on the objectives, outcomes and indicators.
/www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm Progress will be measured based on the
following: (1) Public comments or http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
submitted to the original docket, (2) the objectives of the grant project and
default.htm. outcome measures and indicators
outcome of April 2000 and July 2001
meetings of the Orally Inhaled and Dated: March 25, 2003. developed by the Bureau to meet
Nasal Drug Products Subcommittee of Jeffrey Shuren, requirements of the Government
the FDA Advisory Committee for Assistant Commissioner for Policy. Performance and Results Act (GPRA).
Pharmaceutical Science (ACPS), (3) a [FR Doc. 03–8010 Filed 4–2–03; 8:45 am] To respond to the requirements of
July 2001 meeting of the ACPS, and (4) BILLING CODE 4160–01–S GPRA, the Bureau developed goals,
internal discussions within the Center outcomes and indicators that provide a
for Drug Evaluation and Research. framework for collection of outcome
Changes include reduction in the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND data for its Titles VII and VIII programs.
recommended extent of in vitro testing, HUMAN SERVICES An outcome-based performance system
elimination of two of the three options is critical for measuring whether
for rhinitis study design, and Health Resources and Services program support is meeting national
elimination of the recommendation to Administration health workforce objectives. At the core
demonstrate a dose-response of the performance measurement system
Agency Information Collection are found cross-cutting goals with
relationship from the recommended Activities: Submission for OMB
rhinitis study design (traditional 2-week respect to workforce quality, supply,
Review; Comment Request diversity and distribution of the health
study). The latter two changes are based
on ACPS recommendations. A section Periodically, the Health Resources professions workforce. A demonstration
on reserve samples for BA and BE and Services Administration (HRSA) project to assess availability of the data
testing has also been added. The publishes abstracts of information needed to support the indicators was
statistical information that was collection requests under review by the conducted, and data from this project
previously part of the original draft has Office of Management and Budget, in are currently being analyzed.
now been consolidated into appendices compliance with the Paperwork The grantees were able to obtain and
that will be published at a later date. Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. submit progress reports electronically
This level 1 draft guidance is being chapter 35). To request a copy of the for fiscal year 2001.
issued consistent with FDA’s good clearance requests submitted to OMB for The burden estimate is as follows:
VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:50 Apr 02, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1