Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Main counter
VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF
Sub-counter
VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.RLCRst VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.ULSync VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.UuNoReply VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.Oth
VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Abnorm
Note: VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.Oth and VS.Call.Drop.CS.Other cant be found in M2000. PS call drop counter
Main counter
VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF
Sub-counter
VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.RLCRst VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.ULSync VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.UuNoReply VS.RAB.Loss..PS.RF.Oth
VS.RAB.Loss.PS.Abnorm
Common Reason
CS and PS counter structure are the same. So I just give the description of CS counter.
2011-11-26
1 , 3
Failure reason
VS.RAB.RelReqCS.OM VS.RAB.RelReqCS.RABPreempt VS.RAB.RelReqCS.UTRANgen VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.RLCRst VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.ULSync VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.UuNoReply VS.RAB.Loss.CS.Aal2Loss
Common reason Caused by some risk operation Check whether congestion Need deep analysis, if many just escalate to us. Coverage problem, check missing neighbor cells or handover parameters(handover area is small) Coverage problem, check missing neighbor cells or handover parameters Coverage problem, bad coverage Check transmission configuration and alarm.
VS.RAB.FailEstCS.Unsp
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.RNL
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Power.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.IUB.Band
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong
2011-11-26
2 , 3
PS Counter
PS Counter VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Unsp VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.Cong VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.RNL VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Power.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Code.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.IUB.Band
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.ULCE.Cong
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.DLCE.Cong
2011-11-26
3 , 3